Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
death_n sin_n sin_v wage_n 4,962 5 11.1880 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A07557 The princelie progresse of the church militant marching forth by the steps of the flocke to her triumphant bridegrome Christ Iesus. Encountered with an erronius army, turned aside from Iesus to the Ieesitcall [sic] faction, to fight with the lambe, and make warre with the saints. As it appeareth in the ensuing opposition. With an addition demonstrating the abolishing of Antichrist, supreme head of heretickes, and vniuersall maintainer of treason. Written by Thomas Bedle. Bedle, Thomas. 1610 (1610) STC 1794; ESTC S113620 73,293 130

There are 9 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

hath taken away the curse and terrour of the law This vse of the law God made to Adam in paradise Moses to the Israelites in the wildernesse Christ to the Iewes and Gentiles Concerning which vse the Annotations vpon the Rhems saith Rhem. 10. annot Rom. 10. text Rhem. The law was not giuen to make a man iust or perfect by it selfe but to bring vs to Christ to be iustified by him Againe the law was not as the Iewes ignorant zeale supposed for them to iustifie themselues by it but to bring them to Christ to beleeue in him and so for his sake to be iustified Notwithstanding like Camelions that can turne themselues into all colours they deny this third vse of the law in denying Christ to be the brasen serpent that taketh away the sinnes of the world Christ say they hath merited his owne glory Againe Heb. 2. marg D. Kel pag. 262. Mat. 5. annot Rom. 8. annot Rom. 1. annot 2. Tim. 4. annot Rom. 6. annot 1. Ioh. 4. annot Rhem. our sinnes notwithstanding Christs passion are imputed vnto vs. Againe Christians are truly iust and haue in themselues inherent iustice by doing Gods commandements Againe that Christs paines merited heauen and so doe theirs That a Catholicke liuing but an ordinary honest life either not sinning greatly or supplying his fault by penance is iust That heauen is their owne right bargained for and wrought for That life euerlasting is the stipend of iustice To this belongeth their fidutia which is only a hope well corroborated confirmed and strengthened vpon the promises and graces of God and the parties merit There is no Christ in their fidutia as there is no faith in their Religion For he onely hath merited his owne glory But leauing them as they are I will say with the Prophet Dauid It is time for the Lord to worke Psal 119. verse 126. for they haue destroyed thy law And to cry out with Saint Augustine O vanitas vendens vanitatem vanitatem audituris vanis credituris O vanity selling vanity to them that will heate vanity and vaine are they that will beleeue it Thus gentle reader you may liuely behold the Angels of light directing the way of piety to Christ but the Angels of darknesse to horrible impicy So that no other sect of heretickes as the Kings Maiestie said in the Parliament house The Kings Maiesties speech in the Parliamēt house Not excepting Turke Iew Pagan no not those of Calicute that worship the Diuell did euer maintaine by the grounds of their religion that it was lawfull or meritorious as the Romish Catholickes call it to murther Princes or people for matters of religion OPPOS 3. If Christ hath deliuered vs from hell because he hath paid the punishment due to sin and requireth no other satisfaction then doth he in a maner egge vs forward to all vice Againe Is Christ abode the paine himselfe and would haue none required at our hands in so doing what hath he done but opened a wide gap to all licentious liberty vice and iniquity Suruey of the new religion pag. 260. pag. 261. O Blasphemous hereticke worse then the hereticke Gnosticke who set forth things that were monstrous about the life of the blessed Lady whereas he publisheth hereticall doctrine disgracefull to the passion of our blessed Sauiour First in saying that it is not sufficient of it selfe Secondly if that the redemption of man bee perfected by it onely and not left to mans merit or to the offering vp of a round cake in the Masse then a gate is set open to all licentious liberty vice and iniquity Contrary to this we will first proue that Christ is a perfect redeemer Secondly that Christ hath not onely redeemed vs but also worketh inherent righteousnesse to the restoring of the image of God in vs therefore giues no loose liberty at all to sin and iniquity as Popes and Popish Priests do as the sequele shall declare First concerning the redemption of man God saith that cannot but speake truth that giuing the new Testament he would in such sort be mercifull Ier 31 Heb. 8. Eph. 1.3 as to remember the sinnes of his people no more that i● to say of the true beleeuers The which giueth vs to vnderstand that God for Christs sake by whom and in whom this testament was made is perfectly and perpetually by his onely sacrifice pacified Vpon which place of the Hebrewes Rhem. pag 7●8 S. Chrysostome cited by Doctor Fulke saith Therefore hee forgaue sinnes when he gaue the testament he gaue the estament by his sacrifice If therefore he forgaue sinnes 〈◊〉 one sacrifice now there is no need of the second Theod●ret likewise saith Where there is remission of these things now there is no oblation for sinne for it is superfluous after remission is giuen and he promised remission sayng Their sinnes and iniquities I will no more remember Likewise Photinus saith What need is there of many oblations when that once which Christ offered is sufficient to take away sins Christ saith the Annotations vpon the Rhems is that eternall Prie●t and redeemer which by his sacrifice and death vpon the crosse 2. Tim. 2. annot Heb. 5. an hath reco●ciled vs to God and paid his bloud as a full sufficient ransome for all our sinnes he being without need of any redemption neuer subiect to the possibility of any sinning Againe The full worke of that his sacrifice by which we were redeemed was wholly consummate accomplished at the yeelding vp of his spirit to God the father when he said Consummatum est The truth of which doctrine concerning the absolute redēption of man liuely appeareth in the resurrection of our Sauiour For seeing that Christ as their owne note vpon the Rhems cōfesseth dyed not in his owne but in our sins himselfe neuer subiect to the possibility of sinning It is most assured that if one sinne of all our sinnes had remained either not throughly or imperfectly punished then could not Christ haue risen againe forasmuch as where there is but one sinne there of necessity must bee death For so hath the vnchangeable truth and righteousnesse of God decreed The wages of sinne is death Most excellent to this purpose is that saying of Saint Hillary Rom. 6.23 Apol. pag. 89. cited by Bishop Iewel Our euerlasting life is ready easie to beleeue that Iesus Christ is risen againe frō the dead For in the resurrectiō of our Sauiour w● may behold through a liuely faith the very actual remission of sinnes and our iustification For as t●e Father by deliuering Christ to death Iohn 3.16 Eph. 5.2 Luk. 4.18 hath redeem●d our sinnes in him that was obliged for vs before Adam was created by the decree of the whole Trinty so by raising him from death he hath absolued him from our sinnes and vs in him according t● the saying of the Apostle Rom. 4.25 Who was deliuered to dath for our sinnes
hee so much delighteth that thrise like a Nightingale hee recordeth it againe and againe The iust shall liue by faith Rhem. p. 568. 440. Let the iust man saith Saint Augustine cited by Doctor Fulke tollerate the vniust let the temporall labour of the iust tollerate the temporal impunity of the vniust but yet the iust man liueth by faith For there is no other iustice of man in this life but to liue by faith which worketh by loue For if he liue by faith let him also beleeue that hee shall rest after his labour and they shall haue eternall torments after their present ioy Againe seeing all the iust both of elder time and the Apostles liued by right faith which is in our Lord Iesus Christ and had such holy in inners with faith Chrys●st in Mat. hom that although they could not be of so perfect vertue in this life as in the life to come yet what sinne soeuer hath crept vpon them of humaine frailty it is immediatly wiped away through the piety of the same faith He that desireth not vaine glory saith Chrysostome being made Christs Vicar ought to preach the iustice of Christ This iustice did Saint Paul preach to the Romanes Galatheans and Hebrewes This iustice did the Fathers preach to those that liued in their times Ambrose telleth the Gentiles that they haue receiued a gift of grace and not of workes Againe Amb. de Voc. Gent. lib. 1. cap. ● they are iustified because working nothing nor making any recompence they are iustified through faith onely by the gift of God ●mb Epist ●d Rom. cap. ● Againe this was Gods determination that the law being at an end the grace of God should require faith onely to saluation The Apostle saith Saint Origen doth say ●rigen epist ●d Rom. 3. cap. that the iustification of faith alone doth suffice so that he which beleeueth onely is iustified although he haue fulfilled no worke Wherefore it standeth vs vpon that take in hand to defend the Apostles writing to be perfect and all things to stand with good order to inquire who hath bene iustified by faith onely without works Therfore for example sake I thinke that the theefe is sufficient which being crucified with Christ cryed to him from the crosse Lord Iesu remember me when thou commest in thy kingdome Neither are there any workes of his described in the Gospell But for his faith Iesus said vnto him This day shalt thou be with me in paradi●e Hillariu● vpon Matthew saith It moued the Scribes and Pharises that sinne was forgiuen by a man 〈…〉 ●●ld a man onely in Iesus Christ and that to 〈◊〉 ●or giuen by him which the law could not release for saith onely doth iustifie ●pol p●g ●● Saint Basil cited by Bishop Iewel saith Who so trusteth not in his owne merits nor lo●●●th to be iustified by his owne workes he hath his onely h●pe of saluation in the mercy of our Lord. With whom Saint Augustine agreeing thus exhorteth Presume not of thine 〈◊〉 working but of the grace of Christ for the Apostle s●ith Yee are saued by grace Gregory Naza●●●● speaking in the person of the Publican that praied with the Pharisie Workes s●●ll not saue me but let thy grace and mercy drop downe 〈◊〉 ●ime prophane man which onely hope ô king thou hast giuen to miserable sinners Rom. 9. annot Rom. 10. text With this saying agreeth the Annotations vpon the Rhems All that be deliuered out of the common condemnation be deliuered by grace and pardon through the meanes and merits of Iesus Christ Againe the law was not giuen as the Iewes ignorant zeale supposed for them to iustifie themselues by it considering they could not fulfill it but to bring them to Christ to beleeue in him and so for his sake to be iustified But to make the truth of this doctrine more apparent wee are to consider there concurres two things necessary to the iustification of faith that is to say the forgiuenesse of our vnrighteousnesse Act. 20.43 Rom. 3.23 Ibid. 4.7 1. Ioh. 1.4 Ibid. 2.12 or the remission of our sins and the imputaion of anothers righteousnesse For the first the Prophets beare witnesse that euery one that beleeueth in him namely Christ shall through his name receiue remession of sinnes that is shall by faith be iustified and absolued from the guilt and punishment of sinne and so become blessed in not hauing his sins imputed vnto him Blessed is the man ●aith the Prophet to whom the Lord imputeth no ●●nne With whom S. Augustine agreeing Rom. 4.6 thus redoubleth the words of the Prophet Blessed is he to whom the Lord imputeth no sinne neither is there guilt in his heart This is the cōfession of humble Saints which boast not themselues to be that they are not And this is the confession of S. Ambrose cited by Bishop Iewel Apol. pag. 82. I will not glory for that I haue done good to any man nor for that any man hath done good to me but for that Christ is my aduocate with the Father and for that Christs bloud was shed for me Yet notwithstanding this freedome concerning the remission of sinnes we haue no right to eternall life vnlesse we attaine likewise by faith to an vnchangeable and euerlasting righteousnesse which the law requireth Which sempeternall righteousnesse is that which Christ merited for vs in keeping the law making them blessed to whom it is imputed Daniel 9.21 Blessed is the man to whom the Lord imputeth righteousnesse without workes This righteousnesse of Christ being sempeternall one and the same is to him to whom it is imputed yea to the iust man that sinneth seuen times a day perpetually the roote of life The Spirit is life for righteousnesse sake Most excellent to this purpose Rom. 8.10 is that saying of S. Bernard cited by M. Whittaker against Champion He that hath taken the desert of sinne by giuing vnto vs hi● righteousnesse he hath payed the debt of sinne and restored life For so death being dead life returneth as sinne being taken away righteousnesse commeth againe Furthermore death is abandoned by Christs death and Christs righteousnesse imputed vnto vs. Suruey pag. 607. pag. 637. Rom. 3.25 But forasmuch as Popish Priests alloweth nor liketh iustifying faith which they stile to be an idle apprehension of Christs iustice and a lying faith Let vs try which way else we may be iustified It is most certaine we all haue sinned and are depriued of the glory of God and therefore remaine in death for the wages of sinne is death And notwithstanding Christs passion as saith Kellison sin is still imputed vnto vs. Can the euerlasting torment of the creature pay this debt Suruey pag. 262. The euerlasting torment of the creature is not able to satisfie for it For although in the place of horrour they are as an Ancient speaketh Plena fletus ex dolore stridor dentiū ex furore Full of weeping because of
body or soule of Adam was the image of God but that it had it residence in both In the body there was maiesty representing a diuine maiesty immortality and innocency which as spirituall rich robes decked the same with an vnspeakeable beauty In the firmament of the soule the image of God in knowledge and the same in righteousnesse and holinesse Col. ● 10 Eph●s ● 24 as glistering lights did shine ●orth to the garnishing thereof In the vnderstanding as a bright shining sunne soundnesse of reason ouerspread his glorious rayes In the will vprightnesse and holinesse The libertie of the will shewing forth some very diuine matter in the soule like a precious stone set in gold as Saint Bernard speaketh was ●●ch that by it owne and proper motion it chose and refused that which sound reason said was to be chosen and refused that is the choise of good and euill was free Briefly to take along with vs one of our aduersaries ●●rney of the new r●ligion pag. 253. that his owne mouth may condemne him Adam saith Kellison was enriched with a soule filled with grace and spirituall treasures which was prone to v●rtue not inclined to vice neither molested with concupiscence nor ouer-ruled by passion but ruled reason which was ruled by grace His superiour part was obedient to God his inferiour part to the superiour sensualitie to reason the flesh to the spirit and all creatures to him were obedient Now God hauing created Adam in this surpassing glory placed him in Eden where he was inuironed about with varietie of pleasures And because it was necessary that mā adorned with such height of dignity should yet owe homage vnto his creator as to the supreme Maiesty he made a couenant with him founding it in that pure and holy nature of mans part in which he was made On Gods part in Gods owne law ingrauen in mans heart by his diuine finger in the first creation And not in Christ nor the grace of God in Christ For then God hauing a delight to be with man and man with God there was no breach nor variance that there needed a mediator as after Adams fall there did when a new couenant was to be made namely the couenant of grace in Christ in which legall or natural couenant the Lord promised vnder condition of holy and good workes in obedience and faith to be performed a cōtinuance of immortality through a perpetuall life free from sorrow sicknesse age and death it selfe or otherwise if by disobedience he transgressed death In the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt dye the death saith God to Adam in his fatherly warning or admonition to the end he should not fall Iehouah who had thus made the Angels witnessing spectators of the purity of Adams creation yee for a further testimony likewise to all succeeding ages concerning the goodnes of the Angels of man and all creatures it is said God saw all that he had made and it was very good In the heauens when this celestiall Oracle was published the Angels stood in their beauty surpassing excelling in Wisedome Power Holinesse and Happinesse In paradise Adam was in most admirable glory meditating in the height of his vnderstanding in the mirrour of the diuine Deity neither was there in heauen or earth any enemy to be seene or found to vnrobe Adam by breach of the couenant of the illustrious image of God But as it commonly falleth out in best gouerned states though the Prince do shew neuer such loue to the subiect by the gift of honour and rich possessions yet some are so vngratefull that by conspiracy and in hatred of all piety they seeke to murther their Prince and Soueraigne that they might while streames of bloud inuironne the mournefull throne set the crowne vpon their owne tyranicall heads so in some sort it fell out in heauen the be●utiful citie of perfection For some of the Angels not contented with the blessed permanent state in which they were created hauing Lucifer for their General became aduersaries to God by conspiring in the height of their ambition to plucke the royall and euer-shining Diademe off their creators head Insomuch that in Gods iustice they were throwne downe like lightening from heauen That they might at the time appoynted be chiefe as a terrour to all traytors in hellish torments that would haue bene aboue God in heauenly pleasure and felicity Lucifer and his associates thus banished the coelestiall Hierusalem like a wandring Archtraytor that desireth euery one to be like himselfe by infusing into others his poysō through hellish perswasion set vpon Adam vsing his wife as an instrument to effect what he intended And like as an Aspe doth first send poyson with a tickling delight into one veine and so from veine to veine vntill the vitals be seized vpon and the body wrapped in the armes of Death So did Satan first by sugered temptation eclipse the cleare shining light of Adams vnderstanding when he caused him to call in question the Lords commandement And afterward wounded him with the sting of concupiscence inwardly hauing procured him to reach his hand towards the apple But once eating and by eating transgressing he was wounded to death And by transgression likewise of the law which is a priuation and want of conformity with the law of God the glorious eye of the vnderstanding became presently obscured like a dead mans eye 1. Ioh. 3. with thicke and palpable darknesse of ignorance And the shining beauty of the will turning away from righteousnesse and holinesse was ouerwhelmed with the darksome cloudes of impurity and iniustice and became through the hardnesse of heart deceiptfull lusts corrupt froward and more poisoned then the minde it selfe Briefly Adam like an euil mā that hateth the light being become the companion of of death hating his Creator ●uruey of ●he new ●eligion ●ag 353. thought forthwith to hide himselfe vnder shade trees from his presence from whom darknesse it selfe cannot be hidden Thus when by sin as Kellison saith man would not be subiect to God he became a slaue to his owne flesh passions and sensuality hell and damnation And of all this seruile subiection sinne was the cause For when Adam sinned and we in him transgressed we were by and by guilty of death which is the reward of sinne and by sinne we became slaues to sinne and concupiscence For as Christ saith Whosoeuer sinneth is a slaue to sinne And being slaues to sin we were slaues to the Diuell who hath no authority or power ouer vs but by sinne and being slaues to the Diuell we were the captiues of hell Though this be the state of all the sons of men whose birth-right Adam sold in the height of his pleasure for an apple Rom. 5.18 Heb. 12.16 Suruey pag. 580. and not onely his owne as Esau did for a portion of meate in his hunger Yet God who is good and iust and must be iust as Kellison saith else were he
not good first as he is good yea essentiall goodnesse cannot but require notwithstanding our wofull fall obedience at our hands to the fulfilling of his law through the purity of nature in which he created Adam Which purity lost being also the groūd and iustice out of the which the law should be kept no man though the Lord command obedience is able to performe the same For by sinne as Kellison saith we were dispoyled of grace Suruey pag. 254. And that force of grace had we none because sinne had depriued vs of it Likewise Saint Augustine cited by M. Whittaker against Campian saith Naturall gifts were corrupted the supernaturall extinguished Insomuch that the naturall mans vnderstanding as the Scriptures auerre is so farre off from doing the office of a Generall to direct the will to the effecting that which is good That it neither perceiueth 2. Cor. 2.14 Ephes 4.18 Rom 7.14 Ibid. 6.16.17.20 nor conceiueth the things of God And the will depriued of liberty to choose that which is good and wanting the direction of reason like an vnruly Souldier transgresseth cōtinually the law through disordered motions and euill desires O euill is free will without God saith S. Augustine cited by Bishop Iewel Againe Man misusing his free will Apol. pag. 16. spilt both himselfe and his will Againe What do men presume so much of the possibility of nature it is woūded it is māgled it is troubled it is lost it behoueth truly to confesse it then stedfastly to defend it Againe Free-will once made thrall auaileth nothing but sinne But to make this yet more manifest Rhem. pag 195. that neither the will nor vnderstanding haue life in them most excellent is that place cited by Doctor Fulke from the Councell of Arausican Chap. 7. That we are not apt to thinke any thing of our selues as of our selues If any man do hold that by force of nature he can thinke any good thing which pertaineth and is expedient to eternall life or that hee can choose to be saued that is to consent to the preaching of the Gospel without illumnation and inspiration of the holy Ghost which giueth to all men the sweetnesse in consenting and beleeuing the truth He is deceiued with an hereticall spirit not vnderstanding the voice of God saying in the Gospel Without me yee can do nothing And that of the Apostle Not that we are apt of our selues to thinke any thing as of our selues but our sufficiency is of God And touching vnderstanding the Apostle saith The naturall man vnderstādeth not those things that be of the spirit of God For they are foolishnesse vnto him neither can he know them because they are spiritually discerned So that neither the will nor vnderstanding haue heauenly life in them Therefore it is impossible to do good although the Lord commands it Neither is the Lord bound ●o wo●k it in vs for he oweth vs nothing may leaue vs reprobate to be condemned for euer without impeachment to his goodnesse As he refused Esau when he loued Iacob Respecting them both as ill Rom. 9. Annotat. Rhem. as the Annotations vpon the Rhems teacheth and the one no lesse then the other guilty of damnation for originall sinne which was alike in them both And therefore where he might haue iustly refused both he saued of mercy one which one being as ill as void of grace as the other must therefore hold of Gods eternall purpose mercy ele●tion th●t he is pr●f●rred before his brother which was ●lder then himselfe and no worse then himselfe Suruey pag. 58● Secondly God as he is iust requireth obedience at our hands that our actions may be tryed by the diuine rule of iustice namely his law Otherwise as S. Augustine cited by Kellison teacheth No sinne should be if no law did forbid it If no sinne then no death I● no death then A●am should escape vnpunished contrary to Gods word which saith In the day that thou ●a●●st thereof thou sh●lt dye the death Yet God in commanding vs that which is good and in puni●hing vs doing euill and not good which both as Saint Augustine saith are damnable neither impeacheth hi● goo●nesse as we said before nor iustice the fault being ours that we transgresse and not Gods who created Adam and we in Adam able to performe his law as his word doth auerre his Angels witnesse and Kellison afore cited testifie Therefore if Princes for a momentary transgression may iustly punish their subiects with perpetual exile and death it selfe how much more may God that created Adam so glorious a creature both punish him for his rebellion all his posterity in him that spa●●d not the Angels yet himselfe a most iust and good God According to that saying of Moses Perfect is the work of the mighty God Deut. 32.4 all his waies are iustice and iudgement God is true and without wickednesse iust and righteous is he Not cruell inhumane barbarous or tyranicall as the false Prophet Kellison like a prophane Marcionite vrgeth For as Aristotle a heathen could say Iustitiam esse hespero l●cifero sormosiorem Iustice is farre more beautifull then the euening and morning starre But to conclude against this most blasphemous hereticke with Saint Augustine Detr●ctor diabolum in lingua portat A slaunderer beareth the diuell in his tongue and yet maketh himselfe in the meane time as cunning as any Pelagian of whom Saint Augustine thus speaketh The Pelagians thinke themselues cunning men when they say That God would not command that thing that he knoweth a man is not able to do And who i● there that knoweth not this But therefore God commandeth vs to do some things that we are not able to do that we may vnderstand that we ought to craue of him Thus we see God is good in requiring that which is good at our hands and iust in punishing vs not performing the same And Kellison a blasphemous wretch to vrge the contrary to disgrace the truth the Lord of truth and the preachers of the same OPPOS 2. The Protestant Preachers auouching the lawes and commandements of God to be impossible giue occasion to all impiety Suruey of t●● new religion Pag. 570. The Protestant preachers auerring the couenant of workes founded in nature and in the law of God impossible to be performed auouch the truth Yet teaching the true vse of the law direct the way to all piety Whereas Popish Iesuites and Priests making the law to be no law leade the way to all impiety as the sequele shall declare Although the promise of the law hath annexed condition impossible to be performed by any of the sonnes of Adam yet concerning the elect it is not without most excellent vse For first it serueth th● Spirit of God as an instrumentall meanes to bring them to the notion of sinne Secondly to worke a terrour in them for sinne And thirdly to be as a Schoolem●ister directing to Christ Concerning the
first vse Saint Paul speaking of himselfe saith Nay I know not sinne but by the la● for I had not knowne what lust meant except the la● h●●●●id Thou shalt not lust That is he had no● knowne that euery tickling desire of concupiscence though r●sisted had bene sinne except the law had said Thou shalt not lust Iames 1. Annotat. Rhems This vse of the law Popish Priests and Iesuites do deny First in teaching ●hat concupiscence it selfe is no sinne but when we do obey and yeeld to it Nay they doe suppose that ●he outrage of concupiscence and sensuall appetite is so ●arre off from sinne that he that consenteth not vnto it need not to say God forgiue vs our sinnes for the same Moreouer the Councell of Trident accurseth him that thinketh concupiscence to be a sin If it were no sin the law would not haue prohibited the same as it doth For saith S. Paul as it is in their owne translation But sinne I did not know but by the law for concupiscence I knew not vnlesse the law did say Thou shalt not couet But occasion being taken sinne by the commandement wrought in me all concupiscence Vpon which place the Annotation noteth That sinne Rom. 7. annotat Rhems or concupiscence which was asleepe before was wakened by prohibition the law not being the occasion thereof nor giuing occasion thereunto but occasion being taken by our corrupt nature to resist that which was commanded S. Ambrose vpon this place saith He hath not namely the Apostle discerned this concupiscence from sinne but ioyned it vnto it Signifying that when there was not so much as any suspition that this thing was not lawfull before God I knew saith he that it is a sinne The argument in the Rhems before the Epistle of Saint Iames thus speaketh The Apostle dehorteth from all sinne but yet also namely to certaine and from certaine As fro acception of persons frō detraction and rash iudgements from concupiscence and loue of this world By this we may see that concupiscence is of it selfe a sinne forbidden in the law before we do obey and yeeld vnto it Whosoeuer saith our Sauiour looketh on a wom●● to lust after her hath committed adultery with h●r alre●dy in his heart Againe not onely the man that ●illeth his brother is culpable of iudgement but he ●l●o that is angry wi●● his b●●ther vnaduisedly We ●r● f●●●i●●●n 〈…〉 ●●t onely to 〈…〉 t● be a●●r● Suruey 278. pag. 257. p●g 〈…〉 from a ●ult●●● a●●●●●●●tion bu● al●o fro● c●●●●s look●s yea 〈◊〉 W● a●e not only forbid●en t● o●●end o●r fri●ē●s but a●●o 〈…〉 ●wes Again● th● l●● restraineth oue● 〈…〉 ●s the ou●●●●● For Christ a●●●ng at that most excellent pe●●●ction that was in A●am when he w●s created forbideth in vs by his imm●culate law th●t permitteth no s●●th of si●ne the least euill that may arise through concupiscence to labour against his spirit in so heauenly a building as is the renouation of m●n to his pristen estate A●g contra I●●●●● li● 3 ca● 3. Th●●on●upiscence of the flesh saith Saint Augustine against which 〈◊〉 good ●●●●it d●sireth or laboureth is both sinne it selfe and also the paine of sinne and the cause of sinne For as the Annotations vpon the Rhems teacheth Iames 1. m●●● In a t●●●●ti●● p●●ted b● 〈◊〉 ac●●●●●●gu●●●us 1●●0 From the concupi●cence of the flesh the ●●●●upiscen●e of the eyes and the pride of life all sinne an● temp●●ti●●● pro●●●● As Thomas vpon his Sums there cited confess●th Againe Concupiscence say they ●s a●●●rdin●te appetite of the soule inclining it to ●●llow the d●●ires of the fle●h proceeding from sinne and 〈◊〉 the soule to sinne Secondly they teach contra●● to the law because they say that veniall sins as th●y stile them be no sinnes For a man saith the A●●●ations vpon the Rhem● may be iust notwithstanding veniall sinnes Againe 1 Ioh. 1. marg Rom. 1. Rh●m Mat. 6. annotat Rhems veniall sinnes are pardonable of their owne nature and not worthy of damnation Now those sinnes that are pardonable in their owne nature owe to God no d●bt that is the punishment due for sins But venial sins do For d●bts do not onely s●gnifie mortall sinnes but also v●ni●ll as S. Augustine by them often cited teach●th Therefore euery m●n be he neuer so iust yet because hee cannot liue without veniall sinnes may v●ry truly ●nd ought to s●y this prayer Forgiue vs our debts Againe w●osoeuer hath any impure matter of veni●ll s●nnes or s●ch other debts to Gods iudgments pay●ble must into Purgatory or more truly into hell Rom. 6.23 if they be not pardoned in Christ For the wages of sin is death Thirdly they teach 1. Ioh. 1. marg 1. Ioh. 3. Annotat. Rhems that euery iniquity is not sinne against plaine Scripture that saith That all iniquity is sin 1. Ioh. 3.7 As it is in their owne Rhems Let no man say saith Saint Augustine s●●ne is one thing iniquity is another thing I am a sinfull man but I am not vniust Euery one that doth commit sinne doth commit iniquity for sinne is iniquitie What th●● shall wee do with our sinnes and iniquities No man in this life hath bene is or shall be perfectly iust Moreouer contrary to the law the Iesuite thinkes he sinnes not at all by lying impudently before his Kings f●ce● yea and confirming his lye with p●riury by laying his hand vpon the holy Gospel An● why so Because hauing receiued a commandement from his G●ner●ll to lye I●suite Catech. 2. lib. 122. pag. his vow of obedience is so precise that he thinkes he is freed from all sinne and that he faulted much more if by telling the truth he had not obeyed him Here they p●ay the Priscillianists which sayd Iura periura secretum prodere noli Sweare and forsweare but bewray no secrets Fourthly whereas the law commands obedience vnto the Kings of the nations who beare rule ouer vs Exod. 20. Luke 22. and are as the forbidden fruit and apple in paradice that may not be touched Touch not mine annointed Psal 105.15 Yet notwithstanding it is a common thing with the Iesuites to preach to their yong Nouices concerning the murther of Princes And do teach that the Bulles of Rome haue power to depose all the Kings of the earth I s●ites Catech. lib. 3 pag. 204. ●e Franc. ●n● pag. 18. ● 64 65. 34. and to depriue them of their temporall state and Soueraignty That Kings so excommunicated ought to best ●ne though they be Catholickes That it is a good and meritorious deed to murther them The Councell of Co●stance saith a Iesuite condemned that odious Proposition concerning the killing of Princes by priuate men whensoeuer they iudge them for tyrants but when the Pope that King of pride shal iudge them for tyrants it seemeth it is meritorious for his army of Priests to set vpon them Richard Walpoole the Iesuite furnishing Squire with poyson instructiōs to kil
and is risen againe for our iustification If one dyed for all saith Saint Bernard in his 190 Epistle to Innocent Bishop of Rome then all were lead that so the satisfaction of one might be imputed to all euen as that one person bare the sinne of all No ma● saith Kellison citing Saint Iohn hath greater char●ty then this to dye for his friend and especially for his enemy And this also extolleth Christs power most highly who by death ouercame death yea sinne also and condemnation Here it plainly appeareth by Kellisons owne words that sinne with the guilt and punishment is taken away by Christ and we deliuered fron all sin both originall and actuall veniall and mortall à culpa poena that is from the fault and punishment due to the same as the Annotations vpon the Rhems acknowledgeth and the very Canon law likewise confesseth 1. Ioh. 1. annot De consec 4 cap. 8. 2. Cor. 5.2 Rhem. pag. 570. in teaching that the Son God tooke vpon him the flesh of sinne that is to say sinfull flesh and the punishment he being without fault that so in the flesh of sin both the fault might be satisfied and the punishment also Nay more that we should be made the righteousnes of God in him For he hath made him to be sinne for vs which knew no sinne saith the Apostle that wee should be made the righteousnesse of God in him Vpon which place Saint Chrysostome cited by Doctor Fulke saith that we should be made the iustice of God in him what speech what mind can set forth these things worthily for him that was iust he made a sinner that he might make sinners iust But rather he said not so but that which was much more for he named not the quality but the essence he said not a sinner but sinne it selfe not onely him which sinned not but him which knew no sinne that we might be made he said not iust but iustice it selfe and the iustice of God For this is the iustice of God when iustification commeth not of workes seeing it is necessary that no spot be found but by grace by this meanes all sinne cleane vanisheth away In the meane time he suffereth them not to be extolled seeing God performeth all and sheweth the greatnesse of the giuer in that the former iustice was of the law and of works but this is the iustice of God Primasius vpon this text saith God the Father made his Sonne sinne for vs that is a sacrifice 〈◊〉 sinne The sacrifice offered for sinne in the law was called sinne although it did not sinne at all as it is written And he shall lay his hand vpon the head of his sinne c. By the bloud of these sacrifices that bloud which was shed for vs was prefigured for Christ being offered for our sinnes was called by the name of sinne that we might be made the iustice of God in him not in vs. Theodoret vpon this text saith That when he was free from sinne he suffered the death of sinners that he might loose the● sinne of men and being called that which we were hee made vs that which he was for he gaue vs the riches of his iustice Thus it doth appeare that Christ hath not onely taken away the paine and punishment of sinne but also merited a sempiternall righteousnes for vs which is as an Ancient saith the very roote of life Otherwise what would become of that faith which the Annotations vpon the Rhems speaketh of that reacheth to the life to come Rom. 10. annot making man assured of such articles as concerne the same As of Christs coming downe to be incarnate of his descending to hell of his resurrection ascension and returne againe to be glorified by which actions we be pardoned iustified and saued as by the law we could neuer be In vaine would our faith be saith the Apostle if Christ was not risen iustified from our sins we in him 1. Cor. 15. ●7 for thē we were yet in our sins that is guilty before God Therefore because Christ is risen we are no longer in our sinnes that is we are in very deed absolued from them and the punishment due for them Being thus compassed about with a cloud of witnesses concerning the perfect redemption of man who can but behold our King comming out of his sepulcher as out of a palace leading death in chains and the Prince of death fast bound in fetters of iron and with all his elect traine following him saying O death where is thy sting O graue Ibid. 15.55 56. where is thy victory The sting of death is sinne the strength of sinne is the law But thankes be vnto God that hath giuen vs victory in our Lord Iesus Christ by whom we haue redemption through his bloud Eph. 1.7 euen the forgiuenesse of our sinnes according to his rich grace Secondly forasmuch as that it standeth not with Christs Kingly power to begin and not to accomplish his subiects happinesse hee in his all-seeing wisdome hath merited the Spirit of his Father for vs through the effectuall working power whereof as by his diuine finger he writeth his law in our minds and hearts according to his promise So that the elect may say together with their Sauiour Heb. 8. Psal 40.8 I desired to do thy will ô my God I am ready to do it yea thy law is within my heart That is all knowledge to the performāce of thy law which the naturall man cannot attaine vnto vnlesse God inlighteneth his vnderstanding to discerne betweene obiects things set before it in the holy Scriptures Againe Christ through the effectuall working of his Spirit prepareth the heart by making it soft and tender to will those things that are pleasing to God yea to do the will of God 1 Thes 4.3 whose will it is that we should be holy and cleane When he hath thus done he sitteth in the heart of man working both the will and the deed according to his good pleasure to the perfec● repairing of the Image of God in him God sittet● saith an Ancient in the heart of man like a King in 〈◊〉 palace in his word like a King in his Councell in hi● Church like a Generall in his army in his throne like a conquerour in his triumph Hee sate in the heart of Matthew whom of a Publican and notable sinner he made an Apostle and Euangelist He stirred such a course in the heart of Paul that of a cruell persecutor he became a faithfull and zealous Preacher Yea though Christ doth repaire that which we haue los● by Adams transgression according to the saying o● the Councell of Arausicanum chap. 21. Nature by Adam lost by Christ is repaired yet Kellison doth taxe his passion with this false imputation to egge vs forward to all vice to open a wide gappe to all licencious lilibertie and iniquitie But if a Pope with Bonifac● the eighth or Clement the sixth
giue remissio● of sinnes to those that come on pilgrimage to Rome or send their Angels to mediate their cause he doth not egge forward with Killison to vice Or if a Pope giue remission of sinnes with Vr●a● the sixth or Clement the seuenth to fight in hi● priuate scisme he doth not giue liberty to iniquity Or if a Pope with Inocent the third giue remission o● sinnes to murther a King he openeth no gate to licentious libertie But onely Christ must be taxed with that by Kellison who in no case by the Roman● law may take away sinne Ies●it ca●ech lib. 2. page 83. But the society of Iesuites may Our society of Iesus saith a Iesuite is an acquitall of all sins One daies deuotion in their house may as you may finde it thus written in their Catech. first booke Ibid. li. an Page 8. 8. page He that shall come euery yeare to performe his deuotions one whole day in our house shall haue plenary indulgence of all his sins though he said but one Pater noster or an Aue Mary The Masse Priest by his owne authority may Luke 5. an Who hauing obtained the wonderfull grace to remit sin saith in the preparation to the Masse Thy mine owne authority do first absolue thee from the sentence of the lesse excommunication if thou haue need thereof And besides I absolue thee from all thy sinnes Almes deeds of themselues may Luke 11.16 annot Almes deedes extinguish sinne redeeme sinne deliuer from death and gaine heauen But Christ without the prayers of the Church and parties merite may not Therefore the Priest before Masse in the absolution saith Let thy sinnes be forgiuen thee through the merits of our Lord Iesus Christ the prayers of our mother holy Church the good deeds that thou hast done and which thou shalt hereafter by the grace of God do The merits of Saints without the helpe of Christ may Therefore as a thing of great secret the Masse Priest secretly saith in the Masse We beseech thee ô Lord through the merits of the Saints whose reliques we here haue through the merits of the rest of the Saints to forgiue me all my sins Briefly Masses wherein a round cake is offered and not Christ Indulgences to the which the Pope subscribes not God mens merit which is a menstruous cloth and not as sweet incense reliques purchased of Masse Priests may take away sinnes and giue life but Christ may not for so to beleeue is high treason to the Romish and Canniball army who hauing inuented many heresies propter gulam ventrem for gluttony and belly cheare as Saint Hierome speaketh feed themselues fat vpon the soules of men But miserable is that spouse as Saint Bernard saith that is committed to such leaders they are not the friends they are the enemies of the Bridegroome Thus much shall suffice concerning the difference of doctrine in this position wherein you may be hold the Angels of light leading the way to Christ the hope of glory and the Angels of darknesse to hopelesse glory lying hid in indulgences merit satisfaction worshipping of Saints images and reliques which Kel in his Epistle to the reader in his Suruey hath promised to make as plaine and as plausible as may be to those that will take his impolished worke in good part that is to deny Christs passion to be sufficient and to looke for saluation in them OPPOS 4. Christ deserued for vs at Gods hands grace by which together with our co-operation we may be saued and redeemed Suruey pag. 26. pag 256. 1. Pet. 1. pag. 257. KEllison a little before this place cited treating of the price of our redemption acknowledgeeth the same to bee so great that as S. Peter saith We were redeemed not by gold and siluer but by the pretious bloud of Christ So rich a price was this bloud that it was sufficient to haue satisfied for the sinne that shed it as Saint Bernard saith Whereupon Kellison concludeth That Christ is our redeemer who hath deliuered vs out of the power of darknesse Pag. 262. Pag. 191. freed vs from the slauery of sinne and bondage of the diuell Yet contrary to all this in another place he teacheth that Christ hath satisfied for our sinnes not because his passion without any co-operation on our part doth suffice and therefore Christ thought it good as he elsewhere saith as we fell by our willes into captiuity so by our owne wils together with grace we should rise againe and winde our selues out of the seruitude of sinne and tyranny of the diuell Saint Paul to the confutation of this doctrine teacheth That Christ himselfe when he ascended on high led captiuity captiue and gaue gifts vnto men not that he led captiuity into heauen where there is no place for sin and death but that to the redeeming and reducing of mankinde to his old liberty and dignity ouercoming the diuell sinne and death he led them in open shew in an vnspeakable triumph according to that saying of the Apostle Col. 2.15 Spoyling the principalities and powers thou hast made a shew of them openly and hast triumphed ouer them Whereupon that ioyfull voyce was heard out of heauen when Christ ascended vp thither not where God the word was not before but where the word become flesh sate not before Now is saluation in heauen and strength and the kingdome of our God and the power of his Christ For the accuser of our brethren is cast downe which accused them before God day and night King Dauid prophesied of this vnspeakable triumph saying They haue seene ô God thy goings the goings of my God and my King which art in the sanctuary The singers went before Reu 12.10 Psa 68.24 the players of instruments after in the middest were the ma● is pl●ying with ●●●brels In which sweet reioicing it doth most liuely appeare that saluation power is made perfect by the Lords death resurrection by the which sin death is abolished life is restored the diuell cast down ouerthrown so that he can no more accuse mankind before the iudgment seate of God Now we are freed from sin saith the Apostle who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods chosē Rom. 8. There is our freedome from the punishment It is God that iustifieth who shall cōdemne It is Christ which is dead yea rather which is risen againe which is also at the right hand of God and maketh request also for vs So that no accusation may be brought against Gods chosen Seeing then that Christ hath wrought so excellent and perfect redemption as the whole hoast of heauen doth beare witnesse it appeareth that it is not left to the co-operation of our owne wils to rise againe and winde our selues out of the seruitude of sinne and tyranny of the Diuell If it had bene left vnto the will of man how could the will of man haue performed it Ioh. 15. Without me saith
and seeking battile Speaking peace in their petitions to the Kings maiesty and seeking battaile in their gun-powder treason But the Church standeth Frustra circumlatrantibus hereticis The heretickes in vaine barking about it Gentle Readers thus you may behold the Angels of light teaching as well an inherent as an imputatiue righteousnesse not to giue leaue to sinne whereas the Angels of darknesse teaching neither leade the way to all idolatry OPPOS 9. In vaine the faithfull man praieth for iustification or remission of sinnes because before he praieth his sinnes are forgiuen him and he is iustified or else his full assured faith is a lying and deceiptfull saith Suru●y of the n●● R●ligion pag 458. THe Protestants saith this Popish Iesuite pray in vaine but the Papists wee may say pray vainly who thinke to wash away their sinnes by praier Heb. ● 2● Pag. 4●3 annot 4●● which cannot bee remitted without bloud Otherwise Kellison knoweth no reason why we should weare our h●se out in the knees with praying if praier neither s●nctifieth for sin n●● meriteth any thing at Gods hands truly if we weare our hose out in the knees we● loose more then we get if this doctrine be true This is the supreme honour called by them Latria that this hereticke giueth to God that asketh in the ambition of his owne heart Who is the Almighty that we should serue him Iob. 21. or what profite should we haue if wee should pray vnto him vnlesse by our prayers we may wash away our sins But by what praier By those that are more odious then profitable and not so profitable as odious For though they begin in many of their praiers with Omnipotens sempeterne Deus Act. 17.28 and end with Per Dominum Iesum Christum yet nothing is placed in the middle part but Saints and the merits of Saints to make their prayers meritorious being filled so full of merit But what Saints Such for the most part that haue bene canonized not by God but by Popes As S. Francis made a Saint by Gregory the ninth and Thomas Becket by Pope Alexander the third For none by the decree of the said Alexander are to bee taken for Saints but such are canonized and admitted by the Bishop of Romes Bull. The merits of Saints so canonized are in their prayers offered as an vnlawfull composition for the remission of sinnes not vpon the golden Altar as the righteousnesse of Christ but vpon the stinking Altar of mens nature as the merits of men Iohn 16. marg 1 yet they suppose they are made in Christs name because their praiers made to Saints are concluded with Per Christum Dominum nostrū meum as the margent note vpon the Rhemes testifieth But for breuity we will speake no further of the praiers of these faithlesse men that denying the sufficiency of Christs passion seeke their saluation in them by saying them vpon beads by number that they may know at least thereby how many they say though they vnderstand not what they say But leauing them to their beads I will turne my pen to maintaine the praiers of the faithfull man whose prayers Kellison saith are vaine because hee is assured of his saluation Will Kellison say that S. Iohn the beloued Desciple of the Lord that leaned vpō his breast vnto whom he bequeathed in his last will his mother a virgin to a virgin was not assured of his saluation If he say hee was not the testimony of Saint Iohn will confute him wherein it is written 1. Iohn 3.14 We know that we are translated from death to life Or that Peter did not beleeue the remission of sinnes 1. Pet. 3 18. whose confession is that Christ once suffered for sinnes the iust for the vniust that he might bring vs to God Or that the Apostles in generall did not beleeue the remission of sinnes when the Creed of the Apostles doth testifie they did Yet Christ taught them to desire not once but alwaies when they prayed forgiuenesse of sinnes by these words Forgiue vs our debts Mat. 6.12 not that the punishment due to sin was not forgiuen them for then Saint Iohn would not haue said We know that we are translated from death to life But that through the increase of faith they might more and more inwardly feele the application of the forgiuenesse of sins Saint Paul 1. Cor. 15 17. Phil. 3.13 who proueth by the resurrection of Christ the actuall remission of sinnes which could not be If Christ be not raised as he saith your faith is in vaine and ye are yet in your sinnes Afterward saith I count not my selfe that I haue attained vnto it namely in the 9. and 10. verses before to the full knowledge of Christ and perfect taste of his resurrection Now if an Apostle wrapped vp in the third heauen a pen man of the holy Ghost could not attaine to a full and perfect tast of his saluation how much lesse those whose faith is but as a graine of mustard seede yet sufficient to saluation attaine to the full taste of the application of the forgiuenesse of sinnes without much praier The man that beleeued in Christ desired of him to helpe his vnbeliefe and many a poore soules conscience cast downe yet the children of God would be glad to pray day and night to finde but one dram of this application that Popish Priests will not weare their hose out in the knees for Secondly Tim. Eph. Isa God who hath shewed mercy vnto the faithfull man not that he was but that he should be faithfull and hath selected him not that he was but that he should be holy hath promised that he may be both faithfull and holy to worke a renouation in him and that so apparent that whosoeuer seeth him shall know him thereby Then here is another notable motiue to stirre vp a faithfull man to praier that hee may earnestly desire with Saint Paul that God would make perf●●● his image in him And that by vnderstanding knowing aright the cause and author of all things he may attaine to more noble and purer actions as well in his vnderstandidg as will That his memory sanctified may retaine euermore good and holy cogitations of God and of commendable actions whereby religion is preserued and increased That he would purifie his affections and in stead of such as are euill and corrupt excite by his holy spirit working in his word honest and vertuous motions in his heart And that the inferour powers may be obedient to the superiour that the image of God thereby repaired and the image of Satan abolished we may bee wholly gouerned through the effectuall working and the plentifull presence of Gods Spirit For as yet in this life the faithfull man hath the first fruits of the spirit and not the tenth so that the flesh liueth still in a manner fully in him The which aduantage Sathan espying by beholding grace begun and not perfected fighteth against
from sinners and made higher then the heauens hath no neede dayly as those Priests first for his owne sins then for the peoples to offer sacrifice For this he did once for all in offering himselfe That which they did daily and vnsufficiently in offering the sacrifice of beasts Christ did once and perfectly in offering himselfe From hence appeareth first Reuel 1.5 the excellency of his loue Secondly the excellency of his mediatorship The excellency of his loue who loued vs and washed vs from our sinnes in his bloud What greater proofe can there bee of his loue then this that of tender compassion and loue towards vs as a most mercifull and excellent high Priest he offered vp himselfe in sacrifice euen a slaine and bloudy sacrifice for the sins of the world And so with his bloud once powred forth and once offered hath w●shed away all our sin● and reconciled vs to his Father Secondly insueth as a fruit of his passion the excellency of his mediatorship But now our Priest hath obtained saith the Apostle a more excellent office in as much as hee is the mediator of a better Testament which was made vpon better promises namely the remission of sinnes perfected by his death and sufferings Ier. 31. Heb. 1.16 For I will be mercifull vnto their vnrighteousnesse and I will remember their sinnes and iniquities no more saith Iehouah that made the Testament or couenant concerning the remission of sins And by his death confirmed the same Therefore he forgaue sinnes saith Chrysostome when he gaue the testament by his sacrifice If therefore he forgaue sins by one sacrifice now there is no need of a second Theodoret where there is remission of these things Now there is no oblation for sinne for it is superfluous after remission is giuen And he promised saying Their sinnes and iniquites I will remember no more Which promise of God Rom. 4.5 is euery day more and more performed in the iustification of the vngodly man who is iustified by faith in Christ by hauing his righteousnesse imputed vnto him that hath none of his owne The second vse consisteth in the Kingly dignity of our Sauiour who being exalted and placed in t●e highest degree of honour giueth as he hath receiued Psal 68.8 E●h 4.8 gifts for men By the merit of his manhood gifts vnto men through the power of his God-head the gift of the holy Ghost 1. Ioh. 4.13 The gift of grace Rom. 5.15 The gift of faith Ephes 2.8 The gift of righteousnesse Rom. 5.17 The gift of life Rom. 6.23 with other graces infinite decking vs fit for the bridegroome Since then saith the Apostle that he by the right hand of God hath bene exalted and hath receiued of his Father the promise of the holy Ghost he hath shed forth this which you see and heare As God did beautifie the soules of the Apostles with supernaturall knowledge making them of Fisher-men Preachers and to speake as the Spirit gaue them vtterance to euery one in his owne language So he doth likewise through the same spirit Rom. 10.17 Eph ●1 18 Rom. 8.2 Gal 3.13 open the hearts of the hearers of his word that he may sow the seed of immortality namely the Gospel in them To the bringing forth of faith through the which the holy Ghost applyeth the benefites of Christs passion To the begetting the Church anew lost in Adam and to the reëdifying of it dayly more and more 1. Pet. 1. 1. Cor. 6. Ioh. 6. 1. 1. Cor. 10. 12. Ephes 2. vntill it come to the full period of perfection For Christ by the holy Ghost doth sprinckle vs with his bloud doth make vs his members doth feed vs with himselfe doth make vs drinke of himselfe and doth build vs vpon himselfe that we may be complet in him which is the head of all Principality and Power How then commeth it to passe that Christs sacrifice is not sufficient to vphold religion and the worship of God Kellison telleth vs the reason is If Christ neuer offered any other sacrifice Pag. 291. then that of the crosse then is he not a perpetuall Priest because hee hath no sacrifice which either by himselfe or by his Ministers is perpetually offered Then it may be of them demanded wherein the eternall Priest-hood of Christ consisteth Heb. 7. annot The Annotation vpon the Rhems telleth vs That Christ is not called a Priest for euer onely for that his person is eternall or for that he sitteth on the right hand of God and perpetually prayeth and maketh intercession for vs or for that the effect of his death is euerlasting For all this proueth not in proper signification that his Priesthood is euerlasting and perpetual But that Christs eternall Priest-hood consisteth in the perpetuall sacrifice of his body and bloud in the Church Yet by an vnbloudy sacrifice Pag. 144. pag 614. pag. 288. Pag. 387. continually to be offered as Kellison saith not immediatly from Christ the high Priest but onely by his vnder and virgin like Priests For the worship of God and exercise in religion which sacrifice in the Masse so offered is a most pleasing and cleane sacrifice not onely in respect of the outward forme which is vnbloudy but also in respect of the most chast pure and virgin like flesh and bloud of Christ Now then seeing Christs sacrifice as the Annotation vpon the Rhems teacheth consisteth in the perpetuall sacrifice of his body and bloud in the Church Then it consisteth not in that sacrifice Kellison speaketh of because it is vnbloudy without bloud therefore without profite For without shedding of bloud is no remission Heb. 9.22 If Christs perpetuall Priest-hood consisted in that vnbloudy sacrifice then should Christs perpetuall Priest-hood surcease to be when that should surcea so to be offered But seeing a sacrifice offered by an vnder Priest is so powerfull to vphold religion and the worship of God which the sacrifice of Christ cannot Let vs behold this sacrifice so highly commended and so maiestically offered by virgin-like Priests And first the excellency of the Priests that maketh and offereth it For though they doe stile themselues vnder Priests as the Pope stileth himselfe Seruus seruorum The seruant of seruants yet they challenge notwithstanding with him supreame power ouer the Creator of all things To the manifestation hereof we are first to consider the excellency of the Priest in the consecration They tell vs that in their handes Stella Clericorum as it were in the virgins wombe the Sonne of God is incarnated and taketh flesh That in their consecration they are aboue the blessed mother of Christ For she caused Christ to come into her virgin like wombe with eight words Ecce ancilla Domini fiat mihi secundum verbum tuum whereas their Priests make him come into the hoast with fiue words onely that is to say Hoc est enim corpus meum That they are more higher in authority then