a debt is a debt though a man knoweth it not and it is by so much the more dangerous as not knowing it he will never be carefull to discharge it till the Lords arrest be upon his back when his knowledge will doe him no good VVe may see many which heap sinne upon sinne and know also that they sinne and yet for all that cease not to make good cheer and make their hearts merry The countenance doth not alwayes speake truth so that sometimes under a countenance in shew merry there are stings and pricks in the Conscience Rom. 2. 15. which yet is oftentimes benummed and sometimes through hypocrisie it is seared as it were with a hot iron 1 Tim. 4. 2. but the Lord will find a time to awaken and revive it by laying all his sinnes before his face Psal. 50. 21. VVhen it is known what is the remedy of it It were wisdome not to suffer our guilt to run long on the score but reckon with our selves every night ere we lie down to sleep and look back to the doings of the day that in those things which are well done we may be thankefull and comfort our own hearts and in that which passeth otherwise from us we may call for mercy and have the sweeter sleep for if Solomon willeth us in that case of debt by suretyship to humble our selves to our Creditor and not to take rest untill we have freed our selves Prov. 6. 1 2 3 4 5 6. much more ought we to haste the humbling our selves unto God sith the bloud of Christ is the onely sacrifice for sinne Is the guilt of sin in all men alike No for as the sin encreaseth so doth the guilt both in regard of the greatnesse and of the number of our sins as appears out of Ezra 9. 6. where as sin is said to be gone above their heads so the guilt to reach up to the heavens VVhen the sin is gone and past is not the guilt also gone and past Christ taketh away both the guilt and the sin of the godly except originall sin which continueth during life but in the wicked when the act of sin is gone the guilt remaineth always as the strong savour of garlick when the garlick is eaten or as the scarre of a wound or the mark of a burning when the wound or burning is past VVhat is contrary to the guilt of sin The testimony of a good Conscience which is a perpetuall joy and comfort yea and a heaven to him that hath walked carefully in Gods obedience as the other is a torment of hell So much of the guilt what is the punishment It is the wages of sin sent for the guilt Rom. 6. 23. namely the wrath and curse of God by whose just sentence man for his sinne is delivered into the power both of bodily and spirituall death begun here and to be accomplished in the life to come Gen. 2. 17. John 3. 18 19. 5. 24. 28. 29. Lamen 3. 36. Esa. 64. 5 6. Rom. 6. 12. Gal. 3. 10. VVhat do you understand by bodily and spirituall death By the one I understand the separation of the soule from the body with all personall miseries and evils that attend thereon or make way thereto by the other the finall separation of both from God together with present spirituall bondage and all forerunners of damnation Are all the particular punishments expressed in the word which shall come for sin They cannot wholly be laid down they be so manifold and so divers and therefore it is said they shall come written and unwritten Deut. 29. 20. 28. 61. Against whom are these punishments addressed Against the whole estate of him that sinneth For whereas executions upon obligations unto men are so directed as they can charge either the person alone or his goods and lands alone so as if the Creditor fall upon the one he freeth the other as if he fall upon the person he cannot proceed further then unto his body the execution which goeth out from God for the obligation of sin is extended to the whole estate of the sinner both to the things belonging unto him and likewise to his own person VVhat be the punishments that extend to the things belonging to him Calamities upon his family wife children servants friends goods and good name the losse and curse of all these and unhappy and miserable posterity Matth. 15. 22. Psalme 109. 12. hinderances in goods Deuter. 28. in name ignominy and reproach Matth. 7. 12. Job 18. 17. Prov. 10. 7. losse of friends acquaintance c. What are the judgements executed upon his person They are executed either in this life or in the life to come What punishments are inflicted in this life They be partly outward partly inward What be the outward punishments 1. His want of dominion over the creatures and the enmity of the creatures against him calamities by fire water beasts or other means disorder in the world in summer winter heaven earth and all creatures 2. Shame for the nakednesse of body 3. All hunger in extremity thirst nakednesse penury poverty of estate and want of bodily necessaries 4. Wearinesse in following his calling with sweat of his browes with trouble and irksomnesse Gen. 3. 19. 5. Outward shame and infamy 6. Servitude 7. Losse of limbs or of the use of his senses deformities in body 8. Weaknesse of beeing want of sleep pains of body aches soars sicknesses and diseases of all sorts Deut. 28. Mat. 9. 2. even to the itch which few make accompt of therby to feel the anger of God and punishment of sin hither is to be referred pain in Child-bearing Gen. 3. 16. What be the inward punishments in this life 1. Sorrow and anguish of soul for these plagues and the like 2. Madnesse frenzy and foolishnesse 3. Blindnesse and distemper of the soul when God striketh it with an ignorant spirit with want of judgement to discern between good and bad with forgetfulnesse of holy things or hardnesse of heart Eph. 4. 17 18 19. which although for the time they be least felt yet are they more fearfull and dangerous then those whereof the sense is presently sharp 4. Terrour and vexation of spirit driving into hell guiltinesse and horrour of Conscience the fury of a despairing soul beginning even in this life to feel hell torments Deut. 28. 28. Heb. 10. 27. Esa. 33. 14. 5. Strangenesse and alienation from God 6. Spirituall bondage whereby sinfull man is become subject to the lust of the flesh the curse of the Law the rule of Satan and the custome of the world yea even blessings are cursed Malac. 2. 2. and prosperity causeth ruine Psal. 69. 22. In what sort is man in bondage unto Satan Both soul and body is under the power of the Prince of darknesse whereby man becommeth the slave of the Devil and hath him to reign in his heart as his God till Christ deliver him Col. 1. 13. Ephes. 2. 2. 2 Tim. 2. 26.
cause all things about the Tabernacle to be made according to the pattern given him in the Mount other some things are commanded and set down with condition as when Christ said Marke 10. 17. 19. If thou wilt inherit eternall life keep the Commandements and the Law saith Doe this and this if thou wilt live and these are propounded conditionally to all as well the elect as the reprobate God his absolute will is always one and the same And are they propounded to both after one sort No not so for although they be given to the elect with condition yet the will of God to them is absolute for Gods will simply is that all his elect shall be saved if not always yet at the last and because of their own strength they cannot doe the Commandements of God therefore God doth give them strength by his Spirit and because by this strength they cannot doe Gods will perfectly therefore it is fulfilled for them by Christ which is made theirs by faith and in whom God doth accept their broken and imperfect obedience as if it were whole and perfect But as for the wicked and reprobates it is not so with them for although God doth give them a law to obey and doth promise them life if they doe obey it yet his will to them is not so absolute that they shall keep it neither shall they obtain the promises either in themselves or in Christ. But doth not God mock and delude the Reprobate when he willeth them in his law to doe this and that which yet is not his will to be done No he doth not delude them for although he doth not shew what he will absolutely have done of them which is properly his will indeed yet by his law he doth teach what is their duty and the duty of all men adding moreover that whosoever shall neglect and fail in this their duty he sinneth grievously against God and is guilty of death Can you make this plain by some instance or example or any Parable in the Scripture Yea it is manifest in the Parable of the Kings supper and the bidden guests they which were first bidden and came not were not deluded by the King because he signified unto them what he liked and what was their duty but yet he did not command that they should be compelled to come in as the two sorts which were bidden afterwards where we see that the Kings will was not alike in bidding the first as it was in the second for in calling the latter sort his will was absolute that they should come indeed and so caused that they did come but to the first he onely signified what he liked if they had done it How doe you apply this to the matter in question I apply it thus as it cannot be said that the first bidden guests were mocked by the King although his will was not so absolute for their comming as it was in calling and commanding the second sort of guests so it cannot be said that God doth delude and mock the Reprobate in giving them a law to obey although it be not his absolute will that they should come and obey the law for it is sufficient to leave them without excuse that they know what is acceptable to God and what is their duty to God who hath absolute authority and power over them and over all Obj. God commandeth Pharaoh to let Israel goe and yet his will was to the contrary therefore there were two contrary wils in God one revealed the other concealed It followeth not for the will of God was one onely and most constant and that was that Israel should not be sent away by Pharaoh and so that was fulfilled as for the Commandement given to Pharaoh it was a doctrine to teach Pharaoh what he must have done if he would avoid so many plagues and yet shewed him his duty and what was just and right to be done but it was no testimony of the absolute will of God Whether doth God will evill or sin or no Before we can answer to this question we must consider of three things How many ways sin may be considered How many things are to be considered in sin How many ways one may be said to will a thing Go to then shew first how many ways sin is to be considered Sin is to be considered three ways As it is of it self sin and striving against the law of God As it is a punishment of sin that went before for God doth oftentimes punish one sin with another As it is the cause of more sin following Rom. 1. 26. for one sin doth beget another as one Devil calleth seven Devils 2 Thess. 2. 11. Now declare how many things you doe consider in sin In every sin there be three things The action and that is either inward or outward the action which we call inward is threefold either of the mind as evill thoughts or of the heart as evil affections and desires or of the will as an evill choice or consent to sin The actions which we call outward are the actions or work of the senses fighting against the law of God The second thing in every sin is the deformity or corruption of the action that is when the action doth decline from the rule of Gods law and this properly is sin or the form of sin The third thing in every sinne is the offence or guiltinesse thereof whereby the party offending is bound to undergoe punishment this guiltinesse and obligation whereby we are bound to undergoe the penalty of sin hath its foundation in sin it self but it ariseth from the justice of God Rom. 6. 23. who in his justice rewardeth sin with death as justice indeed giveth to every one his due Now come you to your third point and shew how many ways one is said to will a thing We are said to will a thing two ways either properly for it self or improperly for another end What mean you by a proper willing of a thing We doe will a thing properly for it self or for it own sake when the thing which we will or desire is of its own nature to be wished and desired as for the body health food apparell and such like or for the soul faith repentance patience c. We doe will a thing improperly when the thing which we will is not of it self to be wished but yet we will have it for some good that may come thereof as for example we will the cutting off some member of the body not because of it self it is to be wished but for the health of the body which doth follow that cutting What difference is there between these two wils There is great difference for those things which we will properly we love approve them we encline unto them we delight in them but that which is known of it self to be evill our will is not caried unto that with love and liking but doth decline from it
Egypt and that his brethren did not send him wherein God is said to have had a further and a stronger hand in his sending into Egypt then his brethren and therefore it is manifest that God did that well which the Patriarchs did sinfully Gen. 50. 20. Exod. 7. 3. God hardened Pharaohs heart 2 Sam. 16. 10. It is said that God had commanded Shimei to curse David 2 Sam. 24. 1. God moved David to number the people 2 Chron. 10. 15. It is said that it was of God that Rehoboam harkened not to the people 1 Kings 22. 19. 20. 23. It is said that the Devill was bidden of God sitting in the seat of his righteous judgement to be a lying spirit in the mouthes of the false Prophets 1 Kings 22. Esa. 19. 14. God mingled amongst them the spirit of error Esa. 42. 24. Who gave Jacob for a spoile and Israel to the Robbers did not the Lord Esa. 63. 17. Why hast thou made us to erre out of thy way and hardened our heart from thy feare Rom. 1. 26. God gave them up to vile affections 2 Thess. 2. 11. God sent them strong delusions And to be content with one more testimony among many let us consider how the most vile and horrible act that ever was done upon the face of the earth the Lord God is said to have wrought most holily for as Judas the Jewes and Pilate are all said to have given Christ to death so the Father and Christ are said to have done the same and that in the same words though the manner and purpose are diverse Acts 2. 23. 4. 28. Rom. 8. 32. Doth not God then suffer such things to be done He suffereth indeed yet this is not an idle permission as some imagine but joyned with a very and active doing or work of God as in the crucifying of Christ it is said that they did nothing but that which the hand of God had determined before Acts 2. 23. 3. 18. 4. 28. for God is not only a bare permitter of the evil works but a powerfull governour of them to his glory and an effecter also of it so far as it hath any good in it But doth not this draw God to some stain of sin from which he is most free as being that which he punisheth In no wise for that which is evill hath some respect of goodnesse with God First as it is a meer action God being the Authour of every action Acts 17. 28. but the Devill and our concupiscence of the evill in it as he that rideth upon a lame horse causeth him to stirre but is not the cause of his halting Secondly as it is the punishment of sin for punishment is counted a morall good in that it is the part of a just Judge to punish sinne and thus God willeth the sin of the wicked for their punishment without sin in himselfe Rom. 2. 26. 3. ult Thirdly as it is a chastisement a triall of our faith as martyrdome or propitiation for sin as the death and passion of Christ Acts 2. 23. 4. 27 28. where although the giving of Christ to the death of the Crosse be attributed in the same words to God and Christ to Judas Pilate and the Jewes yet diversly and in severall respects they are declared to meet in one and the same action whereby there appeareth no lesse difference between God and Christs purpose and theirs then between light and darknesse Declare how God can have a hand in these things and yet be free from sin He is a cunning workman which with an ill toole will work cunningly and as a most excellent Apothecary maketh a medicine of the mixture of poyson in it which is not yet poysenous but rather medicinall so the Lord in guiding and managing the poyson of sin draweth treacle from the sins of men as it were the poyson in such sort as they turn to his glory and good of his Church and cannot be charged with sin no more then the Apothecary with poysoning in so ordering the poyson as it doth the contrary by his skill unto that which by nature it would doe and as in painting the black colour giveth grace to other beautifull colours in making them shew better so it is in this work of God in which the sin and untruth of men as by a black and dark colour causeth the truth and righteousnesse of God as the white to be more commended and to appeare better But how are these actions of the wicked discerned from the work of God in them First by the cause from whence the action commeth for Josephs brethren of envie sent him into Egypt but God in mercy Shimei cursed David of malice but God of justice against Davids murther and adulterie Rehoboam out of the unadvisednesse of his heart refused the request of his people but God by his wise Counsell did so dispose of it The Devill from hate to Ahab was a laying spirit in the mouth of all his Prophets but God in justice against his idolatrie Pilate of ambition and feare the Jewes of malitious envie and ignorance Judas of covetousnesse but God of love gave Christ and Christ himselfe in obedience to his Father and therefore that action as it was from God and Christ was most just and righteous as from the other most wretched and abominable Secondly by the end whither they tend for Josephs brethren sent him to the end he should not come to the honour foretold out of his dreame but God sent him to provide for his Church and to fulfill that that was foretold Shimei cursed to drive David to despaire but God directed him for exercise of Davids patience The Devill lied in the false Prophets to ruine Ahab but God justly to punish him for his idolatry Rehoboam to satisfie the desire of his young beardlesse Counsellours but God to perform the word that he had spoken by his Prophets Pilate to please the people and to keep his credit with Caesar Judas for obtaining of the mony he desired and the Jewes that our Saviour Christ should not reigne over them but God and Christ to save his people But were it not better to say that these things were done by Gods permission rather then by his providence and government thereby to avoid an absurdity in Divinity that God is the Authour of evill It is most truly said that God is not the Authour of sin whereof he is the revenger and also that it is done by Gods permission but it is not an idle permission separated from the providence and government of God and therefore a distinction of Gods permission separated from his government of sin is not good especially considering that the distinction of such a permission doth not defend the justice of God for the which it is devised How may that appeare It he permit sin he doth it against or with his will if he doe it against his will then is he not Almighty as one that cannot
as most men think it to be What breaches of the first Commandement may be observed in this transgression First infidelity whereby they doubted of Gods love towards them and of the truth of his word Secondly contempt of God in disregarding his threatnings and crediting the word of Satan Gods enemy and theirs Thirdly hainous ingratitude and unthankfulnesse against God for all his benefits in that they would not be beholding unto him for that excellent condition of their creation in respect whereof they ought unto him all fealty but would needs be his equall Fourthly curiosity in affecting greater wisdome then God had endued them withall by vertue of their creation and a greater measure of knowledge then hee thought fit to reveale unto them Fiftly intolerable pride and ambition not onely desiring to be better then God made them but also to be equall in knowledge to God himselfe and aspiring to the highest estate due to their Creatour How did our first parents break the second Commandement Eve by embracing the word of the Devill and preferring it before the word of God Adam by hearkning to the voyce of his wife rather then to the voyce of the Almighty Gen. 3. 17. What were the breach of the third First presumption in venturing to dispute of Gods truth and to enter in communication with Gods enemy or a beast who appeared unto them touching the word of God with whom no such conference ought to have been entertained Secondly reproachfull blasphemy by subscribing to the sayings of the Devill in which he charged God with lying and envying their good estate Thirdly superstitious conceit of the fruit of the tree imagining it to have that vertue which God never put into it as if by the eating thereof such knowledge might be gotten as Satan perswaded Fourthly want of that zeale in Adam for the glory of God which he ought to have shewed against his wife when hee understood shee had transgressed Gods Commandements How was the fourth Commandement broken In that the Sabbath was made a time to conferre with Satan in matters tending to the high dishonour of God If it be true that on that day man fell into this transgression as some not improbably have conjectured for at the conclusion of the sixth day all things remained yet very good Gen. 1. 31. and God blessed the seventh day Gen. 2. 3. Now it is very likely Satan would take the first advantage that possibly he could to entrap them before they were strengthened by longer experience and by partaking of the Sacrament of the tree of life whereof it appeareth by Gen. 3. 22. that they had not yet eaten and so from the very beginning of man became a manslayer John 8. 44. Shew briefly the grounds of the breach of the Commandements of the second table in the transgression of our first parents The fifth was broken Eve giving too little to her husband in attempting a matter of so great weight without his privity and Adam giving too much to his wife in obeying her voyce rather then the Commandement of God and for pleasing of her not caring to displease God Gen. 3. 17. The sixth by this act they threw themselves and all their posterity into condemnation and death both of body and soule The seventh though nothing direct against this Commandement yet herein appeared the root of those evill affections which are here condemned as not bridling the lust and wandring desire of the eyes as also the inordinate appetite of the tast Gen. 3. 6. in lusting for and eating that onely fruit which God forbad not being satisfied with all the other fruits in the garden The eighth first laying hands upon that which was none of their own but by a speciall reservation kept from them Secondly discontent with their present estate and covetous desire of that which they had not The ninth judging otherwise then the truth was of the vertue of the tree Gen. 3. 6. and receiving a false accusation against God himselfe The tenth by entertaining in their minds Satans suggestions and evill concupiscence appearing in the first motions leading to the forenamed sinnes Thus much of our first parents sinne and the causes thereof Now let us come to the effects of the same shew therefore what followed in them immediately upon this transgression Three fruits were most manifest namely guiltinesse of conscience shame of face and feare of Gods presence Did any punishment follow upon this sinne Sinne guiltinesse and punishment doe naturally follow one upon another otherwise the threatning that at what time soever they did transgresse Gods Commandement they should certainly dye should not have taken effect Declare how that threatning took effect They were dead in sinne which is more fearfull then the death of the body as that which is a separation from the favour of God for there came upon them the decay of Gods glorious image in all the faculties of their soule and also a corruption of the powers of their body from being so fit instruments to serve the soule as God made them and this in them is signified by nakednes Gen. 3. 7. And in their children called originall sin Then there issued from thence a streame of actuall sinnes in the whole course of their life which appeared in Adam even upon his fall by his flying from Gods presence and affirming that it was his nakednesse that made him flye his excusing of his sin and laying it on the woman c. By sin an entrie being made for death Rom. 5. 12. they became subject to the separating of the soul from the body which is bodily death and of both from God which is spirituall death signified by expelling them out of Paradise and debarring them of the sacramentall tree of life Gen. 3. 22. c. And thus by the just sentence of God being for their sin delivered into the power both of corporall and of eternall death they were already entred upon death and hell to which they should have proceeded untill it had been accomplished both in body and soule in hell with the Devill and his Angels for ever if the Lord had not looked upon them in the blessed Seed For the fuller understanding of the things that immediatly followed the transgression of our first parents let us consider more particularly what is recorded in the 3d. ch of Gen. And first shew what is meant by that in v. 7. that their eyes were opened they saw themselves naked were they not naked before and having the eye sharper then after the fall must they not needs see they were naked It is true howbeit their nakednesse before the fall was comely yea more comely then the comeliest apparell we can put on being clad with the robe of innocency from the top of the head unto the sole of the foot wherefore by nakednesse he meaneth a shamefull nakednesse both of soule and body as the Scripture speaketh elsewhere Rev. 3. 17 18. Exod. 32. 25. What
2 Cor. 4. 4. Heb. 2. 14. Luke 11. 21 22. How may a man know whether Satan be his God or no He may know it by this if he give obedience to him in his heart and expresse it in his conversation And how shall a man perceive this obedience If he take delight in the evill motions that Satan puts into his heart and doth fulfill the lusts of the Devil Joh. 8. 44. 1 Joh. 3. 8. What is that slavery whereby a man is in bondage to the flesh A necessity of sinning but without constraint untill he be born again by the grace of God Mat. 12. 33 34 35. If we sin necessarily and cannot but sin then it seemeth we are not to be blamed Yes the necessity of sin doth not exempt us from sin but only constraint What punishments are inflicted upon sinfull man after this life A twofold death Which is the first death Bodily death in the severall kindes namely the separation of the soul from the body Gen. 3. 19. Eccl. 12. 7. Rom. 5. 12. Wherein consisteth the second death 1. In an everlasting separation of the whole man from the favourable presence and comfortable fellowship of Gods most glorious Majesty in whose countenance is fulnesse of joy 2. Perpetuall imprisonment in the company of the Devill and Reprobates damned in hell 3. The most heavy wrath of God and unspeakable torments to be endured in hell fire world without end 2 Thess. 1. 9. How doth this death seize upon man 1. After this life is ended the soule of the wicked immediately is sent unto hell there to be tormented unto the day of Judgement Luk. 16. 22 23. 2. At the day of Judgement the body being joyned to the soule againe both shall be tormented in hell everlastingly Matth. 10. 28. so much also the more as they have had more freedome from pain of body and anguish of soule and losse of outward things in this life Is the punishment of all sins alike No for as the guilt increaseth so doth the punishment and as the smallest sin cannot escape Gods hand so as we heap sins he will heap his judgements John 19. 11. Mat. 11. 20 21 22 23 24. But God is mercifull He is indeed full of mercy but he is also full of righteousnesse which must fully be discharged or else we cannot be partakers of his mercy Cannot we by our own power make satisfaction for our sins and deliver our selves from the wrath of God We cannot by any meanes but rather from day to day increase our debt for we are all by nature the sons of wrath and not able so much as to think a good thought therefore unable to appease the infinite wrath of God conceived against our sins Could any other creature in heaven or earth which is onely a creature perform this for us No none at all for first God will not punish that in another creature which is due to be paid by man Secondly none that is onely a creature can abide the wrath of God against sinne and deliver others from the same Thirdly none can be our Saviour but God Could man by his own wisdome devise any thing whereby he might be saved No for the wisdom of man can devise nothing but that which may make a further separation betwixt God and him VVhat then shall become of man-kind is there no hope of salvation shall all perish then surely is a man of all creatures most miserable when a dog or a toad die all their misery is ended but when a man dieth there is the beginning of his woe It were so indeed if there were no meanes of deliverance but God in his infinite wisdome and mercy hath found out that which the wisdome of man could not and provided a Saviour for mankind How then is man delivered from this sinfull miserable estate Sinne is repressed and misery asswaged by many meanes naturall and civill but they are not removed nor man restored but onely by a new Covenant the old being not now able to give life unto any by reason of the infirmity of our flesh VVhy is the former Covenant of works called the old Because we not onely cannot doe it but through the perversenesse of our nature and not by the fault of the Law it maketh our old man of sin elder and we more hasting to destruction How are they convinced that seek righteousnesse by this Covenant Because thereby they make God unjust and that he should thus give the Kingdome of heaven to wicked men as to those that cannot fulfill the Law Seeing the nature of a Covenant is to reconcile and joyne those together that are at variance as we see in the example of Abraham and Abimelech Laban and Jacob why is this called a Covenant that can make no reconciliation betwixt God and us Although it be not able to reconcile us yet doth it make way for reconciliation by another Covenant neither is it meet strictly to bind Gods Covenant with men to the same Lawes that the Covenants of one man with another are bound unto For amongst men the weaker seeketh reconciliation at the hand of the mightier Luk. 14. 31 32. But God neither able to be hurt or benefitted by us seeketh unto us for peace 2 Cor. 5. 20. VVhether of these two Covenants must be first in use The Law to shew us first our duty what we should doe Secondly our sin and the punishment due thereunto How is that other Covenant called whereby we are reconciled unto God and recovered out of the state of sin and death The new Covenant so called because by it we are renued the Covenant of grace of promise of life and salvation the new Testament the Gospell c. Ier. 31. 31 32. Rom. 3. 23 24. What is the Covenant of grace Gods second contract with man-kind after the fall for restoring of him into his favour and to the estate of happinesse by the meanes of a Mediatour Gal. 3. 21 22. and it containeth the free promises of God made unto us in Jesus Christ without any respect of our deservings VVho made this Covenant God alone for properly man hath no more power to make a spirituall Covenant in his naturall estate then before his creation he had to promise obedience How are they convinced by the giving of this second Covenant which seek righteousnesse in the Law or old Covenant Because thereby they make God unwise that would enter into a new and second Covenant if the former had been sufficient Heb. 8. 7. When was this Covenant of Grace first plighted between God and man Immediately after his fall in Paradise in that promise given concerning the womans seed Gen. 3. 15. God in unspeakeable mercy propounding the remedy before he pronounced sentence of Judgment Was it once only published It was sundry wayes declared in all ages partly by ordinary means and partly by Prophets extraordinarily sent and directed by God What is the foundation of this Covenant The meer
mercy of God in Christ whereby grace reigneth unto life through the obedience of one which is Jesus Christ. Rom. 5. 21. For there being three persons of the Trinity the Father sent his Son to accomplish the work of our Redemption and both of them send the Holy Ghost to work saving grace in our hearts and apply unto our soules the holinesse purchased by the Son of God What is promised therein The favour of God and everlasting salvation with the means thereof as Christ and in him Conversion Justification and Sanctification What is the condition on mans part The gift being most free on Gods part nothing is required on mans part but the receiving of grace offered which is done in those that are of capacity by Faith in Christ John 1. 12. 14 15. Acts 16. 31. whence followeth new obedience whereby the faithfull walk worthy of the grace received and this also is by Gods grace What then is the summe of the Covenant of grace That God will be our God and give us life everlasting in Christ if we receive him being freely by his Father offered unto us Jer. 31. 33. Acts. 16. 30 31. John 1. 12. How doth this Covenant differ from that of works Much every way for first in many points the Law may be conceived by reason but the Gospell in all points is farre above the reach of mans reason Secondly the Law commandeth to doe good and giveth no strength but the Gospell enableth us to doe good the Holy Ghost writing the Law in our hearts Jer. 31. 33. and assuring us of the promise that revealeth this gift Thirdly the Law promised life onely the Gospell righteousnesse also Fourthly the Law required perfect obedience the Gospell the righteousnesse of Faith Rom. 3. 21. Fifthly the Law revealeth sin rebuketh us for it and leaveth us in it but the Gospell doth reveale unto us the remission of sins and freeth us from the punishment belonging thereunto Sixthly the Law is the ministery of wrath condemnation and death the Gospell is the ministery of grace Justification and life Seventhly the Law was grounded on mans own righteousnesse requiring of every man in his own person perfect obedience Deut. 27. 26. and in default for satisfaction everlasting punishment Ezek. 18. 14. Gal. 3. 10. 12. but the Gospell is grounded on the righteousnesse of Christ admitting payment and performance by another in behalfe of so many as receive it Gal. 3. 13 14. And thus this Covenant abolisheth not but is the accomplishment and establishment of the former Rom. 3. 31. 10. 4. Wherein doe they agree They agree in this that they be both of God and declare one kind of righteousnesse though they differ in offering it unto us What is that one kind of righteousnesse It is the perfect love of God and of our neighbour What thing doth follow upon this That the severe Law pronounceth all the faithfull righteous forasmuch as they have in Christ all that the Law doth aske But yet those remaine transgressors of the Law They are transgressors in themselves and yet righteous in Christ and in their inward man they love righteousnesse and hate sin What are we to consider in the Covenant of Grace The condition 1. Of the Mediatour 2. And then of the rest of mankind In the former consisteth the foundation of this Covenant The performance whereof dependeth on Christ Jesus Acts 10. 43. 3. 24. Rom. 1. 3. 4. To the latter belongeth the application thereof for salvation unto all that will receive it 2 Cor. 5. 20. Mat. 6. 33. When was the Mediatour given 1. If we regard Gods decree from all eternity Eph. 1. 4. 2. If the vertue and efficacie of his Mediation as soon as need was even from the beginning of the world Rev. 13. 8. 3. If his manifestation in the flesh in fulnesse of time Gal. 4. 4. 1 Tim. 2. 6. from whence we reckon now 1643. yeares Who is this Mediatour between God and man Jesus Luk. 2. 11. Mat. 1. 21. 1 Tim. 2. 5. the Son of the Virgin Mary the promised Messias or Christ whom the Fathers expected the Prophets foretold John 1. 45. 8. 56. Whose life death Resurrection Ascension the Evangelists describe Joh. 1. 1. Act. 1. 1. Whose word preached unto this day subdueth the world 1 Tim. 3. 16. 2 Cor. 10. 4. 5. Finally whom wee look for from heaven to bee the Judge of quick and dead Acts 10. 42. What doe the Scriptures teach us touching Christ our Mediatour Two things first his person Joh. 1. 14. 3. 33. Secondly his office Esa. 61. 1 2. Luk. 4. 18. What is his Person The second Person in the Godhead made man John 1. 14. What have we to consider herein First the distinction of the two natures Secondly the hypostaticall or personall union of both into one Immanuell What be those two natures thus wonderfully united in one person First his divine nature or Godhead which maketh the person Secondly his humane nature or Manhood which subsisteth and hath his existence in the person of the Godhead and so we beleeve our Saviour to be both the Son of God and the son of man Gal. 4. 4. Luk. 1. 31 32. Rom. 1. 3 4. 9. 5. 1 Tim. 3. 16. Mat. 26. 24. What say you of him touching his Godhead I beleeve that he is the only begotten Son of the most high and eternall God his Father His Word Wisdome Character and Image begotten of his substance before all worlds God of God Light of Light very God of very God begotten not made finally God coessentiall coeternall and coequall with the Father and the Holy Ghost Why call you him the onely begotten Sonne of God Because he is the alone Son of God by nature even the onely begotten of the Father full of grace and truth John 1. 14. 3. 18. For though others be the Sons of God by Creation as Adam was and the Angels Job 1. 6. Others by Adoption and Regeneration as the Saints and the man Christ Jesus in another respect by hypostaticall union yet none is his Son by naturall generation but the same Christ Jesus and that in regard of his Godhead not of his Manhood according to the Apostle who saith that he is without Father according to his Manhood and without Mother according to his Godhead Heb. 7. 3. But it seemeth that he is called the Sonne of God in respect of the generation of his humane nature wherein it is said that the Holy Ghost did that which Fathers doe in the naturall generation especially seeing he is therefore said to be the Sonne of the Highest Luk. 1. 35. He is the naturall Sonne of God onely in regard of the eternall generation otherwise there should be two Sonnes one of the Father and another of the Holy Ghost but he is therefore called the Sonne of the Highest for that none could be so conceived by the Holy Ghost but he that is the
neither God nor man for things mingled together cannot retain the name of one of the simples as hony and oyle being mingled together cannot be called hony or oyle 2. The properties of the Godhead cannot agree to the properties of the Manhood nor the properties of the Manhood to the Godhead For as the Godhead cannot thirst no more can the Manhood be in all or many place at once therefore the Godhead was neither turned nor transfused into the Manhood but both the divine nature keepeth entire all his essentiall properties to it selfe so that the humanity is neither omnipotent omniscient omnipresent c. and the humane keepeth also his properties and actions though oft that which is proper to the one nature is spoken of the person denominated from the other which is by reason of the union of both natures into one person The glory of the Godhead being more plentifully communicated with the Manhood after his resurrection did it not then swallow up the truth thereof as a whole sea one drop of oyle No for these two natures continued still distinct in substance properties and actions and still remained one and the same Christ. Why did he not take the nature of Angels upon him Heb. 2. 16. Because he had no meaning to save Angels for that they had committed the sin against the holy Ghost falling maliciously into rebellion against God without temptation Are not the elect Angels any way benefited by the humane nature of Christ No his humanity only reacheth to sinfull mankind for if he had meant to have benefited Angels by taking another nature he would have taken their nature upon him How is it then said Eph. 1. 10. Col. 1. 20. that he reconciled things in heaven That is to be understood of the Saints then in heaven and not any way of the Angels although by the second Person of the Trinity the Angels were elected and are by him confirmed so that they shall stand for evermore Why was it requisite that our Mediatour should be Man was it not sufficient that he was God No it was further requisite that he should be man also because 1. Our Saviour must suffer and die for our sins which the Godhead could not doe 2. Our Saviour also must perform obedience to the law which in his Godhead he could not doe 3. He must be man of kin to our nature offending that he might satisfie the justice of God in the same nature wherein it was offended Rom. 8. 3. 1 Cor. 15. 21. Heb. 2. 14 15 16. For the righteousnesse of God did require that the same nature which had committed the sin should also pay and make amends for sin and consequently that onely nature should be punished which did offend in Adam Man therefore having sinned it was requisite for the appeasing of Gods wrath that man himself should die for sin the Man Christ Jesus offering up himself a sacrifice of a sweet smelling savour unto God for us 1 Tim. 2. 5. Heb. 2. 9 10. 14. 15. Rom. 5. 12. 15. Eph. 5. 2. 4. It is for our comfort that thereby we might have free accesse to the throne of Grace and might find help in our necessities having such an high Priest as was in all things tempted like unto our selves and was acquainted with our infirmities in his own person Heb. 4. 15 16 5. 2. 5. As we must be saved so likewise must we be sanctified by one of our own nature that as in the first Adam there was a spring of humane nature corrupted derived unto us by naturall generation so in the second Adam there might be a fountain of the same nature restored which might be derived unto us by spirituall regeneration What comfort then have you by this that Christ is man Hereby I am assured that Christ is fit to suffer the punishment of my sin and being man himselfe is also meet to be more pitifull and mercifull unto men What by this that he is both God and man By this I am most certainly assured that he is able most fully to finish the work of my salvation seeing that as he is man he is meet to suffer for sin as he is God he is able to bear the punishment of sin and to overcome the suffering being by the one fit and by the other able to discharge the office of a Mediatour Mans nature can suffer death but not overcome it the divine nature cannot suffer but can overcome all things our Mediatour therefore being partaker of both natures is by the one made fit to suffer by the other able to overcome whatsoever was to be laid upon him for the making of our peace Are these his natures separated No verily for though they be still distinguished as hath been said in substance properties and actions yet were they inseparably joyned together in the first moment the holy Virgin conceived and made not two but one person of a Mediatour 2 Cor. 13. 4. 1 Pet. 3. 18. 1 Cor. 15. 27 28. The holy Ghost sanctifying the seed of the woman which otherwise could not be joyned to the Godhead and uniting two natures in one person God and man in one Christ Luc. 1. 35. 42. Rom. 9. 5. 1 Tim. 2. 5. Joh. 1. 14. a mystery that no Angel much lesse man is able to comprehend Why so For that the manhood of our Saviour Christ is personally united unto the Godhead whereas the Angels of much greater glory then men are not able to abide the presence of God Esa. 6. 2. Was this union of the body and soul with the Godhead by taking of the manhood to the Godhead or by infusing the Godhead into the manhood By a divine and miraculous assuming of the humane nature which before had no subsistence in it self to have his beeing and subsistence in the divine leaving of it one naturall personship which otherwise in ordinary men maketh a perfect person for otherwise there should be two Persons and two Sons one of the holy Virgin Mary and another of God which were most prejudiciall to our salvation What then is the personall union of the two natures in Christ The assuming of the humane nature having no subsistency in it selfe into the person of the Son of God Joh. 1. 14. Heb. 2. 16. and in that person uniting it to the Godhead so making one Christ God and man Mat. 1. 23. Can you shadow out this conjunction of two natures in one person by some earthly resemblance We see one tree may be set into another and it groweth in the stock thereof and becommeth one and the same tree though there be two natures or kind of fruit still remaining So in the Son of God made man though there be two natures yet both being united into one person there is but one Son of God and one Christ. What was the cause that the person of the Sonne of God did not joyn it self to a perfect person of man 1. Because that then there
hath first redeemed us from the power of darknesse Col. 1. 13. namely that wofull and cursed estate which we had justly brought upon our selves by reason of our sins Secondly translated us into his own kingdome and glory Col. 1. 12 13. 1 Cor. 2. 9. a far more glorious and excellent estate then ever our first parents had in Paradise How hath Christ wrought this Redemption Having taken our nature upon him he hath in the same as a surety in our stead made full satisfaction to God his Father by paying all our debts and so hath set us free Heb. 7. 22. What is this debt which we owe to God that he hath paid for us This debt is twofold one is that perfect obedience which we owe unto God in regard of that excellent estate in which we were created Deut. 12. 32. The other is the punishment due unto us for our sins in transgressing and breaking Gods Covenants which is the curse of God and everlasting death Deut. 27. 26. Rom. 6. 23. Mat. 5. 17. Gal. 3. 13. 4. 4 5. 2 Cor. 5. 21. All which is contained in the law of God which is the hand-writing between God and us concerning the old Covenant Col. 2. 15. How was our Saviour to make satisfaction for this our debt 1. By performing that perfect obedience which we did owe. 2. By suffering that punishment due unto us for our sins that so he might put out the hand-writing between God and us and set us free What then be the parts of Christs obedience and satisfaction His sufferings and his righteousnesse Phil. 2. 5 6 7 8. 1 Pet. 2. 24. for it was requisite that he should first pay all our debt and satisfie Gods justice Esa. 53. 5 6. Job 33. 24. by a price of infinite value 1 Tim. 2. 6. 2ly Purchase and merit for us Gods favour Eph 1. 6. and kingdome by a most absolute and perfect obedience Rom. 5. 19. By his suffering he was to merit unto us the forgivenesse of our sins and by his fulfilling the law he was to merit unto us righteousnesse both which are necessarily required for our Justification But how can one save so many Because the Manhood being joyned to the Godhead it maketh the passion and righteousnesse of Christ of infinite merit and so we are justified by a Man that is God How hath Christ made satisfaction for our sins by his suffering He endured most grievous torments both of body and soul offering up himself unto God his Father as a Sacrifice propitiatory for all our sinnes 2 Cor. 5. 21. In this oblation who was the Priest or Sacrificer None but Christ Heb. 5. 5 6. and that as he was both God and man VVho was the sacrifice Christ himself as he was man consisting of body and soul. VVhat was the Altar upon which he was offered Christ as he was God was the Altar on which he sacrificed himself Heb. 9. 14. 13. 10. Rev. 8. 3. How often was he offered Never but once Heb. 9. 28. VVhereunto was he offered Unto the shame pain torment and all miseries which are due unto us for our sins he suffering whatsoever we should have suffered and by those grievous sufferings making payment for our sins Esa. ch 53. Mat. 26. 28. VVhat profit commeth by this sacrifice By his most painfull sufferings he hath satisfied for the sins of the whole world of his elect Esa. 53. 5. 1 Pet. 2. 24. 1 John 2. 2. and appeased the wrath of his Father so that hereby we receive at onement and reconciliation with God our sins are taken away and we are freed from all those punishments of body and soul which our sins have deserved Heb. 9. 26. How commeth it then that Christ having borne the punishment of our sins the godly are yet in this world so often afflicted for them with grievous torments both of body and soul and that for the most part more then the ungodly The sufferings of the godly are not by desert any satisfaction for their sins in any part but being sanctified in the most holy sufferings of Christ they are medicines against sin neither is their affliction properly a punishment but a fatherly correction and chastisement in the world that they should not perish with the world whereas the wicked the longer they are spared and the lesse they are punished in this life their danger is the greater for God reserveth their punishment for the life to come What gather you of this That we should not grudge at the prosperity of the wicked when we are in trouble for as the sheep and kine are put in full pastures to be prepared to the Shambles so they the more they receive in this life the neerer and the heavier is their destruction in the life which is to come Jer. 12. 3. What are the more generall things which he suffered in this life Infirmities in his flesh indignities from the world and temptations from the Devill Mat. 4. 2. Joh. 4. 6 7. 8. 48. 52. Luc. 4. 2. Hitherto belong those manifold calamities which he did undergoe poverty hunger thirst wearinesse reproach c. What benefits doe the godly reap hereby All the calamities and crosses that befall them in this life are sanctified and sweetned to them so that now they are not punishments of sin but chastisements of a mercifull Father What are the more speciall things which he suffered at or upon his death The weight of Gods wrath the terrours of death sorrows of his soul and torments of his body Esa. 53. 4. 10. Mat. 26. 37 38. Luc. 22. 44. Mat. 26. 67. What learn you hence To admire and imitate the love of Christ who being the Son of God became a man of sorrows even for the good of his utter enemies Eph. 5. 2. 1 Joh. 3. 16. Rom. 5. 7 8. What did our Saviour Christ suffer in soul He drank the full cup of Gods wrath filled unto him for our sakes the whole wrath of God due to the sin of man being poured forth upon him Mat. 26. 27 28. Luc. 22. 44. Rev. 19. 15. Joh. 12. 2. Esa 53. 5. and therefore in soul he did abide most unspeakable vexations horrible griefs painfull troubles fear of mind feeling as it were the very pangs of hell into which both before and most of all when he hanged upon the Crosse he was cast which caused him before his bodily passion so grievously to complain What benefit and comfort receive you by this Hereby we have our souls everlastingly freed from Gods eternall wrath and herein are comforted because in all our grievous temptations and assaults we may stay and make sure our selves by this that Christ hath delivered us from the sorrowfull griefs and pains of hell Now for our Saviours bodily sufferings why is it said that he suffered under Pontius Pilate 1 Tim. 6. 13. For the truth of the story and fulfilling of his own prophecy foretelling his suffering under a forain
jurisdiction and authority Mat. 20. 19. Joh. 18. 31 32. as likewise to teach us that he appeared willingly and of his own accord before a mortall Judge of whom he was pronounced innocent and yet by the same he was condemned What comfort have you hereof That my Saviour thus suffering not any whit for his own sins but wholly for mine and for other mens sins before an earthly Judge I shall be discharged before the heavenly Judgement seat What did he chiefly suffer under Pontius Pilate He was apprehended accused arraigned mocked scourged condemned and crucified Mat. 26. 27. and 28. chapters What learn you here That he that knew no sin was made sin for us that we might be made the righteousnesse of God in him 2 Cor. 5. 21. 1 Pet. 2. 24. Did Christ suffer these things willingly as he suffered them innocently Yes he laid down his life meekly as the sheep doth his fleece before the shearer being obedient even unto the death Luc. 23. 41. 1 Pet. 2. 22. Esa. 53. 7. Phil. 2. 8. Heb. 5. 8. Vnto what death was he so obedient Even unto the most reproachfull painfull and dreadfull death the death of the Crosse Mat. 27. 30. 38. Phil. 2. 8. Why was Christ put unto this death of the Crosse Because it was not a common death but such a death as was accursed both of God and man that so he being made a curse for us he might redeem us from a curse due unto us Deut. 21. 23. Gal. 3. 13. What comfort have you by this I am comforted in this because I am delivered from the curse which I have deserved by the breach of the law and shall obtain the blessing due unto him for keeping of the same Why was it requisite that our Saviours soul should be separated from his body Because we were all dead that so he might be the death of death for us 2 Cor. 5. 14 15. Heb. 2. 14. 1 Cor. 15. 54 55. for by sin death came into the world and therefore the Justice of God could not have been satisfied for our sins unlesse death had been joyned with his sufferings How could the death and sufferings of Christ which were but for a short time be a full satisfaction for us which have deserved eternall death Although they were not everlasting yet in regard of the worthinesse of the person who suffered them they were equivalent to everlasting torments forasmuch as not a bare man nor an Angel did suffer them but the eternall Son of God though not in his Godhead but in our nature which he assumed his person Majesty Deity Goodnesse Justice Righteousnesse being every way infinite and eternall made that which he suffered of no lesse force and value then eternall torments upon others yea even upon all the world besides For even as the death of a Prince being but a man and a sinfull man is of more reckoning then the death of an Army of other men because he is the Prince much more shall the death and sufferings of the Son of God the Prince of all Princes not finite but every way infinite and without sin much more I say shall that be of more reckoning with his Father then the sufferings of all the world and the time of his sufferings of more value for the worthinesse of his person then if all the men in the world had suffered for ever and ever What use are we to make of Christs death and passion 1. The consideration hereof may bring us to a sound perswasion and feeling of our sins because they have deserved so grievous a punishment as either the death of the Son of God or hell fire 2. Hereby we reap unspeakable comfort forasmuch as by his stripes we are healed by his bloud washed by his sacrifice God is satisfied and by his death we are saved and redeemed 1 Pet. 2. 24. Rev. 1. 5. Heb. 10. 10. 12. Rom. 5. 8 9 10. 3. We learn from hence to die to our sins and to live henceforth unto him that hath dyed for us Rom. 6. 2. 6. 2 Cor. 5. 15. What befell our Saviour after his soule was separated from his body He was buried Act. 13. 29 30. and went to Hades or as we commonly speak descended into hell Act. 2. 31. Why was it needfull that Christ should be buried 1. To assure us more fully that he was truly dead Mat. 27. 59 60. 94 65 66. Act. 2. 29. 2. That even in the grave the very fortresse of death he might loose the sorrows and bands of death Act. 2. 14. 1 Cor. 15. 55. What is meant by his descending into Hell Not that he went to the place of the damned but that he went absolutely unto the estate of the dead Rom. 10. 7. Eph. 4. 9. What doe you call the estate of the dead That departing this life he went in his soul into heaven Luc. 23. 43. and was in his body under the very power and dominion of death for a season Acts 2. 24. Heb. 2. 14. Rom. 6. 9. What comfort have you by Christs death buriall and lying under the power of death 1. I am comforted because my sinnes are fully discharged in his death and so buried that they shall never come into remembrance 2. My comfort is the more because by the vertue of his death and buriall sin shall be killed in me and buried so that henceforth it shall have no power to reign over me 3. I need not to fear death seeing that sin which is the sting of death is taken away by the death of Christ and that now death is made unto me an entrance into his life Hitherto of his sufferings what is the other part of his satisfaction His perfect righteousnesse whereby he did that which we were not able to doe and absolutely fulfilled the whole law of God for us Ps. 40. 7 8. Rom. 3. 19. 5. 19. Why was it necessary that Christ should as well fulfill the Law as suffer for us Because as by his sufferings he took away our unrighteousnesse and freed us from the punishment due to us for our sins so by performing for us absolute obedience to the whole law of God he hath merited our righteousnesse making us just and holy in the sight of God and purchased eternall happinesse for us in the life to come 2 Cor. 5. 21. Gal. 4. 4 5. 1 Cor. 1. 30. Rom. 8. 3 4. For as we are made unrighteous by Adams sinne so are we made fully and wholly righteous being justified by a man that is God How manifold is the righteousnesse of our Saviour Two-fold Originall Actuall VVhat is his originall righteousnesse The perfect integrity and purenesse of his humane nature which in himselfe was without all guile and the least staine of corruption Heb. 7. 26. Being very man how could he be without sin The course of naturall corruption was prevented because he was not begotten after the ordinary course by man but was conceived in the
to bee plainer even our dearest friend as we doe our selves which cannot bee found Deut. 28. 53 56. c. and therefore the righteousnesse of the Papists is a rotten righteousnesse and such as will never stand with the righteousnesse of God What profit ariseth of the second use That by it as by a glasse wee may the easier see and being shortly contrived we may the better remember our whole duty both to God and man it being as a Card or Mappe of a Countrey easier carried about with us Seeing then that the whole summe and maine end of the Law is Love what gather you thereof That which the Apostle exhorteth unto viz. To leave all idle questions as unprofitable and to deale in those matters onely which further the practise of love 1 Tim. 1. 4 5. Why is the love of God called the first and greatest Commandement Matth. 22. 38. Because we should chiefely and in the first place regard our duties to God and be most carefull to understand his will and to worship him 1 John 4. 20. In which respect the first Table is put before the second as being the principall How may it appeare that our duties to God are to be preferred before the other towards our Neighbour First by the inequality of the persons offended because it is worse to offend God than man Acts 4. 19. Secondly by the punishment assigned in the Scriptures For the breaches of the first Table are to be more severely punished than the breaches of the second As he that revileth the Magistrate shall beare his sinne but hee that blasphemeth God shall bee stoned to death 1 Sam. 2. 25. Num. 24. 11. 14. What gather you of this The crafty practices of Papists who would make men beleeve that the chiefest godlinesse and most meritorious good workes of all required in the Law of God are the workes of the second Table as Charity Almes-deeds c. thereby deceiving the people to enrich themselves Are all the duties of the first Table greater than all the duties of the second No unlesse the comparison be equally made for the morall duties of the second Table being perpetuall are greater than the Ceremoniall duties of the first being temporall whereunto agreeth That God will rather have mercy than sacrifice Hos. 6. 6. Matth. 9. 13. When doe you count the comparison equall When they are compared in like degrees as the chiefe Commandement of the first Table with the chiefe of the second the middle duties of the one with the middle duties of the other and the last and least of the former with the last and least of the latter Thus if we compare the greatest with the greatest and the meanest with the meanest the duties and breaches of the first Table are greater than the duties and breaches of the second But though the principall service of the one be greater than the principall service of the other if the comparison be not made in the same degrees as if for example the murther of a man be compared with the least abuse of the name of God or Adultery with the least breach of the Sabbath these of the second Table are greater Why is the second Table said to be like unto the first Matth. 22. 39. For that they goe so hand in hand together that no man can performe the one unlesse the other as St. John teacheth So Ephes. 1. 2. chap. fourth and fift For whosoever keepeth the first Table well cannot but keep the second and whosoever keepeth the second must needs keep the first What is to be said of those that seeme to keep the one and care not for the other If they will seeme to serve God and are not in Charity they are meere hypocrites and if they will seeme to deale uprightly with their neighbour and have not the love of God in them they are prophane Hypocrites and very Atheists Wherein else doe the Tables agree First in that they are both perpetuall Secondly in that they are both perfect Wherein doe the Commandements of the first Table agree In this principally that they concerne the worship of God and containe our whole duties towards him How are they divided They either respect the root of this worship as the first or the branches thereof as the three following For the fountaine worship of God is prescribed in the first Commandement the meanes of this service in the other three Why did God enjoyne his worship in foure Commandements That we might the better know and retaine them in mind or otherwise might be left the more without excuse What is common to these foure Commandements of the first Table That every one hath his severall reason annexed yet with this difference that the first hath his reason going before the Commandement and the other three have it following Have not the Commandements of the second Table their reasons also Yes verily in the Scriptures but for brevity they are omitted in the Decalogue Why are the reasons of the Commandements of the first Table rather set down then of the second First that we might know that there is no lesse light left in us of the worship of God then of the duties wee owe to our neighbours Secondly to teach us that as all obedience should bee grounded upon Reason and Knowledge so especially that which concerneth Gods worship What gather you of this That those are greatly deceived who thinke it sufficient if they have the Commandements by heart or can say them by roat Why is the reason of the first Commandement set before which in all the other commeth after Because it serveth not onely for a reason of this Commandement but also for a Preface to all the ten for it hath a reference to them all and is a reason to urge the observance to every one of them In what words is it expressed In these words of God Exod. 20. 2. I am the Lord thy God which brought thee out of the Land of Egypt and out of the house of Bondage How prove you this to be a Reason and not a Commandement as some doe thinke First because it is commonly used for a reason of other Commandements Exod. 20. 5. 7. Lev. 19. 36. 37. Secondly because it hath not the forme of a Commandement Thirdly sith the other three Commandements have their reasons added it is unlikely that the first and chiefest should have none How is this Preface set as a reason to enforce the observation both of the first Commandement and of all the rest Thus If I bee the Lord the God which brought thee out of the land of Egypt thou must take me for the Lord thy God alone and keep all my Commandements But I am the Lord thy God which brought thee out of the land of Egypt therefore thou must take mee for thy God alone and keep all my Commandements What ground of obedience is there laid in this Reason That this Law is to be obeyed because it proceedeth from him
the confirmation thereof or a reason of the perswasion that they are forgiven What is the summe of this Petition That we may be justified and be at peace with God that God giving us a true knowledge and feeling of our sins would forgive us freely for his Sons sake and make us daily assured of the forgivenesse of our sins as we are privy to our selves of the forgivenesse of those trespasses which men have offended us by Job 33. 24. Psal. 35. 3. Jer. 14. 7. Col. 3. 13. What is meant here by debts The comparison is drawne from debters which are not able to pay their creditors to whom all we are compared for that we have all sinned Therefore by debts we must understand sins as Saint Luke expoundeth the metaphor and that not in themselves as breaches of the Law of God for who would say that we owe and are to pay sin unto God but with respect to the punishment and satisfaction due to Gods justice for the offence of sin For our debt being properly obedience whereto we are bound under penalty of all the curses of the Law especially eternall death Rom. 8 12. 13. 18. Gal. 5. 3. we all in Adam forfeited that bond wherby the penalty became our debt and is daily increased in us all by sinning Luke 13. 4. Mat. 18. 24 c. Rom. 6. 23. What learne you from hence Here hence two things are implyed One a franke and humble confession that we have sinned both originally and actually Another that there is no power in us to make satisfaction for our sins What use is there of Confession Great for that we have naturally a senselesnesse of sin or else being convinced thereof we are ready to lessen it and make it light the contrary whereof appeareth in the children of God 1 John 1. 8 9. Psal. 32. 3 4. Prov. 28 13. Job 31. 33. 1 Sam. 15. 19 20. Psal. 51. 3 4 5 6. Acts 22. 3 4 5. 1 Tim. 1. 13 15. How can a man confesse his sins being not knowne and without number Those that are knowne we must expresly confesse and the other that are unknowne and cannot be reckoned generally Psal. 19. 12. How appeareth it that we are not able to pay this debt Because by the Law as an obligation every one being bound to keep it wholly and continually Deut. 27. 26. Gal. 3. 10. so that the breach thereof even once and in the least point maketh us debtors presently as having forfeited our obligation there is no man that can either avoid the breach of it or when he hath broken it make amends unto God for it considering that whatsoever he doth after the breach is both imperfectly done and if it were perfect yet it is due by the obligation of the Law and therefore cannot goe for paiment no more then a man can pay one debt with another What doth it draw with it that causeth it to be so impossible to be satisfied The reward of it which is everlasting death both of body and soule Rom. 6. 23. the greatnesse and also number whereof is declared by the parable of ten thousand talents which no man is able to pay being not able to satisfie so much as one farthing But are we not able to satisfie some part of it as a man in great debt is sometime able to make some satisfaction especially if hee have day given him No and therefore we are compared to a child new borne red with bloud and not able to wash himselfe nor to help himself Ezek. 16. 4 5. And to captives close shut up in prison and fetters kept by a strong one Luke 4. 18. Matth. 12. 29. so that there is as small likelihood of our deliverance out of the power of Satan as that a poore Lamb should deliver it selfe from the gripes and pawes of a Lion What is the meanes to free us from this debt By this petition Christ teacheth us that being pressed with the burden of our sin we should flee unto the mercy of God and to entreat him for the forgivenesse of our debt Matth. 11. 28. Esa. 55. 1. even the cancelling of our obligation that in Law it be not available against us In which respect the preaching of the Gospel is compared to the yeare of Iubile when no man might demand his debt of his Brother Luke 4. 19. How shall we obtaine this at Gods hands By the onely blood and suffering of Christ as the onely ransome for sin contrary to the Papists who confessing that originall sinne is taken away by Christ in Baptisme doe teach that we must make part of our satisfaction for our actuall sin and therefore some of them whip themselves as if their bloud might satisfie for sinne which is abominable to think What doe you then understand here by forgivenesse Such remission as may agree with Gods justice which will not endure him to be a loser wherefore it is forgivenesse of us by taking paiment of another Job 33. 24. even of our surety Iesus Christ in our behalfe 1 John 2. 2. What meane you by saying Vs and Ours We include with our selves in this petition as many as are in Christ enabled by a true faith to lay hold on him and to plead his paiment and satisfaction Psal. 130. 7 8. 51. 18. Doe we here pray for the sinnes of this day as before for the bread of this day Not onely for them but also for all that ever we have done at all times before to the end that we might be the further confirmed in the assurance of the remission of all our sins What is further to be considered in this Petition That as in the former by Bread more was understood so here under one part of our Iustification to wit the remission or not imputation of sins unto death by meanes of the satisfaction of Christs sufferings we doe also conceive the other part which is the imputation of his holinesse unto life eternall as implyed under the former and inseparably annexed thereto For as Christ hath taken away our sins by suffering so he hath also cloathed us with his righteousnesse by fulfilling of the Law for us Dan. 9. 24. 2 Cor. 5. 21. What doe we then aske of God in this Petition Six things viz. 1. Grace feelingly to know and frankly and tremblingly to confesse without excuse or extenuation the great debt of our sins Psal. 51. 3. and our utter inability to satisfie for the same or for the least part thereof Psal. 103. 3. 142. 2. 2. That God would bestow upon us Christ Iesus and for his sake remove out of his sight all our sins and the guilt and punishment due unto us for the same 3. The power of saving faith Luke 17. 5. to lay hold on the meritorious sufferings and obedience of our Lord Iesus Christ unto our full Iustification Esa. 53. 5. 4. The Spirit of prayer that with griefe and sorrow for our sins wee may crave pardon for our
to our weaknesse 3. What miserable men they are that refuse the Sacraments Repeat the principall ends for which God hath instituted the Sacraments To help our insight as cleare glasses to releeve our memories as lasting monuments and to confirme our faith as most certain seales and pledges from whence they become our bonds of obedience and the markes and badges of our profession so the ends for which they are appointed are these foure 1. The clearing of our knowledge 2. The helping of our memories 3. The strengthening of our faith 4. The quickning of our obedience How may we more clearly consider of those things which are ministred in the Sacraments By considering distinctly the things given and received and the persons giving and receiving What are the things given and received They are partly outward and partly inward What are the outward The visible creatures ordained for signes and figures of Christ as under the time of the Gospel Water Bread and Wine Why hath God made choice of these creatures Both in respect they are for their naturall properties most fit to represent the spirituall things as also for that they are most generally used of all Nations of the world What are we to learne from hence The wonderfull wisdome of God that hath chosen base and common things for so high and singular mysteries whereas he might have chosen things more rare and of greater price to set out such excellent benefits as are offered to us in the Sacraments wherein there is great difference between the time of the Law and of the Gospel What are the inward things The invisible and spirituall graces namely Christ with all his benefits What learne you of this Not to stick to the outward elements but to lift up our hearts unto God accounting the elements as a Ladder whereby to climb up to those celestiall things which they represent So much of the things what are the persons The Giver and Receiver How many Givers are there Two the outward giving the outward and the inward giving the inward things Who is the inward giver God himself even the holy Trinity God the Father God the Son and God the holy Ghost What are the actions of God in a Sacrament They are principally two 1. To offer and reach forth Christ and his graces 2. To apply them to the hearts of the faithfull Communicant Who are the outward Givers The Ministers especially representing unto us the Lord whose Stewards they are 1 Cor. 4. 1. What is the Ministers office herein To consecrate the elements and then to distribute them Wherein consisteth the consecration of the elements Partly in declaring the institution of the Sacraments and partly in going before the Congregation in prayer unto God First in praising God who hath ordained such means for the reliefe of our weaknesse Then in suing to God that he would be pleased to make those meanes effectuall for which end they were ordained Is not the substance changed of the elements by this consecration No verily onely the use is altered in that they are separated from a common to a holy use which change and alteration continueth onely while the action is in hand Doth the Minister with the signe give the thing signified also No he onely dispenseth the signes but it is God that giveth and dispenseth the things signified Matth. 3. 11. Is God alwayes present to give the thing signified to all them that the Minister giveth the signe No not to all for some in receiving the signes receive together with them their owne judgement 1 Cor. 11 29. yet he is alwayes ready to give the thing signified to all those that are fit to receive the Sacraments and to such persons the signes and things signified are alwayes conjoyned Who are the persons that are to receive the Sacraments All Christians that are prepared thereunto Is there any speciall preparation required to the receiving of the Sacraments Yes verily for seeing men ought to come with preparation to the hearing of the Word alone they ought much more to come when the Sacraments are administred also wherein God doth offer himselfe more familiarly and visibly to us What is the preparation that is required in them that come to receive the Sacraments There is required in those that are of yeares of discretion to a worthy participation of the Sacraments knowledge faith and feeling both in the Law and in the Gospel Seeing no man is able to attaine to the knowledge of the Law and the Gospel perfectly much lesse the simple and common people tell me how farre is this knowledge faith and feeling necessary First concerning the Law it is necessary that the receiver of the Sacraments be able to understand and beleeve the common corruption of all men both in the bitter root of originall sinne and in the poysoned fruits thereof together with the curse of everlasting death due thereunto and that he be able to apply both these that is the sinne and wages thereof to himselfe Secondly concerning the Gospel that he be able in some measure to understand the Covenant of Grace which God in Christ hath made with the sons of men and then that by faith he be able in some measure to apply the same to himself VVhat ariseth from this knowledge faith and feeling to a further preparation thereunto A true and earnest desire to be made partaker of the Sacraments with a conscionable care to performe speciall duties in and after the action of receiving VVhat duties in the action of receiving are to be performed First a grave and reverent behaviour befitting such holy Mysteries Secondly an attentive heedfulnesse in comparing the outward signes and actions in the Sacraments with the inward and spirituall things which they betoken VVhat duties are to bee performed after the partaking of the Sacraments If we have a sense and feeling of the gracious work of God by them we are to rejoice with thanksgiving if not we are to enter into judgment with our selves and to humble our selves for our want thereof And though we ought to be humbled if we feel not the work of God in us in or after the Sacraments as that which argueth want of preparation before or attention in receiving of them yet ought we not therefore to be altogether dismayed for as the sick man feeleth not the nourishment of his meat because of his malady and yet notwithstanding is nourished so it is in such faithfull ones as doe not so sensibly feel the working of God in and by the Sacraments through the weaknesse of their faith and although wee cannot feele it immediately yet after by the fruites thereof wee shall bee able to discern of our profiting thereby Hath the administration of the Gospel been alwaies after the same manner For substance it alwayes hath been the same but in regard of the manner proper to certain times it is distinguished into two kindes the Old and the New Heb. 11.
thing is gone for he hath neither the chiefe City nor the Tribune nor the Commandement of the people and therefore he can be no let to the Antichrists comming especially the Pope having gotten such an upper hand over him as to cause him to waite at his gate barefoot and to hold his stirrop What shall be the end of this Antichrist God shall confound him with the breath of his mouth that is with the preaching of his Word which serveth for another argument to prove the Pope to be Antichrist for whereas he had subdued Kingdomes and Empires under his feet he hath been of late mightily suppressed by the Word preached and not by outward force as other Potentates use to be What learne you of this The marvellous power of Gods Word to suppresse whatsoever riseth against it for if the mightiest cannot stand before it much lesse the smallest and therefore it is expressed by a mighty winde Acts 2. 23. which carrieth all before it and by fire which consumeth all and pierceth all And it declareth a marvellous easie victory against the enemies when it is said that with the breath of his mouth hee shall consume his enemies 2 Cor. 10. 4 5. What else shall be the overthrow of Antichrist The glorious appearance of the Son of God in the latter day What gather you of this That before the last day he shall not be utterly consumed whereof notwithstanding it followeth not that the head shall remaine till then for the Beast and the false Prophet shall be taken and cast into the fire before the latter day but some shall retaine a liking of him and his errors and superstitions even till the last day Hitherto of the head of this generall Apostasie what are the members of it They are first described by their end even a number of people that shall perish which accordeth with that name and property of the head the Destroyer or Son of perdition being truely verified in them in regard of the fearefull end he shall bring them to What is the use of this That as no poyson can take away the life of an elect so small occasions carry away such as are appointed to destruction How otherwise are these members of Antichrist described By this that they never loved the truth although they understood and professed it How should a man love the truth For the truthes sake not for vaine glory filthy delight or commodidities How appeareth it that men love the Word of God When they walke accordingly and keep faith in a good Conscience which some losing by their wicked life lost also their Faith that is their Religion 1 Tim. 1. 19. How is it to be understood that God giveth men up to strong delusions Because God is a just Iudge which by them either punisheth or correcteth former sinnes and especially the contempt of the Gospell in which regard even amongst us now some are cast into the sinke of Popery some into the Family of love some become Arians some Anabaptists at which are as it were divers Gaoles and Dungeons whereinto hee throweth those that are cold and carelesse Professors of the Gospell What learne you by this That they that imagine God favourable unto them notwithstanding their sinnes because their life or goods or honours are spared are foully deceived for when the Lord ceaseth to reprove any or to strive with them Rom. 1. 24 26. then doth he give them up into vanity of their own minds to do their wicked wills which is the greatest judgement and very usuall with God to doe What is our duty in such cases To pray unto the Lord to keep us from all errors but if for our triall and further hardning of others it please him to send errors amongst us that it would please him to preserve us in that danger that we taste not of that bait whereby Satan seeketh to catch us What other cause is there of sending these errors That those may be damned which believe not the truth for as God hath appointed them to damnation so betwixt his counsell in rejecting them and the finall effect of it there must be sin to bring the effect justly upon them What reason is annexed for their just damnation Because they rest in unrighteousnesse having their eares itching after errors which they drink in as the earth drinketh up water So that albeit they be powerfully sent of God in his judgement yet are they also greedily desired and affected of them Having spoken at large of the providence of God disposing of man in this world it followeth to speak of his providence concerning mankinde in the world to come How doth God then deale with men after this life He bringeth them all to judgement What is meant here by judgment The pronouncing or executing of the irrevocable sentence of absolution or condemnation How is that done Partly on every man in particular at the hour of his death Heb. 9. 27. but fully and generally upon all men at the second comming of Christ Acts 17. 31. The death of every one severally goeth immediately before the particular judgement the generall resurrection of all goeth before the finall judgement which shall be at the last day Must all men then die Yea all both good and bad Psal. 49. 10. Eccl. 2. 16. save that unto some namely such as shall be found alive at Christs comming a change shall be in stead of death as shall be shewed Death being the punishment of sinne how commeth it to passe that the righteous dye to whom all sinnes are forgiven Death indeed came on all mankinde by reason of sinne Rom. 5. 12. but yet it is not in all things the same to the godly and to the wicked for howsoever unto both it be the enemy of nature as the end of naturall life 1 Cor. 15. 26. Psal. 90. 3. Yet 1. unto the godly it is a token of Gods love unto the wicked of his anger Psal. 37. 37 38. Job 18. 13 14. 2. Vnto the godly it is a rest from labour and misery Apoc. 14. 13. the last enemy being now destroyed 1 Cor. 15. 26. unto the wicked it is the height of all worldly evils Luke 12. 20. 3. Vnto the godly it is the utter abolishing of sin and perfection of mortification Rom. 6. 7. unto the wicked it is the conquest of sinne and accomplishment of their spirituall captivity 4. Vnto the godly it is so far from being a separation from Christ that even the body severed from the soule and rotting in the grave is yet united to Christ and the soule freed from the body is with him in Paradise Luk. 23. 43. Phil. 2. 16. unto the wicked it is an utter cutting off from the favourable presence and fruition of God 5. Vnto the godly it is the beginning of heavenly glory unto the wicked it is the entrance into hellish and endlesse torments Luke 16. 22 23. How are men judged at the houre of death 1. God at that
and whereas a man willeth a member of his body to be cut off we may rather call it a permission then a willing and yet a vvilling permission You have shewed how many ways sin is to be considered how many things are to be considered in every sin and how we are said to will a thing Now let me hear what you say to the matter in question that is whether God doth will sin or no Before I answer directly to your question I think it is not amisse to shew what every one must carefully take heed of in answering to this question for in answering there is danger Let me hear what dangers must be avoided in answering There are two and every one must avoid them and sail between them as between two dangerous rocks The first is this we must take heed lest we make God the author of sin by affirming that he willeth sin as the Libertines do as Adam did Gen. 3. 12. for that were the next vvay not only to put off our sins from our selves and lay them upon God but also to cast off all conscience of sin and all fear of God then the which nothing can be more blasphemous against God and pernicious to our selves What is the second thing to be avoided The other is this we must take heed that we affirm not any evill to be in the world which God knoweth not of or whether God vvill or no for that vvere to deny Gods omnipotency and al-knowledge These are two dangerous rocks and heresies indeed but now I expect a direct answer to the question That cannot be at once but by going from point to point according to our former distinction of sin and vvilling Very well then declare first of all what things God doth properly will which of themselves are to be willed God doth first and chiefly vvill himself that is his own glory and Majesty as the end for vvhich all things are and this he is said to vvill properly that is he loveth it advanceth it and delighteth in it and to this purpose serve all those Scriptures vvhich command us to sanctifie his name and to adore his glory as in Esa. 48. 11. Pro. 16. 4. Rom. 11. 36. Besides himselfe he doth properly vvill all other things vvhich he made and vvhich he doth himself insomuch as he doth approve them and love them as appeareth by these places following God saw all that he made and it was good and therefore gave a Commandement that one should preserve another by multiplying and encreasing Again it is said whatsoever the Lord will that he doth therefore whatsoever he doth that he wils and although he hateth evill yet he doth properly will and love that good which commeth of evill that is his own glory and the salvation of his people Whether doth God will punishments or no Yea his will is the first and efficient cause of all punishment which is proved by this reason and argument every good thing is of God every punishment being a work of justice is a good thing therefore every punishment is of God and he doth will it What say you to the words in Ezekiel 18. 23. 32. I will not the death of a sinner That place is to be understood onely of the elect for properly indeed God doth not will their death and therefore to keep them from death meaning eternall death he giveth them repentance Whether doth God will sin as it is a punishment of sin that went before Yes he doth and it usuall with God to punish one sin with another as for example the hardning of Pharaohs heart was a sin in Pharaoh and God brought it upon him not as a sin but as a punishment of his former sins You say that in every sin is an action or deed which is either inward or outward whether doth God will that or no So far forth as it is an action only God doth will it but not the corruption deformity of the action for in him we live move and have our beeing Acts 17. 28. But whether doth God will sin properly as it is a transgression of the law and a corruption in the action or no No he doth not neither can be for it is against his nature and to this effect serve these places of Scripture following Psal. 5. 5. Heb. 1. 15. 1 Joh. 1. 4. and reason doth confirm it many vvayes for looke vvhat God doth vvill properly he loveth and alloweth it but God hateth and damneth sin as the Scriptures vvitnesse and therefore he doth not vvill it properly Zach. 8. 17. Again he hath sent his Son to take away the sins of the vvorld and to destroy the vvorks of the Devill therefore he doth not vvill them Lastly if God should properly vvill sin then he must be the author of sin but he is not the author of sin for the Scriptures doe never attribute sin unto God but unto the devil unto men Ro. 9. 14. 1 Ioh. 2. 16. But although God doth not properly will sin yet he doth willingly permit sin doth he not Yes but for the better understanding how God doth permit sin vve must consider hovv many vvays or in hovv many senses one is said to permit a thing and that is three vvays To permit is sometime of two good things to grant that vvhich is lesse good although it vvere against our vvill as for example a man vvould bring up his son in learning rather then in vvarfare or in any other occupation but because his son hath more mind to an occupation then to learning and doth crave of his father to go to some occupation or to be a Soldier rather then a Doctor his father doth grant him his desire but he had rather have him to be a Scholar And this is a kind of permission and suffering but this permission ought rather to be called a will indeed for that which is lesse good yet because it is good he doth will it and approve it and it is a true object of his will and it may be called a permission in respect of that will which had rather have had the greater good And is thus God said to permit sin in this sense No by no means for sin as it is sin hath no shew of good in it which may be compared with a greater good Which is your second way of permitting Sometimes to permit is to grant one evill to goe unpunished that many more grievous evils thereby may be prevented as many times Princes Magistrates are wont to doe and so some do think that God hath granted some sin to be done without danger or threatning of punishment lest more and more hainous mischiefs should ensue And are not you of that mind No God forbid I should for the Apostles rule is both generall and true we must not doe evill that good may come thereof lest we be damned justly therefore no man may by the law of God admit any sin to avoid another
that concerne himselfe 1. Friends and Neighbours should see that his body be honestly buried and Funerals decently performed Gen. 23. 4 19. 25. 9. 1 Sam. 25. 1. Psal. 79. 3. Rom. 11. 9. 2. Moderate mourning is to be used for him Eccles. 12. 7. 1 Thes. 4. 13. 3. We are to report well of him as he hath deserved 4. We are to judge the best of him What is that which concerneth those that belong to him To provide for his wife children and posterity that he may live in them Ruth 2. 20. 2 Sam. 9. 7. So much of the respect which we owe unto our Neighbours Is it not required also that we should shew mercifulnesse unto our beasts Yes A righteous man is to regard the life of his beast Prov. 12. 10. and all hard usage of the creatures of God is forbidden Deut. 22. 6 7. and 25. 4. yet not so much in regard of them 1 Cor. 9. 9 10. as that thereby the Lord would traine us forward to shew mercy to our Neighbour For it being unlawfull to use the dumbe creatures cruelly it is much more unlawfull to use men so What are the breakers of this Commandement to expect The Apostle Iames teacheth that when he saith Iudgement without mercy shall be upon those that are mercilesse Iames 2. 13. Of how many sorts are those judgements They either concerne this life or that which is to come What be those that concerne this life 1. Severe punishments by the Law are to be inflicted upon the body as limbe for limbe eye for eye hand for hand tooth for tooth wound for wound bloud for bloud life for life Exod. 21. 23. Iudg. 1. 5 6 7. although it were a beast if it were knowne to be a striker Exodus 21. 28. 2. Short life Psal. 55. 23. bloud-thirsty men that live not out halfe their dayes 3. Magistrates that should punish murtherers if they spare them their lives are in danger to goe for the offender as Achabs did for Benhadads 1 Kings 20. 42. David was exceedingly punished for sparing bloud-thirsty men such as was his son Absalom and not punishing them 2 Sam. 13. 28 29. 14. 33. 16. 11. 4. God threatneth that hee will not onely revenge the bloud of the slaine upon the murtherer himselfe but also upon his issue and posterity in unrecoverable diseases 2 Sam. 3. 29. What is the punishment that concerneth the life to come 1. That their prayers are not heard Esay 1. 15. 1 Tim. 2. 8. 2. Everlasting death both of body and soule in the bottomlesse pit of Hell and as the degrees of sinne are so shall the punishment be What meanes are we to use for furthering us to the obedience of this Commandement It behoveth us to consider that first all men are made in the Image of God Gen. 9. 6. and of one bloud with us Acts 17. 26. and all Christians in the Image of Christ also in whom we are all one body 1 Cor. 12. 17. 2. God hath appointed the Magistrate also to punish proportionably every offender in this kinde Gen. 9. 6. Lev. 24. 20 21. Yea himselfe also extraordinarily bringing murtherers to light and punishment Gen. 4. 9. Prov. 28. 17. Acts 28. 4. VVhat must we avoyd as hindrances to the obedience of this Commandement 1. The false opinion of the world in placing manhood in revenge aud bloud-shed Gen. 4. 23 24. 2. The company of furious and unmercifull men Proverbs 22. 24 25. 3. Greedy desire of gaine Prov. 1. 19. Mic. 3. 3. 4. Pride Prov. 13. 10. 5. Riot and drunkennesse Prov. 23. 29. Hitherto of the generall duties that belong to the person of man contained in the sixt Commandement what followeth The duties which we owe to man in regard of the things which belong unto him the first whereof concerneth those that bee most deare unto him namely his family and his wife especially who is nearest unto him and as himselfe being one flesh with him In respect whereof temperance and chastity is required in the next Commandement What are the words of the seventh Commandement Thou shalt not commit Adultery Exod. 20. 14. What is comprehended under this name of Adultery All sins of that sort committed either in the body or in the mind of persons whether married or unmarried are signified by this name to signifie the vilenesse of the breach of this Commandement What then is the meaning and scope of this Commandement That all uncleannesse and impurity be avoided and chastity by all meanes preserved 2 Cor. 7. 1. 1 Thes. 4. 3 4 5. What is here forbidden All impurity uncleannes together with all means and provocations to lust What is here required All purity honest behaviour continent and chaste usage towards our selves and towards our Neighbours 1 Thes. 2. 3. 1 Cor. 7. 34. What are the speciall breaches of this Commandement They are either inward or outward What is the inward The unchastity and dishonesty of the mind with all filthy imaginations and inordinate lusts Mat. 5. 28. Col. 3. 5. What are the speciall branches of this inward impurity 1. The desire of strange flesh with resolution to have it if he could Col. 3. 5. 1 Thes. 4. 5. For to lust after a strange woman with consent of heart is forbidden in this Mat. 5. 28. as lust without consent is in the last Commandement Not that the bare affection is of it selfe a sin being rightly directed to a true and good object but the abuse of the affection the right subject manner and measure being not observed 2. Inward boiling and burning in affection whereby godly motions as with a fire are burnt up and a mans mind is so carried away that he is hindered in all other things belonging to his Calling This is an high degree of corruption which if it be not restrained will breake forth into further mischief Jam. 1. 15. And therfore we are earnestly to pray to God against it if we can no otherwise prevaile we must use the remedy of Marriage prescribed by God himselfe For it is better to marry then to burne 1 Cor. 7. 9. 3. Evill thoughts and cogitations in the mind arising from foolish and vaine talke but first and principally from our owne concupiscence when a man suffers as it were his soule to be trampled under foot with impure imaginations Jam. 1. 14 15. 4. Iealousie in the mind betwixt two persons upon no just occasion or good ground which is contrary to that entire love and affection which a man should have towards his wife Numb 5. What is the inward vertue here commended The virginity and constancy of the mind and the chastity and purity of the heart 1 Cor. 7. 34. 1 Thes. 4. 3 4. 5. 23. What is the outward breach of this Commandement Such uncleannes as being once seated in the mind after sheweth it selfe outwardly Wherein doth it shew it selfe Either in things that belong to the body
and night And thus for our main and principall debt of Obedience hath our Mediatour given satisfaction unto the Justice of his Father with good measure pressed down shaken together and running over But beside this we were lyable unto another debt which wee have incurred by our default and drawne upon our selves by way of forfeiture and nomine poenae For as Obedience is a due debt and Gods servants in regard thereof are truly debters so likewise is sinne a debt and sinners debters in regard of the penalty due for the default And as the payment of the debt which commeth nomine poenae dischargeth not the tenant afterwards from paying his yearly rent which of it self would have been due although no default had been committed so the due payment of the yearly rent after the default hath been made is no sufficient satisfaction for the penalty already incurred Therefore our surety who standeth chargeable with all our debts as he maketh payment for the one by his Active so must he make amends for the other by his Passive obedience he must first suffer and then enter into his glory For it became him for whom are all things and by whom are all things in bringing many sons unto glory to make the Captain of their salvation perfect that is a perfect accomplisher of the worke which he had undertaken through sufferings The Godhead is of that infinite perfection that it cannot possibly be subject to any passion He therefore that had no other nature but the Godhead could not pay such a debt as this the discharge whereof consisted in suffering and dying It was also fit that Gods justice should have been satisfied in that nature which had transgressed and that the same nature should suffer the punishment that had committed the offence Forasmuch then as the children were partakers of flesh and bloud he also himself likewise took part of the same that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death that is the Devil and deliver them who through fear of death were all their life time subject to bondage Such and so great was the love of God the Father toward us he spared not his own Sonne but delivered him up for us all and so transcendent was the love of the Son of God toward the sons of men that he desired not to be spared but rather then they should lie under the power of death was of himself most willing to suffer death for them which seeing in that infinite nature which by eternall generation hee received from his Father he could not doe he resolved in the appointed time to take unto himselfe a Mother and out of her substance to have a body framed unto himself wherein he might become obedient unto death even the death of the crosse for our redemption And therefore when hee commeth into the world he saith unto his Father A body hast thou fitted me Lo I come to doe thy will O God By the which will saith the Apostle wee are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all Thus we see it was necessary for the satisfaction of this debt that our Mediatour should be Man but he that had no more in him then a Man could never be able to goe through with so great a work For if there should be found a Man as righteous as Adam was at his first creation who would be content to suffer for the offence of others his suffering possibly might serve for the redemption of one soul it could be no sufficient ransome for those innumerable multitudes that were to be redeemed to God out of every kindred and tongue and people and nation Neither could any Man or Angel be able to hold out if a punishment equivalent to the endlesse sufferings of all the sinners in the world should at once bee laid upon him Yea the very powers of Christ himself upon whom the spirit of might did rest were so shaken in this sharp encounter that he who was the most accomplisht pattern of all fortitude stood sore amazed and with strong crying and tears prayed that if it were possible the houre might passe from him This man therefore being to offer one sacrifice for sins for ever to the burning of that sacrifice he must not onely bring the coals of his love as strong as death and as ardent as the fire which hath a most vehement flame but he must add thereunto those everlasting burnings also even the flames of his most glorious Deity and therefore through the eternall Spirit must he offer himself without spot unto God that hereby he might obtain for us an eternall redemption The bloud whereby the Church is purchased must bee Gods own bloud and to that end must the Lord of glory be crucified the Prince and author of life be killed he whose eternall generation no man can declare be cut off out of the land of the living and the man that is Gods own fellow be thus smitten according to that vvhich God himselfe foretold by his Prophet Awake O sword against my shepherd and against the man that is my fellow saith the Lord of hosts smite the shepherd and the sheep shall be scattered The people of Israel we read did so value the life of David their King that they counted him to be worth tenne thousand of themselves how shall we then value of Davids Lord who is the blessed and onely Potentate the King of kings and Lord of lords It was indeed our nature that suffered but he that suffered in that nature is over all God blessed for ever and for such a Person to have suffered but one houre was more then if all other persons had suffered ten thousand millions of years But put case also that the life of any other singular man might be equivalent to all the lives of whole mankind yet the laying down of that life would not be sufficient to doe the deed unlesse he that had power to lay it down had power likewise to take it up again For to be detained always in that prison from whence there is no comming out before the payment of the uttermost farthing is to lie always under execution and to quit the plea of that full payment of the debt wherein our surety stood engaged for us And therefore the Apostle upon that ground doth rightly conclude that if Christ be not raised our faith is vaine we are yet in our sinnes and consequently that as he must be delivered to death for our offences so he must be raised again for our justification Yea our Saviour himself knowing full well what he was to undergoe for our sakes told us before-hand that the Comforter whom hee would send unto us should convince the world that is fully satisfie the consciences of the sons of men