manifestly intendeth the grave and its forerunner death the last but not the least nay the greatest of all temporal evils When the prophet Isaiah mentioneth One that feareth the Lord and obeyeth his voyce walking in darknesse and seeing no light no doubt he is principally to be understood of the darkness of spiritual desertion when God withholdeth the light of his countenance from the soul. Finally when we frequently read in the New Testament of utter darkness the mist of darkness blackness of darkness what else do those phrases mean but the damneds everlasting misery in being wholly deprived of the beatifical vision 3. Of iniquity in this respect it is that the power of sin ruling in mens hearts is called the power of darkness and the works of sin which they act in their lives are called the works of darkness especially flagitious enormities such as rioting and drunkenness chambring and wantonness strife and envying which are enumerated by the Apostle as the works of darkness If you ask in which of these acceptions it is here to be construed some Interpreters answer in two of them namely for ignorance and iniquity but doubtless more sutably the latter is to be understood namely sin and wickedness and chiefly gross notorious sins because the Apostle speaketh of the conversation the darkness of ignorance is that in which men are said to sit but that in which they walk is most congruously construed to be the darkness of sin And indeed so truly nay fully doth this term of darkness agree to sin that it taketh in all the other acceptions under some notion or other each of which may serve as a several reason why this appellation of darkness is given to it 1. Sin hath relation to the darkness of nature as a concomitant which it most delights in most sins are such as flie the light and love to be covered over with nights canopy St. Paul saith of drunkards that they are drunk in the night and Solomon of the young man that he goeth to the harlots house in the evening in the black and dark night and Iob of the adulterer the thief the murderer that they rebell against the light and the morning is to them even as the shadow of death To this purpose it is that Clemens Alexandrinus observeth of the Carpocratians that they appointed their meetings in the night Indeed the night being a cover to wickedness maketh men secure and shameless in committing it no marvell if they make choice of that time and there works are therefore deservedly called the works of darkness because acted in the night 2. Sin hath relation to the darkness of ignorance both as an effect and as a cause in which respect it is called by wickedness 1. No sin is committed but the Iudgement is first infatuated and therefore it is the wisemans question Do not they erre that devise mischief and the Phylosophers assertion every offender erreth there is upon the heart of every sinner atra nubes caeca nox to use the Poets expression a black cloud a dark night which causeth him to wander and the blindness of our mind is that which misguideth our feet in which respect sin is an effect 2. The commission of sin as it hardneth the heart so it blindeth the minde what mists and fogs and clouds are to the aire that are corrupt affections and flagitious actions to the soul darkning and obscuring whatever light of knowledg shineth in it in this notion we may very well understand that of the wise man when he saith the way of the wicked is as darkness the darkness of ignorance increasing upon men as they go on in sinfull wayes and in this respect sin is as a cause and because sins are caused by and withall are the causes of darkness and ignorance in the mind very fitly is this brand of darkness set upon it 3. Sin hath reference to the darkness of misery as a cause and that in its full latitude Wherefore doth the lâ—ving man complain saith the Church in respect of temporal afflictions man suffereth for the punishment of his sin all the miseries of life yea death it self being the bitter fruits of sin for so the Apostle saith expressely death entred into the world by sin It is the interposition of sin between God and us that eclipseth his loving kindness towards us so saith the Prophet Isay Your iniquities have separated between you and your God and your sins have hid his face from you finally it is wickednâ—ss that brings eternall wrâ—tchedness that being the doom denounced by our blessed Saviour against the wicked servant Cast him into utter darkness there shall be weeping and gnashâ—ng of teeth so that in this respect is sin most justly called darkness because it brings so great a darkness of sorrow and calamity upon the sinner And thus I have given a dispatch to the first of these metaphors 2. The other of walking is no less considerable a word that is very frequently used in Scripture and that to signifie in generall a course of life Indeed what is our life but a walk and all the actions of our life as so many steps and as walking in a way leadeth to some place or other so doth the course of every mans life tend to some end either of felicity or misery To this purpose is that metaphor of sowing which we so often meet with in holy writ because sowing bringeth forth some harvest or other according to the seed that is sown And I would to God that all men might hence learn so to look upon themselves as sowers as travellers therefore to make choice of their seed and take heed to their wayes more particularly this word is used both in respect of a good and an evill course of life and an instance of both we have in this and the next verse there it is applyed to a godly and here to a wâ—cked conversation That then which we are now to inquire into is what this phrase of walking imports concerning a state of sinfull living the answer to which will appear by taking notice of three properties in the motion of walking as being motus voluntarius continuus progressivus a voluntary constant and a progressive motion 1. Walking is a voluntary motion it is one thing to be drawn and another thing to goe the one is an act of violence the other of voluntariness walking is a free willing act so willing that it is an act of choice and is never done but upon a preceding delâ—berate resolution nor is it onely voluntary but delightful running is painful but walking a pleasant motion and it is a great deal of content and pleasure men take in walking All this representeth the temper of wicked men who not onely act sin but affect it a good man may be sometimes drawn into sin but bad men walk in it yea as Solomons expression is They leave the
why hast thou forsaken me and therefore the Prophet Isay foretelling his passion mentioneth his soule which was made an offering for sin in a word not onely his bloud and body and soule but his whole person is to be included the passion being expiatory as you shall hear more fully anon in that it was the passion of such a person and therefore it is often said he gave up himselfe and more appositely to our present purpose is that of the Auther to the Hebrews by himselfe he purged our sins 2. For the Resolution of the 2. question be pleased to take notice 1. That the cleansing of our sins is attributed in scripture to God to Christ to faith and all of them have a reall and severall influence upon this benefit the principall efficient of this cleansing is God to whom therefore it is attributed in the 9 verse the instrument receiving the benefit is faith and therefore it is said to be through faith the meritorious cause deserving this benefit at the hands of God for us is Christs bloud indeed Socinus asserts with a nihil verius that God and Christ act in the same way of efficiency onely with this difference God is the principall and Christ the organicall cause and so God forgiveth by Christ but whilst he onely asserts but doth not prove it we may as confidently deny as he affirmeth especially when the scriptures expresse that not per but propter Christum by but for Christ we are forgiven so our translators render the sence of St Paules 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for Christ sake and our Apostle in the twelfth verse of the next chapter saith our sins are forgiven 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for his name sake 2. More particularly Christs bloud is the meritorious cause of cleansing us from sin inasmuch as he thereby took our sins upon himselfe This is the truth which the Apostle Peter manifestly asserts where he saith he bore our sins on his own body on the tree and presently addeth by whose stripes we are healed Healing cleansing are paralel phrases our sins being the diseases of our souls of these sicknesses we are healed of these sins we are cleansed by Christs bearâ—ng them on his body which because it was done on high upon the tree the Apostle useth not barely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifyeth sursum tulit not onely he bore but he carryed up whereby the sence is not diminished but augmented as having in it a fit allusion to the sacrifices which were lift up upon the Altar It is very considerable in this respect that the hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 like the latine tollo signifie both ferre and auferre to bear and to take away and both these are used concerning Christ in this particular the one by the prophet Isay where he saith he bore our griefes the other by Iohn Baptist when he saith he taketh away the sins of the world and most aptly because he taketh away the sinne from us by taking it upon himselfe To unbowel this precious truth know 1. That Christ bleeding and dying on the Crosse stood in our stead and suffered in our room to this purpose are those expressions where Christ is said to suffer for us to die for the people for so much the preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sometimes signifieth as when St. Paul wisheth to be an anathema 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for or instead of his brethren and when the Apostles are said to be Ambassadors 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for that is in Christs stead more clearly to this intent is that phrase of the Evangelist where Christ is said to give his life a ransom for many the preposition being not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which alwayes implyeth a commutation and when it is applyed to persons signifieth the comming of one into the room of another so Archelaus is said to raign in Judea 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the rooom of his father Herod Yea that this sence is intended where spoken of Christs sufferings appeares by St. Pauls question is Paul crucified for you for if it were onely meant for your good Paul might have been crucified for them as he tells the Colossians I rejoyce in my sufferings for you and therefore crucified for you must be as much as in your stead which neither Paul nor any other could be 2. That Christ standing in our stead death was inflicted on him by God for our sins this no doubt is the genuine meaning of those Scriptures where he is said to be wounded for our transgressions and bruised for our iniquities and again he was delivered for our offences he died for our sins That these phrases cannot properly note the final cause appeareth in that the end of his death is not our sins but what is directly contrary to our sins the destruction of them who ever said that Physick was taken for death that is the avoyding death but for the disease the disease being that which necessitateth to Physick besides to instance yet nearer when we say a man died for theft for murder or treason what else do we mean but that those crimes were the deserving cause which brought him to his end Thus Christ died for our sins our sins bringing him to his Cross to his grave in this sense no doubt it is that the Apostle saith he that is God made him to be sin for us to wit at least so farre as to be made a sacrifice for our sins when yet he sin-namely in himself and look as the beast in the law was slain and sacrificed in the room and for the sin of the person that brought it so was Christ crucified in our stead because of our sin 3. That Christ bleeding and dying for our sins suffered that punishment which was due to us It was the commination of God to Adam Thou shalt dye the death Death then was the punishment due to him and all his posterity for sin and this death which we must have undergone in our own persons is inflicted upon Christ. To this purpose it is that Christ is said by the Apostle to be made a curse when this but when he hung upon the tree for cursed is every one that hangeth upon the tree so that the curse which the law pronounceth against uâ— was laid on him if it be said that the curse and death which was due to us was eternal whereas Christs was temporary I answer that duration is but a circumstance to the thing and the reason why on us it must have been eternal is because our punishment could no other way be infinite which yet is required for the satisfaction of an infinite offended justice whereas the case is farre different in respect of Christ as will appear presently 4. That Christ having suffered
it is that his person being infinite the worth of his blood is infinite and so it became commensurate and adaequate both to the infinite demerit of the sin committed by us and the eternity of the punishment which was to have been inflicted upon us and by the same reason that mans sin being a finite act yet deserveth an infinite punishment because perpetrated against an infinite majesty Christs death though a temporary passion cannot but be infinitely satisfactory because it is the death of an infinite person Christ Iesus the son of God blessed for ever And now what other use should we make of this but as both a looking-glasse and an antidote 1. In this truth as in a looking-glasse let us see these two things the haynous nature of our sins and the unparaleld measure of Christs love 1. View oh sinner the hainous nature of thy sins from which nothing but Christs blood can cleanse thâ—e sin if looked upon in the glasse of the law cannot but appeare sinfull but when beheld in the blood of Christ it must needs appeare beyond measure sinfull ex consideratione remedii periculi aestimo quantitatem saith St. Bernard excellently take notice of the greatnes of thy disease and danger in the remedy prepared for the cure of the one and prevention of the other Oh how great is that wound which nothing could heal but the Physitians death The truth is Christs blood in respect of sin is both aggravating and diminishing look upon sin in Christs blood one way it appeareth not so terrible because this blood cleanseth from it look upon it another way it appeareth abhominable because it could not be cleansed but by this blood Tell me oh sinner why dost thou make nothing to defile thy self with that which cost thy Saviour so dear to cleanse thee from how much rather should thy sins wring tears from thee since they drew blood from Christ 2. Behold oh Sinner the exceeding love of thy Saviour who that he might cleanse thee when polluted in thy blood was pleased to shed his owne bloud Indeed the powring out of Christs blood was eximium charitatis opus a superexcellent worke of charity hence it is that these two are joyned together and when the scripture speaketh of his love it presently annexeth his sufferings so St. Paul who loved me and gave himselfe for me so St. Iohn who loved us and washed us from our sins in his owne blood We read that when Christ wept for Lazarus the standers by said see how he loved him surely if his tears much more his bloud proclaimeth his affection towards us thus may we see the bowels of his compassion through the wounds of his passion The Iewes were the scribes the nayles were the pens his body the white paper and his bloud the red inke and the characters were love exceeding love and these so fairely written that he which runs may read them I shut up this with that of devout Bernard Behold and look upon the rose of his bloudy passion how his redness bespeaketh his flaming love there being as it were a contention betwixt his passion and affection this that it might be hotter that that it might be redder nor had his sufferings been so red with bloud had not his heart been enflamed with love Oh let us beholding magnify magnifying admire and admiring praise him for his inestimable goodness saying with the holy Apostle unto him that loved us and washed us from our sins in his bloud be honour and glory for ever 2. Make use of this truth as a cordiall to revive thy drooping soul in a time of inward affliction it is the note of Oecumenius upon the text Is any one affrighted with the light and sense of sin Let this cleansing by the bloud of Christ make him confident and to the like purpose St. Austin the devil hath put in a caveat an hand-writing against us but let us be secure the blood of Christ hath blotted it out Me thinks I hear some wounded broken sinner crying out in dispaire Woe is me that ever I was born my sins are for number innumerable for measure unmeasurable and I am not able to cleanse my selfe from any no not the least of them Oh what mountaines of grievous sins lye upon my back that I am not able to look up oh what scarlet crimson bloudy sins continually sly in my face that I am not able to behold without desperation oh that I had never been oh that I might be no more whether shall I sly who carry my guilt still along with me What shall I do to be eased of this oppressing burden Ah my sinfull soule what will become of thee Vile wretch that I am where shall I appear But stay thou despaâ—ring sinner with poore Hagar in the wildernesse thou art crying weeping dying when as behold a well of water is by thee a fountaine of bloud is opened for sin and for uncleanness thou dost well to bewayle thy own sin but thou dost ill to forget thy Saviours bloud Thou sayst thou art a great sinner true else Christ needed not have shed his bloud thou sayst thou art a great sinner be it so yet Christs bloud cleanseth from all sin And therefore is Christs bloud sayd to cleanse from all sin because there is no sin so great from which it cannot cleanse what if thy sins be clouds thick clouds yet the beames of this sun of righteousnesse can dissipate them what though they be mountaines yet this red sea can swallow them what though they be scarlet sins yet this scarlet bloud can make them white as snow View the catalogue of those sinners whom this bloud hath cleansed and thou shalt find fornicatours idolaters adulterers effae'minate abusers of themselves with mankind theeves covetous drunkards revilers extorâ—tioners have been washed by it for such saith St. Paul to the Corinthians were some of ye but ye are washed look once again and thou shalt find a blasphemer a persecuter for such was Paul himselfe nay murderers even those who had a hand in the murder of Christ himselfe for such were those converts at St. Peters sermon cleansed mercyfully by this very bloud which they shed so cruelly Sinners this bloud still as it were runs afresh and the efficacy of it is as full now as it was at first onely remember that this bloud which was shed cleanseth not unlesse it be sprinkled so much David intimateth in that prayer purge me with hisope hysope being that by which the bloud of sacrifice was sprinkled to which answereth faith wereby our souls are sprinkled with this bloud of Christ. The brazen Serpent cured those who were stung with the fiery Serpent but not without their looking on it The bloud of Christ can cleanse us from all our sins but not without our applying it Go then oh sinner in a sence of thy own filthiness to thy blessed Saviour
loving to us he had been little other then cruâ—l to Christ There wanâ—ed not other wayes to declare his tender affection to mankind but there was no other way to declare his impartial justice against sin so that since the inflicting of death on Christ as a punishment carrieth with it a more urging inducement then any other cause assigned and since the lesse cause there is of inflicting death upon any the greater must needs be the injustice in the inflicter it evidently followeth that there is nothing can so much clear the justice of God in this act as that which the Orthodox asserts to be the cause of it his undergoing the penalty due to our sins 3. But further Christ becoming man is joyned to us in nature and undertaking in our behalf is conjoyned to us by suretiship and in sensu forensi a judicial construction one with us We see in humane Courts the Law taketh as much hold of the surety as of the debtor and why then should it be unjust for God to punish Christ engaging for our debt indeed upon this account the Messiah though innocent became after a sort guilty not as guilt noteth a due deserving of punishment in respect of sin either personally inherent or at least naturally imputed but onely so farre as it noteth an obligation to the punishment in a judicial way as being our surety in which respect that phrase of St. Paul is very apposite he was made sin for us 4. Lastly to put all out of doubt The undergoing this punishment was Christs voluntary Act who as he had power so he wanted not will to lay down his life He was not sent for this end without his own consent as God layed so he took our iniquities upon him the curse to which we were subject saith Theodorus he assumed upon himself of his own accord the death that was not due to him he underwent that we might not undergo that death which was due to us saith S. Gregory he made himself a debtor for us who were debtors and therefore the creditor exacts it from him saith Arnoldus now Volenti non â—it injuria so the moralist most truly if another will voluntarily substitute himself in the room of a malefactor though the inferiour Judge who is bound by the law cannot yet the superiour Governour may without injustice accept of it When therefore God saith the soul that sinneth shall dye he only sets forth the ordinary course of his providence which impedeth not but that Christ being ready to dye in our stead who had sinned God being the supream Ruler and Judge might most justly inflict it on him 2. This punishment thus inflicted on Christ is a plenary satisfaction to Gods justice It is true this word satisfaction is not formally expressed in Scripture yet there are aequivalent phrases such among others is that phrase so often used of redeeming and as if the Holy Ghost would prevent that Socinian Exposition of redimere pro aliquâ— modo liberare redeeming as if it were onely in a large sence no more then delivering it is St. Pauls expresse phrase ye are bought with a price and that this price may appear to be of full value it is opposed to and advanced above corrupt gold and silver by the Apostle Peter nor is it any infringement to the merit of this price and worth of this satisfaction that the suffering of Christ was not every way the same that we should have undergone since it is all one whether the debt be payed in the same coyne or no so it be to the full value Christ suffered the punishment of our sins as Calovius well observeth though not Seâ—undum identitatem omnimodam yet per aequivalentiam the same in every respect yet aequivalent to it Indeed what satisfaction could justice demand more then infinite and the suffering of an infinite person could not be lesse whence followeth 3. In the last place that Gods justice being satisfied for our offences it cannot but remit those offences to us As the creditor cannot demand that of the debtor which the surety hath already payed so neiâ—her can God exact the punishment of us which Christ hath suffered and therefore it is just with him to forgive and cleanse us The case being thus cleared it will be altogether needless to enquire whether it had been injustice in God to forgive without satisfaction St. Austins determination is very solid there wanted not to God another possible way and if it were unjust it were impossible but this of satisfaction was most agreeable to divine wisdom before God did decree this way it might be free to have used it or not but in decreeing this seemed most convenient and after it became necessary so that there can be no remission without it and however it might not have been unjust with God to have forgiven without yet we are sure it is most just with him to forgive upon satisfaction There is onely one objection which remaineth to be answered and it is that which seemeth to carry a great deal of strength in it namely that forgiveness is a free act in God springing from grace and mercy and if it be of grace how can it be of justice that which is of grace is freely done and might justly have been otherwise that which is of justice there is a necessary obligation to the performance of it and what more opposite besides that which addeth the greater force to this argument is that remission and satisfaction are altogether inconsistent A man cannot be said to forgive that debt which he is fully payed so that plenary satisfaction leaveth no place for remission To remove this doubt you must know that things in their own nature opposite may according to different respects concur to the same work and therefore forgivenesse of sin may be an act both of mercy and justice in a several reference In respect of us it is an act of mercy meer mercy and therefore we are said by St. Paul to be justified freely in respect of Christ it is an act of justice and therefore he is said by the same Apostle in the same place to set forth Christ a propitiation to declare his righteousnesse In these different considerations it is that remission and satisfaction are consistent inasmuch as the satisfaction was by Christ not us and the remission is to us not Christ. For the further clearing of this answer be pleased to observe that 1. This satisfaction was neither performed nor procured by us we did not could not do it our selves we did not desire could not obtain it at the hands of Christ it was no other then God himself the injured person who provided and that no other then his own Son to perform this work if a creditor should of his own good will appoint his Son to pay the debt might he not be said to forgive the debtor and would it not be interpreted an act of benignity though
from Gods pleasure not any want of dignity and sufficiency in the price which was payed by him 2 But when the schooles speak of Christs dying for all sufficiently and accordingly some Expositours interpret this expiation sufficient for the sins of the whole world it is as the Learned Davenant hath excellently observed solidly proved another kind of value to wit such as ariseth from divine ordination and thus though we must exclude Angels and consider men onely as viatores whilest they are in the way since as S. Bernard truly The blood of Christ which was shed on earth goeth not down to hell yet we are by the whole world to understand omnes singulos all and every man that hath been is or shall be in the world so that we may truly assert It was the intention of God giving Christ and Christ offering himselfe to lay down such a price as might be sufficient and so upon Gospel termes applicable to all mankind and every individuall man in the whole world To unfold this truth aright I shall briefly present two things to your consideration 1. A price may be said to be sufficient either absolutely or conditionally a price is then absolutely sufficient when there is nothing more required to the participation of the benefit but onely the payment of the money and thus we are not to conceive of Gods ordination that Christs death should become an actuall propitiation without any other intervenient act on our part He dyed not in this sense for any much lesse for all when therefore we say God would that Chrâ—st should lay down a prâ—ce sufficient and so applicable to every man it is to be understood in a conditionall way upon the termes of faith and repentance And hence it is that though Christ dying suffered that punishment which was designed to be satisfactory for the sins of every man yet God doth justly inflict the punishment upon the persons of all them who are not by faith partakers of Christs death because it was intended to satisfy for them onely upon condâ—tion of beleeving 2. Know further that though God intend Christs propitiation conditionally applâ—cable aequè as well to every as any man yet he did not ex aequo aequally intend it for every man it is one thing to say He is a propitiation not for our sins onely but for the sins of the whole world and another thing to say He is a propitiation as fully for the sins of the whole world as He is for ours It is observable in Scripture that some places speake of Christ laying down his life for his sheep and giving himselfe for his Church and others of Christs dying for all and tasting death for every one in one place He is called the Saviour of the body and in another the Saviour of the world nor will it be hard to reconcile these if we distinguish of a general a speciall intention in God that the fruit of his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 love to mankind this of his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 good will to some particular persons by the former he intends Christs propitiation applicable to all by the latter He decreth it to be actually applyed to some according to this it is that S. Ambrose saith Christ suffered generally for all and yet specially for some and Peter Lumbard Christ offered himselfe on the Altar of the Crosse for all as to the sufficiency of the price for the elect onely as to efficacy because he efâ—ects salvation onely for them that are praedestinaâ—ed Sutably hereunto it is â—hat Divinâ—s conceive a double covenant to be intimated iâ— Scripture the one universall and condâ—tionall the other speciall and absolute the one made with all and every man upon these termes Whosoever beleeveth in Christ shall not perish the other made with Christ concerning a seed which He should see upon makâ—ng hâ—s Soule an offering for â—in to whom He promiseth not onely Salvation by Christ upon condition of beleeving but the writing his law in their hearts whereby they are inabled to performe the condition and so infalâ—â—by pertake of that salvation By all which it appeareth that notwithstanding Gods speciall affection and dâ—crâ—e of election whereby he hath purposed this propitiation shall be actually conferd upon some we may tâ—uly assert God hath a generall love whereby He hath ordained the death of Christ an universall remedy applicable to every man as a propitiation for his sins â—f he beleeve and repent And hence it is that this propitiation as it it is applicable so it is annunciable to every man Indeed as God hath not intended it should be actually applyed so neither that it should be so much as aâ—â—ually revealed to many men but yet it is as applicable so annunciâ—ble both by virtue of the generall covenant God hath made with all and that generall mandate He hath given to his Ministers of preaching the Gospel to all so that if any Minister could go through all the parts of the world and in those parts singly from man to man He might not onely with a conjectural hope but with a certain faith say to him God hath so loved thee that he gave his onely son that if thou beleeve in him thou shalt not perish and that this is not barely founded upon the innate sufficiency of Christs death but the Ordination of God appeareth in that we cannot may not say so to any of the fallen Angels for whom yet as you have already heard Christs death is intrinsecally sufficient And now what should the meditation of this truth afford us but matter of 1 Admiration at the riches of divine love to all mankind and which rendereth it so much the more wonderfull that whilest it is conferd on the whole world of men it is denied to Angels That God should cause his wrath to smoake against those spiritual and noble creatures the Angels and appoint a propitiation a ransome for such crawling wormes sinful dust and ashes as men are is it not to be admired at St. Ambrose speaking of these words the whole earth is full of thy mercy puts the question Why is it not said the heaven as well as the earth and returneth this Answer because there are indeed spiritual wickednesses in high places sed non illae ad commune jus indulgentia Dei remissionemque pertinent peccatorum but the remission of God and propitiation of Christ belongs not to them well may we in this consideration take up those words of the Psalmist quoted by the Authour to the Hebrewes upon this very occasion Lord what is man that thou art so mindful of him and the Son of man that thou visitest him 2. Consolation to all despairing soules it is an excellent saying of Leo The effusion of Christs blood is so rich and availeable that if the whole multitude of captive sinners would beleeve in their Redeemer not one should be detained in the tyrants chaines
as lyable to the penalty so is the forgiven sinner from the punishment it selfe which is the remote term and the obligation to it which is the proxime term of pardon in this respect it is that Anselm saith to forgive sinne is not to punish it and St. Austin to the same purpose it is Gods not marking inquity so as to inflict the penalty due to it and the Schooles to remit the sinne is not to impute it so as to punish it For the fuller opening this truth know 1 On the one hand there is a great deale of difference between these two to withhold the execution off and to withdraw the obligation to the punishment it is one thing for a creditor to give day of payment and another thing to cancell the bond indeed the phrase used by Moses of Gods forgiving his people from Egypt untill now seemeth chiefely to intend his sparing to punish them but that is forgivenesse in a larger and improper sence according to the genuine notion there is a vast difference between forgiving and forbearing mercy As learned Davenant upon those words forbearing forgiving one another hath observed that there is far more in the latter than in the former since a man may forbear revenge meerly for want of ability or opportunity so is it true though not upon the same ground in respect of God his forgiving is farre more then his forbearing and therefore this latter hee vouchsafeth even to those who goe on in sinne but the former onely to them who confesse theâ—r sin since whereas by the one it is onely hee doth not as yet by the other it is that he will not at all punish 2 On the other hand there is a great deal of difference betwixt afflâ—cting for sin and punishâ—ng for sin properly so called for though the meritorious cause of both be the same to wit sin yet the impulsive cause from within is different that from an anger mixed with love this from meer anger and purely judiciall wrath besides the finall cause is far differenâ— that is for emendation of the person this is for satisfaction of the law and so whereas that is medicinall this is exitiall That God doth afflict his own people for sin yea for sinne after it is forgiven is a case so cleare that it cannot upon any just reason be denied The Antinomians doe but discover their owne blindnesse whilest they deny that God seeth sinne so as to correct it in justified persons that instance of David is pregnant whom the prophet tels as it were with one breath that God had forgiven his sinne and yet for that sinne the childe must dye that of the Psalmist concerning the Isralites is very plaine Thou wast a God that forgavest their sinne though thou tookest vengeance of their iniquities finally that of the Corinthians is no lesse apposite who though they were forgiven and therefore should not be condemned with the world yet were judged and chastized of the Lord for their sinne of unworthy receiving the holy sacrament But still though God doe afflict yet hee doth not punish for sinne those whom hee forgiveth unlesse as all afflictions may in some sort bee called punishments and the reason is plain because punishing for sinne is in a war of revenge and Satisfaction which are direâ—tly opposite to forgivenesse and wee may as well say that â— judge can at the same time pardon a malefactor and exâ—â—ute him as that God can punish when hee forgiveth indeed because those eternall miseries have most properly in them rationem paenae the nature of satâ—sfactory punâ—shment therefore forgiveness chiefly consists in taking off the obligation to that according to St. Pauls Phrâ—se There is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Iesus but yet it is no less true that the oblâ—gation to temporall as well as eternall punishâ—enâ— is taken off so that though the same ouâ—ward miseries seize upon pardoned as well as unpardâ—ned sinners yet nâ—t in the same way as hath been already iâ—timated and therefore though God doe inflict many miseries of life yea death it self upon forgiven sinners to make them feel the smart of sinnâ— watchfull how they run into sinne and to declare his justice against sinne yet not in the least to satisfy his justice upon them for sinne that being already most fully as I shall hereafter shew performed by Christ. 2 You see the significancy of the first word and thereby the nature of the thing passe wee on to the second which though the same as to the thing with the former yet wants not its peculiar emphasis That distinction of Divines concerning remissio culpe paenae the remission of the fault and the punishment may not unfittly bee made use of for a distinct reference of those two expressions the former of forgiving more properly refers to the remission of the punishment though yet it includeth the fault as a creditor cancelleth the bond doth thereby remit the debt it selfe this latter of cleansing chiefely refers to the remission of the fault which defileth though it include the punishment because it is of that defilement which is contracted through the guilt of sinne And now as in the former so in this expression wee have two things considerable what unrightâ—ousnesse doth and what pardon doth 1 What unrighteousnesse dothâ— it maketh the sinner filthy and polluted in Gods sight sinnes as they are debita debts so they are said to bee remitted and blotted out and as they are sordes filthy so they are said else where to bee covered and here to bee cleansed Oh then how odious is an unpardoned sinner in Gods sight It is very observable how Almighty God describing the sinfull state of rebellious Israel borroweth a metaphor from a châ—ld that is not swadled but lieth polluted in its bloud the Psalmist speaking of wicked men saith They are corrupt â—nd become abominable where the former word iâ— borrowâ—d from a dead carkass and truely â— child in its bloud is not more loathsome to our eyes a carkasse on the dunghill is not more nâ—isome to our smell then a sinfull wretch is in Gods eyes and to his nostrils 2 What forgivenesse doth it cleanseth the sinner An expression that must not be strained too much as 〈◊〉 according to the doctrine of the Church of Rome the pardoning of sinne were an utter extinction and aboâ—â—tâ—on of it as cleansing doth wholy take away filthâ— truâ— it is where sinne is forgiven the filth of sinne is in some measure and shall at last bee wholly removed but that is onely the effect of glorification not of justification or sanctification and indeed as if our Apostle would prevent any such inference from this Phrase wee finde him subioyning if wee say wee have not sinned as before whâ—n hee speaketh of Christs cleansing he addeth if wee say wee have no sinne so that sinne is therefore said to bee cleansed not that the
therefore God sent his Son to satisfie for our sins yet he is truly said to remit it to us and though upon satisfaction it is an act of justice yet it was mercy which afforded the way and means of accomplishing this satisfaction 2. This satisfaction though tendered by Christ might not have been accepted by God to this purpose it is which Grotius excellently observeth that one man be discharged by the punishment of another there must intervene an act of the supream Governour and that no other then an act of grace for the law requâ—reth that the punishment should be inflâ—cted on the person offending and accordingly justâ—ce might exact the penalty from the person himself so that notwithstanding satisfaction be made by another yet there must be a gracious act which in respect of the law is relaxation and of the offendâ—r remission That therefore God is pleased to accept from Christ what he might in justice have required of us is from no other cause then his gracious clemency and in this respect it is that the case between God and a sinner is not like that between a creditor and a debtor but a King and a malefactor because if the debt be payed whether by the debtor or the surety it matters not nor can the creditor receiving the debt from whomsoever it be if upon the debtors account be said to forgive him his debt whereas the malefactor is bound by the law to suffer in his own person and therefore the King accepting another in his stead is truly said to pardon him as dispensing with that which his law in the rigour of it did requirâ— To summe it up Remission and satisfaction are not repugnant when that satisfaction is accepted which might have been refused and when the person who receiveth the benefit is no way contributory to the performing of it now both these are manifest in Christs satisfaction for that which we do and not that neither of our selves but by Gods grace is only to the applying not at all to the performing of this satisfaction and though Christs satisfaction was so full that it could not be excepted against as to the aequivalency nay redundancy of its value yet God might not have accepted of it in our behalf had he not so decreed of his meer goodnesse By all which it appeareth that there is a sweet contemperation of iustice and mercy in this work so that we may truly say in the remission of our sins righteousnesse and peace meet together and kiss each other whilst justice hath satisfaction in the punishment of the offence and mercy sheweth it self by appointing Christ to make this satisfaction and accepting of it in the sinners behalf whereby he is as to himself freely and graciously as to Christ justly and righteously remitted And surely this being well considered every crevis will be stopt at which despair might creep in When a sinner is sensible of sins there is nothing more affrighteth him then the meditation of Gods justice but see Christ having made satisfaction that justice which was before a cause of fear becometh a support of our hope and when thaâ— which only could discourage us is a ground of comfort what can terrifie us If then at any time upon remembrance of the guilt of sin we begin to faint considering that God is just to hate and punish sin committed let us upon remembrance of Christs satisfaction which God hath accepted in behalfe of all believing and penitent sinners be established and quieted in our minds considering that God is just to forgive sin confessed Indeed the debt being payed by Christ Gods very Justice as I may say with reverence would trouble him if he should not give in the bond and give out an acquittance The pardon of beleevers sins is as it were the wages of his obedience a legacy he bequeathed at his death yea the end of shedding his blood so that as the wages of an hireling detained the Will of one that is dead having left wherewithall to satisfie unperformed yea the blood of one suffering in anothers sâ—ead if that party should notwithstanding be executed must needs cry and that aloud for justice which is hereby very much violated So would Christs death that even against God himself if he should not grant a pardon to them that beleevingly and penitently confess Go then thou burthened sinner to God with boldnesse and in an humble confidence sue out thy pardon not onely at the throne of grace but the bar of Iustice in these or the like expressions Lord thou hast punâ—shed my sins in thy Son wilt thou punish them in me Thou hast accepted that suffering of thy Son as the punishment of my sin and therâ—fore thou canst not in justâ—ce exact it of me for this were to punish twice for one offence which thy justice cannot but abhor To close up with a needful admonition very fit to be annexed to this ample consolation that the dogs may not eat the childrens bread As God is faithful and just to forgive the sins of those that confess them and to cleanse them from all unrighteousness so he is no lesse faithful and just to punish their sins who conceal and continue therein and condemn them for all their unrighteousnesse God beloved hath denounced as many severe threats against the impenitent as he hath pronounced comfortable promises to the penitent and his faithfulnesse no lesse strongly binds him to perform the one then the other Christ hath satisfied Gods justice for the sins of penitent confessors in which respect it is just with God to forgive them but he hath not satisfied for impenitent committers in which respect it is just with God to punish them in their own persons for their iniquities and therefore let the one tremble whilest the other rejoyce in these divine attributes of justice and fidelity And thus through Gods assistance I have finished the first Chapter of this first Epistle wherein you have heard Christs divinity and humanity illustrated the Gospels excellency and certainty demonstrated hypocrisy detected piety encouraged arrogancy confuted and repentance comforted so that what St. Paul saith of the whole Scripture I may justly apply to this Chapter It is profitable for doctrine for reproof for Correction and for instruction in righteousnesse for doctrinâ— in the great mystery of the Gospel for reproof of licentious christians for correction of arrogant justiciaries and for instruction in righteousnesse by teaching us to confesse our sins and walk in the light I have nothing further to adde but only my prayers for you and desire of your prayers for me mine for you that this Chapter which is profitable in it self may become so to you by thâ— mingling of faith and obedience with the reading hearing and meditating on it yours for me that I may through Gods providence continuing my health and his spirits assistance enlightening my mind be enabled to proceed in handling the subsequent Chapters so as