with howe blynde loue of our selues we are taken whiles we are plunged in the mistes of sinne that we esteeme not of so great vncleannesse in vs. It is onely the light of the Lorde which can open our eyes that they may see the corruption lurketh in our flesh Who is truely indued with the principles of Christian religion To conclude therfore he is indued with the principles of Christian philosophie who indeede is displeased with himselfe hath learned wel to be ashamed of his owne misery Finally by the cōsequent he sheweth yet more plainely how greatly they ought to be ashamed when they vnderstand that they were euē at the threshold of death destruction yea were already entered the gates of death if they had not beene drawen backe by the mercie of God A twofold end of sinne and righteousnes 22 You haue your fruite As before he put downe a twofolde ende of sinne so nowe of righteousnes Sinne in this life bringeth the tormentes of an euill conscience and after this life eternall death Of righteousnesse in this life wee reape for fruite sanctification in time to come wee hope for eternall life These thinges vnlesse wee were too sottishe ought to begette in vs a hatred and horrour of sinne and a loue and desire of righteousnesse And whereas some doe take this woorde Telos for tribute I thinke it is not the meaning of the Apostle For although it is true that we suffer the punishment of death for sinne yet that worde cannot agree to the other member wherunto it is applyed of Paule For life is not called the tribute of righteousnesse 23 For the wages of sinne There are some whiche thinke that heere is noted displeasauntly howe harde a wage is payde to sinners whiles Paule compareth death to cates which word with the Grecians sometime is taken for the dyet of souldiers But rather he seemeth indirectly to checke the blynd appetites of those who daungerously intangle themselues with the inticementes of sinne no otherwise then fishes with the hoke Howbeit it shal be more simply to take it for stipendes or wages For surely death is a very sufficient reward for the reprobate And it is the conclusion as it were the Epilogue of the former sentence And yet is it not in vayne that he repeateth the same thing in other wordes agayne for by doubling the terrour he woulde make sinne more detestable But the gift of God They are deceiued which translate this proposition thus What is meant by the gifte of God and what fruite the same bringeth worth in vs. life eternall is the gifte of God as though righteousnesse were the subiectum and gift of God predicatum Because that sence shoulde make nothing vnto the contraposition But as before he taught that sinne bringeth foorth nothing but death so now he addeth that this gifte of God namely our iustification and sanctification bringeth vnto vs the blessednesse of eternall life Or if you hadde rather as sinne is the cause of death so righteousnesse wherewith wee are indued by Christ hath restored eternall life vnto vs. In the meane while here we may most certainly gather that our saluation is wholly of the grace meere bountifulnesse of God He might otherwise haue said the wages of righteousnes is eternall life that one member might haue aunsweared another but he saw it was the gift of God whereby wee obteyne life and not our merite And that gifte also is not one nor single for wee beeynge clothed with the righteousnesse of the sonne are reconciled to God and by the vertue of the spirit renued into holinesse of life And therefore hee addeth in Christ Iesus our Lord that he might drawe vs from all opinion of our owne worthinesse CHAP. 7. 1 DOe yee not know brethren for I speake to them know the law that the lawe hath dominion ouer a man as long as he liueth 2 For the woman which is in subiection to a man is boūd by the law to the mā whiles he liueth but if the man be dead she is deliuered from the law of man 3 So then if while the man liueth she take another man she shal be called an adulteresse but if the man be dead shee is free from the law so that she is not an adulteresse though she take another man 4 So yee my brethren are dead also to the law by the bodie of Christ that yee should be vnto another euen vnto him that is raysed vp from the dead that wee should bring foorth fruite vnto God ALthough hee had sufficiently as in such breuity it could be vnfolded the question of the abrogation of the lawe yet because it was both a difficult question and of it selfe might bring foorth many others he doeth more copiously declare howe the lawe is abrogated from vs secondly he sheweth what profite wee get thereby because whiles it doeth holde vs bounde without Christ it canne doe nothing but condemne vs. And least any shoulde thereby accuse the lawe hee meeteth with the obiections of the flesh and refuteth them where hee excellently handeleth a notable place of the vse of the Lawe 1 Doe yee not knowe Let the generall proposition bee that the lawe was giuen to no other ende vnto men then that it should gouerne this present life To what end the law was giuen with those be dead it hath no place Whereunto afterward hee addeth a more speciall namely that we are dead vnto the law in the body of Christe Some other vnderstand that the dominion of the lawe abideth so long to binde vs as the vse thereof is in force But because this sentence is somwhat obscure and it doth not so properly agree vnto that speciall proposition followeth straightwayes I had rather follow those who take it to be spoken of the life of man and not of the life of the lawe And the interrogatiō verily hath more strength to set foorth the certaintie of the matter is spoken of For it sheweth that that is not strange or vnknowen to any of them but is indifferently graunted among all For I speake to them haue knowledge This parenthesis is to bee referred thither whither the proposition is referred as if he should say that he knew they were not so vnskilfull of the law as they could doubte of that And albeit both might be vnderstood of all lawes together yet is it better to vnderstand it of the lawe of God whiche is now in question Whereas some thinke the knowledge of the law is attributed vnto the Romanes because the best part of the worlde was vnder their Empire gouernement that is very childish For partly he speaketh vnto Iewes or other strangers partly vnto vulgare obscure men Yea he chiefly respecteth the Iewes with whom he had to do concerning the abrogation of the law And least they should thinke they were dealte withal very captiously he sheweth that he taketh a principle cōmon knowen to thē all wherof they
is not put down which might answere the former The inconsequent doth somewhat darken the speech because the seconde member in the comparison is not expressed which might answere to the former But wee will doe our diligence to make both playne when wee come vnto the place Sinne entered into the worlde c. Marke here what order hee vseth For hee saith sinne was first and of that death followed For there are some that goe about to prooue vs to bee so cast away by the sinne of Adam as though we perished through no fault of our owne but therefore onely as though hee sinned for vs. Yet Paule affirmeth plainely that sinne hath entered into all which suffer the punishment of sinne And that hee vrgeth more strickly when a litle after he setteth downe the reason why all the posteritie of Adam is subiect to the power of deathe namely quoth he because we haue all sinned Furthermore this fame to sinne is to be corrupte and faultie Sinne taken for corruption of nature For that naturall prauitie which we bringe out of our mothers wombe althoughe it doe not so sone shewe fourth his fruites yet neuerthelesse it is sinne before the Lorde and deserueth his vengeance And this is that sinne they call originall For as Adam by his firste creation as well receyued for him selfe as for his posteritie the gifts of Gods grace so hee falling from the Lorde corrupted viciated defiled and destroyed our nature in him selfe For hee being put away from the similitude of God could begette no seede but like vnto himselfe Howe all are said to haue sinned Wee haue all therefore sinned because wee are all indued with naturall corruption and so are become sinnefull and frowarde For that imagination was friuelous whereby in olde tyme the Pelagians went aboute to shift of the wordes of Paule saying that sinne hath descended from Adam to all mankinde by imitation for so Christ shoulde bee onely an example of righteousnesse and not the cause Here also it may easely be gathered that the question is not of actuall sinne for if euery one shoulde woorke giltinesse to him selfe to what ende should Paul compare Adam with Christ it followeth therefore that ingraffed and naturall corruption is noted 13 Vntill the lawe This parenthesis contayneth a preoccupation For because it seemeth not there is any transgression without the lawe it might bee doubted whither there were any sinne before the Lawe That there was after the lawe there is no doubt onely the question was of the time went before the lawe Therefore he answereth that albeit God had not as yet denounced sentence by the written lawe yet was mankinde vnder the curse yea and that from his mothers wombe and therefore much lesse were they absolued from the condemnation of sinne who liued wickedly before the publishing of the lawe For there was alway a God to whom worshippe was due If al men be sinners as they come out of their mothers wombe much more are they which liue wickedly and there was alway some rule of righteousnesse This interpretation is so playne and cleare that it doth sufficiently of it selfe refell all contrary interpretations But sinne is not imputed Without the reprehēsion of the law we are in a maner a sleep in our sins And although we are not ignorant that we do euil yet as much as in vs is we ouerwhelme the knowlege of euill offering it self at the least we put it out throgh suddain forgetfulnes but whiles the law reproueth checketh vs as it were pulling vs by the eare it doth awaken vs so that now then we returne to thinke vpō the iudgement of God Therefore the Apostle noteth how peruerse men are when they are not stirred vp by the law namely the difference of good and euill for the most part being driuen away securely and sweetely to pamper thēselues as though there were no iudgement of God Otherwise that iniquities haue bin imputed vnto men of God the punishēnt of Cain the flood where in all the world was destroyed the destruction of Sodom the plages fell vpon Pharao and Abimelech for Abraham lastly the euils came vpō Egipt do proue that men also amongst thēselues haue charged one another with sin it is manifest by so many cōplaints expostulations wherin one accuseth another of iniquitie againe by their apologies wherin they studiously go about to clere their deeds Finally that euery mā was gilty of euill good in his owne conscience there be many examples with proue But for the most part they did so wincke at their euil facts that they would impute nothing vnto thēselues for sinne but that they were constrayned Therefore when he denieth sin to be imputed wtout the lawe How sin is said not to be imputed without the lawe hee speaketh by the way of cōparison namely because whē they are not pricked by the sting of the law they bury thēselues in slothfulnes Furthermore Paul hath inserted this sentēce very wisely that the iewes might therby the better learn how great blame they shuld sustein whō the law did opēly condēne For if they were not free frō punishmēt whō God neuer sōmoned gilty before his tribunal seat what shal come vnto the Iewes to whō the lawe like a cryer sheweth their giltines yea denoūceth iudgement another reasō also may be brought why he may plainly say that sin rained before the law yet was not imputed namely Another reason why sin is saide to haue raigned but not to haue bin imputed before the lawe that we might know the cause of death not to come of the law but to be shewed by the law Hee saith therfore that all men were forthw t frō the fal of Adā miserably cast away albeit the destruction was long after reueiled by the lawe If you translate the particle aduersatiue de although albeit the text shal run better for the meaning shal be albeit men flatter thē selues yet they cānot escape the iudgement of God yea whiles the law doth not reproue thē Death raigned frō Adā He openeth more clearly how it profited men nothing that frō Adam vntil the publishing of the law they liued licenciously securely the choise or difference of good euil being reiected so wtout the admonition of the law the remēbrance of sin was buried because neuerthelesse sin was of force vnto condemnation Wherefore then also death rained because the cecitie hardnes of mē cold not oppresse the iudgement of God 14 Yea euen ouer them Although this place bee commonly vnderstood of infantes who not being giltie of any actuall sinne dye through originall corruption yet had I rather expound it generally of all those sinned without lawe This sentence muste be annexed vnto the wordes wente before where it was said that they which wanted the lawe did not impute sinne vnto themselues They therefore sinned not after the similitude of the transgression of Adam How they who sinned without law are
bondage should abide in the condition of seruitude for he ought to defende that state of libertie which he hath receiued It is not meete then that you should be brought agayne vnder the power of sinne frō the which you were deliuered by the manumising of Christe This argument is taken from the efficient cause There followeth also another taken from the finall cause namely to this ende are yee exempted from the seruitude of sinne that yee might passe into the kingdome of righteousnesse therefore ye ought to be altogether vnmindefull of sinne and to turne your whole minde vnto righteousnesse into the obedience whereof ye are brought And it is to bee noted that no man canne serue righteousnesse except by the power and benefite of God They onely can serue righteousnes whō Christ hath deliuered from the tyranny of sinne Ioh. 8.36 he be first deliuered from the power and tyrannie of sinne As Christ himselfe testifieth If the sonne shall make you free yee shall bee free in deede What then shall our preparations by the vertue of our free will be if the beginning of goodnesse depend vppon this manumission which the onely grace of God accomplisheth 19 I speake after the manner of manne because of the infirmitie of your fleshe as ye haue giuen your members seruaunts of vncleannesse and to iniquity into iniquity euen so now also giue your members seruaunts of righteousnes vnto sanctification 19 I speake c. He saith that he speaketh after the manner of man not in respect of the substance but in respect of the forme as Christ in the 3. of Iohn faith that hee offereth earthlye things Iohn 3.12 How Paule speaketh after the manner of man whiles notwithstanding he intreateth of heauenly mysteries but yet not so honourably as the dignity of thinges required because he would humble himselfe vnto the capacitie of the rude simple people And thus the Apostle speketh by the way of Preface that he might the better shewe that calumniation to be too grosse and wicked when the fredome gotte by Christe is thought to giue liberty of sinning And withall hee aduerticeth the faithful that nothing can be more absurde or rather filthie and shamefull then that the spirituall grace of Christ should be of lesse force with them then an earthly manumission or freedom As though he said by the comparing of righteousnesse and sin I can shew how much more feruently yee ought to bee drawen into the obsequie of that then euer yee obeyed this but yet that I might something pardon your weakenesse I omit that comparison Howbeit that I may deale with you very fauourably this I may by right require of you that at the least yee doe not imbrace righteousnes more coldly or negligently then yee haue serued sinne And therein is included a certayne kinde of silence or concealing when we wil haue more vnderstood then we expresse by words For he doth neuertheles exhort thē to obey righteousnesse so much the more studiously as it is more worthy thē sin to be serued although he seemeth not to require so much in words As yee haue giuen That is seeing before this al your mēbers were so ready to obey sin therby it easily appeared how miserably the prauity of your flesh did hold you captiue and bound Now therfore in like sort be prone and readye to be ruled of God and let not your courage be lesse nowe in doing of good then it was before in doyng of euill Hee doeth not obserue the order of the Antithesis to apply the partes on both sides as to the Thessalonians hee opposeth vncleannesse agaynst holinesse Yet his meaning is apparaunt First he setteth downe two kindes vncleannes 1. Thes 4.7 and iniquitie the first whereof is opposed to chastitie and sanctimonie the other hath respecte vnto iniuries whereby our neighbours are hurte Moreouer hee repeateth this woorde iniquitie twise in a diuers sense For in the first place it signifieth rapines deceiptes periuries and all kinde of iniuries Iniquity hath a twofold acception in the second place it signifieth the vniuersall corruption of life as if it were put thus yee haue giuen ouer your members to commit wicked woorkes that the kingdome of sinne might florishe in you I vnderstand righteousnesse to be put for the lawe and rule of a right life whose end is sanctification namely that the faithfull consecrate themselues in puritie to the worshippe of God 20 For when yee were the seruants of sinne yee were free from righteousnes 21 What fruite had yee then in those things wherof yee are now ashamed For their end is death 22 But nowe being freed from sinne and made the seruantes of God yee haue your fruite in holinesse and the end euerlasting life 23 For the wages of sinne is death but the gift of God is eternall life in Christ Iesus our Lord. 20 For when yee were Yet he repeateth that contrariety betweene the yoke of sinne and righteousnesse whereof hee made mention before For sinne and righteousnesse are things so contrary that he which voweth himselfe to one must needes depart from the other And that he doth to the ende that whiles they are looked vppon eyther of them by them selues it might more easily appeare what a man is to looke for of them both For separation or distinction helpeth in the consideration of the nature of euery thing Therefore hee setteth sinne on one hande and righteousnesse on the other then hauing put a difference hee sheweth what doeth followe on both sides Let vs therefore remember that the Apostle doeth yet argue from contraries after this manner so long as yee were the seruaunts of sinne yee were free from righteousnesse nowe on the contrary yee must serue righteousnesse because yee are free from the yoke of sinne He calleth those free from righteousnes who are holden by no reyne of obedience to the studie of righteousnes Who are called free from righteousnesse This is the liberty or licentiousnes of the flesh which freeth vs so from God that it maketh vs the bondslaues of the diuel Miserable cursed then is that liberty which by an vnbrideled or rather by a mad fury triumpheth to destruction 21 What fruite therefore c. He could not anie way more substantially expresse his mynd then by appealing to their conscience and as it were in their person to be ashamed For the godly assoone as they beginne to be illuminated by the spirite of Christ and the preaching of the Gospell all the former parte of their life which they haue led out of Christ they doe willingly acknowledge to haue beene damnable and they are so farre from goyng about to excuse themselues that rather they are ashamed of them selues And also they doe alway call to mynde the remembraunce of their ignominy to the ende they being so ashamed might more truely and more readily bee humbled before the Lord. Neyther is it in vayne he saith Now yee are ashamed For he insinuateth
restored vs to righteousnes by his sonne who are running headlong vnto death God by sending his sonne Nowe he sheweth the maner how the celestiall father hath restored vs to righteousnesse by his sonne namely because he hath condemned sinne in the flesh of Christ that is the handwriting being as it were cancelled he hath done away the giltines which did hold vs bound before the Lord. For the condemnation of sin hath brought vs into righteousnes because the giltines being put away we are absolued that God might repute vs iust But first he saith that Christ was sent that he might admonish vs how righteousnes is not resident in vs seeing it is to be sought for in another and in vaine doe men trust to theyr merites who are not otherwise iustified then by prayer or intreatie or els because the borrowe righteousnes of that satisfaction which Christ fulfilled in his flesh and he saith that Christ came in the similitude of sinfull flesh because albeit the flesh of Christ was stained with no blots yet to the sighte it seemed sinneful so far foorth as he susteined that punishment was due to our sinnes And certainly vpon the same flesh as subiect vnto him death did shew all the partes of his power And because it behooued our high priest by his own experience to learn what it is to succour the weak Christ would vndertake our infirmities that he might be the redier vnto mutual passion in whiche part also there appeared a certain image of sinfull nature Yea of sin I haue said a while agoe that this was expounded by some of the cause or end why God did send his sonne namely that he might make satisfaction for sin Chrysostome diuers after him vnderstande it somwhat more hardly namely that sin was condemned of sin because it slewe Christ vniustly vnworthily Indeed I confesse because he being iust and innocent vndertooke punishment for sinners by this meanes was the price of redemption paid Sinne taken for the sacrifice of sinne yet I cannot be brought to thinke the word sinne to be put heere in any other sense then for a sacrifice of satisfaction whiche of the Hebrews is called Asham as the Grecians cal Catharma a Sacrifice whereunto malediction or curse is annexed So the same Paul saith Christ who knew not sin became sin for vs that wee might be made the righteousnes of God in him And the preposition Peri of or for is taken here causally as though Paul had said vpon that sacrifice or els for the burden of sin whiche was laid vpon Christ sin was cast downe from his power that now it might not haue vs in subiection For he saith that sin was condēned metaphorically as they who are cast in a matter loose their processe because God dealeth no more against those giltie persons who are cleered by the sacrifice of Christe If wee say the kingdome of sinne wherewithall wee were oppressed was abrogated it is all one Therefore Christ tooke vnto him that was ours that hee might power vpon vs that was his For hauing taken vpon him our curse hee hath indued vs with his blessing Here Paul addeth in the flesh that our confidence might bee more sure whiles we see sinne was conquered abolished euen in our owne nature for so it cōmeth to passe that our nature is truely made partaker of that victorie which thing hee also declareth straightwayes 4 That the righteousnes of the lawe might bee fulfilled They who gather out of this place that those are renued by the spirite of Chrste doe fulfill the lawe they bring in a fayned matter altogether wide from the meaning of Paule for the faithfull so long as they wander in this worlde neuer come vnto that perfection that the righteousnesse of the lawe shoulde bee full and perfect in them Therefore this must needes be referred vnto grace because whiles the obediēce of Christ is imputed to vs the lawe is satisfied that wee might bee accounted for iuste For the perfection which the lawe required was therefore exhibited in the fleshe that the rigour thereof should no more be of force to condemne vs But because Christe doth communicate his righteousnes to none but whom he hath coupled to himselfe by the bond of his spirite Regeneration is added againe leaste Christe shoulde bee thought to bee the minister of sinne Righteousnes by faith in Christe is coupled with sanctification as many are ready to drawe that vnto the lasciuiousnesse of the flesh whatsoeuer is saide of the fatherly mercy of God and some do wickedly slaunder this doctrine as though it extinguished the studie of a right life 5 For they who are after the fleshe studie or cogitate those thinges which are of the fleshe and they which are after the spirite the thinges which are of the spirit 6 The wisedome or cogitation verily of the fleshe is death but the wisedome or cogitation of the spirite is life and peace 7 Seeing the wisedome or cogitation of the flesh is enmitie against God For it is not subiect to the law of God neyther can it be 8 They therefore whiche are in the fleshe can not please God 5 For they who are after the fleshe Hee bringeth in this difference of the fleshe and the spirite not onely by an argument taken from the contrarie to prooue that he sayde before namely that the grace of Christ doth not appertaine vnto any but those who beyng renewed by the spirite doe giue them selues vnto innocencie but also that with due consolation hee might cheere vp the faithful least whiles they are priuie in them selues vnto many infirmities they should dispaire For seeing none are deliuered from the curse but they who lead a spiritual life it might seeme that hope of saluation were cut off from all menne For what man shal be found in the worlde furnished with an Angelicall puritie so that he hath nothing to doe with the flesh It was necessarie to adde this definition what it is to be in the fleshe and to walke according to the fleshe At the first Paule doth not distinguishe so precisely but yet as wee shall see in the processe his purpose is to put the faithfull in good hope albeit they are yet tyed to their flesh so be that they loose not the reynes to the lustes thereof but suffer them selues to bee ruled by the holie spirite When he saith that the carnall doe care for or meditate the thinges of the fleshe hee testifieth that he counteth not those for carnall Who are carnall who aspire vnto heauenlye righteousnesse but who are altogether addicted to the world Therefore I haue put downe the word cogitate which comprehendeth more in steed of to be wise or vnderstand that the reader might know that they are excluded from the sonnes of God who beeyng giuen to the inticementes of the fleshe applye their mindes and studies to wicked lustes Nowe in the seconde member he exhorteth the faithfull to hope well if they feele
their partes for he should rather haue opposed these two members betweene theÌ„selues Who shal accuse It is Christ that maketh intercession Then to haue added the other two Who shal condemne It is God that iustifieth For the absolution or deliuerance of God answereth condeÌ„nation and the defence or supportation of Christ answeareth accusation But Paul not without cause hath transposed theÌ„ another way going about to arme the sonnes of God from top to toe as they say with the confidence of God which might banish a farre off anxieties feares More emphatically therfore he gathereth that the sonnes of God are not subiect to accusation because God doeth iustifie then if he had sayde because Christe is their Patrone for so he expresseth better howe the way is farre shutte vppe to iudgement where the iudge doeth pronounce himselfe that he altogether exempteth him from guiltinesse whom the accusator woulde drawe vnto punishment And there is also the like reason of the second part of the Antithesis or contrarietie For he sheweth that the faithfull are farre from the perill of condemnation seeyng Christe by making satisfaction for their sinnes hath preuented the iudgement of God and by his intercession hath not onely abolished death but also put our sinnes out of rememeÌ„raunce that they come not into account The summe is that we are not onelye by the present remedies when we come vnto the iudgement seate of GOD to be deliuered from feare but God doeth helpe more that he might better prouide for our confidence Howbeit here we are to note that with I haue alwaies admonished of before this namely that to iustifie with Paule is nothing els then being loosed from the sentence of God What it is to iustifie to be counted for iust And it is no harde matter to proue that in this present place where Paule reasoneth from the putting downe of one contrary vnto the destruction of another if so that to absolue and to receiue for guilty be contrarie Therfore God will not admit any accusation against vs because he hath absolued vs from euerye offence For vndoubtedly the Diuel is the accuser of all the godly the lawe of God it selfe and also their owne conscience doth reproue them but all these preuayle nothing before that iudge who doth iustifie them Therefore no aduersarie can shake much lesse ouerthrow our saluation Furthermore he so nameth the elect that he doubteth nothing of himselfe to be in the number of them Here is a general rule prescribed And that not by speciall reuelation as certaine Sophisters faine but by the common sence of all the godly Let euerie one therfore of the godlie by the example of Paul apply that vnto himselfe which is here saide of the elect Otherwise if he did burie election in the secrete counsell of God this doctrine were not onely colde but should lye altogether dead But seeing we know that that is purposely here vttered which euery one of the godly ought to apply vnto himself out of question we are all of vs lead vnto the touchstone of our vocation that we be resolued we are the sonnes of God 34 Who shall condemne As none can preuayle by accusing when the iudge hath absolued so there remayneth no condemnation when the lawes are satisfied and nowe the penaltie is payde But Christ is the man who once hath suffered the punishment due vnto vs therby professing himselfe to vndertake our turnes that he might deliuer vs he therfore that hereafter wil condemne vs must call Christ himselfe againe vnto death And he is not only dead but by his resurrection hath appeared Victorer of death and hath triumphed ouer the power thereof And he addeth yet more namely that hee sitteth at the right hand of the father How Christ is said to fit on the right hand of the father Ephe. 1.20 wherby is meant that he obteyneth the Lordship and full authority of heauen and earth as it is said to the Ephesians Lastly he teacheth that he sitteth so that he is the perpetuall aduocate and intercessour for the defence of our saluation Whence it followeth that if any will condemne vs he doth not only make voyde the death of Christ but also fighteth against that incomparable power wherewith the father hath adorned him placing him in the highest degree with such power This so great boldnes which dare triumph against the deuil death sinn the gates of hell ought to rest in al godly hearts because our faith is no faith vnlesse we doe certainly perswade our selues that Christ is ours that the father is mercifull vnto vs in him Nothing therfore can be imagined more pestilent or more deadlie then the schoole doctrine of the vncertaintie of saluatioÌ„ Who maketh incercession for vs. It was necessary this shoulde bee plainly added least the diuine maiestie of Christ should make vs afraid Although therfore from his high throne he holdeth all thinges in subiection vnder his feete yet Paul giueth vnto him the person of a mediator Of whose countenance to be afrayde were absurd seeing he doth not only gently inuite vs vnto him How Christ is said to make intercessioÌ„ for vs but also appeareth an intercessour for vs before the father Finally we must not measure this intercession by carnall sence For he is not to be thought to beseech his father humbly vpoÌ„ his knees with his hands stretched out but because he appeareth stil with his death resurrection which are in steed of an eternal intercession haue the efficacie of liuely prayer that they may reconcile the father to vs and make him intreatable he is worthely said to make intercession for vs. 35 Who shal separate vs from the loue of Christ Shall tribulation or anguish or persecution or hunger or nakednes or danger or sword 36 As it is written for thy sake we die daily we are counted as sheepe appoynted for the slaughter 37 But in al those thinges we ouercome by him who hath loued vs. 35 Who shal separate Now that securitie or boldnes is extended vnto inferiour thinges For he which is perswaded of the loue of God towardes him is able to stand in most grieuous afflictions which are therfore woont so greatly to torment men either because they thinke not they happeÌ„ by the prouideÌ„ce of God or they interprete theÌ„ to be tokeÌ„s of Gods wrath or that they thinke they are forsaken of God or that they looke for no ende or remeÌ„ber not there is a better life or some other such like But the mind which is purged from such errours shall easily be at rest and be quiet Finally this is the meaning of the words whatsoeuer happeneth we must stand in this faith namely that God who hath once loued vs will neuer cease to care for vs. For he doeth not simply say there is nothing can separate God from the loue of vs but he woulde that the knowledge and liuely sence of loue which he testifieth â—nto vs should so