A CHRISTIAN PLEA Conteyning three Treatises I. The first touching the Anabaptists others mainteyning some like errours with them II. The second touching such Christians as now are here commonly called Remonstrants or Arminians III. The third touching the Reformed Churches with vvhom my self agree in the faith of the Gospel of our Lord Iesus Christ Made by FRANCIS IOHNSON Pastour of the auncient English Church now sojourning at Amsterdam in the Low Countreyes Esa 50.5.6 The Lord hath opened myne eare and I was not rebellious neyther turned away back I gaue my back to the smiters and my cheeks to them that plucked off the haire I hid not my face from shame spitting Ier. 15 19. Thus saith the Lord If thou returne then wil I bring thee againe thou shalt stand before me if thou take forth the precious from the evill thou shalt be as my mouth let them returne unto thee but returne not thou unto them 2 Tim. 4 7 8. I haue fought a good fight I haue finished my course I haue kept the Faith Henceforth there is layd up for me a crown of righteousnes which the Lord the righteous Iudge shall giue me at that day and not to me onely but unto them also that loue his appearing PRINTED In the yeere of our Lord 1617. To the Christian Reader Grace mercy and peace be multiplied in Iesus Christ. CHristian Reader I do here present unto thee three Treatises joyned together in one book which I wish may proue as profitable to the Church and people of God as they are needful for this age estate of things wherein we liue Whereabout there are some few things that I would advertise thee before thou come to read the treatises thēselues 1. That thou wouldest obserue how our Lord Iesus Christ giving ordinances to his Church under the Gospel hath derived them from the practise particulars had among the Iewes of old varying therefrō as litle as might be in such a different estate For example as they had their Synagogues so haue we our particular churches and assemblies Psal 74 8. Mat. 4.23 9.35 with Act. 20.28 Col. 4.16 Rev. 2.1 c. They had in their Synagogues the ministration of the word of God and prayer so likewise haue we Act. 13.14.15 15.21 16.13 with Act. 2.42 1 Cor. 14.3.15.16 1 Tim. 2.1 4.13 They had for ordinarie Sacraments seales of Gods covenant Circumcisiō the Passeover See M. Brought on Dan. 9.25 26 27. with that he alledgeth out of R. Moses ben Maym. in Asure biah perek 13. And Ioseph de bel Iud. 6. cap. 31. And Paulus Burgens in Psal 112. Tremell Scaliger de emendat tempor l. 6. And Beza on Matt. 26.20 we haue likewise baptisme the Lords supper answering thereunto Touching baptisme also our Lord took it as some haue observed frō the Jewes baptizing of Proselytes washing of thēselues frō uncleannes which was knowen usual among thē And the Lords supper likewise frō a custome observed among the Iewes at the Passeover at the end of the celebration wherof the fathers of families were woont to take a cake of bread after the blessing thereof to break distribute it to the cōmunicāts as also after that a cup of wine in like sort Whereunto that may haue reference which David speaketh saying What shal I rēder to the Lord for all his benefits towards me I vvil take the cup of salvation and cal on the name of the Lord. Psa 116.12 13. They had Sacrifices which led thē to Christ who was then to come to dye for our sinnes we haue in stead thereof the Lords supper which cōfirmeth unto us that Christ now is come hath dyed for our transgressions the memorial whereof we doe stil obserue shewing forth his death til he come againe at that great day Lev. 1. c. Esa 53.7 10. Dan. 9.24.26.27 with Ioh. 1.29 1 Cor. 5.7 10.16 11.23 c. They had the Sabbaths and Feast dayes for the solemne worship of God in stead whereof we haue the Lords day Exo. 20.8 Lev. 23. ch Esa 66.23 Zac. 14.16 19. with Act. 20.6.7 Rev. 1.10 They had Priests for offering the Sacrifices that were types of Christs death we haue Pastours for celebration of the Lords supper a memorial of his death passion now performed and still thankfully to be remembred Exod. 28. Lev. 1. Num. 16. 2 Chron. 35.1 Ezech. 43 44. 45. 46 c. with 1 Cor. 10. 16. 11.23 Ephes 4.11.12 Col. 4.17 They had Priests Levites we Pastours and Teachers for the work of the Ministerie Num. 18. Deut. 33.8 11. 2 Chro. 35 ch Esa 66.21 with Ephe. 4.11.12 Rom. 12.7.8 They had for government besides Priests and Levites Ruling Elders also of the chief of the Fathers of Families among them and we haue for government besides the Pastours and Teachers the Ruling Elders also taken out of the people in that behalf And so as they had a Synedrion or Consistorie of Elders consisting of Priests Levites and Fathers of Families of the people among thē so haue we a Presbyterie or company of Elders consisting likewise of Pastours Teachers and Ruling Elders chosen out of the people for the churches government Deu. 19.17 2 Chro. 19.8 Jer. 19.1 with 1 Tim. 5.17 Rom. 12.7.8 1 Cor. 12 28. Act. 20.17.28 Heb. 13.7.17.24 They had for the Treasurie the Leviticall treasurers other the like to whō that busines was committed we haue the Deacons for that use service in that church 1 Chro. 26.20 28. 2 Chron. 31.12 c. Neh. 13 13. with Act. 6. 1 6. 1 Tim. 3. 8 13. They had for censures Niddui Cherem and Schammatha Seclusion Cutting off utter devoting to judgment till the Lords comming at that day We also haue the use of Suspension of Excommunication of Anathema Maranatha Num. 19 ch Esa 66.5 Iude v. 14 22.23 Luke 6.22 2 Thes 3.6.14.15 1 Tim. 1.20 1 Cor. 5.5.11.12.13 16.22 Finally they had Ierusalem where God set his name and the Temple where he dwelt among them whither he required them to come with their sacrifices c. Which typed out unto us not onely the Vniversall church but the particular churches also of Christians where the Lord setteth his name dwelleth among us by his spirit calling us thither to eate at his Table and in all things to worship serue him according to his word Deu. 12.5 6.7 16.2 Psa 26.6 7 8. 27.4 36.8 9. 65.4 132. Esa 27.13 66.23 Dan. 8 11.13.14 11 31. with Mat. 28.19.20 1 Cor. 3. 16.17 2 Cor. 6.16 2 Thes 2.4 Rev. 3. 12. 21. 2. c. By this may also appear how M. Ainsw in his plea against M. Smyth about the Ministerie worship government of the Church wrote once well if he could haue kept unto it whē he asked him saying What one thing haue we in the worship of God which
hath never ben repealed but abideth stablished upon a certaine perpetuall ground that is his promise and covenant of grace made with the faythfull and their seed for ever For which see the Scriptures here cited before and these also which followe Luke 1 54 55 72. c. and 19 9. Act. 16 31. Rom. 4 11 16 17. and 15 8 9 10. Gal 3 8 29. Esa 54 10. Mal. 3 6. Luk. 20 37 38. Hebr. 11 13 16. and 13 8 20. Rev. 14 6. II. And Christ hath confirmed the same when he sent forth his Apostles appointed them †Matth. 28 18 19. and Mark 16 15 16. with Gal. 3 8 29. Gen. 12 3. and 17 4 5 7 12 26 27. with Act. 16 15 31 33. Rom. 4 9 17 and 11.13 16. and 15.8 16. 2 Cor. 1 20. to make all the nations disciples to baptize them into the name of the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost For to make the Gentiles disciples is by the Gospel to bring them unto the covenant of God made with Abraham the Father of manie nations for salvation through the name of Iesus Christ Which covenant is everlasting includeth the faithful their seed So as therefore Baptisme which hath now succeeded and doth seale it in stead of Circumcision is by this appointment of Christ to be administred unto all that be brought comprehended under that covenant of grace and consequently both to such as are of yeeres comming to the faith of Christ and to their children being yet infants And otherwise * Zach. 2 11. Esa 42 6 7. and 49 6 22. Act. 13 46 47. Joh. 10 16. 1 Cor. 1 9 13 16. and 12 13. Ephes 2 11 22. and 3 6. the Gentiles should not with the Iewes be joyned to the Lord and become his people with them and be made coinheriters of the same bodie and joynt-partakers of the same promise of God in Christ by the Gospel as the Scripture teacheth III. Which is yet the more manifest inasmuch as the Scripture speaking both of the Iewes and Christian Gentiles of their Sacraments saith that †1 Cor. 10 1 2. the Iewes of old were baptized and that * Col. 2 11 12. the Christians now are circumcized with circumcision made without hands which the Apostle also calleth the circumcision of Christ and that ‡ with 1 Cor. 12 12 13. and Ephes 3 6. Esa 49 6 22. both Iewes and Gentiles are fellow-heires partakers of the same promise in Christ and of one the same bodie under Christ the head By which againe it is evident that Baptisme is answerable to circumcision succeeding in the place thereof to be the Lords signe seale of his covenant and that Baptisme now is to be administred to the beleevers and their children aswel as circumcision was heretofore IIII. And this was also the †Act. 16 15 33. 1 Cor. 1 16. Apostles practise at the publishing of the gospell through the world to baptize both the householders themselues that beleeved their households also Euen like as ‡ with Gen. 15 6. and 17 26 27. and 21 4. Abraham first beleeved and then was circumcised and all his familie with him And like as * Exod. 12 48 49. And that by the speach of an house familie or houshold children also are implyed therein see Gen. 30 25 30. and 45 18 19. with 46 5 6 7. Num. 3 15. c. Psal 115 12 13 14. 1 Tim. 5 8. Herein therefore Origen sayth well that * Orig. in Epist ad Rom. the Church received Baptisme of Infants from the Apostles And Augustine that †August contra Donatist lib. 4 ca. 23.24 the baptisme of Infants was not derived from the authoritie of man or Councils but from the tradition or doctrine of the Apostles the stranger of the Gentiles which received the faith of the Iewes would keep the Passeover was not onely circumcised himself but all the males also that were his V. Moreover the children of beleevers are holy are Abrahams seed and heires by promise of the kingdome of heauen eternall blessednes And who can then withhold the baptisme of water from them to whom God vouchsafeth the baptisme of his spirit and the blessing of Abraham to an inheritance everlasting in his heauenly kingdome 1 Cor. 7 14. Rom. 11 16. Act. 3 25. Gal. 3 29. Esa 46 3 4. Psal 22 10 30 71 6. 115 12 13 14 15. Luke 1 41 44. Act. 10 47. Rom. 8 9 16. Luke 19 9. Mark 10 13 16. VI. And Baptisme is the Lords signe of his washing awaie of our sinnes receiving of us into the Church and incorporating of us into Christ for salvation by his death and resurrection Whereof the children of beleevers are partakers aswell as they which be of yeeres and therefore can no more be deprived of Baptisme then of remission of sinnes entrance in to the Church ingraffing into Christ salvation by his meanes Rom. 6 3 4. and 5 14 15. Zac. 13 1. 1 Cor. 1 13 16. and 12 13. Act. 4 12. with 16 30 34. and 22 16. Gal. 3 27 28 29. Ephes 2 19. 5 25 30. Tit. 3 4 5 6 7. Rev 1 4 5. Whereupon Origen writeth thus †Orig. tom 2. homil 14. in Lucam Children are baptised for the remission of sinnes Of what sinnes Or when haue they sinned Or how can there be any reason of the laver in children but according to the sense whereof we spake There is none pure from uncleannes no not if their life be but one day upon the earth VII Neyther is there any thing required in the ministration of Baptisme nor was heretofore * Gen. 17 7 12 26. and 21 4. in circumcision whereof young infants are not capable as wel as elder people whereas in the ministration of the Lords supper it is farre otherwise For ‡ and 1 Cor. 1 16. Act. 16 14 15 33. Matt. 28 18 19. with in baptisme the minister is †I speak of the outward agent the agent alone the person baptized whether old or young is onely a patient not an agent but “ in the Lords supper besides the actions laid upon the Minister there are diverse actions required also of the receivers as namely to take to eat to drinke to doe it in remembrance of Christ to shewe forth the Lords death to examine themselues and so to eat of that bread and drink of that cuppe All which actions are required of the receivers of the Lords supper whereby they also are made agents therein and not the Ministers onely But in baptisme it is not so for in it the action is wholly enjoyned and layd upon the baptizer and not upon the baptized So that euen by the institution and administration of baptisme compared with the institution and administration of the Lords supper the trueth of this point yet further is cleared and confirmed unto us †Matth.
thou hast a name that thou livest and art dead Rev. 3 1. Should we novv infer hereupon as this man here doth upon the like phrase in the Prophets touching Israell that therefore baptisme and the other ordinances of God had in the church of Sardis vvere but in shew reteyned therein and could not be unto them the signes and seales of forgiuenes of sinnes and of life eternall and therefore vvere in their use of them false and deceitful as vvere the ordinances as he saith of God reteined among the Gentiles Would any man of heart and understanding endure such blasphemie Saith not the Scripture that the church of Sardis vvas one of the seuen golden candlesticks shewed unto Iohn And doth not Christ our Lord who hath the seuen spirits of God vvhose eyes are as a flame of fire accordingly approue it so to be Rev. 1 4 11 12 13 14 20. with 3 1 c. Far rather will I with Christ his Apostle esteem it to be dead in some respect yet acknowledge it a golden Candlestick and true Church of God in other respect then gather such maner of consequences as this man usually doth upon any such phrases that he meteth vvithall And this is the more to be mynded touching this doctrine of his because himself in the same treatise affirmeth that ‘ Animad pag. 103. our reasons from Israell are impertinent to the estate of Rome there spoken off but might vvell serue for the times vvherein Iohn lived vvhen the true †Rev. 2 and 3 cha Churches vvere many of them apostate Where also he citeth in the margent Rev. 2 and 3 chapters and so this Church of Sardis for one Where I might note againe his contradicting of himself and his manifold errors in divers respects if I vvould here stand thereupon For if the estate of apostate Israell may vvel serue the times of Iohn when the true churches spoken off in the Revelation ch 2 and 3. vvere many of them apostate then it cannot be that the estate and ordinances of God had in Israell should be such as ‡ Animad p. 70 c. in this other place and throughout his treatise he would beare us in hand Thē also should Israel be a true church though in apostasie as here himself calleth those churches in the Revelation apostate and yet true churches Which by vvord and vvriting othervvhere he still oppugneth That vvhich concerneth the church of Rome may be touched othervvhere In the meane time we haue now ynough from these men themselues seeing the church of Sardis vvhich they say was apostate and Christ saith vvas dead is by themselues acknowledged to be a true church by the Scriptures approved for a golden candlestick So al their pretences and oppositions vanish into smoke Secondly for the place of Hoseah it self if it be understood as by putting a vvord to the text here they expound it of death in sinne yet let it be vvell considered vvhether it will therefore follow that circumcision now in Israel was not the Lords signe his seale of forgiuenes of sinne but a false and deceitfull signe in their use thereof and no better then the ordinances of the heathen The Scripture sheweth how vvhen one being called of Christ to follow him requested saying ‘ Luke 9 59 60. Lord suffer me first to goe and bury my father Christ said unto him again Let the dead bury the dead but goe thou and preach the kingdome of God meaning Let the dead spiritually bury those that are dead bodily Shall we novv therefore hereupon gather that the circumcision then had among the Iewes vvas a false deceitful signe in their use thereof and not the Lords seale of forgiuenes of sinne and eternall life Also vvhen Paul speaking of widovves in the Church saith “ 1 Tim. 1 3 5 6. Honour widowes that are vvidowes in deed c. Now she that is a widow in deed and desolate trusteth in God and continueth in supplications prayers night and day But she that liveth in pleasure is dead while she liveth Meaning she that liveth the naturall life but is dead vvith spiritual death May we now infer hereupon that the baptisme had in the church of Ephesus where Timothee thus vvritten unto “ 1 Tim. 1 3. now was or in any other of the Primitiue churches wherein such widowes were was not the Lords signe of the remission of sinnes and eternall life but a lying execrable signe in their use thereof and no better then the heathens baptisme or other observations of theirs Shall the infidelitie of man make Gods trueth of none effect Shall not God be true though men be lyars Shal not his signes seales still be his true and holy ordinances though eyther Churches generally or some particular persons that enjoy them walk unworthy of them abuse and corrupt both them and themselues If some among this people that write shus yea if the Congregation it self vvherof these men themselues are should be dead in sinne having * Rom. 16.17 Gal. 5 19 20. Heb. 10 25 Iude v. 19. offended scandalously divided themselues from the church whereof they vvere as †Arrow against idolatrie p. 4 71. c. they acknovvledge that Israell did from Iudah notwithstanding all their pretences to the contrary will they therefore yeeld that the baptisme had among them is not the Lords ordinance nor his signe seale of forgiuenes of sinne and of eternall life but a lying and deceitfull signe in their use thereof and no better then the heathens ordinances Or if some in any Churches euen in the best at this day be found dead in their sinnes will they therefore infer such consequences about the baptisme other ordinances of God had among them that they are not the Lords signes and seales but lying deceitfull in their use thereof The vvord of God it self is by some made unto themselues the savour of death unto death Is it not therefore in the Lords ordinance the savour of life unto life 2 Cor. 2 14 15 16. So likevvise is it with the Lords supper as the Apostle shevveth 1 Cor. 11 18 34. Yet may vve not therefore gather such consequences thereupon as these men doe about the question in hand Thirdly their exposition of the place aforesaid being admitted it was then that Israell became dead in sinne when they offended in Baal But the vvorship of Baal in the ten tribes vvas first instituted by Achab. 1 Kin. 16. 31 32 33. And Ahab was the seuenth king of Israell and reigned about threescore yeeres after Ieroboam the sonne of Nebat that set up the Calues caused Israell to sinne 1 King 12 16 chap. And there was great difference betweene Ieroboams calues and Baals idolatrie as appeareth both by Eliahs historie vvho ‘ 1 Kin. 18 18. c. directly earnestly set himself against the Prophets of Baal in Ahabs time that first brought them into Israell
as oft as ye drink it in remembrance of me 1 Cor. 11 24 25. By which meanes our faith is the more strengthned our hope increased our mutuall loue nourished and vve still stirred up with all thankfulnes to ascribe unto God the praise of our salvation in Iesus Christ In vvhich respect also it may fitly be called the Eucharist or Thankesgiving 1 Cor. 10.16 18. and 11.23 26. compared vvith Mat. 26.26.27.28 Mar. 14.22 25. Luke 22.19.20 Act. 2.41.42 and 20.7 vvith Numb 28.9.10 Ezech. 44.15.16 4. And note here hovv the Papists and Lutherans doe much urge though diversly the having of Images for the better remembrance of Christ and to be in stead of books for the unlearned people c. whereas Christ hath appointed himself to be described and his people to be taught and put in remembrance of him not by Images but by his Gospel and Sacraments Mar. 16.15 Gal. 3.1.8 Mat. 26.28 and 28.18.19.20 1 Cor. 10.16 and 11.23 26. And therewithall let it be observed whether that Images vvere not then most of all brought into the churches and private houses under the pretences aforesaid vvhen the diligent teaching of the Gospell and often celebration of the Lords Supper did by degrees decay and cease more and more in the parishionall churches among the people So as the Ministers becomming themselues dumbe non resident or slothfull the Images though also dumbe vvere made to supply their place being novv set up to be the peoples teachers and remembrancers another way in stead of the liuely preaching of the vvord careful observation of the Lords supper for the continuall shevving forth and memoriall of his death from time to time Which therefore may the more stirre up the churches novv being reformed not onely to abandon the foresaid Images but also diligently to use both the preaching of the Gospel often communicating at the Lords Table the better to meet with the corruptions of later times and to returne to the intier practise of the churches that vvere in former ages 5. Furthermore the Lords supper being rightly considered is answerable not onely to the Passeover but to the other Feasts also and sacrifices had at Ierusalem And the Prophets speaking of the times of the Gospel under the termes of the shadovves of the Lavv foretold that from one Nevv moone to another and from one Sabbath to another all flesh should come to vvorship before the Lord at Jerusalem c. Which by the practise aforesaid carefully observed vve may performe and enjoy in Christ who is the truth body of all those types and shadovves And how othervvise it is or can outwardly be performed aright and ansvverably to the prophecies and shadowes aforesaid should by al churches heedfully be observed Esa 66.23 Ezec. 44.15.16.24 and 45 18 25. and 46 1 11. Zach. 14 16 19. vvith Col. 2.16.17 Act. 2.42 and 20 7. Rev. 1 10. 1 Cor. 10.16 18. and 11.23 26. Besides that the Lords day and the Lords supper at the Lords Table doe fitly agree together both for the termes and for the things themselues thus spoken of Rev. 1.10 compared vvith 1 Cor. 10.16.17.21 and 11.20 and Act. 20.7 Another question there is about the time of the day vvhen the Lords supper should be celebrated vvhether in the morning or euening c. Some think it should be in the euening or after noone because Christ at first with his disciples did eat it at euen after the Passeover vvhereupon it vvas called the Lords supper Touching which on the other hand may these reasons be observed and the like 1. That the having of it then at euen vvas upon speciall occasion because it follovved the celebration of the Passeover which was kept at euen Which occasion ceasing the time is left free Christ having not appointed it or any set time thereunto Mat. 26.17 26. c. 2. So Christ and his disciples eate it then with unleavened bread by the occasion aforesaid and the feast of unleavened bread then also observed Which now being ceased as vve are not therefore bound to the use of unleavened bread so neyther are vve bound to that circumstance of time but may as freely use another time as other common and usuall bread therein Mat. 26 17 26. Mar. 14 12 22. vvith Exod. 12.8.15.18 c Act. 2.42 and 20.7 1 Cor. 10 16. 3. In like manner at the first celebration of the Passeover in Egypt they eat it standing with staues in their hand as ready to depart from thence and sprinkled blood upon the lintell side posts of their doores keeping within not going out of their houses because that night the Lord vvould passe through to smite the Egyptians and seeing the blood on their doore posts would passe over them and not destroy their first borne vvith the other Exod. 12.7.11 13.22.13 Which occasions ceasing vvhen aftervvard they vvere in the land at rest they eat it sitting sprinkled not their doore posts vvith blood neyther vvere bound to keepe vvithin but might goe out of their houses as we read that Christ vvith his disciples sate dovvne to eat it and then aftervvard went out of the house that night to the mount of Oliues c. Mat. 26 19.20.30 This sheweth forth the Lords death already done as those typed out his death then to come 4. Moreover the Lords supper as by other occasion I noted here before is so to be considered as not onely succeeding the Passeover but as ansvvering also to the other Feasts and Sacrifices then had in Israell Which were observed aswell in the morning as at euening Not to speak of the Shevv bread still being on the pure Table before the Lord other the like ordinances had in Israell Which in the perpetuall equitie thereof may haue their use being hereunto fitly and vvisely applyed according to the proportion of faith Ioh. 1 29 36. 1 Cor. 5 7. and 10 16 17 18. Luke 22 7 20. compared vvith Lev. 1 7. and 23 chap. and 24 5 9. Numb 15 1 2 29. and 28 29 chap. Deut. 16 1 17. Heb. 13 8 16. Hos 14.2 Mal. 1 11. Zach. 14 16 19. Esa 66 23. Rev. 13 8. 5. Finally the auncient practise of the churches of Christ ever synce the Apostles times confirmeth the same yet more unto us As when in the Acts of the Apostles it is vvritten that upon the first day of the week the disciples came together to break bread Act. 20 7. Where in that he saith they came together that day to this end we must either think that they met but at euening for it or grant that they had and might haue it at other times besides Which Iustine Martyr makes manifest whose words I noted here before besides the continuall practise of the Church ever since throughout all ages vvhich is carefully to be regarded in all such things as are not repugnant or disagreeing to the vvord of God CHAPTER XV. Touching the having of a Fast and the Lords supper
as I noted before upon other occasion that we should often celebrate the Lords supper in remembrance of him so shevving forth his death untill he come to make us partakers of eternal salvation in his kingdome for evermore Iohn 20 1 19 26. Rev. 1 10. Act. 20 7. 1 Cor. 16 1 2. with 10 16. and 1◠23 26. Dan. 9 24 27. Esa 66 22 23. Exo. 20 8 9 10. 2. Now also the observation of dayes times that was under the Law a shadow of good things to come is accomplished in Christ And the ceremoniall difference of dayes is taken away together with the rest of the Ievvish shadowes and ceremonies all times being sanctified in Christ to the name and vvorship of God so as vve haue not now such need or use of yerely rites and observations as was heretofore under the Lavv before Christs exhibiting in the flesh Col. 2 16 17. Gal. 4 10 11. with Esa 66 23. Jer. 3 16 17. 3. And seing vve may not novv thus use the dayes which were once ordeyned by God himself much lesse may we thus use other that are devised by men imposed on the church Gal. 4 9 10 11. with 1 Kin. 12 32 33. 4. Besides that by such observation of dayes as is aforesaid superstition and other corruptions still are nourished and the Papists and others more confirmed in their errors 5. Here also may be observed that festivall or holy dayes are appurtenances of the Idols or Images vvhether Christian or Heathen to which they vvere first appointed and thus far forth apperteyne to the second commandement and are breaches thereof In which respect likewise it is not lavvful to invent or to obserue any such as are devised by men for the service and worship of God And therefore as the reformed churches haue abolished and taken away the Images of the Saints Apostles Virgin Mary the Rood Crucifix and the like so should they likewise abandon their festivall or holy dayes with all other remnants of superstition perteyning thereunto Exo. 20 4 5 6. with 32 4 5. 1 Kin. 12 33. Esa 30 22 6. And vvhereas some that haue rejected the other Saints dayes doe yet reteyne the observation of Christmas Easter and the like in tegard of the Nativitie and Resurrection of Christ c. apply hereunto both the reasons aforesaid and these also follovving more particularly Touching Easter or the Resurrection of Christ 1. Whereas the observation thereof from the Apostles times is much alledged note 1. That it comming at the same time vvhen the Passeover was woont to be kept in Israell it might the more be borne with as some other rites dayes and ceremonies of the Ievves vvere for a time Act. 15 19 20 21 24 29. Rom. 14 1 5. c. and 15 1 2 c. 2. The great and auncient controversy that was about the time of the observation thereof betvveen the East West Churches may wel shew that they had no institution or certainty thereof For if there had ben an Apostolik constitution thereof vvhat needed there haue ben such a strife and contention thereabout 3. We haue vveekely the Lords day vvherein Christ rose againe from the dead And vvhat need or use then is there of one day yearely to be kept thereabout vvhen as weekly we haue the Lords day on vvhich Christ rose from the dead and appeared to his disciples that day and eight dayes after againe passing over the Ievves Sabbath and gaue to Iohn the Revelation on that day c. and all his actions are our instructions Of vvhich see more here before section 1. Concerning vvhich also Iustine Martyr vvriteth thus On Sunday we haue all generally our meeting together inasmuch as it is the first day wherein God turning the darknes and matter which he created at first made the vvorld and Jesus Christ our Saviour that self same day rose from the dead For the day before Saturday he was crucified and the day after vvhich is Sunday appearing to his Apostles and disciples he taught those things which we relate unto you that ye might look into them c. Iustin Martyr Apolog. 2. Ed◠Commelin pag. 77. Touching Christmas or the Nativity of Christ 1. That the time thereof is not certainly knowen or is much mistakē there being many reasons of waight why it should rather be thought to be in September then in December as novv commonly is held and observed 1. The heauen and earth and so the vvorld vvas at first created in September at which moneth the Ievves to this day begin their civill yere vvhereunto fitly is answering the creating of the new heauens and earth brought in by Christ and foretold by the Prophets Esa 65 17 18. and 66.22 Rev 21 1. 2. The moneth of September vvas in Israell by Gods ordinance most vvhat a moneth of feasts Num. 29 cha with Lev. 23 23 24 27 34. c. Which might fitly type out the gladsome birth and comming of Christ at that season into the vvorld Whereof the Angell said to the Shepheards Feare not for behold I bring you good tidings of great joy which shal be to all people For unto you is borne this day in the city of David a Saviour which is Christ the Lord. Luke 2 10 11. 3. More particularly in the moneth of September vvas the Feast of boothes or Tabernacles solemnely observed in Israell Levit. 23 34 43. and Numb 29 12 38. Neh. 7 73. and 8 chap Which also might fitly lead unto the birth of Christ at that season of whom the Gospell saith speaking of his manifestation in the flesh The vvord was made flesh dwelt as in a booth or Tabernacle among us c. Iohn 1 14. For so doth the vvord * Ioh. 1 14 with 7 2. Mat. 17 4 Act. 15 16. Heb. 9. ch 11 9 2 Cor. 5 1 4. 2 Pet. 1 13 14. Rev 21.3 ESCENOSE there used signify and implyeth thus much Which may well haue speciall reference hereunto 4. Also in the same moneth vvas the Ark by Salomon brought into the Temple to the most holy place at the Feast of Tabernacles 1 King 8. 1 6. c. Novv both the Temple and most holy place and the Ark it self vvere speciall types of Christ in divers respects Iohn 2 18 21. Hebr. 9 24. Rom. 3 25. Rev. 11 19. Touching vvhich point concerning this moneth and matter because M. Broughton * In his book called Our Lords Family c. fol. 2. b. 3. c. hath observed divers things of good use moment I wil here therefore set down his observation in his own words as followeth In what moneth S. Mark beginneth his storie and the rest the opening of the heauens by the second Elias Because our Lord was baptised euen beginning thirty and to open the Kingdome by teaching the covenant to many three yeeres and six moneths Seing his soules passage frō the crosse to the Father is certaine in the fifteenth of Nisan So his birth and
5 21. and 5 1 10 11. 1. Because the graces and fruits aforesaid namely the spirit of adoption faith in Iesus Christ with the fruits thereof are certain pledges and assurances of Gods eternall election unto salvation as hath ben shewed before pag. 222. Novv as God himself so his decree and loue toward his elect for salvation is unchangeable therefore it cannot be that those vvhom he hath chosen unto life eternall should by him again for ever be rejected and become reprobate unto condemnation and so to fall utterly from the Lord to be deprived for ever of his quickning spirit and saving faith in Iesus Christ Mal. 3 6. and Exod. 3 14 15. Jam. 1 17. Heb. 6 17 18 19 20. Mat. 24 24 31 34. 1 Sam. 15 29. Psal 102 13 14 27 28. Ier. 31 3. Joh. 13 1. compared with 2 Cor. 1 19 22. Rom. 8 15.16 Gal. 4 6. and 5 22 23. Ephes 1 3 14. Phil. 1 6. Tit. 1 1 2. Rom. 8 29 39. 2 Els it vvould follow eyther that such were not the Lords giuen unto Christ or that the Lord is overtaken and deceived in his decree election of grace or not able to preserue them by his grace power to eternall life but that they vvhich are his sheep for whom Christ layd dovvne his life might notvvithstanding perish and be plucked out of his hands Contrarie to the doctrine of Christ Mat. 24 24 31 35. Ioh. 3 8 14 15 16. and 5 24. and 6 35 37 39 40 56 57 58. and 10 15 27 28 29. And contrarie to his prayer Ioh. 17 20.24 with 14 16. Contrarie also to the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles Esa 54 9 10. and 55 3. with Act. 13 34. Jer. 31 31 37. and 32 40. Habak 2 2 3 4. with Rom. 1 16 17. and 4.20 25. and 8.29.30 1 Pet. 1.3 4 5. 1 Iohn 5.4.13.18 Revel 13.8 and 21.27 and 22.6 9. And contrarie to their assured perswasion recorded for our instruction and comfort in the Scriptures vvhen they say I know that my Redeemer liveth and that he shal stand at the latter day upon the earth c. Job 19 25. And againe I know whom I haue beleeved and I am perswaded that he is able to keep that which I haue committed unto him against that day 2 Tim. 1 12. And vvhen the Apostle speaketh of all the elect saying Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods elect It is God that justifieth who is he that condemneth It is Christ that dyed yea rather that is risen again who is euen at the right hand of God who also maketh intercession for us Who shall separate us from the loue of Christ Shall tribulation or distresse or persecution or famine or nakednes or perill or sword c. Nay in al these things vve are more then conquerours through him that loved us For I am perswaded that neither death nor life nor Angels nor principalities nor powers nor things present nor things to come nor height nor depth nor any other creature shal be able to separate us from the loue of God which is in Christ Iesus our Lord. Rom. 8 33 39. 3. Neyther els could vve in this life haue assurance of salvation in Christ but should still be wavering and in doubt and so be left without sound comfort in the midst of the manifold tentations and afflictions of this life Like as cometh to passe by the erroneous doctrine of the Papists in this and other like points of their religion Contrarie also to the assured promise of God the true nature of faith and the gracious testimonie of Gods spirit and fruits thereof in us Besides the examples of such as are recorded in the Scriptures to haue had assurance of salvation and of perseverance to the end As vvas shewed in some examples here before Psal 119.49.50 and 56.3.4.9 13. and 62 1.2 and 116.10 vvith 2 Cor. 4.13.14 Psa 55.3 vvith Act. 13.34 Iohn 5.24 and 6.35.37.39.40 and 10.27.28.29 and 14.27 and 16.33 and 20.31 Rom. 4.20 25. and 8.16 39. 2 Cor. 1.21.22 Gal. 4.6.7 and 5.22.23 Ephes 1.13.14 and 4.30 Phil. 1.6 Tit. 1.1 Hebr. 2.10.11.17.18 6.17 20. 11 ch 1 Pet. 1.2 6. and 2 Pet. 1.3 10. 1 Ioh. 5.4.13 4. Els also the righteousnes vvhich novv we haue by the redemption of Christ should not be more stable and firme unto us then the righteousnes vvhich Adam or the Angels had by creation in that first estate of integritie For Adam fell from his righteousnes and many of the Angels also from theirs leaving their first estate Whereas they vvhich are redeemed by Christ and made partakers of his righteousnes having it once sealed in their hearts by the spirit of God shal never loose it again For the redemption vvhich Christ hath wrought for the elect and the righteousnes vvhich he hath brought in for us by his death is eternall Dan. 9.24 Hebr. 9.12.24.28 and Rom. 8.15.23.30.33.34 38.39 2 Cor. 1.21.22 Ephes 1.7.13.14 compared vvith Gen. 1.26.27 and 3.1 7. Psal 49.12.20 Eccles 7.29 2 Pet. 2.4 Jude ver 8. And they vvhich trust in the Lord and are built upon Christ the rock by faith in him are as the Scripture saith like mount Sion vvhich cannot be removed but standeth for ever Psal 125.1 And like the vvise man which buildeth his house on a rock against vvhich all the raine floods vvinds and stormes that fall and beat upon it can not prevaile to make it fall because it is founded upon a rock Mat. 7.24.25 and 24.24 5. Besides that if one of the elect and faithful beleevers in Christ may vvholly fal away from the Lord be rejected for ever then also might another and another and so all of them For vve haue all like precious faith vvith the Apostles themselues though in several measure and degrees through the righteousnes of God and our Saviour Iesus Christ 2 Pet. 1.1 And thus the faith novv spoken of is fitly called the faith of Gods elect Tit. 1.1 If therefore any and so all of the elect and faithfull beleevers in Christ might vvholly fall avvay from the Lord and be rejected for ever how then were the decree of Gods election eternall and unchangeable as vvas shevved before hovv should the promise of God to his people be certain everlasting how is the covenant of Gods grace certainly confirmed by the death of Christ for salvation to his elect through the blood of his crosse vvhere and what should be the benefit of Christs faithfull keeping and preservation of his people vvhat vvould be the fruit and comfort of the gracious presence and povverfull working of the Spirit of Sanctification in us Finally vvhere should now be the certaintie and stabilitie of the grace power glorie and kingdome of God in Christ for and through the salvation of the elect and faithfull Which the whole Scripture teacheth us to ascribe unto God with praise thanks for evermore Mat. 6.9 13. compared vvith Ephes 1.3.4.5.6.7
distribution thereof but is also a liuely representation of the death of Christ which we shew forth in the participation thereof 1 Cor. 10 16 17. 11 24 26. with Mat. 26 26. Mar. 14 22. Luke 22 19. 3. Such placing of the bread and vvine upon a Table and the distribution of them there accordingly made vve may also learne by the very terme of a Table and the common use thereof Paul calleth it a Table not an altar forme or deske and opposeth it to the Idolaters Table on which they were woont to set their meat and drink 1 Cor. 10 21. with ver 19 20 28. Hitherto also may be referred the use of the Table in the Tabernacle on which the Shevv bread continually was set before the Lord. Exod. 25 23 30. Lev 24 5 9. 4. And for the thanksgiving to be made both at the blessing of the bread the wine it is plainly expressed Mat. 26 26 27. Mar. 14 22 23. CHAPT XII Touching the Ministers communicating with the rest of the Church VVHether the Minister himself that administreth the Lords supper should not also partake vvith the church communicating together therein Mat. 26 17 29. Act. 20 7 11. 1 Cor. 10 16 17. and 11 23 26. and 12 12 13. with 2 Chron. 35 3 14. 1. Because Christ himself did so communicating vvith his disciples both in the Passeover and in the Supper follovving Mat. 26 17 29. with Luke 22 15 c. 2. So also did the Priests and Levites at the celebration of the Passeover vvhereunto the Lords supper with us is answerable 2 Chron. 35 3 14. with 1 Cor. 5 7. and 10 16. and 11 23 26. And the Fathers of families at the first celebration of the Passeover Exod. 12 3. c. And the Apostles at the celebration of the Lords supper Act. 20 7 11. 1 Cor. 10 16 17. 3. And Christ our Lord hath thus commanded saying Drinke ye all of this Mat. 26 27. And againe Doe this in remembrance of me 1 Cor. 11 24 25. 4. The nature also of the thing it self and the reasons vvhich are annexed to the commandement of Christ concerning the celebration of the Lords supper comprehend and bynd the Minister himself asvvell as the other members of the church to the participation thereof As namely that it is a signe and seale of the remission of sinnes obteyned for us by the death of Iesus Christ Mat. 26 26 27 28. And that thus we should shevv forth the Lords death till he come 1 Cor. 11 23 26. And that it is called the Eucharist or thankesgiving because we doe now giue thanks unto God for our redemption wrought by the death of Iesus Christ thus confirmed unto us through his grace Luke 22 19. 1 Cor. 10 16. and 11 24. with Psal 116 12 13 14. c. 5. And the minister himself is together with the rest a member of the church and body of Christ the communion vvhereof is here also celebrated Rom. 12 3 8. compared with 1 Cor. 10 16 17. and 12 12 13 18 27 28. Othervvise also we had need take heed that there be not in deed a schisme or rent made in that Church so in the body of Christ where this order is not observed Like as came to passe in that other case where of the Apostle vvriteth to the church of Corinth 1 Cor. 11.18 c. CHAPT XIII Touching the Ruling Elders Deacons or common people ministring the Sacraments VVHether it be right and lawful for the Ruling Elders Deacons or private people out of office not being Ministers of the word to administer the Sacraments or at the Lords supper in the delivery of the bread and wine to blesse them and to say to each of the communicants severally Take thou and eat c. or Take thou and drink c. Matth 26 26 27. with 1 Cor 4 1. and 10 16. Ephes 4 11 12. Esa 66 21. Ier. 33.18.21 Ezech. 43 18 27. and 44.19 and 46.20 2 Coron 13.10.11 35.2 15. with 1 King 12 31. 1 Chron. 15.2 Rom. 12.3 8. 1 Cor. 12.4 28. Heb. 5.4.5 1. Seeing that the Ministers of Christ are the household stevvards and dispensers of the mysteries of God the ambassadours of Christ and labourers together with him 1 Cor. 4 1. with 3 5 9. and 2 Cor. 5 20. Luke 12.42 Rev. 2.1 with Mal. 2 7. Mat. 28 18 19 20. 2. At the first celebration of the Lords supper Christ himself the Apostle and high Priest of our profession did minister it and giving thanks blessed the bread wine distributed them both among his disciples saying to them all together at once Take ye eate ye drinke ye c. Hebr. 3 1. with Mat. 26 26.27 Mar. 14 22 23. Luke 22 19 20. 1 Cor. 11.23 c. 3. And the ministration of the Sacraments and blessing of the bread and wine is a vvork of the ministerie Mat. 28.18.19.20 and 1 Cor. 10 16. with Ephes 4 11 12. Act. 20 7. c. 4. The †How the other Prisbyters or Elders that are Ministers oâ—â— spoken of in auncient writers may administer the sacraments as some think Baptisme more specially here I treat not But wish that the right may be sought out and rightly observed ruling Elders of the Christian church of vvhom I speak are such as are answerable to those Elders in the church of Israel which were called †As being chosen out of the people by the people and for the people c. The Elders of the people or the Rulers of the Synagogues c. and vvere distinct from the other ministers Priests and Levites vvhich ministred the vvord and holy things of God in Israell 1 Tim. 5 17. and Rom. 12.7.8 with Jer. 19.1 Act. 13.15 and 18.8.17 and Deut. 33.8.10 Esa 66.21 2 Chron. 13.10.11 Whereupon Ambrose saith * Ambr. in 1. Tim. 5. Both the Ievvish Synagogue and afterward the church of the Christians had Elders without whose counsell nothing was done in the church The which by what negligence it is out of use I know not unlesse it be by the sloth or rather pride of the Teachers whiles they alone vvill seeme to be somevvhat But now these Elders being by the mercy of God recovered again and had in many of the reformed churches it is for them carefully to attend upon their ovvn office and function assisting the Pastors and ministers of Christ in the ministration government of the church procuring vvhat in them is the good order peace and benefit of the whole church and of all the members thereof but stil leaving to the Pastors other ministers the works of the ministerie perteyning unto them that so all may performe and fulfill their ovvne offices and ministeries according to the rule of the word of God 1 Tim. 5.17 vvith Act. 20 17 28. Rev. 2.1 c. Rom. 12.7.8 1 Cor. 12.28 Ephes 4 11 12. Col 4.17 1 Thes 5.12 13 14. Heb. 13.7.17 Iam. 5.14 1
Pet. 5.1 4. 5. The Lords supper also is ansvverable to the Passeover sacrifices vvhich after the building of the Tabernacle were offred by the Priests and not by the Elders of the people 1 Cor. 5.7.8 vvith 2 Chron. 13.10 11. and 35.2 15. also Ier. 19.1 and Esa 66.21.23 But note that here I speak not of the praeparation and other service vvhich is attributed to the Levites concerning vvhich see 2 Chron. 35.2 15. That may vvell haue an other consideration vvhich in a good manner may be referred to the work of the Deacons vvho novv make ready and prepare al things necessarie for the Lords Supper and after the blessing or consecration made by the Pastor doe in some churches receiue the bread and wine of him and deliver it unto the communicants that all things in the church may be done decently and in order Whereabout also obserue that vvhich is written Act. 6 2 3. with 1 Cor. 14.40 and 2 Chron. 35 2 15. and vvhat by good consequence and proportion may be gathered and inferred thereupon 6. And touching the Deacons office it self note also how it is distinct from the office of the ministers of the vvord so as the Apostles thought it not to be meet or reason that they should attend to the duties thereof together vvith their ministerie but that others should be appointed to that function that they vvould giue themselues continually to prayer and to the ministerie of the word Act. 6.2.4 And thus also the offices of the Ministers Deacons and Elders are reckned as distinct by the Apostle Paul Rom. 12.7.8 7. Moreover the Lord hath joyned the administration of the Sacraments vvith the ministerie of the word Mat. 28.18.19.20 Act. 20.7.11 1 Cor. 3.5.9 vvith 10.16 Novv what God hath †viz. In the same persons and things and in the ordinarie administration c. joyned together let not man put asunder as Christ taught in another case Mar. 10.9 And on the contrarie what God hath set asunder let not man joyne together Numb 16.9.10 and 18.1 7. vvith Esa 66.21 Ezech. 44.19 and 46.20 1 Tim. 5.17 8. Here also may be considered how God was sore displeased at Corah though he vvere a Levite and at Dathan and Abiram with their company though they vvere Princes of the assemblie famous in the Congregation and men of renovvne also at Vzziah though he were a King vvhen they vvould haue offred incense upon the altar before the Lord vvhich God had layd upon the Priests Numb 16 ch 2 Chron. 26 16. c. 9. Finally a man can receiue or take nothing unto himself except it be giuen him from heauen Ioh. 3 27. and 1 25 33. And no man taketh this honor unto himself but he that is called of God as was Aaron Heb. 5 4 5. Accordingly doe the old and nevv Writers teach about the ministration of the Sacraments and other holy things of God in the church that difference should stil be kept betvveen the Ministers the people Their testimonies I need not note in particular they are so wel knowen Onely see more specially Polanus on Ezech. 43 18 27. pag. 785. 787. And Piscator also and Iunius vvho vvrite that to consecrate the people to minister unto God whereunto God appointed the Levites onely were against the right worship of God and a perverting of all order Piscat Schol. in Ezech. 44 19. Juniij Annotat. in Ezech. 46 20. CHAPTER XIIII Touching the often celebrating of the Lords supper And of the time of the day whether in the morning or euening c. VVHether it be not best and most agreeable to the vvill of God to celebrate the Lords supper often and vvhere it can vvell be everie Lords day besides the churches cōtinual serving worshiping of God daily 1 Cor. 11 23 26. and 10 16 17 18. compared with Act. 20 7. and Esa 66 23. with Exod. 20.8 13. Rev. 1 10. Ezech. 44 15 16 24. and 45 17 25. 46 chap. Numb 28 9 10. Act. 2 42.46 and 3 1. and 26 7. 1 Thes 5 17 18. 1. Because the Apostle teacheth that Christ at the first celebration thereof said This doe ye as oft as ye drinke it in remembrance of me And thereupon inferreth As often as ye eat this bread and drinke this cup ye doe shewe the Lords death till he come 1 Cor. 11 25 26. Which plainly implyeth the often observation thereof in remembrance of Christ and his death 2. Thus also the Apostles and Churches at first used to doe as may appeare by the Apostles vvords aforesaid 1 Cor. 11 26. and by that which is vvritten Act. 20 6 7. Where it is said that Paul abiding at Troas seuen daies upon the first day of the vveeke vvhen the disciples came together to break bread Paul preached unto them c. Where it appeareth that their comming together to break bread that is to celebrate the Lords supper was on the first day of the week that is on the Lords day Which likevvise is expresly noted by ‡ Who lived about 150 yeres after Christ Iustine Martyr in his second Apologie vvhere he saith On Sunday as it is called there is a comming together in one place of all that dwel either in the tovvne◠or in the countrey And there is read the commentaries of the Apostles and Writings of the Prophets as time vvill suffer Then the Reader ceasing †Ho proestos the Praesident maketh a speach vvherein he instructeth the people and exhorteth them to the imitation of such excellent things Aftervvard vve rise up all together and povvre out prayers and as I sayde before bread and vvine and * Euen by this time corruptions began to creep in as by this and other particulars here and otherwhere may appeare vvater is brought and the President likevvise povvreth out prayers and thanksgiving vvith all the might he can and the people hartily speak out together saying Amen And then to everie one that is present is there made distribution communication of those things that vvere blessed on vvhich thanks vvere giuen before and to those that are absent some is sent by the Deacons c. Iust Martyr Apolog. 2. Edit Commel Graeco-lat pag. 76.77 A remainder of vvhich practise for celebration of the Lords supper every Lords day as also of the dayly vvorship of God and of some other like things good to be observed may be seen in the Cathedrall churches at this day though with corruptions othervvise 3. The nature end use of the Lords supper may likevvise lead hereunto inasmuch as it is the sacrament of our continuall nourishment and comfort in the church by Iesus Christ as baptisme is of our once entring thereinto And is also the memorial of the death of Christ which he suffred for our sinnes and should therefore stil be remembred and often celebrated of us with thankesgiving According as Christ himself hath taught saying Doe this in remembrance of me and again This doe ye
opinions to the word of God 4. If Circumcision was the seale onely of the temporarie covenant of the land of Canaan what then did it profit Abraham himself in this behalf to whom God gaue no inheritance in it no not so much as the bredth of a foot Act. 7 5. But Abraham by faith sojourned in the land of promise as in a straunge countrey dwelling in tabernacles with Isaac and Jacob the heires with him of the same promise For he euen as we looked for a city which hath foundations whose builder and maker is God And they desired a better countrey that is an heauenly Wherefore God is not ashamed to be called their God Heb. 11 9.10 16. From which very speach that God is the God of Abraham Isaak and Jacob Exod. 3 6 15 16. Christ proveth the resurrection from the dead Matth. 22 31 32. Luk. 20 37 38. Which also sheweth the covenant made with Abraham to be a spirituall and everlasting covenant 5. If Circumcision was the seale to Abrahams carnall seed touching the land of Canaan why then did not circumcision cease when they enjoyed and possessed the land For Sacraments cease when the promises are fulfilled whereof they are signes and seales as the verie termes of a signe and seale may imply And thereupon it is that we shall haue no need or use of prophecies Sacraments or other like things in the kingdome of heauen after this life as now we haue in this life here on earth 1 Cor. 13 8 12. with chap. 11 23 26. 6. If Circumcision was a seale to Abraham and his carnall seed onely of a carnall covenant or temporarie promise touching the land of Canaan why then did God appoint the proselytes of the Gentiles that came to the Passeover and their children to be circumcised seeing they were not of Abrahams carnall seed nor had the promise of the land of Canaan Exod. 12 48 49. But in deed circumcision sealed to them the same righteousnes of faith and so the spirituall covenant of God in Christ as it did to Abraham and the Iewes that were his carnall seed Rom. 4 11. with Gen. 12 3. and 15 5 6. and 17 7 13. with Exod. 12 48 49. 7. And whereas †Mr. Sm. repl to M. Clift Arg. 2. some say that circumcision was also a seale of obedience to the law of Moses how can this be when as it was appointed to Abraham four hundred and thirty yeeres afore the Law was giuen Gal. 3 17. with â—en 12 3. and 17 chap. And Moses himself vvas not borne till divers geneâ—â—tions after Abraham Gen. 21 2 3. and 25 19 26. and 29 21 34. with Exod. 6 16 20. True it is that as Circumcision vvas also one of the ceremonies being repeated and required in Moses Lavv Lev. 12 3. so they that vvere circumcised after the Lavv vvas giuen became debters to doe the vvhole lavv Gal. 5 3. But as it vvas of the Fathers and not of Moses being before appointed to Abraham to vvhom the Gospell vvas preached and the covenant confirmed four hundred and thirtie yeres before the Lavv Gen. 17 7 13. Joh. 7 22. Gal. 3 8 17. so it vvas a seale of the righteousnes of faith of the remission of sinnes in Christ Rom. 4 1 11. Also vve that are novv baptised are bound to obserue all things vvhatsoever Christ hath commaunded Matt. 28 18 19 20. Yet notvvithstanding baptisme to us is the seale not of our obedience no nor of our faith but of the righteousnes of faith and of the Lords forgiving our sinnes in Iesus Christ Rom. 4 1 11 25. and 6 3. with Act. 2 38 39. and 22 16. For the seale of God in circumcision and Baptisme confirmeth a perfit sure and firme covenant euen the Lords everlasting covenant of grace Gen. 17 7 13. Deu. 32 4. Psal 111 9 145 17. Rom. 11 29. Rev. 14 6. Heb. 13 20 with Act. 2 38 39. and 3 25. vvhereas our faith and observation of the Lords commandements like as theirs in Israell is infirme unperfit Matt. 6 30. and 8 26. Mar. 9 24. Luke 17 5. Rom. 7 12 25. Jam. 3 2. 1 Joh. 1 8 9 10. And it is our comfort in tentations that although vve are vveak sinful yet the Lords covenant of grace confirmed unto us in baptisme as it vvas to them in circumcision is firme and holy euen an everlasting covenant established by the death and blood shedding of Iesus Christ vvho of God is made unto us vvisedome and righteousnes sanctification and redemption that according as it is vvritten He that glorieth let him glorie in the Lord. 1 Cor. 1 30 31. and Jer. 9 23. with Hebr. 13 20. 8. Moreover to be of the carnall seed of Abraham vvhich is so much objected did not hinder the Ievves but that they might also be his spirituall seed in Christ And so they are acknovvledged by the Apostles vvho call them the children of the promise of the covenant which God made with the fathers saying to Abraham In thy seed shall al kinreds of the earth be blessed Act. 2 39. and 3 25. Gal. 3 15 29. Rom. 11 16. c. 9. Finally their outvvard circumcision signified and taught them the invvard and spirituall circumcision of the heart by the spirit of God in Christ like as our outvvard baptisme shevveth and teacheth us the very same thing which is wrought by the sanctification of the spirit and by the cleansing of us from our sinnes in the blood of Iesus Christ Col. 2 11 12. Deut. 10 16. and 30.6 with Act. 15 10 11. and Rom. 6 3 6. 1 Cor. 6 11. Tit. 3 4 7. 1 Pet. 3 21. OBJECTION V. But there is great difference betweene the Iewes and us between their estate before Christ being then as in the infancie and ours since Christ being growne in yeeres between their administration and ours and particularly between their circumcision and our baptisme for circumcision was for the males onely and to be done the eight day whereas baptisme is both for male and female to be done at any time c and the ceremonies had in Israell are now abolished c ANSWER 1. The objection is not of waight though it be common to others with the Anabaptists in other cases who in this matter see the vanitie of it themselues For first as I noted before we speak onely of such things as are morall in their owne nature or agree in a generall and perpetuall equity and in their like common propertie end and benefit and so farre forth are perpetual how ever there be differences othervvise about some outvvard circumstances accidents other like things according to the divers dispensation of the Old and New Testament As may be observed in the Apostles writings in the reasons and allegations made therein which are taken not onely from the * Of vvhich see before pag. 5. moral law but euen from the shadowes and ceremonies of Moses
besides the fyer which consumed the two hundred fiftie men that offred incense the earth opened and swallowed up Dathan covered the company of Abiram their wiues their sonnes their litle children and all that appertayned unto them Num. 16. chap. with Psal 106 17 18. where there is mention of litle children in particular Numb 16 27. Like as there is also at the slaughter made in Ierusalem for the abominations done in the midst thereof Ezec. 9 1 6. And to conclude if children vvere not through sinne subject to death yea and to eternall death condemnation then should â—â—ey need no Saviour and why then needed Christ in respect of them â—â—â—take part with children of flesh and blood that through death he might destroy â—n that had the power of death that is the Divell as the Apostle teacheth Heb. â— 14. And thus much by this occasion touching Originall sinne in children CHAPTER III. Wheher the Baptisme that is received in the apostaticall Churches of Christians as in the Church of Rome and the like is to be renounced a new to be repeated again or not ANother great errour also it is to think that the baptisme had in the Church of Rome or other apostate Churches is not to be regarded but to be renounced and another to be received anevv Which opinion vvhereupon soever it arise whether upon the denying of baptisme to children vvhich is used in the Churches aforesaid or upon other erroneous perswasions touching apostate Churches or the baptisme thereof certaine it is and evident by the Scriptures to be against the vvord and vvill of God and therefore to be sinfull so to hold or practise I. Which first may appeare by this that there is neyther precept not example nor other ground in all the Scriptures either in the Old or Nevv Testament for renouncing repeating nevv requiring or admitting thereof And therefore such perswasions new baptismes are not from heauen but of men Contrary to the baptisme of Iohn and the Apostles vvhich was from the Lord. Matt. 21 25. and 28 18 19 20. Joh. 1 25 33. with Act. 15 24. Gal. 5 7 8. II. Secondly there is one Baptisme as there was one Circumcision And Baptisme had in the apostate churches of Christians is answerable to circumcision retayned in Israels apostasie Now circumcision being once received in the apostasie of Israell was not repeated again at their returning to the Lord and leaving of their idolatrous vvayes to serue him according to his word but they that vvere so circumcised were vvithout any new circumcision of the flesh accepted at Ierusalem and admitted to the Passeover of vvhich none might eat that was uncircumcised In like maner also Baptisme being once received in the apostaticall churches of Christians is not to be repeated agayn when any so baptised returne unto the Lord and forsake their idolatries submitting themselues to the truth of the Gospel but they are without any new baptizing vvith water to be received of the Churches of Christ and admitted to the Lords supper vvhereof none may eat being unbaptized For these examples of Israell as all other things in the Scriptures written aforetyme are aforevvritten for our instruction and comfort Eph. 4 5. with Gen. 17 10 13. Ezâ— 12 48 49. 2 Chron. 30 chap. Jer. 9 26. Hos 1 2. Ier. 50 4 5 19 20. and 51 5. with Ezech. 16 and 23 chap. Ezr. 6 19 20 21. with Rom. 15 4. III. Also the covenant of Gods grace in Christ is * Gen. 17 7. Psa 89 30 34. and 106 45. and 111 5 9. Gal. 3 8 29. Heb. 13 8 20. with Deut. 4 30 31. and 29 10 15. and 30 chap. Rom. 11 15 16 28 29. an everlasting covenant into vvhich it pleased God to take us vvith Abraham our father vvhen he made that covenant vvith him his seed for ever And as the Lord himself vvho knoweth his works from the beginning †Iudg. 2 11. c. 2 King 13 23. and 14 27. 2 Chron. 15 3 4. and 30 6 7 8 9. Jer. 51 5. Ezech. 16 2 60. c. and 28 10 24 25 26. with 32 24 32. Hos 3 1. and 13 4 5. Col. 2 10 13. Rev. 18 4. hath regard unto it in his mercifull dealing concerning his people in apostaticall Churches and estate so ought we also our selues carefully to haue respect thereunto in the consideration of baptisme thus received as in all other things according to the word of God and manifold occasions ministred from the Lord. IIII. And seeing Christ dyed to sinne once being raysed from the dead dyeth no more but liveth to God And we are buryed vvith him by baptisme into his death to be planted with him likevvise to the similitude of his resurrection therefore also all that are once baptized into his name ought still to reteine it for continuall use and comfort and not agayn to repeat it any more then there is repetition of Christs death and sacrifice once offered to take avvay sinne Rom. 6 8 11. with ver 3 4 5. and Act. 13 34. Heb. 7 27. and 9 25 29. and 10 10 14. 1 Pet. 3 18. Revel 1 18. with Matth. 28 19 20. Act. 2 38 39 41 42. and 10 48. 1 Cor. 1 13. and 6 11. 12 13. Gal. 3 27 28 29. 1 Pet. 3 21 22. Rev. 1 4 6. V. And touching the Church of Rome in particular it cannot be denyed but that Church was espoused to Christ in the covenant of grace by the Gospel of salvation having baptisme with the rest of Christs ordinances in the Apostles dayes hath ever since reteyned it with other grounds of Christian religion notwithstanding all her adulteries and apostasie whereinto she is fallen As may be seen both in that Church it self all other churches vvhich are the daughters thereof in their constitution eyther for faith or order or both in vvhole or in part And hereunto as in Iudahs and Israels apostasies heretofore so novv in all cases and questions of this nature due respect is alvvay to be had As may appeare by these Scriptures Rom. 7 1 8. and 6 3 4. with Revel 17 chap. and 18 4. Gen. 17 7 14. with Jud. 2 11 12. c. 1 King 14 22 23 24. 2 Kin. 21 and 24 25 chap. Psal 89 30 34. 2 King 9 6. 13 23. 14 27. Ier. 2 ch Eze. 16 2 44 60 c. and 20 and 23 chap. Dan. 9. chap. Hos 2 chap. and 3 1. and 12 9. 14 1. 2 Chro. 30 6 7 8 9. with 15 3 4. Lev. 12 2 3. and 26 14 45. Deut. 4 25 31. and 29 10 15. and â—0 chap. with Rom. 11 15 16. Hebr. 7 9 10. VI. They professe Iesus to be the Christ to be the sonne of God maniâ—â—â—â—â—â— in the flesh that dyed for the sinnes of the vvorld that by his sacriâ—â—â—â— and death upon the crosse hath reconciled us unto God and payed 〈◊〉 â—ood as a full and sufficient
at Rome to this day the Cardinals that are next to the Pope himself are all of them Presbyters or Deacons and haue each of them their particular church or parish whereof they are named and vvhereunto more particularly they doe apperteyne Whereupon to note it by the vvay this may also be observed that if there be any Bishop at this day in our ovvn countrey or otherwhere vvho hath not his particular Church or parish whereof he is overseer and whereunto he doeth properly appetteyne all such are more degenerate from the auncient way order of the Primitiue Churches then is the Pope himself in this behalf And if the Bishops haue stil every one his ovvn peculiar parish church to vvhich they doe properly belong it is a good print and footstep of the auncient vvay wherein the churches vvere planted at first by the Apostles and Euangelists And is a point that vvill giue great light to this other questions novv much controverted about the order and government of the church Note here also hovv the very things vvhich the Prelates chalenge in the particular churches under them are jurisdiction and ordination And that othervvise they leaue the particular Parishes to their ovvn peculiar Ministers for the ministration of the word and Sacraments among them ordinarily Which is observed in all churches by all Prelates euen the most Popish and under the Pope himself unto this day And is a point also that vvill giue light to the better understanding of the estate of the Prelacy and condition of the †Parishionall Diocesan Provinciall c. churches perteyning unto them of what sort soever But to proceed I am not ignorant that the termes of Diocesan Provinciall Nationall Oecumenical or universal churches are also otherwise used and applied and are ascribed to representatiue Churches to Councils Convocations Synodes Courts and the like whereof there may be some use consideration not unprofitable about the matter here in hand so it be not otherwise abused For vvho knoweth not that the Pope hath novv a long time sit in Councils Courts and other Christian assemblies opposing and exalting himself aboue all that is called God or that is worshipped shevving himself that he is God establishing confirming and disanulling vvhat he would ruling overruling vvhom vvhen as he would yet not present stil in his own person but sometimes by his designed substitutes alvvaies by his usurped povver authoritie and jurisdiction But of this I vvill not insist It may suffice for the point in hand that Antichrist is so set and exalted as hath ben said in the Christian Churches aforesaid which I suppose these men themselues being better advised vvill not deny to be the Churches and Temple of God Or if they doe then I hope they will shevv of vvhat other church or churches they understand this Scripture and hovv that vvhich the Apostle teacheth in this place is by the Man of sinne performed in the Temple of God Alvvaies remembring to distinguish betvveen the man of sinne himself and between the Temple of God wherein he sitteth c. And this for the present I thought to note hereabout Animadv p. 78. Where he saith if we meane a particular Church it will not agree with the prophecies of Antichrist whose City or church is so great as peoples kinreds toungues and nations doe dwell in the streets thereof Rev. 11 8 9. I ansvver first that stil he cals that Antichrists church vvhich the Apostle cals the Temple of God II. Secondly how vvill he proue that the Beasts city spoken off Rev. 11 8. is the Temple of God spoken of 2 Thes 2 4. If he say he speaks not of the Temple of God then he speaks not of the point in hand If he speak of it why doeth he still call it the City Church and Temple of Antichrist and not the Temple of God as the Apostle termes it Hath the very phrase of the Scripture so much light in it as he can not endure to look upon it Or doth he in these things loue darknes more then light Or is there no difference to be put between Antichrists City and Gods church III. Thirdly having this occasion I vvill propound some things hereabout and leaue them further to be considered off being assured that if the true meaning of these Scriptures be rightly found out the difficultie about these and sundry other matters will be far the more easy Whereas therefore he doth not distinguish betvveen the City and the Church but here and throughout his treatise usually confounds them as all one let us obserue and consider of these things thereabout 1. That this City spoken off in ‘ Rev. 11 8. the place that he alledgeth is spiritually called Sodome and Egypt where also our Lord vvas crucified But the church is here called the Temple of God or the Court vvithout the Temple or the holy City c. For which see 2 Thes 2 4. and the chapter it self vvhich here he citeth Revel 11 2. 2. That this great city is not onely Sodome and Egypt spiritually but is also that Sodome Egypt where our Lord was crucified Rev. 11 8. Now al know that Christ our Lord vvas crucified in and under the jurisdiction of the City not of the Church of Rome For he vvas condemned to death by Pontius Pilate the Deputie of the Romane Emperour under whose dominion and jurisdiction now the Iewes were and vvas crucified by the Romane souldjours being delivered to the Gentiles when yet there was no church at Rome as Christ himself had before told his disciples Mat. 27 2 11 26 27 31 35. with 20 17 18 19. Luke 18 31 32 33. and 23 1 2 c. Joh. 18 28 31. 19 1 2 10 12 15 16 18 23. c. Which is also acknowledged by this man himself here a litle after Animadv pag. 83. 3. That this City is that which vvas the Dragons throne and was by the Dragon giuen to the Beast Rev. 13 2. vvhich this man himself also noteth though to another purpose Animad pag. 79. But this was the City not the Church of Rome Neyther I think will these men themselues say that the Church vvas the Dragons throne or was by the Dragon giuen to the Beast 4. That this City also is the throne of the Beast Babylon the great City spoken of Rev. 16 10 19. and 17 18 ch Which that it is to be understood of the city of Rome and the dominion thereof vvill yet appeare further by the reasons follovving And note here how ‡ M. Brighon Rev. 16.19 some treating on Rev. 16 19. expound great Babylon there to be the city of Constantinople called New Rome Which then maketh the more for the point in hand 5. That this city is the woman that sitteth on seuen mountaines Rev. 17 9 18. And that the City not the church of Rome is built on * Called Palatinus Capitolinus Quâ—rinalis Aventinus Caelius
flesh and blood which can not comprehend them Rom. 9 18. Psal 115 3. Esa 14 24 27. and 28 29. and 46 9 10 11. Ezech. 1 4 c. Psal 92 5. Matth. 11.25.26 and 20 15. 5. Moreover If sinne foreseen be the cause of Reprobation then it is eyther originall or actuall sinne But not originall sinne because then all men being so borne should be reprobate Neyther actuall sinne first because then no infants no not of the Turks or Heathens that dye in their infancie should be reprobate secondly because that then on the other hand all of yeres should be reprobate and rejected seeing all such sinne actually as the Scripture teacheth and al vvil acknovvledge 1 King 8 46. Psal 14 2 3. Rom. 3 9 19. Eccles 7 20. 6. Besides if unbelief or other sinne foreseene should be the cause of Reprobation then should also faith and holines foreseen be the cause of Gods election But this is not so as vvas shevved here before p. 221 c. 7. Finally vvhy els should the Apostle so sharply rebuke such as make vaine and odious objections hereabout as he doth vvhen he saith O man vvho art thou that repliest against God Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it Why hast thou made me thus Hath not the potter povver over the day of the same lumpe to make one vessell unto honour and another unto dishonour What if God vvilling to shevv his vvrath to make his povver knovven indured vvith long suffring the vessels of vvrath fitted to destruction and that he might make knovven the riches of his glorie on the vessels of mercy which he hath afore prepared unto glorie Rom. 9 20 23. And hovv greatly again doth the same Apostle admire and reverendly adore Gods dealing herein teaching us by his example so to doe as he doth saying O the depth of the riches both of the wisedome and knowledge of God how unsearchable are his judgements and his waies past traceing out For who hath knowen the mynd of the Lord or who hath ben his counsellour Or who hath first giuen to him it shal be recompensed unto him again For of him through him and to him are all things to vvhom be glorie for ever Amen Rom. 11 33 36. SOME OBJECTIONS AND ANSWERS Object I. But this opinion and doctrine maketh God to be the first cause and author of all sinne Ansvv Not so For first the elect also sinne and not the Reprobate onely And Gods decree of reprobation perteyneth onely to the Reprobate and not to the elect Another cause therefore there is and must needs be of sinne both in the elect and reprobate namely the abuse of free vvill in Adam in vvhom all haue sinned and of whom all are descended both the elect and reprobate and synce Adams fall mans naturall corruption his corrupt vvill concupiscence Gen. 3 1 6. and 5 3. compared vvith Rom. 5 12 19. Jam. 1 13 17. Eccles 7 29. Ephes 2 3. 2. Secondly vve are to distinguish between the action and the corruption of sinne Also betvveen sinne and the punishment of sinne Sinne as sinne and the corruption thereof is of man who being made righteous transgressed vvittingly willingly For vvhich see the Scriptures aforesaid and the like But as it is an action the abilitie to doe this or that is of God in vvhom we liue and moue and haue our being Act. 17 21. also as it is the punishment of sinne it is justly inflicted by the Lord vvho is just to punish sinne Thus God hardneth the heart of Pharaoh Exod. 4 21. 9 12 16. vvith Rom. 9 17 18. and Pharaoh hardneth it himself Exo. 8 15 32. and 9 34. Which as Pharaoh doth it is sinne as God doth it it is the punishment of sinne And thus it hath the consideration of good for declaration of the justice of God For God is just in all his waies and holy in all his vvorks Psal 145 17. and his understanding is infinite vvhich man may admire but cānot cōprehend Psa 147 5. 77 19. vvith Rom. 11 13-36 3. Thirdly distinguish also betvveen effects and consequents Sinnes come after Gods decree of Reprobation not as effects therof but as cōsequents that follovv after it It is most holy so not the cause of sinne 4. Neither is it sound to say because God suffereth this or that therefore he doeth it Difference is to be put between Gods decree of permission vvhich concerneth all and between Gods decree of Reprobation vvhich respecteth onely some to wit the Reprobate Besides all know that men suffer many things which they doe not nor can be said to doe nay vvhich many times they forbid And the cause of an action rightly and properly considered is in the doer not in the sufferer 5. Otherwise let it be observed whether these men themselues doe not in deed by their opinions make God the author of sinne and of evill and destruction vvho hold that God would haue all and every particular man vvhosoever to be saved and cannot deny but he is able to saue all vvhom he is vvilling to saue and yet also grant as the truth is that he doth not saue all What now vvil follow hereupon according to their assertions let them consider with themselues 6. Finally God is so farre from being author of sinne as it is sinne as he hateth forbiddeth and condemneth it vvhich his word everie where and his vvorks at all times make manifest Object II. But the Lord saith by Ezekiell I will not the death of the wicked but that the wicked turne from his way and liue Ezec. 18 23 32. and 33 11. Ansvv 1. The Lord is not contrarie to himself who saith by the same Prophet As the vine tree among the trees of the forest which I haue giuen to the fire for fewell so vvill I giue the inhabitants of Jerusalem and I vvill set my face against them they shall goe out from one fire and another fire shall devoure them and you shall knovve that I am the Lord vvhen I set my face against them Ezec. 15 6 7. Where the Prophet shevveth that as the vine tree is by Gods framing and disposition of it giuen to be fevvell for the fyer so also the Ievves inhabitants of Ierusalem vvere then by the speciall decree of God appointed to the fire and destruction 2. The Prophet speaketh of temporarie death as may appeare by Ezech. 33 11 25 28. and 18 2 13 27. compared vvith chapt 12 and 13 and 14 and 15 c. vvhereas the question is about reprobation to eternall death And great difference there is betvveen these tvvo as may be seen in the cases of Naboth and the Blasphemer spoken of Lev. 24. who vvere both of them stoned to death Lev. 24 14 21. and 1 King 21 1 13. Also in Iosiah and Achab who vvere both slaine in battell 1 King 22 34 35. and 2 Chron. 35 20 24. These now had a like bodily
violent death but shal vve therefore match them together as like touching eternall death 3. Difference also is to be put betvveene the revealed and the hidden vvill of God so to call it As may be observed in the Lords dealing with Abraham Ezechiah and others God biddeth Abraham take Isaac his sonne sacrifice him yet Gods purpose vvas but thus to trie Abrahams faith and obedience vvhich purpose of God was as yet concealed from Abraham till God did afterward manifest it Gen. 22 1 2. c. The Lord also biddeth Esaiah goe tell Hezekiah that he should then dye when God notwithstanding doeth afterward adde fifteene yeres more to his life which as yet was concealed from Hezekiah Esa 38 1. c. Yet this double will so to call it is but in respect of us and the manifestation thereof unto us For otherwise in respect of God himself he never would any other thing but that vvhich also he doth 4. Again difference is to be put between willing as delighting with willing as decreing Otherwise if God simply would not none should dy at al. 5. Obserue vvithal vvhether in the places aforesaid the Prophet speak not of the vvicked converting to the Lord and not of the Reprobate whereabout the question novv is For which consider that vvhich is vvritten in Ezech. 18 21 22 27 28 c. 6. Finally the right translation understanding here is thus †Or I am not delighted with I haue no pleasure saith the Lord in the death of the wicked c. Whereupon obserue againe that God delighteth not in the death of a sinner in one respect as it is the destruction of his creature Ezech. 18 23. and 33 11. But he delighteth in it in another respect as it is his just punishment of sinne Psal 37 13. vvith 2 4 5 12. Prov. 1 26. Ezech. 21 17. And here see Piscat in Ezech. 18 23 32. and 33 11. Also Piscat Resp. ad duas disputat Taufreri Resenij pag. 38 100. Object III. But the doctrine of Gods predestination especially of Reprobation should not be taught or at least not be taught unto the common people c. Ansvv 1. Why then doeth the Scripture teach it the Prophets Apostles and Christ himself The Prophets Gen. 25 23. vvith Rom. 9 12. Exod. 9 16. and 33 19. vvith Rom. 9 15 17 18. Ier. 6 30. Mal. 1 2 3. vvith Rom. 9 13. Prov. 16 4. vvhere it is expressely said that the Lord hath made all things for himself yea euen the vvicked for the day of evill And Christ himself also teacheth the same when he saith †or I confesse to thee I thank thee O Father Lord of heauen and earth because thou hast hid these things the mysteries of the kingdome of heauen from the vvise and prudent and hast revealed them unto babes Euen so Father for so it seemed good in thy sight Mat. 11 25 26. Where it is evident that Gods decree not onely of election but of reprobation also dependeth meerely on Gods good will and pleasure Also Matt. 13 11. And again when he saith in his prayer to the Father Those that thou hast giuen me I haue kept and none of them is lost but the sonne of perdition meaning Iudas John 17 12. Like as Antichrist also is called the sonne of perdition 2 Thes 2 3. that is appointed to perdition and condemnation As by the sonnes of death is understood also such as are appointed to dye Psal 79 11. and 102. 20. And the Apostles teach it in like sort namely the Apostle Paul Rom. 9 11 23. and 11 chap. 2 Tim. 2 19 20. Ephes 1 3 11. 1 Thes 5 9. where the Apostle having said Let us not sleep as doe others but let us that are of the day be sober putting on the brestplate of faith and loue and for an helmet the hope of salvation then presently annexeth For God hath not appointed us to vvrath but to obteyne salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ And Peter likewise who teacheth out of the Prophets that Christ is a stone of stumbling and a rock of offence to them vvhich stumble at the word being disobedient vvhereunto also they vvere appointed 1 Per. 2 8. And Iude the Apostle saying There are certain men crept in unavvares vvho vvere of old foreordeyned to this condemnation c. Jude ver 4. Thus doe the Prophets Apostles Christ himself plainly and purposely teach this doctrine And should not then the ministers of Christ tread in their steppes being still carefull to teach it wisely and soundly according to the Scriptures For vvhatsoever things are vvritten aforetime they vvere vvritten for our learning that we through pacience and comfort of the Scriptures might haue hope Rom. 15 4. 2. Moreover this doctrine is both lawful and good to be taught in the church 1. Because it glorifyeth God ascribing and yeelding to God the glorie of his mercie justice wisdome and povver over all Ioh. 16 14. Rom. 9 22 23. and 11 33 36. II. Because it stirreth up to holynes of life prayer thanksgiving good vvorks searching and relying on the word of God c. 1 Thes 5 6 9. Mat. 11 25 26. Act. 4 24 28. c. Ephes 1 3 12. and 2 10. Rom. 15 4. 2 Tim. 3 15 16 17. 2 Pet. 1 3 10. III. Because it assureth us of the certaintie of our salvation being grounded in the eternall and unchangeable counsell of God It teacheth us to cast off all confidence in our selues and to ascribe our salvation onely to the grace of God acknowledging and admiring the riches of Gods mercy vvho of his free grace hath chosen us to life and salvation in Christ It comforteth us against distrust despaire and other manifold tentations arising by meanes of troubles and adversities that befall us in this life teaching us in all things paciently to rest in the work of God and particularly it strengtheneth us against the grief and offence that otherwise we might take at the iniquitie and evill dealing of hypocrites and other wicked persons in the church or out of the church in asmuch as we knovv that God is the disposer of all things that they come to passe according to his eternall and most certain and determinate counsell vvho therefore will vvork all things for good unto us in Christ 2 Tim. 2 19 20. Rom. 8 28 39. and 11 33 36. 2 Sam. 16 10 11. and Iob 1 21. Mat. 11 25 26. and 20 15. John 17 12. Act 2 23. and 4 27 28. 1 Pet. 2 6 7 8. Jude ver 3 and 4. Rev. 13 8. and 17 8. 20 15. and 21 27. 3. It giueth us good necessarie occasion to put difference between Gods decree of election reprobation which was before all beginning and betvveen the execution thereof vvhich succedeth in time aftervvard And thereupon to obserue that many things come betvveen the decree it self and the execution thereof which are due meanes causes of
heard him that spake unto me c. Eze. 2.1.2 vvith chap. 1 28. and 3 23 24. The like againe may be observed in the Lords dealing with Daniel and so is noted by himself Dan. 10.8 19. And in Christs dealing with Lazarus vvhen he raised him up from death Ioh. 11.43.44 vvith ver 40 41 42. And as touching the preaching and ministerie of the word vvhereabout the objection is much urged we read in the Acts of the Apostles hovv vvhen Luke had noted that Lydia being together vvith other vvomen assembled heard the Apostle speak unto them he presently annexeth that the Lord opened her heart that she attended to the things spoken by Paul And so she became a Christian and was baptised and her houshold Act. 16 14 15. Which likewise shevveth that instruction and exhortation is a meanes vvhich it pleaseth God to use and yet that the fruit thereof dependeth upon the Lords ovvne gracious and powerfull vvorking in us thereby as he pleaseth Whereupon it was that the vvord spoken by the Apostle vvas more fruitfull in Lydia then in the other persons that were there also met together to vvhom Paul spake asvvell as unto her Act. 16.13.14 Without vvhich vvork and blessing of the Lord no increase followeth whatsoever meanes be used as vvas shewed here before Whereunto may be referred that the Apostle saith I haue planted Apollo vvatered but God gaue the increase 1 Cor. 3 6. It is God saith the Apostle that giveth the increase He saith not I haue planted Apollo vvatered but it is of men themselues vvhen the grace is offered to receiue or to refuse it and so to haue some increase or none at all as pleaseth themselues The Apostles teach not so but their doctrine leadeth us to acknovvledge the meanes used by God and yet thereupon neyther to debase the vvork of God nor to advance the vvill or povver of man vvho is dead in sinne and alienated in mynd 〈…〉 the flesh and of the mynd till vve be quickned converted and renevved by the Lord. Ans 3. Besides God may vvell so speak unto man as he made him at first in holynes and righteousnes having free vvill and abilitie unto that vvhich vvas good and holy Whereof novv being deprived by his ovvne voluntarie fall and transgression the blame therefore lyeth upon our selues that vve are not able to performe the commandements exhortations giuen unto us unlesse it please God to renevv us and to vvork in us both to vvill and to doe of his good pleasure Gen. 1 26. and 3.1 7. and 5.3 Eccl. 7.29 vvith Ephes 4.20 24. Phil 2.13 Ans 4. Othervvise in this our corrupt estate vve find that the Lavv vvorketh vvrath and increaseth sinne and maketh it more appear vve being in our selues miserably corrupted since the fall and more and more hardned in evill vvithout the grace of God and povverfull vvorking of his spirit in us as is aforesaid Rom. 4.14.15 and 7.8.9 c. Ans 5. And thus also may be observed hovv the commandements and exhortations spoken off shevv our dutie rather then our abilitie As the Lavv shevveth us vvhat vve ought to doe not vvhat vve are able to doe Whereof vve may likewise make good use to know our own weaknes and sinfulnes the more that so being humbled in our selues we may pray unto God for his grace and mercie that he would work in us his owne good vvork with power to the praise and glorie of his name in Iesus Christ Which is another good use of the commandements and exhortations giuen unto us 10. Finally the contrarie doctrine derogateth greatly from the glorie of God and giveth unto man part of the glorie of our conversion and salvation For look how much we ascribe to the will and power of man so much in very deed vve take from the grace and work of God And if it be in our selues and in the power of our own vvill to turne unto God to exempt our selues from others that doe it not then should we haue so far forth whereof to glorie But most sure it is that we haue not where of to glorie vvith God herein vvho vvill haue the full and vvhole glorie to himself of our conversion and salvation in Christ Therefore in this respect also the contrarie doctrine is erroneous not according to the truth of the gospell 1 Cor. 1 26 31. and 4 7. Ephes 2 8 9. 2 Thes 1 11 12. compared vvith Joh. 7 18. and 16 13 14. Herewith also agree some sayings of the auncient Writers As vvhen Augustine saith Free will to loue God vve haue lost by the greatnes of the first sinne August tom 2. epist 107. ad Vitalem And againe Man using free vvill yll lost both it and himself Ibid. tom 3. Enchiridio ad Laurentium cap. 30. Petrus Diaconus and others What could or can be borne of a servant but a servant For Adam when he was free begate not children but after he vvas made the servant of sinne Therefore as everie one is of him so also everie man is the servant of sinne through him Petr. Diac. c. de incarnatione gratia Christi seu de gratia libero arbitrio cap. 6. And Fulgentius Hold firmely and doubt not at all that no man can come to repentance but whom God inlighteneth and converteth of his gracious mercy compassion Fulgent or August lib. de fide ad Petrum Diaconum cap. 31. And thus much concerning free vvill or power in our selues unto good since the Fall CHAPTER V. Touching the perseverance of the Saints that are truely godly and syncerely beleeue in Jesus Christ VVHether the Saints of God such as faithfully beleeue being made partakers of the spirit of adoption ingrafted into Iesus Christ by true and living faith are not by the grace povver of God in Christ so guided susteyned and preserved as they shall not and in respect of God can not wholly and for ever fall avvay from the Lord utterly be rejected by him and loose that his quickning spirit and saving faith in Iesus Christ Although they be subject still in this life through infirmitie of the flesh in themselues to fall into sinne sometimes also into great and grievous sinnes As may be seen in Noah David Peter c. 2 Cor. 1 19 22. Ephes 1 13 14. and 3 16 20. and 5 23. Rom. 8 15 23. 1 Joh. 5 1 13 1 Cor. 1 4 9. Esa 54 8 9 10. and 55 3. with Act. 13 34. Ier. 31 31 37. and 32.40 Amos 9 9. Habak 2 2 3 4. vvith Rom. 1 16 17. and Heb. 11 ch with 10 38 39. and 13 20 21. Mat. 24 24 31. Ioh. 4 14. and 5 24. and 6 35 37 39 40 54-55 and 10 27.28 29. and 17 24. Rom 8 28 39. and 11 29. Phil. 1 6. Heb. 6 17 20. cōpared with Gen. 9 8 16.21 2 Sam. 11 3 4. Mat. 26. 69 75. 1 Cor. 10 13. 2 Tim. 1 12. 1 Pet. 1 3 4
Zedekiah and the other Ievves that remayned at Ierusalem called naughty figges for whoÌ„ greater punishment was reserved Ier. 24 1 2 3 5 c. Also Zedechiah is Iechoniahs uncle 2 Kin. 24 17. and his sonne 1 Chro. 3 16. and his brother 2 Chron. 36 10. in divers respects The place of the holy city is called profane Ezec. 48 15. and 42 20. yet the name of the city is The Lord is there Ezech. 48 35. and that place in other respect may be considered as a part of the holy oblation Ezec. 48 8 20. with 45 1. c. as Ierusalem also is called the holy city Neh. 11 1 8. Mat. 4 5. and 27 53. And the faithful city becometh an harlot and yet is still the daughter of Zion the house of Iacob the Church and people of God Esa 1 1 21. with 10 32. and 37 22. Ier 2 4 13. and 5 20 21. Mic. 2 5. and 3 1 9 10. c. And very many such like every where in the Scripture may be observed And hitherto of Rom 11 11 20 23 25 26. vvhich he citeth and of ver 27 28 29. the citation of which verses he omitteth whereas they are specially to be observed for confirmation and assurance of the perpetuity unchaungeablenes of the Lords covenant made vvith the Fathers Abraham Isaac Iacob and their seed for ever Rom. 9.4 Like things may be observed out of the other Scriptures here cited by him as Rom. 9 4. with vvhich he should haue joyned also ver 5. vvhere the Apostle shevveth that to the Iewes apperteyne the adoption covenants promises Esa 59.20 21. 〈…〉 Fathers c. And Esa 59 20 21. vvhere the Prophet teacheth that the Lords covenant is with them and their seed for ever And Ezech. 34 23 30. where the fruits of the Lords eternall covenant vvith his people are largely described euen * 〈…〉 2â— 25. vvhen he shall haue punished them for their sinnes and â—avenged the quarrell of his covenant upon them Where also is specially to be observed how he is still called the Lord then God and they his people ver 30. which are the words of the covenant And where moreover vve may learn to put difference between this phrase of the Lord being their God and they his people vvhich is so euen †Psal 89 30 34. 106 43 44 45. when and vvhiles the Lord doth visit their iniquities with the rod betvveen their knovving of the Lord their God to be vvith them and they to be his people by the enjoying of his mercies and fruits of his favour according to his adoption and eternal covenant ver 30. and 31. Like as there is difference betvveene “ Ezec. 2 3. 33 7. Zac. 1 1. 2 3 4. a Prophets being among them between ‡ Eze. 2 5. 33 33. Zach. 2 9.11 their knowing of this that a Prophet hath ben among theÌ„ Finally note here hovv this being the onely place of all those that he alledgeth together vvhere the title of Gods people vvhereof he speaketh is ascribed unto them the Prophet in this place speaketh not simply or onely of their being Gods people but of their knowing and finding by experience that the Lord their God is vvith them and that they are his people Which being well observed as I haue shevved here before is the more against this man himself Like as also is the next and last place which he citeth out of Hos 3 5. Hos 3 5. vvhere it is expressely said that vvhen the children of Israel being put out of the land and punished for their idolatrie and other sinnes shal haue fit many dayes without a king c. then afterward they shall returne and seek the Lord their God which are the vvords of the covenant and David their king and shall feare the Lord and his goodnes in the latter dayes By vvhich it is evident that there is all that time no default on the Lords part but that it is vvholly of themselues vvho in so long a time doe not returne and seek the Lord their God and Christ their king nor fear the Lord and come to his goodnesse all this while And vvhereas he speaketh of this people being called beloved in respect of their estate to come he may see in the beginning of this chapter but three or four verses before that which he citeth that this term of beloved yea beloved of their friend and husband was ascribed unto them by the Lord vvhen Hoseah prophecied notwithstanding their adulterous estate being idolaters and apostates The vvords are these vvhich upon like occasion haue ben treated off before Then said the Lord unto me saith Hoseah Goe yet loue a woman beloved of her †Or husband as Ier. 3 20. friend yet an adulteresse according to the loue of the Lord toward the children of Israell who look to other Gods and loue flagons of vvine Hos 3 1. Which Scripture being vvell considered and compared vvith the other Scriptures aforesaid doeth so evidently convince this mans erroneous assertions and abuse of Scriptures as it may suffice for answer and refutation of all that he hath throughout his treatise about the matters aforesaid And hitherto of these objections concerning the circumcision estate of Israell Some other things moe of like sort doth this man and others except hereabout vvhich I need not novv stand upon By that vvhich hath ben said the discreet Reader wil find how to answer any other objections which they bring hereabout And in the things aforesaid I haue vvritten more largely then I purposed that so I might vvith one labour both more convince them and better informe the Reader concerning these things Yet there being another objection or tvvo that are much urged about this matter I vvill novv also in particular annex somewhat further thereabout and then God vvilling proceed to other matters vvhich are novv likewise much called in question OBIECTION VI. But if Israel now were the church and people of God then ought none to haue left them it had ben schisme so to doe c. ANSWER 1. Nay the same Prophets that acknovvledged them to be the people of the Lord yet taught all to leaue and forsake their sinfull estate false vvorship vvhereinto they vvere fallen being novv become idolaters apostates schismaticks that had divided themselues from Iudah c. Hos 4 15 16 17. and 5 2 3 11. and 11 12. Amos 4 4 5. and 5 4 5. with Mic. 1 5 13. 2 5. and 6 16. 2. Euen in Iudah also it may be observed that both in the time of Manasseh vvhen he set up a grauen image in the Temple of God and caused Iudah to sinne vvith his idols as also in the dayes of Iehojakim long after in the time of the Machabees vvhen Antiochus set up his idoll and other profanations in the Lords sanctuarie then the faithfull syncere vvorshippers of God refused to communicate vvith them
in their idolatrie and chose rather to suffer affliction and death it self so as Ierusalem vvas filled vvith innocent blood 2 King 21 1 16. and 23 36 37. and 24 3. 4. Dan. 11 31 32 33. with 1 Machab. 1 ch and 2 Mach. 6 7 ch and Heb. 11 35 36 37 38. Yet was Iudah still acknowledged by the Prophets to be the church and people of God as hath ben shewed here before and may be seen throughout the historie and their Prophecies 3. And when Esay vvas enjoyned by the Lord in Ahaz dayes to bynd up the Testimonie and scale the Law among his disciples so keeping it from the wicked and perverse that stubburnely despised the word of God communicating it onely with the godly Esa 8 16. with 7 1. 2 Chron. 28 chapt yet euen then also he acknovvledgeth them to be the house of Jacob from whom the Lord hid his face and the people of God that should seek unto him to his law testimonie Esa 8 17 19 20. with 1 3. and 3 15. 10 2 24. 4. The Prophet Amos also teaching the people to avoyd al places assemblies of idolatrie and false vvorship did not onely teach them not to seek Bethel nor to enter into Gilgal which vvere places in Israel but taught them also not to passe over to Beershebah vvhich was †1 Kin. 19 3. a city in Iudah Amo. 5 5. Yet did he acknovvledge them to be the familie of Israell which God brought out of Egypt and the people of God euen Jacob the Lords covenanted people c. as I haue shevved more largely †Pag. 62 83. here before Amo. 3 1 2. 5 1. and 7 2 5 15. So vvhether it be Iudah or Israel consequently other Churches better or worse they may be acknovvledged for the churches and people of God and yet must be left vvhen they stand in apostasie schisme idolatrie c. and not be communicated vvithall in such sinfull estate and transgression 5. Here therefore is to be observed that as they are the church and people of God none are to leaue or refuse communion with them but onely as they stand in apostasy schisme false vvorship c. Neyther Israel nor Iudah might be left nor the Temple in Ierusalem as they were the people and Temple of God but as Ieroboam caused Israell to sinne setting up the calues at Dan and Bethell c. as Manasseh polluted the house of God and caused Iudah to sinne vvith his idols Antiochus profaned the Sanctuarie and compelled the Iewes to transgresse the Law of God c. Yea euen touching the Church of Rome also in particular vve neyther doe nor may leaue it as it is the Temple and church of God but as Antichrist sitteth therein opposing and exalting himself aboue all that is called God or that is divine polluting the Temple and vvorship of God c. Rom. 1 7 c. compared with 2 Thes 2 4. and Rev 11 1 2 3. c Which being observed vve doe and may yea and ought to acknovvledge reteyn any doctrine of trueth ordinances of God stil had among them and yet are bound to leaue their corrupt and sinfull estate and in obedience to God according to his word to returne to the auncient estate of that and the other primitiue churches as they vvere planted by the Apostles in the fayth and order of Christ Rev. 14 9 12. and 18 4. and 22 14. with Jer. 6 16. and 18 15. Song 1 7 8. 6. Moreover it is vvell known that among such as doe much urge this objection there are some vvho haue left the French reformed Church in Amst for some things now had continued in that church Whereupon it will necessarily follow that eyther they hold a true church may be left for some things had among them and yet be held to be the Church of God notwithstanding or els that they hold not the French church aforesaid to be the church of God in their estate Let them novv tel vvhether 7. It is also Popish to hold that the church cannot erre And Anabaptisticall to think that when a church so erreth as it falleth into idolatry apostasie or the like transgressions then they cease to be the church and people of God any longer and very Popish again in deed irreligious under the title of the church of God to urge all eyther to walk as themselues doe what ever transgressions they haue against the word of God or els to account theÌ„ hereticks schismaticks seditious singular new fangled that refuse so to doe endevouring to vvalk in the faith and order of Christ in all things according to the word of God 8. Whereupon it cometh to passe in this case as heretofore it did when that was counted heresy in the Apostles and primitiue Churches which vvas not so in deed Act. 24 5 14. So now at this day both by Papists and others that is often esteemed to be schisme which in deed is not so True it is that schisme is very carefully religiously to be avoyded vvhether it be factious division in the Church or scandalous departing from it 1 Cor. 11 18 19. Rom. 16 17. Heb. 10 25. Iude v. 11 16 19. God hath set an order in his church and appointed bounds and limits which none â—hould transgresse Col 2 5. 1 Cor. 14 33 40. 1 Thes 5 14. Iude ver 19. with Psal 17 4. Schismes and divisions hatred and variance emulations and vvrath strife and envyings are among the works of the flesh of vvhich the Apostle teacheth that they vvhich doe such things shall not inherit the kingdome of God 1 Cor. 3 3 4. Gal. 5 19 20 21. But on the other hand syncere obedience unto God and an holy keeping of the fayth worship order which he hath once giuen unto his church is very carefully also to be reteyned and religiously to be performed notwithstanding the prohibition or opposition of any Princes Prelates people churches or other persons vvhosoever For the Lord hath promised to shevv mercy to those that loue him and keep his commandements and threatned to visit the iniquitie of such as hate him and follow their ovvne inventions misconceived courses in his vvorship service c. Exo. 20 4 5 6. Lev. 10 chap. Numb 16 ch Esa 29 13 14. and 65 2 7. Jer. 6 14 17. and 18 15. Mat. 15 7 8 9. and 28 20. Col. 2 5. 1 Tim. 6 13 14. Iude v. 3 23. Rev. 2 10 24 25 26. and 14 12. and 22 14 18 19. But here it will be demaunded when how we may knovv the estate of any church or churches to be such as we may leaue it or not Touching vvhich question although I had rather heare learne of others then set dovvne myne ovvn mynd specially considering vvhat Opposites I haue of sundry sorts and vvhat great difficulties and waighty consequences doe follovv about this matter every way Yet
both together in one day VVHether it be meet and right upon one and the same day to haue a solemne Fast together vvith the celebration of the Lords supper Judg. 20 26. Ester 4 16. compared with Mat. 26 26 29. Act. 20 7 11. 1 Cor. 10 16 17 and 11 23 26. 1. Because the nature of them both to wit of a Fast and of the Lords Supper is so very divers differing the one from the other Which may appear by their names besides the nature of the things themselues The one is a Fast the other a Feast In the one we absteyne from meat and drink In the other vve doe eat and drink Which also Christ himself hath cōmanded saying Take ye eat ye drinke ye c. And the one is a signe or solemne testification of sorrow the other of joy Judg. 20 26. Ester 4 16. vvith Mat. 26.26 29. Luke 22.17 20. 1 Cor. 5 6 7 8. Where also see consider that which is vvritten Neh. 8 10 13. 2. The Lords supper succeedeth the Passeover and is answerable unto it At the celebration whereof the Lord required that they should eate and drink in Israel And not that they should fast as in the day of Atonement wherein they were enjoyned to afflict their soules and from euen to euen to celebrate their rest Luc. 22 7 20. 1 Cor. 5 7. and 10 16 17. and 11 23 26. and Exod. 12 3 11. Deut. 16 1 7. 2 Chron. 30 and 35 chap. and Psal 116 13. compared with Lev. 23 5 6 27 32. and with Iudg. 20 26. and Dan. 10 2 3 22. And here note that the Lords supper was celebrated of Christ together with his disciples straightvvay after their eating of the Passeover Which is a point likevvise to be observed in this behalf Matth. 26 17 30. Mar. 14 12 26. Luke 22 7 20. As also that it is now in the Church the Christians feast answerable in some respects to the sundry feasts observed among the Ievves Act. 2 42. and 20 7. 1 Cor. 5 7 8. and 10 16 17 18. and 11 23 26. vvith Mar. 14 22 26. 3. And all things in the church of God should be done decently in order 1 Cor. 14 40. Now what order or decency is there in this that whiles and where a Feast is solemnely observed there should bread and wine in the same assembly be set upon a publike Table all at the same time be enjoyned to take to eat and to drink c. or that solemne Fasts and Feasts should be celebrated and joyned togethef upon one and the same day 4. Here moreover may be observed how they were woont in the primitiue churches to haue loue-feasts vvith the Lords supper as by some Scriptures and other vvriters may appeare 1 Cor. 11 20 34. and Iude epist ver 12. Tertullian Apolog. cap 39. Which then being so may shevv how far this custome practise differeth from that vvhich was used in the churches of old Not to speak hovv some in former times haue made question whether the church might haue any Fasts upon the Lords day at all Into vvhich point I vvill not novv enter neither insist upon things that in extraordinarie cases may be admitted CHAPT XVI Touching Loue-feasts VVHether it be good and lawfull for the churches now to haue use Loue-feasts at times convenient and namely on such dayes vvhen they haue the Lords supper Iude epist ver 12. 1 Cor. 11 20 34. compared vvith Deut. 12 5 6 7. and 16 1 15. Touching vvhich on the one hand obserue these things following 1. That so they practised in the primitiue Churches as may appeare both by some speaches in the Scripture Iude ver 12. 1 Cor. 11 20 34. and by the record of auncient writers Clement Tertullian c. 2. And note in Tertullian how he sheweth that they were kept in his time which vvas about two hundred yeeres after Christ And so long then they had continued from the Apostles times there vvhere Tertullian lived Tertullian Apolog. cap. 39. 3. Now whence this practise first arose I leaue further to be considered Onely for the point in hand this I note that vvhether they did it for the better nourishing continuing of loue peace among themselues or for the more comforting refreshing of the poor by the richer sort together with them or that they had therein respect to the action of Christ who celebrated the Lords supper after the eating of the Passeover Luke 22.7 20. or that they took this custome as they did many other things from the Ievves vvho vvere woont to haue feasts together with their sacrifices specially with their thanks offerings and at their solemne festivities or that they had it from some other like originall it cometh to a like end as touching the matter spoken off Deut. 12 7. and 16 1 15. 1 Sam. 1 4. with Exod. 32 6. Psal 116 12 13 14 with 66 13 14 15. On the other hand may be considered how it is observed and noted †Paraeus in 1 Cor. 11.22 Piscator in 1 Cor. 11.34 c. by divers that the Apostle tooke them away and would not suffer the use of them in the church of Corinth because of abuses that were among them through faction schisme and superfluitie 1 Cor. 11 17 34. Which being compared vvith the other particulars here before mentioned may shew that it is a thing indifferent eyther to keep them or to leaue them as they shal be used or abused and as everie church shall find to be most expedient for them and their estate vvhereas if it were a morall perpetuall ordinance of God the abuse onely should be corrected and the thing it self still continued and all churches continually bound to the observation thereof As we see done in the same place about the Lords supper it self 1 Cor. 11.20 23. c. CHAPT XVII Touching the observation of set Holy dayes besides the Lords day And namely of Easter and Christmas c. VVHether it be lavvful for the church of Christ now in the time of the Gospell to consecrate other set dayes ordinarily to keep them as holy dayes besides the Lords day And Whether it be lawfull to consecrate some certaine dayes yerely to the Nativitie Resurrection and ascension of Christ to the Virgin Marie to the Apostles and all Saints Gal. 4 9 10 11. Col. 2 16 17. 1 King 12 32 33. Jer. 3 16 17. and Exo. 20 8 9 10. with Act. 20 7. 1 Cor. 16 1 2. Rev. 1 10. 1. Seing that Christ himself by his practise and the Apostles both by their practise and vvritings haue commended unto us onely the Lords day vvhich is the first day of the vveek wherein Christ our Lord rose againe from the dead bringing life and immortalitie to light and everlasting righteousnes into the world as being by him renewed for ever In memorial vvhereof we are not enjoyned to set apart yerely other dayes besides the Lords day but