3. therefore any sinne which is perceived to be a sinne not unto death may be prayed for and so pardoned Fourthly let it be observed that the Apostle doâ—h 4. in the next verse set down what he means in this place by sinne for verse 17. All unrighteousness is sinne John 3. 4. and he had said before chap. 3. verse 4. Sinne is the transgression of the Law From whence it may be reasonably collected that any unrighteonsnesse or transgression of the Law or any sinne if it be discerned to be not unto death may be prayed for and possibly pardoned A sinne not unto death How any sinne can be said to Beza in loc be a sinne and yet not unto death is hard to be understood seeing we reade Rom. 6. 23. The wages of sinne is death for any sinne ever so little rendereth us liable to death and is affirmed so by Beza Omtria peccata per se lethaliâ— id est All sinnes in their own nature are deadly Our very lapst nature in Adams mass Originall sinne and our minima peccata there is no sinne so small or unconsiderable but draweth after it the weight of eternall wrath and a thousand times meriteth eternall death Thus he and Calvin very truely saith Omne peccatum per se mortale Calv. instit 2. 8. 59. id est Every sinne in it self is deadly but when the sins of holy men are said to be not unto death and veniall it is because by Gods mercy they obtain pardon and not because the sinnes are of themselves veniall for who doubteth but that in the reprobate all sinnes are sinnes unto death but in the Elect no sinne is unto death Saint Chrysostome observeth upon those words Matthew Chrys de compunct n. 18. 5. 22. Whosoever shall say to his brother Thou fool c. De levioribus dat sententiam ut de gravioribus non dubitare debeas id est Christ pronounced sentence of Hell fire against so small a sinne that no man should doubt what greater sinnes deserve Again there are very grand and capitall sinnes which yet in some persons are sinnes not unto death as Galathians 5. 19. Adultery Murther Drunkennesse Seditions Heresies Idolatrie c. of which it is there said They that do such things shall not inherit the Kingdome of God and yet we know that some of the Patriarks and many converted from Heathenisme hath committed these sinnes but obtained pardon and shall inherit the Kingdome of Heaven Noahs excesse Davids adultery the Corinthians incest Peters deniall and the Iewes denying and crucifying the holy One and Pauls persecuting the Church all and every of these sinnes in those penitent and Elect vessels were sinnes not unto death This I think will not be denied Not unto death But why are some mens sinnes called not unto death when the very same speciall sins in other men are indeed sinnes unto death The Poet murmured at such a thing Committunt eadem diverso Crimina fato Juven sat 13. Ille crucem sceleris precium tulit hic Diadema For many sins and very capitall ones are common both to the Reprobates and to the Elect and yet in the Elect and the same sin is not unto death which in the Reprobate is unto death The answer is that our Apostle calls that sin a sin not unto death which is confessed repented forsaken and amended before our death or departure out of this life when a man doth not obdurately continue and persevere in his sin untill his death but forsaketh it in his life-time so that the leaving of his sin and amendment of life may be seen by his brother for how else shall a brother see that the sin is not unto death but by the sinners leaving it desisting from and amending it as by ceasing from adultery rebellion oppression and the like for so the Apostle telleth the Corinthians such as these were some of yee but yee are washed but yee are sanctified 1 Cor. 6. 11. So that sinnes not unto death are not so called from the nature or merit of sin but from the circumstance of the time or person sinning and desisting Fot as is said Every sin is mortall deadly and unto death eternall if we look onely on the merit of sin but every sin though the most grand and capitall sin is not unto death if it be repeated of and left before the departure of the soul from the body So the gloss expoundeth this place Non ad mortem Id est non usque ad mortem i. A sin not unto death is when the sin is not continued in untill the time of death and of David it saith David sinned not unto death for he repented and obtained pardon so that the same sin in one man not repenting produceth damnation when in another it is pardoned upon repentance Neither do we hereby assert any Stoicall f Amb. n. 33. Novatian or g Aug. n. to 6. habes Sardos venales alium alio nequiorem â—ul Epist 125 Iovinian equalitie of sinnes For although no sinne may well be called bettet then another because all are naught yet one is worse then another Of two ill painted pieces one asked uter detâ—rior est i. which is worst and of two evill things in the Comedy it is said h Plaut in Aulular Act. 2. sce â— Alia aliâ pejor est optima nulla est i. one is worse then another neither can be called best i. i Aug. cont mendac c. 8. n. 77. Furum non est ideâ— quisquam bonus quia pejor est unus i One thief is worse then another yet no thief is therefore good Sin in generall is k Bafil n. 5. Proles Diaâ—osi and l Theod. n. 13. mater mortis m Chrys n. 59. grandis Damon peccatum i. the braâ— of the Devil the mother of death and it self is a Devil and so is called in the Gospel yet sins are of severall growths and degrees For therefore are there severall degrees of torments in hell apportioned to the degrees of sins There is a sin as a moâ—e and as a beam and a Camel so there are stripes many stripes weeping wailing gnashing of teeth worm fire and brimstone the damned shall be bound up in bundles according to the likenesse and degrees of their sins and every bundle shall have its just portion as we read of that particular portion of Hypocrites It is a memorable and a terrible observation which Origen makes upon that saying Numb 14. 34. where for one sin in one day a whole year of punishment is apportioned If for every sinne of ours a whole year of Orig. in loc hom 8. punishment shall be allotted I fear that neither the duration of this world nor the eternitie of the next world will be long enough to end ouâ— torments Let us not therefore flatter our selves wâ—th the conceit of a little or a veniall sinne as if such deserved not death for
â—â—tu i. that he was in the light of God and company of Saints and St. Austin prayed thus for his godly Aug. Confes l. 9. c. 13. Mother deceased Pro peccatis matris mea deprecor te Deus demitâ—e illi debita sua c. i. I beseech thee O God for the sins of my Mother that thou wouldst forgive her and yet immediatly he saith Credo jam feceris quod rogo i I beleeve thou hast alreadâ—y done what I now pray for Notwithstanding the Church did so pray and Epiphanius gives this reason why the names of the dead were Epiph. hae 75. mentioned in the Church-prayers Quia hoc magis fuerit utile quid commodius quod credunt praesentes quòd bi qui decesserunt vivunt non sunt nulli i. What can be more profitable to the living then to be assured that the dead persons commemorated do still live and that they are not annihilated So we see the Church had other reasons which moved them so to commemorate the dead though the deceased received no benefit thereby As 1. To commend unto the living and in their mindes to preserve the wholesom doctrine of our Souls immortality 2. Their prayers did challenge the performance of Gods promises to those deceased who had lived and died in the Lord as is declared Rev. 14. 13. Blessed are the dead that dye in the Lord saith the Spirit 3. For the coâ—solation of the living the Priest declared that the sins of such holy men which had lived and died in the faith of Christ were forgiven 4. The Church gave thanks for their departure to rest as acknowledging the mercy of God by which they were saved and not by their own merits Some Divines think that when St. Paul prayed for Onesiphorus The Lord grant unto him that he may find mercy of the Lord in that day 2 Tim. 1. 18. that Onesiphorus was at that time dead because in the end of the Epistle in the salutations there is no mention of Onesiphorus but of his familie only 2 Tim. 4. 19. And because there is no state or condition of men in this life though never so sinful which excludeth them from the benefit of being prayed for therefore some Expositors have thought that when St. John said There is a sin unto death I do not say he shall pray for it 1 Joh 5. 16. his meaning is that such an one who liveth and dieth in a soul-destroying sin such as shall in this book afterwards be discovered without repentance for such a mans prayers are unprofitable and vaine not excluding others that die in the Lord to be commemorated in the prayers of the living as Onesiphorus before mentioned and in that sense as is before said and this is St. Heromes exposition in his objurgatory Hier 10. 9. Epiad Evang. Epistle to Evangius if it be his own and so also saith the interlineal glosse with Lyra. St. Austin being hard put to it to give an account why the Church prayed for the dead and what benefit the dead had by the prayers of the living by the questions of Dulcitius and Paulinus confesseth most inge Aug. lib. de Cur promortâ— c. 1. nuously that the dead can have no benefit at all by our prayers here except by their good life they were capable of good before their death and again he saith Because the Church knoweth not unto what dead men Aug. ib. c. 17. her prayers are profitable therefore she prayeth pro omnibus regeneratis i. for all the regenerate that none may be omitted CHAP. XV. That the Fathers did not beleeve that Souls departed were insensible as if they were dead or asleep because the Saints departed do pray for the Church Militant as the Fathers thought HAving shewed before what the Church Militant did here below for the Triumphant part above it would now be considered what the Triumphant Church above doth for us that are on earth in the judgement of the Fathers The ancient Church were so far from thinking that our souls died with our bodies that they affirme and verily beleeve that the souls of holy men departed and being in rest did pray for the Church on earth for so St. Hierom tels us the Saints deceased pray for the living Hier. Epist 53. n. 17. for they that had so much charity on earth as to pray even for their enemies and persecutors much more will they now in heaven pray for the Church St. Paul is not lesse charitable after his departure then he was before and so he wished Heliodorâ—â— that if he died before Hier. Eipst 1. n. 1. Hierom to pray for him when he was in heaven so likewise he desireth a Id. Epist 27. n. 7. Principia and b Id. Epist exeg 140. n. 30 Paula to remember him when they are in heaven And St. Ambrose professeth c Amb. de fide Resur n. 30. That he expecteth the intercession of his brother Satyrus deceased for the speedier deliverance out of the miseries of this life and that he hoped the godly Emperour d Id. de Obit Theod. n. 47. Theodosius departed did yet pray to God for his surviving Children and that the dead Emperor e Id. de Obit Valent. n. 46. Gratian did pray for his brother Valentinian Of the same Judgment is St. Chrysostom f Chrys ser de uno Legisl to 6. n. 55. for he doubteth not to affirm that the Martyrs and Prophets Apostles deceased do actually pray for the living and before him St. Cyprian in his life-time contracted with Cornelius g Cyp. l. 1. Epist 1. Qui prior è vita discesserit oret pro sratribus i. That which of them should first dye must pray for the survivers and in an Epistle written to some Martyrs who were very speedily to suffer death for Christ he desireth †Cyp. ad Marty n. 98. Naz. Orat. 24. them to be mindful of him when they were in the honour of Martyrs with the Lord. Greg. Naz. tells us that Athanasius though deceased yet as he was perswaded did still help and assist the Church and that his friend St. Basil deceased and now in heaven yet Naz. Orat. 20. even there poured out prayers for the people And of his reverend old father deceased who had been a long time Bishop of Nazianzum he saith That he doubteth Id. Orat. 19. not but though he were in heaven yet the same Pastoral care which he had on earth remaineth still with him and now that he is approached nearer to God he doth more good for that flock by his prayers in heaven then he could do by his doctrine on earth This is enough to shew what the Fathers thought of the Immortality of the soules of men and the same opinion was so generally received of Christian people in those dayes that as St. Chrysostome reporteth they Chrys Ser. 4. de Laz. n. 42. would commonly boast that they should
afterwards Is not this the Carpenters son Matth. 13. 55. disparaging him for his mean parentage this is the Exposition of St. Ambâ—ose a Ambr. de Spirit l. 1. c. 3. In Filium Hominis pâ—ccare est remissius sentire de carne Christi c. To sin against the Son of Man is to conceive too basely of the flesh of Christ and they that so sin are not utterly excluded from pardon 2. The Jewes blasphemed him now in his Godhead by denying it and ascribing the miracle to confederacy with Beelzebub and of this blasphemy which doth take away the very foundation of remission of sins it is said It shall not be forgiven 5. I may adde hereunto that those unbaptized Pharisees in probability did not intend any obloquy or blasphemy against the Person of the holy Spirit as it is the third Person of which they had never been instructed neither had they so much Christianity as those disciples at Ephesus who though they had been baptized unto Iohns baptisme yet they had not so much as heard whether there be an holy Ghost Act. 19. 2. Thus having shewed that in Scripture and in the writings of the Fathers and later Divines the Godhead of Christ is called a Spirit and holy and also an holy Spirit and that in St. Matthew those words holy Spirit are to be understood of the Godhead of Christ which is for ever united to and residing in the Holy Temple of his most sacrâ—d Body and Soul I now reassume my former Conclusion That the denying Christ to be God is the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost which is there said to be unpardonable Now that in a Doctrine of so great moment and concernment the Reader may understand that I do not obtrude any novell and private opinion of mine own upon him I will heâ—e lay down the judgement of soâ—e of the Fathers in this very question and first of Athanasius one of the most profound and godly Divines that since the Apostles dayes the Church ever had who in his book De Communi essentia Patris c. aith b Arha to 3. p. 625. It is hard to conjecture what our Saviour means by those words He that speaketh against the Sod of Man shall be forgiven but he that speaketh against the holy Ghost shall not be so given So that the Son may seem â—o he infâ—riour to the Spirit and yet the So saith The Father and I are one If he that saith to his brother Thou fool shall be cast into hâ—ll â—n quam gehennà gehennarum conjiriâ—tur is qui â—ssâ—rit Deum creatu am â—sse Into what Hell of Hells will he be cast who calleth him that is God a Creature and a Servant and a Minister onely And a little after he saith Dâ—iâ—atâ—m Vâ—rbi ipse Christus Spiriâ—um Sanctum vocâ—t humanitatem suam Filium Hominis nâ—minavit i. Our Saviour called his own Godhead the holy Ghost and his own Manhood he called the Son of Man and of those that blaspheme his holy Spirit by blaspheming his Godhead is this sentence to be understood It shall not be forgiven him neither in this world nor in the world to come This is the judgement of Athanasius To him I adde the Opinion of St. Hilâ—râ— who was contemporary with Athaâ—asius who in his Exposition of that Text Matth. 12. 32. saith c Hil. in Mat. Can. 12. p. 731. Si negetur Dâ—us in Christo caret omni misâ—ricordia i. If a Man deny God to be in Christ that man shall finde no mercy And again he saith d Hil. ib. Can. 31. p. 426. Blasphemia in Spiritum â—st Christum Deum â—sse negare i The blasphemy against the Spirit is to deny Christ to be God The same Father in the place last quoted speaking of Saint Peters deniall of Christ saith Because to deny Christ to be God is that sinne which shall never be forgiven therefore Peter denied thus I know not the Man because a word spoken against the Son of Man may be forgiven The very same conceit hath Saint Chrysostome also in his Sermon of Peters deniall and upon these words I kâ—ow not the Man e Chrys to 6 p. 631. Non dixit non noâ—i Deum Verbum sic enim peccasset in Spiâ—itum Sanctum i. Peter said not I know him not to be God for so he had sinned against the holy Ghost but I know not the Man Now whether Saint Peter meant so as these two Fathers conjectured I cannot affirm for certain but by this I finde that the judgement of these two great Doctours was that the denying of the Godhead of Christ is indeed that great unpardonable sinne To this I adde the testimony of Saint Basil who deserved to be called the Great He in that excellâ—nt Book De Spiritu Sancto saith f Basil de Spirit c. 7. Testificer omni Homini Christum profiâ—enâ—i sed â—um neganti Deum â—sse quod Christus nihil â—i proderiâ— i. I testifie to every Man who professeth himself to be a Christian and yet deâ—â—ieth Christ to be God Christ shall nothing at all profit that man And if Christ do not profit us in the remission of our sinnes I am sure our sinnes shall never be forgiven in this world or in the world to come CHAP. V. The Opinions of later Divines concerning the unpardonable sin A brief Narration of the life and death of Arius and of Julian the Apostate TO the above-named Ancients I subjoyn the opinions of our later Divines who in their Expositions and Tractats where they inquire what particular sin this is although they do not agree therein yet when they inquire what persons have sinned this sin they do commonly affirm for one that Arius in his Heresie did sâ—n thus and this is the opinion of Polanus and also of Bucanus and others Now the Polan synt p. 340. Bucan Lo. Com. p 174. onely noted heresie of Arius was the denying the Godhead of Jesus Christ saying that he was not from everlasting and that he was but preferred to be a God Just as our Commenter would have him onely exalted and deisied This Arius was born in Africk and was a Presbyter or Priest of the Cathedrall Church of Alexandria in Egypt In that City in the dayes of the Emperour Constantine the Great there were ten Churches besides Epiph. haer 69. the Cathedrall Just such as we now call Paraecial or Parish-Churches wherein ten of the Presbyters of the Cathedrall Church were the incumbents and Preachers of these ten Arius was one and was more esteemed and followed then any of his brethren It fell out that the Bishop of Alexandria died Arius gaped for the place but mist it for one Alexander was elected then Arius raised a faction and revived the former Heresie of Paulus Samosatenus preaching this damnable doctrine that Christ was not God When Bishop Alexander was informed of this he convented Arius and upon examination discovering his
is behind of the afflâ—ctions of Christ in my flâ—sh We may not think that Christ in his own particular Person left his Passion insufficient so as if for our redemption the Apostle should need to supply his defect but his meaning is that something was to be suffered in the Mysticall Body of Christ which is his Church by the holy Martyrs for confirmation of Evangelicall Truth as it is there said For his bodies sake that is for the edification of his Members and these Passions of Martyrs are here called the afflictions of Christ though they were acted onely on the Person of this Apostle If it be here objected that there is a great difference between the Sonship of Christ and our sonship because he is the Son of God by Nature and we onely by the Adoption of Grace This cannot be denied but withall we should understand that although Christ in regard of his Divine Nature is very God of very God yet the same Lord Jesus in respect of his assumed Manhood is also the Son of God onely by Grace by Adoption and Election and therefore it is said in regard of this humane Nature All power is given me in Heaven and in Earth Esay 42. 1. 1 Pet. 2. 4. and therefore Christ is called Gods elect Servant and Saint Peter calls him a stone chosen and precious for indeed it was of meer grace that this Man Jesus was chosen and taken into Unity of Person with the Eternal Word and this is the doctrine of the ancient Church Aug. de Verb. Dei ser 8. De Temp. ser 84. delivered by Saint Austine Susceptio hominis per Verbum erat Gratia nam quid meruit ille Homo qui Christus est and again Susceptio hominis ipsius in Deum tota est gratia quid meruit homo ille â—olle gratiam quid est Christus nisi homo quid nisi quod tu and in his disputes against the â—elâ—gians he thus argues Vnde Christus De Praedest cap. 14. homo meruit ut in unitatem personae cum aeterno verbo assumeretur quid â—nte egit and he answereth himself thus ille grat âest tantus â—â gratiâ fiâ— Christianus quâ ille homo fiâ— Christus That is the taking of the manhood into God was meerly of grace for what did that man Christ deserve What did he before by the same grace that a man is made a Christian this man Jesus was made Christ Finally why should we further doubt that holy men are called Christ and the Son of God seeing the Eph. 3. 17. 1 John 4. 13. Matth. 28. 28. Scripture tells us that Christ dwelleth in their hearts and that they dwell in him and that he is with us to the end of the world Hereupon Saint Hierâ—m writes thus to Saint Austin a Hierom. Ep. 80. Habitantem in teâ—dâ—â—exi Dâ—mâ—num Salvatorâ—m And Paulinus thus writes to him b Aug. epist 58. Audiam quâ—d in â—â— mihi loquatnâ— Deus And Austin himself writes thus to Bishop Aurelius c Id. â—e opere Monach. cap. 1. Jussioni â—â—a oporter me obâ—â—mperaâ—e nam Christus in te habitans ex te jussiâ— This union of Christ and his Church is of so great Concernment that the most high and Holy Sacrament was set up by our Saviour purposely not only to signify but also as an Instrumental meanes to effect this most holy Union which cannot be said of common and ordinary food and therefore is called by Saint Austin Thâ— Sacrament of union as out of many grapes one vessell Ad Frâ—â— in Erem ser 28. Sacramentum unitatis of wine is extracted c â—just so saith he of many men one Body of Christ is composed I here present unto the Learned Readers consideration an exposition of those two difficult sayings of Christ but I do not obtrude this conceit Magisterially He saith Iohn 6. 53. Except ye cat the flesh of the Son of man c. and Matth. 26. 26. Take eat this is my Body This he said when he gave not flesh but bread Vide Theophil in â—oâ— 6. 51. This bread may truly besaid to †Vide Theoophil in John 6. 51. be turned into the Flesh of Christ because it is nutrimentally turned into the flesh of every holy Communicant because such are truly called the Body and members of Christ and are called Christ but in prophane persons it is not so turned because they are not the members of Christ neither doth our Saviour say This is my body till he had first said Take Eat my learned friend Dr. Thomas Brown observeth that every Religio â—â—dici man is a kind of Anthropâ—phaâ—e because the main bulk of his body went in at his mouth by nourishment so this holy Eucharisticall nourishment is therefoie turned into the Body of Christ because it is converted into the flesh and blood of us who are his Body for thus Christ and his servants become incorporate and one body In the vision of Saint Peter it was said Arise Acts 10 13. kill and eat the meaning was that Peter should re ceive the Gentiles as well as the Jewes into the Communion of the Church Quasi escam uâ— incorporentur Ecclesiae saith Austin so he expoundeth that of Saint Iohn Aug. Hom. 45. Except ye eat id est nisi incorporentur Christo So also he expoundeth that saying He that cometh to Jo. 6. 37. me I will not cast him out Quiveniâ— ad Christum incorporatur ei And in that exposition of the Apocalyps which goes under his name Rev 20. 9. where it is said that fire came from God and devoured the persecutors he saith Comeduntur ab ecclesia persecutores id est incorporantur the meaning is that by the fire of the Holy Ghost the very persecutors of the Church shall be converted and incorporated into that mysticall Body of Christ this of the first question The second question is What that is which in the Saints Quest 2. Militant is not yet nor ever will be in this life fully subjected to God but shall be hereafter in the next life To this question this is the answer That in the Answer most holy men living there dwelleth a rebellious sin continually unto their death which is the same that by the Apostle is called Concupisence for the law saith Thou shalt not cover and the Apostle saith The Exod 20. 17. Rom. 7. 7. Gal. 5. 17. Psal 94. 20. flesh lusteth against the Spirit this is that which Divines call Originall sin of which the Apostle saith Rom. 7. 23. I see another law in my members warring against the law of my mind Psal 94. 20. he calleth it a law because it hath such power over us as the Edicts of Tyrants have over their Vassals this is that sin which â—weâ—lâ—th in us Rom. 7. 2. of which he saith v. 24. who shall deliâ—er us from this body of death the deliverance mâ—st not be
of all this is as Saint Augustine observeth Aug. De Genesi ad lit l. 11 c. 32. Bestialem motum in membris scilicet appetitum concumbendi erubuit And again Quendam pruritum turpem indicant folia id est The Fig-leaves shew that Adam was ashamed of his lust appearing in those parts This is that Originall sinne in Adam which by Generation is transmitted to his Posterity and which the written Law of God forbiddeth in these words Thou shalt not lust or covet So I proceed to the third question 3. How Christ is freed seperated from 3. Question Original sin To this question the answer of Divines both Ancient and modern is That Original sin is not propagated to posteritie by taking our flesh from our parents but by lust and that because Christ was conceived and born of a Virgin without Lustfull copulation therfore he is free from this Original pollution Nulla volupâ—ate carnalis concupiscentiae seminatus est Aug. Enchâ—rid Cap. 4â— De Genesi ad lit l. 10. c. 18. Christus id ò nullum peccatum originaliter trahit And againe Corpus Christi non seminatum est per eam legem in membris quae repugnat legi mentis Ergo non erat caro peccaâ—i i The body of Christ was not generated in the pleasure of lust by the law in our members warring against the law of our mind therfore his flesh was not sinfull The same reason is rendred by Fulgentius and also by Isychius Christi Christi humanitas munda erat quia non Fulg. de Incarn c. 4. Isych in Levit. c. 14. Calv. instit l. 2. c. 13. S. 4. Aug. cont Pel. l. 2. c. 25. geniâ—a erat ex viri immunditie i. The humane nature of Christ is clean because he was conceived without unclean copulation Indeed Calvin is of opinion that it is not sufficient to acquit Christ from this originall pollution in that he was born of a virgin but because he was also Sanctified by the holy Ghost that his conception might be pure before him S. Austin had written somthing to that purpose Christus carnem ilâ—am aut suscipiendam mundaâ—it â—ut suscipiende mundavit i That Christ before â—e took that flesh or in taking of it did purifie it But the former opinion and this compared with the Scripturall words will amount but to one and the same for what can be meant by Calvin's Sanctified but that the flesh of Christ was separated from the polluted way of other mens flesh And what seperation can be meant but only that Christ was conceived in a way different and Seperate from ordinarie Conceptions And that is miraculously by the operation of the Holy ghost without man and this I take to be the meaning of the Apostle before alleaged Heb. 7. 26 That our high-Preist must be seperate from sinners For to Imagine that the Holy ghost did take away carnal pollution from that part of the Virgin mother of which Christ was made flesh and yet left the said Original pollution remaining in the other parts of her to me it seemes both an unprobable and a needless refuge to this question And whether God doth any time take away the pollution of Original sin from any person in whom it once was during this mortal life I have at large shewed before in my second book and tenth Chapter and that the taking See before l. 2. c. 10. sect 2. 2 Cor. 12. 8. away of Original sin was that very thing which S. Paul prayed for so earnestly and had only this answer My grace is sufficient for thee Finally because the first man was made of earth and the first woman was made of man and both before lust was hatched therfore both were at first free from this Original pollution upon which consideration Aquinas Aquin. l. 2. q. 81. art 4. moveth this pertinent question If now a man should be miraculously made of another man's flesh whether he should contract Original sin His answere is no. upon good reason for such a creature is not procreated by way of carnal copulation I suppose no man will affirm that worms which are bred in humane bodies doe contract any sin from man although they take flesh from man The same reason is appliable to Christ and therfoâ—e Origen upon S. Luke and Austin very often Orig in lu ho. 14. Aug. in ps 22. and De mirab script l. 3. c. 2. applie that saying of the psalmist Psal 22. 6. I am a wâ—â—m and no man as being spoken of Christ because as a worm so Christ was bred in the virgin's wombe without any copulation for therfore some birds bees and worms are so bred that Christ might not be without example who in the Psal is called a worm This I trust is enough to the three questions Now for answer to those Scriptural sayings which seem to charg Christ with sin As He hath made him to 2 Cor. â— 21. Aug. cont Max. l. 2. c. 2. be sin for us which place was by Maximinus the Arrian thus perverted Christus pro nobis peccatum fecit as S. Austin noteth i Christ did sin for us If we should understand this of any personal sin in Christ then should we charg God with being the author of sin But the meaning is only that God made Christ a Sacrifice for sin for sacrifices are called sins Hose 4. 8. They eat up the sin of my people That is the preists did eat the sin offerings That which wee now read Levit. 3. 2. He shall lay his hand upon the head of the Sacrifice The Septuagint read He shall lay his hand upon the head of the sin So from hence no more can be inferred but that Christ Aug. in Psal 68. was Peccatorum Susceptor non commissor as S. Austin expresseth it Christ is thus factus peccatum non natus he is only made sin as a sacrifice but all wee are sin-born to him sin is only imputed but in us it is inherent To that of Rom. 5. 12. Death passed on all for that all have sinned The answer is that all who by way of natural generation proceeded from Adam have sinned as is shewed before indeed death is the wages of sin Either of our owne proper and personal sin for which wee are mortall or els of Imputed sin by which Christ was subject to mortalitie To that of Levi. Heb. 7. 9. who is said to pay tithes to Mâ—lchisedech because he was in the loins of braham And that therfore Christ being in the loins of Adam when he fell may seem lyable to that transgression of Adam wee say if this objection were formed in words which signified propagation of sin which is now our question the solution would appear more evidently as thus Levi was in the loins of Abraham when Jsaac was begotten therfore Levi sinned in Abraham's loins this cannot be denied So Christ was in the loins of Adam when Seth was begotten Seth was Christs
that sin shall never be forgiven for if this sin cannot at all be remitted by repentance in this life why was the Church so offended with Novatus for not admitting penitents to his Atha ib. pag. 624. Communion who in time of persecution for fear had denied Christ and yet if there be a possibility of remission after this life why is Origen so condemned for affirming that the punishment of the damned shall have an end Again he saith 〈◊〉 those who were ignorant of the Godhead of Jesus and so did not believe or confesse it shall not be pardoned what will become of his own Disciples Ausim dicere ne ipsos bâ—atos Discipulos Atha ibid pa. 265. perfectam sententiam de ejus Divinitate habiusse antequam Spiritus sanctus in die Penticostes eos visitasset i I dare bouldly affirm that the blessed Disciples of Christ had not a perfect opinion of their Lords Godhead untill the holy Spirit descended on them at the Feast of Penticost for we read Math. 28. 17. that after his resurrection some worshiped him but some doubted Heathens Turks Jewes and Arrians do unto this day blaspheme the whole Trinity and therefore do certainly blaspheme the Holy Spirit yet if any of these should be converted to the true faith and with a penitent confession and with teares should come to the Christian Church renouncing their blasphemies and desire admission thereinto and to be instructed and then baptized what Christian would be so hard-hearted as to deny them St. Austin goeth yet further Aug. in Exposit Epist ad Rom. n. 96. Si ex eo numero hominum quibus Dominus crimen peccati in Spiritum Sanctum objecit veniret ad ecclesiam ad fidem Christi paenitens salutem cum lacrimes posâ—ens quaero utrum quisquam tanto errore esset ut neget ad baptismum admitti aut frustra admissum esse contendat i If any one of those very Pharisees unto whom particularly Cbrist objected this sin against the Holy Ghost had been converted to the Christian faith and with repentance and tears had desired that saving doctrine I demand whether any one would be so ignorantly nice as to deny him leave to be baptized or to affirm that if he were baptized it would not profit him Certainly if Julian or Arrius who by divines are said to have sinned this sin had so offered themselves to the primitive Church in their times they had not been refused for we know that Novatus and his sect were therefore condemned by the Orthodox because they refused to admit such as had denied Christ as is said before The conclusion and resolution of this question by Aug. Epist 50. n. 31. St. Austin is this that this sin is unpardonable only in this case viz. If such a sinner continue in duritia cordis usque ad finem vitae hujus and again Aug. Enchirid cap. 83. n. 58. Si in hac obstinatione mentis diem extremum clandit i If such a blasphemer continue and persevere in this hardnesse of heart and obstinacy all his life time and in it depart this life then will there be no hope of forgivnesse And for this reason onely this grand sin Vid. infra may be called in the Apostles words 1. John 5. 16. A sin unto death Not because it doth alwaies necessarily bring to that sinner eternall death but because it Aug. Epist 50. â— 31. will do so if that sinner live and die in this sin obstinately and impenitently of which saying I shall more largly speak here after in its due place of this sin when it doth necessarily bring the sinner to eternal damnation the same Saint Austin saith very truly as I conceive Non probatur ab aliquo commissum nisi cum de corpore exierit i none can be properly said to have committed the sin unto death untill the sinner be actually dead because if he repent before his death then the sin canot be said to be unto death Finallie neither this sin or any other Apostasie except it be final is so absolutely unpardonable but that forgivenes may be obtained through Christ if the sinner seeke pardon with true repentance But whether any repentance may be had by such who have once fallen into this grand sin is the next thing to be enquired CHAP. IV. An exposition of Hebr. 6. 4. that the word Inlightned signifieth baptisme Anabaptisme is inhibited as both unprofitable and also sinful BEcause no sin how great soever can be said to be absolutely unpardonable if the sinner wil truly repent him of it and that there is no case or condition in this life wherin sinfull man should despair and cast of all hope of pardon therefore divers * Calvin l. 3. 3. 24. Instit Polan p. 339. Buc. p. 155. divines tell us that the reason why it is said of this sin that it shall never be forgiven is because when it is once committed it is ever after accompanied with final impenitentie and that by the just judgment of God such apostates are punished with final and Eternal blindnes and that they cannot possiblie repent and for this doctrine they alleage the saying of S. Paul Heb. 6. 4. It is impossible for those who were once enlightned if they fall away to renue them to repentance Whether this be the true meaning of those words or not it will better appeare if we diligentlie by way of exposition examine them together with the context both before after Which I will not presume to undertake or performe by mine owne single judgment but will call in the assistance of former expositions by the auncient Fathers upon that place where we read as followeth For it is impossible for those who were once enlightned and have tasted of the heavenly gift c. If they fall away to Renue them againe to repentance The Apostle having in the former verses told those Hebrâ—ws that they should not expect that he would new lay the foundations of Christian religion which had bin done to them before wherof one was 〈◊〉 and its Doctrine for if they must be alwaies nâ—w rounded in Christian religion as oft as they fall into â—in then should they be as often baptized that if they fell a second and third time they should as often be baptized and therby reâ—â—ored to their former estate by so many several baptismes This is the eâ—position of Theophilact Si iterum eâ—â— in primordiis religionis instiâ—ueret Theoph. in locum ruâ—sus baptizaret poâ—iquâ—m denuò â—apsi essent baptizaret aâ—que â—teâ—um per â—ujusmodiâ— iterationem essent multi baptismi verum hoâ—â—bsurdum non oportet iterari baptismum i If the Apostle must new lay the foundations of religion in his disciples as oft as they fall into sin then must he new baptize them and if they fall againe he must baptize them againe and againe but â—f so then there would be many Baptismes which were absurd for Baptisme may
the world Clemens Alex. and Naz. Observe that the very Clem. Alex. Paed. l 1. Naz. Orat. 40. heathens called a man 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i light onlie because he was indued with the light of a reasonable soule much more may those be said to be Inlightned who are indued with the Spirit of Illumination from God Ephe. 5. 8. Ye were darknes but now are light in the Lord and. 1 Joh. 1. 5. God is light for the baptismal regenerating Spirit is the Spirit of God Eusebius noteth in the life of Constantine the Great Post baptismum sibi visus est luce Euseb de vita Con. l. 4. n. 45. plenus quasi numine siderari i Assoone as he was Baptized he seemed to himself to be full of light as if he had bin assisted by some heavenlie power people had such a conceit of Baptismal illumination that Nazianzen reporteth of his reverend Father that as he Naz. Orat. 19. came out of the Baptismal font to them a visible light seemed to shine round about him But I proceed CHAP. V. That the word renuing doth in this place signifie baptisme those that fall after baptisme have yet left to them a second remedy and that is repentance VVE have seen that those that fall into sin after baptism must not expect a release or remedy for their sins by any second or new baptisme the words which follow as some do dangerously understand them at the first veiw seem to exclude such sinners from the second remedy of repentance which is surely an erronious conceit as will appear presently If they fall away it is impossible to Renew them again unto repentance the plain meaning of these words is That those which fall into their old unregenerate and carnal course of living after they have once been renewed by baptism must not expect to be restored to their regenerate and former integrity innocency and cleanesse and freedom from the guilt of their sins by another new baptisme for a second baptisme cannot acquit them of their sins so as their first baptisme did repentance which signifieth amendment of life is not obtained by a second renovation by baptism for that cannot â—enue them so as to make them appear clean and puâ—ged from their sins in the sight of God water once washed in is accounted foul afterwards the Philosopher could say of a fowle Bath Qui hic lavant ubi lavantur St. Ambrose said of Pilates washing in vita Diog. apud Laert. Ambr. non diluit sed in quinavit in psa 61 they that wash in foul water had need to wash again a second baptism is so foul that it addeth a new pollution as will appâ—ar hereafter Indeed God by one baptism wherewith his Regenerating Spirit doth concur doth renew men unto repentance or amendment and newnesse of life but if afterwards we fall away by polluting our selves with new sins let us not so flatter our selves as to imagine that we can be restored and renewed by a second baptismal renovation for no such renewing is to be expected There are two remedies prescribed by God for assoilment from our sins the first is Baptism Act. 22 16 Arise and be baptized and wash away thy sins The second remedy is Repentance Act. 3. 19. Repent ye therefore and be converted that your sins may be bloâ—ted out To renew them to repentance If the Apostle meant that it were impossible for those that fall after baptism to repent it may be wondred why he did not say It is impossible to repent and why he should use two words Renâ—w Repentance for repentance it self is a renewing Renewing is a generall word may be distributed into two sorts First there is a renewing Sacramental and baptismal when a man is baptized or illuminated and thereby initiated to a new state and way of living according to new rules of life Secondly there is a renuing Moral when a man once illuminated or baptized having falne into greivous sins yet by grace given changeth his wicked course of sinning to a careful and conscionable new way of living according to direction of the Gospell Hence I collect that the meaning of these words is That he that hath once been renued by baptismall illumination to repentance or amendment of life if such a man fall he cannot the second time be renued by a second baptismal renuing a second baptisme will not acquit him of his sins but yet he is not excluded from a morall renuing by leaving his sinning which is called repentance briefly though he may be renued yet it may not be by a new baptism though he may repent yet his repentance is not to be wrought by a second baptism For the right understanding of this exposition I here lay down to the Readers view these few plain propositions First a man that after baptisme falls into sin though ever so great yet by the Grace of God may repent and be recovered Secondly a man baptized that is falne in his old carnal living may be renued and possibly may become a new man and a new creature for a sinner after baptism may he renued because he may repent Thirdly the reader may take notice that in this place the words Illuminated and Renue are of the same signification So that the meaning is that he that is once by baptism illuminated cannot again by baptism be illuminated and he that is once by baptism Renued cannot again by baptism be renued to repentance Fourthly a man may once be enlightned and baptized and thereby renued to amendment of life and repentance and freedom or acquitment from his sins past and this by the Spirit of God in the laver of regeneration and by the vertue of Christs death But after this one renuing by baptisme he cannot again be renued to resipiscence newnesse of life and acquitment from his sin by a new baptism To renue them Al though a sinner cannot be renued more then once by the Sacramental renovation of baptism yet there is another way left open for renuing and that is penitentiall renovation and acquiring new Spirituall Graces and this way is and ought to be frequently iterated as it is said 2. Cor. 4. 16. The inward man is renued day by day and to this we are exhorted Ephe. 4. 23. Be renued in the spirit of your mind that is by excluding our sins and by acquiring new and higher graces So that when our Apostle saith It is impossible to renue them he cannot possibly mean that renuing is absolutely impossible but onely that renuing by a new or second baptisme is indeed impossible When St. Peter desired John 13. 9. That not onely his feet but his head also might be washed he had this answer He that is washed needeth not save to wash his Aug. de fide ad Pet. Diac. c. 36. n. 74. feet which place is by Saint Austin urged again rebaptization Baptisma semel dandum est non iterandum Baptisme
must be given but once and cannot be repeated Indeed daily sinning hath need of daily purging by humiliation confession repentance prayer and continuall labour in quitting our selves from the over-ruling of sin there is that corruption in us that requireth daily spiritual physick to expell it or rather a daily dying unto sin more and more as we are exhorted Eph. 4. 22. and Colos. 3. 5. To put off the old man and to mortifie our earthly members but yet not by a new baptism for there is but one baptisme and that cannot be iterated Because it is said that this one and only baptism is Prosp Resp ad Capit. Gallo n. 28 26. cap. 2. for the taking away of sin and that not only actuall sin but Original also It would be inquired whether we may truly affirm that a man that hath been baptized with all the efficacies of true Christian Baptisme is void of original sin Prospeâ— saith very home Baptismo delentu peccata originalia in â—is qui non sunt predâ—stinati ad vitam i That by baptisme the sins even of such who are not predestinated to life are blotted out and yet we find St. Paul complaining Rom. 7. 23. I see a Law in my members warring against the law of my mind Captivating me to the law of sin which surely he meant of original Corruption To this the answer is that by baptism and baptismal grace all sins past whether original or actual are remitted so as our Divines say Quoad reatum seâ— imputâ—tionem i we shall not be charged with them in judgment they shall not be imputed to us they are forgiven but yet they still ramain in us they are not extinguished or extirpated our nature still remaineth corrupt and the soure leaven of sin yet worketh the Serpent continueth in our bosom though the sting be taken out so that it shall not sting us to death and this truth doâ—h evidently appear by the effects of our originall corruption producing daily actual sins both in Parents and their children as the same father observeth Circumcisus gignit Prosp Sentent 298. n. 37. prâ—putium sic baptizatus trajicit peccatum originale in prolem i as he that was circumcised begat an uncircumeised son so he that is baptized propagateth originall sin to his child which could not be if originall sin did not still remain in the baptized but I return to my purpose I am next to shew that the ancient Expositors delivered the same exposition which I have done St. Ambrose upon those words To â—enue to repentance saith Quid ergo exclusa est paenitentia absit sed renovatio per Ambr. in loc sacri baptismatis lavacrum secunda vice fieri non potest i shall we say that the Apostle here quite excludeth repentance No but he only denieth it to be possible by a second baptism So doth Theodoret expound the same words Apostolus non probibet meâ—icamentum paenitentiae Theod. in loc sed Divini baptismi definitionem doceâ— i the Apostle doth not deny the second remedy of repentance only he sâ—eweth that we are confined and limitted to one only baptism and Theophilact upon the same place saith Non si segniter vivamus aut ex fide excidamus Theoph. in loc rebaptizari nobis dabiâ—ur non oâ—orâ—et iterare baptismum sed in priore persever are i If after baptisme we live carelessely or fall from the faith no second baptism can be given but we must hold us to our first and Anselm in loc to one baptisme St. Anselâ— upon this very place reads the words verse 2. not as we now do conjunctively Doctrine of baptismes but severally of baptismes of doctrines which Erasmus approveth of and he thus expounds it Nâ—c rursum jacentes sundamentum baptismatum ut quaeratis itâ—rum baptismali undâ lavari i not laying again the foundation of baptâ—smes so as to defire a second baptism Lastly Epiphanius describing the Novaâ—ian heresie who urged this place against receiving those into the Church upon repentance who had faln after baptisme tells us that the meaning of the words impossible to be renued to repentance is Nemo 1. Epiph. haer 59. potest secundum lavacrum accipere i No man may be twice baptized which he illustrateth by this example As she that hath once parted with here Virginity can never corporally recover it again but yet she may attain unto the grace of continency so they that fall after baptism can never be again baptized but yet they are not excluded from a second grace even the medicine of repentance and this exposition is also asserted by Eusibius Emiss occasionally touching this Scripture Post baptismum sola paenitentia sanat non iterum per baptisma Euseb n. 24. sanari possunt i after baptisme there is no salve for sin but only repentance for men can not be healed by any new Baptisme now I proceed to the next words wherby a reason is given why second Baptismes cannot be admitted CHAP. VI. How a Second Baptism is said to be a new crucifying of Christ that it is ignominious to the all sufficient sacrifice of Christ and that it not only doth no good to a sinner but much harme by aggravating his sins as raine maketh weedes to increase SEeing they crucifie to themselves tee Son of God afresh 1. Reason They that will be a second time Baptized in expectation of remissions of sins committed after their former Baptisme doe in a manner crucifie Christ a second time not as if Christ could be actually and reallie re Crucified but yet such re Baptized ones doe it to themselves that is by their meane and base estimation of that one allsufficient and only sacrifice for sin For as Christ died but once for sin because his once 〈◊〉 dying is a plentifull and sufficient expiation for all our sins through our whole life and ought to be accounted a continual sacrifice and because we are but once to be admitted to the benefit of his one death by one only Baptisme answering to his once dying of which it is said Rom. 6. 3. So many of us as were Baptized Pareus in loc into Christ were Baptized into his death That is admitted to the benefit of his death as is confessed by Pâ—râ—s Therfore whosoever shall be a second time baptized for remission and expiation of his sins doth therby shew that in his false apprehension and misbelief Christs once dying which was once applyed to him by one Baptisme is not by him accounted sufficient to satisfie for his former sins committed before Baptisme and his later sins after Baptisme and therfore he will be againe Baptized and therby a second time admitted to the benefit of Christs death and therby applying a second crucifying of Christ to himself as if that one former application were nullified or insufficient for as there is but one death of Christ so there is but one Baptisme by which that one death
remit a temporal affliction unto a sinner truâ—ie penitent no not when he forgiveth the sin as appeareth in David 2 Sam. 12. 13. I have sinned The Lord hath put away thy sin howbeit the Child shal die * Lueretia apud Livium Des 1. l. 1. Ego me Etsi peccato absâ—lvo supplicio non Libâ—ro The reason why temporal afflictions are not alwayes remitted either to true or false penitents upon their Câ—yes is given by S. Hierom. Magnae faelicitatis â—st interdùm Hier. in Ezech. 8. 18. ad praesens misericordiam non mereri ut malis coacti intellâ—gant quid fecerint i It is in some cases a signe of great happines not to obtaine mercie and releasment that men may learne by afflictions how greatly they have sinned So S. Ambrose saith of Amb. Epist l. 3. n. 52. Cyp. cont Demet. n. 75. Naz. Orat. 20. n. 19. the same people of whom the Prophets spake those things Judaeos in potestatâ—m hostium dedit Deus ut a Caelo remedium quaererent i. God delivered his people the Jewes into the hands of their enemies to provoke them to seek help from heaven Cyprian saith â—eus qui beneficiis non intelligitur plagis intelligitur Nazianzen saith Plaga cordaâ—is viris doctrina est i. When men will not listen to God for his benefits sake he will open their understandings with afflictions temporal plagues to wisemen are active sermons If we rightly consider to what end God sendeth or permitteth temporal afflictions to fal both upon penitents and impenitents we shal find it rather a token of his mercy then a signe of his anger we honour a Physician or a surgeon for curing us though it was done by bitter potions or painful searings and cuttings Ama medicum percussorem quia eâ—us plaga est Hier. n 38. mater medicinae i. Because the paine he puts us to proves a medicine God is our physician tribulations are his medicines which he therfore applieth only that they may heale us and howsoever the medicine be sharpe and seeme very evil and penal and for present displease us yet Quae hic puâ—antur mala in Ambr. in symb n. 20. and n. lact n. 17. Caelâ— bona sunt i. On earth that which is thought evil in Heaven is known to be good for it is here taken to be a punishment which indeed was but a medicine Vâ— curat medicus vulnera vulneribus as a Surgeon Pros Epig. n. 33 Aug. Epist 48. cureth a wound by lancing Qui phrenetioum ligaâ— lethargicum excitat ambobus molestus ambos amat i. He that binds a mad man and with a blow rowseth up one falling into a dâ—owsiâ— lethargie angreth both and yet to both doth a freindly office And although these temporal judgments are set forth unto us as signes of Gods anger because they are such things as angrie men wish and bring upon their enemies yet they are indeed arguments of his care over us and used as preventions of worse evils Divina bonitas ideo irascitur in hoc seculo ne Irâ—scatur Prosp in sent 5. n. 33. in futuro i. God sheweth signes of his anger in this world to prevent his anger aeternal in the world to come Men are ready to say or to imagine that God doth not heare or regard the Prayers of men in affliction because he doth not send present deliverance but this is an error in us for God ever heareth yea and granteth the request 's of trulie penitent and faithful soules though not to our phansie and desire yet substantially to our greater benefit Bonus Deus non Aug. Epist 38. tribuit saepe quod volumus it quod maluimus trebuat i though he grant not that particular thing which we expected yet he giveth that which we would rather chose if both were propounded to us And therfore some prudent Christians have bin so far from murmuring at afflictions that they have earnestlie desired Orig. in Psal 37. hom 2. Aag vita l. 3. cap. 29. them of God Domine oro flagella me and noli me resâ—rvare cum illis qui non flagellantur Domine hic seca ure ut in aeâ—ernum parcas i. Lord I pray thee chastice launce and seare me in this life and reserve me not to perish eternallie with them that have their pleasures in this world And for this they have a parterne from a Prophet Jer. 10. 24. O Lord correct me but with judgment not in thine anger This is enough to the question in hand viz. that this Grand sin is not alwayes left to final impenitencie nor is the repentance if it be true of such sinners vaine and fruitless and consequently that this sin is not absolutly unpardonable CHAP. XVI An Exposition of that place 1 John 5. 16. Of the distinction of sins into venial and mortal what is meant by a sin not unto death and a sin unto death that all sins are not Equal THere is yet another doubt to be cleered which seemeth to represent this grand sin as if it were altogether and absolutely unpardonable which is occasioned by those words 1 John 5. 16. If any man see his brother sin a sin which is not unto death he shal aske and he shal give him life for them that sin not unto death There is a sin unto death I dâ—e not say that hee shall pray for it By which words at first sight it may seeme that 1. some sins are deadly or Mortal and others sins not deadly for from these words the Fathers often use to distinguish sins into Venial and Mortal wheras we are well assured that every sin even the very least pâ—ccadillo is in it self Mortal and may bring damnation and yet we doubt not but the greatest Capital sin may by Gods mercy become Vemal and may be pardoned Secondly it may seem by these words that although 2. some sinners may and in Christian Charitie ought to be prayed for yet others without breach of Christian Charitie may be omitted and not prayed for which yet seemeth very rough and harsh seeing we are commanded Mat. 5. 44. both to love our enemies and to pray even for them that persecute us Wherefore for the right understanding of these difficulties it will not be amiss to examine these words diligently by way of an Exposition For surely if any sinner in this life sinne so deadly that we may not pâ—ay for him and if Prayer be absolutely forbidden by these words who will doubt but that such a sinner is absolutely unpardonable and wholy left to desperation now to the words If any man see his brother sinne a sinne which is not unto death In these words the prudent Reader may observe First That the sinne here meant is such a sinne as 1. may be seen perceived and discerned Secondly That it must be discernable whether it 2. be unto death or not unto death Thirdly That because no particular sinne is named
the very least sin is liable to eternall death except it be confessed and in this life in some measure repented But I proceed CHAP. XVII Whas is meant by a sin unto death the judgment of the Fathers and the Ancient expositdrs therein and the discipline of the primitive Church therunto correspondent that the greatest sins both have bin actuallie and so may be pardoned in what sence the Fathers called some sins venial and some Mortal THere is a sinne unto death I do not say he shall pray for it If any words in the whole sacred Scripture will bear this exposition and make good this Doctrine That there is any sinne at all which once committed cannot possibly upon any terms or condition whatsoever be remitted not upon confession or repentance and forsaking and renouncing it and after it adhering to Gods Truth and his Precepts and that even to death and martyrdome nor upon all these together This saying is most likely to bear it A sinne unto death and not to be prayed for which words require a very diligent Explication being of so great weight and concernment Lord Jesus send thy Light and thy Truth A sinne unto death This sin unto death I conceive not to be intended of any particular sin whether it be absolute Atheisme or the blasphemy of Arâ—us denying the Godhead of Christ or of Eunâ—mius denying the Holy Ghost or totall Apostacie from Christianity or Adultery Idolatry witchcraft murther sedition or any of these grand sins mentioned Gal. 5. 19. such as the Fathers do usually â—in som sence call sins Mortall Mortiferous and Capitall My reason is because it may be made apparant by Scriptures and the Records of the Church that particular men who have sinned these sins severally have bin by Gods mercy and his castigations reduced to renounce their errours and to forsake their sins For many of those sins were seen in King Manasses 2 Chron 33. Who yet was converted and humbled himself greatly and God was intreated and we know that many Heathens Atheists Apostates and â—rrians have Paulinus in vita Ambrosii n. 3. Athan. to 2 page 448. n. 17. bin reduced to Confession of their sins and to repentance of their Arrianismâ— and those who have not bin actually reduced yet during their naturall lives were in a condition reducible if grace sufficient and prevalent had bin given so that their conversion was not absolutely impossible Beza finding fault with distinction of sinnes into Beza in loâ— veâ—iall and mortall as the Schoolmen sometimes use it for which he had good reason affirmeth that it is absurd to say that mortall sins are utterly left without all hope of pardon and yet he thinketh the sinnâ— unto death here meâ—tioned to be that sinne against the holy Ghost and that it is lethiferous and that the commitrers thereof cannot possibly repent which I dare not assent unto but yet he most truly affirmeth that if those who have once committed that sinne against the Holy Ghost would and could repent Certè veniam consequerentur i. certainly they would and might obtain pardon Thus he Vnto death The old Exposition of the Fathers and ancient Expositors surely is the truest and plainest and being received will quit us of many unnecessary doubts and anxiâ—tics and is most agreeable with the Analogie of Faith particularly with the Article of forgivâ—nâ—sse of sinnes and coâ—respondeth best with the justice and mercifulnesse of God for thus they write A sinne unto death is any grand or capitall sinne such as is before mentioned out of Gal. 5. 19. in which a man liveth continueth and dieth impenitently And that it is therefore onely so called a sinne unto death because it is obdurately and impenitently continued and persevered in unto the end of our life and expiration of our souls So Oâ—cumâ—nius saith Solum hoc peccatum ad mortem Oâ—â—um in loc est quod ad paeâ—tentiam non respicit id est Onely that sinne is a sinne unto death which never is repented Beda â—n loc And Beda saith Peccaâ—um ad morâ—em peccatum usque ad tempora mortis protractum diximus râ—cte posse intelligi est de tali magno peccato quale David commisit si proâ—ractum sit usque ad mortem id est A sinne unto death may truely be understood of a sinne continued in untill the time of our death such a great sinne as David committed if we persevere in it till death So doth Saint Hierome understand it Peccâ—tum ad Hier. in Evag. objurg n. 41. moâ—tem est cum tempus râ—â—â—ssionis in vitio inueniâ— id est A sinne unto death is when death cometh and findeth us continuing in sin So doth Saint Austine expound this very Text Peccatum Aug. Retract l. 1. c. 19. ad morâ—â—m est si in hac perversitate finierit â—anc uiâ—â—m id est The sinne unto death is when a man continueth in sinne obstinately and therein endeth his life and in another place he just so expounds the sin against the holy Ghost which shall never be forgiven Non absurde intelligunt â—um peccare in Spiritum â—sse sine Aug. de fide oper c. 16. n. 79. venia reum aeterni peccati qui usque ad finem vitae â— oluerit credere in Christum id est It is no inconvenience â—o understand it thus that he sinneth against the Holy Spirit and shall not be forgiven for ever who will not at all believe in Christ as long as he liveth Just so Lyra and both glossâ—s expound it Ad mortalem i. usque ad morâ—em vitae quod in hac vitâ— non corrigitur est finalâ—s impaenitentia si quis perseveret in eo usque ad finem vitae inclusivè i. unto death signifies to the end of our life natural that sin which is not amended in this life it is finall impenitencie when a man persevereth in sin unto the end of his life inclusively not repenting at the time of his departure but dieth impenitent By all which it appeareth that in the judgement of these Expositors the sin unto death is some of those grand sins in which a man liveth and dieth impenitently and that it is not called the sin unto death in respect of the sin it self but for the sinneâ—s continuance therein unto his death for the same sin which in one man is a sin unto death and shall never be forgiven in another man proves a sin not unto death but is repented of and so is pardoned that this is the judgment of St. Austin I have divers times shewed before and especially in that place alleaged by me before pag. 201. cap. 14. whâ—reafter after a long discourse concerning the sin called the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit he concludeth That no sin against Vide supra â— 14. the Holy Ghost is unpardonable but only in case a man doth obstinately persevere in it without any hope or desire of pardon or care of
amendment To this doctrine of the pardonablenesse of any sin though ever so great upon repentance the Church discipline of old was correspondent for in the Ecclesiasticall Canons recorded by St. Basil it is ordered That whosoever had denied Christ in time of persecution should be debarred from the Communion all his life time untill his death bed and remain onely in the number and ranck of penitentiaries but upon point of death he should be restored and the Sacrament administred to him and this propter fidem divinae Clementiae i. because the Church believed that our merciful God did pardon those true penitents who had fallen into that grand sin of denying Christ Upon the same doctrine did the fathers ground their distâ—nction of sins calling some mens sins venial and others mortal just as St. John here doth a sin unto death a sin not unto death For so Origen mentioneth mortale peccatum and St. Ambâ—ose speaketh of crimen Orig n. 41. Ambr. n. 9. 15 Aug n. 6773 77. Prosp n. 34 mortale and Erratum Noae erat veniale So doth St. Austine call sins Vâ—nialia Morralia capitalia Damnabilia and so doth Prosper and so doth the Church of Englands Liturgie mention a Deadly sin and all these onely in this sence as Saint Ambrose expresseth himself Venialis culpa est quam Amb. de Paradiso cap. 14. sâ—qnitur confessio i. that sin is called venial which is confessed or repented of And so that sin is onely a deadly sin or a sin unto death in which men live and die impenitently aud therefore unpardonably as is shewed before CHAP. XVIII The meaning of these words Idoe not say he shall pray for it that this praying and not praying is to be understood of the living and not of the dead the practise of the Church in praying for penitents the manner and form of Ecclesiastical or external pennance viewed in the Roman Lady Fabiola in what case God forbad praying for sinners in the Old Testament THere remaineth yet a greater difficultie in the words next following wherby this sin unto death may seem to be such a sin as the Apostle forbiddeth men to pray for wherby he may also seem to set the brand and mark of absolute unpardonablenes upon the sinner as being quite forlorne and bereft of all remedie and left utterly to desperation for thus we read A sin unto death I doe not say he shall pray for it It being granted that the sin unto death is one of those capital sins before mentioned out of Math. 12. 31. and Gal. 5. 19. In which the sinner continueth impenitently al his life time and therin dieth we are next to inquire whether the Apostle meaneth that such a sinner so dying is not to be prayed for after his death or whether he mean that such a sinner is not to be prayed for during his life time whilest he continueth in his sin without repentance For if we grant that by these words a man dying in that sin is excepted from being prayed for after death then it will follow that the other sort of sinners which sin not impenitently unto their death may be prayed for after death and so prayers for the dead must be allowed of as if they were warranted by Scripture which the Church of England doth neither practice nor allowe of although we can not denie but that the ancient Church used them so as I have shewed above in my first book To this inquirie the answer is that the praying or not praying here mentioned is to be understood of men living and only during their life time for so the Apostle meaneth he that is seen or knowne to consess his sin to repent and amend it may be prayed for by the Church whilest he is living But he that is not perceived or perceived not to Confess repent and amend his foul visible and noted sins whilest he liveth the Church hath no direction to pray for such a sin or for such a sinner in this sense that the sin may be forgiven which is never repented Or that the sinner may be pardoned notwithstanding his obdurate persisting and continuing in his sin no not whilest he is living and much less when he is dead So here is no warrant for praying for the dead whether they died penitently or impenitently but in what sense an impenitent sinner during his impenitencie may and ought to be prayed for in this life will appeare hereafter more cleerly but first I must shew the Church practise in praying for sinners The reader may consider that this Epistle is Catholick written to the whole Church and upon this direction the Church Catholick used to pâ—ay most earnestly yea and with teares and lamentations for such sinners who for some grievous and known Crime had bin excommunicated and this the Church did at such times as the sinners appeared to and in the Church or at the Church dores as penitents confessing and bewayling their owne sins in garments of sackcloth and their faces besmeared with ashes bâ—gging on their knees both the prayers of the Church and also reconciliation and re admission to the congregation and communion The manner of penitents humiliation and of the Churches commiseration and compassion we have very frequently described in the Church Histories and the Fathers thus In the wistâ—rne Church saith Sozomen Soz l. 7. c. 1â— Ambr. 34. 37. Epiph. haer 59. Origen lam n. 30. there is a set place appointed where the penitents stand with a sad counâ—enance mourning and weeping then they cast themselves downe on the pavement being clad in course sack cloth and their beautiâ— obscurâ—d and dâ—faced with ashes and with long sorrow and fasting they beg the prayers of the Church to God for them Confessing their sins openly If the Bishop be present he Compassionatly kneeles and weepes and prayes with them and for them and so doth the whole congregation S. Jerome relates the particular Hier. Epist 30. n. 8. pennance of the noble and religious Lady Fabiola as it was performed in his owne time She had bin divorced and after divorcement she was married to another man whilest her divorced husband was living But she repented and confessed her offence with great sorrow in sack cloth and ashes publickly in the sight of the whole citie of Rome Episcopis presbyâ—eris populo Collacrimantibus i. her self and the Bishops present and the priests and the whole multitude altogether compassionatly weeping This was the use and manner of the Churches praying for those Brethren or Sisters which were thus seen to confefs and express penitency for their sins and therfore not sinning unto death impenitently and this they did upon this direction If any man see his brother sin a sin that is not unto death let him pray for him c S. Ambrâ—se doth exhort the sinner to confession Ambr. de paenit l. 2. c. 10. n. 34. and penitencie by this motive Fleat pro te mater ecclesia that
Christ is the Authour or Testator of the Evangelicall Testament and not onely a Witnesse or Martyr as the Commenter would have him Chapter VIII The Immortalitie of the Soules of Men asserted against this Commenter from our Saviours Page 23 words Matthew 22. 32. Luke 23. 43. That the Article of Resurrection is therefore expressed to be said of the body onely because the Soul dieth not which is shewed in Saint Pauls Rapture and Saint Stephens Prayer from Church Writers Philosophers and Physicians observations in Anatomie the Souls mortalitie was the old Arabick Heresie Of the immortalitie of Christs humane Soul and consequently of ours That the Doctrine of the Souls immortalitie is now an Article of the Creed and why this Article was then newly added to the old Creed Chapter IX That the Article of Christs descent was added to Page 26 the old Creed principally to set forth the Immortalitie of the Soul of Christ and so of our souls An examination of the tradition oral and the writing of Creeds The summe of the ancient Doctrine of Faith briefly delivered by Irenaeus and the most Ancient Creed thereunto agreeing recorded by Tertullian Chapter X. That divers additions were made to the old Creed Page 29 occasioned by divers Heresies What the Heresies were and what Articles they occasioned and particularly that the Arabick Heresie denying the Souls immortalitie occasioned the Article of Descent is probably shewed for that it was not any Creed generally received before the death of Saint Austine the Nicene hath it not yet the Athanasian at first had it not nor is it in the symbolicall Hymne called Te Deum A modest censure of the Athanasian symbol and an Observation concerning the multitude of Creeds Chapter XI Of the word Hades which is translated Hell Page 32 that it proves the soules immortalitie in that it signifies a being subsistence or permanencie of the souls of dead men separated from their bodies and residing in a Mansion and Condition invisible to us Mortals That the place and state of souls separated is kept secret from us though the knowledge thereof hath been and is much desired Of Saint Hierom's and Curina's visions and the apparition of Irene deceased Chapter XII A censure of those visions of Saint Hierome and Page 35 Curina by comparing them with the Ecstasies of Saint Peter and Saint Paul mentioned Acts 10. 10. and Acts 22. 17. What an Ecstacie Traunce or Vision is In what manner God spake to the Prophets in visions Of Saint Johns Revelation The difference between Divine Inspirations and prophane Enthusiasmes That the one illuminates the other obtenebrates mens understanding and how such raptures or exstacies do argue and prove the Soules seperabilitie and immortalitie Chapter XIII That the Apparitions of the dead do not prove the Page 39 Souls immortalitie For that they are not really the Soules of men deceased but possibly may be the delusions of Satan assuming the shapes of men Why Necromancy is forbidden Deuteronomie 18. 11. Albeit the dead cannot appear to the living at their desire That the state of Soules seperated is concealed Chapter XIV That the Soules immortalitie is confessed by the Page 41 Church Catholick That the Commemoration of the dead in the Church Litnrgies was principally to set forth the Churches belief of the immortalitie of their Soules For that the dead receive no benefit by the prayers of the living The Opinion of some Divines concerning Saint Pauls prayer for Onesiphorus 2 Timothy 1. 18. and of that saying 1 John 5. 16. of which see a full Exposition in my fourth Book Chapter XV. That the Father's did not believe as the Commenter Page 43 doth that Soules departed are insensible as if they were dead or asleep because the Saints departed do pray for the Church Militant as the Fathers thought Chapter XVI Of the departures of mens soules That their conductors Page 48 and leaders to the other World are Angels good or bad That soules seperated are setled in certain Mansions is shewed by Scriptures and Fathers whereby the permanencie and immortalitie of the soul is clearby proved That all those severall mansions go under the generall appellations of Heaven and Hell Chapter XVII A particular detection of the blasphemies contained Page 51 in the Commentarie which are reduced to these two heads The first shewing the blasphemies against the Godhead of Jesus Christ The second shewing the blasphemies against the Incarnation of God and his gracious work of Redemption CHAP. XVIII The dreadfull consequences of the Commenters Page 51 blasphemies in denying the Godhead of Christ and his great works both of Creation and Redemption That it is much better never to have been born or by death to be annihilated or to perish as the beasts doe then to live and die in these sinnes and to rise to judgement The conclusion of the first Book The Table THE SECOND BOOK Containing an assertion of the Godhead of Jesus Christ against the Commentarie Chapter I. AN introductorie discourse concerning Page 1 the sinne against the Holy Spirit as it is described Matth. 12. 31. Mark 3. 29. Luke 12. 10. Divers doubts difficulties and opinions thereof Chapter II. What the word Blasphemie signifies That this Page 4 sinne was the blasphemous denying the Godhead of Christ The spreading of that Pharisaicall blasphemie amongst Jewes and Heathens Of Apollonius of Tyana the Magician compared by Heathens with Christ for miracles Certain considerations premised for clearing doubts concerning this sinne and two conclusions extracted from those consisiderations Chapter III. That the Godhead of the Sonne is called Spirit 7 and Holy Spirit that every Person in the Trinitie is and may be called the Everlasting Father in respect of Creatures and yet how the appellation Father is proper to the first Person That every Person is holy and an Holy Spirit and yet how the appellation Holy Spirit is proper to the third Person That the words Spirit and Ghost signifie the same thing Chapter IV. Diverse Observations of the words of Christ Matthew Page 20 12. The result is that the Pharisee's blasphemie consisted in the deniall of Christ's Godhead The difference between a sinne against the Sonne of Man and against the Holy Spirit The judgement of the Fathers herein Chapter V. The Opinion of later Divines concerning this Page 14 sinne that they affirm Arius and the Emperor Julian the Apostate to have sinned this sinne An examination of the particular sinne of the said Arius and Julian and a breif narration of their lives and deaths Chapter VI. Why the Blasphemy of denying Christs Godhead Page 33 is called the unpardonable Sinne that the Commenters Doctrine in this grand Heresie is no better then Judaisme or Turcisme that it is by the Fathers esteemed and called Antichristianisme To deny Christs Godhead is to renounce redemption and salvation by him wherein the worth and preciousness of the blood of Christ consisteth Chapter VII That the Commenter in Logick sheweth himself Page 37 to be a
of the Godhead and manhood in the Person of Jesus Christ the communication of the properties of each nature the life and death of Nestorius and how Christ is said to be deified FOr the avoyding of the unpardonable sin before mentioned it will not be sufficient to believe and confess that God is in Jesus as a man in a ship or as God was in the Prophets and is now in holy men who are therefore called the Temples of the living God 2 Cor. 6. 16. or as God is every where who filleth heaven and earth Jer. 23. 24. For though God be in an holy Man yet we cannot say that God and that Man are one Person and though God be in Heaven yet he and Heaven are not one hypostasis or subsistence in one Personall union but as our soul and body united and composed are one Man and one Person so the Godhead and Manhood united in Iesus are one Person one Christ Now these two distinct natures to wit the Godhead and Manhood are in Christ so united that they will be for ever inseparable and they are so entwined one with the other that no action or passion can be said of the man Christ which may not be said of God the rule of Divines is Effâ—ctus hypostaticae unionis est Regula Theolog communicatio idiomatum i. The result or effect of the Personall union is a communication of properties which rule is laid and more plainly expressed by St Austine in these words Vnilas Personae Christi sic Aug. to 6. cont Ser. Arian n. 7. constat ex humana divina natura ut quaelibet earum vocabulum impertial alteri i. The unitie of the Person of Christ doth so consist of the Divine and humane natures that each nature imparteth its appellation mutually to the other so that what is properly belonging to the divine nature is ascribed as done also by the humane nature the same is also thus expressed by Theodoret Communia Persona evadunt quae sunt Theod. Dial. impatib n. 13. P. 398. propria naturarum i. By reason of this hypostaricall union those things which are proper to each nature severally become common to the whole person and hence it is that Christ is called the Son of Man and the Son of God eternall and yet born the on of David and yet the Lord of David of him it is said John 3. 13. He that came down from Heaven even the Son of Man which is in Heauen yet the Manhood did not come from heaven nor was the Manhood at that time in Heaven so again Christ said to the thief Luke 23. 43. To day shalt thou be with me in paradise and yet Christ was not there that day in his body nor by his soul for ought we know but onely by his Godhead which was then in Paradise when his body was on the earth and hence it is that the appellation of God is stamped on the humane and infirm actions and passions of Christ for though he was crucified through weaknesse as it is said 2 Cor. 13. 4. that is as he was man yet because his Divine Nature is for ever inseparable from the humane nature he is truely called Deus crucifixus Hier. ut sup c. 6. Naz. Orat. 51. n. 35. i. God crucified as is shewed before out of Saint Hierome and Nazian saith Si quis crucifixum non adorat anathema sit i. He that doth not worship him that was crucified let him be accursed This great mystery of the hyposiaticall union was prudently discerned by the ancient Fathers Origen saith Judaei Dâ—um crucifixâ—â—unt i. The Jewes crucied Origen hom 5. in Ps 36. Orig. in Luc. hom 38. n. 45. Chrys in synax n. 35. God and the same Father speaking of the tears which Christ shed over Jâ—rusalem calleth them Lacrymas Dei i. the tears of God So St. Chrysostome calleth Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. the crucified God The Prophet Esay prophesying of the birth of Christ Esay 9. 6. Vnto us a child is born immediately addeth his name shall be called The mighty God and the Church used the same language Fulgentius saith Maria Fulg. de grat n. 3. est genetrix Dei quia were propriâ— peperit Deum Verbum i. Mary is the Parent of God for she brought forth truly and properly God the Word St. Hierome saith Virgo Deum puerum peperit i. Mary brought Hier. Ep. 30. n. 8. forth a child that is God So Saint Ambrose speaketh i Ambr. in sym n. 20. Deus natus est ex virgine God was born of a Virgine and Athanasius saith k Atha apol 2. n. 15. n. 22. Deus incarnatus Deus passus est God was incarnate and God suffered This doctrine is so true and necessary that otherwise we could not have been redeemed the denying thereof no doubt is within the compass of the unpardonable blasphemy and the Church accounted such as taught the contrary to be in the number of the most dangerous hereticks as may appear by the story of Nestorius thus in brief This Nestorius was by birth a German and was admitted Soc. l. 7. c. 29. Theod. haer fab l. 4. n. 16. to be a Presbyter or Priest in the Church of Antioch from thence he was preferred to be Patriarch of Constantinople and there he was a sore vexer of the Arians Novatians and Macedonian hereticks and so eager therein that he incensed the Emperour against them using this proud speech O Imperator da mihi Soc. l. 7. c. 29. terram purgatam hâ—reâ—icis ego tibi eoelum vetribuam i. If the Emperour would purge his Empire of hereticks he would assure him of Heaven He was a man very cloquent and so proud thereof that he disdained to reade the ancient Writers and so being ignorant of Catholick Doctrine he fell into this Heresie of dividing or separating the two Natures of Christ and particularly teaching that the Virgin Mary ought not to be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the Parent or Mother of Evag. l. 1. c. 3â— God and because some of his sect would have her called onely ' 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the mother of a man Nestorius desiring to go in a middle way would have her called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. the Mother of Christ but at no hand the Mother of God so his error was in this that he divided and rent and severed the two natures of Christ that which his crucifiers were not permitted to do to his very garments in effect as Vincentius noteth Nestorius duos vult esse Filios Dei duos Christos Vincent Lirin c. 17. n. 53. unum Deum alterum hominem i. Nestorius would have fancied two Sons of God and two Christs whereof one should be God and the other a man and so by denying the unity of his Person he indeed made a quaternity of Persons instead of a Trinitie against the sentence of
Christ was fore ordained before the foundation of the World 1 Pet. 1. 19. 20. But I ask how could the blood of Christ with righteousnes and equitie be so ordained If Christ had not freely and voluntarile thus ingaged himself who could compel him therunto or did not he who is the wisdome of the Father fore see the bloody Passions which such an undertaker must undergoe or what claime could the Sons of men have to chaleng any interest in his actions or Passions but only by this covenant and ingagement and how could it be said Eph. 1. 4. God hath Chosen us in him before the foundation of the World And how can in be said 2 Tim. 1. 9. God hath saved us and called us according to his purpose and grace which was given us in Christ Iesus before the world began Unles man be considered and looked upon in Christ through this Covenant because therby the Son of God did ingage and oblige himself to the Father in man's behalf to performe the whole will of God which should be required of man for therfore is the Son called the Angel or messenger of the covenant Mal. 3. 1. Because he was the Mediator sent interested and imploied both in the undertaking and in the performance of that secret Covenant of whom it is also written Psal 40. 7. In the volume of thy booke it is written of me that I should performe thy will or that I delight to doe thy will Thus because Christ had undertaken for us and therfore was by his promise to performe the will of God for us hence it is that all our salvation is in and by and through him and all the promises of God to man are in him and for this reason it is said Tit. 1. 2. That God promised Eternal life before the world began But to whom could it be promised before any Creature was made except only to the Son of God and why to him but because he only had ingaged himself in this Eternall Covenant and becauâ—e our transgressions were fore seen that they would deserve death and that our suertie in the payment of our debt must needs suffer death therfore this our suertie is called Rev. 13. 8. The Lambe slaine from the foundation of the world see Iohn 17. 5. CHAP. IX The Covenant between God and Man the Legall and Evangelicall Covenant are but one the reasons why Christ was Circumcised and Baptized BY what hath bin said it appeareth that the Son of God was indeed secretly ingaged to the Father for mankind before the world was made and so secretly that it is said Col. 1. 26. That it had bin hâ—d from ages and generaâ—ions But how shall it appear that this Sonne of God ingaged himself to Man Where shall we find his word and promise to be an undertaker and surety for us so that we may faithfully and boldly lay hold on and chalenge his promise I answer that after the Creation God the Son entered into the same Covenant wirh Man that he had ingaged himself in to the Father before the Creation and by this renuing the same Covenant he bound Mankind to himself as himself had bin bound before to the Father and that divers and sundry times For first the words of the Covenant between God and the Son and Mankind before the fall were these Gen. 2. 17. Of the Tree of Knowledge of good and evill thou shalt not eat of it for in the day thou eatest thou shall surely die In this Covenant on Gods part life is promised implicitely and on mans part obedience is reftipulated or covenanted for to this condition Man had submitted and given consent as appeareth Gen. 3. 3. So that this was a perfect Covenant on both sides the Tree of Knowledge standing as a visible figne for mans obedience and the Tree of Life as a Sacramentall sign of Gods promise But after the fall of Man the same God did again more evidently and particularly ingage himself when he said of the seed of the woman Gen. 3. 15. It shall bruise the Serpents head In this promise the Incarnation of God in the seed of the woman was meant and that therein he should take upon him the curse and death formetly denounced by offering himself a sacrifice for sin the outward signs of this Covenant were the sacrifices wherewith the Patriarks did signifie and nourish their faith in that promise 3. After this the same Covenant was again renued to Abraham more particularly Gen. 12. 3. In thee shall all Families of the earth be blessed c. and then came in the Sacrament of Circumcision 4 After this again the same Covenant was more largely given to and published by Moses in the Law Morall containing Mans duty and in the Law Ceremoniall declaring Gods promise of Redemption by the Figures Types signs and shadowes of Tabernacle Priest and sacrifices 5 After this again the same Covenant was more clearly delivered in the Gospel by the same Lord God and most graciously explained and the vail taken off from it for then it was shewed who was that seed of the woman and that seed of Abraham and that sacrifice Lamb of God which should take away the sins of the world and how man should be enabled to perform the Covenant and Law of his God namely in that Christ his surety should perform all in mans behalf with this condition onely required of man to believe in this Jesus his God and Saviour for so the Evangelicall Covenant declareth John 3. 16. God so loved the world that he gave his onely begotten Son that whosoever believed in him should not perish but have everlasting life And again Mark 16. 16. He that believeth and is baptized shall be sav'd but he that believeth not shall be damned This is the one and onely and everlasting Covenant of Grace there are not two Covenants but onely this one both before and since the world began Now if any man ask why there is mention of a new Covenant I answer it is called a new Covenant because the old Covenant is renued just as we say there is a new Moon when it is but the old Moon newly enlightned which is but Nova lunatio i. a new illumination Tert. cont Marc. l. 5. Id. cont Marc. l. 4. So the same Father said of Christ O Christum in novis veterem i. Christ in the New Testament is the same with Messiah in the Old Testament We may as well say that the Sun-rising is a new Sunne which being but one and rising dayly and diversly Catul. car 5. Virg. An. 1. is called Soles as if there were many Suns Soles occidere redire possunt Quid tantùm Oceano properent se tingere Soles Hiberni For the same Covenant which before was clouded with obscurity and with Types in the time of the Law shineth brightly in the time of the Gospel But why then do Divines call this Law-Covenant the Covenant of works whereas the
for us in Heaven and there shewing and offering himself for us As this P. 84. c. 5. v. 7. page 160. c. 9. v. 7. Commenter would have us believe and if he could what need was there that God the Sonne should undergoe such bitter and cruell torments and death also To this I answer that as things then stood God could not otherwise save us but by the Incarnation yea and the death of his Son because as is before shewed God hath limited and bound and confined himself by his own word his Law his Decree and Covenant for by his sentence and determinate judgement he had denounced death and a curse to our first Parents and in them to all their Posteritie Gen. 2. 17. In the day thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die and Ezech. 18. 4. The soul that sinneth it shall die and Rom. 6. 23. The wages of sin is death and Deut. 27. 26. cursed be he that confirmeth not all the words of this Law to do them and Matt. 5. 19. Whosoever shall break one of the least of these Commandments shall be called the least in the kingdom of God and James 2. 10. Whosoever shall keep the whole Law and yet offend in one point he is guiltie of all We see that here is a curse and death denounced to all transgressors of the Law and this curse and death must needs fall upon Mankind because God is true and just and righteous But suppose the transgressours of the Law could escape the curse and death denounced yet how should they obtain life eternall seeing that is not obtained but by the perfect and exact performance of the Law of God which no mere man of all the sonnes of Adam hath or can perform For the Condition or Covenant for life is Levit. 18. 5. Keep my Statutes which if a man do he shall live in them so Ezech. 20. 11. Rom. 10. 5. Gal. 3. 12. and this is confirmed by Christ Matth 19 17. If thou will enter into life keep the Commandments These considerations being premised let us now move the question cannot God assoil men and give them eternall life at the request onely of Jesus Christ although Jesus had never suffered the pain and death of the Crosse I answer That God cannot absolve man from sinne without satisfaction to his Justice his Truth and Righteousness I may say God cannot do this as well as the Scripture saith Tit. 1. 2. God cannot lie And 1 Sam. 15. 19. The strength of Israel will not lie for as Saint Austin hath truly said Diabolus non fuit superandus potentia Dei Aug. de Trin. l. 13. c. 13. sed justitia i. as things then stood The devil was not to be conquered by the power onely but by the Justice of God And therefore before man can be redeemed and absolved the curse and death denounced must fall upon man for transgressing the Law 〈…〉 of his God and before man can enter into 〈…〉 Commandements of God must be perfectly 〈◊〉 by man Now if we can shew that the just sentence of God in the curse and death hath bin fully executed on man and that the Justice of God hath had its full course and if we can shew that the whole Law of God hath bin most exactly performed by man and all this by no other man but onely by the great Son of Mâ—â— Iesus Christ being God Incarnate and for this reason incarnate that he might as an undertaker and suretie for mankind both take upon him the curse and suffer death by obedience passive and also perform everâ— title of the Law by active obedience and this for us and in our stead and that our transgressions were imputed to him and his righteousness in performing the Law is imputed to us and that by vertue of the Covenant most justly and that mans redemption and salvation could not otherwise stand with the truth and righteous judgement of God For as Athanasius saith Verbum Atha Ser. 3. cont Arian 6. nunquam destinatum fuisset fieri homo nisi hominum necessitas requisisset i. the Son of God had never been ordained to be made Man if mans necessity had not so required All this being undeniable I trust the Christian Reader doth apprehend the reason why our true and onely God must needs have been incarnate for the working out of mans redemption Justification and salvation CHAP. XI That Christ was a person able and fitt to performe the law and to suffer for manking and that he did stand in the place and stead of all men VVEe have seen what Christ hath vndertaken for us But it must next be inquired whether Christ were a person able and fitly qualified to performe what he undertook viz. to take away the sins of the world and indeed Iesus Christ the Son of God perfect God perfect man was a person able and every wayfitly qualified for performance of the truth of God both in suffering the punishment and in performing the whole law of God in the behalf of man for as man is a Miâ—rocosme or an abridgment of the great world as Austin saith Omnis creatura in homine est i in man Aug. l. 83. quaest n. 87. Every creature is comprised So Christ is the Epitome of mankind and to be esteemed an Vniversal man in as much as â—â—rist the head and all his mystical members arâ— one mystical body as hath bin shewed before Christus universus est caput cum membris i the whole Idem ibidem quaest 69. Christ is himself the head and his Church the members for if the first Adam be esteemed as all mankind why should not the second Adam be so much rather accounted S. Austin saith of the first man Omnis homo Aug. Retract l. 1. c. 15. Abm. de Obitu Satyri n. 29. Pros resp ad Cap. Gall. c. 9. â—errenus est Adam i All men earthlie are one Adam â—nd of Christ S. Ambrose saith as much in Christo Summa universitatis est portio singulorum i Christ is the â—otal sum of all men and a portion of everie man and Prosper gives this true and excellent reason of it Nullus est hominum Cujus natura non erat suscepta in Christo i There is no man in the world whose nature Christ took not upon him and therfore the Scripture calleth Christ the last Adam as well as the first man is called the first Adam 1 Cor. 15. 45. And yet more expreslie it saith Gal. 3. 28. Yee are all One in Christ Iesus And so againe 1 Cor. 12. 12. And indeed wee are rather nearer of kindred and by a better tie to the Second then wee are to the first Adam not because Christ and wee are the Sons of men which cannot be said of Adam who was Terrae-Filius the Son of the earth and not the Son of man but Omnes nati ad primum renati ad secundum Pros sent 299. pertinent Wee derive ourworse carnal
Porphyrian in denying the Godhead of Christ and followeth the Heresies of Cerinthus the Maniches and Arius and acteth for Antichrist and Turcisme The Charactor of Socinus Of the Grand Antichrist and his numerous Corporation which is the Mysticall body of iniquitie and of their preachers Chapter VIII Of the Vnion of the Godhead and Manhood in Page 52 the Person of Christ and that the two Natures once united continue for ever inseparable The difference between the Existence of the Godhead in Christ and its Existence in all creatures Of the mutuall communication of properties between the Divine and Humane Natures in Christ The Heresie of Nestorius his life condemnation banishment and exemplarie death How holy Men are said to be Deified by partaking of Divine Graces and conforming to Gods will Chapter IX The Commenters blasphemous conceit of Christs Page 33 Deification In what sense Christ may be truely said to be Deified in time who was the onely God from all Eternitie The true sense of diverse sayings in Scripture concerning Christs Exaltation How the Sonne of God comes to be called Christ Chapter X. How those Scripturall sayings are to be understood Page 37 which mention the abasing or minoration of Christ the Sonne of God An Exposition of 1 Cor. 15. 24. Concerning Christs delivering up the Kingdome and reigning till judgement and his subjection afterwards Of which see more in the 2 Section of this Chapter Chapter XI Why the unpardonable Sinne is fastned rather Page 52 on the deniers of the Godhead of the Sonne then on them that deny the Godhead of the other Persons in the Scriptures Expression Of the form of words used at Baptisme diversly mentioned in Scripture and the reason of that diversitie That Christ mediateth for us in Heaven not verbally as the Commenter would have it but by a reall presenting that Person who in our stead did perform and suffer what was required of his mysticall Bodie Chapter XII The Godhead of Jesus Christ shewed by Scriptures Page 55 Propheticall and Evangelicall by the Type of the Tabernacle which was as a visible habitation of God representing the Body of Christ How the Heathens immitated this by setting up visible images wherein they thought their God was resident Chapter XIII Reasons why the Jewish worship was confined to Page 58 the Tabernacle and Temple that these were Types of God to be Incarnate Why the People of God worshipped with their faces towards the Temple That the Church is more Ancient then the Temple That notwithstanding the Commenters cavill the Patriarches belived in the same Sonne of God that that we Christians do though the appellation Christ could not then be used Chapter XIV That the Christian when he prayeth prayeth to Page 61 God whom he considereth to be resident in Jesus Christ as in his Temple As the Israelites considered God resident in the Tabernacle and Temple and so prayed toward that place That God so intabernacled in the Body of Christ is the finall or ultimate Object of The Christians prayer and worship Chapter XV. How the onely and most high God became a Priest Page 65 and a Mediatour That Christ is prayed to and yet is a Mediatour How Christ is said to pray and yet is the supream God That every Person in the Trinitie may be prayed to Chapter XVI The Godhead of Christ shewed from the Adoration Page 68 of his Person that his Godhead is worshipped and not his Body alone considered without the Godhead That the Godhead united with a creature for so is the Body of Christ doth not hinder us from worshipping our God Of the worship of Jesus performed and yet without worshipping a creature Chapter XVII That the custome of bowing when the Name Page 71 Jesus is mentioned was appointed principally to set forth his Godhead and to keep Christians in a continuall Confession and memorie thereof being the main foundation of our Religion Chapter XVIII That Jesus Christ is Jehova Of the Name Page 74 Jesus that it is a proper Name of God No Person in the Trinitie hath any name proper but onely the Sonne Of divers appellative Names of God Chapter XIX An enquirie whether the pure Godhead considered Page 77. as not incarnate hath any proper Name The distinction of Names Proper and Appellative The opinion of Philo the Jew therein and of the Fathers that their judgement is That there is no proper Name of God but onely the Name Jesus The Authours submission hereof to the learned Reader Chapter XX. The Godhead of Christ shewed from his appellation Page 79 Jehova That no meere creature can be called Jehova The signification of that word The reverend esteem of it by the Ancients That by the word Tetragrammaton Jehova is meant both in Jewish and Christian Writers Chapter XXI The Conclusion of this second Booke with the Page 82 Authours resolute Confession of Jesus Christ to be the most High and the Onely Lord God The Table THE THIRD BOOK Containing an Assertion of the Incarnation of the most High and Onely God in the Person of Jesus Christ Chapter I. THe vindication of Eusebius against the Page 1 false aspersion of the Commenter That Eusebius consented to the Eternall Godhead of Christ and to the Article Homo-ousion His judgement conâ—erning Gods visible appearance to the Patriarches in the Person of the Sonne That the supream God appeared to Abraham in the Person of the Sonne The Vnitie of the Godhead in the Persons of the Father and the Son Chapter II. How in the Scriptures the most high God is said Page 6 to have been seen and yet that no man hath seen God and both very truely Two questions propounded concerning the visibilitie and invisibilitie of God Chapter III. The first question How God is invisible What Page 8 is meant by the Face of God some places of Scripture which seem Opposite are reconciled Chapter IV. More concerning the first question How God Page 10 hath been and may be seen What the word Angel signifieth Of the appearing of God by assuming a corporeall shape Of Gods walking in Paradise That the apparitions of God in corporeall shapes were but Preambles and Prefigurations of his Incarnation Chapter V. That the Incarnation of God was foreshewed in Page 13 words and by promises The meaning of the Image of God wherein Man was made The meaning of the oath under Abrahams thigh The mysterie of Abrahams entertaining God at meat and of Jacobs wrastling with God unfolded What is meant by the Back-parts of God A rejection of the errors of the Anthropomorphites and an Explication of the first Article of Englands Religion Chapter VI. The second question Why the Fathers said Page 16 that onely the Sonne was seen by the Patriarchs and not the Father seeing both persons are but one God An exception of the difference between seeing God in this life and in the other life Whether God in the Person of the Father was ever seen in an assumed shape the judgement of