the unrighteous man his thoughts and let him return unto the Lord and he will have mercy upon him and to our God for he will abundantly pardon Come let the unprejudiced judge if this Scripture-Doctrine is not very remote from saying his Nature cannot forgive sin therefore let Christ pay him full satisfaction or he will certainly be avenged which is the substance of that strange Opinion 5. Behold the days come saith the Lord that I will make a New Covenant with the House of Israel I will put my Law in their inward Parts I will forgive their iniquity I will remember their sin no more Here is God's meer Grace asserted against the pretended necessity of a satisfaction to procure his Remission And this Paul acknowledgeth to be the dispensation of the Gospel in his eight Chapter to the Hebrews So that this New Doctrine doth not only contradict the Nature and Design of the second Covenant but seems in short to discharge God both from his Mercy and Omnipotence 6. Who is a God like unto thee that pardoneth iniquity and passeth by the transgression of the Remnant of his Heritage He retaineth not his Anger for ever because he delighteth in Mercy Can there be a more express passage to clear not only the possibility but real inclinations in God to pardon sin and not retain his anger for ever since the Prophet seems to challenge all other Gods to try their excellency by his God herein describing the supremacy of his Power and superexcellency of his Nature that he pardoneth iniquity and retaineth not his anger for ever so that if the Satisfactionists should ask the Question Who is a God like unto ours that cannot pardon iniquity nor pass by transgression but retain his anger until some-body make him satisfaction I answer Many amongst the harsh and severe Rulers of the Nations but as for my God he is exalted above them all upon the Throne of his Mercy who pardoneth iniquity and retaineth not his anger for ever but will have compassion upon us 7. And forgive us our Debts as we forgive our Debtors Where nothing can be more obvious than that which is forgiven is not paid And if it is our duty to forgive without a satisfaction received and that God is to forgive us as we forgive them then is a satisfaction totally excluded Christ further paraphrases upon that part of his Prayer v. 14. For if ye forgive their trespasses your Heavenly Father will also forgive you Where he as well argues the equity of Gods forgiving them from their forgiving others as he encourages them to forgive others from the example of God's Mercy in forgiving them which is more amply exprest in chap. 18. where the Kingdom of Heaven that consists in Righteousness is represented by a King Who upon his Debtors Petition had compassion and forgave him but the same treating his fellow Servant without the least forbearance the King condemned his unrighteousness and delivered him over to the Tormentors But how had this been a fault in the Servant if his Kings Mercy had not been proposed for his Example How most unworthy therefore is it of God and blasphemous may I justly tearm it to be in any's daring to assert that forgiveness impossible to God which is not only possible but enjoyn'd to men 8. For God so loved the World that he gave his only begotten Son that whosoever believed in him should not perish but have everlasting Life By which it appears that God's Love is not the effect of Christ's satisfaction but Christ is the proper Gift and Effect of Gods Love 9. To him gave all the Prophets witness that through his Name whosoever believeth in him shall receive Remission of sins So that Remission came by believing his Testimony and obeying his Precepts and not by a pretended satisfaction 10. If God be for us who can be against us He that spared not his own Son but delivered him up for us all Which evidently declares it to be God's Act of free Love otherwise if he must be paid he should be at the charge of his own satisfaction for he delivered up the Son 11. And all things are of God who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ and hath given to us the Ministry of Reconciliation to wit that God was in Christ reconciling the World unto himself not imputing their trespasses unto them How undeniably apparent is it that God is so far from standing off in high displeasure and upon his tearms contracting with his Son for a satisfaction as being otherwise uncapable to be reconciled that he became himself the Reconciler by Christ and afterwards by the Apostles his Ambassadors to whom was committed the Ministry of Reconciliation 12. In whom we have redemption through his Blood the forgiveness of sins according to the riches of his grace Now what relation satisfaction has to forgiveness of sins or how any can construe Grace to be Justice the meanest understanding may determine 13. But the God of all Grace who hath called us unto his eternal Glory by Christ Jesus He does not say that God's Justice in consideration of Christ's Satisfaction acquitted us from sins past present and to come and therefore hath called us to his eternal Glory but from his Grace 14. In this was manifested the love of God towards us because that God sent his onely begotten Son into the World that we might live through him Which plainly attributes Christ in his Doctrine Life Miracles Death and Sufferings to God as the Gift and Expression of his Eternal Love for the Salvation of men 1. In abolishing that other Covenant which consisted in External and shadowy Ordinances and that made none clean as concerning the Conscience 2. In promulgating his message of a most free and universal tender of Life and Salvation unto all that believed and followed him the Light in all his Righteousness the very end of his appearance being to destroy the works of the Devil and which every man only comes to experiment as he walks in a holy subjection to that measure of Light and Grace wherewith the fulness hath enlightned him 3. In seconding his Doctrines with Signs Miracles and a most innocent-self-denying-life 4. In ratifying and confirming all with great love and holy resignation by the offering up of his Body to be crucified by wicked hands who is now ascended far above all Heavens and is thereby become a most compleat Captain and perfect Example So that I can by no means conclude but openly declare that the Scriptures of Truth are not onely silent in reference to this Doctrine of Satisfaction but that it 's altogether inconsistent with the Dignity of God and very repugnant to the Conditions Nature and Tendency of the second Covenant concerning which their Testimony is so clear The Absurdities that unavoidably follow the Comparison of this Doctrine with the sence of Scripture 1. THat God is gracious to forgive
and yet impossible for him unless the Debt be fully satisfied 2. That the finite and impotent Creature is more capable of extending Mercy and Forgiveness than the Infinite and Omnipotent Creator 3. That God so loved the World he gave his onely Son to save it and yet that God stood off in high displeasure and Christ gave himself to God as a compleat satisfaction to his offended Justice with many more such like gross Consequences that might be drawn Refuted from right Reason But if we should grant a Scripture-silence as to the necessity of Christ's satisfying his Fathers Justice yet so manifest would be the Contradictions and foul the Repugnances to right Reason that who had not vail'd his understanding with the dark suggestions of unwarrantable Tradition or contracted his Judgment to the implicit apprehensions of some over-valued acquaintance might with great facility discriminate to a full resolve in this point for admitting God to be a Creditor or he to whom the Debt should be paid and Christ he that satisfies or payes it on the behalf of man the Debtor this question will arise Whether he paid Debt as God Man or both to use their own tearms Not as God 1. In that it divides the Unity of the God-head by two distinct Acts of being Offended and not Offended of condemning Justice and redeeâ—â—â—â— Mercy of requiring a satisfaction and then paying of it 2. Because if Christ payes the Debt as God then the Father and the Spirit being God they also pay the Debt 3. Since God is to be satisfied and that Christ is God he consequently is to be satisfied and who shall satisfie his infinite Justice 4. But if Christ has satisfied God the Father Christ being also God 't will follow then that he has satisfied himself which can't be 5. But since God the Father was once to be satisfied and that it 's impossible he should do it himself nor yet the Son or Spirit because the same God it naturally follows that the Debt remains unpaid and these Satisfactionists thus far are still at a loss Not as Man 6. The Justice offended being infinite his satisfaction ought to bear a proportion therewith which Jesus Christ as Man could never pay he being finite and from a finite cause could not proceed an infinite effect for so man may be said to bring forth God since nothing below the Divinity it self can rightly be stiled Infinite Not as God and Man 7. For where two mediums or middle Propositions are singly inconsistent with the nature of the end for which they were at first propounded their conjunction rather does augment than lessen the difficulty of its accomplishment and this I am perswaded must be obvious to every unbyas'd understanding But admitting one of these three mediums possible for the payment of an infinite Debt yet pray observe the most unworthy and ridiculous consequences that unavoidably will attend the impossibility of Gods pardoning sinners without a satisfaction Consequences Irreligious and Irrational 1. That it 's unlawful and impossible for God Almighty to be Gracious and Merciful or to pardon Transgressors then which what 's more unworthy of God 2. That God was inevitably compel'd to this way of saving men the highest affront to his incontroleable Nature 3. That it was unworthy of God to pardon but not to inflict punishment on the Innocent or require a satisfaction where there was nothing due 4. It doth not onely disacknowledge the true Virtue and real Intent of Christ's life and death but intirely deprives God of that praise which is owing to his greatest love and goodness 5. It represents the Son more kind and compassionate than the Father whereas if both be the same God then either the Father is as loving as the Son or the Son as angry as the Father 6. It robs God of the gift of his Son for our Redemption which the Scriptures attribute to the unmerited love he had for the World in affirming the Son purchas'd that Redemption from the Father by the gift of himself to God as our compleat satisfaction 7. Since Christ could not pay what was not his own it follows that in the payment of his own the case still remains equally grievous Since the Debt is not hereby absolv'd or forgiven but transfer'd only and by consequence we are no better provided for Salvation than before owing that now to the Son which was once owing to the Father 8. It no way renders men beholding or in the least oblieg'd to God since by their Doctrine he would not have abated us nor did he Christ the last farthing so that the acknowledgments are peculiarly the Sons which destroys the whole current of Scripture-Testimony for his good will towards men O the infamous portraiture this Doctrine draws of the infinite Goodness Is this your retribution O injurious Satisfactionists 9. That God's Justice is satisfied for sins past present and to come whereby God and Christ have lost both their power of injoyning Godliness and prerogative of punishing Disobedience for what is once paid is not revokeable and if punishment should arrest any for their Debts it either argues a breach on God or Christs part or else that it has not been sufficiently solv'd and the penalty compleatly sustain'd by an other forgetting that every one must appear before the Judgment Seat of Christ to receive according to things done in the body Yea every one must give an account of himself to God But many more are the gross Absurdities and Blasphemies that are the genuine Fruits of this so confidently believed Doctrine of Satisfaction A Caution Let me advise nay warn thee Reader by no means to admit an entertainment of this Principle by whomsoever recommended since it does not only divest the glorious God of his sovereign Power both to pardon and punish but as certainly insinuates a licentiousness at least a liberty that unbecomes the nature of that antient Gospel once preached among the Primitive Saints and that from an apprehension of a satisfaction once paid for all Whereas I must tell thee That unless thou seriously repent and no more grieve God's Holy Spirit placed in thy inmost Parts but art thereby taught to deny all ungodliness and lead into all Righteousness At the Tribunal of the Great Judge thy Plea shall prove invalid and thou receive they reward without respect to any other thing than the Deeds done in the Body Be not deceived God will not be mocked such as thou sowest such shalt thou reap which leads me to the consideration of my third Head viz. Justification by an Imputative Righteousness The Justification of impure Persons by an imputative Righteousness refuted from Scripture THat there is no other way for sinners to be justified in the sight of God than by the imputation of that Righteousness Christ long since performed Personally and that Sanctification is consequential not antecedent 1. Keep thee far from a false matter and the Innocent and Righteous
actually a breaker of it is excluded as not justifying before God If you fulfil the Royal Law ye do well so speak ye and so do as they that shall be judg'd thereby 8. If ye live after the flesh ye shall die but if ye through the Spirit do mortifie the deeds of the Body ye shall live No man can be dead and justified before God for so He may be justified that lives after the flesh therefore they only can be justified that are alive from whence this follows If the living are justified and not the dead and that none can live to God but such as have mortified the deeds of the Body through the Spirit then none can be justified but they who have mortified the deeds of the Body through the Spirit so that Justification does not go before but is subsequential to the mortification of lusts and sanctification of the Soul through the Spirits operation 9. For as many as are led by the Spirit of God are the Sons of God How clearly will it appear to any but a cavelling and tenatious Spirit that man can be no farther justified then as he becomes obedient to the Spirits leadings for if none can be a Son of God but he that 's lead by the Spirit of God then none can be justified without being led by the Spirit of God because none can be justified but he that is a Son of God so that the way to Justification and Son-ship is through obedience to the Spirits leadings that is manifesting the holy Fruits thereof by an innocent life and conversation 10. But let every man prove his own work and then shall he have rejoyceing in himself alone and not in another Be not deceived for whatsoever a man soweth that shall he reap If rejoycing and acceptance with God or the contrary are to be reaped from the work that a man soweth either to the Flesh or to the Spirit then is the Doctrine of Acceptance and ground of Rejoycing from the works of another utterly excluded every man reaping according to what he hath sown and bearing his own burden 11. Was not Abraham our Father justified by works when he had offered Isaac his Son upon the Altar Ye see then how that by works a man is justified and not by Faith only He that will seriously peruse this Chapter shall doubtless find some to whom this Epistle was wrote of the same Spirit with the Satisfactionists and Imputarians of our time they fain would have found out a Justification from Faith in the Imputation of anothers Righteousness but James an Apostle of the most high God who experimentally knew what true Faith and Justification meant gave them to understand from Abrahams self-denying Example that unless their Faith in the purity and power of God's Grace had that effectual Operation to subdue every beloved lust wean from every Dallila and intirely to resign and sacrifice Isaac himself their Faith was a Fable or as a Body without a Spirit and as Righteousness therefore in one person cannot justifie another from unrighteousness so whoever now pretends to be justified by Faith whilst not led and guided by the Spirit into all the Wayes of Truth and Works of Righteouness their Faith they will find at last Fiction 12. Little Children let no man deceive you he that doth Righteousness is Righteous as God is Righteous but he that committeth sin is of the Devil From whence it may be very clearly argued that none can be in a state of Justification from the Righteousness performed by an other imputed unto them but as they are actually redeemed from the commision of sin For if he that commits sin is of the Devil then cannot any be justified compleatly before God who is so incompleatly redeem'd as yet to be under the captivity of lust since then the Devil's Seed or Off-spring may be justified but that 's impossible It there follows that as he who doth Righteousness is Righteous as God is Righteous so no farther is he like God or justifiable for in whatsoever he derrogates from the works of that Faith which is held in a pure Conscience he is no longer Righteous or justifi'd but under condemnation as a Transgressor or dissobedient person to the Righteous Commandment and if any would obtain the true state of Justification let them circumspectly observe the Holy Guidings and Instructions of that Unction to which the Apostle recommended the Antient Churches that thereby they may be led out of all ungodliness into Truth and Holiness so shall they find acceptance with the Lord who has determined never to justifie the wicked Refuted from right Reason 1. Because it 's impossible for God to justifie that which is both opposite and destructive to the purity of his own Nature as this Doctrine necessarily obliges him to do in accepting the wicked as not such from the imputation of anothers Righteousness 2. Since man was justified before God whilst in his native Innocency and never condemned till he had err'd from that pure state he never can be justified whilst in the frequent Commission of that for which the Condemnation came therefore to be justifi'd his Redemption must be as intire as his fall 3. Because sin came not by Imputation but actual Transgression for God did not condemn his Creature for what he did not but what he did therefore must the Righteousness be as personal for acceptance otherwise these two things will necessarily follow first that he may be actually a sinner and yet not under the curse secondly That the power of the first Adam to death was more prevalent then the power of the second Adam unto life 4. It s therefore contrary to sound reason that if actual sinning brought death and condemnation any thing besides actual obedience unto Righteousness should bring Life and Justification for Death and Life Condemnation and Justification being vastly opposite no man can be actually dead and imputatively alive therefore this Doctrine so much contended for carries this gross absurdity with it that a man may be actually sinful yet imputatively righteous actually judged and condemned yet imputatively justified and glorified In short he may be actually damned and yet imputatively saved otherwise it must be acknowledged that obedience to Justification ought to be as personally extensive as was disobedience to condemnation In which real not imputative sense those various tearms of Sanctification Righteousness Resurrection Life Redemption Justification c. are most infallibly to be understood 5. Nor are their words Impute Imputed Imputeth Imputing used in Scripture by way of application to that which is actual and inherent as the Asserters of an Imputative Righteousness do by their Doctrine plainly intimate but so much the contrary as that they are never mentioned but to express men really and personally to be that which is imputed to them whether as guilty as remitted or as righteous for instance What man soever of the house of Israel that killeth
an Ox and bringeth it not to the door of the Tabernacle to offer unto the Lord Blood shall be imputed unto that man or charg'd upon him as guilty thereof And Shâ—mei said unto the King Let not my Lord impute Iniquity unto me for thy servant doth know that I have sinned 6. But sin is not imputed where there is no Law From whence it is apparent that there could be no imputation or charging of guilt upon any but such as really were guilty Next it is used about Remission Blessed is the man unto whom the Lord imputeth not iniquity or as the foregoing words have it Whose transgression is forgiven Where the non-imputation doth not argue a non-reality of sin but the reality of God's pardon for otherwise there would be nothing to forgive nor yet a real pardon but onely imputative which according to the sence of this Doctrine I call Imaginary Again God was in Christ reconciling the World unto himself not imputing their trespasses unto them Where also non-imputation being a real discharge for actual trespasses argues an imputation by the reason of contraries to be a real charging of actual guilt Lastly it 's used in relation to Righteousness Was not Abraham justified by works when he offered Isaac and by Works was Faith made perfect and the Scripture was fulfilled which saith Abraham believed God and it was imputed unto him for Righteousness By which we must not conceive as do the dark Imputarians of this age that Abraham's offering personally was not a justifying righteousness but that God was pleased to account it so since God never accounts a thing that which it is not nor was there an imputation of anothers righteouss to Abraham but on the contrary his personal obedience was the ground of that just imputation and therefore that any should be justified from the imputation of anothers righteousness not inherent or actually possessed by them is both ridiculous and dangerous Ridiculous since it is to say a man is rich to the value of a thousand pounds whilst he is not really or personally worth a groat from the imputation of another who has it all in his possession Dangerous because it begets a confident perswasion in many people of their being justified whilst in captivity to those lusts whose reward is condemnation whence came that usual saying amongst many Professors of Religion That God looks not on them as they are in themselves but as they are in Christ not considering that none can be in Christ who are not new Creatures which those can't be reputed who have not disrob'd themselves of their old Garments but are still inmantled with the corruptions of the old man Consequences Irreligious and Irrational 1. It makes God guilty of what the â—criptures say is an abomination to wit that he justifieth the wicked 2. It makes him look upon persons as they are not or with respect which is unworthy of his most equal Nature 3. He is hereby at peace with the wicked if justified whilst sinners who said There is no peace to the wicked 4. It does only imply communion with them here in an imperfect state but so to all eternity for whom he justified them he also glorified Therefore whom he justified whilst sinners them he also glorified whilst sinners 5. It only secures from the wages not the dominion of sin whereby something that is sinful becomes justified and that which defileth to enter God's Kingdom 6. It renders a man justified and condemned dead and alive redeemed and not redeemed at the same time the one by an imputative Righteousness the last by a personal unrighteousness 7. It flatters men whilst subject to the Worlds lusts with a state of Justification and thereby invallids the very â—â—d of Christs appearance which was to destroy the works of the Devil and take away the sins of the World a quite contrary purpose then what the Satisfastionists and Imputarians of our Times have imagined viz. to satisfie for their sins and by his Imputed Righteousness to represent them holy in him whilst unholy in themselves Therefore since it was to take away sin and destroy the Devils works which were not in himself for that Holy One saw no corruption consequently in man-kind what can therefore be concluded more evidently true then that such in whom sin is untaken away and the Devils works undestroyed are strangers notwithstanding their conceits to the very end and purpose of Christs manifestation Conclusion by way of Caution THus Reader have I lead thee through those three so generally applauded Doctrines whose confutation I hope though thou hast run thou hast read and now I call the Righteous God of Heaven to bear me Record that I have herein sought nothing below the defence of his Unity Mercy and Purity against the rude and impetuous assaults of Tradition Press and Pulpit from whence I daily hear what rationally induceth me to believe a conspiracy is hold by Counter-plots to obstruct the exaltation of Truth and to betray Evangelical Doctrines to Idle Traditions But God will rebuke the Winds and destruction shall attend the Enemies of his Anointed Mistake me not we never have disowned a Father Word and Spirit which are ONE but mens Inventions for 1. Their Trinity has not so much as a Foundation in the Scriptures 2. That its Original was three hundred years after Christianity was in the World 3. It having cost much blood in the Council of Sirmium Anno 355. it was Decreed That thenceforth the controversie should not once be remembred because the Scriptures of God made no mention thereof Why then should it be mentioned now with a Maranatha on all that will not bow to this abstruse Opinion 4. And it doubtless hath occasioned Idolatry witness the Popish Images of Father Son and Holy Ghost 5. It scandalizeth Turks Jews and Infidels and palpably obstructs their reception of the Christian Doctrine Nor is there more to be said on the behalf of the other two for I can boldly challenge any person to give me one Scripture Phrase which does approach the Doctrine of Satisfaction much less the Name considering to what degree it 's stretched not that we do deny but really confess that Jesus Christ in Life Doctrine and Death fulfilled his Fathers Will and offered up a most satisfactory Sacrifice but not to pay God or help him as otherwise being unable to save men and for a Justification by an Imputative Righteousness whilst not real it 's meerly an imagination not a reality and therefore rejected otherwise confest and known to be justifying before God because there is no abiding in Christ's Love without keeping his Commandments I therefore caution thee in love of whatsoever Tribe or Family of Religion thou mayest be not longer to deceive thy self by the over-fond imbraces of humane apprehensions for Divine Mysteries but rather be informed that God hath bestowed a measure of his Grace on thee and me to shew us what is good that
we may obey and do it which if thou diligently wilt observe thou shalt be led out of all unrighteousness and in thy obedience shalt thou receive power to become a Son of God in which happy estate God only can be known by men and they know themselves to be justified before him whom experimentally to know by Jesus Christ is life Eternal A Post-script of Animadversions upon T. V's Contradictions delivered in his Sermon from 1. John 5.4 at his evening Lecture in Spittle-Yard For whatsoever is born of God overcometh the World Whatsoever Person is born of God overcometh the World There is a two-fold Victory the first Compleat the second Incompleat This is as well a contradiction to his Text and Doctrine as common sence for besides that they neither of them say He that 's born of God cannot perfectly overcome the World but much the contrary I fain would understand his intention by an incompleat victory If he means not such a one as is obtained by the slaughter of every individual but that which onely does subdue the force and lead captive their enemies yet will the Victory prove compleat for if they be so far overcome as to be disarmed of farther power to mischieve the dispute is properly determined but whatsoever is incompleat is but overcoming or in the way to victory and victory is the compleating of what was before imperfect Such overcome as are born again who are in Christ that have cast off the old Man and known a change altogether new Worldly lusts can't be extirpated out of God's People in this World If sin must have a place in them how can they be born of God and have a place in Christ or cast off the old man and know a change altogether new Gods Children are the greatest Conquerors Alexander and Caesar were Conquerors but these overcome their lusts God's Children can't perfectly overcome the lusts of the World they sometimes take them captive What strange Divinity is this that God's People should be Conquerors and yet Captives overcome the World and yet be overcome thereby Sin may tyrannize over Believers But not have dominion it 's in captivity it 's in chains Who is so absolutely injurious and incontrolable as a Tyrant and notwithstanding that he should have no dominion but be in captivity and in chains at best are Bedlam distinctions and consequently unworthy of any mans mouth that has a share of common sence You must kill or be kil'd either you must overcome the World or the World you If ye fight ye shall overcome 2. Incompleatly he overcomes when he breaks their force leads them captive and puts them into chains but they are not at all slain they sometimes take him captive To kill or be kill'd admits no middle way to escape yet that both Sin and Gods Children should lead one another captive and that he which fights shall overcome and yet in danger of being led captive because incompleatly a Conqueror to me seems very strange Doctrine However he goes on to tell them Whosoever is born of God overcomes the lusts of the World and he that overcomes the lusts of the World overcomes the Devils of Hell God's Children have to do with a conquered Enemy Yet he would all this while be understood in an incompleat sence and to excite all to fight for this incompleat Victory he recommended to their consideration the excellent rewards of Conquerors that is To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the Tree of Life the hidden Mannâ— I will give him a white Stone a new Name Power over Natons whiâ—e Rayment yea I will make him a Pillar in the Temple of my God he shall go no more out and I will grant him to sit with me in my Throne Admirable priviledges I acknowledge but are they promis'd to incompleat Conquerors I judge not Reader by this thou mayest be able to give a probable conjecture of the rest and â—s I have begun with him and his Co-disputants with them I l'e 〈◊〉 who notwithstanding all their boasts and calumnies against us have so evaded those many opportunities we have offered them by Letters Verbal Messages and Personal Visits that had they any Zeal for their Principles love for their Reputation or Conscience in their Promises they would have been induc'd to a more direct and candid Treaty But as it hath occasioned the publication of this little Treatise so am I credibly inform'd through the too busie and malitious inquisition of some concerning it which have amounted to no less than positive Reports its currantly discours'd How that a certain Quaker hath lately espoused the controversie against R.F. and therein has perverted the Christian Religion to that degree as plainly to deny Christs coming in the flesh with much more then was fit to be said or is fit to be answered But Reader I shall ask no other Judge to clear me from that most uncharitable accusation since first I am altogether unacquainted with R.F. nor never did design directly such a thing being unwilling to seek more Adversaries than what more nearly seek the overthrow of Truth although I doubt not but this plain and simple Treatise may prove some confutation of his Sentiments And lastly as concerning Christ although the slander is not new yet never the less false for I declare on the behalf of that despised People vulgarly called Quakers the Grace of which we testifie hath never taught us to acknowledge another God then he that 's the Father of all things who fills Heaven and Earth Neither to confess another Lord Jesus Christ than he that appeared so many hundred years agoe made of a Virgin like unto us in all things sin excepted or any other Doctrine than was by him declared and practised therefore let wery mouth be stopt for ever opening more in blasphemy against God's Innocent Heritage who in Principle Life and Death beaâ— an unanimous Testimony for the only True God True Christ and Heavenly Doctrine which in their Vindication is openly attested by William Penn jun. ERRATA PAge 7. line 1. read traditional p. 14. l. 6. r. or subsistence p. 15. l. 20. r. Theophilus p. 20. f. necessity r. impossibility p. 24. l. last r. compell'd p. 29. l. 31. f. their r. those l. 32. f. application r. opposition John 5.7 Heb. 1.3 1 King 8.23 Isa 40 25 c. 45.5 6. c. 48.17 Ps 71.22 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Zac. 14.9 Mat. 19.17 Joh. 17.8 Rom. 3.30 1 Cor. 8.6 Eph. 4.6 1 Tim. 2.5 Jude 25. Doctr. Exod. 34.6 7. 2. Chron. 3â— â— Neh. 1â— 17 Isa 55.7 Jer. 31.31 33 34. Mich. 7.18 Mat. 6.12 John 3.16 Act. 10.34 Rom. 8.31 32. 2 Cor. 11.5.18 19. Eph. 1.7 1. Pet. 5.10 1. John 4.9 Rom. 14 12. 2 Cor. 15.10 Gal. 6.7 Doctr. Exod. 23.1 Prov. 17 15. Ezek. 18.20 26 27 28. Mat. 7.21 24 25. John 15.10 Joh. 15.14 Rom. 2.13 Rom. 8.13 Rom. 8.14 Gal. 6.7 Jam. 2.21 24. 1 John 3.7 8. Lev. 17 4. 2 Sam. 19.18 19 20. Rom. 5.13 Psal 32 2. 2 Cor. 5.19 Jam. 2.21 22 23. Rom. 8.30 Socrat. Schol. an 355. Conc. Sirm. cap. 25. p. 275. Doctr. Animad Cont. Anim. Cont. Anim. Cont. Anim. Cont. Anim.