Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
death_n law_n sin_n transgression_n 7,400 5 10.9794 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A77851 A treatise of self-judging, in order to the worthy receiving of the Lords Supper. Together with a sermon of the generall day of judgement. / By Anthony Burgesse pastor of Sutton-Coldfield in Warwickshire. Burgess, Anthony, d. 1664.; Burgess, Anthony, d. 1664. Demonstration of the day of judgement against atheists & hereticks.; England and Wales. Parliament. 1658 (1658) Wing B5661; Thomason E1904_1; ESTC R209997 46,977 246

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

it but a transgression of a positive law Uzzah was stricken dead Nadab and Abihu consumed with fire from heaven and all because they did not keep to such order in Gods worship as he had instituted 1 Chron. 15.13 Yea Moses but for deferring Circumcision which was an Ordinance likewise of meer institution so that it had been no duty to circumcise if God had not commanded it yet he was threatned to be killed for his delay therein The Paschal lamb also Exod. 4.24 to which the Sacrament of the Lords Supper doth answer whosoever did neglect was to be cut off from among his people Numb 9.13 By these instances it doth appear how severe the wrath of God is against all such as do not keep to the Ordinances of God and that in such order as he hath required as we reade David acknowledging 1 Chron. 15.13 I shall not treat in the general about all the positive institutions of Christ but limit my self to this of the Lords Supper and to shew you that seeing God will so justly judge men for their unworthy approaches to it it is good for us to judge our selves for such sins first and this may prevent Gods judging of us only to understand the Doctrine you must know that that speaketh of sins of two sorts moral sins and positive sins to understand which distinction you must know that this division is according to the two kinds of Commands which God imposeth upon his Church there are moral commands which command or forbid that which is either intrinsecally good or evil so that because they are goo● God commandeth them they are not commanded and therefore good suc● is to love God to fear hi● and such are the duties of the second Table for we regard not those Schoolmen who say nothing is intrinsecally good or evil but meerly so from the outward Command of God or his prohibition Again there are positive commands and these have their goodness onely because God commands them in themselves they have no intrinsecal goodness only Gods institution makes them good thus the sanctification of the Lords Day is a duty by positive institution so the observation of the Sacraments it is a duty by Gods meer will and institution so that the not being baptized the not receiving of the Lords Supper had not been any sins if God had not required them only these positive Commands are again distinguished into positive temporary such things as God hath required of h●s Church for a time only as to be Circumcised to observe the Judaical Rites and Sacrifices it was great sinne to keep them up when the time of their obligation was expired 2. There is positive perpetual and that is when God hath appointed such Ordinances to be observed till the coming of Christ as the Lords day Baptisme and the Lords Supper we are to shew forth his death till he come 1 Cor 11. This is called by some Divines Moral Positive and the other Moral commands are called Moral Natural Now as there are two kinds of Laws so there are such kinds of sins which are the transgression of those Laws when a man is unjust unclean intemperate then he breaks the natural Law of God when he prophanes the Sabbath when he cometh unprepared to a Sacrament he breaketh the Positive Law and whereas it might be thought these latter sins are not very hainous because they are only mala quia prohibita evils because prohibited Gods prohibition maketh them to be sins The Doctrine telleth us that for such sins God will judge us yea it is worth the while to take notice of that place Levit. 17. ver 3 4 5. where God speaking not of a prophane killing of beasts for common food but religious by way of Sacrifice he enjoyneth this order that whosoever killeth a beast thus for a Sacrifice and bringeth it not unto the door of the Tabernacle blood shall be imputed to that man he hath shed blood A notable place to shew how hainous a sin it is not to keep to Gods order in his worship The very not bringing of it to the door of the Tabernacle maketh it as hainous a sin as to kill a man and indeed in some respects these sins are worse then the other whereof this is the chief because the Lord doth by these Positive precepts demonstrate his soveraignty over us and try our obedience so that if we be negligent or omissive therein we do expresly and formally manifest our disobedience to God and do refuse to own him as our Lord Not to add that in these positive institutions God regardeth our good he hath appointed Sabbaths and Sacraments not for his good but for ours not that he needeth us but because we need him and therefore we must highly sin against our souls What particulars are to be examined inquired after with special respect to the Ordinance of the Lords Supper when God shall in such a mercifull manner tender our good and we refuse it This foundation laid let us inquire into the duty of Self-judging in this particular Ordinance of the Lords Supper and because this judging as you heard doth imply a judgment of discussion and upon sin discovered a judgement of condemnation Let us speak to both and for the judgement of Discussion these things are to be done first the worthy Receiver who may receive comfortably is to judge himself about the state of grace to examine himself whether he be a new creature whether God hath ever put a supernatural and heavenly principle in him or no for if he be a man in the state of nature still If he have no more in him then what he came with into the world he cannot put forth those actual graces of Faith and spiritual hunger after Christ and his benefits which make the Lords Supper to be spiritual meat and nourishment indeed There was once a prophane custom crept into the Church which was removed by a Council That the Lords Supper should no● be given to dead men and the elem●nts being symbols of nourishment in the use whereof we a●e commanded to eat and drink all this supposeth that while men are dead in sins void of spiritual life they cannot spiritually eat and drink nor put forth gracious actings in the Ordinances for there must be a good root befo●e the branches be good there must be a good Fountain ere the streams be and so a good foundation of grace and spiritual life within before thou art able to put forth Sacramental act ngs only you must remember that the Church admits such to this Table that have competent knowledge and are free from gross sins because she cannot judge of the hearts of men neither is the Sanctification or Regeneration of a person either in Baptism or the Lords Supper a foundation of the administration of the Sacrament for then the Minister would be in perpetual doubtings to whom to give it to or ra her conclude to give it to none because he