Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
death_n law_n sin_n sinful_a 4,258 5 10.1705 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A57982 The tryal & triumph of faith: or, An exposition of the history of Christs dispossessing of the daughter of the woman of Canaan Delivered in sermons; in which are opened, the victory of faith; the condition of those that are tempted; the excellency of Jesus Christ and free-grace; and some speciall grounds and principles of libertinisme and antinomian errors, discovered by Samuel Rutherfurd, professor of divinity in the University of St. Andrews. Published by authority. Rutherford, Samuel, 1600?-1661. 1652 (1652) Wing R2397A; ESTC R203460 278,378 498

There are 10 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

as he is to mourn for this very thing that Christ was pierced and crucified to remove the guilt and the obligation to satisfactory punishment Zac. 12.10 And they shall look upon me whom they have pierced and they shall mourn for him as one mourneth for his onely son Yea it s so the believers sin even when he believeth that his originall corruption is pardoned yet it dwelleth in him having the compleat essence and being of sin so as if he should say he had no sin and nothing in him contrary to the holy Law of God he should deceive himself and the truth should not be in him 1 Joh. 1.8 Yea let him be a Paul Not under the Law but being dead to the Law Rom. 7.6 as touching all actuall obligation to eternall death yet in regard of the reall essence of sin and proper contrariety that sin hath to Gods righteous Law he cryeth out ver 14. For we know that the Law is spirituall but I am carnall and sold under sin 17. Now it is no more I sanctified and pardoned I who am in Christ Rom. 8.1 dead to the Law Rom. 7.6 freed from condemnation that do sinne but sin that dwelleth in me If there were no sinfull I to speak so and no corrupt self in Paul which breaketh out into sin and this indwelling sin were as really in its essence and its being removed and taken close out of Paul as money taken really out of a place is no more left in that place then if it had never been there surely then justified Saints were as clean as these who are up before the Throne clothed in white and when Paul saith It is no more I that do sin but sin that dwelleth in me he should speak contradictions and say It is no more I that do sin but it is I that do sin there should be in justified Paul No Law in his members warring against the Law of his minde as he saith Rom. 7.23 No body of death leading him captive to the Law of sin vers 2● and making him wretched vers 24. No flesh lusting against the spirit hindering the regenerated to do the good that they would as Paul speaketh Gal. 5.17 There should be no members on earth to be crucified as it is Col. 3.5 No old man to be put off no corruption no deceitfull lusts in us to bee abated as we are charged Eph. 4.22 23. No fleshly lusts in us which warreth against the soul as 1 Pet. 2.11 No weight no sin that doth so easily beset us to be laid aside by the regenerated and justified who are to run their race with patience contrary to the Spirit of God speaking the contrary Heb. 12.1 2. Yea there shall be no originall sin remaining in the justified person which can be named sin nothing in them lusting against the spirit nothing to be mortified crucified resisted nothing to ●e work for the grace of God nothing to be a field and plat of ground to be laboured on by the spirit by faith nothing to be the seed and rise of humiliation the sinner may go to heaven and be nothing in Christs debt to help him against indwelling sin for that ghuest is so taken away as money that was in a place and is every penny really removed to another place yea it s a flat contradiction say Antinomians to be a pardoned soul and yet to have sin dwelling in the soul. Positi 2. The guilt of sin and sin it self are not one and the same thing but far different things that I may prove the point let the tearms be considered There be two things in sin very considerable 1. Macula the blot defilement and blacknesse of sin which I conceive is nothing but the absence and privation of that moral● rectitude the want of that whitenesse innocencie and righteousnesse which the holy and clean Law of the Lord requireth to be in the actions inclinations powers of the soul of a reasonable creature 2. There is the guilt of sin that is somewhat which issueth from this blot and blacknesse of sin according to which the person is liable and obnoxious to eternall punishment this is the debt of sin the Law-obligation to satisfaction passive for sin just as there be two things in debt so these two are in sin for when a man borroweth money and profusely and lavishly spendeth it this is unjustice against his brother in matter of his goods and a breach of the eighth Commandment Again this breach in relation to policie to the Magistrate and the Law of the land putteth this broken man under another relation that he is formally a debter and so it is just that he either pay the money or suffer for this act of unjustice and satisfie the Law of the fifth Commandment which is that he satisfie the Law and the Magistrate the publike Father tutor of a wronged and oppressed brother Now here be two things in debt 1. An unjust thing a hurting of our brother in his goods this is a blot and a thing privatively contrary to justice 2. A just thing a guilt a just debt according to which it is most just that the broken man either pay or suffer Now these two as all contraries do Faciunt numerum they make a number as just and unjust must be two things and two contrary things I know there be cavils and subtilties of School-men touching the blot or Macula peccati and Reatus the guilt of sin but this is the naked truth which I have declared Some say the blot of sin is that uncleannesse of sin which is washed away by the blood of the Lord Jesus and this is nothing but the very guilt of sin which is wholly removed in Justification But I easily answer The blot of sin hath divers relations and these contrary one to another As 1. There is the blot of sin in relation to the holy Law as it is a privation of the rectitude and holinesse that the spirituall Law requireth and it is formally sin and not the guilt of sin in which consideration as nothing removeth blindnesse but seeing eyes or deafnes●e but hearing ears so nothing formally removeth sin but only the perfect habit of accomplished sanctification and so the blot of sin Macula is not that which is formally removed in justification but only in perfected sanctification 2. The blot of sin in relation to God as offended and injured putteth on the habit of guilt and so it is washed away in the Fountain opened to the house of David and formally removed in justification but now it is not formally considered as sin but according to that which is accidentall in sin to wit obligation to punishment which may be and is removed from sin the true essence and nature of sin being saved whole and intire Hence sin hath divers considerations 1. As sin is contrary to the righteousnesse and holinesse of the Law it is formally sin and this essentiall form and life
by his efficacious Grace to will and to do as he hath promised Phil. 2.13 Ezek. 36.26.27 and the regenerate cannot sin at all because its the Lords fault God avert blasphemy that we sin for for without his giving of a new heart and his efficacious moving us to walk in his way to which God is tyed by Covenant Ezek. 36.27 Deut. 30.6 We cannot chuse but sin hence they teach we are not obliged to pray nor do we sin in not beleeving in not praying when the breath of the wind of the Holy Ghost doth not blow and act us to those holy duties Hence also it is taught That none are exhorted to beleeve but such whom we know to be the elect of God or to have his spirit in them effectually working Obj. 3. To do any thing in conscience to a commandement is to be under the Law and contrary to the Covenant of Grace ib. Er. 33. Ans. The Law of Grace or Gospel hath Commandements as Rom. 6.12 Let not sin raign therefore in your mortall bodies And this is backed with a reason taken from the promise of Grace v. 14. For sin shall not have dominion over you for you are not under the Law but under Grace so Phil. 2.12 Work out c. for vers 13. It s God who worketh in you Though we have no Physicall dominion over the assisting grace of God so as I can forceably command the winde of the Spirit to blow when I please yet have we a certain Morall Dominion by vertue of an Evangelick promise so as faith is to have influence in all acts of sanctification to look to the promise of assistance which he who cannot lie hath promised though he be not tied to my time and manner of working yet do I sin in not praying and in not believing even when his wind bloweth not Gods liberty and freedom of grace doth not destroy the Law of either works or grace and free me from a duty Object 4. Beleeving and obedience of Faith is but a consequent of the Covenant not an antecedent so I must beleeve upon other grounds but not in way of the condition of the Covenant for in that tenour I am to do nothing Ans. The Apostle Rom. 10. Expresly distinguisheth between the righteousnesse of the Law vers 5. Which requireth doing as a condition and the righteousnesse of faith ver 6. Which requireth believing ver 10. and Gal. 5.5 We through the spirit wait for the hope of righteousnesse through Faith nor can any have claim to the Covenant but such as beleeve Object 5. The covenant is Gods love to man to take him to himself and that before the children do good or ill and to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace but of debt Ans. The covenant is a fruit and effect of Gods love but it is not formally Gods love for because God loved Israel therefore did he enter in covenant with them Deut. 7.7 8. Ezech. 16.8 and Arminians expound that of Iacobs imbracing of the covenant by Faith and of Esaus rejecting of it through unbelief Whereas Paul speaketh of Iacob and Esau as they lay stated in the eye and view of God from eternity ere they were borne and had as yet neither done good nor ill Now the covenant of Grace or Gospel manifested to Iacob and Esau is not eternall but proposed to them after they are borne and when the offer of Christ in the Gospel is made and how could Esau ere he was born refuse the Gospel except you say he did evil before he did evil which is non-sense 2. Paul saith plainly To him that believeth is the work reckoned Object 6. Our act of believing is a work and no work can be a condition of the covenant of Grace yea Christ alone justifieth faith is not Christ nor any partner with him in the worke yea we are justified before we believe and Faith only serveth for the manifestation of justification to our conscience for we believe no lie when we believe we are justified but a truth then it must be true that we are justified before we believe Ans. 1. Christ alone as the meritorious cause justifieth and his imputed righteousnesse as the formall cause and this way Christ alone justifieth the Patriarchs Prophets Apostles and all believers ere they be born but this is but the fountain ready to wash but believe it Christ washeth not while we be foul he clotheth us not while we be naked he giveth not eye-salve while we be blinde nor gold while we be poor nor is his name our righteousnesse while we be sinners 1. Men not born cannot be the object of actuall righteousnesse the unborn childe needeth no actual application of Christs eye-salve of his gold and righteousnesse now justification is a real favour applyed to us in time just as sanctification in the new birth 1 Cor. 6.11 And such were some of you but ye are washed but ye are sanctified but ye are justified then they were sometimes not washed 2. Poverty putteth beauty worth and a high price on Christ sense of sin saith O what can I give for precious Iesus Christ But his Father cannot sell him 2. Yet is Faith a palsie hand under Christ to receive him Ioh. 1.11 It s an Evangelick act and not a meer passion but of grace deputed to be a receiver a certain Inne keeper to lodge Christ and so Christ his alone doth not justi●ie us being meer Patients this is not to put Faith in the chair and Throne of Estate with Christ Faith giveth glory to Christ and taketh Grace as an almes but taketh no glory from him Rom. 4.20 But he was strong in the Faith giving glory to God We cannot be justified before we believe 1. We are damned before we believe he that believeth not is condemned already Iohn 3.2 He that is justified is glorified Rom. 8.30 and saved Mar. 16.16 3. We are borne and by nature the sons of wrath Ephes. 2.2 We our selves were sometime disobedient c. But he hath saved us v. 7. That being justified by his Grace we should be made heirs according to the hope of eternall life Rom. 7. Paul maketh clearly two different times and States of the Saints on v. 5. When we were in the flesh and the motions of sins which were by the Law did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death then our first husband the law was living and we under a mother and father that begat children to death and so we were justified v. 6. But now we are delivered from the Law and Rom. 6.14 Yea are not under the Law but under Grace when Christ our second husband marrieth the widow freed from her first husband the Law then are we under grace and justified and then new Lord new Law 4. By Faith we are only united to Christ possessed of him Christ dwelling in us Ephes. 3.17 Living in me by Faith Joh 11.26 Gal.
Regenerate from both Principles are to walke in love and holinesse as Christ did the Law directing is not abolished by Grace or by love to Christ and this is no other then the reasoning of old Libertines Paul said Rom. 7.6 Now we are delivered from the Law O then said Libertines We may sin and fleshly walking shall not prejudge salvation nor condemn us v. 7. What shall we say then Is the Law sin God forbid and Rom. 5.20 Where sin abounded grace did much more abound Then said the Libertine chap. 6.1 What shall we then say Shal we continue in sin that grace may abound 2. God forbid then the Law commandeth and directeth not to sin and Christ and Grace being friends speak with the same mouth God forbid that we sin we are not so freed from the commanding power of the Law as that we sin not when we do what is contrary to Gods law we are so far under the Law as not to sin because the rule of Law is removed nay the Law backs a man while he come to Christ and to glory and Christ backs the Law and saith the Law forbiddeth you sin I say Amen Grace saith sin not and Christ also layeth new bands of love and obligation to thankfulnesse on us not to sin but removeth not the ancient bounds Grace and condemnation are opposite but not Grace and the commanding power of the Law Obj. 5. The Law is a letter of death and bondage and can never convert the soul only the Gospel doth that for in the Gospel Grace is given to obey what is commanded Therefore your Law-preachers lead men from the foundation Christ. Ans. 1. The Letter of Law without the spirit of Christ cannot convert any nor can the Letter of the Gospel or Gospel-threatnings without the spirit of Grace convert any both Law and Gospel separated from the spirit are alike in this and neither Law nor Gospel according to this reasoning should be preached Antinomians do in down right tearms teach this for they say 1. That the due searching and knowledge of the Scriptures is not a safe and sure way of searching and finding Christ. The Word saith the contrary Psal. 19.7 8 9. Act. 10.43 Rom. 3.21 Joh. 5.39 Luk. 1. 70.71 2. To do any thing by vertue of a commandement is a Law way not Gospel obe●dience Contrary to Psal. 119.6.43 44. v. 11. 2 Pet. 1.19 20. 2 Tim. 3.16 3. All verball Covenants and the word written is but a Covenant of Works and taketh men off from Christ And the whole letter of the Scripture holdeth forth a Covenant of works All Doctrines Revelations and spirits are to be tried by Christ rather then by the Word Those that go from the Sun must at length walk in darknesse Anabaptists of old said the Covenant of Grace was written in the inward parts and in the heart therefore there was no need of word or ministery But when Satan knocketh his knock is dumb and speechlesse he bringeth not the Word and speaketh not according to the Law and Testimony Because he is a dumb Devil Christ bringeth the word with him To all these we can say no other then that they condemn the Scriptures and the Preaching of the word Because nothing can avail us to Salvation without the spirit This is 1. to condemn the wisdom of our Lord who hath appointed that Faith should come by hearing and that the things that are written are written That we in believing might have Eternal life Ioh. 20.31 2. It s to fetter the free operation of the spirit whose winde bloweth when he listeth to the preaching of the word 3. Yea to make Christs Death Resurrection Ascension and Intercession at the right hand of God which all must be the marrow of the Evangel things meerly legall and things belonging to the Covenant of works because all those without the Grace of the spirit are meerly fruitless to many thousands Obj. 6. But repentance in the New Testament is nothing else but the change of the mind and to be of another mind then to seek Righteousnesse by the works of the law even to seek it in Christ alone and mortification is but the apprehension of sin slain by Christ and so Repentance is a part of Faith though Repentance in the Old Testament was to bewail sin and so sake it Ans. But this is to dally with Christ all mortification and dominion over our lusts that fighteth against mercy and justice and the duties of the second Table must be by this means an act of Faith and the New light of Christ in the mind believing our Righteousnesse to be in Christ And so an act of Internall worship belonging to the first Table then as the Scripture saith The sinner is justified by Faith apprehending Christs Righteousnes so might we well say that we are justified by Repentance and by mortification 2. That Repentance layeth hold on Christs Righteousnesse 3. That as to beleeve only without works doth justifie and save so to repent only that is to change the minde and apprehend Righteousnesse not in works but in the Christ without all holinesse and forsaking of sin should save us But this is to acquit men from all duties of the second Table yea and of all the first Table loving of God Praying Praising hearing c. except only we are to beleeve This is clear the way of the old Gnosticks who placed all holinesse in meer knowledge and apprehension of Gods will without love or obedience 2. Repentance is sorrow according to God 1 Cor. 7.9.10 Jam. 4.9 And eschewing evill and doing good 1 Pet. 3.11 And the Crucifying of the old man and the lusts thereof as Fornication Vncleannesse Inordinate affection evil Concupiscence Covetousnesse Col. 3. 5. And these are commanded in the New Testament as the very lesson of the Grace of God Tit. 2.11 It s true in the Old Testament the People were under Tutors and bondage but that was in regard of the carnall commandement of Ceremonies the cognizance of our bloody demerit held forth in bloody sacrifices 2. In regard lesse of Christ and the sweetnesse of the Gospel was then known and the Law chased harder the guilty to Christ. But 1. Servile obedience through apprehension of legall terrors was never commanded in the spirituall Law of God to the Jews more then to us 2. The Jews were not justified by the works of the Law more then we but by Faith in Christ as well as we Act. 15.11 Act. 10.42.43 Heb. 11. 1 Cor. 10.1 2 3. Yea we are justified as David and Abraham were Rom· 4.3 4 5 6 7 8 Yea the Iews seeking of Righteousnesse by the works of the Law is a stumbling at the stone laid in Zion Rom. 9.31.32 33. Yea its blasphemy to say Repentance in the Old Testament was a sorrow for sin and a forsaking of it as if under the New Testament we were Licensed to sin and turn Grace
never so righteous as the surety except in this sense he is aequè but not aequaliter he is righteous as the surety who has payed the sum for him in regard that the Creditor can no more in Law charge him with the sum then he can in Law charge the surety who hath compleatly paid it so are we in Christ freed from the guilt of eternall wrath in that the Lord can no more in Law charge sin to actuall condemnation on the Believer then he can put Christ to death again or give a new ransom for us but this is but formally a righteousnesse in regard of freedom from the punishment of sin But as I have said the surety is more righteous simply in regard the Surety never broke faith to the Creditor the broken debtor hath broken to him 2. The Surety never injured the Creditor by unjustice done against the eighth Commandement but the broken man hath failed in this But I would be resolved what truth can be in those Prov. 20.9 Who can say I have made my heart clean Job 14.5 Who can bring a clean thing out of an un clean No not one Eccl. 7.20 There is not a just man upon earth that doth good and sinneth not Joh. 1.8 If we say we have no sin we deceive our selves and the truth is not in us If we be compleatly as righteous as Christ and if as Crispe divines all the Idolatry Thefts murthers of the Redeemed Become actually the transgressions of Christ● and so cease to be the transgressions of the sinners from that time they were laid upon Christ to the hour of their death Can he determine the time when persecuting Sauls blasphemies and bloody outrages to the Saints were laid upon Christ I conceive he will say from Eternity they were laid upon Christ and ere he believed certainly this was an untruth then Saul made havock of the Church even when he did make havock of the Church and ere he believed for if Saul persecuting and all the Elect unconverted yet disobedient and boiling in their lusts be as righteous as Christ all their life It is most false that ever they were dead in sin or some times disobedient If it be said The Elect considered in themselves and in nature are sinners but considered as men in Christ they are as righteous as Christ it helpeth not for we must not dream of and fancy considerations that hath no reality and truth in them for all now born since our Lord died I am perswaded by the Doctrine of Antinomians were never nor can they be reall and true objects of this consideration For from that time that their sins were laid upon Christ to the last hour of their life they are as righteous as Christ and so washed and justified Now their sins were laid upon Christ as some Libertines say from eternity as others from that day that he died on the Crosse 2. Sins taken away by Christs blood saith Dr. Crispe are no sins of the Saints Christ did take them away and bear their weight even in the fault and sin it self and not the guilt only and not by supposition or meer imputation only and that from eternity But when Antinomians confesse that Christ acted no sin so that in respect of the Act the sinfull act against the Law of God must be here understood not one sin of the Believers is Christs but only in respect of passing accounts from one head to another This is all the truth we here plead for because the Act or somewhat answerable to that done against the Spirituall Law of God is sin it self and essentially sin if this was never upon Christ then sin it self was never upon Christ now there is no other thing remaining in sin but the debt guilt or obligation of sin that can be laid on Christ and the truth is the Scripture expoundeth the laying our sins upon Christ to be nothing but God punishing Christ for our sins as Isa. 5 3.4 The cause and formall reason why Christ did bear our griefs and carry our sorrowes is ver 6. Because the Lord laid on him the iniquity of us all and is so expounded 1 Pet. 2. Whereas it is said ver 21. that Christ suffered for us and an objection is removed vers 22. Why should he suffer Did he sin the Apostle answereth by concession of the Antecedent and by denying the consequence vers 22. He did no sin personally neither was guile found in his mouth But it followeth not that he should not suffer legally and for others the punishment due to them so his sufferings is expounded v. 24. Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the Tree Now how did Christ bear our sins On the Tree that is by suffering and Gal. 3. Paul evidently distinguisheth between two sorts of persons that are cursed the sinners that abide not in all that is written in the Law to do them v. 10. These are intrinsecally and in their person cursed as being sinners in their person and so the intrinsecall objects of divine hatred and a curse and abominable to God Yea but Christ was also cursed But how Not intrinsecally God is never said to hate his Son Christ nor to abhor him as he doth sin which personally resideth in the man who acteth sin in his own person Therefore the Lords forsaking of Christ his Son is not an intrinsecall detesting or a morall abhorring of Christ but an extrinsecall a penall or a judiciall suspending of the beams and rayes as Cyrill saith or the overclouding of his favour in the comfortable shining on the soul of his own sin and it is not said that Christ was cursed but only vers 13. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He was made a curse for us that is the fruits and effects of Gods curse the punishment due to sinners even that satisfactory and penall curse and punishment which infinit Justice requireth was laid upon Christ while as he died upon the Crosse and suffered the effects of Gods wrath upon his soul for our sins Then he must be the sinner only by Imputation except Antinomians show to us how a person is made sin or accounted the sinner And yet is neither a sinner by inherent and personall acting of sin nor yet by Law-imputation And truely its bad Divinity for Dr. Crispe to say as we are actuall and reall sinners in Adam so here God passeth really sin over upon Christ for we sinned intrinsecally in Adam as parts as members as being in his loynes and we are thence by nature the children of wrath Eph. 2. But it is blasphemy to say that our blessed Saviour sinned intrinsecally in us as part or member of the Redeemed or that he is a son of Gods wrath for sin intrinsecally inherent in him as it is in us Farther Christs bearing of our iniquities is an obvious Hebraisme and all one with the bearing not of the intrinsecall and fundamentall guilt of sin but of the extrinsecall guilt or
chain of thy neck Holines and the image of God is the object of this love not the cause nor any hire it is not so properly love as the other God rather loveth persons desiring well and good to them then things Mr. Denne is not content with this distinction and why The love of Election and the love of Justification saith he are not diverse loves or divers degrees of love but divers manifestations of one and the same infinite love as when a Father hath conveyed an Inheritance to his son here is no new love from the Father to the son but a new manifestation of that love wherewith the Father loved the son before Answ. Men should not take on them to refute they know not what not any Protestant Divines ever taught that there is a new love in God or any new degree of love in God that was not in him before Arminians indeed tell us of new love new desires and of ebbing flowing love and hatred succeeding one to another in Gods minde these Vorstian blasphemies we disclaim it is indeed one and the same simple and holy will of God by which he loved Peter and John from eternity and choosed them to salvation by which he so loveth them in time as of Free-grace he bestoweth on them Faith Holiness Pardon in Christ and followeth these with his love and the former is called his love of good will to their person ere they do good or ill the latter his love of complacency to their State and the Lords new workman-ship in them as with the same love the husband chooseth such a one for his wife and loveth her being now his married Spouse Obj. 2. Men like those whom they love and so doth God Ans. We grant all these termes of Gods good loving and good-liking are chosen of Divines to expresse the thing God loveth and liketh Jacob not Esau from eternity ere he believe or do good but he doth not so love and like Jacob from eternity to bestow Faith and the Image of the second Adam on him while in time he hear the Word and be humbled for sin and the truth is the love of complacency is not a new act of Gods wil that ariseth in God in time but the declaration of Gods love of good wil in this effect that God is pleased to bestow faith his beauty of holinesse which maketh the soul lovely to God and it is rather the effect of eternall love then love And God hath a love of complacency toward the persons of the Elect love of good will though not of chusing good will toward them for their holiness Cant. 4.9 Obj. 3. It is absurd that God should love the Elect vvith infinite love to chuse them to salvation as touching their persons and withall to hate them with an infinite batred as workers of iniquity Answ. It were absurd I grant if Gods hatred to the Elect as sinners were any immanent affection in God opposite to his love by which he should be averse to their persons But Gods hatred to the Elect because they are sinners is nothing but his displicency against sin not against the person so as he is to inflict satisfactory punishment on the surety Christ for their sin A Father may so love his Prodigall Son as to retain a purpose to make him Inheritor of a Kingdom if he had a Crown for himself and to pay his debts and yet both hate and punish his profuse and lavish wasting of his goods Mr. Denne would teach us how love and hatred toward sinners doth consist The Law saith he and the Gospel speak divers things the one being the manifestation of Gods Justice tells us what we are by nature the other the manifestation of Gods mercy tells us what we are by Gods mercy in Jesus Christ. The Law curseth and condemneth the sinner The Gospel blesseth and justifieth the ungodly Ans. What is this else But that which Mr Denne and other Antinomians condemn in us How can one and the same unchangeable God curse condemn and so hate sinners as to punish them eternally and yet blesse justifie and love to eternall salvation their persons except they teach the same very thing which we do For the Law and the Gospel are no more contrary one to another then love to the persons of the Elect and hatred and revenging justice to their sins Mr. Denne would further clear the point thus What ever wrath the Law speeketh it is to the sinner under the Law although the elect are sinners in the judgment of the Law sense reason yea oftentimes conscience yet having their sins translated into the Son of God in whom they are elected they are righteous in Christ the Mediator Ans. The Law speaketh wrath in regard of its reign and dominion to death to the elect not yet converted and to the reprobate without exception of persons but it cannot speak wrath to the believer though he be one that daily sins and is under the Law that is under the rule of the Law now to be under the Law to Paul Rom. 6. and 7. is to be under the damnation of the Law in which regard believers are not under the Law but under the sweet reign of pardoning grace yet are they under the Law as a Tutor a guide a rule and that the rule and reign of the Law are different is evident 1. because the ruling power of the Law is an essentiall ingredient of the Law without the which the Law is not the Law the reign or damnation of the Law agreeth to the Law by accident in so far as man is a sinner which is a state accidental to the law 2. The Law is a rule and hath a proper guidance and tutory over the confirmed Angels and should have had over man if he had never sinned but the Law can have no reign to death over the confirmed Angels and man in that case as the Iayler hath no power over the man who was never an evil doer 1. We are sinners in the judgement of Law both sin dwelling in vs and 2. the guilt of the Law lying on us to condemnation But being once in Christ and justified we remain sinners as touching the indwelling blot but we are not sinners as we are justified in Christ as touching the Law-obligation to eternall condemnation from which we are fully freed But the justified and redeemed of Christ remain as formally and inherently sinners as Milk is formally white a Raven black Justification removeth not the indwelling of sin and so in regard of sense reason and conscience we are sinners to our dying day but not condemned sinners M. Denne objecteth We pray daily forgive us our sins then we are not righteous in Christ he answereth that Protestants say we begge greater certainty and assurance of forgivenesse but not content with this answer he addeth When we pray for forgivenesse we magnifie his grace who hath freely given us
body of Christ that ye should be married to another 5. For when we were in the flesh the motions of sins which were by the Law did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death 6. But now we are delivered from the Law that being dead wherein we were held we should serve in newnesse of spirit and not in the oldnesse of the Letter Hence it is clear that there was a time in which Paul and the Elect at Rome were servants of sin Rom. 6.20 21. Under the lusts and motions of sin which work in their Members to bring forth fruit that is sins to death eternall Ro. 7.5 Ergo They were then under the curse of the Law and so far from blessednesse and the servants of sin Rom. 6.20 and persons in the flesh But the case is changed they are now not the servants of sin but servants of righteousnesse Rom. 6.22 Married to a new husband Iesus Christ Rom. 7.4 Whence came this change of two contrary states yea and before God contrary for before God it cannot be one state to be servants of sin under the Law and servants of God and under Grace Certainly from Faith on our part or some other grace in us at least there must be something of grace by which the alteration from a cursed estate to a blessed estate is made then faith is not a naked manifestation of the blessednesse of justification to the which we was intitled before we believed for before we believed we was in a cursed estate This also may be added that if Faith be but a Declaration or manifestation that we are justified before we believe Paul had no reason to deny that we are justified that is that we know to our comfort by works of holinesse that we are justified for works of sanctification are evident witnesses that we are in Christ and are justified 2 Cor. 5.17 1 Joh. 3.14 1 Joh. 2.3 Jam. 2.24.25 2 Pet. 1.10 3. It layeth down this false ground that grace is nothing in us but a meer comfortable sense and apprehension of Free-love and Grace is conceived to be only and wholly in Christ so that there is no inherent grace in the Believer by which he is differenced from an unbeliever sanctification and duties flowing from the habit of grace are nothing but dreams of Legall men Christ justifying the sinner is all and some in the Elect strict and precise walking conduce nothing to salvation To think that it can do any thing in order to salvation is to worship saith Mr. Denne an angry deity 2. To satisfie justice with our works fasting tears duties Therefore our 6. Propos. Is that it is a vain distinction of Master Denne who would have a reconciliation of God to man and of man to God 1. Because we read that man is reconciled to God Rom. 5.10 2 Cor. 5.18 19 20. Col. 1.20 21. Eph. 2.16 Man is the enemy whereas in Adam he was a friend and in Christ the second Adam he is made a friend but that God is reconciled to man or changed toward his own Elect from an enemy and a God that hateth their persons into a friend and lover of them I never read if at any time God be said to be comforted toward his people or eased these are borrowed speeches 2. Love of Election yea the love that putteth God on work to Redeem Call Justifie Sanctifie the Elect is no love bought with hire yea the price of Redemption which Christ gave for sinners cannot buy eternall love blood and the blood of God shed cannot woodset ancient love all the sins of Devils of men cannot forfeit it make sins floods and seas and ten thousand worlds of rivers they cannot quench that eternall coal and flame in the brest of so free a Lover as God in a word the shed blood of Christ is an ●ffect not a cause of infinite love 3. What ●hen doth reconciliation place any new thing in God No Doth it turn him from an Hater to a Lover No Reconciliation active on the Lords ●art is a change of his outward dispensation not ●f his inward affections Fury is not in me he ●ith himself Isa. 27.4 He cannot wax hot and ●●ry in the Acts of his spotlesse and holy will Reconciliation turneth not the heart but the hand of the Lord upon the little ones as he speaketh so that he cannot deal with or punish his elect as otherways he would do The Lords justice may be satisfied his love cannot be budded or hired and the effect of justice the inflicting of infinite wrath is diverted as a River that runneth East hath been made to run West and an issue of blood in one member of the body hath been diverted to run at another channell justice was to run through the Elect of God in the due legal punishing of the sinner which yet is extraneous to the just and eternall will of God but infinite wise mercy caused that River to run in another veine through the soul of Iesus Christ. 7. Propos. Joy of the holy Ghost is a fruit of the Kingdom of Grace Rom. 14.17 But not that joy spoken of Rev. 21.4 and Is. 35.10 Which excludeth all tears death sorrow crying all sighing as Mr. Denne dreameth so as joy can no more be separated from the Subjects of that kingdom then light from the Sun heat from the fire or ebbing and flowing can be stopped in waters as he saith far lesse is it true that actuall love and obedience doth inseparably follow this condition except we were made Angels when we are once justified nor is the Kingdom of God spoken of 1 Cor. 6.9 10. And the seeing of God Heb. 12.14 The Kingdom or state of Grace or the seeing of God in a vision of Faith here in this life but of the Kingdom of glory and of the vision of God in the other life as M. Denne expoundeth it that he may elude all necessity of holinesse but that which floweth from no obligation of any Law or Commandement of God But which is in our power of love to perform or not perform if we perform it not it s no transgression of any Law of God 1. M. Denne himself granteth pag. 84. God is not like some nigardly man who will not bid us welcome to his house unlesse we bring our cost with us Nor is holinesse required of us without Faith and before we believe and enter Citizens of the kingdom of Grace Nay by this interpretation 1 Cor. 6. We must be Justified and washed before we can inherit this Kingdom v. 9 10.11 But we are not to be washed and justified before we inherit the Kingdom of Grace and before we believe for so we should be justified and washed before we be justified and washed and the like I say of the Kingdom of God John 3.3 For it should follow that a man must be born again ere he be born again if he must be born again ere
was in the Father and so though there was no unfitnesse in either to be our King Priest and Prophet yet the love grace mercy righteousnesse of God and his infinite wisdom dwelleth in the Son O what a bargain of love that to borrow the word the lot of matchlesse love and free grace fell upon the Son Son my onely begotten Son thou must go down empty thy self and leave heaven and go and bring up the fallen sons out of Hell Mankinde like a precious Ring of Glory fell off the Finger of God being his Image and was broken the Son must stoop down though it pain his back to lift up the broken Iewell and mend and restore it again and set it as a seal on the heart of God This was the rise of the Covenant from Eternity that Christ gave his word as the prime Son that all the derived sons should put their hands and hearts to the Pen and signe and subscribe the Covenant of Grace the Writs Evidences and Charters of our salvation were concluded and passed the sign and seal of the Blessed Trinity in Heaven from Eternity The Gospell is not a yesterdayes fable it s an old counsell of infinite wisdome 2. The Son was qualified 1. With a Passive aptitude to speak so to be a man that hee might suffer 2. He was graced with all active indowments to be a Mediator The ground-work of all was the grace of Union the God-head dwelling bodily in him 2. The sea of infused graces above all his fellows to say nothing of what he learned by experience being a Son put to School 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he learned his lesson of obedience with many stripes though an innocent childe Heb. 7. v. 8. Hence he came loaded with Grace and blessings for all the cursed sons 3. All was nothing except this Ambassador of Heaven had also had a Commission for us but he brought two Writs two Books from Heaven 1. He came as a flying Angel with the everlasting Gospel to preach to the Nations 2. The book of life also in the former were three acts of Law So Christ is our Saviour both by nature and by a Positive Law Christ and Grace is Law 1. Because of his place and birth being our goel and neer●st kins man he was more kind then any other here to redeem the sold inheritance CHRISTS nature in the womb was grace it s nothing but nature and that bad enough for us to be born Christs mothers wombe was Grace It was grace that the Son should be conceived and born and by this he had law to us 2. Christs act of dying was a speciall Law Ioh. 10.18 This commandement received I of my Father that I should lay down my life 3. By his death and Resurrection he is made a Prince by Law and hath Law and authority to forgive sins Acts 5.31 Mat. 9.6 And power to give life eternall Ioh. 17.2 And rule all by a new Law in his new Kingdom Mat. 28.8 Our heaven now is by Law and a speciall Commission But the Gospel is a Generall he brought all Gods secrets from Heaven and in his speciall Commission Christ hath as it were private Instructions Save such and such persons not any other not all Israel but the lost sheep Not the Goats thers's a great mystery how there be no double dealing in the Gospel and two contrary wills in GOD. 1. He offereth in the Gospel life to all so they believe and God mindeth to work Faith and intendeth to bestow life on a few only like a Kings Son coming to a Prison of condemned men with offered Pardons to all upon condition they accept of them but yet he singleth out some perswadeth them to lay hold on the Fathers Grace and by the head taketh them out leaveth all the rest to justice Yet is this no greater mystery then this Many are called but few are chosen so Christs sending with his Commission cometh under a twofold notion one is in the intention of the Euangel the other is in the intention of him who proposeth the Evangel to men I mean Gods intention to give Faith and effectuall Grace The former is nothing but Gods morall complacency of Grace revealing an obligation that all are to believe if they would be saved and upon their own perill be it if they refuse Christ. This is the heart and minde of Christ to persons revealing two 1. Mens dutie 2. Gods Grace to give life Eternall to believers but the latter is not a morall will in God only but a reall physicall will to speak so according to the which Christ effectually strongly layeth bands of love cords of sweet inforcing Grace to perswade the Soul to take Jesus Christ. Christ cometh to the minde under a higher apprehension with his rainy and wet hair knocking and againe knocking to shew his face in such soul redeeming beauty and excellency as the soul must be taken Captive subdued and overcome with the love of Christ as the Spouse is so wrought on with the Beauty Grace Riches Indowments of excellency words of love of such an husband that she is forc'd to say I have no power neither heart nor hand to refuse you Now the former notion of the Gospel is enough to lay on the obligation of beleeving on all so as though the Gospel reveal not Gods purpose of Election that is only and formally revealed in and by Gods efficacious working of Faith called the inward calling yet it saith this to all You are all to beleeve no lesse then if there were not any Reprobated persons amongst you If therefore any dispairing ones as Cain yea and many weak ones refuse to beleeve on this ground Why shoald I beleeve the Gospel hath excepted me it belongeth not to me I am a Reprobate they are deluded for the Gospel formally revealeth neither the Lords decree of Election nor Reprobation the embracing of the Gospel and the finall rejection thereof can speak to both these but that is neither the Gospell voice nor the Gospel spirit that revealeth any such bad tidings Its true Satan may speak so but Christ cometh once with good tidings to all Elect and Reprobate men do hereby buy a Plea against Christ and force a quarrell upon him the beleever breaketh first with Christ before ever Christ breaketh with him bad tidings are too soon true I doubt if Reprobation be so far forth revealed to any even to those that sin against the Holy Ghost as they are to beleeve their owne impossibility to be saved For though a man knew himself to be over score and past all remedy he is obliged to beleeve the power of infinite mercy to save him and to hang by that threed in humility and adherence to Christ. 2. If Christ be sent for lost Israel and say in the Gospel Who will go with me And say to thee My Father the King sent me his own son to bring thee up
Sing us one of the songs of Zion Psal. 137. raiseth an higher esteem of Zion because Z●ons songs are scoffed at Vers. 5. Let them mock Zion as they list But if I forget Zion then vers 6. I pray God my tongue may cleave to the roof of my mouth So the Theef hearing Christ blasphemed and railed on by his fellow doth take more boldnesse to extoll him as a King Lord remember me when thou comest to thy Kingdome Grace appeareth the more gracious and active that it hath an adversary contraries in nature as fire and water put forth their greatest strength when they actually conflict together Vse 1. Antinomians turn grace in a temptation and then cast off all duties as Christ has pardoned all sin his righteousnesse imputed is mine what do you speak to me of Law-duties The way that cryeth down duties and sanctification is not the way of grace grace is an innocent thing and will not take men off from duties grace destroyeth not obedience Christ has made faith a friend to the Law the death of Christ destroyeth not graces activity in duties It s true grace trusted in becomes our selfe not grace and self cannot storm heaven and take Christ by violence grace though near of kindred to Christ as it is received in us is but a creature and so may be made an Idoll when we trust in it and seek not Christ first and before created grace but beleeving and doing are bloud-friends Joh. 11.26 Vse 2. This would be heeded that in difficulties and straits we keep from wicked wayes and being tempted that we strive to come near the forerunners way it was peculiar to Christ to be angry and not to sin to be like us in all points tempted like as we are yet without sin Heb. 4.14 with this difference Christ was tempted but cannot sin the Saints tempted but dare not sin The Law of God honeyed with the love of Christ hath a Majestie and power to keep from sin So Christ made under the Law for us Isa. 53.7 was oppressed he was afflicted oppression will make a sinfull man mad but it could not work upon Christ He was oppressed yet he opened not his mouth he is brought as a Lambe to the slaughter So all Christs followers did they are tempted but grace putteth a power of tendernesse on them Joseph tempted saith Gen. 39.9 How can I do this great wickednesse and sin against God David is reproached by Shimei but he dares not avenge himself Iob heavily as any man tempted yet Iob 1.22 In all this Iob sinned not nor charged God foolishly I deny not but the temptation doth sometime obtaine half a consent Nabal tempted David so that he resolved to be avenged 2. It will leave a bleck and a crook behinde it in some for their whole life Peter shall be all his life known to be one that once forsware his Lord. But this is fearfull when men both creat temptations by defending a bad cause as holy men may have an unholy cause and then can finde no way to carry it out but by crooked policie and calumnies We are now pursued by Malignants with an unjust war to embrace peace upon any dishonourable tearms to Christ is to desert a duty for fear of a temptation On the other side to refuse an offer of peace because many innocent persons have been killed is also a yeelding to a temptation for by war we kill many moe innocent ones and it s against the Lords counsel Psal. 34.14 Seek peace that is as much as we are not to be patients only but agents even when we are wronged in seeking peace But what if peace flee from me I confesse that is a temptation then saith the Lord follow after it the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Daresh is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Heb. 12.14 the Syrocha●d is run after peace compell peace and force it as men follow an enemy Rom. 14.19 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Let us pursue after things of peace Vse 3. See the sweet use of faith under a sad temptation faith traffiqueth with Christ and heaven in the dark upon plain trust and credit without seeing any surety or pawn Joh. 20.29 Blessed are they that have not seen and yet have beleeved And the reason is because faith is sinewed and boned with spirituall courage so as to keep a barred city against hell yea and to stand under impossibilities and here 's a weak woman though not as a woman yet as a beleever standing out against him who is Isa 9.6 The mighty God the father of ages the Prince of peace Faith only standeth out and overcometh the sword the world and all afflictions 1 Joh. 5.4 This is our victory whereby one man overcometh the great and vast world SERMON XVI Vers. 26. But he answered and said it is not meet to take the childrens bread and to cast it to whelps 27. And she said Truth Lord yet the whelps eat of the crums that fall from the Masters Table 28. And Jesus answered and said unto her O woman great is thy faith be it unto thee even as thou wilt and her daughter was made whole from that very houre 30. And when she came to her house she found the devill gone out and her daughter laid upon the bed THe dispute between Christ and the woman goeth on Christ bringeth a strong reason vers 26. why he should not heal he● daughter because she and all her nation not being in Covenant with God as are the Jews the Church of God are but dogs and profane and unworthy of Christ which is the bread ordained for the children When Christ humbleth he may put us in remembrance of our nation and nationall sins Isa. 51.1 Look to the Rock whence ye were hewen and to the hole of the pit whence ye were digged I alone called Abraham he was an Idolater Hos. 9.10 I found Israel like grapes in the wildernesse they should have been wild grapes rotten in the wildernesse had I not put them in my basket Ezek. 16.2 Son of man cause Jerusalem to know her abomination How Make them know the stock they came of 3. And say thus saith the Lord unto Jerusalem Thy birth and thy nativity is of the land of Canaan thy father was an Amorite and thy mother a Hittite When the Jews was to offer the first fruits to the Lord Deu. 26.5 And thou shalt speak and say before the Lord thy God A Syrian ready to perish was my father and went down to Egypt to sojourn there Thus the forgetting of what we are by nature addeth to our guiltinesse Eze. 16.22 And in all thine abominations and thy whoredoms thou hast not remembred the days of thy youth when thou wast naked and bare and wast polluted in thy blood So the Ephesians must be told how unfit they were by nature for Christ being the very work-house and shop of the Devill in which he wrought Eph. 2.1 2 3. Nationall sins
and that which is essentially sin dwelleth in us while we are here as the sad complaints of justified Saints do testifie as Chemnitius observeth yea Andradius saith as Antinomians do that we put blasphemy upon Christ his merits and grace as if he could not in a moment wash us perfectly from all sin And what Arguments Papists in this Point use the same doth Eaton and Antinomians use also yea but justified Job saith cap. 9.30 If I wash my self with snow-water and make my hands never so clean 31. Yet shalt thou plunge me in the ditch and mine own cloaths shall abhorr● me Job 40.4 Behold I am vile what shall I answer thee This Job after he was by Gods pen declared an upright man saith of his own wayes in his sufferings And David a justified man faith Psal. 143.2 Enter not in judgement with thy servant for in thy sight shall no flesh be justified yet Job and David were no hypocrites SERMON XVIII NAy give me leave to say that Antinomians make justification and free grace their Common-place of Divinity as if they only had seen the visions of the Almighty and no other but they are utterly ignorant thereof for they confound and mix what the Word distinguisheth because justification is onely a removall of sin by a Law way so that in Law it cannot actually condemn Rom. 8.1 There is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he saith not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nothing that deserveth condemnation Nihil condemnabile So that in Law all obligation to externall punishment called Reatus personae the guiltinesse of the sinner is removed and he shall never be condemned for sin because Christ did bear that guilt for him hence we say in this regard its blasphemy to say that tears of sinners do wash away sin that sorrow for sin and fasting pacifieth or removeth Gods wrath for my part I never used such Popish and unsavory speeches Papists do and we must distinguish between the lax Rhetorick and the strict Divinity of fathers But 2. Justification is not an abolition of sin in its reall essence Physicall indwelling Justified Paul sigheth and cryeth Rom. 7.14 I am carnall sold under sin 18. I know that in me that is in my flesh dwelleth no good 24. O wretched man that I am who shall deliver me from the body of this death Now if the sense of the corrupt flesh make these complaints in Job David Paul and if sinfull flesh opposite to faith apprehending the just contrary in Christ who justifieth the sinner dwell not in us Then 1. David Job Paul did lie in these confessions for to speak contrary to the language of justifying faith must be a lie 2. They were not really carnall and sold under sin but onely according to the sinfull doubting and apprehension of the flesh Pauls crying out of the body of sin was an irrationall fleshly and hypocriticall complaint 3. We are not to grow in the grace of sanctification and abstinence from yeelding to the motions of the flesh because if there be no sinfull imperfections in our sanctification we are not to grow in grace really but only in the false and hypocriticall apprehension of the flesh 4. If God see nothing of sin in the saints after their justification then there can be no sin in them after justification and so the justified cannot sin except they may sin and yet God cannot see them sin contrary to Ps. 69.5 Ps. 139.1 2 3. Yet Iohn saith even of himself and of those who have an Advocate in heaven 1 Ioh. 2.1 That if we say we have no sin we deceive our selves and the truth is not in us 1 Joh. 1.8 Now he cannot speak of men as considered in the state of nature and unjustified because to answer a doubt of weak consciences who said oh if we have sin then are we eternally lost and condemned he answereth 1. the justified are to confesse v. 9. and God is faithfull to forgive 2. He answereth 1 Iohn 2.1 If we sin we have an advocate with the Father 5. It must inevitably follow that Christ commanding these who have a Father in heaven to pray forgive us our sins commandeth them daily to pray out of a fleshly doubting not from the Spirit of Faith I had rather say with Scripture that all the justified Saints must take down their Top-Sail and go to heaven halting and that they carry their bolts and fetters of indwelling 〈◊〉 through the field of Free-Grace even to the gates of glory Christ daily washing and renewing Pardons and we daily defiling to the end that grace may be grace 6. Yea the Scripture is most clear that the fairest face that is now shining in glory was once even in the Kingdom of Grace and in the state of justification blacked with sin and sin-burnt by reason of sin dwelling in them 1 Kin. 8.46 For there is no man that sinneth not This is a black put on the faces of all men dwelling on the earth amongst which you must reckon justified and pardoned souls Eccles. 7. v. 20. For there is not a just man upon earth thr● doth good and sinneth not Then there 's a Thorne in our fairest Rose Davids Sun shines not so bright but there 's a cloud going over it in every justified mans good he doth in every sacrifice he offereth there 's some dung The sun hath looked on him Augustine had the same controversie but on another ground with Julian who also of old conceited that justified souls were free of inherent sin as Libertins now teach but Augustine saith alway That sinne dwelleth in the regenerate but it is not imputed and concupiscence after Baptism is removed Non ut non sit sed ut non imputetur Not that it is not but that in the Court of justice it is not reckoned on our score by which it is more then evident that justification is not such an abolition of sin in its ro●● and essence as shall be in the state of glory ●hen root and branch shall be abolished and not only shall justification free us as it doth in this life from all Law-guilt and obligation to wrath which is but Actus Secundus the second Act of sin the effect not the essence of sin but also sanctification being perfected all indwelling of sin shall be removed sin in the justified hath but house-room and stayeth within the walls as a Captive an Underling a servant it hath not the keyes of the house to command all nor the Scepter to rule All the keys are upon Christs shoulder far lesse hath it a Law-power to condemne therefore saith Augustine ●xcellently Cont. Iulian lib. 6. c. 5. Sanat vit●atum à reatu statim ab infirmitate paulatim God healeth the sinner from his guiltinesse its a Law word and a Law cure presently but from his infirmity by degrees by little and little and Gregory Moral lib. 29. c.
sign even as the day-star maketh not the Sun to rise it being only a signe that the Sun shall rise and that justification is as old a childe of free-love as election to life Then say I Paul might have taken the like pains to prove these Propositions We are chosen to glory before the world was by faith and not by the good works of the Law and this men are reprobated from eternity by finall unbeleef For sure it is that we come to the knowledge of our election to glory by beleeving not to say that Pauls large dispute with justiciaries was not whether we know and apprehend our own justification by the works of the Law or by faith in Christ. 3. If Antinomians say That Christ was slain for our sins from eternity not actually but only in Gods eternall purpose and they must say either he was the Lamb actually crucified for us from eternity which is a new eternal world we are actually justified from eternity and our sins imputed to Christ and actually translated off us and laid on him and so our sins are actually pardoned from eternity Or then they must say Christ was the Lambe slain from eternity not actually not really but only in the decree and gracious purpose of God now that is I grant sound Divinity Christ died not from eternity but God only decreed and purposed that in the fulnesse of time he should die But then it must follow that God did not actually charge sin on Christ from eternity and that Christ did not actually from eternity justifie the ungodly but onely in his eternall purpose he did justifie the ungodly Then the ungodly are justified in time and when is this time I believe the word of God that it is never while the poor soul believe even as the sinner is condemned and under wrath but never while he mis-believe and reject the Son of God But 4. if the meaning that Christ is the Lamb slain for our sins from eternity be that he is slain only in Gods purpose then are we no more justified and pardoned from eternity and so before we beleeve then the world was created from eternity Now in the Antinomian sense as we are justified by faith that is we come to know that we were in Gods minde actually justified Then it may be said The world was created by faith For Heb. 11.2 Through faith we understood that the world was created and God laid our sins upon Christ by faith and Christ died for us and bare our sins on his own body on the tree by faith For by faith we come to know that God made the world but because the knowledge and apprehension of the creation may some say is not a point serving for peace of conscience and Christian consolation which yet is false every point of saving faith is apt to breed peace and consolation yet certainly we came to know and apprehend that God laid our sins upon Christ by faith Isa. 53.6 and that Christ died for us and bare our sins on his own body on the tree by faith and by faith only to our peace and consolation and so if justification by faith be nothing but the manifestation of Gods love to us in imputing our sins to Christ and have no subordinat organicall act in our justification but we be justified before we believe and that from eternity upon the very same ground God created the world by faith Christ died for our sins by faith 5. Yea in this sense the world must be created from eternity and all things which fell out in time fell out in eternity because as Christ was the Lamb slain from eternity in Gods eternall purpose so were all things and the world created from eternity in Gods purpose and decree but things that only have being in the decree of God are not simply nor have they any being at all and therefore our free justification from eternity had no being but only was to be and actually is when God giveth us faith to lay hold on the remission of our sins Nor is it enough to say That faith is only given for our joy and consolation and not for the alteration and change of our state that of unjustified we may be justified For this layeth down these false grounds 1. The believer is so ●n every moment of time to rejoice as he is never to sorrow for sin nor to confesse sin because ●ins were pardoned from all eternity but so neither after a soul believe nor before he believe is he to confesse sins or mourn for them because both after and before yea from eterni●y sins are not at all but removed in Christ. 2. It ●ayeth down this ground that we are justified no more by faith then by the works done by the saving grace of God after regeneration ●nd that Paul in the Epistle to the Romanes ●nd Galatians does contend with justiciaries ●ow these who were from eternity justified shall come to know and apprehend for their ●wn peace joy and consolation that they were ●ustified and elected to glory whether men ●ay know this by faith in Christ or by the works of the Law But 1. this is not the state of the question between Paul and the Justiciaries For Rom. 3. Paul concludeth strongly we are really and indeed changed from a state of sin unto a state of justification even before God not because by keeping the Law we know we are justified but because all have sinned and are come short of the glory of God and so are inherently wicked abominable doers of ill and condemned therefore before God from Davids testimony Psal. 14. Psal. 53. This Argument concludeth reall and intrinsecall condemnation v. 19. not the knowledge of condemnation nor the knowledge that we are not justified by the works of the Law Rom. 4.2 Paul proveth that we are justified as David and Abraham was Now they are not said to be justified by faith because they come by faith to the knowledge of their justification for Abrahams righteousnesse and the blessednesse of the justified man opposed to the curse of the Law from which we are freed in justification Gal. 3.10 11 12 13. is the reall fruit of justification and of believing in him that justifieth the ungodly Rom. 4.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9. But this blessednesse and freedom from the curse of the Law is not any fruit or effect or consequent of our knowledge and apprehension of our justification in Christ as if we were before we believe blessed and freed from the curse of the Law because ever the Elect before they believe are under the curse and are not blessed 1. Because they are before they believe the children of wrath Eph. 2.2 Ergo They are under the curse 2. Because Paul and the Elect before they be under grace and belief were under the Law and so under wrath Rom. 6.14 15 16 17. Rom. 7.4 Wherefore my brethren ye also are become dead to the Law by the