all ages held this truth giving the same glory honour worship to all the three persons which they gave to each of them singly How often the Church of England sings glory be to the Father and to the Son c. is known It is the Catholick Doctrine taught by all Reformed Churches both of the late and the former Councell of Helv. Art 6. Art 3 of Bas. Art 1. of Bohem. Art 3 of Fr. Art 1 of Belg. Art 2 of Ausp Art 1 of Wirt Art 1 2 3 of Scot. Art 1. of England Art 1. The Article it self is this There is but one living and true God everlasting without body parts or passions of infinite power wisdome and goodness the maker and preserver of all things both visible and invisible And in Unity of this Godhead there be three Persons of one substance power and eternity The Father the Son and the holy Ghost Quest. 5. Why are Kings and Magistrates called Gods and rebellion said to be like witchcraft in Scripture 1. This Question ariseth from what hath been before spoken for if there be but one God how come the rulers of the Earth to be called Gods Ex. 7.1 Ex. 22.28 Psal. 82.1 Iohn 10.34 35. 1. Gods they are called to teach that such ought to excel others in Godliness and such only are to be chosen that for religion are like Gods among men 2. To encourage them that they ought no more to fear the faces or regard the person of men or to punish the wicked among men then God doth 3. To draw them to his honour he hath given them his own name they are Gods and therefore they ought not to serve the Devil or the world but execute true judegement as God doth 4. To teach their Subjects Obedience there ought to be no grumbling nor murmuring nor rising up against God In distress one may petition to him but further we ought not to go he hath in the hearing of their Subjects given them his own name and thefore they are to honour them accordingly beg petition of him but no further 5. Let us of these nation add one comparison not known to the ancients our British god whom the Heavenly God make in peace glorious and in warre victorious hath only as God one unpardonable sin but one sin which he will never forgive one sin which is unto death he doth not say that we shall pray for it There are some that are thought to sin against the holy Ghost yet possibly do not I am prone to think that Spira sinned not that sin though he charged it upon himself some poor souls through Sauls persecution did blaspheme Christ for whom God might have a pardon Saul might not be guilty of that sin of Regicide so high as to make it a sin unto death for them our King hath mercy Fear might make them to blaspheme majesty repentance may procure them a pardon the others like Witches though repent must die whence flowes the second part of the question Rebellon is either against God Num. 14.9 or his Word Psal. 108.28 of against a King 1 Kings 12.19 Yet when ever it is in nature it is as witchcraft 1 Sam. 15. â—3 We shall consider it in that part that is against Lawfull Kings and Governours the Similitude may stand thus viz. 1 Witchcraft is a direct opposing of the order laws and Statutes that have been enacted by him who is the God of Heaven Rebellion is of his who is a God on earth Witchraft throws off God and is not afraid of his Majesty Rebellion throws off a lawfull Prince and is not carefull of his honour 2 Wichcraft is usually entered upon by a League Compact or Covenant which according to Authors is sometimes privately and sometime visible made with the Devil So Rebellion seldome or never goes without one or both these 3 Witchcraft as we read draws the party to deny that oath that he made with God in Baptisme Rebels if not formally yet virtually renounce those obligations which they made to their King and Soveraign 4 Witchcraft arises often from Malice Envie Discontentedness if God anser nor their mindes or revenge their quarrell they will endevour to do it by Satans assistance if Royal bounty flow not upon the Subject as he would have it he growes angry and will take by Rebellion 5 Witchcraft sometime is followed by pride or curiosity to do some secret and hidden work and to receive some kind of reputation among men Some will turn Conjurers Negromancers and Witches by the same subjects will turnâ— Rebels and Traitors 6 Witchcraft is followed by some through poverty or covetousness to get a poor living and to help their necessity they will bargain with Sathan Subjects to better their estates purchase wealth will often break out into Rebellion 7 Witches what through Justice guilt fear as we read seldome or never repent some sorrow they may have when they are in the hand of Justice for the same reason Rebels seldom or never repent except or untill they fall in the hands of the Officer and as Witches seldom then 8 Witches first or last meet with judgement much trouble and evil may be made and done by them but at length here or hereafter they are brought to triall they that rebell first or last receive to themselves damnation Rom. 13.2 I will not judge of their eternall estate but fire on earth is usually prepared for them both In Scripture Satan is called a god 2 Cor. 4.4 because of that power given him over the wicked whom God hath not called out of the World The Belly is called a god Phil. 3.9 men spending their time strength parts for its service Idols are called gods not that they are so at all but because Jdolaters have such an opinion of them Quest. 6 What was that Image wherein God made man and why was man created naked God having made man according to his own Image and yet God not being a corporall substance as man how is man made in his Image The likeness of God wherein man was made is Internall or externall 1 Internall that is in his soul where he was like God 1 In knowledge he knew God himself the Creatures his own happiness distinctly clearly fully that is as a creature was capable of Gen. 2.20 23. 1 Rom. 19.20 2 In holiness In him was no sin as in God is no darkness In him there was an ability to have cleaved only to good and exactly to perform what by God was commanded his affections were holy and pure without disorder and without stain and subject perfectly to the rule of right reason 3 In righteousness God could behold nothing in him but what was very good Gen. 1.31 no crookedness but a totall and universall conformity to his own nature purpose and desire law and precept there needed no Mediator between God and man he being upright before him All these three to be inwardly the Image of God appears Ephes. 4.23 24. Col.
3.10 2 External that is in body where he was like God 1 In Immortality Death was to have no dominion over him dissolution he was not to know God is Immortall and man in Immortality was like him 2 In Dominion over the creatures God gave man half his Empire to rule over Gen. 1.28 The furious Lyon the Kingly Eagle and the great Leviathan man stood in no awe of they all submitted to his Scepter The whole Creation of Beasts and Fowl was brought before him and though he was naked he feared them not and they disobeyed not him Gen. 2.20 This ushers in the second part of the question why man was created Naked For answer to which we make this brief reply 1 That but for sin this would be no more a question then it is now why men cover not their faces that was a piece or part of that perfection wherein God created him cloathing is but a cumber a toyl a labour a trouble and God made him perfectly happy 2 To admonish him of his sociable and peaceable life with his kinde God created other creatures with weapons strength to defend themselues against each other to some he gives swiftness to others craftiness to others strong and hard hides to others hard hoofes to some prickels to some sharp claws to others stings and poyson but only man is naked exposed open and free so that we see when men go to make war one upon another they deform themselves and look liker monsters then men God therefore would teach him by his being naked to live peaceably and sociably in the world 3 To Admonish him of his diligence and industry He hath given man little without him besides his skin yet Inriched the World for his use and that he might Imploy himself in some refreshing labour without trouble and do those things in the World most pleasing to himself what ever they were with the greater facility God created him naked 4 To discover the excellency of Adams perfection God did not make so beautifull a Creature to hide it in the cloud of a Woolen Silken or Linen garment he was the most beautifull of all creatures and God would have his beauty discovered As Eva was the Mother of all living I am prone to suppose she was the fairest of all her Daughters that lived and God would have her favour seen What needed cloathes to either since both were perfectly holy It was their holiness that made them not ashamod of their being naked Gen. 2.25 Quest. 7. Whether the reading of the Ceremonial Law be profitable to a Beleever Or whether any part of that Law be established under the Gospel The Law Ceremonial which consists of Types and Shadowes as Washings Shavings and Offerings of Sacrifices Shedding of blood Sprinkling c. some may think to be needlesse under the Gospel but they erre a Beleever may reap much profit by them 1 They may serve to confirm his faith in the truth of the Word by his seeing the Types fulfilled by Christ he is the Lamb of the Male kinde that must be Offered for the sins of the World He is the scape-goat that taketh the sins of men into the Wildernesse of Oblivion 2. By them we may take notice of Gods offence at sin he wil have the blood of man or of beasts to satisfie his Justice in respect of sin willing to spare men untill the Son of man come the blood of Buls and goats shall serve to the purifying of the flesh 3. By them believers may be excited to love Christ the more for freeing them from the burthen of that Law It was a yoke that the Jews were not able to bear Acts 15.10 By Christ the Believer is freed from it he is not now tyed to Ierusalem he needs not go there to worship neither need he kill his beast for Sacrifice but offering pure hands without wrath and doubring makes him accepted in the beloved 4. By that Law we see that there is but one Saviour for Jew and Gentile which may be the ground of many a fervent prayer for the Jews Conversion that they might effectually have the blood upon their hearts for the pardon of their sins whose blood typically they shed for the remmitting of their offences Poor souls whose Fathers saw his blood in the killing of their beasts yet their seed to be killed through their not believing in his blood now that it is poured forth Return O Lord to thee many thousands of Israel 5. Believers by that may see how carefull God is of his Worship in his making such strict Laws Statues and Judgements and the least of them to be fulfilled under the pain of being cut off 6. They may fear to sin the more against the gospel if it was dangerous under so dark a Ministration what now if it was death to break the Law delivered by Moses what then to sin against the Law given by Christ if these escaped not that broke the Law because they were delivered from Egypts thraldome How shall we escape if we neglect so great salvation Heb. 10.2 3. Let us not sin the more because the yoak is took from us but rejoyce always in God that made us free in Christ which calls upon us to see if by Christ we are free'd from any part of that Law or from all of it which is the second part of the Question The ground of it is the determination of that first and famous Counsell of the Church Acts 15. In which it was appointed v. 29 that the converted Gentiles should abstain from meats offered to Idols and from blood c. By reason of which precept some conclude this part of the Law to be confirmed under the gospell and by Christians to be observed But these men erre not knowing the Scriptures For the detecting of which errour we shall promise a few things touching the institution of the Law and the reason of the Law 1. Of the Institution When God had preserved himself a very small remnant in the Earth by Noahs Ark he gave to Noah and to his Sons every moving thing that liveth for meat Gen. 9.3 But flesh with the blood thereof which is the life thereof these they must not eat that is flesh with the blood in it or raw or not thorowly boyld or not throughly blooded or not throughly dressed as for haste the Israelites did 1 Sam. 14.32 33. Afterwards in the time of Moses this Law was enlarged Levit. 17.1 Prohibiting not only the eating of flesh with the blood but the blood of any manner of flesh v. 10. v. 14. so that untill Moses the not eating of blood divided from the flesh is not expressly forbidden though it might not by holy men be eaten for a reason hereafter to be shown 2. Of the reason of this Law and that is three fold Either 1. Physicall 2. Morall Or 3. Mystical 1. Physical The blood of beasts divided from the flesh eaten alone or the blood of beasts eaten
earnest or desirous they are to have us to do it that adjure us The Institution of Magistrates being from the Lord though the constitution of them be of man calls loud for obedience and that danger that might attend the Gospell of the Lord if believes should not obey is possibly the ground of this high charge For indeed whatever Government be set over us though possibly disaffected by us ought in such things to be yielded unto if not for his sake who is in the Throne yet for his sake who set him in But by this time I conjecture I see some in this Generation affirming that by this some passages mentioned before I take from them all liberty and the death of Christ advantageth them nothing and therefore they condemn me as Antichristian Having heard so much of that and seen it used so often by those that did not understand it as a proper shield against the Magistrates commands I shall in a word discover the severall parts of Christian liberty that consists 1. In our being delivered from the curse of the Law Galat. 3.23 2. From the Law of sin and death Rom. 8.2 3. From all Jewish Rites and Ceremonies as such Acts 15.24 4. From all humane Ordinances and Traditions whatsoever when they are imposed upon the Consciences of men to be observed under the pain of damnation Col. 2.8 This is the whole of Christian liberty from these Christ hath made us free but as touching the Observation of Laws and Ordinances such as were before spoken of Christ's death hath tyed us to them so farr are the Thrones of Princes or Church Governours seats from being shaken by Christs bowing down his head at which time our liberty began that they are much strengthned by it as appeared by his own life before he dyed and by his Apostles Doctrine when he was ascended The same reach the Reformed Churches in the Articles above mentioned Quest. 5. Whether the segregated Churches now in England be true Churches For the resolving of this Question we must consider the members of these Churches 2. ways 1. Either as holding the same fundamentall Doctrine that is by Law professed in England under the Guardship of an Ecclesiastick person by him taught in all necessary and saving truths though differing from the Church of England in other smaller points these must and ought to be accounted of our body and are indeed real and true Churches However if they would take counsell it were to be wished that they would go no further in this separating way For though I am perswaded they are not the real Fathers of that Bastard brood of Hereticks that now lies at every door yet they have given and still do give too much occasion by their wanton dalliance to be suspected for the reputed Father of them all as could be proved most clearly from the exercises of those Churches at their meetings But I forbear 2. Or we shall consider them as holding the same fundamentall Doctrine with us as the authority of the Scriptures the necessity and utility of the Sacraments and the like and these gather themselves together and Ordain a Mechanick or Lay-person to be their Teacher in Ordinary We shall take no notice of his Learning whether he have any or no or if you will suppose him to have all learning acquainted in all the Mysteries of Art wanting nothing to compleat a Scholar yet a Trades-man Mechanick or secular person either not Ordained or Ordained by the people and by vertue of that Ordination whether assumed by himself or imposed by the people dispenseth the word and Sacraments exerciseth the power of the Keys and as a Minister sent them of God to perswade them in an Authoritative way to be reconciled to God And these we must also consider 2. ways 1. In their private or civill capacity as they are Christians liveing about or among us and so both their Teacher and themselves are Members of the same Church with us viz. the Catholick Or 2. In their publick formal or supposed Ecclesiastick capacity as they have formed themselves having appointed Mechanicks for their Teachers whether certain or not whether Male or Female exercising worship among themselves by such or receiving Sacraments at the hands of such Let me now lay down and open one distinction which well considered will answer all objections that in the handling of the Question may arise in the Readers judgement that is this We must note there is a vast difference between a Church constituting and a Church constituted This holds not only in Churches but in other things when a government is going to be erected some things extraordinary may be done through necessity which necessity being removed by the thing competed those extraordinary acts cease being as at the creation in constituting the World God made trees herbs plants fishes beasts yea man in an extraordinary way being necessitated to do upon the account of his naturâ— that admitting no creature to be from eternity but having once made these he ceased that extraordinary act of creating and appointed the conservation of the species of the creatures to be in the successive generation of the Individuals Man is not now made out of the ground nor the woman made at an instant out of man God hath put an end to creation and constituted now generation for the means of keeping man upon the Earth So in his constituting of the Sacrament of circumcision to be a standing Ordinance to the Church of the Jews we know by Gen. 17.24 25. that Abraham was Ninety nine years old and his Son Ishmael 13 and the servants of his house some elder some younger but being in their flesh constituted it was from them to all posterity to be given at Eight days old Ishmael was thirteen years but his sons must be circumcised sooner because when the Ordinance was constituted he was not to look to that age wherein God did institute that Ordinance So in setling the Priesthood upon Aaron Levit. 8. Moses was the man that sanctified him and sprinkled the blood on the Altar seven times and other Levitical Rites which in after-ages was not lawfull save by the Priests because God having instituted Aaron he had appointed a natural Succession and by that Succession was he to be found out whom the Lord would make to offer upon his Altar So in setling the Crown of Iudah upon David he was anointed by the Prophet when he followed the Flocks but having constituted him and by that extraordinary act deputed the Son of Iesse to be the Captain of his People he will now have us to look no more after that but among David's Sons and after Solomon the First-born the ordinary way that God hath now appointed for bringing forth one to rule that People So Christ in constituting a Church for himself upon earth took from Boats and from the receipt of Custom men and immediately ordained them to preach Repentance to the People now they being
or her pleasure openly expound and preach the Gospel that it was no lawfull for a Minister to have humane learning or that it was unlâ—wfâ—ll to hear such that it was and would be unlawful for Ministers to prepare themselves to preach by study that it was unlawful for a Gospel-Minister not to have some handy Trade and work in a Mechanick way for his living Ought they not since it was known to have been long used by Gods people before the Law and by his people after the Law to have told that to receive Tythes now was to deny that Christ was come in the flesh why was it not told us that the whole â—â—sterity of man whether of Heathens or Christians during their Infancy are pure and holy there being no Originall sin why did not that wise Master builder lay his foundation aright and show us that to enter any into thâ— Church by Baptism without declaration of Faith and Repentance though born of holy parents was a sin and also if any such thing were done in the name of the holy Trinity wherein consists the essence of Baptisme with the application of the spirit which is not hindred by Infancy yet that they ought to be baptized again Why did they not inform the Church that though God was pleased to receive the Children of the Jews so far into his favour as to give them the outward sign of his Covenant with the Fathers viz. by circumcision yet would not have the Children of Christians to receive the outward sign of his Covenant with their Fathers viz. by Baptism Why did they not inform us that there were none baptized nor none should account themselves baptized except they were plunged or dipped in a River And that any member of the Church might do that why did he not tell us that it was and would be a sin for one to teach his child to say the Lords Prayer or call God father since they had no faith in Christ Why do they not shew us that to be in a place hearing his word with those that were not all holy was a great sin before God and that there should be a parity in the Church of God That no civill Magistrate hath any power at all to be command any thing to be done in the Church of God and that no Christian ought to pray in a set form and therefore that the Lords prayer was not to be used yea was as abominable unto God as Swines flesh unto a Jew as I have read some of them do however we know it is disused by them all Why was it not told us that to receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper was either a vain thing or an indifferent thing or to eat it with unholy persons a sinful thing and also that any one that had gifts might administer the same or that the profit of the Sacraments depended upon the goodness or holynesse of him that gave it or did administer them These with a thousand more are the Principles that our Hereticks walke and teach by and if they be true doctrine how long hath the Church been without truth and in matters of greatest concernment as Preaching the word and Sacraments Why did not the Apostles once at least encourage Christians to persevere in Holiness upon the account of Christs comming personally to Reign upon Earth and why would they not tell that it was a decent holy seemly thing to hear a woman Preach It seems strange that neither by word nor by Epistle this was made known that any man might assume the office of the Ministry unto himself though he were not outwardly called as was Aaron why would they not tell us that Ordination was but a toy and was not to continue longer then themselves But what am I doing If these be true Churches and this Doctrine true Gospel the Apostles have been faithlesse and unjust I speak it trembling for no such thing did they ever teach but the contrary we finde them often times in the Scripture handling those very points and laies down contrary conclusions particularly Heb. 5.4 speaking of Priest-hood in generall and of Christs in particular who is the high Priest of the Gospel saies no man taketh this honour to himself but he that is called as was Aaron And that Aaron had an outward call for that Office and was deputed and set apart for that function in a publick way is clear from Ex. 29. and Levit. 9. Rom. 5.12 where the Apostle handling the infectious nature of sin maintains That by one man sin entered into the World and death by sin and so death passed upon all men for that all had sinned viz. by the sin of that one man I can find here no exception of Infants which if true doctrine the wisedome of God would have discovered in such an apt and proper place And truly that Infants should dye having no sin since death is the wages of sin Rom. 6 23. is a Doctrine that either charges God with unjustice or St. Paul with a falshood or at least a grosse mistake Of Baptizing of Infants we shall speak in it's own place and touching receiving the Sacrament of the Lords Supper with a mixed Congregation in its propper season and of Dipping when we come to the Font. Touching the peoples Ordination let the Scripture be produced that gives the people power for to set apart a Lay or Mechanick or any person and to constitute him a Church-Officer in the least Let the Scripture be produced that gives a power to a multitude so to do or that approves of a mans assuming to himself the power ministerially to teach Baptize give the Sacrament of the Lords Supper show or produce me that Scripture that gives authority to a Lay-man such a one we count him that is not Ordained by an Ecclesiastick person according to Apostolicall Tradition to bind or lose to cast out of the Church by judicial Excommunication or â—o receive in by authoritative absolution I say again let any of our â—ereticks produce me that Scripture show that text and I here promise them to renounce my Ordination forsake my calling and deny my Baptisme For I am not ignorant that the whole stream of the Scripture goes smoothly in another Channel If these or any of these be Churches then the candle hath never been upon a candlestick the City hath never been upon a hil Kings have never been her Nursing Fathers nor Queens her nursing Mothers except Iohn Buckhold alias Iohn of Layden with his fifteen Wives which Iohn being a Botcherly Taylour was by a mad crew of Anabaptists despisers and otherwise opposers of all government appointed King at Munster in Germany An 1534. where wearing Royall Robes of Embroidered work Spurs of gold Scabbards of gold and two Crowns of gold he had his Chancellours Cup-beares Carvers one holding up the holy Bible and another a naked Sword the handle whereof glistered with gold and pretious stones went before his Botcherly Majesty
spiritual conflicts which in their own nature are so unpleasing and so bitter that were it only their own Laws we should see them live more merrily in the world And what makes after Ages imbrace those Scriptures though good men should make them since they are contrary to flesh and blood and might therefore be rejected In a word a good man could not have said O earth earth earth hear the word of the Lord Jer. 22 29. if it had been his own Invention 2. Bad men did not do it the lyar the drunkard the thief the swearer would never have made Laws against lying Drunkenness stealing swearing nor have counselled men to have shunned their company nor damned themselves eternally for their so doing Since therefore neither in heaven nor in earth can there be found â—ut a Creature to be but probably supposed the Author of the Scriptures it remains therefore that the Creator must who is God blessed for ever 2. From the testimony of the Scripture it self it is apparent that God is the Author of it He that gave the Law was the same that brought Israel out of Egypt viz. the Lord God â—xod 20.2 He that commanded Iohn to write to the Churches of Asia was the first and the last Rev. 17. Thus saith the Lord Hear the word of the Lord is a usual phrase in Scripture which coâ—ld not have been said by Men or Angels had it been their own It was he that gave Moses the Law the Statutes and the Judgements for all Israel Mal. 4.4 It was God that spake by the mouth of his Holy Prophets which have been since the world began Luke 1.70 All the words that are written in that Book are his words Ier. â—0 2 What Isaiah uttered it was the Lord that spake it Isa. 1.2 what Ieremiah spake the Lord commanded Ier. 1.7 Nay what ever the holy men of God spake it was as they were moved by the Holy Ghost 2 Pet. 1.21 3. From the excellency of the matter contained in the Scripture it appears to be of God where it promiseth it goes above the power reason or invention of man as Those that do well shall shine as the stars and as the firmament nay as the Sun for ever and ever Dan. 12.3 and Matth. 13.43 The Incarnation of God a Virgin bearing a Son the resurrection of the dead all without the reach of man making Laws for the hearts of men of Kings and Princes poor and rich high and low shews that it is not of man threatening eternal death and promising eternal life both which are without the power of men and that to soul and body both which by man nor the powers of man cannot be reached unto It perswades to nothing but what is in it self good were it not commanded and disswades from nothing but what is in it self hurtfull were it not forbidden and that oftentimes without giving any reason but the will and authority of the Law-giver why must not men swear steal c. The Lord hath forbidden it The Proem to the Law is I am the Lord thy God Exod. 20.2 I am the Lord is often given as the only reason of the Law Lev. 18. 4. From the effects thereby wrought the Scripture hath wrought that upon the hearts souls and consciences of men that the writings of men and Angels could never have accomplished it fills sometimes the very souls of men so full of terrour and other times so full of comfort that were not God the Author thereof could not be effected he that is in love with sin and dark through sin it makes him to hate sin and to be in love with righteousness it hath brought the hearts and spirits of men to so much certainty that all the tortures torments and pains that men or devils could invent was not once able to make them doubt of it 5. From the scope and final end of the Scriptures it declares that God is the Author of them if any creature had been the composer of them he would in one verse or other have sought something to himself but the scope of the Scripture is purely for the glory of God the honour of God the praise of God to make men admire God to have them praise God to have them pray to God and to depend upon God and in their ways to acknowledge God It debaseth every creature in comparison of God and puts all things under the feet of God by which it is demonstrable it is from God 6. From the constant consent and declaration of the holy Catholick Church that in all Ages under and after Moses before and afteâ— the Judges before and under the Kings before and after the Captivity before Christ and in his time before the coming of the Holy Ghost and afâ—er the Apostles untill this very time hath in all Ages been consented to and looked upon as the word of God the very word of God the only word of God the holy word of God and besides this the Church hath owned no other The same Teacheth the Reformed Churches of Helvetia Article 1. of Bohem. Art 1. of Fraâ—ce Art 2. of Belg. Art 3. of Wirt Art 31. of Scot. Art 17. Quest. 2. Whether the Scripture ought to be mens only Rule There are many that pretend to new Revelations new lights walking according to and going a whoring after their own Inventions but that the Scriptures are to be our only rule these following Arguments may declare 1. It is the only infallible and unalterable Rule Many Rules and Laws have there been in the world which time hath altered and experience hath made to appear not good but the Scriptures of God remain the same no addition to them no dimunition of them to Kings and people they are now what they ever were and they shall be what for the present they are to all generations For ever O Lord thy word is setled in heaven Psal. 119.89 All other Rules have and may still deceive but this hath never deceived nor failed and is the same for ever and ever 2. The Churches of Christ had never any other Rule the word of God the Scriptures of God was ever the Rule of their Doctrine in matters of Faith The Rule of their lives in matters of fact Malachy that ends the Old Testament commands them to Remember the Law of Moses and Iohn that concludes the new pronounceth him Blessed that keepeth the Prophesie of the sayings of this Book Rev. 22.17 And whoever speaks not according to this word it is because there is no light in them Christ himself appeals to the Scriptures to be the Tryers of his Doctrine Iohn 5.39 3. They are written that they might be our Rule These things are written that we might believe that Iesus is the Christ and that believing we might have life John 20.31 We are to take heed unto this doctrine 1 Tim. 4.16 We have a more sure word of prophesie unto which we shall do well if we take heed
with the flesh might and doth breed bad and unwholesome humours in the body of which Noah might have been ignorant or at least would caution him against it and the Israelites we know are most of all forbidden those beasts and fouls and fishes that in their own natures do breed no good nor wholesome nourishment to the body whatever the matter was above other Countries Israel had most Lepers God suited their fare according to the nature possibly of their foyl forbidding in it selfe what might harm their healthy constitution and among other things forbid them blood or to eat flesh with the blood or flesh not well blooded as being grosse food and tending to the hurt or detriment of man 2. Morall blood might be forbidden to the Jews 1. To separate them and keep them from the practice of the Gentiles who eat and drank the blood of those Creatures they offered in Sacrifice to their false gods That Israel was a people prone to Idolatry it is known no Nation was more they might quickly learn this piece of Gentilisme which to prevent this Law might be enjoyned them 2. To dehort or keep them from cruelty to teach them by prohibiting the eating of the blood of any not greedily to thirst after the life of any Creature or of their own kind that the Jews naturally are a cruell mercilesse and hard hearted people is known by a proverb to teach them therefore to be tender of the blood wherein is the life of all Creatures how strictly doth God give a Law concerning little Birds Deut. 2.26 that they shall not take the young ones with the Dam but to let her go So they are not to seeth a Kid in his Mothers milk Deut. 23.19 which literally to understand is not absurd which shows how farre God would have his people from the very appearance of cruelty 3. Mysticall and to the Author this is Instar omnium God would have the blood not to be eaten because he would have it sprinckled and poured out upon his Altar signifying that man for his Rebeliion had forfeited his lifeto the hands of Justice for it is said Levit. 17.11 And I have given it to you an Attonement for your souls For it is the blood that maketh an Atonemen for the soul. This is the mystery that is included in the prohibiting of blood it it makes attonemeâ—t and God would have it not put to any use for food of the â—o'y for he intended to be for the use even the Atonement of the soul which might by inspiration be known even to Noah and to the Fathers before Moses since the eating purely was not exprâ—ssely forbidden till now Since Christ by his blood hath made an Attonement for the souls of men there is no use to be made of blood now in Sacrifice neither is it a Creature can be used any other way then for food it must therefore be eaten or thrown away that is upon the account oâ— conscience to throw it away haâ—h an appearance of sin nay is a sin since there is a Rule in the gospell to make all things edible good for man to be eaten some say is a sin since it is forbidden in the gosspell at a Council of the Apostles and Elders Act. 15. In that Epistle written to the Churches of Antioch but this Scripture is also wrested which to demonstrate we shall briefly view the occasion of that Epistles writing The parties written the thing written of 1. The occasion of that Epistles writing A Church being planted in Antioch by the conversion of many Gentiles to the Christian faith some Jewish Preachers yet believers taught unto them the necessity of keeping the Law of Moses Act. 15.1 if they would be saved and v. 5. this discouraged the Gentiles much from or in believing in Christ the Law being to the Iews themselves an unsupportable burâ—hen as is implyed v. 31. Paul and Barnabas dissented from such teaching maintaining that Believers were not at all tyed to Moses Law Now the Houses Churches and Pulpits of Antioch were full of disputings and arguings the Iewish Doctors teaching one thing and Paul another No small dissention was among them v. 2. At length they think of an agreement Paul and Barnabas and others some of both opinions are sent to the Church of Ierusalem to know their minds vers 2. At their arrival there is a Councel called great controversy and much disputing there was the law of Moses must be kept if they would be saved ver 5.6.7 Peter rises so great is the difference Appeals to the Councel if among them whom God appointed to Preach he had not made choice of him to Preach to the Gentiles the gospel of Christ that they might be saved from whom as if he had said I received no such commission as to preach the Law of Moses as circumcision or the like Takes God to witness that all times God had testified of his content sufficiently and was satisfyed in the Gentiles beleiving without their keeping of the Law of Moses by giving them faith and the holy Ghost vers 7.8.9 Maintains further that they tempt God that reach the contrary doctrine and hinder or may hinder the progress of the Gospell by putting on that yoake viz of the Ceremonial Law of Moses on the necks of the Disciples which neither we nor our Fathers were able to bear by which he holds forth that the law of Moses obligeth not the Church under the Gospel And therefore is to be taught by none and is any do they tempt God At this Argument the mouths of all opponents are stopped Peter had been an eye witness of our Lords death and resurrection He got a special tripled comission to feed the sheep of Christ And at Gods Appointment did preach to the Gentiles the gospel and not the Law that God had blessed his preaching by giving the Gentiles Faith and the holy Ghost Though the Law was never taught nor observed their conscience now tells them this their doctrine is not of God they remained silent no disputing no arguing more vers 10 11.12 Paul and Barnabas takeing occasion by this argument of Peters declares unto the Councel what works God had done by their preaching among the Gentiles without the observance of the Law makeing the same conclusion Implicitely that Peter made from the same Premisses viz God owning their Preaching by faith and miracles and therefore as they taught at Antioch so they teach now being both here and there guided by the infalliable Spirit of God that the Law of Moses was not to be Preached was not to be kept in the mouth of these three Witnesses guided by the Holy ghost let this truth be justified that no part of the Ceremonial Law is to be taught obliging now and by consequence eating of blood is no gospell precept v. 12. Again there is silence the whole Councel being convinced of the truth of the Arguments urged by Peter confirmed by Paul and Barnabas However being
God touching those blessings that he will give his children and a full of Will God wherein are all the duties he requires of his people recorded and inserted 2. In respect it was confirmed by the death and sufferings of Christ he was the Lamb slain before the beginning of the World Revel 8.31 Matth. 26.28 For this is my blood of the new Testament c. For where a Testament is there must also be a Testator Heb. 9.17 Having therefore the blood of Christ sealing this his last will it is called a Testament 3. In respect there is no addition to nor no diminution oâ—ght to be made of it When the Testator is dead there is nothing oâ—ght to be took from his Will nor nothing put to his Will Now Christ having fulfilled both Law and Prophets with his blood hâ—th sealed them by his death and hath threatned them that adde to or take from it Rev. 22.18.19 it is called and that fitly a Testament Quest. 10. Why are there some things in Scripture hard â—o be understood and whether the Scripture can dwell richly in those that cannot read That there are in Scripture some things hard to be understood is both arrested by S. Peter 2 Pet. 2.3.16 and known by the experience of the Saints who dayly pray that their eyes may be opened to behold the wonderous things therein written Psal. 119.18 which yet sufficeth not to maintain as the Church of Rome the imperfection of the Scripturâ—s For 1. It is but some things it is not all hard to be understood we easily understand the whole meaning of the Law and Prophets In loving the Lord our God with all our heart and with all our soul and our neighbour as our selves Matth. 22.37 2. Every thing that is necessary for salvâ—tion is most easie it is plain before us This commandement which I command thee this day it is not to hide from thee says God Deut. 30.11 And who dare say it is otherwise but observe when any thing is said to be hard in Scripture or obscure as the doctrine of the Trinity of the incarnation or the resurrection it is to be understood either in the mâ—stâ—ry it self or in the manner of its delivery now the mystery is in it self inscrutable cannot be understood nor fathomed by the wit of man we are not able throughly to apprehend the grâ—at mystery of the three persons the glory of heaven the proceeding of the Holy Ghost the nature of Angel the eternal decrees but the manner of their handling that is that these things are so is clear and manifest and held out to us for to believe which last is necessary to salvation not the other we may be happy though we cannot comprehend the nature of the Trinity yet we must beliâ—ve it The resurrection is an Article of our Creed that is we believe it and the ground of our belief is clear in Scripture though the thing it self be above our â—â—prehension 3. We ought to expect some hard things in Scripture it is no wonder to hear God speaking like himself he is delivering his own mind and sometimes he will speak according to his own conception yet that makes the Scripture no more imperfect then a man who knows not how the souls acts his bones grow nor how the watery humour of his eyes keeps a fixed place moves and how his soul by that humour discerns colours how the soul by the self same eaâ— jâ—dges of diversity of sounds is to be judged not a perfect man There are in nature many hidden mysteries and shall men wonder to find some in the book of God to come to the Question he purposely in his Scriptures conceals something from us and speaks soâ—e thing therein which is hard to be understood 1. To keep us humble knowledge is often times a cause of puffing up God foresees that men would be apt to be conceited and raised up should they comprehend his meaning therefore in divine things he wisely orders that all shall not be understood to keep down pride and bridle arrogance 2. To stir us up to diligence by this doing God intends to set us a working that by searching and praying for the spirit we might the better be brought to know what God would have us to do 3. To hold up the dignity of his word were it plain men would quickly contemn it Ministers would be slighted whose office is to open it to save his word therfore from being vilified he is pleased to wrap up some of it in the clouds of prophesies dark sentences visions that we may set the greater value upon it and men in their reading may have the more reverend thoughts of it which brings us to the second part of the Question whether it may dwell richly c. Which we shall answer briefly There are four wayes by which Christians may come to the knowledge of Scripture that is by reading by hearing by remembring by discourseing he that cannot read may have the Scriptures dwelling richly in him to salvation by the oâ—her three means Yet 1 Whose fault is it thou canst not read thy unwillingness or crosseness or thy parents neglect or carelesseness if thy self be in the fault the greater is thy sin be the more earnest unto God in acts of contrition and repentance 2. Hast thou not spent as much time in toys and in sin as thou mightest have learned to read in supposing thou wert brought up in ignorance if so redeem the time by a double diligence 3. Be more humble before God the less help thou hast of thy self call to God for more those that read must have Gods blessing before they profit and grace before they be righteous Thou shalt have grace if thou beest humble Iames 4.6 4 Be more diligent in other Ordinances if thou hast not skill to read yet hast thou ears to hear Faith comes by hearing Rom. 10 17. and by hearing of the word it may dwell richly in the salvation 1 Cor. 15.2 But this brings us to the second direction above proposed for the Words in dwelling viz. Of hearing the Scriptures that is to suffer our selves to receive the knowledge of the Scripture by its being opened taught or expounded this is done two wayes 1. Authoritatively and pâ—blickly proper to the Gospel Ministry which is commonly called preaching 2. Charitably and privately common to all believers called in the Text teaching we shall first speak of the publick proper to the ordained Ministers of the Gospel and in Order to it handle three Ordinances contemned in this age which are as adjuncts or circumstances to this Authoritative way of teaching these are 1. The time of preaching 2. The place of preaching 3. The party that preacheth The party that doth or should teach is the Minister of the Gospel appointed and separated thereunto by Apostolical Ordination the place of teaching is that which commonly and authoritatively is called the Church we shall speak of these in Order beginning with the
or Superiours 1. Tim. 2.1 There are five sorts of persons cheifely need our prayers and we sin if they want our charity when we aproach the throne of God they are Magistrates or Princes Ministers or Evangelists Apostates or backsliders Heathens or Idolaters Saints or Religious 1. For Kings Magistrates or Princes whether we be under good or bad governours that God that hath set them over us commands prayer for them from us 1 Tim. 2.1 good men have done it for wicked cruel and Idolatrous Princes Gen. 20.17 Dan. 4.19 Dan. 6.21 also for good kings 1 King 1.29 and thy are the sonnes of Belial that do it not For 1. Their frailties and Imperâ—ections stand in need of it kings are but men in nature and have their failings witnesse Davids Ambition Hezekias forgetfullnesse Iosias rashnesse and Solomons wantonnesse Non tutum est semper bonum dare consilium Regibus was an old saying 2. Their dangers and their labours to procure our good deserves it they are higher then others so their care is greater then others no crown but hath its crosse if not visibly to their subjects yet sensibly to themselves Bonus Rex servus est publicus It was a true speech and had much under it that was uttered by the Emperour Trajan that the Sea and the Empire were pleasant to look upon but troublesome and dangerous to be upon 3. Our Christian profession binds us to it If we would not be thought to be infringers of the laws and examples Châ—ist and his Saints have layd before us we are not to forget our Soveraign when we minde our selves and justly may God shut that part of our prayer from him that is not attended with this piece of loyalty We may think it a slight matter to oppose magistracy but God is strong and mighty to uphold his own ordinance and through justice seldome can we see Traitors go in peace to their graves Scripture shews us that Zimry had no peace who slew his master 2 Kings 9.31 and though they should scape on earth first or last they shall receive damnation Rom. 13.2 This is a scripture truth and a secure or deluded conscience shall never be able to ward its blows Let a prince be a hunter after Innocent blood Let him be a known Hypocrite Let it be known that God hath forsaken him let it be known that an evil and wicked spirit possesses him let it be known that God hath designed another to succeed hiâ— all which we know to be true of Saul yet who can put forth his hand against him and be guiltlesse seeing he is the Lords annointed 1 Sam. 26.9 Every true Christian will pray with David the Lord forbid that I should v. 11. The Macedonians had a law that condemned and put to death five of their nearest kinred that were once convicted of treason In a word our goods our bodys our lives and our prayâ—rs are to be laid out in the service of our Prince or else we are traitors to the King of Kings and may be punished by his deputy here on earth 4. The good or the evil that they may be the cause of may force us to iâ— An oversight in the general may ruine a whole army a single errour in the pilot may sinke a rich ship Kings and princes like great oaks if they fall will spoyle thousands of the lower shrubs that are about them they are the eyes of the nations to prevent dangers and perceive conveniâ—nces It went ill with him in scripture that cryed out My head My head 2 King 4 19. Regis ad exemplum totus componitâ—r orbis It is observable in sacred writing that Israel after their rebellion from the house of David never had good Kings all of them being successively wicked which made the people desperatly prophane untill God swept all away for ever but in the house of Iudah which did cleave to the house of David we find good Princes making their people good and sometimes wicked Princes makeing their people sinners such influence hath the lives of Princes upon the practises of their subjects which consideration will make the Christian pray for his soveraigns happinesse 5. Their true title and lawfull succession calls for it since in their persons they must dye like men to avoyd future danger we are to pray for their successours that God would out of their loyns raise up seed to sit upon the throne the first Saint we find praying for a King is Abraham and his prayers are for the Kings seed Gen. 20.17 a local alleigance we owe to every Prince in whose country we are â—nd a natural to that Soveraign under whom we are born ' a great part of which consists in this doing for Abraham was a stranger and a sojourner in Gerar when he prayed for posterity to King Abimelech 6. The best of Saints both to the good and wicked Kings have done it 1 King 1.34 1 Sam. 10.24 2 King 11.12 Act. 28.29 Vivat Rex or regnes in aeternum was a usuall complement the Pinces of Persia gave their Heathen kings Dâ—â— 5. 10. Dan. 6 6. the same is used by Daniel A man greatly beloved then to the same kings and by all true subjects to this day throughout the world whether Christian or Heathen Dij te servâ—nt was the Romans prayer at the Installment of their Emperours Dâ—j te servent Feliciter Imperator es cumfilio im peres was the prayer of the inhabitants of Tysdrum when Gordianus was proclaimed Emperor Antonie Pie Dij te servent Antonie Clâ—ments Dij te servent Antonie Clemens Dij te servent vincis Inimicos hostes exuperas Dij te tuentur did the Roman Senators cry out having read some letters from Antonius their Emperour and God save the Kâ—ng was the usual petiton of the Hebrews at the anoynting of their Kings and the same is the acclamation of the Châ—istian at the Coâ—onation of their Princes What shall we say since the days of Gambrivins who according to Authors was the first that ever ware a crown or royall Diademe never had people morâ— reason to pray Give the King thy judgments O God then the people of these nations and for such as do is not let them know that the subjects of the South shall rise up in judgment against them and condemne them at the last 2. Ministers pastors or Evangelists must be partakers of our prayers and ought to be remembered of us when we appeaâ— before God When those Cedars as Sylvarus and Timotheus men of the highest rank seeme to be pillaâ—s in the caâ—tâ—h of God want the prayers of the people and call for it 1 Thes. 5.25 Rom. 15.30 Ephes. 6.18 19. Heb. 13.18 Pâ—il 1.19 shall others that are but as shrubs and in comparison of them seem to be but smal pins in the temple of the Lord go without our prayers These things ought not so 〈◊〉 bâ— For 1 Of all men they have the greatest discouragements in the works of their
be taken Quest. 1. Whether swearing be an ordinance of or under the Gospel There are them that live about us and among us who denies that swearing is any part of Gospel worship and therefore though called thereunto refuse least they should sin but erroneously For 1. Swearing was no part of the Ceremonial law but used long before Moses and the ends of it are morall and therefore it is not abolished by the death of Christ. 2. It is prophesyed that the Church of the Gentils shall swear by the Lord and by the God of truth Isa. 65.16 Ier. 4.16 Implying that whereas they did swear by Baal and other false gods they should by knowledge be brought from that Idolatry and give that point of worship to the God of Heaven who alone is the true God 3. By a holy Apostle it is frequently done even by him who was an eminent preacher of the Gospel viz. St. Paul an oath is nothing but a calling of God to witnesse of the truth of that which is done or spoken that it may be received with the greater belief now how often doth that eminent servant of the Lord Jesus deliver himself in the very substance of an oath as God is my witnâ—sse Rom. 1.9 God is my record Pâ—il 1.8 God is my witnesse 1 Thes. 2.5 10. God knoweth 2 Cor. 11 11 31. Before â—od I lie not Gal. 1.20 I say the truth in Châ—istiâ—n Christ I lie not Rom. 9.1 As the truth of Christ is in me 2 Cor. 11.10 I speak the truth in Christ and lye not 1 Tim. 2.7 All which are as substantial oaths as any we read of in the oâ—d â—â—â—pensation 4. Even in the close of the Gospel we find a holy Angell to swear Rev. 10.6 we pray that the will of God may be done by uâ— as it is done by the hoâ—y Angels and hear we have an Anâ—ell for greater certainty sealing his threatning by an oath From these reasons we may without errour conclude that the oâ—dinance of swearing is in full force and power under the Gospell to all intents and purposes any thing that our adversaries can bâ—ing to the Contrary notwithstanding Those texts Math. 5.34 and Iames 5.12 speaks of swearing in our common communication and of such oathes as are sworn by the creatures as may appear by the contexts not of Judicial swearinâ— oâ— any other kind of oathes when necessity and authority draws men to it for clearing of the truth and ending of controversie against which the Gospel speakes not one word but confirms it by severall passages yea St. Paul writing to the Hebrews says Heb. 6.16 That an oath for confirmation is to men an end of all strife not that it was but it is q.d. while I am writing and preaching now when the found of the Gospell is gone over all the world is an oath the end of strife and that not to some only but to men i.e. to all sorts of men whether Jew or Gentile now had it been a sin to have used an oath under the Gospell for that end we should have heard of it in this most proper place or in some other And if any will be contentious let them consider that Pauls before God I lye not 1 Gal. 20. and the Angells by him that lives for ever is more then yea yea and yet who dare reprove either of them of sin To this doctrine consents the reformed Churches of Helva Art 30. of Ausp Art 16. of England Art 39. the Art itself is this Art 39. of the Church of England As we confesse that vain and rash swearing is forbidden Christian men by our Lord Iesus Christ and James his Apostle so we judge that Christian religion doth not prohibit but that a man may swear when the Magistrate requireth in a cause of faith and Charity so it be done according to the Prophets teaching in Iustice Iudgement and truth Quest. 2 Whether the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy required by the Kings of England c. of their Subjects may lawfully be taken That Covenants or oaths in cases of necessity or suspition may be made by the subjects of a land to their lawful Prince appears by that Act of Iehoiadah at the Coronation of King Iehoash 2 King 11.17 where we have the footsteps of a Coronation and allegiance oath but to come to the matter in hand either of these oaths may lawfully be taken For 1 Swearing is a Gospell Ordinance and therefore under the Gospell may be performed being ratified taken and used by a holy Apostle and blessed Angell 2 There is nothing in them oaths that is contrary to the word of God God who made the heavens is only called to testifie the reallity of the intentions 3 The taking of them gives assurance to his Majesty of his Subjects faithfulnesse and loyalty and indeed as the case now stands he may be suspected of disloyalty that will not satisfie the law in that particular 4. It is but equall that subjects swear to defend his Majesties honours and prerogatives since he hath sworn to maintain his subjects rights and properties Next swear not at all the grand objection is his Majesties supremacy But 1 It is under Christ none acknowledgeth him as absolute head of the Church that being his sole prerogative who is King of Kings and it would be considered whether God hath not made as good and as many Laws touching the government of the State as he hath for that of the Church yet who will thence conclude that the Magistrate is not supreame in civill affairs that is next immediately under God For no otherwise is he head that is governour of the Church 2 It is only to exclude the Popes Authority His holinesse at Rome looks upon all Kings and Emperours as his Vassals and servants and did he not exalt him above all that are called Gods he would want one mark of the Antichrist 1 Thes. 2.4 by the way they being called Gods we are to know that none on earth no no Presbytery their superior nor contain the Pope therfore pretending a power over the Church making himself or giving out himself as head of all civil Ecclesiastical officers and withall making the Church to be so absolute a distinst body from the state that no state officer whether the King though he only be supream ought in the least to meddle with it or if he do to be excommunicated or deposed for his presumption this power is by this Oath taken from the Pope and given to him that is the true as the Pope makes the Church to be so absolute a distinct body from the state as that the state hath nothing to do with it or in it there are them in our dayes to be quit with the Pope that would have no Church officer in the least to meddle with the state supposing such an absolutnesse in the one that it hath no coherence with or dependance upon the other in this absolute sence the