Linguistic DNA - Concept Modelling Demonstrator

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
death_n	law_n	sin_n	sin_v	8,157	5	9.6294	5	true

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A15877	The rekenynge and declaracion of the fayth and belefe of huldrike zwyngly byshoppe of ziiryk the chefe town of Heluitia, sent to Charles .v. that nowe is Emproure of Rome: holdynge a parlement or counsayll at Ausbrough with the chefe lordes and lerned men of Germanye, the yere of our Lorde M.D.xxx. in the moneth of July.; Ad Carolum Romanorum imperatorem Germaniae comitia Augustae celebrantem, fidei Huldrychi Zuinglij ratio. English	Zwingli, Ulrich, 1484-1531.; Joye, George, d. 1553.; Holy Roman Empire. Reichstag (1530 : Augsburg, Germany)	1548 (1548)	STC 26139; ESTC S105862	32,224	70

Fourthly I knowe that olde GraÌ„dsyre ouâ— fyrste parent was throughe that loue of hym selfe hytherto brought the deuyll throughe enuy entysynge and mynistring that pernycious counsayl that he desyred to be lyke vnto god This great cryme when he had commytted it he dyd eate that forboden and deadly apple wherby he became gyltie death now made the enemye of his owne God This man therfore when god myght nowe by his iustyce haue vtterly loste and dampned hym yet of his mercyable goodnes he toke a more easy way with hym that is to wyt he chauÌ„ged this deadly euerlastynge payne of both body soule into a transytory condycion or state that is he made hym but a boÌ„de seruaÌ„te whom he myght haue perpetually sayd in tormeÌ„tes This bonde condycion of seruytute syth nother y e man hymselfe nor yet any maÌ„ borne of hym may auoyd and take away for what can y e bonde maÌ„ beget but a bonde maÌ„ he threw thrusted al his posterite throuhe y e deadly taste of thaple also into boÌ„dage And here this is my mynde as touchyng Orygynall syn synne is called verely y t that is commytted agaynst the lawe For where as is no law thereis no traÌ„sgression where as is no traÌ„sgressioÌ„ there is no syn ê“perly so called takynge synne for that iniquite cryme vngodlynes actually coÌ„mytted gyltie death I knowledge therfore that ouâ— fyrste parent synned y t actuall and oryginall syn whiche is verely synne iniquite cryme vngodlynes But they y t are borne of hym synÌ„ed not lyke maner to Adam For which one of vs his posteryte deuoured eate any forbodeÌ„ apple in paradyse wherfore we must nedes graunt y t oryginall syn as it is in the chyldren of AdaÌ„ is not a syn properly actually coÌ„mytted agaynst the lawe But may be called properly our byrth sore or naturall syknes also our naturall synfull coÌ„dycion synfull seruyle state Our sore or syknes it is called because as he thorowe y e loue of hiÌ„selfe fyl euen so do we fall It is called also our synfull coÌ„dycion and state because y e lyke as he became a seruauÌ„t bonde vnto death eueÌ„ so are we borne the bond seruauÌ„tes the chyldren of wrath vnder the power of death albeit I care not gretly thoughe men call this sore syknes coÌ„dicion syn after Paule yea suche syn so y t who so euer be borne in it they be thenimies aduersaries of god For to this state y e condicioÌ„ of y e coÌ„cepcion byrth briÌ„geth theÌ„ not any actual ê‘pretacion doyng of syn but in that y t this syn our fyrste pareÌ„t once coÌ„mytted it wherfore y e cryme syn once coÌ„mitted of adaÌ„ is the verye cause of thopen treason agaynst gods maiestie and of our death and enemyte betwyxt god vs. And this is verely synne But the synÌ„e which cleaueth vnto vs at oure concepcion is verely that naturalis on full sore and decease it is that condicion and state yea it is that necessite to dye Vvhiche soâ—e condicion had neuer hapened vnto vs by our byrth onely had not tâ—is synne viciated and polluâ—ed our coÌ„cepcioÌ„ natiuite The synne therfore and not our byrth is the cause of our misâ—rable calamite Oure natyuite is no nother couse then is that thing which foloweth of the principall cause This my sentence I confyrme with auctorite ensample Paule Ro. v. sayth If that by y e synne of onely one man death got the mastry ouer all men c. Euen so dyd grace with the gyfte whiche is ryghtwysnes raigne into lyfe by onely one man Iesus christ Here we se synne takeÌ„ properly for it was onely Adam by whose fault death hangeth ouer oure heades In the .iii. chap. also he sayth Allaâ—e synners and destytute of that glory of god that is to saye all haue loste that glorious symylitude and beutifull ymage of god wherin man was fyrste created an innocent perfyte without spot or tymple Here is synne taken for the sore or syknes for our synfull condicion and natiuite wherby we loste our similitude so that all men be called synners yea and that are they be borne that is to saye all are in the coÌ„dicioÌ„ and state of synne death before they synne auctually Vvhich sentence is constantly coÌ„fyrmed by Paules wordes agayne Roma v. saynge But death obtayned the mastrie and went thorow euen from Adam vnto Moises yea that thorow euen those whiche had not synned as had Adam transgressed Lo here ye se death eueÌ„ vpon vs infantes althoughe yet we haue not synned as dyd Adam And wherfore for he hath synned But we syth we haue not synÌ„ed as dyd he wherfore shuld death deuoure vs Verely because he died for his synne he thus deade that is to saye adiuged to death the sentence layde vpon hym dyd beget vs. Vve therfore dye but thorowe his fault and thorewe oure owne condycion and sore or dysease or els yf thou haddest leuer so call it thorow our owne synne so that thou takest synne for not auctuall an ensample A man taken in batayll deserueth by his vnfaythfulnes and enemytie to be kept and holden a bonde man of whoÌ„ as many as be borne are become seruauntes and bonde men borne as they saye in theyr maisters howse They be boÌ„de not through theyr owne fault or gylt but through the coÌ„dycion whiche foloweth y e fault For their pareÌ„tes of whom they be borne deserued this boÌ„dage through theyr owne synne As for theyr children they haue not this synne but the payne punysshment of the syn that is to wyt the condycion the seruitute pryson These thynges yf it lyke you to call synne because they be inflycte for the synne I wyl not agaynesay But as for origynall synne by the reason of the coÌ„dycion and contagion I knowledge it to be borne and coÌ„ceyued in all that be gotten of thaffect and desyre of man and womaÌ„ And vs to be naturally the chyldren of wrath I knowe it but by the grace whiche hath restored the fall throughe the seconde Adam christe I doubte not to be receiued among the chyldreÌ„ of god and that by this waye whiche foloweth Â¶ The .v. article Fyfthlie hereby it is manifeste that yf we be restored in Christ the secoÌ„de Adam vnto lyfe as we were gyuen ouer in the fyrste Adam vnto death that then be we to fole hardye to dampne any chyldren borne of christen pareÌ„tes yea or yet the heathen mennes chyldren thoughe they dye without baptisme or cyrcuÌ„cision for yf Adam were able to lese all mankynde by one synne christ by his deth hath not reuyued and redemed all mankynde froÌ„ that plage gyuen thorughe Adam then was there not lyke health gyuen throughe christe neyther can it be lyke trewe whiche God forbyd that as in Adam all were dead euen fo in christ all be restored to lyfe But howe so euer men diffyne of the

Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Text snippets containing the quad