was a disobediēce Gen. 2.17 3.6 Rom. 5.19 which was shewed not so much in the outvvard deede as in the purposed consent of his minde vvherin he vvould not be obedient vnto god III. What and how manifold a death followed Adams sinne So vve confesse that man being then destitute of the fauour of god by his ovvne faulte did loose that life vvherein he liued holily vnto God his minde being darkened his vvill depraued and all integritie of nature vtterlie lost Ioh. 8.34 Eph. 2.1 Rom. 5.12 name lie in those things vvhich pertaine to god and to a life acceptable to God and so vvas made the seruant of sinne the slaue of sathan and quite dead vnto god Moreouer he incurred both the death of the bodie vvhich is novv come vnto all men with al the calamities of the bodie and also the eternall that is the most miserable grieuous and most vnhappie life of the vvhole man more intollerable vvithout comparison then anie death vvith the deuill in euerlasting torments vvhence he could not be deliuered but by Christ 1. Cor. 15.22 IIII. That in Adam all men sinned But for as much as al mankinde which was by naturall generation to issue from Adam was then in his loines whereby the commandement vvith the curse annexed pertained not onelie to the person of Adam but to all mankinde likewise The Rom. 5.19 efore with the Apostle do vve beleeue and confesse that in Adam sinning all men sinned so that that disobedience was not onelie proper to Adam himselfe but also made common to all mankinde sith his guiltines enwrapped all men who were then and are yet dailie carnallie to be begotten of his seede Euen as the Apostle to the Romaines plainly teacheth yea and most strongly prooueth by an Antithesis or contraposition of the disobedience of Adam and the obediēce of Christ For if the obedience of Christ be no lesse ours by imputation then his owne by his proper action because wee are regenerate of his incorruptible seede and of his spirite it followeth that the disobedience likewise of Adam must be imputed vnto vs and we touched with his guiltines because we are borne of the seed of his flesh being father of al men V. The corruption of mans whole nature followed vpon Adams disobedience in all men But like as the corruption of our vvhole nature Rom. 7.7 Aug. tom 7 con Iul. Pela li. 5. c. 3 immediatlie by gods iust iudgement tooke holde on the person of Adam for that actuall disobedience called of the Apostle Concupiscence which is both a punishment of the former sinne a sinne and a cause of other sinnes euen so being taught by the holy scriptures we beleeue and with the whole church confesse that all men which by naturall propagation are conceiued of his seed ar borne infected with the contagion of his corrupt nature For all men sinned in Adam and by the guiltinesse of his disobedience wee are all kept bound VI. What we properlie call originall sinne Wherefore we doe so saie that this haereditarie fault and contagion of nature is sinne in all men and so we vse to cal it originall sinne that we do not separate it from the guiltines and imputation of the first disobedience Euen as likewise on the other side we doubt not but the righteousnes of christians doth consist not so much in the regeneration of nature which is made by the spirit of Christ which is vsuallie called by the name of inherēt righteousnesse as in the imputation of the perfect obedience and righteousnes of Christ whose members we are VII That contagion of nature is verie sinne And although that contagion was inflicted not onelie vppon Adam alone but also on his whole posteritie for a punishment of that first transgression of Gods commaundement yet wee hold this as certainelie out of the holy scriptures as whatsoeuer is most certaine Rom. 7.7 that the same is not onely the punishment of sin and the cause of all other follovving sinnes but also a verie sinne it selfe euen so great as were sufficient to condemne vs. VIII That concupiscence of it owne proper nature is a sinne in the verie regenerate Yea so farre doe we learne that concupiscence of it owne nature is a sinne fighting against the lavve of God and making all men subiect to condemnation vnlesse they bee deliuered by Christ yea that in the regenerate themselues though the guiltines being taken away by faith in Christ it be not imputed vnto them anie more yet we doubt not 1. Ioh. 3.4 Rom. 7.7 but it is a sinne yea and that worthy of eternall death sith it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a transgression of the lawe and is by gods lawe condemned as the Apostle teacheth IX From concupiscence ingrafted in vs the riuers of sinne doe continually flowe Futrhermore we beleeue that this our naturall deformitie is such a fountaine of al sin and that euer so abounding that from it doe continuallie spring most corrupt waters of e-euill affections of vngodlie thoughts vvicked desires which vnlesse they be by the spirit of Christ restrained they breake out at length into manifest sinnes offences some worse thē others so that there is not any man so holie which beareth not about him this puddle of vices yea and feeleth not the filthie vapors breathing from it and is not often sprinckled and bespotted with that noisome contagion Euerie man is tempted of his ovvne concupiscence saieth Iames vvhen he is drawne avvaye by his ovvne concupiscence Iam. 1.14.15 and is entised then vvhen lust hath conceiued it bringeth forth sinne and sinne whē it is finished bringeth forth death X. That God is not the author of sinne Now all these things beeing thus wee are confirmed in that beleefe wherein wee hold that god is not the author of sinne sith he neither created Adam euill or prone vnto euil but iust and righteous neither did hee intice or mooue him to il but he of his own accord and by his free-will sinned 1. Io. 2.16 neither yet vvas this naturall peruersnesse from god but of it selfe it followed that disobedience of Adam being depriued of his righteousnes god most iustly so permitting and punishing mans trāsgression by that worthie punishment XI Errors We condemne therefore with Ireneus and the whole church all those which make god the author of sinne likewise all Pelagians as wel new as old which denie that all men sinned in Adam and are holden in the guilte of the first offence or doe labour to prooue that this ingrafted concupiscence is onelie a disease and a punishment of sinne but not indeede a sinne it selfe or at least in the regenerate will not haue it to bee worthie the name of a sinne Wee condemne also those which haue taught that originall sinne is a substance because this opinion either makes god the author of sinne or else denies that god is the maker of euerie substance and confirmes the doctrine
that they may auoide condemnation XI Errors Therefore wee condemne those which reiect the law out of the church as vnprofitable and not pertaining to christians and againe those which teach that a man may either wholie or in part bee iustified by the lawe fith it was rather giuen Io. 1.29 to shutt vp all men vnder sinne and to leade them to Christ who alone taketh away the sinnes of the world And this is brieflie our confession of the law deliuered from god by Moses and declared by the Prophets vvhich prepareth disposeth and bringeth men vnto Christ Rom. 10.4 and therefore Christ is ende thereof as the Apostle writeth CHAP. XI Of Christ the redeemer I. A summe of the faith of the person and office of Christ the redeemer WHen therefore the fullnesse of time was come Gal. 4.4 wherein the promise of redemption made vnto the first man was to be accomplished by the second God the euerlasting father sent his onely begotten sonne and eternal and therefore true God of the same nature vvith the father made of a vvoman alone and vvithout the seede of a man and therefore true man but vvithout sinne and so true Christ made subiect to the lavve and therefore circumcised that he in most perfect obedience might fulfill that lavv in the name of vs all made obedient to his father euen vnto death namely for vs for he being vvithout sinne deserued not to die that he might redeeme those which vvere vnder the law and all the elect euen by his obedience by his death and bloodshedding that is by a sacrifice of exceeding vertue for it vvas the blood of God and a most effectuall ransome that he might I saie redeeme vs from sinne to the old image of god to perfect righteousnesse yea from death to eternal life and from the kingdome of Satan to the kingdome of God and that we might receiue adoption of children and so in the ende bee taken into full and perfect possession of the heauenlie inheritance as sonnes and lavvfull heires And lastlie that he might gather together all thinges in heauen and in earth vnder one head and ioyne them to himselfe Eph. 1.10 for the glorie of God the father II. Christ the redeemer is true God and true man We beleeue therefore Iesus Christ to be the onely begotten sonne of God Ioh. 1.14 Mich. 5.2 Phil. 2.6 1. Ioh. 5.20 Mat. 1.1 and so the sonne in nature consubstantial and coeternall to the father and lastlie true God almightie also true man of the true seed of Abraham and Dauid conceiued vvithout the help of a man Heb. 4.15 Mat. 26.35 but onlie by vertue of the holie ghost in the vvombe of the virgine and vvithout sinne and borne of her indued vvith a true soule and a humaine minde and made like vnto vs in all thinges sinne onelie excepted so that he is true God of the substance of the father Ath. in sym begotten before all vvorldes and true man of the substance of his mother borne in the vvorld III. Onely the Sonne to be both God and man and onely Christ But so vve beleeue that the sonne of God is both true God and true man and therefore the true Christ and him alone vve confesse to bee such sith vve read that neither the father neither the holie Chost but onelie the vvorde it selfe vvas made flesh Ioh. 1.14 and the Apostle saieth that the sonne onelie vvas made of a vvoman and that he onelie suffred Gal. 4.4 although to the creation of the nature vvhich the sonne tooke vppon him not onely the Sonne but the Father also and the holy ghost vvere all concurrent IV. That the sonne vvas made man without anie change of himselfe but onely assuming to himselfe humaine nature And vvee beleeue that the sonne of God vvas made man vvithout making any confusion of the diuine and humaine natures vvithout his conuersion into flesh or anie chaunge in the flesh onely by assuming of the humaine nature into the vnitie of that person and as Athanasius speaketh In sym not by conuersion of the godhead into flesh but by taking of the manhood into God so that that vvhich he vvas he did by no meanes leese or let goe but that vvhich he vvas not he tooke vppon him as the Apostle saith Ieb 2.16 the sonne tooke on him the seede of Abraham and as he teacheth that as the sonne taking vppon him vvas not chaunged into the thing taken for God cannot be chaunged at all but remained the same that he vvas trulie distinct from the thing assumed and taken So that seede taken on him vvas not turned into the thing that tooke it but was vnited with the diuine nature into the vnitie onely of the same person according to that saying The word was made flesh The flesh therefore remained flesh and was not changed into the word V. Nether one nature tooke on it another nature nor one person another person but the person of the sonne of God tooke on him mans nature Whence also wee vnderstand that neither the diuine nature common to the three persons nay indeed one and the self same nature of them all did take on it humaine nature nor one person tooke on it another person but onelie another nature For neither did the sonne of God take on him any sonne of Abraham but the seed of Abrahā that is humaine nature spreading from Abraham therefore wee acknowledge not two persons in Christ but onely the same alone by which all thinges were made and which was so perfect before it tooke on it the seede of Abraham that by the same taking it is not made anie other or anie perfecter person or yet indeed any whitt vnperfect VI. The humaine nature was not taken to make a nevv person in Christ or to make perfect the former but onelie to be coupled and vnited to his eternall and most perfect person For albeeit we acknowledge two natures in Christ the diuine and humaine yet we doe not admit that the humaine was therefore assumed that either a new person compounded of that this as of the parts should be made in Christ or that the former and the eternall person should bee made the perfecter by the coupling of a newe nature but onelie that mans nature beeing taken into vnitie of that most perfect and euerlasting person the sonne of God remaining the same that he was might be made that he was not and might haue what to offer vnto his father for vs. And therefore we doe not simplie allow it if one saye so the person of Christ is compounded of the diuine and humaine nature as the person of a man consisteth of a soule and a bodie But we allow the vsuall phrase in the church that Christ clothed himselfe or was clothed with our flesh Whereupon Augustine saith Christ came downe from heaven as a naked man comes downe a hill but he went vp againe clothed with our flesh as vvith
all into euerlasting glorie with Christ Neither doe wee doubt but Christ purposed to foreshew vnto vs the second by the first and the third by the second that by that which was alreadie made we might bee confirmed in the hope of that which was to be made VI. As the first vnion was made that satisfaction might bee made for our sinnes so the second is made that vve might bee partakers of that satisfaction Wee beleeue therefore that letting passe those things which pertaine not to this matter in hand wee may come neerer that the Sonne of God by the euerlasting will of the Father and therefore of himselfe also and of the holy ghost like as he tooke vpon himselfe into vnity of his person our flesh that is mans nature conceiued by vertue of the holy ghost in the wombe of the virgine that he might in himselfe purge vs of our sinnes and in that flesh he most perfectlie fulfilled the lawe of God for vs beeing made obedient vnto his Father euen vnto death and at the length the same flesh being offred vp in sacrifice for our sinnes he obtained in himselfe eternall saluation for vs so also that he might make vs partakers of this saluation by sacrifice of his flesh assumed for vs he was willing accustomed to take vnto him and to knitt and ioyne all his elect vnto him in another kinde of vnion namelie in such a coupling as in it wee may bee vnited with him though not into one person yet into one misticall bodie whereof he is the head and euerie one of vs members and may be made partakers of his diuine nature VII As the first is made by vertue of the holie ghost so is the second As we certainelie knowe that as the Sonne of God our Lord Iesus Christ in the first vnion coupled vnto himselfe our flesh and blood by vertue of his spirite for he was conceiued man of the holie ghost and therefore without sinne for which cause also he is called the man from heauen so also in the secōd vnion he doth communicate his flesh and his blood and his whole selfe vnto vs and in the same communion doth knitt ioyne and incorporate vs into him by the power of the same his spirite that alwaies the bonde where with Christ is coupled with vs and we with Christ might bee the same spirite of Christ which as it did bringe to passe in the wombe of the virgine that the sonne of god should be made flesh of our flesh and bone of our bones so also by working in our hearts and incorporating vs into Christ it bringes to passe that wee likewise by participation of the bodie blood of Christ should be bone of his bone and flesh of his flesh especiallie seeing hee stirreth vp that faith in vs whereby wee acknowledge and embrace him for true God and man and therefore a perfect Sauiour VIII The vnion of vs with Christ is spirituall yet so as it is true and reall So we beleeue that this other vnion also is almost no lesse then the former so spirituall if we may so speake that yet it is true reall Because that by the spirite of Christ wee allthough remaining on the earth yet are truely and reallie coupled with the bodie blood and soule of Christ raigning in heauen so as this misticall bodie consisting of Christ as the head and of the faithfull members sometime is simplie named Christ So great is the coniunction of Christ with the faithfull and of them with Christ that surelie it may seeme not to be said amisse that as the first vnion was made of two natures in one person so this is made of many persons as it were into one nature 2. Pet. 1.4 Eph. 5.30 according to those sayings That ye should be made partakers of the diuine nature And Wee are members of his bodie of his bones and of his flesh IX A confirmation of the former opinion hovve straight this vnion is For like as the soule in a man because it is one and the same and no lesse whole in the head and in each member then it is in all the bodie together it causeth that all the members do vnite and ioyne themselues into one bodye vnder one head euen so by vertue of Christs spirit because it is one and the same in Christ and in euery of the faithfull it causeth that all of vs knitte spiritually together both in soules and bodies into one we are all one and the selfe same body with Christ our head a body I say misticall and spirituall because it is ioyned and compact by a secret band of the same spirite X. This vnion because it is made by vertue of the holie spirit cannot be hindred by anie distance of place Whereupon it followeth that this true and reall vnion though spirituall of our bodies soules with the bodie and soule of christ can be letted by no distance of place though neuer so great because that spirite is so mightie in operatiō as it reacheth from earth to heauen and beyond and ioyneth in one no lesse strictly the members of christ being on earth with their head in heauen sitting at the right hand of the Father then the soule of a man ioyneth together the hands and leggs and other members into one bodie with the head yea though that man were so great that his head did reach vnto the ninth spheare and his feete stand fast in the center of the earth So great is the vertue of the soule thē how great is that of the holie spirit the true and almightie God XI The spirit by whome this vnion is made is giuen of Christ to the preaching of the gospell and administration of the Sacraments Furthermore wee beleeue that his spirite whereby christ both coupleth himselfe vnto vs and vs vnto him ioyneth his flesh with ours and ours with his is communicated of the same christ vnto vs by his meere grace when and where and how he please yet ordinarily at the preaching of the gospell and administration of the Sacramēts Of which thing was a visible testimonie which we read how that they in the primitiue church which imbraced the gospell by faith and were baptised in the name of christ or vpon whomsoeuer the hands were laid besids the inuisible grace receiued also diuerse sensible giftes of the spirite XII This vnion is the especiall ende of the gospell and Sacraments Whereuppon we do easily gather which is the principall end both of preaching the gospell and administring the Sacraments namelye this communion with christ the Sonne of God incarnate who suffered and died for vs but now raigneth in heauē and imparteth saluation and life to his chosen which communion was begonne here but was to be perfected in heauen so that we by this true reall copulatiō of our selues with his flesh blood and his whole person may also be made partakers of eternall saluation which was purchased by him and stil remaineth and
of the heauenly inheritance IX Charitie also doth spring of faith We beleeue also that of true faith springeth true charity by which it worketh and by which it sheweth how forcible it is as the Apostle saith Gal. 5.6 1. Ioh. 4.3 that the faith auaileth much in Christ which worketh by loue and Iohn affirmeth that he which loueth not Ia. 2.15.16 hath not knowne God Therefore we acknowledge not them for brethren which boast of faith when they haue not charitie X. Charitie is the gift of God And wee beleeue that the same charitie is the singular gift of God 1. Ioh. 4.18 whereby we are affectioned towards God the father and Christ our redeemer to loue them againe to glorifie them with all our hearts and inclined made proue to good will and louing kindnes aswell towards al men yea euen our enimies as especially towards the saintes and faithfull Therefore we disallow them which saye that man can of his owne naturall power loue god aboue all things For loue commeth of God 1. Ioh. 4.7 saith Iohn XI Testimonies of true charitie Neither doe we thinke that to be true and christian charitie which commeth not to that nature which the Apostle describeth in the first to the Corinthians chap. thirteen ver 4.5.6.7 namely that it suffreth long is bountifull enuieth not doeth not boast it selfe is not puffed vp doeth no vncomely thing seeketh not her owne things is not prouoked to anger thinketh not euill reioyceth not in iniquitie but reioyceth in the trueth suffereth all things and the rest which follow XII By charitie the communion with Christ and the church is nourished We beleeue that by true charitie the communion with Christ and with the church is exceedingly cherished increased and preserued in as much as loue doth vnite betweene themselues the persons louing and beloued as Iohn saith He which abideth in loue abideth in God and God in him CHAP. XVIII Of repentance ALthough that all these thinges Faith Hope and Charitie Repentance Iustification the studie of good works and of a godly life cannot indeed be separated from one another yet in as much as one of them dependeth on another they are therefore to be distinguished and each of them seuerallie to bee considered of and to bee seene what they be and what they worke And therefore wee thinke good brieflie to declare what wee thinke of them euerie one and first of repentance the continuall and inseparable companion of faith For albeit it bee daily made more perfect after iustification yet because no man is iustified without repentance and the beginning thereof goeth before iustification therefore wee haue purposed in this first place to declare what our beleefe is concerning the same I. To Justification and therefore to the communion with Christ Repentance is necessarie Wee beleeue that to the true participation of Christs righteousnesse and so to the communion with Christ repentance is very needefull whereby beeing turned from sinne and from the worlde by chaunging our mindes willes we are turned to God and are ioyned vnto him and so obtaine forgiuenesse of our sinnes in him and by him be cloathed with his righteousnesse and holinesse For the first thing that Iohn Baptist yea that Christ himself preached Mar. 14.15 was repentance for the remission of sinnes And except saith Christ yee repent Luc. 13.3.5 yee shall all likewise perish II. What we meane by the name of repentance By the name of repentance we vnderstand two things especially first an earnest griefe a true sorrow for our sinnes cōmitted against God and that not so much for the feare of punishment due to sinne as for that we haue offended God himselfe our chiefest good yea our maker and louing father and then an vnfained chaunging of our mindes hearts wills and intents and so of our whole life For this part which Christ calleth properly repentance and the Prophets a turning to God 2. Cor. 7.10 and the circumcision of the heart the Apostle teacheth to come of the former ioyning both partes together where he saith Godly sorrowe causeth repentance vnto saluation III. Repentance is the gift of God We beleeue that repentance is the gifte of God comming from his meere grace not due to any of our deserts or endeauours as the Apostle saith 2. Tim 2.25 If god at any time will giue them repentance that they may acknowledge the trueth may come to amendment out of that snare of the deuill Ier. 31.18 and the Prophet saith Turne me O Lord and I shal be turned IV. To stirre vp repentance in vs God vseth ordinarily the word of the law and the gospell and therefore the hearing of both is most necessarie in the church God accustometh for the stirring vp of repentance in vs to vse ordinarily aswell the declaration of his lawe which discouereth our sinnes and laieth open gods wrath as also the preaching of the gospel which sheweth remissiō of sinnes fauour of god in Christ euē as it manifestly appeareth to euerie godly man which readeth the holie scriptures And therfore wee iudge the declaration and hearing of them both to bee verie needefull in the church V. A summe of the doctrine of repentance euery where and alwaies necessarie to all of yeares of discretion The summe of our faith concerning repētance necessarie euerie where and at al times to all that bee of yeares of discretion is this that repentance is a chaunging of the minde and heart stirred vpp in vs through the holie ghost by the word both of the law and the gospell wherein wee greeue from our heart wee detest we lament we loath and bewaile and cōfesse before God all our sinnes euen the corruption of our nature as things vtterly repugnāt as the law teacheth to the wil of god to the cleansing whereof the death of Gods owne sonne as the gospell preacheth was needefull and doe humblie pray and intreat for pardon and forgiuenesse of the same and do earnestly resolue vpon amendment of our life and on a continuall studie and care of innocencie and christian vertues and exercise our selues in the same diligently all the dayes of our life to the glorie of God and edification of the church VI. That the vulgar or vsuall partes of poenitencie as contrition confession of sinnes and satisfaction are not simplie condemned Concerning the partes of repentance besides those which are alreadie declared wee haue not much to speake being taught by the holie scriptures that the same doth wholy and chiefly consist in an earnest mortification of the olde man and a quickening of the newe whereof the former taketh the force from the death of Christ the latter from his resurrection the holie ghost imparting them both vnto vs. Meanewhile we doe not simplie disallow that same distinction receiued and long held in the schooles of the partes of repentance into contrition confession of sinnes satisfaction namely if it bee examined
and most perfect essence in three existences or as the church vseth to speake persons Mat. 28.19 1. Ioh. 5.7 namelie subsisting of the eternall Father the eternall Sonne and the eternall holie spirite truely distinct among themselues yet without all diuision being both beginning and cause of all thinges II. That so euerieperson by it selfe is true god that yet there be not three gods For so wee doe beleeue and haue learned out of the holie scriptures that the father by himselfe is true and perfect god the Sonne by himselfe is god and the holie spirite by himselfe is god and yet that they are not manie but one onelie god Almightie Rom. 11.30 of vvhome all things by vvhome all things and for vvhome all things are III. One person to be distinct from another in personall proprieties but in essentiall they differ from euerie creature And because the holie scriptures doe so speake of god that they attribute vnto him manie proprieties both essentiall and personall and they teach that in the essentiall he differeth from all things created but in the personall one person to be distinguished frō another we therefore doe so beleeue that as to begett the Sonne is such a proprietie of the Father as can agree neither with the Sonne nor the holie spirite and againe to be begotten can agree to none but the Sonne and so of the rest so likewise to be most pure eternal immeasurable present euerie where simplie knowing all thinges simplie almightie simplie good and such like are in such sorte the verie proprieties of god that they can by no meanes bee communicated to anie creature so as it should bee good for example sake in that immeasurable goodnesse or omnipotent in the same omnipotencie that god is IIII. The essentiall proprieties in god doe not in verie deede differ from the essence For we acknowledge that in god for his singlenesse the essentiall proprieties doe not in deede differ from the essence and therfore they without this cannot be communicated to anie creature and therefore no creature can be or can be said to be for example sake omnipotent simplie iust wise or such like Euen as our Lord Iesus speaking of one proprietie Matt. 19.17 teacheth of them all saying none is good simplie but god V. That nothing is or can be made simplie such as god is vnlesse the same might simplie be god Wherefore they which will affirme that anie created substance euer could or can bee made partaker of those diuine proprieties whereby it should be such as god is as simplie omnipotent and such like they must needs then confesse that the same is or that it can be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the same substance with god for asmuch as neither the sonne himselfe is simplie omnipotent but as he is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 consubstantiall with the father nor yet the holie spirite VI. A confirmation of the former opinion Whereuppon we also vnderstand how it is that sith the sonne is no lesse omnipotent thē the father and so likewise the holie ghost yet we doe not saie that they are three almighties Atha creed but wee confesse with Athanasius and the whole church that they are one onlie almightie because indeed of them all there is but one and the selfe same substance Therefore seeing no creature hath one the selfe same essence with God but a farre other and diuerse and if the same by cōmunication of the diuine omnipotencie could also be made omnipotent then it must follow that there might be more almighties then one which wee beleeue can not without blasphemie be affirmed VII Errors Wherefore we condemne and detest all heresies which haue risen against this first article of our faith or haue sprong from hell bin condemned by the holie fathers in their lawfull councells as those of Cerin thus Ebion Valentinus Marcion Manichaeus Arius Eunomius Sabellius Praxea Fotinus and such like as Seruetus and Tritheitae also the blasphemies of Iewes and Turkes and lastlie all heresies which haue bin inuented by the diuell either against the vnitie of the diuine essence or against the true Trinitie of persons Yea and those therefore which denie either the Sonne to be true and euerlasting god or the holie ghost to be so or which do cōfound these persons and saie they bee one and the selfe same existence which for diuers respects is called by diuerse names of Father Sonne and holie Ghost We also condemne all those errors which doe seperate the essentiall proprieties of god from the diuine essence which it seemeth vnto vs that these men verie vnaduisedlie doe which teach that those essentiall proprieties in verie deed may be communicated or rather at already cōmunicated to creatures without cōmunication of the essence CHAP. III. Of the foreknowledge and praedestination of god I. God did foreknovv and foresee all thinges from the beginning WE beleeue that God before he made the worlde euen then from before all things by his immeasurable wisedome foreknew all things yea and what good he ment himselfe to doe and what ill he meant to suffer to be done so farr forth as nothing was euer hidden or could be hidden from him but all things aswel what hath bin done is done or shall be done as what cā be done though it neuer be done Heb. 4.13 Act. 15.18 wee doubt not but hath and doth lye open and manifest all waies in his sight II. God hath determined all things in his eternall counsell and hath before hand ordayned them to the best ends And we beleeue that God hath not onely foreseene all things and that they are present in his sight Act. 4.28 but also in that his most wise and eternall counsell he hath certenly established whatsoeuer did or doeth appertaine to the creation and gouernement of the world or to the selecting of his church from the vncleane filth of other people or to our redemption and eternall saluation and that he ordained through his infinite goodnesse that those euills which in his wisedome he would suffer to be done should bee to good endes so that not one haire can fall from our head Mat. 10.29.30 without the will of the Father or without cause III. All men to be praedestinate some to life and some to death Wherefore we also doubt not that God when he created all men to speake nothing of Angells in Adam righteous he foresawe that in him all should sinne and elected some in Christ Eph. 1.4.5 that they should be holiē and vndefiled in his sight in charitie and therefore predestinated them of his meere grace and according to the purpose of his will Rom. 9.22 to eternall life other some he would not vouchsafe that grace and therefore prepared them as vessells of wrath for destructiō because of his iustiudgement that in the one sort his infinite mercie in the other his iustice might bee knowne to the whole world to his great glorie IIII. The
true and liuely picture of the image of God to vvhich man vvas created vvhereby vvee are instructed vvhat vvee vvere vvhat vvee are vvhat vve ought to bee and in deede vvhat vvee shall be if vve trust in Christ IV. The summe of the law to bee restrained to the loue of God and our neighbour Novv vve beleeue and confesse that Christ did teach Mat. 22.37 that the summe or substance of the vvhole lavv is cōtained in these two precepts Thou shalt loue the Lord thy God with all thy heart withall thy minde withall thy soule and vvithall thy strength thou shalt loue thy neighbour as thy self the first of these is the summe of the first table the other the summe of the second table V. If God alone bee to be loued with the whole heart he alone is to be worshipped And if the summe of the first table which containeth the whole worship due vnto God doe consist in the perfect loue of God alone from hence besides other expresse commandements of God declaring this commandement we gather and we beleeue that God alone is to bee adored inuocated and serued with a religious worshipp and that wee must sweare onelie by his name because these bee all contained within that commaundement of louing God with all our heart to let passe that the image of God whereof this lawe is a type did teach Adam the same thing VI. That our verie concupiscence and corruption of nature is a sinne But if by Gods law be condemned whatsoeuer offence is repugnant to that first image of God that is to iustice holinesse and righteousnes wherein man was created we hold that in man not onely his actions committed with cōsent of his will against the law of god but euen the motions also of lust yea the concupiscence it selfe and the whole corruption of his nature is sinne Rom. 7 7 and by the lawe of God condemned because it is repugnant to that vprightnes and iustice wherein man was creted and wherein he ought and might haue kept himselfe if he would VII Although the law cannot bee obserued yet it was not giuen in vaine nor vnprofitablie And although the law of God be so perfect Rom. 7.101 8.3 that it neuer could or can be obserued of anie man either all or alwaies or in such measure as it ought yet we beleeue that it was not giuen in vaine nor vnprofitablie sith God doth not anie thing in vaine but all things with his exceeding high wisedome to his owne glorie and to our profit and saluation VIII A threefold profit by the law of God First by the perfect declaration of the will of God by this law men might and may better vnderstand what was pleasing vnto god what was good and what ill what was to bee done and what to be auoided then by the onely reliques of the law of nature remaining in mans minde and therefore all cloake of ignorance being cleane taken awaye the Iewes were made more inexcusable then other nations if they kept not the law which thing falls out greatlie to the glorie of God sith men do therby vnderstand that his iudgements towards vs are verie iust Furthermore by the curses which are added against the transgressors and the blessings for the obseruers men were restrained by feare of those as it were with a bridle from committing sinne and by hope of these as it were with a spurre were stirred vp to keep the law if not wholly and perfectlie yet in part and for the externall obseruances and so might bee the better held within their dueties which how profitable it is not onely to a whole common wealth but to euerie particular man so bearing himselfe none can be ignorant Last of all by that that men saw by dailie experience how they continually sinned against this so perfect a law and perceiued that they were not able to obserue it as it ought to be and so that they were dailie more and more in daunger of Gods wrath guiltie of eternall death It came to passe that distrusting themselues their owne strēgth they grew to haue a greater and earnester desire of the promised Sauiour and redeemer And therfore how much the more they knew their sinnes by the law and their weakenes more sensiblie felt the wrath of God so much the more greedilie did they hunger and thirst after righteousnesse and were disposed and prepared to take holde on Christ by faith so that verie true were both those sayings of the Apostle by the lawe is the knowledge of sinne Rom. 2.20 Gal. 3.24 and the law was a schoolemaister vnto Christ IX The lavv hath still the same vse yea euen in men regenerate And we beleeue that these vses of the law are perpetuall as long as wee remaine in this world not onely in men not regenerate as it said but also in the verie regenerate For sith our mindes are still blinded with much darknesse and our memorie so slipperie that wee can neither perfectlie vnderstand the thinges that are of god nor keep in minde that which we haue vnderstood we haue euermore need of this glasse of the diuine lawe wherein wee may dailie behold and still more certainelie vnderstād what god will haue vs to do Moreouer sith our heart is not yet perfectly cleansed from all corruption that it can bee fullie setled vppon doing the will of God but that the flesh still wrastleth against the spirite Gal. 5.17 therefore the law is most necessarie which may terrifie vs with the threatninges and hold vs in from offending and with the promises may stirre vs forward to obedience and to the working of righteousnesse Lastlie sith there is none so holie which sinneth not manie waies 1. Ioh. 1.8 which hath not sinne dwelling in him whereby wee bee made weake vnto goodnesse and prone to ill Therefore the lawe is proffitable vnto vs by which our sinnes and infirmities being made knowne to vs wee may dailie more and more acknowledge how impossible it is that we by our owne works should at anie time bee iustified or saued and therefore should bee filled with the greater desire hunger and thirst of the righteousnesse of Christ and embrace him by faith And thus the law when it can neuer iustifie vs yet it may alwaies drawe vs neerer vnto Christ who iustifieth more and more to be iustified X. The morall lawe touching the substance vvas not to be disanulled by Christ For we knovve and beleeue that the lawe touching the substance and those wholesome vses of which we speake was not to be abolished by Christ and so not abolished at all but onelie touching the curse and condemnation because there is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Iesus Rom. 8.1 which walke not after the flesh but after the spirite But yet the law was proffitable euen in the condemnation and alwaies is to them which are not yet in Christ in as much as it driueth them to Christ
laid vp in him requireth onely these three things First that being touched with an earnest griefe of our whole life ledd amisse wee might desire from our heart to haue our mindes and so all our affections chaunged renued into the obedience of the diuine will and that we might earnestly pray and doe our best endeuour that it might be so Secondlie that imbracing Christ by a true faith withall his treasures wee might beleeue firmely and without any wauering that all our sinnes are for euer pardoned of the fauour and mercie of god through Christ alone and we receiued into grace made the children of God and heires of euerlasting life Lastly that beeing thus perswaded of the free and eternall saluation through Iesus Christ wee should thence foreward labour by all meanes to obserue whatsoeuer Christ hath commaunded to the glorie of God and profite of our neighbour so as faith do euermore accompanie vs to the ende whereby we beleeue that howsoeuer in this new obedience we err or do offend yet for Christs sake it shall not be imputed to vs but contrariewise by the perfect obedience iustice and holinesse of christ imputed vnto vs our imperfect obedience shal be perfected and shal be taken and reputed for most perfect in the sight of God And to three thinges are all the preceptes of christ referred namely that renouncing all vngodlines worldly desires wee should liue in this world in respect of our selues soberlie in respect of our neighbour iustly in respect of God godlie Tit. 2.12 looking for that blessed hope and the comming of the glorie of the great God This wee beleeue to bee the summe of those thinges which christ requireth of vs in the doctrine of the gospell and therefore that they bee true gospellers and christians indeede that bende their whole studie and care hereunto VII Jn what thinges especially the Gospell differeth from the Law And nowe of that which is alreadie saide it appeareth that we do not confound the Law with the Gospell For albeit wee confesse that God is author aswel of the Law as of the gospell and that of it selfe it is as well holie iust Exo. 20 and good as the gospell Rom. 7.12 yet we hold that ther is no smale difference betwixt them both not onely because the Lawe was deliuered to the Israelites alone and the gospell pertaineth to al people and nations and also not onely because that was for a time and to continue but till christ and the gospell is euerlasting and also not onely because that was deliuered by Moses and declared by the Prophets and the gospell was brought by christ and published to the whole world by the Apostles But indeed and most especially for these causes First because the matter of the law is onely commandementes with irreuocable curses thereunto ioyned if they bee broken neuer so little It hath also promises not onely of earthlie but also of heauenly blessings but al of them with the condition of perfect obedience and none merely free But the gospell is properly a happie message setting before vs gratis christ the redeemer forgiuing sinnes and sauing vs yea and requiring nothing at our handes for the obtaining of life euerlasting but a true faith in christ which faith cannot bee without true repentance nor without a care to doe the will of God that is to liue so berly iustly and godly as is aboue declared Moreouer because the law did not performe that which it required nether had it power whereby to saue therefore was vnsufficient and a killing letter the minister of wrath and death more prouoking then taking away sin But the Gospell what it requireth the same it performeth and therefore whatsoeuer it offereth the same also it truely imparteth vnto vs For as much as the holy ghost is by it powerful in the elect at the preaching of the Gospell stirring vp in them that true faith wherby they apprehend christ offred and with him eternall life For faith is by hearing of the Gospell Rom. 10.17 but obedience is not by hearing of the Lawe because the holie spirite giueth no man strength to the hearing of the Lawe by which hee might obserue the same as he stirreth vp faith in the elect to the hearing of the gospell For which cause as the Lawe is called a killing letter so is the Gospell called a quickning spirite and therefore is a true and forcible instrument to saluation vnto euerie beleeuer Whereon also followeth the third difference namely that the Law was not written in their hearts but remained written onely in tables and therfore did not chaunge men But the Gospell is written by the holie ghost in the hearts of the elect therefore it chaungeth and renueth them 2. Cor. 3.18 because it is the instrument of the holie ghost to sanctifie and to saue vs. VIII The Law of Moses is partly taken away and partly not taken away by the Gospell Of this which we haue said it also plainelie appeareth what our faith is of the abrogation of the law by the gospell First wee beleeue that in the gospell so farre forth as it declareth all things which in the old Testament did figuratiuely foreshew of Christ to bee fullfilled in this Iesus as is saide before in the 11. chapter we are taught that the law of Moses concerning cerimonies sacrifices and all Moses outward worship are simply abrogated according to that saying of the Apostle Heb. 9.10 Ioh. 1.17 that all these things vvere inioyned vntill the time of reformation and that The Law was giuen by Moses but the trueth came by Jesus Christ Moreouer so farre forth as the gospell is the instrument of the holy spirit whereby we are ingrafted and vnited to Christ made partakers of redēption and saluation as is said before in the 12. chapter So far also we confesse that the morall law touching the cursse against the transgressors is abrogated by the gospell of Christ according to that of the Apostle Rom. 8.1 There is no condēnation to them that are in Iesus Christ where of this is a token that they walke not after the flesh but after the spirit But now so farre forth as the doctrine of the Gospell requireth our repentance and the holinesse of life and that we liue soberly righteously and godly therein it taketh not away the law concerning māners for it is wholy consonant and agreeable with the doctrine of the gospel of eschewing vices and following vertue Lastlye in as much as Christ in his gospel did not take away the politicke lawes of the nations which were not contrarie to the law of nature Therefore wee thinke it lawfull and free for any gouernors to bringe among their subiectes such politick lawes as were deliuered to the people of Israell and by the same then which none are more iust to rule and gouerne the people Therefore they do exceeding great iniurie to the Gospell of Christ that saye it troubleth or
commaundeth to be performed faithfully and prudently by the other faculties of the minde and instruments of the body Vpon the 19. chap. Of iustification Aphorisme 6. Whereas I so expounded that place concerning the faith of Abraham out of the 15 of Genesis and the 4. to the Rom. as I saide that that same thing was imputed vnto him for righteousnes which hee beleeued concerning Christ the promised seede I did it rather respecting the matter it selfe then the bare word of faith For I was not ignorāt that both Moses and Paule spake of the faith of Abraham that this faith was imputed to him for righteousnes seing the Apostle manifestly gathering a general doctrine from the example of Abraham adioyneth these wordes But to him that vvorketh not but beleeueth in him that instifieth the vngodlie his faith is counted for righteousnes that is hee is therefore accompted iust with God because he beleeueth in him which iustifieth the vngodlie by which place it most plainelie appeareth that from the true iustification of vs are excluded our owne works and that it is whollie ascribed to onely faith aswell touching the ende as touching the beginning But when the question is asked what cause there is why iustification should be attributed to faith and not to the works thereof it is wōt to be aunswered and that both well and truely because faith not the works thereof doth apprehend remission of sinnes and Christ our righteousnes For by it we are not iustified in respect that it is a worke but in respect that Christ is apprehēded by it by the righteousnes of whom alone being imputed vnto vs we are properlie reputed iust before God and this is that which some say how faith iustifieth not in respect of it selfe but in respect of the obiect which it taketh hold on Thus is it manifest that it is true which I saide how that was properlie imputed vnto Abraham for righteousnes for that hee beleeued God concerning Christ namelie that in him all nations should be blessed and therefore Abraham himselfe also Likewise in the last aphorisme Neither deo wee allow of those which set our iustificatiō in the only remission of sinnes denying the imputation of the iustice and obedience of Christ which we thinke to be repugnant to the Scriptures Esay 7. Achild is giuen vnto vs c Whatsoeuer therefore he did or hath it is wholly ours Rom. 5. As by one mans disobedience many were made sinners so by the obedience of one many shal bee made righteous The disobedience of Adam was the breaking of Gods commaundement therefore the obedience of Christ cōsisteth not onely in his death but also in his whole former keeping of the law Likewise the disobedience of Adam was whollie imputed to vs why not then also Christs whole obedience Also wee are two manner of wayes made sinners by Adams disobedience namelie by imputation of his transgression and by the reall deriuation of sinne that is of concupiscence into vs. Why then should we not thinke the same of Christ The vertue of his obedience to the commaundements of God the father is truely communicated vnto vs so that wee also begine to obey Gods law What lets then why wee may not say that his whole obedience is imputed vnto vs 1. Cor. 1. He is made vnto vs of God wisedome and righteousnes and sanctification and redēption Phil. 2. He became obedient vnto death for which humbling of himselfe and obedience euen vnto death God hath highlie exalted him and in him vs c. He hath deserued by his obedience eternall glorie for himselfe vs as al the schoolemen and fathers do teach Therefore his obedience also to the law is imputed vnto vs for righteousnes Gal. 4. He was made subiect to the law that hee might redeeme those vvhich were vnder the lavve Therefore he kept the law for vs and for our saluation The testimonies of the fathers and also of the learned men of this age for breuitie sake we ouerpasse To conclude we beleeue concerning Christ that as for vs men and for our saluation hee came downe from heauen and was incarnate so also for the same cause he kept the law and did all the other things Vppon the 25. chapter Aphor. 10. and 11.12 When I write this cōfession of saith I write euerie thing vppon a good conscience and as I beleeued so I spake freelie as the holie scriptures doe teach that wee ought to doe My faith is grounded simplie and principallie on the word of God and next somewhat vpon the common cōsent of the whole auncient catholicke church if it doe not gainsaye the holie Scriptures For I beleeue that the thinges which were decreed and receiued of the fathers by common consent of them all gathered together in the name of the Lord without anie contradiction of holie Scriptures that they also though they bee not of equall authoritie with the Scriptures come from the holie ghost Hereupon it is that the thinges which are of this sorte I neither will nor dare disprooue with a good conscience And what is more certaine out of the histories the councells and writings of all the fathers then that those orders of ministers of which wee spake were ordained and receiued in the church by common consent of all the whole christian common wealth And who om I that I should disprooue that which the whole church hath approoued Neither haue all the learned men of this age dared to disprooue the same as knowing both that the church might lawfullie doe so and that all those thinges were ordained and done vppon a godlie purpose and to excellent good endes for edification of Gods children For confirmation sake hereof I haue thought good here to insert that which Martin Bucer of godlie memorie a man both for life and learning most famous hath left written concerning those matters vpon the Epistle to the Ephesians The ministerie of the worde being performed by reading and rehearsing the diuine Scriptures by interpretation and exposition of the same and with exhortations takē there out and also by rehearsall and catechisme which is done by mutuall questions and aunswers of the yong beginner and the catechizer and also by holie conferences and deciding of the hard questions about religion according to this manifold dispensation of wholesome doctrine there are also manie dueties in this function For whatsoeuer belōgeth to the perfectest manner of teaching is with an especiall care to bee vsed in the ministerie of the doctrine of saluation because indeed it ought to be deliuered as a knowledge both of all other most diuine and of all most difficult namelie that he which is man should liue according to God Now they which do teach diligently the artes as they are contained in certen knowne books as if they meane to teach mathematicall principles out of Euclide first of all they will reade and rehearse the same booke by and by they will expound the seuerall words such as euerie one knowes
is true God and the same true man existing vnspeakably of two natures vnited together in one person in the virgines wombe which natures seing that in this wonderfull covnion they are not abolished in him to shew a plaine extance and appearance of the proprietie of them both in himselfe being one he did and spake thinges belonging to both not deuiding the wordes nor parting the aspects nor seperating his deeds but he himself being one speaking and doing in himself and by both that which was agreeable and was proper to both natures And to make it more plaine which we haue said let vs vse an example as thus I my selfe am hee which with my bodilie eyes doe behold a white colour or a blacke and againe I am hee which by sight of my minde doe iudge of the euill of iniquitie and the good of righteousnesse yet notwithstāding I am not now diuers persons because I doe both these in a diuerse respect For I doe not see the difference of coulours with the same eyes with which I see the diuersitie of speaches and yet I am the verie same which doe this both the wayes both are in me not to see righteousnesse but onely with the eyes of my minde and it is in me not to see colours but onely with the eyes of my flesh and it is in me not to heare wordes with my eyes and in me not to see light with my eares in me not to iudge of tastes with my nose and in me not to perceiue smelling at my mouth And whereas it is wholly mine owne proprietie in my selfe to see to heare to smel to taste and yet it is one thing in me whereby I see another whereby I heare another wherby I taste or smell and all this being in me wholly and yet in a certaine priuate respect deuided and diuers I my selfe notwithstāding cannot be deuided or seperated So therefore Christ himselfe also being one and the same created and not created hauing beginning being without beginning growing in age vnderstanding and receiuing no increase of age and vnderstanding suffering death not yeelding to the lawes of death receiuing honor for his desert yet hauing need of no mās honor and al these things being diuers in him yet are meerely proper vnto himselfe And therfore he diuideth not in himself the words affects and deedes agreeable both wayes in himselfe because both are properly his owne yet hauing one proprietie by the nature of the word which remaining God he lost not and another by the nature of the flesh which being made man hee receiued Wee will yet speake more to confirme more plainely this one nature for their sakes which through their vnsaide skilfullnesse not vnderstanding the proprietie and communion of the natures howe it is said to be in Christ do abuse and vtterly refuse the same words It is diuerse and another thing not to haue beginning and to subsist by a beginning to die and not to bee able to suffer yet as they are both proper vnto Christ so are they both common not vnto him but in him For if wee say common vnto him we must needs bee vrged and driuen to giue and shew some other with whom the same should be common vnto him which necessity of instance cannot but incline to the impious opinion of Nestorius We therfore better and more catholically saye it is common in him and not to him and so wee say better it is proper to him and not in him Therefore it is proper to him to dye by the nature of his flesh which is mortall and it is proper to him not to dye by the nature of the vvord which cannot dye Likewise by that vnspeakable misterie of the vnion of both the natures the mortallitie of the flesh was common in him to the nature of the vvord which could not dye and the immortalitie of the vvorde was common in him to the nature of the flesh which yeelded to death Therefore as it is proper vnto him in respect of both natures to dye and not to dye so it is common in him in both natures to doe that which is their proprietie and as I maye for example sake say it is proper to me to carry the marke of the blacknesse of a stroakein my bodie by the nature of my flesh so it is proper to me to carrie the stripe of a word that is of some hard speach in my minde by the nature of my soule and it is also proper to me not to carrie the same stripe of wordes in my bodie by the nature of my flesh And sith both these are proper to me and both of them different from my bodie and from my soule because neither my bodie vnderstandeth anie hard or any pleasing speaches neither can my soule be made blacke by the stroake of a whipp yet both these are common in my selfe both to my soule and to my body because neither my soule placed out of my bodie doth feele that which is proper to it to feele nor my bodie without the companie of my soule can carrie the marks of the blowes That therefore which is proper vnto me in either of them and yer different from neither of them that is common in my whole selfe to either of them which is proper to either of them And yet I am the verie same in them both being both of them common in me and I am the very same in either of them being both proper to me This saith Vigilius What can more fittly be said for the deciding of this present controuersie of the reall communication of the proprieties For this whole treatise of Vigilius is resolued into these speciall propositions pertaining to our cause For setting first downe a rule of the catholicke faith which in the text is marked with the letter A then from the same hee draweth certaine positions by which he manifestly confuteth the heresie of Eutyches The summe of that rule of faith is this that one and the same Christ is God and man both natures are kept whole in him Out of this rule Vigilius gathered these positions 1 The Lord Iesus Christ is the same true God and the same true man The reason for he existeth of two natures the diuine and the humaine vnspeakablie ioyned and vnited together in one person and that in the virgins wombe This is against Nestorius against Eutyches is added another position 2 These natures in that wonderfull covnion are not abolished in Christ The confirmation followeth by the life of Christ because the Lord Iesus both by his sayings and deeds did shew that the proprieties of both the natures remained safe and whole in him therefore he addeth 3 To she we an extancie that is an existence of the proprieties of them both in himselfe being one namely that the proprieties of both the natures did exist distinct in him he spake and did things of both natures himselfe being one This is also against Eutyches But how namely so that