sonne who is of his owne nature and essence euen bone of his bone flesh of his flesh and bloud of his bloud who is a liuely picture yea a liuing image of his owne person representing after a most plaine manner his stature forme beauty strength complexion behauiour and conditions yea who doth raigne ioyntly and equally with him being partaker of his riches treasures glory maiesty power office and authority This death of this prince being decreed by the king his father it is needfull that for the suffering of the course of the law together with the sentence and punishment of death he should debase him to the condition of a subiect yet retaining the aforesaid prerogatiues So that there is in one person the condition and as it were the nature both of a king of a subiect the one maketh that he may be put to death the other maketh that this death tho it be the death but of one person is more then a sufficient ransom for the offence of ten thousand of his subiectes as the people of Israell doe confesse 2. Sam. 21. 17. That it were much better that ten thousand of themselues should perish then that King Dauid whome they call the light that is all the glory of Israell shoulde be in danger of death In like manner there was no way whereby God the glorious monarch of heauen and earth could preserue both his owne iustice and man but that he should giue his owne onely naturall and eternall sonne the brightnesse of his glory the expresse forme and charecter of his Godhead beeing partaker of his owne essence glory maiestie power authority wisedome iustice mercy and in breife of his whole diuine nature to be a ransome for the sinne of man For the which purpose it was needful that he should to his kingly and diuine estate take vnto himselfe the base condition of a subiect and creature and in that condition submit himselfe to the law of God and to the sentence of death pronounced by God the father as by a most iust seuere and righteous iudge By faith in this death of the sonne of God saluation is brought to mankind For it freeth the beleeuer from all manner of guilt of sin whether original or actual whether past present or to come And further as this mediator doth redeeme vs from death and indue vs with perfect righteousnesse by his death so by the vertue of the holy spirit proceeding from his diuine nature the beleeuer is endued although not at the first with perfect holinesse and preserued for euer from falling from this estate Thus wee haue summarily declared the doctrine of fayth as it hath beene published to the worlde by the ministery of the Apostles whose doctrine we doe hartely embrace and openly confesse professing that there is no other name meanes nor mediatour in heauen or earth which can giue saluation then Iesus the sonne of Mary Now that we see what is the obiect of this iustifying fayth we are in the next place to gather out of this doctrine the difference betwixt legall and euangelicall fayth betwixt that fayth wherewith Adam was indued in the state of innocencie that which hath place in this state of regeneration Both kindes are affiance in god for happinesse to be had by the meanes of perfect holynesse but the first kynde looketh directly on the godheade without any mediation the second beholdeth the godheade through the humanitie of Christ as through a vaile or couering for man being now polluted with sinne dare not looke on god without a mediatour as he did before the fall Secondly euangelicall fayth coÌ„teineth in it forgiuenes of sin which was not in the first estate Thirdly the righteousnesse whereby legall fayth trusteth for happinesse is naturall to man inherent in the person of man and his owne but the righteousnesse of the other kynde is borrowed from an other The first kinde maketh man trust in himselfe but the secoÌ„d maketh him to renounce him selfe and to fly to Christ for righteousnesse The first kinde relyeth it selfe on the equity and iustice of god the which rewardeth the righteousnesse of the creature with life But the other flyeth to his loue and mercy in Christ the which pardoneth and saueth a sinner Rom. 4. 5. Legall fayth cannot of it selfe iustify a man it being but one part of mans holynesse called by the diuines Sanctitas Fiduciae that is the holynesse of the affectioÌ„ of trust or coÌ„fideÌ„ce or a holy confidence besides the which there is required for perfect holynesse the holynesse of hope of loue of feare of reuerence and of all the affections yea the holynesse of the will and of the mynde and to be shorte the holynesse of the wholle nature and of all the actions of man so that if we should suppose that Adam did euen in the very moment of sinning and also after he had transgressed gods commaundement still retaine this part of his holinesse to wit affiance in god yet we coulde not thinke that he did continue in the state of life which is lost by one sinne but not kept by one part of holynesse But it is farre otherwise with this euangelical fayth the which although in the owne nature it be but the holynesse of one affection namelie of confidence or affiance as legall fayth is yet it bringeth with it perfect righteousnesse or iustice making the righteousnes of Christes death to belong to the beleeuer In the which respect it is called iustifying fayth not that â—his fayth can be without some measure of â—he other parts of holynesse or giue the possession of eternall glory without perfect â—olynesse but that in the matter of our iuâ—â—ification onely faith hath force in so much â—hat he who beleeueth in the last moment â—f his life as the theefe on the crosse did Luc. â—3 42. hauing neither time to doe any one â—ood worke nor yet strength to speake one â—ood worde or yet almost to thinke a good â—ought is as surely and as fully purged â—â—om all his sinnes as he who hath liued a â—ousand yeares in the greatest measure fayth godlynesse zeale loue patience soâ—ietie chastitie humilitie and of all other â—â—rituall graces whereunto any man can atâ—â—ne in this life For inherent holynesse comâ—only called sanctification be it neuer so â—at is imperfect and therefore as little auailable for our iustification as if it were none at all For imperfect holines doth no more iustify then no holinesse doth neither is there any other account made of it before the iudgment seat of God in the matter of our iustification howsoeuer there be necessary vse of sanctification for saluation as we are hereafter to consider And yet although this one part of mans holynesse doe serue for our iustification we are not thereof to gather that we are saued by it as a parte of inherent holynesse for faith doth not iustifie vs as it is a parte of holynesse but because this affection hath by the
goodnesse of God decreeing mans saluation by this meanes this naturall propertie or qualitie to appropriate to a man Christ with his righteousnesse Lastly the first kind is easie to be had and attained vnto by supposition of perfect inherent holynesse it being agreeable to naturall reason yea there being some reliques of it in the gentils themselues who know good euil and also that the punishmeÌ„t of death is due to the one the reâ—ward of happines appointed for the other Bâ— Euangelicall fayth is supernaturall yea it contrarie to our naturall disposition and câ—â— not be attained vnto without the mighty â—â—peration of the spirite of God whereof herâ—â—after This wholle doctrine may be gathered into one summe or definition in this manner Euangelicall fayth is affiaunce in Gods promises propounding eternall saluation to all those who rely themselues wholly on the mercy of God in Christ. Or more briefly thus It is affiaunce in Christ for happines Or thus It is trust or confidence in Christ whereby his death and the righteousnesse arising thereof are appropriated to the beleeuer Nowe we are out of the seuerall parts of these definitions to search out more particularly the true nature of faith to what kynd or head it is to be referred whether it be a part of regeneration and sanctification or something diuerse from both these Secondlie what is the place and subiect of it whether the minde the wil or the affections Thirdly by what meanes it may be wrought and attained Fourthly by what signes and markes it may be knowen Fiftly whether it may be lost or no. Lastly howe it hath this force that it is of it selfe able to iustifie and to saue a man For the first Regeneration and sanctification or the newe creature or recreated holynesse or thus The newe man and holynesse signifie all one thing to wit regenerate sanctitie or in plaine English renewed holynesse so that faith if it be a part of the newe man it is a part of regeneration and of holynesse and contrariwise if it be a part of mans holinesse it is a part of regeneration of the newe man and of the newe creature That it is a part of mans holynesse we cannot doubt seeing it is a holy affection euen the affiaunce and confidence of the heart relying it selfe on God the which affection was also in Adam and therefore it is a part of regeneration and of the newe man For although there be great difference betwixt legal and euangelical faith as touching the meanes of saluation the which is in the one the iustice of God in the other his mercy yet both of them are to be referred to the same heade of mans holynesse Legall faith being a part of the created holynesse of man as Euangelicall faith is a part of his regenerated or recreated holynesse The truth hereof may easely be gathered out of the section written of faith in generall for Legall and Euangelicall faith agree in a common definition and in all those points which are there mentioned The which doth also shew vs what to thinke of the subiect of faith to wit that it is in the will of man being nothing but a holy affection of confidence trust or affiaunce If it be obiected that faith is vsually in the scripture called beleefe as infidelity is vnbeleife the which is an action not of the will but of the minde giuing assent or dissent to the worde of God we answere that beleife is put for faith or affiaunce because it doth alwayes not onely accompany it but also after a sorte beget it and is the cause of it For when as a man doth without doubting beleeue Gods promises being fully perswaded of the trueth of them he cannot choose but rely himselfe vpon them so that beleife although it cannot be separated from faith yet it may and ought to be distinguished from it If it be obiected that Euangelicall fayth cannot be made a parte of mans holynesse seeing it is not commaunded in the morall law we answere that it is commaunded in the morall law as the other kind is in that it is all one in substance with naturall faith both kindes being affiaunce in God for happinesse to be attained by the meanes of perfect holynesse and therefore both kindes are commanded in the first coÌ„maundement Iehoua shall be thy God the which law doth enioyne that all the affections of man to wit his loue feare hope reuerence and with the rest his whole affiaunce or confidence be set whollie oâ— God as well after his fall to be saued by the mercy of God in Christ as in the state of innocencie to be saued by his owne righteousnesse Yea this first precept commaundeth al men to beleeue God in his word as wel in his Gospell as in his lawe and therefore whosoeuer doth not knowe beleeue and imbrace the Gospell he doth transgresse this first commandement In the third place we are to coÌ„sider that the meanes of attaining faith is to get the knowledge of the worde of God first of the lawe which shewing sinne death and damnation doth bruse and wound the harte and secondly of the gospell which teaching faith righteousnesse saluation healeth the aforesaide woundes and comforteth the sinner with pardon of his sinne and hope of eternall life This knowledge must of necessitie goe before faith for the minde of a man must be inlightned to see the trueth before the hart and affections can loue and embrace it The meanes which God doth ordinarilie vse in bringing men to knowe his wil is the publick ministery of the word performed by men indued with spirituall gifts fit for this purpose yet as hath bene said of regeneration so we are to thinke of faith all other spirituall graces that they come not by vertue of the meanes but by the power and worke of Gods spirit without the which it is impossible that any man shoulde vnderstand beleeue and imbrace the doctrine of the Gospell But howe commeth it to passe that man being a reasonable creature indued with an vnderstanding soule whereby he is able not onely to conceiue any thing that is taught but also him selfe to inuent new things not heard of before shoulde be so brutishe and blockish in learning the worde of God We answere that this commeth of the nature of the doctrine of the gospell the which being contrary to mans reason cannot be conceaued by it Yea as soone as it is hard it is straight way reiected as absurde ridiculous and foolishe so we reade 1. Cor. 2. 14. The naturall man perceiueth not the things of GOD for they seeme foolishnesse vnto him neither can he perceiue them because they are spiritually discerned Thus to make instance in one point of this doctrine to wit in the resurrection from death we see Act. 17. 32. that when the wise philosophers and men of Athens harde Paul mention it they mocked him And so we are to thinke of the cheife pointes of 〈◊〉 religion For
in the minde knowledge being put for affiaunce as the cause is often put for the effect Thus Coll. 2. 2. Faith is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the full assurance and certaine preswasion of the vnderstanding and so throughout the wholle scripture faith is made nothing else but beleefe and to haue faith nothing but to beleeue that the worde promises and threatnings of GOD are true But in trueth to make vp the full nature of fayth there must be added to this action of the minde an action of the heart and will to wit affiaunce We confesse that there is a kinde of faith which is a meere perswasion of the minde as namelie that which is called the fayth of miracles whereby a man being perswaded of the power and will of GOD for the effecting of strange thinges doth by vertue of that knowledge worke miracles but this fayth doth not concerne the saluation of man and therefore doth not belong to our purpose In the second place the definition giueth vs to vnderstand that the obiect or thing whereat fayth aimeth and where about it is conuersant is not anie particular blessing or good whatsoeuer but full and perfect happinesse which containeth in it all graces blessings pleasures and ioyes whatsoeuer doe anie waie make for the good and excellent estate of man Likewise the promises of GOD whereon faith relieth are those which are made concerning happinesse Yet sometimes it pleaseth GOD to make some one particular and temporarie blessing a signe and pledge of eternall and vniuersall happinesse and then the faith of the beleeuer relieth it selfe first and immediatly vppon the saide particular promise and on the blessing therein contained but it doth not rest there but through that particular obiect doth see and take holde of eternall happinesse Thus GOD promised to Abraham being nowe stricken in yeares a sonne this promise Abraham did fully apprehende by faith and by this meanes became happie and was accounted iust before GOD. Rom. 4. 22. Abraham beleeued God promising a sonne vnto him this his particular faith was accounted to him for righteousnesse for that in that one blessing he saw the infinite treasures of Gods mercy loue and bountie propounded vnto him Although we might answere another way saying that the obiect of Abrahams faith was not onely Isaac but also Christ the sauiour of the worlde who was to come of Isaac and to make all the nations of the earth happie Likewise Math. 9. The man sicke of a palsey vnder his bodily and temporarie health looked for eternall saluation as Christ the searcher of the harte doth witnesse saying to him thy fayth hath saued and purchased to thee thy former health withall pardon of sinnes vvhich is euerlasting happinesse Heereof ariseth a third point to be considered to vvit that this faith doth after a speciall manner both tie man to God and so bring forth all the rest of the partes of holinesse for as this is ingrafted into the nature of all liuing creatures to preserue themselues in a good estate so especially those vvhich are indued vvith reason namely Angels and men as soone as the exist they do in the first place bend all the force of their mindes to seeke out some meanes of continuing and increasing their ovvne happinesse The meanes vvhich doe in this consideration offer themselues are of tvvo sorts the first is the onely true meanes euen God the fountaine of all happines on whose word promises made touching their happy estate they by faith depend and rely themselues and so they are ioyned to God for euer The other means is the creature it selfe trusting not in God but in it selfe vvhereof hereafter Thus faith in that it ioyneth vs to God it conueyeth from God to vs as all happinesse so also all spirituall graces and holinesse the meanes of happinesse in the vvhich respect it may be called the fountaine of all the holinesse follovving euen as vvhen vvater is brought from a fountaine or spring to any place somewhat distant by pipes of wood lead or clay the first pipe which ioyneth all the rest to the fountaine may be said to giue the water to the rest so doth faith conuey the graces following to vs and that both by the immediate extraordinary blessing of God who multiplieth his graces vpon the creature cleauing vnto him in ful affiance as men vsually giue howses land and all thinges needful to those that rely themselues vpon them as also by meanes inherent in the reasonable creature the which loueth honoureth and serueth God not for nought but as the giuer of all happinesse and so doe all the rest of the affections and faculties of mans soule follow both that light of the minde which faith bringeth with it or rather which bringeth forth faith commonly called beliefe and also faith it selfe The last words of the definition which mentiō the perfect holines of man giue vs to vnderstād that the only means of being happy is to be first perfectly holy as hath been heretofore often declared Thus much of the generall doctrine of faith now we come to the kinds of faith the which are two in number the first is the faith of the first estate to wit that wherewith Adam was indued in his creation the second is the faith of the third estate to wit that wherof all the regenerate are made partakers so that the first is a created the second a recreated faith The which two kindes as they do agree in all those pointes which haue beene declared in the former section so they differ in that which followeth The difference ariseth of the diuers kinds of that perfect holines which is mentioned in the generall definition of faith For the faith of the first estate looketh for happinesse by righteousnes inherent in the person of the beleeuer and by his own natural holines but the faith of the third estate maketh men happy by imputed righteousnes supernatural holines The cause of this difference is this God created man perfectly holy therefore he might wel looke that he should retaine that holines which was bestowed vpō him but man by his fal lost his holines therefore being now sinful vnrighteous must in this third state cloth himself with the righteousnes of some other So that in both states perfit holines is the means of attaining happines but in the first state this holines is inherent in Adams person in the second it is had from another And therefore the first kind of faith is to be defined affiance in Gods promises propounding happines to the natural proper or inherent holines of the reasonable creature whether man or Angell This faith is vsually called legall faith although not properly seing that this name agreeth also to the euangelical faith the which doth require perfect obediēce the absolute fulfilling of the morall lawe for whosoeuer beleeueth in Christ fulfilleth the lawe and hath legall iustice by the death of Christ
which he did enioy whilst he liued in alleagance to his lorde so the case standeth with man when as by infidelitie he falleth from God For then he looseth all manner of blessings belonging either to his happinesse or to his holynesse yea it is impossible that a man shoulde either loue feare honor or obey God from whome he looketh for neither good nor euil and therefore infidelitie is to be accounted the roote of all euill Heb. 3. 12. Take heed brethren least that there be in any of you an euill heart of vnbeleefe to depart away from the liuing God Thus much in generall of infidelity the which as hath bene said of faith is of two sorts Legall and Euangelicall legall infidelitie is to distrust Gods promises propounding happinesse to the inherent holinesse of the creature as did the wicked Angels who were perswaded that they coulde not become happy by continuing in holynesse Likewise Euangelicall infidelitie is to distrust Gods promises propounding happinesse to man relying himselfe on the mercie of God in Christ as most of all the men in the worlde haue alwaies done do at this day and will do as long as the world endureth Sect. 3. Of the faith of the gospell vsually called iustifying fayth IT hath been declared that the renewed holynesse of a man regenerate hath two parts Subiection and Conformity The first kinde of renewed Subiection being opposed to infidelity is called as in the first state by the name of faith The nature and force whereof is to repaire that breach which infidelity hath made betwixt God and man and to ioyne man to God in due subiection as he was in his first creatioÌ„ so that it is as it were the haÌ„d whereby man being before separated from God doth lay holde on him by beleeuing his promises and by putting all his trust and affiaunce therein But what bond can be imagined so strong as to be able to knitte God and man being nowe polluted with originall and actuall sinne together in any manner of coniunction being far more conâ—â—ary repugnant the one to the other then 〈◊〉 fire to water or light to darknesse or any oâ—her thing in the world All which doe only in qualitie fight one against another but sinne is contrary to the very nature and essence of God and therefore although that affiance in God which was in Adam were renued in vs yet it woulde not serue to ioyne vs to God because we want that perfect holynesse without the which no faith can ioyne any creature to him So that before that faith can either ioyne vs to God or be any thing auailable for our saluation it is needefull that we shoulde haue perfect holynesse the which whosoeuer goeth about to effect in himselfe will finde it a thing altogether impossible and that in these respects First because man in the very moment of sinning doth make himselfe guilty of eternall death and so he being once deade cannot raise himselfe vp againe or make himselfe capable of holynesse muchlesse worke it fully and perfectly in himselfe Secondly if that this be attributed to the patience and longe suffering of God that man is not straight way as soone as he sinneth vtterly destroyed and so consumed to nought by the anger of God but that he doth still exist in nature and so consequently is not altogether vncapable oâ— holynesse Yet it is impossible for him either to shake off that originall sinne which cleaueth inseperably to his nature or yet to fulfill the lawe of God by actuall obedience both which are needfull for perfect holynesse Lastly if man coulde not onely doe away his sinne already committed but also restore himselfe to his first integritie yet this woulde not serue for his eternall saluation because he were as like to fall away againe from GOD as he was before So that before man can be ioyned againe to God in hapinesse he must do foure things whereof euery one is altogether impossible to be performed either by man himselfe or by any other creature First he must by sustayning eternall death satisfie the iustice of God for his sinne already committed the which if he doe as he must doe if God be iust that is if he be God howe can he euer liue who must dy for euer Secondly he must wholly change his own nature create in himselfe a newe minde harte will and euen a new man the which thing belongeth to God onely Thirdly he must performe absolute and perfect obedience to the lawe of God And lastly he must continew in the saide obedience for euer Howe then is there no meanes of saluation left for man can there no way of performing these impossibilities be inuented Let all the men in the worlde lay their heades together and consult of this weightie matter let them haue the wisdome of Salomon the counsell of Achitophel the naturall wit of Aristotle the learning of the greatest Philosophers the diuining spirits of the southsayres what can they all say to the first question howe will they make man to liue who must dy for euer they will confesse that death and life cannot be together and therefore they must come to this last refuge that man shall not die in his owne person but get some other to dy for him and so satisfie Gods iustice Well this is good paiment if he who dyeth for man be in nature and dignitie equiualent to him but where shall this mediatour be founde As touching man euerie one desireth to liue and abhorreth death yea no man will dy for a iust man much lesse for a sinner But yet perhaps some one wil find such a friend as will not refuse to dy eternally for him Will this serue the turne no truely except he haue moe liues then one because he must first dy for his owne sinne and what then is left to discharge other mens debts But we may fly to some saint or holyman to S. Peter S. Paule S. Mary whose righteousnesse is so great as that it wilbe a ransom both to doe a way their owne sinne and the sinne of others also But there is no merite or righteousnesse which can proceede from any of the sons of Adam no more then sweet water can flowe from a corrupt fountaine yea no righteousnesse of any saint whosoeuer will serue for himselfe or satisfie Gods iustice for his owne sinne but when he hath done all that he can he is an vnprofitable seruant and for any helpe he can haue by his own holynesse in the same state of eternall death wherein others are his greatest righteousnes comming in the name of merite being in the sight of God no better then a filthy and defiled clout So then there is no meanes of mans saluation in man Neither can the oblation of brute beastes serue the turn or stand in the place of a reasonable creature for sinne is not purged by the bloud of bulles and gotes Heb. 10. 4. neither will God accept a thousand
rams as a sufficient ransome for the sinne of mans soule Mich. 6. 7. so that we finding no succor in this worlde are constrained to fly to the holy Angels and to craue their helpe in this behalfe But what can be hoped for at their hands whose righteousnes be it neuer so greate is no more then they doe owe to God for themselues being bounde to serue him with their whole mind hearte and the whole strength and power of their nature If it be imagined that their death might deliuer vs from death we answere first that no man can finde such fauour in their sight as that they will suffer themselues to be accursed for him from the happy and glorious presence of God which they haue enioyed in heauen euer since the first creation thereof Secondly if that we shoulde suppose such an impossible and inordinate loue in them yet the death of many angels coulde not satisfie Gods iustice for the sinne of mankinde but onely for the sins of some number much lesse performe all those things which are needfull for the effecting of our saluation and therefore euery one may say of him selfe O miserable man that I am whom no creature either in heauen or earth can deliuer from sinne and from the punishment of eternall death due vnto it Seing therfore that no creature can satisfie Gods iustice for the sin of man it remaineth that God shoulde either saue man without takeing any satisfaction for his sinne or else himselfe be this mediator for it hath already bene declared that God hath certainly decreed the saluation of man but both these are impossible for God can no more saue man without satisfaction made to his iustice then he can cease to be iust or to be God Againe it is no lesse impossible for God himselfe to make this satisfaction for first sinne cannot be imputed to the godhead but onely to some nature which is capable of sinne but the diuine nature cannot any way be made or imagined the subiect of sin no more then the fire can be made the subiect of extreame cold secondly if this impossibilitie were supposed that God could some way take the sinne of man vpon himselfe yet he could suffer no punishment for it for his nature is such that it can no way suffer much lesse sustain the punishment of eternall death due vnto our sinne What then can all the wit wisedome pollicie and inuention of man say to this case but onely acknowledge that mankind is in a most wretched miserable case quem ipsa salus seruare non potest whom God himselfe cannot saue But when man is brought to a bay and euen at his wits ende there the wisedome of God doth most appeare and that which seemeth impossible to man is possible with God who as he hath decreed mans saluation so he is able to bring it to passe and that not by taking away his owne iustice and essence but by satisfying and establishing it not by polluting the Godhead with the sin of man but by purging man from sin by the infinite power of the Godhead not by translating sinne from man to God but by making the nature of man able to beare the own burden by ioyning it to the nature of God not impairing his owne iustice but punishing the sinne of man more then it deserued and yet not consuming man in his wrath but declaring the endlesse riches of his mercy in sauing him from death that so all the praise glorie and thankesgiuing of our saluation might redound to God who is the beginner worker and finisâ—â—r yea the very meanes of it and who as he did in the beginning without the helpe or meanes of any creature create man in perfect holinesse and happinesse so againe he himselfe and that by himselfe doth restore him to perfect righteousnesse holinesse and eternall glory But it is needfull that we make a more plaine declaration of this mysticall and wonderfull doctrine especially it being the most happy and ioyfull doctrine which euer sounded in the eares or was at any time vttered by the tongue of man the summe of it is this The onely meanes whereby God coulde restore man to his first estate was that he himselfe should take vnto his diuine nature the nature of man so that he might in that nature take vpon him both the guilt also the punishmeÌ„t of our sin For this cause the sonne of God euen God himself did take vpon him our nature consisting of a body a soule indued with al the naturall powers faculties which are in man yea subiect to all humane infirmities yet without sinne This humane nature was begotten not by maÌ„ but by God it being formed fashioned not by the seed of maÌ„ but by the power of the godhead in the wombe of the virgin Mary who was of the linage of Dauid of part of her substance it being first sanctified by the holy Ghost from the inherent corruption of sinne so this nature being from the first moment of the conception vnited to the godhead in one person called Iesus the Sauiour of the worlde the promised Messias or the annointed or holy one of God and consisting of the diuine and a humane nature was brought foorth into the world in Bethlem in the land of Iury according as the prophets had foretold in the raigne of Augustus Caesar and so liued about 33. yeares till that in the daies of Tiberius Caesar it suffered a shamefull and violent death the which death of this humane nature was more then a sufficient ransome for the sinnes of the whole worlde because it was the death of God tho not of the Godhead and therefore it was of infinite merite and dignity yea it was more then the eternall death of all the men in the world although it had lasted but one moment of time as it continued but three daies For it is and that in the iudgement of any reasonable man a farre lesse matter that all the creatures in the world should die for euer then that God himselfe the creator of all things the Lord of glory and giuer of life yea who is glory and life it selfe should suffer death one minute of an houer So that the humanity of Christ gaue the possibility of suffering death as the diuinitie gaue the sufficiency excellency merite of this ransome or paiment made to God for the debt of man This incomprehensible mysterie of Gods wisedome and eternall counsell may be declared after this manner Suppose that there is in this or that countrey an absolute maiesticall and glorious monarch or king against whome many thousands of his subiectes rebell refusing to performe loyall obedience to his lawes The King seeing this rebellion purposeth so to deale in reuenging it as that not onely his iustice but also and especially his mercy and loue towards his naturall subiectes may appeare and therefore he meaneth to punishe their offence in himselfe by putting to death his owne onely
of God for if man were accounted righteous for his holinesse or loue he might impute his saluation to his owne desert for perfect loue deserueth loue and holinesse will chalenge life as of due debt But affiance implieth a humble loyall and duetifull subiection acknowledging the vnworthines basenesse insufficiency and weakenesse of man and together the mercy goodnesse loue fauour bounty trueth and power of God This reason is vsed for this purpose Ro. 3. 27. what law or meanes of saluation doth take away all boasting from man and so giueth all the glory of our saluation to God not the law of workes or inherent holinesse but the law of faith yea of all the graces which are in man faith onely hath in it this naturall property to make a man partaker of Christes death and righteousnes and so of saluation For euen as a tennant inioyeth his house and landes not for that he loueth or feareth his lord or for any vertue wherwith he is indued but only because he doth depeÌ„d on his Lord and so doth purchase vnto him worship and honour by relying himselfe wholly vpon his loue fauor liberality constancy ability riches so standeth the case with man in respect of his saluation For no grace saue onely this affiance on God and on his mercy in Christ can conuey vnto vs remission of sinnes and eternall life In the which respect it is commonly said in holy scripture that faith doth iustifie not as it is a parte of mans holinesse whereof no one part no not all the partes of it if any one be wanting will serue to make a man righteous before God but as it hath in it this proper vertue to make the death of Christ the death of the beleeuer so the righteousnes arising of the said death the righteousnes of the beleuer For he that hath suffered death is iustisied from sin Thus much of the obiect nature attributes of euangelical faith It remaineth that before we proceed to the rest of the partes of mans holines we should declare the relatioÌ„ which is betwixt faith them It hath bene said of faith in general that it is as it were the root froÌ„ the which other graces do spring in that it tieth vs to God the fountain of al graces as to the only giuer of all happines the which thing is true of this euangelicall faith after a special manner For in that it ioineth vs to Christ it maketh vs partakers of the spirit of Christ or rather causeth an increase of all spirituall graces For regeneratioÌ„ is although not in time yet in nature before faith Therefore this faith is made the subiect of the spirituall life of the new man euen as the hart is in the body the fountaine of heat Gal. 2. 20. I liue yet not I but Christ liueth in me in that I now liue in the flesh I liue by the faith of the sonne of God who hath loued me and giuen his life for me And Act. 15. 9. Peter saith that God did purifie the hartes of the gentils that is as it is expounded verse 8. worke sanctification in them by faith In the which respect it is compared to the foundation of a house where vpon the whole buylding standeth and to the roote of a tree which giueth heate sappe and life to all the partes of it Coll. 1. 23. If ye continue founded and established in fayth and to a fountaine of liuing water Ioh. 7. 38. He that beleeueth in me out of his bellie shall flow riuers of the water of life And therfore it is put before all other graces 2. Pet. 1. 5. Ioyne to your fayth vertue and to your vertue knowledge temperance patience godlynes brotherly loue and kyndnes Hence it is that it is vsually distinguished from the rest of the partes of sanctification they being called by the name of loue or of the holy ghost 1 Tâ—ess 3. 6. Tymothie hath brought vs tydinges of your fayth and loue So it is saide Act. 6. 5. That Stephen was a man full of fayth and of the holy spirit not that faith it selfe is not a worke of the holy spirite and a parte of the spirituall holynesse of man but because it is the first worke of Gods spirite and the foundation of mans holinesse and saluation who must be by fayth freed from sinne and death before he can be endued with positiue holynesse and life Thus the Apostle doth often exhorte vs to fanctification and holynesse of life by an argument drawen from iustification which is the proper effect of faith as we may see Ro. 6. 14. sinne shall not haue dominion ouer you because you are not vnder the lawe but vnder grace But it may be asked how iustification doth bring foorth sanctification especially seing that to mans reason it is rather a motiue to a wicked and dissolute life that by the multitude and hainousnesse of our sinnes the mercy of God whereby they are pardoned might the more appeare Rom. 3. 7. and 6. 1. We answere that iustification doth of necessitie bring foorth sanctification and that diuers wayes For first the sense of the vnspeakeable loue of God whereby we are deliuered from eternall damnation doth inflame the hart of the beleeuers with a greate loue of God the which cannot be shewed any other way then by keepeing his commaundementes and by laboring to glorifie his holy name by a holy life Secondly God doth saue the faythfull not as stockes or stones without requiring anie worke action or duety at their handes but so as that he maketh them to be his fellow workers not that man can do any thing of him selfe without the grace of God but that man being endued and renewed by grace doth after a sort worke his owne saluation not by any naturall vertue but by the power of Gods spirite and therefore as Christ taketh away the guilte of sinne being committed so the faythful ought to endeuor that sin be not coÌ„mited Otherwise if they shoulde still of set purpose committe sin they should crosse Christ in the worke of their owne redemption defiling theÌ„ selues with sin whom he hath clensed with his bloud yea they should crucifie him againe treade vnder foote his bloude as a vile thing Thirdly the faithfull doe labour for sanctification as for the onely testimony of the soundnesse of their fayth and of the truthe of their iustification For fayth without the other partes of holynesse is but adeade and vnprofitable fayth Lastly the faythfull man knoweth that fayth is not of it selfe without the rest of sanctification sufficient for the attaining of saluation For although it alone dothfully iustify that is bring perfect remission of all manner of sinne whatsoeuer yet before that a man can enter into the kingdome of heauen he must be endued with perfect positiue holinesse the which cannot be made perfect in the worlde to come vnlesse it be begun and carefullie sought after