weake in the mouth of a Iesuite who holdeth that a Pope Bellar. l. 2. de Rom. Pont. c. 29 be he neuer so wicked and a destroyer of the Church cannot be deposed no not by a general Councell and yet there is greater apparant danger in this then in the former That which Bellarmine addeth seemeth to haue beene written by him being asleepe and is nothing else but a quippe to make men laugh He proueth that a faithfull people may free themselues from the yoake of a Prince that is an Infidell that is to say may rebell against him and that by the example of the beleeuing wife which by the iudgement of the Apostle 1. Cor. 7. is not bound to abide with an husband that is an Infidell when hee will not dwell with her Whereunto I answere first that Similitudes are no proofes Secondly this Similitude being rightly taken doth not hurt vs for as a beleeuing wife is not bound to follow her husband when he forsaketh her and wil no longer co-habite with her so I will freely confesse that subiects are not bound to acknowledge a King that abandoneth his subiects and will no longer be King ouer them but renounceth his Realme and this is all that may be drawne from this Comparison Thirdly this Similitude is aduantageous vnto vs for if we admit the Comparison betweene the condition of a wife and of subiects then will it definitiuely determine our Controuersie and make vs gain the cause For as while an husband that is an Infidell will abide with his beleeuing wife she may not forsake him nor shake off her yoake so while a King that is an Infidell will retayne his soueraignty ouer beleeuing subiects they may not abandone him nor rebell against him The wordes of the Apostle are directly to this purpose If any woman haue an vnbeleeuing husband and he consent to dwell with her let her not forsake him All that which Bellarmine addeth is nothing else but as his manner is suppositions without proofes We graunt him that Princes who against their promise doe warre against the true fayth deserue to be depriued of their Kingdome but wee denye that this power of depriuing them is in the Pope VVe must reserue that iudgement to God seeing it is he that hath established them and that as Tertullian sayth they are inferiour to GOD alone Tertul. ad Scapulam in Apolog. cap. 30. A quo sunt secundi post quem primi Cap. 30. Cum dixit Petro Amas me Pasce oues meas idem dixit caeteris As touching these wordes spoken to S. PETER Feed my sheepe to omit for the present that which S. AVSTIN sayth in his booke of the Christian combate that Iesus Christ saying to S. Peter Feede my lambes spake the same to the rest as all the auncients with one accord doe say that the power of binding and loosing was giuen to the Apostles and to the whole Church in the person of S. Peter to omit this because I will treat of it in his proper place I onely say that albeit this had beene spoken to the Pope yet might he not for all that chastise Princes with depriuation of their estates or by raising a commotion among his subiects or by imposing fines and amercements vpon his countreyes This is to enterprete the word Feede too licentiously we had neede of new Grammer for this new Diuinity for the word Feede which in times past signified to teach and to guide dooth now a dayes signifie to blast whole kingdomes with the lightning of excommunications to ouerthrow great Monarches and to sucke and draw out the very substance of the poore people Beare with our simplicity herein for so great an abuse in wordes maketh vs to feare a greater in the matter it selfe To speake barbarously were an euill somewhat tollerable were it not that Barbarismes doe sometymes passe into Heresies and incongruities in wordes into incongruity in fayth Thus the Bishop of Rome calleth himselfe the Pylot and Steer-man of S. Peters Shippe but he imployeth that barke to trafficke his owne gayne and S. Peters nets to fish for Princes Crownes and to entramell whole States and Common-weales His keyes now a dayes serue onely to open Cofers His power of loosing only to loose the bonds of fidelity through a mutinous piety and a factious Religion which maketh it self Iudge ouer the consciences of kings which euen hateth their Religion because it hateth their rule gouernment and maketh that to be a good subiect to be a good Christian are things that cannot subsist together Bellarmines reasons hauing beene very feeble the examples which he produceth in the Chapter following are lesse currant He sayeth that Osias king of Iuda was dryuen out of the Temple by the High Priest and depryued of his kingdome The text of Scripture is direct to the contrary It is said 2. King 15.2 that Osias began to raigne in the sixteenth yeare of his age and hee raigned fifty two yeates so that he liued threescore and eyght years whence it appeareth that he was King euen vntill his death In the fift verse Iotham his son during the time of his fathers separation because of his leprosie he is not called King but gouernor of his house And ver 7. the beginning of the raigne of Iotham is reckoned only from the death of Osias his father The example of Athalia driuen from the Kingdome by Iehoiada the high Priest is as little to the 2. King 11. purpose For wee speake here of lawfull Princes deposed and he brings vs an example of a woman thâ—t vsurped anothers Kingdome by force and tyranny in which case euery man is allowed to employ himselfe to expel the vsurper and to preserue the Kingdome to the lawfull King The example of S. Ambose Bishoppe of Millan who would not receiue the Emperour Theodosius to the communion by reason of that great slaughter which his souldiers at his commaundement committed at Thessalonica maketh expresly against the Bishop of Rome For would the Pope now a dayes indure that a Bishoppe of Millan or Colleyne should intrude himselfe to excommunicate Emperours and to declare them to be fallen from their Empire without his permission Did Ambrose this by the counsaile or commaundement of the Bishop of Rome And were it so that Ambrose had beene that the Pope now sayth himselfe to be where will Bellarmine finde that Ambrose did degrade the Emperour or that he dispensed with his subiects for the Oath of fidelity Let a man read his three and thirtieth Epistle and he shall see with how great humilty he submitteth himselfe to an Arrian Emperour so farre from preaching any reuolt of his subiects from him that indeede hee willingly offered to dye and to suffer persecution if such were the will of the Emperour As touching the law which Theodosius imposed vpon himselfe by the Counsell of S. Ambrose which was that from thence forward he would stay the execution of any sentence of death
his fellowes where he saith that the rebellion of a Clergie man against his King cannot be treason in that he is not subiect to the King which agreeth with that which is written by the Iesuite Saunders in his second booke of his visible Monarchie whereof the King of great Britaine in his first booke cyteth many passages Now whereas the Iesuites of France did make a booke intituled * In the pag. 70. of the Edition of the bigger print 1595. you shall finde these wordes The Pope pretendeth nothing ouer Souerainty but to correct as a father as a Iudge such as are pernitious to the Church For then he may not alone but he is bound to shew himselfe their Superior Security wold make thee peruerse froward but thou must be kept down be made to confes that thou hast neyther reason nor conscience For it is fit that Princes shold be often held in and curbed by feare of their temporalities The defence of the truth against the pleading of Anthony Arnold In which they maintaine at large that the Pope may as Iudge depriue Princes of their temporalties This is wholly to be imputed to the times for then it was fit to speake in that manner but now they reserue those Maximes for fitter seasons Diuinity is to be applyed as occasions serue and wee are now in an age that if wee would know how wee were to teach and moue the people we must first looke into the Aâ—minake and accommodate our selues to the affaires of the Common wealth and therefore it is to be hoped that such * The which are produced in the Chapter following passages of Bellarmine that do make the liues and Crownes of Kings subiect to the Pope will be mended in the next Edition And as for the troubles and seditions which these Fathers haue stirred in Polonia which hath cost Demetrius his life and as for the causes which haue moned the Venetians to banish them out of their estate this a thing wholly to be imputed to the Climate or to the strange humors of the Country which is farre differing from Fraunce All this being considered it is to be hoped that the King of great Britaine following the counsell of Doctor Coeffeteau will take them to be neare about his person The other Reasons which are brought to recommend them seeme not to me of any great weight It is said that they carefully instruct youth if it be so how commeth it to passe that since they haue vndertaken to teach learning is so much decayed I would willingly that one could shew mee in Fraunce any of their Disciples that were of exact and exquisite learning or whom haue they in their society that may bee compared with those that were the Schollers of Turnebus or of Cuias Who are yet as many of them as are left the very lights and ornaments of the Court where is now the Vniuersitie of Paris which had wont to haue in it thirty thousand schollers but hath declined towards barbarisme euer since this kinde of people haue vndertaken to teach by their abridgements and Epitomies the which haue beene framed and composed by a rable of Pedants that teach all by rote in stead of drawing their instructions from the Fountaines of the Greeke and in stead ofâ—etling their iudgements by the course of auncient Philosophy And as for humane learning Scaliger Casaubon Passerate Lipsius and diuers like vnto them were they brought vp in their schooles Or indeede whom haue they brought vp comparable to them But Coeffeteau saith that the most Christian King is serued by them dealeth well with them and taketh them neere vnto his person our condition is too low and our vnderstanding too weake to search out the Counsels of so great a King whom God hath endued with an incomparable wisedome but yet I thinke that this serues not to iustifie them for who can tell whether his Maiesty doth this onely to put in practise that rule of the Gospell which is To doe well to those that hate vs Or whether he endeauoureth by his goodnes to master and ouercome their wickednesse and so by that meanes to binde them to fidelity Or who can tell whether his Maiestie herein imitateth the example of God who imployeth the wicked spirits for such causes and to such purposes as are best knowne to his diuine wisedome Or who knoweth whether in this he doth like Vlisses who for auoyding of tempests would keepe the winds with him shut vp in a leather bagge This great King whose paines and industry procureth our generall repose whose vigilancy makes vs to sleepe securely who bereaueth himselfe of himselfe and bestoweth himselfe on the publique and who maketh peace to flourish vnder the shaddow of his victories Long may hee enioy that quiet and repose which he hath broght euen to those that hate him Let his Counsels be euer blessed with happy successe his life with safety his subiects with fidelity his Crowne with glory and his Kingdome with prosperity CHAP. V. Of the power of the Pope ouer the temporalities of Kings and that he cannot take from Kings their Crownes nor free subiects from the Oath of fidelity And thereupon the reasons of Bellarmine are examined THe King of great Britaine in his Apology complayneth of two Breues or letters Apostolique of Clement the eight sent into England a little before the death of the late Queene ELIZABETH which were produced at the arrainment of Garnet the Iesuite by which the said Pope excludeth him from the succession of the Kingdome by a generall debarring of all such as were not of the Romane Religion This thing being so notoriously vniust and so publique yet notwithstanding Coeffeteau saith that there hath beene a wrong interpretation made of this Popes intentions and that it hath beene some particular mens drift to put it into his Maiesties head that he went about to hinder his establishment in the Kingdome These are insurious speeches to say that the King of great Britaine hath beene circumuented and that men haue only made him beleeue things but that he hath not seene any such Breues but speaketh this onely vpon trust There likewise turning to the side of Kings against the consent of the whole Romish Church he speaks thus It is a thing without doubt Fol. 6. pag. 2. that if the Pope would inuade Kingdoms and giue them in prey to whom he pleaseth deuesting the right possessors of them he well deserueth that Princes should stand stiffe against his viosence and should ioyntly runne vpon him as vpon a robber and spoiler of their inheritances And a litle after The Popes pretend nothing ouer the temporalties of Kings are contented only to make their authority appear ouer the crimes of men which he bindeth or looseth without stretching of it tyranically to dispose of their possessions otherwise then such as are fallen vnto him what causes here moued Coeffeteau thus to fauour Kings and to pare the Popes nayles so neare
terms England neyther is nor euer shall be the patrimony of S. Peter Math. Paris p. 270. Anno 1216 A King cannot giue his Kingdome without the consent of his Barons And thereupon all the French Nobility cryed out that they would fight to the death in that quarrell IOHN being dead Math. Paris pag. 425. Rex inclinato ad genua eius capite vsque ad interior a regni deduxit officiosè his sonne and successor HENRY the third did homage to the Pope and payed the accustomed tribute Shortly after the Pope sent into England a new Legate one Otho a Cardinall before whom the King bowed himselfe soâ—low as to touch the Legates knees with his head which Cardinall behaued himselfe more like a King then a Legate This Cardinall being desirous to haue entred into Scotland the King would not receiue him Non me memini Legatum in terra mea vidisse nec opus esse Pag 530. Rex in ampliori regia Westmonasterij pransurus Legatum â—uem inuitanerat in eminentiori loco mensae scilicet in Regali sede quae in Medio mensae crat non sine muliorum obliquantibus oculis collocauit saying that he had neuer seene Legate in his Kingdome neyther had he neede of them But in England he was his owne caruer cutting and paring away at his pleasure euen so farre as that he presumed to sit at table in the Chaire of State aboue the king as hee did at a feast which king Henry the third made at Westminster as Matth. Paris witnesseth which Authour also Ann. 1241. speaking of his Legates returne saith that according to the account then made he carried away more money with him then he left in all the kingdome besides hauing rifled and spoyled it like a Vine brouzed and troden downe by wilde Boares yea all the Historians of England doe complaine of the pillages and exactions of Rome which sucked the Englishmen to the very blood And as I vnderstand Cardinall Bellarmine hath lately made a booke against the king of England Bellarm. in his new booke pa. 19. Rex AngloruÌ„ duplici iure subiectus Papae vno communi omnib ' Christianis ratione Apostolicae potestatis quae in omnes extenditur iuxta illud Psal 44. Constitues eos principes super omnem terram altero proprio ratione recti Dominij c. wherein he maintayneth that the Pope is direct Lord of England and Ireland and that these kingdomes are the Churches fee Farmes and the King the Popes vassall or feudatary Things which I thought good to represent at large to the end that his Maiesty of England may know and acknowledge how much the Crowne which God hath giuen him is beholding to the purity of the Gospell the preaching whereof hath broken that yoake and hath made libertie to spring forth together with the truth dissipating at once both superstition and tyranny Iesus Christ saith Ioh. 8. You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free which saying may after a sort bee applyed to this purpose for there our Lord speaketh of the seruitude of sinne and here we speake of the slauery vnder the man of sinne there our Lord speaketh of the freedome and deliuerance from the bondage of the father of lies here we speake of being enfranchized from the thraldome of the sonne of perdition and indeede that temporall seruitude of the Crowne of England came from the spirituall bondage of the conscience For the Popes laid this subiection vpon men as a meanes and condition of obtayning remission of sinnes Then England enioyed the happy golden age in which euery man for his money might enter into Paradise but Iesus Christ ouerthrew this bancke of money-changers set vp in the Temple and detecting the abuses sheered asunder those inuisible chains of Custome and Opinion which held mens soules ensnared in and vniust seruitude Certainely then the doctrine of the Gospell is the setling and establishment of Thrones and that which exalteth raiseth Kings seeing that it doth not subiect their Crownes to any man liuing and further stoppeth vp all wayes and accesse to rebellion and disloyaltie Now out of that which aboue hath beene said it is euident that Coeffeteau telling the king of great Britaine that the Pope doth neyther expose kingdomes as a prey nor pretend any thing vpon the temporalties of kings thought the king a stranger at his owne home and one that knew not his Genealogie nor the story of his owne house or else deemed him blinde and bereft of sense when hee complayneth in his Apologie that Bellarm. writing against him dooth importunately inculcate this position that the Pope may depose kings in that he may excommunicate them It must needes be then if we beleeue Coeffeteau that the king of great Britainecy ther did not read or else vnderstood not the booke of his Aduersary If we would seeke out examples of the like cases besides these of England we might fill a iust volume How many Germane Emperours haue beene degraded from their Empire by excommunications and Papall fulminations and their Imperiall Diadem giuen in prey to him that could catch it Did not Pope Iulius the second Anno 1511. take from king Iohn of Nauarre his kingdome and giue it to Ferdinand king of Castile This Bull of Alexander is found in the beginning of Francisco Lopez de Gomara his Story of the â—ndies Did not Pope Alexander the sixt Anno 1492. diuide the Indies betweene the Portugals and the Spaniards allotting the west Indies to the Spaniards and the East to the Portugals whereat Atabalippa the poore king of Peru asked who the Pope was that gaue that which did not belong vnto him To omit the confusions and hurly-burlies of later times which of fresh memory haue blasted and singed our kings with the lightnings of excommunications and almost burnt them to powder and haue made the people to rise in rebellion against their soueraigne Prince the soares doe yet bleede neyther is the wound yet soundly cured Now if experience be not strong enough to enforce the certainty of Papall vsurpations ouer kings let vs heare the Popes themselues speake Clementina Pastoralis de sententia reiudicata Nos tam ex superioritate quam ad imperium non est dubium nos habere quam ex potestate in quam vacante imperio Imperatori succedimus In ipsa vrbe vtriusque potestatis Monarchiam Romanis Pontisicibus declararet and let vs learne what their intent is rather from their owne mouthes then from the fearefull and doubtfull termes of this Iacobin Clement the fift being in the Councell of Vienna speaketh thus We aswell by that Superiority which wee haue ouer the Empire as by the power whereunto we succeed the Empire being vacant c. As it is contayned in the Clementine Pastoralis And in the Chapter Fundamenta de Electione in 6 Pope Nicholas the third sayth that Constantine hath graunted to the Bishoppes of Rome both the one
he celebrated the Eucharist and that his body was already dead Lactantius in his fourth booke and fourteenth Chapter dooth formally denie the Diuinity of Iesus Christ and in his seuenth booke and one and twenty chapter he saith that the soules of men as well good as bad In vna communique custodia detinentur are detained in one common prison Saint Gregory Nazianzen in his Sermon of Baptisme willeth that vnlesse it be in case of vrgent necessity the Baptisme of young children be deferred vntill such time as they may be capable to aunswere and to yeeld account of their faith Himselfe in his Epitaph vpon Basill doth preferre him before Enoch Contemninus n. Phegor omnem ignominiam eius scientes quod qui in carne sunt non possunt placere Deo and compareth him to Abraham Saint Ierome in his first booke against Iouinian often calleth marriage an vnchast state of life and an ignominy and that the fruite of it is death and that a woman that doth marry the second time ought not to participate of the Almes no nor of the body of the Lord. The Church of Rome doth no longer beleeue the Purgatorie of Gregory the first which hee placeth sometimes in Bathes sometimes in the winde sometime in the water Nor the opinion of Honorius Bishop of Rome who was a Monothelite the Epistles whereof are inserted in the fift and sixt generall Councels For all these good seruants of God were subiect to mistaking and had their faults and vices like warts in a faire face to the end that in reading them a man should haue alwayes in his hand the Compasse of the holy Scripture and the rule of the word of God And that a man should beleeue that which they haue well said not because they haue said it but because it is found in the word of God if they erre in any thing Antiquity cannot authorize an errour There can be no prescription against the truth And a time there was when these Fathers were no Fathers and before they wrote the Christians were ruled by the word of God As touching that which the King of great Britaine saith that they doe contradict one another the verification of it is easie For euery man knoweth the contentions betweene Chrysostome and Epiphanius the Disputes betweene Cyrill and Theodoret the sharpe Epistles and full of gall of Saint Ierome to Saint Austin And S. Austin speaketh farre otherwise of Free-wil of Predestination and of the gift of Perseuerance then all the Greeke Fathers of his age He that will haue a cleare mirrour of this their discord let him compare the Commentaries of S. Austin vpon the Psalmes with those of Saint Ierome and he shall scarcely finde them to agree in two verses together It is then with very iust reason that Coeffeteau doth graunt this to the King of great Britaine and doth acknowledge the faults and contradictions of the auncients whom notwithstanding we ought to loue and honour as great lights in their times and worthy seruants of God who hauing combatted Heresies in their life time doe yet beat downe Popery after their deaths For we maintaine against whosoeuer he be that in the foure first ages and yet wee might discend much lower there shall not be found out any one man who hath had a Religion not so much as approaching to that of the Romish Church now-a-dayes And in this challenge I will lay downe my Ministers cloake ready to be frocked and cladde in a Monks-coule if I shall finde a man that will satisfie me in this point And to the end to expresse my selfe more clearly I say that betweene vs and our aduersaries there be two kindes of Controuersies for some there be vpon which they are wont to produce some passages for proofes But eyther they be quotations altogether false or maimed and curtalled or of no vse to proue the point in question or else places taken contrary to the authours meaning Yet being a thing ordinary with these Messieus to put the ancient Fathers vpon the racke to make them speake in fauour of an vntruth Such is the question of transubstantiation of praying for the dead or Purgatory and of the Sacrifice of the Masse But there are other Controuersies no lesse important and more in number In which they are cleane destitute of all authority of the auncient Church and vpon which being interrogated they answere besides the matter For changing the question they endeauour to proue that which is not demaunded of them See here some examples 1. They cannot shew that any auncient Church did celebrate the eucharist without communicants as it is done ordinarily in the Church of Rome yea and sometimes also without any assistants 2. They cannot shew that any ancient Church hath excluded that people from the communion of the cuppe or chalice 3. Or that in any ancient Church the publike seruice was done in a language not vnderstood of the people 4 Or that any ancient Church hath hindered the people from reading the holy Scripture As it is no way permitted in those Countries where the Pope is absolutely obeyed without speciall priuilege 5. Or that in any ancient Church they haue made Images of God and representations of the Trinity in stone or in picture 6. Also they cannot proue vnto vs that in any ancient Church the people hath beene instructed to pray without vnderstanding that which they say speaking in a tongue not vnderstood of himselfe that prayeth 7. Or that any ancient Church did yeeld worship or religious seruice to the Images of creatures kissing them decking them with robes kneeling before them and presenting them gifts and offerings c. 8. Or that the ancient Church hath beleeued that the Virgin Mary is crowned Queene of the heauens and Lady of the world as this is painted throughout all their Churches 9. Or that the ancient Church hath giuen to the Saints diuers charges as to one the commaund euer such a country to another the cure ouer such a maladie to a third to be Patron ouer such a trade and mysterie 10. Or that the ancient Church hath beleeued that the Pope can giue and take away Kingdomes And dispense with subiects for the oath of their alleageance Can canonize Saints and dispense with Vowes and promises solemnly made to God c. 11. Or that in the ancient Church the Pope by his pardons did distribute supererogatory satisfactions of the Saints for the remission of paine and punishment of other mens sinnes 12. Or that the Pope did then place his pardons in one Church and not in another In one Towne and not in another and that sometimes for an hundred and two hundred thousand yeares of pardon 13. Or that the auncient Church hath beleeued the Limbe of little children 14. Or that the auncient Church hath adored the host which the Priest holdeth vp with the worship of Latria which is done to God alone And to this end the Priest hath caused the Eleuation of
tumultuarily and in hast hath not had this curiosity It remaineth to examine the place of S. Austin of which euery one that hath a quicke smell will acknowledge the corruption and falsification First of all because it is not credible that this holy Personage would oppose himselfe single to the whole Church of his time and to all the Doctors that went before him and namely to the Councell of Carthage whereat himselfe had beene a present assistant Secondly because it is not credible that S. Austin would contradict himselfe for in the sixe and thirty Chapter of the eighteenth booke of the Citie of God he speaketh thus The supputation of these times since the building vp of the Temple is not found in the holy Scriptures which are called Canonicall but in other bookes among which are the Maccabees Is it possible to say in more plain and expresse termes that the Maccabees are not holy Scriptures nor Canonicall bookes But heere wee admire a pretty pleasant folly and stupidity of a taile handsomely fastened and sowed on by some Monke for after all this they make S. Austin to adde Which bookes not the Iewes but the Church boldeth for Canonicall O grosse Imposture After that hee had simply set downe that the Maccabees are not holy nor Canonicall Scriptures would hee say that the Church receiueth them for Canonicall By the same fraude this other place of S. Austin which Coeffeteau alleadgeth hath beene falsified Let vs adde hereunto that S. Austin cap. 23. of his second booke against Gaudentius answereth thus vnto Gaudentius who serued himselfe with the example of Razis who killed himselfe whereof mention is made in the second booke of the Maccabees The Iewes do not hold this booke in the same rancke with the law the Prophets and the Psalmes to which Iesus Christ beareth witnesse is they that beare record of him But this booke is receiued by the Church not vnprofitably if men read it soberly principally because of the sufferings of certaine Martyrs Who feeth not that he doth weaken the authority of these bookes in that Iesus Christ doth giue no testimony vnto them And if these bookes haue not beene reckoned for holy Scripture amongst the faithfull of the olde Testament I maruell when they became holy Scripture It is also a poynt very considerable that in this place of S. Austin produced by Coeffeteau Ecclesiasticus is put among the Canonicall bookes in which booke it is said cap. 46. Samuel prophesied after his death and declared vnto King Saul his death lifting vp his voyce out of earth An opinion which S. Austin doth condemne in his booke of Questions on the old Testament in the 27 Question saying Porrò autem hoc esi praestigium Satanae quo vt plurimos fallat etiam bonos se in potestate habere confingit that it is a great indignity to beleeue it and maintaineth that it was an illusion of Satan who to deceiue many faineth to haue good men in his power And in his booke of the care that men ought to haue of the dead after hauing spoken doubtfully he saith that men * Huic libro ex Hebraeorum Canone quia â—n eo non est contradicâ—tur controule the booke of Ecclesiasticus because it is not in the Canon of the Hebrews And in his booke of the eight Questions to Dulichius Quaest 6. he canuasseth this Question by way of Probleme leaning notwithstanding to the opinion that it was a meere fantasme or vaine apparition See hereupon the Canon Nec mirum in the Cause 26. Quest 6. where also S Austin is alleadged maintayning that this was done by enchantment Whence I conclude Caietan in fin-Commentaâ—oruÌ„ ad Historiam vet Test Ne turberis No uities si alicubi reperis libros istos inter Canonicos supputari vel in Sacris Con cilijs vel in Sacris Doctoribus Non. nâ—sunt Canonici id est regalares ad probandum ea quae sunt fidei possunt tamen Canonici dici ad aedificationem fidelium that S. Austin should contradict himselfe if after hauing refuted the opinion of Ecclesiasticus he should afterwards put him in the role of the Canonicall bookes These falshoods hauing not beene acknowledged by Cardinall Caietan droue him to finde out another euasion Be not astonished or troubled O thou who art but a Nouice in Diuinity if somtimes thou find eyther in the Councels or in the Doctors these bookes to be counted among the Canonicall For they are not Canonicall to proue the points of faith Notwithstanding they may be called Canonicall for the edification of the faithfull ARTICLE VI. Touching the memory of Saints and of their Feasts and holy dayes AS for the Saints departed I honour their memory The KINGS Confession and in honour of them doe wee in our Church obserue the dayes of so many of them as the Scripture doth Canonize for Saints but I am loath to beleeue all the tales of the Legended Saints Here Coeffeteau beginneth to skirmish without neede Fol 13. He complayneth for that the King speaketh onely of solemnizing the memory of those Saints of whom mention is made in the Scripture He saith that the Church of Smyrna did celebrate the feast of the Martyrdome of Polycarp That Basil did recommend the Feasts of S. Iulitta and of the forty Martyrs That Gregory Nazianzene did solemnize with the other Christians the Feast of S. Cyprian and S. Gregory of Nissa that of the Martyr Theodore That Cyprian commanded that they should marke out the dayes of the Passion of the Martyrs to the end that they mighcelebrate their memories That S. Austins twentieth booke against Faustus Manicheus cap. 21. saith that the Christian people did celebrate the memories of the Martyrs And yet that S. Polycarpe S. Iulitta c. are no Saints of whom there is any mention in the Scripture Hee addeth notwithstanding that the Church of England is in that lesse irreligious then the Caluinists of Fraunce who haue cut off all sorts of holy-daies of Saints aswell Apostles as others As touching the Legends We are saith hee no more credulous of them then you He saith he doth not receiue miracles vnlesse they be approued by the publique testimony of the Church and that euen in the first ages they suggested and foysted in false actes of Martyrs These passages which he alleadgeth are in part false partly they are of no vse to proue the Question Let vs begin with the falshood First in alleadging out of Eusebius the example of the Church of Smyrna who buried the bones of Polycarpe with honour and celebrated his memory Anniuersarily euery yeare there is no mention made of his Feast or Holy-day but onely of a day dedicated to the commemoration of his Martyrdome Ignorantes nos ChristuÌ„nunquam relinquere qui pro totius seruan dorum mundi salute passus est nec alium quenquam colere posse Nam hunc quidem tanquaÌ„ filium Dei adoramus Martyres verò
Fraunce were vnder Marcus Aurelius the sonne of Anthony that is to say in the yeare of our Lord 162. threescore and fiue yeares after the death of Domitian whosoeuer shall calculate the times shall find that Denis the Ariopagite was then Iudge in Ariopagus at the time when S. Paul conuerted him whence it is to be presumed that he was at least thirty or fiue and thirty yeare olde which time if you extend as farre as to the raigne of Marcus Aurelius he should haue liued some hundred and fiftie yeares and also should die by torment before that he was broken by olde age We could produce others in this point but this sufficeth to iustifie the King of great Britaine who though he should haue called the Saints that neuer were Tutelary gods yet should there not bee iust cause to reprehend him After this Caeffeteau comes to the authorities of the Fathers surely this matter should well deserue some commaundement from God One Ordinance of God had cut off al difficulty and had been more of value then a thousand testimonies of men But Coeffeteau could finde none for indeede there is none Being not able then to draw out of the Diuine spring he seekes heere and there for the Cesternes of men Our aduersaries tell vs that they receiue the Fathers for interpreters of the Scripture but the passages are drawne out of phrases of the Fathers in which they doe not interprete the scripture but what will become of the matter if these quotations be to no purpose if indeede they be false And that is it which we are to shew Basill in his oration of the 40. Martyrs saith indeed that some in their necessity had recourse vnto them but he doth nor commaund to doe it as Bellarmine will haue it in b Where he pâ—â—â—teth confugiat for confugit and oret for orat falsifying this place Aliud est quod docemus aliud quod sustinemus donec emendemus tolarare compellimur a man must not maruaile if a people newly crept out of Paganisme did retaine something of their owne Custome and oftentimes the Bishops caryed away with the terrent of popular zeale were constrained to tollerate these abuses Saint Austine in his twentieth booke against Faustus the Manichee Chap. 21 confesseth that many dranke drunke ouer the Sepulchres of the dead but withall he addeth it is one thing that we teach another that we tollerate it is one thing that which we are commaunded to teach another thing we are commaunded to correct and which we are constrained to beare withall vntill that it bee amended And in the first booke of the manners of the Catholicke Church Chap. 24. I know many saith hee who doe adore the Sepulchres and pictures I know many who drinke most excessiuely ouer the dead The good Bishops saw these maladies in their flockes which being desirous to amend they haue beene often hindred by the sedition of the people as appeareth by the Counsell of Carthage where the Bishops of Affrica being desirous to abolish the abuse which was committed at the sepulchres of the Martyrs they feare to be hindred by the tumult of the rude people 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 If say they men be hindred to doe this by the vprore of the people at least wise let the multitude be admonished not to assemble in these places Coeffeteau then had alleadged this to purpose if he had the generall custome of the Church of those times or some prayer to Saints made in the publicke seruice instead of producing the misguided deuotion of some particular men In the second place he aleadgeth the oration of Gregory Nyssen in the praise of the Martyr Theodore which we haue heretofore evicted of falsehood After this he produceth the oration of Grogory Nazianzen vpon Saint Basill And here againe his vnfaithfull dealing appeareth for hee dessembleth the wordes going before which serue for a solution where Saint Gregory sheweth that that which he saide to Saint Basill being deceased is onely by opinion and by coniecture These are his wordes And now Basill is in the heauens 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 offering as I thinke sacrifices for vs and praying for the people hee speaketh as being assured thereof we know also that the custome of Orators who speake in praise of any man is to make Rhetoricall appellation to the dead and to speake to the absent as to men present The Bookes of the Paynims are full of these examples See how Plinie speaketh to Ciciro long before deceased in his seauenth booke and thirtyeth Chapter Salue primus omnium parens patriae appellate To Gregory Coeffeteau addeth the Catechisme of Cyrill which are falâ—ely attributed vnto him Gesner in his Bibliotheca witnesseth that this booke is found in written hand vnder the name of one Iohn of Ierusalem Gretzer a Germiane Iesuit in his booke for Pilgrimages page 354. witnesseth the same Harding in his Treatise of Accidents without subiect Section the 6. saith that in his time this booke was not fouâ—d but manuscript and knowne to a fewe And the foolery which is found in the 24. Catechise when he saith that the wood of the Crosse doth increase and multiply in such fort that the earth is full thereof sheweth that this booke was written many ages since doubtlesse by this Iohn of Ierusalem an aduocate for Images who liued in the yeare 767. See the Ecclesiasticall Stories of Vigner in the yeare 767. Afterwards commeth a place of Saint Austine It is iniurie to pray for a Martyr by whose prayers wee on the other side ought to be recommended This place is found indeed in his 17. Sermon De verbis Apostoli but not in the 80. Tract vpon Iohn as Coeffeteau alleadgeth it who spake by other mens report Now this place is not to the purpose for hee saith onely that the Saints pray for vs which thing wee haue neuer denyed we doe out of Godly considerations presume that albeit they know not the necessity of particular men yet they pray for the Church in generall But that wee should for this cause inuocate them or yeeld them any religious seruice Saint Austine doth not avouch Lastly Coeffeteau addeth Saint Ambrose who in his booke of Widdowes exhorteth Widdowes to pray to the Angells and Martyrs whom he calleth beholders of our liues and actions Here a man may see the humour of our Aduersaries which is to passe by the vertues of the Fathers and to set forth nothing but their vices and blemishes like Flyes who cast themselues vpon gaules and botches of bodies rather then vpon the sound parts The Reader then shall be aduertised that Saint Ambrose was chosen Bishop before he was baptised Hauing thus cast himselfe at the first iumpe into a charge to the which hee was no way prepared no man ought to maruaile if in his beginnings he said somthings for which he afterwards corrected himselfe The booke of Widdowes is one of his first works wherein you may
see more eloquence then diuinity and we will no other proofe hereof then that place which saith that the Martyrs if there remained any sinnes vnto them they purged them by their bloud what is there lesse agreeing with the Gospell then to thinke that any Martyrs haue beene without sinne and that which is worse that a man may wash away and blot out his sinnes by his owne blood For the holy scripture doth giue vs no other labor for our sinnes then the blood of Iesus Christ Apoc 1.5 To Iesus who hath loued vs and hath wasted away our sinnes by his blood And in the 7. Chapter The Saints do wash their garments in the blood of the lambe and to the end that no man should deuise any other clensing Jdeo ad Regem per tribunos aut Cometos itur quia homo vtique est Rex nescit quibus debeat Remp. credere Ad Deum autē promerendum saffragatore non opus estsed mente deuota Saint Iohn 1. Epist 1. saith that the blood of Iesus Christ doth clense vs from ALL sinne yea Saint Ambrose himselfe hath not perseuered in this error But vpon the first Chapter of the Epistle to the Romanes he disputeth against those who said that they did as those who goe to the King by his offices and hee calleth it a miserable excuse and addeth Therefore men goe to a King by his Collonells and Nobles because the King is a man and knoweth not to whom to commit the Common-weale But to be receiued into grace and fauour with God we need no spokesman but onely a deuout Spirit Himselfe in the oration vpon the death of Theodosius Et tamen tu solus Domine inuocandus es tu rogandus Thou ONELY O Lord oughtest to be inuocated and prayed vnto Let this be noted in generall vpon all the passages that the King of great Britaine demaunded authorities from the first fower ages But all these allegations are but about the end of the fourth age we must then helpe Coeffeteaus memorie and bring him a little higher In the first age we haue the Apostles who did not only not inuocate the Virgin Mary nor any other of the Saints deceased But who doe expresly forbid vs to inuocate any other then God alone 1 S. Paul Rom. 10. How shall they cal vpon him in whom they haue not beleeued He is of opinion then that a man cannot call vpon any but him in whom he beleeueth Now we beleeue in God onely The Creede doth teach vs to beleeue in the Father and in the sonne and in the holy Chost but not to beleeue in any creature And Iesus Christ Ioh. 14.1 You beleeue in God beleeue also in me If any man will here bring forth vnto vs two sortes of Religious worship he must be pleased to proue them vnto vs by the word of God 2 The same Apostle Rom. 14.23 sayth that whatsoeuer is done without faith is sinne And cap. 10. he saith that faith commeth by hearing the word of God Prayer therefore to Saints being not founded vpon the word of God it is without faith and consequently is sinne 3 S. Peter Act. 1. calleth God searcher of the hearts agreeable to that which Salomon saith 2. Chr. 6.30 that God ONLY knoweth the hearts of men If then the Saints know not our hearts what an abuse is it to call vpon them Must a man cry high And how shall they know whether thou be an hypocrite or no If it be so that they see all things in the face of God as some say then should they haue an infinite knowledge and by consequent should be infinite and should know the day of iudgement * marc 13. which is vnknowne to them And their spirit in one onely moment should apprehend and behold infinite diuersity of things which is a thing incompatible with the nature of the creature whose life and being and consequently whose actions are fleeting by acontinuall succession of parts That is to say that as the parts of their duration succeede one another so their thoughts and action successiuely follow one another They doe not then apprehend infinite things in one moment Thus is their imaginary looking-glasse broken wherin nothing doth appeare but the temerity of these men who affirme things that they cannot know who speake of heauen and yet haue their nose in the ground describing what is done there as if they came but lately from thence I further adde that this is greatly to trouble the felicity of the Saints to make them spectators of mens affaires An holy woman that inioyeth the glory of heauen would she no feele an extreame greefe if she beheld from heauen one of her children tormented in Hell another broken vpon the wheele at the Greue in Paris another giuen to Art-magicke or bowing his knee before an Image or adoring a God made and set vp by men 4 The Apostle S. Paul 1. Tim 2. There is one God and one Mediator betweene God and men the man Christ Iesus In the Greeke it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vnicus Deus vnicus mediator Seeing that these things are thus coupled together it is certain that as there is but one God so is there but one Mediator It is a coy nicenesse to say that he is the only Mediator of Redemption but not of Intercession But this distinction is not found in the Gospell and indeede it doth contradict it selfe for Iesus Christ is not the mediator of intercession but so farre forth as he is our Redeemer whence it followeth that in Iesus Christ to be mediator of redemption and mediator of intercession is one and the same thing And that which is more the same Apostle Rom. 8. doth teach vs that euen as touching the intercession he is our onely mediator For he saith Christ is he who died nay rather who is risen againe who also is set at the right hand of God who maketh request for vs. Now he died onely for vs he rose onely for our sakes and onely is set downe at the right hand of God and he alone then also it is which maketh request for vs for the course of the wordes and the drift of the place doth necessarily so require it And that which is more by this Distinction they condemne the Church of Rome who maketh Saints also to bee mediatours of Redemption as Bellarmine teacheth in the fourth Chapter of his first booke of Indulgences and indeede the Church of Rome doth holde that their sufferings doe turne to our aduantage and the Priest in the Masse doth euery day craue saluation of God not onely for their prayers but also for their merites as if by their good workes they had merited saluation Quorum precibus meritisque rogamus c. and the grace of God for vs Let a man read all the Letanies and publicke prayers of the Church of Rome and he shall finde that they say Petre Ora pro nobis S. Nicholae Ora pro
after Which is confirmed by the Masse it selfe and by the Latine Translation of the Bible which the Councell of Trent will haue onely receiued which saith Qui pro vobis effunditur which shall bee shed for you expresly translating the present tense by the future to shewe that Christ spake not of an effusion of bloud to be presently made but to be done soone after Bellarmine answers this shedding might be vnderstood in both tenses but I say it could not be for Christ here gaue vs not wordes with double visages nor doth he by one word signifie two effusions of blood so disagreeable and beside the Canon of the Masse and the Romane Bible should have idly translated the present tense by the future if it might and should bee taken in the present tense And this is the place where the perplexity of the errour appeareth which hew and interferre that it selfe is not vnderstood for our aduersaries say that vnder the formes the blood of Christ is shed but yet runnes not out of his veynes that it is shed and yet stirres not and howbeit euery effusion be a motion yet it is an effusion without effusion And which is more Effusio est extra fusio they say this Sacrifice is vnbloody whence it followes that there is no effusion of blood that is to say that it is of blood not bloody as if one should say a heate not hote or whitenesse not white so they lead vs blindfolded for there is nothing that a man will not say that thinkes he speakes vnto beasts or that will mocke God himselfe But especially note that these Masters say that the body is also in the cup yea in euery drop of the cup so that he which ouerturnes the cup ouerturnes the flesh and the bones so these Doctors by a new Alchymie distill the body of our Sauior And that they may puzle plaine people As if one should say the formes of a man or of a treâ— in stead of hâ—s length or his colour they say that the blood of Christ is shed vnder the accidents of Wine which they doe fraudulently call the formes But we enquire not of them vnder what the blood is shed but whether it be shed or no for that which is really shed vnder another thing is not there shed the lesse The quality of our redemption and the onely sacrifice of our Redeemer doe arme vs with inuincible proofes against this strange errour We demand of these Masters whether the sacrifice of the Crosse and the sacrifice of the Masse bee two or one and the same sacrifice For feare we should accuse them of confessing another propitiatory sacrifice beside that of the Crosse they say that the Masse is the same with the sacrifice of the Crosse but this we may easily disproue and proue that the sacrifice of the Crosse and that of the Masse cannot be one sacrifice our reasons are 1 First the sacrifice of the Masse and that of the Crosse cannot be one sacrifice because the definition of one agreeth not with the other for the sacrifice of the Crosse is the death of Iesus Christ offered vpon the Crosse for our redemption but the Masse is not the death of Iesus Christ c. and then is not the Masse the sacrifice of the Crosse 2 The proprieties and circumstances differ the sacrifice of the Crosse was painfull this of the Masse is without paine the sacrifice of the Crosse was bloudy this is not bloudy one was visible the other is inuisible and none doth see Christ who they say is offered the one hath beene offered and is not reiterable for Christ died but once the other is infinitely reiterated and in infinite places at one time that was immediately performed by Christ and this is done by the ministery of a Priest 3 So doe they also much differ in vertue and efficacy for the death of Christ which he once suffered was sufficient to redeeme the whole world from eternall damnation but the Sacrifice of the Masse is prized at a very low rate for there must be a greate number of them to redeeme one poore soule out of Purgatory they are sold in the Countrey for sixe blanckes but at Paris they cost more The first of the nine dayes after the Popes death Lib. 1. Sacrarum Ceremoniar Sect. 15. cap. 2. there are two hundred Masses said for his soule and vpon each of the eight daies following there is one Masse said to deliuer his pontificall soule out of Purgatory yea for fiue hundred yeares together there are Masses sung for some deceased persons that haue enriched some Monastery yea scarce fifty thousand Masses are sufficient for one soule 4 To be short seeing the sacrifice of the Crosse is nothing but the death of Iesus Christ no man will beleeue that the Masse wherein Christ dyeth not is the same sacrifice with his death 5 Hereunto can wee haue no answere from them to the purpose for they onely say that it is the same host both in the Masse and vpon the Crosse to wit the body of Iesus Christ and therefore that it is the same sacrifice I answere that put the case that in the Masse Christ be really sacrificed as well as on the Crosse yet doth it not follow that it were the same sacrifice it should indeede be the same thing sacrificed but not the same sacrifice For a sacrifice to speake properly is not the thing sacrificed but the action of offering and the very Etymologie of the word Sacrifice importeth the doing or action which Bellarmine confesseth Lib. 1. de Missa cap. 2. where hauing set downe the definition of a Sacrifice §. Primo igitur Hoc loco sacrificium accipimus pro actione sacrificandi non autem pro victima Et lib 2. c. 4. §. Secundum Sacrificium est actio non res permanens hee saith that by Sacrifice he vnderstands the action of sacrificing and not the thing sacrificed 6 Obserue farther that although the death of Iesus Christ and the Masse should bee the same sacrifice in kinde and that one definition agreed to eyther yet should they not be the same action in number for it is wel known that there are in number many Masses and indeede two Masses do cost more then one for were there not many Masses in number it were very absurd to number them as they doe that sell them againe one action done cannot be the same in number with one that is not done one blow giuen yeasterday cannot be the same in number with that which shall be giuen to morrow else should a thing to come be past that is should be and should not be If then Masses doe differ in number among themselues why shall they not differ in number from the death of Christ Seeing that between the death of Iesus Christ and the Masse there is more difference then betweene two Masses how diuers soeuer in shew The matter being thus plaine these Doctors will not denie that
not good to be too deepely engaged to him and t is a credite for a man to satisfie for himselfe whence it followes that the diuell that makes long satisfaction with euerlasting torments shall purchase the more credire Besides it is a goodly ambition to giue vnto God more then we owe him by performing these supererogatory satisfactions for so it is to be feared that God finding himselfe indebted to such a number of Friers may bee in danger of turning banckrupt O spirite of blasphemy and prophanation of the Gospell O wonderfull patience of the Lord But now let vs take a view how this superfluity of satisfaction of the Saints is distributed The Pope opens this Treasure and drawing thence spirituall graces Of the distribution of the treasure of the Church doth variously make distribution of them sometimes hee giues particular priuiledges to certaine Orders and Fraternities So Pope Sixtus quintus in the yeare 1586. In the booke of Indulgences graunted to the Cordeliers printed at Paris by Iean le Bouc 1597. the seuenth of May graunted to all those of the Order of the Cordeliers that on the Eue of Palme-sonday and on Midsomer Eue and on the Eue of Io. Port-latin shall say fiue Pater-nosters and as many Aue-Maries a Pardon for all their sinnes beside the power of easing one soule in Purgatory And in as bountiful a manner hath the Pope graunted to the Order of the Friers Carmelites a priuiledge that they shall continue in Purgatorie no longer then the Saterday after their departure Sometimes againe the Pope disperseth certaine holy graines and hallowed Crosses the saluting of which with an Aue-Mary doth purchase a Pardon for a hundred yeares or peraduenture a plenary Indulgence Our Kings Ambassadours comming from Rome doe ordinarily bring with them such gratifications His Holinesse is also pleased to send vnto diuers places certaine priuiledged Altars vpon which if a Masse or two chance to be vttered they redeeme a soule out of Purgatory The Church of the Feuillans at Paris hath this priuiledge that euery Masse that is there sung for the dead on the Munday or Wednesday doth redeeme a soule from Purgatory for the Masses said on other dayes haue no such vertue in them to which purpose Mr. Coeffetean could haue alleadged some place of S. Paul but that he bethought him not of it Moreouer the Pope opening this Treasure doth now and then graunt certaine liberatory Bulles from Purgatory in fauour of some persons of quality and at the instance of their parents which Buls are paide for in Ducats of the Chamber at the end whereof there should not be written Datum Romae dated at Rome but venditum Romae solde at Rome For there is no reason that this treasure should be opened for the soule of euery monilesse beggar But the most ordinary manner of this distribution is that the Pope sets downe some proportion or number of Pardons for certaine Churches in some more in some lesse We haue a booke expresly written of Romane Indulgences printed at Rome by Iulio Accolto Ann. 1570. out of which take this example among a thousand others In the moneth of February vpon Septuagessima sonday for going the Station vnto S. Lawrence without the walles there is graunted a plenary Indulgence beside a pardon for eleuen thousand yeares and forty eight Quarentaines and remission of one third part of all sinnes and the redemption of a soule out of Purgatory This is one of the high Holy-dayes Vpon the Wednesday after S. Lucy being Ember-weeke the Station is to S. Maryes the greater for which an Indulgence is graunted for eight and twenty thousand yeares and as many Quarentaines and remission of one third part of sinnes yea and a plenary pardon for all sinnes The same booke saith that for each dayes repaire to S. Eusebies Church a pardon is vndoubtedly graunted for threescore and eighteene thousand yeares and as many Quarentaines and that on euery All-Saints day there is in al the principal Churches sixe thousand yeares of an infallible pardon But especially his Holinesse doth grow prodigall in the dissipation of this Treasure in the yeare of Iubile which is now celebrated euery fiue and twentieth yeare hauing made a kinde of circle of sinne as it were a solar reuolution of the forgiuing of sinnes then Indulgences flie thicke abroad and the Pope doth freely and fully pardon all sinne the place of this Iubile are the Stations at Rome prouided that they bee resorted vnto for thirty dayes whether of consecution or intermission it matters not then Pilgrims flocke from all partes and one Nation enuying anothers quarrels and blowes are often exchanged among them the next yeare after his Holinesse conueyes the Iubile ouer the Alpes and withall sendes the same spirituall fauours to two or three places in Fraunce and so in Spaine Now if death chaunce to take any out of the world in this yeare of Iubile no question but he goeth straight to Paradice but he that vnfortunately dies the yeare before his lot is to frie in Purgatory and must misse of this pontificall bounty vnlesse the Pope by a speciall pardon doe priuiledge him from this fire But hence arise sundry other inconueniences for in places not aboue fifty or a hundred leagues from the place where the Iubile is kept such as are well horsed and haue mony in their purse doe easily obtaine pardon for their sinnes but he that hath neyther horse nor money for his iourney is excluded from this great happinesse for why is he so beggerly Or wherefore should he want horse flesh Or why is he such an Asse that he should not finde himselfe a good paire of legges and therefore shal haue no remission of sinnes And therefore it is a goodly matter to dwell at Rome and be at the Well-head of these pardons without running so farre after them neyther is it credible that any that dwels at Rome vnlesse he be a very lob should goe to Purgatory for there is the spring of spirituall graces and a man may euery day get fiue or sixe hundred yeares of Pardons which is forsooth a gallant prouision at the yeares end Let the Reader take his counters and cast vp the reckoning Now if any shall atrest a Pilgrime trauelling toward the Iubile this is a case of speciall reseruation and from a sinne of this high nature none of this side the Alpes can giue absolution Bulla de Caena Domini de casibus reseruatis marry for murther or adultery or such sinnes as offend onely the law of God and hinder not the Popes profite the matter is more easie for we must obserue that in the Buls of pardon this clause is ordinarily inserted that these Pardons are granted manus porrigentibus adiutrices to such as put forth helping handes for which purpose there are Trunckes and Chests set at the gates and euery one is exhorted to spit in the Bason These high dayes of Pardon are euen the Faires of Babylon
Confession TOuching the Reliques of Saints if I had any such that I were assured were members of their bodies I would honourably burie them and not giue them the reward of condemned mens members which are only ordained to be depriued of buriall But for worshipping eyther them or Images I must account it damnable Idolatry Vnto this doth Doctor Coeffeteau oppose foure passages of the Fathers alleadging S. Ierome dissputing against Vigilantius for the Reliques of Saint Ambrose in his Sermon of S. Nazarius and S. Celsus saying in many places that he honoureth the bodies of Saints S. Chrysostome who in his Homily of S. Iuuentius and Maximus saith that men doe visite and adorue their Tombes and touch their Reliques with faith to the end they may receiue some blessing thereby S. Augustine in the two and twentieth booke of the City of God speaking of three persons that were cured with the touch of certaine Reliques He alleadgeth no one testimony of holy Scripture it hath no voyce in the Chapter and yet hee skips at once ouer the first foure hundred yeares after Christ for the auncientest of these foure wrote about the end of the fouth age 1 To begin then with the word of God Wee read in the olde Testament that the bodies of the holy Patriarches haue beene enterred Gen. 50.25 and buried in the Sepulchres of their Fathers Ioseph when he died gaue order that his bones should be kept till their departure out of Egypt for he desired that the keeping of his bones should be an instruction to continue the hope of their deliuerance but of any worship done vnto his bones there is no mention at all 2 When Moses died vpon the mountaine of Nebo Deut. 34.6 God would not suffer the Israelites to know the place of his buriall the reason being doubtlesse a feare that they would haue Idolatrously abused his bodie 3 In the first booke of Kings chap. 13. God raised a dead man by the vertue of Elizeus his touching of the dead body the Lord intending by this Miracle to authorize the doctrine of his faithfull seruant But we finde not at all that the body of Elizeus was for this taken out of his graue neyther that the people did kneele to his bones that they brought any offerings vnto it or that they kissed or carried it in procession Ver. 17 4 In the second booke of Kings cap. 23 King Iosias forbids the digging vp of the bones of a deceased Prophet but will haue them left in the Sepulchre He doth not then commaund any transportation of his bones or to yeelde any veneration or worship or oblation or adoration Ver 12 5 In the ninteenth of the Acts there are cures wrought by touching of the Kerchiefes brought from S. Paul yet is not the linnen put apart for a relique nor is there any ceremony done vntoit For the Miracles were not wrought by any vertue of the linnen but by the power of God who by these Miracles confirmed the preaching of his holy Apostle 6 Therefore Esay 8.19.20 the Prophet hauing reproued those that went from the liuing to the dead sends vs to the law and the testimony if wee will haue the light of heauen to shine vpon vs. 7 To be short our aduersaries finde not one sillable in the word of God nor any example of any religious seruice or adoration of Reliques For it is vntruely affirmed by Bellarmine that the Scripture alloweth the religious worship performed to our * Lib. de reliquijs sanctorum cap. 4 §. Ad tertium Seriptura approbat cultum Sepulchri fimbrie Christa Item vmbrae Petri sudariorum semicinctâ—orum Pauli Sauiors Sepulchre and to the hemme of his garment and to Peters shadow and Pauls Kercheifes How should it approue that whereof it makes no mention at all Why doth he not alleadge some passage of Scripture wherein the worship or veneration of the linnen or shadowes or Sepulchres is mentioned who will be perswaded that a learned man affirming a matter so full of vntruth should haue any conscience in him So in the beginning of the third Chapter hee falsely alleadgeth these wordes out of the eleuenth of Esay ver 10. His Sepulchre shall be glorious for it is in the Hebrew his rest shall be glorious whereunto let this be added that there is no word in that place of any worship performed to this Sepulchre Now that the point in difference betweene vs may be vnderstood wee dispute not whether the bodies of Saints and Martyrs may be reserued respectiuely or in case their Sepulchres were vndecently placed or ridiculously exposed to prophane insolencies whether it be lawfull to remoue their bodies to some other place for thus farre we agree And his Maiesty of England protesteth that if hee certainely knew any Reliques which were indeede the body of any Saint he would honourably burie them and keepe them with respect for if men doe curiously affect the sight of the monuments of auncient Kings or pagan Emperours who should be so prophane as not to desire the sight of the Tombs of the Apostles and of those sacred lights whose glory shineth euen after their death Or who in this regard would not be touched with a louing respect to them and their memory But the question is whether wee must performe any seruice to these Reliques or must adore them or speake to things without life or offer vnto bones or clothes or whether God haue commaunded to lay them vpon Altars or carry them in procession For the Conuenticle held at Nice Pag 104 of the Colen Edition Ossa cineres pannos sanguinem sepulera denique martyrum adoremus about the yeare 789. which the Church of Rome reckoneth for a generall Councell in the fourth Act willeth that the bones ashes and the ragges be adored And Bellarmine in the fourth chapter * §. Quod autem Chrysostemê° Sermone in Sanctos Iuuentium Maximum dicit Tumulos Martyrum adoremus of his booke of Reliques proueth the adoration of Reliques by these wordes of Chrysostome in his Sermon of Iuuentius and Maximus Tumulos Martyrum adoremus Let vs adore the Monuments of Martyrs but the words in Chrysostome are Tumulos Martyrum adornemus Let vs adorne the monuments of Martyrs which is a horrible falsification but this is ordinary with the Cardinall whereof Coeffeteau himselfe is euen ashamed for alleadging the same passage he translates it faithfully Fol. 55. pag. 2. Let vs adorne their monuments The same Cardinall about the end of the second chapter sayth We adore not Reliques as God then by his owne confession he worshippeth Reliques but it is with an inferiour adoration Now wee require our aduersaries to shew vs some commaundement of God or some example out of the holy Historie for this adoration and religious worship for whatsoeuer distinction of worship they may produce is alwaies such a seruice and religious worship as God hath not commaunded and is consequently comprised vnder that
vnto the 15. verse of the 21. chapter Seauen dayes after his arriuall he is taken and to auoyd the violence of the Iewes he appealeth vnto Caesar when he came to Rome he preached there two yeares Acts 28.30 and there suffered Martyrdome as we may easily gather out of the 2. Timothy Chapter 4. verse 6. and by the subscription of the Epistle From whence it appeareth that the Epistle to the Romanes could not be written aboue three yeares before his death and not to be too strict let vs admit that it might be 4. yeares let vs now shew that S. Peter had not beene at Rome when S. Paul wrote this Epistle for that is prooued by the fifteenth chapter of the said Epistle to the Romanes where Saint Paul saith that he is resolued to goe to Rome whereof he rendreth this reason to wit I study to set forth the Gospell not in those places where mention hath beene already made of Iesus Christ to the end faith he that I build not vpon another mans foundation He presupposeth then that neyther S. Peter nor any Apostle had till that time laid nay foundation in the Church of Rome otherwise S. Paul going thither soone after should haue built vpon anothers ground-worke The renowne and credite and the mutual conference and conuersation of the Christian strangers with the Romanes had sowen the Christian Religion at Rome but before S. Pauls comming thither there was not any forme of a Church gouerned S. Paul laid the first foundation as is manifest by the place alleadged This being thus gained let vs end the rest of the combat The Kings Maiesty of England hath aduisedly noted that the Apostle S. Paul did excommunicate the incestuous person of his owne authority the spirit of the Corinthians ioyning with his spirit without making or medling with S. Peters spirit Coeffeteau here answereth that by the spirit S. Paul meant not authority but knowledge and declaration of will as Beza expoundeth it I aunswere that this declaration of will was done by vertue of the power and authority which he had as he addeth in the wordes following In the name of our Lord Iesus and by his power so calleth he that power which Christ had giuen him and which hee denieth to haue receiued from any man Gal. 1. v. 1. and chap. 2. v. 6. n = * They which were the cheef brought nothing vnto it But saith Coeffeâ—eau it is not necessary at all times to expresse all the functions of the Church nor the Primacy of S. Peter it being sufficient to beleeue it Then say I if he omitted it in this place and neuer thelesse beleeued it you must then shew vs some other place wherehe confesseth that he beleeued it Coeffoteau goeth further and saith Coeff fol. 89. That in the Letters of the Councell of Ierusalem the decision was made by the authority of the whole Assembly without speaking of Peter Acts 15.23 because the Letters were sent in the name of all the company n = * The apostles and the Elders brethren to the brethren that are of the Gentils in Antiochia Besides it is sufficient that elsewhere S. Peter is called cheefe by the Oracle of truth and that Peter himselfe speaketh first To this I say that if in these dayes a Councell where the Pope were present should write Letters to decide a Controuersie it would be thought very strange if in those Letters there were no mention made of the Pope Againe we cannot finde that the Oracle of truth did euer giue vnto S. Peter any power or Iurisdiction ouer the other Apostles Furthermore in this Councell Peter spake as a man that gaue his aduise or iudgement but it was Iames that spake last and pronounced the finall decision as President in the action But among all the reasons alleadged by the King of great Britaine that is most witty and forcible which is drawne from the first chapter of the first to the Corinthes which hath not beene yet noted by any other S. Paul had founded the Church of Corinth and had laboured mightily but after his departure from them they fell to faction and partaking one saying I am of Paul another of Apollo and another of Peter Those that said they were of Paul had a desire rather to become his followers then Peters it appeareth then that S. Paul had not taught them to acknowledge S. Peter to be his Superior and to be the head of the vniuersall Church for if he had so taught them they would neuer haue resisted and withstood that his instruction Neyther is it possible that any man would oppose himselfe herein against S. Paul thinking in so doing to become his Disciple or that he would not beleeue him to the end he might become his follower This is not onely absurde but it is also impossible from this argument so aptly collected Coeffeteau being vnable to comprehend the force thereof is driuen to shifts and querkes cleane from the purpose To as little purpose is it when he saith that Caluine speaking of the Controuersie betweene Paul and Peter Coeff fol. 90. Gal. 2. did not inferre a Preference of S. Paul before S. Peter but onely an equalitie for his Maiestie doth not intend a preheminence of S. Paul aboue S. Peter in generall but onely in this particular action Forasmuch as iustly to reprehend is a thing more noble then to be reprehended and to teach better then to learne I also adde that it is very likely that if S. Peter had had his Cardinals about him or a guard of Swyssers and Light Horsemen See Crysostome vpon chap. 1. to the Galathians he would not haue suffered S. Paul to haue withstood him to his face But follow on the line and leauell of S. Pauls purpose 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and it will lead you directly to the truth that S. Pauls drift was to meete with and to preuent the mis-regard which some had of his Apostleship which some held to be of an inferior ranck because he was none of the twelue but came after them Against this opinion of theirs he iustly armeth himselfe and saith in the very beginning of his Epistle that he is an Apostle not of men nor by man but by Iesus Christ where he teacheth vs sufficiently that hee had no commission from S. Peter And chap. 2. verse 6. he saith that they that seemed to be in estimation added nothing vnto him He saith that the charge was diuided betweene him and Peter to him were the Gentiles committed euen as to Peter those of the circumcision that Iames Peter and Iohn who were accounted the Pillars gaue him the right hand of Fellowship that he withstood Peter to his face when he came to Antioch Petrum solum nominant sibi comparat quia primatum ipse accepit ad fundandam Ecclesiam se quoque pari modo electum vt primatum haberet in fundandis gentis um Ecclesijs and went not the right
the Church and the first of all other and this is found in the 16 Session But note that it is not the Councell which speaketh thus but Paschasin deputed from Rome who pleadeth his owne cause and yet this hindred not this Councell from making a Canon expresly declaring and defining that the Bishop of Constantinople is equall with him of Rome in all things yea euen in causes Ecclesiasticall the Canon hath beene produced by vs before He further saith that Irenaeus chap. 3. lib. 3. doth attribute vnto the Church of Rome a principality more powerfull thē vnto others which is most false and an euident corruption of the place Irenaeus speaketh of the principality and power of the city for being the seate of the Empire the faithfull of all Churches had necessary occasions to repaire thither The words are these Ad hanc Ecclesiam propter potentiorem principalitatem necesse est omnem conuenire c. Ecclesiam vnto this Church by reason of the more mighty principality it is necessary that euery Church should resort As if I should say that all the Churches of France should come to that of Paris because there is the principality and power of the Realme and yet can I not for all this say that the faithfull ministers of the Church of Paris haue a principality ouer the rest Saint Cyprian in the third Epistle of his first booke doth directly call the Church of Rome the principall Church because in all the West there was no Church so great or so remarkable as it He saith that the vnity of Priesthood came from thence because his opinion was Hoc crant vtique caeteri Apostoli quod Petrus pari consortio honoris potestatis sed exordium ab vnitate proficisc it ur vt Ecclesia vna monstretur that albeit the Apostles were all equall in power and honour yet S. Peter was entertained into his charge some small time before the other Apostles Iesus Christ hauing a determination to begin from one to the end to shew the vnity of the Church as he saith in his treatise of the simplicity of Prelates He beleeued then that S. Peter who for a season held the sacerdo tall dignity alone to testifie the vnity of the Church had beene at Rome and that from thence Christiā religion spred it selfe into the West Now in this Cyprian goeth about to soften and to gratifie the Bishop of Rome to the end to prepare him the better to taste and to brooke the checkes and reproofes which afterwards he adioyneth whereby he proueth to Cornelius that he hath no power at all ouer Affricke and that he neither could nor ought to receiue the causes of those whom the Bishops of Affricke had condemned for saith he presently after seeing it is ordered among vs all and that it is a thing iust and reasonable that euery mans cause should be examined where the crime was committed and that vnto euery Pastor there is allotted a portion of the flocke which each one ought to gouerne and leade as being to render an account vnto the Lord of his carriage and behauiour there is no reason that those whom we guide should runne from one place to another and through their fraudulent rashnesse seeke to breake the concord of Bishops friendly knit together but that they should there pleade their causes where they may haue accusers and witnesses of their crimes lest it fall out that some desperate and forlorne persons should thinke that the authority of the Bishops of Affricke who haue condemned them should be lesse then others their cause hath beene alreadie examined the sentence hath beene alreadie pronounced To conclude he maintaineth that Cornelius may not take knowledge of any causes determined by the Bishops of Affrica without accusing them of lightnesse and vustaydnesse and so trouble the peace and quiet of the Church This is the cause that made Cyprian to gild his pill to extol the dignity of the Church of Rome before he would shew him that he ought not to thrust himselfe into the affaires of other Churches For it is diligently to be noted that those among the ancient Fathers that affirme that the Bishop of Rome is successour to Peter doe thereby vnderstand that he is successour in the charge of Bishop of Rome but not in the Apostleship After this sort also the Bishops of Ephesus were successors to S. Iohn and S. Paul the Bishops of Ierusalem successors to S. Iames so farre as these Apostles were Bishops of Ephesus and Ierusalem but they neuer were successors to the Apostleship and to the gouernment of the Church Vniuersall Nor is there any reason why the Bishop of Rome should be successor to Peter in his Apostleship and yet the Bishop of Ierusalem should be onely successor to S. Iames in his Bishoppricke Besides the Bishop of Antioch more auncient then the Bishop of Rome hath alwaies beene called the successor of S. Peter and why should it not be aswell in the Apostleship and gouernment of the Vniuersall Church If you will say that Peter hath taken away the prerogatiue and preheminence from Antioch and hath transported it to Rome we vtterly deny it and thereof no proofe worthy the receiuing can be brought If they further say that Peter dyed at Rome I will also say that Iesus Christ dyed at Ierusalem And why should not Christ his death at Ierusalem haue in it more power and vertue to make the Bishop of Ierusalem chiefe of the Church then the death of S. Peter at Rome to conferre this great dignity vpon the Bishop of Rome I leaue it likewise to the Readers to iudge who after the death of Peter ought of right to bee the chiefe of the Vniuersall Church For S. Iames liued yet at Ierusalem after S. Peter was dead And the Apostle S. Iohn out-liued him 32 yeares Eusebius in his Chronicle saith that Peter and Paul died the yeare of our Lord 69. and that S. Iohn dyed at Ephesus in the yeare 101. according to the accompt of Eusebius and Irenaeus Is it a thing to bee beleeued that S. Iohn the Disciple whom Iesus loued who leaned on his breast vnto whom he recommended his mother at his death whose writings are diuine oracles as the Reuelations in the Apocalips doe witnes that he should bee inferior to Linus the Disciple of Paul and indeed our aduer saries themselues haue inserred into the first Tome of their Councels certaine Epistles which they say were Clements Bishoppe of Rome amongst which there is one to S. Iames Bishop of Ierusalem and thus it beginneth Clemens to Iames brother of the Lord Bishop of Bishops gouerning the holy Church of the Hebrewes which is in Ierusalem Clemens Iacobo fratri Domini Episcopo Episcoporum yea all the Churches which are founded euery where by the prouidence of God And a little after hee calleth him his Lord words which witnesse that Clemens acknowledged Iames for his superior and chiefe of all
the Bishops of the world We graunt then willingly that the auncient Bishops of Rome before the corruption of Doctrine and vsurpation of the Monarchie in the Church were successors of S. Peter in the Bishoppricke of Rome onely euen as the Bishop of Corinth was successor to S. Paul but withall we adde this that through the corruption of Doctrine which hath by little little crept into the Church of Rome euery age hauing added and contributed thereunto hee is now wholy and iustly falne from that succession For he may not in no wise be called Peters successor who oppugneth the Doctrine preached by S. Peter and who in the Chaire of verity doth establish a lie The Turke may not bee called successor to the Emperour of Greece albeit he be seated in his place seeing that he is rather his subuerter I would haue one shew me that euer S. Peter preached any other purgatory then the bloud of Iesus Christ or any other satisfaction to the iustice of God then his obedience any other sacrifice propitiatory then his death That euer he gaue pardons for an hundred thousand yeares or drew soules out of Purgatory with buls and indulgences that he euer degraded Emperours that he tooke away from the people the reading of the holy Scriptures or the Communion of the Cup or that he commaunded the worshipping of Images and publique Seruice to bee said in an vnknowne tongue or that he euer constrayned other Bishops to take from him letters of Inuestiture and to pay vnto him Annates Or that euer S. Peter was called God on earth the Spouse of the Church and caused himselfe to be worshipped or that euer he sung Masse or commaunded the Host to be adored or that euer he left off preaching the Gospell or quitted the Crosier-staffe to take vnto him a triple Diaderne If I say they can shew me that S. Peter euer did these things then though the Pope were Bishop but of one Village alone I will willingly acknowledge him for S. Peters Successor but still in the Bishopricke only and not in the Apostleship which ended in his person and is not deriued vnto his Successors in particular Churches THus doth the confession of the King of Englands faith remain firme and vnshaken against which Coeffeteau hath armed himselfe with humane testimonies being vtterly destitute of any authority out of the booke of God For as they that are ready to drowne catch hold on any thing so these men in a desperate cause embrace all defences but least of all those that be good Againe whatsoeuer this Doctor alleadgeth out of the Fathers is found to be eyther false or clipt or vtterly counterfeit This payment is not currant especially to such a Prince who hath consecrated his penne to the defence of the truth But this is not to be imputed to Coeffeteaus disability but to the vnlawfulnesse of the cause vnto which we haue in such sort satisfied as whosoeuer shall examine my worke he shall finde an answere to Bellarmines booke also which he hath not long since made against the said booke of the King of great Britaine with more weakenesse and lesse dexterity then Coeffeteau hath done There remayneth the last part of his Maiesties booke wherein with a straine of admirable wit assisted by the spirit of God hee openeth the booke closed with seuen seales and piercing into the secrets of sacred Prophesies he findeth in the seat of Rome the full accomplishment of the Apocalyps When hate and bitternesse shall be extinguished through time Posterity shall admire both the worke and the person and looking backe into ages past for the like patterne shall not be able to finde any thing to be compared with it We will not feare then to enter into these darkenesses vnder so great a guide for it is hard eyther to stumble or to stray where so faire a Torch doth light and shine before vs. But we must here take breath a while before we enter into this taske For the sudden death of our King like a great cracke of Thunder benummeth our handes with astonishment and troubleth our spirits with griefe and anguish Let vs then giue place to necessity and leaue to write that we may haue leisure to lament and let Posterity carefully bethinke it selfe of remedies and hold it for a thing most certaine that hee that setteth light by his owne life is master of another mans and that there is nothing so forcible to make vs to contemne our owne liues as this new doctrine which by the murther of Kings openeth the way to the Kingdome of heauen FINIS Faults necessarily to bee corrected The first number noteth the Page the second the Line The letter R. standeth for Reade L. signifieth the line in the same PAGE PAge 13.25 r. Siloe 14.20 r. Enfant 17.19 r. Armies l. 24. r. these 20.15 r. villanies 42.13 for that r. as l. 19. r. State 49.25 r. things that appeare are more feared c. 56. l. vlt. r retorted 62.2 r. infinity of businesses 71.3 for or r. and. 74.2 r. differents 79.24 r. in the Bookes of the Acts and Charters 81.1 r. See and in the margent paulum annixus 82.1 r. whom l. 3 r. giue it l. 20. r. Ostia 84.25 r. deuolued 90.27 r. Ruota 91.4 r. fifth part or fifth penny 95.14 blot out he l. 25. r. Distinction 97.23 for alleadged r. already 99.18 make it 560.100.26 r. no wayes for now adayes 101.24 for take r. make 102 17. r. aboue 104.24 for Sinnes r. Summes 106.25 r Bellisarius 107.20 r. Conon 108.4 r. debonnaire l. 7. for to r. doe 110.1 for penalty r. priuity 119.12 Consiglio l. 17. r. retchlesse 125.7 for which is r. with l. 11. r. Augustin l. 25. for as r. and. in the margent Ponticus verunnius 127.20 r. different 136.24 blot out kinde in the marg r. communia debere 140.9 r messieurs l. 12. r. of for or 147.15 r. receiued them 158.2 r. or no more 160.25 r. Nattiers 161.1 blot out the. 168.4 r. Doctors l. 17. madonna 27. Letanies 169.22 for Fathers r. saluation 173.11 r. the brecz-flies 174.9 r. discourse l. 19. r. she for he 177. l. the last r. Antonine 178 27. r. places for phrases 180.18 r. as not being 182.18 r. lauour l. 20. r. washed 188.18 r. but saith 193.11 r no prescription 197.27 for toward r. ouer vs. 203.20 r. out of the 217.23 for ouer turnes r. powreth out of l. the last r. therefore 221.1 blot out the. 229.28 r. they saw well that if they should breake 261.3 for tongues r. Fire-tongs 281.11 r. commanded 300.1 r. meditation 301.8 for defectiue r. wanting 305.4 r. another 307.22 blot out that l. 23. r. should 308.1 blot out bad 309.25 r. with l. 28. r. istud 349.14 for if r. though 369.28 r. Suppositions