Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
death_n grace_n life_n reign_v 4,565 5 9.3210 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A48358 Holy characters containing a miscelany of theolocicall [sic] discovrses that is theology, positiue, scholasticall, polemicall, and morall built upon the foundation of scriptures, traditions, councils, fathers, divided into two books / written by George Leybvrn ... Leyburn, George, 1593-1677. 1662 (1662) Wing L1938; ESTC R18553 388,184 688

There are 9 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

from equalling or adjusting of things due by right Iustice deriues its name which in order to God is meet exhibiting of praise and seruice in regard of his diuine perfections and thanksgiuing in reference to the infinit benefits he hath confer'd on mankind and a meet satisfying for sin whereby God is injured It is meet and just that we praise and serue God who is our soueraign lord of whom we hold all our goods both temporall and spirituall and which-indeed are rather his goods then ours he hauing deliuered them to us only vpon condition we render him faithfull seruice that is * Ad Epes 6. non ad oculum seruientes quasi hominibus placentes sed vt serui Christi facientes voluntatē eiuo ex animo not seruice to the eye as men-pleasers but as good seruants doing his will with a perfect heart and willing mind * S. Chrysos cum tali inquit vultu respicit Deus ea quae facis cum quali facis For God regardeth our seruice according to the manner we doe it he glorifyeth the good and casteth the euill seruants into vtter darknes wherfore whosoeuer will be for himselfe and not for God * S. Gregor de nihilo Deus fecit omniae qui sibi vult esse non tiói nihil vult esse inter omnia will be nothing amongst all things which God made of nothing besides it is meet and just that we praise and serue God in regard he is our Father we are the clay and he our potter and we all are the work of his hands Isa 64. if a child is bound to honour and serue his earthly Father in deed in word and in all patience Eccle. 30. from whom he receiueth his body much rather he ought to honour and serue his heauenly Father that both formes the same body and breathes into it a breath of life vnto making him a liuing soul and exalting him to a heauenly inheritance wherfore doubtless euery good Christian when he saith our Father which art in Heauen hath a great sense of his condition and taketh thought for pleasing God his heauenly Father lest he come to heare the heauy sentence of Iudgment declared to the wicked Iewes I haue nourished and brought vp children but they haue rebelled against me Isa 50. or that other Io. 8. ye are of your Father the deuil and the lustes of your Father ye will doe Again t is meet and just that we celebrate the remembrance of Gods immense benefits bestowed on us with thanks-giuing for he * Ephes 2. Deus qui diues est in misericordia propter nimiam suam charitatem qua dilexit nos which is rich in mercy through the great aboundance of his loue where with he loued us euen When we were by nature the children of wrath and dead in sin hath quickened us together in Christ by whose grace we are deliuered from bondage death and made partakers of eternall life to the end we may raigne with him celestially Eph. 20. One of the ten lepers Luc. 17. was just fell down on his face at the feet of Christ and gaue him thankes for the healing of his corporall leprosy much rather we Christians ought to exalt the great mercy of God with thanks-giuing for as much as he hath cured vs through IESUS-CHRIST of our spirituall leprosy which is sin vnless we will be like the other euill nine lepers which returned not to praise God that had clensed them or like the pagan Philosophers Rom. 10. which God gaue vp to their vaine thoughts deceitfull vanities and their hearts filthy lusts because though they knew yet they did not glorify him neither were thankfull Again t is meet and just that we acknowledge our sins to God vnto repairing of the injuries done him thereby and when we (c) An humble confession of our sins appeaseth Gods wrath I did confess saith the Royall Prophet against my selfe my iniustice to our lord and he forgaue the impiety of my sin confess with a contrite heart against our selues our wickednes his mercy forgiues the punishment of our guilt * Ezechiel 18. si impius egerit poenitiam ab omnibus peccatis suis quae operatus est .... omnium iniquitatum eius non recordabor neither will God remember the iniquities of him that turnes from them and makes him a new heart and a new spirit Iustice in order to our neighbour is to pay to all men loue respect honour and duty that is to doe to euery man whatsoeuer we would * Haecest lex naturae Quod tibi nō vis facere alteri nefeceris that euery man should doe to vs for euery man is euery mans neighbour there being nothing of * Aug. in Psal 118. omnis homo omni homini est proximus nec vllae cogit anda est longinquitas generis vbi est natura communis distance as to birth or kindred where nature is common alike Besides Gods law of charity excepts none his will being to saue and bring all men vnto the knowledg of his truth (d) According to the generall practice of the Catholick Church publick prayers are offered on good friday for all men of what condition or profession soeuer they be which holy custome plainly demonstrates the sence of the whole Church in order to Christs offering his passion for the redemption of the world that is the Church beleiues that Christ excluded none from that oblation Pagans Iews and hereticks through the great mercy of God may cast from them their iniquities vnto iustification of life in respect wherof the Apostle Timo. 2. exhorteth that supplications prayers intercessions and giuing of thanks be made for all men in consequence of the premises as we would that our neighbour should doe to vs so must we doe to him likewise as we would that our neighbour should giue to vs loue respect honour and duty so must we giue to him likewise as we would that our neighbour should not prejudice us in word counsell or deed so must we doe to him likwise as we would that all men should keep their faith pawned to us so must likewise wee performe faithfully our ingagement with all men Furthermore Iustice in order to our neighbour is to fullfill (e) S. Gregor l. 4. Dial. c. 58. aduiseth vs as a thing more safe and profitable to procure in our life time those benefits and aduantages which after our death we exspect from those which are intrusted with our pious legacies saying t is better to depart out of this world vnliable to imprisonment then afterwards in prison to seek liberty the will of the dead according to the trust put in us and to powre out our prayers to giue of our aboundance alms and to vnder goe voluntary afflictions for the faithfull departed to the end that such as after their remouall out of their bodies stand liable (f) S. Bernard auerreth that the torments of faithfull souls
Rom. 5. Inuisibilia Dei à creatura mundi per ea quae facta sunt intellecta conspiciuntur in his works visible CHAR. IJ. OF ADAM THE CONTENTS The integrity of Adams creation his fall from originall Iustice through the euill managing of his free will all his posterity concerned in his fall ADam was the first man that God made * Gen. 1. creauit Deus hominem ad imaginē similitudinē suam in his own image and after his likeness (a) S. Hieron l. 3. com in epis ad Ephes calleth Adam the first man and first Prophet because he fore told the mysterious Incarnation of the Son of God in saying This novv is bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh which the Apostle nameth magnum Sacramentum For as much as it importes Christs nuptiall conjunction or marriage with the Church his Spouse the first Prophet that prophesied of the mysterious Incarnation of the Son of God and the first prodigall son that vnhappily managed his patrimony (b) Eccl 1. God made man vpright that is according to the interpretation of great S. Austin l. de cor gra God gaue him in his creation sanctifying grace And the same S. Austin l. 13. de civit Dei expresly teacheth that the first man was created in grace and l. 12. de civit affirmes that the Angels in their creation received grace together with their nature His heavenly Father had setled him in a fair estate of originall iustice as to his soul * Sap. 2. Creauit hominē inexterminabilē and immortallity as to his body and he made away with both wilfully for the obedience that was onely required to the conseruing thereof * Non foret homo animal rationale nisi ei inesset libera boni mali electio nec Deus foret iustus si impossibilia iuberet Aug. ser de tem laid in his power And it was necessary to injoyne * Aug. l. 8. gen oportebat vt homo sub Domino Deo positus aliundè prohiberetur him the performance of that vertue for if nothing had been commanded him or he forbidden from nothing he would haue had nothing to know his own inferiority and to acknowledge his Creatours superiority The Command that God laid vpon Adam was that he should not cate of the tree of knowledge of good and euill so named not in reference to the fruit that in it selfe was good * Gen. 1. omnia quae fecerat Deus erant valde bona for all that God created was very good but in order to transgression that taught him to discern between good and euill between the good of obedience as to the perpetuating of grace and life and the euill of disobedience as to the introducing of sin and death Yet God had no part in Adams transgression for his diuine goodnes had bestowed on him sufficient auxiliaries to continue him in obedience and did nothing to necessitate his disobedience (c) Ecclus. 15. God made man from the beginning and left him in the hand of his counsel gaue him his commandements .... they shall conserue thee he hath set vvater and fire before thee stretch out thy hand vnto vvhich thou vvilt before man is life and death good and euill vvhat liketh him shall be giuen him This sacred Text giues clear euidence of Adams free will as to accepting or rejecting diuine grace that might haue led him to euerlasting life and indeed S. Austin infers from the same text free will in all men lib. de gra lib. arb arguing from thence that though God giues to euery one his mercifull grace vnto obtaining of heauenly blessednes neuertheles he necessitates none to accept of it being in the liberty of each one to reject it And herein according to the Council of Trent Consisteth the reconciling of mans free will and grace together Morouer the holy writer of Genesis clearly demonstrats mans free will after Adams fall for cap. 4. God said to Cain who was troubled and angry to see his brother Abel and his offerings respected aboue his own Why is thy Countenance cast dovvn if thou doe vveli shalt thou not be accepted and if thou doest not vvell sin lyeth at the door but the lust therof shall be vnder thee and thou shalt haue rule ouen it that is saith S. Austin l. 13. Civit. Dei cap. 7. thou shalt bear dominion ouer sin Where by is evident that mans free will was not extinct through Adams fall and this Catholick assertion is yet more plainly taught Deutr. 30. I call heauen and earth to vvithess this day saith Moses to the People of Israël that I haue set before you life and death blessing and cursing chuse therefore life These last particles evidence enough that God gaue man liberty to chuse good or euill which is the consistency of liberum urbitrium free will S. Ambros in Psal 40. v. 10. for he left him in the hands of his own counsell election and deliberation which euinces Adams free will for what is necessary or impossible requires noe consultation or deliberatnes these being manifest tokens of free actions Besides it is not agreeable vnto reason that he who was established absolute lord of all liuing thing created to the vse of man * Aug. l. de cor gra docet obseruationem praecepti Adamo impositi dependisse ab eius libero arbitrio should want dominion and free vse of his own will and liberty Howeuer Adams fall seems a strange thing he hauing nothing in himselfe that inclined to disloyalty for God had made him vpright and the integrity of his creation extended to all his faculties spirituall and sensible in his will was integrity of sanctifying charity in his vnderstanding integrity of both naturall and supernaturall knowledg and in his sensible parts integrity of order with subordination and peace with quietnes whereby plainly appeares that his fall did not proceed from himselfe originally Neuertheles t' is certain that he did fall yeelding to a weak temptation of which himselfe was not author Simple Eue whom God made for his meet helpe ill counsel'd by the crafty serpent propounded vnto him the eating of the forbidden fruit vnder a fair colour of bettering his and her own condition in the knowledg Of good and euill Adams condescention to this out ward suggestion occasioned his fall wherin he imbarqued all men to ruine leauing nothing behind him for their reparation * Zach. 13. Adam exeplum metem ab adolescentia mea saue his own example of sacrilegious disobedience to make them be wary how to ingage in the future against the vertue of obedience CHAR. IIJ. OF ORIGINALL SIN THE CONTENTS The innate propriety of Originall sin the difference between Originall sin and Adams personall offence and between Originall sin and carnall concupiscence ORiginall sin is the * Aug. Epis 130. vocat peccatum originale vitium haereditarium debitum paterni chyrographi
hereditary vice that passed from our first parent vpon (a) The Apostle Rom. 5. teacheth that as by one man sin entred into the world and death by sin soe death went ouer all men in whom all men haue sinned all mankind The preuarication of Adam did not prejudice himselfe only (b) Concil Araus 2. can 2. condemnes such as assert Adams transgression to haue preiudiced himselfe only and not his posterity This Canon is set down in the Council of Treat sess 6. but also the posterity God did not giue him originall iustice so peculiarly as that it was not intended to all others descending from him yet his diuine wisdom put in his will the cause of hauing or wanting it (c) God had constituted Adam head of all mankind as to hauing or wanting Originall Iustice in consequence of which the will of Adam he being head of all human nature contained the wills of all men taken in the morall sense as to keeping or losing Originall grace God hauing plac'd in his will the cause that might preserue or lose it yet though the will of Adam taken in the proper reall sense was the same when he sinned and when he repented howeuer it was not the same morally because he sinned as a publick and repented as a priuate person only and therfore his repentance profited himselfe alone whom he had constituted chief head of all men and his disobedient carriage depriued all of the intended grace (d) S. Anselm l. de Concep Vir. c. 26. nameth Originall sin nakednes of Justice due that is a priuation of Originall Iustice iustifying grace being due to euery man from the integrity of creation and lost by Adams preuarication the wanting where of is originall sin so named because it proceeds originally from Adam by the conveiance of * Cōcil Trid. definit peccatum originale in omnes trāsfundi per propagationem propagation accompanied vith carnall concupiscence as the conduit of its passage to all his race (e) S. Austin l. 3. oper imperf teaches that originall sin is not only a sin but also the pain of sin whereby t' is euident that originall sin is not the actuall personall sin that Adam committed which could not be the pain of sin for sin a fore was not come into the world Whereby plainly appeares that the actuall and personall sin of Adam that preceded propagation is not originall sin contracted by propagation Besides this passeth vpon all men and consequently is common but personall and common are diuers and inconsistent together Howeuer it is the effect of the personall sin yet so * Sap. 10. eduxit illum Adam à delicto sico that the washing away of that was not to proue a cure for this It was in Adams power to hurt but not to cure the wound He made his own peace with his Creator by the vertue of true repentance (f) S. Austin l. 3. de lib. arb saith that it were not as to equity consonant that Adam should beget children better then himselfe but could not therin include his family as he did in his fall wherfore though justifying grace had cleard him of the guilt of sin notwithstanding he begot children that were sinners Euen so pure grain sown in the ground produces corne with chaff and straw good grapes bring forth wild grapes good oliue trees wild oliue trees and circuncised Iewes vncircuncised children As originall grace is the life of the soul so is originall sin which is the priuation therof the death of the soul and therby distinct (g) S. Austin l. de pec ment remis expresly teacheth that carnall concupiscence which the Apostle calleth lex in membris remaines after baptism in consequence whereof t' is noe sin sin taken in the proper sense for baptism leaueth nothing of vncleaues in him that is baptised aright Again lib. de nup. concup and in sundry other places of his writings he declares that baptism doth not wash away concupiscence thereby distinguishing originall sin which baptism fully destroyeth from concupiscence Moreouer S. Austin l. 2. de nup. concupis plainly affirmes that the conflict or rebellion that comes of carnall concupiscence is not damnable though troublesome because of the extream vnquietnes which it foment's from carnall concupiscence which is not mortall and damnable because it doth not perfect sin though it is very troublesom because it foments disquietnes * Gal. 5. care concupiscit uduersus spiritum for it is the law in the flesh that resist's the law of the mind And albeit that baptism washeth originall sin out of the soul yet it doth not wash concupiscence out of the flesh * Aug. illa concupiscentia ex nobis ipsis inobediētia iustissimo reciprocatu inobedientibus reddita est which is a disobedience laid vpon all flesh by just reciprocation for the disobedience of the first flesh Whereby is plainly evidenced that concupiscence (h) S. Austin l. 3. coun Iulian. teaches that concupiscence does not proceed from God but from sin wherefore S. Paul sometymes call's concupiscence sin for as much as it came of sin and inclines to sinning And indeed t is noe sin sin taken in the proper sense for à free voluntary act of transgression against the law of God Wherefore the Council of Trent hath defin'd that it is not properly a sin as it is left in the regenerated through baptism because as S. Austin teacheth concupiscence does not perfect iniquity and it is left after baptism to a good intent namely to be the seed of a spirituall warfaire vnto exercising of the soul in humility vertue and godlines is not made by God but by the sin of the flesh Howeuer the supreame prouidence lets it raign in the flesh euen after baptism that the flesh may minister matter of vertue to the spirit Though the Children of Israël Gods chosen people passed the red sea which is a Type of Christian baptism came safe to the land of promise which is a figure of sanctifying grace that baptism confers and droue away the Cananites their enemies that possessed it afore which denotates the Deuil that the Sacrament of baptism cast's out of the baptized neuertheless the supream providence left in the mids of them a Iebusaeus whereby is represented carnall concupiscence that daiiy four ented disquietnes continually quarielling fighting and prejudicing them extrea●ely After the same manner the desires of the flesh fight whith and sometymes ouercome the spirit not by strengh but by flattery The flesh is like the alluring Dalila that through fawning sweet enticing words mastered Sampson who exceeded her farre in strength carnall concupiscence is a faire spoken lady that tempteth the spirit as Eue did Adam and if it finde not the spirit circumspect watchfull without sleeping and extream swift in flying from its allurements as Ioseph did from the wanton lady of Egipte it will gaine the victory infallibly in consequence of which euery Christian
exercise of good works opposite therto namely fasting praying Alms deeds c. S. Iohn did not require of the sinfull Iewes inward detestation of their transgressions only but exacted likewise the exercise of painfull works outwardly as to compensation or satisfaction thereof wherefore as fruit's do suppose the Tree that produceth them so good work 's which be fruites of penance suppose sinnes pardoned afore through penance taken in the sense mentioned in consequence whereof they suppose somthing of temporall paine due therunto otherwise they ought not to be called fruit's worthy of penance since after the remission of sinn's in order to the guilt thereof nothing remaineth that requireth fruit's worthy of penance if temporall pain be laid aside for the malice of sin which is it's mortall guilt cannot be taken away in part to wit partly by contrition and partly by painfull works outwardly exercised being indiuisible and without parts so that to exclude temporall punishments as due to sins remitted afore is to ascribe nothing to outward works of satisfaction in reference to penance which is contrary to the word 's vttered by S. Iohn Do fruites worthy of penance And hereby is required besid's meer works of penance proportion between the works and the sin 's committed as plainly shew's the word worthy * S. Grego hom 20. non debet inquit esse par fructus boni operis eius qui minus eius qui amplius peccauit For example one that sinneth little is liable to less satisfaction then another that sinneth much Caeteris paribus and although sacramentall satisfaction be proper only to the new law established by Christ yet taken in the generall sense in order to temporall paine that remain's after the guilt of sin is blotted out was in all times a necessary requisite for the obtaining eternall life as doe clearly euidence the scripture-testimonies sett down Howeuer no satisfaction is worthy vnless the Penitent that satisfyes be in the state of grace and therby incorporated into Christ for satisfaction is made worthy only through the merits of his death and passion the application wherof is an effect of his supernaturall friendship which is not between him and a sinner continuing in the state of mortall sin in consequence of which outward works worthy penance do suppose sanctifying grace in him that worketh worthily vnto remission of temporall paine Furthermore this catholick doctrine is euen agreable to the dictates of naturall reason for as much as amongst men it is not enough that he who wound 's the honour of his neigh hour conceiue inward griefe of that offence only but he ought also to exercise an outward action to the restoring of the honour taken away which hath something of satisfaction in order to the party offended and something of pain in order to him that offendeth so (e) According to S. Leo. ser 7. de Epiph. Domini No man is so clens'd from sin as that neither iustice can findein him what to condemne nor mercy what to pardon it is expedient for him that is a penitent besids an act of inward detestation of his sins to endure something to the satisfying of God as to the dishonour done him therby and as by sinning he hath vsed ill the creatures of God taking inordinate delight therin so he ought to suffer from creatures something of affliction to the repairing of the injury that God suffereth on that score the diuine iustice exacting that satisfaction of penitent sinners whom he chasteneth after their admittance into his fauour God scourgeth euery son Hebrae 12. whom be receiueth for his better correction and amendment Again since euery sin how great and malicious soeuer is remitted as to the guilt therof by (f) Contrition necessary to iustification requires not any certain degree of intensness or certain endurance of tyme for contrition how remiss soeuer it be and how litle soeuer it endures is either formally and indeed an act of perfect charity or importes as much in consequence of which the least measure or degree of true contrition that includes the loue of God aboue all things is inconsistent with deadly-sin euery contrition how litle-soeuer contained within the bound of true contrition and since most sin's haue an * Haecinaequalitatis ratio deprōpta est ex Concil Trid. quod sic ait qui non peccarunt per ignorantiā quique semel a peccari daemonis seruitute liberati accepto Spiritus sancti dono sciētes Templum Dei violare Spiritum sanctum cōtristare non formidarūt minori venia indulgentia digni sunt vnequiall and different malice one being greater then an other reason requires in conformity to diuine equity and iustice that a sinner who through lesser contrition is reconciled to God and becom's Heire of blessedness doth so receiue remission of sins that neuertheless he suffer withall something of affliction to compense the remissnes of his contrition In respect of this painfull satisfaction endured after the remission of the guilt of sins the Sacrament of penance is called by holy Father 's a Laborious baptism whereby it is distinguished from the Sacrament of baptism which washeth away at once both the pain and guilt of sinns as often as it is worthily receiued and the reason of difference in order to their effects respectiuely beside the will of God that hath invested these two Sacrament's with an vnequall power of working is because such as after the receiuing of sanctifying grace through baptism whereby they be deliuered out of the seruitude of sin and the diuell doe knowingly and by a voluntary act of their own will sinne again pollute the Temple of God which is their soul and grieue the Holy Ghost as far as lyeth in their reach deserue less pardon and indulgence in consequence whereof the application of Christ's merits made in the Sacrament of penance ought to be less perfect in order to remission then the application of the same merits made in the Sacrament of haptism yet it would not be less as to perfection if meer contrition or the meer Sacrament of penance should at all tymes procure full remission in order to the guilt eternall and temporall paine of sins committed after baptism (g) S. Chrysos hom 5. in Epis ad Hebrae makes this difference between the wicked that receiue from God in this life riches dignities c. and the good which endure miseries and afflictions to wit God so carries himself toward 's the wicked that albeit he let 's them haue full enjoyment of worldly fortunes neuertheless will punish them in the next life But during the present life God is wont to punish the good that deliuer'd thereby from the vncleaness of sin they may depart out of the world without reproach Wherefore the Sacrament of penance doth not so remit sins but that in remitting the eternall pain corresponding to the malice of them it changeth eternall into temporall paine that remaines behinde as a iust
the sinns of the whole world joynt and seperat comprehending euen children of one daies old and such as are hardened against him * Concil Valent 3. cap. 5. Christus Iesus Daeminus noster sicut nullus homo est fuit vel erit cuius naturae in illo assumpta nō fuerit Ita nullus est c. as there is none or hath been or euer shall be any whose human nature is not assumed in Christ so there is none or hath been or shall euer be any for whome Christ hath not suffered his passion in regard whereof he is called Sauiour of all though specially of those which by baptisme are buried with him into death that is which drink of the Cup of his passion for baptism was instituted by him as an essentiall requisite for the drinking thereof vnto iustification of life and the offering the Cup of his passion had been litle conducible to the end it was offered for if necessary meanes had not been prouided to profer it an end cannot be obtained without the application of helps conuenient and conform there to and as to this point of generall prouision Christ was wanting to none for such as are baptised in him and consequently buried with him by baptism into death of sin receiue the benefit of his passions Cup which if they shall constantly keep they cannot be depriued of eternall blessednes due to their holy perseuerance in sanctity through the merits of Christs death and all those * Secundum S. Aug. qui nunquam audiuit Euangelium Chricti habet gratiam qua possit vel praeceptū naturae implere vel qua possit implorare auxilium ad praeceptū naturae implendum vnde illud psal 83. benedictionē dabit Dominus qui lege dedit who are not baptised if they are come to the yeares of discretion do infallibly participate of Gods generall grace on the same scoare of Christs death sufficiently as to the obseruation of the commandements which if they shall faithfully keep and these are written in their hearts they must certainly enioye the benefit of baptism or some other aduantage equalling that as to iustification Touching (b) According to S. Prosper l. de voca Gent. c. 23. Young children born of vnbelieuing parents might receiue meet helpe in order to their saluation if the same parents should vse well the grace that Christ through his bitter passion hath procured for euery kind of people and nation being Christ offered the Cup of his passion for all men joint and seperat excluding none on his part from the possibility of drinking of it children who die before the vse of reason without baptism though they want thereby the benefit of generall redemption and consequently are depriued of full felicity neuertheless their misfortune must not be ascribed to the wanting of a generall Redeemer (c) The Apostle 2. Cor. 5. inferreth from Christs dying for all men that all were dead in Adam saying if one Christ be dead for all from whence t is euident that Christ dyed for all which were dead in Adam and indeed otherwise the Apostle had made a very weak inference and to noe purpose wherfore since according to the Apostle all men were dead in Adam without doubt Christ dyed for all men joynt and seperat and S. Austin after the same manner inferreth from the text set down that all men were dead in Adam because Christ dyed for all and l. 6. con Iulia c. 1. makes vse of the same argument to proue against Iulian and the Pelagians that all children were dead in Adam because one Christ dyed for all and this Catholick doctrine S. Austin inculcateth vrgeth and presseth against all opposers Hanc inquit doctrinam inculco impingo refercio recusanti so that our modern Teachers say vnaduisedly that S. Austin nouer taught that Christ gaue himselfe a propitiation was crucifyed or dyed for all men joynt and seperat besides S. Austin trac 31. in Joan. saith expresly that the Iewes which murthered Christ ought not to dispaire being Christ euen for them offered his prayer and a litle after Christ saith he considered his death as offered for and not as procured by them which doctrine S. Prosper confirms l. 2. de vocat gent. Christ hauing dyed for and to redeem all excluding none on his part it is to be imputed either to the negligence of their parents who if Christians let them die without baptism if infidels help them not as they might doe by embracing * Graetia implorandi diuinum uuxilium implēdi omnia praecepta naturae omnibus hominibus adultis gratis cōcessa est proinde nemo est cui ad fidem Christi aliquis non patent accessus vnde Io. 1. erat lux veraquae illuminat omnem bominem venientem in hunc mundum Gods generall grace that leads them to the marueilous light of Christian faith Again many times it is to be ascribed to naturall secundary causes which take Children out of this life before baptism can be administred to them howeuer God is not wanting in necessary requisits or meanes as to the full happines of those Infants which by naturall causes are preuented of the application of baptism because they do not suffer preiudice for want of sufficient expedients since Christ hath instituted baptism as a most sufficient remedy vnto blessednes in order to all men and infants are depriued of the fruit for as much only as the application of it is obstructed by certaine naturall causes which God did not dispose and ordaine to that end or purpose but for a generall good of the whole vniuers which God is not bound to hinder for he doth not inuert or obstruct the order of things settled from the creation of the world he is not only generall benefactour according to mercy but also a generall prouider according to prouidence he taketh not care of one creature so as to neglect his care of another or so to benefit one as to preiudice another for example if a man should cast himselfe willfully into a hot fiery furnace God to preserue him from burning should be obliged to hinder the innate actiuity of fire which is to burne and so to work miraculously aboue nature as he did in the hot furnace of Babilon which God is not bound to doe howeuer the premises giue euidence enough to beleiue that Christ is rightly named the Redeemer and Sauiour of all Besides as a king is truly a king soueraign lord and supream Gouernor of his people though they rebell against him and will not be gouerned so Christ is truly (d) The Apostle 1. Timoth. 4. calleth Christ the Sauiour of all men but specially of the faithfull where the particle specially giues euidence enough against our modern Teachers that Christ dyed for the Redemption of all men joynt and seperat which Catholick doctrine S. Iohn the Apostle cap. 2. clearly demonstrates saying that Christ Is the propitiation for our sins and not for ours
will free himselfe of his bondage at his pleasure As a ship that hath lost her helme cannot sail whether and as her self would but is caryed whether and as the wind will euen so a sinner that is depriued of the helme of grace cannot doe the good things which he should but the euill which he should not and as ship of it self can descend but not ascend so a man by the power of his own free will can fali into But cannot rise from sin The works of nature (c) God said by the mouth of his Prophet Ose cap. 13. Perdition is thine O Israel onely in me is thine help whereby is clearly euidenced that the euils which happen come of our own procurement in regard of the sinnes we commit which do not proceed from God who cannot be the author of euil as it is an euil worke though according to the Prophet Amos cap. 3. he is cause of punishment due to sin which is called malum poena But God punisheth in order to amendement in this life and Iustice after death so that those which amend their life need not feare the diuine iustice after death can cast him down but the works of grace only can raise him vp again that he is a seruant of sin and freed of iustice is his own free act but that he is freed of sin and a seruant vnto iustice is the work of grace through IESUS-CHRIST and indeed if the works of nature were sufficient enough to raise vp a sinner vnto iustification of life Christ had dyed * Ga. 2. so per legem iustitia ergo Christus gratis mortuus vnde Aug. infert contra Pelagi Si per naturā tustitia ergo Christus graits moriuus ergo scandalum crucis euacuatum est without cause Furthermore besides this bondage there be sundry other euil things which the deuil hath made of sin for he that sinneth speakes * Jsa 5. va vobis qui dicitis malū bonum bonum malum ponentes tenebras lumē lumen tenebras ponētes amarum in dulce dulce in amarū good of euill and euil of good puts darknes for light and light for darknes puts bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter goes far from the springs of liue waters and dyes in the waters of vnclean delights that is to say a sinner preferreth wickednes to godlines ignorance to knowledg vice to vertue and death to life for as much as he forsaketh God his creator without whom nothing can be lightened sweetened sanctified quickened know therefore says the holy Prophet Ieremy cap. 2. and Behold ô sinner that it is an euil thing and bitter that thou hast for saken God thy lord which is an infinit treasure of good things The deuil makes a couenant with euery man that sinneth which is like the league * 1. Reg. 11 Naas interpretatur serpens significat diabolum of Naas the Amonite 1. Reg. 11. on condition that he may thrust out his right eye that is his obedience to God and his loue to spirituall things which is a very ill agreement in regard it spoileth him of knowledg grace and glory a chess player by one negligent remouall or touch of his men a miss often times loseth the whole game and the whol gaine too euen so one sin destroyeth much good Eccles 9. for euen When a iust man turneth away from his iustice and committeth iniquity all his iustice that be bath done shall not be remembered but in his transgression that he hath committed and in his sin that be bath sinned in them shall be dye Ezech. 8. That is when a sinner does not cast away from him his wickednes wherby he hath taken the couenant of the deuil and turne to God with a new heart and a new spirit but die in the bitternes of his soul he shall lose all the fruit of his good works together with the glory of Heauen Neither are these all the euill things that the deuill hath made of sin for the burdens which he layes on the shoulders of him that sinneth mortally are most beauy and grieuous and albeit that for the present they seem sweet and light yet afterwards they press him down as he that in water drawes a log of wood feels not the full waight therof till he come to land so the burden of a sinner is not felt in the waters of fleshly delights and the pleasures of this life but when he shall goe out of them that is when he shall depart out of the world he will find the (d) S Iohn Apoca. 8. faith that the waters destroy many that is worldly delights which after death are made bitter water in which he delighted as bitter as wormwood and the load that sin laid on his neck so heauy that it will suppress him suddenly for as lightening descends from Heauen in the turne of an eye so a sinner will fall down into hell in * Job 21. in puncto descendune ad inferos Ex Luc. 10. videbam Satanam sicut fulgur de calo cadentem a trice which is the place of diuine execution in punishment of transgressions As earthly kings haue faire lodgings for the entertaining of the good people and dark prisons for the punishing of malefactours so the king of glory that is exalted aboue all Princes of the earth hath goodly pallaces for delighting such as do well which is Heauen and dungeons of vtter darknes for tormenting of those that doe euill which is hell where the wicked experience in bitter suffering the power of him whose mercy in bountifull gifts they haue despiced as he that walketh in iustice and shutteth his eyes from seeing euill shall dwell on high with God in full enjoyment of all good things so he that deuiateth from the waies of godlines and delighteth in the pathe of iniquity when the number of his life is cut of (e) The Prophet Isaias cap. 33. expressing the punishments which the wicked endure after their death speaketh to sinners thus Who among yee can endure to dvvell vvith the deuouring fire vvho among yee vvith euerlasting burnings Wherfore S. Gregory saith that the death of the wicked is an euerlasting death shall dwell below with the deuil in deuouring fire and euerlasting burnings which is a death without dying and sorrow without ending for death there is alwayes * S. Gregor●●it miseris ●●ors sine ●●●rte begining and sorrow neuer ending in reguard the deuouring fire is for euer burning and no deliuerance from hell which is a laborynth in the mids of the earth though easely entred into yet affordes no guid or thread to direct out againe and the windings and turnings therof minister nothing of pleasure for brimstone is scattered in euery walke * Job 14. vndique terrebunt eum formidines and trouble anguish feares together with dispaire and horrible confusion be on euery side hope of blessednes being rooted out of this dwelling yet
and offered at his last supper vnder the form's of bread and wine according to the Order of Melchisedech and that the Eucharist as it was instituted and celebrated was not only a Sacrament but also a sacrifice is plainly euidenced out of the words expressing the action that Christ vsed in the instituting and celebrating therof for example (c) The three Euangelists S. Mathew S. Mark and S. Luke express the words Christ vsed in the instituting and celebrating of the Eucharist in the present Tense for example IS GIVEN IS shed likewise S. Paul as to Christs body 1. Cor. 11. is broken Besides the French and Latin Bibles of Caluinists haue IS giuen for you IS shed for you But according to the Latin vulgar translation the particles giuen shed broken are expressed in the future Tence namely shall be giuen shall be shed shall be broken Howeuer Howeuer whether they be expounded in the present or future Tense it matters not since the sense is the same for although is giuen is shed carry the signification of the present Tense neuertheless the subsequent particles namely Do this in remembrance of me vntil our lord shall come to judge the quick and the dead 1. Cor. 11. imply the future Tense The Greek Church hath alwais vsed the future Tense in their Liturgies namely S. Iames. S. Clement S. Basil S. Chrysostome to proue that Christ offered the sacrifice of his body and blood when he was present with his Apostles at his last supper and indeed Christ himselfe paue euidence enough of this Catholick assertion by saying Hic Calix Sanguinis mei This Cup of my blood And the Latin Church vseth the future Tense shall be giuen shall be shed to shew plainly that Christ spoke not of his body and blood onely then at his last supper offered but of the same sacrifice that was to be offered for the future till he should come again to judge the quick and the dead This is my body which is giuen for you Luk 22. which S. Paul expresseth in other term's viz This is my body which is broken for you 1. Cor. 11. This is my blood of the new Testament which is shed for many Mar 14. This is my blood the new Testament that is shed for many vnto remission of Sins Math. 26. All which sentences import sacrificing since they containe the proper words of sacrifice as it is plainly deducible out of other euident Scripture-testimonies in consequence whereof the Eucharist instituted and celebrated by Christ in his last supper is not a Sacrament only but a sacrifice also Again the afore said Verbs namely to giue to break to shed are vttered in the present tense after the Greek Translation signifying that Christ did did not only offer sacrifice in a bloody manner on the Crosse but in an vnbloody also at his last supper (d) S. Luke cap. 22. expresseth the action that Christ vsed in the institution of the Eucharist as to his body vnder the elements of bread and wine in these words This is my body vvhich is giuen for you which S. Paul 1. Cor. 11. deliuers thus This is my body vvhich is broken for you and 1. Cor. 10. he saith The bread which we break is it not the participation of the body of our lord S. Chrysostome expounding this sacred Text demandes why S. Paul added to the words of the Euangelist vvhich vve break and answer's to his own question saying This is done in the Eucharist and not on the Cross vvhere no bone of him vvas broken Io. 19. According to S. Chrysostome as likewise Theodoret and Occumenius who were versed in the Greek tongue Christ suffered himselfe to be broken in the Eucharist vnder the form of bread vnto filling of all which he did not suffer to be done saith S. Chrysostome on the Cross vnto redeeming of all and indeed Calvin in his Commentary vpon the 11. Chapter set down noteth that the particles Is Broken signify is offered or is sacrificed whereby appear's that the Apostles intent and aime was to shew that Christs body was truly broken in the vnbloody oblation offered at his last supper for as much as the species of the consecrated bread were then truly broken Besides as the words of the action which Christ vsed in instituting and celebrating the Eucharist viz This is my body which is giuen for you This is my blood shed for many vnto remission of sins doe euidently import (e) The sacrifice of the Euchariste in as much as it appeaseth God rendereth him propitious and procureth diuine grace vnto remission of sin● is truly a propitiotary sacrifice taken in the proper sense according to the ancient Fathers S. Gyprian S. Basil S. Chrysostome S. Ambrose S. Austin and the Council of Trent assertes this Catholick doctrine and addeth withall The sacrifice of the Eucharist according to Apostolicall tradition is not onely offeréd for sinnes pains satisfactions and other necessities but likevvisa for such as are dead in the state of grace and not sufficiently purged as yet a propitiatory sacrifice for blood to be shed is to be sacrificed for propitiation or pardon of sins so the words of precept which follow This is my body giuen for you namely doe this in remembrance of me That is in memory of my death and passion doe signify a commemoratiue sacrifice and consequently plainly demonstrate the Eucharist not to be a Sacrament only but (f) The ancient Fathers S. Cypr. Ep. 63. and Caeci Orig. in cap. 16. Mat. and others also compare the sacrifice Christ offered of his body and blood at his last supper vnto the sacrifice of the paschall Lambe and other sacrifices of the old law wherby appears that the sacrifice Christ offered at his last supper was a sacrifice taken in the proper sense wherfore S. Gregor Nyssen Ora. 1. de Resur saith expresly that Christ in celebrating the Euchariste at his last supper sacrificed himselfe before he was sacrificed vpon the Cross a sacrified also For otherwise it would not be a liuely and perfect commemoration or representation of the sacrifice offered on the Cross such as Christ requireth Luk. 22. for as a Sacrament cannot be perfectly represented but by an other Sacrament 〈◊〉 a sacrifice cannot be liuely represented but by another sacrifice there is necessarily required similitude and proportion between the thing that representeth and the thing represented for a man cannot represent an horse or an horse a man nor the saying of the Apostle 1. Cor. 11. as often as you shall eat of this bread and drink of this drink you shall shew the death of our Lord doth infirm the strength of this argument * Patres antiqui in tribus oecumenicis Concilijs puta Ephesino Calcedo Constantinop vt constat ex praefatione Ephesi sic interpretati sunt verbae Apostoli quotiescunque māducabitis mortem Domini annunciabitis For the true sense and meaning therof is that the sacrifice of the Eucharist which is
autem contritio actus voluntatis non appetitus sensitiui a bitter griese and detestation that a penitent sinner voluntarily conceiues to the punishing of his sin as an offence against God together with a full purpose to confess satisfy and neuer to sin again As the innate heat of new wine put into a close vessel makes to boile the whole substance therof and thereby purgeth out the dregs so the fire of contrition kindled in a penitent soul makes it seeth in teares of bitter sorrow * Psal 50. cor cōtritum humiliatum Deus nō despiciet proinde peccator eliciens contritionem perfectam Deo reconciliatur wherby the filth and vncleanesse of sin together with the ill affection inclining thereto purge away As the heate of the sun doth disperse the black clouds which obstruct its brightnesse so the warmeness of a contrite heart dissipates sins which are the dark clouds obstructing the light therof But there (a) Loue that proceed's from the motiue of charity precisely is perfect and called Amor amicitrae the loue of friendship which imports remission of sinns Loue that comes of the motiue of Gods iustice or feare of him is named Amor benevolentiae loue of good will which is imperfect An example of remission of sinnes by perfect loue or perfect contrition which includes perfect loue without the Sacrament or penance is set down Deut. 4. Jf thou seek our lord God thou shalt finde him if thou seeks him vvithall thine heart and vvith all thy soul be two kinds of contrition the one perfect in as much as a penitent sinner grieueth for and detesteth his sin in regard precisely that he loueth God with all his heart that is maketh Gods own goodness the chief motiue of his loue and in respect therof preferreth him before all earthly enjoyments The other is imperfect and by vsage of speech named Attrition proceeding from a motiue far inferiour to that of a full loue to God For example a sinner conceiueth an act of imperfect contrition or attrition when he grieueth to haue sinned and purposeth amendmēt in regard meerly of the deformity of sin which is it's formall essēce or feare of eternall fire which is the proper effect therof if mortall Perfect contrition was of absolute necessity vnto remission of sins in all times before the establishment of the new law No man euen in the old law did finde God that did not seek him with all his heart and with full tribulation of his soul Deut. 8. which imports perfect contrition notwihstanding the Sacraments and sacrifices thereof they being poor beggerly elements and no effectuall instruments of grace and life Yet in the new law of Christ which is not a law of bondage but of grace not of beggery but of plenty and consequently abounding with sauing priuiledges and prerogatiues aboue the other by diuine dispensation attrition (b) The Council of Trent fess 14. declar's that imperfect contrition called attrition though it be grounded in the feare of Hell or in a serious reflexion on the deformity of sin neuertheless if it exclude an affection to sinning is Donum Dei a gift of God and a motion of the holy Ghost And notwithstanding faith the Council that attrition of it selfe cannot bring a sinner vnto iustification of life howeuer in the Sacrament of Penance it disposeth him thereto Whereby euidently appears that attrition is not the same disposition seperate from that it is ioynt vnto the Sacrament in consequence of which the meaning of the Council is that seeing it is a remote disposition vnto iustification without sacramentall penance ioynt thereto is made an immediate disposition that of necessity procures iustifying grace that of it self is not sufficient enough to bring a sinner vnto iustification of life ioyned to and supported by the Sacrament of penance is an effectuall expedient for the obtaining it and indeed Christians vnder the new law were in a worse condition then the Israëlits vnder the old law if beside perfect contrition God should exact of them as a necessary requisit to remission of sins Confession since he required of the Israëlites perfect contrition only Deut. 4. Wherfore that the trouble implyed in confession of sins might be compensed by taking away the absolute necessity of hearing the other burthen implyed in perfect Contrition Christ hath so instituted the Sacrament of penance in his new law that as water which albeit according to its own naturall propriety hath nothing of heate yet made hot with fire can produce heate so Attrition which though in order to it 's owne vertue is no effectuall instrument of grace to the quickning a dead soul howeuer together with the help of the Sacrament can deliuer out of the lawes of death and restore it to newnesse of life Again if perfect Contrition were of absolute necessity penance ought not to lay claime * Poenitētia est Sacramētum mortuorum nam id ad quod est primo per se institutum est prima gratia sanctificans seu hominem baptizatum in peccata laepsum reconciliare Ita docet Trid. sess 14. can 1. to the Title of Sacramentum mortuorum that is Christ did not institute it for an effectuall help of such (c) The chiefe effect of sacramentall penance is to reconeile vnto God such as haue sinned after their baptism and because mortall sin is the death of the soul sacramentall penance that is specially instituted to confer the first sanctifying grace vnto remitting of deadly offences is called Sacramentum mortuorum a Sacrament of the dead as are dead in sin because it would presuppose allwayes the remission therof perfect Contrition including a full loue of God which is inconsistent with deadly sin and therby would plainly follow that the sacramentall Absolution of a Priest were a meer declaration of sins remitted afore In consequence of which sacramentall penance should not produce the effect which it signifyes to wit remission of sins which is contrary to the nature (d) It is an Article of catholick faith that the Sacraments of the new law produce sanctifying grace ex opere operato that is by the efficacy of their working after the manner of naturall causes which employe their whole actiuity while they worke so that the Sacrament of penance produces ex opere operato a greater or lesser measure of grace according to the greater or lesser dispositions of those which receiue it As to the form of speaking ex opere operato taken in the passiue signification it is ancient Pope Innocentius the third vsed it and the catholick Church in the Council of Trent receiu'd it which makes it a matter of faith of the Sacraments of the new law they being by vertue of their institution practicall Rites or signes for the effecting of sanctifying grace which indeed they signifie and to say that perfect contrition includeth a desire of the Sacrament of penance hath nothing of weight with it to weaken this
(c) S. Austin l. de bono coningij cap. 6. names mortall sin deadly crime and Epis 89. and in sundry other places he calleth offences which are not deadly and therfore commonly nam'd veniall sinnes litle fault 's of which the Apostle S. Iames cap. 2. in many things vve sinne all And S. Mathew cap. 6. foregiue us our treipasses c. and of veniall sinnes the Mileuitan synode interpretes these scriptures so that the iustest man that liues is liable to veniall sinnes and veniall defects and therefore counted imperfect they continue depriued of blessedness till all imperfection be purged away As a Iudg doth not punish all offences with death and as one man after that he is reconciled to another that hath iniured him demandeth some satisfaction for the iniury done for Dauid though he pardoned Absolon his offence Yet he did not suffer him * Reg. 14. Dauid condonauit filio suo Absoloni peccatum sic tamen ci placatus addit reuertatur in domum suam faciem meam non videat to abide in his sight or in his house so God though he doth not punish all sinnes with eternall death some hauing nothin g of mortall malice and though he receiueth a grieuous sinner into grace that casteth away all his mortall transgressions and turneth vnto him with a new heart neuertheless he doth not admit him to his glorious presence till he hath made full satisfaction as to the reparation of he injury done him wherby it is clear that God neither in this life nor in the next * Prouerb 23. Tu virga percuties eum animam eius de inferno liberabis Item Tob. 13. Tu flagellas saluas deducis ad inferos reducis chasteneth sinners that haue turned away from their iniquity as his enemies to destroy them but as his children to make them fit and proper for the enjoyment of their heauenly inheritance This catholick truth all antiquity acknowledgeth Councils define the approued vniuersall practice of christian Churches teacheth and authority of scriptures warranteth The second booke of the Machabees prayseth the noble Iudas (d) Judas Machabae us piously conceiu'd all or at least many of his souldiers to haue dyed godly that is in the state of grace and though they might haue coueted and detain'd some part of the siluer and gold that was on the Idols contrary to the commandement of God Deut. 7. Neuertheless we ought not to infer from thence that the same souldiers did not repent of that sin before their death or that by doing so they committed a deadly sin being they might want sufficient instruction and recogni zance in order to that law Howeuer t' is certain that Iudas Machabaeus appointed a sacrifice to be offer'd for those only which dyed godly As to the books of the Machabies S. Austin l. 18. de ciuit cap. 3. attests that though they be not contained in the Iew 's Canon or Catalogue neuertheless the catholick Church counteth them for canonicall Besides the third Council of Carthage whereof S. Austin was a member placeth he Machabies in the number of diuine scriptures who iudged that it was a holy and good thought to pray for the dead that they might be deliuered from sin and therfore sent three thousand drachmes to Iesusalem for the offering of a sin-sacrifice in regard of his souldiers that were ssaine in the holy warr belieuing that there was great fauour laid vp for those that died godly that is in the state of grace and since this action of religious piety cannot be meant in order to blessed soul's these hauing ful enioyment of blessedness nor in order to damned souls these being sentenced to eternall fire it is plainly euident that the meaning thereof is in reference to good souls which are neither in Heauen nor in Hell but in a third place suffering vnto heauenly blessedness this doctrine the Apostle teacheth * Ex scriptura 1. Cor. 3. Patres Latini in Conlio Florent Purgatariū dari definiunt Et quod ibi Apostolus intelligat ignē Purgatoriū testantur Orig hom 25. in Exod. Jtem Aug. in Enchyrd c. 68. l. 21. de ciuit c. 2. 26. 1. Cor. 3. where he affirmeth that after this life some souls are saued by fire saying If any man's work 's burne be shall suffer preiudice but he shall be saued himselfe yet so as it were by fire In which scripture he distinguisheth two kind's of work 's that a catholick christian constituted in the state of grace exerciseth whereof some are meritorious and in as much as they containe nothing of vncleaness or imperfection the Apostle compareth them vnto gold siluer and precious stones which can receiue no detriment through fire therby signifying that such souls as build on the foundation that is Christ and his grace works of gold siluer and pretious stones which is to say pure and holy actions without mixture of vncleaness (e) According to holy scripture fire shall trye all works yet not so as that all works and all the workers shall haue their tryall in burning flam's but because fire that is ordain'd to purge out of our works the dregs of corruption is said to trye works which haue nothing of vncleanes because the fire does not touch them in regard of their purenes Which is s. Ambroses explication in Psal 118. and after the same manner wild beasts are said to haue tryed many martyrs though they touch'd not their sacred bodyes will suffer no preiudice by fire in the day of particular or vniuersall Iudgment but there be other workes built vpon Christ as the foundation which include small defects and imperfections to wit veniall sinnes only which the Apostle nameth Wood bay or stubble that do consume in the fire wherfore such soul 's as be charged with this kinde of vncleane works doe suffer detriment in the day of particular Iudgment remaining afflicted by fire till all vncleaness be purged away and this to be the true meaning of the Apostle his own words explicated aright do clearly euidence For first that by gold siluer and pretious stones be vnderstood good work 's pure without thout staine orthodox writers vnanimously grant Secondly that by wood hay or stuble are meant veniall sinnes it is manifest enough because the Apostle expresly doth assert that the works signified by those word 's are to be burnt by the fire and neuertheless such as haue exercised them are to be saued which cannot be vnderstood of mortall offences the guilt wherof vndoubtedly damneth euery one that dyeth charged with it neither can the said word 's carry the sense of works that haue nothing of vncleaness because fire cannot preiudice those they being as gold siluer and pretious stones vnc●mbustible wherefore of necessity wood hay or stuble doe signifie small faults which being once purged out by fire the soul that committed them is saued that is to say translated to eternall life and indeed since the Apostle