the head h Idem in Psaâ— 88. Yea we may assure our selues that being members of such a head yea body to it we are in â—ffâ—ct where ouâ— head is For saith Augustin this body cannot bee beheaded but if the head triumph forever the members must needes triumph for ever also And that wee haue this benefite by Christs ascension into heaven before hand for vs i Bern. serm de eo quod legitur a pud Iob. in sex tribulatio nibus c. Bernard excelleÌ„tly sheweth Bee it saith he that only Christ is entred into heaven yet I trowe whole Christ must enter and if whole Christ then the body as well as the head yea every member of the body For this head is not to bee found in the kingdome without his members Hence it is that the Scripture speakes of the faithfull as already raised from the dead placed in heaven with Christ yea as of them that shall not nor caÌ„not die as k Ioh. 11. vers 26. Hee that liveth and beleeveth in me shall never die And l Ioh 5. v. 24. againe Verily verily I say vnto you whosoever heareth my word and beleeveth in him that sent me hath eternall life and shall not come into iudgement but hath passed from death to life And Hee saith m Ephes 2. v. 6. S. Paul hath raised vs vp togither hath placed vs togither in heaven with Christ He saith not he will raise vs vp hee will place vs in heaven with Christ but he hath so raised and placed vs which is spoken both for the certaintie thereof also for the streight vnion betweene the head and the body by means whereof that which is already actually accomplished in the head is said to bee so also in the body In a word the head being aboue water the body can never bee drowned although it bee never so much beaten and tossed with waues And thus much for our first and principall defense against death the sum whereof is this that it is not onelie a weakenesse but also a shame for the members to fear an enemy which the head hath already conquered subdued 5 There are also diverse other Christian comfortes against death which I wil briefly touch And first as we heard * Chap. 7. Sect. 2. leq before that all other evils of paine are to a Christian chaunged into another nature and of punishments become favours and benefits so is it also in this of death For now it is not a tokeÌ„ of Gods anger for sin but an argument of his loue and mercy it is not properly death but a bridge by which wee passe to a better life from corruption to incorruptioÌ„ from mortality to immortality from earth to heaven that is in a word froÌ„ vanity and miserie to ioy and felicity And who would not willingly passe over this bridge whereby hee passeth from all cares and sorrowes and passeth to all delights and pleasures leaveth all miseries behinde him hath all contentation and happinesse before him 6 The Gentils taking it for grauÌ„ted that after death either wee should be happy or not be at all and so concluding that at least death would free vs from all evill and misery therevpon made litle reckoning of death nay manie times voluntarilie procured their own death and imbraced it as a rich treasure as wee haue * Chap. 4. Sect 3. Chap. 5. Sect 3. already heard But how fowly they were mistaken herein hath withall beene sufficiently declared It is the Christian only that enioyeth this benefite by death namely the exemption from all cares and troubles and an ende of all sorrowes Wherefore the death of the godly is called n Esai 57. vers 2. Dan. 12. v. 2. 1. Thes 4. vers 13.14 Revel 14. v. 13. in Scripture by the names of bedde of rest sleepe peace and such like being all names of benefite and commodity How sweet is peace to them that haue beene vexed with warres and broiles how plesant is the bedde rest sleepe to the weary and those that are overwatched The labourer is glad when his daies work is done the traveller reioiceth when he is come to his waies ende the marriner and passenger thinke themselues happy wheÌ„ they arriue in the harbour and all men shun paine and desire ease abhorre daunger and loue securitie It were madnes theÌ„ for a Christian to feare so advantageous a death and to wish for continuance of so wretched a life I conclude this pointe with that elegant laying o Tertul. de testim animae cap. 4. of Tertullian That is not to bee feared which sets vs free froÌ„ all that is to be feared And indeed what weaknesse folly is it to fear a superfedeas against all the things which heare we do feare 7 But the true Christian hath yet a farre greater benefit by death For it doth not only put an end to the evils of paine but also to the evils of fault not only to the punishments for sin but to sinne it selfe Now we haue often heard before that the evils of fault are farre worse then the evils of paine yea that the least sinne is more to be abhord and shund theÌ„ the greatest punishment for sinne Hâ—w welcome then should death bee vnto vs that endeth not only our sorrowes but also our sinnes As long as wee liue here and beare about vs these earthly tabernacles wee daily multiply our rebellings against God and sustaine a fierce conflict and continual combat in our very bosomes while p Galat. 5.17 the flesh lusteth against the spirit and the spirit against the flesh and q Rom. 7 2â— the lawe in our members rebelleth against the lawe of our minde as S. Paule speaketh and leadeth vs captiues to the law of sin which is in our members O bondage of all bondages to be in bondage vnto sin r Sen ep 37. 39. The Gentill that apprehended vice only as a morall evill could say that men beeing in bondage to their lusts were more cruellie handled by them than any slaues were by the most cruell maisters Howe much more should wee that feele sin as al spiritual evill and groane vnder the burden thereof account the bondage there of intollerable and worse than subiection to the most barbarous Tyrant in the world And how welcome should he be that would set vs free from the same Now it is death and only death that can doe this for vs and indeede doth it for vs. What great cause them haue wee with all willingnesse to imbrace it Å¿ Diogenes Laertius vit Phil. lâ—â— 7. Zeno the founder of the Stoicall sect helde it lawfull for them that had loathsome diseases vvhich were incurable to kill themselues that so they might be rid of them and t Con. Nepos in vita Titi Pomp. Attici See also the like of Tullius Marcellinus in Seneca ep 78. Pomponius Atticus others put it in practise If they counted it a
of his death and passion The summe whereof c Ioh. 3.16 the Evangelist coÌ„prehends in these few but golden words So God loved the world that he gaue his only begotten sonne to the end that whosoever beleeved in him should not perish but haue life everlasting For the better vnderstanding wherof we must obserue that the humane nature in Christ is not a distinct and severall person by it selfe as Peter Iohn and such like but so vnited to the divine nature that did assume it as they both make but one person so that all that is in it is truely said to be Gods and al that was done by it to be done by God d Act. 20.28 his bloud was Gods bloud his death Gods death c which necessarily implyeth the perfection of all his actions beeing the actions of him that was God as well as man and both God and man in one person Secondly we must note that all that hee did or suffered in his humane nature thus vnited to the divine he did and suffred for vs that we might haue the benefite of it he tooke our evils vpoÌ„ him our sinnes and death due to our sins and imparted his good things to vs his innocency obedience holines and righteousnesse finally his sufferings partly in his life time but principally at his death vpoÌ„ the crosse his humiliation is our exaltation his condemnation our absolution his death our life 4 This course was most effectuall and availeable in this case yea in the apprehension of man only of force possibilitie to remedy this branch of our miserie namely our sinnes and condemnation for sinne For first e Chrysost in prior ep ad Timoth. hom 7. he that is to reconcile persons that are at variance difference one with the other must haue interest in both else is he vnfit to reconcile them and bring them friends wherefore God and man being at variance it was requisite that he which shoulde reconcile them shoulde be both God maÌ„ Againe man having sinned iustice required that man should be punished having sinned vnto death should be punished with death but now a meer maÌ„s death could not salue the matter for as formerly hath been shewed the death of one sinner cannot pay the debt and death of another every sinner owing a death for himselfe And besides he that was to deliver others from the danger of penalty and death was not only to suffer death but also to vanquish overcoÌ„e death which a meere maÌ„ could never haue don God could not dy maÌ„ could not recover himselfe when he should dy wherefore the Mediatour was to be man to suffer death and God to vanquish death Thus as f Anseâ—m tract cur Deus homo a Divine of middle times sweetly saith Sith such a satisfaction was requisite as none but God could make none but man was bound to make he that was to make it was to bee both God and man Thus our Christian religion only directs vs to the meanes wherein there is possibility of saving vs froÌ„ our sins and hence it is g Mat. 1. v. 2â— that Christ had the name of Iesus that is of a Saviour as he that only could and would do this so great a worke 5 And that he as well would do it as could do it yea therefore only was incarnated and suffered death that he might do it is most evident h Cyp. de Idolor vanitate Christ was made that which man was that man might be made that which Christ was And as i Bernard in vigilia nativit Domini Bernard saith why was the son of God made the sonne of man but that the sonnes of men might be made the sonnes of God Surely k Gregor homiâ— 34. in â—vangel this cannot but yeeld man boldnes with God that God himselfe is become man l August in Psal 148. There is no cause nowe why man should doubt of living for ever sith God hath died for him For shal not he liue for ever for whome hee died that liues for ever Verily it is nothing so strange that mortall man should liue as that â—he immortal God should die specially since this death of the son of God was vniust without cause in respect of himselfe and therefore must needs be available for some others as m August de temp serm 101. S. Augustin excelleÌ„tly saies Death could not be conquered but by death therefore Christ suffered death that an vniust death might overcome iust death and that he might deliver the guilty iustly by dying for them vniustly And thus n August de verbis Domini secund LucaÌ„ de temp serm 141. by taking vpon him our punishment without taking vpon him our fault he hath discharged vs both of the punishment and the fault And that by good right o Bernard ad milites templi c. 4. sith although because he was maÌ„ he could die yet because he was iust he ought not to haue died he that had no cause to die for himselfe in reason and equity should not die for others vnprofitably Neither surely did hee but to greatest purpose namely that the sonne of God dying for the sonnes of men the sons of men might be made the sonnes of God as we heard before out of S. Bernard yea that of bad servaÌ„ts men might be made good sonnes as p Aug. ser 28 Saint Augustine speaketh and this glorious mystery of our Saviours incarnation and passion must needes bring foorth glorious effects q Ansel in c â— ep ad Eph this strange and vnspeakeable loue of God that his only sonne should die for vs that a Lord should die for servants the creatour for the creature God for man this strange loue I say must needs be of strange operation as it is r Bern. feria 4. heb dom paenolae even to make of sinners iust men of slaues brethren of captiues fellow heires and of banisht persons kings 6 Why then shoulde our sins dismay vs if we be vnfainedly sorrie for them and by faith haue recourse vnto Christ that hath borne the punishment of them O let vs thinke vpon this comfortable chaÌ„ge Å¿ August m Psal 2â— c. narrat 2. that Christ made our faults his faults that hee might make his righteousnesse our righteousnesse t Iust Martyr ad Diagnetum O sweet exchange o vnsearchable skill that the vnrighteousnes of many should bee hidden in one that is righteous the rightteousnesse of one should cause many that are vnrighteous to be accounted righteous Although we bee not nor cannot bee without sinne yet as long as our sins are not imputed to vs they cannot hurr vs. The princely prophet David as u August in Psal 32. c naâ—rat 2. S. Augustine well obserues saies not they are happy that haue no sinne but whose sinnes are covered Surely if God haue covered our sinnes he will not see them if he will
placed in Paradise in a most happy and pleasant state of life only restrained from tasting of the fruit of one only tree to vveete the tree of the knowledge of good and evill as a triall of their subiection and loyalty by the Divels suggestion Gods deadly enemy theirs presumed to eate thereof and so lost the loue and favour of God and incurred his displeasure and indignation and consequētly became subiect to al misery calamity not only in this life but also in the life to come 2 It may seeme that this offence was not so hainous nor deserved such severe punishment But we must consider that many and grievous iniquities yea abominations lurked in this fact For first of all God having expresly told thē that whensoever they shoulde taste of this forbidden fruite they should die the death that is they should surely die they harkening to the serpent telling them the contrary make God a lyer yea take the Devils word before his Now how great a wickednes this was the simplest may easily perceiue Secondly here vvas great ingratitude and vnthankfulnes The Devill tels them that God had dealt craftily with them in telling thē there was such daunger in eating of that fruit whereas indeede it had that vertue to make them equall to himselfe and therefore in pollicie he forbade them to taste of it Which necessarily argues that they were malecontent with their present estate as if God had dealt niggardly with them and had not bestowed so much vpon them as hee might haue done and so in effect that the Devill would by his counsell and advise do more for thē then God had done or woulde doe Thirdly principally here was high treason against the most high accompanied with detestable blasphemie For they eating of the forbiddē fruit because as the Devill informed them therby they should be equall to God manifestly shewed that they disdained to be Gods vnderlings and to hold a happines from him by inferiority and dependancie and would be happy absolutely and of themselues without being any way beholding to God for the same Now when the subiect denieth homage and fealty to the Soveraigne the Creature to the Creator man to God what can it bee but high treason yea highest treason as committed against the highest Besides it could bee no lesse than abhominable blasphemy that a mortal man should so much as admit a thought to make himselfe equal to the immortal God much more to desire it yea to attempt it 3 And yet further this doth not a little aggravat their sin that they thē had absolute power not to sinne To expresse this pointe I had rather vse Saint Augustines wordes then mine own If saith b Aug. de eivitat Dei li. 14. c. 15. he any man thinke that Adams condemnation was either too heavy or vniust surely hee knowes not howe to weigh the matter namely how great the iniquity of sinning was vvhen there was so great easines not to sin And a little after Where there is great punishment threatned for disobedience and the matter commāded by the creatour to be obeyed so easie who can sufficiently declare how great a wickednesse it is not to obey in a matter so easie where there is so great power to obey and so greate danger for not obeying 4 I omit many other considerations which might farther aggravat the greatnesse of our first parents sin But that which hath beene alreadie saide may suffice Only this I thought good not to omit that it may be replied by some that howe great soever their personall offence were yet what reason is it that their posterity shoulde beare the smart thereof and that in so hard measure as wee see and feele by common experience that they doe The answere is easie that Adam had either happinesse or miserie in his owne hands not onely for himselfe but for all his and therefore by making himselfe miserable willinglie I meane at least willingly doing the thing that iustly made him miserable hee also iustly drewe miserie vpon all his We see that even humane iustice punisheth the children for the offense of the fathers He that commits treason not only dyeth himselfe for it but brings miserie vpon all his children who by his offense loose all their goods and lands that otherwise should haue descended vnto them as also if the parties so offending bee of such quality and ranke their nobility and advantages of birth and parentage Again we as commonly kill the yong foxes wolues and such like ravenous and noisome beasts as the old although as yet they haue done no actuall harme because we knowe they are of the same nature that the olde are and lacke not malice but time to hurt and destroy Much more therfore may God that more hates malignitie of nature in man than man doeth in beastes manifest his wrath against mankinde even in their infancie knovving that the roote and seede of all evill lurkes in them from the wombe yea in the wombe and that the poison of sinne and wickednesse is even incorporated into their essence And this is the cause of all those miseries and extremities which many times wee see yong children to endure The ignoraunce of which point drewe the Gentiles out of the Church and hereticks in the Church into that ridiculous errour * before specified Chap. 3. Sect. 3. that mens soules had committed some foule fault in heaven for the which they were sent into bodies here on earth to doe penance for the same Now man having thus vvillingly seperated himselfe from God his Creator and the onely author of his happinesse it is no marvaile if he became subiect to all kinde of miserie This was saith c Aug. de civit Dei lib. 6 cap. 13. S. Augustine a perverse haughtinesse to forsake that originall cause wherevnto only the soule ought to cleaue after a sort to become his owne originall that is to leaue God and goe about to be his owne God and to be happy without being beholding to God for it And a little after Man by affecting to be more then he was is now lesse then hee was and while he made choice to be sufficient of himselfe forsook him that only coulde be sufficient for him And d Ambro. de Elia ieinmio cap 4. S. Ambrose brings in God expostulating reasonning the matter with man after his fall thus Didst thou thinke to bee like vnto vs therefore sith thou wouldst be what thou wast not thou hast ceased to be what thou wast And c Bernard tractat de gratia libero arbit S. Bernard verie sweetly expresseth this point saith he they to wit our first parents which woulde needes be their owne became not only their owne but the Devils also that is the Divels slaues held in bondage by him at his pleasure as f 2. Tim. 2.36 the Apostle speakes This was a wofull alteration that mā who was the sonne of God while hee would
benefite to be delivered from a loathsome disease of the body by an vnlawfull and wicked death we haue reason to think it a benefite yea a singular benefite to be ridde of a loathsome and incurable disease of the soule namely sinne by a lawful death which it pleaseth God to send vnto vs. 8 But death doth more for vs than all this For it doth not only free vs from all evils and from that evil of evils sinne but puts vs into actual possession of all good things yea of such good thinges as our eies haue not seene our eares haue not heard neither are our harts able to conceiue brings vs to that place where if there were place for any passion we should be angry with death for not bringing vs thither sooner But I reserue a more particular declaration of that point vnto the thirteenth and last chapter CHAP. 12. Consolations against the terrours of the generall iudgement 1 THERE is yet an other thing which considered in it selfe is a greater branch and part of mans misery in regard of passiue evils than all the rest namely the last and generall iudgement where all flesh shal be arraigned before Gods Tribunall bar to giue an account of all they haue done to receiue their recompense accordingly The terror wherof I had rather expresse in a Anselm in libro medita tionum Anselmes wordes than in mine own O hard distresse saith he on one side wil be our sinnes accusing vs on the other side iustice terrifying vs vnder vs the gulfe of hell gaping aboue vs the iudg frowning within vs a conscience stinging without vs the world burning Which way then shall the sianer thus surprised turne himselfe To hide our selues will be impossible to appeare will be intolerable Wherewithal then shal miserable man arme himselfe against this so great terrour danger Surely our Christian profession affordeth munitioÌ„ against this assault also 2 And first that which hath beene spoken against the feare of death in the former chapter serveth also here against the feare of the last iudgmeÌ„t For that which made the first death so terrible and dangerous the same maketh the second death also so to bee namely sinne and as deliverance froÌ„ sinne doth as we there heard free vs from al annoyance by the first death so doth it also from all annoyance by the second death that is eternal condeÌ„nation at the last iudgement They that in Christ are coÌ„querers over the first death shall not nor cannot bee conquered by the second death and b Rev. 2c 6. on those that haue their part in the first resurrection the second death shall haue no power saith the spirit That is condemnation caÌ„not take hold on those whom God hath gratiously called to the knowledge and love of his saving truth reveiled by the Gospell 3 But to come to more peculiar comforts against this matter of terrour and amazement let vs farther consider that Christ had mercy on vs wheÌ„ we were meere strangers to him nay even when we were his enemies as c Rom. 5. v. 8.9.10 S. Paul well vrgeth God herein saith he commended his loue towards vs that when we were sinners Christ dyed for vs being theÌ„ now iustified by his bloud much more shall we be saved by him from that wrath Note that he saith from that wrath that is froÌ„ the wrath of the last iudgemeÌ„t For if saith he when we were enemies we were reconciled vnto God by the death of his sonne much more being reconciled wee shall be saved by his life Wee may easilie perceiue the force of the Apostles comfortable reasoning to wit that sith Christ died for vs when wee were sinners that is nothing but sin surely hee will saue vs being now righteous in him if wee were pardoned through his death when we were enimies wee shall much more bee saved by his life now that we are friendes For how incredible is it nay rather how impossible that he which pardoneth an enemy should condemne a friend He loved vs when wee bare the image of the devill and will hee not much more loue vs now since he hath in parte repaired his fathers image in vs and confirmed vs to himselfe We were deare to him when there was no iot of goodnesse in vs can hee reiect vs nowe that wee haue some good things in vs although but weake specially hee himselfe being the author and former of them by the grace of his holy spirit And so d Bernard epist 190. Bernard reasons For having spoken of our calling vnto the grace of the Gospell he inferres this beeing thus puld out of the power of darknesse I will not now feare to be reiected by the father of light being iustified freely in the bloude of his sonne Why it is he that iustifieth who is it that shall condemne Surely hee will not condemne the iust that had mercie on a sinner c. Thus wee see he reasoneth from that which GOD hath done for vs already to that which he will doe yea in a sort must doe for vs here after And we must all reason after the same manner and saie everie one to his owne soule with e Augustin in Psal 96. Saint Augustine Thou wast wicked and hee dyed for thee thou art now iustified and will hee forsake thâ—e 4 Moreover to take away the terrour of the last iudgement consider who shall be the Iudge even Christ himself that was thy redeemer And hovve canne wee feare such a iudge How happy in our case that hee must be our iudge that was himself iudged for vs He is our husband and wee his wife by whoÌ„ would the wife chuse to be iudged but by the husband specially by so kinde a husbande as wee haue * Chapt. 10. Sect. 2. marginal letter d. before heard him to be who sheweth that favour that no husband doth yea he is our head we are his meÌ„bers wil the head giue sentence of condeÌ„natioÌ„ against his own meÌ„bers This in effect were to giue senteÌ„ce against himself He is our advocat and Proctor how happy would we think our selues if in causes touching this life our own atturney might be our iudg He is now thine advocate f August in Psal 51. saith Augustine that hereafter shall be thy iudge Let vs then assure our selues he vvill not coÌ„demne vs that hath already been coÌ„demned for vs. 5 Yea so farre of is it that the last and generall iudgement shoulde be terrible vnto vs that it should rather minister matter of great ioy and comfort vnto vs. And therefore our Lord and Saviour Iesus Christ having set downe the chiefe signes and tokens that should go before the day of iudgment saith to the faithful g Luc. 21.28 When yee see these things begin to come to passe looke vp and lift vp your heads for your redemption draweth neere So that by Christes owne exhortation in this place when wee thinke vpon the