Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
death_n die_v sin_n wage_n 7,907 5 11.1189 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A53678 A continuation of the exposition of the Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the Hebrews viz, on the sixth, seventh, eight, ninth, and tenth chapters : wherein together with the explication of the text and context, the priesthood of Christ ... are declared, explained and confirmed : as also, the pleas of the Jews for the continuance and perpetuity of their legal worship, with the doctrine of the principal writers of the Socinians about these things, are examined and disproved / by J. Owen ... Owen, John, 1616-1683. 1680 (1680) Wing O729; ESTC R21737 1,235,588 797

There are 27 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

that Death was the Wages of Sin For although there was allowed in them a Commutation that the Sinner himself should not dye but the Beast that was Sacrificed in his stead which belonged unto their Second end of leading unto Christ yet they all testified unto that Sacred Truth that it is the Judgment of God that they who commit Sin are worthy of Death And this was as the whole Law an Ordinance of God to deterr Men from Sin and so put bounds unto Transgressions For when God passed by Sin with a kind of Connivance winking at the Ignorance of Men in their iniquities not giving them continual warnings of their Guilt and the consequents thereof in Death the World was filled and covered with a Deluge of Impieties Men saw not Judgment speedily executed nor any Tokens or Indications that so it would be therefore was their Heart wholly set in them to do Evil. But God dealt not thus with the Church He let no Sin pass without a Representation of his displeasure against it though mixed with Mercy in a direction unto the Relief against it in the Blood of the Sacrifice And therefore he did not only appoint these Sacrifices on all the especial occasions of such Sins and Uncleanness as the Consciences of particular Sinners were pressed with a sense of but also once a year there was gathered up a Remembrance of all the Sins Iniquities and Transgressions of the whole Congregation Levit. 16. 2. They were added as the Teaching of a School-master to lead unto Christ. By them was the Church taught and directed to look continually unto and after that Sacrifice which alone could really purge and take away all Iniquity For God appointed no Sacrifices until after the Promise of sending the Seed of the Woman to break the Head of the Serpent In his so doing was his own Heel to be bruised in the suffering of his Humane Nature which he offered in Sacrifice unto God which these Sacrifices did represent Wherefore the Church knowing that these Sacrifices did call Sin to remembrance representing the displeasure of God against Sin which was their First end and that although there was an Intimation of Grace and Mercy in them by the commutation and substitution which they allowed yet that they could not of themselves take away Sin it made them the more earnestly and with longing desires look after him and his Sacrifice who should perfectly take away Sin and make peace with God wherein the principal exercise of Grace under the Old Testament did consist 3. As unto their especial nature they were added as the great instruction in the way and manner whereby Sin was to be taken away For although this arose originally from Gods meer Grace and Mercy yet was it not to be executed and accomplished by Soveraign Grace and Power alone Such a taking away of Sin would have been inconsistent with his Truth Holiness and Righteous Government of Mankind as I have elsewhere at large demonstrated It must be done by the Interposition of a Ransome and Attonement by the substitution of one who was no Sinner in the room of Sinners to make satisfaction unto the Law and Justice of God for Sin Hereby they became the principal direction of the Faith of the Saints under the Old Testament and the means whereby they acted it on the original promise of their Recovery from Apostasie These things do evidently express the Wisdom of God in their Institution although of themselves they could not take away Sin And those by whom these ends of them are denyed as they are by the Jews and Socinians can give no account of any end of them which should answer the Wisdom Grace and Holiness of God This Objection being removed I shall proceed unto the Exposition of the words in particular And there are Four things in them as a Negative Proposition 1. The Illative Conjunction declaring its respects unto what went before 2. The subject matter spoken of The Blood of Bulls and Goats 3. What is denyed concerning it it could not take away Sin 4. The Modification of this Negative Proposition it was impossible they should do so 1. The Illative Conjunction For declares what is spoken to be introduced in the Proof and Confirmation of what was before affirmed And it is the closing Argument against the Imperfection and Impotency of the Old Covenant the Law Priesthood and Sacrifices of it which the Apostle maketh use of And indeed it is comprehensive of all that he had before insisted on yea it is the Foundation of all his other Reasonings unto this purpose For if in the Nature of the thing it self it was impossible that the Sacrifices consisting of the Blood of Rulls and Goats should take away Sin then however whensoever and by whomsoever they were offered this effect could not be produced by them Wherefore in these words the Apostle puts a Close unto his Argument and reassumes it no more in this Epistle but only Once or Twice makes mention of it in the way of an Illustration to set forth the excellency of the Sacrifice of Christ as v. 11. of this Chapter and Chap. 13. 10 11 12. 2. The subject spoken of is the Blood of Bulls and Goats The reason why the Apostle expresseth them by Bulls and Goats which were Calves and Kids of the Goats hath been declared on Chap. 9. ver 11 12. And some things must be observed conceruing this Description of the Old Sacrifices 1. That he makes mention of the Blood of the Sacrifices only whereas in many of them the whole Bodies were offered and the Fat of them all was burned on the Altar And thus he doth for the ensuing Reasons 1. Because it was the Blood alone whereby Attonement was made for Sin and Sinners The Fat was burned with Incense only to shew that it was accepted as a sweet savour with God 2. Because he had respect principally unto the Anniversary Sacrifice unto the Consummation whereof and Attonement thereby the carrying the Blood into the Holy Place did belong 3. Because Life Natural is in an especial manner in the Blood which signified that Attonement was to be made by Death and that by the effusion of Blood as it was in the Sacrifice of Christ. See Levit. 17. 11 12. And in the shedding of it there was an Indication of the Desert of Sin in the Offerer 2. He recalls them by this Expression of their Sacrifices the Blood of Bulls and Goats unto a due consideration of what effect might be produced by them They were Accompanied with great Solemnity and Pomp of Ceremony in their Celebration Hence arose a great Esteem and Veneration of them in the Minds of the People But when all was done that which was Offered was but the Blood of Bulls and Goats And there is a Tacit Opposition unto the matter of that Sacrifice whereby Sin was really to be Expiated which was the precious Blood of Christ as Chap. 9. 13 14. 3. That which
Religion But the Truth is if 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here signifies a certain and determinate place that opposed in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there must be Salem where Melchisedec dwelt which was not only afterwards Tithable as within the Bounds of Canaan but most probably was Hierusalem it self as we have declared This Conjecture therefore is too Curious nor do we need to tye up our selves unto the precise signification of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 although that also be sometimes used with respect unto time as well as place VVherefore these words here and there do express the several different states under Consideration Here is in the case of the Levitical Priesthood and There respects the case of Melchisedec as stated Gen. 14. Secondly The Foundation of the Comparison that wherein both agreed is in this that they received Tithes It is expressed of the one sort only namely the Levitical Priests they received Tithes but it is understood of the other also whereon the word is repeated and inserted in our Translation but there he receiveth them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 They do receive Tithes in the Present Tense But it may be said there was none that then did so or at least de jure could do so seeing the Law of Tithing was abolished Wherefore an Enallage may be allowed here of the present time for that which was past they do that is they did so whilst the Law was in force But neither is this Necessary For as I have before Observed the Apostle admits or takes it for granted that the Mosaical System of Worship was yet continued and argueth on that concession unto the Necessity of its approaching abolition And yet we need not here the Use of this Supposition For the words determine neither time nor place but the state of Religion under the Law According unto the Law are Tithes to be paid unto and received by such Persons This therefore is agreed That both the Levitical Priests and Melchisedec received Tithes The Opposition and Difference lyes in the Qualification and Properties of them by whom they are received For 1. Those on the one side that is of the Levitical Priesthood were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Homines qui moriuntur or homines morientes Men that dye dying men that is Men subject unto Death Mortal men who lived and dyed in the Discharge of their Office according unto the Common Laws of Mortality And the Observation of Schlictingius on these words is as far as I can understand Useless unto his own Design much more to the Apostles Notandum vero quod non mortalibus hominibus sed morientibus tantum Melchisedecum Author opponat nec immortalem eum esse sed vivere dicit vita autem non mortalitati sed morti proprie opponitur Something is aimed at in way of Security unto another Opinion namely that all men were Created in a state of Mortality without respect unto Sin But nothing is gotten by this Subtility For by Dying men the Apostle intends not Men that were actually dying as it were at the point of Death For in that Condition the Priests could neither execute their Office nor receive Tithes of the People Only he describes such Persons as in the whole course of their Ministry were liable unto Death from the Common Condition of Mortality and in their several Seasons dyed accordingly Wherefore dying men or men Subject to Death and Mortal men are in this case the same And although Life as to the Principle of it be opposed unto Death yet as unto a continual Duration the thing here intended by the Apostle it is opposed unto Mortality or an obnoxiousness unto Death For a Representation is designed of him who was made a Priest not after the Law of a Carnal Commandment but after the Power of an endless Life Wherefore saith the Apostle those who received Tithes after the Law were all of them Mortal men that had both Beginning of Days and End of Life So the Death of Aaron the first of them and in him of all his Successors is Recorded in the Scripture In Opposition unto this state of the Levitical Priests it is affirmed that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Case of Melchisedec 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it is Witnessed that he Liveth How he Liveth and how it is Witnessed unto that he Liveth we must Enquire For it is apparently of Melchisedec of whom in the first place as the Type these things are spoken and yet we know that really and in his own Person he was Dead long before But there are several things on the Account whereof it is said that it is witnessed that he Liveth For 1. Whatever the Scripture is silent in as to Melchisedec which it usually relates of others in the like state our Apostle takes for a Contrary Testimony unto him For he lays down this general Principle That what the Scripture conceals of Melchisedec it doth it to Instruct us in the Mystery of his Person and Ministry as Types of Christ and his Hence the Silence of the Scripture in what it useth to express must in this case be Interpreted as a Testimony unto the contrary So it witnessed of him that he was without Father without Mother without Descent in that it mentioneth none of them And whereas he had neither Beginning of Days nor End of Life Recorded in the Scripture it is thereby witnessed that not absolutely but as to his Typical consideration he Liveth For there are no bounds nor periods fixed unto his Priesthood nor did it expire by the bringing in that of Levi as that did by the Introduction of Christ's 2. He did actually continue his Office unto the end of that Dispensation of God and his Worship wherein he was employed and this witnesseth the perpetuity of his Life in opposition unto the Levitical Priests For these two States are compared by the Apostle that of Melchisedec and that of Levi. There was a time limited unto this Priesthood in the House of Aaron and during that time one Priest died and another Succeeded in several Generations until they were greatly multiplyed as the Apostle observeth ver 23. But during the whole Dispensation of things with respect unto Melchisedec he continued in his own Person to execute his Office from first to last without being Subject unto Death wherein it is witnessed that he Liveth 3. He is said to Live that is always to do so because his Office continueth for ever and yet no meer Mortal Man Succeeded him therein 4. In this whole Matter he is considered not Absolutely and Personally but Typically and as a Representation of somewhat else And what is Represented in the Type but is really subjectively and properly found only in the Antitype may be affirmed of the Type as such So it is in all Sacramental Institutions as the Paschal Lamb was called expressely Gods Passover Exod. 12. 11. when it was only a Pledge and Token thereof as under the New
the Old Testament or dispensation of the Old Covenant Such a time there was appointed unto it in the counsel of God during this season things fell out as described ver 9. The certain period fixed unto these days is called by our Apostle the time of Reformation Chap. 9. 10. After those days that is in or at their expiration when they were coming unto their end whereby the first Covenant waxed old and decayed God would make this Covenant with them And although much was done towards it before those days came absolutely unto an end and did actually expire yet is the making of it said to be after those days because being made in the wane and declension of them it did by its making put a full and final end unto them This in general was the time here designed for the making and establishing of the New Covenant But we must yet farther enquire into the precise time of the accomplishment of this Promise And I say the whole of it cannot be limited unto any one season absolutely as though all that was intended in Gods making of this Covenant did consist in any one individual act The making of the Old Covenant with the Fathers is said to be in the day wherein God took them by the hand to bring them out of the Land of Egypt During the season intended there were many things that were preparatory to the making of that Covenant or to the solemn establishment of it So was it also in the making of the New Covenant It was gradually made and established and that by sundry Acts preparatory for it or confirmatory of it And there are six degrees observable in it 1. The first peculiar entrance into it was made by the Ministry of John the Baptist. Him had God raised to send under the name in the spirit and power of Elijah to prepare the way of the Lord Mal. 4. Hence is his Ministry called the beginning of the Gospel Mark 1. 1 2. Until his coming the People were bound absolutely and universally unto the Covenant in Horeb without alteration or addition in any Ordinance of Worship But his Ministry was designed to prepare them and to cause them to look out after the accomplishment of this promise of making the New Covenant Mal. 4. 4 5 6. And those by whom his Ministry was despised did reject the counsel of God against themselves that is unto their ruine and made themselves liable to that utter excision with the Threatnings whereof the Writings of the Old Testament are closed Mal. 4. 6. He therefore called the People off from resting in or trusting unto the Priviledges of the first Covenant Mat. 3. 8 9 10. preached unto them a Doctrine of Repentance and instituted a new Ordinance of Worship whereby they might be initiated into a new state or condition a new Relation unto God And in his whole Ministry he pointed at directed and gave Testimony unto him who was then to come to establish this New Covenant This was the beginning of the accomplishment of this Promise 2. The coming in the Flesh and personal Ministry of our Lord Jesus Christ himself was an eminent advance and degree therein The dispensation of the Old Covenant did yet continue For he himself as made of a Woman was made under the Law yielding Obedience unto it observing all its Precepts and Institutions But his coming in the Flesh laid an Axe unto the Root of that whole dispensation For therein the main end that God designed thereby towards that People was accomplished The interposition of the Law was now to be taken away and the Promise to become all unto the Church Hence upon his Nativity this Covenant was proclaimed from Heaven as that which was immediately to take place Luk. 2. 13 14. But it was more fully and evidently carried on in and by his personal Ministry The whole doctrine thereof was preparatory unto the immediate introduction of this Covenant But especially there was therein and thereby by the truth which he taught by the manner of his teaching by the miracles which he wrought in conjunction with an open accomplishment of the Prophesies concerning him evidence given that he was the Messiah the Mediator of the New Covenant Herein was a declaration made of the Person in and by whom it was to be established and therefore he told them That unless they believed it was he who was so promised they should dye in iheir sins 3. The way for the introduction of this Covenant being thus prepared it was solemnly enacted and confirmed in and by his death For herein he offered that Sacrifice to God whereby it was established And hereby the Promise properly became 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Testament as our Apostle proves at large Chap. 9. 14 15 16. And he declares in the same place that it answered those Sacrifices whose blood was sprinkled on the People and the Book of the Law in the confirmation of the first Covenant which things must be treated of afterwards This was the Center wherein all the Promises of Grace did meet and from whence they derived their efficacy From henceforward the Old Covenant and all its administrations having received their full accomplishment did abide only in the patience of God to be taken down and removed out of the way in his own time and manner For really and in themselves their force and authority did then cease and was taken away See Eph. 2. 14 15 16. Col. 2. 14 15. But our obligation unto Obedience and the observance of Commands though formally and ultimately it be resolved into the Will of God yet immediately it respects the Revelation of it by which we are directly obliged Wherefore although the causes of the removal of the Old Covenant had already been applied thereunto yet the Law and its Institutions were still continued not only lawful but useful unto the Worshippers until the Will of God concerning their abrogation was fully declared 4. This New Covenant had the complement of its making and establishment in the Resurrection of Christ. For in order hereunto the Old was to have its perfect end God did not make the first Covenant and therein revive represent and confirm the Covenant of Works with the Promise annexed unto it meerly that it should continue for such a season and then die of its self and be arbitrarily removed But that whole dispensation had an end which was to be accomplished and without which it was not consistent with the wisdom or righteousness of God to remove it or take it away Yea nothing of it could be removed until all was fulfilled It was easier to remove Heaven and Earth than to remove the Law as unto its Right and Title to rule the Souls and Consciences of men before all was fulfilled And this end had two parts 1 The perfect fulfilling of the Righteousness which it required This was done in the Obedience of Christ the Surety of the New Covenant in the stead of them with whom
nor was there any constraint on Christ but he offered himself willingly through the eternal Spirit 2 She was to be had forth without the Camp ver 3. which the Apostle alludes unto Chap. 13. 11. representing Christ going out of the City unto his Suffering and Oblation 3 One did slay her before the face of the Priest and not the Priest himself So the hands of others Iews and Gentiles were used in the slaying of our Sacrifice 4 The Blood of the Heifer being slain was sprinkled by the Priest seven times directly before the Tabernacle of the Congregation ver 4. So is the whole Church purified by the sprinkling of the Blood of Christ. 5 The whole Heifer was to be burned in the sight of the Priest ver 5. So was whole Christ Soul and Body offered up to God in the fire of love kindled in him by the eternal Spirit 6 Cedar wood Hysop and Scarlet were to be cast into the midst of the burning of the Heifer ver 6. which were all used by God's Institution in the purification of the unclean or the sanctification and dedication of any thing unto sacred use to teach us that all spiritual vertue unto these ends really and eternally was contained in the one offering of Christ. 7 Both the Priest who sprinkled the Blood the men that slew the Heifer and he that burned her and he that gathered her ashes were all unclean until they were washed ver 7 8 9 10. So when Christ was made a Sin-offering all the legal Uncleannesses that is the Guilt of the Church were on him and he took them away But it is the use of this Ordinance which is principally intended The Ashes of this Heifer being burned was preserved that being mixed with pure water it might be sprinkled on persons who on any occasion were legally unclean Whoever was so was excluded from all the Solemn Worship of the Church Wherefore without this Ordinance the worship of God and the holy state of the Church could not have been continued For the means causes and ways of legal defilements among them were very many and some of them unavoidable In particular every Tent and House and all persons in them were defiled if any one died among them which could not but continually fall out in their Families Hereon they were excluded from the Tabernacle and Congregation and all Duties of the Solemn Worship of God until they were purified Had not therefore these Ashes which were to be mingled with living water been always preserved and in a readiness the whole worship of God must quickly have ceased amongst them It is so in the Church of Christ. The Spiritual Defilements which befal Believers are many and some of them unavoidable unto them whil'st they are in this world yea their Duties the best of them have defilements adhering unto them Were it not but that the Blood of Christ in its purifying vertue is in a continual readiness unto Faith that God therein had opened a Fountain for Sin and Uncleanness the Worship of the Church would not be acceptable unto him In a constant application thereunto doth the exercise of Faith much consist The nature and use of this Ordinance is farther described by its object the unclean 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is those that were made common All those who had a liberty of approach unto God in his Solemn Worship were so far sanctified that is separated and dedicated And such as were deprived of this priviledge were made common and so unclean The Unclean especially intended in the Institution were those who were defiled by the dead Every one that by any means touched a dead body whether dying naturally or slain whether in the house or field or did bear it or assist in the bearing of it or were in the Tent or House where it was were all defiled no such person was to come into the Congregation or near the Tabernacle But it is certain that many Offices about the dead are works of Humanity and Mercy which morally defile not Wherefore there was a peculiar reason of the constitution of this defilement and this severe Interdiction of them that were so defiled from Divine Worship And this was to represent unto the People the Curse of the Law whereof Death was the great visible effect The present Iews have this Notion that defilement by the dead arose from the poyson that is dropt into them that dye by the Angel of death whereof see our Exposition on Chap. 2. 14. The meaning of it is that Death came in by Sin from the poysonous temptation of the old Serpent and befel men by the Curse which took hold of them thereon But they have lost the understanding of their own Tradition This belonged unto the bondage under which it was the Will of God to keep that People that they should dread Death as an effect of the Curse of the Law and the fruit of Sin which is taken away in Christ Heb. 2. 14. 1 Cor. 15. 47. And these works which were unto them so full of defilement are now unto us accepted Duties of Piety and Mercy These and many others were excluded from an interest in the Solemn Worship of God upon ceremonial defilements And some vehemently contend that none were so excluded for moral defilements and it may be it is true for the matter is dubious But that it should thence follow that none under the Gospel should be so excluded for moral and spiritual Evils is a fond imagination Yea the Argument is firm that if God did so severely shut out from a participation in his Solemn Worship all those who were legally or ceremonially defiled much more is it his Will that those who live in spiritual or moral defilements should not approach unto him by the holy Ordinances of the Gospel The manner of the application of this purifying water was by sprinkling Being sprinkled or rather transitively sprinkling the unclean Not only the Act but the Efficacy of it is intended The manner of it is declared Numb 19. 17 18. The Ashes was kept by it self Where use was to be made of it it was to be mingled with clean living water water from the Spring The vertue was from the Ashes as it was the Ashes of the Heifer slain and burnt as a Sin-offering The water was used as the means of its application Being so mingled any clean person might dip a Bunch of Hysop see Psal. 51. 7. into it and sprinkle any thing or person that was defiled For it was not confined unto the Office of the Priest but was left unto every private person as is the continual application of the Blood of Christ. And this Rite of sprinkling was that alone in all Sacrifices whereby their continued efficacy unto Sanctification and Purification was expressed Thence is the Blood of Christ called the blood of sprinkling because of its efficacy unto our Sanctification as applied by Faith unto our Souls and Consciences The effect of
consequents of it Hereof he gives an illustration by comparing it unto what is of absolute and unavoidable necessity so as that it cannot otherwise be namely the death of all the individuals of mankind by the decretory sentence of God As they must dye every one and every one but once so Christ was to dye to suffer to offer himself and that but once The instances of those who died not after the manner of other men as Enoch and Elias or those who having died once were raised from the dead and died again as Lazarus give no difficulty herein They are instances of exemption from the common Rule by meer acts of Divine Sovereignty But the Apostle argues from the general Rule and Constitutions and thereon alone the force of his comparisons doth depend and they are not weakned by such exemptions As this is the certain unalterable law of Humane condition that every man must dye once and but once as unto this mortal life so Christ was once and but once offered But there is more in the words and design of the Apostle than a bare Similitude and illustration of what he treats of though Expositors own it not He doth not only illustrate his former Assertion by a fit comparison but gives the Reason of the one offering of Christ from what it was necessary for and designed unto For that he introduceth a Reason of his former Assertion the Causal connexion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth demonstrate Especially as it is joyned with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is in quantum inasmuch as in which sense he constantly useth that expression chap. 3. 3. chap. 7. 20. chap. 8. 6. And in as much as it was so with mankind it was necessary that Christ should suffer once for the expiation of Sin and the Salvation of Sinners How was it with mankind in this matter On the account of sin they were all subject unto the Law and the curse thereof Hereof there were two parts 1 Temporal Death to be undergone penally on the sentence of God 2 Eternal judgment wherein they were to perish for evermore In these things consist the effects of sin and the curse of the Law And they were due unto all men unavoidably to be inficted on them by the judgment and sentence of God It is appointed decreed determined of God that men sinful men shall once die and after that come to judgment for their Sins This is the sense the sentence the substance of the Law Under this Sentence they must all perish eternally if not Divinely relieved But inasmuch as it was thus with them the one offering of Christ once offered is prepared for their Relief and deliverance And the relief is in the infinite Wisdom of God eminently proportionate unto the evil the remedy unto the disease For 1. As man was to dye once legally and penally for sin by the sentence of the Law and no more So Christ died suffered and offered once and no more to bear Sin to expiate it and thereby to take away death so far as it was penal 2. As after death men must appear again the second time unto judgement to undergo condemnation thereon so after his once offering to take away Sin and Death Christ shall appear the second time to free us from judgement and to bestow on us eternal Salvation In this interpretation of the words I do not exclude the use of the comparison nor the design of the Apostle to illustrate the one offering of Christ once offered by the certainty of the death of men once onely for these things do illustrate one another as so compared But withal I judge there is more in them than a meer comparison between things no way related one to another but onely have some mutual resemblance in that they fall out but once Yea there seems not to be much light nor any thing of Argument in a comparison so arbitrarily framed But consider these things in their mutual Relation and opposition one unto the other which are the same with that of the Law and the Gospel and there is much of light and argument in the comparing of them together For whereas the end of the Death Suffering and Offering of Christ was to take away and remove the punishment due unto Sin which consisted in this that men should once die and but once and afterwards come to judgment and condemnation according to the sentence of the Law And it was convenient unto Divine Wisdom that Christ for that end should Dye Suffer Offer once only and afterwards bring them for whom he died unto Salvation And this is the proper sense of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in quantum which Interpreters know not what to make of in this place but endeavour variously to change and alter Some pretend that some Copies read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and one 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which they suppose came from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But the onely Reason why the word is not liked is because the sense is not understood Take the mind of the Apostle aright and his expression is proper unto his purpose Wherefore there is in these verses an entire opposition and comparison between the Law and the Gospel the Curse due to Sin and the Redemption that is by Christ Jesus And we may observe That God hath eminently suited our Relief the means and causes of our spiritual Deliverance unto our Misery the means and causes of it as that his own Wisdom and Grace may be exalted and our faith established That which is here summarily represented by our Apostle in this Elegant Antithesis he declares at large Rom. 5. from ver 12. to the end of the Chapter But we proceed with the interpretation of the words In the first part of the Antithesis and comparison ver 27. there are three things asserted 1 The Death of men 2 The judgment that ensues and 3. The cause of them both The last is first to be explained It is Appointed Determined Enacted statutum est It is so by him who hath a Sovereign Power and Authority in and over these things and hath the force of an unalterable Law which none can transgress God himself hath thus appointed it none else can determine and dispose of these things And the word equally respects both parts of the Assertion Death and Judgment They are both equally from the constitution of God which is the cause of them both The Socinians do so divide these things that one of them namely Death they would have to be natural and the other or judgment from the constitution of God which is not to interpret but to contradict the words Yea death is that which in the first place and directly is affirmed to be the effect of this Divine Constitution being spoken of as it is Penal by the curse of the Law for sin and judgment falls under the same constitution as consequential thereunto But if death as they plead be meerly and only natural they
cannot refer it unto the same Divine Constitution with the future judgment which is natural in no sense at all Death was so far natural from the beginning as that the frame and constitution of our nature were in themselves liable and subject thereunto But that it should actually have invaded our nature unto its dissolution without the intervention of its meritorious Cause in Sin is contrary unto the Original state of our Relation unto God the nature of the Covenant whereby we were obliged unto Obedience the Reward promised therein with the threatning of Death in case of disobedience Wherefore the Law Statute or Constitution here related unto is no other but that of Gen. 2. 17. In the day thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely dye with that addition dust thou art and unto dust thou shalt return Chap. 3. 19. God enacted it as an everlasting Law concerning Adam and all his Posterity that they should dye and that once as they were once taken out of the Dust. But in the words of God before mentioned there are two things 1. A penal Law enacted Gen. 3. 17. 2. A judicial sentence denounced Chap. 2. 19. not onely Death but future judgment also was appointed thereby Thus it is appointed to men that is to all men or men indefinitely without exception it is their lot and portion It is appointed unto men not meerly as men but as sinners as sinful men For it is of sin and the effects of it with their removal by Christ that the Apostle discourseth It is appointed unto them to dye that is penally for sin as Death was threatned in that Penal statute mentioned in the curse of the Law And death under that consideration alone is taken away by the death of Christ. The sentence of dying naturally is continued towards all but the moral nature of dying with the consequents of it are removed from some by Christ The Law is not absolutely reversed but what was formally penal in it is taken away Observe 1. Death in the first constitution of it was penal And the entrance of it as a penalty keeps the fear of it in all living Yea it was by the Law Eternally Penal Nothing was to come after death but Hell And 2. It is still penal Eternally penal unto all unbelievers But there are false notions of it amongst men as there are of all other things Some are afraid of it when the penalty is separated from it Some on the other hand look on it as a Relief and so either seek it or desire it unto whom it will prove only an entrance unto judgment It is the interest of all living to enquire diligently what death will be unto them 3. The death of all is equally determined and certain in Gods constitution It hath various wayes of approach unto all individuals Hence is it generally looked on as an accident befalling this or that man But the Law concerning it is general and equal The Second part of the Assertion is that after this is the judgment This by the same Divine unalterable constitution is appointed unto all God hath appointed a day wherein he will judge the world in Righteousness Death makes an not end of men as some think others hope and many would desire it should Ipsa mors nihil post mortem nihil But there is something yet remaining which death is subservient unto Hence it is said to be after this As surely as men dye it is sure that somewhat else follows after death This is the force of the particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but but after it Now this after doth not denote the immediate succession of one thing unto another if one go before and the other certainly follow after what ever length of time be interposed between them the Assertion is true and proper Many have been long dead probably the most that shall dye and yet judgment is not come after But it shall come in its appointed season and so as that nothing shall interpose between death and judgment to make any alteration in the state or condition of the persons concerned in them The souls of them that are dead are yet alive but are utterly incapable of any change in their condition between death and judgment As death leaves men so shall judgment find them The second part of this penal constitution is judgment after death judgment It is not a particular judgment on every individual person immediately on his death although such a judgment there be For in and by death there is a declaration made concerning the eternal condition of the deceased But judgment here is opposed unto the second appearance of Christ unto the Salvation of believers which is the great or general judgment of all at the last day 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 used with respect unto this day or taken absolutely do signifie a condemnatory sentence only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the resurrection of or unto judgment is opposed unto 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the resurrection of or unto life Joh. 5. 29. See ver 22 23 24. So is it here used Judgment that is condemnation for sin follows after death in the righteous constitution of God by the sentence of the Law And as Christ by his death doth not take away death absolutely but only as it was penal so on his Second appearance he doth not take away judgment absolutely but only as it is a condemnatory sentence with respect unto Believers For as we must all dye so we must all appear before his judgment seat Rom. 14. 10. But as he hath promised that those that believe in him shall not see death for they are passed from death unto life they shall not undergo it as it is penal so also he hath that they shall not come 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word here used into judgment Joh. 5. 24. They shall be freed from the condemnatory sentence of the Law For the nature and manner of this judgment see the Exposition on Chap. 6. 5. This then is the sense of the words Whereas therefore or in as much as this is the constitution of God that man sinful man shall once dye and afterwards be judged or condemned for sin Which would have been the event with all had not a Relief been provided which in opposition hereunto is declared in the next verse And no man that dyes in sin shall ever escape judgment VER XXVIII This verse gives us the Relief provided in the wisdom and Grace of God for and from this condition And there is in the words 1. The Redditive note of comparison and opposition So 2. The subject spoken of the offering of Christ. 3. The End of it to bear the sin of many 4 The consequent of it which must be spoken to distinctly 1. The Redditive note is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So in like manner in answer unto that state of things and for the Remedy against it in a blessed condecency unto Divine
that it might be fitted and suited unto the work that it was ordained unto In the former sense the Body it self is alone the Object of this preparation A Body hast thou prepared me that is designed for me This latter sense comprizeth the use of the Body also it is fitted for its work This latter sense it is that is proper unto this place Only it is spoken of by the Psalmist in a Prophetical Style wherein things certainly future are expressed as already performed For the word signifies such a preparation as whereby it is made actually fit and meet for the end it is designed unto And therefore it is variously rendred to fit to adapt to perfect to adorn to make meet with respect unto some especial end Thou hast adapted a Body unto my work fitted and suited an Humane Nature unto that I have to perform in it and by it A Body it must be yet not every body nay not any Body brought forth by Carnal Generation according to the course of Nature could effect or was fit for the work designed unto it But God prepared provided such a Body for Christ as was fitted and adapted unto all that he had to do in it And this especial manner of its preparation was an act of Infinite Wisdom and Grace Some Instances thereof may be mentioned As 1. He prepared him such a Body such an Humane Nature as might be of the same Nature with ours for whom he was to accomplish his work therein For it was necessary that it should be Cognate and Allied unto ours that he might be meet to act on our behalf and to suffer in our stead He did not form him a Body out of the Dust of the Earth as he did that of Adam whereby he could not have been of the same Race of Mankind with us nor meerly out of nothing as he created the Angels whom he was not to save See Chap. 2. ver 14 15 16. and the Exposition thereon He took our Flesh and Blood proceeding from the Loyns of Abraham 2. He so prepared it as that it should be no way subject unto that depravation and pollution that came on our whole Nature by Sin This could not have been done had his Body been prepared by Carnal Generation the way and means of conveying the taint of Original Sin which befel our Nature unto all individual persons For this would have rendered him every way unmeet for his whole work of Mediation See Luke 1. 35. Heb. 7. 26. 3. He prepared him a Body consisting of Flesh and Blood which might be Offered as a real substantial Sacrifice and wherein he might Suffer for Sin in his Offering to make Attonement for it Nor could the Sacrifices of Old which were Real Bloody and Substantial prefigure that which should be only Metaphorical and in appearance The whole evidence of the Wisdom of God in the Institution of the Sacrifices of the Law depends on this that Christ was to have a Body consisting of Flesh and Blood wherein he might answer all that was prefigured by them 4. It was such a Body as was Animated with a Living Rational Soul Had it been only a Body it Might have Suffered as did the Beasts under the Law from which no Act of Obedience was required only they were to suffer what was done unto them But in the Sacrifice of the Body of Christ that which was principally respected and whereon the whole Efficacy of it did depend was his Obedience unto God For he was not to be Offered by others but he was to Offer himself in Obedience unto the Will of God Chap. 9. 14. Ephes. 5. 2. And the principles of all Obedience lye alone in the Powers and Faculties of the Rational Soul 5. This Body and Soul were obnoxious unto all the Sorrows and Sufferings which our Nature is liable unto and we had deserved as they were poenal tending unto Death Hence was he meet to Suffer in our stead the same things which we should have done Had they been exempted by special priviledge from what our Nature is liable unto the whole work of our Redemption by his Blood had been frustrate 6. This Body or Humane Nature thus prepared for Christ was exposed unto all sorts of Temptations from outward Causes But yet it was so Sanctified by the perfection of Grace and fortified by the fulness of the Spirit dwelling therein as that it was not possible it should be touched with the least Taint or Guilt of Sin And this also was absolutely necessary unto the work whereunto it was designed 1 Pet. 2. 22. Heb. 7. 26. 7. This Body was liable unto Death which being the Sentence and Sanction of the Law with respect unto the First and all following Sins all and every one of them was to be undergone actually by him who was to be our Deliverer Heb. 2. 14 15. Had it not died Death would have borne Rule over all unto Eternity But in the death thereof it was swallowed up in Victory 1 Cor. 15. 55 56 57. 8. As it was subject unto Death and died actually so it was meet to be raised again from Death And herein consisted the great pledge and evidence that our dead Bodies may be and shall be raised again unto a Blessed Immortality So it became the Foundation of all our Faith as unto things Eternal 1 Cor. 15. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23. 9. This Body and Soul being capable of a real separation and being actually separated by Death though not for any long continuance yet no less truly and really than them who have been dead a Thousand years a Demonstration was given therein of an active Subsistence of the Soul in a State of Separation from the Body As it was with the Soul of Christ when he was dead so is it with our Souls in the same State He was alive with God and unto God when his Body was in the Grave and so shall our Souls be 10. This Body was visibly taken up into Heaven and there resides which considering the ends thereof is the great encouragement of Faith and the Life of our Hope These are but some of the many instances that may be given of the Divine Wisdom in so preparing a Body for Christ as that it might be fitted and adapted unto the work which he had to do therein And we may Observe that Not only the Love and Grace of God in sending his Son are continually to be admired and Glorified but the acting of this Infinite Wisdom in fitting and preparing his humane Nature so as to render it every way meet unto the work which it was designed for ought to be the especial Object of our Holy Contemplation But having treated hereof distinctly in a peculiar discourse unto that purpose I shall not here again insist upon it The last thing Observable in this Verse is that this preparation of the Body of Christ is ascribed unto God even the Father unto whom he speaks these words a Body
which he had all along compared and expressed Wherefore to convince the Hebrews not only of the certainty and severity of the Judgment declared but also of the Equity and Righteousness of it he proposeth unto them the consideration of Gods constitution of punishment under the Old Testament with respect unto the Law of Moses which they could not deny to be Just and Equal Ver. 28. he lays down the matter of fact as it was Stated under the Law Wherein there are three things 1. The sin whereunto that of Apostasie from the Gospel is compared He that despised Moses Law 2. The Punishment of that sin according to the Law he that was guilty of it dyed without Mercy 3. The way whereby according unto the Law his sin was to be charged on him it was under two or three Witnesses Unto the first two things did concur 1. It was such a sin as by the Law was capital as Murder Adultery Incest Idolatry Blasphemy and some others Concerning them it was provided in the Law that those who were guilty of them should be put to Death God alone by vertue of his Soveraignty could dispense with the Execution of this sentence of the Law as he did in the case of Lavid 2 Sam. 12. 13. but as unto the people they were prohibited on any account to dispense with it or forbear the Execution of it Numb 35. 31. 2. It was required that he did it presumptuously or with an high hand Ex. 21. 14. Numb 15. 30 31. Deut. 17. 12. He that was thus guilty of sin in sinning is said to despise Moses Law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to abolish it to render it useless that is in himself by contempt of the Authority of it or the Authority of God in it And it is called a contempt and abolishing of the Law as the word signifies 1. Because of Gods indulgence unto them therein For although the general sentence of the Law was a Curse wherein death was contained against every Transgression thereof Deut. 29. yet God had ordained and appointed that for all their sins of Ignorance Infirmity or surprisals by Temptations an Attonement should be made by Sacrifice whereon the guilty were freed as unto the terms of the Covenant and restored to a right unto all the Promises of it Wherein they would not abide in those Terms and Conditions of the Covenant but transgress the bounds annext to them it was a contempt of the whole Law with the wisdom goodness and authority of God therein 2. They rejected all the Promises of it which were given exclusively unto such sins nor was there any way appointed of God for their recovery unto an interest in them Hereby they made themselves Lawless Persons contemning the Threatnings and despising the Promises of the Law which God would not bear in any of them Deut. 29. 18 19 20 21. It is the contempt of God and his Authority in his Law that is the Gall and Poyson of sin This may be said in some measure of all voluntary sins and the more there is of it in any sin the greater is their guilt and the higher is their aggravation who have contracted it But there is a degree hereof which God will not bear with namely when this presumptuous contempt hath such an influence into any sin as that no ignorance no infirmity no special temptation can be pleaded unto the extenuation of it I obtained mercy because I did it ignorantly in unbelief And sundry things are required hereunto 1. That it be known unto the sinner both in point of right and fact to be such a sin as whereunto the penalty of death without dispensation was annexed 2. That therefore the sence of God in the Law be suggested unto the soul in and by the ordinary means of it 3. That the Resolution of continuing in it and the perpetration of it doth prevail against all convictions and fear of punishment 4. That Motives unto the contrary with reluctancies of Conscience be stifled or overcome These things rendered a sinner presumptuous or caused him to sin with an high hand under the Law Whereunto the Apostle adds in the next verse the peculiar aggravations of sin against the Gospel This it is to despise the Law of Moses as it is explained Numb 15. 30 31. 2. The Punishment of this sin or of him that was guilty of it was that he died without mercy He died that is he was put to death not alvaies it may be de facto but such was the constitution of the Law he was to be put to death without mercy There were several waies of inflicting Capital punishments appointed by the Law as hanging on a Tree burning and stoning Of all which and the application of them unto particular Cases I have given a description in the Exercitations unto the first Volume of these Commentaries And it is said that he dyed without mercy not only because there was no allowance for any such mercy as should save and deliver him but God had expresly forbidden that either mercy or compassion should be shewed in such cases Deut. 13. 6 7 8 9. Deut. 19. This is expresly added unto the highest instance of despising the Law namely the decalogue in the foundation of it whereon all other precepts of the Law were built and that which comprised a total Apostacy from the whole Law Wherefore I doubt not but the Apostle had an especial respect unto that sin in its punishment which had a compleat parallel with that whose hainousness he would represent However When the God of mercies will have men shew no mercy as in the Temporal punishment he can and will upon repentance shew mercy as to Eternal punishment For we dare not condemn all unto Hell which the Law condemned as unto temporal punishment 3. The way of Execution of this Judgment it was not to be done under two or three witnesses that is that were so of the fact and crime The Law is express in this case Deut. 17. 6. Chap. 19. 13. Numb 35. 30. Although God was very severe in the prescription of these Judgments yet he would give no advantage thereby unto wicked and malicious persons to take away the lives of innocent men He rather chose that those who were guilty should through our weakness go free for want of evidence against them than that innocence should be exposed unto the malice of one single testimony or witness And such abhorrency God had of false witnesses in criminal Causes as that which is most contrary unto his Righteousness in the Government of the world as that he established a Lex talionis in this case alone that a false witness should suffer the utmost of what he thought and contrived to bring on another The Equity of which Law is still continued in force as suitable to the Law of Nature and ought to be more observed than it is Deut. 19. 16 17 18 19 20 21. On this Proposition of
both these cases doth not only condemn these Errors as false but declares positively that their admission overthrows the Faith and renders the preaching of the Gospel vain and useless Now this Resurrection of the dead is the Restauration by the Power of God of the same numerical body which died in all the essential and integral parts of it rendring it in a re-union of or with the Soul immortal or of an Eternal duration in blessedness or misery And The Doctrine of this Resurrection is a fundamental principle of the Gospel the Faith whereof is indispensibly necessary unto the Obedience and Consolation of all that profess it I call it a principle of the Gospel not because it was absolutely first revealed therein It was made known under the old Testament and was virtually included in the first promise In the Faith of it the Patriarchs lived and died and it is testified unto in the Psalms and Prophets With respect hereunto did the Ancients confess that they were Strangers and Pilgrims in this world seeking another City and Country wherein they should live with God for ever They desired and looked for an heavenly Country wherein their persons should dwell Heb. 11. 16. And this was with Relation to Gods Covenant with them wherein as it follows God was not ashamed to be called their God That is their God in Covenant which Relation could never be broken and therefore our Saviour proves the Resurrection from thence because if the dead rise not again the Covenant Relation between God and his people must cease Math. 22. 31 32. Hence also did they take especial care about their dead bodies and their burial not meerly out of respect unto natural order and decency but to express their Faith of the Resurrection So our Apostle says that by Faith Joseph gave commandment concerning his bones Chap. 11. 12. And their disposal into a burying place is rehearsed by Stephen as one fruit of their Faith Acts 7. 15 16. Job gives testimony unto his Faith herein Chap. 19. 25 26. So doth David also Psal. 15. 17. and in sundry other places And Isaiah is express to the same purpose Chap. 26. 19. Thy dead shall live together with my dead body shall they arise awake and sing ye that dwell in dust for thy dew is as the dew of Herbs and the Earth shall cast out the dead This God proposeth for the comfort of the Prophet and all those who were either persecuted or slain in those days for Righteousness sake Their Resurrection is both directly and emphatically expressed And whereas some would wrest the words to signifie no more but the deliverance and exaltation of those who were in great distress yet they must acknowledge that it is expressed in allusion to the Resurrection of the dead which is therefore asserted in the words and was believed in the Church The same also is taught in Ezekiels vision of the vivification of dry bones Chap. 37. which although it declared the Restauration of Israel from their distressed condition yet it did so with allusion to the Resurrection at the last day without a supposition of the faith whereof the vision had not been instructive And many other testimonies to the same purpose might be insisted on I do not therefore reckon this a principle of the Doctrine of the Gospel absolutely and exclusively unto the Revelations of the Old Testament but on three other reasons 1. Because it is most clearly evidently and fully taught and declared therein It was as sundry other important truths made known under the Old Testament sparingly and obscurely But Life and Immortality with this great means of them both were brought to light by the Gospel 2 Tim. 1. 10. all things concerning them being made plain clear and evident 2. Because of that solemn confirmation and pledge of it which was given in the Resurrection of Christ from the dead This was wanting under the Old Testament and therefore the Faith of men might oft-times be greatly shaken about it For whereas death seized on all men and that penally in the execution of the sentence of the Law whence they were for fear of it obnoxious to bondage all their days Heb. 2. 14 15. they had not received any pledge or instance of a recovery from its power or the taking off that sentence and penalty But Christ dying for us and that directly under the Sentence and Curse of the Law yet conquering both Death and Law being raised again the pains or bonds of death being loosed hath given a full confirmation and absolute assurance of our Resurrection And thus it is said that he brought Life and Immortality to light by abolishing of death 2 Tim. 1. 10. that is the power of it that it should not hold us for ever under its dominion 1 Cor. 15. 54 55 56 57. 3. Because it hath a peculiar influence into our Obedience under the Gospel Under the Old Testament the Church had sundry motives unto Obedience taken from temporal things namely prosperity and peace in the Land of Canaan with deliverance out of troubles and distresses Promises hereof made unto them the Scripture abounds withal and thereon presseth them unto Obedience and diligence in the Worship of God But we are now left unto promises of Invisible and Eternal things which cannot be fully enjoyed but by virtue of the Resurrection from the dead And therefore these promises are made unspeakably more clear and evident as also the things promised unto us than they were unto them and so our motives and incouragements unto Obedience are unspeakably advanced above theirs This may well therefore be esteemed as an especial principle of the Doctrine of the Gospel And 1. It is an animating principle of Gospel Obedience because we are assured thereby that nothing we do therein shall be lost In general the Apostle proposeth this as our great encouragement That God is not unrighteous to forget our work and labour of love ver 10. and shews us the especial way whereby it shall be remembred Nothing is more fatal unto any endeavours than an apprehension that men do in them spend their strength in vain and their labour for nought This makes the Hands of men weak their Knees feeble and their Hearts fearful Nor can any thing deliver us from a slothful despondency but an assurance that the fruit of our endeavours shall be called over again And this is given us alone by the Faith of the Resurrection of the dead when they shall awake again and sing who dwell in the dust and then shall the Righteous be had in everlasting remembrance Let no man fear the loss of his work unless it be such as the Fire will consume when it will be to his advantage to suffer that loss and to have it so consumed Not a good thought word or work but shall have a new Life given unto it and have as it were a share in the Resurrection 2. We are assured hereby that such things shall
not only be remembred but also rewarded It is unto the Righteous as we have observed not only a Resurrection from the dead but a Resurrection unto Life that is Eternal as their Reward And this is that which either doth or ought to give Life and Diligence unto our Obedience So Moses in what he did and suffered for Christ had respect unto the recompence of reward Heb. 11. 26. God hath put this declaration hereof into the foundation of all our Obedience in the Covenant I am thy exceeding great reward Gen. 15. 1. And at the close of it the Lord Jesus doth not think it enough to declare that he will come himself but also that his reward is with him Rev. 22. 12. Some have foolishly supposed that this Reward from God must needs infer Merit in our selves whereas Eternal Life is the Gift of God through Jesus Christ and not the wages of our works as Sin is of death Rom. 6. 23. It is such reward as is absolutely a free gift a gift of Grace and if it be by Grace then it is no more of works otherwise Grace is no more Grace and if it be of works then it is no more Grace otherwise work is no more work Rom. 11. 6. The same thing cannot be of Works and Grace also of our own Merit and of the free Gift of God And others it is to be feared under a mistaken pretence of Grace do keep off themselves from a due respect unto this gracious reward which the Lord Christ hath appointed as the blessed issue and end of our Obedience But hereby they deprive themselves of one great motive and encouragement thereunto especially of an endeavour that their Obedience may be such and the fruits of it so abound that the Lord Christ may be signally glorified in giving out a gracious reward unto them at the last day For whereas he hath designed in his own Grace and Bounty to give us such a glorious Reward and intendeth by the Operation of his Spirit to make us fit to receive it or meet for the Inheritance of Saints in Light Col. 1. 12. our principal respect unto this Reward is that we may receive it with an advantage of Glory and Honour unto our Lord Jesus And the consideration hereof which is conveyed unto us through the Faith of the Resurrection is a chief animating principle of our Obedience 2. It hath the same respect unto our Consolation For if in this Life only we have hope in Christ then are we of all men most miserable 1 Cor. 15. 19. that is if we regard only outward things in this world Reproaches Scornings Revilings Troubles Persecutions have been the Lot of most of them who so hoped in Christ. But is this all which we shall have from him or by him probably as to outward things it will prove so to most of us in this world if it come not to greater extremities Then are we of all men most miserable But stay awhile These things will be all called over again at the Resurrection and that is time enough and all things be put into another posture See 2 Thes. 1. 6 7 8 9 10. We have therefore no reason to despond for what may befall us in this life nor at what distress this flesh we carry about us may be put unto We are it may be sometimes ready to faint or to think much of the pains we put our selves unto in Religious Duties especially when our bodies being weak and crazie would willingly be spared or of what we may endure and undergo but the day is coming that will recompence and make up all This very flesh which we now thus employ under its weaknesses in a constant course of the most difficult duties shall be raised out of the dust purified from all its infirmities freed from all its weaknesses made incorruptible and immortal to enjoy rest and glory unto Eternity And we may comfort our selves with these words 1 Thes. 4. 18. Fourthly The fourth principle mentioned is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This is the immediate consequent of the Resurrection of the dead Men shall not be raised again to live another Life in this world and as it were therein to make a new adventure but it is to give an account of what is past and to receive what they have done in the body whether it be good or evil And because there are no outward visible transactions between God and the Souls of men after their departure out of this world nor any alteration to be made as to their Eternal state and condition this Judgement is spoken of as that which immediately succeeds death its self Heb. 9. 27. It is appointed to all men once to dye and after this the Judgement This Judgement is sure and there is nothing between death and it that it takes notice of But as to some there may be a very long space of time between the one and the other neither shall Judgement be administred until after the Resurrection from the dead and by means thereof And when all the race of mankind appointed thereunto have lived and died according to their allotted seasons then shall Judgement ensue on them all 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is commonly used for a condemnatory Sentence Therefore some think that it is only the Judgement of wicked and ungodly men that is intended And indeed the day of Judgement is most frequently spoken of in the Scripture with respect thereunto See 2 Thes. 1. 7 8 9 10. Jude 14 15. 2 Pet. 2. 4. And this is partly because the remembrance of it is suited to put an awe upon the fierceness pride and rage of the spirits of men rushing into Sin as the Horse into the battel and partly that it might be a relief unto the godly under all either their persecutions from their cruelty or temptations from their prosperity But in reality the Judgement is general and all men both good and bad must stand in their lot therein We shall all stand before the Judgement-seat of Christ as it is written As I live saith the Lord every knee shall bow to me Rom. 14. 10 11. And this is that which is here intended As the Resurrection of the dead that precedes belongs to all so doth the Judgement that follows And this our Apostle expresseth by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a word of the same original and signification with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Judgement is said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is the eleventh fundamental Article of the Jewish present Creed Two of the Targums as a supplement of that Speech which they suppose defective 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gen. 4. 8. And Cain said to his brother Abel add a disputation between the Brothers about Eternal Judgement with Rewards and Punishments which they suppose Cain to have denied and Abel to have asserted And as there is no doubt but that it was one principal Article of the Faith of
the Church before the Flood so it is probable that it was much opposed and derided by that corrupt violent and wicked generation which afterwards perished in their Sins Hence Enochs Prophecy and Preaching among them was to confirm the Faith of the Church therein Jude 14 15. And probably the hard speeches which are specified as those which God would severely revenge were their contemptuous mockings and despisings of Gods coming to Judgement as Peter plainly intimates 2 Pet. 3. 3 4 5. This seems to be the great controversie which the Church before the Flood had with that ungodly generation namely whether there were a future Judgement or no in the contempt whereof the world fell into all profligacy of abominable wickednesses And as God gave testimony to the truth in the Prophecy of Enoch so he visibly determined the whole matter on the side of the Church in the Flood which was an open pledge of Eternal Judgement And hence those words the Lord cometh became the Appeal of the Church in all Ages 1 Cor. 16. 22. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 respects not the duration of this Judgement but it s ●●d and effect For it shall not be of a perpetual duration and continuance which to fancy is both absurd in nature and inconsistent with the proper end of it which is to deliver men over into their everlasting Lot and Portion And it is both curious needless and unwarrantable to enquire of what continuance it shall be seeing God hath given no Revelation thereof Neither is the mind of man capable of making any tolerable conjecture concerning the process of the infinite wisdom of Christ in this matter Neither do we know as to time or continuance what will be necessary therein to the conviction and confusion of impenitent sinners or as to the demonstration of his own Righteousness and Glory It may be esteemed an easie but will be found our safest wisdom to silence even our thoughts and enquiries in all things of this nature where we cannot trace the express foot-steps of Divine Revelation And this Judgement is called Eternal 1 In opposition to the temporal Judgements which are or have been passed on men in this world which will be all then called over again and revised Especially it is so with respect unto a threefold Judgement First That which passed upon the Lord Christ himself when he was condemned as a Malefactor and Blasphemer He never suffered that sentence to take place quietly in the world but from the first he sent his Spirit to argue reason and plead his cause in the world Joh. 16. 9 10 11. This he ever did and ever will maintain by his Church Yet is there no absolute determination of the case But when this day shall come then shall he condemn every tongue that was against him in Judgement and all his Adversaries shall be confounded 2ly All those condemnatory sentences whether unto death or other punishments which almost in all Ages have been given against his Disciples or true Believers With the thoughts and prospect hereof did they always relieve themselves under false Judgements and cruel Executions For they have had Trials of cruel mockings and scourgings yea moreover of bond and imprisonment they have been stoued and sawn in sunder tempted and slain with the Sword have wandred about in Sheep-skins and Goat-skins being destitate afflicted tormented not accepting deliverance upon the worlds terms that they might obtain a better Resurrection as Heb. 11. 35 36 37. In all these things they possessed their Souls in patience following the example of their Master committing themselves unto him that judgeth righteously 1 Pet. 2. 23. 3ly The false sentences which under their provocations professors have passed on one another see 1 Cor. 4. 3 4 5. 2 Because it is Judicium inevitabile an unavoidable sentence which all men must stand or fall by For it is appointed unto all men once to dye and after that is the Judgement This Judgement is no more avoidable unto any than death it self from which the experience of some thousands of years leaves unto men no hope of escape 3 Because in it and by it an unchangeable determination of all mens estate and condition is made for Eternity The Judgement which disposeth of men unalterably into their Eternal estate whether of Blessedness or of Misery Two things must be yet farther spoken unto to clear this great principle of our Faith First the general nature of this Eternal Judgement and then the Evidences we have of its truth and certainty 1. The general concerns of this Eternal Judgement are all of them plainly expressed in the Scripture which declare the nature of it 1 As to its time there is a determined and unalterable day fixed for it God hath appointed a day wherein he will judge the world in Righteousness Acts 17. 31. And this time is commonly called the day of Judgement Matth. 10. 15. Chap. 11. 22 24. Chap. 12. 32. Mark 6. 11. 2 Pet. 2. 9. 1 Joh. 4. 17. And this day being fixed in the foreknowledge and determinate counsel of God can no more be either hastened or deferred than God himself can be changed Until this appointed time comes whatever falls out he will satisfie his Wisdom and Glory in his ordinary government of the world enterwoven with some occasional extraordinary Judgements and therein he calls all his own people to be satisfied For this precise time the knowledge of it is among the principal secrets of his Soveraignty which he hath for reasons suited to his infinite Wisdom laid up in his own Eternal bosom Hence is that of our Saviour Of that day and hour knoweth no man no not the Angels that are in Heaven neither the Son that is in and by the humane nature but the Father Mark 13. 32. which is the highest expression of an unrevealable divine secret God hath not only not revealed it but he hath decreed not to reveal it All enquiries about it are not only sinfully curious but foolish and impious Then it is certain when all things foretold in the Scripture are accomplished when the Obedience of all the Elect is compleated and the measure allotted unto the wickedness of the world in the patience of God is filled up then and not before the End shall be In the mean time when we see a man old weak diseased nature being decayed and infirmities abounding we may judge that his death is not far off though we know not when he will die so seeing the world come to that state and condition so weakened and decayed as unto its principal end that it is scarce any longer able to bear the weight of its own wickedness nor supply the sinful Lusts of its inhabitants seeing all sorts of Sins new and old heard and unheard of perpetrated every where in the light of the Sun and countenanced with Atheistical security as also considering that the Gospel seems to have finished its work where it is preached with all sorts of
had often threatened them that the Kingdom of God should be taken from them they should no longer enjoy the means of saving Knowledge or Repentance God laid them aside as a Field no longer fit to be Till'd And this he did about the writing of this Epistle for immediately hereon he began utterly to forsake them who were obstinate in their Judaisme and all those who Apostatized thereunto from Christianity And thus also in proportion he deals with all other unprofitable Hearers and Apostates There is a time after which he casts them out of his Care will feed them no more provide no more that they be rained on or dressed And if they do any more enjoy the Word it is by accident for the sake of some who are approved but they shall receive no Advantage by it seeing they are no longer Gods Husbandry Secondly On this rejection of them they were nigh unto Cursing that is they were so ordered and disposed of as that the destroying Curse of Gods Might came upon them God had now Anathematized them or devoted them to Destruction and hereupon he gave them up unto all those ways and means whereby it might be hastened and infallibly overtake them For 1 He gathered all the good Plants from amongst them he called out and separated from them all true Believers and planted them in the Christian Church so he deals with all Apostate Churches before their utter Destruction Rev. 18. 4. 2 He took away their Fences casting them out of his Protection insomuch that when they were destroyed the General of the Roman Army acknowledged that God had infatuated them that their impregnable Holds and Forts were of no use unto them 3 He granted them no more use of means for their Conversion Thenceforwards they fell into all manner of sins confusions disorders tumults which ocasioned their Ruine After the same manner will God deal with any other people whom he rejects for their rejection of the Gospel And the World hath no small reason to tremble at the Apprehension of such a condition at this day Thirdly In the End this whole barren Earth was burned up In the first place this respects the Destruction of Hierusalem which ensued not long after when Temple and City and People and Countrey were all devoured by Fire and Sword Matth. 4. 1. But yet this like the Destruction of Sodom was but an Emblem of the future Judgement Hypocrites Unbelievers Apostates are to have another End than what they fall into in this World An End they shall have wherein their Eternal condition shall be immutably stated And this End is that they must have to the Fire the Fire prepared for the Devil and his Angels they shall be gathered together and burned with a Fire that shall never be quenched Joh. 15. 3 4. And this final Destruction of all unprofitable Hearers Unbelievers and Apostates is that which is principally intended in the words And we must not let this wholsome Admonition pass without some Observations from it Whilst the Gospel is preached unto men they are under their great trial for Eternity The Application that is made unto them is for an Experiment how they will prove If they acquit themselves in Faith and Obedience they receive the Blessing of Eternal Life from God If they prove barren and unprofitable they are rejected of God and cursed by him Nor shall they ever have any other Trial nor shall ever any other Experiment be made of them Heb. 10. Their Season of the enjoyment of the Gospel is their day When that is past the Night comes on them wherein they cannot work When these Bellows are burnt and the Lead is consumed the Founder Founding in vain men are rejected as Reprobate Silver never to be tried any more Men do but deceive themselves in their reserve of a Purgatory when they are gone out of this world If they are cast under their Trial here so they must abide to Eternity And we may do well to consider these things distinctly because our concernment in them is very great To this purpose observe 1. That we are all made for an Eternal State and Condition in blessedness or wo. Men may live like Beasts and therefore wish that they might dye like them also But we are all made with another design and must all of us stand in our Eternal Lot at the end of the days Dan. 12. 13. 2. That the unchangeable determination of our Eternal state depends on what we do in this Life There is neither Wisdom nor Knowledge Duty nor Obedience in the Grave whither we are going As the Tree falls so it must lye It is appointed for all men once to dye and after that is the Judgement Nothing interposeth to alter our state and condition between Death and Judgement The contrivance of Purgatory when we are gone hence was an Invention of Sathan to delude the Souls of men with hopes of relief when all means and ways of it were past and irrecoverable 3. The Trial of our future state is made by the Preaching of the Gospel unto us and our compliance with it or rejection of it This is that which the Text declares on the one hand and the other the barren Ground is rejected on this Trial. 4. It was a Fruit of Infinite Grace Condescension and Mercy to grant a new Trial unto Sinners under the Curse we had all cast our selves into There God might have left us So he dealt with the sinning Angels whom he spared not And had he dealt so with all mankind who could say unto him what dost thou And it is that which we must all answer for namely that when we were lost and fallen under the Sentence of the Holy and Righteous Law God would propose any terms of Peace and Reconciliation unto us and give us a second Trial thereon 5. That the especial way of this Trial doth most eminently set out this Grace and Mercy A way it is full of infinite Wisdom Goodness Love Mercy and Grace Such as wherein all the Divine Perfections will be Eternally glorified whether it be accepted or refused 6. When the Gospel is preached unto any God telleth sinners that although they have destroyed themselves and are ready every moment to sink into Eternal Misery yet he will out of infinite Grace and Compassion try them once more and that by the holy terms of the Gospel And in the preaching of the Word he doth it accordingly And although the season of this Trial be determined with God yet it is unto us uncertain on many Accounts for 1 the continuance of our Lives during which alone we are capable of enjoying it is so 2 We see that the Preaching of the Gospel is so also The Lord Christ doth oft-times remove the Candlesticks whilst they continue alive in the world among whom it was once fixed And 3 there is a time when a Period is put unto the Efficacy of the Word for the Conversion of some although the
render Surely it is meet to be said unto God I have born I will not offend and that properly And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was of common use in the Greek Tongue in Assertory Oaths So Demosthenes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He sware 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that he would destroy Philip. The Vulgar Latine renders it by nisi that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 contrary to the sense of the Ancients Chrysostome Oecumenius and Theophylact as some of the Expositors of the Roman Church do acknowledge But yet that manner of expression denotes a sense not unusual in the Scripture For there is an Intimation in it of a reserved Condition rendring the saying ensuing a most sacred Oath Unless I bless thee let me not be trusted in as God or the like But the formality of the Oath of God is neither in Genesis nor here expressed only respect is had unto what he affirms by my self have I sworn Surely undoubtedly The Promise it self is expressed in those words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Blessing I will bless thee and multiplying I will multiply thee Our Apostle renders the words of Moses exactly Gen. 22. 17. Only where it is said there I will multiply thy Seed he expresseth it by I will multiply thee which is all one or to the same purpose for he could be no way multiplied but in his Seed and he proceedeth no farther with the words of the Promise as being not concerned in what followeth For although his Seed was actually multiplied yet it was Abraham himself who was blessed therein The Vulgar Latine in this place reads Benedicens benedicam blessing I will bless but in Genesis hath only benedicam and multiplicabo Hence divers of the Roman Expositors as Ribera Tena and others give sundry reasons why the Apostle changed the expression from what was used in Moses where it is only said I will bless thee into blessing I will bless thee And which I cannot but observe Schlictingius who followeth in this place the Exposition of Ribera complies with him also in that Observation aliis quidem verbis saith he promissionem hanc apud Mosem extulit But all this is but the mistake of the Vulgar Interpreter on Gen. 22. For the words in the Original have the Reduplication rendered by the Apostle which the Lxx also observe And this Reduplication is a pure Hebraisme vehemently affirming the thing promised and hath in it the nature of an Oath It also intends and extends the matter promised Blessing I will bless thee I will do so without fail I will do so greatly without measure and eternally without end And this kind of Asseveration is common in the Hebrew Gen. 2. 17. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In the day thou eatest thereof dying thou shalt dye thou shalt assuredly dye be certainly obnoxious unto Death it may be also that the double Death temporal and eternal is included therein See Gen. 37. 33. 2 Kings 2. 23. 1 Sam. 23. 22. Josh. 24. 10. Jer. 23. 17. Dan. 11. 10. We have need of every thing that any way evidenceth the stability of Gods Promises to be represented unto us for the encouragement and confirmation of our Faith As God redoubled the word at the first giving out of the Promise unto Abraham for the strengthening of his Faith so is the same here expressed by the Apostle that it might have the same effect upon us And two things especially God seems to impress upon our minds in this vehemency of expression 1 The sincerity of his Intentions without reserve 2 The stability of his Purposes without alteration and change It is to signifie both these that such emphatical vehement expressions are used even among men and both these Unbelief is apt to question in God He that believeth not maketh God a liar 1 Joh. 5. 10. He is a lyar who in his Promises intendeth not what his words signifie but hath other reserves in his mind and he who having promised changeth without cause Both these doth Unbelief impute to God which makes it a sin of so hainous a nature The first time God used this kind of Reduplication it was in his threatening of Death unto the Transgression of the Command Gen. 2. 17. In the day thou eatest thereof dying thou shalt dye And that which Sathan deluded our first Parents by was in perswading them that there was not sincerity in what God had said but that he had reserved to himself that it should be otherwise The Serpent said unto the woman 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dying ye shall not dye Gen. 3. 4. But this being directly contrary unto what God had expresly affirmed how could Sathan imagine that the Woman would immediately consent unto him against the express words of God Wherefore he useth this Artifice to prevail with her that although God had spoken those words yet he had a Reserve to himself that it should not be unto them indeed as he had spoken ver 5. By these means Unbelief entered into the world and hath ever since wrought effectually in the same kind There is no Promise of God so plainly expressed but Unbelief is ready to suggest innumerable exceptions why it should have such reserves accompanying of it as that it doth not belong unto us Most of these exceptions we gather from our selves and were it not for them we suppose we could believe the Promise well enough But the truth is when we are called to believe when it is our Duty so to do when we pretend that we are willing and desirous to do so were it not for such and such things in our selves it is the sincerity of God in his Promises we all in question and we think that although he proposeth the Promise unto us and commandeth us to believe yet it is not his intention and purpose that we should do so or that we should be made partakers of the good things promised By the purpose of God I do not here intend the Eternal purpose of his Will concerning the effects and events of things about which we are called to exercise neither Faith nor Unbelief until they are manifested But the whole Rule of our Duty is in Gods Command and the Faith required of us consists in this that if we comply with what God prescribeth we shall enjoy what he promiseth if we believe we shall be saved And herein to question the Truth or Sincerity of God is an high effect of Unbelief This distrust therefore God removes by the Reduplication of the word of the Promise that we might know he was in good earnest in what he expressed The like may be spoken concerning the stability of the Promises with respect unto change which because it must be particularly afterwards spoken unto shall be here omitted And these things we have need of If we think otherwise we know little of the nature of Faith or Unbelief of our own weakness the efficacy of the Deceits of Sathan or the manifold oppositions which
Interest in the Priesthood as it was Established by Law 2. He had no Genealogy upon the Priestly Line And that which is Recorded of him on other accounts is so far from having respect unto his Right unto the Priesthood of the Law that it directly proves and demonstrates that he had none For his Genealogy is evidently of the Tribe of Judah which was excluded Legally from that Office as we have besides the Institution an Instance in King Uzziah 2 Chron. 26. 16 17 18. from Exod. 30. 7. Numb 18. 7. Hence our Apostle concludes That had he been on the Earth that is under the Order of the Law he could not have been a Priest there being others who by virtue of their Descent had alone the Right thereunto Heb. 8. 3 4. Wherefore God in these things Instructed the Church that he would erect a Priesthood which should no way depend on Natural Generation Descent or Genealogy whence it inevitably follows that the state of the Priesthood under the Law was to cease and to give place unto another which our Apostle principally designs to prove 3. In this respect also the Lord Christ was without Beginning of Days and End of Life For although in his Humane Nature he was both Born and Died yet he had a Priesthood which had no such Beginning of Days as that it should be traduced from any other to him nor shall ever cease or be delivered over from him unto any other but abides unto the consummation of all things In these things was Melchisedec made like unto Christ whom the Apostle here calls the Son of God made like unto the Son of God I have formerly observed in this Epistle that the Apostle makes mention of the Lord Christ under various Appellations on various Occasions so that in one place or another he makes Use of all the Names whereby he is signified in the Scripture Here he calls him the Son of God and that 1. To intimate that although Melchisedec were an Excellent Person yet was he infinitely beneath him whom he Represented even the Son of God He was not the Son of God but he had the Honour in so many things to be made like unto him 2. To declare how all these things which were any way Represented in Melchisedec or couched in the Story or left unto Enquiry by the vail of silence drawn over them could be fulfilled in our High Priest And it was from hence namely that he was the Son of God By virtue hereof was he capable of an always-living abiding uninterrupted Priesthood although as to his Humane Nature he once died in the Discharge of that Office This Description being given of the Person treated of which makes up the Subject of the Proposition it is affirmed concerning him that he abideth a Priest for ever For any thing we find in the Story of his Death or the Resignation of his Office or the Succession of any one unto him therein he abideth a Priest for ever Some I find have been venturing at some obscure Conjectures of the perpetuity of the Priesthood of Melchisedec in Heaven But I cannot perceive that they well understood themselves what they intended Nor did they consider that the real continuance of the Priesthood for ever in the Person of Melchisedec is as inconsistent with the Priesthood of Christ as the continuance of the same Office in the Line of Aaron But things are so related concerning him in the Scripture as that there is no mention of the ending of the Priesthood of his Order nor of his own Personal Administration of his Office by Death or otherwise Hence is he said to abide a Priest for ever This was that which our Apostle principally designed to confirm from hence namely that there was in the Scripture before the Institution of the Aaronical Priesthood a Representation of an Eternal unchangeable Priesthood to be introduced in the Church which he demonstrates to be that of Jesus Christ. It may not be amiss in the close of this Exposition of these Verses summarily to represent the several particulars wherein the Apostle would have us to observe the likeness between Melchisedec and Christ or rather the especial Excellencies and Properties of Christ that were Represented in the Account given of the Name Reign Person and Office of Melchisedec As 1. He was said to be and he really was and he only first the King of Righteousness and then the King of Peace seeing he alone brought in Everlasting Righteousness and made Peace with God for Sinners And in his Kingdom alone are these things to be found 2. He was really and truly the Priest of the High God and properly he was so alone He offered that Sacrifice and made that Attonement which was signified by all the Sacrifices Offered by Holy Men from the Foundation of the World 3. He Blesseth all the Faithful as Abraham the Father of the Faithful was Blessed by Melchisedec In him were they to be Blessed by him are they Blessed through him delivered from the Curse and all the Fruits of it nor are they Partakers of any Blessing but from him 4. He receiveth all the Homage of his People all their grateful Acknowledgments of the Love and Favour of God in the Conquest of their Spiritual Adversaries and Deliverance from them as Melchisedec received the Tenth of the Spoils from Abraham 5. He was really without Progenitors or Predecessors unto his Office nor would I exclude that Mystical sence from the intention of the place that he was without Father as to his Humane Nature and without Mother as to his Divine 6. He was a Priest without Genealogy or Derivation of his Pedigree from the Loyns of Aaron or any other that ever was a Priest in the World and moreover Mysteriously was of a Generation which none can declare 7. He had in his Divine Person as the High Priest of the Church neither Beginning of Days nor End of Life as no such thing is reported of Melchisedec For the Death which he underwent in the Discharge of his Office being not the death of his whole Person but of his Humane Nature only no Interruption of his endless Office did ensue thereon For although the Person of the Son of God died whence God is said to Redeem his Church with his own Blood Acts 20. 28. yet he died not in his whole Person But as the Son of man was in Heaven whilst he was speaking on the Earth John 3. 13. namely he was so in his Divine Nature so whilst he was dead in the Earth in his Humane Nature the same Person was alive in his Divine Absolutely therefore nor in respect of his Office he had neither Beginning of Days nor end of Life 8. He was really the Son of God as Melchisedec in many Circumstances was made like to the Son of God 9. He alone abideth a Priest for ever whereof we must particularly treat afterwards The Doctrinal Observations that may be taken from these Verses
Testament the Bread and Wine in the Sacred Supper are called the Body and Blood of Christ which they do Represent Thus it is true really and absolutely of our Lord Jesus Christ That he Liveth for ever that he is a Priest for ever which the Apostle much insisteth on and urgeth unto his purpose afterwards This Eternity or ever-living of Jesus Christ was Represented in Melchisedec in that it is not said any where in the Scripture that he dyed it is witnessed therefore that he Liveth because He whom he Represents doth really do so his own Death is not mentioned on purpose that he might so Represent him And the Apostle's Argument unto the Dignity and Preheminence of Melchisedec above the Levitical Priests in this Instance is of an unquestionable Evidence For consider Melchisedec not in his Natural Being and Existence which belongs not unto this Mystery but in his Scripture-Being and Existence and he is Immortal always Living wherein he is more Excellent than those who were always obnoxious unto Death in the Exercise of their Office And from the branches of this Comparison we may take two Observations 1. In the outward Administration of his worship God is pleased to make Use of poor frail mortal dying men So he did of old and so he continues still to do Our Fathers where are they and the Prophets do they Live for ever Zech. 1. 5. The Prophets of old the most Eminent Administrators under the Old Testament they were all mortal dying men and whilst they lived in this World they were Subject unto like Passions with other Men James 5. 17. And the same account the Apostle giveth us of the Principal Administrators of the New Testament 2 Cor. 4. 8 9 10 11 12. Chap. 6. 8 9. And we know it is so with all those into whose hands the same work is transmitted Yea oft-times as to the Infirmities of Body and outward Condition their weakness and frailty are signalized above others Nor doth any Advantage accrue to the Gospel by the Secular Exaltations of such as pretend unto the same Employment wherein without other Qualifications they do little resemble the Ministry of Christ himself Such I say doth God please to make Use of Persons obnoxious unto all Infirmities and Temptations with all other Believers and equally with them falling under the stroke of Mortality He could have accomplished his whole Design immediately by his Grace and Spirit without the Institution of any Administrators He could have employed his Holy Angels in the Declaration and Dispensation of the Gospel or he could have raised up Men so signalized with Wisdom and all endowments of Mind and Body as should have eminently distinguished them from the whole Race of Mankind besides But waving these and all other ways possible and easie unto his Infinite Wisdom and Power he hath chosen to make Use in this great Occasion of Poor Infirm Frail Tempted Sinning Dying men And sundry Reasons of this his Holy Councel are expressed in the Scripture 1. He doth it to make it Evident that it is his own Power and nothing else which gives Efficacy and Success unto all Gospel-Administrations 2 Cor. 4. 7. VVe have this Treasure in Earthen Vessels that the Excellency of the Power may be of God and not of us There is an Excellency of Power accompanieth the Dispensation of the VVord Mighty Spiritual Effects are produced by it such as wherein the Glory of God doth consist and whereon the Eternal welfare of the Souls of Men doth depend This Glory in subduing the Adverse Power of Sin Satan and the World in the Quickening Sanctifying Saving the Souls of the Elect God will be seen and owned in he will not give it unto another Whereas therefore those by whom these Treasures are communicated unto others are frail perishing Earthen Vessels or those by whom the Gospel is dispensed are poor frail weak men seen and known so to be there is no veil by their Ministry cast over the Glory of God There is not a Soul Convinced Converted or Comforted by their Word but they may truly say of it as the Apostles did of the Miracle which they wrought Acts 3. 12. Why look ye so on us as though by our own Power and Holiness we made this man walk This Blind Man to see this Dead Man to live By the Consideration of our meanness all may discern that the Excellency of this Power is of God and not of us Yea for this very End our Apostle refused to make Use of such a perswasiveness of words and exercise of VVisdom as might give any Appearance or Countenance unto such an Apprehension as though by them this Effect were produced 1 Cor. 2. 4 5. My Speech and my Preachings was not with enticing words of mans wisdom but in demonstration of Spirit and of Power that your Faith should not stand in the wisdom of Man but in the Power of God And herein ought he to be an Example unto us all But it is come to that with many that being destitute utterly of what he had namely and ability to dispense the word in the Demonstration of the Spirit and of Power do wholly betake themselves unto what he refused or the enticing words of Mans wisdom according to their Ability But what the Jews spoke Blasphemously of Christ upon his opening the Eyes of him who was Born Blind may in a sence be truly spoken of any of us upon the opening of the Eyes of them that were Spiritually Blind Give God the praise we know that this man is a Sinner 2. God hath so Ordered things in VVisdom and Grace that the Administrators of Holy things unto others might have Experience in themselves of their State and Condition so as to be moved with Compassion towards them Care about them and Zeal for them VVithout these Graces and this constant Exercise Men will be but very useless Instruments in this work And they will not grow any where but in Mens own Experience For how shall he be Tender Compassionate Careful towards the Souls of others who knows no Reason why he should be so towards his own The High Priest of Old was such an one as could have Compassion on the Ignorant and them that are out of the way for that he himself was encompassed with Infirmity Heb. 5. 2. And therein was he a Type of Christ who was in all points Tempted as we are that he might be ready to Succour them that are Tempted This gave him the Experience of Compassion in the Exercise of it VVherefore when a Minister of the Gospel knows his own VVeakness Infirmities and Temptations his need of Mercy and Grace the ways of his obtaining Supplies of them the danger of the Snares which he is exposed unto the value of his own Soul the Preciousness of the Blood of Christ and Excellency of the Eternal Reward he cannot considering the Charge committed unto him and the Duty required of him but be moved with Pity Compassion
Tenderness Love and Zeal towards those unto whom he doth Administer especially considering how greatly their Eternal welfare depends on his Ability Diligence and Faithfulness in the Discharge of his Duty And this proves on sundry accounts greatly to the Advantage of the poor Tempted Disciples of Christ. For it makes a Representation unto them of his own Compassion and Love as the great Shepherd of the Sheep Isa. 40. 11. and causeth a needful Supply of Spiritual Provisions to be always in readiness for them and that to be Administred unto them with Experience of its Efficacy and Success 3. That the Power of Gospel-Grace and Truth may be exemplified unto the Eyes of them unto whom they are dispensed in the Persons of them by whom it is Administred according unto Gods Appointment It is known unto all who know ought in this matter what Temptations and Objections will arise in the minds of poor Sinners against their obtaining any Interest in the Grace and Mercy that is dispensed in the Gospel Some they judge may be made Partakers of them but for them and such as they are there seems to be no Relief provided But is it no Encouragement unto them to see that by Gods appointment the Tenders of his Grace and Mercy are made unto their Souls by Men Subject unto alike Passions with themselves and who if they had not freely obtained Grace would have been as vile and unworthy as themselves For as the Lord called the Apostle Paul to the Ministry who had been a Blasphemer a Persecutor and Injurious that he might in him shew forth all Long-suffering for a Pattern unto them who should hereafter believe on him to Everlasting Life that is for the Encouragement even of such high Criminal Offenders to Believe 1 Tim. 1. 13 14 15 16. So in more Ordinary Cases the Mercy and Grace which the Ministers of the Gospel did equally stand in need of with those unto whom they dispense it and have received it is for a Pattern Example and Encouragement of them to Believe after their Example 4. In particular God maketh Use of Persons that dye in this matter that their Testimony unto the Truth of Gospel-Grace and Mercy may be Compleat and unquestionable Death is the great Touch-stone and Trial of all things of this Nature as to their Efficacy and Sincerity Many things will yield Relief in Life and various Refreshments which upon the approach of Death vanish into nothing So it is with all the Comforts of this VVorld and with all things that have not an Eternal Truth and Substance in them Had not those therefore who dispense Sacred things been designed themselves to come unto this Touch-stone of their own Faith Profession and Preaching those who must dye and know always that they must do so would have been unsatisfied what might have been the Condition with them had they been brought unto it and so have ground to fear in themselves what will become of that Faith wherein they have been Instructed in the warfare of Death when it shall approach To obviate this Fear and Objection God hath Ordained that all those who Administer the Gospel shall all of them bring their own Faith unto that Last Trial that so giving a Testimony unto the Sincerity and Efficacy of the things which they have Preached in that they Commit the Eternal Salvation of their Souls unto them and higher Testimony none can give they may be Encouragements unto others to follow their Examples to imitate their Faith and pursue their Course unto the End And for this cause also doth God oft-times call them forth unto peculiar Trials Exercises Afflictions and Death it self in Martyrdom that they may be an Example and Encouragement unto the whole Church I cannot but Observe for a Close of this Discourse that as the unavoidable Infirmities of the Ministers of the Gospel managed and passed through in a course of Faith Holiness and Sincere Obedience are on many Accounts of singular Use and Advantage unto the Edification and Consolation of the Church so the Evil Examples of any of them in Life and Death with the want of those Graces which should be excited unto Exercise by their Infirmities is pernicious thereunto 〈…〉 2 The Life of the Church depends on the Everlasting Life of Jesus Christ. It is said of Melchisedec as he was a Type of him It is witnessed that he Liveth Christ doth so and that for ever and hereon under the Failings Infirmities and Death of all other Administrators depends the Preservation Life Continuance and Salvation of the Church But this must be spoken peculiarly on ver 27. whither it is remitted VER 9 10. It may be Objected unto the whole precedent Argument of the Apostle That although Abraham himself paid Tithes unto Melchisedec yet it followeth not that Melchisedec was Superiour unto the Levitical Priests concerning whom alone the Question was between him and the Jews For although Abraham might be a Priest in some sence also by virtue of common Right as were all the Patriarchs yet was he not so by virtue of any especial Office Instituted of God to abide in the Church But when God afterwards by peculiar Law and Ordinance Erected an Order and Office of Priesthood in the Family of Levi it might be Superiour unto or Exalted above that of Melchisedec although Abraham paid Tithes unto him This Objection therefore the Apostle obviates in these verses and therewithal giving his former Argument a farther Improvement he makes a Transition according unto his usual Custom as it hath been often Observed that it is his Method to do unto his especial Design in proving the Excellency of the Priesthood of Christ above that of the Law which is the main scope of this whole Discourse VER 9 10. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ut verbum dicere as to speak a word Vul. Lat. Ut ita dictum sit be it so said Syr. As any one may say Arab. And it is said that this Discourse or Reason may be some way ended Ut ita loquar as I may so speak In the rest of the words there is neither Difficulty nor Difference among Translators There are three things Observable in these words 1. The manner of the Introduction of the Apostle's new Assertion 2. The Assertion it self which hath the force of a new Argument unto his Purpose ver 9. And 3. The Proof of his Assertion in ver 10. The manner of the Introduction of his Assertion is in these words as I may so say This Qualification of the Assertion makes an abatement of it one way or other Now this is not as to the Truth of the Proposition but as to the Propriety of the Expression The words are as if that which is expressed was actually so namely that Levi himself paid Tithes whereas it was so only virtually The thing it self intended was with respect unto the Apostles purpose as if it had been so indeed though Levi not being
not the Design of God always to keep the Church in a state of Non-age and under School-Masiers he had appointed to set it at Liberty in the fulness of time to take his Children nearer unto him to give them greater Evidences of his Love greater Assurances of the Eternal Inheritance and the use of more Liberty and Boldness in his Presence But what this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the Gospel is wherein it doth consist what is included in it what freedom of Spirit what liberty of Speech what Right of Access and Boldness of Approach unto God Built upon the removal of the Law the communication of the Spirit the way made into the Holyest by the Blood of Christ with other concernments of it Constitutive of Gospel-perfection I have already in part declared in Our Exposition on Chap. 3. ver 5. and must if God please yet more largely insist upon it on Chap. 10th so that I shall not here further speak unto it 5. A clear fore-sight into a Blessed estate of Immortality and Glory with unquestionable Evidences and Pledges giving Assurance of it belongs also to this Consummation Death was Originally threatned as the final End and Issue of sin And the Evidence hereof was received under the Levitical Priesthood in the Curse of the Law There was indeed a Remedy provided against its Eternal Prevalency in the first Promise For whereas Death comprised all the Evil that was come or was to come on Man for Sin In the day thou eatest thereof thou soal die The Promise contained the means of deliverance from it or it was no Promise tendred no Relief unto Man in the state whereinto he was fallen But the People under the Law could see but little into the manner and way of its Accomplishment nor had they received any Pledge of it in any one that was dead and lived again so as to die no more Wherefore their Apprehensions of this deliverance were dark and attended with much fear which rendred them obnoxious unto Bondage See the Exposition on Chap. 2. 14. where we have declared the dreadful Apprehensions of the Jews concerning Death received by Tradition from their Fathers They could not look through the dark shades of Death into Light Immortality and Glory See the two-fold Spirit of the Old and New Testament with respect unto the Apprehensions of Death expressed the one Job 10. 21 22. the other 2 Cor. 5. 1 2 3 4. But there is nothing more needful unto the perfect state of the Church Suppose it endowed with all possible Priviledges in this World yet if it have not a clear view and prospect with a Blessed assurance of Immortality and Glory after Death its condition will be dark and uncomfortable And as this could not be done without bringing in of another Priesthood so by that of Christs it is accomplished For 1. He himself died as our High Priest He entred into the devouring Jaws of Death and that as it was threatned in the Curse And now is the Trial to be made If he who thus ventured on Death as threatned in the Curse and that for us be swallowed up by it or detained by its Power and Pains there is a certain end of all our Hopes Whatever we may arrive unto in this World Death will convey us over into eternal Ruine But if he brake through its Power have the pains of it removed from him do swallow it up into Victory and rise Triumphantly into Immortality and Glory then is our entrance into them also even by and after Death secured And in the Resurrection of Christ the Church had the first unquestionable Evidence that Death might be Conquered that it and the Curse might be separated that there might be a free passage through it into Life and Immortality These things Originally and in the first Covenant were inconsistent nor was the Reconciliation of them evident under the Levitical Priesthood But hereby was the Veil rent from top to bottom and the most Holy place not made with hands laid open unto Believers See Isa. 25. 7 8. 2. As by his Death Resurrection and entrance into Glory He gave a Pledge Example and Evidence unto the Church of that in his own Person which he had designed for it so the Grounds of it were laid in the Expiatory Sacrifice which he Offered whereby he took away the Curse from Death There was such a close Conjunction between Death and the Curse such a Combination between Sin the Law and Death that the breaking of that Conjunction and the dissolving of that Combination was the greatest Effect of Divine Wisdom and Grace which our Apostle so Triumpheth in 1 Cor. 15. 54 55 56 57. This could no otherwise be brought about but by his being made a Curse in Death or bearing the Curse which was in Death in our stead Gal. 3. 13. 3. He hath clearly declared unto the utmost of our Capacities in this World that future state of Blessedness and Glory which he will lead all his Disciples into All the concernments hereof under the Levitical Priesthood were represented only under the obscure Types and Shadows of Earthly things But he hath abolished Death and brought Life and Immortality to light through the Gospel 2 Tim. 1. 10. He destroyed and abolished him who had the Power of Death in taking away the Curse from it Chap. 2. 14. And he abolished Death it self in the removal of those dark shades which it cast on Immortality and Eternal Life and hath opened an abundant entrance into the Kingdom of God and Glory He hath unveiled the uncreated Beauties of the King of Glory and opened the Everlasting Doors to give an insight into those Mansions of Rest Peace and Blessedness which are prepared for Believers in the Everlasting Enjoyment of God And these things constitute no small part of that consummate state of the Church which God designed and which the Levitical Priesthood could no way effect 6 There is also an especial Joy belonging unto this state For this Kingdom of God is Righteousness and Peace and Joy in the Holy Ghost Neither was this attainable by the Levitical Priesthood Indeed many of the Saints of the Old Testament did greatly Rejoyce in the Lord and had the Joy of his Salvation abiding with them See Psal. 51. 12. Isa. 25. 9. Hab. 3. 17 18. But they had it not by virtue of the Levitical Priesthood Isaiah tells us that the ground of it was the swallowing up of Death in Victory ver 8. which was no otherwise to be done but by the Death and Resurrection of Christ. It was by an Influence of Efficacy from the Priesthood that was to be introduced that they had their Joy Whence Abraham saw the Day of Christ and Rejoyced to see it The Prospect of the Day of Christ was the sole Foundation of all their Spiritual Joy that was purely so But as unto their own present state they were allowed and called to Rejoyce in the abundance of Temporal things
Evidence of Imperfection And by the Appointment of this Order God signified an Imperfection and Mutability in that Church state Succession indeed was a Relief against death but it was but a Relief and so supposed a want and weakness Under the Gospel it is not so as we shall see afterwards Observe that God will not fail to provide Instruments for his work that he hath to accomplish If many Priests be needful many the Church shall have 3 The Reason of this Multiplication of Priests was because they were not suffered to continue by reason of Death They were mortal men subject unto death and they died Death suffered them not to continue in the Execution of their Office It forbad them so to do in the name of the great Sovereign Lord of Life and Death And hereof an Instance was given in Aaron the first of them God to shew the nature of this Priesthood unto the people and to manifest that the everlasting Priest was not yet come commanded Aaron to dye in the sight of all the Congregation Num. 20. 25 26 27 28. So did they all afterwards as other men dye in their several Generations They were all by death forbidden to continue Death laid an injunction on them one after another from proceeding any farther in the Administration of their Office It is not surely without some especial design that the Apostle thus expresseth their dying They were by death prohibited to continue Wherefore he shews hereby 1. The way whereby an end was put unto the personal Administration and that was by death 2. That there was an Imperfection in the Administration of that Office which was so frequently interrupted 3. That they were seized upon by death whether they would or no when it may be they would have earnestly desired to continue and the people also would have rejoyced in it Death came on them neither desired nor expected with his Prohibition 4. That when death came and seized on them it kept them under its power so that they could never more attend unto their Office But it was otherwise with the Priest of the better Covenant as we shall see immediately Observe 1. There is such a necessity of the continual Administration of the Sacerdotal Office in behalf of the Church that the interruption of it by the death of the Priests was an Argument of the weakness of that Priesthood The High Priest is the Sponsor and Mediator of the Covenant Those of old were so Typically and by way of Representation VVherefore all Covenant Transactions between God and the Church must be through him He is to offer up all Sacrifices and therein represent all our prayers And it is evident from thence what a Ruin it would be unto the Church to be without an High Priest one moment Who would venture a suprizal unto his own soul in such a condition Could any man enjoy a moments peace if he supposed that in his extremity the High Priest might dye This now is provided against as we shall see in the next verse VER 24. But this man because he continueth ever hath an unchangeable Priesthood IN opposition unto what was observed in the Levitical Priests the contrary is here affirmed of the Lord Christ. And the Design of the Apostle is still the same namely to evince by all sorts of Instances his Preeminence as a Priest above them as such also 1. The Person spoken of is expressed by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Exceptive Conjunction 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but answereth unto 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 before used and introduceth the other member of the Antithesis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hic ille iste He of whom we speak namely Jesus the Surety of the New Testament We render it this man not improperly he was the Mediator between God and man the man Christ Jesus Nor doth the calling of him this man exclude his Divine nature for he was truly a man though God and man in one Person And the things here ascribed unto him were wrought in and by the humane nature though he that wrought them were God also But He or this man who was represented by Melchisedec of whom we speak 2. It is affirmed of this Person that he hath an unchangeable Priesthood the Ground and Reason whereof is assigned namely because he continueth ever which must be first considered The sole Reason here insisted on by the Apostle why the Levitical Priests were many is because they were forbidden by death to continue It is sufficient therefore on the contrary to prove the perpetuity of the Priesthood of Christ that he abideth for ever For he doth not absolutely hereby prove the perpetuity of the Priesthood but his perpetual uninterrupted Administration of it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This was the Faith of the Jews concerning the Messiah and his office We have heard say they out of the Law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Joh. 12. 34. That Christ abideth for ever whereon they could not understand what he told them about his being lifted up by Death And so the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth to abide to continue in any state or condition Joh. 21. 22 23. And this was that which principally he was Typed in by Melchisedec concerning whom there is no Record as to the Beginning of Days or End of Life but as unto the Scripture Description of him he is said to abide a Priest for ever It may be said in opposition hereunto that the Lord Christ dyed also and that no less truely and really than did Aaron or any Priest of his Order Wherefore it will not hence follow that he had any more an uninterrupted Priesthood than they had Some say the Apostle here considers the Priesthood of Christ only after his Resurrection and Ascension into Heaven after which he dyes no more death hath no more power over him And if we will believe the Socinians then he first began to be a Priest This Figment I have fully confuted elsewhere And there is no ground in the Context on which we may conjecture that the Apostle intends the Administration of his Priesthood in Heaven only although he intend that also For he speaks of his Priesthood as typed by that of Melchisedec which as we have proved before respected the whole of his Office I say therefore that although Christ dyed yet he was not forbid by death to abide in his Office as they were He died as a Priest they died from being Priests He died as a Priest because he was also to be a Sacrifice But he abode and continued not only vested with his Office but in the execution of it in the state of death Through the indissolubleness of his Person his soul and body still subsisting in the Person of the Son of God he was a capable subject of his Office And his being in the state of the dead belonged unto the Administration of his Office no less than his Death it self So that from the first
moment of his being a Priest he abode so alwaies without interruption or intermission This is the meaning of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He in his own Person abideth Nor doth the Apostle say that he did not dye but only that he abideth alwaies 3. It followeth from hence that he hath an unchangeable Priesthood A Priesthood subject to no change or alteration that cannot pass away But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is sacerdotium successivum per successionem ab uno alteri traditum Such a Priesthood as which when one hath attained it abideth not with him but he delivereth over unto another as Aaron did his unto Eleazar his Son or it falls unto another by some Right or Law of Succession A Priesthood that goes from hand to hand 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a Priesthood that doth not passe from one unto another And this the Apostle seems directly to intend as is evident from the Antithesis The Priests after the Order of Aaron were many and that by reason of death Wherefore it was necessary that their Priesthood should pass from one to another by Succession So that when one received it he that went before him ceased to be a Priest And so it was either the Predecessors were taken off by death or on any other just occasion as it was in the case of Abiathar who was put from the Priests Office by Solomon 1 King 2. 27. How beit our Apostle mentions their going off by death only because that was the ordinary way and which was provided for in the Law With the Lord Christ it was otherwise He received his Priesthood from none Although he had sundry Types yet he had no Predecessor And he hath none to succeed him nor can have any added or joyned unto him in his Office The whole office of the Priesthood of the Covenant and the entire administration of it are confined unto his Person There are no more that follow him than went before him The Expositors of the Roman Church are greatly perplexed in the reconciling of this Passage of the Apostle unto the present Priesthood of their Church And they may well be so seeing they are undoubtedly irreconcileable Some of them say that Peter succeeded unto Christ in his Priesthood as Eleazar did unto Aaron So Ribera some of them deny that he hath any Successor properly so called Successorem non habet nec it a quisquam Catholicus loquitur si bene circumspectè loqui velit saith Estius But it is openly evident that some of them are not so circumspect as Estius would have them but do plainly affirm that Peter was Christs Successor A Lapide indeed affirms that Peter did not succeed unto Christ as Eleazar did unto Aaron because Eleazar had the Priesthood in the same degree and dignity with Aaron and so had not Peter with Christ. But yet that he had the same Priesthood with him a Priesthood of the same kind he doth not deny That which they generally fix upon is that their Priests have not another Priesthood or offer another Sacrifice but are Partakers of his Priesthood and minister under him and so are not his Successors but his Vicars which I think is the worst composure of this difficulty they could have thought upon For 1. This is directly contrary unto the words and design of the Apostle For the Reason he assigns why the Priesthood of Christ doth not passe from him unto any other is because he abides himself for ever to discharge the Office of it Now this excludes all subordination and conjunction all Vicars as well as Successors unless we shall suppose that although he doth thus abide yet is he one way or other disabled to discharge his Office 2. The Successors of Aaron had no more another Priesthood but what he had than it is pretended that the Roman Priests have no other Priesthood but what Christ had Nor did they offer any other Sacrifice than what he offered as these Priests pretend to offer the same Sacrifice that Christ did So that still the case is the same between Aaron and his Successors and Christ and his Substitutes 3. They say that Christ may have Substitutes in his Office though he abide a Priest still and although the office still continue the same unchangeable So God in the Government of the world makes use of Judges and Magistrates yet is himself the Supreme Rector of all But this Pretence is vain also For they do not substitute their Priests unto him in that which he continueth to do himself but in that which he doth not which he did indeed and as a Priest ought to do but now ceaseth to do for ever in his own Person For the principal Act of the Sacerdotal Office of Christ consisted in his Oblation or his offering himself a Sacrifice of a sweet smelling savour unto God This he did once and ceaseth for ever from doing so any more But these Priests are assigned to offer him in Sacrifice every day as partakers of the same Priesthood with him which is indeed not to be his Substitutes but his Successors and to take his Office out of his hand as if he were dead and could henceforth discharge it no more For they do not appoint Priests to intercede in his room because they grant he continueth himself so to do but to offer Sacrifice in his stead because he doth so no more Wherefore if that be an Act of Priesthood and of their Priesthood as is pretended it is unavoidable that his Priesthood is passed from him unto them Now this is a blasphemous Imagination and directly contrary both unto the words of the Apostle and the whole Design of his Argument Nay it would lay the advantage on the other side For the Priests of the Order of Aaron had that Priviledge that none could take their Office upon them nor officiate in it whilst they were alive But although Christ abideth for ever yet according unto the sense of these men and their practice thereon he stands in need of others to officiate for him and that in the principal part of his Duty and Office For Offer himself in Sacrifice unto God he neither now doth nor can seeing henceforth he dieth no more This is the work of the Mass-Priests alone who must therefore be honoured as Christs Successors or be abhorred as his Murderers for the Sacrifice of him must be by blood and death The Argument of the Apostle as it is exclusive of this Imagination so it is cogent unto his purpose For so he proceedeth That Priesthood which changeth not but is alwaies vested in the same Person and in him alone is more excellent than that which was subject to change continually from one hand unto another For that Transmission of it from one unto another was an effect of weakness and Imperfection And the Jews grant that the frequency of their change under the second Temple was a Token of Gods displeasure But thus it was with the Priesthood of
three things must be considered in these words 1 The state and Condition of Christ as an High Priest He liveth alwayes or for ever 2. What he doth as an High Priest in that state and Condition He maketh Intercession for us 3. The Connexion of these things their mutual regard or the Relation of the work of Christ unto his state and condition the one is the end of the other He lives for ever to make intercession for us 1. As to his state and condition He lives for ever He is alwayes living The Lord Christ in his Divine Person hath a threesold life in Heaven The one he lives in himself the other for himself and the last for us 1. The Eternal life of God in his Divine Nature This he liveth in himself As the Father hath life in himself so hath he given unto the son to have life in himself Joh. 5 26. He hath given it him by eternal Generation in a communication unto him of all the divine Properties And he that hath life in himself a life independent on any other he is the living one the living God No creature can have life in himself For in God we live move and have our being He is hereby Alpha and Omega the first and the last the Begining and end of all Revel 1. 11. because he is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the living one ver 18. And this Life of Christ is the foundation of the efficacy of all his Mediatory Actings namely that he was in his own divine Person the Living God Act. 20. 28. 1 Cor. 2. 8. 1 Joh. 3. 16. But this is not the immediate cause of his Mediatory Effects nor is it here intended 2. There is a Life which he liveth for himself namely a Life of unconceivable Glory in his Humane Nature He lead a mortal life in this world a life obnoxious unto misery and death and died accordingly This life is now changed into that of immortal eternal Glory Hence forth he dyeth no more death hath no more Power over him And not only so but this Life of his is unto him the cause of and is attended with all that ineffable Glory which he now enjoyes in Heaven This Life he lives for himself it is his reward the Glory and Honour that he is crowned withal All the endowments all the enjoyments and the whole eternal exaltation of the Humane Nature in the Person of Christ belong unto this Life of Glory And the glorious exaltation of that individual humane nature which the son of God assumed far above all Principalities and Powers and every name that is named in this world or the world to come is the principal part of the Design of Infinite wisdom in the work of the new Creation But neither is this the Life here intended 3. The Lord Christ lives a Mediatory Life in Heaven a Life for us So saith our Apostle he was made a Priest after the Power of an endless Life whereof we have treated before He lives as King Prophet and Priest of the Church So he describes himself Revel 1. 18. I am he that liveth and was dead and behold I am alive for evermore and have the keys of Hell and Death As he died for us so he liveth for us and is entrusted with all Power over the Churches adversaries for its good As he died for us so he liveth for us in Heaven and therefore tells us that because he liveth we shall live also Joh. 14. 19. Now this life differeth not essentially from that life of Glory in the Humane Nature which he liveth for himself in Heaven Only it denoteth one especial end of it and that only for a season The Lord Christ will have the life in himself the divine life unto all Eternity and so also will be the Life of Glory in the Humane Nature But he shall cease to live this Mediatory Life for us when the work of his Mediation is accomplished 1 Cor. 15. 28. But he shall lead this life alwaies for us until the whole work committed unto him be accomplished and shall lead it as a Life of Glory in himself unto Eternity Obs. It is a matter of strong consolation unto the Church that Christ lives in Heaven for us It is a spring of unspeakable Joy unto all true Believers that he lives a Life of Immortality and Glory in and for himself in Heaven Who can call to mind all the miseries which he underwent in this world all the reproach and scorn that was cast upon him by his enemies of all sorts all the wrath that the whole world is yet filled withal against him but is refreshed rejoyced transported with a spiritual view by Faith of all that Majesty and Glory which he is now in the Eternal Possession of so was it with Stephen Act. 7. 56. And therefore in all the Appearances and Representations which he hath made of himself since his Ascension into Heaven he hath manifested his present Glory Act. 26. 13. Revel 1. 14 15 16 17 18. And the due consideration hereof cannot but be a matter of unspeakable Refreshment unto all that love him in sincerity But herein lyeth the Life of the Churches Consolation that he continues to live a Mediatory Life in Heaven for us also It is not I fear so considered nor so improved as it ought to be That Christ dyed for us all who own the Gospel profess in words though some so explain their Faith or rather their Infidelity as to deny its proper use and to evacuate its proper ends That so he lived for us here in this world so as that his Life was some way or other unto our Advantage at least thus far that he could not have died if he had not lived before all men will grant even those by whom the principal end of this Life namely to fulfil the Law for us is peremptorily denyed But that Christ now lives a life of Glory in Heaven that most men think is for himself alone But the Text speaks to the contrary He lives for ever to make Intercession for us Neither is this the only end of his present Mediatory Life in Heaven though this only be here expressed Should I undertake to shew the ends of the present Mediatory Life of Christ for the Church it would be too great and long a decursion from the Text. However the whole of the work of this Life of his may be reduced into these three heads 1. His immediate Actings towards the Church it self which respects his Prophetical Office 2. His Actings for the Church in the world by Vertue and Power of his Kingly Office 3. His Actings with God the Father in their behalf in the dischage of his sacerdotal Office 1. The first consisteth in his sending and giving the Holy Ghost unto the Church He lives for ever to send the Holy Spirit unto his Disciples Without this constant effect of the present Mediatory Life of Christ the Being of the Church would fail it
Oblation of himself on the Cross or he was never any nor needed so to be nor could he so be for after he was freed from death he had nothing to offer And it is a strange order of things that the Lord Christ should first offer his onely Sacrifice and after that be made a Priest But the Order Time and manner of the Call and Consecration of the Lord Christ unto his Priesthood I have elsewhere declared Wherefore 4. We may observe that all these Qualifications of our High Priest were peculiarly necessary on the account of the Sacrifice which he had to offer They were not only necessary for him as he was to be the Sacrificer but also as he was to be the Sacrifice not only as he was to be the Priest but as he was to be the Lamb. For the Sacrifices were to be without blemish as well as the Sacrificers So were we redeemed with the precious blood of Christ as of a Lamb without blemish and without spot 1 Pet. 1. 19. But however the Sacrifices were chosen under the Law without blemish yet were they still in their own nature but Calves and Goats and Lambs And therefore Priests who had weaknesses and infirmities and sins of their own might be meet enough to offer them But here both Priest and Sacrifice were to be equally pure and holy 5. We must not pass by the wresting of this Text by the Socinians nor omit its due Vindication For they contend that this whole Description of our High Priest doth not respect his internal Qualifications in this world before and in the offering of himself by his Blood but his glorious state and condition in Heaven For they fear as well they may that if the Qualifications of a Priest were necessary to him and required in him whilst he was in this world that then he was so indeed He who says such an High Priest became us as is holy harmless undefiled separate from sinners doth affirm that when he was so he was our High Priest In that state wherein these things were necessary unto him he was a Priest To avoid this ruine unto their Pretensions they offer violence unto the Text and the signification of every word in it and dangerously insinuate a negation of the things intended to be in Christ in this world So speaks Schlictingius on the place Unde apparet sequentibus verbis seu Epithetis Christo tributis non mores ipsius seu vitam ab omni peccati labe puram sed felicem ac beatum statum describi ac designari ob quem fiat ut in aeternum vivens nostri quoque perpetuam gerat curam Licet enim omnia ista ratione vitae morum de Christo intellecta verissima sint tamen nihil ad praesens Authoris institutum faciunt So also argues Smalcius de Reg. Christi Cap. 23. whom we have elsewhere refuted The Paraphrase of one of our own seems to comply herewith which is as followeth And this was a sort of High Priests which we sinful weak creatures had need of which by the way I do not understand for we stood not in need of a new sort of High Priests but of one single individual High Priest One that being mercifully disposed is also incapable of suffering any hurt of being defiled or corrupted and consequently of dying and to that end is exalted unto a pitch above our sinful corruptible condition here So 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are rendred in the Margin free from evil and undefileable The sense is plainly the same with that of Schlictingius though there be some variety in the expressions of the one and the other And therefore is Christ said to be exalted that he might be such as he is here described as though he was not so before in the sense here intended by the Apostle however the words here in another sense might be applyed unto him Three things seem to be aymed at in this Exposition 1. To make way for another corrupt notion on the next verse wherein these men with Grotius would have Christ in some sense offer for his own sins also which there can be no pretence for if these things be asscribed unto him as he was a Priest in this world 2. To take care that the Innocency Holinesse and absolute Purity of our High Priest be not supposed to be necessary unto our Justification neither as the material nor formal cause of it For if the Lord Christ in the Sacrifice of himself died for our Justification and that he might do so it was necessary that he should antecedently be holy harmless undefiled and separate from sinners then was his being so necessary unto our Justification as a cause thereof 3. To obviate an Apprehension of his being an High Priest before his death and to have offered his one Sacrifice therein For if he had not the Qualifications necessary unto an High Priest before his Ascension into Heaven he could not be so before But these things are none of them compliant with the Truth And 1. This Exposition is contrary to the concurrent sense of all sober antient and modern Expositors And which is more it is contrary to the common sense of all Christians Not one of them who knoweth ought of these things unless their minds are perverted with these mens glosses and that meerly to comply with other opinions wherein the text is no way concerned but that in their first and last consideration of these words they respect Jesus Christ as to his personal Holiness in this World And that Exposition had need be well confirmed which is not only contrary to the Judgement of all learned men but also destructive of the common Faith of Christians But as yet we have nothing beyond crude Assertions offered in the proof of it 2. It is contrary unto or inconsistent with the sense and use of the Words in all good Authors sacred and prophane and contrary unto the Application of them unto the Lord Christ in other places of the Scripture as we shall see immediately 3. It is contrary to the order of the Apostles words For he placeth all these Properties as qualifications of this Person antecedently unto his Exaltation He was first Holy Harmless Undefiled and then made Higher than the Heavens But according unto this Exposition his being made higher than the Heavens is the antecedent cause of his being made Holy c. 4. It is highly false that the blessed state pretended to be here set forth was antecedently unto his being a Priest and the sacrifice which he offered yea such an estate was inconsistent with the Oblation of himself For he offered himself unto God in his Blood Heb. 9. 14. and that with strong cryes and tears Chap. 5. 7. which were inconsistent with such a state for it is so described on purpose to be exclusive of every thing required thereunto 5. Schlictingius pleads that although all these things were true with
unto God when he offered himself not to expiate his own infirmities by his offering but that he might be carried through and supported in his Oblation which he offered for the sins of the People and had success therein See the exposition on chap. 5. 7. 5. He is more kind than ordinary in extending the Oblation of Christ unto his death also But he recalls his grant affirming that he did only prepare himself for his offering thereby And this also casts his whole Exposition into much confusion Christ offered himself once saith the Apostle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 once and at one time This I suppose is agreed Then he offered for himself and his own sins or not at all For he offered but once and at one time Where then did he thus offer himself and when In Heaven upon his Ascension say the Socinians with one accord Where then and when did he offer for himself On the earth Then he offered himself twice No by no means he offered not himself on the Earth how then did he offer for himself on the earth He did not indeed offer himself on the Earth but he prepared himself for his offering on the Earth and therein he offered for himself that is he did and he did not offer himself upon the earth For they cannot evade by saying that he did it when he offered up prayers on the Earth For the Apostle says expresly in this place that what he did he did it when he offered himself And it must be by such an offering as answered the offering of the high Priest for himself which was bloody 6. The close of his Discourse whereby he would prove the Truth of his Exposition of the verse foregoing from his Interpretation of this is absurd as that which would give countenance unto an evident falsehood from what is more evidently so Grotius adds little unto what Schlictingius offers in this case Only he tells us that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is taken for those griefs which are commonly the punishment of sin Rom. 6. 10. But it is a mistake 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in that place signifies nothing but the Guilt of Sin which Christ died to expiate and take away He died once for sin that is he suffered once for sin He says moreover that profluvium mulierum is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Levit. 12. 8. 15. 13. as also is the leprosie chap. 14. 13. But herein also he is mistaken both the one and the other subject unto those defiling Distempers were appointed to offer a sin-offering for those sins which those Defilements were tokens of and the sin of Nature which they proceed from Again he says that Christ in his offering was freed from those infirmities and miseries per mortem acceleratam But his death was not hasted one moment until all was finished nor did he offer for the hastening of his Death And his ensuing words are most ambiguous Christ offered pro doloribus istis qui solent peccatorum poenae esse quos Christus occasione etiam peccatorum humani generis toleravit If the sorrows intended were not true punishments of sin they could not be offered for And what sorrows Christ underwent so far as they were penal he offered for them when he offered for the sins of the People and not otherwise But those which are called his own sins must be every way distinct from the sins of the People and have no Relation unto them as the sins of the High Priests of old had not Wherefore if by the occasion of the sins of men he intend that his Sufferings and Griefs were for the sins of men then he offered for them when he offered for the sins of the People when he bare our sins and sorrows and had no need to offer distinctly for them as his own And if it were a sorrow that was not for sin it cannot be called Sin Christs sufferings on the occasion of the sins of mankind is well understood by those who are any way skilled in the Socinian Mysteries Hammond says the same He both saith he offered for himself that is made expiation as it were not to deliver himself from sin for he was never guilty of any but from the infirmities assumed by him but especially from death it self and so is now never likely to dye and to determine his Melchisedecian Priesthood Ans. 1 To make expiation as it were from the infirmities assumed by him or to be delivered from them is hard to be understood 2 Much more is it how by death wherein he offered himself he should make expiation to be delivered from death it self 3 And it is as hard to say that Christ offered for himself once by death that he might dye no more seeing it is appointed unto all men only once to dye I have digressed thus far to crush this novel Invention which as it is untrue and alien from the sense of the Apostle so it hath in the expression of it an ungrateful sound of Impiety But I expect not so much Sobriety as that considering the means of its conveyance unto the minds of men at present it should not be vented again until what hath been here pleaded in its confutation be answered At present I shall proceed with the Exposition of the remainder of the words How and what Christ offered for the sins of the People is declared in the words remaining 1. For the way or manner of it He did it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Once only This is directly opposed unto the frequency of the legal Sacrifices repeated daily as there was occasion Those High Priests offered 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 daily on all occasions He 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Once only And I cannot but observe by the way that this Assertion of the Apostle is no less absolutely exclusive of the Missatical Sacrifices of the Priests of the Roman Church than it is of the Levitical Sacrifices of the High Priest of the Church of the Jews Their Expositors on this place do generally affirm in plea for their Church that they offer it not to make expiation of sins but only to represent and make application of the one Sacrifice of Christ on the Cross. But in their Mass it self they speak otherwise and expresly offer it to God a Sacrifice for the sins of the living and the dead Neither yet do we enquire unto what End they do what they do and this is all they say that they offer the same sacrifice that Christ did that is himself And this they do a thousand times more frequently than the Expiatory Sacrifices were among the Jews Neither were their Sacrifices offered properly by Gods Appointment to make Attonement for Sin by their own vertue and Efficacy but only to be a Representation and Application of the Sacrifice of Christ to come Whatever ends they therefore fancy unto themselves by pretending to offer the same sacrifice that Christ did they contradict the words of the Apostle and wholly
to have been a distinct Covenant and not a meer administration of the Covenant of Grace 1. This Covenant called the Old Covenant was never intended to be of itself the absolute Rule and Law of Life and Salvation unto the Church but was made with a particular design and with respect unto particular ends This the Apostle proves undeniably in this Epistle especially in the Chapter foregoing and those two that follow Hence it follows that it could abrogate or disannul nothing which God at any time before had given as a general Rule unto the Church For that which is particular cannot abrogate any thing that was general and before it as that which is general doth abrogate all antecedent particulars as the New Covenant doth abrogate the Old And this we must consider in both the instances belonging hereunto For 1. God had before given the Covenant of Works or perfect Obedience unto all Mankind in the Law of Creation But this Covenant at Sinai did not abrogate or disannual that Covenant nor any way fulfill it And the reason is because it was never intended to come in the place or room thereof as a Covenant containing an entire Rule of all the Faith and Obedience of the whole Church God did not intend in it to abrogate the Covenant of Works and to substitute this in the place thereof Yea in sundry things it reinforced established and confirmed that Covenant For 1. It revived decIared and expressed all the Commands of that Covenant in the Decalogue For that is nothing but a Divine Summary of the Law written in the heart of man at his Creation And herein the dreadful manner of its delivery or promulgation with its Writings in Tables of Stone are also to be considered For in them the nature of that first Covenant with its inexorableness as unto perfect Obedience was represented And because none could answer its demands or comply with it therein it was called the Ministration of Death causing fear and bondage 2 Cor. 3. 7. 2. It revived the Sanction of the first Covenant in the Curse or Sentence of Death which it denounced against all Transgressors Death was the penalty of the transgression of the first Covenant In the day thou eatest thou shalt die the death And this Sentence was revived and represented anew in the Curse wherewith this Covenant was ratified Cursed be he that confirmeth not all the words of this Law to do them Deut. 27. 26. Gal. 3. 10. For the design of God in it was to bind a sense of that Curse on the Consciences of men until he came by whom it was taken away as the Apostle declares Gal. 3. 14 15 16. 3. It revived the Promise of that Covenant that of eternal Life upon perfect Obedience So the Apostle tells us that Moses thus describeth the Righteousness of the Law that the man which doth these things shall live by them Rom. 10. 5. as he doth Lev. 18. 5. Now this is no other but the Covenant of Works revived Nor had this Covenant of Sinai any Promise of eternal Life annexed unto it as such but only the Promise inseparable from the Covenant of Works which it revived saying Do this and live Hence it is that when our Apostle disputeth against Justification by the Law or by the Works of the Law he doth not intend the Works peculiar unto the Covenant of Sinai such as were the Rites and Ceremonies of the Worship then instituted but he intends also the Works of the first Covenant which alone had the Promise of Life annexed unto them And hence it follows also that it was not a New Covenant of Works established in the place of the Old for the absolute Rule of Faith and Obedience unto the whole Church for then would it have abrogated and taken away that Covenant and all the sorce of it which it did not 2. The other instance is in the Promise This also went before it neither was it abrogated or disannulled by the introduction of this Covenant This Promise was given unto our first Parents immediately after the entrance of sin and was established as containing the only way and means of the Salvation of Sinners Now this Promise could not be abrogated by the introduction of this Covenant and a new way of Justification and Salvation be thereby established For the Promise being given out in general for the whole Church as containing the way appointed by God for Righteousness Life and Salvation it could not be disannulled or changed without a change and alteration in the counsels of him with whom is no variableness or shadow of turning Much less could this be effected by a particular Covenant such as that was when it was given as a general and eternal Rule But whereas there was an especial Promise given unto Abraham in the Faith whereof he became the Father of the Faithful he being their Progenitor it should seem that this Covenant did wholly disannul or supersede that Promise and take off the Church of his Posterity from building on that foundation and to fix them wholly on this New Covenant now made with them So saith Moses The Lord made not this Covenant with our Fathers but with us even us who are all of us alive here this day Deut. 5. 3. God made not this Covenant on Mount Sinai with Abraham Isaac and Jacob but with the People then present and their Posterity as he declares Deut. 29. 14 15. This therefore should seem to take them off wholly from that Promise made to Abraham and so to disannul it But that this it did not nor could do the Apostle strictly proves Gal. 3. 17 18 19 20 21 22. Yea it did divers ways establish that Promise both as first given and as afterwards confirmed with the Oath of God unto Abraham two especially 1. It declared the impossibility of obtaining Reconciliation and Peace with God any other way but by the Promise For representing the Commands of the Covenant of Works requiring perfect sinless Obedience under the Penalty of the Curse it convinced men that this was no way for Sinners to seek for Life and Salvation by And herewith it so urged the Consciences of men that they could have no rest nor peace in themselves but what the Promise would afford them whereunto they saw a necessity of betaking themselves 2. By representing the ways and means of the Accomplishment of the Promise and of that whereon all the efficacy of it unto the Justification and Salvation of Sinners doth depend This was the Death Bloodshedding Oblation or Sacrifice of Christ the promised Seed This all its Offerings and Ordinances of Worship directed unto as his Incarnation with the Inhabitation of God in his Humane Nature was typed by the Tabernacle and Temple Wherefore it was so far from disannulling the Promise or diverting the minds of the People of God from it that by all means it established it and lead unto it But 3. It will be said as was before observed that
be done by that Covenant against which the Sins were committed neither by the Priests nor Sacrifices nor any other Duties of it Therefore had he promised the Abolition of it because of its weakness and insufficiency unto this end as also the introduction of a new to supply its defects as we have seen at large in the Exposition of the foregoing Chapter For it became the Wisdom Goodness and Grace of God upon the removal of the other for its insufficiency to establish another that should be every way effectual unto his purpose namely the Communication of an Eternal Inheritance unto them that are called But then the Enquiry will be How this Covenant or Testament shall effect this end what is in it what belongs unto it that should be so effectual and by what means it might attain this end All these are declared in the words And Sixthly In general all this arose from hence that it had a Mediator and that the Lord Christ the Son of God was this Mediator The dignity of his Person and thereon both the Excellency and Efficacy of his Priestly Office whereunto alone respect is had in his being called here a Mediator he had abundantly before demonstrated Although the word in general be of a larger signification as we have declared on Chap. 8. 6. yet here it is restrained unto his Priestly Office and his acting therein For whereas he had treated of that alone in the foregoing Chapter here declaring the Grounds and Reasons of the necessity of it he says for this cause is he the Mediator And proceeding to shew in what sense he considers him as a Mediator doth it by his being a Testator and dying which belongs to his Priestly Office alone And the sole end which in this place he assigns unto his Mediatory Office is his death That by means of death Whereas therefore there were Sins committed under the first Covenant and against it and would have been so for ever had it continued which it was no way able so to take away as that the called might receive the Inheritance the Lord Christ undertook to be the Mediator of that Covenant which was provided as a Remedy against these Evils For herein he undertook to answer for and expiate all those Sins Whereas therefore Expiation of Sin is to be made by an Act towards God with whom alone Atonement is to be made so as that they may be pardoned the Mediation of Christ here intended is that whereby suffering death in our stead in the behalf of all that are called he made Atonement for Sin But moreover God had a further design herein He would not only free them that are called from that death which they deserved by their Sins against the first Covenant but give them also a Right and Title unto an Eternal Inheritance that is of Grace and Glory Wherefore the Procurement hereof also depends on the Mediation of Christ. For by his Obedience unto God in the discharge thereof he purchased for them this Inheritance and bequeathed it unto them as the Mediator of the New Testament The Provision of this Mediator of the New Testament is the greatest Effect of the infinite Wisdom Love and Grace of God This is the Center of his Eternal Counsels In the womb of this one Mercy all others are contained Herein will he be glorified unto Eternity 1 The first Covenant of Works was broken and disannulled because it had no Mediator 2 The Covenant at Sinai had no such Mediator as could expiate Sin Hence 3 Both of them became means of Death and Condemnation 4 God saw that in the making the New Covenant it was necessary to put all things into the hand of a Mediator that it also might not be frustrated 5 This Mediator was not in the first place to preserve us in the state of the New Covenant but to deliver us from the guilt of the breach of the former and the Curse thereon To make provision for this End was the Effect of Infinite Wisdom Seventhly The especial way and means whereby this Effect was wrought by this Mediator was by death Morte obita facta interveniente intercedente by means of death say we Death was the means that whereby the Mediator procured the Effect mentioned That which in the foregoing Verse is ascribed unto the Blood of Christ which he offered as a Priest is here ascribed unto his death as a Mediator For both these really are the same only in the one the thing it self is expressed it was death in the other the manner of it it was by blood in the one what he did and suffered with respect unto the Curse of the first Covenant it was death in the other the ground of his making Expiation for Sin by his death or how it came so to do namely not meerly as it was death or penal but as it was a voluntary Sacrifice or Oblation It was therefore necessary unto the End mentioned that the Mediator of the New Testament should dye not as the High Priests of old dyed a natural death for themselves but as the Sacrifice dyed that was slain and offered for others He was to dye that death which was threatned unto Transgressions against the first Covenant that is death under the Curse of the Law There must therefore be some great Cause and End why this Mediator being the onely begotten of the Father should thus dye This was say the Socinians that he might confirm the Doctrine that he taught He dyed as a Martyr not as a Sacrifice But 1 There was no need that he should dye unto that End For his Doctrine was sufficiently confirmed by the Scriptures of the Old Testament the Evidence of the Presence of God in him and the Miracles which he wrought 2 Notwithstanding their pretence they do not assign the Confirmation of his Doctrine unto his Death but unto his Resurrection from the dead Neither indeed do they allow any gracious Effect unto his death either towards God or men but only make it something necessarily antecedent unto what he did of that kind Nor do they allow that he acted any thing at all towards God on our behalf Whereas the Scripture constantly assigns our Redemption Sanctification and Salvation to the death and blood of Christ. These Persons 1 deny that of it self it hath any influence into them wherefore 2 they say that Christ by his death confirmed the New Covenant but hereby they intend nothing but what they do also in the former or the Confirmation of his Doctrine with an addition of somewhat worse For they would have him to confirm the Promises of God as by him declared and no more as though he were God's Surety to us and not a Surety for us unto God Neither do they assign this unto his Death but unto his Resurrection from the dead But suppose all this and that the death of Christ were in some sense useful and profitable unto these Ends which is all they plead
yet what use and advantage was it of with respect unto them that he should dye an accursed death under the Curse of the Law and a sense of God's displeasure Hereof the Socinians and those that follow them can yield no reason at all It would become these men so highly pretending unto reason to give an account upon their own Principles of the death of the onely begotten Son of God in the highest course and most intense Acts of Obedience that may be compliant with the wisdom holiness and goodness of God considering the kind of death that he dyed But what they cannot do the Apostle doth in the next words Eighthly The death of the Mediator of the New Testament was for the Redemption of Transgressions and for this End it was necessary Sin lay in the way of the enjoyment of the Inheritance which Grace had prepared It did so in the Righteousness and Faithfulness of God Unless it were removed the Inheritance could not be received The way whereby this was to be done was by Redemption The Redemption of Transgressions is the deliverance of the Transgressors from all the Evils they were subject unto on their account by the payment of a satisfactory price The words used to express it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 will admit of no other signification Here it must answer the purging of Conscience by the blood of Christ. And he calls his life a Ransom or Price of Redemption And this utterly destroys the foundation of the Socinian Redemption and Expiation for Sin For they make it only a freedom from Punishment by an Act of Power Take off the covering of the words which they use in a sense foreign to the Scripture and their proper signification and their sense is expresly contradictory unto the sense and words of the Apostle He declares Christ to have been the High-Priest and Mediator of the New Testament in the same Acts and Duties They teach that he ceased to be a Mediator when he began to be a Priest He affirms that the Blood of Christ doth expiate Sins They that he doth it by an Act of Power in Heaven where there is no use of his Blood He says that his death was necessary unto and was the means or cause of the Redemption of Transgressions that is to be a price of Redemption or just Compensation for them They contend that no such thing is required thereunto And whereas the Scriptures do plainly assign the Expiation of Sin Redemption Reconciliation and Peace with God Sanctification and Salvation unto the Death and Blood-shedding of Christ They deny them all and every one to be in any sense Effects of it only they say it was an antecedent sign of the Truth of his Doctrine in his Resurrection and an antecedent condition of his Exaltation and Power which is to reject the whole Mystery of the Gospel Besides the particular Observations which we have made on the several passages of this Verse something may yet in general be observed from it As 1. A New Testament providing an Eternal Inheritance in Sovereign Grace the Constitution of a Mediator such a Mediator for that Testament in infinite Wisdom and Love the Death of that Testator for the Redemption of Transgressions to fulfil the Law and satisfie the Iustice of God with the communication of that Inheritance by Promise to be received by Faith in all them that are called are the substance of the Mystery of the Gospel And all these are with wonderful wisdom comprised by the Apostle in these words 2. That the Efficacy of the Mediation and Death of Christ extended it self unto all the called under the Old Testament is an evident Demonstration of his Divine Nature his Pre-existence unto all these things and the Eternal Covenant between the Father and him about them 3. The first Covenant did only forbid and Condemn Transgressions Redemption from them is by the New Testament alone 4. The Glory and Efficacy of the New Covenant and the Assurance of the Communication of an Eternal Inheritance by vertue of it depend hereon that it was made a Testament by the death of the Mediator which is farther proved in the following Verses VER XVI XVII 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the death of him is declared shewed argued or proved Mors intercedat necesse est Necesse est mortem intercedere Ar. Necesse est mortem ferri which is not proper in the Latine Tongue however there is an emphasis in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 more than is expressed by intercedo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of him that made it of the Testator 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in him that is dead in mortuis among them that are dead 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vulg confirmatum est and so the Syriac ratum est more proper 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There is no use profit or benefit in it Ar. nunquam valet quandoquidem nunquam valet nondum valet it is not yet of force For where a Testament is there must also of necessity be brought in the death of the Testator For a Testament is firm or ratified after men are dead otherwise it is of no force whil'st the Testator liveth There is not much more to be considered in these verses but only how the Observation contained in them doth promote and confirm the Argument which the Apostle insists upon Now this is to prove the necessity and use of the death of Christ from the Nature Ends and Use of the Covenant whereof he was the Mediator For it being a Testament it was to be confirmed with the death of the Testator This is proved in these Verses from the Notion of a Testament and the only use of it amongst men For the Apostle in this Epistle doth argue several times from such usages amongst men as proceeding from the Principles of Reason and Equity were generally prevalent among them So he doth in his discourse concerning the assurance given by the Oath of God Chap. 6. And here he doth the same from what was commonly agreed upon and suitable unto the reason of things about the nature and use of a Testament The things here mentioned were known to all approved by all and were the principal means of the preservation of Peace and Property in Humane Societies For although Testaments as unto their especial Regulation owe their original unto the Roman Civil Law yet as unto the substance of them they were in use amongst all Mankind from the foundation of the world For a Testament is the just determination of a Man's Will concerning what he will have done with his Goods after his decease Or it is the Will of him that is dead Take this power from men and you root up the whole foundation of all industry and diligence in the world For what man will labour to increase his substance if when
he dyes he may not dispose of it unto those which by Nature Affinity or other obligations he hath most respect unto Wherefore the foundation of the Apostles arguing from this usage amongst men is firm and stable Of the like nature is his observation that a Testament is of no force whil'st the Testator liveth the nature of the thing it self expounded by constant practice will admit no doubt of it For by what way soever a man disposeth of his Goods so as that it shall take effect whil'st he is alive as by Sale or Gift it is not a Testament nor hath any thing of the nature of a Testament in it For that is only the Will of a man concerning his Goods when he is dead These things being unquestionable we are only to consider whence the Apostle takes his Argument to prove the necessity of the death of Christ as he was the Mediator of the New Testament Now this is not meerly from the signification of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which yet is of consideration also as hath been declared but whereas he treats principally of the two Covenants it is the Affinity that is between a Solemn Covenant and a Testament that he hath respect unto For he speaks not of the death of Christ meerly as it was death which is all that is required unto a Testament properly so called without any consideration of what nature it is but he speaks of it also as it was a Sacrifice by the effusion of his blood which belongs unto a Covenant and is no way required unto a Testament Whereas therefore the word may signifie either a Covenant or a Testament precisely so called the Apostle hath respect unto both the significations of it And having in these Verses mentioned his death as the death of a Testator which is proper unto a Testament in the 14th Verse and those that follow he insists on his blood as a Sacrifice which is proper unto a Covenant But these things must be more fully explained whereby the difficulty which appears in the whole Context will be removed Unto the confirmation or ratification of a Testament that it may be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sure stable and of force there must be death the death of the Testator But there is no need that this should be by blood the blood of the Testator or any other Unto the consideration of a Covenant blood was required the blood of the Sacrifice and death only consequentially as that which would ensue thereon but there was no need that it should be the blood or death of him that made the Covenant Wherefore the Apostle declaring the necessity of the death of Christ both as to the nature of it that it was really death and as to the manner of it that it was by the effusion of his blood and that from the consideration of the two Covenants the Old and the New Testament and what was required unto them he evinceth it by that which was essential unto them both in a Covenant as such and in a Testament precisely so called That which is most eminent and essential unto a Testament is that it is confirmed and made irrevocable by the death of the Testator And that which is the excellency of a Solemn Covenant whereby it is made firm and stable is that it was confirmed with the blood of Sacrifices as he proves in the instance of the Covenant made at Sinai v. 18 19 20 21 22. Wherefore whatever is excellent in either of these was to be found in the Mediator of the New Testament Take it as a Testament which upon the Bequeathment made therein of the Goods of the Testator unto the Heirs of Promise of Grace and Glory it hath the nature of and he dyed as the Testator whereby the Grant of the Inheritance was made irrevocable unto them Hereunto no more is required but his death without the consideration of the nature of it in the way of a Sacrifice Take it as a Covenant as upon the consideration of the Promises contained in it and the Prescription of Obedience it hath the nature of a Covenant though not of a Covenant strictly so called and so it was to be confirmed with the blood of the Sacrifice of himself which is the Eminency of the Solemn Confirmation of this Covenant And as his death had an Eminency above the death required unto a Testament in that it was by blood and in the Sacrifice of himself which it is no way necessary that the death of a Testator should be yet it fully answered the death of a Testator in that he truly dyed so had it an Eminency above all the ways of the confirmation of the Old Covenant or any other Solemn Covenant whatever in that whereas such a Covenant was to be confirmed with the blood of Sacrifices yet was it not required that it should be the blood of him that made the Covenant as here it was The consideration hereof solves all the appearing difficulties in the nature and manner of the Apostles Argument The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whereunto respect is here had is as we have shewed of a large signification and various use And frequently it is taken for a free grant and disposition of things by promise which hath the nature of a Testament And in the Old Covenant there was a free grant and donation of the Inheritance of the Land of Canaan unto the people which belongs unto the nature of a Testament also Moreover both of them a Covenant and a Testament do agree in the general nature of their confirmation the one by blood the other by death Hereon the Apostle in the use of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth diversly argue both unto the nature necessity and use of the death of the Mediator of the New Testament He was to dye in the confirmation of it as it was a Testament he being the Testator of it and he was to offer himself as a Sacrifice in his blood for the establishment of it as it had the nature of a Covenant Wherefore the Apostle doth not argue as some imagine meerly from the signification of the word whereby as they say that in the original is not exactly rendred And those who have from hence troubled themselves and others about the Authority of this Epistle have nothing to thank for it but their own ignorance of the design of the Apostle and the nature of his Argument And it were well if we all were more sensible of our own ignorance and more apt to acknowledge it when we meet with difficulties in the Scripture than for the most part we are Alas how short are our Lines when we come to fathom the depths of it How inextricable difficulties do appear sometimes in passages of it which when God is pleased to teach us are all pleasant and easie These things being premised to clear the scope and nature of the Apostles Argument we proceed unto a brief Exposition of
Sin as should manifest that they stood in need of a farther Expiation than could be attained by them But a difficulty doth here arise of no small Importance For what the Apostle denys unto these Offerings of the Law that he ascribes unto the One only Sacrifice of Christ. Yet notwithstanding this Sacrifice and its Efficacy it is certain that Believers ought not only once a year but every day to call sins to remembrance and to make Confession thereof Yea our Lord Jesus Christ himself hath taught us to pray every day for the pardon of our sins wherein there is a calling of them unto Remembrance It doth not therefore appear wherein the difference lyes between the Efficacy of their Sacrifices and that of Christ seeing after both of them there is equally a Remembrance of Sin again to be made An. The difference is evident between these things Their Confession of Sin was in order unto and preparatory for a new Attonement and Expiation of it This sufficiently proves the insufficiency of those that were offered before For they were to come unto the new Offerings as if there had never been any before them Our remembrance of Sin and confession of it respects only the Application of the Virtue and Efficacy of the Attonement once made without the least desire or expectation of a new propitiation In their remembrance of Sin respect was had unto the curse of the Law which was to be answered and the wrath of God which was to be appeased it belonged unto the Sacrifice it self whose Object was God Ours respects only the application of the benefits of the Sacrifice of Christ unto our own Consciences whereby we may have assured peace with God The Sentence or Curse of the Law was on them until a new Attonement was made for the Soul that did not joyn in this Sacrifice was to be cut off But the Sentence and Curse of the Law was at once taken away Eph. 2. 14 15 16. And we may observe 1. An Obligation unto such Ordinances of Worship as could not expiate sin nor testifie that it was perfectly expiated was part of the Bondage of the Church under the Old Testament 2. It belongs unto the Light and Wisdom of Faith so to remember Sin and make Confession of it as not therein or thereby to seek after a new Attonement for it which is made once for all Confession of Sin is no less necessary under the New Testament than it was under the Old but not for the same end And it is an eminent difference between the spirit of Bondage and that of Liberty by Christ. The one so confesseth Sin as to make that very Confession a part of Attonement for it the other is encouraged unto Confession because of the Attonement already made as a means of coming unto a participation of the benefits of it Wherefore the causes and reasons of the Confession of Sin under the New Testament are 1. To affect our own Minds and Consciences with a sense of the Guilt of Sin in it self so as to keep us humble and filled with self-abasement He who hath no sense of Sin but only what consists in dread of future judgment knows little of the mystery of our Walk before God and Obedience unto him according unto the Gospel 2. To engage our Souls unto watchfulness for the future against the sins we do confess for in confession we make an abrenuntiation of them 3. To give unto God the glory of his Righteousness Holiness and Aversation from Sin This is included in every Confession we make of Sin for the reason why we acknowledge the Evil of it why we detest and abhor it is its contrariety unto the Nature holy Properties and Will of God 4. To give unto him the glory of his infinite Grace and Mercy in the pardon of it 5. We use it as an instituted means to let in a sense of the pardon of Sin into our own Souls and Consciences through a fresh Application of the Sacrifice of Christ and the benefits thereof whereunto Confession of Sin is required 6. To exalt Jesus Christ in our Hearts by the application of our selves unto him as the only procurer and purchaser of Mercy and Pardon without which Confession of Sins is neither acceptable unto God nor useful unto our own Souls But we do not make Confession of Sin as a part of a Compensation for the Guilt of it nor as a means to give some present pacification unto Conscience that we may go on in Sin as the manner of some is VERSE IV. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 THere is no difficulty in the Words and very little difference in the Translations of them The vulgar renders 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the Passive Impossibile est enim sanguine taurorum hircorum auferri peccata It is impossible that Sins should be taken away by the blood of Bulls and Goats The Syriack renders 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is to purge or cleanse unto the same purpose For it is impossible that the Blood of Bulls and Goats should take away Sin This is the last determinate resolution of the Apostle concerning the insufficiency of the Law and its Sacrifices for the Expiation of Sin and the perfecting them who come unto God as unto their Consciences And there is in the Argument used unto this end an inference from what was spoken before and a new enforcement from the Nature or subject matter of these Sacrifices Something must be observed concerning this Assertion in general and an Objection that it is liable unto For by the Blood of Bulls and Goats he intends all the Sacrifices of the Law Now if it be impossible that they should take away Sin for what end then were they appointed Especially considering that in the Institution of them God told the Church that he had given the Blood to make Attonement on the Altar Levit. 17. 11. It may therefore be said as the Apostle doth in another place with respect unto the Law it self if it could not by the works of it justifie us before God to what end then served the Law To what end serve these Sacrifices if they could not take away Sin The Answer which the Apostle gives with respect unto the Law in general may be applyed unto the Sacrifices of it with a small Addition from a respect unto their special Nature For as unto the Law he answers two things 1. That it was added because of Transgressions Gal. 3. 19. 2. That it was a Schoolmaster to guide and direct us unto Christ because of the severities wherewith it was accompanied like those of a School-master not in the Spirit of a tender Father And thus it was as unto the end of these Sacrifices 1. They were added unto the promise because of Transgressions For God in them and by them did continually represent unto Sinners the Curse and Sentence of the Law namely that the Soul that sinneth must dye or