Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
death_n	die_v	sin_n	sin_v	13,883	5	9.2456	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A17121	An historicall narration of the iudgement of some most learned and godly English bishops, holy martyrs, and others (whereof III; viz. Archbishop Cranmer, B. Latimer, and Bishop Hooper, suffred martyrdome, in the dayes of Q. Mary, for the truth and Gospell of Christ Iesus) concerning Gods election, and the merit of Christ his death, &c.	J. A., of Ailward.; Ailward, John, attributed name. aut; Andrewes, John, fl. 1615, attributed name. aut	1631 (1631)	STC 4; ESTC S100399	62,871	120

both their Goods and their Lives against that Fil●●y and detestable Sect. And as for those Errours which Pelagius the old Hereticke with Calestinus and Iulianus his Adherents did hold and also Revoked the same in the Iudiciall Councell of Palestine I thinke it good to Rehearse them First in Latine● and after in English as they are gathered together by St. Augustine And then to shew according to your request what part of their Doctrine which they teach under the name of Predestination My selfe and others doe mislike To the end that you and others may the better Iudge who are indeed worthy to bee called Pelagians and whether some part of their Doctrine be not for just cause misliked The words of St. Augustine are These Obiectum est Eum dicere 1. Quia Adam sive peccaret sive non peccaret Moriturus esset 2. Et quòd Peccatum ejus Ipsum solum ●eserit Non genus Humanum 3. Et. quòd Infantes in Illo statu sunt quo Adam fuit ante praevaricationem 4. Et quòd neque per Mortem vel praevericationem Adae Omne Genus humanum moriatur neque per Resurrectionem Christi Omne Genus Humanum resurgat 5. Et Divites Baptizatos nisi Omnibus abrenuncient si quid Boni ●●s● fuerint facere non Reputari illis nec cos habere posse Regnum Dei 6. Et Gratiam Dei Adjutorium non ad Singulos Actus dari sed in Libero Arbitrio esse vel in Lege atque in Doctrinâ 7. Et Dei Gratiam secundùm merita nostra dari 8. Et Filios Dei non posse vocari Nisi omninò absque peccato fuerint effecti 9. Et Non esse Liberum Arbitrium si Dei indiget Auxilio quoniam in propriâ voluntate habet vnusquisque facere aliquid vel non facere 10. Et victoriam nostram Non ex De● adjutorio esse sed ex libero Arbitrio 11. Et quòd Poenitentibus venia non Detur secundùm Gratiam Misericordiam Dei sed secundùm Meritum Laborem eorum qui per Poenitentiam Digni fuerint misericordiâ Haec omnia Pelagius Anathematizavit The First of Pelagius's Errors which St. Augustine heere citeth is That ADAM should have Dyed whether hee had Sinned or not Sinned This is as you heare One of Pelagius his wicked Errors That Sinne is not the Cause of Reprobation or casting away Death sprung out of Gods Ordinance or some other way and came not of Mans Sinne. For saith Hee Whether Man had Sinned or Not sinned yet Hee should have Dyed Contrary to the Manifest Scripture which sayth That By One man Sinne entred into the world and Death by the Meanes of Sinne. And the Wiseman saith That GOD Created man to bee undestroyed And againe hee saith God hath 〈◊〉 made Death neyther hath Hee pleasure in the Destruction of the living Hee created All things that They might have their Beeing yea All the people of the Earth hath Hee made that they should have Health That there should bee no Destruction in Tlum And that the Kingdome of Hell should not bee upon the Earth For Righteousnesse in everlasting But Vnrighteousnesse bringeth Death Wicked therefore and abominable was This Error of Pelagius which affirmed That whether Man had Sinned or not Sinned Hee should have Dyed And heere in the very Beginning of Pelagius's errours I report me to Themselves even to Them I say that blow the Trumpet of Defamation against others with the Tearmes of pestilent Pelagians whether Those whom they so accuse now to bee Pelagians doe hold this Errour Or whether they Themselves which would take some Mote of Errour out of other mens Eyes have not this Pelagius Beame sticking fast in their owne Let they-themselves be Iudges or ●et their owne Doctrine Iudge both in Print and Preaching whereof some part shall bee hereafter rehearsed Ye● let All the world judge which haue heard the Doctrine of both parties who they are which in this point ought worthily to bee called Pelagians The Second Errour which St. Augustine rehearseth is That ADAMS Sinne did onely hurt Himselfe and not the whole generation of Man This is another vile and Detestable errour which Pelagius held That the Sinne of Adam brought not Misery and Death upon all his Posteritie Contrary to the open Scripture which sayth That By the sinne of One condemnation came upon All men And the Holy man Esdras sayth O Adam what hast th●n done For though it was Thou that sinned yet Thou art not fallen alone but All wee that come of thee The Third depending also upon the Second is this Thas Infants being new borne are in that state that Adam was in before his Transgression Which Errour seemeth onely or chiefly to extend to the Innocencie of Children For if his mind were that in All points Infants were in Adams state then should it bee over-Brutish For who seeth not that Babes new-borne suffer oftentimes Paine and Griefe Which Adam did not before his Transgression But to affirme that Infants are not Borne and Conceived in si●ne is to deny Originall sinne which is an old ard a Dive●●sh errour and utterly against the Scripture which sayth plainely Behold I was borne in wiskednesse and in sinne hath my Mother conceived Mee The Fourth errour is That Neyther by the Death and Transgression of Adam All the Generation of Man dyeth nor that by the Resurrection of CHRIST All the Generation of Man doth rise againe I doe no● understand that Felagius here spake of the last Resurrection at the Day of Iudgement as though hee had after the manner of the Sadduces denyed the Resurrection of our Soules and Bodies at the last Day For then were all their Disputation in vaine of the Manner how wee should bee saved Whether by the Grace of GOD or by the Deserving of Man if Salvation or Resurrection had of eyther part beene denied altogether Neyther doth the Scripture attribute the last Resurrection unto CHRIST as though the Soules and Bodies of Men should have dyed like Beasts and not have rison againe unto Iudgement if CHRIST had Not come yea no Doubt all men should have risen againe and That unto the Iudgement of everlasting Damnation if CHRIST had not come But I understand that Pelagius in this Article denyed the Genera●●tie of Redemption by the Death of CHRIST by which wee 〈◊〉 as it were arise from Death because of the State of Life and Salvation whereunto we are brought in Christ by Redemption like as wee were in the state of Death and Damnation in ADAM by sinne Not that any Man is purged from the Corruption of Sinne unto the Innocency of ADAM but because the Sinne is covered in Christ and pardoned for His sake And further there is to bee Noted that the First part of this Errour is manifestly the very same which is the Second and Third Errour before rehearsed and by the same

Predestination of GOD that it cannot be mooved from the same But GOD created Man and did Predestinate him That if hee were obedient and did abstaine from the taste of the forbidden Apple hee should Live but if hee were disobedient he should abide the sentence of Death This Predestination is of Condition and of Iustice For GOD before the Fall of man did not by power of binding so Predestinate him to Dye that of necessity hee must needs dye but under that condition if hee Sinned Because therefore Man did Sinne it was a righteous thing that he should Dye If he sinned not hee should not be bound to Death by any chaine of GODS Predestination All these are the wordes of AVGVSTINE And this division is often repeated and commended by the best learned of the Protestants Many thinges doe offer themselves in this matter to bee spoken but my purpose of briefenesse causeth mee to grow to an End I have thought good therefore in few wordes to note one point more of evill Doctrine which now adayes is taught and it springeth also cut of this aforesaid Proposition That GOD's Predestination causeth all sinne and wickednesse And this it is That Sinne is not the cause of Reprobation nor of GODS hatred towards the wicked which are Damned Which thing indeed to bee short I grant must needs follow if the former Conclusion bee true That Sinne commeth of GODS Predestination or that GODS Predestination was the cause of Adams Fall which was the Originall of Sinne For if Sinne or the Originall thereof came of GOD or of his Ordinance and from GOD commeth nothing but that which is Holy Iust and Good then is Sinne no sinne and cannot bee the cause of GODS hatred towards them that perish Except wee should say that GOD hateth them for that thing which is Holy Iust and good And lest I should bee thought through pretence of brevitie to passe over without plaine proofe of that which I say that this part of Doctrine is also set foorth and taught I will rehearse One sentence of theirs published in Print which is so open and manifest that it may serve as well as a Thousand I reade in the fore-named Booke translated out of French into English towards the latter end of the Booke upon this place thus noted in Figures and these very Wordes follow Rom. 9. c. 11 12 13. Hee sayth not onely that Esau was ordayned to bee hated Before hee did any Evill For in so saying hee should not seeme to Exclude any thing but actuall Sinne and Incredulitie But hee sayth Expresly before hee was Borne Whereby hee excludeth Originall Sinne and all that which might bee considered in the Person of Esau by his Birth from the cause of Hate Touching the Text whereupon it is spoken assuredly Inke serveth not 〈◊〉 to make Ivorie white than these Wordes to open the minde and sence of the Apostle as it were easie to proove if shortnesse would suffer to make a digr●s●ion But touching that part of Doctrine a tho 〈…〉 se●est that hee speaketh of two Opinions The one that Actuall Sinne or Incredulitie should bee the cause of GODS hatred towards the wicked The other that Originall Sinne is the cause of GODS hate towards them This man against them both taketh occasion upon this example of ESAU To Exclude all that is in Man eyther outward Sinne or inward eyther originall Sinne or actuall from the cause of GOD● hate So that if it bee true which they say GOD doth hate men neyther for their outward wicked Life not for their inward D●vellish lust but for his owne pleasure onely The very same thing sayth KNOXE in the 14● Page of his aforesaid Booke where his words are those Further I say That if ESAU was Hated for his Evill deserving then must needes follow That IACOB was Loved for his Well-deserving by the Argument following of the nature of Contraries As well it might be sayd It must needs follow by the contraries That if a King or Prince hate one man which hath Well-deserved his hate by stealing from him his Ring his Chaine or some great Iewell then doth hee not love any other man but hee which hath well deserved his Love by giving to him a Ring a Chayne or some great Treasure As though hee should say because Iustice worketh on the one side therefore Mercy hath nothing to doe on the other side or as though GOD were not both Iust and Mercifull Iust in Damning for theyr offence those which are damned and Mercifull in saving without their desert those which are Saved And who seeth not that neyther Simile nor Dis●imile neyther like thinges nor thinges contrary doe hold in all points For nothing is So like which in some thing is not unlike neyther any thing so contrary which doth in all thinges vary CHRIST is likened to a Lyon but did hee ever Ravish Devoure and shed any Innocent blood Latimer wisheth That All the Byshops were like Byshop Devill in diligence then ought not the Devill and a Byshop to differ in any thing And most especially and plainely doth the Scripture beate in our heads above all other thinges That the natures of Contraries doe not hold in both sides of GODS reward and Mans deserving For as they are inseparable Relatives in the one part so on the other side the one hath never any relation to the other For as GODS Hatred and Vengeance hath ever Relation to Mans ill-deserving So hath GODS Love and Mercy never any relation to Mans merit Yea all the Scripture teacheth us That GOD never Hateth or punisheth Man without his owne Deserving For as the Wise man sayth Et eum qui nullam poenam commerit 〈…〉 s sit condemnasse à tuâ potentiâ indic as alienum And thou Lord saith hee esteemest it a thing contrary to thy Power to have condemned him which hath not deserved Punishment What should bee sayd of the Caananites and the Israelites If the nature of Contraries doe alwayes hold and have such relation of the one to the other Must it not then necessarily follow as hee sayth by the nature of Contraries That if the Caananites were cast out of the fortunate-Land that flowed with Milke and Honey for theyr Evill-deserving That on the other side the Israelites were brought and Planted into that same happie and blessed rest for theyr Well deserving But what sayth the Scripture Speake not in thy heart after that the Lord thy GOD hath cast them out before thee saying For my Righteousnesse the Lord hath brought mee in to possesse this Land Nay but for the wickednesse of those Nations the Lord hath cast them out before thee So plainly speaketh the Holy Ghost here that thou mayest easily perceive how grosse and vaine their saying is which affirme That if GOD Hate an Evill man for his owne Evill deserving then must it needes follow that hee Loveth a good man for his owne Well-deserving For the hatred of GOD and

it cleane away but rather the strength and force of the same So he saved vs from other Calamities not taking the same cleane away but rather the power of the same So that no Calamity nor misery should be able to hurt us that are in Christ Iesu And likewise he saved us from Death not that we should not dye but that Death should have no victory over vs nor condemne us but rather to be a way and entrance unto Salvation and everlasting Life for death is a gate to enter into everlasting life No man can come to everlasting life but he must first dye bodily But this death cannot hurt the faithfull for they are exempted from all danger through the death and passion of Iesus Christ our Saviour who with his death hath overcome our death And in another place the same Father writeth as followeth viz. THe Holy Scripture maketh mention of a Sinne against the Holy Ghost which Sinne cannot bee forgiven neyther in this world nor in the world to come And this maketh many men unquiet in their hearts and consciences For some there be which ever bee afraid least they have committed that same sinne against the Holy Ghost which is irremissible Therefore some say I cannot tell whether I have sinned against the Holy Ghost or not If I have committed that sinne I know I shall be damned But I tell you what yee shall doe Despaire not of the Mercy of GOD for it is immeasurable I cannot deny but there is a Sinne against the Holy Ghost which is irremissible But wee cannot iudge of it afore-hand we cannot tell which man hath committed that sinne or not as long as he is alive But when he is once gone then I can Iudge whether hee sinned against the Holy Ghost or not As now I can judge that Nero Saul and Iudas and such like that dyed in sinnes and wickednesse did commit this sinne against the Holy Ghost for they were wicked and continued in their wickednesse still to the very end They made no end in their wickednesse But we cannot judge whether one of us sinne this sinne against the Holy Ghost or not For though a man bee wicked at this time yet he may repent and leave his wickednsse to morrow and so not commit that sinne against the Holy Ghost Our Saviour Christ pronounced against the Scribes and Pharises that they had committed that sinne against the Holy Ghost because Hee knew their hearts he knew that they would still abide in their wickednesse to the very end of their lives Further the promises of Christ our Saviour are generall they pertaine to all Mankinde hee made a generall Proclamation saying Qui credit in me habet vitam aeternam Whosoever beleeveth in mee hath everlasting life Likewise St. Paul saith Gratia exuperat super peccatum The Grace and Mercies of God exceedeth farre our sinnes Therefore let us ever thinke and beleeve that the grace of God his mercy and goodnesse excedeth our sinnes Item consider what Christ saith with his owne mouth Venite ad me omnes qui laboratis c. Come unto me All yee that labour and are laden and I will ease you Marke here hee saith Come all yee Wherefore then should any body despaire or shut out himselfe from these promises of Christ which be generall and appertaine to the whole world For he saith Come all unto me and then againe he saith Refocillabo vos I will refresh you you shall be eased from the burdens of your sinnes Therefore as I said before he that is blasphemous and obstinately wicked and abideth in his wickednesse still to the very end he sinneth against the Holy Ghost as St. Augustine and all other godly writers doe affirme But he that leaveth his wickednesse and sinnes and is content to amend his life and then beleeving in Christ seeketh Salvation and everlasting life by him No doubt that man or woman Whosoever they be shall bee saved For they feed upon Christ upon that meate that God the Father this Feastmaker hath prepared for all his guests Such another passage to This same purpose you may Reade in his sixt Sermon upon the Lords Prayer Some two passages before the End of the Sermon Speaking against Novatus the Hereticke CHrist onely and no man else merited Remission Iustification and eternall felicity for as many as will beleeve the same They that will not beleeve it shall not have it For it is no more but beleeve and have For Christ shed as much bloud for Iudas as for Peter Peter beleeved it and therefore he was saved Iudas would not beleeve and therefore he was condemned The Fault being in him onely and in no body else Againe The same blessed Father writeth Thus as followeth SIc Deus dilexit mundum So entirely hath GOD loved the world that hee sent his onely begotten Sonne to that end that all that beleeve in him should not perish but have life Everlasting this is now a Comfortable thing and a great promise which GOD maketh unto the whole world and no doubt he is as able to fulfill that promise of Grace as hee was able to fulfill His wrathfull word against the Iewes So likewise hee saith Vivo ego dicit Dominus nolo mortem Peccatoris sed ut convertatur vivat As truely as I live sayth the Lord God I will not the death of a Sinner but rather that hee shall turne and live It is not his pleasure when wee be damned therefore hee sweareth on Oath wee ought to beleeve him without an Oath yet to satisfie our mindes and to the intent that wee should beleeve him and be the better assured of his goodwill towards Vs hee sweareth this Oath Now therefore if wee will follow him and leave our wicked living convert and turne our selves unto him be sory for that which is past and intend to amend our life now forward If wee doe so no doubt we shall live with him everlastingly without end Therefore let every one of us goe into his owne heart and when he findeth that hee hath beene a Wicked man an Irefull man a Covetous or a sloathfull man Let him Repent and be sory for it and take a good purpose to leave that same sinne wherein he hath lyen before Let us not doe as the Iewes did which were stiffe-necked they would not leave their Sinnes they had a pleasure in the same they would follow their old Traditions refusing the Word of GOD Therefore their Destruction came worthily upon them And therefore I say let us not follow them least we receive such a Reward as they had least everlasting destruction come upon us and so we be cast out of the favour of GOD and finally lost world without end Furthermore in another Sermon hee saith as heere followeth I Say there be two manner of Men Some there be that are not Iustified not Regenerate nor yet in State of