euery motion but of its owne The practice of grace is a good motion and the time thereof is good very well imployde to a good purpose to the honour of Iesus The practice of sinne is an ewill motion and its time is euill But those motions haue their owne times and so haue all things els vnder heauen Eccles 3. But I am sure that swearing and blaspheming haue noe appoynted times They and their times are forbidden and therefore away with such a blaspheming argument Things forbidden are vnlawfull for Christians at no time they must bee admitted But bowing at the name of Iesus is a commanded duty And because the Church hath seene the bâ—ffling of Catchpole Scripturists she hath namde the time of bowing at the name of Iesus The time is the time of diuine seruice so we read at the 18. Canon A very congruous time Euery commanded thing hath its commanded time and therefote bowing at the name of Iesus hath its commanded time proper to it selfe so exclusiue of all other times that only a religious time must be and is the time of bowing at the name of Iesus If Mr Prinne be such a Borrower or exchanger of times let him answeare this argument for his owne argumeÌ„ts sake Mr Prinne is M. Prinne at all times at all places If at all times therefore he was Mr Prinne before his father was borne for that time is time for that time is subordinate to one of the species of time And so he is a very 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Obiection 4 Every religious duty is vniversall either in respect of person time or place But bowing at the name of Iesus is not vniversall for person For the Popish Councell of Basil prescribes it only to Canonicall persons so Surius Concil Tom. 4 pag. 61. The councell of Seine or Sienna restraines it only to the same persons Concilium Senonense decreta morum Cap. 18. Surius Tom. 4. Pap. 741. The Synode of Augusta Anno Dom. 1548. Cap. 27. hath decreed that Ecclesiasticall persons shall bow at the name of Iesus and at the name of the B. Virgin Mary and at the mention of the body and blood of Christ Surius Tom. 4. Pag. 810. 2ly bowing at the name of Iesus is not an vniversall duty for time place For men bow not at all times Gregory the 10 one of the first Fathers of it restrains it to celebrating the Masse Sexti decretalia l. 2. T. 23. c. 2. The Councell of Basil restraines it to Canonicall houres in Cathedrall and Collegiate Churches In like manner the Councell of Seine The Synode of Augusta restraines it to Sermons and Masses M. Hooker confines bowing at the name of Iesus onely to the time of reading the Gospell Solution Here M. Prinne disputes against Protestants and Papists but being ignorant of Modalities De quibus non degustauit He erres vnsufferably in his reports For the Councell of Basil doth not prescribe bowing at the name of Iesus only to Canonicall persons These are the words Statuit igitur Sancta Synodus vt in cunctis Cathedralibus Collegiatis Ecclesiis c Cum nominatur gloriosum illud nomen Iesus in quo omne genu flectitur caelestium terrestrium infernorum omnes caput inclinent this is M. Prinnes note All Cathedrall and Collegiate Churches shall bow at the name of Iesus But M. Prinne where is your exclusiue tearme Onely You must plead A non est inventus That word Only is not in any Popish Councell Only they drinke the holy wine at Masse I meane the Popish Priests but that Only They shall bow at the name of Iesus No ProtestaÌ„t at any time as yet did iustly charge them with And what if the Synode of Augusta hath coÌ„maÌ„ded Papists to bow at the name of the B. Virgin Mary at the mentioÌ„ of the body blood of Christ what is that to this purpose That which is good in Austin the Popish Arch-bishop of Canterbury we imbrace and commend but that which is otherwise let it wither in the roote from whence it sprang so M. Mason lib. 2. cap. 4. of consecration of Bishops pag. 58. Our Church Gods holy name ever be blessed is purged from popish corruption the Lord Iesus preserue her from Imperious Puritans What hath our Church to doe with Popish religion Reade the 18. Article of our reformed Faith and so informe your vnderstanding in the name Iesus Once more let me tell M. Prinne that hee injur'd Pope Gregory the 10. His words are these Quod generaliter scribitur vt in nomine Iesu omne genu flectatur singuli singulariter implentes praecipue dum aguntur missarum sacra mysteria gloriosum illud nomen quandocunque recolitur flectant genua cordis sui quod vel capitis inclinatione testentur Here M. Prinnes quotation is Sexti Decretalia lib. 2. Tit. 23. cap. 2. But t is lib. 3. de Immunitate Ecclesiae c. Decet 6. Here Gregory the 10. commands all to bow at the name of Iesus and not only but chiefely at the Masse But that Gregory the 10 who liu'd in the yeare of the Lord. 1271. was one of the first Fathers of bowing at the name of Iesus this is fabulous a part of the Puritans Legend Had M. Prinne beene carefull to haue pervs'd Bishop Andrews his 9th Sermon on the Resurrection He had read these words No writer not of the Ancient on this place that I can finde saue he that turn'd all into Allegories but literally vnderstands it and likes well that we should actually bow pag. 476. there you may see Authorities that bowing at the name of Iesus did not begin at Gregory the 10 ths time St Cyrill the Bishop of Alexandria who liu'd in the yeare of the Lord 430. saith that the Church then did bow at the name of Iesus cap. 5. Thus numquid hominem communem nos vniuersuÌ„ coelum hactenus percolimus Absit Adoramus EmmanueleÌ„ c. Binius in his Coll of Councells Tom 1. ActoruÌ„ coÌ„ilij Ephesini oecumenici pag. 670. we bow at the name of Emmanuel because he being the sonne of God tooke on him our nature died by his owne power did rise againe and so made vs the conquerors of death And who is Emmauel but Iesus To this purpose Athanasius who liued 326. yeares after Christ writeth Ideo adorauit quia vidit suum opificem Architectumque in carne consistere Et in nomine Iesu omne genu Flectebatur et in posterum flectetur In his Epistle to Adelphius pag. 69. Therefore the Church did bow doth and shall bow at the name of Iesus because she hath doth and shall behold by faith Iesus in our flesh Flectebatur the Church then did bow at the name of Iesus before that time of Athanasius Thus then t is plaine that Gregory the 10. was not one of the first Fathers of bowing at the name of Iesus Concerning Mr. Hooker he saith that we chieflly bow at the name of
The everlasting Father for he is the resurrection and the life restoring the dead The Prince of peace for he hath reconciled God and sinners The blessed For he is all glory The only Potentate for he is the only cōmanding Lord. Emmanuel the only begottē sonne of God The King of kings all Creatures are his subjects The Lord of Lords for all are his servants He is the head of the Church for the Church is his body which he makes to liue to moue and to be in essence Is Iesus so great a governour and commander and hath he humbled himselfe to saue sinners and will some refuse to bow at the name of Iesus being therevnto commanded Are our knees bless'd our heads our soules and bodies because Iesus died the death of the Crosse And shall not we honour Iesus with all manner of honour internall and externall Imperious ingratitude The bowing of the outward man is a lesser duty then bowing of the inward man He then that will not performe the lesser may very well bee suspected for neglecting the greater duty He that is so stiffe in the knee and so heady in the hat is masterles at the heart Iesus is no Master no Lord no King ouer such These are the men whom no Lord must controll psal 12. These will rather breake than bow Away with such vnsufferable contumacy Objection 6. Here is vnderstood Lord only Lord to be the name aboue euery name which runnes in the Genitiue case And every tongue shall confesse that Iesus is the Lord and this is the opinion of the ancient and moderne Commentators on this Text and Iesus is the Genitiue case which denotes the person of Iesus Solution This Genitiue case-argument is answer'd at the 2 argument concerning the letrer of the text That Lord is the only name here vnderstood is twise disputed before in this Question at a fourthly fiftly But let Mr Prinne note whether this proposition be true Iesus is the Lord and being graunted to be true let him say if he can which is the nomen significans which is the subiect of the proposition if Iesus be not And 't is certaine that Iesus is the highest personall name for merit That King of Kings and Lord of Lords are his titles of honour and that every knee must not bow to the titles of Honour but to the most Renown'd Person and so not at those names but at this proper personall name once revil'd For only Iesus is the Finis cui the personall end of bowing Here note that Master Prinne hath sayde all this to contradict Iesus the Personal End for whose honours sake we bow at his name Iesus in time of diuine seruice for rewards or titles of honour receaue not honour for they are honours giuen Now in that which followes he would make his private friends belieue that he will teach the reall meaning of the text or else he hath forgotten himselfe this being a Question concerning the meaning of Philip 2. different from the literall meaning which is a part of the letter if the letter hath any signification And I belieue that he is on the literall meaning here at this part of his Appendix For there are tres species three kindes of the dictionall or literall meaning this is true metaphysically according to participation of essence though the vulgar division Entis rationis in scripturis of the written word of God be literall and figuratiue These are the three species 1. is grammaticall 2. is rhetoricall whereof metaphoricall is a part 3. is logicall Only metaphoricall bowing at the name of Iesus He sayth is vnderstood at Philip 2 10. This dispute beginnes at a Secondly which hath no reference to a First place expressed in the Appendix This is to dispute sine capite without an head But is bowing at the name of Iesus metaphoricall figuratiue and so dictionall Certainely 't is reall for 't is essentiall a reall subordination of the knee to a religious heart in the state of grace and in the time of glory euery knee spirituall and corporeall shall really bow Besides this reall essence Bowing at the name of Iesus depends on reall causes The 1. is Gods command which requires the Church to bow for all knees are commanded which are the knees of things in heaven of things in the earth c then bowing c. is lawfull The 2. is Iesus his merit which is the Holy Ghosts reason and 't is a necessary reason because 't is iust that Iesus bee rewarded with all honour and therefore with knee-honour The 3. is the loue and honour and glory of Iesus which we owe to him this is the end of bowing which makes it commendable Master Prinne then must be followed in his owne way that essentiall and demonstratiue arguments may overtake him and binde him to his good behauiour because he sayth that this bowing at the name of Iesus is metaphoricall But our knees are not metaphoricall but substances corporeall organicall and obedient He sayth that bowing c. is one and the same in all creatures and yet all haue not knees alike He sayth that bowing c. is subiection of all creatures to Iesus at the last day only at the last day But our Church doth now testify that Iesus is the Lord now in the time of grace with bowing of the knee and is this a sinne against any law of God Obstante Prinne this is a duty of the text Objection 7. This kind of bowing in Philip 2. 10. is metaphoricall For 't is not the externall Ciuill Reverence which is due only to man Gen. 19 2. 33 6 7. c. 2ly this bowing is not diuine worship or Adoration which is due only to God Gen. 18 2. 24 26 48. 3ly nor is it praier which we performe with bended knees Psal 95. 6. Eph 3. 14. For the Deuills the damned and Infidels doe not adore nor pray to Iesus But this bowing is the bowing of all things Philip 2. 10. of all things in Heauen and Earth and vnder the Earth And what can that be but the subiection of creatures to Christ at the last day aboue whom he is exalted The last day is only the time when Philip 2. 10. shal be literally fulfilled Therefore 't is only that Subiection therefore 't is a metaphoricall bowing Solution This Argument is 5th argument of the letter of the text twise a fourthly in this Question But here note that this bowing at the name of Iesus now Questioned is externall diuine worship in our Church 't is adoration and now Master Prinne may know what kinde of bowing bowing at the name of Iesus is There is adoration inward and outward at Esay 45 23. at Rom 14. 11. Esay 45. is not vnderstood of bowing at the last day for there the text teacheth Gods people to forsake Idols and bow or giue worship to him But when not till the last day Rom 14. 10. teacheth that we must all stand before Gods
the text and he hath no explication of the severall kinds of Ceremonies which he ought to haue had for his private friends sake that they might vnderstand how that no ceremony is a duty of the text Certainely a necessary an vniuersall ceremony is a duty of the text as a thing considered bowing at the name of Iesus is both a dutie and Ceremony sed formaliter for seuerall respects as it t is a ceremony t is not a duty as t is a dutie t is non ceremony as you shall learne hereafter He is not only confus'd in handling the name Iesus and in the substance of Appendix but also in his Method Let an vnderstanding man obserue his manner of dispute and hee cannot but affirme that he is altogether vnworthy to teach or to contradict the Learned and Conforming Professors of of our Church His method is neither essentiall nor demonstratiue and then it 's not necessary Ti 's fit that it be knowne what it is It is a Delemma whose two generall parts are grosse mistaks First he chargeth Bishop Andrewes Mr. Adams the Sorbonists and Rhemists that they teach that bowing at the name of Iesus is nothing els but a duty of the text The opposition of the 2 parts doth warrāt me thus to write Then He saith that Zanchius Mr Hooker Dr. Boyes and Mr. Widdowes defend this assertion that bowing at the name of Iesus is but an indifferent innocent harmeles Ceremony yet all these Bishop Andrewes c. Zanchius c. doe teach that bowing at the name of Iesus is both a duty and Ceremony which how this can be he is not able to vnderstand He is so ignorant that he cannot tell whether all things haue their perculiar times Hence it is that he confounds the time of divine seruice with the time of swearing and blaspheming with any sinfull time when Iesus is named He hath not learned the difference betweene a categoricall and an exclusiue sense and therefoer he is not a sham'd to inferre because the Councell of Basil enjoyned Canonicall persons to bowe at the name of Iesus therefore only they did bowe at the name of Iesus He is so wilfull in his opinion that he denies in the despight of the Councell of Nice and Ephesus that either Primitiue Church or any Reformed Church ought to bowe at the name of Iesus He perceiues not that in or at the time when Iesus is named every knee shall bow are promiseuosly read So it seemes that he is not a Grammarian Notwithstanding all this ignorāce he so earnestly disputs as if he would talke him selfe out of breath or else what meanes his zealous Tautologie The argument of Souereignty is disputed six times at handling the meaneing of the text The argument of preferring one name of Iesus before another is repeated 8 times six times in the third question twise in the fourth The Arg of bowing only to the name Iesus and not to the persō is disputed six times The argument of preferring one person of the deity before the other is twise disputed The argument that Iesus is the name only of Incarnatiō c. is disputed 5 times That Iesus is not Iesus to the Deuils c. is disputed at rhe second and third Question That bowing is only Metaphoricall is disputed foure times That Lord is the name aboue every name disputed thrise The metaphoricall sence of bowing he hath separated from the letter of of the text and makes that to be the only manner of bowing at the name of Iesus Philip. 2. 10. But he must Vnderstand that there is a reall bowing and more morall then to be only metaphoricall as it appeares at the end of his arguments answear'd concerning the meaning of the text where he hath confounded an exclusiue with a compar'd sence Thus bowing at the last day c. is the only principall and therefore t' is the only bowing at the name of Iesus hence he hath falsified 15. scriptures many primitiue fathers others the nūber of them is but fourescore Istos modos dicēdi Per se per accidēs those naturall accidentall manner of speeches he confounds Thus some doe abuse Bowing at the name of Iesus as papists Ignorant Protestants Therefore t is no harmeles ceremony And he is so decent so trimme in his arguments cōcerning the decency of bowing that he confounds Coordination and Subordination with contrarie opposition Thus Bowing with the heart and bowing with the knee which are subordinate doe differ therefore they are so contrary as two contrary masters To read bow to heare and bow c are Coordinate duties yet these with him are so contrarie as that they cannot be done together without confusion Now behold the strang learning of a monstrous learned Immethodist Is he not rare for dispurations being so ignorant of modalities Is he not excellent to teach our Chutch being so braue a Babe in vnderstanding Againe his Appendix is vaine and Idle For in what the holy Ghost doth seriously cōmend Iesus that he neglects to remember The Holy Ghosts reason why all knees shall bow at the name of Iesus is because Iesus tooke on him our nature and then did so humbly demeane himselfe that he died the death of the Crosse to saue his Enemies Ro. 5. 8. For this cause God honored Iesus so much that he commands every knee to bow at his name This is the scope of the text and then is not Mr. Prinne vaine and idle in his conceipt to suppose argumenrs to contradict the good iust meaning of the Holy Ghost who is that True teacher that God is the Iust rewarder of Iesus his the greatest Humility Is it not vaine and an idle conceipt for to thinke better of Mr Prinns arguments to cause no Bowing at Iesus his name then of the Holy Ghosts dictate which is Iesus his merit revealed to be and Gods Exaltation of Iesus the causes why every knee shall bow at the name of Iesus It is vaine and idle to fight against God this is the opinion of Gamaliel a Dr. of the law Act. 5. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. yet so vaine and so idle the younger Lawier is that he would rather that his arguments should be beliued then the most credible truth of the Holy Ghost Here is a strange oppositiō A Christian may and ought verily to beleiue that a man should not dare thus to dispute against the Holy Ghost What may be thought to be the cause that a man should grow so bold as to question the Holy Ghost for his doctrine Certainely the mystery of iniquitie is working a new worke Thus. If this name Iesus were disrespected not so publiquely magnified as t is by the outward mans Bowing in or at the time of divine service then doubtles the Pure Holy doctrine and discipline of Elect Geneua shall be taught every where to reforme this Church of Great Britaine Doe but dishonour the head of the Church and then regenerate Geneuaters shall
Read or write still they are the same letters And then seeing that one not more learned than a writing Boy nay then a Reading or spelling child can assure the doubting Questionist that there are no more no fewer and that only These are the letters of Philip. 2. 10. how dares a Professor be so bold as to say that to bow at the name of Iesus is not a duty of the Text according to the letter After the substance of the letter examine the signification of these words whether Iesus signifies any person else at Philip. 2. but the Lord Iesus not Ioshua who is called Iesus only twise in the new Testament once at Acts 7. 45. and once at Heb. 4. 8. Nor doth this Iesus a literall personall name signifie Iustus who is called Iesus Coloss 4. 11. And as for Iesus the sonne of Iosedecke Agge 1. 1. he is not read in the new Testament nor is Iesus the sonne of Sirach in any text of the Gospells or Epistles So here is no ambiguity for t is perspicuous not is here any error for t is Certaine that the Lord Iesus is only Iesus written read and vnderstood at Philip. 2. It is manifest that this is true by Mr Prinnes Quotations by these Clemens Alexandrinus Tertullian St Cyprian loco 10 20 30. St Hilarie loco 10 Greg. Nyssen loco 20 St Ambrose loco 10 20 30 c. St Cyrill of Alexandria loco 10 Fulgentius loco 20 and Iohn the 2 Pope Therefore let no man doubt but that only the Lord Iesus is literally this proper personall name Iesus written at Philip. 2. The 2. word in the text is knee Euery knee at which Mr Prinne doth stumble The letters are visible enough in his owne English Bible for substance one and the same for number all equall with these EVERY KNEE and for posture not dislocated And what kind of knees all creatures haue this is not written in the letter expressely litterally but those knees which the creatures haue they shall bow and they shall bow every one their owne knees and that without proxies for every knee sayth the text shall bow all Angelicall all infernall and all corporeall knees The knees of things in Heauen of things in the Earth of things vnder the Earth St Paule writes here true literall divinitie Mr Prinne will grante this of all tongues in Heauen because they shall all confesse that Iesus is the Lord For it is the tongue that confesseth and so he may say as truly that Angells other spirits haue knees for the same Author hath iustified it in one and the same Philip. 2. The 3. word is bowing which Calvin calls externall adoration in vs at Philip. 2. we must glorify God in our Bodie and spirit 1. Cor. 6. for that end He bought vs with the price of his vnvaluable life Calvin sayth that now in this life we must bow at the name of Iesus not only inwardly but outwardly in his Commmentaries on Isay 45. Rom. 14. Philip. 2. the same say Musculus Aretius Bullinger Marlorat Zanchius c. And rather at the name of Iesus than at any other name of God because God in his 2. person named Iesus only humbled himselfe and died the death even the death of the crosse A good Lecturer may finde this divinity in the very letter of Philip 2. Must all knees bow at the name of Iesus Must all knees Then I pray you obserue with me hence this Doctrine All Christian knees in the Militant Church must bow at the name of Iesus Is this true doctrine All knees must bow But when Then when they must honour Iesus And now is a time and appoynted by the Lord to worship Psal 95. no worship neither inward nor outward God by scripture hath denyed to be given to Iesus God hath not said that we must worship him only at the last day The Prophet Isaiah hath not writ it nor St Paule but the letter of the text is expresse that he hath allready merited all Honour and that every knee shall therefore bow at the name of Iesus And is the time of our Christian life too sodaine a time as that now we must not worship him The 24. Elders haue proclaimed the contrary Reuel 5. Obserue this vse Did Iesus die for vs What Did Iesus die the death of the Crosse was Iesus so cruelly so despightfully so disdainfully handled for his Church Then in time of divine service let Iesus haue giuen to him knee hat for a free will offering nay more Giue him heart and soule and body euen all Decent well order'd honour Iesus thought that his life was not too much to saue miserable sinners and therefore 't is an odious ingratitude to denie him knee-honour at the time of holy worship seing by his promise he is in the midst of them that are gathered togeather in his name Iesus to praise and magnifie him for all blessings conferr'd on his People But Master Prinne never thought of this and therefore he disputes as followeth Obiection To bow in the name of Iesus is not to bow at the name of Iesus But the letter of the text is euery knee shall bow in the name of Iesus Thus all the Fathers hereafter quoted Thus all the Translations but Bezas Thus all the Expositors on this Epistle but those who follow Beza Thus all our English Translations but Geneuas which is Beza translated The new translation is In the name of Iesus so all ancient English writers who quote this scripture Solution 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The praeposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies in or at so Petrus Gillius Albiensis Grammer learning doth teach thus much And t is very rationall and as vulgar as true In Grammar we say in a place or at a place In a bill or a bond Mr Seriuener writes in or at the dwelling house of c. at in or on the 25. of March which shall be in An. Dom c. Thus in and at a place in at a time are promiscuously vsed So speaking of the time when Iesus is repeated to put vs in remēbrance of bowing at his name we doe truly and properiy say In the time or at the time of divine service when Iesus is mentioned every knee shall bow The 18th Canon is the same in sence according to either of the acceptions At Michaelmas Terme and in or at some other terme all Lawiers will follow their owne vocation and not continue bold and ignorant Immodalists in expounding Philip. 2. and other scriptures But howsoeuer remember that in Michaelmas terme or at Michaelmas terme aut eo circiter I thus answeard a lawier translated into a Pastor or Dr. of the Church that in a place and at a place in a time at a time are not formally differing expositions But stay Mr Prinne is in another error he saith that all the Fathers write in the name of Iesus every knee shall bow But
Claritatis Meritum Claritas Humilitatis Praemium so Iudiciously Solide Bp Andrewes out of St Augustine on the 17. Chapter of St Iohns Gospell Humility the Merit worthy of honour Honour the reward of Iesus his humility most worthily deseruing are the scope or meaning which the holy Ghost did signify to the Church by this scripture Philip. 2. from the 5th to the 12. verse who this Person is who is the Meritorious Practitioner of humility the Text sayth He is Iesus Christ Philip. 2. 5. The Terminus a Quo whence Iesus began to humble himselfe is his Equality with God in forme or Essence in his owne thought equall to God ver 6. The first descent of his humiliation is his putting of the Glory of his diety He made himselfe of no Reputation answearable to his Maiesty Then hee tooke on him the forme of a servante this is his conception by the holy Ghost Then he was made like vnto men this is his Incarnation Then he was found in shape as a man this is his Nativity Then he humbled himselfe liuing in obedience to poore Parents Then he became obedient vnto the death No sooner was he borne but King Herod sought after his life Matth. 2. No sooner did he preach but his owne Countrimen and kinsmen were offended at him For casting out Deuills he is proclaim'd to be a Coniurer For his Excellency and Maiesty obscurely perceaued he is accused for a Seducer and a Traitor Then he submits to the sentence of the Iudge and he condemn'd him and his owne Nation did crucify him Now behould how Iesus perform'd a Sauing suretiship for vs to God the Iust Iudge We are the transgressors of Gods law and therefore Iesus submitted to die We are the Traitors against the king of Heauen and Iesus was put to death This is Iesus his greatest sauing humility obserue it well whether it be meritorious and so meritorious as to be honoured by all rationall Creatures The Holy Ghost doth testify that Iesus his humility hath deseru'd all honour of Heauen and Earth and Hell Such a desert so well deseruing must needes inferre a large reward And what is that God hath highly exalted him and giuen him a name aboue every name that at the name of Iesus euery knee shall bow of things in Heauen of things in the earth and of things vnder the Earth And that all tongues shall confesse that Iesus is the Lord. I will repeate Arch-BP Whitguifts words These One reason that mooved Christians in the beginning rather to bow at the name of Iesus than at any other name of God was because this name was hated and most contemned of the wicked Iewes and other Persequutors of such as professed the name of Iesus For other names of God they had in reverence but this name they could not abide Wherefore the Christians to signify their faith in Iesus and theit obedience to him and to confute by open gesture the wicked opinion of the Iewes and other Infidels vsed to doe bodily reverence at all times when they heard the name of Iesus but especially when the Gospell was read which containeth the glad tidings of salvation which is procur'd vnto man by Iesus Christ c. Neither can it be against Christianity to shew bodily reueverence c. These are the words of Orthodox Dr Whitguift the most Reuerend Arch-BP of Canterbury in his Answeare to Mr Thomas Cartwright in the defence of the Answeare to the Admonition pag. 742. 'T is merit why Iesus is the name aboue euery name of God not to adde an higher degree to Gods essence or to his eslentiall glory but to make it manifestly knowne in which name God wil be most gloryfied by his Triumphant and Militant Church and by his Enemies taken captiue and made the Perpetuall Prisoners of Hell Vpon S. Matth. 11. ver 27. on these words No man hath seene the father but the sonne c. S. Ambrose writes thus Plus dix it defilio quam de Patre non quod plus habet quam habet Pater sed quod ne minus esse videatur lib. 2. de spititu Sancto cap. 12. There the text sayth more of the Sonne than of the Father not because the Sonne hath more Authority than the Father but because the sonne should not seeme to be inferiour to the Father At Philip. 2. Merit is cause why Iesus is the greatest name of God propos'd to vs to worship And the reason is very infallible For seeing that God only in the name of Iesus would humble himselfe and suffer shame and rebuke therefore in the same name he is and wil be to the worlds end most of all magnified He wil be more magnified in his name Iesus than in any other Title For no other name of his but Iesus suffered shame reproofe death and Hell Swearing dishonours God Idolatry more but God hanged on a tree this is the great curse the most shamfull dishonouring of Iesus Yet thus Iesus redeemed vs from the curse of the law Gal. 3. 13. He was crucified in the flesh 2. Cor. 13 verse 4. Iesus was slaine and hang'd on the Tree Actes 5. 30. Still 't is merit why Iesus is exalted why his name is aboue every name God hath then rewarded Iesus and he requires our duty to bow at his name and so acknowledg that his name Iesus is aboue euery name that he hath God hath rewarded Iesus freely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God hath freely giuen him his name Iesus to be the name aboue euery name He being dead in body God rais'd him from death He did not suffer his holy one to see corruption When the humanity could not helpe it selfe then God did and rais'd Iesus to honour There is the gift aboue every gift Iesus his hands were enabled to receaue the gift was put into his hands and he hath honour so freely giuen him aboue all honour Accepit vt homo quod habebat vt deus His Manhood did receaue and his Godhead did conferre the gift I adde his humbled Godhead did receaue his manifested greatest Exaltation When Iesus his humanity was dead the high Exaltation was a gift and because Iesus did lay downe his life the Exaltation is also a reward Gratia vnionis because Iesus is the most Excellent Person that died therefore hee was rewarded with transcendent honour thus Iesus is the Exalted name aboue every name In this name Iesus are ioyn'd togeather Gods glory and our safety therefore God estemes of his name Iesus aboue all other his names so B. Andrewes Iesus is Gods only most deseruing name and then by proportion of Iustice Iesus is his only name aboue euery name God made choyce of this name aboue all his names that we might accordingly esteeme of him that esteem'd it aboue all only for our sakes This is the only name by which we are saued Act. 4. 12. The learned and Right Reuerend B. Andrewes sayth very remarkeably and solidly that the name of Iesus is
of more worth to vs than the very name of God For God in him reconcileth the world 2. Cor. 5. 19. without Iesus God is the Enemy to the world and to vs. With Iesus there is comfort in the name of God without Iesus there is none at all Iesus is the name that helpes vs out of sinne and misery For Iesus is God and Man so he is our Sauiour our Allmighty and most mercifull Iesus A last note that bowing at the name of Iesus is a duty of the text and that we must bow in time of divine service is Philip 2. 10. 11. For then we must bow when our tongues ought to confesse that Iesus is the Lord. Every knee shall bow and every tongue shall confesse that Iesus is the Lord. These must goe vnseparably togeather so Mr Prinne And when must wee confesse that Iesus is the Lord Not till the last day No Christian dares say That 't is true For we must confesse that Iesus is the Lord in time of divine service At the generall confession of our sinnes we doe actually confesse that Iesus is the Lord and then we bow At rehearsing the Apostles Creede we stand and bow at the name of Iesus our Lord who was conceiued by the Holy Ghost c. At the second Lesson though we sitt yet we bow At the Gospell we bow standing The glorified bodies must bow at the last day The regenerate bodies must bow in the time of Grace For Grace doth owe her knees to Iesus And her knees are not in her heart but thereby gouern'd Hence it is that good Christians doe bow at the name of Iesus testifying thereby that Iesus is the Lord that died the death of the Crosse to saue sinners And therefore with retribution of hearty thankes for that supervaluable benefit we praise Iesus the exalted with heart and knee at once And the Lord Iesus giue vs grace ever to bow such safety therein that we neuer be hindred by Puritan or Papist Now obserue whether Mr Prinne doth come nigh the meaning of Philip 2. 9. 10. 11. verses as they haue reverēce to the 5. 6. 7. 8 that 't is not the meaning of the text that our knees shall bow at the name of Iesus in time of divine service seeing he doth not vse these argumēts 1. Because Iesus did not deserue this honour of bowing 2. That God did not giue Iesus this honour being dead 3. That God hath not commanded vs to bow at the name of Iesus although Iesus hath deserued more then knee-honour 4. That Iesus did not deserue so vniversally for every member of our bodies that the knee must giue him honour 5. That Iesus was not the only vilified name of the Lord. 6. That there ought to be no bowing at the name of Iesus in the time of Grace but only in the time of Glory This he would make his friends belieue but therin he hath deceiu'd them 7. That the time of of bowing is vtterly separated from the time of the tongues confessing that Iesus is the Lord if the time be the time of the practise of grace in the Temple Hence I pray you obserue that Mr Prinne hath corrupted the text with false and by-suppositions that he hath secretly wounded his private friends and encouraged others to be obstinate Schismatiques But will not the Gentl. vnderstand Must ignorance and presumption prescribe to establish'd doctrine and discipline I pray to Iesus that that day may never be Away with imperious Puritanisme and behold his arguments exactly confuted Objection Iesus is not the name aboue every name vnderstood at Philip. 2. 10. For the name aboue every name was giuen to Iesus after the exaltation But Iesus this name was giuen by God the Father vnto Christ before his natiuity or conception Matth. 1. 21. 25. Luc. 2. 21. Solution Iesus his name was giuen him twise once till death afterwards for euer first as a note of entring into covenant with God the iust Iudge to fullfill the law for vs to die for our sinnes secondly as a note of so Meritorious a person more rewarded more exalted then any person euer hath or shall be magnified First Iesus was the humble name of the only deserving Grace Now Iesus is the exalted name of transcendent Glory The Iewes did crucifie Iesus and his name and the Apostles did then distrust whether Iesus was the true Iesus Luc. 24. 21. All the Disciples did forsake him they did fly from him Matth 26. 56. St Peter did curse and sweare that he did not knowe him v. 74. And was not this a death of Iesus his name which before was admired among the people Matth 4 24. But behold God hath raised this same Iesus from death his day of resurrection is his glorious Birthday Psal 2. 7. Because Iesus was crucified to saue sinners therefore God hath highly exalted him and giuen him his name Iesus againe Although his name was dash'd out with the shamelesse scornes of the High Priests and people of the Iewes Yet God hath giuen Iesus the same name with letters of the greatest honour therefore at the name of Iesus every knee shall bow Here are two reasons why Iesus his name was giuen him twise The former that he should be our Iustifying Sanctifying and saving Surety thus those texts signifie Matth. 1. 21. 25. Luc. 2. 21. The latter that he shal be acknowledged to be our Exalted Lord the King of Kings Because God hath thus rewarded his most deseruing humility Therefore at Philip. 2. 9. 10. 11. we read that his name Iesus is aboue every name Note then that Master Prinne hath not disputed according to the time of giuing Iesus his name at Philip. 2. which is the time of Iesus his Exaltation but according to the time of Iesus his humility which is at Matt. 1. c. There is not a Father but he doth teach that Iesus is exalted and that therefore hee is exalted because hee died the death of the crosse See the 318. Bishops of the Councell of Nice against Arius and the 200. Bishops of the Councell of Ephesus against Nestorius Dominus noster Iesus Christus est in gloria Patris licet Arianis id ipsum non videatur Caro per verbum Dei glorificata est Factus est homo vt nos in seipso Deificaret Athanasius in his Epistle to Adelphius his Brother Contra Arianos pag. 69. The 5. 6. 7. 8. verses of Philip. 2. speake of Iesus his humility but the 9. 10. 11. speake of his glory that his humanity is exalted that it did receaue the All glorious reward of Iesus his deity being a cause of his Exaltation Athanasius Orat. 2ª contra Arianos pag. 100. 101. 102. In the time of his humility he was taken to be nothing els but a man but now hee is acknowledged to be God ouer all things blessed for euer Rom. 9. This is St Ambrose note on the Text. The Iewes dishonour'd him as he was the Sonne of
not to the sound or syllables of his name Solution This Argument is Mr Prinnes 2 Argument at the first Question and the 4 in the last Question And let Mr Prinne learne that bowing at the name of Iesus hath relation to a sacred Ordinance and this is diuine seruice then only we bow and relation to a religious duty which is the Hearts worshipping of Iesus the inward bowing and relation immediately to the Person of Iesus for he is the Immediate finis cui the exalted Lord for whose Honours sake we bow Independent relation what learned word is that Independent Master Prinne saith that bowing at the name of Iesus hath immediate Independent relation to the very person of Christ Relation is a mutuall dependence if it be essentiall and bowing at the name of Iesus is dependent on the very Person of Iesus there it rests as in its Center or Personal End 2 Assertion The arguments which are produced to proue it to be a necessary or laudable ceremonie doe directly proue it to be no ceremonie but a divine worship or Adoration peculiar vnto Christ as God Objection 1. Bishop Andrewes Doctor Boyes Master Adams and Master Widdowes c. haue disputed the very letters and syllables of Philip. 2. 10 to proue bowing at the name of Iesus to be a necessary or laudable ceremony but this argument proues it to be a duty incident to the very name and Person of Iesus therefore 't is no naked arbitrary Ceremony Solution Here obserue that Master Prinne hath contradicted the diuision of his first argument at the first Question For there Bishop Andrewes and Master Adams are the Teachers as he saith that bowing at the name of Iesus is a duty of the text and here againe He sayth that Doctor Boyes and Master Widdowes doe teach that bowing at the name of Iesus is an indifferent harmelesse Ceremony Quo teneam vultum mutantem Protea Nodo In my first answeare there is Bishop Andrewes M. Adams c. Tenet which Master Prinne did falsify And there is Dr Boyes and Giles Widdowes c. assertion all opposite to the intruding Diuine But see a contradiction in this argument D. r Boyes c. proue bowing at the name of Iesus to be a necessary or laudable ceremony so Master Prinne but they hold that 't is a naked arbitrary ceremony so Master Prinne As if necessary were not opposite to indifferent and laudable were not more excellent than a bare Arbitrary ceremony Obiection 2 This bowing at the name of Iesus is to the person of Christ therefore t is not idolatry to bow at the name of Iesus From this argument Mr Prinne concluds that the bowing at the name of Iesus is no bare arbitrary ceremony because t is done to the person of Christ Solution And I say that 't is no arbitrary ceremony because 't is expresse Scripture so say all Orthodoxe divines B. Andrewes Dr Boyes Mr Adams Zanchius c. And therefore t is a necessary ceremony commanded by God himselfe and for Puritanicall contempt which now despiseth this ceremony our Church hath ordained the 18th Canon to reforme the wilfull and ignorant Obiection 3. This is a forg'd reason why Christians bow at the name of Iesus This To iustify testify and proclaime the deity of Christ against Arians Iewes and Infidells that deny it No ancient Father euer said that this is true nor Councell c. Solution Here Mr Prinne doth accuse Zanchius Mr Hooker and Dr Boyes of forgery But hee is very grossely mistaken though he hath disputed this argument before at the first question and first argument For Athanasius contra Arianos orat 2. and in his Epistle to his brother Adelphius doth teach that wee must bow to testify that Iesus is God The councell of Ephesus consisting of 200 Fathers saith the same against Nestorius Athanasius answereth the Arians that disputed that Iesus is not God because he died the death of the crosse Phil. 2. 8. Thus That Iesus was put to death in the flesh and the humanity exalted now he must be honoured with this honour At the name of Iesus every knee shall bow Nunc in posteris for euer The Fathers before quoted say the same Againe there is not the same reason why wee should bow at the name of the Holy Ghost though Heretiques haue denied that he is God as there is why we should bow at the name of Iesus for the text saith because Iesus died the death of the Crosse therefore every knee shall bow so Iesus was really more really despised then the Holy Ghost and a long time before Macedonius was an Heretique And why we bow at the name Iesus rather then at any other of his names T is answered at the 3 argument of the 2 question Objection 4. This reason of justifying testifying and proclaiming the deity of Iesus against the Arians c. ceaseth to be a reason because none doe openly deny the deity of Iesus as these Arians Solution The Turkes deny Iesus to be God so doe the Iewes who are not converted and other infidells divillish Apostats And the Puritans are no friends to Iesus differ not much from Arians and Nestorians in expounding of this text His name Iesus was not aboue every name with these neither is it the highest name with them Iesus was most disgraced in this name Iesus but what is that to Puritans they will worship him nothing the more for that So then there is cause and shall be cause why we must maintaine bowing to the Worlds end When Iesus shall come to iudgement shall he find all faithfull that are then aliue Obiection 5. If this bowing be so great as that every knee must bow then this bowing is the greatest of bowings then 't is a divine worship proper to Christ then 't is no humane Constitution which man can prescribe then 't is no arbitrary ceremony Solution This bowing is so great as the Text saith all knees shall bow at the name of Iesus And in a divine manner with reference to Iesus both God and man all knees at divine service doe bow The bowers at Iesus his name doe loue him aboue all things accordingly they doe bow at his name Thus this bowing is aboue all other bowings This is a bowing proper to God in mans nature first vilified now exalted and t is only due to Iesus as hee is exalted King of Kings and Lord of Lords It is beyond the spheare of man to be the author of this adoration but the Church hath power to reforme the neglect of this bowing at the name of Iesus Hence the Church hath instituted the 18 Canon to that purpose Obiection 6. This bowing at the name of Iesus is not arbitrary for many are vrged to vse it others are questioned for oppugning and censur'd But Mr Hooker Dr Fulke and Mr Willet say that this Ceremony is arbitrary Solution Master Hooker sayth that bowing at the name of Iesus is harmlesse He vseth not the
words arbitrary ceremony D. Fulke doth commend it and misliketh the superstition at the name Iesus Yet neither he not Doctor Willet speake so fully to this bowing as they might haue done But I tell you and not I but Orthodoxe Bishop Andrewes that bowing at the name of Iesus is a necessary ceremony They that say that this bowing is arbitrary in actu elicito as a thing to be thought by any man for indifferent are to be Questioned and Censur'd for Church Rebelles But questionles 't is arbitrary actu imperato It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to the Church to will and command this bowing at the name of Iesus 3 Assertion Bowing at the name of Iesus is not an harmelesse ceremony Obiection 1. T Is no harmelesse ceremony For it occasions much Idolatry in Papists and ignorant Protestants The Papists doe adore this name Iesus as they doe their Images Altars Hoasts Crosses and Crucifixes Ignorant Protestants doe worship the very naked name Iesus or else Ioshua Iustus or the sonne of Sirach and the Identity of the word Iesus deceaues the ignorant Protestant Solution Gods blessings doe occasion some men to bee couetous And therefore king David Prayed to the Lord thus Incline not my heart to couetousnesse Psal 119. Ioseph the Lords chosen servant occasioned his Brethren to sell him to the Ishmaelites Gen. 28. What then Should neither Gods blessing nor Ioseph be because evill men did abuse them This is strange doctrine Iesus his name occasions idolatry that is your Scandalum acceptum your peevish conceipt Must Iesus his name then bee had in no honour Must not the knee bow I deny that Prohibition Doe ignorant Protestants bow at the bare name Iesus Then they must be thus instructed that they bow ever hereafter in token that Iesus being despised by Iew and Gentile is Iesus exalted and acknowledged by our Church to be the King of Heauen and Earth Doe ignorant Protestants bow at the name of Iesus who is either Ioshua or Iustus or Iesus the sonne of Sirach I thinke in charity that no Protestant is so ignorant as to bow at the name of Iesus the sonne of Sirach For he is in the Apocrypha But who ever did heare of any man that bowed at the name of Iesus in the old Testament or Apochrypha And did any man bow at the name of Iesus who is Ioshuah at reading the new Testament or at the name of Iesus who is called Iustus Then let him learne these notes Iesus who is Ioshua is only at Act 7. 45. and at Heb 4. 8. And Iesus which is Iustus is read only at Coloss 4. 11. The 2 former scriptures are not so plaine as the last to know the Iesus there signified But remember that I haue put you and your Brethren in minde where you must forbeare to bow at the name of Iesus Doe Papists committ Idolatry with their Images Altars Crosses and Crucifixes This is Indirect Idolatry so much I haue obseru'd out of Bellarmines indirect worship of Images Direct Idolatry is a sinne against this law Thou shalt haue none other Gods but me To bow downe before Images Crucifixes c is a sinne against the second commandement For therein God hath forbidden such worship God wil be worshipped according to his owne methode and rule in spirit and truth Ioh 4. thus according to his owne Methode which is the methode of Grace and no otherwise he wil be worshipped therefore mans presuming worship must not be practised But the adoration of the Hoast is Idolatry 't is a giuing of the honour of the Creator vnto the Creature And Transubstantiation is a grosse sinne By a Popish conceipt it is a Confusion of Iesus his glory more Tyrannicall than the pulling of Iesus his skinne ouer his eares For Transubstantiation in termiuo a Quo is a seperation of Iesus his All-glorious Essence from his most glorious Inseperable Accidents And in termino ad quem 't is a confining Iesus vnder the superficies of an inches length and bredth or thereabouts in their sacrament with more than a 1000 parricular contradictions This is much like Master Prinns separating the name Iesus from the signified Iesus as if the name Iesus had no signification no sense because a Perverse Humorist thinks so ignorantly of vnlearned Protestants as if they did bow to the fiue letters Obiection 2. T is no harmlesse ceremony For it occasioneth much palpable superstition by bowing at the name of Iesus only and not at the name of God the Father God the Holy Ghost God Emmanuel Lord Iehouah Sauiour Sonne of God Lamb of God Christ Mediator c. All being Glorious Reuerend Holy Great c. Names deseruing as much Bowing as the name Iesus doth Solution This superstitious Argument is disputed in many arguments before at handling the scope of the text and there t is answeared that Iesus is in Essence and Power all these But here is so much repeating of the same thing as if Master Prinne were in loue with superstitious Tautology If that first Moue able be in his mouth his tongue can neuer stand still And why then is Iesus so much magnified Because Iesus exinanivit se did put of himselfe c. and God the Father is so well pleased herein that he hath made this bowing and this confession to be his Glory and Greatest delight Obiection 3. T is no harmlesse ceremony for it makes a disparity in the sacred Persons who are coeternall and coequall For the Sonne is aduanced aboue them Because his name Iesus is more honoured than theirs Solution This Argument is disputed before Master Prinne is a fraide of the text But was either the Father or the Holy Ghost so basely vsed as he Will He euer be talking and yet neuer speake to the Purpose Tell me what is the reason why Iesus is exalted and so much exalted that at the name of Iesus euery knee shall bow If He will be tongue tied now I will tell him the reason and I would to God that hee would vnderstand the text which sayth Because Iesus was so humble as that he died the death of the Crosse that cursed death Yet He will not Bow Why Truely then he should dishonour the Father the Holy Ghost yet the Father and the Holy Ghost are so willing that Iesus should be honoured with hat knee and heart that they teach and command that as Iesus was vilified with the knee for the Iewes bowed the knee and mocked him Matth. 27. 29. so the Church therefore must honour him with the knee and bow to their Almighty King Iesus Our Sauiour saith that He is in the Father and that the Father is in him and and therefore he tould Philip Ioh 14. 9 10. That He that had seene him had seene the Father also The three Persons are but one God in substance thus there is no disparity no superaduancing For the same Substance is Father Sonne and Holy Ghost who is thus reuerenced worshipped
honoured St Aug in his 14. lib. de Trinitate as I remember calls the three Persons Relatiuam naturam Gods relatiue nature St Hierome in his exposition of the Creede calls the three Persons tres proprietates three relatiue properties of God And t is graunted by Protestant Papist and Puritan that the three persons are not three substances but three Relatiue Modalities of one and the same Infinite and most Mercifull God And because in the Relation of a sonne he did humble himselfe to performe all and the extremest obedience for vs what shall hinder him to require our thankefull and most humble heart and knee-obedience cheifely to magnify his deity and humanity in the name of Iesus God made this Person lower then the Angells to Crowne him with glory and worship so the Psalmist Obiection 4. 'T is no harmelesse ceremony for this preferrs one name of Christs before another Solution 'T is true and yet this is not an vnlawfull disparity as 't is disputed in the 3 argument For Iesus is the name aboue every name The 3. Argument of the 2 Question doth not proue the contrary nor the Argument of Souereignty repeated 6 times in the 3. Question This reason of S. Paule must still be true because Iesus was so humble as that hee died the death of the Crosse therefore Iesus is thus exalted that at the name of Iesus c. Obiection 5. 'T is no harmeles Ceremony For this attributes more honour and dignitie to the Naked name than to the Person of Iesus Solution This argument is part of the first in this Assertion 't is the 2. of the 2. Assertion t is a fourth at the Metaphoricall sence 't is a part of the 2. argument of the 1 Question in Master Prinnes Appendix 't is at the 6 argument of the 3 Question and now 't is fiftly And t is not true that our Church doth Bow at the name Iesus and not to his person as it is answered already Obiection 6. 'T is no harmlesse Ceremony For to bow at the name of Iesus is to take Gods name in vaine For many doe ignorantly carelesly customarily and superficially for the most part cap and Bow without reverence c. of Iesus his person Solution Some then sinne against Iesus Ignorantly they doe worship only the fiue letters Therefore Master Prinne will not Bow the knee He will oppose his Mother the Church and his nourse the Vniversitie and which is worst of all the holy Ghost the teacher of all truth Here is a case worse then the worst case in Law and it must not goe on his side For the Evidence is plaine that our Church doth not take Gods name in vaine by bowing at the name of Iesus The Ascension-day is the appoynted time when our Church doth solemnely celebrate this part of the Apostles Creede Iesus ascended into Heauen Then publiquely and religiously wee teach with bended knees that Iesus is the Lord. And is this to take Gods name in vaine 8th Psalm ver 1. our Church affirmeth that Iesus is our Lord and Gouernour At the 2. ver that He is omnipotent in ordaining strength out of the mouth of Babes and sucklings for to still the Enemy and the Avenger In the 3 that He is our Creator I will consider the Heauens the workes of thy fingers c. At the 4 vers That He is the most mercifull God mindfull of vs in that he came to visit vs by Incarnation At 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. verses there is the exaltation the Crowning of him with glory and great worship The acknowledging that Iesus hath the Dominion of the workes of Gods hands That all things are put in subiection vnder his feete At the 15. Psalm we read in the Audience of all the Congregation that only he is the Deseruing Person to dwell in Heauen At Psal 21. That Iesus is our King our sauing King our Crowned King our Immortall King Invincible Victorious King At the 24. Psal That Iesus is our Triumphant King the King of Glory the Lord strong and mighty in Battell The Lord of Hosts the King of Glory At Psal 48 108. there our Church doth aboundantly reioyce in him our Powerfull and mercifull God The Chapters the Epistle and Gospell and the Collect for the Ascension-day are infallible rules that our Church doth not take the name of God in vaine but hath appoynted the services in and to the honour of our God and Saviour Iesus 4. Assertion Bowing at the name of Iesus is no orderly and Decent Ceremony Obiection 1. T is noe orderly and decent Ceremony For it confounds one duty with an other viz praying with Bowing Reading and bowing hearing and Bowing For many duties cannot be done togeather without Confusion Solution To rise vp from praying on the knee to Bow is a needles suppose for that Bowing at prayer is the greater Bowing at the name of Iesus for that doth invoke the Lord Iesus this doth but testifie that Iesus is the Lord. But to read and bow these are coordinate duties and so are to heare and bow one doth not confound the other for they are yoake-fellowes fellow-labowrers they doe enioy one the other in an vnanimous Concurrence A man doth heare and goe at the same time so he doth see and goe speake and goe read and goe A man doth heare and stand and then why not heare and bow Coordinate duties although they be many are all done togeather without confusion At the same time a man doth see with the eie heare with the eare tast smel handle without confusion every Coordinate Organ is able to exercise its office At the same time many subordinate duties may be done The first moueable doth moue all other spheares and they all doe moue from East to West in 24. howres So the heart serving God doth incline and agitate all inferiour parts to praise the Lord so that the knee doth bow and the tongue doth confesse that Iesus is the Lord both serue the Lord thus togeather Obiection 2. T is no orderly and decent Ceremony For this disturbs men in their devotion For devotion and bowing are severall distinct actions and they both require the whole Inward and outward man at once Therefore to bow and to be devout togeather destroy the Hoc agere the seriousnes which ought to be severall in devotion and Bowing because no man can serue two masters Solution The Inward man is the guide and Gouernour of the outward man in the state and in the able parctise of Grace He then is no regenerate man in whom there is so much contrariety as that his soule and his body agree not to worship the Lord Iesus If Puritans consist of such sullen oppositions their waies are confusion and their Hoc agere is nihil agere If their hearts and eares and knees be such great strangers as that when to pray fervently to heare attentiuely be at Church then to bow reverently is separated from hearing and praying and left
at home the outward man is not subordinate to the inward the soule and bodie are contraries Are bowing and devotion distinct actions cannot they agree togeather This bowing is externall adoratiō and so it depends on and necessarily is subordinate to vnto inward devotion They cannot be separated distinctly for devotion is in bowing and exercising and bending the knee What is that which doth essentially virtually and effectually read pray and bow but faith radically in the heart and the same faith manifested in the tongue speaking and in the knee Bowing And then what great difference what distinction haue the inward and outward actions but a Primarily for the inward action in the heart belieuing and a Secondarily for the outward action in the tongues expression and in the knees orderly and decent signification that Iesus is the Lord at whose name every knee c. The members of mans body serue to helpe one another in their seuerall actions The head cannot say to the feete I haue no neede of you nor can the feete say to the head I haue no neede of thee c. 1. Cor. 12. In the hoc agere in the most serious worke they helpe one another Therefore the heart in devotion and the knee in subiection must not be spared at bowing at the name of Iesus a true and divine seruice Here is no seruing of two Masters but of one For Iesus is the fame yeasterday to day and ever Heb. 13. 8. But yet so ignorant Mr Prinne is that he knowes not the difference betweene subordination and contrary opposition Master Prinnes opinion is that Bowing at the name of Iesus is a meere Popish Invention to Iustify the worshipping of Images Crosses Crucifixes Hoasts Reliques and Idolized Altars This he saith is a practise much in vse of late among some Romanizing Protestants yet he hopes that shame may turne the hearts of the zealous Teachers of bowing at the name of Iesus and Altar-Geniculations that they will forbeare thus to bow till they can produce better Authority then yet they haue alleaged Reply And what better profe then the Text that wee must bow at the name of Iesus God commands this bowing Thus. 1 All knees commanded to bow at the name of Iesus must bow at the name of Iesus The Churches knees are commanded to bow at the name of Iesus Therefore the Churches knees must bow at the name of Iesus The maior is a divine axiome so worthy for truth that all Christians must belieue it The minor is the Text. Thus All knees are commanded to bow at the name of Iesus and the Churches knees are included in all knees True saith Mr Prinne at the last day all knees shall bow but our knees must not bow at time of Divine service which I refell Thus A time to bow is the time of Grace Thus 2 The time of Grace to confesse that Iesus is the Lord is the Militant Churches time to Bow at the name of Iesus The time of Divine service is the time of grace to confesse that Iesus is the Lord. Therefore the time of Divine service is the Militant Churches time to bow as the name of Iesus The Maior and Minor propositions are diuine axiomes And Master Prinne saith that then is the time of bowing when the tongue must confesse that Iesus is the Lord. 3 Argument From the end of bowing To testify that Iesus is the Lord is lawfull and necessary at time of divine seruice To bow at the name of Iesus is to testify that Iesus is the Lord so the 18th Canon Therefore to bow at the name of Iesus is lawfull and necessary at time of diuine seruice 4 Argument From the latitude of our duty All Religious Church-honour is to be giuen to Iesus in time of divine seruice Bowing at the name of Iesus is religious Church-honour Therefore bowing at the name of Iesus is to be giuen to Iesus in time of diuine seruice It is adoration so the Fathers and Master Prinne at his compares 5 Argument From the intent of St Paules exhortation To be humble is necessary at time of divine seruice To bow at the name of Iesus is to be humble Therefore to bow at the name of Iesus is necessary at time of diuine seruice St Paule teacheth humility at the 5th verse 6 Argument Is a demonstration 1 There is the cause Iesus by dying deseru'd bowing of the knee at his name 2 There is the effect which is bowing the knee 3 There is the subiect which is the Church Thus Where Iesus deseru'd by his death bowing of the knee at the name of Iesus there must be bowing of the knee at the name of Iesus In the Church Iesus deserued by his death that there should be bowing of the knee at the name of Iesus Therefore in the Church there must be bowing the knee at the name of Iesus But is not the death of Iesus worthy of knee-honour Heard-hearted Blasphemy 7 Argument From Gods gift Whatsoeuer God hath giuen to Iesus we acknowledge to be due vnto him To bow at the name of Iesus in time of diuine seruice God hath giuen Iesus Therefore to bow at the name of Iesus in time of diuine seruice wee must acknowledge to be due to him The Minor is true For God hath giuen Iesus all Power and therefore the Church must honour Iesus with internall and externall honour 8 Argument From the proportion of Iesus his merit Iesus deserued grace for the whole man therefore grace in euery part of man must serue Iesus therefore the regenerates mans knee must bow to Iesus in the time of grace 9 Argument This proposition is true of corporall and spirituall knees At the name of Iesus every knee shall bow therefore Iesus is the name at which the Churches knees must bow And now you may know evidently that Iesus is the name at which euery knee must bow whether they be knees of the regenerate or of the glorified And let Master Prinne be ashamed of his fighting against Iesus and his Church This is his folly he hath dishonoured Iesus and so the king the Vice-Gerent of the Lord Iesus And is he not affrayde Concerning the Turning of Communion-Tables into Altars That is contrary to the Scripture Mar. 14. 18. Luc 22. 21. But why should not we bow towards the Holy Communion-Table though it be neither scripture nor canon to bind vs thus to bow yet an orderly decent ceremony may and ought to be admitted into the Church so our Church teacheth There is sufficient reason why we should bow towards or at the Holy Comunion-table For we must bow at his Maiesties Chaire of State this is a knowne truth and the King is Iesus his Deputie in his Dominions The Chaire of State of the Lord Iesus his cheifest place of presence in our Church is the Holy Communion-table and therfore we may bow thereat without Idolatry to testify thereby the honour that belongs to the Almighty King Seeing Iesus is the