Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
death_n	die_v	king_n	year_n	13,736	5	5.1327	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A46779	Severall papers lately vvritten and published by Iudge Ienkins, prisoner in the Tower viz. 1. His vindication. 2. The armies indempnity [sic]: with a declaration, shewing, how every subject ought to be tryed for treasons, felonies, and all other capitall crimes. 3. Lex terræ. 4. A cordiall for the good people of London. 5. A discourse touching the incoveniences of a long continued Parliament. 6. An apologie for the army.; Severall papers lately written and published by Judge Jenkins, prisoner in the Tower.	Jenkins, David, 1582-1663.	1647 (1647)	Wing J608; ESTC R217036	64,480	98

said King to allow them in the seventeenth of King Iohn the said Liberties were by King Iohn allowed and by his son Hen. the third after in the ninth yeere of his Reigne confirmed and are called Magna Charta and Charta de Foresta declared foure hundred twenty two yeeres sithhence by the said Charters Now rests to be considered after the Subjects had obtained their Rights and Liberties which w●n● no other then their ancient Customes and the fundamentall Rights of the King as Soveraigne are no other How the Rights of Soveraignty continued in practise from Henry the thirds time untill this present Par●●ament of the third of November 1640. for before Henry the thirds time the Soveraignty had a very full Power Rex habet Potestatem jurisdictionem super omnes qui in Regnosuo sunt ea quae sunt jurisdictionis Pacis ad nullum pertinent nisi ad Regiam dignitatem ●reacton temps H. 3. lib. 4. cap. 24. Sect 1 habet etiam coeroionem ut Delinquentes puniat coerceat This proves where the supreame Power is A Delinquent is hee who adheres to the Kings Enemies Com Sur. Littl. 261. This shewes who are Delinquents Omnis sub Rege ipse sub nullo nisi tuntum Deo non est inferior sibi Subjectis Sect 5 Bractabid non parem habet in Regnosuo This shewes where the supreame power is Rex non habet superiorem nisi Deum satis habet ad poenam quod Deum expectat ultorem Bracton lib. 5. tract 3. de de saltis Cap. 3. Bracton Lib 3. Cap. 7. This shewes where the suprerme power i● Treasons Fellonies and other Pleas of the Crowne are propri● causa Regis This shewes the same power By these passages it doth appeare what the Custome was for the power of Soveraignty before that time the power of the Militia of coyning of Money of making Leagues with forreigne Princes the power of Pardoning of making of Officers c. All Kings had them the said Powers have no beginning Sexto Ed 1. Comsur Littl. 85. Liege Homage every Subject owes to the King viz Faith de Membre Ewd. 1. de vita de terren● Honore the forme of the Oath inter vetera statuta is set down We read of no such or any Homage made to the two Houses but frequently of such made by them It is declared by the Prelates Earles Barrons and Commonalty of the Realm that it belongeth to the King and his Royall Segniory 7. Ed. 1. statuts at large●●l 42. straitly to defend force of Armour and all other force against the Kings peace at all times when it shall please him and to punish them that shall doe contrary according to the Law and Usage of the Realme and hereunto they are bound to ayde their Soveraigne Lord at all seasons when need shall be Here the supreame power in the time of Parliament by both Houses is declared to belong to the King At the beginning of every Parliament all Armes are or ought to be forbidden to be born in London 7. Ed. 2.4 pars instit 14. 1 Ed. 2. de Militibus Westminster or the Subburbs This condemnes the multitudes comming to Westminster and the Guards of armed men All who held by Knights-service and had twenty pounds per 〈◊〉 were distraynable ad Arma militaria suscipienda This agrees with the Records of ancient time continued cer●●●ntly in all Kings times but at this Parliament 3. November 1640. The King out of his grace discharged this duty which proves that the power of warre and preparation thereto belongs not to the two houses but only to the King The two Spencers in Ed. 2. Ed 3. Calvins Case Cook l. 7. fol. 1 time hatched to cover their Treason this damnable and damned opinion viz. That Ligeance was more by reason of the Kings politique capacity then of his person upon which they inferred these execrable and detestable consequences First if the King demeaned not himselfe by reason in the right of his Crown his Lieges are bound by Oath to remove him Secondly seeing the King could not be removed by suit of Law it was to be done by force Thirdly that his Lieges be bound to govern in default of him All which tenets were condemned by two Parliaments the one called exilium Hugonis in Ed. 2. time the other by 1. Ed. 3. cap. 2. All which Articles against the Spencers are confirmed by this last Statute the Articles are extant in the booke called vetera Statuta The separation of the Kings person from his power is the principall Article condemned and yet all these three damnable detestable and execrable consequents are the grounds whereupon this present time relies and the principles whereupon the two Houses found their Cause The Villeine of a Lord in the presence of the King Plowdon com 322 27. ass pl. 49. 33 Ed. 3● ayde der●y 103 Fitz. 10 H. 7 16. cannot be seized for the presence of the King is a protection for that time to him This shewes what reverence the Law gives to the person of a King Reges sacro oleo uncti sunt capaces spirituallis jurisdictionis But the two Houses were never held capable of that power Rex est persona mixta cum sacerdote habet Ecclesiasticam spititualem jurisdictionem This shewes the Kings power in Ecclesiasticall Canses The lands of the King is caled in Law Patromonium sacrum Com. Sur Littl Sect 4. 3. Ed. 3. 19 The houses should not have meddled with that sacred Patr●●●●y The King hath no Peere in his land and cannot be judged Ergo the two Houses are not above him The Parliament 15. Ed. 3 was repealed for that it was against the Kings Lawes and prerogative 4 pars instit fol. 52. this shewes cleerely the propositions sent to Newcastle ought not to have been presented to his Majesty for that they are contrary to the Lawes and his Prerogative The Lords and Commons cannot assent in Parliament to any thing that ●ends to the disinherision of the King and his Crowne 4 pars Cookes instit fol. 14 42. E. 3. Parliament Rol. num 7. Lex consuetudo Parliamenti to which they are sworn This condemnes the said Propositions likewise To depose the King to imprison him untill he assent to certaine demands A war to alter the Religion established by Law or any other Law or to remove Councellors to hold a Castle or Fort against the King are offences against that Law declared to be treason by the resolutions herein after mentioned by that Law men are bound to ayd the King when war is levied against him in his Realme 25. Ed. 3. cap. 2. King in this Statute must be intended in his naturall body and person that only can die for to compass his death and declare it by overt Act is declared thereby treason to incounter in fight such as come to ayd the King in his wars is treason Compassing of the

facto but not de jure Ed. 4. c. ● but not de jure as appeares by the Acts of Parliament declaring them so And by all our Law-Bookes and the fundamentall constitution of the Land Regall power is hereditarie and not elective For the words vulgus-elegerit if vulgus be applyed to the House of Commons 1 H. 7. they of themselves can make no Lawes The Peeres were never yet tearmed vulgus but allowing they be so called the Lawes to be made must be just and who is fit to judge thereof is before made evident Customes cannot referre to future time ●5 Ob. and both are conpled Lawes and Customes Princes have beene deposed and may be by the two Houfes go. The deposers were Traytors Sol. as appeares by the resolution of all the Judges of England Coke Chap. Treason in the second part of the Institutes And never was King deposed but in tumultuous and mad times and by the power of Armies and they who were to be the succeeding Kings in the head of them as Edward the third and Henry the fourth The appeale to the Parliament for errors in judgements in all Courts 16 Ob. is frequent go. This is onely to the House of Lords Sol. and that is not the Parliament the House of Commons have nothing to doe therewith and in the House of Peeres if a Writ of Error be brought to reverse any judgement there is first a petition to the King for the allowance thereof and the reason of the Law in this case is for that the Judges of the Land all of them the Kings Councell and twelve Masters of the Chancerie assist there by whose advice erroneous judgements are redressed The Parliaments have determined of the rights of Kings 17 Ob. as in Henry the sixts time and others and Parliaments have bound the succession of Kings as appeares by the Statute of the thirteenth of Q. Elizab. Chapter the first and the discent of the Crowne is guided rather by a Parliamentarie Title then by Common Law go. If this Objection be true Sol. that the Title to the Crowne is by Parliament then we had no Usurpers for they all had Parliaments to back them yea Richard the third that Monster All cur Bookes of Law say they have the Crowne by discent and the Statutes of the Land declare that they have the same by inherent birth-right And the Statute of the thirteenth of Elizabeth the first Chapter was made to secure Q Elizabeth against the Qu. of Sca●● then in the kingdome clayming the Grown of England and having many adherent● 〈…〉 〈…〉 〈…〉 And that Statute to that end a firmes no such power in the two Homfor which is the Question but in Q Elizabeth and the two Houses which makes against the pretence of this time Master Prynne fol. 104. of his booke intituled The Parliaments supreme power c. Objecting the Statute of the first of Queen Elizabeth and his own Oath that the king is the onely supreme Governour of this Realme Answers The Parliament is the supreme power and the king supreme Governour And yet there he allowes him a Negative Voyce and fol. 107. confesseth that Acts of Parliament translated the Crowne from the right Heires at Common-law to others who had no good Title then the Parliamentary Title makes not the king so powerfull in truth that it escapes from a man unawares To make a distinction betweene Supreme Governour and Supreme power is very strange for who can Governe without power The king assembles the Parliament by His Writ adjourns Vide Speed 645.4 par Instit 27. 1. prorogues and dissolves the Parliament by the law at his pleasure as is evident by constant practise the House of Commons never sate after an adjournment of the Parliament by the kings command Where is the supreme Power The king by his Oath 1●● Ob. is bound to deny no man right much lesse the Parliament to agree to all just and necessary lawes proposed by them to the king This is the substance of the discourse against the kings Negative Voyce The king is so bound as is set downe in the Objection but who shall judge whether the Bill proposed be just and necessary Sol. For all that they doe propose are so pretended and carried in either House sometimes by one or two Voyces or some few as aforesaid and certainly as hath been shewn the king his Councell of State his Judges Sargeants Attorney Sollicitor and twelve Masters of the Chatcery can better judge of them then two or three or few more Mr. Pryn fol. 45. In his book of the Parliaments interest to nominate Privie-Councellors calleth the opinion of the Spencers to divide the Person of the King from his Crowne a strange opinion Calvins case 7. pars fol. 11. and cites Calvins Case but leaves out the conclusions there in mentioned fol. 15. Master Prynne saith there But let this opinion bee what it will without the Kings Grace and Pardon it will goe very far and two Acts of Parliament there mentioned are beyond an opinion And in his Book of the opening of the Great Scale fol. 17. The Parliament hath no jurisdiction to use the Great Seale for Pardons Generall or Particular Where is the Supreme power Mr. ●9 Ob. Prynnes opening of the Seale pag. 19. saith The Noblemen and State the day after the Funerall of King Henry the third King Edward the first his sonne being in the Holy Land made a new Great Seale and Keepers of the same And in Henry the sixts time in the first yeere of his Reigne the like was done in Parliament A facto Sol. ad jus is no good Argument for that in Edward the firsts time it was no Parliament for King Henry the 3. was dead which dissolved the Parliament if called in his time and it could be no Parliament of Edward the firsts time for no Writ issued to summon a Parliament in his Name nor could issue but under that New Seale it was so sodainly done after Henry the thirds death King Edward the first being then in the Holy Land it was the first yeere of his Reign and no Parliament was held that yeere nor the second yeere of his Reigne The first Parliament that was in his Reigne was in the third yeere of his Reigne as appeares by the Printed Acts. Also the making of that Seale was by some Lords then present What hand had the Commons in it Concerning the Seale made in Henry the sixths time the Protector was Vice-Roy according to the course of Law and so the making of that Seal was by the Protector in the Kings name and that Protector Humphrey Duke of Gloucester as Protector in the kings Name summoned that Parliament and was Protector made by the Lords and not in Parliament as appeareth plainely for that Parliament was in the first of Henry the sixth and the first holden in his time and power given by Commission to the

Queenes death of the Kings eldest son to coyne his money to counterfeit his Great-Seale to levie Warre against him to adhere to such as shall so do are declared by that Act to be high Treason This Statute cannot refer to the King in his politique capacity but to his naturall which is inseperable from the politique for a body politique can have neither Wife nor Child 21. Ed. 4.14 not levie Warre nor do any Act but by the operation of the naturall body A Corporation or body politique hath no soule or life but is a fiction of the Law and the Statute meant not fictitious persons but the body naturall conjoyned with the publique which are inseperable The clause in that Act that no man should sue for grace or pardon for any offence condemned R. 2.11 〈◊〉 cap. 13. 4. pars instit fol. 42. or forfeiture given by that Act was repealed by a subsequent Act in 〈◊〉 R●● holden unreasonable without example and against the Law and custom of the Parliament This condemnes the Proposition for disabling the King to Pardon 4. pars instit fol. 42. The Act of 11. R. 2. so much urged by the other side was an Act to the which the King consented and so a perfect Act yet Note the Army then about the Town Note that that Law is against private persons and by the 3. cap. thereof the Treasons there declared are declared to be new Treasons made by that Act and not to be drawne to example it was abrogated 21. R. 2. and revived by an usurper 1. H. 4. to please the people and by the tenth chap. thereof enacts that nothing shall be treason but what is declared by 25. Ed. 3. 16. R● cap. 5. The Regality of the Crown of England is immediatly subject to God and to none other Plaine words H. 4. shewing where the supreame power is The Commission of Array is in force and no other Commission Ret. Parim ● H. 4. numb 24. an Act not printed this Act was repealed by 4. and 5. P. M. cap. 2. this repealed by the Act of 1. Iacobi and so it is of force at this day for the repealing Statute is repealed 4. pars institu fol. 51. 125. published sithence this Parliament by the desire of the house of Commons their Order is printed in the last leafe of the commentaries upon Magna Charta Sir Edward Cooke A booke alowed by Sir Nat. Brent called the reason of the War fol. 65. by their party is holden for the Oracle of the Law who wrote the said fourth part in a calme and quiet time and I may say when there was no need to defend the authority of the Commission of Array For that objection that that Commission leaves power to the Commissioners to tax men secundum facultates and so make all mens estates Arbitrary the Answer is that in levying of publick ayds upon mens goods estates which are variable and probably cannot be certainly knowne by any but the owners it is impossible to avoid discretion in the assessements for so it ever was and ever will be By this appeares that the Votes of the two houses against the commission of Array were against the Law The death of the King dissolves the Parliament H. 5. if Kings should refer to the politique capacity it would continue after his death 4. pars Inst 46. which proves that the King cannot be said to be there when he is absent as now he is 2. H. 5. 4 pars instit 46. there is no interregnum in the Kingdome the dissolution of the Parliament by his death shewes that the beginning and end thereof refers to the naturall person of the King and therefore he may lawfully refuse the Propositions 2. H. 5. Chap. 6. to the King only it belongs to make Leagues with Forraigne Princes● this shewes where the supreame power is 8. H. 6. numb 57. R●tt Parl-Cookes 4. p●ns instit 25 N● peiviledge of Parliament is grantable for treason H. 6. Felony or Breach of the Peace if not to any one member not to two not to ten not to the Major part 19. H. 6.62 The Law is the inheritance of the King and his people by which they are ruled King and people And the people are by the law bound to ayde the King and the King hath an inheritance to hould Parliaments and in the ayds granted by the Common●alty If the major part of a Parliament commit treason they must not be Judges of it for no man or body can be Judge in his owne cause and aswell as ten or any number may commit treason the greater number may aswell The King by his letters pattents may constitute a County palatine and grant Regall rights 32. H. 6 13. Plowd 334. this shewes where the supreame power is 17. Ed. 4. rot parl numb 39. Ed 4. No priviledge of Parliament is grantable for Treason Fellony or Breach of the peace if not for one not for two or more or a Major part The same persons must not be Judge and party A corporate body can committ no treason Calvins Case 7 pars fol. 11 12 nor can treason be committed against a corporate body 21. E. 4 13. ond 14. but the persons of the men who make that body may committ treason and commit it against the naturall person of him who to some purposes is a body corporate but quatenus corporate no treason can be committed by or against such a body that body hath no soul no life and subsists only by the fiction of the Law and for that reason the Law doth conclude as aforesaid Plow com 213. therefore the statute of 25. E. 3. must be intended of the Kings naturall person conjoyned with the politique which are inseparable and the Kings naturall person being at Holmby his politique is there also and not at Westminster 19. Ed. 4.46 for the politique and naturall make one body indivisible If all the people of England should breake the league made with a forreigne Prince 22. Ed. 4. Fitz juvisdiction last placite without the Kings consent the league holds and is not broken and therefore the representative body is inferior to his Majesties The King may erect a Court of Common-pleas in what part of the kingdome be pleaseth by his letters patents can the two houses do the like 1. Ed. 5. fol. 2. It cannot be said that the King doth wrong Ed. 5. 4 Ed. 4.25 5 Ed. 4.29 declared by all the Judges and Serjeants at law then there The reason is nothing can be done in this Common wealth by the Kings grant or any other act of his as to the subjects persons goods lands or liberties but must be according to established lawes which the Judges are sworn to observe and deliver betwene the King and his people impartially to rich and poor high and low and therefore the Justices and the Ministers of Justice are to be questioned and punished if