Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
death_n dead_a life_n raise_v 9,308 5 6.9695 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A70617 An uncovering of mysterious deceits by which many are kept from repentance and entring the doore of life in a reply to M. Garners opposition of truth stiled Unvailing of mysteries, with addition of A reply to Mr. Thomas Whitfield his treatise with a three-fold title / by Thomas Moore. Moore, Thomas, Senior. 1647 (1647) Wing M2595; ESTC R30527 138,859 193

There are 12 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

which I stood page 33.36 Then I began to prove by opening the question and answering it in twelve answers by plain sayings of Scripture without interpretation or glosses chapter 7. page 37.38 39. which when Mr. T. W. can doe to prove Christ dyed not for all or only for an elect company or that all he dyed for shall have eternall life or that there is a world yet in Scripture called a beleeving world that are the sinners and unjust for whom Christ dyed he may be credited else he doth nothing to purpose then I proceeded to more enlarged proofe 1. By considering Christ as the common person in the room of all mankind of whom the first was a figure chapter 8. page 40 49. 2. By considering the joynt mentioning of creation and redemption by Christ chapter 9 page 49 52. 3. By considering the constancy of the Scripture in changing the person when having mentioned the generall it mentions any speciall chap. 10. p. 53.54 4 By considering 1 Tim. 3.6 and Heb. 2.9 in the force of the words the scope and circumstances of the places chap. 11.12 p. 55 56. 5. By considering like places of Scripture speaking in like manner chap. 13. p. 66. 70. To all which M. W. hath said nothing to confute any one argument 6. By adding six arguments to satisfie such as must have reason satisfied with addition of 18. severall proofes chap. 20. page 129. to 137. with addition of more proofes chap. 21. p. 138. 143. with removeall of doubts chap. 22. now Mr. W. only pitches upon the generall expressions the sixth of the 18. proofs p. 233. Did this learned man examine my Booke well or goe about to answer me to call this my third ground and to say nothing but that which is already answered in the Booke and the least refuted by him that for answer to all I need but say read the Treatise againe and for such generall words as All men Every man the World he taketh paines to no purpose The Treatise sheweth as many significations as he but how it is taken when it is spoken by God of his great workes by and concerning his Sonne in this he hath done nothing and all he hath said is fully answered in the Treatise chap. 5 11. 12. 13. And at large in answer to Mr. Garner as for the objections I answered I never medled with them so long as I looked on them as Schoole disputes framed against Arminius by learned men who in their grounds of Religion have confessed as much as I say but when they were sent me by a Gentleman sometime as report is a Black smith no dishonour to him in the eyes of the wise in opposition to the truth I have so answered them and Mr. W. hath strengthened my answers by faulting and not confuring any one of them as he that reads may there see In which all his here now moulded objections queries and reasons are answered and again in answering the same things to Mr. R. G. on the same words in the second and third part of that Reply only I shall here hint some things as answers to some new expressions of his 1. I beleeve according to Scripture two Adams or men the first naturall the second spirituall and the sayings of Scripture as they are of things belonging to the first I understand in a naturall sense and as they are of things belonging to the second I understand in a spirituall sense and yet both in that sense the words in such sayings imports which is rightly called the litterall sense 1 Cor 15.45.48 And this in answer to Mr. W. p. 8.9 whose crosse and carnall expressions I forbeare to put to tryall 2. I never said nor writ that every child can understand such a figure as this the Pot seethes over where the subject is put for the adjunct alas many Children may take the fastened grumble on the outside as well as the pottage within for an adjunct But I said such a saying may be understood by meane Country people that know not what to call such figures yea and profitably so as the end of such a voice being to hasten the Mother to save the pottage from being lost which if shee stay to here a Clearke open the figure and being delighted in hearing how figurative the childs speech was all may be lost I apply it not But in the other figure though a part be sometimes put for the whole that excludes not the whole or else that he cals a part is the whole But that God made all Nations should be a figure put for part and that God made Israell should be the proper speech to limit and explicate I hope Mr. T. W. will not say and this for answer to his p. 13. 3. I am not willing to urge his taking men off from beleeving the resurrection of all men from the testimony of Scripture to take it on his word 1 Cor. 15. For since by man death is not that the death of all by man also the resurrection of the dead is not that as large as the former did death befall any more by the first man then were made righteous in him and he stood for and they sinned in him and shall any more be raised by the second then those whose natures he hath taken and for whom dyed and rose let Mr. W. prove that till when I prefer the text v. 22. For as in Adam all dye evenso in Christ shall all be made alive though I beleeve a more aboundant and excellent life for such as by grace are one in him 4. I am sorry for his rashnesse and bold adventure to give occasion of strength to those that would hold many Gods and have many wives and be justified by their own workes as if the word But or only or that which is as much or more were not in the Scripture for these what are not mens words and humane righteousnesse plainly excluded in our justification before God Rom. 3.20.21 27 28 9.32 10.3 Is it not plainly said there is but one God 1 Cor. 8.6 and saith he not expresly Isay 45.21 22. No God else besides me none besides me I God and none else and surely though men should love their enemies and their Brethren and their Children And I am perswaded Mr. W. would those at least where he is Minister should love him and that with true and faithfull love also and yet this is more then to love their wives only But if Mr. W. meane it of that peculiar love and fellowship that ought to be between man and wife I suppose he better knowes the law of nature the law mortall and Leviticall then so to object did not God make twaine one Hath he not forbidden to take another to vex her life Hath he not forbidden fornication Adultry c. Is there another Minister besides M. W. or any judicious among the people that will thus reason when he can shew the place in holy
have abode in that glory Ioh. 12.24 But in this his glory and glorious perfection abiding and not laying it aside and becomming lower he could not be for mankind that was fallen into sinne and under death a perfect JESUS a perfect Propitiation peace righteousnesse and perfect Lord Saviour and helper of mankinde which he must certainly bee or else he cannot be the author of eternall salvation That he might be perfect then in regard of us it was necessary that he be made flesh in our very nature that so the nature that sinneth might suffer John 1.14 Rom. 8.3 yea in our nature as fallen and so submitted to infirmities and mortallity even to the flesh and blood that he might dye Heb. 2.14 And that hee be in this our nature subjected to infirmities as a publike ma● and surely in the same obligation with us and so under the Law under which wee were fallen That so our debt may be his and he be found under the guilt of our sinnes Gal. 4.4.5 And being thus found as a surety a servant and under the Law for us that God the Father passe by us and call him to an account for our debt and charge him with our sinnes Isay 53.6.2 Cor. 5.19 And he must own this charge and imputation and confesse also Heb 10.5 9. Psal 40 7.12 And that our sinnes being charged on him and he accepting the charge he also undergoe the sentence and so dyed for our sinnes for without shedding of blood there is no remission of sinnes 1 Pet 2.24 and 3 18. Heb 9 22. And yet that he may be perfect for us it is necessary that he rise from the dead acquit of all our sinne and a victory over our death that as mercy and truth are met and righteousnesse and peace doe kisse in his Death So truth may spring out of the earth in his resurrection for our justification Psal 85.10 11. Rom 4 25. For if Christ be not raised our faith is vain we are yet in our sinnes 1 Cor. 15.17 And now he is so risen yet there is still more to be done by him necessary that he might be a perfect Saviour namely That by the eternall spirit he ascend into the highest Heaven even the holy of holiest and there appeare before God for us and present at the propitiatory or mercy seat and bosome of the Father the vertue of his blood shed He being now risen and so offer to him his own risen and holy body a spotlesse sacrifice a price a ransome for those for whom he dyed that so thereby he may obtain and procure of his Father 1. A right of Lordship over us all 1. That wee may be his by purchase and he have the power and authority over us to dispose of us and judge us 1 Tim. 2.6 Rom. 14.9 2. Eternall redemption of our nature in himself as the publick man and for men and receive eternall life in our nature in the man and for men that he may have it to bestow Heb. 9.12 14. 1 John 5.11 3. The use of meanes and sending forth of his Spirit in that meanes whereby men might be enlightned in some knowledge of his goodnesse and have some participation of his mercyes that they might thereby be admonished and reproved and instructed to repentance and seeking of him and so come in to him for life Psal 68.18 John 1.4 5 9 Act. 14.17 and 17 26 27 30 31. Rom. 2.4 Iohn 1.7 and 20.31 for as wee in our particular persons as individualls could not have partaked of the misery we fell in too in the fall of the first publick man had their been no medium by propogation for encrease to come forth of him so neither could any of mankinde in any of their particular persons partake of that blessed restoration and eternall life obtained and received in the nature of and for mankind in and by the second publick man if there be no Spirituall medium to call and regenerate men that they may come into him But he having gon through and done all first mentioned and now obtained all this latter mentioned he is made perfect and become perfect and so as it is said of him Luke 24.26 46. ought not Christ to have suffered these things and to enter into his glory thus it is writen and thus it behooved Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead the third day and that repentance and remission of sinns should be preached in his name among all nations so it is said even of God the Father Heb. 2.10 It became him for whom are all things and by whom are all things in bringing many sonns unto glory to make the Captaine of their salvation perfect through sufferings suitable to which it is said of Christ himself Heb 5.8 Though he was a sonne yet learned he Obedience by the things which he suffered as I understand he tooke occasion to shew forth obedience by the things which he suffered and so was made perfect yea perfect in the highest degree of perfection though not while he was suffering yet by and through sufferings not in one thing only suffered but the things which hee suffered his sufferings for had he not had our nature subjected to humane infirmities and that made under the law for us he could not have dyed for us and then truth and mercy could not have mett righteousnesse and peace could not have kissed on our behalfe Heb. 2.14 Psal 85.10 And had he not dyed for our sinns he could not have risen Just on our behalfe and for our Justification and so truth could not have sprung out of the earth that we might participate Rom. 4 25. Psal 85.11 and had he nor so risen for our Iustification he could not have ascended into the Heavens to present the vertue of his blood and offer himself a sacrifice a price and ransom to God for us he had not then had wherewith to prevaile with God to take sinne out of the way with all that was contrary to us that mercy might be shewne and righteousnesse looke downe from Heaven on us Heb. 1.3 Col. 2.14 15. to purchase us into his dispose Rom. 149. To obtain eternall redemption and receive eternall life in our nature for men that he might have it to bestow Heb. 9.12 to procure meanes and spirit to be sent to call and draw us Iohn 16.7 Psal 68.18 nor had he had wherewith by spirit to take sinne out of our conscience and to purge our nature Heb. 9.14 for which cause he had his body given him and hath done the will of the Father Heb. 10.5 10 and so through suffering in our nature for us and in the same nature raised presenting the nature of his sufferings and offering himselfe a sacrifice unto God he is made perfect or become perfect A perfect Saviour Propitiation righteousnesse A Lord able to save and able to destroy and here is our businesse sure distinct and here is a reconciliation and salvation in our nature dispensable
mercy Seat in his own bosome as I may say there was Truth requiring our death and Justice our suffering the curse But Jesus Christ that dyed for our sinnes being risen for our justification and gone with the vertue of his blood to the Father mercy truth are met righteousnesse peace have kissed and Christ hath made the atonement with God and is become the propitiation for the sinnes of the whole world and now righteousness looks down from Heaven and God shewes mercy to men Psal 85.10 11 1 John 2.2 Psal 36.7 8. so that here is a reconciliation made with God for men 2 Cor. 5.19 Ephes 2.16 Col. 1.20 a purgation Heb. 3. a laver of regeneration Tit. 3.5 to reconcile and purge with all and this for men But yet if this be not applied if men receive it not and be not sprinckled washed and purged and renewed therewith they cannot be reconciled in themselves to good and so not eternally saved 1 John 3 3 5. and this spinckling is a spirituall businesse namely When through the Gospell in which Christ is set forth for a propitiation Rom. 3.25 the spirit beares witnesse of Christ John 15.26 1 John 5.6 and therein instructeth in the knowledge of his death and resurrection for us and so gives in to beleeve the testimony 1 Cor. 15.1 4. Gal. 3.1 5. 2 Thes 1.10 then shines in commends the love of God to the heart in this that while we were siners Christ dyed for us and his love thus commended through his death made known then the vertue of his death becomes prevalent and effecatious in the beleevers heart reconciles him to God in this his receit of the atonement Rom. 5.8.10 11. Tit. 3.4 5. and redeems him from his vain conversation 1 Pet. 1.18 19. from among men to God Rev. 5.9 and so purgeth both conscience and nature Heb. 9.14 and so doth he purchase to God and wash from sinne with his blood Acts 20.28 Rev. 1.5 and yet in himselfe in the propitiation he hath made with God for men there is the same fulnesse still for those that have not yet received and to dispence more still of the vertue of his blood to those that have received Rom. 25.26 1 Cor. 15.2 3 4. 1 John 1.7 8 9. Iohn 1.16 So that both the distinctions remain sound as they are explicated in the faulted but not confuted Treatise chap. 1. and 2. and I am sorry that Mr. Knowles and Mr. Gerner are adversaries hereto 5. He secretly and covertly faults the distinction about the severall endes of the death of Christ one for propitiation and one for witnesse bearing to the truth and so giving us example of obedience to God and love to one another and one for confirming the new Testament all which are proved and explicated in the second chapter page 16 21. and not at all by him refused and if he desire any further explanation or proofe he might have it I trow he will not say that as Christ dyed for our sinnes the Scribes and Pharises did make him flesh or under the Law for us or that they did charge our sinnes upon him or put him to death for them but that God the Father did all this to Christ for us and so delivered him for our offences and raised him for our justification Isay 53.6 Rom 4 24 25. I hope also he will not say that as Christ did willingly lay down his life in suffering all that befell him or witnesse-bearing to the truth for calling sheep and feeding the called and to give us an example to follow his steps therein that God did persecute and crucifie him for speaking the words he gave him to speake and doing of that he gave him to doe for the good of men and the speciall good of his sheep But that the Scribes and Pharises the Elders chiefe Priests c. did through envy persecute crucifie and put him to death for that Psal 2.1 4. Mat. 27.18 I hope he that can see the difference between Gods sending Joseph into Aegypt for good and his Brethens sending him for evill can see the difference in this also and so distinguish of the ends of the same death of Christ in these respects And for the third end is that a confirmation of a Testament when the Testator is put to death as an evill doer surely it s not proper to say God the Father put him to death to confirme Christ his owne Testament nor did the Pharisees so put him to death but as he was one with the Father in will and so willingly yeelded himselfe to dye for our sinnes and willingly laid down his life in witnesse-bearing too and defence of the truth he had preached so he most willingly and freely as his owne more peculiar acting did give up the ghost and die to ratifie the new Testament Heb. 9.16 17. Galath 3.14 15. which appeares also in the timelinsse of his death before those that were crucified with him Mark 15 44. though that also was for another speciall end Joh. 19.36 But yet most clearely in this that whereas others when they were spent and gave up the ghost their heads fell downe he cried with a loud voice Mark 15.37 and first bowed his head and then gave up the ghost Joh. 19.30 And so freely dyed and confirmed his Testament But Master Garner would be faulting knew he how saying that I speaking of the severall ends of his death in my Treatise pag. 22. But hee was mistaken for that was in the former chap. but in the third chapter I was speaking of the divers maner of mentioning those ends in Scripture but something hee would say to bring that distinction within compasse to be faulted in faulting the distinction pag 7. lin 3.19 though to no advantage to him 6. He saith also pag. 7. That I say That when the death of Christ in respect of that end which was for propitiation and ransome is only mentioned as it is for all so it is exprest in such generall words only as the world all men c. But here he hath clipt my words and left out that I say in Propositions for faith it is here exprest and for this I quote hee saith 2 Cor. 5.14 15 19 c. And hee should have done well to have put in many other places and expressions quoted Chap. 20. pag. 133. Proof 6. But this conclusion is unsound saith he which will appeare from what is written Heb. 9.28 where mention is made saith he of the death of Christ in respect of ransome and propitiation only c. And yet it is not exprest in such generall words as the world or all men to which I answer hee hath corruptly left out c. which was explained in my Treatise chap. 20. pag. 33. But to passe that I question his first affirmation and deny his second though he calls to mind it and double the same But now let us mind it well Heb. 9.28 So Christ was once
such or a sorer curse then that mentioned Deut. 28.27 28 29. and without any hope so not an estate of life whence also when men for their contempt of and resisting the meanes used for their repentance are given up of God so reprobated that there is no more hope for them Ier. 6.16 30. Ezek. 24.13 Rom. 1.18 28. Prov. 1.23 24. c. Their life is not then an estate of life though once it was but then also as well as in death such are said to be blotted out of the Book of life Psal 69.28 not though this seacible being of those reprobates after raised and made a live by Christ shall after his sentance remain in torment for ever yet is that no where called life as this life of men during the time of Gods patience and giving space and meanes is 2 Pet. 3.9 Rev. 2.21 Eecles 9.4 Job 33.30 Besides this life and eternall life are set forth indifferent expressions in Scripture this is a preservation from death that there may be a time to seek the other Eccles 11. and 12. Psalme 69.8 9 10. But eternall life is a life from the dead Rom. 11.15 This the life that now is but the other that which in its fulnesse and visibility is to come 1 Tim. 4.8 This the life or light of men John 1.4 But the other the life of Beleevers Col. 3.3 This is called the life of the world John 6 5.33 But eternall life is called the life of Jesus 2 Cor 4.11 and the life of God Ephes 4.18 the one affording a hope that men following lying vanities may deprive themselves of Prov. 1.23 24. Isay 55.6 Ionah 2.8 The other affording such blessednesse as preserves the honour for ever Iohn 10.27 28 29 30. yea the one vouchsafed to unbelievers that they might receive him though they doe not Iohn 1.4.11 but the other only to them that receive him Iohn 1.12 Now let us mind what life or living is here meant 2 Cor. 5.15 And this without any wresting by minding first the reading secondly the expression thirdly the dependency it bath with that fore declared fourthly the explanation and confirmation in other places speaking of the same things First for the reading eternall life sure by all confessed is even God living in his and so they living in God and to God and sure so farre not to themselves but to Christ and the text speaketh not in such tearmes that they which live unto God should not live c. But that they which live Secondly the expression is That they which live should not hence-forth after life vouchsafed though before they did 1 Peter 4.2 3 4. live unto themselves but unto him that dyed for them and rose again Now sure so much eternall life as is in any heart the spirit is life for righteousnesse sake Rom. 8.10 and so farre doth and can doe no other but live in God and to God and so farre not to themselves but to Christ Rom. 8.2 1 John 3.6.9 and 5.4 Thirdly the dependency of this with the first ground of the Apostles exhortation 2 Cor 5.10 That we must all appear before the judgement seat of Christ that every one may receive the things done in his body according to that he hath done whether it be good or bad knowing therefore the terrour of the Lord wee perswade men c. And where in will either the equity or terrour of that judgement be if not in this that such as he dyed and rose for and hath offered them life when some light comes doe refuse to yeild to him and will still live to themselves I trow this will not be said of them that have eternall life And fourthly for the explanation and confirmation in other places of Scripture speaking of the very same businesse doth not the same Apostle speaking of Beleevers not living to God give a ground like this 2 Cor. 14.15 why all ought to do● so Rom. 14 9. for to this end Christ both dyed and rose and revived That he might be the Lord both of the dead and living and doth he not on this ground diswade men from living to themselves and perswade to live to Christ and this also with the same motive that wee must be judged by him and give account to him verse 10 11 12. And doth not the Apostle Peter lead us to the same sense 1 Peter 4. For as much as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh arm● your selves likewise with the same mind for he that hath suffered in the flesh hath seaced from sin that he no longer should marke here the living scope of live the rest of his time in the flesh to the lust of men but to the will of God for the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentils c. See how in all things the places agree and what life or living they speak of As for Mr. Garners pointing 1 John 6.51 to know the life here ment to be eternall life he is confuted by the place he points to which sheweth the life of the world to be procured and given by the death and Sacrifice of Jesus Christ offered to God by which they live but eternall life is received only in feeding on him which none doe till by grace drawn out of the fellowship of the world to beleeve on him John 6.27.29 40 51.53 c. So that in this beginning of his dealing with the quoted Scripture he hath preferred his reason as a light before the plain saying of the Scripture which indeed is a light though by him counted darknesse that his reason that should have submitted to be inlightened by it may inlighten it and so he useth here carnall reasoning before faith and acknowledgeth though weakly some part of truth to deny another part and takes the expression as independant and so forceth an unfound sense upon it and two other places together I hope M. Knowles nor Mr. Garner did not count the sense given by him on these words 2 Cor. 5.15 those that live to be one of the mysteries he unvailed for he hath striven in this to vaile that which is open and plain and discover in it a mystery of deceit that he might privily bring in a damnable heresie leading the greatest part of men to deny the Lord that bought them by denying his right of Lord-ship by purchase by denying his goodnes in proucring them thereby their lives with mercies a door of hope by denying their ingagement to him not to live to themselves but to him by denying the equity of his judgeing them Auill beginning And to save labour where like abuse of Scripture and reason and teaching such denyals are I shall but note them with this marke ☞ 1. 2. And in abusing three places to force sense on these words That liveth he doth the like by these words John 12.32 Will draw all men unto me which he limmiteth to this sense I will give
of the first Adam but only the nature which was one in both sexes and each degree Then he came and dyed for all men in both sexes and every degree not so much respecting sexes or degrees as the nature of men for whom and for whose sins he came and dyed and so for them as men ungodly and sinners and not as elect vessels and a holy generation though to make such and even from the roofe and beginning of all it is evident That Jesus Christ the second publique man undertook as the second man A publique person for the first man a publique person and so for all that were in him and by propogation to come of him that they might not perish in this first judgement and death but to be given him into his dispose to preserve alive a time that they might live to him in this life and after death to raise them and bring them alive before him to be judged by him in another judgement to another life or to another death according to the Gospell Rom. 14 9-12 2 Cor. 5.10 11 14 15. Phil. 2 7-11 Rom. 2.16 and so the holy Ghost teacheth us to understand the businesse saying As by the offence of one unto all men to condemnation even so by the righteousneosse of one unto all men to justification of life Rom. 5.18 that is as is aforesaid in the other in the publicke man that undertooke for all men and that so as their lives are preserved a time and the old creation for them that such as come into him by the meanes he useth while he preserveth them in this old creation may partake of the new creation in him and such as perish in rebellion against him may be brought to another judgement and sentenced to a second Death And so in this sense Jesus Christ hath dyed and given himselfe a ransome for All men so as he hath made an atonement with God and is himselfe become the propitiation for their sinnes that it may be declared or testified in some fruites of his goodnesse to lead to repentance and seeking the Lord that so such as are by grace brought in to beleeve may be reconciled unto God and receive remission of sinnes and eternall life and those that perish in refusall and rebellion be justly sent down to a second Death which is a foundation and ground of and motive to repentance faith and obedience for all men set forth in the Gospell shewing in all this their obligation to Christ with incouragement to come in to Christ and terrour to all that rebell If Mr. T. W. his expressions may be taken in this sense it is yeelded as a true report or else not for this is that which Mr. T. W. opposeth and which T. M. endevoureth to shew proved in the sayings of holy Scripture for otherwise to prove he is still lesse being no Linguist for knowledge of divers tongues no Arthist in Logick either according to Aristotle or Ramus nor learned in Philosophy either morrall politicall or naturall either Epicurian Pithagorean Stoicke or Platonist or were he yet he could not thinke meet by these to square mould and prove Divinity but only what God saith in his word as he is helped to understand he desireth to beleeve and takes his sayings to be proofe enough and of more worth then all the reasons and arguments of men against them But Mr. T. W. saith that for proofe T. M. makes use of three things which he makes the principall ground of his Doctrine That which he cals the first ground for T. M. his proofe is The distinction between the Redemption reconciliation and salvation which Jesus Christ effected in his own body with God for men and that he effected by his Spirit in men God this saith Mr. T. W. is not agreeable to Scripture To which I answer I have been so told by such whom he reproacheth as lay preachers but not by any profest Divines before I read it in Mr. T. W. 2. This distinction and foure more one about the distinct ends of his death another the distinct manner of mentioning those ends another about the divers waies of propounding his death and another about the difference of the extent and force of the same word in Scripture I used for clearing the businesse in stating the question But seeing so many of those he reproacheth as lay preachers affirme them my proofes and now it is so affirmed by two Clerks professed Divines though of contrary judgement and practice let them so stand each of the five distinctions being of the like force to prove and foure of them not faulted by Mr. T. W. 3. This distinction he faulteth is in the Treatise shewn expresly in the Scripture there quoted page 2. to 14 15. and nothing there disproved in any quotation but remaineth full enough to answer all he hath said to fault it besides the distinction and that which it now acknowledged a proofe for are both shewn in that Treatise and in the first part of my answer to Mr. Garner to be plainly set forth and proved in the Scripture 4. His way of faulting the distinction is by framing reasons and calling Scripture to make a consequent with though I hope he will not justifie the Saduces so reasoning from Scripture Mat. 22. as divers in our-dayes also have done to deny the reurrection of the body But this with all that followes in his leasons is answered and the abuse of Scripture therein shewn before in that Treatise in divers places to which he hath said nothing and again in the first and third part of the Reply to M. Garner so as for answer no more need but only to desire the Reader to peruse the same though the Reader of his may see 1. In his first reason much weaknesse for whatever reconciliation be wrough with God in Christ by his Death yet no men are reconciled to God but by the spirituall application thereof when the love of God is there through commended to the heart which slayes the enmity there and reconciles to God in receit of the atonement whence the words while wee were c. and being now justified and wee have now received Atonement Rom. 5.8 9.10 11. The Colotians were enemies in their minds by wicked workes in which they walked after Christ had dyed yea and made peace in presenting the vertue of his death before God also and by application of this were after reconciled to God Col. 1.20 21 22 23. Besides he is not able to prove that the Death of Christ is agreater worke then the resurrection of Christ nor that the reconciling to God by love commended through the death of Christ a greater worke then the further saving by the power of the Spirit of life by which he rose from the dead which sounds harsh to Ephes 1.17.19 20. though his so saying acknowledgeth the distinction As for his altering the Text Rom. 8.32 it may be said God doth not give an un●glorified Sonne to
Lord owner and so he ransomes purchaseth or recovereth it again out of the hand of unjust detainers of it and this most properly called redemption though not only nor and alwaies 1 Sam. 30.18 19. c. Exod. 4.22 23. and 9.6 7 and yet that we may come plainly to our businesse A redemption may be off or made with a friend or lover and loved as Ruth chap. 4.3 10. and so hath Christ our kindsman bought us of God 1 Tim. 2.6 it may be off or from an enemy or adversary Neh. 5 8. And with the parties own selfe that is purchased Hos 3.2 yea and the redemption also may be partly partly by price partly by strong hand Psalm 77.15 And now to bring all close to our businesse in searching the Scripture wee shall find a double or twofold redemption purchase or recovery effected by Jesus Christ our Lord. 1. A purchasing of God his father mankind that had lost or sold themselves to sin Satan and death and so the truth and justice of God required the overthrow and destruction of mankind in that first judgement and death but Iesus Christ having dyed for our sins and risen for our justification and so mercy and truth met and righteousnesse and peace have kiffed and truth sprung out of the Earth Psal 85.10.11 Hee offered himselfe a price or ransome to God his father for all fallen and lost mankind and so redeemed bought purchased and recovered them all of God his father from everlasting perishing in this first judgement and death and got them all into his dispose yea God the father accepting the ransome or price hath given them all into the dispose of Christ and made him Lord of all So as he is able to save and able to destroy and will raise all and bring them to another even his judgement seat absolving such as have believed on him throughout the day of grace and sentencing to a second death such as have persisted in rebellion against him their right and lawfull Lord that bought them And in this redemption and purchasing men of God the Father he had also the enemie even the Devill to conflict with who by might and strong hand he overcame having tryumphed over him and spoyled him of his right of principality by his first conquest over men in drawing him to eate of the forbidden fruit and having spoyled him so as if he get men now it is by a new conquest in keeping them in unbeliefe and so from eating of the tree of life 2 Cor. 4.4 and 11.3 Ephes 2.2 he sat downe on the right hand of God Col. 2.15 All power and authority given to him 1 Pet. 3.22 who hath bought all mankind of God the father that hath given all over into the dispose of Christ and made him Lord of all Acts 2.36 And of this redemption buying purchase or recovery we are to understand these Scriptures that testifie of it Psal 2 5.9.10.11 and 24. 1 and 75 27. Rom. 14.9.10 11.12 2 Cor. 5.9.10.11 Phil. 2.11 1 Tim. 2.6 2 Pet. 2.1 And doe not they that deny Christ to have made this purchase devide Christ and his redemption and deny him his right of Lordship and the equity and power of raifing from the dead and of judging a great part of mankind let any judicious and unprejudicated Reader judge and yet I am sure all thus redeemed or purchased and bought are not in themselves partakers of the choice ends and fruit of this purchase 2. A pu●chasing men of themselves by a price tendered to them and put into their hands though fooles want a heart Pro. 17.16 And this I 〈◊〉 that was foreslaine and had bought men of God com●s a●●●n to b●●y men from among the fellowship of the world and from 〈◊〉 service of sin and Satan and all their vain conversation 〈◊〉 God And this by his blood and sactifice also but in tendering and applying it to them affording the oppertunity in meanes vouchrated sending spirit therein to witnesse of himselfe and th● peace made righteousnesse compleated by him and life in him commending the love of God through his blood death and Sacrifice and with the riches and excellencie appearing in him out-bidding the world hee draweth them to himselfe and by vertue of his blood spiritually applyed speaketh peace to their hearts pulls them out of the state and fellowship of the world and reconcileth and uniteth them to God in himselfe And this is a redemption of men unto God in which redemption working Jesus Christ hath to deale with enemies also as the rebellious lusts of the flesh and the unbeleeving world and the Devill that rules in the hearts of unbeleevers all which by might and strong hand hee overcomes and brings out of the power of them into his owne Kingdome Col. 1.13 and makes them free c. Iohn 8.36 Gal. 5.1 And this is a little of the redemption he workes in men to God and of this as a first fruites of the whole are such redeemed ones partakers of in themselves before God And of this redemption is to be understood such places of Scripture as these which testifie of it Acts 20.28 Rom. 5.8.10 11. Tit. 3.4.5.6 Phil. 3.3.8.9 Rev. 1.5 and 5.9 Ephes 1.7 Col. 1.14 21. But not so fully in all the places aleadged by Mr. Garner for in Col. 1.20 is a cleare distinction between his having made peace through the blood of his crosse and then his reconciling all things unto himselfe by him of which the 21. Verse mentions but a part as is shewn in the Treatise he opposeth Chap. 9. pag. 50.51 but answereth not Ephes 2.13.19 Holdeth forth the opposed distinction of a peace made and enmity first slaine and then that peace preached and after by some injoyed Rom. 4.24.25 A cleare distinction between Christ delivered for our offences and raised for our justification and the beleeving on him that raised him from the dead neither doth the Scripture in that or any other place say that all for whose sins he dyed and for whose justification he arose doe beleeve in him that raised him from the dead though he would force that forraign and corrupt sence on that and other places of Scripture as in his treatise pag. 13. and Rom. 3.24 25. hold forth cleerly the distinction of that in Christ for men and through Christ in beleeving men Are not all Iew and Gentile first concluded under sin and short of the glory of God without difference Verse 9.19.23 Is not the righteousnesse of Christ set forth in the Gospell or Doctrine of Christ oft called the faith of Christ affirmed according to the distinction Verse 22. unto all and upon all them that beleive and is it not explicated according to the distinction first Verse 24. The justification freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Iesus Then Verse 25. Gods setting him forth to be a propitiation through saith in his blood to declare his righteousnesse c. Sure then it was
whether only the materiall blood which in shedding issued out of the body of Christ as the blood he did bleed and that came forth of him when he was circumcised Luke 1.21 and when he was in his agony Luke 22.24 and as some suppose when he was Scurged and when he had a crown of Thornes platted on his head Mark 15.15 17. and when they nayled him on the Crosse and crucified him Mat. 27.35 and when after his death his fide was peirced with a speare Luke 19.34 35. whether this be his meaning by all the blood as the words with that he writ before and after it would so seem and whether this shedding be all the sprinckling he beleeveth or not it remaines doubtfull but as I understand as he tooke flesh and blood when he was made in our nature Heb. 2.14 even so all the abasements sorrowes anguishes and torments he suffered in that nature with all the forementioned being compleated or consummated in his death or dying the whole being his laying down his life for us this all this nothing lesse then this I understand by all the blood that Christ did shed 1 John 3.16 Isay 5.3.1 8. and with all his sufferings the compleating of them in dying I count the shedding of his blood though in this businesse bloodsheeding doth imply the Sacrifice offered whose blood was shed Heb. 9.12.22.26 and yet take in all his sufferings with the vertue thereof in his Sacrifice offered still shedding is not sprinckling but shedding and sprinckling are two distinct things tnd so with out shedding of blood and so offering the sacrifice whose blood was shed there is no remission of sinnes because otherwise there can be no blood to be sprinckled Heb. 9.22 23 26. yet even so also without sprinckling of blood and therein applying the vertue of the sacrifice there is no remission of sinnes purgation of conscience and nature and happy safety received and enjoyed Heb. 9.12 13 14 23. and 12.24 And this is clearly shaddowed and typed out it was not enough for the Passeover that the Lamb was of the first yeare and without blemmish and slain and so the blood shed c. unlesse the blood was offered with a branch of Hysop taken and sprnickled on the two side posts and the upper post of the dore and without which no assurance of a sacrifice Exod. 12.6 7 22 23. nor for cleansing and sanctifying Blood-shedding was not enough if it were not also sprinckled Lev. 8.11 30. and 14 7. nor for taking away any uncleannesse it was not enough that the water of purification was made for all Israel unlesse the particulars defiled were sprinckled with it Num. 19.13 18 19. yea this distinction between blood-shedding and blood-sprinckling is in the Law clearly held forth Exod. 29.16 21 Lev. 1.5 and 4.6 7. Num. 8.7 And come to the Gospell ● may be said of all to that what ever right or part Christ hath in them by vertue of his bloodshed and Sacrifice offered to God yet as Christ saith to Peter John 13.8 If he wash them not they have no part with him 3. Thirdly ●as he hath set down his proposition darkly and unprofitably so he hath set it down subtilly and craftily as a man guilty of some known errour in what he would seeme to maintain in that going about to disprove the distinction between blood-shedding and blood-sprinckling he saith all the blood which Christ did shed is the blood of sprinckling which is fit togull the un-wary leaves roome when the distinction proves sound for him notwithstanding his position to say he ment not to fault the distnction though that be his main drift that he might thirdly disprove another distinction if he could As here is a suspition ofcarnality and ignorance in his understanding of the blood of Christ as it is sprinckled may not some Reader conceive that he would have men to thinke that in the Mosayecall Sacrifices the materiall blood even so such and as it was when shed was sprinckled even so the materiall blood of Christ his body such as it was when shed even such and so materially sprinckled a brave motive for the Romish reservation of rellects and because this can no way be demonstrated and evidenced how it should be so and that it so is therefore all the blood-shedding must needs be sprinckling But to come a little neerer him If blood-shedding had been the sprinckling or if it had or could so have been sprinckled upon any what would it have profited them seeing if Christ be not risen wee are yet in our sinnes our faith vaine and preaching vain 1 Cor. 15.14 17 and the Lord Jesus Christ of whom and whose redemption wee treat hath a spirituall body and is a spirituall man the Lord from Heaven heavenly A quickning spirit 1 Cor. 15.40 49. So now as he hath dyed for our sinnes and rose for our justification and offered himselfe with the vertue of his blood and death a sacrifice to God the Father appearing now in Heaven for us Rom. 4.25 1 Cor. 15.3 4. Heb. 9.12 14.24 when we speake of his blood and death as presented before God in the heaven or applyed to or sprinckled on the hearts and consciencs of men on earth wee understand it spiritually his words even when he speakes of these things are spirit and life and so spiritually to bee understood John 6 63. and so though when we speak of his suffering blood shedding and dying we understand it materially as in a mortall body hee suffered in the flesh and shed materiall blood indeed and dyed for our sinnes and was put to death in the flesh yet as he is risen for our justification and hath overcome death and is gon up to Heaven and hath presented the vertue of his blood which is reall and spirituall before his Father in the Heavens and by the spirit by which he rose from the dead offered himselfe a spotlesse sacrifice to God and obtained eternall redemption Heb. 9.12.14 So when wee speake of the sufferings blood and death of Christ as presented in Heaven to God or applyed on earth to men wee understand it spiritually of the worth vertue and prevailing effecacy thereof with God or men and as the High-priest did once a yeare go into the holy of holiest sprinckled blood on the mercy seat c. and so sanctified the tabernacle and made an atonement for all Israel and this that they might be cleansed legally from all their sinnes Levi. 16.14.15 36.34 and yet they had their sacrifices to come to and sprincklings of blood and of the waters of purification for application which if neglected the neglectors were not personally clean but to be cut off or dye in that their legall uncleannesse Num. 19. to 8. And the fault found in those sacrifices as appertaining to conscience is that they did not make the commers thereunto perfect even so we being fallen and God yet mercifull and willing to shew us favour even at his
when they turned aside they came neerer to truth and had before been seeming servants to him who by this mans doctrine was but a seeming Lord to them whose heart trembles not at this But he will helpe it with comparing it with the Epistle of Iude let that therefore be also veiwed doth not Iude mind them of the faith of the common salvation and tels them of some that turned not a seeming or shew but the grace of our God into wontonnesse and denying the only Lord God and our Lord Jesus Christ Iude 2 3 4 doth he not professe for their admonition even therefore to put them in remembrance though they once knew this how that the Lord having saved the people out of the land of Aegypt afterwards destroyed those that beleeved not Jude 5. Doth not J●●● here point the Christians to the remembrance of Gods dearing with Israel of old as Peter about their Teachers to the Prophets of old And was not this deliverance out of Aegypt a ●ipe of Gods now bringing men out of the darknesse and fellowship of the world to fellowship with his people which is somthing above that Mr. Garner opposeth and is not that deliverance called a redeeming them Deu. 15.15 and. 25.8 and 24.18 and buying them Peu 32.6 16. a saving Psal 109.8 15. so that here were a people redeemed bought saved yet many of them for their unbeleef afterwards destroyed and this writ for our admonition who is that which is so bold to give the holy Ghost the lye say they were not really redeemed bought saved but only seemingly so they perished really in the first overthrow but seemingly afterward now that men were once alive in Adam fell truly into the power of the first death but are in no sort truly made alive by Jesus so cannot be twise dead indeed but once really and the other is seemingly How thinkes any they shall perish in a second death for denying a seeming Lord a seeming redemption forsaking a seeming life in a seeming profession who like M. Garner to paint out these things in fine words yea in his conceit he hath so coloured and garnished these texts with his device that every understanding Reader shall see no other but take this his forgery to be as he professeth it to be even the mind of God not only in this but in many other Scriptures as he saith page 163. so that where the holy Ghost speaks not of mans goodnesse or works in purging or sanctifying themselves but of his own goodnes in the gift of his Son and of his Sons blood in the vertue thereof that had made a purgation for them prevailed for means to work purgation in them and sent his gracious spirit in the meanes with some prevailing effecacies to set forth the greatnesse of their sinne and the justnesse of their judgement like that Ezek. 24 23. that slight such grace despite such a spirit and ill require such goodnesse 2 Peter 1.9 Heb. 10.29 30. all this gracious workes of Father Sonne and holy Spirit he conceives must be taken for counterfeits and seemings also and who will be charged with hypocrisie here so that the evill of men in departing from the faith is their departure from hipocrysie whereas the Holy Ghost chargeth them with hypocrysie in their wayes when they are departed 1 Tim. 4.1 2 3 4 now he that dares thus deal with the Scripture pretend the originall put words for text that are none make seemings of truth and adde too and change the sayings of the Holy Ghost and call his own sayings the mind of God what error may not he this way bring in if beleeved But who that is wise will credit him that so dealeth with the Scripture VII I might note his intimation of difficultie in the plain sayings of the Gospell page 47.77 which when they speak of the foundation and first beginning of the Gospell are all plain and easie as they are now set forth as the Holy Ghost justifieth Pro. 8.6 7 8 Heare for I will speake of excellent things and the opening of my lips right things for my mouth shall speak truth and wickednesse abomination to my lips all the words of my mouth in righteousnesse nothing froward or perverse in them they are all plain to him that understandeth and wright to them that find knowledge and chapter 22.20 21. Have not I written to thee excellent things in counsell knowledge note the end that I might make thee know the certainty of the words of truth and that thou mights answer the words of truth to them that send to thee Surely had Mr. Garner beleeved this testimony he would not have conceited so many impossibilities of truth and absurdities in the plain sayings of Scripture and under pretense of difficulties have so wrested altered and added to them to make them right to his seeming but it may be he will deny all this and say he hath denied no truth though he have often but onely sound out fitter words to expresse it but for that note Eccles 12.10 The Preacher sought to find out acceptable words note here words acceptable and pleasing to God and profitable and safe for men to vent and receive the mind of God in and what are they marke and that which was written up ight words of truth Where is he that can find us out more acceptable words to tell us the mind of God in or that will plead difficultie in his words in the beginning of the Gospell that he may help us with plainer words to give the sense wil such a one reply that in 2 Pet. 3 16. many things hard to be understood which they that are unlearned unstable wrest as they do all the other Scriptures to their own destruction Let such a one again mind this very place whithout colouring or wresting or glossing he may see 1. That the spirit by Peter speakes not here by things of the beginning of the Gospell of Christ neither what Christ hath compleated in his own body for men not what by spirituall opperation he workes and dispenseth heere in beleeving men But of the second comming of Christ to restore all things and so of the new Heaven and new Earth of which things Paul writ to these Hebrewes Heb. 2.5 8. and 12.26 27 28. and so in all his other Epistles in one place or other 2. That he speaketh not of all or any whole Epistle of Paul but only of some of his sayings about these things the comming and Kingdome of Christ c. and of these things he saith not all but as some Translators many some certain things are hard to be understood 3. That he saith not that the manner of his writing nor that the sayings but some things in those sayings are hard to be understood now this is commonly known a saying may be plain and easily understood what is said and yet somthing spoken in that saying above our knowledge especially in promises of this
beleevers every one of us shall give an account of himselfe to God Rom. 14.11 12. and wee must all appoare before the judgement seate of Christ 2 Cor. 5.10 And is not this a most dangerous and perrillous way of expounding Scripture As it is more largely shown both in the Epistle and Book of the opposed Treatise which if he could not answer he might have taken warning not to have run into such snares XI He plainly and in expresse termes denyeth the Gospell and word of God to be the Gospell and word of God in that he denyeth that doctrine and Gospell and those sayings to be there which are expresly there intimating as if he had some other un written verity or Gospell which with him is the Gospell and it is not there and all in this written Gospell must be brought to that 1. Whereas the Apostle speaking of those men that must all appear before the judgement seate of Christ that every one may receive the things done in his body according to that he hath done in his body whether it be good or bad 2 Cor. 5 10. sutable to that John 5 19. and of his knowledge of the terrour of the Lord which will in that judgement be against them that would not submit to but deny the Lord that bought them and on that ground did perswade men Though his heart and spirit was manifested unto God and in beleevers verse 11. yet he preached to others also that judged evill of him and then tels them what constrained him even the love of Christ and on what ground even because we thus judge that if one dyed for all then all dyed or were dead and then affirmes it possitively with one end of his death and that he dyed for all that c. verse 14 15. and after an exposition how to take the word All when God speakes of Christ and his workes in and through Christ he saith that he by the grace of God might tast death for every man Heb. 2 9. and speaking even of unbeleevers also he saith he gave himselfe a ransome for all 2 Tim. 2.1 6. And another Apostle in an opposition between beleevers and unbeleevers saith He is the propitiation for the sins of the whole world 1 Joh. 2 2. yet this man saith that to affirme of Christ that he hath wrought a peace or reconciliation in himselfe with God for all men that it might be declared for them to beleeve and to affirme Christ dyed for all men he finds no where in the Gospell nay that is more moderate then that which followes for he goeth further page 188. It is not agreeable to the Scriptures and to preach it is not to preach the Gospell of Christ but somthing which men sure he must mean such as the Carpenter the Sonne of Mary Peter the fisher Paul the Tent-maker have added to the Gospel of Jesus Christ p. 177 he saith determinatively that this doctrin of Christ suffering for al men his phrase is persons is not the doctrin of Jesus Christ nor the subject matter of the Gospel nor is there such a thing found in the Gospell nor in any part of the word of God and then he addes rightly understood And must not that understāding be according to some unwritten Gospell to cloath this with to be adored which in its own cloathing is denied and made vile by him page 176. 2. Whereas the Gospell is glad tydings of a redemption and peace and life and so good will to be declared that in beleeving men might receive it and glad tidings and a word of truth it can be to none for whom there is nothing in truth prepared And the Gospell our Saviour so preaching John 3 16 17. and 12 47 45. commanded his disciples to preach to every creature speaking of the world of mankind as Iohn 1.3 4 5 7 9. Mat. 28.19 Mar. 16.15 and they so preached the Gospell 2 Cor. 5.19 and him the Sonne of God the Saviour of the world 1 Iohn 4 14 and many have so beleeved and confessed Iohn 4.42 He plainly denyeth all this and sayeth expresly page 133. That neither Christ nor the Apostles did so teach nor that he required them so to teach and though they declared peace to whatsoever house they came that was but ministeriall as if in ministry they told lyes page 136. nor saith he did any of the Saints so beleeve So that the written Gospell with him is no Gospell no word of God understood according to its own sayings but according to some unwritten verity of his which he calls the right understanding of it 3. Whereas the Scripture in the Gospell setteth forth God to be the Saviour of all men 1 Tim. 4.10 and that his mercies are over all his workes Psalme 145.8 9. and that it is through Christ that these mercies are extended Psalme 75.3 Iohn 1.3 4 5 9. Col. 1.18 and that these mercies are witnesses of his goodnesse Acts 14.17 and fruites of love kindnesse and mercy Mat. 5.44 48. Luke 6.32 to 36. and come to lead men to repentance Rom. 2.4 and to the Gospell that they might beleeve and when men harden their hearts and will not be brought to submit to and beleeve on him he chargeth them to hold the truth in unrighteousnesse Rom. 1.18 To be adversaries to him for his love to have rewarded him evill for good and hatred for his love Psalme 109.4.5 and that which was for their wel-fare to be turned into a trap Psalme 69.22 beside that said Psal 36.5 6 7. Yet would he have assaid to deny the enjoyment of any mercies any benefit yea as a benefit though outward by any unbeleever through Christ page 148 149. but because he is in this moderate and saith it is not cleare to him which I beleeve because he beleeveth not that for them through which it is procured and saith if he mistake in this or any other thing he is willing to be informed The Lord preserve in him and me such a heart and then wee shall not deny the sayings of Scripture XII But that he may not be said wholly and altogether to deny all the sayings of the Gospell he doth acknowledge some parts and sayings of truth and presse the same to hide and deny other parts of truth as the worke Jesus Christ worketh in men by spirituall application of his blood to deny the compleatnesse of that he hath wrought in himselfe with God for men His reconciling men to God by spirituall application of his blood to deny his reconciliation wrought with God in presenting the vertue of his blood in sacrifice offered to God his redeeming men out of the world to God to deny his purchasing men of God the eternall life given in Christ to deny the life of the world given by Christ as is seen throughout his Treatise And usuall waies of such as are witty and subtil not only in points of faith that they may the more fairely deny one for that
mystery he hath unvailed are not all degrees of men and all Nations and all Kindreds of people all persons had he not as good have writ plainly and said All signifies but some of all sorts of men and so have saved himselfe out of that snare of denying persons to be men But if he had so said yet the Scripture would reprove his saying where Paul was preaching Gospell and Christ risen from the dead and that God will judge the world by him and that he hath given assurance thereof to all men or offered them faith a ground to beleeve it in that he hath raised him from the dead how doth he teach us there to understand All men and All Nations see Acts 17.24 God that made the world and all things therein mind how well this suits with Psalme 8.6.10 Heb. 2.6.9 John 1.3.11 Seeing he is the Lord of Heaven and Earth c. compare this with Col. 2.3.9 He giveth to all life and breath and all things and was not all this by Christ who by vertue of his death and ransome is the Lord of all Acts 10.36 Rom. 14.9 now mind verse 26. And hath made of one blood all Nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth so here in respect of the nature the flesh and blood Christ took is no difference so in respect of his death as death was the wages of finne and of his resurrection and offering through which he is become Lord of all so as there is in him a door of hope and he shall be the judge so farre no difference the difference and so the mystery unvailed by the Spirit through the Apostles and not Mr. Knowles and Mr. Garner is in some further thing And all Nations of men is here all men that are in all Nations of all sorts and degrees which also is from his providence according to his purpose as saith the text mind it And hath determined the times before appointed and the bounds of their habitation and now marke the end verse 27. that they should seeke after the Lord if happily they might feel after him and find him note here his gracious end but is there any hope or possibility mind the text though he be not farre from every one of us see here how the word Vs may be stretched to the largest when All is spoken of all while used in the works of God leaves none out and that is a good ground in speaking to and of persons surviving and hearing to leave none out and so the Apostle here doth not after such a large proposition single out himselfe and those of his mind from the residue But in respect of that he had spoken in this equalizeth himselfe to them according to that Phil. 2.6 7. and so Vs is as large as all spoken to yea all at that time living as the text doth manifest verse 18. for in him wee live and move and have our being and that wee may be assured the Apostle puts in himselfe with them in the word Vs see how he applyes the saying of some of their own Poets for wee are also his ofspring c. and on this ground exhorteth to repentance by preaching Gospell and that this shall not be in vain wee have a sure word Psalme 86.9 speaking of God and his workes he saith All Nations whom thou hast made shall come and worship before thee Oh Lord c. which is true and will appear true as a Prophesie at the returne of the Jewes and Christ sitting on his Throne and as a proposition at the great and generall Judgement Isay 45.22 23. Phil. 2.10 11. So that he that will exclude the persons of men or any of them from the death of Christ and his resurrection and this fruit of the same mentioned Acts 17 24-31 and Psalme 86.9 Doth likewise as much exclude their persons or for many persons from being created and preserved by God But had Mr. Garner observed or would any man observe how the Holy Ghost gives us to understand the word All when spoken by God of his workes in and by Christ when of creation when of a restoration by and in a publike man when of Son like priviledges when the word All is in such speeches used as a proposition and when as a prophesie hee should see it in the largest extent the word in such a sentence can beare and that as a ground when his servants speake of the same it is in the largest sense that can be sutable to his servants therefore concerning me and those of my mind Mr. Garner with the approbation of Mr Knowles hath written a notorious and plain un-truth and slander page 57. In saying that by All in Isay 53.6 wee understand all persons from first to last wee have no cause so to do for in that when God speakes of his giving his Sonne to dye for All men he meanes all from first to last is a good ground for men to speak of all men in their time and to whom they speak and so for the Prophet to speak of all Israel But with this slander he hath written as false doctrine in his interpretation that All is only wee who doe enjoy peace with God whereas he meant all Israel as is evident John 8.39 as the Apostle includes unbeleeving Gentils with himselfe and stretcheth All to the utmost a servant may without limmitation Acts 17 24-31 But enough is shown before about the word All which in so many Scriptures is abused by M. Garners Reason and a forced stinted sense put in it ☞ 1. 5. The word Tast in Heb. 2.9 should tast death the naturall meaning of these words he conceives and layeth his conceit for a ground of Doctrine and truth is not his suffering of death but an effect and fruit of his suffering of Death and being crowned with glory and saith he we are to understand the words Tasting death to be a sweetning or rellishing of death a making of death tastfull savory sweet usefull and gainfull page 44. now for answer That Jesus Christ by his death and resurrection hath taken out the sting and curse of the first death so as in it selfe it is to no man a curse nor is able for ever to detain those that dye But they shall be raised and made a live again and so it is made lesse dreadfull more easie and but as passage to immortality to every man is a truth affirmed in Scripture though by Mr. Garner denyed 1 Cor. 15.21 22-54 55 56. 2 Tim. 1.10 though the choyce benefit be to Beleevers Eccles 7 1-8 1 Cor. 15.57 58. so that through the mediation of Christ and only his own personal death is made savory gainfull to them Rom. 5 8-10 Rev. 1.5 1 John 1.7 but their-through even their own dyings also 2 Cor. 4.11 to 18. Phil. 1.21 2 Cor. 1 5-9 And had the word Tast such a meaning in this Heb. 2.9 it would still confirme the truth Mr.
Garner opposeth seeing by Christ death is made more easie for all men and so as all men shall be brought out of it yet a specialty for Beleevers which overthrowes Mr. Garners drift but this being plainly set forth in other places of the Scripture and no so plainly in this word Tast wee are still to try whether Mr. Garners private sense having no other place to second it will stand or not first he prepared his way by his reasonings and they are divers 1. Hee no where finds the death of Christ no where called a tasting death but what strength is in this what if it be so called here and what if the denying of some of those for whom he dyed be so called is not that equivolent And that it is so see Mat. 16.28 with 17.16 Marke 9 1-6 Luke 9 27 32. yea and even the Jewes though they saw not the spirituall life and so minded not the spirituall death Christ spake of at that time yet understood seeing and tasting death for dying John 8.51 52. so sight or tasting was understood and that rightly by old Simeon Luke 2.26 so that there is no weight in this reason 2. Hee conceives to take Tasting Death for dying implies a needlesse repetition and much hashnesse in the words as that he suffered death that he should suffer death but there is no ground for this his conception if he could nor have seen to have read the words otherwise yet then he might have taken Death in the first place for his fore-going abasement and sufferings which in Scripture are called Deaths also 2 Cor. 1.9 and 4.10 11. and 11.13 and so have suited it with other places speaking of his abasement and sufferings that he might dye as Phil. 2.7 8. Heb. 2.14 and 10. But the words are plaine to set forth that exalted one even our Lord Jesus Christ of whose exaltation he speaketh and how farre the subjecting all to him is already fulfilled concerning himselfe And in this Heb. 2 9 two things he shewes concerning him whom by faith wee now see crowned with glory as first the end why he was abased namely That he migh suffer death he was made a little lower then the Angels verse 7. and this the same hee that is crowned with glory as verse 7. Who was made lower then the Angels for suffering death that he might suffer death and so overcome death as verse 9.14 Secondly the manner for whom and that was That by the grace of God he should tast death for every man agreeable to that 2 Cor. 5 14 15. and so the words crowned with glory and honour import not that it was so before his suffering death but referring to that said verse 7 may be read as in a parenthisis and yet truly he was much glorified in being made such a publike man and filled with might to suffer and overcome such a death and so to read the words in order Then tasting Death is not onely dying but also instructive to us in two things about his death as namely 1 Tha the only grapled with the sting curse and strength of the first death that hee and he only tasted or felt indeed 1 Cor. 15.3 4 55-52 2 Cor 5.21 Gal. 3 13. and 2. That he stayd not long in death no not so long as to see corruption of his body but soon overcame it and rose again Acts 2.29 31. But this is shown at large for All in the 12 charter of the opposed Treatise and not refuted by this opposer And so his third reason as absurdly raised is fallen Secondly for the sense it selfe of the word tast he hath given it in his own name and though he pretended at first to refuse the naturall and openly appearing sense of the words because he could not find it in another place yet he hath presumed to put his fancyed sense upon it without any allowance from this or any other place either from the word in the originall or in any translation or in any customary speech for though the Noune tast may some times signifie savoury and some times bitter yet to make tastfull it signifieth not that is another word But the verb tast so tast or tasting which may signifie feeling or savouring either sweetness or bitterness to signifie to put a tast in a thing and so to make it sweet or savoury is no wherefound and if we should so read the Scriptures wee should multiply absurdities so that in this he hath advanced his reason to force a strange sense to an evill end ☞ 1. 6. The word World is abused by him and a limmitted sense forced on it as if in such and so many places it signified the Gentils or all Nations opposed to the Jewes or rather according to his drift a few here and there a small number comparred to the rest among the Nations or Gentils opposed to a small remnant of the Jewes for so is his drift and meaning though he strive to colour it with words and so he hath abused John 1.29 page 74. John 3.16 pag. 82. John 6 51. page 101 Iohn 12 47. page 126. 2 Cor. 5.19 page 1 18. and 1 John 2.2 page 97. In which places the text it selfe beareth out a larger sense and that the answer to him about these and other places abused by him may be the briefer let thi● be noted that the word World when it is in Gods own sayings and of his works by Christ used for the world of mankind It most usually frequently fignifieth naturall men as they come from the first Adam and bear his Image and are preserved through Christ whose light shines on them and yet they remain in their blindnesse and naturall state still and so wee are taught Iohn 1.3 to 11. verse 3. All things made by Christ verse 4 in him was life and the life was the light of men verse 5. And the light shined in darknesse and the darknesse comprehendeth it not and then more meanes used to testifie of the light to verse 9. where he is affirmed The true Light which lighteneth every man that commeth into the world and having spoken of the world of mankind sayeth verse 10. He was in the world by his light mercies and means vouchsafed from the beginning and in fulnesse of time in his bodily presence and the world was made created preserved and stored with good things by him and the world knew him not so explicating verse 4 5. and verse 11. He comes to his own he gave to a certain people of the world more meanes and came to them by his word and Orracles and put his name upon them and called them his and in fulnesse of time came in personall presence and preached by his messenger and himselfe to them and his own received him not they beleeved not one him so explicating verses 6.7 8 9. And so though a distinct part of the world yet the world still all concluded under sinne and under unbeleefe Rom.
before Mr. Garners time or mine so that he in this hath unvailed no mystery but strove to cast a vail on Iohn 6.33 51. to obscure the plainly appearing sense and to make men beleeve that the life of the world and the life of Christ that eternall life he gives to them that in beleeving he draws out of the world is all one and the same life a grosse and absurd conceit V. Mystery That the reall manifestation and suffering of Christ in the flesh his personall Death upon the Tree was more wonderfull glorious and mysticall in respect of the declaration of the wisdome power and grace of God which did more wonderfully shine forth in it then either the promises or shadowes of his Death so it was more wonderfull and glorious then those in respect of the power fruit of it also which was the breaking down the partition wall which was between Jewes and Gentils it was the beginning of life and salvation unto all Nations of the world p 111 112 113 114 126. He cals ' it the glorious saving power of the Death of Christ and surely I am ready to acknowledge the dying of Christ precious powerfull glorious c. and the Death of Christ exceeding in power glory and fruitfulnesse and that to Gentils also But this hath been unvailed by the Apostles and is clearly held forth in preaching and writing generally and so not unvailed by Mr. Garner who hath rather vailed the plainly appearing truth then unvailed the mystery in his expressions for the Death of Christ was gloriously and savingly powerfull even before his actuall dying and that to mankind and in Beleevers from Adam to Noah and from Noah to Abraham before there was any Nation of Israel distinct from Gentils Heb. 11.1.8 and when that distinction was it did not limmit the power of his Death to Israel muchlesse did it limmit it to the lewes it only limmitted the enjoyment of the priviledges of the first Testament to them and yet not so but that the door was open for any Gentile of any Nation in submitting and comming in by Circumcision to be one people with them they might enjoy Exod. 12. and 13. though through the pride of the Gentils this became a partition-wall And yet farther through Christ was much glorified in being inabled to dye such a death and mercy and truth met therein yet the Holy Ghost speaketh of the personall sufferings and dying of Christ as of an abasement Isay 53. 2 Cor. 5.21 Phil. 2.7 8. and of his resurrection as that wherein he was mightily declared to be the Sonne of God Rom. 1.4 and sayeth expresly notwithstanding his denying that if he had not risen wee had been yet in our sinnes and faith and preaching vain 1 Cor. 15.17 And that he is exalted to be a Prince and a Saviour c. Acts 5.31 and received spirit gifts in the man for men even for the rebellious also That the Lord God might dwell among them Psalme 68 18 and by this spirit making known and applying the death of him that is risen that was once dead and is alive for evermore it is that his death is so glorious powerfull and saving in men as is foreshown But Mr. Garner saith expresly that to dye for men and to gather them together in one is one and the same thing pag. 126. so that he doth but talke confusedly when he talkes of sprinckling for blood-sheding and blood sprinckling are by this saying one and the same thing so that here he vailes the mystery in Scripture unvailed VI. Mystery That Christ was fore promised to be a light in the Gentils revealing in them and giving to them remission of sins salvation life everlasting through saith in Christ page 128 And that unto all those to whom he is a light which himselfe expounded in many places to be all the Nations of the earth All men the World the whole World the Gentils c he revealeth himselfe in them drawing their hearts to beleeve in him unto life everlasting page 129. This is the main and bottome matter the grand mystery and swaying and interpreting truth which though in many places he puts down in his own name yet he takes it for granted none will deny it this streams through his Book from the beginning to the end and is the ground of his forcing his private sense on so many places of Scripture this is it led him to such expressions in his unvailing Mysteries This is it with which he answers Mr. Lambs reasons this is the maine matter and bottome proofe for his confounding the destinctions at first and for raising his conclusions at last and to speak as the truth is if he have unvailed any one Mystery this is it but whether it be a mystery of truth or no that remaines to be tryed for he hath brought no proofe nor testimony for the truth of it but his own affirmation and Mr. Knowles aprobation and that is to light for proofe for we have no Rabby to take any point of faith from for his own authority or testimony but only Christ Mat. 23.8 nor are we to esteem any light in his sayings that addes to or takes from or speakes besides and otherwise then the sayings of Christ in the Gospell Isay 8 20. Gal. 1.6 7 8 9. Rev. 22.18 19. Besides Mr. Garners expressions are some-what harsh and dangerous giving to much aprobation to the opinion of those that will speak as gloriously of the death of Christ as he and yet concerning Jesus that was borne in Bethlehem ●e out of us dying and rising and offerering Sacrifice for us and so a propitiation with God for us and this made known to us concerning that in his person without us by word and Spirit and all effecacies thereof are nothing but Christ after the flesh and knowing him after the flesh And they exalted a Christ that is the Son of God the Saviour the propitiation they say and in every man Dying in a man and rising in a man and this their happinesse when this in them is revealed to them quite besides the Scripture the next step to Athisme And Mr. Garners expressions are come very neer to it but to say the least in this expression of his mystery that with faithfulnesse can be said he wrongs the Scripture Isay 52.15 and 9.1 2. Mat. 4 14 15. That speakes of Christ personall comming to the Jewes preaching the Gospell to them and that Gentils also might enjoy the same As if Zabulun and Napthaly because bordering upon and in the way of the Gentils were Gentils and as if the Gospell preaching by Christ come in the flesh were not a great light among them yea no light but only to those in whom Christ was revealed giving them remission of sinnes and everlasting life yea he alters the language of the Holy Ghost who speaking of the life and propitiation in Christ and the Salvation in him as set forth shining and tendered in the Gospell