Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
death_n dead_a die_v soul_n 6,918 5 5.2813 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A49843 Observations upon a sermon intituled, A confutation of atheism from the faculties of the soul, alias̀€, Matter and motion cannot think preached April 4, 1692 : by way of refutation. Layton, Henry, 1622-1705. 1692 (1692) Wing L756; ESTC R39115 14,582 19

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

World daily communicates for supplying the daily Decays of them I conceive Matter thus constituted impregnated irrigated and enlivened may by Divine Power be made cogitative That the Insects work according to Rules of Art and Science I know none who can observe them and deny it that Brutes have their Senses Affections Passions Appetites and Motions all Men do grant but the most blind and wilful among the Cartesians also that they have Phansie Memory and Perceivances acted in and by their Brains and Dr. Willis dict lib. p. 59. says in Hominibus Brutis eadem prorsus est conformatio organorum animalium And the Evidences that Cogitation and all other rational Acts in Men depend upon the Brain and are performed in it and by it seem to me so clear and undeniable as that joined to the rest it may pass for a strong Proof that the Brain of Man is cogitative Matter or very like it And as to his phrasing it that Omnipotence it self cannot make cogitative Body there may be applied a Saying of Dr. Willis p. 5. such Men it seems do think quod Deus nihil amplius fabricare valeat quam quod homo possit concipere aut effingere Well but our Preacher says this cannot be done because of the Incapacity of the Subject to this I answer that Aaron's Rod laid upon the Tabernacle was dry Wood and seemed to be under an incapacity of bearing Fruit and yet in the morning by Divine Power it had budded and brought forth Blossoms and yielded Almonds the Red Sea stood like Walls and Jordan staid its Waters from running downwards the Chaldean Fire forbore to burn God's Servants or so much as to singe their Cloths all which are Acts beyond the natural Capacities of the Agents of them and so was the multiplying of the Loaves and Fishes under the Gospel and what will our Preacher say to Matth. 19.24 Hath a Camel the Capacity of going through the Eye of a needle Christ says with Men this is impossible but not with God for with him all things are possible whence it seems possible with him to make cogitative Body notwithstanding our Preachers assurance to the contrary That the cogitative Power very much depends upon the good Disposition Soundness and Temperament of the Brain is a thing so well known as it seems to need very little confirmation David Psal 146.3 says When the breath of man goeth forth he shall turn again to his earth and then all his thoughts perish the new Translation reads Mans breath goeth forth he returns to his earth and that very day his thoughts perish The perishing of his Thoughts may be expounded his Intentions or Designs but more literally and fully it seems to intend the Man's power and faculty of Thinking for the Man dead can think no more But what is it that dies our Preacher will deny that his Soul dies and yet by Death the Man's Faculty of Thinking is certainly destroyed viz. by Death of the Body and the Parts and Organs of it ergo the Body or some Organs of it are materia cogitativa And the same may be further proved ex principiis for during Childhood and whilst the cogitative Parts and Organs are immature we think like Children but grown to maturity we put away childish Thoughts or modes of Thinking and yet then if the Brain happen to be clouded with Fumes from the Spleen or other Distempers or even by those from Wine or Strong-drink the Man cannot think orderly or rationally and in phrenetick Distempers Mens Thoughts rave and rove without Order or any Coherence or Connexion at all in Diseases where the Head is stupified as Apoplexies the Man becomes temporally incapable of any Thoughts at all From all which I collect that the Particles of Blood inflamed ascending from the Heart unto the Head are there further rarified and made lucid irradiating the Brain and the Ventricles thereof and that to these Spirits and Organs God hath imparted a discerning Faculty or Power and that when these Organs are sound and perfect and the flaming Particles clear bright and lucid they work to a perfection of degrees in the Minds Reason and Thoughts of Men unto which God adds when he pleases afflatum divini numinis and that accumulates an excellency of Perfection to Man and in him of thinking inventing and discerning P. 31. Our Preacher says he hath sufficiently shewn that Sense and Perception can never be the product of any kind of Matter or Motion And if this be true let our Readers make themselves the Judges Well but says he if this cannot be corporeal it must come from an incorporeal Substance within us If he will take a material Spirit for an incorporeal Substance we are agreed but if he will have this incorporeal Substance to be an immaterial intelligent angelical Spirit I answer he hath not proved the necessity of its being so nor that the thing is so nay here he confesses we cannot conceive the manner of our Souls Action and Passion nor what hold it can lay on the Body when it voluntarily moves it this is what we cannot conceive of such a Soul But I desire him to tell us what he doth conceive or know concerning such a Soul that he will evince to Reason quod sit quid sit unde oritur quando ingreditur ubi residet quomodo operatur an separatim subsistit quo avolat deficiente corpore If he can teach scientifically concerning these Points his word will be better taken in many other things and yet even then I could hardly credit his next Assertion viz. tho we cannot conceive the Soul nor its Actings yet we are as certain of them as of any Mathematical Truth whatsoever which I both can conceive and may be easily demonstrated to me The Truth and Reasonableness of this Assertion shall be left to those who are at leisure to consider of them P. 32. He confesses his Ignorance in causes of Mens Pleasure Pain Sleep Activity he says this Knowledge exceeds Man's narrow Faculties and is out of the reach of our Discovery he discerns excellent Final Causes of the vital Conjunction of Body and Soul but the Instrumental he knows not nor how they are united or tied together he resolves all into God's good Pleasure but he shews us no Evidence that it is or ever was his Pleasure to inform Mankind by an Immaterial Intelligent Spirit which is capable of living in a State of Separation from the Body And if Corporeal Powers be confessedly too hard for him it may seem strange he should attempt upon the Disquisition concerning the Being and Operations of an Immaterial Soul in Man without so much as offering to make any positive proof of the Thing from the Grounds either of Reason or Scripture I am not able to credit his bare Word for it nor his negative proof that it must be so because he thinks it cannot be otherwise These persuasions seem of small force with those who think the
that human Arts have so far prevailed as to communicate to dead and hard Matter a fixed and regular Motion Witness Architas his Dove and Regiomontanus his Eagle both made of Wood and a Fly of Iron made by the last who all flew at their full liberty in the Air to a certain and considerable distance and returned in a regular manner to the places from whence they first set out and this Men would not then believe could be done without an Immaterial Spirit that these Engines therefore were moved by Daemons and the Artists were Conjurers was a common opinion of those times and hitherto Artists are with Difficulty defended from such Imputations Dr. Willis in his Anima Brutorum p. 40. De illis redarguendis solicitus non sum qui viventium sensus facultates quascunque perceptivas non nisi à substantia immateriali immortalique obire posse contendunt he says He did not think such Thinkers worthy of any answer and this perhaps might be his reason for it he knew that our Preacher's Affertion was maintained by several learned Men but after a different mode of Argumentation for when they were press'd by the Argument taken from the Actions and Faculties of the Brutes viz. that they have and act as many Senses as Men have and use them as perfectly that they have as strong and active Affections Passions Appetites and local Motions as Men have that they have Phansie Memory and Perceivance like those of Men tho in far lower degrees than those of Men are Upon averment that all these Faculties in the Brutes were acted by a material Spirit and a demand why the same might not be effected amongst Men the Maintainers of Immateriality seem much put to it for an answer to this Objection and they are divided upon it some of them say that Brutes have neither Senses nor Affections nor Appetites nor any sort of Perceivances at all and that they know no more of what they do than the Organ-pipes know when they make Musick or a pair of Bellows that they blow the Fire whence they would infer that they have not and need not any sort of Soul for that they neither use nor have any sensible Faculty at all But this Argument appears to me as I suppose it did to Dr. Willis argumentum ducens ad absurdum and therefore but a Fallacy For what can lightly appear more absurd to the common sense of Mankind than boldly and seriously to affirm that a Dog or a Horse doth neither hear see smell taste nor even feel when they are whipt spurr'd or beaten and that Beasts have neither Love Wrath Fear Expectation or Desire these Assertions appear so contrary to Mens daily experience and therefore so absurd as to make Dr. Willis think such Arguers deserve no answer and yet Des Cartes and Sir K. Digby profess to argue on that side and thereby to support the necessary Immateriality of a human Soul Others there are who to support the necessity of such an Immateriality take a quite different and even a contrary course for observing the infirmity and absurdity of the forecited Argument they agree and acknowledge that Brutes have and use all their Senses Affections Passions Appetites and local Motions as Men use them and that they have and use Phanfie Memory Perceivance and Choice like but in a much lower degree than those of Men but say they the Brutes cannot thus act without the assistance and guidance of Spirits or Souls nay and that it is not a Material Soul which can serve for such purposes but that Brutes must of necessity be reputed to have Immaterial Souls praeexistent before they came into their brutal Bodies and that shall subsist in a state of Separation after the death of such brutal Bodies And this they say and affirm with design to persuade that there is an absolute necessity for Men to have Immaterial Souls because say they the very Brutes cannot act their Senses and Faculties without such Souls And these were such Arguers as Dr Willis thought not to deserve his Answer and yet Dr. More asserts this opinion in terminis and Baxter follows the same very near altho not altogether so fully But they are all eagerly bent to establish the Immateriality and Immortality of Human Souls for fear that otherwise there would not be a sufficient ground or foundation for the expectation of Rewards and Punishments future to this Life not enough remembring or considering the Article of the Resurrection and the last Judgment appointed by God for that very purpose of distributing Recompences according to the behaviour which Men have used in passing through the Trials and Temptations of this World Our Preacher insists That if Sensation were inherent in Matter Stocks and Stones would be Percipient and Rational Creatures To this I say that may be competent to and inherent in one sort of Matter which is very incompetent to and incoherent with another sort of Matter But he seems to intend a confounding all sorts of Matter together as if Logs Metals and Stones were of the same nature with Flesh Blood and Brain or those of Water Air and Fire amongst all which sorts of Matter I say there are very great Differences and some of these sorts of Matter are capable of such Effects and Operations as others of them are not P. 15. Aimed only against Atheists and such as deny there are any Spiritual Substunces I say thereunto I am not of that Belief or Opinion P. 17. He says Matter cannot acquire Motion of it self This I deny For I say that Wind and Fire are Matter and yet Self-movers nor do they or can they ever lose their Motion or cease moving so long as they continue to be Wind or Fire And if we shall consider the Dust of which Adam was made we may find that it may be so comminuted and refined as when pounced through a fine Searce the smallest part of it will rise up again like a thin cloud ascending upwards of itself and apt to be moved with every little Breath resembling and fine as those Atoms which we call Motes in the Sun and which of their own nature maintain a perpetual Motion It seems a Compositum of such active Particles impregnated with rorid Steams and Juices apt to ascend by adhering to any solid Body are not apt alone for Motion but that by the hand and skill of a Divine Artist there may be made of such like Ingredients a Cogitative Matter For an instance of which we may propound the Insects who have nothing but mere earth and dust impregnated for their Originals and yet act regularly and according to the Rules and Directions of Art and Science witness the Bees the Ants and the admirable Textures of the Spiders God thereby revealing to us that he can out of mere Matter produce Arts and Sciences and especially for the preservation and benefit of his Creatures but far beyond the Practise or Knowledge of Men to perform and