Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
death_n day_n king_n life_n 4,747 5 4.1881 3 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A77411 A brief collection of some memorandums: or, Things humbly offered to the consideration of the members of the great convention and of the succeeding Parliament. 1689 (1689) Wing B4555A; ESTC R173274 9,364 15

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

power when setled Yet may it not be judged meet by this Convention in their erecting a new building to lay such foundations while the sense of their danger and deliverance is upon them as may prevent the return of the evils complained of and prevent them more effectually if God be with us than an act of Parliament can do And the humble petition is That it may please this great Assembly not to leave the Protestant Dissenters bound as Felix did Paul but to make Liberty in matters of Religion for them I meddle not with others though I with all men well I say Liberty for Protestant Dissenters a Stone in the Foundation of the New Building than which as the petitioner believeth never will any man find a Squarer Fitter Stronger better to lay in the Foundation of a Government And if this great Convention shall be pleased to do this which it may be harder to get done in another time and way 't is already manifest by the Prince's Declaration and otherwise that to His Highness it would be very acceptable And why should not His Government if that shall be agreed on be hereby Endeared to all the Protestants And does not the Condition and Safety of the Nation require an Union of Protestants not by the harsh and impossible way of an Enforced Uniformity but by a Gracious Liberty Can it be reasonably supposed that Dissenting Protestants will be able chearfully to Engage in their Trades by which the Riches of King and Kingdom are encreased while they are liable every day to undoing Penalties Worshipping of God And will it be a fair Encouragement for them to venture their Lives in the High places of the Field it may be in a Foreign Nation to remember that if they escape Death and return Home the next place they shall lodge in may be a Gaol for Life upon a Capias Excommunicatum and that their Estates may be pulled to pieces upon the Statute of twenty pound a month for not coming to Church or some other Penal Laws And the Petitioner adds his fear that if care be taken only for our Civil Liberties and no pitty shewed to them who have been so long oppressed in their Spiritual or Religious Liberties God's controversy will not yet be at an end with us And shall we provoke the Lord to jealousy Are we stronger than he His late works shew we are not 2. To the ensuing Parliament The humble Petition is That the Government would be pleased to Repeal all the Penal Laws in so far as concerns Protestant Dissenters and that none of them may hereafter suffer for not coming to Church or other Non-Conformity or for Worshipping God in their own Meetings according to their own best light and understanding of God's Word particularly that the Laws against Conventicles the Five-mile Act the Statute of the 35th of Queen Elizabeth a Repeal of which last once already passed both Houses with other the like may be Repealed II. Thus far as to Popery somewhat more is added as to Slavery and the means of preventing it Upon the Restauration of King Charles the Second there seems to have been a Bending of the Stick to the other Extreme and that He coming in without Terms the Prerogative gained much upon the Liberties of the People and has been upon the gaining hand ever since Here is a Gracious and Magnanimous Prince no Friend to Arbitrary Despotic Government Were it not good to procure the repeal of some late Laws which trench upon the Rights of the Subject and the passing of some Laws for their preservation I. One of the chief Fences against Arbitrary Government is the frequent assembling of free Parliaments There are Laws in force for this Two Statutes appoint a Parliament every Year v. 4 Ed. 3.14 and 36 Ed. 3.10 There was also a Law for a Triennial Parliament made in the time of King Charles the first which was repealed if indeed it be repealed for the matter is doubtful and another act for a Triennial Parliament which some esteemed a New Nothing passed in its room 1. Were it not good that for the next Reign there be a Parliament once in a Year and afterwards the old Act for a Triennial Parliament being revived to take place and be observed Frequent Parliaments would make Ministers of State and Judges if any of them should attempt to winde up the Government to a Tyranny afraid of a Day of Account in this World though of that in the next they should be secure 2. And were it not good that this expensive and vile way of compassing a Seat in the House of Commons in Parliament by Hiring the Votes of the Countrey and making people drunk should be laid aside And that whosoever shall in a County spend above or in a City Burrough or Cinqueport above to procure or reward Suffrages should be disabled to Sit and the matter being well proved before a Committee for Elections the Election should be void 3. We have had an Instance of purchasing the Liberties and Money of the Nation by Pensions paid to Members in a Parliament which Posterity will know by a Name taken from that practice Is it not fit that the like be prevented for the future by the Highest Penalties upon the Givers and Receivers of such Pensions 4. Were it not good to appoint Penalties upon Sheriffs and other Officers who shall make false and undue Returns of Members of the House of Commons in Parliament higher than any Law hath yet appointed and more proportionable to so grand and pernicious an Offence with a way for the more easie Levying of such Penalties 5. And if the Privilege of Parliament hath suffered any diminution in the Case of Fitz-Harris or of them who had and pleaded Pardons to defeat impeachments made in Parliament by the Commons of England for High Treason Provision may be made that such things may not for the future be drawn into Example 6. Whether something should not be done if it shall be found needful to reconcile the King's Negative Voice to Bills in Parliament with his Coronation-Oath whereby he swears to consent to or confirm Laws quas Vulgus Elegerit 7. What if Power were given by Law to the Speaker or any Committee of the House of Commons to administer an Oath in matters concerning the Privileges of their own House II. Since the Restauration there hath been such a Determination of the Question which was disputed between King Charles the First and the first Long-Parliament touching the Militia as in effect makes the Government in proximâ potententiâ at least of becoming Arbitrary as some think With respect to that may it be considered 1. Whether it be not meet by Law to Limit the number of the King's Guards 2. To provide against a Standing Army within the Kingdom by Indispensable Laws making it High Treason for any Commanders Officers or Souldiers besides the King 's allowed Guards to enter into such a Standing Army within the