and intent of the said law Now in case these two causes and coÌsiderations wil not satisfie th Aduersarie we wil adioine therevnto a third which he shal neuer by any good and honest shift auoid And that is the vse and practise of the Realme as wel in the time foregoing the said statute as afterward We stand vpon the interpretation of the coÌmon law recited and declared by the said statute And how shal we better vnderstand what the law is therein then by the vse and practise of the said lawe For the best interpretation of the lawe is custome But the Realme before the statute admitted to the Croune not only kings children and others of the first degre but also of a farther degre and such as were plainely borne out of the Kings allegeance The soresaid vse and practise appeareth as wel before as sithens the time of the Conquest Among other King Edward the Confessour being destitute of a lawful Heire within the Realme sent into HuÌgary for Edward his Nephew surnamed Outlaw son to King EdmuÌd called IroÌside after many yeres of his exile to returne into EnglaÌd to th' intent the said Outlaw should inherite this Realme whiche neuerthelesse came not to effect by reason the said outlaw died before the said king Edward his Vncle. After whose death the said king apointed Eadgar Etheling sonne of the said Outlaw being his next cosen and heire as he was of right to the Croune of EnglaÌd And for that the said Eadgar was but of yong and tender yeares and not able to take vpoÌ him so great a gouernement the said king coÌmitted the protection as wel of the yong Prince as also of the Realm to Harold Earle of Kent vntil suche time as the said Eadgar had obteined perfit age to be hable to weld the state of a King Which Harold neuerthelesse coÌtrary to the trust supplanted the said yong Prince of the Kingdome and put the Croune vpon his own head By this it is apparent that foraine birth was not accoÌpted of before the time of the CoÌquest a iust cause to repel and reiect any man being of the next proximitie in blood froÌ the Title of the Croune And though the said king Edward the CoÌfessors wil and purpose toke no such force and effect as he desired and the law craued yet the like succession toke place effectuously in king Stephen and king HeÌry the secoÌd as we haue already declared Neither wil th' Aduersaries shift of foramers borne of father and mother which be not of the kings alegeaÌce help him forasmuch as this clause of the said statut is not to be applied to the kings childreÌ but to others as appeareth in the same statute And these two kings StepheÌ and Henrie the 2. as they were borne in a forain place so their fathers and mothers wer not of the kings allegeaÌce but mere Aliens and straÌgers And how notorious a vaine thing is it that th' Aduersarie would perswade vs that the said K. Henrie the secoÌd rather came in by force of a coÌposition then by the proximitie and nearenes of blood I leaue it to euery man to coÌsider that hath any maner of feling in the discours of the stories of this realm The coÌpositioÌ did procure him quietnes and rest for the time with a good and sure hope of quiet and peaceable entrance also after the death of King Stephen and so it followed in deede but ther grew to him nomore right therby then was due to him before For he was the true heir to the Croune as appeareth by Stephen his Aduersaries owne confession Henry the firste maried his daughter Mathildis to Henry the Emperour by whome he had no childreÌ And no dout in case she had had any children by th'Emperour they should haue ben heires by succession to the Croune of England After whose death she retourned to her father yet did King Henry cause all the Nobilitie by an expresse othe to embrace her after his death as Queene and after her her children Not long after she was maried to Ieffrey Plantagenet a Frenchman borne Earle of Aniowe who begat of her this Henry the second being in France Whervpon the said King did reuiue and renue the like othe of allegeaÌce aswel to her as to her sonne after her With the like false persuasioÌ the Adueruersarie abuseth him selfe and his Reader touching Arthur Duke of Britanie Nephew to King Richard the first As though forsooth he were iustly excluded by Kinge Iohn his vncle by cause he was a forainer borne If he had said that he was excluded by reason the vncle ought to be preferred before the Nephewe though it should haue ben a false allegation and plaine against the rules of the lawes of this Realme as may wel appeare among other thinges by King Richard the second who succeded his graÌdfather king Edward the third which Richard had diuerse worthie and noble vncles who neither for lacke of knowledge coulde be ignorant of the right neither for lacke of frendes courage and power be enforced to forbeare to chalenge their title and interest yet should he haue had some countenance of reason and probabilitie bicause many arguments and the authoritie of many learned and notable Ciuilians doo concurre for the vncles right before the Nephewe But to make the place of the natiuitie of an inheritour to a kingdom a sufficieÌt barre against the right of his blood it seemeth to haue but a weake and slender holde and grounde And in our case it is a most vnsure and false ground seeing it is moste true that King Richard the first as we haue said declared the said Arthur borne in Britanie and not son of a King but his brother Geffreys sonne Duke of Britanie heire apparent his vncle Iohn yet liuing And for such a one is he taken in al our stories And for such a one did all the worlde take him after the said King Richard his death neither was King Iohn taken for other then for an vsurper by excluding him and afterward for a murtherer for imprisoning him and priuily making him away For the which facte the French King seased vpon al the goodly CouÌtries in France belonging to the King of England as forfeited to him being the chiefe Lorde By this outragious deede of King Iohn we lost Normandie withall and our possibilitie to the inheritance of all Britanie the right and Title to the said Britanie being dewe to the said Arthur and his heires by the right of his mother Constance And though the said king Iohn by the practise and ambition of Quene Elenour his mother and by the special procurement of Huberte then Archebishop of Caunterburie and of some other factious persons in EnglaÌd preueÌted the said Arthur his nephew as it was easy for him to do hauing gotten into his handes al his brother Richardes treasure by sides many other rentes then in England and the said Arthur being an infante
burge who therby inioyed the Countie Pâlatine The like may be said of diuers othâ partes of the Germanical Empire yea a wâ maÌ hath ruled and gouerned the said who Empire as it is euident in Agnes the wiâ of the Emperour Henry the third duriâ the time of the minoritie of her sonne Hârie the fourth And yet the same Empire ye wote wel passeth by choise and election and not by lineal succession of bloode yeâ many hundereth yeares ere she was borne and in the florishing time of the olde Roâmaine Empire Mesa Varia grandmother to the Emperour Heliogabalus and Alexander Seuerus sate with the Senate at Rome heard and examined the weighty causes oâ the Empire and set her hand also to suche thiÌgs as passed touchiÌg the publike affaires I do now adioyne the kingdom of Sicile and Naples in Italie of the whiche Italie Noah whom the prophane Writers cal Ianus made Crana his daughter ruler and Quene wher also Lauinia reigned after the death of Aeneas And as for Naples this presideÌt of womanly Gouernment is not there only of later yeares in both the Queenes called Iohanne but euen from very auncient time which thing the stories do recorde in Amalasintha that gouerned after the death of her father King Theodoricus with her sonne Athalaricus The said Amalasintha was mother to Almaricus King of Spaine and after his death ruled her self the said Realme Let vs nowe adde farther the Dukedoms of Loraine and Mantua the kingdome of Swetia and Dania and of Noruegia whereof Margaret the daughter of Waldemarus was gouernesse and Quene the kingdom of Beame and of HuÌgarie And to draw nere home the Realm also of ScotlaÌd which realm hath denomination of a woman as their stories report as hath likewise Flaunders The like some of our stories report of EnglaÌd wherin I wil make no fast footing Now touching the feminine Successâ to the right of the Croune of England itâ no new found Succession and much leâ vnnatural We reade in our Chronicles Queene Cordel the thirde heire and daugâter of King Leyre the teÌth King of Eritanâ that restored her father to the kingdomâ being deposed by her two other sisters Wâ reade that about three hundered fifty anâ fiue yeares before the Natiuitie of Christâ Martia Proba during the nonage of heâ sonne did gouerne this Realme ful politikâly and wisely and established certaine laweâ called Leges Martianae There be aswel of our owne as of exterternal historiographers that for a most certeinty affirme that Helena the noble Constantine his mother was a Britaine and the only daughter and heire of Coelus King of Britanie and that the said Constantine was borne in Britanie Surely that his father CoÌstantinus died in Britanie at Yorke and that the said Constantinus began his noble Victorious race of his most worthy Empire in Britany it is reported by auncient Writers and of great faith and credit And that likewise long before the said Helens time women bare the greatest sway both in warre ând peace and that the Britaine 's had womeÌ or their Capteines in warfare AmoÌg other Cornelius Tacitus writeth thus His atâe allis inuicem instructi Voadica generis regij âmina Duce neque enim sexum in Impertis âscernunt sumpsêre vniuersi bellum We haue now already shewed of Henry he seconde who obteined the Croune by âhe mothers right Which said King by the Title of his wife and after him his Succesâours Kings of England did inioy the Dukeâomes of Aquitania and the Dukedome of Poiters as the said Kings Successour should âaue done also as we haue shewed before the Dukedome of Britanie if Arthur King Richardes Neuew had not by the vsurping of King Iohn and his vnnatural crueltie died without issue And by what other right then by the womans inheritance dew to King Edward the third by his mother the Frenche Kings daughter doe the Kinges of this Realme beare the Armes and Title of the Kings of FraÌce And though the FreÌch men thinke their parte the better against vs it is not but vpoÌ an old politike law of their owne as they say and not vpon any suche fonde ground as ye pretende that women Regiment is vnnatural Which RegimeÌt ye stoutly affirme to bâ farre a sunder from any natural RegimeÌt yeâ truely as farre as was the boies head froÌ the shoulders the last Bartholmew Faire at LoÌdon which many a poore foole did beleeue to be true For as the boies head remained stil vpon his necke and shoulders though iâ seemed by a light liuely legerdemaine to be a great way from the bodie so would you now cast a mist before our eies and make vs beleue that womans gouernmeÌt and nature be so diuided and sundred that they may iâ no wise be lincked and coupled together But surely the French nation was neuer so vnwise to thinke this kind of GouermeÌt repugnant to Nature or to Gods holy Word For then they would neuer haue suffered their Realme to haue ben so often gouerned and ruled by women in the time of the nonage or absence of their Kings As by Adela the mother of King Philip and by Blanche the mother of S. Lewis and by the wife of the late King Frauncis taken prisoner at Paura and by diuers others Neither should the said Adela and Blanche haue ben so coÌmended of their said noble and worthy rule and âuernmeÌt The said FrenchmeÌ though by âoliâie they haue prouided to exclude foâiners from the inheritance of the Croune ãâã they themselues holde at this day by âe womaÌs title and interest the Dukedom âf Britanie with diuers other goodly posâssions And we haue shewed before how âewis the Dolphin of France made a Title ãâã the Croune of this Realme in the right âf his wife Thus I haue as I suppose sufficiently proued that this kinde of RegimeÌt ãâã not against Nature by the auncient and âontinual practise of Asia Aphrica and Euââpa For the perfecting of the whiche laste âârte of Europa and of the whole three âartes I ende with the notable Poet Virgils verses Filius huic fato Diuûm prolesque virilis Nulla fuit primaque oriens erepta iuuenta est Sola domum tantas seruabat filia sedes We knit vp therfore our conclusion against you after this sort That law and vsage caÌnot be compted against the law of nature or ius GeÌtiuÌ which the most part of al couÌtries and one great or notable part of the whol world doth and hath vsed but this lawe or vsage is such Ergo it is not against the law of Nature The Maior nedeth no proufe and foâ the proufe of the Minor we neede to imploy no farder labour then we haue already done Whervpon the consequeÌt must nedeâ be inferred that this law or vsage doth weâ agree and stand with the law of nature The reason thereof is that it
the said statutes And therefore in that respect the said Wil is insufficient in lawe And to aggrauate the matter farther ye shal vnderstand of great inconueniences and imminent dangers which as yet are likely to ensue if that supposed Wil should take place It is not vnknowen but that at the time of the making of the said Wil the said Ladie Francis had no issue male but onely three daughters betwene her and Henrie Duke of Suffolke Afterward in the time of our late soueraigne Ladie Queene Marie the said Duke of Suffolke was attainted and suffered accordingly After whose death the said Ladie Francis to her great dishonour and abasing of her selfe toke to husbande one Adrian Stokes who was before her seruant a man of very meane estate and vocation and had issue by him Which issue if it were a son and be also yet liuing by the wordes of the said supposed Wil is to inherite the Croune of this Realme before the daughters betwene her and the said late Duke of Suffolke begotteÌ which thing was neither intended nor meant by the makers of the said Actes Who can with any reason or common sense thinke that al the states of the Realme assembled together at the said Parlament did meane to geue authoritie to King Henry the eight by his Letters PateÌts or last Wil to disherit the Queene of Scotland lineally descended of the blood roial of this Realme and to appoint the sonne of Adrian Stokes then a meane seruing man of the Duke of Suffolks to be King and Gouernour ouer this noble Realme of EnglaÌd The inconueniences whereof as also of the like that might haue followed of the preteÌsed Mariage of M. Keies the late Sergeante Porter I referre to the graue consideratioÌs and iudgementes of the honorable and worshipful of this Realme Some peraduenture wil say that King Henry the eight meant by his Wil to dispose the Croune vnto the Heires of the body of the said Ladie Francis by the said Duke lawfully begotten and not vnto the heires by any other person to be begotteÌ Which meaning although it might very hardly be gathered vpon the said supposed Wil yet can not the same be without as great inconueniences as the other For if the Croune should nowe remaine vnto the heires of the bodie of the said Ladie Francis by the said Duke begotten then should it remaine vnto two daughters ioyntly they both being termed and certainly accompted in law but one heire And by that meanes the state and gouernment of this Realme should be changed from the auncient Monarchie into the gouernement of many For the Title of the Ladie Francis being by way of remainder whiche is compted in law a ioynt purchase doth make all the issue female inheritable a like and cannot go according to the ancient law of a desceÌt to the Croune which is that the Croune by descent must go to the eldest daughter only as is aforesaid For great differeÌces be in law where one cometh to any Title by descent and where as a purchaser And also if th' one of those issues female dye then were her heire in the Title as a seueral tenant in tayle And so there should follow that so many daughters so many general Gouernors and so might their issue being heirs females make the gouernmeÌt grow infinite Which thing was most farre from the meaning of the makers of that Acte of ParlameÌt What if the said King had by his last Wil disposed this realme into two or three parts diuiding the gouernement thereof to three persons to rule as seueral Kinges as for example Wales vnto one the Northe partes vnto an other the South partes vnto the third and by that meanes had miserably rent this Realme into partes Had this ben according to the entent and meaning of the said Acte of Parlament Or had it bene a good and sufficient limitation in law No verily I thinke no man of any reasonable vnderstanding wil so say And no more can he either say or thinke of the remainder limited vnto heires of the body of the said Lady Francis by the said supposed Wil. Now to coÌplete and finish this our Treatise touching the Queene of ScotlaÌds Title to the fuccession of the Croune as we haue done so let vs freely and liberally graunt the Aduersaries that whiche is not true that is that the said supposed Wil was signed with the Kings owne hand Let the heires of the Lady Francis come forth in Gods name and lay forth to the world their demauÌd and supposed right against the said Q. of Scotlandes interest The Quene on th' other side to fortifie and streÌgthen her claime laieth forth to the open sight of al the worlde her âust title and interest signed and alwaies afore this time allowed not onely as with the Seales but with the othes also of al the Kings that euer wer in EnglaÌd takeÌ at the time of their Coronation for the coÌtinuance of the lawes of this noble Realme of England signed and allowed I say almost of al the world by sides yea signed with God and natures owne fingers Her right is as open and as clere as the bright Sonne Now to darken and shadow this glorious light what doe the heires of the said Ladie Francis or others bring forth to grouÌd their iust claime and demauÌd vpoÌ When al is done they are faine to ruÌne and catche holde vpon King Henry the eightes written Wil signed with his owne hande Wel let them take as good handfast thereon as they can but yet lette them shewe the said Queene the said original Wil. It is wel knowen that they themselues haue said that that to doe they can not Yet let them at least lay forth some autheÌtical Record of the same It is also notorious that they can not If then the foundation of their claime being the Wil of such a Prince and of so late and fresh memorie made neither the original nor yet any good and worthy Recorde sufficiently authorised remaine of the same by what colour wil they exclude the saide Queene They must claime either by proximitie of blood or by Charter For the first nature hath excluded them Charter they haue none to shew They wil perchance crie out and complain of the losse and imbeaseling of the same and say that such a casualtie should not destroye and extinguish their right This were some thing perchance if it were in a priuate maÌs case It were somewhat if their demauÌd did not destroy the coÌmon law and the law of nature also It were somewhat if their supposed Charter were perished or by any frau duleÌt meanes intercepted by the said Quene Vpon whom in this point it is not possible to fasten any the very least sinister suspicioÌ It were somewhat if they did not aspire to take gaine and lucre or if the Queene sought not to auoide daÌmage For daÌmage it is when any person is spoiled of any right due to him by law and reason And there is
and the whole state froÌ danger to liue willingly in perpetual exile and bannishment God be thanked that after these seditious and trayterous subiectes haue bene so stout and storming in the rekoning vp and accumulating of faults and offenses of their innoceÌt Maistresse and Quene they are yet at the leÌgth forced to answere for theÌselues and for their excessiue outragious rebellious dooings Their glorious and glittering excuses may perhaps at the first shew seme to some of the Readers to haue a ioly face of much probabilitie great trueth and feruent zeale to the weale publike But may it please them aduisedly and depely to ponder and weigh aswel what we haue said as what we farther shal say in supplement of ful answere and then to iudge and deme of the mater none otherwise then reason equitie and law do craue they shalat length fynde out and throughly perceaue and know these mennes dealinges and doinges who as yet couer their foule filthy lying detestable practises and trayterouse enormities with suche a visarde of counterfeit fained holines and suche exceding greate shew of zeale to the Queenes honour in punishing malefactors and to the preseruation of the state of the Realme as though al the worlde would fal and go to ruine if it were not vpholden and vnderpropped by the strength of their shoulders They shal see how they wil appeare in their owne natural likenes so ougly that al good harts wil vtterly detest them and thinke them moste worthie for example sake to al the worlde hereafter of extreme punishment We affirme then first that as they haue produced nothing in the worlde touching the principal points as of the Lorde Darleyes death the acquital of the Earle Bothwel and the Queenes mariage with him iustly to charge her withal so are they them selues aswel for the said acquital and mariage as for their damnable and rebellious attempts against their Souereigne and for many other enormous crimes so farre and so depely charged so foule stained and so shamefully marked and noted that neuer shal they with al their hypocritical fine fetches be able to rubbe out the dirty blottes thereof from their skirts which thing wilbâ easely perceaued of them that wil vouchesafe aduisedly to consider the friuolous and contradictorie excuses they make in their defence At the beginning their open surmised quarel whereby they went about to drawe the peoples hartes to them selues and to streÌgthen their owne faction stood in three points as appeareth by their excuses and by their pretensed Proclamations The first was to deliuer the Quene from the Earle Bothwel who violently deteined her and to preuent daungers imminent to her person The second to reuenge the Kings death vpon the said Bothwel whom they knew as they pretended to haue ben the principal doer in the execution of the said murther The thirde was to preserue the yonge Prince the Queenes sonne This is their ioly and holy pretense Nowe let vs see how conformable their worthy procedinges are to these their colourable cloked holy collusions The first gentle and humble admonition that these good louing subiectes gaue her to refourme these surmised enormities was in âattail array at Bortwike Castle which they thought vpon the sodaine to haue possessed with the Queenes person Wherevpon they being disapointed therof gat into the Town and Fortresse of Edenboroug by the treason of Balfoure the Captaine thereof and of Cragmiler the Prouost of the Citie whereby they being the more animated to follow and prosecute their wicked enterprise begaÌ now to be strong in the field The Queene hauing also a good stroÌg army and thinking her self wel able therby to encounter with th' enemie and to represse their furious outrage yet notwithstaÌding for the great loue and pitie she had to them though rebellious subiects willing as muche as in her lay to kepe and preserue their blood from sheding offred them faire of her owne free motion that if they would vse her as their Queene she would peaceably come to them and take due and conuenient order for the redresse of al suche thinges as might appeare by law and reason mete to be refourmed Wherevpon the Lorde Grange was sent by the Lordes to her who in al their names moste humbly vppon his knees assured her of al dewe obedience of securitie anâ safetie of both her life and honour And ãâã the good Ladie her conscience bearing heâ witnes of al her iust and vpright dealingeâ and therfore nothing mistrusting dismissing her army yelded her self to the Lordes whâ conueyed her to Edenborough and there set her at suche a meruelous libertie and ãâã suche securitie and safetie that al good meâ to the worlds ende wil wonder at their exceding good loyaltie First they keping her owne Palaice seâ and placed her in a merchants house and vsed her otherwise very homely She now considering and perceauing to what ende these matters tended most pitifully cried and called vpon them to remember their late promisse or at the least that she might be brought before the Counsaile offering to stande to the order and direction of the States of the realme But God knoweth al in vaine For now had they the pray whereon they inteÌded to whet their bluddy teeth ere they did dismisse or forgoe her as the euent doth declare Wherefore in the night priuily she was conueyed and with haste in disguised apparel to the strong Forte of Lochleuen and after a few daies being stripâed out and spoyled of al her princely atârement was clothed with a course broune âassoke After this these good loial subiects praâising and encreasing more and more daily âhe performance of their saied promised âbedience neuer ceassed vntil they had vsurped the ful authoritie and Regiment of the whole Into the which though they had intruded themselues yet seing as blinde as they were by disordinate vnseemely and vnmeasurable ambition that the Queene remained and was stil Queene and that there was no iust cause by the ordinarie course of the lawe or for any her demerits and deserts to bring her forth to her trial that she might be conuicted and deposed went like good honest plaine men and wel meaning subiects bluntly to worke and coÌsulted and determined to dispatche and rid her out of her life vnlesse she would yelde to them and subscribe suche writinges as they would send to her concerning the dimission of her Croune to her sonne and the Regiment of the Realme to the Earle of Murray Wherevpon th' Earle of Athele Secretârie Ledington with other principals of theiâ factious band sent Robert Miluen to Lochâleuen to wil her in any ease if she sought the safegard of her life to coÌdescend to such demaundes and set her hand to al such writinges as should be proposed and broughâ to her Whiche as they said to doe neuâ could be preiudicial to her being by forââ and violence extorted Sir Nicolas Throgmorton also being then Ambassadour theââ from England gaue her the
the Title whiche the Kinges of England haue claimed vnto the Realme of Scotland is not in the possession of the lande and Croune of Scotlande but onely vnto the seruice of homage and fealtie for the same And although the Kinges of Scotland sith the time of King Henry the eight haue intermitted to doe the said homage and fealtie vnto the Kinges of Englande yet for al that the Kinges of Scotland can not by any reason or lawe be called vsurpers And thus may ye see gentle Reader by the opinion of al indifferente men not lead by affection that the Realme of Scotlande hath bene and is yet within the allegeance and dominion of England And so is the Antecedent or first proposition false And yet that maketh no proufe that the Realme of France likewise should nowe be said to be within the allegeance of the Kings of England by reason of the manifest and apparent difference before shewed But what if your Antecedent were true and that we did agree both with the said Queene of Scotland and her subiectes and also with you that Scotland were out of the allegeance of England Yet it is very plaine that your consequent and conclusion can not by any meanes be true And that principally for three causes whereof one is for that neither the King not the Croune not being specially meÌtioned in the said rule or pretended Maxime can be intended to be within the meaning of the same Maxime as we haue before sufficiently proued by a great number of other suche like generall rules and Maximes of the lawes An other cause is for that the Croune can not be taken to be within the woordes of the said supposed Maxime and that for twoo respectes one is bycause the rule doth only dishable Aliens to demaunde any heritage within the allegeance of England Whiche rule can not be stretched to the demaunde of the Croune of EnglaÌd which is not with in the allegeance of England but is the very allegeance it selfe As for a like example it is true that al the landes within the Kinges dominion are holdeÌ of the King either mediatly or immediately and yet it is not true that the Croune by whiche onely the King hath his Dominion can be said to be holdeÌ of the King. For without the Croune there can be neither King nor allegeance And so long as the Croune resteth onely in demaund not being vested in any person ther is no allegeaÌce at al. So that the Croune can not be said by any meanes to be within the allegeance of England and therfore not within the wordes of the said rule or Maime The Title of the Croune is also out of the wordes and meaning of the same rule in an other respect and that is bycanse that rule doth only dishable an Alien to demauÌd landes by descent as heire For it doth not extende vnto landes purchased by an Alien as we haue before sufficiently proued And then can not that rule extende vnto the Croune being a thing incorporate the right wherof doth not descend according to the common course of priuate inheritance but goeth by successioÌ as other corporatioÌs do No man doubteth but that a Prior Alien being no denizon might alwaies in time of peace demaund land in the right of his corporatioÌ And so likewise a Deane or a Person being Aliens and no deniznos might demaund lande in respecte of their corporations not withstaÌding the said supposed rule or Maxime as may appeare by diuerse booke cases as also by the statute made in the time of King Richard the second And although the Croune hath alwaies gone according to the common course of a Descent yet doth it not properly descende but succede And that is the reason of the lawe that although the Kinge be more fauoured in all his doinges then any common person shal be yet can not the King by lawe auoide his grauntes and Letters Patentes by reason of his Nonage as other infantes may doe but shal alwaies be said to be of ful age in respect of his Croune euen as a Person Vicare or Deane or any other person incorporate shal be Whiche can not by any meanes be said in lawe to be within age in respect of their corporations although the corporation be but one yeare olde Bysides that the King can not by the law auoide the Letters Patentes made by any vsurper of the Croune vnlesse it be by act of Parlament no more then other persons incorporate shal auoide the grauntes made by one that was before wrongfully in their places and romes whereas in Descentes of inheritance the lawe is otherwise For there the heire may auoide al estates made by the disseafour or abatour or any other person whose estate is by lawe defeated Whereby it doth plainely appeare that the King is incorporate vnto the Croune and hath the same properly by succession and not by Descent onely And that is likewise an other reason to proue that the King and the Croune can neither be saide to be within the wordes nor yet with in the meaning of the said general rule or Maxime The third and most prncipall cause of all is for that in the said statute whervpon the said supposed rule or Maxime is gathered the children descendantes and descended of the blood royal by the wordes of Infantes de Roy are expresly excepted out of the said supposed rule or Maxime Whiche wordes the Aduersaries do much abuse in restrainiÌg and construing them to extende but to the first degree only whereas the same wordes may very wel beare a more large and ample interpretation And that for three causes and considerations First by the Ciuil lawe this word Liberi which the worde Infantes being the vsuall and original worde of the statute written in the Frenche tongue counteruaileth doth comprehende by proper and peculier signification not only the childreÌ of the first degree but other Descendants also in the law saying That he who is manumissed or made free shal not commence any Action against the children of the Patrone or manumissour without licence not onely the first degree but the other also is conteined The like is when the lawe of the twelue Tables saith The first place and roome of succession after the death of the parentes that die intestate is due to the children which successioÌ apperteineth as wel to degrees remoued as to the firste Yea in al causes fauourable as ours is this worde son Filius coÌteineth the nephew though not by the propertie of the voice or speache yet by interpretation admittable in al such thinges as the law disposeth of As touching this worde Infantes in FreÌch We say that it reacheth to other DescendaÌts as wel as the first degree Wherein I do referre me to suche as be expert in the said tongue We haue no one worde for the barenes of our English toÌgue to couÌterpaise the said French word Infantes or the Latin word
only Of the like weight is his other coÌsideration imaginiÌg and surmising this statute to be made bicause the King had so many occasioÌs to be so oft ouer the sea with his spouse the Queene As though diuers Kings before him vsed not often to passe ouer the seas As though this were a personal statute made of special purpose and not to be takeÌ as a declaratioÌ of the coÌmon law Which to say is most directly repugnant and contrary to the letter of the said statute Or as though his children also did not very often repaire to outward Countries as Iohn of Gaunt Duke of Lancaster that maried Peters the King of Castiles eldest daughter by whose right he claimed the Croune of Castile as his brother EdmuÌd Erle of Cambridge that maried the yongest daughter as Lionell Duke of Claraunce that maried at Milaine ViolaÌt daughter and heir to Galeatius Duke of Milan But especially Prince Edwarde whiche moste victoriously toke in battaile Iohn the French King and brought him into England his prisoner to the great triumphe and reioysing of the Realme whose eldest sonne Edward that died in short time after was borne beyond the seas in Gascome and his other sonne Richard that succeded his grandfather was borne at Burdeaux as these noble King Edwardes sonnes maried with forainers so did they geue out their daughters in mariage to foraine Princes as the Duke of Lancaster his daughter Philippe to the king of Portingale and his daughter Catherin to the King of Spaine and his Neece Iohan daughter to his sonne Earle of Somerset was ioyned in mariage to the King of Scottes Iohan daughter to his brother Thomas of Wodstocke Duke of Gloucester was Queene of Spaine and his other daughter Marie Duchesse of Britannie Now by this mans interpretation none of the issue of al these noble Women could haue enioyed the Croune of England when it had fallen to them though they had bene of the neerest roial blood after the death of their Auncestours Which surely had bene against the auncient presidentes and examples that we haue declared and against the common Lawe the whiche muste not be thought by this Statute any thing taken away but only declared and against al good reason also For as we would haue thought this Realme greatly iniured if it had ben defrauded of Spaine or any of the foresaid couÌtreies being deuolued to the same by the foresaid Mariages as we thincke our self at this day iniured for the withholding of France so the issue of the foresaide noble womeÌ might and would haue thought them hardly and iniuriously handled yf any such case had happened Neither suche friuolous interpretation and gloses as this man nowe frameth and maketh vppon the statute woulde then haue serued nor nowe wil serue But of all other his friuolous and folish ghessing vpon the clause of the statute for Infantes de Roy there is one most fond of al. For he would make vs beleue such is the mans skil that this statute touching Infantes de Roy was made for the great doubte more in them then in other personnes touching their inheritance to their Auncestours For being then a Maxime saieth he in the lawe that none could inherite to his Auncestours being not of father and mother vnder the obedience of the King seing the King him selfe could not be vnder obedience it plainely seemed that the Kinges children were of farre worse condition then others and quite excluded And therefore he saith that this statute was not to geue them any other priuilege but to make them equall with other And that therefore this statute touching the Kinges children is rather in the superficial parte of the worde then in effecte Nowe among other thinges he saieth as we haue shewed before that this word Infantes de Roy in this statute mentioned must be taken for the children of the first degree whiche he seemeth to proue by a note taken out of M. Rastal But to this we answer that this maÌ swetely dreamed when he imagined this fonde and fantasticall exposition And that he shewed him selfe a very infante in law and reason For this was no Maxime or at lest not so certaine before the making of this statute whiche geueth no new right to the Kinges children nor answereth any doubt touching them and their inheritance but saith that the law of the Croune of England is and alwaies hath bene which lawe saith the King say the Lordes say the Commons we allowe and affirme for euer that the Kinges children shal be hable to inherite the Landes of their Auncesters whereâoeuer they be borne Al the doubt was for other persons as appeareth euideÌtly by the tenour of the statute whether by the coÌmon law they being borne out of the allegeance were heritable to their Auncestours And it appeareth that th' Aduersary is driueÌ to the hard wal when he is faine to catch hold vpon a selie poore marginal note of M. Rastal of the Kinges childreÌ and not of the Kings childrens children Which yet nothing at al serueth his purpose touching this statute But he or the Printer or who so euer he be as he draweth out of the text many other notes of the matter therin coÌprised so vpoÌ these FreÌch wordes Les enfants de Roy he noteth in the MargeÌt The Kings childreÌ but how far that word reacheth he saieth neither more nor lesse Neither it is any thing preiudicial to the said Queenes right or Title whether the said wordes Infants ought to be takeÌ strictly for the first degree or farther enlarged For if this statute toucheth only the succession of the Kings children to their Auncestours for other inheritaÌce and not for the Cround as most men take it and as it may be as we haue said very wel takeÌ and allowed then doth this supposed Maxime of forain borne that seemeth to be gathered out of this statute nothing anoy or hinder the Queene of Scotlandes Title to the Croune as not therto apperteining On the other side if by the inheritance of the kings childreÌ the Croune also is meant yet neither may we enforce the rule of foraine borne vpoÌ the kings children which are by theâpresse wordes of the statute excepted neither enforce the word Inâââs to the first degree only for such reasons presidents and examples and other prouffes largely by vs before set forth to the coÌtrarie seing that the right of the Croune falling vpoÌ them they may wel be called the kings ChildreÌ or at the lest the childreÌ of the Croune Ther is also one other cause why though this statute reach to the Croune and may and ought to be expouÌded of the same the said Queene is out of the reach and coÌpasse of the said statute For the said statute can not be vnderstanded of any persons borne in Scotlande or Wales but onely of persons borne beyond the sea out of the allegeance of the King of England that is to wrtte France Flandres and such like For England