thou mayest be forgiven Ans For what the Apostle there mentions 1. The recovery of the sick person is evidently intended but this extreme Unction in not used until the recovery of the party be past hope 2. The health there promised was miraculous answering to that time when the Faith of Miracles was in the Church and temporary for such as had the extraordinarie gift of healing but for the Elders of the Church praying over the Sick though not having such a gift now we deny not its prepetual use SECT XIV Qu. HAth not that Article of the Romish Doctrine Transubstantiation clear warrant in the Scripture that Christs bodily presence in the Sacrament is such as the whole substance of the Bread and Wine there in the act of Consecration is turned into the substance of his Body and Blood Ans It is manifest 1. That it could be no more a Sacrament if the sign should be turned into the thing signified 2. It is expresly to deny the real Body of Christ and that he did visibly and locally leave this World Whom the Heavens must contain until the time of the restitution of all things Acts 3 11. 3. It is most directly contrarie to the Scripture where it is so evident that the Bread and Wine remain still the same after the Consecration 1 Cor. 11 vers 26. So oft you eat of 〈◊〉 this Bread And let a Man examine himself and so let him eat of this Bread 1 Cor. 10 16. The Bread which we break is it not the Communion of the Christ Yea Acts 2 46. Where the partaking of the Sacrament is called the Breaking of Bread in all which it is most expresly shewed to be still Bread 4. It is clear that Jesus Christ as Man cannot be in divers places at once nor his Body at the same time in Heaven and upon Earth in the Host being made like unto us in all things sin only excepted Heb. 2 17. 5. This is to subject the blessed Body of Christ now in a glorified state to the greatest ignominies such as to go into the belly to be eaten by his enemies to be destroyed by rats and other beasts the verie conceiving of which should cause horrour Qu. Are not these the very words of Institution when Jesus Christ took the Bread This is my Body Ans They are but nothing more usual in Scripture than such figurative expressions as this is to shew the sacramental Union betwixt the Bread and Christs Body as 1 Cor. 10 1. The Rock was Christ Joh. 15 1. I am the true vine which I am sure none can take in the literal sense But I confesse such need not fear to lose their cause who from the Church's Authority can make void Scripture Sense and Reason at once Qu. Wherein doth this contradict Sense or Reason Ans It expresly shews 1. That we must not credit our own eyes and that all who were witnesses of the Miracles of Christ could have no certainty thereof by their sight though these were given to confirm the Truth unto mens senses 2. That the accidents of Bread and Wine such as colour taste c. can remain without their Subject 3. That the same numerical Body should be in so many places at once which is in effect to deny the Body of Christ to be humane and finite Qu. Yet is it not agreeable to take away the Cup from the People in the Eucharist Ans If the written Word have any weight it is then sure how contrarie this is 1. To the Institution and Command of Jesus Christ Mat. 26 27. Which in these words is expresse Drink ye all of it 2. To the Command and Rule given us by the Apostle 1 Cor. 11 23. Let a man examine himself and so let him eat of this Bread and drink of this Cup which hath there a respect to all who have cause for self examination 3. Doth so far frustrate that end of the appointment of the Lords Supper for commemorating his death and sufferings So oft as you eat of this bread and drink of this cup ye shew forth the Lords death till he come again since it is clear they cannot aright celebrate the memory thereof who partake not of that part of the Sacrament whereby we commemorate the effusion of Christ's blood 4. Though in the first administration by Jesus Christ himself the receivers then were Apostles â—et is it manifest he did then enter the whole Christian Church in possession of such a priviledge in that very manâ—er he gave it and not the least shadow for this restriction to be found SECT XV. Qu. IS there not safe Worshipping God under a visible representation and in an Image according to the practice of the Romish Church Ans It is not their practice only but professed Doctrine and Principle that the Images of the Trinity are not for a shew set up but for Religious adoration which 1. Is a most direct violation of the moral Law Deut. 5 8. Thou shall not make unto thy self any graven Image or the similitude of any thing to bow down to it 2. It is to change the glory of the invisible God into the likenesse of a sinful creature Rom. 1 23. Which none can deny to be the grossest Idolatry 3. It is a most expresse breach of the Command which forbids all serving the true God after the manner which the Heathens used in serving their Idols Deut. 12 30 31. Take heed to thy self that thou be not snared by asking how these Nations did serve their Gods thou shalt not do so to the Lord thy God which is not thou shalt not do so to these Idols but not in that manner to the true God as they did to their Idols 4. There can be no possible representing the Invisible God by any outward resemblance To whom will ye liken me Isa 46 5. And therefore when the Law was given Deut. 4 12. The People Heard a voice but saw no shape lest thereby they should take occasion to represent him by an external image 5. How great a sin it is to conceive or imagine in our hearts that the glorious God is like any thing how excellent soever We think it is clear Acts 17 29. Qu. But can this charge the Romish Church with Idolatry since they do not fix or terminate their Worship on the Image but on what is thus represented Ans No subtil distinction will acquit before the Lord and at the bar of his Word what he hath so expresly condemned when it is clear 1. That not only worshipping with our mind the Image but all corporal adoration thereof is forbidden as Idolatrous worship Thou shalt not bow down thereto 2. None will deny but Aarons calf and those of Jeroboams were intended for the true God yet their worship was most grosse Idolatrie 3. We find the brazen Serpent though an instituted type under the Old Testament taken down and destroyed when once the People begun in an Idolatrous way to look after
Ans It is sure 1. That the wages of sin is death Rom 6 23. And no difference there is shewed betwixt venial and mortal 2. If a full acquittance from the guilt and punishment of sin be by Jesus Christ and that he hath payed the whole price no Satisfaction to Justice can be of use for temporal punishment 3. It is clear the most sharp chastisements of the Saints in this life are for healing and no effect of Vindictive Justice nor can give the last ground to plead for humane Satisfaction or such a thing as Purgatory after this life SECT XII Qu. BUt is there no Scripture warrant for the Romish Mass as a real external Sacrifice propitiatory for the living and the dead and that wherein the body of Christ is really offered up Ans It is clear 1. That not the least footstep of a Sacrifice or of Christs offering his Body and Blood was in the first institution of the Eucharist nor in these Offices given to the Church of Apostles Pastors Teachers c. Rom. 12 6 7 8. 1 Cor. 12 28. is there mention of any such as a sacrificer of Christs Body 2. No external Sacrifice can be now under the New Testament these under the Law being only typical of that which was accomplished in Jesus Christ who offered himself but once Heb. 7 27. And by this one offering hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified Heb. 10 18. So as this denies the perfection of Christ's Offering and his everlasting Priesthood 3. No sacrifice can be propitiatory which is without blood since without that There is no remission Heb 9 22. 4. It is clear in a true Sacrifice the thing sacrificed must be destroyed in the act of sacrificing which none dare say of the blessed Body of Christ nor can it be conceived how a repetition of the Offering up of Christ should really be and not of his Sufferings also Qu. Can it be denyed but some Offerings are even under the New Testament unto God Ans We know in the Lords Supper there are Offerings of praise and love with a solemn commemoration of Christ death but no external Sacrifice there or the least shadow of ground from the Scripture for it Qu. Did not Melâ—hizedeck offer Bread and Wine who was the Priest of the most High God Gen. 14 18. Ans His bringing it forth to Abraham is there shewed but nothing to shew his Offering of it or what could give ground for the Idolatrous service of the Mass though on this they lay its greatest weight Qu. Are there not Priests now in times of the Gospel as under the Law Ans We know One only eternal High Priest who is such as can have no successour and it is clear Heb. 7 26. that the Priest and Offerer under the New Testament should be holy undefiled and separate from sinners which I judge they dare not own But what do they mean thereby since it must either be to repeat over again Christs Sacrifice which is impossible and blasphemous or to present what was then done by him which is a Sacrament and no Sacrifice yea even in this are they manifestly divided to give an account wherein the action of sacrificing consists whether in the words of consecration This is my Body or in putting it on the altar Qu. Yet may not some be present there with a safe Conscience when no evil is intended Ans We ought not from these grounds 1. The scandal and offendâ—ng of our Brother which is not to be judged from our intention but from what is manifest to others in our doing such a thing 2. The hardening of Papists in their way this being a special symbol of their profession whereby they are discerned 3. It were an obvious dissimulation before God and with the adversary in that professed communicating with them in an external part of worship SECT XIII Qu. IS it not an essential of the Christian Religion that such a precise number of Sacramenâ—s is and neither more nor fewer than Seven as is the Doctrine of the Romish Church Ans It is indeed an essential of their Religion but such as could never shew its warrant from the Bible where two Sacraments only can be found of Christs appointment Baptism and the Lords Supper as having these requisites to a Sacrament of the New Testament 1. An external visible element 2. That it be of expresse Divine institution 3. To have a promise of Grace and Pardon annexed thereto which is not only signified but offered and sealed to all who rightly partake thereof 4. That it be perpetual unto the Worlds end Qu. Are these other five Sacraments of the Romish Church but of humane invention to wit Confirmation Pennance Extreme unction Orders and Marriage Ans Since Divine Worship must be according to the Rule given us by the Lawgiver it is clear these have not the least impress of a Divine appointment thereon Qu. Is not Confirmation an ancient practice of the Church Ans It was a custom in the Primitive times to bring Children Baptized and after they came to some years before the Church to put them in mind of their Baptism and engagements they were under which they now turn into a Sacrament and therewith use Chrism which is Oyl mixed with Balm putting it on the forehead in the form of a Cross with these words I sign and confirm thee with the Chrism of Salvation giving them a blow on the face with other foolish rites by which they say the fulnesse of the Holy Ghost is given But how this is a Sacrament or by what Institution ordained or what promise of Grace and Pardon is annexed hereto must be sought elsewhere than from the Bible Qu. But is not Penances a part of Repentance and a visible sign thereof Ans The publick profession of Repentance for publick scandalous sins is a duty but no such outward sign was ever instituted in the Word as Whipping Pilgrimage c. Yea nothing more contrary thereto than their declared meaning of this to be a Satisfaction to justice and Compensation of the wrong done unto God thereby nor can they agree among themselves about the Sacramentality thereof if the form be in the act of the Priests Absolution or not Qu. Are not Marriage and Orders unquestionably of Divine appointment Ans None will deny that Marriage and these Offices appointed by Christ in his house have their Warrant in the Scripture but not as Sacraments yea is it not amazing how the Romish Church should assert this who maintain the use of these Sacraments to be necessary to Salvation when all of their Church are by their own Doctrine excluded from one of them the whole Laity from Orders and the Clergy from Marriage Qu. Is there not yet ground for extreme Unction Jam. 4 14. In which with the Oyl of Olive they anoint divers parts of the bodies of those who are in death bed with such words I anoint such a place that wherein thou hast sinned
it Qu. Is it not lawful to make an Image of Christ who is truly Man for keeping up the remembrance of him in our Worship Ans We may not 1. Because it is expreslie forbidden to frame unto ourselves the likenesse of any thing in Heaven where the blessed body of Christ now is 2. Since both natures in him are inseparable this were to fix a representation in our mind of his manhood only dividing it from his Divinity and thus give a manifest advantage to Arrianism 3. Nothing from the Scripture giveth the least shew of any shape or lineament of his Body to let us see that under no visible Image we should seek to represent him 4. The true portraicture of Christ crucified we have set before our eyes in the Gospel and administration of the Sacraments as is clear Gal. 3 vers 1. Qu. Yet is there not safe ground for the worship of Angels of the Virgin Mary and of the Saints since this is not directed unto them as unto God but in a lower degree Ans God alone is and ought to be the object of Religious Worship which in no degree can be given unto any creature whatsoever as is expresse from the Command Matth. 4 10. Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and him only shalt thou serve 2. All worshipping of Angels is forbidden Col. 2 18. Rev. 10 10. 3. Since Religious Worship is due to God alone we may in no degree give it to the Virgin Mary or the Saints since there is but one Mediator Jesus Christ 1 Tim. 2 5. Yea this were so far to put them in the place of God to provoke his jealousie Exo. 24 14. Thou shalt worship no other God for the Lord whose Name is Jealous is a Iealous God And of this is he in a special way Jealous that none be copartners with him in his Worship Qu. Is there no warrantable use of Images Ans The use of Images is not simply condemned for we find some in the Temple by expresse Command though they were only Typical to shadow out things to be fulfilled under the New Testament there is a Political use of Images also lawful for ornament and to keep up the remembrance of friends some historical and for doctrinal use but none should be set up in Churches or in the least set apart for Religious Worship SECT XVI Qu. MAy not the Worship of God in the publick Prayers of the Church be in an unknown tongue according to the Popish Doctrine Ans You have the Apostles answer to this 1 Cor. 14 2. He that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men but unto God for who understands him In which he shews there can be no visible communion in such an act of worship and lets us see how it contradicts one great end of publick worship that such can have no real and heart consenting therein which is indispensiby called for in that dutie of publick Prayer as we see vers 16. For how shall be that occupieth the room of the unlearned say Amen at thy giving of thanks since he understands not what thou sayest Qu. Is it not enough to intrust Church-guides with this to whom the People makes their Confession Ans We know no such implicite relyance taught by the Scripture but there is no cure where men will intrust both Religion and Reason at once to the disposal of others Qu. Yet is there not a necessity of some Implicite relyance on these since according to the Romish Doctrine none can be assured of his own Salvation but what he hath on the assurance of his Priest and Confessor Ans Nothing is more clear than a Christians accesse to be assured of his being in the state of Grace and that he hath passed from death to life 1 Ioh. 3 14. Upon these grounds 1. Because a rejoycing in the hope of the glory of God is attainable here as the Apostle sheweth Rom. 5 vers 2. 2. That by the works and evidences of Sanctification a most firm and infallible assurance is in this life given to the Saints 1 Ioh 3 18 19. Let us not love in tongue neither in word but in deed and truth and hereby do we know that we are in the truth and shall assure our hearts before him 3. By the testimonie of the Spirit witnessing with our Spirits That we are the children of God Rom 8 16. 4. By that earnest of the Spirit in our hearts whereby we are sealed unto the day of Redemption Eph. 1 13 14. 4 30. Qu. Is there no ground for that Article of the Romish Doctrine that under pain of damnation there be a Confession of the most secret sins of men yea their very thoughts so far as they can remember unto the Priest according to that James 5 16. Confesse your faults one to another Ans We see as much ground from this to confesse to the people as to the Priest nor doth the Scripture warrant any such thing but this assurance have we that He who confesseth and forsaketh his sins shall find mercy Prov. 28 13. Which none will deny is there meant unto God nor did the Saints in Scripture know Auricular Confession I said I will confesse my transgressions unto the Lord and thou forgavest the iniquity of my sin Psal 32 5. Though we deny not the duty of publick Confession in the case of publick and scandalous sins but if men shut not their eyes nothing but a politick interest is here to be thus on the most hid and close counsels of men by such a pretext to keep the Conscience under awe SECT XVII Qu. BUt how should that plea be answered which the Romish Church hath to prove their Religion from its unity universality and an uninterrupted succession Ans It is I confesse strange and astonishing when so clear 1. For her Unity That besides what known differences they are at amongst themselves in many Doctrines they are visibly divided about the very foundation of their Faith and Infallibility of their Church whether it resolve on the Pope alone or on the Pope and a Council or that late found-out Rule of Oral Tradition 2. For an Universality it is easie to know how much more than the one half where the Christian Faith is embraced through the World doth not at all own the See of Rome And 3. For that Succession of their Church and uninterrupted line of Popes they will not themselves debate how there have been â—hree Popes at one time yea by what horrid means some of them got up to that throne as their greatest Writers are forced to confesse Qu. But is the Apostacy of that Church such as there is no safe union with it nor hope of being saved in their Religion Ans If Rome be that spiritual Babylon Rev. 18 4. as is there most evident then is the command peremptorie to come out of her leâ—t being partakers of her sins thâ—y be partakers of her plagues yea such a threatning we may read Rev.
what pretext so ever for any to be Popish Nor is it strange that after such abused light hell becometh now more hot and more inevitable than before whilst so much of the Christian World who own that name and Profession do shut their eyes and ears at so clear and distinct a sound from the Scripture seemes to roll over all certainty hereof to the decision and irrevocable Sentence of the Great Judge CONSID. II. SEcondly Can it be in the dark this day if this be not upon Choice that the great interest of the Reformed Church in contending against Popery is a most express appearance and contending for the Truth of Christianity and Doctrine of the Scripture delivered to us in the Old and New Testament And is so discernable upon these great Heads 1. That there is but one Mediator betwixt God and Sinners against such direct opposition thereto in the Doctrine of the Romish Church that brings in a plurality of Mediators and the Worshipping of Angels and Saints departed for that end 2. In behalf of the reality of Christs humane nature which by the Doctrine of Transubstantiation is subjected to have a new created being in their consecrated Hostia at each time every where at the pleasure of a wretched man which is in effect a most express denying of his blessed body to be humane and finite 3. It is clear how expresly concerned the Protestant Church is in opposition to Popery to contend for the reality of Christs death and suffering for his Elect. And that this time is come and past no more possibly to be repeated again wherein he once appeared in the end of the world to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself Heb. 9 26. And by one offering hath for ever perfected them that are sanctified Heb. 10 14. Against that horrid blasphemy of the Mass which they own as a repeated offering of the blessed body of the Redeemer by the hands of the Priest unto God as a Propitiatory sacrifice for the living and the dead which is so evident a subverting the foundations of Christianity and to make void the infinite value and efficacy of the death and suffering of Christ once offered and for ever in behalf of his Elect whilst they thus own a continued offering of his body which as the Apostle shewes Heb. 9 25. that if Christ had offered himself often he behoved to have fuffered often 4. And is it not clear that great interest of truth the Reformed Church is now pressed to appear upon against Popery is the Doctrine of Christ delivered to us in the Scripture as that whereon we must found and resolve our faith and not the Authority of men which they so expresly oppose and deny so as it is no less than the Christian cause and quarrel for which all who loves the truth are called to contend and that we should not be berest of that blessed infallible rule and standart of truth by those whose great aime is to have it denuded of all Authority but what is precarious and dependent on them nor to be so much as intelligible and to have an articular voice until they cause it speak and put what sense thereon they please CONSID. III. THirdly It may be astonishing and is surely one of the greatest depths of the Judgment of God this day to see what of the world with their own consent is subjected to so visible and notour an imposture as Popery is whilst such as it would seeme not conceiveable how men can exerce reason and not as in a deep sleep and have this hid from their eyes the obvious deceit and imposture of such a way where no Religion but a compound of humane Policy with their own private interest and gain is wholly intended About which I shall offer I hope I may with some confidence say it 's for the truths sake a short touch here at in some undeniable justances 1. None will debate how this way is framed for such an interest that there may be a gâ—aunt and allowance from the Pope for any sin and to transgress the express Lawes of the great Lawgiver yea this put to sale Oh what a strange device that for money men may have a liberty to destroy themselves Whilst on the other hand nothing is followed with more severe threatnings then an absolute subjecting â—o their arbitrary Commands so that one may safely disobey the holy God and this with a warrant but not the Pope and his Clergy under the hazard of condemuation 2. That such a stock and treasure of merites should be in keeping by the Romish Church and under their trust to dispose of as a thing deposited into their hand by such who had more than enough for themselves to serve for the use of others And thus at their disposal to give out thereof to satisfy divine Justice for those who have not sufficient merite of their own this only being necessarily provided that these who get a share of such a treasure compense it by somewhat equivâ—lent and buy it ere they have it but herein could they never resolve the world how to be sure if these merites were truely more than such whose they were needed themselves or how they came into their hand or was intrusted by them to apply or if their strength be not long since spent and exhausted by so long continued application in such innumerable indulgences given out of that treasury Oh! what a deplorable contrivance is here which I confess should be owned as one of the greatest Master pieces of cheatry as ever the world knew if it were only to cheat men of their purse but this goes further to those great interests of the immortal soul and yet so many will not see the visible intent of this trade and merchandice that it is indeed the merchandice of the souls of men so expresly foretold by the holy Ghost Rev. 18 13. 3. Their taking on them to change the condition of the dead and ensure to their friends the happy estate of their soul upon some large offerings to the Church for this As likewise that respect and veneration they require from men to the reliques of the Saints deceased whereto they ascribe such power both against fin and for healing diseases of the body yea most of these pretended reliques such as must necessarily plead some extraordinary miracle to be wrought for their continued preservation that thus they may with confidence perswade the world their having some bone or scull of the Apostles Primitive Saincts to be still seen if any have a heart to give a price for it 4. That the Romish Pope is the true Successor of Peter and thus Christs Vicar as they tearme him upon the earth which men must needs take upon trust with an implicite faith from such whose preferment and gain in the World should be other wise ruined if this be not taken off their hand whilst yet it is so undeniable at what a strait they are