Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
death_n	cup_n	eat_v	show_v	4,020	5	5.4880	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A93702	Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht: containing a confutation of the three degrees of popery, viz. papacy, prelacy, and presbitery; answerable to the triple crowne of the three-headed Cerberus the Pope, with his three fold hierarchies aforesaid. With a dispelling of all other dispersed clouds of errour, which doth interpose the clear sun-shine of the Gospel in our horrizon. Wherein the chiefe arguments each of them have, for the vindication of their erronious tenents are incerted, and refuted; with a description of such whem [sic] the true Church of Christ doth consist of: as also how, and by whom, they may be gathered, and governed, according to the will, and appointment of Jesus Christ, and his apostles, in the primative purity thereof. / By Iohn Spittlehouse, assistant to the Marshall Generall of the Army, under the command of his Excellency, the Lord Generall Fairfax. Imprimated by Theod. Jennings, and entred in the Stationers Hall.	Spittlehouse, John.	1649 (1649)	Wing S5013; Thomason E586_2; ESTC R203633	304,213	396

last day as also that his flesh is meat indeed and his blood is drink indeed and that he that eateth his flesh and drinketh his blood dwelleth in Christ and Christ in him Joh. 6. 53 54 55 56. Ans The wicked and unbeleevers neither have eternall life The wicked neither eate or drink the body or blood of Christ neither doe they dwell in Christ or Christ in them neither doe they live by Christ which life is by faith in the Son of God Gal. 2. 20. therefore they can neither eate nor drink the body and blood of Christ this proposition therefore is directly opposite to the Scriptures but yet to give such of them satisfaction that are yet kept in ignorance and in the chaines of darknesse by that man of sinne I will therefore branch the Argument into these three particulers 〈◊〉 as 1. What a Sacrament is 2. How Christ is said to be eaten in the Sacrament and 3. Who they are that eate Christ in the Sacrament SECT 2. VVHat the Sacrament of the Lords Supper is Bernard termeth What the Lords Supper is it Canalis grati lavacrum anime the cunduit of Gra●● and the hath of the Soule which the whole company of the faithfull doe consecrate and sacrifice as well as the Priest or Mi●ister and it consisteth of two things viz. the visible substance which is Bread and Wine 2. The invisible grace which is redemption by Christs death from the punishment due unto our sins that like as by Baptisme we are inis●iated into the Church so by this spirituall Banquet we are preserved in that life into which he hath begotten us through the Word and in this holy Mystery three things are to be considered as 1. The signification 2. The matter and 3. The effect now the signification is placed in the promise the matter is Christs death and resurrection and by the effect is meant redemption righteousnesse and eternall life which is the fruit which a worthy receiver obtaineth by being partaker of that Divine Mystery In the second Circumstance the great controversie will fall by course to be disputed upon viz. Whether or no our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ whom the Apostle saith the heavens must containe untill the restauration of all things or untill the day of Judgement be so eaten in the Sacrament as these Popelings seeme to be confident of according to the former expression delivered SECT 3. ANd for the better clearing of the truth in this particular When Scripture is to be taken literally and when spiritually there is a way discovered whereby we may understand when Scripture are to be understood literally and when spiritually for the first when Christ seems to command a foule and wicked act that must not be taken litterally as in them words of our Saviour formerly expressed in which he seems to command a foule and wicked act it is therefore figuratively spoken now it is the spirituall understanding that saveth him that beleeveth Joh. 6. 47. For the letter killeth but the Spirit quickneth Joh. 6. 63. neither is it Christs bodily presence if it were in the Sacrament according to their opinions that could save a receiver of it for Judas a Son of perdition received panem Domini sed non panem Dominum the bread of the Lord but not the bread the Lord. So that when Christ saith This is my body he meaneth the figure of his body and therefore we are to understand it by way of signification and not properly for it is his presence in our hearts through faith in his blood which we receive profit by and not by his bodily presence in the Bread and Wine as I have formerly said and if we beleeve not his bodily presence there that will not damne us but it is his absence out of our heart● which bringeth damnation SECT 4. THis Sacrament then being a Spirituall thing must be spiritually The Soule cannot 〈◊〉 ●●d wi●h co●po●al●●ood deserned for the food of the Sou●e upon earth is no other then the food of Angels which is the joy and delectation which they have of Gods glory and therefore not to be fed with corporall food such as they would make Christs body and seeing that all corporall food is digested into the stomack and so cast o●t into the draugh● I blush to think of their audacious blasphe●●●s who doubtlesse cannot be ignorant that if they eate him ●●rnally that they doe also expell him in that manner as they doe other meat which thing is a shame to any Christian to conceive much more to expresse and vindicate And it may very ●ell be thought that though the Apostles of Christ would have been ●●y s●r●pilous to have drunk Christs very blood seeing it was so plain against the Law of Moses and their owne decrees A●● 15. 29. if they had understood him in that grosse sence which these Papists doe Ag●in the writers of Scriptures must be examined as Spirituall Scripture must be 〈◊〉 st●od 〈◊〉 spirituall sence men and not as Carnall men in regard they were delivered by holy men of God as they were moved by the Holy Ghost and therefore one taking upon him the person of our Saviour to whom in the sixtieth verse of the sixth of John who is said to murmur● at his sayings answereth them thus by expounding of our Saviours words in the 63. ver You saith he shall not ●at● this body which you see nor drink this blood in my v●●nes but I shall give a certain Sacrament unto you which if it be spiritually understood quick●●th you otherwise it profi●eth nothing SECT 5. IT is also evident from Exod. 12. 11. that the Paschall Lambe The ●●gne called by the name of the thing signified was called the Lords Passeover whereas it was but a signe and representation of the Passeover As also Circumcision was called the Lords covenant Gen. 17. 11. whereas it was only a signe and seale of i● Then as neither the Lambe was the Passeover it self nor Circumcision the Covenant it self it is but weakly inferred by these people from the words of our Saviour that the bread should be the body of Christ Mat. 26. 26. so that it must needs follow from hence that the Sacrament of the Lords Supper is only a signe or representation of the body of Christ yea the Apostle Paul expounding them words of our Saviour in the institution of the Sacrament viz. This is my body exhorteth us to doe it in remembrance of him And that so oft as we eate this this bread and drink this cup we shew the Lords death till he come 1 Cor. 11. 26. If then it be but a signe and representation of his death it is not his absolute death for if it were so then must Christ be really s●aine and crucified at every Sacrament which God forbid we should imagine and therefore the Apostle saith it is a remembrance of the Sacrifice of his body and blood which was shed for

it were a large Volume of the Creation of God by his Word and that the same Word is his Son How then is it possible that men living in so shining a light as is now defused amongst us should espape the force wrath and vengeance of God for not imbrasing of the truth seeing that the other as it were through a mist did see a cleernesse of his brightnesse and that we whom he hath nourished in his owne bosome and comforted with the grapes of his owne vine-yard fed with the bread of his owne Flesh and bathed in the blood of his owne heart should refuse to give him that respect which was acknowledged by them Doubtlesse those whom I have named shall rise up in judgement against all the Arians Anti-trenitarians and what others who yet wilfully oppose the truth as it is in Jesus yea when the Scriptures doe so punctually declare Christ to be the Son of God as in these five respects which agree to no other but him As first in his Name for he is simply called God as Joh. 1. 1. Christ declared to be the Son of God in five respects the Word was God as also 1 Epist John 5. 20. where the Apostle speaking of Jesus Christ saith the same was very God 2. By his Nativity and Generation and so he is called the Son of God Rom. 1. 3. 3. By nature he is one with God as in Joh. 20. 30. I and the Father am one 4. In power as in Mat. 28. 18. all power is given me in heaven and earth 5. By his owne profession for he professed himselfe to be the Son of God and therefore th● Jewes went about to kill him because he said that God was his Father Joh. 5. 18. Which five places if there were no other expressions to make out the truth of it is sufficient to convince the worst of men and certainly such as refuse to subscribe to this truth may justly be termed worse then the Devill for he freely confessed that Jesus Christ was the Son of the most high God Mark 5. 7. and surely none will any longer persist in such blasphemies but such as dispaire of their salvation and therefore indeavoureth to intrap others in the same snare for if there be no God and Christ be an imposter what expectation of any good can be hoped from them CHAP. III. Antiscriptarists objections cited and answered SECT 1. THis Herisie hath been maintained of old by the Maniches who held that the Old Testament was contrary to the New and that in these respects 1. Object Because that in the Old Testament the Lord professeth enmity against the Cananites and chargeth the Israelites to kill and destroy them how then is this say they consonant and agreeable with the Gospel where Christ commandeth to love our enemies Mat. 5. 44. Ans 1. That discention and enmity was not in respect of the Persons but of the manners of the Gentiles the Israelites were not so much enemies unto them as they were enemies to the true religion of the Israelites in worshipping of God aright 2. The killing of the enemy did agree with that carnall people to whom the Law was given as a School-master Gal. 3. 24. Revenge may be taken of some people in charity 3. The Apostle when he delivered over the incestuous man unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh did sufficiently declare that revenge may be taken of some enemies in charity therefore there may be love in him that taketh revenge as we see in Fathers which correct their children whom they love and although Fathers kill not their children in correcting of them yet God that knoweth what is better for every one can correct with love not only by infirmity and sicknesse but also with temporall death as is evident in the Corinthians where the Apostle saith For this cause many are weake and sick amongst you and many sleep And that these corrections proceed of love he presently after sheweth as in these words But when we are judged we are chastened of the Lord because we should not be condemned with the world 1 Cor. 11. 30. 32. 4. Neither did they doe this without divine Authority which sometimes ●s manifested in Scripture and sometimes concealed lest any should think it was permitted them to kill whom they would at their pleasure 5. Albeit that in the Old Testament it be permitted to kill The Old Testament not contrary to the New the enemies of God yet is there also examples of loving our enemies as in David who when Saul was offered into his hands he chose rather to spare him then kill him where then there was neither difficulty nor feare of killing the enemy it was love that helped him and therefore in that respect the Old Testament is not contrary to the New SECT 2. Object THat precept of honouring Parents is contrary to that in the New Testament where our Saviour being asked leave by one to goe and bury his Father answered Let the dead bury their dead Luk. 9. 60. Ans If herein the Old Testament and the New doe vary VVhen God is in computition Parents ought to be contemned and contradict one another then the New Testament therein will be contrary to it selfe for the Apostle urgeth this Commandement Eph. 6. 2. 2. It is manifest that honour in a certaine degree is to be reserved unto Parents yet in comparison of the love of God there is no doubt but that they ought to be contemned Mat. 10. 37. He that loveth father or mother more then me is not worthy of me SECT 3. Object IN the Old Testament the Lord is said to harden mens hearts which is an evill worke and therefore it proceedeth from a God that is a worker of evill Ans God is said to harden the heart without any touch of God hardneth the heart without any breach of sin sinne 2. It was not any violence from God that hardned Pharoahs heart but his owne impiety and obstinacy that hardned him like as the water is frozen untill the Sun shine upon it and then it resolveth but when the Sun is departed it is bound with cold againe now the Sun is not the cause of the freezing of the water Simile but the coldnesse of the water bindeth it selfe So properly God causeth not the heart to be hardned but by the absence of his grace it is hardened As one speaking in the Person of God to Pharaoh saith When my grace is drawne from thee then thy owne wickednesse shall harden thy heart the cause then must needs be ascribed to their owne wickednesse which deserveth to be hardned or it must be referred to the just judgements of God which are often hid but never unjust it sufficeth us to know and beleeve as the Apostle saith Rom. 9. 15. Is there unrighteousnesse with God God forbid SECT 4. Object IN the Old Testament the Lord is said to dwell in houses made with hands Exod. 25. 8.

so that it maketh directly against the Pelagians who deny sinne to be a deprivation of nature but say it is a corrupt imitation whereas it appeareth by the Text that even in the very youth and first age when we are not so apt to imitate there is evill and corruption in the heart Again sinne is the cause of death for if Adam had not sinned he had not dyed but it is most evident that Infants dye which if sinne were not the cause then were the Scriptures false which The death of Infants an evident demonstration of originall sinne saith the wages of sinne is death Now what other sinne can procure an infants death which hath not sinned according to the similitude of Adams transgression viz. actually unlesse it be originall sinne which certainly is a most infallible demonstration that children are borne in originall sinne In the next place I will shew you what it is SECT 3. Originall sinne described ORiginall sinne is an inherent corruption of our nature powred out into all the parts of the minde by the guilt of Adam who was not only the Progenitor but also as it were the root of mans nature for the Lord committed those gifts to Adam which he intended to bestow upon mans nature which when he had lost he lost them not only for himself but also for his while posterity by meanes of which we bring forth the workes which are called the workes of the flesh Gal. 5. 19. Now to the further description of originall sinne we finde in Scripture the cause the subject and the effect of it 1. The cause as I said before was Adams fall as we may see The cause of originall sin Rom. 5. 15. 1 Cor. 15. 21. as also by the suggestions of the Devell Gen. 3. 4. as also through Adams Free-will whereas he might have refused 2. The subject of it we take to be the old man with all his The subject of originall sin power minde will and heart for in the minde there is darknesse and ignorance of God and his Will as appeareth by the words of our Saviour Mat. 12. 34. O generation of vipers how can ye being evill speake good things The Apostle also saith that the carnall minde is at emnity with God for it is not subject to the Law of God neither can be Rom. 8. 7. The Apostle James also testifieth the same in these words Let no man say when he is tempted that he is tempted of God for God cannot be tempted with evill neither tempteth he any man but every man is tempted when he is drawne away of his owne lusts and inticements then when lust hath conceived it bringeth forth sinne c. Jam. 1. 13 14 15. 3. The fruits of originall sinne are either internall or externall The fruits of originall sin internall as ungodly affections or evill concupisence which the Apostle termeth Idolatry 2. Externall as wanton lookes prophaine speeches and devillish actions as in Mat. 15. 19. Out of the heart proceedeth evill thoughts c. which procureth a cauterised conscience the which procureth the wrath of God and eternall damnation as the Apostle testifieth where he saith that the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodlinesse and unrighteousnesse of men that holdeth the truth in unrighteousnesse for which thing sake the wrath of God is come upon the Children of disobedience Col. 3. 16. Joh. 8. 24. Rom. 5. 12. 18. Jam. 1. 15. SECT 4. Of Concupisence THe Pelacians doe hold this tenent in the generall that Concupisence was not sinne in any man and so doe the Papists generally in particulars viz. that concupisence after Baptisme is not properly sinne nor forbidden by Commandement and that it is not verily and properly a sinne in the regenerate but that it is only so called because it comes of sinne and inclineth to sinne each of their Objections shall be propounded and answered Questions propounded and answered touching Concupisence And first in answer to the Pelagians objection that hold it in the generall that concupisence which is the first fruit of originall sinne being to will or to desire without the externall action is no sinne to which purpose they argue thus viz. Obj. Such things as are naturall are not evill but concupisence or to will is naturall therefore it is not evill nor consequently sin Ans The Apostle saith that we are all by nature the children of wrath therefore because we are so by nature by the same reason it should be no discommodity unto us to be the children of wrath which would be a meere madnesse to conceive Obj. Even in our nature as it now standeth corrupt the appetite or desire of such things as tend to the conservation of nature and to decline and shun the contrary are not evill but such is the concupisence to meat and drink and the like ergo Ans Such motions and appetites of themselves are not evill Concupisence how evill and how not evill as they are naturall motions but if they be inordinate motions and exceed a just measure they are evill as to have an immoderate desire to meat and drink for as it was naturall for Eve to desire to eate of the fruit of the tree yet to desire it against the Commandement of God was evill so it is likewise with these naturall motions if they be immoderate and inordinate they are evill SECT 5. How Sinne is to be measured Obj. THat which is not in mans power to avoyd is no sinne but not to covit is not in mans power ergo it is no sin Ans Sin is not measured by the necessity and liberty of Nature How sin is to be measured but by the disagreement which it hath with the Will of God 2. When God first printed the Law in mans nature before his fall then were the precepts of God given unto him in his power to keepe 3. Though man by his voluntary corruption hath lost his power and liberty yet God fore-goeth not his power and right in commanding but that Concupisence is sinne Concupisence is sinne it is most evident by the Morall Law that would not forbid it unlesse it were sinne As also the Apostle who urgeth the same argument saying I had not known sin but by the Law for I had not known lust except the Law had said thou shalt not covit Rom. 7. 7. Thus much touching the objections of the Pelagians next in answer to the Popish objections Obj. The objection which the Papists make touching concupisence is viz. That it is taken away by Baptisme to whom I returne this answer viz. Ans The subjects which they and many other Societies admit Popish objections touching concupisence answered to Baptisme are not at that time of their admittance fit members or subjects to receive that Sacrament of initiation into the Church of Christ which in its due place I shall fully prove But as to such persons as are meete Members

perfectly good or imperfectly good such as is now in man mixed with many infirmities and imperfections which is either naturall in man as the coveting and desiring of meat and drink and other things necessary for the use of man or supernaturally wrought in man by grace as is the love and desire of vertue or it is mixed partly naturall and partly supernaturall as Matrimoniall concupisence for procreation which hath both a naturall cause or being and is likewise guided by grace unto a right end and none of these kinds of good and commendable concupisence is sinne Evill concupisence is of three sorts 1. As Idle roving and Evill concupisence of three sorts impertinent thoughts which the mind may easily reject 2. Violent cogitations which sticketh more closely and nearely as the immoderate desire of meat and drink and such things as belong to the necessity of nature as sumptuous apparrell and the like 3. There are filthy and uncleane cogitations as lasciviousnesse envie vain-glory and the like The first of these may be compared to thin Clay that sticketh or cleaveth not the second to tough Clay that sticketh fast and the third to uncleane and stinking Myre and Mud otherwise the first motion is not voluntary as a certaine preparation of the affection the second is with the will but the same not obstinate as when it commeth to ones minde to revenge himself when he is hurt but the third kinde is so outragious that it will not be ruled by reason as when a man is carried to revenge himself without measure The first of these can be no more ruled by reason then such things as hapneth to the body as when one yauneth when he seeth another yaune or suddenly winketh when one putteth their finger towards anothers eye c. SECT 4. Obj. ARe these idle wandrings being without respect to any certaine object sin and so forbidden in the Morall precept seeing the Morall precept aymeth at a certaine object as thou shalt not covet thy neighbours house c. Ans If we doe reject these thoughts at the very first moving of them and yet if so they carry some staine and guilt in them in regard children which have no such evill thoughts yet are not cleane before God being conceived and borne in sin as in Psal 51. 5. and which is also most evidently confirmed by the death of Infants as I have formerly shewed sin being the cause of death Therefore the best solution is that those cogitations which doe vanish before the minde be affected be not comprehended in the precept as actuall sins untill the will of man in some degree give consent till then sinne is only in the conception but not in the birth as the Apostle James saith When lust hath conceived it bringeth forth sin Jam. 1. 15. but as it is the first fruit of originall sinne together with that native corruption they are contrary to the precept for the Morall Law being grounded upon the Law of Nature which was perfect in man by creation before his fall and from which perfection originall sinne being a defect It may well be concluded that though they doe not come to reckoning before God if they presently vanish before the will and affection be inclined unto them yet doe they shew the corruption of our nature and although they breake not into a a flame yet they are sparkes that flye upward but if those sparks doe not break into a flame they shall never burn us nor be laid unto our judgement for if the will assent not concupiscence shall never hurt But this is through Gods meere mercy for otherwise Original sinne enough to condemne us this very originall corruption is enough to condemne us And thus I have shewed the distinction of sinnes veniall and yet not veniall in their proper nature in respect of their greatnesse and smalnesse but not to be permitted for these reasons SECT 5. Why originall corruption is not to be permitted 1 IN respect of the nature of sinne which of it selfe deserveth death Rom. 6. 23. The wages of sinne is death as also in that it is a transgression of the Law 1 John 3. 4. and every transgression of the Law is under the Curse Gal. 3. 10. 2. In respect of the infinite Maiesty of God who to offend can be no veniall sinne of it selfe considering his perfect and absolute righteousnesse which cannot abide the least blemish and imperfection Therefore in regard of the perfect righteousnesse and infinite Maiesty of God no sinne against him can be veniall as in the sudden motion and passion of anger even when it is sudden and unadvised yea though there be no further purpose or intendment of hurt is notwithstanding guilty of judgement Matth. 5. 22. So then we admit of a distinction of mortall and veniall sinnes The distinct●ō of mortall and veniall sinnes if it be understood not of the nature of sinne but of the qualities of the persons for unto them that believe all sinnes are veniall and pardonable through the mercy of God Rom. 8. 1. There is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus but to the wicked and unbelievers all their sinnes are mortall Rom. 6. 23. to them the stipend and wages of sin is death Now if we trace this originall and spaune of sinne unto the birth we shall find it in action which action proceedeth from the conception of the will to enioy the thing desired as the Apostle James saith When lust hath conceived it bringeth forth sinne Jam. 1. 15. SECT 6. Five things to be considered in every sinfull act ANd in every sinfull act there are five things to be considered as Actus Peccati Culpa Macula Reatus Poena 1. The very act of sin 2. the fault 3. the blot 4. the guilt and 5. the punishment 1. The act of sin as it is an act is not alwayes evill for there Sin as it is an act is not alwayes evill is the same act in substance in sin as in doing that which is honest as in adultery there is the like externall act as in lawfull Matrimony so that onely the fault which is in respect of the circumstances which are not observed make the difference 2. The second thing to be considered is Culpa the faultinesse of the action which is committed by the not due observing of the Circumstances which are these First Quid what it is that hee Nine things to bee considered in the faultinesse of an action doth whether it be lawfull or not lawfull honest or not honest 2. quantum the quantity must be considered as one may steale much or little or raile sparingly or with a full mouth 3. quoties how often for he that committeth the same sinne often is more blameable then he that doth it seldome 4. qualiter after what manner whether willingly or unwillingly whether he be quicke or slow in doing of it 5. Cum quo with what instrument as he that smiteth with a

severity of Gods punishment appeareth as also the greatnesse of mans sin that brought destruction upon many As David● sin in numbring of the people did procure a punishment upon the whole Land 3. Because beastly men had abused the Creature to their beastly pleasure and riotous excesse it stood with Gods Justice to punish the instrument with the principall and though it pleased God to spare the Fish in regard that man had not so much abused them yet at other times the Lord threatned to take away the Fish of the Sea Hos 3. 4. Obj. Seeing the Lord saith by his Prophets that the Sonne shall not dye for the Fathers iniquity how standeth it with the Justice of God to visite the iniquity of the Fathers upon the Children to the third and fourth Generation Exod. 34. 7. Ans By sin in that place is neither understood the act of sin which cannot be transmitted over unto another but being a transitory thing resteth in the doer neither the fault which goeth with the act nor the blot which is only in the Soule of the offender or sinner nor yet the guilt for if children were guilty of their Fathers sins then for the same they should be everlastingly punished therefore by sin in that place is meant the punishment of sinne which is extended to their posterity SECT 5. Obj. THe contrary may be argued in these two respects 1. In that it is to be considered who are the Authors of the infliction God or man If by man the punishment be imposed it is in the losse only of temporall things as of possessions priviledges honours c. for the transgressions of their Parents as by humane Lawes treason against the State or Common-wealth is punished with death in the Offendor and losse of honour and goods in their posterities But the punishment of death cannot be inflicted upon the children for their fathers offence as a rule is given in Deut. 24. 16. The Father shall not be put to death for the Children nor the Children for the Father 2. If the punishment be inflicted of the Lord it is either eternall or temporall now eternall punishment is laid upon none but the party that sinneth the soule that sinneth shall dye If it be temporall it either consisteth in some temporall benefit or of life If the first not only little ones and infants but even they which are of yeares shall suffer for their Fathers sins as the Israelites did beare the iniquities of their Fathers forty yeares in the Wildernesse and the Jewes great and small were afflicted in the Babilonish Captivity But where the punishment of temporall death is decreed by the Lord there only the infants are punished for their Fathers sins as the children of the rebellious Corah Dathan and Abiram were swallowed up with their Fathers the greater sort also perished in that destruction but then they were such as consented thereunto Achan also was punished with his Sons and Daughters for the sacriledge by him committed which was done for the greater detestation of the fact and the examples of others these are the two Arguments which the Popish Writers use for the vindicating of this their assertion which may be thus answered Ans These two opinions will allow of two exceptions 1. That they make Infants liable to those sins of their Fathers which the Lord saith he will visite to the third and fourth generation whereas those children which continue like haters of God as their Fathers were and imitate their impiety are only included in that combination as appeareth by that clause incerted in the second Commandement of them that hate me again when Infants are cut off by death their owne originall sin is a sufficient cause thereof which bringeth death upon them Secondly they restraine this generall speech visiting the si●s The Lord Judgements are not to be limited of the Fathers c. only unto tempo all punishment whereas the Lords Judgements are not to be limited to this or that kinde but sometimes by corporall death sometime by other temporall punishments he doth visite the iniquity of wicked Fathers upon their evill posterity and as concerning the third and fourth generation there are foure answers usually made to shew the equity that the posterity of the wicked should be punished for their Fathers sinnes 1. Because God which gave life may without any injustice The Lord which gave life may also require it again at his pleasure require it again he doth no wrong by slaying of any 2. They doe not so much rue the sins of their Parents as yeeld Natures debt which God may exact when and of whom he will and how he pleaseth as Josh 7. 25. 26. 3. It must be understood of temporall punishment which may be inslicted for their Fathers sins but the best solution is that God is said to shew mercy to thousands of them that love him so that he is to visite the iniquities of them that hate him SECT 6. Obj. THe wicked Children of godly Parents are found to be respected for their Fathers as the Lord suffered the wicked Kings of Judah to sit upon the Throne for their Father Davids sake Ans It is not denyed but that God may bestow temporall blessings upon the Children of the righteous although they be wicked but that is generall or particular God sometimes is mercifull as he was to Davids posterity for some reasons best known to himself but this promise in generall certainly holdeth not but where the children imitate their fathers piety Obj. If this should be meant of shewing mercy to the vertuous seed and vengeance to the wicked race they should be respected or punished for their owne piety or sin and not for their parents Ans The condition of them that love me and of them that Sinne punished in a double respect hate me is not understood of the particular but of the exemplary vertues or sins of the Children where they imitate their Parents and so they are both their Parents Origine exemple in respect of the originall and example and the Childrens in imitation so that mercy is extended to the righteous seed of the Mercy extended in a double respect righteous in a double respect viz. both for their exemplary vertues of their Fathers whom they imitate and of their own righteousnesse and this without limitation even to a thousand generations not that there shall be so many generations in the world but to shew that Gods mercy shall never be drawne dry And so the wicked race of the ungodly is also punished in a double manner for imitating their Fathers sins which punishment extendeth not beyond foure generations and for their owne sins which every one shall be judged for in his owne generation and that for ever so that the Sonne doth not here beare the Fathers iniquity when he doth not imitate his Fathers sin Moses and Ezekiel are here then reconciled Ezekiel saying the Sonne shall Mose● and Ezek●el reconciled

then make better tryall of mans obedience then in forbidding that which is good But to the point in question if all were alike saved by the death of Christ why then are the termes of election and Predestination used so frequently in Scripture SECT 5. Object VVHat is meant by the word Election and Predestination Answ Predestination is the eternall decree of God whereby he determined with himself what he would have become of every What election is in the generall man for men are not since the fall of Adam created to the like estate and condition but for some eternall life and for others eternall death is appointed whereby Gods free election is made manifest seeing it lyeth in his will what shall be the estate and condition of every Nation whereof the Lord sheweth a token in the whole issue of Abraham as we may read Gen. 24. 37. Deut 32. 8. Psal 147. 20. There is also a certain speciall election wherein appeareth Of particular election more plainly the grace of God seeing that of the same Stock of Abraham God rejected some as Ishmael and Esau and at length most of the Tribes of Israel unto whom the entery of life were shut before them by his just yet by his incomprehensible judgement In the next place it is requisite to shew the effect that Gods The effects of election and repto●ation election and reprobation worketh and 1. Touching the elect whom God in his mercy hath appointed to salvation for his own righteousnesse sake and not for their desert Those he guideth by the grace of his holy Spirit Rom. 8. 14. c. 9. c. As many as are led by the Spirit of God are the Sons of God as also the Prophet Isai All those that I have called by my name I have created fashioned and made for my honour Isa 43. SECT 6. NOw as the elect are led guided and directed by the Spirit of God so on the contrary are the reprobate by the spirit of Sathan who is the God of the world or worldly-minded men and hence it is that Christ telleth the wicked Jewes That they were of their father the Devill Joh. 8. 44. whose workes they did so that as on the one side the elect indeavoured to doe the will of God their Father so the other the will of their father the Devill And those sort of people are compared by the Prophet Isaiah S●mpromes of the sonnes of Sathan to a raging Sea that cannoe rest whose waters foameth with myre and gravell for they have no peace with God Isa 57. 20. The Prophet David also considering of their estate and condition Psa 73. 4 5 6. giveth this reason for it viz. The Lord suffereth them to come to no perill of death but they are lusty and strong they come in no danger like other folke neither are they plagued like other men Their eyes swell with fatnesse and they doe even what they lust they have riches in possession and they call their Lands by their owne names And this is the cause saith he that they be so holden with pride and overwhelmed with cruelty these are they that talke against the most highest which say Tush how shall God perceive it is there knowledge in the most high Can he heare our Swearings see our secret Wheredomes and Adulteries Doth he take notice of our prophaning the Sabbaths or of our quaffing and drinking of healths of villifying Professors with reproachfull tearmes of Schismaticks and Hereticks and the like surely no. Such as these were Cain Cham Ishmael Pharaoh Ammon Their predecessor Saul Absolom Antiochus Herod Pilate Judas the traitor and many others who brought upon themselves eternall condemnation The same Prophet David also describeth the end of such men with another reason of it in these words namely That the Their end Lord hath set them in slippery places and cast them downe and destroyed them by which meanes how suddenly doe they consume and perish and come to a fearefull end yea even as a dreame so doth he make their image to vanish SECT 7. Object IF God have reprobated and cast them off how can they doe any other the cause of sinning therefore is not in them but in God who leaveth them to themselves how doe those Scriptures agree then where the Lord saith that he delighteth not in the death of a sinner Ezek. 33. 6. And O that Israel would obey me c. with O Jerusalem Jerusalem how often would I have gathered thee together and ye would not Mat. 23. 37. As also that he willeth not the death of a sinner and other while that some are ordained of old to condemnation as in Jude vers 6. Judas also is called the sonne of perdition Joh. 17. 12. Ans To the Answer which hath formerly been made to such Sundry arguments answered touching rejection a question as this may be added this answer of the Prophet Jeremy The Lord is more righteous then to be disputed with Jerem. 28. 6. And the Prophet Isaiah saith We are in the hands of the Lord as the Clay in the hands of the Potter Isa 47. 9. And the Apostle saith Hath not the Potter power over the Clay and of the same lump to make one vessell to honour and another to dishonour Rom. 9. 21. Again Who art thou that replyest against God ver 20. Was there unrighteousnesse in God in loving Jacob and hating Esau God forbid ver 14. For he will have mercy on whom he will have mercy and compassion on whom he will have compassi●n ver 15. and whom he will he hardneth so that there is vessels of wrath and vessels of mercy as in ver 22. 23. for otherwise why should these phrases be used in Scripture CHAP. III. Treateth of hardning the heart SECT 1. Objection IF God harden the heart of a sinner how can he chuse but sinne seeing that by nature we are all the children of wrath Ans In every action the ●nd and meanes must goe together the cause doth never follow the effect but the effect the cause and in one and same action there is a double cause as 1. The instrumentall cause moving 2. God separating from the instrument yet giving power of motion to the same and so the wicked may be said to be the instruments of God yet not God the cause of their wickednesse and therefore one saith Deus agit per malos non in malis God worketh by evill men not in evill men God therefore may be said to be the cause of the action but God is no way the author of sinne not of the quality of the action Gods decree is no cause of their sinning but the voluntary inclination of the will unto evill being neither forced nor by any violence compelled and therefore no evill is either to be attributed to God or his decre● 2. Again God is no way the author of sinne seeing he neither tempteth nor perswadeth unto it Jer. 1.

shall profit you nothing Gal. 5. 2. for when the body is come the shadow must be abolished but the Ceremonials were shadowes the body is Christ Col. 2. 17. their Temple signified the Church of God their holy place Heaven their Sacrifices the Passion of Christ their expiations the remission of sins these things then being fully exhibited and fulfilled in Christ have now no more place in the Church Again the Ceremonials served only for that carnall people To what end Ceremonies served which were as children kept in bondage under the rudiments of the world Gal. 4. 3. but now we are no longer under tutors and governours the time appointed by the Father being expired but are set free and redeemed by Christ Another reason for the abolishing of them is in respect of that people to whom they were prescribed as a marke and cognizance to discerne them from all other Nations but now this distinction being taken away and the wall of partition being broden downe both Jewes and Gentiles being made all one in Christ that also is abolished which discerneth them from other people for the causes being changed for the which the Law was made there must needs also follow an alteration of the Law it self As Of the juditiall Law for the Judicials they are neither abolished nor yet with such necessity to be injoyned the equity of them bindeth but not the strict severity they doe not hold affirmatively that we are tyed to the same severity of punishment now as was inflicted then but negatively they doe hold that now the punishment of death should not be adjudged where sentence of death is not given by Moses Christian Magistrates living now under Christ the prince of peace Isa 9. 6. that is of clemency and mercy may abate of the severity of Moses Lawes and mittigate the punishment The severity of the judicial Law to be abated of death but they cannot adde unto it to make the burthen more heavie To shew more rigor then Moses becommeth not the Gospel to extend more favour is not unbeseeming of which two assertions these are the reasons 1. The first is urged from Lukes Gospel where our Saviour Example reproveth his Disciples because they would have had fire to have come downe from Heaven upon the Samaritans by which we are shewed that vengeance is not alwaies to be taken on them that offend because oftentimes clemency is more profitable both for patience in the offended and amendment in the offend●r and that by the example of our Saviour Luk. 9. 54. The Son of man is not come to destroy mens lives but to save them 2. In that example of Christ who suffered the woman taken Example in Adultery to escape without punishment of death Joh. 8. 11. from which may be inferred that the Adultresse now is not to be put to death but to live rather to be reconciled to her Husband or to come to repentance in which instance our Saviour doth not abrogate the Law against Adultery but refuseth only to meddle with the Magistrates office And albeit Christ did not exercise the Magistrates office in his owne person giving unto Caesar the things that was Caesars according to his owne direction yet in this case it had not been impertinent to have given directions to have had her before the Civill Magistrate as in another case he did send the Leaper to the Priest Mat. 8. 4. if it had pleased him to impose still the severity of the Law yea our Saviour sheweth by this answer Let him that is amongst you without sinne cast the first stone at her Joh 8. 7. so that he would not have them such straight executors of the rigour of the Law of Moses upon others but rather be severe Judges of themselves and with charitable affections to support the frugality of others to which they themselves were subject unto SECT 3. THe difference betwixt the time of the Law and the Gospel The difference of time to be considered must be considered then they received the spirit of bondage to feare but now the spirit of adoption Rom. 8. 15. Then they which came neare the Mount where the Morall Law was given were stoned or strucken through with a Dart whether man or beast Heb. 12. 20. but it is not so now then the blood of Abel called for vengeance but the blood of Christ now calleth for mercy and so speaketh better things then that of Abel ver 24. therefore to mittigate the severity of Moses Law in some cases yet not leaving sin unpunished nor by connivance cherished it is more sutable to the profession of the Gospel of peace and mercy 4. The continuall practice of the Church sheweth as much The practice of succeeding Churches decline th●m to b● mitigated that the rigour of Moses Judicials is mittigated the Apostle only willing the infectious man to be excommunicated 1 Cor. 5. 5. by which it seemeth there was no Law in force to put such to death neither therefore was the Law cruell then neither now doth the Gospel seeme to be desolate but in them both the benignity of God appeared yet by a divers dispensation Then by the death of the body the people was rather parged from their sins then cond●mned but unto us sin is not purged by corporall punishment but by repentance The death of the body then served a● an expiation of their sins prefiguring the death of Christ Gal. 3. 13. but now the expiation of sins is by repentance and remission of sins in Christ Now a greater punishment abideth the contemners of the Gospel even eternall in the next world and therefore corporall death is not so much inflicted now As to the continuance of the Morall Law it is yet in force The Morall Law yet in force and is not abrogated in respect of obedience which thereunto is still required under the Gospel but in respect of the curse and ●alidictio● which Christ hath taken away so that it is most true which our Saviour saith He came not to dissolve the Law but to fulfill it Mat. 5. 17. he hath fulfilled it in his owne person in keeping it ● In paying the punishment which was due by the Law to the transgressors thereof 3. By inabling us by his grace to walk in obedience to the Law SECT 4. Obj. THe Morall Law only prescribeth duties concerning God and our Neighbour and speaketh nothing of man toward himself 2. It forbiddeth perjury whereas blasphemy and heresie was ●s needfull to be forbidden 3. The precepts of the Sabbath is only expressed whereas there were divers other Feasts as of the Passeover P●ntic●ast and others which the Israelites were bound to keep 4. The duty of Parents is commanded but not the the love of Parents againe unto their children 5 The inward act of Murder is not forbidden as the inward act of Adultery namely concupisence therefore there is not a sufficient enumeration in the M●rall Law of all Morall

New for divers Saints had their proper possessions and goods as Tabitha Act. 8. that made Coates for the poore of Lidia Act. 16. who was also a seller of purple 6. It is lawfull for Christians to have their p●oper servants much more his proper goods for the peculiar possession of servants seemeth more to be against the liberty of Nature then of goods and lands but the distinction of Masters and Servants are not taken away but maintained and continued in the New Testament Ephe. 6. and in other places much more distinct possessions of things SECT 5. Obj. T is also appropriated unto them of this notion that they are of opinion that it is not lawfull to take an oath before a Magistrate aleadging the Text Mat. 5. 34. But I say unto you sweare not at all c. but that it is lawfull to take an oath amongst Christians is thus proved Ans If it had not been lawfull to sweare and if the thing were The lawfulnesse of an oath to which purpose many objections are answered evill in it selfe then the holy Servants of God would not have sworne at all as Abraham did to Abimelech Gen. 22. Jacob to Laban Gen. 31. 53. Jonathan to David and David to Jonathan 1 Sam. 20. 42. 2. God commandeth us to sweare by his name Deut. 6. 13. 10. 20. but God commandeth no evill to be done 3. The end of an Oath is to put an end to all strife and controverfie Heb. 16. 16. therefore it is to Gods glory and profitable to humane society that by Oathes such businesses should be ended Obj. Although it were permitted in the Old Testament to the Fathers to sweare yet it is forbidden in the New at Mat. 5. 34. I say unto you sweare not at all Ans Christ came not to dissolve the Law viz. the Morall Law which being perpetuall doth yet remaine in use 2. The Prophets speaking of the times of the Gospel and o● the state of the Church under Christ doth fore-tell that they should sweare by his name Isa 65. 16. He that sweareth on earth shall sweare by the true God 3. We have the example of Paul which often called God to witnesse as Rom. 1. 9. Cor. 1. 23. Rom. 9. 1. Phil. 1. 8. Gal. 1. 23. Obj. Our Saviour giveth a generall prohibition against swearing in that text of Mat. 5. 34. and the Apostle James saith Above all things my brethren sweare not at all but let your yea be yea and your nay nay c. Ans Our Saviour doth not generally forbid all kind of oathes but only rash and unadvised oathes which were used in their common talke so that there he only correcteth an abuse amongst the Jewes who were allowed to sweare by heaven and earth and such like as though such kinde of oathes nothing concerned God but our Saviour telleth them that even in such oathes the name of God is prophained and abused because there can no part of the world be named where the Lord hath not sent some prints of his glory Againe as touching the instance of our Saviours Mat. 5. 34. he meaneth such oathes as came of an evill minde for otherwise he himselfe used more then yea and nay in his speech saying Amen c. the Apostle Paul also oft-times called God to witnesse which should have been against his Masters rule if it had not been lawfull at all to have taken an oath and therefore in regard of the incredulity and deceitfulnesse of men the necessity of oathes were brought in therefore the Argument doth not follow that whatsoever is more c. commeth of evill for albeit that good Lawes are caused by evill manners it doth not therefore follow that they are evill Obj. It is not in mans power to performe what he sweareth to doe for things to come are not in his power therefore it was better to forbeare an oath then to fall into apparent danger of perjury Ans Though this were granted yet doth it not take away the use of all oathes but only such as are for the performing of Covenants and promises There is another kinde of oathes which is called Acirtorium which affirmeth the truth of something already done which oath if this objection were admitted were not to be taken away It satisfieth that he that taketh an oath to performe some covenant and promise have a full intent and purpose to doe it though it fall out otherwise afterward Obj. The oathes which are allowed in Scripture were publick such as were required of the Magistrate this giveth not liberty to private men Ans Jacob sware to Laban Joseph to Jacob Jonathan to David and David to Jonathan yet all these which tooke these oathes sware privately and as private men and so an oath serveth Severall objections answered touching the power of the Civill Magistrate for the evidence of the truth for the ending of strife and controversies in which there may be a lawfull and necessary use of oathes as well publickly as privately not upon every occasion but when the matter is urgent and the place so requireth SECT 6. Obj. ANother Tenent which is urged upon them is that they deny the lawfull power of the Mastistrate viz. that he hath power to put any to death or at least for a Christian to be a Civill Magistrate Ans The Apostle affirmeth the contrary Rom. 13. 4. where he saith That the power beareth not the Sword in vaine and that he is the Minister of God to shew revenge upon them that doe evil Obj. Our Saviour exhorteth us in his Sermond not to resist evill so that Christ restraineth the power of revenging evill given by Moses to the Magistrate Ans Although this power was first given to the Magistrate yet the Scribes and Pharisees corruptly applyed it to private revenge so that Christ in this place disanulleth not the Law of Moses but speaketh against their corrupt glosses of it Obj. We ought not to be subject unto Magestracy because Christ hath made us free Ans The internall liberty and freedome of the Spirit doth not take away externall subjection unto the Magistrate as the Apostle saith Art thou called being a servant care not for it 1 Cor. 7. 21. As one then may be a servant and retaine his Christian liberty so he may also be a subject We read also that Cornelius a Centurion and Sergius Paulus Pre-consul after their conversion was not charged to leave their calling SECT 7. ANother Tenent which is attributed unto them is That they Severall objections answered touching the lawfulnesse of Warre hold it not lawfull for a Christian to beare Armour or Weapons or wage Battell their reasons and objections being these viz. Obj Our Saviour exhorteth us not to resist evill but whosoever shall smite us on the cheeke to turne to him the other also Mat. 5. 39. Ans It is evident that Christ doth not here bring in a new Law but only freeth it from the corrupt glosses of the