Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
death_n cup_n eat_v show_v 4,020 5 5.4880 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A14057 A new dialogue vvherin is conteyned the examinatio[n] of the messe and of that kynde of priesthode, whych is ordeined to saye messe: and to offer vp for remyssyon of synne, the body and bloud of Christe agayne. Turner, William, d. 1568. 1548 (1548) STC 24363; ESTC S108032 34,102 104

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

whē he ●ot only speaketh with but also toucheth ●he king of heauē●ye must not therfore 〈◊〉 rashly dispise the hallowed vestimē●es other suche lyke outward semely ●eremonies which serue for a good or●●r knouulege I perceyue well when ●●s ye can not answerere to the reso●es whyche I haue made vnto youre ●llowe ye would drawe me craftelye ●●te of the matter in to an other newe matter But leaste I shoulde seme to be vnable to answere vnto youre resones I saye the vestymentes for all the Bysshoppes bablynge are no holyer then Tom● Tynkers taberd is and the name of God is abused whē it is called vpon to sanctify thynges that God neuer cōmaunded to be sanctifyed or hallowed Christes naturall body is not now honoured with outward garmentes and he wyl not be honoured otherwise then he hath commaunded for he hath gyuen no cōmaundemunte so to be honoured And as for hys godhede because it is a spyrite i● muste be spyrytually worshypped in sprite and in truth and not in outward vestimētes Yf ye wyll worshyp Christes bodye as ye oughte to doo gyue good newe clothes vnto the naked or to the poore that haue nede of clothes and then doo ye honour Christe as ye shoulde do But to returne vnto oure purpose agayne I axe of you whether a lay man when he taketh hys rygtes at Easter in loue and charite wyth a christiā faith celebrateth the hole supper or no Philargy I graunt that h● celebrateth the hose supper knouulege but the same celebrateth not the hol●nesse and the supper of the Lorde are not all one Porphiry As a naked man now wythin this houre clothed dyffereth not in substāce from hym selfe because he is clothed so the messe dyffereth not from the supper of the Lorde because it hath decent apparell nowe semely for such a mystery whyche perchāce it had not in the primatiue church or elles there is no difference at al betwene the Messe and the supper of our Lorde for there is in the messe before the consecration breade and wyne and after the cōsecration the body bloud of Christ and these are in the supper of our Lorde and also in the messe therfore the messe and the Supper of oure Lorde are al one knouulege Ye say because there is breade and wyne in the messe before the consecration and the body and bloude of Christ after the cōsecration and these ar both in the sup●er and also in the messe therfore that the supper of the Lorde and the messe are all one Fyrst ye doo suppose to be true which is playn false that is wher soeuer breaed and wyne is the bodye and bloude of Christe is that there is Christes supper At the maryage in the Cane of Galile was breade and wyne and the body and bloud of Christ more truly then they are now in your messe yet was not Christes supper there In the Supper also of the Corynthyans which they eate before the Lordes supper was breade and wyne and yf it be true that the sacramētaries hold that Christes body is in euery place there was Christes body and bloude but for all that that supper was not Christes supper because it was not done in the remembraunce of Christes deathe but onely to fyll the belly and not to fede the soule Porphiry thys is not a lyke case for neyther in the Cane of Galile neyther in the Corynthyans Supper was the wordes of consecration sayd and therfore was there no supper of oure Lorde knowelege Then yf the wo●des of consecration had bene sayd in the Corynthyans supper thoughe the Corynthyans hadde not intended to haue remembred Chrystes deathe theyr former supper shoulde haue bene christes supper and now by your resō when and where soeuer a preiste sayth the wordes of consecratyon as ye call them ouer breade and wyne there is Chrystes supper as thoughe in these it thynges alone to haue breade wyne and certayne wordes sayd ouer the same shoulde consyste Christes supper whyche opynion I wyll take in hande to proue false by the autorite of goddes word Luke in the .xxii. chap. describing the Lordes supper al such thinges as belōge vnto it in these wordes do this in the remēbraūce of me teacheth vs plaīly the one of the chefe pointes that belōgeth vnto the lordes supper is to call to remēbraūce the passiō of christ And paul in the .xi. chap. of the former epistle to the corīthiās writeth of christes supꝑ thus Take ye eat ye this is my body which is brokē for you do this in the remēbraūce of me After the same maner also he toke the cuppe when supper was done and sayd thys cup is the new testament in my bloude do thys as oft as ye shall drinke it in the remēbraunce of me for as oft as ye shal eat of thys bread and drynke of thys cup ye shall declare the death of the lord vntyl he come These are the wordes of saynt Paule and the vndoubted scripture wherevpon I gather that it belongeth as muche to Christes supper to receyue the breade and wyne in the remēbraūce of Christ and to declare and shew hys death as it belongethe to reherse these wordes thys is my bodye yea and more to for sainte Paule sayeth as oft as ye shall eate thys breade and drynke thys cup ye shall declare and set furth the death of the Lord vntyll he come He sayeth not as oft as ye shal eate thys breade and drynke thys cup ye shall say these wordes ouer the breade and wyne this is my bodye and thys is my bloude Then doth not onely breade and wym and the wordes of consecration sayde by a prest make the supper of the lord excepte the remembraunce of Christes death the presēce of Christes church be annexed also therunto Then doo I gather this argument the messe is not done in the remembraunce of Christe as oft as it is done therfore the messe is not the supper of the lord Furthermore that the messe and the supper of the Lorde dyffer no more one from an other then a naked man and a clothed man do thys argumente shall sufficiently declare Whose operationes and endes doo differ and are dyuerse they are also dyuerse thynges and dyffer and can not be all one But the operatiōs and endes of Christes supper and the messe are dyuerse and dyffer one from an other therfore the supper of Christ and the messe do dyffer and are diuerse thinges and can not be al one The operation and ende of the Messe are these to purchasse remission of syn by offerynge vp of Christe agayne to make fayre wether and rayne to heale sycke horses meseld swyne the french pox to bryng soules to rest that are in tormente and payne to delyuer soules out of hel The messe is sayd and done in the remembraunce and honoure of men Thys is also an operation at the messe to purge synnes and to take thē awaye and to brynge the kyngdome of