Selected quad for the lemma: death_n
Text snippets containing the quad
|
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
|
A36118
|
Discourses upon the modern affairs of Europe tending to prove that the illustrious French monarchy may be reduced to terms of greater moderation.
|
|
1680
(1680)
|
Wing D1630; ESTC R24999
|
20,174
|
26
|
of their teeths for there is no such thing as prudence amongst them That weak and irresolute States do seldom take good Counsels unless they be forced for their weakness suffers them not to deliberate where any thing is doubtful and if that doubt be not removed by a violent necessity they never come to a resolution but are always in suspence And that it is a fault peculiar to all weak and improvident Princes and Governments to be slow and tedious as well as uncertain in their Counsels which is as dangerous as the other With divers more of the like nature Wherefore thete may seem to be but one thing that may perplex us and that is Whether this course may sort to the nature of the times and our circumstances Touching this point the same Author gives this Rule That the occasion of every mans good or bad fortune consists in his correspondence accommodation with the times The wary course that Fabius took against Hannibal was good because the times and the condition of the Romans suited to it But had the same course been holden on when Scipio undertook the War Hannibal might have staid in Italy but the times being changed they also altered the method of the War And it is certainly true That to every purpose there is a time and a judgment therefore the misery of man is great upon him because the time is hard to be discerned for if the time be missed things cannot succeed for man knoweth not his time If a man chuses a wrong time he may labour and travel not only in vain as to the issues designed but may bring forth his own destruction for the universal influence and concourse of the first Providence is wanting But when we shall seriously consider that there is no other way left that the French King will neither be quiet himself nor let any body else alone and that we must either throw up the Cudgels and let him domineer as he pleases or do something that may either deter him from attempting further or if he does may shew him there is as good iron in the world as any he has in France I say things being thus I can foresee no objection of weight against the proposition That State that will defend it self must be in a condition to offend its enemies And so long as this State shall give occasion to France to apprehend that they are afraid of him he will use them as Dogs Therefore since this is like to be a League of as great importance as has been made in the world a good while to render the same secure to the parties to add majesty and grandeur to it to render it more sacred and to give it weight and reputation in the world it will be necessary that the same be approved ratified and confirmed both by the Parliament of England and the General Estates of the Seven Provinces in an extraordinary Assembly I confess the thing is both very extraordinary and magnificent and will make the times famous But the arguments that inforce the necessity thereof are irrefragible the demonstration whereof I shall leave this whole discourse and the dignity and weight of the matters themselves to give evidence unto and shall say no more in this place Than that there is nothing that Princes and States may more justly value themselves upon than Faith and Sincerity in their Leagues and Treaties and Negotiations with other Princes and States and insincerity or Stare-hypocrisie less becomes the majesty of State than it does private persons in moral and civil actions But before we go any further it will be but necessary to answer an Objection that may be made on the part of England and that is That to confirm a League by the Parliament will weaken the Kings Prerogative To which I answer 1. Ad hominem That which has been don in the time of former Kings and those the greatest and wisest of our Princes and did not lessen their Prerogative may be don again without weakening the Prerogative of the present King But this thing has been often don in former Parliaments as our Rolles of Parliament Records Law Books and Histories shew But I shall content my self to name two or three of the most Principal as sufficient A League and Alliance was made between King Henry 5. his Heires and Successors and Sigismond King of the Romans his Heires and Successors Kings of the Romans and was confirmed by Act of Parliament Coke Inst pars 4.156 Rot. Parl. 4. H. 5. N o. 14. That illustrious Peace 9. H. 5. made between Charles the 6. of France and the said Henry 5. of England who was the very Alexander of the Kings of England for magnificence by which the King of England had confirmed to him the Regency of the Kingdom of France during the life of Charles and the succession of the Crown after his death was ratified by the three Estates of France and sworn to by the King of England in Parliament and by the same Parliament ratified And 11. Henry 7. the same case happened again The three States of the Kingdom joyned with the King in the ratification of a Peace with France in the same manner This King was a Prince of great wisdom and sufficiency as I said before He invaded France with a Royal Army made them buy a Peace of him and pay him Tribute which continued yet in the times of Henry 8. his Son nevertheless he ratified a Peace by the Parliament So you see two Kings one the greatest Conqueror as the other was the greatest Polititian of the Kings of England ratifying their Leagues which nevertheless they purchased with their own swords by Parliaments And so sacred were our Leagues and Truces held to be in those times that 2. H. 5. c. 6. It was enacted by Parliament That the breaking of Truces should be High Treason in the subjects of England But 2. I answer ad Rem It is said the Kings Prerogative is to make War and Peace If the King then make a League and the Parliament confirm that League it is so far from lessening that it confirms that Authority That there must be a New League and that it must have not only more but larger dimensions then the present League in being is evident Because the House of Commons in the late long Parliament voted That the League offensive and defensive between his Majestie and this State is not according to their Advices given to his Majestie nor pursuant to the ends by them proposed Which vote has blasted the present League And if you should call twenty Parliaments they would all be of the same opinion And because all humane Providence is short-sighted there may be a provisional clause added That where the ordinary provisions and remedies of this League shall fall short or disproportionate the Parliament shall be called to deliberate of supplemental complements of provisions that may be adequate to the force that shall attacq the League which