Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
death_n	covenant_n	law_n	sin_n	4,869	5	5.4906	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A47576	The Jewish Sabbath abrogated, or, The Saturday Sabbatarians confuted in two parts : first, proving the abrogation of the old seventh-day Sabbath : secondly, that the Lord's-Day is of divine appointment : containing several sermons newly preach'd upon a special occasion, wherein are many new arguments not found in former authors / by Benjamin Keach.	Keach, Benjamin, 1640-1704.	1700 (1700)	Wing K73; ESTC R7556	176,774	438

chiefly because to them were committed the Oracles of God Now Stephen shews by the Oracles of God are meant the Ten words Act. 7. 33. who told the Jews Their Fathers received on Mount Sinai the lively Oracles to deliver them saith he to us i. e. us Jews Now I argue thus If the Gentiles had the same lively Oracles or Oracles of God given to them then in this the Jews had not the advantage above the Gentiles He doth not speak of the Advantage the Jews had as to the clearest Revelation of those Oracles to them above the Gentiles but of the giving of them to the Jews and not to the Gentiles 3. Again two or three times Paul expresly affirms that the Gentiles had not the Law and were without the Law For when the Gentiles which have not the Law c. Rom. 2. 14. What is more plainly expressed The Gentiles he saith had not the Law that is as given by Moses tho they had the Law written in their Hearts So elsewhere he says 1 Cor. 9. 21 22. Vnto the Jew I became a Jew that I might gain the Jews to them that are under the Law as under the Law c. to them that are without the Law as without the Law being not without Law to God but under the Law to Christ that I might gain them that are without the Law Three times he here affirms the Gentiles are without the Law Object He means the Ceremonial Law Answ True they were without that Law as well as the Decalogue Law but he cannot here refer to the Ceremonial Law because it is such a Law as the Gentiles were under to Christ or as it is in the hand of Christ which must intend the Moral Law for no Gentile Believer or Unbeliever was under the Ceremonial Law to Christ because utterly abolished but so is not the Moral Law in which sense we are without the Law to God but under the Law to or as it is in the hand of Christ 4. Take this Argument The Gentiles shall not be judged by Moses's Law That Law which the Gentiles shall not be judged by they were never under but the Gentiles shall not be judged by the Law of Moses therefore they were never under that Law For proof of the major Proposition see what Paul saith Rom. 2. 12. For as many as have sinned without Law shall be judged without Law and as many as have sinned in the Law shall be judged by the Law By the first he means the Gentiles and by the latter the Jews And from hence the Apostle proceeds to evince that as the Gentiles shew'd the Works of the Law written in their Hearts they should be judged by that Law but not as that Law was formerly written by Moses in two Tables of Stone ver 15. As to the minor Proposition can any suppose that if the Gentiles had been under Moses's Law yet they should not be judged by it Sure none can Obj. If the Gentiles were not under the Law Christ came not to redeem them for he came to redeem none but such as were under the Law Gal. 4. 5. Answ The old World was under the Law and Covenant of Works and the Curse thereof in the first Adam it was his first Transgression that brought all the World under the Curse of the Law or breach of the first Covenant and not the Law as given by Moses tho that Law 't is true pronounceth that Curse afresh on those that continued not in all things contain'd therein For by one Man's Offence Death reigned by one Rom. 5. 1● 17 18. c. By one Man Sin entered into the World and Death by Sin Therefore as by the Offence of one Judgment came upon all Men to Condemnation c. Thus we were all under the Law of the first Covenant and as the Law is written in our Hearts but we were not all under that Ministration of the Law given by Moses Obj. If all the World became guilty by the breach of Moses's Law then all the World was under it but this Paul affirms Rom. 3. 19. Now we know whatsoever things the Law saith it saith to them who are under the Law that every mouth may be stopped and all the World may become guilty before God Answ Paul in the precedent Chapter and what goes before in this had proved that the Gentiles were under Sin and were all guilty before God for violating the Law written in their Hearts See Chap. 2. 12. and 3. 10. Well what of this the Gentiles then were cast and found guilty that way yet they were not all but part of the whole World And from hence he in this 19th Verse comes again to speak of the Jews who were under Moses's Law and saith What the Law that is Moses's Law saith it saith to them who are under it meaning the Jews and what the Consequence of this is he shews i. e. that every mouth might be stopped not the mouths of the Gentiles only but the mouths of the Jews also that so all the World that is both Jews and Gentiles might become guilty before God I hope all are and will be convinc'd that this is directly the meaning of Paul if they consider the scope and coherence of the Text. And thus I have clearly proved that the Law of the Decalogue or Moses's Law was not given to any but the Jews and proselyte Strangers and therefore from that it cannot be the Duty of believing Gentiles to keep the Seventh-day Sabbath Object But it is again objected That the Apostle James injoineth the Royal Law upon believing Gentiles and the Royal Law is the Law of the Decalogue therefore all were under the Law of the Decalogue which forbids Adultery Murder c. Answ 1. It is a hard case that Men Jam. 2. 8 10 11 12. about fulfilling the Royal Law opened to prove their fond Notions should put such an Interpretation on a Text of Scripture as is directly contrary to other plain Texts for unless they can prove we mistake those Scriptures newly mentioned which say that Moses's Law was only given to the Jews and not to the Gentiles besure they urge this to no purpose but mistake the sense of the Apostle as others do about what he says concerning Justification 2. We never deny'd but readily grant that all believing Gentiles are oblig'd to keep the whole moral Law or all simple moral Precepts as they are in the hand of our Lord that one Lawgiver of which this Apostle speaks but I have proved that the precise Seventh-day Sabbath is not a simple moral Precept nor any part of the Morality of the fourth Commandment and therefore not intended here Therefore it followeth that Man may fulfil the Royal Law according to the Scripture and yet not observe the Seventh-day Sabbath 3. The Apostle James clears the matter himself So speak and so do as they that shall be judged by the Law of Liberty ver 12. He

but ●e are come to Mount Sion to the Gospel-●ispensation Ver. 25. and so to hear him only that speak●h from Heaven But such as keep the old Sabbath go for it to Mount Sinai and are ●earers not of Christ but of Moses in that ●ase 8. Because the whole Law is changed or the ●●d Covenant and all the Laws and Precepts ●hat belonged peculiarly to that as the old Sabbath did 2 Cor. 5. 17. are abolished Therefore if any Man be in Christ he is of the new Creation or 〈◊〉 new Creature Old things are passed away and behold all things are become new The old Church and old Church-Membership Rites Privileges and Ordinances both the old Jewish Worship and old Day of Worship are gone for ever and a new Church-state new Ordinances a new Worship and a new Day of Worship are introduced in their stead Now since the old Sabbath was a Sign of the old Covenant nay called the Covenant be sure that is gone Exod. 31. 16. wherefore the Children of Israel shall keep the Sabbath throughout their Generations for a perpetual Covenant It belonged to the old Creation in a peculiar sense and from hence upon the bringing in the new Creation and making all things new this Sabbath cannot remain the old Jewish Legal Typical Church-Worship and Day of Worship went off all together Can any think that the old Sabbath still remains which was the sign of the old Covenant This is strange if it doth remain be sure the Penalty annexed for the breach of it remains also but the Penalty can't remain therefore the Sabbath is gone Take away the Penalty of a Law and what is become of that Law is it not abrogated Now the Penalty being corporal Death the Sabbath is gone because the Gospel-Church has no such Policy or political Power to inflict any such Punishment on Sabbath-breaking A Sabbatarian being in Prison with Mr. Tho. Grantham he professed much Love to him Ah said Grantham thou wouldst kill me Who I said he what kill my Brother or to that effect Saith the other Had you the Power of the Civil Magistracy in your hand and should I break your Sabbath what would you do with me Said he I confess Justice must take place It is well they have not that Power in their hands 9. Because Christ as a Testator hath made another Will which is his last Will and Testament and this makes all Precepts void that were given in the Old Testament and are not given forth or repeated in the new All know that no Legacy bequeathed in a former Will that is left out in a last Will is recoverable Upon this account it is you have argued that the Law for Tithes is not in force now nor Infant Churchmembership nor an external Canaan flowing with Milk and Honey or have Ministers Sons a right to succeed in the Ministry and many other things because they are not Legacies left in Christ's last Will and Testament tho they were in the Old Testament So the old Sabbath being left out in Christ's last Testament is no Legacy left to us 10. That the Decalogue-Law is transferred from Moses to Christ appears by the manner of the writing of the one and the other Moses had it to give as it was written in two Tables of Stone by the Finger of God Christ hath wrote it not in Stone but in the fleshly Tables of our Hearts by the Holy Spirit which was signified by God's writing of it with is Finger the Spirit being called the Finger of God If I by the Finger of God cast out Devils c. To close this take what Mr. B. hath said viz. The whole Law of Moses B. on the Sabb. p. 77 78. formally as such ●s ceased or abrogated by Christ I say as such because materially the same things that are in that Law may be the matter of the Law of Nature and the Law of Christ of which I shall speak anon That the whole Law of Moses as such is ab●ogated is most clearly proved By the frequent arguings of Paul who ever speaketh of that Law as ceased without excepting any part and Christ saith Luke 16. 16. The Law and the Prophets were until John that is were the chief Doctrine of the Church till then Joh. 1. 17. The Law was given by Moses but Grace and Truth came by Jesus Christ No Jew would have understood this if the word Law had not contained the Decalogue So John 7. 19 23 24. Acts 15. 5. it was the whole Law of Moses as such which by Circumcision they would have bound men to Gal. 5. 3. The Gentiles are said to sin without Law even when they broke the Law of Nature meaning without Moses's Law In all these Scriptures it 's not part but the whole Law of Moses which Paul excludeth which I acknowledged to the Antinomians tho they take me for their too great Adversary * Rom. 3. 19 20 21 27 28 31. Ch. 4. 13 14 15 16. Ch. 5. 13 20. Ch. 7. 3 4 5 6 7 8. Ch. 9. 4 31 32. Ch. 10. 5. Gal. 2. 16 19 21. Ch. 3. 2 10 11 12 13 14 19 21 24. Ch. 4. 21. Ch. 5. 3 4 14 23. Ch. 6. 13. Eph. 2. 15. Phil. 3. 6 9 Heb. 7. 11 12 19. Ch. 9. 19. Ch. 10. 28. 1 Cor. 9. 21. 3. More particularly there are some Texts which express the cessation of the Decalogue as it was Moses ' s Law 2 Cor. 3. 7 11. Not in Tables of Stone but in the fleshly Tables of the Heart But if the ministration of Death written and engraven in Stone was glorious so that the Children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his Countenance which was to be done away or is done away They that say the Glory and not the Law is here said to be done away speak against the plain scope of the Text For the Glory of Moses's Face and the glorious manner of deliverance ceased in a few days which is not the Cessation here intended But as Dr. Hammond speaketh that Glory and that Law so gloriously delivered is done away and this the 11th Verse fully expresseth For if that which is done away was glorious or by Glory much more that which remaineth is glorious or is Glory So that as it is not only the Glory but the glorious Law Gospel or Testament which is said to remain so it is not only the Glory but the Law which is said to be done away And this is the Law which was written in Stone Nothing but partial Violence can evade the force of this Text. So Heb. 7. 11 12. under it the Levitical Priesthood the People received the Law And the Priesthood being changed there is made of necessity a change also of the Law Ver. 18. For there is verily a disannulling of the Commandment going before for the weakness and the unprofitableness thereof For the Law made nothing perfect but the

and the Courts at Westminster Saturday is called Sabbati or Dies Sabbati True as supposing by Tradition this day of our week to be what the Jews called the Sabbath in their week but do you not know also in the same Records Sunday is called Dies Dominicus the Lord's-day And if those prove Saturday to be the Jewish Sabbath why should not these as well prove Sunday to be the Lord's-day All the difference is as to that you were quick-sighted but blind as to this You may observe also that the one is Sabbati or Dies Sabbati in the Genitive case in the same form with Dies Saturni and as the other days are but the Lord's-day is Die Dominico in the Ablative meaning I suppose that Saturday is the day which had been the Jewish Sabbath but this the day which is the Lord's-day Which different Construction seems plainly to intend in our Law a different import of the words by Dies Saturni or Dies Lunae we do not mean a Day instituted by Saturn or the Moon as by Dies Dominica we do mean the Day instituted by our Lord like as by Coena Dominica we mean the Supper instituted by our Lord So that these Records do you no Service at all but Disservice I shall here before I close add a few Syllogistical Arguments for our Opponents to answer Arg. 1. If the holy Spirit doth write the whole Moral Law of God in the Hearts of all true Believers but doth not write the Law of the Seventh-day Sabbath in their Hearts then the Seventh-day Sabbath is no Moral Precept but the former is true Ergo. Arg. 2. The holy Spirit doth convince all Gospel-Believers of all immoral Evils or of every simple moral Precept the holy Spirit doth not convince all Gospel-Believers it is an Evil not to observe the seventh Day as a Sabbath nor that this is a moral Precept Ergo 'T is not an immoral Evil to work upon that day c. Or thus Arg. 3. The holy Spirit guides all true Believers into all Truths that result from the holy Nature of God or that are good and therefore commanded the holy Spirit doth not guide all true Believers to observe the seventh Day as a Sabbath Ergo the Seventh-day Sabbath is no such Truth c. Arg. 4. If the New Testament be a perfect Rule of Faith and Practice and there is no Precept nor Precedent for the observance of the Seventh-day Sabbath the Seventh-day Sabbath ought not by us to be observed but the former is true Ergo 't is not our duty to observe that Day Arg. 5. If Christ and Paul after him have made known or declared the whole Counsel and Will of God or whatsoever we should believe observe and practise but have not made known or declar'd it is our duty to observe the seventh Day then 't is not our duty to observe it but the former is true Ergo. Arg. 6. If the Law of the Seventh-day Sabbath as given by Moses belonged wholly or was annexed to the Judgments of the Mosaical Oeconomy and the Judgments of the Mosaical Oeconomy belong not to the Gospel-Church then the Law of the Sabbath as given by Moses belongs not to us but this is so because Death was the Penalty of the breach thereof Ergo. Object What if we grant that all the ten Commandments belonged or were annexed to the Mosaical Oeconomy are all the ten Commandments abrogated therefore or not in force to us Answ I have shewed that the whole Moral Law is given forth by Christ considered as Mediator and that we are not obliged to observe them as given by Moses and the precise seventh Day being no simple Moral Precept but merely Judaical pertaining to the Covenant of Works our Lord hath not nor could confirm that Precept in the Gospel so that it appears the Sabbath only belonged to the Mosaical Oeconomy and will you affirm that of all the Ten. One Sabbatarian * Mr. Edw. Stennett on the Sab. p. 50. saith That all the ten Commandments had the Penalty of Death annexed to them to be inflicted by the Magistrate which saith he is an evident distinction between Moral Laws and Laws Ceremonial c. Again he saith Pag. 53. See the Snare broken the Sabbath having the same Penalty that the other nine have it convincingly proves the Morality of it Answ 1. This shews that none of the ten Commandments as given by Moses are in force to Believers or oblige the Gospel-Church but only belong'd to the Jewish Policy as formally deliver'd Exod. 20. and tho the Moral Law given by Christ as Mediator doth oblige us yet the precise seventh Day being no Moral Precept but only Judaical is gone it not being given forth anew in the Gospel nor could be given with its old Sanction viz. the Penalty of Death to be inflicted on such that break it because the Gospel-Church is no Political Body or Civil State they can't inflict Death on such as transgress this or other Precepts 2. Nay nor ought such to die that profane the holy Name of God or disobey their Parents or commit Adultery c. by any Law given by Christ in the Gospel * And do not such as affirm otherwise strangely Judaize those Temporal Punishments only belonged to the Mosaical Oeconomy many in the Gospel-Church before call'd were guilty of the gross breach of divers moral Precepts yet were not to be put to death Christ came not to take away Mens Lives but to save them both from temporal and eternal Death 3. Moreover it is a grand mistake to say that the Penalty of Death distinguisheth Moral Laws from Ceremonial for he that in the days of Atonement did not afflict his Soul Levit. 23. 29. must die or be cut off and whosoever toucheth the Mount shall be surely put to death Exo. 19. 13. And he that was not circumcised must die or he cut off so for divers other Sins † Exod. 30. 33 38. Lev. 7. 20 21 25 27. 17. 4 9. that were not Moral Precepts Pray read Heb. 10. 28. Paul shews that in this respect we are not come to Mount Sinai but to Mount Sion Heb. 12. 18. and sad it is to see any so left as to endeavour to carry the People back again to that fiery Law which was so terrible as the Apostle shews ver 21. But it is no marvel they do thus when they that intimate the Law and Covenant Exod. 20. was the Covenant of Grace If I have an Answer God sparing my Life you shall see what some of their chief Writers have said as to this and some other things that may seem more distasteful to all pious Christians Arg. 7. If the first Day was observed as a day of Worship by the Apostolical Church and no other day of the week then the first Day is that day of Worship which we should observe but the first Day was so observed c. Ergo. Arg. 8. If Moses as