33.27 Our hand is high and the Lord hath not done all this or the Lord was not able to give them the land which he had promised them and so will preferre their idol-gods before the Lord God of Israel Vers 11. For they have taken of the accursed thing and have also stollen c. Here the Lord sets forth the severall degrees of the hainousnesse of that sinne of Achans wherewith all Israel was involved for first saith the Lord they have taken of the accursed thing that is they have reserved to themselves some part of that which as an accursed thing should have been burnt to wit the Babylonish garment secondly they have also stollen that is they have taken of that also which I reserved for my self to wit the gold and silver thirdly and dissembled also that is they have done this closely and cunningly the party offending carrying the matter so as if he had done no such thing which indeed must needs be a great aggravation of his sin this being no lesse implicitly but a deniall of Gods omniscience or a bold contempt of his wrath against those that transgresse his Laws and then fourthly they have put it even amongst their own stuffe which is added as the last and highest aggravation of this wickednesse because this argued a remorselesse resolution to hold what he had so wickedly gotten and that he was farre from being smitten in conscience for what he had done Vers 13. Vp sanctifie the people c. See the note upon Exod. 19.10 Vers 14. And it shall be that the tribe which the Lord taketh shall come according to the families thereof c. That is the tribe upon which that lot falleth shall bring all their severall families that so by casting of lots it may also be discovered which is the guilty familie for that the guilty tribe and then the guiltie familie then the houshold were taken by lots is evident by comparing this place with that in the 1. Sam. 14.41 42. where the same phrase is used Saul said unto the Lord God of Israel give a perfect lot and Saul and Jonathan were taken And Saul said Cast lots between me and Jonathan my sonne and Jonathan was taken But why did not the Lord tell Joshua that Achan was the partie that had sinned but cause him thus to be discovered by casting of lots I answer first because by this means the Lord tried Achan whether he would come in voluntarily and confesse his sinne and indeed by Achans holding out so long even till the lot fell upon his own person there was a notable discovery made how hardly men are brought to confesse their secret sinnes and how prone they are to flatter themselves with a vain hope that their secret sinnes shall never be discovered and secondly because hereby the Lord made known that even the most casuall things to wit the casting of lots are certainly governed by the providence of God according to that of Solomon Prov. 16.33 The lot is cast into the lap but the whole disposing thereof is of God a truth the fitter to be cleared to this people because the land was within a short time to be divided amongst them by lot Vers 15. And it shall be that he that is taken with the accursed thing shall be burnt with fire he and all that he hath c. That is after he hath undergone the punishment due to him by the Law as a presumptuous transgressour of Gods command which was that he should be stoned Numb 15.30 35. let him be also burnt with fire according as the things anathematized or accursed were to be consumed See vers 25. And all Israel stoned him with stones and burned them with fire after they had stoned them with stones Vers 17. And he brought the familie of Judah c. That is the families which were foure or five Numb 26.20 21. And he brought the familie of the Zarhites man by man That is the heads of that familie one after another to wit those five mentioned 1. Chron. 2.6 The sonnes of Zerah Zimri and Ethan and Heman and Calcol Dara five of them in all and so Zabdi was taken that is the lot fell upon his posterity and household who were brought man by man Vers 18. And he brought his houshold man by man c. That is Joshua as above vers 16. So Joshua rose up early in the morning c. Vers 21. And behold they are hid in the earth in the midst of my tent and the silver under it That is and the silver you shall find under the garment or rather as the originall may be understood wrapt up within the garment to wit because it consisted of so many severall peices of coyn and this he expresseth that by this particular relating how they were hid it might be the more evident that he spake truly Vers 22. So Joshua sent messengers and they ran unto the tent c. This running of the messengers to Achans tent to fetch the things stollen which he had confessed were hidden there might well proceed from their eager and earnest desire to clear themselves from the accursed thing which had kindled Gods anger against them for they were fetched not onely to discover the truth of what Achan confessed but also that they might be burnt as God had commanded vers 15. yet it may be also that God commanded them to runne lest any upon Achans confession should get thither and remove them elsewhere Vers 24. And Joshua and all Israel took Achan c. Here the story relates how Joshua and the Israelites took Achan with the things he had stollen his children and all that he had and carried them down to the valley called afterwards upon this occasion the valley of Achar that they might be there burnt as God had commanded Now amongst other things there being here particular mention made of his oxen and his asses and his sheep c. it may be gathered from thence that he had before a competent estate and did not therefore steal those things for want which he took out of the spoyl of Jericho but out of mere covetousnesse for the further inriching of himself which was doubtlesse a great aggravation of his sinne Vers 25. And all Israel stoned them with stones and burned them with fire after they had stoned them with stones So that both Achan and his sonnes and daughters were stoned Now though this Joshua might not have done by the ordinary Law Deut. 24.16 The father shall not be put to death for the children neither shall the children be put to death for the father yet here it was just because God commanded it yea though they were no way consenting to their fathers sinne for first God might have respect if they were of grown years to the punishment of other sinnes whereof he knew them guilty or might take them away in mercy but however though they were infants at least some of them to take away the
to the wicked wayes of their idolatrous fathers yea and did worse then they indeed as relapses in regard of sicknesse bring men usually into a more dangerous condition then they were in before so it is with relapses to idolatrie a Church and people that have been reformed and fall back to idolatry are usually farre worse and more grossely superstitious then they were before Vers 22. That through them I may prove Israel whether they will keep the way of the Lord c. These words may be understood two severall wayes for first they may have reference to that clause in the latter end of the foregoing verse where there is mention made of Joshua his leaving the Canaanites unexpelled the nations which Joshua left when he died and then the meaning must be that the nations were not wholly driven out in Joshua's time but were left for the tryall of Israel to wit to see whether they would be drawn away by their idolatries or no And secondly they may have reference to all that which is said in the two foregoing verses Because this people have transgressed my covenant c. I also will not henceforth drive out any from before them of the nations which Joshua left when he died That through them I may prove Israel whether they will keep the way of the Lord c. and then the meaning must be that God for the sinne of the Israelites resolved not to cast out any more of the Canaanites that remained in the land that they might continually oppresse and vex the Israelites and so thereby he might prove them namely whether by these afflictions they would be brought to repent and turn to the Lord and so again to walk in his wayes And indeed both these may be well here comprehended CHAP. III. Vers 2. ONely that the generation of the children of Israel might know to teach them warre c. Two reasons were given in the latter end of the foregoing chapter why the Lord did not wholly cast out the Canaanites out of the land in the dayes of Joshua and here now a third is added Some conceive indeed the meaning of this clause to be this that by leaving the Canaanites amongst them God would now let this wicked generation know to their cost what warre is their fathers by the extraordinary help which the Lord afforded them did soon vanquish their enemies and knew not the misery that warre usually brings with it but this their degenerate posterity being now forsaken of God should know to their sorrow what warre is But according to our translation I conceive the meaning of the words to be rather this that God left these inhabitants of the land unexpelled that the future generations might hereby be made carefull to train up their people in martiall discipline that so they might be the better able to perform what God had enjoyned them in not suffering any of the Canaanites to remain in the the land And this it is I conceive that in these words the holy Ghost doth chiefly aim at not so much their teaching the people the skill of the warre as their intention therein to wit that they might obey the Lords command in driving out the remainder of this people Vers 3. Namely five Lords of the Philistines c. Here the nations are reckoned that were not cast out of Canaan and the first mentioned are the five Lords of the Philistines to wit the Lords of Ashdod Gaza Askelon Gath and Ekron indeed three of these cities were at first taken by the men of Judah after the death of Joshua to wit Gaza Askelon and Ekron but it seems the Philistines soon recovered them again See chap. 1.18 Vers 5. And the children of Israel dwelt amongst the Canaanites c. from the eleventh verse of the foregoing chapter unto this place we have had a summary description of the state of Israel in the dayes of the Judges and here now the Authour of this story enters upon the particular story of Othniel the first of the Judges telling us in the first place what their sinnes were that brought them into that bondage out of which Othniel delivered them Vers 7. And served Baalim and the groves That is the idols which they set up and worshipped in the groves Vers 8. And he sold them into the hand of Cushan-rishathaim king of Mesopotamia See the note chap. 2.14 And the children of Israel served Cushan-rishathaim eight years It seems to me evident that for some years after the death of Joshua the people continued constant in the worship of the true God chap. 2.7 And the people served the Lord all the dayes of Joshua and all the dayes of the Elders that out-lived Joshua c. and doubtlesse some few years it was after they fell to idolatry ere God sold them into the hand of this king of Mesopotamia and therefore how long after the death of Joshua these eight years began of Israels bondage under the king of Mesopotamia we cannot say Vers 9. And when the children of Israel cryed unto the Lord the Lord raised up a deliverer c. The word in the Hebrew signifieth a saviour but thereby is meant one that delivered them from the bondage they were in and this was Othniel who was the sonne of Calebs brother and withall his sonne in law as being married to Achsah his daughter chap. 1.13 for that noble exploit of his in taking Debir and this was the honour of the children of Judah that the first judge after Joshua was of their tribe the Lord therein making good that prophecy of Jacob Gen. 49.8 Judah thou art he whom thy Brethren shall praise thine hand shall be in the neck of thine enemies thy fathers children shall bow down before thee Many hold that Othniel became Judge of Israel immediately after the death of Joshua but me thinks it is clear in this place that it was not till towards the end of the eight years of Israels bondage under Cushan-rishathaim king of Mesopotamia for it is said that then the children of Israel cryed unto the Lord and thereupon God raised up Othniel to be a deliverer that is God did then by a speciall instinct of his Spirit stirre him up to make warre against this tyrant for the deliverance of his people and furnished him with all necessary gifts and graces of his Spirit both for the vanquishing of the enemie and for the government of the people which it seems upon this occasion he took upon him But yet if Othniel took Debir and thereupon married Calebs daughter whilst Joshua was yet living as many Expositours hold he did hereby we may probably gather that it was not many years after Joshuas death ere the Israelites were thus oppressed by this king and so thereupon Othniel was raised up of God to be their Judge Vers 10. And the Spirit of the Lord came upon him That is God by his Spirit did poure forth upon him an extraordinary measure of all gifts requisite
of this horrible villanie that had been committed upon his concubine Some conceive that there was none sent to the tribe of Benjamin but that there was two pieces sent to the tribe of Manasseh because that tribe dwelt half within Jordan and half without But this is altogether a groundlesse conceit for there was most reason for sending a piece to Benjamin in regard the fact was committed in a citie of their tribe and there was as much reason why they should have sent two pieces to the tribe of Dan as to the tribe of Manasseh since the tribe of Dan was also seated in two severall parts of the land some in the portion of Judah and some northward at Laish as in the former chapter was related Vers 30. And it was so that all that saw it said There was no such deed done nor seen c. The messengers relating the cause why the Levite had done this not onely the elders of each tribe to whom these parcels of her body were sent because there was no magistrate armed with regall power to punish this fact but even all that came to the hearing of it cried out against it as a matchlesse villâ—nie and stirred up one another not to let it passe unrevenged And hence is that expression of the prophet Hos 9.9 They have deeply corrupted themselves as in the dayes of Gibeah CHAP. XX. Vers 1. THen all the children of Israel went out and the congregation was gathered together c. All the children of Israel that is the chief of all the people as it follows in the next verse all the elders and officers captains and men of warre except onely they of the tribe of Benjamin went out from their own habitations severally and were gathered together as one man that is unanimously as readily as if one man onely had been appointed to come to any place and thus was there an assembly of all the land to wit those within Jordan from Dan to Beersheba and together with them also of the land of Gilead that is those without Jordan and that in Mizpeh Mizpeh was a place where the Israelites did usually hold their publick assemblies 1. Sam 7.5 And Samuel said Gather all the children of Israel to Mizpeh and so also chap. 10.17 and Jer. 40.7 8. It is very probable that it stood in the confines of Judah and Benjamin and is therefore reckoned amongst the cities of both tribes see Josh 15.38 18.26 neither could there be therefore for the businesse they met about a fitter place chosen now here they are said to be gathered together unto the Lord not because the Tabernacle was there as we shall after see vers 27. but either because they were assembled in Gods name and to heare what God would give them in charge or because in all judiciall assemblies the Lord is in a speciall manner present Psal 82.1 God standeth in the congregation of the mighty he judgeth among the gods or else because they met in a synagogue a house set apart for publick prayer and teaching the people which seems the more likely even because of that which we reade in one of our Apocryphal books 1. Macc. 3.46 Wherefore the Israelites assembled themselves together and came to Maspha over against Jerusalem for Maspha was the place where they prayed aforetime in Israel Some conceive I know that the Ark was at present removed to Mizpeh but of that see vers 27. Vers 2. Foure hundred thousand footmen that drew sword The number of these men of warre is expressed both to shew their zeal in seeking to punish this abominable fact of the men of Gibeah and also to shew how evidently the hand of God was against these Israelites when they were twice beaten by the Benjamites and yet were so many more in number then they Vers 3. Now the children of Benjamin heard that the children of Israel were gone to Mizpeh This is added to implie how resolved the Benjamites were to stand out in defence against the rest of the Israelites who hearing of the Israelites assembling themselves about this businesse neither went to the assembly themselves nor sent any messenger to them Vers 5. And the men of Gibeah rose against me and beset the house round about upon me by night and thought to have slain me To wit by their unnaturall lust as they had slain his wife or at least he means that they thought to have done that to him which rather then he would have endured he would have lost his life Vers 7. Behold ye are all children of Israel c. And therefore ought to take to heart that so foul an abomination should be committed in Israel it concerns you all and therefore look to it Vers 8. We will not any of us go to his tent neither will we any of us turn in to his house This is added to shew how zealous they were in seeking to punish this horrible sinne they vowed that they would not so much as go home to their houses till they had executed judgement upon those that were guiltie of it yea not onely so but also at the same place and time at least when the report was brought them that the Benjamites would not deliver the malefactours into their hands but were resolved rather to defend them they vowed also that having slain the Benjamites they would not give any of their daughters in marriage to any that were left alive chap. 21. vers 1. Now the men of Israel had sworn in Mizpeh saying There shall not any of us give his daughter to Benjamin to wife and that they would likewise destroy every town throughout the whole land of Israel that had not sent some of their people to this assemblie to help them in this warre chap. 21.5 They had made a great oath concerning him that came not up to the Lord to Mizpeh saying He shall surely be put to death Vers 9. We will go up by lot against it That is we will by lot determine it who shall go up to fight against Gibeah and who shall go forth to fetch in victuals and other provisions for the people one in ten had need to be set apart for this service and who they shall be the lot shall decide Vers 12. And the tribes of Israel sent men through all the tribe of Benjamin c. Though the Benjamites absenting themselves from the assembly of all Israel at Mizpeh was a just ground of suspition that they meant not to yield up the malefactours to be punished yet would not the Israelites thereupon make warre presently against them but first they sent messengers to all the families of the tribe of Benjamin to desire the deliverie of those sonnes of Belial to deserved punishment that so if it were possible bloud-shed and civill war might be prevented Vers 13. Deliver us the men the children of Belial which are in Gibeah that we may put them to death and put away evil from Israel That is make others
type of Christ Matth. 3.17 And so a voice from heaven saying This is my beloved sonne in whom I am well pleased Vers 26. And Joab fought against Râ—bbah of the children of Ammon and took the royall citie Rabbah it seems consisted of two parts which were as it were two cities joyned together and one of them was called both the royall city because there the king had his palace and the city of waters because it was invironed with waters or at least lay upon the side of some river as it is expressed vers 27. I have fought against Rabbah and have taken the city of waters Now Joab having continued almost a yeare in bâ—sâ—â—ging this city as indeed it was no wonder that God gave him no better successe abroad David having so displeased him by his sinne at home at length he took this royall citie or citie of waters and knowing that the other could not now long hold out because this was farre the strongest piece and the other depended upon this and had happely their water from this which was now cut off he therefore sent to David to come thither that he might have the glory of taking the citie Vers 29. And David gathered all the people together and went to Rabbah and fought against it and took it It may justly seem strange that David should go with a numerous army out of the land of Israel into the land of the Ammonites onely to take a citie that was in a manner taken already and which they were afraid would be wonne before he came and that for no other end but that David might have the name of taking the citie But for this we must consider first that even the best of Gods servants are naturally vain-glorious and too much transported with a desire of having their name famous and renowned and secondly there might be other occasions of Davids going thither as for the prosecuting of their conquests in the land of the Ammonites and for giving directions for the punishment of those that had with such scorn abused his embassadours and that Joab knowing this did advise him onely the rather to hasten his coming thither that the citie might be taken by him and so he might have the glory of this great piece of service Vers 30. And he took the kings crown from off his head the weight whereof was a talent of gold with the pretious stones c. There was but a talent of gold in the golden candlestick of the Sanctuary Exod 25.39 which is thought to have been at least an hundred and twenty pound weight but the common talent some say was but half so much as the talent of the Sanctuary to wit sixty pound weight and so much it may be therefore this crown weighed and if so doubtlesse it was too massie to be usually worn Rather it was a crown of state which was onely set upon the heads of their kings at their coronation or hung over their heads in some chair of state and so happely at this time it was set upon their kings head and then taken off and set upon Davids to shew that now the royall dignity was transferred from him to David and indeed because the brother of this king the sonne of Nahush succoured David when he fled from Absalom chap. 17.27.28 it is most probable that Hanun was now either deposed or put to death by David and his brother made governour of Rabbah whence it was that he shewed such respect to David in that time of his troubles Vers 31. And he brought forth the people that were therein and put them under saws and under harrows of iron and under axes of iron and made them passe through the brick-kiln Thus severely David punished them whether by expresse direction from God or otherwise we cannot say because they had against the law of nations so shamefully abused Davids messengers withall having perhaps respect to their inhumane idolatry in causing their children to passe through the fire to Molech which was their idol 1. Kings 11.7 Yet it is like that onely the principall ringleaders in that barbarous usage of Davids messengers and the stirring up of the neighbouring nations against him were thus punished CHAP. XIII Vers 1. ABsalom the sonne of David had a fair sister whose name was Tamar and Amnon the sonne of David loved her Tamar was Amnons sister as well as Absaloms for they were all Davids children but she is called peculiarly Absaloms sister because she was his sister both by father and mother for both Absalom and Tamar were born to David of his wife Maacha the daughter of Talmai king of Geshur and observable it is how much sorrow David had in both these his children which he had by the daughter of an heathenish idolatrous king the incestuous rape of the one and the unnaturall rebellion of the other were a fair evidence to let him see that his matching himself with such a wife was not pleasing to God Vers 2. For she was a virgin and Amnon thought it hard for him to do any thing to her That is being a virgin and so strictly kept and looked to he thought it would be an impossible thing for him ever to get an opportunity of satisfying his lust with her Vers 4. Why art thou being the kings sonne lean from day to day Two reasons may be given why Jonadab wondring that Amnon should so droop and pine away as he did amplified his wonder from this that he was the kings sonne to wit first because he thought the happinesse of being the kings sonne might easily over-weigh any cause of sorrow he could possibly pretend and secondly because there was nothing almost which he could desire which he might not have Why art thou being the kings sonne lean from day to day as if he should have said Being the kings sonne thou mayest command what thou wilt and wherefore then dost thou vex and afflict thy self And Amnon said I love Tamar my brother Absaloms sister He calls her here not his sister but Absaloms thereby seeking to palliate or extenuate his sinne in lusting after her by intimating that she was his sister onely by the half-bloud and not his sister by father and mother as she was Absaloms and yet afterward he calls her his sister the better to hide his purpose from his father vers 6. Amnon said unto the king I pray thee let Tamar my sister come c. Vers 6. The king was come to see him No sooner did Amnon pretend himself sick but presenâ—ly his father came to see him No doubt his late loosing of his child that he had by Bathsheba made him the more fearfull of his loosing this sonne too and being also his eldest sonne he could not but lay it the more to heart and yet how well had it been for David if he had been sick indeed yea sick unto death considering how much bâ—tter sorrow he immediately brought upon him by that unnaturall villany of his in
of my fathers unto thee Thus he rejected Ahabs motion with detestation to wit because the Lord had forbidden in his law the perpetuall sale of any mans inheritance Levit. 25.23 The land shall not be sold for ever and though therefore such a motion made by a prince in another kingdome could not have been rejected by any subject without grosse disregard of that Majestie which God hath put upon princes yet Naboth was bound in conscience to do it and no doubt though it be not here expressed as he refused to satisfie the desire of his Soveraigne herein so also he humbly presented him with the reasons why he durst not do it and made it appear that it was not so much the parting with his vineyard as his sinning against God in parting with it that he stumbled at whereby it appears also that this Naboth was a pious man and zealous of observing Gods law even in these idolatrous times which made his bloud cry the louder for vengeance against Ahab and Jezebel Vers 4. And he laid him down upon his bed and turned away his face c As one that was discontented and therefore would have no body to speak to him that cared not to see any body nor to have any body see him Vers 7. I will give thee the vineyard of Naboth the Jezreelite This is spoken in a vaunting way and it may have reference either to Naboths refusing to give Ahab his vineyard as if she had said Though he will not give thee his vineyard I will thou shalt not need to purchase it nor to stand to his curtesie whether he will yield it up to thee or no I will give it thee or else to those foregoing words of Jezebel Doest thou now govern the kingdome of Israel as if she had said One would think a king should not whine for a subjects deniall of such a thing having so much power to satisfie himself but since thou knowest not how to improve thy power I that am but a woman will do it for thee I will give thee the vineyard of Naboth the Jezreelite Vers 8. So she wrote letters in Ahab's name c. To wit Ahab not knowing nor caring to know what course she took for the accomplishing of that promise she had made of getting Naboths vineyard for him Vers 9. Proclaim a fast and set Naboth on high among the people Some understand this thus that Naboth should be set as in regard of his dignity he used to be in some eminent place amongst the chief men of the city as if there had been no evil at all plotted against him and then on a sudden the witnesses should out and accuse him of blaspheming God and the king But I rather think that malefactours when they came to be tried before the Magistrate were usually set upon some scaffold where they might be in the sight of the people and thence it was that Jezebel wrote in her letters And set Naboth on high amongst the people As for the fast to be proclaimed that was enjoyned to make a shew as if indeed such a horrible wickednesse had been committed by Naboth as might bring Gods wrath upon all the nation and for the diverting whereof therefore it was fit the people should in a solemn manner humble themselves and cry unto God for mercy Vers 10. And then carry him out and stone him that he may die For so the Law of God had appointed him to be punished that should blaspheme the name of the Lord Levit. 24.15 16. Whosoever curseth his God shall bear his sinne and he that blasphemeth the name of the Lord he shall surely be put to death and him also that should curse his father Exod. 21.17 And he that curseth his father or his mother shall surely be put to death the Prince therefore being the father of the people pater patriae it seems the cursing of him which is also a sinne forbidden by the Law Exod. 22.28 Thou shalt not revile the gods nor curse the ruler of thy people was usually likewise punished after the same manner Vers 11. The Elders and the Nobles who were the inhabitants in his citie did as Jezebel had sent unto them c. It may well seem strange that the letters of Ahab enjoyning such a grosse and horrible act of injustice should without any scruple be so readily obeyed by the Elders and Nobles of Jezreel but for this we must consider First that Israel was now become idolatrous and in all other respects exceedingly corrupt it is no wonder that a people that have changed their Religion at the will of a supreme Magistrate should do any thing else that he will command them Secondly that the imperious severitie and crueltie of Jezebel had doubtlesse brought this people into a miserable bondage and thraldome Thirdly that Naboth being a man strictly conscionable amongst a lawlesse degenerate people it is likely they were glad of an opportunitie to wreak their teen upon him Fourthly that Jezebel might inform them that Naboth had done this she charged him with some private discourse betwixt the king and him onely the king had no witnesses of his peremptory and blasphemous speeches and so that she desired was onely this that some witnesses might be found that upon the credit of the kings word would charge him with this which could not otherwise be legally proved and that thereupon he might be condemned for blasphemy and put to death Vers 13. Then they carried him forth out of the citie and stoned him with stones that he dyed And with him his sonnes were also put to death as it seems 2. Kings 9.26 Surely I have seen yesterday the blood of Naboth and the blood of his sonnes said the Lord and I will requite thee c. which was directly against the law of God Deut. 24.16 The fathers shall not be put to death for the children nor the children for the fathers their aim herein was doubtlesse that Ahab might without opposition enjoy Naboths vineyard But with what pretence of justice they did it it is uncertain perhaps as some think they might alledge that in punishing so execrable a wickednesse Gods severity against Achan was a president fit to be followed whose sonnes and daughters were stoned together with him Josh 7.24 Vers 14. Then they sent to Jezebel c. To shew how ready they had been to do what she had enjoyned for though the letters they had received were written to them in the kings name yet they knew well enough that the affairs of the kingdome were chiefly swayed by her and that she did all and carried all in a manner as she pleased and therefore their care was chiefly to ingratiate themselves with her Vers 15. Jezebel said to Ahab Arise take possession of the vineyard of Naboth c. Some conceive that Naboth was of the bloud royall and that Ahab was now the next heir which they judge the more probable because Naboths vineyard lay so close upon
reigne to wit when Azariah or Uzziah was made king of Judah is counted the seven and twentieth from his first designation to the crown of Israel or rather Azariah or Uzziah was not fully seated in the kingdome untill twelve years after the death of Amaziah see chap. 15.1 Vers 3. And he did that which was right in the sight of the Lord yet not like David his father c. That is he did to wit in the beginning of his reigne that which was for the substance of it approved of God but he did not do it as David did with an upright and perfect heart 2. Chron. 25.2 And he did that which was right in the sight of the Lord but not with a perfect heart he did that good he did out of respect to men or to his own advantage not out of a sincere desire of pleasing God such as his father was such was he his father a while out of a respect to men as long as Jehoiada lived did that which was right but out of a false hollow heart and so afterward fell away to idolatry and so did he Vers 4. Howbeit the high places were not taken away c. This is added by way of exception not to that which went immediately before of his doing all things as Joash his father did for his father Joash did not take away the high places no more then he did but to that which is said in the begining of the third verse that he did that which was right in the sight of the Lord to wit in the beginning of his reigne for as concerning this outward conformity which at first he yielded to the law of God herein he failed that he did not suppresse that superstitious worshiping of God in the high places Vers 5. And it came to passe assoon as the kingdome was confirmed in his hands c. It seems the murther of his father Joash chap. 12.20 21. was at least so farre approved and applauded by many of the people as the just judgement of God upon him for his apostacie to idolatry and especially for the death of Zachariah the sonne of Jehoiada that Amaziah at his first entrance upon the kingdome thought it good policie to dissemble his displeasure and give way to the time and so foâ—bore a while to punish the traitours but assoon as he perceived his government well established and found that the conspiratours howsoever the deed done was applauded as the handy work of God had neither any mighty partakers in their fact nor strong maintainers of their persons he on a sudden called them to an account and so without any tumult they were put to death Vers 6. But the children of the murderers he slew not c. Which is noted as one of those acts wherein he carried himself commendably in the beginning of his reigne he might well fear lest the children of those he now put to death might seek in after times to be revenged on him and yet he would rather hazard this then transgresse Gods law which enjoyned that the children should not be put to death for any fault of their parents Deut. 24.16 Vers 7. He slew of Edom in the valley of salt ten thousand and took Selah by warre c. Of this valley of salt see the note 2. Sam. 8.13 whether it were the happy successe of Joash king of Israel in his warres at this time against the Syrians that kindled in Amaziah a desire of undertaking some expedition wherein himself might purchase the like honour or what else it was that first put Amaziah upon this invasion of the Edomites it is not expressed sufficient cause he had of making warre upon them because in his grandfather Jehorams time they had rebelled and so continued unto this time and therefore considering of what importance the reducing of them to their former subjection would be he went forth against them and obtained a notable victory though he did not wholly subdue them the particulars of which enterprise are more fully expressed 2. Chron. 25.5 16. as first that though upon a view taken he found in his own kingdome three hundred thousand serviceable men for the warres yet thinking it the better way in point of policie to wage this warre chiefly by mercenaries he hired an hundred thousand able valiant men of the Israelites for an hundred talents of silver who were in those times by reason of their successefull warres against the Syrians become famous souldiers to go with him against the Edomites for which being reproved by a prophet that came to him and threatned with ill successe if he strengthened himself with the help of these men whom God did not love because they were idolaters though he prospered them in their warres against the cruell Syrians however he stuck a while at the losse of that great summe of money wherewith he had hired them yet at length he dismissed them and they enraged hereby to revenge this high disgrace as they esteemed it fell upon the cities of Judah in their return and slew three thousand of them and took much spoil Secondly that entring afterwards couragiously into the Edomites countrey with his own souldiers he obtained against them a notable victory wherein he not onely slew of them ten thousand as is here expressed but also took other ten thousand prisoners whom he threw from an high rock that very place perhaps which is here called Selah or the rock using it may be such severity against them because notwithstanding this his victory they still stood out and would not be reduced again under the subjection of the crown of Judah thirdly that when he returned home besotted by I know not what strange witchcraft he set up the idol-gods of the Edomites which among the other spoils he had brought away to be his gods and worshipped them and burned incense unto them for which being reproved by a Prophet he would not hearken to him but checked him for daring to meddle with him and so received from the Prophet that fearfull doom that God had determined to destroy him Vers 8. Then Amaziah sent messengers to Jehoash the sonne of Jehoahaz c. That is Amaziah puffed up with his late victory in his warres against the Edomites sent a proud challenge to Joash wherein he dared him to meet him with his best forces and give him battel most probable it is that the injurie done him by the Israelites whom he had dismissed when he undertook the late expedition against mount Seir was the first occasion that provoked him to quarrel with Joash 2. Chron. 25.13 But the souldiers of the army which Amaziah sent back that they should not go with him to battel fell upon the cities of Judah from Samaria c. and that this late wrong might also bring old matters into question namely the slaughter which Jehu the grandfather of this Joash had made amongst the princes of Judah and especially the title which the kings of Judah had to
his father Uzziah but that foure years before he died he wholly resigned his kingdome to his sonne Ahaz and so it was in the fourth yeare of Ahaz when Hoshea slew Pekah and took upon himself the title of king of Israel but this fourth yeare of Ahaz is called the twentieth of Jotham because Jotham had still the title of king though he had foure years before resigned his kingdome to his sonne Ahaz Vers 32. In the second yeare of Pekah the sonne of Remaliah king of Israel began Jotham c. To wit after his father Uzziahs death for he had the government of the kingdome under his father a long time before this to wit ever since his father became a leper as is noted verse 5. About this time therefore did the prophet Isaiah see that glorious vision Isa 6.1 In the yeare that king Uzziah died I saw also the Lord sitting upon a throne high and lifted up and his train filled the temple c. and in this kings reigne Hosea and Micah prophesied to the people Vers 33. Five and twenty years old was he when he began to reigne and he reigned sixteen years c. Some Expositours conceive that he was thus old when he began to reign in his fathers life-time which they hold thereby to resolve that great difficulty concerning the age of his grand-child Hezekiah when he began to reigne of which see the note chap. 18.2 But I rather think it must be understood for so the words seem clearly to import of his age when he began his sixteen years reigne which was after his fathers death to wit to the seventeenth yeare of Pekah as is evident in the first verse of the following chapter In the seventeenth yeare of Pekah the sonne of Remaliah Ahaz the sonne of Jotham king of Judah began to reigne Vers 34. And he did that which was right in the sight of the Lord c. This is more fully expressed 2. Chron. 27.21 And he did that which was right in the sight of the Lord according to all that Uzziah his father did howbeit he entred not into the temple of the Lord and the people did yet corruptly Vers 35. He built the higher gate of the house of the Lord. Or the high gate 2. Chron. 27.3 which was it seems the outer east-gate the gate whereby they went to the kings palace 2. Chron. 23.20 And they came through the high gate into the kings house the same I conceive it was which afterward for the statelinesse of it was called the beautifull gate of the Temple Acts 3.2 and by Jeremy often the new gate as Jer. 26.10 and 36.10 c. Vers 36. Now the rest of the acts of Jotham c. Some of these are related in the Scripture Chronicles as first that he built divers cities in the hills of Judah and in the forrests towers and palaces and secondly that he enforced the Ammonites to pay him tribute to wit of silver an hundred talents of wheat and barley twenty thousand measures 2. Chron. 27.4 5. Vers 37. In those dayes the Lord began to send against Judah Rezin the king of Syria and Pekah the sonne of Remaliah That is towards the end of his reigne they began to conspire against the land of Judah but it seems till his sonnes reigne after his decease they did not invade the land the Lord herein shewing mercy to good Jotham that he took him away before those heavy calamities that immediately after fell upon the kingdome of Judah CHAP. XVI Vers 1. IN the seventeenth yeare of Pekah the sonne of Remaliah Ahaz the sonne of Jotham c. The seventeenth yeare of Pekah was the sixteenth yeare of Jotham chap. 15.32 at which time Jotham did either resigne the kingdome to his sonne Ahaz or at least he left the government to him but yet the lived at least foure years after See chap. 15.30 Vers 2. Twenty years old was Ahaz when he began to reigne and he reigned sixteen years c. If Ahaz was twenty years old when he began his reigne when he died sixteen years after he was but thirty six years old and then was Hezekiah his sonne twenty five years old chap. 18.2 Twenty and five years old was Hezekiah when he began to reigne and he reigned twenty and nine years in Jerusalem whereby it may seem that Hezekiah was born to Ahaz when he was yet but ten or eleven years old which say some Expositours we need not wonder at considering the singular blessing that nation had for generation but because it is very unlikely that the Jews had children so young therefore other Expositours do answer this objection two other wayes to wit first that Ahaz was twenty years old when he that is Jotham his father of whom he had spoken in the former verse began to reigne to wit after the death of his father Uzziah or secondly and I think thus it is better answered that Ahaz began to reigne when he was first designed king in the life of Jotham his father and then he was but twenty years old and the like must then be said of Jotham too chap. 15.30 but when after his fathers death he began to reigne as absolute king himself from which these sixteen years must be reckoned he might be twenty five or twenty six years old or perhaps more Vers 3. But he walked in the wayes of the kings of Israel That is he worshipped idols as they also did for so it is expressed 2. Chron. 28.3 He burnt incense in the valley of the sonne of Hinnom and burnt his children in the fire after the abominations of the heathen Yea made his sonne to passe through the fire c. Concerning this abominable idolatry of making their children to passe through the fire see what is noted Levit. 18.21 But the Ahaz did indeed burn his sonnes at least some one of his sonnes as by way of sacrificing them to his idol-gods is evident 2. Chron. 28.3 where also the place is named where he offered this inhumane oblation to wit the valley of the sonne of Hinnom a valley not farre from Jerusalem Moreover he burnt incense in the valley of the sonne of Hinnom and burnt his children in the fire This high place was called Tophet and was it seems especially used for this execrable idolatry Jer. 7.31 They have built the high places of Tophet which is in the valley of the sonne of Hinnom to burn their sonnes and their daughters in the fire and by Josiah it was defiled chap. 23.10 He defiled Tophet which is in the valley of the children of Hinnom that no man might make his sonne or his daughter to passe through the fire to Molech Vers 5. Then Rezin king of Syria and Pekah sonne of Remaliah king of Israel came up to Jerusalem to warre No sooner was Ahaz settled in the throne of Judah but both Rezin king of Syria and Pekah king of Israel began streight to invade Judah for Pekah reigned in all but
called Philosophers and amongst the Chaldeans Magi so amongst the Jews their great Doctours were called Scribes Vers 7. And there went up some of the children of Israel and of the priests c. Of those that hitherto had stayed in Babylon and Assyria and went not up at first with Zerubbabel there did some now go up with Ezra in the seventh yeare of Artaxerxes which was about fifty eight years after the sixth yeare of Darius mentioned chap. 6.15 if it be meant of Artaxerxes Longimanus for Darius lived after that thirty years Xerxes his sonne one and twenty years and after him succeeded this Artaxerxes Vers 10. For Ezra had prepared his heart to seek the law of the Lord and to do it and to teach in Israel statutes and judgements That is the chief aim of his journey was to instruct the people and to reform those things that were out of order amongst them and accordingly the Lord prospered his journey but withall observable it is how these three particulars are here joyned together to wit that he had prepared his heart first to seek the law of the Lord that is to endeavour to understand the law of God secondly to do it that is to yield obedience thereto in his own particular and thirdly To teach in Israel statutes and judgements that is to instruct the people also in the lawes of the Lord. Vers 14. Thou art sent of the king and of his seven counsellours to enquire concerning Judah and Jerusalem c. The Emperours of Persia had alwayes seven chief princes which were over all the rest and next unto the king of these Darius the sonne of Hystaspes was one and by them he was chosen Emperour Cambyses the sonne of Cyrus being dead and the usurping Magus being discovered and slain and so likewise there is mention again made of them Esther 1.14 Now hence it is said that Ezra was sent of the king and of his seven counsellours to enquire concerning Judah and Jerusalem according to the law that is to make enquiry whether all things were done amongst them according to the rule and direction of Gods law Vers 16. And all the silver and gold that thou canst find in all the province of Babylon c. To wit say some Expositours that belongs to the Temple at Jerusalem but others understand this clause of the silver and gold which Ezra could gather among the severall subjects of the king of Babylon from whom Ezra had power by vertue of this clause in his commission to receive what they would freely contribute as well as from his brethren the Jews of whom the next clause is added with the free will offering of the people and of the priests Vers 18. And whatsoever shall seem good to thee and to thy brethren c. To wit the rest of the priests Vers 22. And salt without prescribing how much Because they used salt yea perhaps much salt in all their sacrifices Levit. 2.13 And every oblation of the meat offering shalt thou season with salt c. and so Mark 9.49 For every sacrifice shall be salted with salt and withall because it was a commodity not so costly as the rest therefore there was no measure appointed for that but the kings treasurers were to allow them as much salt as they would require Vers 26. And whosoever will not do the law of thy God and the law of the king let judgement be executed speedily upon him whether it be unto death c. Which was more then the Jews were allowed to do when the Romanes were their lords John 18.31 The Jews said unto him It is not lawfull for us to put any man to death Vers 27. Blessed be the Lord God of our fathers which hath put such a thing as this in the kings heart c. These are Ezra his words and here the Hebrew begins again in the originall books CHAP. VIII Vers 2. OF the sonnes of David Hattush It may be this is that Hattush of the stock of David mentioned 1. Chron. 3.20 Vers 3. Of the sonnes of Shechaniah of the sonnes of Pharosh c. This clause of the sonnes of Pharosh is added to distinguish this Shechaniah from the other mentioned vers 5. As for the severall numbers here mentioned of those that went with Ezra besides such as are expressed by name they make one thousand foure hundred ninety and six to wit males besides women Vers 13. And of the last sonnes of Adonikam c. These here mentioned are said to be of the last sonnes of Adonikam either because they come now at last with Ezra out of Babylon whereas other of the sonnes of Adonikam went away before with Zerubbabel chap. 2.13 or else because they were descended of the youngest and last born sonnes of Adonikam Vers 15. And I gathered them together to the river that runneth to Ahava c. Ahava was it self a river vers 21. Then I proclaimed a fast there at the river Ahava this place therefore where they assembled together as the first place for their randezvous from all parts was where either Euphrates or some other river and the river Ahava met together as indeed Babylon was a countrey full of rivers Psalme 137.1 By the waters of Babylon we sate down c. and here they abode in tents three dayes waiting to see whether any more of their brethren would come thither to them And I viewed the people and the priests and found there none of the sonnes of Levi. That is none saving such as were priests no Levites that therefore which was said before chap. 7.3 there went up some of the children of Israel and of the priests and of the Levites c. was spoken with reference to the Levites that were now sent for by Ezra and came accordingly Vers 16. Then sent I for Eliezer c. That which is here noted by way of distinction concerning these eleven men whom Ezra chose to send unto Iddo for Levites to wit that the first nine were chief men and the two last Jarib and Elnathan were men of understanding may well I conceive be thus understood that the first nine were of the chiefest rank and dignitie amongst them princes or heads of families and the other two were men of speciall note for their wisedome learning and eloquence and therefore picked out for the well mannaging that great businesse that they had now in hand Vers 47. And I sent them with commandment unto Iddo the chief at the place Casiphia c. Because he had speciall use of the Levites to wit to help in that which was the chief businesse of his journey the instructing of the people in the law of God and the reforming of those things he should find out of order amongst them according to the rule and direction of the law when he found that there was none of the Levites amongst those that were going up with him he dispatched certain messengers to a place called Casiphia where he knew there
whole tribe of Manasseh Judges 5.14 Out of Machir came down govâ—rnours and amongst his posterity it seems that Manassehs portion was now wholly divided But then it may be questioned by some why Machir is here called the first born of Manasseh To which I answer that the child that first openeth the wombe is usually in the Scripture called the first born though there were no more born after him Because he was a man of war therefore he had Gilead and Bashan That is because Machir the father of Gilead was a man of warre Many conceive that Machir had no other sonnes but Gilead and that all Manassehs portion was divided amongst Gileads posteritie But this we may well doubt 1. Because Gen. 50.23 there is mention made of Machirs children 2. Because Num. 26.29 we reade of a family of the Machirites distinct from those that were called by the names of the sonnes of Gilead concerning which see the note on the place However the posterity of Machir had the land of Gilead and Bashan that is the half of it settled upon them which is here mentioned by the way that after he might proceed to speak of their dividing to the other half of this tribe their portion of the land within Jordan and that because Machir was a man of warre that is because the Machirites were men of warre and did themselves win Gilead and dispossesse the enemie of it See the notes Numb 32.39 40. Vers 4. Therefore according to the commandment of the Lord he gave them an inheritance c. See Numb 27.7 Vers 5. And there fell ten portions to Manasseh That is the land was divided into six parts according to the number of the sonnes of Gilead mentioned verse 2. and Hephers part was divided into five parts and given to his sonne Zelophehads five daughters and so there were ten portions in all Vers 7. And the coast of Manasseh was from Asher to Michmethah c. If Asher was a town seated at the south-east end of Manassehs lot as some conceive it was then in this and the following verses we have onely the description of the southern bounds of this tribe of Manasseh which were also the north bounds of Ephraims portion as is evident because Michmethah and the other following places here mentioned as Tappuah and the river Kanah are the same that were named before in the north border of Ephraim But if Asher stood as others think in the north-east of Manassehs portion then in the first words we have the east bounds of this half tribe of Manasseh to wit that they were drawn from Asher on the north all along by the river Jordan to Michmethah on the south that lyeth before Shechem and then in the next words we have the southern bounds described from Michmethah to the midland sea to wit that from Michmethah it went a long on the right hand turning westward to Tappuah and so on the south of the river Kanah verse 9. and so right on to the sea and thus as is noted in that ninth verse the land was Manassehs both on the north and south side of the river Kanah though the cities that stood on the south side of that river belonged to Ephraim which is intended in those words these cities of Ephraim are among the cities of Manasseh that is the cities on the south side of the river belonged to Ephraim though they were within the coasts of Manasseh Vers 10. And they met together in Asher on the north and on Issachar on the east That is the north bounds of Josephs portion to wit Ephraims and Manassehs considered joyntly in one was the tribe of Asher on the north and Issachar on the east For otherwise then thus it cannot be conceived how they should meet together in Asher on the north since Ephraim no where could reach to Asher being bounded as Manasseh also was on the west by the main sea Vers 11. And Manasseh had in Issachar and in Asher Beth-shean and her towns c. even three countreys This is added to intimate that these towns to wit Bethshean Iblâ—am Dor and En-dor whither Saul went to a witch and Taanach and Megiddo being in the confines of Asher and Issachar and yet belonging to Manasseh stood not all in one place but were in three severall tracts of ground Or else it may be added to shew that three of the countreys before mentioned were in Ashers portion and three in Issachars and so Manasseh had in each of them three countreys Vers 12. Yet the children of Manasseh could not drive out the inhabitants of those cities c. This is spoken of the times after the death of Joshua and therefore the same is repeated Judg. 1.27 28. Partly through cowardlinesse and partly through Gods withdrawing his help at first they could not drive them out afterwards when their fear could not so much blind their judgements but that they must needs then acknowledge themselves strong enough yet they put them to tribute which did much aggravate their sinne Vers 14. And the children of Joseph spake unto Joshua saying Why hast thou given me but one lot c. Here the story relates how the sonnes of Joseph that is the two tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh came to Joshua and made a great complaint and it was doubtlesse after they had entred upon the land which fell to them by lot that there was not a convenient portion of land assigned to them for their inheritance no more indeed then was fitting to be the lot of one tribe for that is the meaning of those words Why hast thou given me but one lot and one portion to inherit that is why hast thou given us no more of the land then if we had been to be accounted but as one tribe and so to have but one lot Questionlesse Joshua and the rest that were intrusted in this businesse had not either through ignorance or partiality set forth a lesse portion of land for these sonnes of Joseph then was fitting But because a part of the land allotted them was over-grown with wood and a great part of it was still in the possession of the Perizzites and the Rephaims or giants with whom through infidelity and sloth they affraid to encounter therefore they judging this as nothing conclude they had no more given them to dwell in then might well be reckoned the portion of one tribe The most questionable passage in this complaint of theirs is this that to make good that they had not a competent portion of land assigned them they alledge the extraordinary encrease of their people in number through the speciall blessing of God upon them Why hast thou given me but one lot and one portion to inherit seeing I am a great people forasmuch as the Lord hath blessed me hitherto since it is evident as is noted Num. 26.37 that the sonnes of Ephraim when they were numbred the second time a little before their entrance into Canaan were eight thousand
in the utmost north-end of Canaan whence the length of the land is ordinarily described to be from the entrance of Hamath to the river of Egypt 1. Kings 8.65 See Num. 13.22 and Cinnereth was a city in the eastern parts whence the lake so often mentioned in Scripture was called the lake of Genezereth Vers 38. Nineteen cities with their villages For some of them mentioned before in drawing the border of their lot stood happely in the portion of the bordering tribes Vers 40. And the seventh lot came out for the tribe of the children of Dan. Though this tribes lot was not wholly taken out of that which was given to Judah as Simeons was yet that a part of it was is manifest by some of the cities mentioned here that chap. 15. are numbered amongst those that were at first in Judahs portion it was compassed with the sea and the borders of the other tribes formerly described and so the borders of this tribe are here omitted Vers 41. And the coast of their inheritance was Zorah and Eshtaol c. In this Zorah Samson was born Judges 13.2 and between Zorah and Eshtaol he was buried Vers 43. And Elon and Timnathah c. Whence Samson took a wife Judges 14.1 Vers 47. Therefore the children of Dan went up to fight against Leshem c. Or Laish The story we have Judges 18. This then happened after Joshuas death but here it is mentioned lest it should seem strange how the Danites came to inhabite the north parts of the land when their lot fell to them in the south parts even close by Judahs portion the reason was because being not able to drive out the Philistines out of their land they were streightned for room so went out and took Laish a city that was in Naphtalies lot though then in the Zidonians possession and transplanted a Colony thither calling it Dan from their father Dan the sonne of Jacob it stood almost in the furthest north part of the land Judges 20.1 The congregation was gathered together as one wan from Dan to Beersheba Vers 50. According to the word of the Lord they gave him the citie he asked even Timnath-serah in mount Ephraim c. To wit the word of the Lord which he spake to Moses not onely concerning Caleb but concerning Joshua for why indeed should he be left out see Iosh 14.7 to wit that he should chuse a peculiar portion to himself where he would yet it may be meant also of some direction given him by Eleazar the priest upon his inquiry of God for him However herein first was the modesty of Ioshua remarkable that he was content to stay till all the tribes had their portion ere there was any motion made of that which by way of speciall Prerogative was to be conferred upon him secondly That he was content to receive what God had promised him as by way of gift from the people he asked and they gave him the city he asked thirdly That whereas he might have chosen the fairest and goodliest city in all their tribes he chose his seat in a mountainous countrey nothing so pleasant and delightfull as many other places were yea and it seems a city that was ruinated so that he was fain to build it ere he dwelt in it for so it follows in the next words and he built the city and dwelt therein CHAP. XX. Vers 2. APpoint out for you cities of refuge c. Concerning these cities of refuge see the notes Numb 35.6 and 24 c. Vers 6. And he shall dwell in that city untill he stand before the congregation for judgement and untill the death of the high priest c. That is untill he be fetched thence to the place where the fact was done that it may be there tryed whether it were done wittingly or unwittingly so long he was to abide there however or untill the death of the high Priest if it were found that he did it unwittingly for then he was to be sent back to the city of refuge and to be kept there till the high priest dyed Concerning the mysticall reason of the man-slayers staying in the city of refuge till the death of the high priest see the note upon Num. 35.25 But to this some also do adde a literall reason to wit that hereby was implyed how hainous a fault it was to shed the bloud of a man and how displeasing to God in that the man that was but unwittingly defiled with the shedding of bloud must be thus shut up lest he should happen to come into the sight of him who did as it were represent Gods person amongst them to wit the high priest nor could be suffered to stirre from thence till he was dead Vers 8. And on the other side Jordan by Jericho eastward they assigned Bezer c. That is they confirmed and ratified these to be cities of refuge without Jordan which Moses himself had formerly chosen and set apart for that use See Deut. 4.41 42 43. CHAP. XXI Vers 1. THen came near the heads of the fathers of the Levites unto Eleazar the priest c. It was doubtles immediately after they had made an end of dividing the land that the Levites came thus to Eleazer and the rest of the Commissioners to receive from them the cities which God had appointed to be set apart for their dwelling For first it is not probable that there was any delay which might move the Levites to challenge their right and secondly it is as improbable that the Israelites did first settle themselves in these cities and then were afterwards put out to give way to the Levites Vers 2. The Lord commanded by the hand of Moses to give us cities to dwell in c. See the notes upon Numb 35.2 c. Vers 4. And the lot came out for the familie of the Kohathites God had expressed the number of cities that were to be given them to wit fourty eight Numb 35.7 So all the cities which ye shall give to the Levites shall be fourty and eight cities he had also given them directions to take these cities out of each tribe some according as their proportion was greater or lesser and therefore the Commissioners for the dividing of the land made choice no doubt of these cities as in their wisdome they found them most convenient for the Levites and for the people and then having divided the cities they had chosen into foure parts one for the priests a second for the Levites of Kohaths familie a third for the Gershonites and a fourth for the Merarites then was it at last decided in which of the tribes the priests should be placed and so of the rest or at least of those cities which were judged convenient they took the number agreed upon by lot See vers 11. And the children of Aaron the priest which were of the Levites had by lot out of the tribe of Judah c. Thus by Gods speciall providence the
hand foot for foot Exod. 21.24 Some Expositours indeed conceive that the Israelites knew not of this particular cruelty that he had used to others till himself acknowledged the just hand of God upon him herein verse 7. Threescore and ten kings having their thumbs and their great toes cut off gathered their meat under my table and so they ascribe this which the Israelites did wholly to the secret providence of God who moved them thus to return his cruelty upon himself they not knowing why they did it But no such thing can be necessarily inferred from his acknowledgement of that which he had done to the kings that he had conquered for either to confesse how many kings he had used so or out of remorse of conscience being as it were constrained to confesse that it was the just vengeance of God upon him he might well say what he did though he knew the Israelites had purposely done thus to him because he had formerly done so to others Vers 7. Threescore and ten kings having their thumbs and great toes cut off gathered their meat under my table c. This need not seem strange to us if we consider first what petty kings there were in those times and secondly that this may be understood of so many kings who at severall times had been thus used not that there were seventy all at one time thus waiting upon him though even that is not so incredible considering that in those dayes every city almost had a severall king And as for their gathering or gleaning their meat under his table the meaning is not that they lay like dogs under the table but that they were kept as slaves in such a manner that for hunger they were glad to gather up the crumbs and scraps that fell under the kings table as having nothing allowed them to eat but that and happely the king to please himself with this cruell spectacle did sometimes cause them to be fetched in when he was in his cups feasting himself that he might see them in this piteous plight whereunto he had brought them and insult over them And they brought him to Jerusalem and there he died To Jerusalem I conceive they brought him as a spectacle worthy to be beheld that men might learn by him how just God is in punishing men according to the nature of their wickednesse and therefore it is most likely also that he dyed there presently of the wounds he had received in the warre in that severe punishment that was inflicted on him or else that he was kept there upon this extraordinary occasion purposely that men might see in him how God abhorres such cruelty as his was he being otherwise one of those accursed nations that might not be spared Vers 8. Now the children of Judah had fought against Jerusalem and had taken it c. That is before Joshuas death for this is added to shew the reason why they carryed him to Jerusalem to wit because Jerusalem that is that part of Jerusalem that was in Judahs lot was now in their possession though not the fort So that most Expositours hold that both this and the following verses unto verse 17. are a repetition of the memorable acts done by the tribe of Judah whilest Joshua was now living Indeed before the land was divided all Israel fought as in one army against the Canaanites but after the tribes were seated in their severall portions each tribe made warre against the inhabitants in their severall lots and thus the men of Judah are here said to have done these things here related for it is not necessary to hold that Jerusalem was taken when the king thereof was slain Josh 10.23 See the note Josh 15.63 Vers 9. And afterwards the children of Judah went down to fight against the Canaanites that dwelt in the mountain c. That is from Jerusalem which stood in a mountainous countrey Psalme 125.2 As the mountains are round about Jerusalem so the Lord is round about his people Vers 10. And Judah went against the Canaanites that dwelt in Hebron c. That is against the Canaanites that dwelt in the mountains about Hebron which they did in the dayes of Joshua and under the conduct of Caleb who then commanded in chief It is evident that Hebron was taken by Joshua concerning which see the note Joshua 10.37 and that afterwards Caleb drove out the giants that had possessed themselves of the strong holds in and about Hebron Ioshua 15.13 14. Concerning which see the note Ioshua 11.21 But because the Authour of this history was here to relate the memorable exploits that were done by the men of Iudah therefore together with those noble acts which they did after the death of Ioshua he repeats also those that were done by them whilest Ioshua was yet living under the command of Caleb both against Hebron and against Debir in the following verses so to set forth the glory of this tribe the more fully Vers 11. And from thence he went against the inhabitants of Debir c. See the notes that concern these following verses Ioshua 15.15 16 c. Vers 16. And the children of the Kenite Moses father in Law went up out of the city of palm-trees c. That is out of Jericho Deut. 34.3 the plain of the valley of Jericho the city of palm-trees Concerning these Kenites see the note upon Numb 10.31 in tents they alwayes dwelt chap. 4.17 Howbeit Sisera fled away on his feet to the tent of Jael the wife of Heber the Kenite it seems therefore that being appointed to have their lot with Judah having formerly dwelt in their tents in the countrey about Jericho for Jericho it self was many years ago destroyed Josh 6.24 after Judahs portion was cleared they removed with them to the wildernesse of Judah there to dwell with the men of Judah as Moses had promised to Hobab the Kenite Num. 10.32 And it shall be if thou go with us yea it shall be that what goodnesse the Lord shall do unto us the same will we do unto thee Vers 17. And Judah went with Simeon his brother To wit to help Simeon in the clearing his lot as before Simeon had helped Judah vers 3. And they slew the Canaanites that inhabited Zephah and utterly destroyed it and the name of the citie was called Hormah That is utter destruction they were not wont thus utterly to destroy all the cities they took it is therefore probable that they did thus destroy this place because of the vow which the Israelites had made long since when Arad the king of the Canaanites made warre against them see the note Numb 21.3 and the mention of Arad in the foregoing verse makes this opinion the more probable Vers 18. Also Judah took Gaza with the coast thereof c. Yet it seems soon after the Philistines recovered these cities with the coasts thereof and drave out the Israelites ere they could well settle themselves therein to wit because
why they had done it they could have nothing to say for themselves Vers 3. But they shall be as thorns in your sides See the note Numb 31.55 Vers 5. And they called the name of that place Bochim and they sacrificed there unto the Lord. Though by divine dispensation or at least Gods conniving at it the faithfull servants of God did sometimes sacrifice in other places then the Tabernacle for so did Samuel at Mizpeh 1. Sam. 7.6 and Gideon in Ophrah Judg. 6.24 yet there is no necessity that can force us to say it was so here For this Bochim might be in Shiloh or near about it where the Tabernacle was as is noted above vers 1. Vers 6. And when Joshua had let the people go the children of Israel went c. In the following part of this chapter is laid down in generall the summe of the whole book to wit Israels idolatrie and Gods dealing with them both in punishing them and delivering them again But the death of Joshua and the Elders which had seen the works of the Lord made way to this defection of Israel and therefore the story first begins with that and tells us how Joshua dismissed them from the camp where they had as yet continued together and sent them every tribe to their own portion which by lot in the late division of the land God had given them Vers 9. And they buried him in the border of his inheritance in Timnath-heres Josh 24.30 it is called Timnath-serah Vers 10. And there arose another generation after them which knew not the Lord nor yet the works which he had done for Israel We need not inquire whether there were none now alive that knew the works of the Lord for there might be some that did as doubtlesse there were some likewise that did not fall away with the rest to the worship of idols and yet it might be said that there arose another generation that knew not the Lord c. namely because the greatest number was of that generation that had not seen the works of the Lord to wit those works which he did in Egypt yea many of them not those works which he did at their entrance into Canaan the dividing of Jordan c. and these they were that knew not the Lord that is effectually as the other generation had done who by the sight of Gods wondrous works were brought truly to fear the Lord. Vers 11. And the children of Israel did evill in the sight of the Lord and served Baalim That is the severall gods of the nations whom they called Baalim For Baal signifieth a Lord hence were those names so frequent amongst the great men of Carthage of Hannibal and Asdrubal and many others whereupon they called God by way of excellency Baal that is the Lord and when they came by degrees to fall to idolatry every man of renown that after his death was worshiped as a god was called Baal and by some of those eastern nations Bell Esa 46.1 Bell boweth down Nebo stoopeth yea and the severall planets which by the Chaldean Astrologers were said to rule in their severall houses in heaven were called Baalim that is Lords or rulers and so all the severall gods of the Chaldeans Syrians and Canaanites yea and severall idols and images of these gods were called Baalim Vers 13. And they forsook the Lord and served Baalim and Ashtaroth The goddesse of the Sidonians 1. Kings 11.5 And Solomon went after Ashtaroth the goddesse of the Sidonians 2. Kings 23.13 And the high places that were before Jerusalem which were on the right hand of the mount of corruption which Solomon the king of Israel had builded for Ashtaroth the abomination of the Sidonians and of the Philistines 1. Sam. 31.10 And they put his armour in the house of Ashtaroth yet it seems as Baalim was the common name of all their gods so was Ashtaroth the common name of all their goddesses Vers 10. And he delivered them into the hand of the spoilers that spoiled them he sold them into the hand of their enemies round about c. That is not onely suffered the enemies to enter upon the land carry away their goods whereby as with a gentler rod he did at first chastise them but at last he gave their persons also into the hands of those that made warre with them to be their bondslaves as a man should sell his child to be a servant or slave so did the Lord passe away the right which he had in them and put them under the power of the enemie who also sold them away here and there when they pleased Psal 44.12 Thou sellest thy people for nought and dost not increase thy wealth by their price Vers 16. Neverthelesse God raised up judges that delivered them c. That is God stirred up men to undertake the avenging of them upon their enemies and to govern them according to the Laws of God and advanced them above others with the gifts of his Spirit that they might be fit for those great imployments Vers 17. And yet they would not hearken unto their Judges but they went a whoring after other gods c. That is for a while they hearkned unto them but not constantly within a while after they returned unto their evil wayes as it is more fully expressed vers 18 19. As for this phrase of going a whoring after other gods it is used frequently in the Scripture to imply mens unlawfull and base joyning of their souls to idols that were formerly entred into a covenant with God and therefore should have kept themselves solely to him as a wife to her husband and the rather doubtlesse is the blind mad and unreasonable zeal of idolaters compared to the violent and incorrigible lusts of whoremongers because as they that are once inflamed with those lusts are as men bewitched no counsell or perswasion doth any good upon them they care not what they spend what pains they take into what inconveniences they cast themselves so they may satisfie their lusts so it is with idolaters so bewitched they are that there is no disswading them no charge toil or danger can make them give over this abominable sinne Vers 18. For it repented the Lord because of their groanings c. See the note Gen. 6.6 Vers 19. And they returned and corrupted themselves more then their fathers Before it was said vers 19. that they returned quickly out of the way which their fathers walked in which was meant of that generation which was immediately after those that in the dayes of Joshua and the godly Elders after him continued constant in the true Religion but this is now spoken of the children of those that in the following generation did apostatize from the true worship of God these their children though for a time during the life of their Judges they made a show of repentance and forsaking their idolatry yet when their Judges were dead they soon returned again
for the service he was to undertake and withall did secretly but mightily work upon his spirit in moving him to undertake that service for which he had fitted him Vers 11. And the land had rest fourty years That is unto the expiration of fourty years to wit from the death of Joshua It is a great question amongst Expositours whether the years wherein the Israelites are said in this book to have been in bondage under those nations that prevailed over them and the years wherein the Judges are here said to have judged Israel and wherein the land is said to have been in rest are to be accounted as severall distinct years or no and so it is in this particular place some holding that the land had rest fourty years under Othniels government after those eight years wherein the king of Mesopotamia had tyrannized over them and others holding that both the eight years of the bondage of Israel under Cushan-rishathaim and the foregoing years wherein the Israelites lived without a Judge under the joynt-government of their Elders and had not yet by their sinnes brought themselves into bondage are to be all comprehended under the fourty years here mentioned and indeed these last I conceive are in the right unquestionably as may be thus made evident It is expressely said that from the Israelites going out of Egypt to the building of the Temple in the fourth yeare of Solomons reigne there were but four hundred and eighty years 1. Kings 6.1 And it came to passe in the foure hundred and fourscore yeare after the children of Israel were come out of the land of Egypt in the fourth yeare of Solomons reigne c. that he began to build the house of the Lord. Now first if to the fourty years of the children of Israels wandring in the wildernesse and the seventeen years of Joshua we adde the severall years of Israels bondage mentioned in this book of Judges and secondly the years wherein the land is said to have rested and thirdly the severall years of the Judges from Abimelech to Eli and fourthly the years of Eli Samuel and David we must say then that there were well nigh six hundred years from the Israelites going out of Egypt to the building of the Temple in the fourth year of Solomons reigne yea though we allow no time of distance between the death of Joshua and the eight years of Cushan-rishathaims tyranny which would be absurd and this cannot stand with that place 1. Kings 6.1 Besides in one place of this book it is plain that the years of the Judges are confounded with those of the enemies oppressing the land namely chap. 15.20 where it is said of Samson that he judged Israel in the dayes of the Philistines twenty years and why therefore may it not be so with the other Judges too I make no question therefore but under the fourty years here mentioned And the land had rest fourty years we must comprehend both the eight years of Israels bondage under the king of Mesopotamia and all the years before that bondage of the Israelites even from the death of Joshua The main objection against this is how the land can be said to have rested fourty years if part of those fourty years it was wasted with war and the people held under a miserable bondage But to this I answer 1. That it is not unusuall in the Scripture to denominate a full number of years from that which is properly true onely of the greater part of that number as we see Gen. 35.26 where after the naming of the twelve sonnes of Jacob this clause is added These are the sonnes of Jacob that were born to him in Padan-Aram and yet Benjamin is mentioned amongst them who was not born in Padan-Aram but in the land of Canaan and so likewise Acts 7.14 where it is said that Joseph sent and called his father and all his kindred threescore and fifteen souls and yet indeed there went but threscore and tenne of them at that time into Egypt Gen. 46.27 and so again Exod. 12.40 where it said that the sojourning of the children of Israel who dwelt in Egypt was foure hundred and thirty years and yet they were not in Egypt above two hundred and fifteen years And 2. that the meaning of these words And the land had rest fourty years may be that the land had rest unto the end of fourty years to wit counting the fourty years from the death of Joshua to the death of Othniel and so indeed Junius translates these words usque ad quadragesimum annune unto the expiration of fourty years for so the like expression we find chap. 14.17 where it is said of Samsons wife that she wept before him the seven dayes while the feast lasted and yet the meaning is onely that she wept to the ending of those seven dayes to wit from the time he refused to tell her the meaning of his riddle Vers 12. And the Lord strengthened Eglon the King of Moab against Israel c. That is he gave him courage and strength to invade Israel and prospered his attempts against them whereas otherwise happely they would have been afraid to meddle with a people that had been so victorious Vers 13. And went and smote Israel and possessed the city of palm-trees That is Jericho Deut. 34.3 Jericho was indeed wholly burnt by the Israelites Josh 6.24 and was not rebuilt till Ahabs dayes 1. Kings 16.43 but the meaning therefore is that this Eglon King of Moab having vanquished the Israelites in battell possessed himself of the land and territory thereabouts where the city Jericho formerly stood and either built some strong fort there or possessed himself of some fort that might he there before and that to the end he might have the command of the foords of Jordan both because there was the passage over towards his own countrey the land of Moab and because by this means he should be the better able to keep the Israelites within Jordan and those without from joyning their forces together against him and hence it was that when Ehud began to raise the countrey against the Moabites after he had slain Eglon their king the first thing they did was to take the foords of Jordan vers 28. They went down after him and took the foords of Jordan towards Moab and suffered not a man to passe over Vers 14. So the children of Israel served Eglon King of Moab eighteen years How long it was after the death of Othniel ere these eighteen years of the Israelites bondage under Eglon began it is not expressed onely this is clear that first the Israelites revolted to idolatry after Othniels death and then the Lord brought Eglon against them for it However observable it is that whereas their first bondage under Cushan-rishathaim king of Mesopotamia continued but eight years ver 8. this next under Eglon continued eighteen years and so the next too after that under Jabin king of Canaan continued twenty years
Shamgar the sonne of Anath therefore it is commonly held that he was the next Judge after Ehud onely they say it was but for a very short time and thence it is that there is no mention of the lands resting under him and the story of Deborah in the following chapter begins as if she were the next after Ehud there being no mention made there of Shamgar at all vers 1. And the children of Israel did evill in the sight of the Lord when Ehud was dead However this miraculous deliverence which he wrought for the Israelites was certainly after Ehuds death for then it seems the people returned to their former sinnes and the Lord suffered the Philistines thereupon to invade the land but then he also delivered them miraculously by this worthy till finding that they would not be warned by these things he sold them into the hands of Jabin as it is expressed in the following chapter CHAP. IV. Vers 1. ANd the children of Israel again did evill in the sight of the Lord when Ehud was dead In none of the Judges dayes did the Israelites enjoy so long a peace as in the dayes of Ehud as is evident in that clause however we understand it chap. 3.30 Moab was subdued under the hand of Israel and the land had rest fourscore years and here we see what effect this long peace wrought amongst them and how ill they requited the Lord for so great a mercy even as standing waters are wont to putrifie so they were corrupted by their long peace and by degrees fell off from God as they had formerly done Vers 2. And the Lord sold them into the hand of Jabin king of Canaan that reigned in Hazor See the note chap. 2.14 There was a Jabin that reigned in Hazor formerly who it is likely was called as this is here king of Canaan for Hazor is there said to be the head of all the neighbouring kingdomes Josh 11.10 the same who was the cheif in that confederacy against Joshua Joshua 11.1 but he was slain by Joshua and his city burnt with fire Josh 11.11 It seems therefore that this was some one of that stock who afterward recovered from the Israelites that part of the land and repaired the city Hazor and so reigned there again as his predecessours had done When this was done we cannot say but doubtlesse it was not in Joshuas time as some think for it is not to be thought that the Lord ever suffered the Canaanites to recover any part of the land which the Israelites had taken from them till they by their sinnes had provoked the Lord to anger against them But now at last not contented with his own kingdome it seems he made warre with the Israelites in generall brought them into bondage and no doubt oppressed them the more cruelly in revenge of that Joshua had done to Hazor and Jabin king thereof Josh 11.11 who perhaps was his father or grandfather And besides it must needs be most terrible to the Israelites to be oppressed by the Canaanites of all other nations because God had promised to cast them out before the Israelites so that their prevailing over them was in a speciall manner a signe that God had cast them off The Captain of whose host was Sisera which dwelt in Harosheth of the Gentiles So called as it is probably thought because in the time of the Israelites prevailing against the severall nations of the Canaanites many of them fled thither as to a place of great strength and there fortified themselves unto this time or else for the reasons given in a like case Josh 12.23 Vers 3. For he had nine hundred chariots of iron and twenty years he mightily oppressed the children of Israel Concerning these chariots of iron see the note Josh 17.16 This clause and he mightily oppressed the children of Israel is no where else inserted where mention is made of the bondage of Israel under other kings and therefore it seems this king did farre more cruelly oppresse them then the rest had done which might be partly from the deadly hatred which the Canaanites above other nations did bear to the Israelites because the Israelites had taken their land from them and partly from the just vengeance of God upon the Israelites because God had afforded them so long a peace in the dayes of Ehud chap. 3.30 and they had made so ill an use of his long-suffering and goodnesse therein See the note also chap. 3.14 Vers 4. And Deborah a prophetesse c. A woman the weaker sex that the glory of the work might be given to God and not to the instrument he used Vers 6. And she sent and called Barak the sonne of Abinoam out of Kedesh-naphtali c. That is Kedesh in the tribe of Naphtali to distinguish it from other towns of the same name in other tribes as Kedesh in Issachar 1. Chron. 6.72 Kedesh in Judah Josh 15.23 and others Now Deborah did thus send for Barak not of her own head chusing him as a man of eminency for the undertaking of the service but by speciall direction from God as the words she spake to Barak when he came to her do imply Hath not the Lord God of Israel commaded saying Go and draw toward mount Tabor c Deborah was a prophetesse and therefore no doubt God had revealed unto her that which now she imparted to Barak to wit either by secret instinct of his Spirit or perhaps by the ministry of an Angel for that some Angel did appear to her either before or after the battell which they fought with Sisera seems evident in that clause of Deborahs song chap. 5.26 Curse ye Meroz saith the Angel of the Lord curse ye bitterly the inhabitants thereof And take with thee ten thousand men of the children of Naphtali and of the children of Zebulun To wit first because they were nearest at hand secondly because Naphtali was likely to be the forwardest in this work because Barak was of that tribe and they were most oppressed Hazor and Harosheth being both in their tribe Vers 8. And Barak said unto her If thou wilt go with me then I will go c. Barak no doubt believed what Deborah had told him in the foregoing words as from the Lord namely that Sisera should be vanquished by him and therefore we see that he was willing to hazard his life and all that he had in rising against this mighty king that had brought the Israelites into bondage whence it is that Barak is commended for his faith by S. Paul and reckoned amongst those who through faith subdued kingdomes Heb. 11.32 33. But why then did he refuse to undertake the service enjoyned him unlesse Deborah would go along with him I answer partly because he considered that Deborah being a prophetesse he should have a great advantage in having her with him to pray for them to give them counsell and to advise them what to do upon every occasion but partly also no
the telling of the dream and the interpretation thereof that he worshiped c. That is he bowed himself to God by way of thankfullnesse for bringing him to hear this for the strengthening of his faith for first hereby it was manifest that God had already stricken them with a fear of him those forces which he had raised against them and secondly he might plainly see that Gods hand was in this businesse to comfort and encourage him that just at this time one of the souldiers should be telling this dream and another of his fellows should in this manner expound it Vers 18. And say The sword of the Lord and of Gideon Thus was Gideon carefull in the first place to ascribe all their successe to the Lord acknowledging thereby that Gideons sword would have been of no power to vanquish their enemies if the Lord should not fight for them and cause the sword of Gideon to be victorious but yet withall he appointed them to joyn his name with the Lords the sword of the Lord and of Gideon because he perceived by that which he heard in the camp of the Midianites that the Lord had made his name terrible amongst them Vers 19. So Gideon and the three hundred men that were with him came to the outside of the camp in the beginning of the middle watch If the Hebrews in these times did as some conceive divide the night into three watches the meaning of the words is plain that this was done in the beginning of the second watch but it is evident that in future times they had foure watches allowing three hours to every watch Matt. 14.25 And in the fourth watch of the night Jesus went unto them walking on the sea If it were so now also the meaning must be that Gideon came upon them in the beginning of the third watch which is called the middle watch because it begun about midnight but I should rather think that they had not four watches till they came to be under the Romane government and so followed their custome in the ordering of their night-watches And they blew the trumpets and brake the pitchers that were in their hands c. Besides the terrour of the suddennesse of seeing so many lights burning about them and of hearing so many pitchers broken so many trumpets sounding and so many men crying out the sword of the Lord and of Gideon that in the dead of the night when they lay sleeping securely the first thoughts which advised reason could suggest must needs be that it could not but be a mighty army that had so many trumpets and lights attending them and hence it was that the Midianites ran and cryed and fled vers 21. Yea besides we may well think this was the rather appointed that herein we might have a sweet type of the spirituall conquest of Satan by Christ and his elect For how did Christ vanquish hell and death but 1. by being broken for our transgressions and bruised for our sinnes Heb. 2.14 For as much therefore as the children are pertakers of flesh and bloud he also himself likewise took part of the same that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death that is the devil and 2. by his resurrection wherein the splendour of his divinity did shine forth most gloriously Rom. 1.4 and 8.34 And how do the Saints prevail but 1. by the preaching and the free profession of the Gospell the treasure we have in earthen vessels 2. Cor. 4.7 that the excellency of the power may be of God and not of us 2. By shewing forth the power of the word in the light of a holy conversation and 3. By a willing suffering for the truth Rev. 12.11 They overcame him by the bloud of the Lamb and by the word of their Testimony and they loved not their lives unto the death Vers 21. And they stood every man in his place round about the camp As if they had come onely to be torch-bearers to the rest of the army and indeed thereby testifying also that this victory was to be the sole work of God according to that Exod. 14.14 The Lord shall sight for you and ye shall hold your peace Vers 24. Then all the men of Ephraim gathered themselves together and took the waters unto Beth-barah and Jordan That is the foords and passages of the river Jordan even unto Beth-barah or Bethabarah John 1.28 or else these waters unto Beth-barah were some other rivers they were to passe over ere they came to Jordan and therefore distinguished from them and indeed by this means many of the Midianites did they here intercept and amongst the rest two of their princes Oreb and Zeeb and the other that escaped over before the passages could be taken Gideon pursued now hereby the Israelites might have seen the humble spirit of Gideon namely that he desired not to ingrosse the glory of the victory wholy to himself but was willing that his brethren should have their share in it too Vers 25. And they slew Oreb at the rock Oreb and Zeeb they slew at the wine-presse of Zeeb c. That is the rock and winepresse which were afterwards called upon this occasion the rock Oreb and the wine presse of Zeeb namely because there these princes were taken and slain the very places where it may be they had hid themselves for fear of the Israelites As for the next clause where it is said that they brought the heads of Oreb and Zeeb to Gideon on the other side Jordan though this be here inserted that so the whole passage of that which the men of Ephraim did might be related together yet it was not done as is expressed in the words till Gideon had passed over Jordan to pursue those Midianites that were escaped which must be noted because we see that after this there is mention made of Gideons passing over Jordan Chap. 8.4 And Gideon came to Jordan and passed over he and the three hundred men that were with him CHAP. VIII Vers 1. ANd the men of Ephraim said unto him Why hast thou served us thus c. See the last note of the foregoing chapter As afterwards they quarrelled with Jephthah chap. 12.1 And the men of Ephraim gathered themselves together and went northward and said unto Jephthah Wherefore passedst thou over to fight against the children of Ammon and didst not call us to go with thee So here now they contended with Gideon Jacob had given this tribe of Ephraim the preheminence above that of Manasseh which might happely make them the more impatient of this dishonour which was now done them as they conceived and the lesse able to brook that the Manassices of whom Gideon was should become so renowned for this victorious exploit of theirs against the Midianites But however being puffed up partly with the potency of their tribe and partly with the preheminence they had above the other tribes in that the Tabernacle was settled amongst them
Penuel and slew the men of the city That is the Magistrates of the city as before he did in Succoth Vers 18. Then said he unto Zebah and Zalmunna What manner of men were they whom ye slew at Tabor Because it seems Gideon had heard that these kings had slain certain men of the Israelites that had retired themselves for shelter to some strong holds or caves in mount Tabor and feared they vvere his brethren because they amongst others sought to provide for the saving of their lives in those dangerous times as others did chap. 6.2 And the hand of Midian prevailed against Israel and because of the Midianites the children of Israel made them the dens which are in the mountains and caves and strong holds and had not been since heard of therefore he inquires thus concerning the men vvhom they had there slain And they answered As thou art so were they each one resembled the children of a king This may be meant of that likenesse of feature which is usually amongst brethren but plainly it intends that they were of a goodly and comely personage even as Gideon was and such as might well beseem men of a princely and Royall stock Vers 19. As the Lord liveth if ye had saved them alive I would not slay you The meaning is that he would have spared them because they had shown mercy to his brethren and hereby he expresseth his sorrow for his brethren and shews what little cause they had now to expect any mercy from him Vers 20. And he said unto Jether his first-born Up and slay them Upon him he imposeth this work rather then any other first that he might train him up even from his young years to draw his sword against the enemies of Israel and to be severe to those that should rise up against God and against his people secondly that it might be done by way of avenging the death of his brethren thirdly because it would adde if not to the pain yet to the dishonour of their death to die by such a hand Vers 21. Then Zebah and Zalmunna said Rise thou and fall upon us for as the man is so is his strength In this reply of theirs first they descant in a kind of scornfull manner upon that command of Gideons setting a child to take away their lives whereas indeed this his young heire had scarce courage enough to look them in the face secondly they provoke Gideon as impatient of delay to rise upon them himself and rid them out of the way thereby discovering their contempt of death and how much they scorned to begge life and withall happely being loath to die by the hand of a child And took away the ornaments that were on their Camels necks As the memorials of this great victory Vers 22. Then the men of Israel said unto Gideon Rule thou over us both thou and thy sonne c. That is they offered to receive him to be their king and to settle the kingdome successively upon his posterity Vers 23. And Gideon said unto them I will not rule over you c. That is not as a king he judged Israel unto his dying day but it was the kingdome of Israel the regall power which they proffered and he now refused and that upon this ground because the accepting of this would have been in a manner a taking of the government out of Gods hand the Lord saith he shall rule over you Not that God rules not by kings as well as by other kind of Magistrates but because God had established this way of governing them by Judges who had not so great a degree of soveraignty and power over the people as kings usually have were extraordinarily called of God withall because God had in his Law expressed that in case they should desire a king they were to take him whom the Lord should choose Deu. 17.14 15 When thou art come to the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee and shalt possesse it and shall dwell therein and shalt say I will set a king over me like all the nations that are about Thou shalt in any wise set him a king over thee whom the Lord thy God shall chuse One from among thy brethren shalt thou set over thee thou mayest not set a stranger over thee which is not thy brother Therefore he takes this rash proffer of changing the government to be a shaking of Gods government because they went about to change it without Gods leave and refuseth to give any consent to it all which is evident by that which the Lord said of the Israelites desiring a King in Samuels dayes 1. Sam. 8.6 7. But the thing displeased Samuel when they said Give us a King to judge us and Samuel prayed unto the Lord And the Lord said unto Samuel Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee for they have not rejected thee but they have rejected me that I should not reigne over them Vers 26. And the weight of the golden ear-rings which he requested was a thousand and seven hundred shekles of gold c. Which is esteemed to be according to the account of our weight 2380 pounds it is not impossible that all this should be spent in the making of one ephod as it is said vers 27. especially if it were made as that of Aarons with a brestplate set with so many precious stones of great value Exod. 28.15 16.17 But the words will well enough bear that of part of this gold now given him he made an ephod Vers 27. And Gideon made an ephod thereof and put it in his city Not a linen ephod but such a one as that which was made for the high priest of gold blue purple scarlet c. Exod. 28.6 It is probable enough that he intended it onely as a memoriall of this their victory over the Midianites the monument being of the very prey which was there taken though afterwards it became a snare both to him and to his house But why then did he make an ephod rather then any other monument this indeed seems to imply that his purpose was to make use also of this ephod either in offering sacrifices in his own house and then under this ephod all the priestly garments may be comprehended or else thereby to enquire what the will of the Lord was according to the judgement of Urim Not considering that this previledge was onely annexed to Aarons ephod wherein was the brestplate of judgement with the Urim and Thummim and therein therefore he sinned greatly and brought Gods wrath upon his posterity And all Israel went thither a whoring after it c. Either they went thither as to a famous Oracle to inquire concerning the will of God in any doubtfull cases or else drawn with the superstitious conceits they had entertained of this ephod they set up there a place of sacrificing contrary to the expresse letter of the Law of God or else they resorted
of his house of purpose to meet him by way of congratulating the great victory wherewith God had honoured him It is indeed strange that an Israelite yea a faithfull good man for he is reckoned by S. Paul Heb. 11.32 amongst Gods worthies that through faith did accomplish great things should be so ignorant of Gods Law as to think to please God with that which was so expressely there forbidden Deut. 12.30 31. Take heed to thy self that thou be not snared by following them c. for every abomination to the Lord which he hateth have they done unto their gods for even their sonnes and their daughters have they burnt in the fire to their gods Yea besides had he been never so great a stranger to the Law of God as being a man trained up in the warre and that too a great part of his life amongst heathens out of the land of Israel yet the sacrificing of men and women is a sinne so much against the light of nature that one would think it should not come into the thought of a man that had any spark of grace in him Well but yet the letter of the text being so expresse for this I see not how it can be determined otherwise but that in this vow of his he did intend a humane sacrifice and that we may not stumble too much at the strangenesse of it we must consider first that the people of Israel were for the generallity never so farre fallen away from the knowledge and worship of the true God or so farre corrupted with the abominations of the heathens as they were now we see that it is said before in the sixth verse of this chapter that they forsook the Lord and served not him but were wholly gone aside after the idolatry of the heathen secondly that Jephthah had hitherto perhaps lived in as much darknesse as the rest and that the rather because he had spent so much of his time out of the land of Israel and therefore though at this time God had called him and so the spirit of the Lord came mightily upon him that for the present he should make such an uncouth and unwarrantable vow in such dark times is not at all incredible thirdly that there being a sort of vowes mentioned in the Law of God wherein the persons devoted to be put to death Levit. 27.29 None devoted which shall be devoted of men shall be redeemed but shall surely be put to death this Jephthah might take to be a jâ—st warrant for his vow though indeed it were not and fourthly that Jephthah made this vow rashly not considering the mischief that might follow upon it being at that time transported with the fervency of his zeal for the rescuing Gods people from the oppression of the Ammonites for to this end that he might have the Ammonites delivered into his hand he sought as it were to demerit Gods favour by promising this extraordinary gift and by binding himself solemnly to do that for God which the heart of man would startle at Vers 33. And he smote them from Aroer even till thou come to Minnith even twenty cities c. That is the inhabitants of twenty cities and those in the land of the Ammonites for they were beyond Aroer which was the bounds betwixt Israel and Ammon of Minnith there is mention made Ezek. 27.17 Judah and the land of Israel they were thy merchants they traded in thy market wheat of Minnith and Pannag and honey and oil and balm Vers 35. Alas my daughter thou hast brought me very low and thou art one of them that trouble me c. That is God having raised me to a high pitch of honour by this glorious victory which I have now attained over the Ammonites thou who mightest have reaped a great share in mine honour and thereby have added unto my joy hast now humbled me and deprived me of all the glory and comfort of my victory and hast brought more trouble upon me then all mine enemies could have done Vers 36. And she said unto him my father if thou hast opened thy mouth c. By those words of her father mentioned in the former verse Alas my daughter c. for I have opened my mouth unto the Lord and I cannot go back she might conceive that he had made some vow concerning her but could not know what that vow was and therefore it is evident that besides what is expressed in the foregoing verse her father had also acquainted her what the vow was that he had made and thereupon being erroneously perswaded that he was bound to make good his vow she freely offers her self to undergo what he had vowed as being ready to die rather then he should sinne against God by breaking his vow and desirous by discovering her willingnesse to consent thereto to appease and mitigate his sorrow as much as in her lay Vers 37. Let me alone two moneths that I may go up and down upon the mountains bewail my virginity c. She chose the mountains to do this in because those unfrequented and solitary places were fittest for the bitter lamentations and mournfull expressions of their grief wherewith she resolved with her companions in a solemn manner to bewail this heavy affliction that was fallen upon her and happely withall she desired by retiring to those unfrequented places to fit and prepare her self for that death which within a short time she was to undergo for though she spake onely of her bewailing her virginity yet thereby is meant that she would bewail her dying a virgin implying how much this did aggravate her sorrow that she should die without leaving any posterity behind her and indeed to die childlesse was in those times esteemed one of the greatest of earthly miseries There are many learned Expositours that conceive that Jephthahs vow was that whatsoever should first meet him should be the Lords and that if it were a creature which by the Law might be offered in a sacrifice then he would offer it for a burnt offering so many of them read his vow disjunctively as is noted before vers 3. It shall surely be the Lords or I will offer it up for a burnt offering and so they conceive that his daughter was not sacrificed but onely shut up there in perpetuall virginity to spend all her time in the service of God and therefore she desires not respite to bewail her death but to bewail her virginity But many things make this opinion lesse probable for first we reade not the least touch in the Scripture of any such separating men or women to the service of God in a monasticall life much lesse that parents should have this power over their children to vow them to virginity without their consent Samuel that was consecrated to God from his infancy was yet married and had many children secondly if his vow must be understood of any thing that should first meet him whereof see vers 31. we may demand
Samson was followed on afterwards in the dayes of Eli Samuel and Saul for they never were after this in bondage to the Philistines till at length they were perfectly subdued by David Vers 6. A man of God came unto me and his countenance was like the countenance of an Angel of God very terrible That is his countenance was very venerable and full of reverend Majesty and such as wrought a kind of astonishment and fear in me Vers 7. For the child shall be a Nazarite to God from the womb to the day of his death Others that took upon them the vow of a Nazarite were onely such for a time namely so long as they had vowed to consecrate themselves unto the Lord in this strict way of singular holinesse which was therefore called the dayes of their separation see the notes Num. 6.3 4 5. But now Samson was in an extraordinary way separate to be a Nazarite to wit by the appointment and command of God and not by his own voluntary vow and therefore he was to be a Nazarite all his life from the womb to the day of his death and herein was Samson above other Nazarites a type of Christ who was from his first conception perfectly sanctified Luke 2.35 That holy thing which shall be born of thee saith the Angel to the virgin Mary shall be called the sonne of God and so continued all his dayes holy harmlesse undefiled and separate from sinners Heb. 7.26 and that to the end he might be the saviour of Gods people for the better manifestation whereof it was that God by his providence did so order it that he was though upon another occasion called a Nazarene Matht 2.23 And he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Prophets He shall be called a Nazarene Vers 10. And the woman made haste and ran and shewed her husband c. Knowing how earnestly her husband had prayed unto the Lord that he would again send that man of God to them that had at first brought her the tidings of her conception no sooner did she now see him again but as taking this to be an answer of his prayer and therefore not doubting but he would stay till she came back again and withall longing to make glad the heart of her husband she made haste and ran as the text saith to tell her husband of it Vers 16. Though thou detain me yet I will not eat of thy bread and if thou wilt offer a burnt-offering thou must offer it unto the Lord. Manoah had said in the foregoing verse I pray thee let us detain thee untill we shall have made ready a kid for thee now because those words may be meant especially as they are in the originall either his preparing a kid merely for him to eat or else for preparing a kid for a sacrifice to wit of a peace-offering for with such sacrifices they used to feast their friends after they had offered the fat unto the Lord accordingly the Angel of the Lord answers Manoah in these words for first he absolutely refuseth to eat of any provision that he should make ready for him Though thou detain me I will not eat of thy bread and this he saith not because Angels in those assumed bodies wherein they appear to men cannot eat for we see the contrary expressely affirmed concerning the Angels that appeared to Abraham when as yet they would not be known to be any other but men Gen. 18.8 He took butter and milk and the calf which he had distressed and set it before them and they did eat but because he now desired to lead on Manoah by degrees to apprehend him to be more then a man which as yet Manoah had not conceived and then secondly he addes and if thou wilt offer a burnt offering thou must offer it to the Lord wherein he intimates to Manoah that he vvould not have him think of providing a sacrifice that he might eat of it yet if he had a mind to offer a burnt offering he should approve of that onely he then gives him vvarning to take heed of having any other thought then to offer it to the Lord Jehovah onely As concerning the reason vvhy he gives him that expresse caveat that he should be sure that he did not think of offering his burnt offering to any but the Lord I conceive it to be onely because many of the Israelites did at this time vvorship the idol-gods of the heathens and therefore the Angel took this occasion to bid him to beware of that Many Expositours indeed conceive that the Angel that novv appeared to Manoah being a created Angel spake this purposely to beat off Manoah from thinking to offer any sacrifice to him and others that hold it was the Sonne of God that novv appeared to him understand these words as if he had said If you think of offering me a burnt offering you must offer it to me as the true God not as to a created angel but first because there is nothing said before whereby it may be gathered that Manoah intended to offer a sacrifice to the Angel and secondly because it is manifest that as yet he took him to be a man as himself was some prophet sent unto him from God as it follows in the next words Manoah knew not that he was an angel of the Lord I see not why we should think that the angel spake these words with respect to himself but rather to give him warning of the idolatrie that was then too rise in the land Vers 17. What is thy name that when thy sayings come to passe we may do thee honour That is that we may make report to others concerning this thy foretelling future things and so both we and they may esteem and honour thee as a prophet of the most high God This I conceive is chiefly intended though withall it may be meant of some bountifull reward wherewith by way of gratitude he meant to honour him that is to testifie their honourable and high esteem of him Vers 18. Why askest thou thus farre after my name seeing it is secret Or seeing it is wonderfull as it is in the margin of our Bibles for the word in the Originall signifieth both secret and wonderfull If we hold that this was a created angel that now appeared to Manoah there is no necessitie that we should thereupon make enquirie as many Papists have very busily done whether the holy angels in heaven have all of them their severall names whereby they are distinguished and known when the angels would impart any thing one to another concerning any particular angel For though there is no question to be made but the angels both can and do impart what they would make known both one to another and one concerning another yet because they do this not by words or vocall expressions but as spirits in a spirituall manner and such as we are not able to
formerly concluded the maâ—ch between him and the woman of Timnath he went now thither again to solemnize the marriage his father and his mother as we see vers 9. going along with him as formerly and so coming near to the place where he had in his last passing that way slain the lion he turned aside to see the carcase of the lion no doubt that the sight of the lions carcase might affect him the more in the thankfull remembrance of that great mercy of God to him in enabling him so miraculously to kill that ravenous beast when he flew upon him and so by the providence of God he came to take notice of that which God intended should be the occasion of the ensuing quarrell between him and the Philistines for when he came to the place behold there was a swarm of bees and honey in the carcase of the lion that is in the bones of the carcase as they lay fastned still together the flesh being eaten or dried away for otherwise a swarm of bees would not have settled there and this shews that there was some good distance of time between his first going down with his parents to Timnath to make the match between him and the woman of Timnath to whom he had taken a liking and his going now down with them the second time to take her to wife Vers 11. And it came to passe when they saw him that they brought thirty companions to be with him The most of Expositours by farre understand this place thus That when the Philistines saw Samson perceiving him to be a man of wonderfull strength and full of terrour they brought thirty companions to be with him under pretence of respect and the custome of their marriage solemnity but indeed that they might set a guard upon him lest he should suddenly do them any mischief But first because they had seen him before and were not then affraid of him secondly the Scripture doth not any where make the least mention of any thing extraordinary in Samsons body or the terrour of his countenance but ascribes his strength merely to the coming of Gods spirit upon him and thirdly Samson by the guidance no doubt of Gods spirit purposely concealed the killing of the lion that the Philistines might not be afraid of him therefore I think it farre more probable that the meaning of these words is onely this that when the brides friends and kindred saw that Samson was come to take his wife they provided thirty young men according to the custome of those times as his companions and bridemen children of the bride-chamber as they are called Matt. 9.15 to attend upon him and to rejoyce with him Vers 12. And Samson said unto them I will now put forth a riddle unto you c. It was it seems the custome of those times by way of exercising their wits especially at feasts to strive for the masterie one with another in point of resolving dark and intricate questions and riddles whereto some apply that 1. Kings 10.1 that when the Queen of Sheba heard of the fame of Solomon concerning the name of the Lord she came to prove him with hard questions and so hereupon it was that Samson the first day of his wedding feast propounded a riddle to his bride-men however his aim doubtlesse therein was to take an occasion of picking a quarrell with the Philistines to which some Expositours do adde this too that as Samson in his marrying with a daughter of the Philistines was a type of Christ in his calling the Gentiles to be his people and so marrying them to himself as his bride and spouse so also this riddle propounded by Samson was a figure of the doctrine of the Gospel published to the world by Christ when the time of the calling of the Gentiles was come which indeed was a riddle to flesh and bloud according to that of the Apostle 1. Cor. 1.23 We preach Christ crucified to the Jews a stumbling block and to the Gentiles foolishnesse as concerning the seven dayes of the wedding feast here mentioned see the note Gen. 29.27 and concerning the thirty change of garments which is a part of the wager propounded by Samson see the note Gen. 45 22. Vers 14. Out of the eater came forth meat and out of the strong came forth sweetnesse The honey which Samson found in the carcase of the lion was the ground of this riddle but withall we may well think that meditating by himself concerning this observable passage of Gods providence in yielding him food to eat out of the carcase of that lion that a while before thought to have eaten up him he called to mind how usually God is wont after the same manner for his children to bring them good out of evil so did the rather propound this riddle because it was a notable enigmaticall expression of Gods dealing with his people in this regard For when Satans temptations yea the sinnes of the godly turn to their advantage what is this but honey out of that roaring lion that seeks to devoure us When the cruell enemies of Gods people are made their friends or that God turns their malicious practises to the furtherance of the Gospel and the good of the Church what is this but meat out of the eater When afflictions yea death it self yields matter of much sweet comfort to the godly and opens a way to a better life for them what is this but sweetnesse drawn forth for them out of the carcase as it were of their strong enemies Yea principally did this shadow forth that mysterie of the sweet and saving food of our souls in the ministerie of the Gospel which we have from Christs victorie over hell and death by his own death according to that of the Apostle Heb. 2.17 Forasmuch therefore as the children are partakers of flesh and bloud he also himself likewise took a part of the same that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death that is the devil and that of our Saviour John 6.51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven If any man eat of this bread he shall live for ever and the bread that I will give is my flesh which I will give for the life of the world The more unexpectedly good comes to us out of evil the more thankfull his people must needs be for it and therefore God loves to store up comforts where his people would least expect to find them And they could not in three dayes expound the riddle And thus it was with the Philistines as it is with all other naturall men in regard of the mysterie of the Gospel which Christ hath published to the world they are not able by any wisdome and endeavours of their own to comprehend it unlesse by the spirit of God it be revealed to them according to that of the Apostle 1. Cor. 2.14 15. The naturall man receiveth not the things of the spirit of God
Judges that not long too after the death of Joshua and not according to the order of time as they are here inserted after the death of Samson Concerning which see the note upon vers 6. Vers 2. And he said unto his mother The eleven hundred shekels of silver that were taken from thee about which thou cursedst c. To wit either by cursing those that had stolen it through the violence of her passion or by adjuring those she spake to under a curse to reveal what was become of it if they knew any thing of it Now the bitternesse of his mothers spirit in cursing thus was doubtlesse the greater because she had superstitiously devoted it to a religious use to wit the making of images for her sonne But yet Micah mentions it as being touched in conscience by way of aggravating his sinne implying the reason why he could no longer detain it In mine own hearing saith he thou didst curse those that had taken thy silver from thee or that did not discover where it was yet wretch as I am hitherto I have detained it but no longer dare I lie under a mothers curse and therefore am I now come to confesse my sinne and to restore again the money to you And his mother said Blessed be thou of the Lord my sonne That is free be thou from my curse my sonne and mayst thou be blessed of the Lord and not cursed because thou hast repented of this fact and so ingeniously dost offer to restore what unadvisedly before thou hadst taken away from me Vers 3. His mother said I had wholly dedicated the silver unto the Lord c. Micahs mother here tells him that she had wholly dedicated the silver unto the Lord Jehovah as it is in the Hebrew and yet withall she addes that it was to make idols for him to make a graven image and a molten image whereby it is evident that in these times when many of the Israelites were become idolaters yet they pretended and intended the worship of the true God in their idol-service not esteeming those dumb and dead images gods but onely representations and remembrances of the true God Some question whether this which she spake of a graven image and a molten image was meant of two severall images that she intended should be made of her silver one graven and another molten or of one image which is called a graven and a molten image onely because they did melt their silver and cast it into the form of an image and then did afterwards polish and finish it with graving tools but that two severall images are here intended is evident in the following chapter vers 18. where it is plain that they are named severally And these went into Micahs house and fetched the carved image the ephod and the Teraphim and the molten image Vers 4. Yet he restored the money unto his mother Though she now gave it him freely yet he would not keep it as fearing the disquiet of his conscience if she would bestow it as she vowed she might but he would be sure to rid his hands of it And his mother took two hundred shekels of silver and gave them to the founder who made thereof a graven image and a molten image c. The other nine hundred shekels were therefore it seems laid out in providing an ephod and other ornaments for the priest in providing their teraphim and whatsoever else was requisite for the idolatrous worship oâ— theâ— false gods Vers 5. And the man Micah had an house of gods c. That is a chappel consecrated to these superstitious devotions and made an ephod under which are comprehended all other garments for the priests and teraphim now these teraphim were a speciall sort of images distinguished by that name from all other sorts of images 2. Kings 23.24 Moreover the workers with familiar spirits and the wizards and the images the teraphim it is in the originall and the idols and all the abominations that were spied in the land of Judah and in Jerusalem did Josiah put away It seems they had the shape of men 1. Sam. 19.13 And Michael took an image and laid in the bed for there also Michaels image is in the originall called teraphim and that they made use of them as oracles and received from them answers what to do in doubtfull cases Ezek. 21.21 The king of Babylon stood at the parting of the way at the head of the two wayes to use divination he made his arrows bright he consulted with images or teraphim Zach. 10.2 The idols or teraphim have spoken vanity and the diviners have seen a lie and have told false dreams and it may well be that this made the Danites enquire at Micahs house concerning the successe of their journey Vers 6. In those dayes there was no king in Israel c. That is in those dayes when Micah did this before related But when was this The time is not expressely set down some conceive this was done after Samsons death and that therefore it is next related in the course of the history but the most probable opinion is that both this and all that followeth to the end of this book were done long before Samsons death and are here onely related apart by themselves that the story of the Judges the main thing intended in the former part of the book might not be interrupted first because it is not probable that the Danites being a populous â—â—be and straitened in their dwelling by reason of the Amorites so long before Judg. 1.34 And the Amorites forced the children of Dan into the mountain for they would not let them come into the valley would stay so many years ere they would look out to enlarge their borders which how they did and how they stole away Micahs gods is related in the following chapter But especially because in the warre of Israel against Benjamin which is largely related in the three last chapters of this book Phinehas ministred before the Lord chap. 20.28 And Phinehas the sonne of Eleazar the sonne of Aaron stood before it in those dayes saying Shall I yet again go out to battel against the children of Benjamin my brother who killed Zimri and Cozbi Numb 25.7 above three hundred years before Samsons death It seems therefore either this was done immediately after the death of Joshua and those elders who all their time kept the people from revolting from God Judg. 2.7 And the people served the Lord all the dayes of Joshua and and all the dayes of the elders that outlived Joshua who had seen all the great works of the Lord which he did for Israel and then the meaning of the words may be there was no King in Israel that there was no ordinary supreme magistrate neither King nor Judge to restrain the people from these wicked courses or else that it was done in the time of some of the Judges that followed next after Joshua and then the meaning of
Jephtha foyled them to wit a claim which they laid to the land of Gilead where Jabesh stood which now to recover and withall to revenge that shamefull overthrow which Jephtha had given them they might be the rather emboldened because the Philistines on the other side of the countrey had exceedingly weakned and oppressed the Israelites Vers 2. On this condition will I make a covenant with you that I may thrust out all your right eyes and lay it for a reproch upon all Israel To wit to disable them for the warre for with their shields they covered their left eyes and therefore having lost their right eyes what service of warre could they be fit for and consequently that the accepting of such dishonourable conditions might be a perpetuall reproch to all the people because it would be said hereupon what a base people the Israelites were that would buy off death upon any terms yea to the God of Israel on whom his people durst not rely for help and thus Sathan labours to put out the right eye of faith and to leave us onely the left eye of reason Vers 4. Then came the messengers to Gibeah of Saul c. That is as to other towns so also to this or rather knowing that Saul their Prince elect was at Gibeah and Samuel with him these messengers of Jabesh-gilead went directly thither that they might acquaint them with the extremity of streights they were in that so they might speedily send into all the coasts of Israel for help Had Nahash the king of the Ammonites yielded to the submission of the inhabitants of Jabesh-gilead he might not only have had that town delivered up to him but in all probability many more would have yielded themselves to him after their example Yea and when they desired seven dayes respite that they might send messengers into all the coasts of Israel promising that if in that time they had not help they would yield up the town had not he yielded to this he might happely in that time have taken the town by force But first he proudly and scornfully refused the tender of their service and sent them word that nothing should satisfie him unlesse he might thrust out all their right eyes and when they desired a truce of seven dayes to try if they could call in their brethren to their aid ere they yielded to so hard a condition he granted them their request and as we see here suffered them to send their messengers as being puft up with such an opinion of his own strength that he thought it impossible that in that time their brethren either could or durst come to relieve them and so by this means through his arrogancy and cruelty he was carried headlong to his own destruction whereas by granting them fair quarter he might have brought them under his yoke and have spread his victories much further Vers 5. And behold Saul came after the herd out of the field Being onely yet elected king and finding many to repine against it returning home he betook himself as most Interpreters hold to his wonted countrey imployments But this agreeing not with the state of his being conducted home chap. 10.26 may rather be understood of casuall coming after the herd and that it is here expressed onely because of that which followeth his taking a yoke of the oxen and hewing them c. Vers 6. And the spirit of God came upon Saul when he heard those tidings and his anger was kindled greatly Herein we see how fairly Saul carried himself as long as those gifts of Gods spirit were continued to him wherewith the Lord had fitted him for the government of his people He that was so patient in his own cause that when certain children of Belial scorned and despised him he passed it by as if he had taken no notice of it chap. 10.27 was now impatient of the wrong that was done to the Lord and his people by the Ammonites that had propounded such intollerable conditions to the men of Jabesh-gilead now his anger was kindled greatly and it never abated till he had rescued his poore oppressed brethren out of the danger they were in As for that expression And the spirit of God came upon Saul see the note Judg. 3.10 Vers 7. Whosoever cometh not forth after Saul and after Samuel so shall it be done unto his oxen It may well be that Saul took this course of hewing a yoke of oxen in pieces and sending the pieces to the severall tribes of Israel in imitation of the Levite Judg. 19.29 who did thus cut his concubine in pieces and sent them to the severall tribes the better to stirre up their indignation And in the message he sent to the tribes because he was not yet generally approved and received as king of all the people he useth not his own name onely but Samuels also who it seems accompanied him home from Mizpeh as others did chap. 10.26 and so was now with him that by this means he might make sure that all should come if not for respect of him their king yet out of regard had to Samuel Gods Prophet and formerly their Judge And the fear of the Lord fell on the people and they came out with one consent That is though Saul did what he could to make the people afraid to disobey his command yet it was of God that they were so generally stricken with fear and thereupon ready to come forth at the command of their new chosen king as it is said of the Canaanites that were restrained from pursuing Jacob and his family when his sonnes had made that massacre in Schechem Gen. 35.5 And they journeyed and the terrour of God was upon the cities that were round about them and they did not pursue after the sonnes of Jacob. Vers 8. The children of Israel were three hundred thousand and the men of Judah thirty thousand The men of Judah are reckoned apart from the children of Israel and these reasons may be given for it 1. Because they usually had the priviledge of going first against the enemy in any common danger 2. To let us see that the tribe of Judah though the chief and the tribe wherein God had said the throne should be established Gen. 49.10 yielded to obey Saul chosen out of the least of the tribes or thirdly because this would intimate how willingly the people flocked together when out of Judah alone there came thirty thousand though by the continuall incursions of the Philistines they were forced to look to the defence of their own coasts against these their neighbours Vers 9. And they said unto the messengers that came c. That is Saul and Samuel Vers 10. Therefore the men of Jabesh said To morrow we will come out unto you c. They repeat the main head of the covenant they had made with the king of Ammon to wit that they would come forth and yield themselves concealing the condition that is if help came not in
the mean time by concealing whereof they both provide for their own safetie that nothing might be presently attempted against them and make their enemies the more secure that Saul might come upon them unawares Vers 11. Saul put the people in three companies and they came into the midst of the host in the morning watch c. It seems Saul marched all night that by the morning watch he might come upon them and surprise them unawares And thus he raised the siege of Jabesh-gilead and freed them from that horrid cruelty which the enemy entended against them and how thankfull the inhabitants of this citie were to Saul for this great benefit they enjoyed by his means we may see chap. 31.11 12 13. And when the inhabitants of Jabesh-gilead heard of that which the Philistins had done to Saul All the valiant men arose and went all night and took the body of Saul and the bodies of his sonnes from the wall of Beth-shan and came to Jabesh and burnt them there And they took their bones and buried them under a tree and fasted seven dayes Vers 13. And Saul said There shall not a man be put to death this day for to day the Lord hath wrought salvation for Israel In this reason that Saul gave why he would not suffer any man to be put to death that day for to day the Lord hath wrought salvation in Israel two things may be implyed first that he would not have a day of so much joy and triumph stained with the least sorrow and mourning amongst any of the people and secondly that when God had shewn himself so good and gracious to his people he could not think it fit to be so rigid severe against those that had at first slighted him in his sovereignty However here again we see what a difference there was betwixt that which Saul was in his first government and that he was afterwards when the Spirit of the Lord was departed from him Now none more humble and gentle then he not a man should be put to death for him but afterwards in his dealing with David and the Priests of the Lord he was another man even bloud-thirsty cruell and implacable beyond measure Vers 14. Then said Samuel to the people Come and let us go to Gilgal and renew the kingdome there A city this was near hand adjoyning upon Jordan there Joshua renewed the covenant betwixt the Lord and his people Josh 5.9 and there Samuel now renewed the covenant concerning the kingdome betwixt Saul and the people Before he was chosen but this was as it were the solemnity of his inauguration and coronation and now it seems he was anointed in publick as before in private and therefore in the next chapter Samuel speaking to the people calls Saul severall times the Lords Anointed Vers 15. And there they made Saul king before the Lord in Gilgal and there they sacrificed c. It is evident therefore that here now Saul and Samuel sacrificed together in Gilgal whence we may certainly conclude that the charge which Samuel gave to Saul chap. 10.8 that he should stay for Samuel at Gilgal seven dayes till he came to offer sacrifice for him was not meant of Sauls immediate going to Gilgal but of his going thither when he should be in a strait and had not Samuel with him as is before noted in the exposition of that place CHAP. XII Vers 1. ANd Samuel said unto all Israel Behold I have hearkened unto your voice in all that ye said unto me c. Samuel presseth them now more closely and sharply then ever with their sinne in rejecting the government which God had established among them first because in this their jollity for that glorious victory which their new king had obtained against the Ammonites they were in danger to be puffed up with an opinion that God approved that which they had done and that they had not sinned in desiring a king secondly because having established Saul in the throne actually resigned the government into his hands he might now speak the more freely without giving the least ground of suspition that he was loth to give over the government and therefore condemned them for choosing a king Vers 2. And now behold the king walketh before you This is meant of Sauls being now settled in the supreme magistracy as a shepherd or captain to lead and govern the people and to be as a shield unto them to stand betwixt them and harms way the like phrase there is Numb 27.17 concerning which see the note there And I am old and gray-headed and behold my sonnes are with you To imply how good cause he had to be very well content in regard of himself that the burden of the government should be taken from his shoulders he wisheth them to remember that he was now grown aged I am saith he old and gray-headed and then he addes and behold my sonnes are with you that is they are amongst you as one of you they shall lay no claim to the government no more then I do so that this he saith either first the more to clear his integrity who was willing his sonnes should lay down the power of government as well as himself or secondly to intimate that if they could charge him for any wrong done his sonnes should make satisfaction or else to imply that of them they might be satisfied concerning his course of life and particularly whether he did any way incourage them in those wicked courses they ranne into chap. 8.3 Vers 3. Behold here I am witnesse against me before the Lord and before his anointed c. As if he should have said being now the power of government is transferred to another ye need not fear to speak your minds of me and therefore if ye can accuse me of any evil speak it freely And this protestation of his innocency he makes First that he might the more freely reprove them Secondly to manifest the greivousnesse of their sinne who had without any just cause rejected the government which God had erected among them And thirdly to propound this covertly as a pattern for their new chosen king to follow before whom all this was spoken witnesse against me before the Lord and before his Anointed Vers 7. Now therefore stand still that I may reason with you before the Lord of all the righteous acts of the Lord c. That is both mercies and punishmenâ—â— but cheifly I conceive this is meant of his mercies wherein the Lord approved his faithfulnesse in performing the covenant which he had made with them for these he presseth upon them to discover the hainousnesse of their sinne in rejecting his government who had so carefully protected them against all their enemies and so abundantly blessed them in every regard Vers 8. The Lord sent Moses and Aaron which brought forth your fathers out of Egypt and made them dwell in this place This making them to dwell in the land
infamous thing Hos 9.10 They went to Baal-peor and separated themselves unto that shame Vers 5. Who lay on his bed at noon Though it be not simply evil to lie on a bed at noon yet considering that the Scripture sets forth Ishbosheth in other things to be a man of a slothfull and dull spirit not active in any thing but leaving all to Abners disposing we may justly think that it is purposely noted here as the just reward of his idlenesse and sloth that as he slept away his time so he dyed at last sleeping Vers 6. And they came thither into the midst of the house as though they would have fetched wheat c. The meaning of this is either that they came in the disguise and habite of countreymen or merchants that came to buy wheat or of porters that came to fetch away wheat that was bought or else rather that being known Captains of Ishbosheths bands under a colour that they came to fetch corn for the souldiers or for themselves for the souldiers in those times had usually their pay in corn they had free accesse into the house and so went in where he lay and slew him and that by smiting him under the fifth rib of which see the note chap. 2.23 and this doubtlesse they did hoping that David would reward them for it for though David seemed greatly to take to heart the death of Abner and to be highly displeased with Joab for it yet because he did not punish him these captains perhaps concluded that David was well enough pleased with it though he would not be known of it and so he would be with them too if they should kill Ishbosheth and hereby it is likely they encouraged themselves in this treacherous villany against their Lord and Master Vers 11. How much more when wicked men have slain a righteous person That is in respect of them which conspired against him he had deserved well of them and for them therefore thus treacherously to slay him in his own house upon his bed when he thought of no danger was a villany that did farre more justly deserve death and the rather too because they durst do this notwithstanding David had so severely punished him that pretended he had slain Saul Vers 12. And they slew them and cut off their hands and their feet and hanged them up over the pool in Hebron To wit that all men might see how much David abhorred this fact of theirs and how farre he was from knowing any thing of it or giving the least encouragement to them that did it CHAP. V. Vers 1. THen came all the tribes of Israel to David unto Hebron c. That is many of all the tribes of Israel in the name of the rest not onely the elders and heads of each tribe as is expressed vers 3. So all the elders of Israel came to the king to Hebron but multitudes also of the people that bare arms as is more largely expressed 1. Chron. 12.23 where it is particularly expressed how many thousands of each tribe there came as likewise how they were there with David three dayes eating and drinking and making merry together vers 39.40 For saith the text their brethren had prepared for them and there was joy in Israel And indeed though the greatest part of these tribes had for seven years stood out against David for Ishbosheth and the house of Saul yet because now at last they were not subdued by the sword and forced to submit but came in freely of their own accord God enclining their hearts thereto even this submission of theirs did also shadow forth the willing submission of believers to Christs sceptre and government as is noted before concerning the men of Judahs taking David to be their king chap. 2.4 as likewise Davids free accepting of these did shadow forth Christs gratious acceptance of those that do at length come in and submit to him and that he never will cast off any for their former obstinacy and rejecting of grace Behold we are thy bone and thy flesh That is Israelites as thou art Herein they might imply their hope that in this regard he would receive them into his favour though they had hitherto sided with the house of Saul against him but doubtlesse they principally alledged this as one of the main motives that now induced them to accept of him for their king to wit because though he were not of any of their tribes yet he was an Israelite and the law enjoyned them onely to this that their king should be one from amongst their brethren Deut. 17.15 Thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee whom the Lord thy God shall choose One from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee thou mayest not set a king over thee which is not thy brother and seeing the hand of God was so evidently with him why therefore should they oppose him and indeed this also brings in all believers to stoop willingly as was prophesied Psalme 110.3 to the sceptre of Christ Ephes 5.29 30. For no man ever yet hated his own flesh but nourisheth it and cherisheth it even as the Lord the Church For we are members of his body of his flesh and his bones and Heb. 2.14 16 17. Forasmuch therefore as the children are partakers of flesh and bloud he also himself likewise took part of the same that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death that is the devil For verily he took not on him the nature of angels but took on him the seed of Abraham Wherefore in all things it behoveth him to be made like unto his brethren that he might be made a mercifull and faithfull high priest in things pertaining to God to make reconciliation for the sinnes of the people Vers 2. Also in times past when Saul was king over us thou wast he that leadest out and broughtest in Israel c. That is thou wert our captain that 〈◊〉 lead forth our armies and bring them back again Two other reasons are here alledged by the Israelites whereby they were now moved to come in and submit themselves to Davids government The first is that they considered how well David had deserved at their hands and that indeed during Sauls reigne he had been their chiefest support and defence under God against their enemies and the other is that God had by Samuel appointed him to rule over them and they were bound by the law of God to take a king of his choosing Deut. 17.15 Thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee whom the Lord thy God shall choose ◠and this they alledge as the chief motive in the following words And the Lord said to thee Thou shalt feed my people Israel that is as a shepherd provides for his flock so must thou provide for my people and thou shalt be a captain over Israel and indeed this is the chief reason too that brings men to submit to
David perceived that they had begun this work and that as yet there was no signe of Gods displeasure against them as there had been formerly in the smiting of Uzzah it greatly cheared his heart and thereupon he judged it fit to stay a while there and offer God some sacrifices by way of thanksgiving to wit upon some altar for that purpose erected He knew well that it was of Gods mercy that they had found out their former errour in carrying the ark in a cart and had now reformed it by appointing the Levites to carry it on their shoulders according to the Law and he considered besides that for many other things the Lord might have taken advantage against them and punished them as formerly and therefore presently by way of thankfulnesse he sacrificed oxen and fatlings and indeed so much is plainly intimated 1 Chron. 15.26 where also the number of the sacrifices offered is expressed And it came to passe when God helped the Levites that bare the Ark of the covenant of the Lord that they offered seven bullocks and seven rammes And secondly by way of imploring Gods mercy that he would shew them favour in the rest of the way as he had done hitherto The remembrance of that dolefull disaster that befell Uzzah made him the more fearfull and so the more carefull to seek Gods favour Vers 14. And David was girded with a linen ephod That is a linen garment like that of the Priests ephod which doubtlesse he put on not onely that he might be lighter to dance before the ark but also to shew his devotion Vers 17. And they brought in the ark of the Lord and set it in his place in the midst of the tabernacle that David had pitched for it For the tabernacle and altar of burnt-offerings which Moses had made were both still at Gibeon 2. Chron. 1.3 4. So Solomon and all the congregation with him went to the high place that was at Gibeon for there was the tabernacle of the congregation of God which Moses the servant of the Lord had made in the wildernesse But the ark of God had David brought up from Kiriath-jearim to the place which David had prepared for it for he had pitched a tent for it at Jerusalem and 1. Chron. 21.29 For the tabernacle of the Lord which Moses made in the wildernesse and the altar of the burnt-offerings were at that season in the high place at Gibeon At this time David did also deliver to the Levites a Psalme to be sung before the ark as we may see 1. Chron. 16.7 c. Vers 20. Then David returned to blesse his houshold That is to rejoyce with them in private and to worship God with them and to crave a blessing from God on them as he had done on the people How glorious was the king of Israel to day who uncovered himself to day in the eyes of the handmaids of his servants c. That is who forgetting or casting off the respect of his regall dignity both in apparell and behaviour mixed himself with the base multitude dancing and leaping in the open streets as fools will do and vain men when they are hired to make others sport as one of the vain fellows shamelessely uncovereth himself Some conceive that whilest David danced having onely a loose linen garment upon him some part of his bare legs or thighs might be discovered which they judge the more probable because his wife upbraids him that he had uncovered himself in the eyes of the handmaids But I conceive there is no necessity that the discovering his naked skin should be hereby meant but onely that laying by his princely attire he had used light behaviour not beseeming the gravity of a king and had thereby exposed himself to the scorn and contempt of every girl that came to see the pomp of this removall of the ark Vers 21. And David said unto Michal It was before the Lord which chose me before thy father c. Considering how grievous a thing it is to any woman to be upbraided with the faults and miseries of her parents and how farre every husband is bound to bear with the infirmities of his wife as the weaker vessel it may seem that David was somewhat too tart in this reply of his upon his wife for it must needs cut her to the heart to heare her self twitted with the Lords rejecting of her father and his family But indeed David had just cause to be thus sharp not onely because the flouts and insolencies of a wife are most insufferable but also especially because it was his zeal and devotion in the service of God which she derided that it was that chiefly moved his spirit that it should be cast in his teeth as a matter of reproch and disparagement that he had humbled himself so in a way of religion which was indeed a reproching of God Vers 23. Therefore Michal the daughter of Saul had no child unto the day of her death And thus when David came to blesse his house Michal by her sinne brought a curse upon it If she were barren before as indeed we read not of any children she had hitherto yet Davids prayers might have prevailed for this blessing but now because of this wickednesse God adjudged her to perpetuall barrennesse and so she died childlesse CHAP. VII Vers 1. ANd it came to passe when the king sat in his house c. This clause when the king sat in his house is here inserted First to imply though more obscurely what is afterwards more fully expressed to wit that David for the present had rest from warre he sat quietly in his house the Lord had given him rest round about from all his enemies as it follows in the next words and so being freed from former troubles he began to think of further promoting the cause of religion and of building a temple for the ark which he had lately brought to Jerusalem And secondly to intimate what it was that made him think of building a temple to wit that he was come to dwell in that stately house which he had built for himself for the building whereof Hiram had sent him both cedar trees and carpenters and masons chap. 5.11 and so sitting in this his palace he began to think with himself how unreasonable it was that he should dwell in such a stately house and the ark of God should be lodged the whilest in a poore tent or tabernacle for though when the people of Israel removed from one place to another the Lord chose to dwell in a tent which might be removed yet now that Israel had been a long time settled in the land which God had given them it was no longer necessary that Gods dwelling place should be a tent and therefore David conceived that his purpose of building a settled house for God would not be a crossing of that which God himself had ordered in choosing a tent to be his dwelling place Vers 3. And
his grosse sinnes he had given occasion to wicked prophane men whom God esteems his enemies to speak evil of that which God had done for David yea and of all the godly that walked strictly with God as David had done and of all such wayes of piety and zeal as David had hitherto walked in What might they say is this the man after Gods own heart of whom Samuel promised such great matters Did Saul ever commit adultery with another mans wife as he hath done and why then was Saul cast off and he anointed in his room but thus indeed it is with all those that make such a shew of religion and seem so zealous of religion there are none so bad as they this is the fruit of their hearing and praying so much c. Thus wicked and prophane wretches were like to descant upon these sinnes of David and so to blaspheme according to that of the Apostle Rom. 2.24 where having spoke much of the great wickednesse of the Jews he addes For the name of God is blasphemed amongst the Gentiles through you and for this cause the prophet tells David here that the child he had begotten of the wife of Uriah should die Because by this deed thou hast given great occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme the child also that is born unto thee shall surely die For though it were in some regard a benefit both to David and Bathsheba that this child died so did God temper his displeasure with goodnesse for as long as this child had lived it would have been a memoriall of their sinne and shame both to themselves and others yet considering the affection they bare to their child and the manifestation of Gods displeasure therein it was indeed a sharp affliction and caused David a great deal of sorrow Vers 16. David therefore besought God for the child c. For though Nathan had told him that the child should surely die yet he might hope that this was threatned conditionally and that upon his tears and repentance this sentence might be reversed as was afterward that of Hezekiah his death and the destruction of the Ninivites Vers 18. And it came to passe on the seventh day that the child died That is the seventh day after he fell sick or as many take it the seventh day after he was born and if we thus understand the words then the child died before he was circumcised and yet after he was dead David cheared up himself we see not doubting of the childs salvation yea though he was begotâ—en in adultery vers 23. But now he is dead wherefore should I fast Can I bring him back again I shall go to him but he shall not return to me Vers 20. Then David arose from the earth and washed and anointed himself and changed his apparell and came into the house of the Lord and worshipped c. There is a law Num. 10.14 That when one died in a tent all that came into the tent and all that was in the tent should be unclean seven dayes yet David presently after the death of this infant washed himself and went up into the house of God either therefore this law when they came to dwell in houses was understood to extend no further then to the room where the party died not to the whole house or else the child died not in the same house wherein David was but in some other house not farre from Davids pallace Many reasons may be conceived why David his conscience being now awakened was so eager to worship God in his house to wit partly that he might blesse God for calling him to repentance when he lay in such a dangerous condition for giving him assurance by the prophet that his sinne was pardoned and for enabling him to bear with patience the losse of his child and partly that he might further acknowledge and bewail his sinnes before God and pray for mercy in regard of those remaining corrections which God had threatned him with at least that God would strengthen him to bear them and sanctifie them to his good However observable it is that so eager he was upon these duties of Gods worship that though he had fasted all the time the child lay sick yet he would not eat any thing till he had first been in the house of God that is the tabernacle which he had set up for the ark but when once he had been there and had there worshipped the Lord Then as it follows in the next words he came to his own house and when he required they set bread before him and he did eat Vers 24. And David comforted Bathsheba his wife Both concerning the losse of her child and concerning her adultery with David for which it is likely she was also at present much afflicted upon this discovery of the Lords displeasure against them and indeed some Expositours conceive that Bathsheba was so farre troubled about it that she questioned whether she might as yet safely live as a wife with David till he comforted her and satisfied her herein which they gather from the order of the words in this place And David comforted Bathsheba his wife and went in unto her and lay with her And she bare a sonne and called his name Solomon Which signifieth peaceable and it was by expresse direction from God that David gave his new-born sonne this name as is evident 1. Chron. 2â— 9 where David tells Solomon how he had herein received a charge from God Behold a sonne shall be born unto thee who shall be a man of rest and I will give him rest from all his enemies round about for his name shall be Solomon and I will give peace and quietnesse unto Israel where we see the reason of his name is also expressed because of the great peace the Israelites should enjoy under his reigne therefore was his name called Solomon that is peaceable and herein was Solomon a type of Christ who is styled Isaiah 9.6 The Prince of peace and partly because his subjects do even here in this world enjoy peace with God to whom he hath reconciled them by the bloud of his crosse and peace with their own consciences yea and with all the creatures but especially because in heaven they shall enjoy a perfect and solid peace unto all eternity Vers 25. And he sent by the hand of Nathan the prophet and he called his name Jedidiah That is the Lord sent Nathan to David to tell him that his child should be called not Solomon onely but also Jedidiah that is Beloved of the Lord to wit because of Gods singular love to him and thus did the Lord chear David by the same prophet by whom he had humbled him Nathan it was that told him that his former child born of Bathsheba should surely die and by Nathan now the Lord assured him concerning this child that he should be Jedidiah that is The beloved of the Lord and herein also was Solomon a
herdmen of Tekoah c. Now Joab resolved to employ a woman in this plot that he had in hand first because men are most ready to pitie them in their misery and secondly because he thought a woman fittest to counterfeit and dissemble a man he thought would hardly have told a forged tale with such lively expressions of bitter sorrow nor would have been so nimble and ready to make fit replies to any thing that David should say and therefore he determined to have a woman to be his instrument because none can better feigne themselves to be mourners then women can why he pitched particularly upon this woman of Tekoah it is not expressed onely we may guesse that she was a woman singularly famous for her wisdome or happely one of those who were usually hired to mourn at funerals and so being grown famous for her notable artificiall performance of that service was therefore chosen to be the agent in this plot Vers 5. And she answered I am indeed a widow-woman and my husband is dead This she premiseth that thereby she might winne the king the more to commiserate her condition for first being a widdow she was the lesse able to defend her self against those that were risen up against her secondly being under such a heavy weight of sorrow for the losse of her husband any addition of further grief must needs presse her the more sorely and thirdly having lost already the stay and support of a husband she was farre the more unable to bear the losse of her onely sonne too Vers 6. And thy handmaid had two sonnes and they strove together in the field c. In these words she seeks to extenuate the pretended offence of her sonne in killing his brother to wit that he did it in heat of bloud without any premeditated malice being together in the field where there was no body by to part them they fell out and quarrelled and so at last fighting together the one happely being sorely first wronged and provoked killed the other Vers 7. And behold the whole family is risen against thine handmaid c. To wit as knowing that my sonnes inheritance should come to them if he were put to death and indeed to this those following words seem to have relation which she pretends her kindred had spoken and we will destroy the heir also namely that by that means the land may come to us but yet some Expositours do otherwise understand those words to wit that the kindred did thereby imply one chief reason why they desired her surviving sonne should be put to death which was that he by killing his brother might not come to inherite his estate And so they shall quench my coal which is left c. As if she should have said this sonne is the onely comfort that is left me in the world like one poor coal in a heap of ashes so is he left alive in the sad ruines of our family so that by seeking to take away his life they go about wholly to extinguish my husbands name and to leave me destitute of all comfort Vers 9. My lord O king the iniquity be on me and on my fathers house and the king and his throne be guiltlesse Because David might happely scruple whether he should do well to shelter one that had killed his brother upon any pretence whatsoever therefore to remove this scruple she offereth to take the sinne upon herself My lord O king the iniquity be upon me c. there is indeed no weight at all in this kind of pleading for when men are perswaded to do evil if they that perswade them do engage themselves to bear the punishment that they are liable to set consenting to do it they engage themselves for that they cannot make good for God will punish both the one and the other but yet because first there is in this a kind of slattering insinuation which may ingratiate men to those they perswade namely that they had rather the evil if there were any to be feared should fall upon themselves then them and secondly it implies so great a confidence in those that engage themselves that there is indeed no evil like to follow upon it therefore it hath been alwayes a plea usuall with men so Rebecca pleaded with her sonne Jacob when he scrupled the course prescribed him for deceiving his father Gen. 2â— â—2 Upon me be thy curse my sonne onely obey my voice and so the Jews sought to winne Pilate to yeild to the crucifying of Christ Matth. 27.25 His bloud be on us say they and on our children Vers 11. Then said she I pray thee let the king remember the Lord thy God c. That is let the king be pleased to remember that this which thou hast said hath been promised as in Gods presence that thou wilt not suffer the avengers of blood to destroy my sonne and thus she covertly also presseth David to confirm what he had said with an oath as we see thereupon he did And he said As the Lord liveth there shall not one hair of thy sonne fall to the earth indeed nothing the woman had said concerning her supposed sonne that had killed his brother contained any just reason why he should not be put to death for the law of God did expressely enjoyn that all manslayers should be put to death excepting none but those that do it by chance or in their own defence and therefore it is strange that David should undertake so solemnly to secure him from punishment But it seems Davids heart did encline to the saving of his own sonne Absalom who was guiltie of the like offence and by this byas was his heart drawn aside to spare unjustly this widdows sonne too Vers 13. Wherefore then hast thou thought such a thing against the people of God As if she should have said since thou dislikest the violence of the men of my family against me in seeking to deprive me of my sonne because he contending with his brother slew him why then shouldest thou entertain the very like thoughts against the whole people of God which they have entertained against me They would deprive me of my onely comfort and quench my coal that is left even so hast thou sought to deprive Gods people of thy sonne Absalom upon whom their eyes are set as the man that should succeed thee in the throne in whom the light of Israel should be renued when thou art gone and that because he hath slain his brother that had grievously provoked him by ravishing his sister thus Joab by his instrument the widdow of Tekoah sought to perswade David that the people were much grieved and were like indeed to suffer very much severall wayes because Absalom the kings heir for it seems by this that Chileab his second sonne chap. 3.3 was dead also should thus long live as an exile amongst an idolatrous people and so endeavours to convince him that he was blame worthy for this his
Sion and being therefore conscious to themselves of much ingratitude against their sovereigne and fearing withall his just displeasure against them they durst not think of going forth to meet him David therefore by the priests who had stayed all this while in Jerusalem sends them word how ready he was to pardon and forget all that was past Why are you the last to bring the king back to his house and assures them that his affection to them was singular as being his brethren of the same tribe with himself Ye are my brethren ye are my bones and my flesh and acquainting them what he had heard concerning the resolution of the other tribes warns them to take heed that they were not the last in fetching home their king that had cause to be the first and thus was David a notable type of Christ who doth also fetch in rebels to God by proclaiming the tidings of mercy to them the terrours of the Law may scare sinners and make them desire if it were possible to runne away from God but it is the tender of grace in the Gospel that makes them come in and submit themselues Vers 13. And say ye to Amasa Art thou not of my bone and of my flesh c. David doubting that Amasa despairing of the pardon of his offence might draw from him a great part of the strength of Israel now under his command he sent particularly to him both to assure him that he was ready to receive him into his favour again and to give him the respect of a near kinsman for he was indeed his sisters sonne 1. Chron. 2.16 17. and also to proffer him the place of captain of the host the place which Absalom had given him and which Joab now enjoyed and had long since purchased by his valour 1. Chron. 11.6 God do so to me and more also if thou be not captain of the host before me continually in the room of Joab and thus did David seek both to satisfie Amasa and winne him to come in and withall to weaken the excessive power of Joab who had alwayes carried himself too too insolently towards him and had now lately much provoked him both by slaying Absalom against his expresse command and speaking so roughly and rudely to him when he was in heavinesse lamenting his death Vers 14. And he bowed the heart of all the men of Judah even as the heart of one man c. Some understand this of Amasa that upon this promise made to him by David he presently inclined the hearts of all the men of Judah to David so that unanimously they sent to the king their desire that he should return to Jerusalem again and the tender of their fealtie and alleageance to him as in former times but I rather think with others that this is spoken of David and that it is mentioned as the happy effect of this his wise and gentle carriage of himself both towards the men of Judah in generall and Amasa in particular namely that herewith he bowed the heart of all the men of Judah to desire unanimously to settle him again in the throne it might have cost a great deal of bloud to have subdued them by force but by these tenders of grace he bowed their hearts to him even according to his own desire Vers 17. And they went over Jordan before the king That is before the king came over to wit to meet him there on the other side and to fetch him over Vers 20. I am come the first this day of all the house of Joseph to go down to meet my Lord the king It may be justly questioned why Shimei who was of the tribe of Benjamin chap. 16.5 should here say I am come the first this day of all the house of Joseph but to this two answers may be given which have good evidence of reason in them to omit others that are not so satisfactory as these are to wit first that hereby is meant that he was the first of all the tribes of Israel that came to the king as considered apart from the tribe of Judah the Scripture is wont ordinarily to divide the tribes into Judah and Israel and the tribes of Israel so reckoned a part from Judah are usually called Ephraim because that was the chief of those tribes as Esa 7.2 Syria is confederate with Ephraim and the house of Joseph Psal 80.1 Give eare O shepherd of Israel thou that leadest Joseph like a flock and Zach. 10.6 I will strengthen the house of Judah and I will save the house of Joseph and so here in the same regard all the tribes of Israel as distinguished from Judah are comprehended under these words the house of Joseph or secondly that hereby is meant that he was come before any of the house of Joseph I am come the first this day of all the house of Joseph that is I am come before any of the tribes of Israel and because indeed where Judah and Israel or the house of Judah are distinguished in the Scriptures Benjamin is usually reckoned with Judah therefore many Expositours do rather approve of this last resolution of this doubt Vers 22. And David said What have I to do with you ye sonnes of Zeruiah that ye should this day be adversaries unto me That is that you should advise me to that which may prove so exceeding prejudiciall to me my adversaries could not wish me more hurt then this which you advise may bring upon me For do not I know that I am this day king over Israel That is am I not this day reestablished again in my kingdome which I had in a manner lost and would it be convenient to damp the joy of this day with shedding bloud or would it be safe to beat off them that begin now to submit themselves and to endanger my yet unsettled estate by shewing such severitie to him that first stooped and acknowledged his fault and should not Gods mercy in restoring me to my kingdome induce me to shew mercy to others Vers 23. Therefore the king said unto Shimei Thou shalt not die and the king sware unto him Yet at his death he gave Solomon charge to put him to death 1. kings 2.9 his hoar head bring thou down to the grave with bloud as perswading himself happely that therein he should not break his oath first because he sware onely for himself that he would not put him to death I sware to him by the Lord saying I will not put thee to death secondly because he did not as it may seem absolutely enjoyn his sonne to put him to death for this fact but to take some other occasion to do it for so much those words seem to imply which there he useth thou art a wise man and knowest what thou oughtest to do unto him namely that if he watched and observed him well his malice and wickednesse would break forth and give occasion enough in somewhat or other to proceed against him
this way to work the poore Gibeonites could never have escaped his fury no though his intentions were utterly to root them all out of the land yet the way he took to effect it was by picking quarrells severally against them some at one time and some at another that so he might cut them off by degrees and that under a pretence of Justice either by charging them with forged accusations or by aggravating any smaller offence and making it to them capitall or some such other wayes of heavie oppression and thus intending to proceed in this close politick way though he slew many of them as is here expressed yet it seems he was some way taken off before he could accomplish what he had determined however for this cruelty of Sauls against the Gibeonites it was as the Lord here tells David that the famine had been so long upon the land It is for Saul and for his bloudy house because he slew the Gibeonites Indeed considering what an execrable act of cruelty that of Sauls was when he slew fourescore and five of the Priests and utterly destroyed their citie with all that were therein both men and women children and sucklings c. It is strange that Sauls posterity were not called to an account for that cruelty of Sauls against the Priests of the Lord as well as for this against the Gibeonites but for this two reasons may be probably given first that it was to let the Israelites see that God will be avenged for shedding the bloud of the meanest such as the Gibeonites were who were as bondmen and slaves to the Israelites as well as for shedding the bloud of the greatest secondly that it was to let the Jewes see that those of other Nations if they were of the faith of Israel and were once received to be his people were as acceptable to God and as precious in his sight as the Jewes were and thirdly that it was to discover how the Lord abhorres all falsifying of oaths and covenants in that he proceeded with such severity against Sauls posterity because he had done the Gibeonites conrary to what Joshua and the Israelites had covenanted and sworn many hundred years ago so hatefull to God all persidiousnesse is whatsoever pretences are put upon it Vers 2. The Gibeonites were not of the children of Israel but of the remnant of the Amorites c. The Gibeonites were Hivites Josh 9.7 And the men of Israel said unto the Hivites Peradventure ye dwell among us c. But both Hivites and generally all the inhabitants of Canaan are usually in the Scripture called Amorites Gen. 15.16 For the iniquitie of the Amorites is not yet full Ezek. 16.3 Thy Father was an Amorite and thy mother an Hittite Vers 3. Wherefore David said unto the Gibeonites What shall I do for you c. It seems by this that when David enquired of the Lord he did not onely tell him wherefore this famine was sent but also enjoined him to satisfie the Gibeonites for the wrong which had been done them for why else should he allow them to prescribe what should be done And wherewith shall I make the atonement that ye may blesse the inheritance of the Lord That is that ye may pray for the people of God and the land which God hath given them for their inheritance because the Lord had pleaded the cause of the Gibeonites by sending a famine upon the whole land of Israel David looked upon them as men highly favoured of God and therefore was the more desirous that they should pray for them Vers 4. We will have no silver nor gold of Saul nor of his house neither for us shalt thou kill any man in Israel That is save onely of his family that did oppresse us Vers 6. Let seaven men of his sonnes be delivered unto us and we will hang them up unto the Lord c. That is to satisfie his justice and appease his wrath and that others by this example may learn to keep covenant and not to oppresse the stranger that is taken under Gods protection See the note Numb 25.4 Vers 8. But the King tooke the two sonnes of Rizpah c. and the five sonnes of Michal the daughter of Saul whom she brought up for Adriel c. It is certain that not Michal but Merab her elder sister was married to this Adriel the son of Barzillai called the Meholathite because he was of Abel-meholah in the Tribe of Benjamin Judg. 7.22 and to distinguish him from Barzillai the Gileadite chap. 19.31 1. Sam. 18.19 When Merab Sauls daughter should have been given to David she was given to Adriel the Meholathite to wife and that Michal had no children to her dying day 2. Sam. 6.22 Therefore Michal the daughter of Saul had no child unto the day of her death and therefore doubtlesse these five sonnes of Adriel were the children of Merab Michals sister and were onely brought up by Michal as her own she having no children and therefore called her sonnes but are said to be brought up for Adriel her sisters husband Vers 9. And they hanged them in the hil before the Lord. That is in a hill in Gibeah of Saul vers 6. that they might be a spectacle of Gods indignation against Saul for that sinne of his in slaying the Gibeonites and thus did the Lord punish that cruelty of Saul toward the Gibeonites and withall did provide for the setling of the Kingdome upon David and his seed by cutting off the posterity of Saul lest they should be still plotting and practising against them Vers 10. And Rizpah the daughter of Ajah took sackcloth and spread it for her upon the rock c. Rizpah Sauls concubine the mother of two of those that were hanged knowing it seems that the bodies of her sonnes were to hang up till God should testifie that he was appeased by giving them rain again wherein doubtlesse David had speciall direction from the Lord for otherwise it had been against the expresse letter of the Law Deut. 21.23 His body shall not all night remain upon the tree but thou shalt bury him that day That she might defend their bodies both from birds and beasts she resolved to watch them and to that end she took sackcloth and spread it for her upon the rock that is she spread therewith a Tent in the rock next adjoyning the better to defend her from the heat and withall perhaps to testifie her sad and mournfull condition in regard of this shamefull death of her children and so continued watching them untill water dropped upon them out of Heaven till God sent rain upon the land as was desired she that had been Sauls concubine it is likely had servants to have done this but such was the strength of her affection that she could not be satisfied unlesse she did it or saw it done her self Vers 12. And David went and took the bones of Saul c Hearing as it is said in the foregoing verse
oath that Adonijah should presently be put to death he had formerly pardoned him onely upon condition of his loyaltie for the time to come chap 1.52 which having now forfeited by this second attempt even for his former conspiracie it was fit he should die As for the mention that he makes in his oath of Gods establishing him in the throne that was because his assurance that God had placed him in the throne was that which encouraged him to proceed thus against Adonijah he that had set him in the throne he knew would stand by him and defend him herein but however here we see still that verified which Nathan had threatned against David 2. Sam. 12.10 The sword shall never depart from thine house Vers 26. And unto Abiathar the priest said the king Get thee to Anathoth c. He banished him from the court and confined him to his own house in Anathoth which was a city of the priests Josh 21.18 that he might not hereafter attempt any thing against him Vers 27. So Solomon thrust out Abiathar from being priest unto the Lord that he might fulfill the word of the Lord which he spake concerning the house of Eli in Ehiloh For by this means according as God had threatned Eli above fourscore years since 1. Sam. 2.31.35 the high priesthood was transferred from the posterity of Eli who was of the stock of Ithamar to Zadok who was descended of Eleazar And so also that promise made to Phineas the sonne of Eleazar was fulfilled Numb 25.13 And he shall have it and his seed after him even the covenant of an everlasting priesthood because he was zealous for his God and made an atonement for the children of Israel Vers 28. Then tidings came to Joab To wit that Adonijah was slain and Abiathar put from his place For Joab had turned after Adonijah though he turned not after Absalom This clause is inserted first to shew the cause of his fear and danger his siding with Adonijah and secondly to intimate the hand of God in this businesse for how came it to passe that he that had stuck so faithfully to David in the case of Absalom should now take part with Adonijah in his usurpation surely it was that the bloud of Abner and Amasa might fall upon him Vers 30. And he said Nay but I will die here This Joab spake doubtlesse as hoping that by hanging on the altar he should save his life and that they would not there put him to death indeed it is strange that he should so think considering the Law of God was so expresse Exod. 21.15 that he that had slain a man wilfully should be taken from the altar and be put to death but for this we must know that Joab dreamed not now of being put to death for his murthering of Abner and Amasa but onely of his conspiracy with Adonijah in which case he hoped the altar might be a refuge to him Vers 31. And the king said unto him Do as he hath said c. This Solomon enjoyned as conceiving that the Lord who allowed not that the altar should be a shelter to wilfull murderers would not be displeased that Joab should be slain there if he could not be drawn thence yet perhaps Benaiah had before bidden Joab come forth voluntarily out of the tabernacle and so Solomon gave him here a charge onely to draw him thence by force and then to slay him for indeed the words of the Law are Exod. 21.14 that he should be taken from the altar and slain and the same course we see was taken with Athaliah 2. Kings 11.15 have her forth without the ranges and him that followeth kill with the sword for the priest had said Let her not be slain in the house of the Lord. Vers 32. And the Lord shall return his bloud upon his own head who fell upon two men more righteous and better then he c. This Solomon spake as judging that their open insurrections were not so bad as his treacherours shedding innocent bloud as for that clause which he addes and slew them with the sword my father David not knowing of it very observable it is how carefull he was to insert this for the honour of his father Vers 36. Build thee an house in Jerusalem and dwell there and go not forth thence any whither Shimei was not suffered to return to Bahurim to his own countrey but was confined to Jerusalem both to prevent all seditious practises he might otherwise have runne into and also that he might be in Solomons eye in the eye of his servants that if he went away it might be discovered and so an advantage might be taken against him which he waited for as his father had advised him v. 8.9 Vers 37. On the day thou goest out and passest over the brook Kidron c. It is evident in the former verse that he was not to go any way out of Jerusalem yet here his going over the brook Kidron is particularly expressed because that was the way to Bahurim where he formerly dwelt where his inheritance lay 2. Sam. 16.5 Vers 38. And Shimei said unto the king The saying is good c. And withall it seems he took an oath that he would do as Solomon had said as we may see v. 42.43 Vers 40. And Shimei arose and sadled his asse and went to Gath c. Whereby it appears that there was peace at this time betwixt the Israelites and the Philistines It may justly be wondred at that Shimei should for the recovery of his two runaway servants venture to go out of Jerusalem when he knew that his life lay upon it but for this we must consider first that covetousnesse doth ordinarily so besot men that it makes them do that which is most unreasonable secondly that perhaps he was so transported with passion against his servants that either he thought not of his danger or else however could not forbear thirdly that he might flatter himself with vain hopes that doing this secretly it would not be known it was now three years since this charge was given him vers 39. and by this time he might hope that Solomon would not so heedfully mind what he did at first so strictly command he had matters of state of greater importance to intend and therefore going secretly and returning speedily there would be no notice taken of such an outscape as this was and fourthly that there was doubtlesse an over-ruling hand of Gods providence in it that carried him on headlong upon his own ruine that so he might receive his just reward for his base reviling of David the Lords anointed in the time of his affliction Vers 46. And the kingdome was established in the hand of Solomon For the execution of justice upon offenders doth establish kingdomes and besides the faction that opposed Solomon was now destroyed CHAP. III. Vers 1. ANd Solomon made affinitie with Pharaoh king of Egypt and took Pharaohs daughter David had married
valiant man and a man of warre and much more might Solomon use this term of himself when he speaks comparatively with respect to that great charge of governing Gods people which now lay upon him though he were as probably it is thought he was at least twenty years old Vers 12. There was none like thee before thee neither after thee shall any arise like unto thee To wit for wisdome some referre this onely to the kings of Israel namely that there was never any king in Israel either before Solomon or after him that equalled him in wisdome and indeed in the following verse where he is promised riches and honour above all others it is expressely limited to kings And I have also given thee that which thou hast not asked both riches and honour so that there shall not be any among the kings like unto thee but yet if we understand this of naturall wisdome and not of supernaturall wisedome which was reserved as the speciall priviledge of Gods servants in the dayes of the Gospel I see not but that these words may be taken as they are expressed without any such limitation namely that there was never mere man since the fall of Adam like unto Solomon for wisdome which seems the more probable because in the next chapter the comparison is made betwixt him and others that were not kings and of other nations too as well as Israelites vers 30.31 Solomons wisedome excelled the wisedome of all the children of the East country and all the wisedome of Egypt for he was wiser than all men then Ethan the Ezrahite c. and herein was Solomon a notable type of Christ Col. 2.3 in whom are hid all the treasures of wisedome and knowledge Vers 13. So that there shall not be any among the kings like unto thee all thy dayes That is among the kings of Israel there shall be none like thee for riches and honour and in the Chronicles this is more generally expressed namely that he should excell in riches and glory all before him and all after him 2 Chron. 1.12 Vers 15. And Solomon awoke and behold it was a dreame c. That is behold he perceived that God had in a supernaturall dreame appeared unto him and so returnâ—ng thereupon to Jerusalem with his Nobles he there offered many gratulatory sacrifices to God Vers 16. Then came there two women that were harlots unto the King c. The Hebrew word here translated harlots signifieth either victuallers or harlots therfore it may be thought that they were such as did openly professe themselves Victuallers though they were more secretly harlots for it is not so likely that they durst thus have presented themselves before the King if they had beene known to be such as lived so openly in so lewd a course of life that the people might the more reverence Solomon the Lord was pleased by this controversie that was brought before him to let them see what a singular measure of wisedome he had conferred upon him Vers 18. And it came to passe the third day after I was deliver'd that this woman was deliver'd also c. Hereby is shown in part what it was that made the case in question so difficult namely that both children were so neare of an age the one being borne but three dayes after the other and indeed if we adde to this first that the feature of the dead child would be so altered by death that it must needs be hard for those neighbours and friends that had seene it alive to say to which of the women it did belong secondly that no body was by when this fact was done that might bear witnesse on either side thirdly that the mother of the live child confessed she was asleep and so did not see when her child was taken away and fourthly that the parties contending for the child were of equall repute the one deserving no more credit than the other because they were both harlots all these things joyntly considered must needs make the case so difficult that when it came to be brought before the king it may well be it was thought the wit of man could not determine it Vers 20. And she arose at mid-night and tooke my sonne from beside me c. But why should she be willing to keep another womans child I answer women are naturally ashamed of overlaying their children to avoid this disgrace in the heat of her passion she could have beene content to nurse up another child in stead of her owne rather than have it said that by her slothfulnesse and negligence she had beene the death of her owne child CHAP. IIII. Vers 2. ANd these were the Princes which he had That is these were his chiefe Nobles and such as were in highest places about him whilst he sate in the throne of Israel especially in the first beginning of his reigne for though there are two here mentioned to wit the sonne of Abinadab vers 11. and Ahimaaz vers 15. that married the two daughters of Solomon Taphah and Bazmach yet that may be because they did some yeares after marry them for when Solomon came to the crowne we read not of any child he had born but only Rehoboam and much lesse could he have any daughter mariageable Azariah the son of Zadok the priest Azariah the son that is the grand child of Zadok for he was the son of Ahimaaz the son of Zadok 1 Chro. 6.8.9 is here said to have been the priest that is Solomons priest because it seems he was continually imployed for him as our Princes houshold Chaplaines are for them in those things that concerned the worship and service of God Or it may be meant of the son of some other Zadok for the word here translated Priest may also be translated chiefe Officer as is expressed in the margin of our Bibles Vers 3. Elihoreph and Ahiah the sonnes of Shisha Scribes We read but of one Scribe or Secretary of State that David had 2 Sam. 20.25 but Solomon had two which shewes that the dominion and royaltie of Solomons Kingdome was greater than his fathers and so therewith the state affaires must needs increase Jehoshaphat the sonne of Ahilud the Recorder He held therefore the same place still which he had in Davids time 2 Sam. 20.24 Vers 4. And Zadok and Abiathar the Priests That is they were the two chiefe of the two families of the priests according to Davids division 1 Chro. 24.3 4. for Abiathar did not cease to be a priest though he were restrained from the execution of his office and confined to his owne house in Anathoth And besides that he had been the chiefe among them is sufficient to make him be reckoned here amongst those that were in eminent place whether in Church or Common-wealth in the first yeares of Solomons reigne Vers 5. And Azariah the sonne of Nathan was over the officers c. Some conceive that these were the sonnes of Nathan the sonne of
mentioned because hereby the widdow perceived that her sonne was dead for that he was indeed dead and was not onely fallen into a swoun is evident in many following passages as vers 18. and 20. where the widow and the Prophet bemoan that God had slain her sonne and vers 21. where it is said that Eliah prayed My God I pray thee let this childs soul come into him again and then again ver 22. And the soul of the child came into him again and he revived which may also be confirmed by that of the Apostle Heb. 10.35 which many think was written partly with reference to this story Women received their dead raised to life again this being the first we reade of in the Scriptures that being dead was restored again to life Vers 18. And she said unto Elijah What have I to do with thee O thou man of God c. That is wherein have I offended thee or whence is it that thou a holy Prophet of the Lord shouldest come to me a mere stranger to thee thus to punish me for my sinnes wherefore art thou come to me art thou come to call my sinnes to Gods remembrance and so to move him to kill my sonne to what end were our lives saved when we were in danger to perish for want of food if now my sonne must die with sicknesse when God punisheth those for their sinnes whom a while he did forbear he is said in the Scripture to remember their sinnes 1. Sam. 15.2 Now the conscience of this poore widow telling her that the death of her sonne was for her sinnes and therefore apprehending that his dwelling with her had been accidentally through her not profiting by his presence as she ought to have done the occasion of her sonnes death or rather that he had besought God thus to punish her as by his prayer he had brought the drought and famine upon the land or that he was sent as the minister of Gods wrath to take away her sonne from her hence it was that she break forth into this impatient bewailing her losse and her sinnes that had been the cause of it the expression she useth is much like that of Peter when the ship began to sink Luke 5.8 Depart from me for I am a sinfull man O Lord. Vers 20. O Lord my God hast thou also brought evil upon the widow with whom I sojourn by slaying her sonne Herein the Prophet pleads first his own interest in God O Lord my God secondly the condition of the woman a widdow and that because women in that estate are least able to endure the losse of those that should be a stay and support to them and God is wont to be very compassionately tender over them and thirdly the interest she had in him because he sojourned with her as grieving that the woman that had harboured him so long and for whose preservation God had wrought so great a miracle should now have all her joy dashed with such a sad losse or that it should be said by any that it had been well for her if the Prophet had never come into her house Vers 21. And he stretched himself upon the child three times and cried unto the Lord c. The meaning of this is either that he stretched himself upon the child and so in that posture of body prayed and then left off again doing this three severall times or else rather that he stretched himself upon the child and then went and prayed unto the Lord and so did by turns three severall times however doubtlesse his stretching himself upon the child was partly that feeling the coldnesse of the childs body he might be stirred up thereby to pray the more earnestly for him and partly that he might perceive when heat and life begun to come into the child and partly also thereby to expresse his exceeding grief for the death of the child and his earnest desire that God would be pleased to restore him to life there being an intimation in this gesture of his that he could have been glad to infuse of his own life into the child and that to move the Lord the rather to heare his prayer and grant his request the like we reade of Elisha 2. Kings 4.34 and of Paul to Eutichus Acts 20.10 Vers 24. And the woman said to Elijah Now by this I know thou art a man of God c. That is now her faith was strengthened concerning this she had called him a man of God vers 18. yet perhaps her faith was shaken with the death of her child and now with this miracle it was strengthened again CHAP. XVIII Vers 1. THe word of the Lord came to Elijah in the third yeare Elijah was sent to Ahab not long before the Lord sent rain again upon the earth so that from the first begining of the drought unto this time when the Prophet was sent to Ahab it was well nigh three yeares and six moneths complete for so long rain was with-held Luk. 4.25 either therefore the third yeare here spoken of must be the third yeare from his first hiding of himself chap. 17.3 or the third yeare since he went to sojourne with the widdow of Zarephath chap. 17.6 or else the third complete yeare since the time they began to want rain the six odd moneths not being reckoned as indeed it is usuall in the Scripture in noting times to set down onely the full complete yeares and not to mention the odd moneths or dayes Go shew thy self unto Ahab and I will send rain upon the earth Though the Israelites continued in their idolatry still yet the Lord determined to take off that judgement of want of rain that now for three years and a half had been upon them and this he did partly for his righteous servants sake that were still in the land who could not but suffer much in this common calamitie and partly because the Lord intended by Elijah to bring Baals prophets to be slain by the people and so thereupon to remove the judgement he had brought upon the kingdome and so now Elijah was sent to give notice they should have rain and so that which he said to Ahab might be made good to wit that there should be no rain but according to his word yea and withall doubtlesse God gave him now in charge though it be not here exprest what he afterwards did concerning the challenge he made to Baals prophets as is evident by that which he saith vers 36. Lord God of Abraham Isaac and Israel let it be known this day that thou art God in Israel and that I am thy servant and that I have done all these things at thy word Vers 3. Obadiah feared the Lord greatly But how could this be if he went not up to Jerusalem to sacrifice I answer so long as he did sincerely feare God and yielded him that spirituall service which was required of him and kept himself pure from the idolatry of the place
Ahabs pallace others that it was a custome or statute at this time amongst the Israelites that the goods and lands of them that were put to death for any capitall offence against the king were escheated to the crown or at least that in this particular the judges had so determined and indeed why might they not in this disregard the direction of Gods law as well as in putting his sonnes to death however if they would enter upon the vineyard who durst now oppose it which might be the onely ground why with such confidence she appoints her husband to go and take possession of Naboths vineyard Vers 18. Arise go down to meet Ahab king of Israel which is in Samaria c. That is who reignes in Samaria for in the next words it is said that he was now in Naboths vineyard which was in Jezreel vers 1. or secondly though indeed he was at present in Naboths vineyard when God spake to Elijah yet he might be appointed to meet him in Samaria because he was presently to return thither or rather thirdly this clause which is in Samaria hath reference to the word Israel because the subjects of the kings of Judah were also Israelites therefore by way of distinction Ahab is called king of Israel which is in Samaria that is in the kingdome of Samaria Veas 19. Thus saith the Lord Hast thou killed and also taken possession Much evil is charged upon Ahab in these few words namely First his unjust seising upon the goods of his subjects Secondly his desperate accomplishing his desires herein by the bloudshed and murther of the owner And thirdly that after he had taken away his life he was so farre from relenting for what he had done that as rejoycing in the successe of his project he had gone and taken possession of the vineyard of Naboth nor need it seem strange that what was plotted and acted by Jezebel should be laid to Ahabs charge First because the originall of all was from his coveting of the vineyard And secondly because where the wife doth any evil with the allowance or connivance of her husband the husband is there guilty as well as the wife In the place where dogs licked the bloud of Naboth shall dogs lick thy blood even thine This was partly accomplished in that as in the high way in Jezreel where Naboth was stoned the dogs licked Naboths bloud so also the dogs licked Ahabs bloud in the poole of Samaria Chap. 22.38 And one washed his chariot in the poole of Samaria and the dogs licked up his bloud c. And indeed the words seem principally to intend the licking of Ahabs bloud in particular thine even thine But secondly it was partly also accomplished in the dogs licking of the bloud of Joram Ahabs sonne whose dead body was cast out in that very plat of ground where Naboth was stoned and that to fulfill this prophesie 2. Kings 9.25 26. Then said Jehu to Bidkar his captain Take up and cast him in the portion of the field of Naboth the Jezreelite for remember how that when I and thou rode together after Ahab his father the Lord laid this burden upon him Surely I have seen the bloud of Naboth and the bloud of his sonnes said the Lord and I will requite thee in this plaâ—â— where also we may see that Elijah did openly deliver this message to Ahab which now God gave him in charge his servants and courtiers being about him Vers 20. And Ahab said to Elijah Hast thou found me O mine enemie The last time Elijah had been with Ahab he ranne before Ahabs chariot and all seemed then to be peace betwixt them but now hearing Elijah threaten him so he brake out Hast thou found me O mine enemy that is can I never be quiet for thee but thou must audaciously hunt me out It was a wonder that I have been so long ridde of thy threatnings but thy hatred of me will not suffer thee to let me be in peace long for now again thou art come after the old manner denouncing judgements against me Thou hast sold thy self to work evil in the sight of the Lord. That is thou hast wholly yielded up thy self to the devil to do onely that which is evil in his sight notwithstanding thou canst not but know that all thou doest is done in the sight of the Lord for as bondslaves that sell themselves do voluntarily give up themselves to be wholly in the power of their masters that buy them so those that yield themselves to be slaves to sinne and under the bondage of the devil all their counsel words and endeavours are voluntarily still for sinne neither can they ridde themselves of this slavery though sometimes they feel the inconvenience of it and indeed herein lies the chief difference between the bondage of the righteous under sinne and the bondage of the wicked the righteous are sold under sinne as Paul saith of them Rom. 7.14 I am sold under sinne they are tyrannically overruled by sinne though they strive against it but now wicked men do sell themselves to do evil and this doubtlesse is the principall thing for which Ahab is here said to be sold to work evil as the like phrase is in the same sence used concerning the Israelites 2. kings 17.17 to wit that they sold themselves to work evil in the sight of the Lord to provoke him to anger but yet withall it may be meant of the slavery he was kept in by his wife Jezebel that to injoy her love and favour and to keep her in peace with him he had given up himself as a servant to be at her command not daring to refuse the doing of any evil which she would have done and therefore these two are joyned together vers 25. Ahab did sell himself to work wickednesse whom Jezebel his wife stirred up Vers 21. And will cut off from Ahab him that pisseth against the wall c. See chap. 14.10 Vers 27. He rent his clothes and put sackcloth upon his flesh and fasted and lay in sackcloth and went foftly That is slowly and heavily as sorrowfull men and mourners use to do thus wicked Ahab humbled himself but it was merely for fear of the vengeance threatned not because he truely repented of the sinnes he had committed whence it was also that this humiliation of his was not available for the pardon of his sinne but onely procured a proroging of the chief evils threatned to the dayes of his sonne Joram vers 29. a temporary reward of a temporary penitence and that chiefly to let us see how assuredly true penitents may expect much more from God since the slavish humiliation of Ahab was thus farre regarded CHAP. XXII Vers 2. JEhoshaphat the king of Judah came down to the king of Israel Since the first revolt of the ten tribes under Jeroboam from the kingdome of Judah there had been continuall warres betwixt the kings of Judah and Israel but when Jehoshaphat
Elisha had afforded the kings in their distresse chap. 3.16 c. had brought him into great credit at court And she answered I dwell among my own people In this answer is implyed that she needed not his help in this kind as intimating First that she lived contentedly and was not ambitious of any better condition then that she enjoyed in a private quiet life amongst her own neighbours Secondly that she lived peaceably not having occasion to complain or seek relief from higher powers not amongst enemies but neighbours and friends in a mean condition nor so high as to be envied nor so low as to be trodden on Thirdly that if she should have occasion to seek help she could not want friends that would do what one man may do for another yet afterward it was well she found a friend in court chap. 8.3 4. to wit when Gehazi obtained that her land should be restored to her Vers 14. And he said What then is to be done for her That is when Gehazi brought back to Elisha this answer of the Shunamites he asked Gehazi what else then there was wherein they might gratifie her wherein also it is well worth the noting that though Elisha were so great a prophet yet he would vouchsafe thus to consult and advise with his servant Vers 15. And when he had called her she stood in the doore To wit as out of modesty she would not presently rush into the prophets chamber though it were in her own house but stood at the doore till either he should come out to her or call for her in Vers 16. And he said About this season according to the time of life thou shalt embrace a sonne This phrase thou shalt embrace a sonne implyed not onely the birth of the child but also the safety of the child and mother the time is expressed much in the same words as in the promise that was made to Abraham concerning the birth of Isaac Gen. 18.10 of which see the note there Nay my lord thou man of God do not lie unto thine handmaid As if she had said O that God would grant that it might be so but my lord thou man of God do not deceive thy handmaid with vain hopes she knew well that the holinesse of the prophet could not stand with wilfull lying yet perhaps she might feare it was spoken for tryall onely and therefore as being divided betwixt hope and feare she desires to be satisfied whether she might assure her self of what he had promised for so it is expressed vers 28. Then she said did I desire a sonne of my lord did I not say Do not deceive me Vers 21. And she went up and laid him on the bed of the man of God c. All this she did either as hoping the child might be restored to life by being laid upon the prophets bed or rather thereby to hide this occasion of grief from her husband and family lest they should hinder her in her intended designe of going to the prophet as confidently hoping by the prayers of that prophet on whose bed she had laid her dead child to receive him restored to life again and perhaps the rather because she had heard how Elijah had restored to life a widows dead child 1. Kings 17.21 Vers 23. And he said Wherefore wilt thou go to him to day it is neither new moon nor sabbath c. This he saith because on those dayes they did usually go to the prophets to be instructed and seldome at other times which made him wonder why she should desire to go now and hereupon she answered It shall be well as if she had said do not trouble your self my journey doubtlesse shall be for good and therefore I pray give way to it Vers 26. Run now I pray thee to meet her and say unto her Is it well with thee Because she came in such haste at an unusuall time he feared something was amisse with her Is it well with the child and she answered It is well This she spake as it were to cut off her speech with Gehazi and as hastening to speak with Elisha himself and withall happely as perswading her self that this which God had done would be for good Vers 27. And when she came to the man of God to the hill she caught him by the feet Transported with the vehemency of her passion she fell down upon the ground and cast her arms about his leggs thereby expressing both first the reverent respect she bare to him as the disciples did when they cast their arms about Christs feet Matth. 28.9 secondly the unsupportablenesse of her sorrow and thirdly the vehemency of her desire to obtain help by his means in whom all her refuge and hope was and that she was resolved not to leave him till he had satisfied her desire as she expresses her self afterward vers 30. As the Lord liveth and as thy soule liveth I will not leave thee But Gehazi came near to thrust her away As apprehending that this uncouth carriage of her self towards the prophet was neither seemly for her nor him Vers 28. Then she said Did I desire a sonne of my lord did I not say Do not deceive me That is why was a sonne given us of thy own motion when I asked no such thing yea when I desired that thou wouldest not deceive me with vain hopes if now my misery must be greater by losing him then it would have been by remaining childlesse had I offended by too violent desire of a child I might have judged that to have been the cause why my child is now again taken away but being given freely without any request of mine why am I now so soon deprived of him Vers 29. Then he said to Gehazi Gird up thy loynes c. As they used to do in those countreys where they used long garments when they meant to make hast and for the same cause he is enjoyned not to stay to salute any body by the way Some think the cause of this enjoyned haste was to prevent Gehazies vain-glorious imparting of the businesse he was sent about to any body he should meet with by the way which might have proved a hinderance to the working of the miracle but that which others say is farre more probable namely that it was onely to make sure that the child might be restored to life before his death came to be known in the family that so the fathers grief might be prevented and the miracle withall might be concealed Vers 30. And the mother of the child said As the Lord liveth and as thy soul liveth I will not leave thee Though she did not oppose nor distrust altogether the course which Elisha had taken for the raising of the child for had she not given Gehazi the key of the prophets chamber wherein she had locked up the dead child vers 21. how could he have come at him to lay the prophets staffe upon his face yet as
questioning and doubting whether this means would be effectuall or no and therefore desiring that he would go along with her she resolves confidently that she will not return without him Vers 31. And laid the staffe upon the face of the child but there was neither voice nor hearing c. Some ascribe this to want of faith both in Gehazi and the mother others think that Elisha gave that direction for the laying of his staffe upon the face of the child without any speciall direction or promise from the spirit of God onely because he had at other times wrought miracles with this staffe but rather I think it is to be ascribed to the change of Elisha his purpose had he not yielded to have gone himself perhaps the staffe might have been effectuall now the Lord was pleased to withhold his power and help till the prophet came Vers 34. And he went up and lay upon the child c He applyed his body to the body of the child so farre as it could be done in two bodies of such disproportion See the note 1 Kings 17.21 Vers 35. Then he returned and walked in the house to and fro c. Why he rose up from lying upon the child to walk to and fro and then went and lay upon the child again it is hard to say it is said that perhaps he was wearied with lying in that manner as he did upon the child or that perceiving the flesh of the child to wax warm as in the foregoing verse it is said it did the joy thereof did make him rise up and fetch a turn and then presently he lay down upon the child again But I rather conceive all this proceeded from the exceeding vehemency and intention of his desires in seeking to God for the reviving of the child it being usuall with those that are so transported with strong desires to be thus various in their actions and sometime to be in one posture and sometime in another as finding no rest in themselves till their desires be satisfied And the child opened his eyes Which was a signe that the child was perfectly restored to life and thus as in other miracles so in this God was pleased to make it manifest that the spirit of Elijah rested upon Elisha as his successour by enabling him to do the same kind of wonders that the other had done Elijah divided Jordan with his mantle 2 Kings 2.8 so did Elisha too verse 14. Elijah multiplyed the widow of Zarephaths oyle 1 Kings 17.14 and Elisha did as much for a poore prophets widow vers 2 c. of this chapter Elijah brought rain from heaven after a time of great drought 1. Kings 18.41 and Elisha supplyed three kings and their armies with water when they were ready to perish with drought 2 Kings 3.16 17. Elijah cursed the captains and their fifties that came to apprehend him and they were presently destroyed with fire from heaven 2 Kings 1.10 And Elisha cursed the children that reproched and mocked him and they were presently torn in pieces by two she beares chapter â— 24 and so now here Elisha raised from death the Shunamites sonne as Elijah had raised the Sareptans sonne before 1 Kings 17.21 22. Vers 33. And Elisha came to Gilgal and there was a dearth in the land c. To wit to visit the Colledge of the prophets which was in this citie and that the rather to encourage and comfort them because of the dearth that was now in the land and therefore it is said in the next clause and the sonnes of the prophets were sitting before him to wit to be instructed by him as Paul used to sit at the feet of Gamaliel Acts 22.3 which is perhaps the rather added to intimate that it was by Elishaes meanes that the society of the prophets was not dissolved but holy exercises were continued amongst them notwithstanding the famine Vers 39. And one went out into the field to gather herbs and found a wild vine and gathered thereof wild gourds c. That is going forth to gather herbs for the pottage he lighted upon this wild vine and not knowing it yet gathered thereof now it is generally thought that this was Coloquintida a plant that growes in fields and hedg-rowes somewhat like a vine the gourds that is the leaves and branches whereof are bitter and poysonous Vers 40. They cryed out and said O thou man of God there is death in the pot As fearing by their bitter and unsavoury rast there had been poyson in the pottage Vers 42. And there came a man from Baal-shalisha and brought the man of God bread of the first fruits c. The first fruits by the law were to be given to the priests Numbers 18.12 but the priests were now driven away from the ten tribes ever since Jeroboam had set up his golden Calves and forbidden the people to go up to the temple at Jerusalem 2. Chron. 11.14 and therefore this good man brought these twenty loaves of the first fruits c. to Elisha and the prophets who instructed the people instead of the priests and that the rather out of a care to supply their necessities in this great dearth that was now in the land CHAP. V. Vers 5. GO and I will send a letter unto the king of Israel Which was Jehoram the sonne of Ahab chap. 3.1 Vers 6. I have therewith sent Naaman my servant to thee that thou mayest recover him of his leprosie That is that thou mayest cause him to be recovered of his leprosie for what any prophet in Israel could do he doubted not but that the king might command Vers 7. He rent his clothes and said Am I a God to kill and to make alive c. His words shew what was the cause of his griefe namely the feare that Ben-hadad the king of Syria the old enemy of Israel sought in this to pick a quarrell that he might invade the land yet likely enough it is that to cover this he pretended the blasphemy of requiring that of him which was the onely proper work of God and in the meane season never thought of what Elisha could do Vers 8. Wherefore hast thou rent thy clothes And thus Elisha covertly taxed the king for so little regarding the miracles which Elisha had wrought that now he never entertained a thought of consulting with him and gave him to understand that even the Syrians should know that there was a prophet in Israel though he and his courtiers would take no notice of him Let him come now to me saith he and he shall know there is a prophet in Israel Vers 10. And Elisha sent a messenger unto him saying Go and wash in Jordan seven times c. Not going out to him First that the miracle might be the more remarkable the prophet doing no more but send him a message that he should go and wash in Jordan and he should be clean Secondly that Naaman might the more plainly see that he did
had kept himself out of the storm with Baalis king of the Ammonites Jer. 40.14 and being of the kings seed he now envied that the government should be committed to Gedaliah and stirred up also by the king of Ammon he made a conspiracy with some few more to slay Gedaliah this Johanan mentioned above vers 23. discovered to Gedaliah and offered his help to slay Ishmael Jer. 40.13 14. but Gedaliah being incredulous Ishmael had the better advantage to effect his purpose for whilest he was feasting with him he slew him and those that were with him Jer. 41.1 2 3. Ishmael the sonne of Nethaniah of the seed royall and ten men with him came to Gedaliah and they did eat bread in Mizpah together and Ishmael arose and ten men with him and smote Gedaliah the governour and all the Jews that were with him c. after this fourescore men coming from severall places of the kingdome in a most sad and mournfull manner because of the desolation that was fallen upon Jerusalem having certain offerings and incense with them which they purposed to offer to the Lord in the place where the Temple had stood the place which God had chosen though now ruined by the Chaldeans Ishmael having notice of it went forth to meet them and with counterfeit tears making shew that he also bare a part with them in their sorrow he invited them to go with him to Gedaliah thereby to try how they stood affected to him and so having gotten them into the city he slew them all ten of them onely excepted whom he spared because they promised to discover unto him some treasures hidden in the fields during the warres he also addressed himself presently to return to the Amonites and carried with him as captives all the inhabitants of that place and amongst the rest Zedekiahs daughters committed to the care of Gedaliah by Nebuchadnezzer but Johanan hearing of it with such forces as he could get pursued him presently and overtaking him at Gibeon the captives fell off him and Ishmael with eight men onely escaped by flight all which is largely related in the 40. and 41. chapter Vers 26. And all the people both small and great and the captains of the armies arose and came to Egypt c. Fearing the Babylonian would take occasion upon the murder of Gedaliah and the Chaldeans that were with him utterly to destroy all the Jewes that remained in the land Johanan and the other captains resolved to fly with the people that were left into Egypt first indeed they came to Jeremiah and asked counsel of him vowing to do as he should direct them from the Lord but when he answered them that if they stayed in the land God would shew them mercy but if they went down into Egypt they should all perish there they charged him with prophesying falsely in the name of the Lord and despising the oracle of God they went away to Egypt and carried both Jeremiah and Baruch along with them and inhabited near unto Taphnes where when Jeremiah continued to reprove them for their idolatry and to foretell the destruction of Egypt and of the Jews that sought to shelter themselves there for this with all before mentioned is largely related by Ieremiah in the 41 42 43 and 44. chapters of his prophesie he was at length there as other histories report stoned to death by his own ungratefull countrey-men Vers 27. And it came to passe in the seven and thirtieth yeare of the captivity of Jehoiachin c. Zedekiah died in prison in Babylon Jer. 52.11 Then he put out the eyes of Zedekiah and the king of Babylon bound him in chains and carried him to Babylon and put him in prison till the day of his death and had onely the honour of being buried as a prince and lamented at his buriall by his people Jer. 34.5 But thou shalt die in peace and with the buryings of thy fathers the former kings which were before thee so shall they burn odours for thee and they will lament thee saying Ah Lord for I have pronounced the word saith the Lord. But Jehoiachin because he yielded himself at Jeremiahs counsel to Nebuchadnezzer was at length by Evilmerodach the sonne of Nebuchadnezzer taken out of prison and used with all princely respect indeed whereas here it is said this was done on the seven and twentieth day of the twelfth moneth Jerem. 52.31 it is said to have been done on the five and twentieth day but the reason of this may be because order was given for his release on the five and twentieth day but it was not done till the seven and twentieth day as is here said ANNOTATIONS Upon the first book of the CHRONICLES CHAP. I. ADam Sheth Enosh c. In the book of the kings there is frequent mention of the book of the Chronicles of the kings of Israel and of the kings of Judah as 1. Kings 14.19 and 1. Kings 15.23 and in many other places But it is clear that these books of the Chronicles which are a part of the sacred Scriptures are not the very same that are there mentioned because many things which are there said to have been related are not here to be found as we see 1. Kings 14.19 Yet these were happely collected out of those and that by Ezra as it is generally thought Their chief scope is to give us the history of the kings of Judah entirely by it self without intermingling the story of the kings of Israel as it is in the books of the kings and especially to adde such remarkable passages concerning Judahs kingdome as were omitted in the books of the kings whence they are called by the Greek Interpreters Paralipomena that is passages formerly passed by and omitted In the first foure verses we have the line of Adam to Noah no other of the posterity of Adam being mentioned because they were all destroyed in the floud Vers 5. The sonnes of Japheth Gomer c. See Gen. 10.1 Vers 10. And Cush begat Nimrod he began to be mighty upon the earth See Gen. 10.8 Vers 18. And Arphaxad begat Shelah The Septuagint in their Greek translation of the old Testament do both here and also Gen. 10.14 insert one generation more then is in the Hebrew reading the text thus And Arphaxad begat Cainan and Cainan begat Shelah And yet herein according to our translation Luke the Evangelist followeth the corrupt Septuagint translation rather then the Hebrew copies Luke 3.35 36. making Salah or Shelah the sonne of Cainan and Cainan the sonne of Arphaxad Now to this it is answered that the Evangelist did this because the Septuagint translation was then of great esteem and of most frequent use amongst the Jews and therefore he would not for so small a matter and of no importance minister any occasion of contention it being sufficient for him to shew that Christ was the sonne of David even according to the genealogy of David set down by the Septuagint which in
32. Also we made ordinances for us to charge our selves yearely with the third part of a shekel for the service of the house of our God Vers 7. For the sonnes of Athaliah that wicked woman had broken up the house of God c. To promote the worship of Baalim they robbed the Temple and so there was not in the treasuries of the Temple any competent summe of money whereby the decayes thereof might be repaired Indeed the sonnes of Joram by Athaliah were all slain by the Arabians save onely Ahaziah chap. 21.17 But this might be done before that Vers 8. And at the kings commandment they made a chest The Levites being forbidden by Joash to meddle any more with the collection of the money because of their former neglect 2. Kings 12.7 And set it without the gate of the house of the Lord. To wit by the gate whereby they went out of the great court and on that side the gate where the altar stood 2. Kings 12.9 Vers 14. They brought the rest of the money before the king and Jehoiada whereof were made vessels for the house of the Lord c. See 2. Kings 12.13 Vers 16. And they buried him in the citie of David amongst the kings because he had done good in Israel both towards God and towards his house That is the house and family of David or rather the Temple the house of God Vers 17. Now after the death of Jehoiada came the princes of Judah and made obeysance to the king c. In the most fawning and flattering manner they presented themselves before him and withall petitioned him that every one might worship God as they pleased themselves namely in the high places after the manner of their fathers to wit because it was burthensome to go up from all places to the Temple or because every one desired to have his own proper place of devotion Now this request is implyed though not expressed in the following words then the king hearkned to them and they left the house of the Lord God of their fathers Vers 18. And wrath came upon Judah and Jerusalem for this their trespasse For Hazael king of Syria as it is related 2. Kings 12.17 invaded the land and having taken Gath addressed himself to Jerusalem having sufficient pretence for what he did if his ambition cared for pretence because the kings of Judah had formerly assisted the Israelites against the Syrians at Ramoth Gilead and so formidable to Joash was this approch of Hazael towards Jerusalem that he took all the hallowed things and all the gold that was found in the treasures of the Temple and in his own house and with that present purchased his peace Some conceive that this invasion of Hazael mentioned in the Kings is the same with that inrode of the Syrians spoken of vers 23. of this chapter but that cannot be for this was before the slaying of Zachariah vers 20. that after it vers 23. in this the matter was compounded without a battel in that a battel was fought to Joash his great losse vers 24. in this Hazael was present 2. Kings 12.11 in that the Syrians sent the spoil they took to their king at Damascus vers 23. And last of all in this the Syrians had great forces else Joash would not have been afraid of them in that they came with a small band of men vers 24. Vers 20. And the spirit of God came upon Zechariah the sonne of Jehoiada the priest c. It is a great question amongst Expositours whether this were that Zechariah of whom our Saviour spake Matth. 23.35 From the bloud of righteous Abel unto the bloud of Zacharias sonne of Barachias whom ye slew c. Most conceive it is and that because this Zechariah was slain by the Jews and that as is expressed in the following verse in the court of the house Lord nor do we reade in Scripture of any other Zechariah that was so slain for though this was the sonne of Jehoiada and that Zachariah of whom Christ speaks is expressely called there the sonne of Barachias yet to this it may be answered that Jehoiada was so called Barachias or that he is called Barachias which signifies the blessed of the Lord because he was in his time such a blessed instrument of so much good to the people of God and it may well be the drift of Christs words to shew that the bloud of all that were long ago slain should be charged upon that generation and so in that regard this Zechariah is joyned there with Abel But now others hold that it is not this Zechariah of whom our Saviour speaks there but that Zachariah which is last but one of the small Prophets that was raised up of God to encourage the people that were come back from Babylon to rebuild the Temple And indeed first because that Zachariah is expressely called the sonne of Barachiah Zach. 1.1 as it were purposely to distinguish him from this Zechariah the sonne of Jehoiada And secondly because the words of our Saviour seem rather to imply that all the bloud of Gods righteous servants slain in former times from the first to the last should be charged upon them and so Abel is mentioned as the first and Zachariah as the last I cannot see but that very probably it may be understood of that Zachariah and that he after the reedifying of the Temple flying to the altar for Sanctuary when the Jews were for some cause enraged against him was there slain as our Saviour saith between the Temple and the altar Vers 25. For they left him in great diseases To wit by reason of wounds received in the fight or some exquisite tortures which happely the Syrians had put him to His own servants conspired against him for the bloud of the sonnes of Jehoiada the priest c. Hereby it may appear that having slain Zechariah they slew also his brethren the sonnes of Jehoiada perhaps lest they should avenge his death yet some conceive that the plurall number is put for the singular sonnes for sonne as it is also in many other places CHAP. XXV Vers 1. AMaziah was twenty and five years old when he began to reigne c. To wit in the second yeare of Joash king of Israel See the notes for this chapter 2. Kings 14.1 c. Vers 13. But the souldiers of the army which Amaziah sent back that they should not go with him to battel fell upon the cities of Judah from Samaria even unto Beth-horon Beth-horon was one of the cities of Ephraim Josh 15.3 but because some of the Israelites cities had been taken by the kings of Judah in the warres betwixt those two kingdomes therefore it is here said that in their return from Samaria they fell upon the cities of Judah from Samaria to Beth-horon Vers 23. And Joash the king of Israel took Amaziah king of Judah the sonne of Joash the sonne of Jehoahaz c. That is the sonne of Ahaziah