Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
death_n	charles_n	great_a	king_n	4,015	5	3.8638	3	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A66946	A vindication of the historiographer of the University of Oxford, and his works from the reproaches of the Lord Bishop of Salisbury, in his letter to the Lord Bishop of Coventry and Litchfield, concerning a book lately published, called, A specimen of some errors and defects in the history of the reformation of the Church of England, by Anthony Hurmer, written by E.D. ; to which is added the historiographer's answer to certain animadversions made in the before-mention'd History of the Reformation, to that part of Histroia & antiquitates Universitatis Oxon, which treats of the divorce of Queen Catherine from King Henry the Eighth.	Wood, Thomas, 1661-1722.; E. D.	1693 (1693)	Wing W3412; ESTC R22497	12,326	32

of Creature who when for their Snarling and Barking a Stone or a Stick is thrown at them they turn Tail to him that threw it and fall with Teeth and Grins upon the poor Instrument of Correction With Reverence be it spoken there is a great likeness in the present Case Mr. Harmer being a little offended with the Noise made by the Writer of The History of Reformation thought fit to cast at him a passage out of Athenae Oxon. Vol. 2. p. 625. Upon this the Author of that History turns away from the Objecter and falls upon the Book so Objected to him with so much Fury that if the Book had been burned it had been better used But pray where 's the Ingenuity of this Method of Defence Would any Court of Equity allow that when a Person stands Convicted of a Crime by this or that Evidence he shall not insist upon disproof of the Testimony but fall upon the Witness and call him Fool and Knave because he dared to prove him guilty If the Writer of this Vindication had treated Mr. Harmer with some Scorn and Contempt it had not affrighted him nor deterr'd him from enquiring further into the truth of things And therefore it seems when he foresaw his Scorn and Contempt would be thrown away upon the said Mr. Harmer he was resolv'd to cast it all upon the By-stander the Author of Athenae Oxen. And it was wisely done not to provoke the Man that wore the Sword but to turn the Affront upon the Naked Passenger And he has effectually done it upon one who can digest a Rude thing and equally neglect Greatness and Passion The next matter that his Lordship of Salisbury takes notice of is His Barbarous attacking the Memory of his Predecessor Bishop Ward who was in so many respects one of the greatest Men of his Age c. What his Lordship means by Barbarous attacking is no doubt in his sense Abusing or Reporting False things of him If so then let the Reader know that what is said being taken from Register and Observation is as clear as the Sun at Noon But I see Truth must not be spoke at all times Had his Lordship known Dr. Ward before His Majesties Restauration he would have been of another Mind but his knowledg of him was not I presume till after he was a Bishop when then and to the time of his Death he was esteemed a Good and Excellent Man The Truth is he was a Man of Parts and a great Royalist for a time but when he saw that King Charles the First was beheaded and Monarchy never in a possibility of returning again then did he change his Orthodox Principles submit to the Men then in power and Eat the Bread of Two Royalists that had been Ejected successively And tho' his Friends say that he never took the Oath cal●ed the Engagement yet it appears that he did so in the Register belonging to the Committee for the Reformation of the University of Oxon as I was many Years since informed by the Clerk belonging to that Committee What his Life and Conversation was while he Lived in Oxon the poor Remnant of the Royalists that then remained there would have told you who usually said That had not Dr. Ward degenerated from their Principles of Loyalty he would not have lashed out into several Immoralities c. for the doing of which he also lost the Opinion that the then Saints in the University had of him And now to conclude I shall leave with you the Character of the Author of the Athenae Oxon. which is at the end of the Epistle to the Reader of which but few were Printed set before the First Volume of the said Athenae running thus The Reader is desired to know that this Herculean Labour had been more proper for a Head or Fellow of a College or for a Publick Professor or Officer of the most Noble University of Oxon to have undertaken than the Author who never enjoyed any Place or Office therein or can justly say that he hath Eaten the Bread of any Founder Also that it had been a great deal more fit for one who pretends to be a Virtuoso and to know all Men and all things that are Transacted Or for one who frequents much Society where the Characters of Men and their Works are frequently discussed but the Author alas is so far from frequenting such Company that he is as 't were Dead to the World and utterly unknown in Person to the generality of Scholars in Oxon. He is likewise so great an Admirer of a Solitary and Retired Life that he frequents no Assemblies of the said University hath no Companion in Bed or at Board in his Studies Walks or Journeys nor holds Communication with any unless with some and those very few of Generous and Noble Spirits that have in some measure been promoters and encouragers of this Work And indeed all things considered he is but a degree different from an Ascetick as spending all or most of his time whether by Day or Night in Reading Writing or Divine Contemplation However he presumes that the less his Company and Acquaintance is the more Impartial his Endeavours will appear to the Ingenious and Learned to whose Judgments only he submits them and himself To which I shall add what I know besides of the same Author viz. That he did never in heat and forwardness meddle with a Subject to which he was not prepar'd by Education and a due Method of Studies That he never Wrote to oblige a Rising Party or to insinuate into the disposers of Preferment but has been content with his Station and aimed at no end but Truth That he never took up with the Transcript of Records where the Originals might be consulted Nor made use of others Eyes when his own could serve That he never Wrote in Post with his Body and his Thoughts in a hurry but in a fix'd Abode and with a deliberate Pen That he never conceal'd an Ungrateful Truth nor flourish'd over a Weak Place but in sincerity of Meaning and Expression has thought an Historian should be a Man of Conscience That he has never had a Patron to oblige or forget but has been a free and independent Writer And in a Word that he confesses there may be some Mistakes in Modern Things and Persons when he could have no Evidence but from the information of living Friends or perhaps Enemies But he is confident that where Records are cited and where Authentick Evidence could possibly be had there he has been Punctual and Exact And therefore he defies Anth. Harmer to Write any one Specimen of Errours and Defects in his History or if he can find out Eighty Nine or One Hundred gross Mistakes yet he should not value his Threats of further Exposing him and his Writings FINIS * Nich. Lloydius in Dictionario Historico Geograph Poet. c. Edit Oxon. in fol. 1670. p. 593. col 2. in Voce Oxon. * In his Mystery of Iniquity c. Printed at Geneva in Octavo Anno 1545 Fol. vel Pag. 26. * So in The Works of the Learned c. London 1691. qu. p. 5. * See Hist Antiq. Univ. Oxon lib. 2. p. 243. See also in Athenae Oxon Vol. 2. p. 625. * Preface to the Specimen of Errours c. p. 7.