truly nor the example of one Princes punishment maketh another to beware for the next successour after this noble Edward which was King Richard the second though he were not his son but his sons son to wit son and heire to the excellent and renowned black Prince of Wales this Richard I say forgetting the miserable end of his great Grandfather for evill government as also the felicity and vertue of his Father and Grandfather for the contrary suffered himselfe to be abused and misled by evill councellours to the great hurt and disquietnesse of the Realme For which cause after he had reigned 22. yeares he was deposed by act of Parliament holden in London the yeare of our Lord 1399. and condemned to perpetuall prison in the Castle of Pomfret Polyd. l. 20. hist Aug. 1399. where he was soon after put to death also and used as the other before had been and in this mans place by free election was chosen for King the noble Knight Henry Duke of Lancaster who proved afterwards a notable King and was father to King Henry the fifth sirnamed commonly the Alexander of England for that as Alexander the great conquered the most part of Asia in the space of 9. or 10. yeares so did this Henry conquer France in lesse then the like time I might reckon also this number of Princes deposed for defect in government though otherwise he were no evill man in life this King Henry the fourths nephew I mean King Henry the sixt who after almost forty yeares reigne was deposed imprisoned and put to death Polyd. l. 23. â—istor Anglie together with his sonne the Prince of Wales by Edward the fourth of the house of Yorke and the same was confirmed by the Commons and especially by the people 〈◊〉 London and afterwards also by publicke Act of Parliament in respect not only of the title which King Edward pretended but also and especially for that King Henry did suffer himselfe to bee overruled by the Queen his wife and had broke the articles of agreement made by the Parliament between him and the Duke of Yorke and solemnly sworne on both sides the 8. of Octob. in the yeare 1459. In punishment whereof and of his other negligent and evill government though for his owne particular life he was a good man sentence was given against him partly by force and partly by law and King Edward the fourth was put in his place who was no evill King and all English men well know but one of the renownedst for martiall acts and justice that hath worne the English Crowne But after this man againe there fell another accident much more notorious which was that Richard Duke of Glocester this King Edwards yonger brother did put to death his two nephews this mans children to wit King Edward the fifth and his little brother and made himselfe King and albeit he sinned grievously by taking upon him the. Crown in this wicked manner yet when his nephews were once dead he might in reason seem to be lawfull King both in respect that he was the next male in blood after his said brother as also for that by divers acts of Parliament both before and after the death of those infants his title was authorised and made good and yet no man wil say I think but that he was lawfully also deposed again afterward by the Commonwealth An. 1487. which called out of France Henry Earle of Richmond to chastise him and to put him downe and so he did and tooke from him both life and Kingdome in the field and was King himselfe after him by the name of King Henry the seventh and no man I suppose will say but that he was lawfully King also which yet cannot be except the other might lawfully be deposed I would have you consider in all these mutations what men commonly have succeeded in the places of such as have been deposed as namely in England in the place of those five Kings before named that were deprived to wit John Edward the second Richard the second Henry the sixt and Richard the third there have succeeded the three Henries to wit the third fourth and seventh and two Edwards the third and fourth all most rare and valiant Princes who have done infinit important acts in their Commonwealths and among other have raised many houses to Nobility put downe others changed states both abroad and at home distributed Ecclesiasticall dignities altered the course of discent in the blood Royall and the like all which was unjust is void at this day if the changes and deprivations of the former Princes could not be made and consequently none of these that doe pretend the Crowne of England at this day can have any title at all for that from those men they descend who were put up in place of the deprived And this may be sufficient for proofe of these two principall points that lawfull Princes have oftentimes by their Commonwealths been lawfully deposed for misgovernment and that God hath allowed and assisted the same with good successe unto the Weal-publique and if this be so or might be so in Kings lawfully set in possession then much more hath the said Commonwealth power and authority to alter the succession of such as doe but yet pretend to that dignity if there be due reason and causes for the same The fourth Speech TRuly Sir I cannot deny but the examples are many that this Gentleman hath alleaged and they seeme to prove sufficiently that which you affirmed at the beginning to wit that the Princes by you named were deprived and put downe by their Common-wealths for their evill government And good successors commonly raised up in their places and that the Common-wealth had authority also to doe it I doe not greatly doubt at leastwise they did it de facto and now to call these facts in question were to embroyle and turne up-side-down all the States of Christendome as you have well signified but yet for that you have added this word lawfully so many times in the course of your narration I would you tooke the paines to tell us also by what Law they did the same seeing that Belloy whom you have named before and some other of his opinion doe affirme Belloy apolog catholic part 2. paragraf 9. apol pro rege cap. 9. That albeit by nature the Common-wealth have authority over the Prince to chuse and appoint him at the beginning as you have well proved out of Aristotle and other wayes yet having once made him and given up all their authority unto him he is now no more subject to their correction or restraint but remaineth absolute of himselfe without respect to any but onely to God alone which they prove by the example of every particular man that hath authority to make his Master or Prince of his inferiour but not afterwards to put him downe againe or to deprive him of the authority which he gave him though he should not beare himselfe well and
pretended that he was chosen before byâ— K. Edw. the Confessour that the Realm had given their consent thereunto that K. E. left the same testified in his last will testament an 1066. and albeit none of our English Authors do avow the same cleerly yet do many other forrain Writers hold it it seemeth very probable that some such thing had past both for that D. William had many in England that did favour his pretence at his entrance as also as Girard in his French story saith that at his first comming to London he punished divers by name for thâ—t they had broken their oaths and promises in that behalf Gir l. 6. â—n 1065. And moreover it appeareth that by alledging this title of election he moved divers Princes abroad to favour him in that action as in a just quarrel which is not like they would have done if he had pretended only a conquest or his title of sanguinity which could bee of no importance in the world for that effect seeing it was no other but that his Grandfather and King Edwards mother were brother and sister which could give him no pretence at all to the succession of the crowne by blood and yet we see that divers Princes did assist him and among others the French chronicles Girard so often named before writeth Chron. Cassin l. â— cap. â—4 that Alexander the second pope of Rome whose holinesse was so much esteemed in those daies as one constanâ—inus After wrote a booke of his miracles being informed by Duke William of the justnesse of his pretence did send him his benediction and a prâ—cious ring of â—od with a hollowed banner by which hee gett the victory thus writeth Girard in his French Chronicles and Antonius Archbishop of Florence surnamed Antoninus â—art 2 Chron. â—it 16. cap. 5. s 1. Sainct writing of this matter in his chronicles speaketh great good of vvilliam conqueror commendeth his enterprise But howsoever this was the victory we see he get and God prospered his pretence and hath confirmed his of-spring in the Crown of England more then 500 yeares together so as now accâ—unting from the death of King Edmond I consider unto this man we shall find as before I have said in lesse then 5â— yeares that 5. or 6 Kings were made in Engâ—and one after another by only authority and approbatiâ—n of the â—ommon wealth contrary to the ordinary course of ineall succession by propinquity of bloâ—d And al this is before the conquest but it we should passe any further down we should find more eâ—amples then before For first the two sonnes of the Conquerour himselfe that succeeded after him to wit William Rufus and Henry the first were they not both younger brothers to Robert Duâ—e of Normandie to whâ—m the most part of the realme was inclined as Polydor saith Polyd. in vita Gul. Conq. to have given the kingdome presently after the Conquerors death as due to him by succession notwithstanding that Wâ—illiam for perticular displeasure against his elder sonne and had ordeinâ—d the contrary in his testament But that Robert being absent in the War of Hierusalem the holy and learned man Lanfranke as he was accompted then Archbishop of Canterbury being deceived with vain hope of William Rufus An. 107 good nature perswaded thâ—m the contrâ—ry who was at that day of high estimation and authority in England and so might induâ—e the realme to do what he liked By like meanes gat Henry his younger brother the same crown afterwards to wit by fair prâ—mises to the peopâ—e and by help principally of Henry Newborow â—arle of Warwick that dealth with the nobility for him and Maurice Bishop of London with the cleargie for that Ansâ—lme Arch bishop of Canâ—erbury was in baâ—nishment Besides this also it did greatly helpe his cause that his elder brother Robert to whom the Crowne by reign appetteined was absent again this second time in the vvarre of Ierusalem and so lost thereby his Kingdome as before Henry having no ther title in the world unto it but by election and admission of the people which yet he so desended afterwards against his said brother Robert that came to claim it by the sword and God did so prosper him theâ— rein as he took his said elder brother prisoner and so kept him for many yeares untill he died in prison most pitifully But this King Henry dying left daughter behind him named Mawde or Mathilde which being married first to the Emperour Henry the fist he dyed witâ—out issue and then was shee married againe the second time to Geffry Pantageâ—t 〈◊〉 of Earle of Anjow in France to whom she bare a sonne named Henry which this King Henry his grand father caused to be declared for heire apparent to the Crowne in his daies buâ— yet after his disceasse for that Stephen Earl of Bollogne born of Adela daughter to William the Conquerour was thought by the state of England to be more 〈◊〉 to governe and to defend the land for that he was at mans age then was Prince Henry a child or Maâ—de â—is mother he was admitted and Henry put backe and this chiefly at the perswasion of Henry Bishâ—p of Wincheâ—â—er brother to the said Stephen as also by the sollicitation of the Abbot of Glastâ—nbury and â—thers who thought be like they might do the same with good conscience for the good of the realm though the evenâ— proved not so well for that it drew all England into factions and divisions for avoyding and ending whereof the states â—â—me years after in a Parliament at vval ingford made a agreement that Stephen should be lawfull King during his life only and that Henry and his of-spring should succeed him and that prince vvilliam King Stephens sonne should be deprived of his succession to the crowne and made onely Earle of Norfolke thus did the statâ— dispose of the crown at that time which was in the yeare of Christ 1153. To â—his Henry succeded by order his oldest sonne then living named Richard and surnamed Cordelton for his Valour but after him againe his succession was broken For that Iohn King Henries youngest sonne 〈◊〉 youuger brother to Richard whom his father the King had left so unprovided as in jest he was calâ—ed by the French Iean sens terre as if you wouâ—d say Sir Iohn lacke-land this man I say was after the death of his brother admitted and crowned by the states of England and Arthur Duke of Brittaine sonne and heir to Geffry that was elder brother to Iohn was against the order of succession excluded â—nd albeit this Arthur did seeke to remedy the matter by warr yet it seemed that God did more defend this election of the Common wealth then the right title of Arthur by succession for that Arthur was over-come and taâ—en by King Iohn though he had the King of Francâ— on his side anb he died pitifully in prison or rather as most authors do hoâ—d he was put to death by King Iohn
surnamed the Catholick and this was the 4 race of Spanish Kings after the Romans which endureth until this day And though in all these foure raceâ— and â—anks of Royall discents divers examples might be alleadged for manifest proof of my purpose yeâ— will not deale with their race for that it is evident by the Councell of Tolido which were holden in that very time that in those daies expresse election was joyned with succession as by the deposition of K. Suintila and putting back of all his children as also by the election and approbation of K. Sifinando that was further of by succession hath been insinuated before and in the 5 Councell of that age of Toledo it is decreed expresly in these words Si quis talia meditatus fuorit talking of pretending to be King quem nec electio omnium perficet nec Gothicae gentis nobilitas ad hunc honoris apicom trahit si consortio Catholicorum privatus divino anathemat condemuatus Concil Tol. 5. c. 3. If any man shall imagine said these Fathers or go about to aspire to the Kingdom whom the election and choice of all the Realm doth not make perfect nor the Nobility of the Gotish Nation doth draw to the height of this dignity let him be deprived of all Catholique society and damned by the câ—rse of Almighty God by which words is insinuated that not only the Nobility but of Gotish bloud or nearnes by succession was required for the making of their King but much more the choice or admission of all the Realm wherein thiâ— Councell putteth the perfection of his title Don Pelayo died in the year of our Lord 737. and left a Son named Don Fauila who was King after his Father and reigned 2. yeares only After whose death none of his Children were admitted for King though he left divers as all writers do testifie But as Don Lucas the Bishop of Tuy a very ancient Authour writeth Aldefonsus Catholicus ab universo populo Gothorum eligitur that is as the Chronicler Moralis doth translate in Spanish Don Alonso surnamed the Catholick was chosen to be King by all voyces of the Gotish Nation This Don Alonso was Son in law to the former K. Fauila as Morales saith for that he had his Daughter Ermâ—nesenda in Marriage and he was preferred before the Kings own sonnes only for that they were young and unable to govern as the said Historiographer testifieth And how well this fell out for the Common-Welth and how excellent a King this Don Alonso proved Morales sheweth at large from the 10. Chapter of his 13. Booke untill the 17. and Sesastianus Bishop of Salamanca that lived in the same time writeth of his valiant acts he was surnamed the great Sâ—â—ast Episc Saelam in hist Hisp To this famous Don Alonso succeded his son Don Frucla the first of that name vvho vvas noble King for 10 years space and had divers excellent victories against the Moores but aftervvard declining to tiranny he became hatefull to the subjects and for that he put to death vvrongfully his ovvn brother Don Vimerano Prince of excellent parts and rarely beloved of the Spaniards he vvas himselfe put dovvn and put to death by them in the year of Christ 768. And albeit this King left 2. godly Children behind him vvhich vvere lavvfully begotten upon his Queen Dona Munia the one of them a son called Don Alonso and the other a daughter called Dona Ximea yet for the hatred conceived against their Father neither of them vvas admitted by the Realm to succeed him but rather his châ—sen german named Don Aurelio brothers son to Don Alonso the Catholique vvas preferred and reigned peacably 6 years and then dying vvithout issue for this the hatred â—f the Spaniards vvaâ— not yet ended against the memory of K. Eruela they vvould not yet admit any of his Generation but raâ—her excluded thâ—m again the 2 time and admitted a brother in lavv of his named Don Silo that vvas married to her sister Dona Adosinda daughter to the foresaid noble K. Catholique Alonso So that here vve seervvice the right heyres of K. Don Fruela for his evil government vvere put back But Don Silo being dead vvithout issue as also Don Aurelio vvas before him and the Spaniards anger against K. â—ruca being novv vvel aslvvaged they admitted to the Kingdom his foresaid son Don Alonso the yonger surnamâ—d aftervvard the chast vvhom novv tvvice before put back as you have seen but novv they admitted him though his reign at the first endured very little for that a bastard uncle of his named Don Mauregate by help of the Moores put him out reigned by force 6. years in the ending vvithout issue the matter came in deliberation again vvhether the K. Don Alonso the chast that yet lived had been hidden in monastary of Galitia during the time of he yrant should returne again to govern or rather that his coseâ—n German Don vermudo son to his uncle the Prince should be elected in his place And the Realm of Spayâ—ed etermined the 2. that Don Vermulo though he vvere much further of by propinquity of blood vvithin 〈…〉 also should be admitted True it is that after three yeareâ— reign this 〈…〉 King Vâ—rmudo being weary of kingly life feeling some scruple of conscience that being Deacon he had forsaken the life Ecclesiasticall maryed though by dispensation of the Pope as Morales saith entangled himself with the affairs of a kingdom Moric 28 29. an 791. he resigned willingly the gouernment unto his said cozen Don Alonso the chast himself lived after a privat life for divers yeers but this Don Alonso who now the 4. time had been deprived of his succession as you have seen deceived the expectation of the Spaniards that accounted him a Monk for he proved the most valiant excellent King that ever that Nation had both for his vertue valour victories against the Moors building of Towns castles churches Monasteries other such works of christianity as Morales recounteth he reigned after this his last admission 51 yeers had great friendship with K. Charles the great of France who lived in the same time with him And this man among other most noble exploits so tamed the Moores of his country as during his days he never paid that cruelâ— horrible tribute which before and after was paid by the christians to the Moors Mor. l. 13 c. 45. an 842. which was 100 young Maidens 50 Sons of Gentlemâ—n every yeer to be brought up in the Religion of Mahomet among those infidell tyrants And finally this man after so much affliction came to be one of the most renowned Princes of the World After this Don Alonso who left no children for that he would never marry who lived all his life in chastity there succeeded to him by election his nephew named Don â—anurs son to the former said K. Don Vermudo the Deacon that gave this man the
of King Etheldred untill the possession thereof gotten by William Duke of Normandy to wit for the space of 50 yeers shall easily see what Authority the Common-wealth hath in such Affaires to alâ—er Titles of Snccession according as publique necessity or utility shall require for thus briefly the matter passed King Eâ—â—ldred seeing himself to weak for Sweno the King of Danes that was entred the Land fled with his wife Emma and her two children Edward and Alerud unto her brother Duke Richard of Normandy and there remained untill the death of Sweno And he being dead Etheldred returned into England made a certain agreement and division of the Realme between him and Canutus the Son of Sweno and so dyed leaving his eldest sonne Edmond Iron-side to succeed him who soone after dying also left the whole Realm to the said Canutus and that by plain covenant as Canutus pretended that the longest liver should have all Whereupon the said Canutus took the two children of King Edmond Iron-side named Edmond and Edward and sent them over into Swethland which at that time was also subject unto him And caused them to be brought up honourably of which two the elder named Edmond dyed without issue but Edward was marryed and had divers children Ethâ—ldred and his Son Edmond being dead Canutus the Dane was admitted for King of England by the whole Parlâ—ament and consent of the Realm anno 1018. and crowned by Alerud Archbishop of Canterbury as Polidor saith and he proved an excellent King and went to Rome and was allowed by that See also He did many works of charity shewed himself a good Christian and very loving and kind to Englishmen marryed Queene Emma an English woman and mother to King Edward the Confessour and had by her a Son named Hardicanutus and so dyed and was much mourned by the English after he had reigned twenty yeers though his entrance and title was partly by force and partly by election as you have heard After this Canutus the first surnamed the Great for that he was King joyntly both of England Norway and Denmark was dead Polidor saith that all the States of the Realm met together at Oxford â—o consult whom they should make King and at last by the more part of voyces was chose Harald the first Sonne of Canutus by a Concubine King Harald the Bastatd 1038. Polid. l. 8. Hist Ang. By which election we see injury was done to the line all succession of three parties First to the Sons of king Edmond Iron-side that were in Swethland Then to the Princes Edward and Ajerud sons to king Etheldred and brothers to Iron-side that were in Normondy And thirdly to Hardie mutus son to Canutus by his lawfull wife Emma to whom it was also assured at her marriage that her issue should succeed if she had any by Canutus After the death of this Harald who dyed in Oxford where he was elected within 3 yeers after his election there came from Denmark Hardicanutus to claim the crown that his Father Brother had possessed before him of whose coming Polidor saith libentissimis animis accipitur communiqve omnium consensu rex dicitur an 1041. He was received with great good will of all and by common content made King this was done by the States without any respect had of the succession of those Princes in Normondy Swethland who by birth were before him as hath been shewed this is the second breach after lineal discent after Elthred But this Hardicanutus being dead also upon the sudden 〈◊〉 a certaine banket in Lambeth by London without issue within two yeers after his Coronation the states of the Relm had deâ—ermined to chuse Aludred for their king who was yonger bâ—other to Edw. for that cause sent for him out of Normondy as polid recounteth had made him K. without all doubt for that he was esteemed more stirring valiant then his elder brother Edw. had not E. Goodwin of Kent fearing the youngmans stomack raised a strong faction against him thereupon also caused him to be trayâ—eronsly murthered as he passed through Kent towards London nor had the State here in any respect to Antiquity of bloud for that before Alured were both 〈◊〉 own elder brother P. Ed. who after him was chosen King and before them both were Edm Edw. the children of their elder brother Edmond Iron 〈◊〉 and this the third breach of lineall discent But this notwithstanding Alerud being slain P. Edw. was made King tanta publica lat tia saith Polidor vt certatim pro ejus faelici principatu cuncti vota facerent that is he was made King with such universall joy contentment of all men as every man contended who should pray and make most vows to God for his happy reign and according to this was the successe for he was a most excellent Prince and almost miraculously he reigned with great peace void of all war at home abroad for the space of almost 20 yeers after so infinit broyls as had beene before him ensued after him yet his title by succession cannot be justified as you see for that his eldest brothers Son was then alive to wit Prince Edw. surnamed the outlaw who in this Kings reign came into England brought his wife three lawfull children with him to wit Edgar Margaret and Christian but yet was not this good K. Edw. so scrupulous as to give over his kingdome to any of them or to doubt of the right of his own title which he had by election of the Common-wealth against the order of succession This K. Edward being dead without issue Polidor saith that the States made a great consultation whom they should make King first of all it seemeth they excluded him that was only next by propinquity in bloud which was Edgar Aledin son to the said Prince Edw. the outlaw now departed and Nephew to K. Edmond I tonside the reason of this exclusion is alleadged by Pol. l. 8. in these words is puer id aetatis nondum regno gubernando maturus erat that is he beinâ— a child of so small yeers was not ripe enough to govern the kingdom and then he saith that Harald son of Earl Goodwin by a daughter of Canutus the first proclaymed himself King an 10â—â— morover he addeth Nond spt cuit omninoid factum populo qui plurimum spei in Haraldi virtue habehat itaque more majorum sacratus est which is this fact of Harald displeased not at all the people of England for that they had great hope in the vertue of this Harald so was he annoinâ—ed crowned according to the fashion of the ancient Kings of England by which words we may see that Harald had also the approbation of the Realm to be King notwithstanding that little Edgar was present as hath been said so as this was the 4. breach of succession at this time But in the mean space William Duke of Normandy
his uncles own hands in the castle of Roan thereby to make the titlâ— of his succession more cleare which yet could not be for that as well Stow in his chtonicle as also Matthew of vvestminster and others before him do write that Geffry beside 〈◊〉 sonne left two daughters by the Lady Constance his wife Countesse and heâ—r of Britâ—ain which by the law of England should have succeeded before Iohn but of this small accompt seemed to be made at that day Some yeares after when the Barons and states of England miâ—liked utterly the government and proceeding of this King Iohn they rejected him againe and chose Lewis the Prince of France to be theiâ— King 3216 and did swear feaâ—ty to him in London as before hath bin said and they depâ—iâ—â—ed also the young prince Henry his sonne that was at that time but of 8 years old but upon the death of his father King Iohn that shorty â—fter insued they recalled againe that sentence and admitted this Henry to the Crown by the name of King Henry the third and disanulled the a leageance made unto Lewis Prince of France and so king Henry raigned for tâ—e 53 yeares afterward the â—ongest reign as I think that any before or after â—im hath had in England Moreover you â—now from this king Henry the third dâ— take thâ—ir first beginning the two branches at Yorke and Lâ—ncastee wihch after feâ—â— to fo great contention about the crown Into which if we would enter we should see plainely as before hath beene noted that the best of all their titles after their deposition of king Richard the second depended of this authority of thâ— comâ—on-wealth fot that as the people were affected and the greater part prevailed â—o â—ere their titles either a lowed confirmed altered or disanulled by Parliament yet may not we well affirm but that either part when they were in possession and confirmed herein by these Parliaments were lawfuâ—l kings and that God concurred with them as with true princes for government of the people for if we should deny this point great incouveniences wouâ—d oâ—ow and we should shake the states of most princes in the world at this day And to concâ—ude as one the one side proâ—inquity of bâ—ood is a great â—reheminence towards the atteining of any Crowne so doth it not ever bind the common weaâ—th to yeeld there-unto if weightier reasons shauld urge them to the contrary neither is the Common-wealth bound bound alwayes to shut her eyes and to admit at â—p-hazard or of necessity every one that is next by succession of bâ—oud as some faâ—seâ—y and fondly aâ—â—meth but rather she is bound to consider well and maturely the person that iâ— to enter whether he be â—ike to perform his duty and charge committeed or no for thâ—t otherwise to admitt him that is an enimy or unfitis but to destroy the Common wealth and him tâ—gether This is my opinion aud this seemeth to me to be conform to al reason awâ— religion pâ—ery wisdome poâ—â—icy and to the use aud customs of all well governed common-weaâ—thes in the world neither do I meane to prejudice any any princes pretence or succession to any crown or dignity in the world but rather do hold that he ought to enjoy his preheminence but yet that he 〈◊〉 not prâ—judicall thereby to the whole body which is ever 〈◊〉 be respected more then any one person whatsoever The ninth Speech ACcording to law both civill and Canon which is great reason it is a matter most certaine that he who is judge and hath to give sentence in the thing it selfe is also to judge of the cause for thereof is he called judge and if he have authority in the one good reason he should also have power to discerne the other so as if we grant according to the forme and proofes that the Realme or Common-wealth hath power to admit or put back the Prince or pretender to the Crowne then must we also confesse that the same Common wealth hath authority to judge of the lawfulnesse of the causes and considering further that it is in their owne affaire and in a matter that hath his whole beginning continuance and subsistance from them alone I meane from the Common wealth for that no man is King or Prince by institution of nature as before hath been declared but every King and Kings son hath his dignity and preheminence above other men by authority onely of the Common wealth God doth allow for a just and sufficient cause in this behalfe the onely will and judgement of the weal publick it selfe supposing alwayes as in reason we may that a whole Realme will never agree by orderly way of judgement for of this onely I meane and not of any particular faction of private men against the heyre apparent to exclude or put back the next heyr in blood and succession without a reasonable cause in their sight and censurre And seeing that they only are to be judges of this case we are to presume that what they determine is just and lawfull for the time and if at one time they should determine one thing and the contrary at another as they did often in England during the contention between York and Lancaster and in other like occasions what can a private man judge otherwise but that they had different reasons and motions to leade them at different times and they being properly lords and owners of the whole busines committed unto them it is enough for every particular man to subject himselfe to that which his Common wealth doth in this behalfe and to obey simply without any further inquisition except he should see that open injustice were done therin or God manifesty offended and the Realme indangered Open injustice I call when not the true Common wealth but some faction of wicked men should offer to determine this matter without lawfull authority of the Realme committed to them and I call manifest offence of God and danger of the Realme when such a man is preferred to the Crowne as is evident that he wil do what lyeth in him to the prejudice of them both I mean both of Gods glory and the publick wealth as for example if a Turk or Moor or some other notorious wicked man or tyrant should be offered by succession or otherwise to governe among Christians in which cases every man no doubt is bound to resist what hee can for that the very end and intent for which all government was first ordeined is herein manifestly impugned From this consideration of the weal publick are to be reduced all other considerations of most importance for discerning a good or evill Prince For that whosoever is most likely to defend preserve and benefit most his Realme and subjects he is most to be allowed and desired as most conforme to the end for which government was ordained And on the contrary side he that is least like to do this deserveth least to be preferred and here doth
of the other two formes of Government also and namely in England all three do enter more or lesse for in that there is one King or Queen it is a Monarchy in that it hath certain Councels which must be heard it participateth of Aristocratia and in that the Commonalty have their voyces and Burgesses in Parliament it taketh part also of Democratia or popular Government All which linitations of the Princes absolute Authority as you see do come from the Common-wealth as having authority above their Princes for their restraint to the good of the Realme From like Authority and for like considerations have come the limitations of other Kings and kingly power in all times and Countries from the beginning both touching themselves and their posterity and successours as briefly in this place I shall declare And first of all if we will consider the two most renowned and allowed States of all the World I mean of the Romans and Grecians we shall finde that both of them began with Kings but yet with farre different Lawes and restraints about their Authorities for in Rome the Kings that succeeded Romulus their first Founder had as great and absolute Authority as ours have now a dayes but yet their children or next in bloud succeeded them not of necessity but new Kings were chosen partly by the Senate and partly by the people as Titus Livius testifieth Livil 1 dec 1. So as of three most excellent Kings that ensued immediatly after Romulus to wit Numa Pompilius Tullius Hostilius and Tarquinius Priscus none of them were of the Bloud Royal nor of kin the one to the other no nor yet Romans borne but chosen rather from among strangers for their vertue and valour and that by election of the Senate and consent of the People In Grecce and namely among the Lacedemonians which was the most eminent Kingdom among others at that time the succession of children after their fathers was more certain but yet Aristotle noteth Arist l. 2. c. 8. Pol. Plutarch in Lycurg Their authority and power was so restrained by certain Officers of the people named Ephori which commonly were five in number as they were not onely checked and chastened by them if occasion served but also deprived and somtimes put to death for which cause the said Philosopher did justly mislike this eminent jurisdiction of the Ephori over their Kings but yet hereby we see what authority the Common-wealth had in this case and what their meaning was in making Lawes restraining their Kings power to wit thereby the more to binde them to do justice which Cicero in his Offices uttereth in these words Justitiae fruendae causa apud majores nostros in Asia in Europa bene morati Reges olim sunt constiti c. at cum jus aquabile ab 〈◊〉 viro homines non consequerentur inventae sunt leges Cic. l. 2. Offic. Good Kings were appointed in old time among our Ancestours in Asia and Europe to the end thereby to obtain justice but when men could not obtain equal justice at one mans hands they invented Lawes The same reason yeildeth the same Philosopher in another place not onely of the first institution of Kingdomes but also of the change thereof again into other Government when these were abused Omnes antiquae gentes regibus quondam paruerunt c. Cic. l. 3. de legibus That is All old Nations did live under Kingdomes at the beginning which kinde of Government first they gave unto the most just and wisest men which they could finde and also after for love of them they gave the same to their posterity or next in kin as now also it remaineth where kingly Government is in use but other Countries which liked not that forme of Government and have shaken it off have done it not that they will not be under any but for that they will not be ever under one onely Thus far Cicero and speaketh this principally in defence of his own Common-wealth I mean the Roman which had cast off that kinde of Government as before hath been said for the offence they had taken against certain Kings of theirs and first of all against Romulus himselfe their first Founder for reigning at his pleasure without law as Titus Livius testifieth for which cause the Senatours at length slew him and cut him in small pieces And afterwards they were greatly grieved at the entring of Scrvius Tullius their sixth King for that he gat the Crown by fraud and not by Election of the Senate and special approbation of the people as he should have done but most of all they were exasperated by the proceeding of their seventh King named Lucius Tarquinius sirnamed the proud who for that he neglected the Lawes of Government prescribed to him by the Common-wealth as namely in that he consulted not with the Senate in matters of great importance and for that he made War and Peace of his own head and for for that he appointed to himselfe a Guard as though he had mistrusted the People and for that he did use injustice to divers particular men and suffered his children to be insolent he was expelled with all his posterity and the Government of Rome changed from a Kingdom unto the Regiment of Consuls after two hundred yeares that the other had endured And thus much of those Kingdomes of Italy and Greece and if likewise we will look upon other Kingdomes of Europe we shall see the very same to wit that every Kingdom and Countrey hath his particular Lawes prescribed to their Kings by the Common wealth both for their Government Authority and Succession in the same for if we behold the Roman Empire it selfe as it is at this day annexed to the German Electours though it be first in Dignity among Christian Princes yet shall we see it so restrained by particular Lawes as the Emperour can do much lesse in his State than other Kings in theirs for he can neither make War nor exact any contribution of men or money thereunto but by the free leave and consent of all the States of the German Dieâ— or Parliament and for his children or next in kin they have no action interest or pretence at all to succeed in their Fathers Dignity but onely by free Election if they shall be thought worthy nay one of the chiefest points that the Emperour must swear at his entrance as Sleydan writeth Sleydan l. 8. Anno 1532. is this That he shall never go about to make the Dignity of the Emperour peculiar or bereditary to his Family but leave it unto the seven Electours free in their power to chuse his Successour according to the Law made by the Pope â—regory the fifth and the Emperour Charles the fourth in this behalfe Blond Dicad 2. l. 3. Crant l. c. 25. The Kingdomes of Poloma and Bohemia do go much after the same fashion both for their restrant of power and succession to their Kings For first touching their
against them wheresoever they thinke they may make their party good inventing a thousand calumniations for their discredit without conscience or reason whom in deed I do thinke to have little conscience or none at all but rather to be those whom the Apostles Peter and Jude did speake of when they said Novit Dominus iuiquos in diem judicii reservare cruciandos magis autem eos qui dominitionem contemnunt audaces sbi placentes c. 2 Pet 2 10. Jâ—de 8. God knoweth how to reserve the wicked unto the day of judgement there to be tormented but much more those which do contemne domination or government and are bold and liking of themselves Nay further I am of opinion that whatsoever a Princes Title be if once he be settled in the Crown and admitted by the Common-wealth for of all other holds I esteem the tenure of a Crown if so it may be termed the most irregular and exraordinary every man is bound to settle his conscience to obey the same In all that lawfully he may command and this without examination of his Title or Interest for that God disposeth of kingdomes and worketh his will in princes affaires as he pleaseth and this by extraordinary meanes oftentimes so that if we should examine the Titles at this day of all the princes in Christendom by the ordinary rule of private mens rights successions or tenures should finde so many knots and difficulties as it were hard for any to make the same plain but onely the supreme Law of God's disposition which can dispence in what he listeth This is my opinion in this behalfe for true and quiet obedience and yet on the other side as farre off am I from the abject and wicked flattery of such as affirme princes to be subject to no Law or limitation at all either in authority government life or succession but as though by Nature they had been created kings from the beginning of the World or as though the Common-wealth had been made for them and not they for the Common-wealth or as though they had begotten or purchased or given life to the Weal-publique and not that the Weal-publique had exalted them or given them their authority honour and dignity so these flatterers do free them for all obligation duty reverence or respect unto the whole Body where of they are the Heads nay expresly they say and affirme that All mens goods bodies and lives are the Princes at their pleasures to dispose of that they are under no Law or account-giving whatsoever that they succeed by Nature and generation onely and not by any authority admission or approbation of the Common-wealth and that consequently no merit or demerit of their perso is to be respected nor any consideration of their Naâ—ures or qualities to wit of capacity disposition or other personal circumstances is to be had or admitted and do they what they list no authority is there under God to chaâ—ten them All these absurd paradoxes have some men of our dayes uttered in flattery of princes to defend a kings Title with assertions and propositions do destroy all Law of reason conscience and Common-wealth and do bring all to such absolute tyranny as no Realme ever did or could suffer among civil people no not under the dominion of the Turke himselfe at this day where yet some proportion of equity is held between the prince and the people both in Government and Succession though nothing so much as in Christian Nations To avoid these two extremes as all the duty reverence love and obedience before nameâ— is to be yeelded unto every Prince which the common-wealth hath once established so yet retaineth still the common-wealth her authority not onely to restrain the same Prince if he be exorâ—itant but also to chasten and remove him upon due and weighty considerations and that the same hath bin done and practised at many times in most Nations both Christian and otherwise with right good successe to the weal publick The Third Speech TWo points are now to be proved First that Common-wealths have chastised sometimes lawfully their lawfull Princes though never so lawfully they were descended or otherwise lawfully put in possession of their Crown and secondly that this hath faln out ever or for the moâ—â— part commodious to the weal publique and that it may seem that God approved and prospered the same by the good successe and successors that insued thereof Yet with this protestation that nothing be taken out of my speech against the sacred authority and due respect and obedience that all men owe unto Princes both by Gods Law and Nature but only this shall serve to shew that as nothing under God is more honourable amiable profitable or Soveraigne than a good Prince so nothing is more pestilent or bringeth so generall destruction and desolation as an evill Prince And therefore as the whole body is of more authority thâ—n the only head and may cure the head if it be out of tune so may the weal-publique cure or purge their heads if they infect the rest seeing that a body Civill may have divers heads by succession and is not bound ever to one as a body naturall is which body naturall if it had the same ability that when it had an aking or sickly head it could cut it off and take another I doubt not but it would so do and that all men would confesse that it had authority sufficient and reason to doe the same rather then all the other parts should perish or live in pain and continuall torment but yet much more cleare is the matter that we have in hand for disburdening our selves of wicked Princes as now I shall begin to prove unto you And for proofe of both the points joyntly I might begin perhaps with some examples out of the Scripture it selfe but some man may chance to say that these things recounted there of the Jewes were not so much to be reputed for acts of the common-Wealth as for particular ordinations of God himselfe which yet is not any thing against me but rather maketh much for our purpose For that the matter is more authorized hereby seeing that whatsoever God did ordaine or put in â—re in his Common Wealth that may also be practised by other Common-Wealths now having his authority and approbation for the same Wherefore said he though I do hasten to examples that are more neerer home and more proper to the particular purpose whereof we treat yet can I not omit to note some two or three out of the Bible that doe appertain to this purpose also and these are the deprivation and putting to death of two wicked Kings of Judah named Saul and Amon 1 Kin. 31. 4. King 22. 44. though both of them were lawfully placed in that dignity and the bringing in of David and Josia in their roomes who were the two most excellent princes that ever that Nation or any other I thinke have had to governe them And first king
Saul though he were elected by God to that royal Thron yet was he slain by the Philistims by God's order as it was foretold him for his disobedience and not fulfilling the law and limits prescribed unto him Amon was lawfull King also and that by natural discent and succession for he was son and heir to king Manasses whom he succeeded and yet was he slain by his own people Quia non ambulavit in via Domini for that he walked not in the way prescribed unto him by God and unto these two kings so deprived God gave two Successours as I have named the like whereof are not to be found in the whole ranke of kings for a thousand yeares together for of Josias it is written Fecit quod crat rectum in conspectu Domini non declinavit neque ad dextram neque ad sinistram 2. Paralip 34. 5. He did that which was right in the sight of God neither did he decline unto the right hand nor the left he reigned 31 yeares 2. Paralip 35. And Jeremias the prophet that lived in his time loved so extremely this good king as he never ceased afterwards to lament his death as the Scripture saith 2 Chron. 34. 35. Chapters As for king David it shall not be needfull to say any thing how excellent a king he was for as many learned men do note he was a most perfect paterne for al kings that should follow in the World not as king Cyrus whom Xenophon did paint out more according to his own imagination of a perfect king that he wished then to the truth of the story but rather as one that passed farre in acts that which is written of him and this not onely in matters of religion piety and devotion but also of chivalry valour wisedom and policy neither is it true which Nicholas Maehiavel the Florentine N. Mach. l. 2. c. 2. in Tit. Liv. And some others of his new unchristian school do affirme for defacing of Christian vertue That religion and piety are le ts oftentimes to politique and wise Government and do break or weaken the high spirits of magnanimous men to take in hand great enterprises for the Common-wealth Aug. lâ—de Gran. This I say is extreme false for that as Divines are wont to say and it is most true Grace doth not destroy or corrupt but perfect Nature so so as he which by Nature is valiant wise liberal or politique shall be the more if also he be pious and religious which we see evidently in king David who notwithstanding all his piety yet omitted he nothing appertaining to the state and government of a noble wise and politique Prince for first of al he began with reformation of his own Court and Realm in matter of good lif and service of God wherein he used the counsel and direction of God and of Nathan the Prophet as also of Abiathar and Hiram the chief Priests and of Heman his wise Councellour 1. Par. 15. He reduced the whole Clergy into 24. degrees appointing 4000. Singers with divers sorts of musical instruments under Asaph Heman and other principal men that should be Heads of the Quire psal 22. 25. He appointed all Officers needfull both for his Court and also the Common-wealth with the Armes of the Crown which was a Lion in remembrance of the Lion which he had slain with his own hands when he was a childe he ordained a mynt with a peculiar forme of money to be stamped took order for distributing relief unto the poor and other like acts of a prudent and pious Prince After all this he turned himselfe to his old exercise of Warres to which he was given from his child hood being wonderfull valiant of his own person as appeareth by the Lion and Bear that he slew with his own hands and the courage wherewith he took upon him the combat with Goliah and as he had shewed himselfe a great Warriour and renowned Captain many yeares in the service of Saul against the Philistims and had gained many noble victories so much more did he after he was king himselfe for that he conquered not onely the philistims but also the Amorites Idumeans Moabites with the kings and people of Damasco and all Syria even unto the River Euphates and left all these Countries peaceable to his Successour 2 Reg. 8. and in three or four Battailes wherein David himselfe was present within the space of two or three yeares almost a hundred thousand Horse and Foot slain by him 8. paral 18. and that himselfe flew in his dayes eight hundred with his own hands 2 reg 13. Joseph l. 7. antiqu c. 10. and that he made by his example thirty and seven such Captaines as each one of them was able to lead and governe a whole Army and yet among all these expences of Warres had he care to lay up so much money and treasure as was sufficient for the building of that huge and wonderfull Temple after him which hee recommended to his son Salomon and amidst all this valour and courage of so warlike a King and Captaine had he so much humility as to humble himselfe to Nathan the Prophet when he came to rebuke him for his fault and so much patience and charity as to pardon Semci that reviled him and threw stones at him in the high way as he went and among so many and continuall businesses both Martiall and Civill and great affaires of the Commonwealth he had time to write so many Psalmes as we see and to sing prayses seven times a day to Almighty God and to feel that devotion at his death which we read of and finally he so lived and so dyed as never Prince I thinke before him nor perhaps after him so joyned together both valour and vertue courage and humility wisdome and piety government and devotion nobility and religion Wherefore though I have been somewhat longer then I would in this example yet hath it not been from the purpose to note somewhat in particular what two worthy Kings were put up by God in place of two other by him deprived and deposed And now if we will leave the Hebrews and returne to the 〈◊〉 of whom we spake before we shall finde divers things notable in that state also to the purpose we have in hand For before Romulus their first King having by little and little declined into tyranny 〈◊〉 thine and cut in peeces by the Senate 〈◊〉 1. which at that time contained an hundred in number and in his place was chosen Numa Pompilius the notablest King that ever they had whâ— prescribed all their order of Religion and manner of sacrifices imitating therein and in divers other points the rites and ceremonies of the Jewes as Terâ—ulâ— and other Fathers does note 〈…〉 contrahaeres Iustin Martyr apolog Hee began also the building of their Capitol added the two months of January and February to the yeare and did other such notable things for that Commonwealth Againe when Tarquiâ—ius
it was not his but theirs Why doe the Kings of England France and Spain ask money of their Subjects in Parliaments if they might take it as their own Why are those contributions â—ermed â—y the name of Subsidies helps benevolences lones c. if all be due and not voluntary of the Subjects part How have Parliaments oftentimes denyed to their Princes such helps of money as they demanded Why are their Judges appointed to determine matter of Suits Pleas between the Prince and his Subjects if all be his and the Subject have nothing of his own And last of all why doth the Canon Law so streightly inhibit all Princes upon pain of excommunication to impose new impositions taxes upon their people without great consideration necessity free consent of the givers if all be the Princes nothing of the Subject Nay why be all Princes generally at this day prohibited to alienate any thing of their own Crown without consent of their people if they only be Lords of all and the People have interest in nothing And hereby also we may gather what the Prophet Samuel meant when he thretned the Jews with the disorders of Kings that should reign over them not that these disorders were lawfull or appertained to a righteous King but that seeing they refused â—o be under the moderate government of their high Priests and other Governors which God had given them hitherto required to be ruled by Kings as other Heathen Nations of Egipt Babilon Syria Persia were whose manner of Government not only Historiogrâ—phers but Phylosophers also Aristotle among the rest doth note to have been very tyrannicall Arist l. 5. pol. c. 11. Joseph l. 6. ant c. 4. yet for that the Jews would needs haue that government as a matter of more pomp glory then that which hitherto they had had Samuel did first iusinuate to them what extortion wickednesse those Heathen Kings did use commonly over their people in taking their children servants wives goods the like from them that many Kings of Israel should do the like take it for their right and Soveraignty should oppose tyranize over them inforce them to cry out to God for help they should not find remedy for that so heddily they had demanded this change of Government which highly displeased Almighty God And this is the true meaning of that place if it be well considered and not to authorize hereby injustice or wickedness in any King seeing the principall pointâ— recorded to all Princes and Kings through all course of Scripture are diligere inducrum justitiam apprebendere disciplinam â—facere veritatem that is to say to love judgement and justice to admit discipline and to execuâ—e truth and this is the instruction that God gave to the Jewes in Deutronomy Deut. 17. 3. Reg. 2. 10 for their Kings when they should have them which God foretold many yeares before they had any and this is the admonition that King David left unto Psal the 2. his Sonne and successour Salomon at his death and by him to all other Kiogs and Princes and for want of observing their points of judgement justice discipline and truth wee see not only Achab and Iezabel before mentioned grievously punished but many other Kings also by God himselfe as Achaz Manasses Ioachim and the like which had not been justice on Gods part so to punish them if it had been lawfull for them to use that manner of proceeding towards their people as these good instructors of Princes in out daies most fondly and wickedly do affirme and thus much for that place But to the point by what Law the Common-wealthes did punish their evill Princes it is by all law divine and human divine for that God dath approve that form of government which every common-wealth doth chuse unto it selfe as also the conditions statutes und limitations which it selfe shall appoint unto her Princes as largely before hath been declared And by all human law also for that all law both naturall nationall and positive doth teach us that Princes are subject to law and order and that the common-wealth which gave them their authority for the commmon good of all may also restraine or take the same way again if they abuse it to the common evill And whereas these men say that like as if a private man should make his inferiour or equall to be his prince he could not after restrain the same again and so neither the common wealth having once delivered away her authority I answer first that the comparison is not altogether like for that a privat man though he give his voice to make a Prâ—nce yet he being but one maketh not the Prince wholly as the Common wealth doth and therefore no marvaile though it lie not in a perticular mans hand to unmake him again besides this a privat man having given his voice to make his Prince remaineth subject and inferiour to the same but the whole body though it be governed by the Prince as by the head yet is it not inferiour but superiour to the Prince neither so giveth the common wealth her authority and power up to any Prince that she depriveth her self utterly of the same when need shall require to use it for her defence for which she gave it And finally which is the chiefest reason of all and the very ground and foundation indeed of all Kings authority among christians the power and authority which the Prince hath from the common wealth is in very truth not absolute but potestas vicaria or deligata that is to say a power deligate or power by commission from the common wealth which is given with such restrictions cautels and conditions yea wiâ—h such plaine exceptions promises and oathes of both parties I meane between the King and common wealth at the day of his admission or coronation as if the same be not kept but willfully broken on either part then is the other not bound to observe his promise neither though never so solemnly made or sworn for that in all bargains agreements and conâ—racts where on part is bound mutually and reciprocally to the other by oath vow or condition there if one side go from his promise the other standeth not obliged to performe his and this is so notorious by all law both of nature and nations and so conform to all reason and equity that it is put among the very rules of both the civill and cannon law where it is said frustra a fidem sibi quis postulat servari ab eo cui sidem a se prestitam servare recusat He doth in vaine require promise to be kept unto him at an other mans hands to whom he refuseth to performe that which himselfe promised and againe Non abstringitur quis â—uramento ad implendam quod juravit si ab alia parte non impletur cujus respectu praebuit juramentum A man is not bound to performe that
unto this King Sissinandus Ambros Maral l. 11. cap. 17. and speaketh infinite good in the same of the vertues of King Suintila that was now deposed and condemned in this said Councel whereby it is to be presumed that he had changed much his life afterward became so wicked a man as here is reported After this the Councel confirmeth the Title of Sissinandus and maketh decrees for the defence thereof but yet insinuateth what points he was bound unto and whereunto he had sworn when they said unto him To quoque pâ—â—aesentem 〈◊〉 Ac juturos aelatum sequentium principes c. We do require you that are our present King and all other our Princes that shall follow hereafter with the humility which is convenient that you be meeke and moderate towards your Subjects and that you govern your people in justice and piety and that none of you do give sentence alone against any man in cause of life and death but with the consent of your publike Councell and with those that be Governours in matters of judgement And against all Kings that are to come we do promulgate this sentence that if any of them shall against the reverâ—nce of our Lawes exercise cruel authority with proud domination and Kingly Pompe only following their own concupiscence in wickednes that they are condemned by Christ with the sentence of excommunication and have their separation both from him and us to everlasting judgement But in the next two yeares after the end of this Councel King Sissinandus being now dead and one Chintilla made King in his place there were other two Councels gathered in Toledâ— the first whereof was but Provinciall and the second Nationall and they are named by the names of the fifth and sixt Councels of Toledo Ambros Moral l. 11. cap. 23. 24. In the which Councells according to the manner of the Gothes who being once converted from the Arrian haereâ—ie were very catholick and devout ever after and governed themselves most by their Clergy and not only matters of Religion were handled but also of State and of the Common Wealth Concil 5. cap. 2 3 4. 5. conc 6. cap. 16. 17 18. especially about the succession to the Crown safety of the Prince provision for his Children friends Officers and favorites after his death and against such as without election or approbation of the Common-Wealth did aspire to the same all these points I say were determined in these Councels and among other points a very sâ—vere decreâ— was made in the sixt Councel concâ—rning the Kings Oath at his admission in these words Consonan une corde ore promulgamus Deo placituram sententiam Coucil Td. 6. c. 3. We do promulgate with one heart and mouth this sentence agreeable and pleasing unto God and do decree the same with the consent and deliberation of the Nobles and Peeres of this Realme that whosoever in time to come shall be advanced to the honor and preferment of this Kingdom he shall not be placed in the Royall Seat untill among other conditions he hath promised by the Sacrament of an Oath that he will suffer no man to break the Catholick Faith c. By which words especially among other conditions is made evident that those Princes sweare not only to keepe the Faith but also such other conditions of good Government as were touched before in the fourth Councel and these things were determined while their King Chintillâ— was present in Tolledo as Ambrosio Morales â—oteth Ambros Moral lib. 1. cap. 23. The distruction of Spayne Before the entrance of the Moores and before the dividing thereof into many Kingdoms which happened about â— hundreth yeares after this to wit in the year of our Saviour 713. and 714. But after the Moores had gayned all Spayne and divided it between them into divers Kingdoms Ambros Moral li. 13. c. 1. 2 de la Chron. de Espâ— yet God provided that within foure or five yeares the Christians that were left and fled to the Mountaines of Asturias Biscay found a certain young Prince named Don Pelayo of the ancient blood of the Gotish Kings who was also fled thither and miraculously saved from the enemies whom they chose straight wayes to be their King and he began presently the recovery of Spayne and was called first King of Asturias and afterward of Leon and after his successors got to be Kings also of Castilia and then of Toledo and then of Aragon Barcelona Valentia Murcia Cartagena 〈◊〉 Cortuba Granado Siuil Portugall and Nauarra all which were different Kingdoms at that time so made by the Moores And all these Kingdoms were gained againe by little and little in more then 700. yeares space which were lost in lesse then two years and they never came again indeed into one Monarchy as they were under Don Rodâ—igo their last King that lost the whole untill the yeare of our Lord 158â— when Don Philippe King of Spayne re-united again unto that Crown the Kingdom of Portugall which was the last peece that remayned seperated and this was almost 900. yeares after Spayne was first lost But now to our purpose the Chronicler of Spain named Ambrosio Morales doth record in his Chronicle a certain Law written in the Gotish-tongue left since the time of this Don Pelayâ— the first King after the universal distruction of Spain the title of the Law is this Como se an delevantar Reyen Espùa y como el ha de lurar los fueros Ambros Moral l. 13. c. 2. that is to say how men must make their King in Spain and now he must swear to the priviledges and liberties of that Nation then he putteth the Articles of the Law whereof the first saith thus before all things it is establishâ—d for a law liberty and priviledge of Spayne that the King is to be placed by voices and consent perpetually and this to the intent that no evill King may enter without consent of the people seeing they are to give to him that which with their blood and labours they have gained of the Moores Lucas Episcop Tuyens in histor Hispan Loudou de molin lib. de hered Thus far goeth this first article which is the more to be marked for that divers and those most ancient Spanish Authors do say that from this Don Pelayo the succession of Kings descended ever by propinquity of blood and yet we see that election was ioyned there withall in expresse termes The second part of the law containeth the manner of ceremonies used in those old dayes at the admission of their Kings which is expressed in these words let the King be chosen aud admitted in the Metropolitan City of this Kingdome or at least wise in some Cathedrall Church and the night before he is exalted let him watch all night in the Church and the next day let him here masse let him offer at Masse a peece of Scarlet and some of his own money and after let him communicate
words in thâ— name of all the Cleargie and Churches of France Sir that which we require at your handes this day is that you promise unto us that you will keep all canonicall priviledges law and Justice due to be kept and dâ—fendâ—d as a good King is bound to do in his Realme and to every Bishop and Church to him Committed whereunto the King answered I do promise and avow to every one of you and to every Church to you committed that I will keep and maintaine all canonicall priviledges law and Justice due to every man to the uttermost of my power and by Gods helpe shall defend you as a good King is bound to doe in his Realme This being done the King did sweare and make his Oath laying his handes upon the Gospell in these words following Auâ—nom de Iesus Christ ie Jure promots aw peuple Christiâ—n a may suject cos thoses c. Which is in English in the name of Jesus Christ I do sweare and promise to all Christian people subject unto me these poiuts ensuing first to procure that all my subjects be kept in the union of the Church and I will defend them from all excesse rapin extortion and iniquitie Secondly I will take order that in all iudgments justice shall be kept with equity and mercy to the end that God of his mercy may conserve unto me with my people his holy grace and mercy 3. I shall endeavour as much as possibly shall lie in me to chuse and drive out all my Realm and all my Dominions all such as the Church hath or shall declare for Heriticks as God shall help me and his holy Gospells Thus sweareth the King and then kisseth the Gospells and immediately is sung Te Deum laudamus and after that are said many particular prayers by the Arch-Bishop and then is the King vested and the ring scepter Crown and other Kingly Ornaments and Ensignes are brought and put upon him with Declaration first what they signifie and then particuler prayers are made to God that their signification may be by the King fulfilled And after all ended the Arch-Bishop with the Bishops do blesse him and say these words unto him God which reigneth in Heaven and governeth all Kingdoms blesse you c. Be you stable and constant and hold your place and right from henceforth which here is committed and layd upon you by the Authority of Almighty God and by this present tradition and delivery which we the Bishops and other Servants of God do make unto you of the same and remember you in place convenient to bear so much more respect and reverence unto the Clergy by how much nearer then other men you have seene them to approach to Gods Alter to the end that Jesus Christ Mediatour of God and man may confirme maintaine you by the Clergy and people in this your Royall Seat and Throne who being Lord of Lords and King of Kings make you raigne with him and his Father in the life and glory everlasting Thus saith the Arch-Bishop unto him and after this he is led by him and the other Peeres unto the seat Royall where the Crown is put upon his head and many other large Ceremonies used which may be read in the Author aforesaid and are to long for this place And yet have I bin the larger in this matter of France for that I do not think it to be improbable which this Author and others do note to wit that most Nations round about have taken their particuler formes of Anointing and Crowning their Kings from this ancient Custome of France though the substance thereof I meane of their sacring and Anointing be deduced from examples of far more antiquity to wit from the very first Kings among the people of Israel 1. Reg. 10. 16. 2. Reg. 2. whom God caused to be anointed by his Priests and Prophets in token of his election and as a singuler priviledge of honour and preheminence unto them whereof King David made so great accompt when he said to the Souldier that had kissed Saul his enemy in the war 2. Reg. 1. quaere non to â—uisti mittere manum tuam in Christum Domini Why diddest thou not feare to lay thy hands upon the Anointed of God and he put him to death for it notwithstanding Saul had been long before deposed and rejected by God and that himselfe had lawfully borne Armes against him for many dayes so much was that ceremony of Anointing estemed in those daies and so hath it been ever since among Christian people also for that Kings hereby are made sacred and doe not only participate with Priests but also with Christ himselfe who hath his name of this circumstance of Anointing as all the world knoweth Probable then I say it is that albeit the substance of this ceremony of Anointing King be much elder then the Christian Kingdom of France yet is this particuler rule and maiesticall manner of doing the same by way of Coronation the most ancient in Frauce aboue all other Kingdomes round about especially if it began with their first Christian King Clodovious not full 500. Yeares after Christ as French Authors doe hold At what time also they recount a great miracle of holy Oyle sent from Heaven by an Angell for Anointing Clodouâ—us whereof they say they have still remaining for the Anointing of their Kings at Rhemes which point I will not stand to treat or discourse in this place but rather will referr my reader to the foresaid Chapter of Francis Belforest Chronicler of France Belfo. l. 3. Cap. 17. who alleadgeth divers writers of almost 500. year antiquitie that write of the same but howsoever that be very propable it seemeth that all the ceremonies of Coronation in Germany and Polonia before receited which had their begining long after the reigne of Clodoneus might be taken from thence so the affinity likenesse of one to the other doth seeme to agree and Garibay also the Chronicler of Spaine and Nauarra in his 22. Booke Estevan Garribay lib. 22. c. 1. talking of this custome of annointing and Crowning the Kings of Nauarra saith that this excellent custome began there I meane in Nauara about 800. yeares past and was brought in by certain Earls of Champain of France named Theobaldes who comming to attaine that Crowne brought with them that reverent ceremony of Anointing and Crowning their Kings according to the use of the French which custome endureth untill this day in that part of Navarra that is under the house of Vandome albeit in the other that is under the Spaniards which is firr the greater it was left of in the Year 1513. when Fardinande surnamed the Cathol que King of Spaine entred thereupon for the Spanish Kings are never Anointed nor Crowned but otherwise admitted by the Common wealth But among all other Kingdomes it seemeth that England hath most particularly taken this custome Ceremony from France not only for the reason before
had some hope to have her sonne Reigne after David upon a certaine promise that David in his youth had made unto her thereof as also she had in the speciall favour and friendship which Nathan the Prophet and Sadock the Priest who could do much with the ould King David did beare unto her sonne Solomon aboue all the rest of his Bretheren Hereupon I say these two that is to say Queene Bersabee and Nathan the Prophet comming together to the old man as he lay one his bed and putting him in mind of his promise and oath made to Bersabee for the preferment of her Son and shewing besides how that Adonias without his order and consent had gathered an Assembly to make himselfe King even that very day which did put the old King in very great feare and anger and further also telling him which pleased him wel quod oculi totius Israel in eum â—espicerent ut indicaret eis quis sederet in solio suo post ipsum 3. Reg. 1. that is that the eyes of all Israel were upon him to see whom he would commend unto them to sit in his seat after him which was as much to say as that the whole common-wealth referred it to his choise which of his Sonnes should reigne after him Vpon these reasons and perswasions I say the good ould King was content that they should take Solomon out of hand and put him upon the Kings owne mule and carry him about the streets of Ierusalem accompanied with his guard and court and crying with sound of Trumpets Vivat Rex Salomon 3. Reg 1. and that Sadock the Priest should anoint him and after that he should be brought back and placed in the royall Throne in the palace and so indeed he was at what time King David himselfe being not able through impotencie to rise out of his bed did him honour and reverence from the place where he lay for so saith the Scriptures Adoravit Rex in lectulo suo king David adored his Sonne Salomon thus Crowned even from his bed all which no doubt though it may seeme to have been wrought by humane meanes and policy yet must we confesse that it was principally by the speciall instinct of God himselfe as by the sequell and succes we see so that hereby also we are taught that these and like determinations of the people Majestrates and common wealths about admitting or refusing of Princes to Reigne or not to Reigne ever them when their designements are to good ands and for just respects and causes are allowed also by God and oftentimes are his owne speciall drifts and dispositions though they seeme to come from man Whereof no one thing can give a more evident proofe then that which ensued afterward to Prince Roboam the Lawfull Sonne and heire of this King Salamon who after his Fathers death comming to Sichem where all the People of Israel were gathered together for his Coronation and Admission according to his right by succession 3. Reg. 12. For untill that time we see he was not accounted true King though his Father was dead and this is to be noted the people began to purpose unto him certain conditions for taking away of some hard and heavy impositions laid upon them by Salomon his Father an evident president of the oath and conditions that Princes do swear unto in these dayes at their Coronation whereunto when Roboam refused to yeald ten Tribes of the twelve refused to admit him for their King 3. Reg 11. but chose rather one Ieroboam Robohams servant that was a meere stranger and but of poore parentage and made him there lawfull King and God allowed thereof as the Scripture in expresse words doth testifie and when Roboam that tooke himselfe to be openly Injured heereby would by armes have pursued his Title and had gathered together an Army of a hundred and foure-score thousand chosen souldiers as the scripture sayth 5 Rig. 12. and 21. to punish these rebells as he calle them and to reduce these 10. tribes to their due obedience of their naturall Prince God appeared unto one Semejah a holy man and bad him goe to the camp of Roboam and tell them plainly that he would not have them to fight against their Brethren that had chosen another King but that every man should goe home to his house and live quietly vnder the King which each party had and so they did and this was the end of that tumult which God for the sins of Salomon had permitted and allowed of And thus much by the way I thought good to touch on t of holy Scripture concerning the Iewish Common-Wealth even at the begining for that it may give light to all the rest which after I am to treate of for if God permitted and allowed this in his own Common wealth that was to he the example and patern of all others that should ensue no doubt but that he approveth also the same in other Realms when just occasions are offered either for his service the good of the people and Realm or else for punishment of the sinnes and wickednesse of some Princes that the ordinary line of succession be altered Now then to passe on further and to begin with the Kingdoms of Spayne supposing ever this ground of Gods Ordinance first I say that Spayne hath had 3. or 4. races or discents of Kings as France also and England have had and the first race was from the Gotheâ— which began their raigne in Spayne after the expulsion of the Romans about the year of Christ 416. Ambros Moral lib. 11. c. 12 to whom the Spaniard referreth all his old Nobility as the Frenchman doth to the German Franckes and the English to the Saxons which entred France and England in the very same age that the other did Spayne and the race of Gothish Kings indured by the space of 300. yeares untill Spayne was lost unto the Moores The second race is from Don Pelayo that was chosen first King of Asturias and of the Mountain Countrey of Spayne after the distruction thereof by the Moores about the year of Christ 717. Ambros Moral lib. 13. c. 2. which race continued and increased and added â—â—â—gdom unto Kingdom for the space of other 300 years until the year of Christ 1034. Moral lib. 13 c. 42 43 44. when Don Sancho Mayor King of Navarra got unto his power the Earldom also of Aragon and Castiliae and made them Kingdoms and divided them among his Children and to his second sonne named Don Fernando surnamed afterward the great he gave not only the said Earldom of Castilia with title of Kingdom but by marriage also of the sister of Don Dermudo King of Leon and Austâ—rias he joyned all those Kingdoms together that day forward the 3 race of the Kings of Navair to reign in Castel and so indured for 500 years until the year of Christ 1540. when the house of Austira entred to reign there by mariage of the daughter heire Don Ferdinando
that her Mother Lady Elenor was their sister daughter to K. Henry the 2. and K. Iohn made this mariage therby to make peace with the French was content to give for her dowry for that he could not tell how to recover them again all those Townes Countries which the said K. Phil. had taken upon the English by this Kings evill Government in Normandy Gascoyn and moreover promise was made that if P. Henry of Spain that was the only brother to the said Lady Blanch should dye without issue as after he did then this Lady should succeed in the Crown of Spain also but yet afterward the State of Spain would not perform this but rather admitted her younger sister Dona Berenguela maryed to the Prince of Leon and excluded both Blanch her son the King S Luis of France against the evident right of succession propinquity of bloud the only reason they yeelded hereof was not to admit strangers to the Crown as Garabay testifieth This hapned then I do note by the way that this Dona Berenguela second daughter of Q. Elenor the English woman was maried as hath bin said to the Prince of Leon had by him Don Fernando the 3. of that name K of Castilia surnamed also the Saint so as the two daughters of an English Queen had two Kings Saints for their Sons at one time the elder of France the yonger of Spain After this again about 60 yeers the Prince of Spain named Don Alonso surnamed de la cerda for that he was borne with a great gristle haire on his breast called cerda in Spanish which Don Alonso was Nephew â—o the King Fernando the Saint marryed with the daughter of S. Lewis K. of France named also Blancha as her grand mother was had by her two sons called Alonso Hernando de la cerda as the Prince their Father was named which Father of theirs dying before the King the Grand father left them commended to the Realm as lawful heire apparent to the crowne yet for that a certain Uncle of theirs named Don Saâ—cho younger brother to their father which Don Sancho was surnamed afterward el bravâ— for his valour and was a great Warrier and more like to manage wel the matters of war then they he was made heir apparent of Spain add hey putbâ—ck in their Grandfaâ—hers time and by his and the Realms consent their Father as I have said being dead and this was done at a generall Parliament holden at Segovia in the yeer 1276. and after this Don Sancho was made King in the yeer 1284 the two Princes put into prison but afterward at the suit of their Uncle King Philip the 3 of France they were let out again endued with certain lands so they remain unto this day and of these do come the Dukes of Medina Celi all the rest of the houâ—e of Cerda which are of much Nobility in Spain at this time K. Philip that reigneth cometh of Don Sancho the yonger Brother Not long after this again when Don Pedro surnamed the cruel King of Castile was driven cut his bastard brother H 2. set up in his place the Duke of Lancaster John of Gant Gar. l. 15. c. 1. an 1363. having maried Dona Constantia the said King Padroes daughter and heir pretended by succession the saidâ— Crowne of Castile as indeed it appertâ—ined unto him but yet the State of Spain denyed it flatly and defended it by arms they prevailed against John of Gant as did also the race of H the Bâ—stard against his lawfull brother the race of Don Sancho the uncle against his lawfull nephews that of Dona Berenguela against her elder sister all which races do reign unto this day these three changes of the true line hapned within two ages and in the third and principall discent of the Spanish Kings when this matter of suceession was most assuredly perfectly established yet who will deny but that the Kings of Spain who hold by the latter titles at this day be true lawfull Kings Well one example will I give you more out of the kingdom of Portugal so will I make an end with there countries This king Henry the bastard last named 〈◊〉 Spain had a son that succeeded him in the crown of Spain named Iohn the 1 who marryed the daughter heâ—r named Dona Beatrix of k Fernando the 1. of Portugal but yet after the death of the said k. Fernando the States of Portugall would never agree to admit him for their King for not subjecting themselvs by that means to the Castilians for that cause they rather took for their king a bastard brother of the said late k. Don Fernando whose name was Dondulan a youth of 20 yeers old who had bin Master of a military order in Portugal named de Avis so they excluded Dona Beâ—trâ—x Q. of Cast l. that was their lawfull heire chose this young man marryed him afterwards to the Lady Philip daâ—ghter of Iohn of Gaunt D. of Lancaster by hâ—s first wife Blanch Duches heir of Lancaster in whose right the kings of Portugall their discendents do pretend unto this day a certain interest to the house of Lancaster Hereby we see what an ordinary matter in hath been in Spain Portugall to alter the line of next succession upon any reasonable consideration which they imagned to be for their weal publike and the like we shall find in France and England The eighth Speech AS concerning the state of France although since the entrance of their first king Pharaniond with his Franks out of Germany which was about â—he yeere of Christ 419. they have never had any stranger come to wear their crown which they attribute to their law Salike that forbiddeth women to reign ye among themselves have they changed twise their whole race linage of kings once in the entrance of k. Pepin that put out the line of Pharamond about the yeer 751. again in the promotion of k. Hugo Capetus that put out the line of Pepin in the yeer 983. so as they have had 3 discents races of Kings as well as the Spaniards the first of Pharamond the 2. of Pepin and the 3. of Capetus which endureth to this present if it be not altered now by the exclusion that divers pretend to make of the King of Navar and other Princes of the bloud Royall of the house of Burbon I will here set pâ—sse the first rank of all of the French Kings for that some men say perhaps that the common wealth and law of succession was not so well setled in those days as it hath been afterward in time of k. Pepin Charles the great and their discendantaâ— as also for that it were in very deed over edious to examine and peruse all three ranks or kings in France as you will say when you shall see what store I have
to alledge out of the 2. rank only which began with the exclusion and deposition of their lawfull king Childerike the 3. and election of k. Pepin then surnamed le brefe or the little for his small stature though he were a Gyant in deeds being made king of France by meer election in the yeer of Christ 751. after 22 Kings that had reigned of the first line of Pharamond for the space of more then 300 yeers being so famous worthy a King as all the world knoweth reigned 18 yeers and then left his States Kingdoms by succession unto his eldest Son Charles surnamed afterward the Great for his famous heroicall acts And albeit the whole kingdom of France appertained unto him alone by the law of succession his Father being King and hee his eldest Son yet would the Realm of France shew their authority in his admission which Girard setteth down in these words Estant Pepâ—n decede les Francois esleurent Rois Charls Carlomon ses fils ala charge quils partageroient entre eux egalement le royaume Gir. du Haillan l. 3. an 768. which is king Pepin being dead the brench-men chose for their kings his two Sons Charles Carlomon with condition that they should part equally between them the Realm Wherein is to be noted not only the elect on of the Common wealth besiâ—es succession but also the heavy condition laid upon the heyre to part half of his kingdom with his younger brother and the very same words hath Eginard an ancient French Writer in the life of this Charles the Great to wit That the French State in a publike Assembly did chuse two Princes to be their Kings with expresse condition to divide the Realm equally as Francis Belforest citeth his words Eginard Belfor l 2. c. 5. After 3 yeers that these two Brethren had reigned together K. Carlomon the yonger dyed and left many Sons the elder whereof was named Adalgise but Belforest saith That the Lords Ecclesiasticall Temporall of France swore fidelity and obedience to Charles without any respect or regard at all of the childâ—en of Carlomon who yet by right of succession should have been preferred and Paulus Emilius a Latine Writer saith proceres regni ad Carolum ultroven entes regem tum totius Galliae sulutarunt Paâ—l Mil. hist Frâ—nc that is The Nobility of the Realme coming of their own accord unâ—o Charles saluted him k. of all France whereby is shewed that this exclusion of the children of Carlomon was not by force or tyranny but by free deliberaâ—ion of the Realm After Charles the great reigned by succession his only Son Lewis the first surnamed deâ—onnaire of hâ—s courtesie who entring to reigâ— in the yeer 817. with great applause of all men for the exceeding gratefull memory of his father was yet afterward at the purâ—uit principally of his own three sonnes by his first wise which were Lothair Pepin and Lups deposed Girard l. 1 An. 834. first in a chancell at Lions and then again at Compeigne and put into a monastery though afterward he came to reigne againe An 840. and his fourth sonne by hâ—s second wife which sonne was named Charles le châ—une for that he was bald â—ucceeded him in the states of France though after many battells against his brother Lothair to whom by succession the same apperteyned After Charles the bald succeeded Lewis the second surnamed le begue for his stuttering who was not eldest but third Son unto his Father an 878. for the second dyed before his Father the eldest was put by his succesâ—ion for his cruell demeanure this Lewis also was like to have bin deprived by the States at his first entrance for the hatred conceived against hâ—s Father Charles the baâ—d but that he calling a solemn Pâ—rl at Compeigne as Girard saith Gie l. 1. an 879 he made the People Clergy Nobility many fair promises to have their good wils This Lewis the stuttering left two bastard sons by a Concubine who were called Lewis Carlomon as also he left a litle Infant newly born of his lawfull fe Adeltrude daughter to k. Alfred of England which Infant was K. of France afterward by name of Charles the simple albeit not immediatly after the death of his Father for that the Nobles of France said that they that they had need of a man to be King not a child as Girard reporteth therefore the whole State of France chose for their Kings the two foresaid bastards Lewis the 3. Carlomon the first of that name joyntly they were crowned most solemnly divided the whole Relm between them in the yeer of Christ 881. Q. Adeltruds with her child true heir of France fled into England to her Father there brought him up for dâ—vers yeers in which time she saw 4 or 5 Kings Reigne in his place in France one after the other for briefly thus it passed Of these two bastard Kings the elder named Lewis reigned but 4 yeers and dyed without issue the 2d that is Carlomon lived but one yeer after him left a Son called also Lewis the 5. surnamed Faineant for his idle slothfull life an 886. For which as also for his vicious behaviour in perticular for taking out marying a Nun of the Abby of Baudour at Chels by Paris he was deprived made a Monk in the Abbey of S. Denis where he dyed in his place was chosen K. of France and crowned with great solemnity Charles the 4. Emperour of Rome srrnamed le gios for that he was fat corpâ—lent he was Nephew to Charles the bald before mentioned therfore the French stories say that he came to the Crown of France partly by succession partly by election Girard l. 5. an 888. but for succession we see that it was nothing worth for so much as Charles the simple the right heire was alive in England whom it seemeth that the French men had quite forgotten seeing that now they had not only excluded him three times already but afterwards also againe when this grosse Charls was for his cruel government by them deposed deprived not onely of the kingdom of France but also of his Empire which he had before he was King was brought into such miserable penury as divers write that he perished or want this time I say the States of France would not yet admit Charles the simple though hitherto his simplicity did not appear but he seemed a goodly Prince but rather they chose for King one Odo Earl of Paris Duke of Angiers caused him to be crowned But yet after a few yeers being weary of this mans government and moved also somewhat with compassion towards the youth that was in England they resolved to depose Odo and so they did while he was absent in Gascony and called Charls the simple out of England to Paris and restored him to the kingdom of France leaving only to
named Ethelwâ—lfe or Adâ—â—ulte or Edolph an 829. for all is one who succeeded him in the kingdom and was as worthy a man as his Father and this Adeluulfe again had four lawfull Sons who all in their turns succeeded by just and lawfull order in the crown to wit Ethelbald Ethelbert Ethelred and Alfred for that none of the former three had any children and all the latter three were most excellent Princes especially Alfred or Alured the last of all four whose acts are wonderfull an 8â—2 and who among other his renowned Guests drove Rollo that famous Captain of the Danes from the Boâ—ders of England with all his company into France where he got the country or Province named then Neustria and now Normandy and was the first Duke of that Province and Nation and from whom our William Conquerour came afterwards in the 6. discent This man also erected the University of Oxford being very learned himselfe builded divers good Monasteries and Churches dying left as famous a Son behind himself which was Edward the first surnamed the senior or elder Anno 900. This King Edward dying left two Sons lawfully begotten of his wife Edgina the one named Prince Edmund the other Eâ—â—â—ed and a third illegitimate whose name was Adelstan whom he had by a Concubine But yet for that this man was esteemed to be of more valour then the other he was preferred to the crown before the other two Princes legitimate an 924 for so testifieth Poâ—dor in these words Adâ—â—anus ex concubina Edwardi filius rax a populo consalutatur atque ad Kingstonum opidum more majorum ab Athâ—â—lmo cautuariensi Arel lepiscopo corâ—natur Pol. l. 5. hist ang which is Adelstan the Son of K. Edward by a Concubine was made King by the People and was crowned according to the old custome by Athelme Archbishop of Canterbury at the town of Kingston Thus far Polidor and Stow addeth further these words His coronation was celebrated in the Market place upon a stage erected on high that the King might better be seen of the multitude he was a Prince of worthy memory valiant and wise in all his acts and brought this land into one perfect Monarchy for the expelled utterly the Danes and quieted the Welch men Stow p. 136. an 924. Thus much Stow of the snccesse of chusing this King bastard to reign To whose acts might be added that he conquered Scotland and brought Constantine their King to doe him homage and restored Lewis d'Outremer his sisters Son to the Kingdom of France an 940. This man dying without issue his lawfull brother Edmond put back before was admitted to the crown who being of excellent expectation dyed after 6 yeers and left two lawfull sons but yet for that they were young they were both put back by the Realm their uncle Eâ—dred was preferred before them an 946. so saith Palidor Genuâ—t Edmondus ex Egilda uxore Edvinuus Edganum qui cum etate pueri esseâ—â— post Eldredum deinder regnarunt Pol l. 6. King Edmond begat of his wife Egilda two Sons named Edwin and Edgar who for that they were but children in yeers were put back and reigned afterward after their uncle Eldred The like saith Stow and yeeldeth the same reason in these words Eldred succeeded Edmond his bâ—other for that his Sons Edwin and Edgar were thought to young to take so great a charge upon them This Eldred though he entred as you see against the right of the Nephews yet saith Polidor and Stow that he had all mens good will and was crowned as his brother had been at Kingston by Odo Archbishop of Canterbury and reigned 9 yeers with great good will and praise of all men He dyed at last without issue aud so his elder Nephew Edwin was admitted to the crown but yet after 4 yeers he was deposed again for his lewd vicious life and his younger brother Edgar admitted in his place in the yeer of Christ 959. This King Edgar that entred by deposition of his brother was one of the rarest Princes that the world had in his time both for peace and war justice piety and valour Stow saith he kept a Navy of 3000. and 600 ships distributed in divers parts for defence of the Realm Also that he built and restored 47 Monasteries at his own charges and did other many such acts He was Father to King Edward the Martyr and Grandfather to K. Edward the confessor though by two different wives for by his first wife named Egilfred â—hee had Edward after martyrized and by his second wife Alfred he had Etheldred Father to Edw. the confessour and to the end that Etholdred might reign his mother Alfred caused K. Ed. the son of Egilfred to be slain after King Edgar her husband was dead After this so shamefull murther of K. Edw many good men of the Realm were of opinion not to admit the succession of Etheldred his half brother both in respect of the murther of K. Ed. his elder brother committed for his sake as also for that he seemed a man not fit to govern and of his opinion among others was the holy man Dunston Archbishop of Canterbury as Polidor saith Pol. l. 7. hist Ang. who at length in flat words denyed to consecrate him but seeing the most part of the Realm bent on Etheldreds side he foretold them that it would repent them after and that in this mans life the Realm should be destroyed as indeed it was and he ran away to Normondy and left Sweno and his Danes in possession of the Realm though afterward being dead hee returned againe and dyed in London This Etheldred had two wives the first Ethelgina an English woman by whom he had Prince Edward surnamed Iron-side for his great strength and valour who succeeded his Father in the Crown of England for a yeer and at his death left two Sons which after shall be named And besides this Etheldred had by his first wife other two Sons Edwin and Adelston and one Daughter named Edgina all which were either slain by the Danes or dyed without issue The second Wife of Etheldred was called Emma sister to Richard Duke of Noâ—mondy who was Grandfather to William the Conquerour to wit Father to Duke Robert that was Father to William So as Emma was great Aunt to this William and shee bare unto King Atheldred two Sons the first Edward who was afterward named King Edward the Confessor and Alerud who was slain trayterously by the Earl of Kent After the death also of King Etheldred Queen Emma was marryed to the Dane King Canutus the first of that name surnamed the Great that was King of England after Etheldred and Edmond Ironside his Son and to him she bare a Sonne named Hardicanutus who reigned also in England before King Edward the Confessour Now then to come to our purpose hee that will consider the passing of the Crown of England from the death of Edmond Iron-side elder Sonne