went out after him Joabs men and the Cherethites and the Pelethites and all the mighty men and they went out of Jerusalem to pursue after Sheba the sonne of Bichri and 1. Kings 1.38.44 So Zadok the Priest and Nathan the Prophet and Benaiah the sonne of Jehoiada and the Cherethites and the Pelethites went down and caused king Solomon to ride upon King Davids mule but why were they so called Some derive their names from certain Hebrew words which may imply that the Cherethites were the kings executioners that did cut off malefactours and the Pelethites were excellent men and chosen to defend his person but because we find that the Philistines were called Cherethites 1. Sam. 30.14 We made an invasion upon the South of the Cherethites and upon the coasts which belongeth to Judah and Cherethims Ezek 25.16 Thus saith the Lord God Behold I will stretch out mire hand upon the Philistines and I will cut off the Cherethims and the nation of the Cherethites Zeph. 2.4 5. Gaza shall be forsaken and Ashkelon a desolation they shall drive out Ashdod at the noon day and Ekron shall be rooted up Wo unto the inhabitants of the sea coast the nation of the Cherethites the word of the Lord is against you I rather subscribe to those that hold that the Cherethites were such garrison souldiers of the Israelites as were seated in Chereth of the Philistines from whom there was still a band chosen to attend the kings person as the guard of his body because they were the most expert and able souldiers and so also the Pelethites might be garrison souldiers amongst the Japhlethites Josh 16.3 And goeth down westward to the coast of Japhleti And Davids sonnes were chief rulers In 1. Chron. 18.17 chief about the king CHAP. IX Vers 1. ANd David said is there yet any left of the house of Saul c. Thus David began now to call to mind the covenant he made with Jonathan 1. Sam. 20.14 15. And thou shalt not onely while yet I live shew me the kindnesse of the Lord that I die not But also thou shalt not cut off thy kindnesse from my house forâ—ever no not when the Lord hath cut off the enemies of David It may seem strange indeed that David did not long ago think of this or that now thinking of it he should know nothing of Mephibosheth Jonathans sonne but for the first of these we may ascribe it to the continuall warres wherewith he had been hitherto encumbred and besides we know that in the sacred History all things are not set down in the very same order wherein they were done and for the second we must consider first that David having lived as an exile both from the court and kingdome of Israel a long time might happely know nothing of this child of Jonathans when he came to the crown secondly that the friends of Saul might purposely conceal him for fear of David thirdly that David was not through jealousie and fear inquisitive after Sauls posterity and fourthly that there is no cause why we should be so solicitous to clear David from being too remisse in taking care of performing the covenant which he had made with Jonathan However observable it is that when he enquired whether there were any left of Sauls family he expressed the reason That I may shew him kindnesse for Jonathans sake for doubtlesse this was added purposely that his courtiers might not forbear to deal plainly with him for fear he should enquire after them with an ill intent Vers 3. Is there not yet any of the house of Saul that I may shew the kindnesse of God unto him That is that great kindnesse that in the presence of God I promised to Jonathan or the kindnesse which God sheweth to the fatherlesse and afflicted yea to his very enemies and which he likewise requires that we should shew to them that are in distresse and misery that we may be like herein to God All this may be comprehended in this expression and it was indeed in the very same tearms challenged from David when Jonathan made a covenant with him 1. Sam. 20.14 15. And thou shalt not onely while yet I live shew me the kindnesse of the Lord that I die not But also thou shalt not cut off thy kindnesse from my house for ever c. Vers 4. Behold he is in the house of Machir the sonne of Ammiel in Lodebar A place beyond Jordan see chap. 17.27 so farre from Jerusalem he was perhaps purposely removed that he might be the better concealed from David Vers 6. Now when Mephibosheth the sonne of Jonathan c. Who is also called Merib-baal 1. Chron. 8.34 Vers 7. I will surely shew thee kindnesse for Jonathan thy fathers sake and will restore thee all the land of Saul thy father c. This land of Sauls had been hitherto it seems in Davids hands either by way of confiscation because of Ishbosheths rebellion or by title of succession as crown lands belonging to the king of Israel or by right of inheritance because David had married Sauls daughter according to the law Num. 27.8 If a man die and have no sonne then ye shall cause his inheritance to passe to his daughter Vers 10. And thou shalt bring in the fruits that thy masters sonne may have food to eat c. That is that Mephibosheth thy master Sauls sonne may have wherewith to nourish and provide for his sonne and the rest of his family Many Expositours hold that by his masters sonne in these words is meant Micha mentioned vers 12. the sonne of Mephibosheth who was now Ziba's master and so they take the drift of Davids words to be this that with the fruits of the land he should nourish Micha his master Mephibosheths sonne and that Mephibosheth himself should live with him in his Court and eat at his table but because in the verse immediately before this by his masters sonne is meant Mephibosheth I have given to thy masters sonne all that pertaineth to Saul and to all his house and so likewise in the words immediately following But Mephibosheth thy masters sonne shall eat bread alway at my table I cannot think that in these words between he should not mean the same by his masters sonne onely indeed it is plain by these words that thy masters sonne may have food to eat is onely meant that he might have food in his house for his family to eat for the next words shew that himself was to be continually at Davids table But Mephibosheth thy masters sonne shall eat bread alway at my table Vers 12. And Mephibosheth had a young sonne whose name was Micha Mephibosheth was but five years old when Saul and Jonathan were slain chap. 4.4 and now he had a young sonne so long it was after Sauls death ere David began to think of requiting the love which Jonathan had shewn to him CHAP. X. Vers 2. THen said David I will shew kindnesse unto Hanun the
hand foot for foot Exod. 21.24 Some Expositours indeed conceive that the Israelites knew not of this particular cruelty that he had used to others till himself acknowledged the just hand of God upon him herein verse 7. Threescore and ten kings having their thumbs and their great toes cut off gathered their meat under my table and so they ascribe this which the Israelites did wholly to the secret providence of God who moved them thus to return his cruelty upon himself they not knowing why they did it But no such thing can be necessarily inferred from his acknowledgement of that which he had done to the kings that he had conquered for either to confesse how many kings he had used so or out of remorse of conscience being as it were constrained to confesse that it was the just vengeance of God upon him he might well say what he did though he knew the Israelites had purposely done thus to him because he had formerly done so to others Vers 7. Threescore and ten kings having their thumbs and great toes cut off gathered their meat under my table c. This need not seem strange to us if we consider first what petty kings there were in those times and secondly that this may be understood of so many kings who at severall times had been thus used not that there were seventy all at one time thus waiting upon him though even that is not so incredible considering that in those dayes every city almost had a severall king And as for their gathering or gleaning their meat under his table the meaning is not that they lay like dogs under the table but that they were kept as slaves in such a manner that for hunger they were glad to gather up the crumbs and scraps that fell under the kings table as having nothing allowed them to eat but that and happely the king to please himself with this cruell spectacle did sometimes cause them to be fetched in when he was in his cups feasting himself that he might see them in this piteous plight whereunto he had brought them and insult over them And they brought him to Jerusalem and there he died To Jerusalem I conceive they brought him as a spectacle worthy to be beheld that men might learn by him how just God is in punishing men according to the nature of their wickednesse and therefore it is most likely also that he dyed there presently of the wounds he had received in the warre in that severe punishment that was inflicted on him or else that he was kept there upon this extraordinary occasion purposely that men might see in him how God abhorres such cruelty as his was he being otherwise one of those accursed nations that might not be spared Vers 8. Now the children of Judah had fought against Jerusalem and had taken it c. That is before Joshuas death for this is added to shew the reason why they carryed him to Jerusalem to wit because Jerusalem that is that part of Jerusalem that was in Judahs lot was now in their possession though not the fort So that most Expositours hold that both this and the following verses unto verse 17. are a repetition of the memorable acts done by the tribe of Judah whilest Joshua was now living Indeed before the land was divided all Israel fought as in one army against the Canaanites but after the tribes were seated in their severall portions each tribe made warre against the inhabitants in their severall lots and thus the men of Judah are here said to have done these things here related for it is not necessary to hold that Jerusalem was taken when the king thereof was slain Josh 10.23 See the note Josh 15.63 Vers 9. And afterwards the children of Judah went down to fight against the Canaanites that dwelt in the mountain c. That is from Jerusalem which stood in a mountainous countrey Psalme 125.2 As the mountains are round about Jerusalem so the Lord is round about his people Vers 10. And Judah went against the Canaanites that dwelt in Hebron c. That is against the Canaanites that dwelt in the mountains about Hebron which they did in the dayes of Joshua and under the conduct of Caleb who then commanded in chief It is evident that Hebron was taken by Joshua concerning which see the note Joshua 10.37 and that afterwards Caleb drove out the giants that had possessed themselves of the strong holds in and about Hebron Ioshua 15.13 14. Concerning which see the note Ioshua 11.21 But because the Authour of this history was here to relate the memorable exploits that were done by the men of Iudah therefore together with those noble acts which they did after the death of Ioshua he repeats also those that were done by them whilest Ioshua was yet living under the command of Caleb both against Hebron and against Debir in the following verses so to set forth the glory of this tribe the more fully Vers 11. And from thence he went against the inhabitants of Debir c. See the notes that concern these following verses Ioshua 15.15 16 c. Vers 16. And the children of the Kenite Moses father in Law went up out of the city of palm-trees c. That is out of Jericho Deut. 34.3 the plain of the valley of Jericho the city of palm-trees Concerning these Kenites see the note upon Numb 10.31 in tents they alwayes dwelt chap. 4.17 Howbeit Sisera fled away on his feet to the tent of Jael the wife of Heber the Kenite it seems therefore that being appointed to have their lot with Judah having formerly dwelt in their tents in the countrey about Jericho for Jericho it self was many years ago destroyed Josh 6.24 after Judahs portion was cleared they removed with them to the wildernesse of Judah there to dwell with the men of Judah as Moses had promised to Hobab the Kenite Num. 10.32 And it shall be if thou go with us yea it shall be that what goodnesse the Lord shall do unto us the same will we do unto thee Vers 17. And Judah went with Simeon his brother To wit to help Simeon in the clearing his lot as before Simeon had helped Judah vers 3. And they slew the Canaanites that inhabited Zephah and utterly destroyed it and the name of the citie was called Hormah That is utter destruction they were not wont thus utterly to destroy all the cities they took it is therefore probable that they did thus destroy this place because of the vow which the Israelites had made long since when Arad the king of the Canaanites made warre against them see the note Numb 21.3 and the mention of Arad in the foregoing verse makes this opinion the more probable Vers 18. Also Judah took Gaza with the coast thereof c. Yet it seems soon after the Philistines recovered these cities with the coasts thereof and drave out the Israelites ere they could well settle themselves therein to wit because
How to compute the time from the birth of Boaz to the birth of David is a matter of great difficulty for from the going of the Israelites out of Egypt to the building of the temple it was 480. years and therefore from the Israelites entring the land of Canaan to that time it was 440 years out of which deducting 24 years for the age of Solomon when he began to build the temple 50. years for the age of David when Solomon was born which is most probable it will then be found that it was 366. years from the Israelites entring into Canaan to the birth of David and it was not sure long after the Israelites took Jericho ere Salmon married Rahab by whom he had Boaz. But yet granting that both Boaz begat Obed when he was a very old man and so Obed Jesse and Jesse David it might well be that in 366. years there might be no more then these generations ANNOTATIONS Upon the first book of SAMUEL Otherwise called The first book of KINGS CHAP. I. NOw there was a certain man of Ramathaim-zophim c. The two books of Samuel are so called because they contain the storie of the life and death of Samuel and of the Common-wealth of Israel under his government and likewise the storie of Saul and David who were both anointed kings by Samuel and so shew how the prophecies of Samuel concerning them both were exactly fulfilled Yet by the Greek and Latine Interpreters they are usually called the two first books of the Kings because therein is related how the government of Israel came first to be changed from that of Judges to that of Kings and because they contain the storie of Saul and David the two first Kings of Israel By whom these books were written is no where expressed but that they were written by the inspiration of the holy Ghost whosoever the penmen were is evident by the testimonie of the Jews to whom were committed the Oracles of God and who did alwayes acknowledge them to be a part of the sacred canon of the Scripture and it is likewise confirmed in the new Testament where some passages of these books are cited as a part of the Scripture as we may see Matt. 12.3 4. where that passage concerning Davids eating the shew-bread 1. Sam. 21.6 is cited by our Saviour Have ye not read what David when he was an hungred did and they that were with him how he entred into the house of God and did eat the shewbread c. and again in those two testimonies cited by S. Paul the one Rom. 15.9 As it is written For this cause I will confesse to thee amongst the Gentiles and sing unto thy name which is taken out of the 2. Sam. 22.50 and the other Heb. 1.5 I will be to him a father and he shall be to me a sonne which is alledged from 2. Sam. 7.14 As for these first words Now there was a certain man of Ramathaim-zophim c. wherein we are told what Elkanah the father of Samuel was we must know first that whereas elsewhere the town where Elkanah dwelt is called Ramah as in the 19. verse of this chapter And they rose up in the morning early and came to their house to Ramah and so again chap. 2.11 here it is called Ramathaim-zophim Ramathaim in the duall number because it consisted of two towns that were called Ramah two Ramahs joyned in one and Zophim either because it was situate in the countrey or region of Zuph whereof we reade chap. 9.5 And when they were come to the land of Zuph Saul said to his servant that was with him Come and let us return c. or else because of the high situation of the place standing upon some notable high hill in regard whereof it may well be that there were some watch-towers there for that the name seems to import because Zophim signifieth watch houses or towers or else as some think because there was there an Universitie or school of Prophets who are usually in the Scripture called watchmen as Ezek. 3.17 Sonne of man I have made thee a watchman to the house of Israel secondly that whereas in setting down the genealogie of Elkanah it is said that he was the sonne of Jeroham the sonne of Elihu the sonne of Tohu the sonne of Zuph it seems in the 1. Chron. 6.26 27. that three of these were also called by other names for Elihu is there called Eliab and vers 34. Eliel and Tohu Nahath and vers 34. Toah and Zuph Zophai and thirdly whereas it is said that Elkanah was an Ephrathite thereby is meant that he dwelt in mount Ephraim Elimelech and his two sonnes are called Ephrathites Ruth 1.2 because they were of Bethlehem Ephratah and Jeroboam is called an Ephrathite because he was of the tribe of Ephraim 1. Kings 11.26 but Elkanah is here called an Ephrathite onely because he dwelt in mount Ephraim for that he was a Levite of the familie of the Kohathites to whom indeed certain cities were allotted in the tribe of Ephraim Josh 21.20 and of the posteritie of Korah that wretch that was in so fearfull a manner destroyed in the wildernesse for his rebellion against Moses is evident 1. Chron. 6.22 23 c. so that it is no wonder though the sonnes of Korah were spared whilest the father was destroyed since the Lord had determined from this cursed stock to raise up to the Israelites such a glorious Prophet as Samuel was Vers 2. And Peninnah had children but Hannah had no children Hannah is reckoned in the foregoing words in the first place and it is probable therefore which some conceive that Hannah was his first wife and that afterwards he took Peninnah to wife because Hannah was barren For in those times they counted it an extraordinary crosse to die without issue yea because the temporall promise made to that nation depended much upon their carnall generation though the Lord allowed not their polygamie yet he was pleased to tolerate this infirmitie in his servants till the Messiah came when the Church should no longer be tied to one nation but spirituall children should be begotten unto God from all nations and it may be they did conceive that Gods promise to Abraham of multiplying his seed as the starres of heaven did implie a dispensation granted to them for having many wives Vers 3. And this man went up out of his citie yearly to worship and to sacrifice to the Lord of hosts in Shiloh At Shiloh the Tabernacle had stood ever since the seventh yeare of Joshua Josh 18.1 thither went Elkanah yearly that is at those three solemne feasts wherein all the males were bound to appear before the Lord Deut. 16.16 He might go at other times as a Levite to do service in his course at the Tabernacle but here doubtlesse his going up yearly at those great feasts is onely intended when his familie went with him yea the women also such was their devotion though
the mean time by concealing whereof they both provide for their own safetie that nothing might be presently attempted against them and make their enemies the more secure that Saul might come upon them unawares Vers 11. Saul put the people in three companies and they came into the midst of the host in the morning watch c. It seems Saul marched all night that by the morning watch he might come upon them and surprise them unawares And thus he raised the siege of Jabesh-gilead and freed them from that horrid cruelty which the enemy entended against them and how thankfull the inhabitants of this citie were to Saul for this great benefit they enjoyed by his means we may see chap. 31.11 12 13. And when the inhabitants of Jabesh-gilead heard of that which the Philistins had done to Saul All the valiant men arose and went all night and took the body of Saul and the bodies of his sonnes from the wall of Beth-shan and came to Jabesh and burnt them there And they took their bones and buried them under a tree and fasted seven dayes Vers 13. And Saul said There shall not a man be put to death this day for to day the Lord hath wrought salvation for Israel In this reason that Saul gave why he would not suffer any man to be put to death that day for to day the Lord hath wrought salvation in Israel two things may be implyed first that he would not have a day of so much joy and triumph stained with the least sorrow and mourning amongst any of the people and secondly that when God had shewn himself so good and gracious to his people he could not think it fit to be so rigid severe against those that had at first slighted him in his sovereignty However here again we see what a difference there was betwixt that which Saul was in his first government and that he was afterwards when the Spirit of the Lord was departed from him Now none more humble and gentle then he not a man should be put to death for him but afterwards in his dealing with David and the Priests of the Lord he was another man even bloud-thirsty cruell and implacable beyond measure Vers 14. Then said Samuel to the people Come and let us go to Gilgal and renew the kingdome there A city this was near hand adjoyning upon Jordan there Joshua renewed the covenant betwixt the Lord and his people Josh 5.9 and there Samuel now renewed the covenant concerning the kingdome betwixt Saul and the people Before he was chosen but this was as it were the solemnity of his inauguration and coronation and now it seems he was anointed in publick as before in private and therefore in the next chapter Samuel speaking to the people calls Saul severall times the Lords Anointed Vers 15. And there they made Saul king before the Lord in Gilgal and there they sacrificed c. It is evident therefore that here now Saul and Samuel sacrificed together in Gilgal whence we may certainly conclude that the charge which Samuel gave to Saul chap. 10.8 that he should stay for Samuel at Gilgal seven dayes till he came to offer sacrifice for him was not meant of Sauls immediate going to Gilgal but of his going thither when he should be in a strait and had not Samuel with him as is before noted in the exposition of that place CHAP. XII Vers 1. ANd Samuel said unto all Israel Behold I have hearkened unto your voice in all that ye said unto me c. Samuel presseth them now more closely and sharply then ever with their sinne in rejecting the government which God had established among them first because in this their jollity for that glorious victory which their new king had obtained against the Ammonites they were in danger to be puffed up with an opinion that God approved that which they had done and that they had not sinned in desiring a king secondly because having established Saul in the throne actually resigned the government into his hands he might now speak the more freely without giving the least ground of suspition that he was loth to give over the government and therefore condemned them for choosing a king Vers 2. And now behold the king walketh before you This is meant of Sauls being now settled in the supreme magistracy as a shepherd or captain to lead and govern the people and to be as a shield unto them to stand betwixt them and harms way the like phrase there is Numb 27.17 concerning which see the note there And I am old and gray-headed and behold my sonnes are with you To imply how good cause he had to be very well content in regard of himself that the burden of the government should be taken from his shoulders he wisheth them to remember that he was now grown aged I am saith he old and gray-headed and then he addes and behold my sonnes are with you that is they are amongst you as one of you they shall lay no claim to the government no more then I do so that this he saith either first the more to clear his integrity who was willing his sonnes should lay down the power of government as well as himself or secondly to intimate that if they could charge him for any wrong done his sonnes should make satisfaction or else to imply that of them they might be satisfied concerning his course of life and particularly whether he did any way incourage them in those wicked courses they ranne into chap. 8.3 Vers 3. Behold here I am witnesse against me before the Lord and before his anointed c. As if he should have said being now the power of government is transferred to another ye need not fear to speak your minds of me and therefore if ye can accuse me of any evil speak it freely And this protestation of his innocency he makes First that he might the more freely reprove them Secondly to manifest the greivousnesse of their sinne who had without any just cause rejected the government which God had erected among them And thirdly to propound this covertly as a pattern for their new chosen king to follow before whom all this was spoken witnesse against me before the Lord and before his Anointed Vers 7. Now therefore stand still that I may reason with you before the Lord of all the righteous acts of the Lord c. That is both mercies and punishmenâ—â— but cheifly I conceive this is meant of his mercies wherein the Lord approved his faithfulnesse in performing the covenant which he had made with them for these he presseth upon them to discover the hainousnesse of their sinne in rejecting his government who had so carefully protected them against all their enemies and so abundantly blessed them in every regard Vers 8. The Lord sent Moses and Aaron which brought forth your fathers out of Egypt and made them dwell in this place This making them to dwell in the land
which he built himself or else because those altars were onely set up for present use and then demolished again but this was the first which he built for a standing continuing altar which then is noted because it was directly against the law of God as we may see in the notes Exod. 20.24 Vers 36. Then said the Priests Let us draw near hither unto God That is let us enquire of God before the Ark because the prosecuting of the enemies by night which Saul had motioned to the people was an act of some danger and the people were very forward to do what he advised therefore the Priest interposed himself and wished them by all means to enquire first of the Lord and this perhaps he did the rather because he saw what ill effects had followed upon Sauls neglecting to do this before ver 19. to wit that Saul by a rash and unadvised oath had weakened the hands of the people in the pursuance of their victory and had been withall the occasion of a grievous sinne amongst the people which was their eating of the spoil with the bloud vers 32. Vers 37. But he answered him not that day When Saul had enquired of the Lord by the judgement of Urim and Thummim the Lord answered him not but whence was this doubtlesse the Lords displeasure was against Saul not against Jonathan who though he had done what his father had forbidden and that with an oath that whosoever should offend therein should be accursed and so put to death yet he did it ignorantly not knowing that his father had made such a vow and was compelled too by necessity being ready to faint when he reached out his rod and so by tasting a little honey refreshed himself yet it is evident too that the Lords refusing to answer Saul tended to this that it might be discovered that Jonathan had transgressed the command and vow of his father but why not so much to discover Jonathan to be the party with whom the Lord was offended as first to discover to Saul his hypocrisie and the rashnesse of his unadvised oath who had hereby hindred the victory caused the people to sinne and now brought his own sonne under the danger of being accursed and put to death and secondly to shew the religious respect that was due to an oath Vers 38. And Saul said Draw ye near hither all the chief of the people and know and see wherein this sinne hath been this day Saul concluded that God was offended when he had enquired of him by the Priest and he would not answer him and therefore presently commanded all the chief of the people that is all the heads of the Tribes and families to draw near unto him to wit that by drawing lots it might be discovered who it was that had sinned and offended God amongst them for though himself had sinned in that rash and unadvised oath that he took ver 24. and and that he knew the people had sinned grievously in eating with the bloud vers 32. yet like a true hypocrite he never minded these things but concluded that the breach of his vow and command must needs be the great offence which caused the Lord to be silent and therefore for the finding out of this he would have them draw lots Vers 43. I did but tast a little honey with the end of the rod that was in mine hand and lo I must die As if he had said That which I did was a very small offence if any especially considering that I knew not of the oath and yet it seems I must die for it Vers 44. And Saul answered God do so and more also See the note Ruth 1.17 Vers 45. As the Lord liveth there shall not one hair of his head fall to the ground for he hath wrought with God this day That is through Gods blessing and assistance he hath been the means of procuring a most glorious victory to the children of Israel Vers 47. So Saul took the kingdome over Israel and fought against all his enemies c. That is being confirmed in his kingdome by this glorious victory over the Philistines he again undertook the managing and administration of it or else this may be spoken with reference to that which went before to wit that thus as we have heard he took upon him the kingdome being chosen thereto of God and in defence of the people fought against all their enemies Vers 49. Now the sonnes of Saul were Jonathan and Ishui c. This Ishui is also called Abinadab chap. 31.2 and 1. Chron. 8.33 and 10.2 Ishbosheth who is also called Eshbaal 1. Chron. 8.33 is not here mentioned though now above twenty years old 2. Sam. 2.10 happely because he survived his father and those onely are here mentioned that died with him chap. 31.2 As for his sonnes which he had by Rizpah 2. Sam. 21.8 they are not here named because she was not his wife but his concubine CHAP. XV. Vers 1. SAmuel also said unto Saul The Lord sent me to anoint thee to be king over his people over Israel That is the Lord gave me commission to anoint thee king for Samuel went not to Saul but Saul came to Samuel and this Samuel premised before he gave him the following charge from the Lord that he should go and destroy the Amalekites that the remembrance of this honour whereto God had exalted him might make him the more carefull exactly to do what God had enjoyned him Now therefore hearken thou unto the voyce of the words of the Lord. In this word now Samuel covertly puts him in mind of his former transgression chap. 13.8.9 As if he had said though thou didst formerly neglect to do what the Lord enjoyned thee yet now remember what God hath done for thee and be sure strictly to observe this which God hath given thee in charge Vers 2. I remember that which Amalek did to Israel how he laid wait for him in the way when he came up from Egypt Three severall times God had foretold that he would destroy the Amalekites and that for the violence which they offered to the Israelites to wit Exod. 17.14 Numb 24.20 and Deut. 25.19 And now Saul is sent to execute that vengeance upon them which the Lord had so long time since at severall times threatned for though the present king and people of Amalek had been cruell and bloudy adversaries to the people of God as Samuels speech to Agag seems to imply vers 33. As thy sword hath made women childlesse so shall thy mother be childlesse among women and so had deserved to be destroyed for their own sinnes yet because the Lord would have his people know that he had not forgot that former injurie of their Ancestours towards his people though it were now above foure hundred years since but intended now principally to be avenged on them for that in the commission that he sent now to Saul for the destroying of the Amalekites he
would abuse the souls of the dead at his pleasure to deceive the living secondly it is no way likely that the Lord who had so lately refused to answer Saul by the Prophets would now raise up Samuel from the dead to answer him we see what was said in a like case to the rich man in hell Luke 16.31 If they heare not Moses and the Prophets neither will they be perswaded though one rose from the dead thirdly even the mantle wherein he appeared vers 14. was an evident signe that all was counterfeit for did Samuel think we carry his mantle with him into heaven or into the grave fourthly had the Prophet Samuel been sent of God which is the onely evasion the Papists have to maintain this errour the witch they say did not conjure him up but God sent him to appear to Saul he would never have said as this counterfeit Samuel did ver 15. that the witch by Sauls means had raised him up Why saith he hast thou disquieted me to bring me up It was therefore doubtlesse by the witches inchantments that this Samuel was raised and consequently it was not Samuel indeed but the devil in Samuels likenesse and therefore called Samuel here when the woman saw Samuel c. and that it was that made her cry out so violently as soon as she saw him when the devil was raised it seems according to the accustomed manner the witch was presently possessed vvith a spirit of divination and hereby knevv Saul for vvhom she had done this and hereupon cried out as apprehending he vvas come to ensnare her that having discovered her he might put her to death Why saith she hast thou deceived me For thou art Saul all vvhich shevvs plainly that the Authour of that Apocryphall book of Eccclesiasticus vvrote not by the inspiration of the holy Ghost vvho saith of Samuel as in relation to this history chap. 46.20 After his death he prophecied and shew the king his end c Vers 13. And the king said unto her be not afraid for what sawest thou Hereby it appears that Saul saw not the apparition at the first though afterward he was admitted to the sight of it and that happely because the woman was at first apart by her self as witches indeed use not to be seen when they work their feats And the woman said unto Saul I saw gods ascending out of the earth This she spake either because he appeared in such an attire c. that she might easily perceive it was some Magistrate or personage of great eminencie and worth and such are called Gods Psalme 82.6 I have said ye are Gods or else because this evil spirit now a counterfeit Samuel did rise up with such a divine kind of splendour and brightnesse as we know he can change himself into an Angel of light 2. Cor. 11.14 That the poore woman unacquainted with such apparitions was even astonished with beholding it Vers 14. And Saul perceived it was Samuel and he stooped c. Saul at length is admitted to the sight of this counterfeit Samuel though it seems he were not by when the witch first conjured him up vers 12.13 and so Saul addressing himself to enquire of this infernall prophet the witch it seems withdrew her self as appears vers 21 where it is afterwards said The woman came unto Saul and saw that he was sore troubled Vers 17. And the Lord hath done to him as he spake by me That is to David the man to whom the Lord hath betaken his favourable presence since he departed from thee Vers 18. Because thou obeyedst not the voice of the Lord nor executedst his fierce wrath on Amalek c. When Saul was in consultation about sparing Agag the Amalekite the devil no doubt then suggested whatever might encourage and embolden him thereto but now when he come to be affrighted with the apprehension of Gods wrath even that fact of his he alledged against him thereby to adde to his terrours and to drive him to despair and that under a colour of speaking as a Samuel Vers 19. And to morrow shalt thou and thy sonnes be with me That is ye shall be slain and so not be any longer amongst the living but with me amongst the dead But how came the devil to be of Gods counsell that he can so certainly determine the period of their lives I answer first that the devil can and doth many times by strong conjectures foretell many future things which accordingly come to passe Secondly that he doth not here define the time of their death certainly but speaks darkly and deceitfully for to morrow doth not onely signifie the day immediately following but also the time to come indefinitely Exod. 13.14 And it shall be when thy sonne asketh thee in time to come or to morrow what is this thou shalt say unto him c. and Matth. 6.34 Take therefore no thought for the morrow c. as indeed it seems it was not the very next day that Saul and his sonnes fell before the Philistines and so we see in another particular he speaks ambiguously Thou and thy sonnes shall be with me which might either be meant of their dying onely as spoken with respect to Samuel or of being with Sathan and then that as concerning Jonathan we are sure he lyed grossely but thus will the devil still preach comfort to those at last that will not away with the preaching of Gods prophets when they sharply reprove them for their sinnes Vers 21. And the woman came unto Saul and saw that he was sore troubled c. Hereby it appears that the witch had withdrawn her self whilst Saul and her familiar spirit then Samuels counterfeit had been talking together CHAP. XXIX Vers 1. NOw the Philistines gathered together all their armies to Aphek A town in the tribe of Asher Josh 19 24 30. Vers 2. But David and his men passed on in the rereward with Achish Though Achish was king of Gath onely which was but one of the five principalities of the Philistines yet it seems he was the chief among all the princes and had therefore the honour of leading up the rereward and that therein too he had given the honour to David and his men of being as it were his own life guard and therefore it is said that they marched on with Achish in the rereward Vers 3. Then said the princes of the Philistines what do these Hebrews here This is not meant of those Lords that were subjects to Achish the king of Gath as is indeed evident by the roughnesse of their language vers 4. And the princes of the Philistines were wroth with him and the princes of the Philistines said unto him make this fellow return c. but of the princes of the other places of Palestina for these all joyned their forces with Achish in this invasion of the land of of Israel the common sort had indeed as much cause to suspect Davids perfidiousnesse and to provide for
him against David what would they have done for Jonathan so brave and hopefull a Prince had he out-lived his father As for Abinadab here named he is also called Ishui chap. 14.4 and Ishbosheth Sauls fourth sonne it seems was left at home perhaps to take care of the government of the kingdome in Sauls absence for God intended by him further to try the faith and patience of David Vers 3. And the battel went sore against Saul and the archers hit him c. Saul therefore fell not at the first onset but for his greater terrour and sorer punishment first he saw the army routed and his sons together with many of the people slain then at last he was wounded and pursued so closely that there was no hope of escape Vers 4. Draw out thy sword thrust me through therewith lest these uncircumcised come and thrust me through Thus at the very houre of his death yea when he was ready to lay violent hands upon himself Saul could despise the Philistines and speak reprochfully of them and that because they were uncircumcised and consequently none of Gods peculiar people as he was whereas being such a wicked wretch his condition was the worse because he was circumcised and one of Gods peculiar people No Philistine could be so bad as he in this regard Vers 4. Therefore Saul took a sword and fell upon it And thus with the sword he had drawn against David he slew himself the Lord in his just judgement giving him over to this desperate impatience whereupon it is said that the Lord slew him 1. Chron. 10.14 and enquired not of the Lord therefore he slew him c. Vers 6. So Saul died and his three sonnes and his armour-bearer and all his men c. That is not all his souldiers for many of them fled and escaped but all his houshold servants and those perhaps too that were the guard of his body Vers 7. They forsook the cities and fled and the Philistines came and dwelt in them That is some of the men of Israel the inhabitants of some cities on the other side of the valley to wit the valley where this battel was fought and on the other side of Jordan fled out of their cities upon this defeat and so the Philistines came and dwelt in their room Whereby I conceive is meant that at the present they did pursue their victory for a time and pursuing it took those weaker towns out of which the inhabitants were fled for fear and then left garrisons in them for it is not likely that presently they removed colonies of the Philistines to dwell there Vers 9. And they cut off his head and stript off his armour As David had done to Goliath chap. 17.54 and 21.9 Vers 10. And they fastened his body to the wall of Bethshan His head they put in the temple of Dagon 1. Chron. 10.10 but his body and the bodies of his sonnes also vers 12. they fastened to the wall of Bethshan that is to a wall in the street of Bethshan 2. Sam. 21.12 a town that belonged to the lot of Manasseh though not yet recovered from the Philistines called also Bethshean Judg. 1.27 Vers 11. And when the inhabitants of Jabesh-Gilead heard of that which the Philistines had done to Saul c. As being thankfully mindfull of that which Saul had done for them 1. Sam. 11. when he came and helped them against the king of the Ammonites that had besieged their citie and besides no doubt the Lord intended a little hereby to revive the dead hearts of the poore distressed Israelites Vers 12. And took the body of Saul and the bodies of his sonnes from the wall of Bethshan and came to Jabesh and burnt them there This was not the ordinary use of the Israelites and therefore two reasons are given for this by Expositours 1. That it was because the flesh was now corrupt and putrified 2. Lest the Philistines should again get their bodies into their power Vers 13. And they took their bones and buried them under a tree at Jabesh and fasted seven dayes The flesh being burnt from off their bones they gathered up their bones which would not be so soon burnt as the flesh was and buried them solemnly in Jabesh and there they continued till toward the end of Davids reigne when he took up their bones and buried them in the sepulchre of Kish the father of Saul 2. Sam. 21.12 c. As for their fasting seven dayes to wit till the evening of each day when they had thus buried the bones of Saul and his sonnes that was done doubtlesse not onely by way of bewayling the death of Saul and his sonnes but also especially that they might seek unto God in the behalf of the whole land and people of God who were now in a sad condition by reason of this great defeat which the Philistines had given them Nor is it necessary that we should think that they did neither eat nor drink all these seven dayes some masters of Physick have concluded that it must needs be mortall to be without all nourishment for seven daies together rather we may think that they afflicted themselves with fasting for seven dayes together onely taking still at night some small refreshing and yet indeed in those east countreys they will far longer endure fasting then we can do in theâ— paâ— ANNOTATIONS Upon the second book of SAMUEL Otherwise called The second book of KINGS CHAP. I. NOw it came to passe after the death of Saul when David was returned from the slaughter of the Amalekites c. This book containeth the history of Davids reigne who was chosen of God to succeed Saul in the kingdome yet because hereby is shown the accomplishment of Samuels prophecy concerning the kingdom of David therefore it is called The second book of Samuel And the first thing here related is how the tidings of the death of Saul and his sonnes were first brought unto David whilest he was yet in Ziklag David was lately returned thither from the slaughter of the Amalekites and had been preparing and sending away presents to his friends in Judah of the spoil he had taken from them when behold on a sudden their great joy was damped with the sad tidings of the overthrow of Gods people the death of Saul and his sonnes even Jonathan amongst the rest the dearly beloved friend of David And thus though a way was opened for David to come to the crown yet it was by a sad calamitie that must needs allay his comfort therein with a great deal of sorrow Vers 2. A man came out of the camp with his clothes rent and earth upon his head See the notes Gen. 37.29 and Josh 7.6 Vers 4. And David said unto him How went the matter I pray thee tell me This eagernesse of David to know what had passed betwixt the armies of the Israelites and the Philistines that had invaded their land discovered plainly how solicitous he
type of Christ Matth. 3.17 And so a voice from heaven saying This is my beloved sonne in whom I am well pleased Vers 26. And Joab fought against Râ—bbah of the children of Ammon and took the royall citie Rabbah it seems consisted of two parts which were as it were two cities joyned together and one of them was called both the royall city because there the king had his palace and the city of waters because it was invironed with waters or at least lay upon the side of some river as it is expressed vers 27. I have fought against Rabbah and have taken the city of waters Now Joab having continued almost a yeare in bâ—sâ—â—ging this city as indeed it was no wonder that God gave him no better successe abroad David having so displeased him by his sinne at home at length he took this royall citie or citie of waters and knowing that the other could not now long hold out because this was farre the strongest piece and the other depended upon this and had happely their water from this which was now cut off he therefore sent to David to come thither that he might have the glory of taking the citie Vers 29. And David gathered all the people together and went to Rabbah and fought against it and took it It may justly seem strange that David should go with a numerous army out of the land of Israel into the land of the Ammonites onely to take a citie that was in a manner taken already and which they were afraid would be wonne before he came and that for no other end but that David might have the name of taking the citie But for this we must consider first that even the best of Gods servants are naturally vain-glorious and too much transported with a desire of having their name famous and renowned and secondly there might be other occasions of Davids going thither as for the prosecuting of their conquests in the land of the Ammonites and for giving directions for the punishment of those that had with such scorn abused his embassadours and that Joab knowing this did advise him onely the rather to hasten his coming thither that the citie might be taken by him and so he might have the glory of this great piece of service Vers 30. And he took the kings crown from off his head the weight whereof was a talent of gold with the pretious stones c. There was but a talent of gold in the golden candlestick of the Sanctuary Exod 25.39 which is thought to have been at least an hundred and twenty pound weight but the common talent some say was but half so much as the talent of the Sanctuary to wit sixty pound weight and so much it may be therefore this crown weighed and if so doubtlesse it was too massie to be usually worn Rather it was a crown of state which was onely set upon the heads of their kings at their coronation or hung over their heads in some chair of state and so happely at this time it was set upon their kings head and then taken off and set upon Davids to shew that now the royall dignity was transferred from him to David and indeed because the brother of this king the sonne of Nahush succoured David when he fled from Absalom chap. 17.27.28 it is most probable that Hanun was now either deposed or put to death by David and his brother made governour of Rabbah whence it was that he shewed such respect to David in that time of his troubles Vers 31. And he brought forth the people that were therein and put them under saws and under harrows of iron and under axes of iron and made them passe through the brick-kiln Thus severely David punished them whether by expresse direction from God or otherwise we cannot say because they had against the law of nations so shamefully abused Davids messengers withall having perhaps respect to their inhumane idolatry in causing their children to passe through the fire to Molech which was their idol 1. Kings 11.7 Yet it is like that onely the principall ringleaders in that barbarous usage of Davids messengers and the stirring up of the neighbouring nations against him were thus punished CHAP. XIII Vers 1. ABsalom the sonne of David had a fair sister whose name was Tamar and Amnon the sonne of David loved her Tamar was Amnons sister as well as Absaloms for they were all Davids children but she is called peculiarly Absaloms sister because she was his sister both by father and mother for both Absalom and Tamar were born to David of his wife Maacha the daughter of Talmai king of Geshur and observable it is how much sorrow David had in both these his children which he had by the daughter of an heathenish idolatrous king the incestuous rape of the one and the unnaturall rebellion of the other were a fair evidence to let him see that his matching himself with such a wife was not pleasing to God Vers 2. For she was a virgin and Amnon thought it hard for him to do any thing to her That is being a virgin and so strictly kept and looked to he thought it would be an impossible thing for him ever to get an opportunity of satisfying his lust with her Vers 4. Why art thou being the kings sonne lean from day to day Two reasons may be given why Jonadab wondring that Amnon should so droop and pine away as he did amplified his wonder from this that he was the kings sonne to wit first because he thought the happinesse of being the kings sonne might easily over-weigh any cause of sorrow he could possibly pretend and secondly because there was nothing almost which he could desire which he might not have Why art thou being the kings sonne lean from day to day as if he should have said Being the kings sonne thou mayest command what thou wilt and wherefore then dost thou vex and afflict thy self And Amnon said I love Tamar my brother Absaloms sister He calls her here not his sister but Absaloms thereby seeking to palliate or extenuate his sinne in lusting after her by intimating that she was his sister onely by the half-bloud and not his sister by father and mother as she was Absaloms and yet afterward he calls her his sister the better to hide his purpose from his father vers 6. Amnon said unto the king I pray thee let Tamar my sister come c. Vers 6. The king was come to see him No sooner did Amnon pretend himself sick but presenâ—ly his father came to see him No doubt his late loosing of his child that he had by Bathsheba made him the more fearfull of his loosing this sonne too and being also his eldest sonne he could not but lay it the more to heart and yet how well had it been for David if he had been sick indeed yea sick unto death considering how much bâ—tter sorrow he immediately brought upon him by that unnaturall villany of his in
made a very great burning for him Vers 27 And Baasha smote him at Gibbethon which belongeth to the Philistines c. This Gibbethon belonged to the tribe of Dan Josh 19.41 and was in the dayes of David and Solomon in the Israelites possession but now it seems the Philistines had gotten it and whilest Nadab laid siege against it that he might recover it he was treacherously slaine by Baasha and so the siege it seems was raised for twenty six yeares after or thereabouts the sonne of Baasha did again lay siege to this citie as we may see chap. 16.15 Vers 30. Because of the sinnes of Jeroboam c. So that the idolatry wherewith Jeroboam thought to have continued the kingdome to him and his posterity was the very cause why his whole family was rooted out and the kingdome was transferred to another CHAP. XVI Vers 1. THen the word of the Lord came to Jehu the sonne of Hanani against Baasha This Jehu was the same Prophet that afterwards was sent to Jehoshaphat to reprove him for his league with Ahab 2. Chron 19.2 and that wrote a book of the Chronicles of those times 2 Chron. 20.34 and his father Hanani was he that reproved Asa for seeking to Benhadad for aid against Baasha 2. Chron. 16.7 so that the father and the sonne were both at the same time the known Prophets of the Lord. Vers 7. And also by the hand of the prophet Jehu the sonne of Hanani came the word of the Lord against Baasha c. Some conceive that this hath reference to the judgement denounced against Jeroboam by Ahijah chap. 14.6 c. as if it had been said as the word of the Lord came by Ahijah against Jeroboam so also by Jehu against Baasha But I rather think that the meaning of this clause is onely this that before the death of Baasha Jehu did his message as God had commanded The same words are here again repeated which we had before vers 1. but there they are to shew what God gave in charge to the Prophet here their drift is to shew that accordingly the Prophet delivered his message as the Lord had enjoyned him and that for all the evil that he did c. in being like to the house of Jeroboam and because he killed him that is his lord Nadab the sonne of Jeroboam as is expressed before chap. 15.27 for though Baasha did herein what God had decreed yet he had no command from God for it but did it onely to get the kingdome and therefore it was treason now in him as it was afterward also in Jehu when he slew Ahabs posterity because he aimed onely at himself therein though he had a command from God Hos 1.4 And it shall come to passe at that day that I will break the bow of Israel in the valley of Jezreel and will avenge the blood of Jezreel upon the house of Jehu And indeed that the judgement which fell upon Baasha was partly for his murdering of Nadab we may see by the Lords dealing with him just as he dealt with the house of Jeroboam for as he slew the sonne of Jeroboam when he had yet sat in the throne of Israel not full two complete yeares and that whilest he was laying siege against Gibbethon and then immediately destroyed all the rest of his family chap. 15.27 28 29. so Zimri slew the sonne of Baasha when he had reigned not full two complete yeares as is said here vers 8. and that too whilest his army lay encamped against Gibbethon vers 15. and then immediately cut off all the rest of his family and friends vers 11.12 Vers 8. In the twenty and sixth yeare of Asa king of Judah began Elah the sonne of Baasha to reigne over Israel in Tirzah two years But not fully complete for he began to reigne in the six and twentieth yeare of Asa and was slain in the seven and twentieth yeare of Asa vers 15. Vers 9. And his servant Zimri captain of half his chariots conspired against him as he was in Tirzah c. His forces lying then encamped against Gibbethon vers 15. whereby he gave such an advantage against himself as was not by Zimri neglected Vers 11. And it came to passe when he began to reigne as soon as he sat on his throne that he slew all the house of Baasha c. That is he slew all his family kinsfolks and friends that there might be none to avenge his death and that presently that he might not be prevented as indeed he had been if he had not done it speedily for within few dayes he himself came to an untimely end vers 18. Vers 13. In provoking the Lord God of Israel to anger with their vanities c. That is with their idols for so the idol-gods of all idolatours are usually called in the Scripture partly because they have nothing of a God in them their deitie wholly consisting in the idolatrous vain opinion We know that an idol is nothing saith the Apostle 1. Cor. 8.4 and partly because they can do neither good nor evil 1. Sam. 12.21 Turn ye not aside for then ye shall go after vain things that cannot profit for they are vain Vers 15. In the twenty and seventh yeare of Asa king of Judah did Zimri reigne seven dayes c. Accounting as is most likely to the time that Omri was proclaimed king in the camp as is related in the following verse Vers 18. He went into the pallace of the kings house and burnt the kings house over him with fire c. That so first Omri might never enjoy that stately palace of Tirzah and secondly that neither living nor dead he might fall into the hands of his insulting adversaries Vers 19. For his sinnes which he sinned in doing evil in the sight of the Lord in walking in the way of Jeroboam c. For though he reigned but seven dayes ere Omri was proclaimed by the souldiers yet perhaps it was longer ere he was forced to burn himself and beside within the space of those seven dayes he might by his edicts make known to the people his resolution to continue the worship of Jeroboams calves Vers 21. Half of the people followed Tibni the sonne of Ginath to make him king and half followed Omri It seems the people misliking that the souldiers should take upon them to choose their king chose this Tibni to be their king between whom and Omri there was continuall warres for three years and upward each party striving to assure the crown to him whom they had elected till at length Omri prevailed Vers 23. In the thirtie and one yeare of Asa king of Judah began Omri to reigne c. That is then he was fully and peaceably settled in the kingdome in the seven and twentieth yeare of Asa was he first chosen king by the army at Gibbethon vers 15 19. but for well nigh foure years after Tibni that was chosen by the people strove with him for the
time all their chief officers were called Eunuchs As we see Potiphar to whom Joseph was sold though he were a married man is termed an Eunuch Gen. 37.36 Vers 7. And Elisha came to Damascus and Ben-hadad the king of Syria was sick c. The most received opinion is that Elisha went now to Damascus according to a charge given him by Elijah purposely to anoint Hazael king but why was Elijah sent from mount Horeb to Damascus if God meant not that he himself should anoint Hazael 1. Kings 19.15 And the Lord said unto him Go return on thy way to the wildernesse of Damascus and when thou comest anoint Hazael to be king over Syria rather therefore I conceive that Elisha went now by the speciall instinct of Gods Spirit to confirm that to Hazael by a second prediction which formerly upon Elijahs anointing he did not much believe and that the rather because of the present famine in Israel and so coming thither found Ben-hadad sick whether his sicknesse was occasioned through grief as Josephus saith for the shamefull flight of his armie from the siege of Samaria chap. 7.6 especially when he heard it was occasioned by a causelesse feare the Scripture expresseth not but onely notes how in his sicknesse he was glad to consult with the Prophet concerning his recovery whom ere while he sent to apprehend in Dothan chap. 6.13 14. encouraged happely thereto also by the miraculous cure that he had wrought upon the leprosie of his servant Naaman Vers 10. Go say unto him Thou mayest certainly recover c. That is thy disease is not mortall Thou mayest certainly recover of thy sicknesse that therefore which the Prophet addes concerning his death howbeit the Lord hath shewed me that he shall surely die doth not contradict this which he said concerning his sicknesse The question was whether he should recover of that sicknesse wherewith he was visited to this a direct answer is given that he might well recover notwithstanding his sicknesse but withall an intimation is given to the messenger that he should surely die to wit by another means though not by his sicknesse Vers 11. And he settled his countenance stedfastly till he was ashamed That is Elisha did fix his eyes stedfastly upon Hazael untill he began to be ashamed because he saw he could not forbear weeping or rather untill Hazael began to blush and to be ashamed because he saw the Prophet look so earnestly upon him Vers 13. And Elisha answered The Lord hath shewed me that thou shalt be king over Syria Intimating that in this regard it was likely enough he would exercise those cruelties upon the Israelites which now he made so strange of and that because he should then have power to do it and withall when once he sate in the throne of Syria he would bear the same deadly hatred against Gods people which his predecessours had done before him and thence is Damascus threatned under those terms Amos 1.4 I will send a fire into the house of Hazael which shall devoure the palaces of Ben-hadad Vers 15. He took a thick cloth and dipt it in water and spread it on his face c. And thus Ben-hadad was strangled by Hazael and that so that no signe or token could be seen in his dead body of any violence that was offered him and perhaps too under a pretence of allaying the distemper of heat he was in by reason of his sicknesse Vers 16. And in the fifth yeare of Joram the sonne of Ahab king of Israel c. Jehoshaphat had designed his sonne Jehoram to be king and appointed him to govern the kingdome in his absence in the seventeenth yeare of his reigne a little before he went with Ahab against Ramoth Gilead and thence the yeare of Jehoram king of Israel his beginning to reigne is counted to be both the eighteenth yeare of Jehoshaphat 2. Kings 3.1 and the second yeare of Jehoram the sonne of Jehoshaphat 2. Kings 1.17 but at his return he resumed the royall power wholly to himself not communicating the same again to his sonne untill the fifth yeare of Joram king of Israel which was the two and twentieth of Jehoshaphat and then this old king took unto him this his eldest sonne as partner in the government himself yet living the cause whereof in all probabilitie was some discord and differences which brake out even then between him and his younger brethren which as they moved Jehoshaphat to commit to his younger sonnes the custody of strong fenced cities in Judah 2. Chron. 21.3 the better to assure them if it might have been against the power of their elder brother so also on the other side it caused him to put this his eldest sonne in possession of the kingdome whilest himself was living for fear of tumult after his death Vers 17. And he reigned eight years in Jerusalem To wit foure years together with his father and foure years himself alone Vers 18. For the daughter of Ahab was his wife To wit Athaliah vers 26. Vers 19. Yet the Lord would not destroy Judah for David his servants sake as he promised him to give him alway a light c. That is one of his seed in whom the soveraigntie of Judah should be continued though farre short of the glory that formerly they enjoyed before the revolt of the ten tribes Vers 20. In his dayes Edom revolted from under the hand of Judah c. The Edomites ever since Davids time 2. Sam. 8.14 had been tributaries to the kings of Judah and had been governed by a Viceroy whom they set over them 1. Kings 22.47 There was no king in Edom a deputy was king But now they cast off this yoke and so the prophecie of Isaac began to take effect Gen. 27.40 that Esau should break the yoke of his brother Jacob from off his neck 2. Chron. 21.2 we reade first that so soon as his father was dead he presently made use of his power against his six younger brethren and having gotten them into his hands slew them and together with them for company many of the great men of the land such belike as either formerly or then had taken their part that withall he took upon him to make innovations in Religion erecting high places in the mountains of Judah and forcing the people to embrace that idolatry which himself had learned from the house of Ahab vers 10.11 And these combustions in the land of Judah we may well think gave encouragement to the Edomites to revolt at this time and so God punished these his abominable courses Vers 22. Yet Edom revolted from under the hand of Judah unto this day That is though Joram overthrew the Edomites in that forementioned battel vers 21. yet they retiring into their places of advantage persisted resolutely in their revolt and so he was forced to return again into his own land which indeed is not so strange if we consider that he might perhaps heare of the revolt of
perhaps he called a generall assembly of all the elders of Israel that the sight of the multitude of those that cryed out against them and the hearing of so many of their brethren protesting against this which they had done and Nehemiahs reproof in this publick assembly all this together might humble them the more and make them even ashamed of the evil they had done which was according to that the Apostle adviseth concerning publick offences 1. Tim. 5.20 Them that sin rebuke before all that others also may fear Vers 8. We after our ability have redeemed our brethren c. That is we have done what in us lay to free our brethren from their bondage in Babylon and will you make them bondslaves again onely to pay your useries and unjust exactions even the bringing of the Jews out of Babylon may be this redeeming of the Jews whereof Nehemiah here speaks yet happely the liberty granted by the Persian kings to the Jews that who would might return to their own countrey did not extend to those that had been bought and sold and therefore perhaps both Nehemiah and others had with their money redeemed many of those that were so sold and so brought them also out of Babylon Vers 10. I likewise and my brethren and my servants might exact of them money and corn To wit for money we have lent them or as a recompence of our publick imployments Vers 11. Restore I pray you to them even this day their lands c. To wit remitting the debt for which they were morgaged for that he did require them to remit the debt as well as to restore the morgage is evident by their answer vers 12. We will restore them and will require nothing of them Also the hundred part of the money and of the corn c. To wit which they paid every moneth by way of use for the money corn c. which they had borrowed as for instance if they borrowed an hundred pounds for a moneths loan they paid one pound and for a twelve-moneth twelve pound all which since they had unjustly exacted of their brethren Nehemiah calls upon them to restore it again Vers 12. Then I called the priests and took an oath of them that they should do according to this promise Some Expositours conceive that some of the priests being guilty of this sinne of oppressing the people by taking usury of them out of respect to their office Nehemiah called them to him by themselves in private and took an oath of them that they should also do according to that which the people had promised but I rather think that it was the people of whom he took the oath of whom it is said in the foregoing words that they promised to do all that Nehemiah had required of them and that the priests were called either because it was the custome that the priests did give the oath to those that were sworn or at least because being sworn in the presence of the priests who were the messengers of the Lord of hosts the adjuration might be the more solemn and sacred and those that were sworn might be the more religiously affected with it Vers 13. Also I shook my lap and said So God shake out every man from his house and from his labour c. That is may God so cast him out of his house lands and estates which is here called his labour because he means that which he had gotten by his labour that performes not this promise as by shaking of my lap any thing that were therein would be now cast out of it so that this ceremony of shaking his lap was much like that of Pauls shaking his raiment Acts 18.6 though that was to signifie another thing namely that he was clear of the bloud of the Jews that would not embrace the truth he had taught them he shook his raiment and said unto them Your bloud be upon your own heads I am clean and that also when Christ appointed his disciples Matth. 10.14 to shake off the dust from their feet as a witnesse against those that would not receive them Vers 14. Moreover from the time that I was appointed to be their governour c. To shew how unreasonable a thing it was in the richer sort to take usury of their poore brethren he puts them in mind that merely because he would not over-burden the people all the twelve years that he had been their governour he had lived wholly upon his own personall estate and neither he nor his brethren had eaten the bread of the governour that is the allowance of bread and other necessaries which had been alwayes given by the people for the daily provision of their Governour and his family As concerning the twelve years here mentioned wherein Nehemiah had been their governour see chap. 2.6 Vers 15. But the former governours that had been before me were chargeable unto the people c. To make it the more apparent how loath he was to be chargeable to the people in regard of their poverty and so by consequence to imply what an unmercifull act it was in the richer sort to oppresse them with usurie he shewes here that though he might have challenged a yearely allowance for his maintainance because all the governours had it that were before him yet he required no such thing of them The former governours had taken of them bread and wine that is a certain quality of bread and wine and such other necessaries besides fourty shekels of silver to wit for every day or of the head of every family but he durst do so But now by the former governours I do not conceive that Zerubbabel and Ezra are meant but rather those governours which after Zerubbabels death till Nehemiahs coming had the chief sway of government amongst the Jews for Ezra was not sent as a governour but as a scribe to teach them what they ought to do Yea even their servants bear rule over the people That is they also exacted what they pleased of the people Vers 16 Yea also I continued in the work of this wall Though in the third chapter where it is fully expressed by whom the severall parts of the wall were repaired there is no mention of any particular part thereof undertaken by Nehemiah yet he might well say that he continued in the work of the wall because he was continually imployed in the oversight of the work and was still with them to direct and incourage the builders yea and because his servants were imployed too where most need was to help in the work as it followes in this verse and all my servants were gathered thither unto the work though he lived wholly upon his own private means yet both he and his were still imployed in the publick service Neither bought we any land Though the people being many of them much indebted he might have had great bargains of them and this is alledged as a proof that neither he nor his