speaking hymselfe when he sayed vnto his apostles after his resurrection Luc. 22. These are the wordes which I spake vnto yow when I was with yow For he ment that he was not then with them as he was afore his resurrection when he was mortal apte to suffre peynes neadyng meate and drinke and subiect vnto such other passions of man and so he was not wyth them when he spake this vnto then But this your reason is anusweared fully Noweye alleadge wordes these of Christ Many hereafter shal come and say The â—ysshop Fo. 16. et 24 Matth. â—4 The confutation loke here is Christ or looke there is Christ but beleue them not O lord what blyndnes is this Christ prophised of false prophetes which then should either come before the destruction of HierusaleÌ„ such as were ben Cosban Theodas Iudas of Galilee of whom Iosephus Eusebius and S. Act. 5. Luke in the actes do make mention and say that they are christ or els whych is nerer to the letter christ spake then of false prophetes and false Christes that should come with Antichrist The confutation and say by hym and other such here is christ or there is Christ vtterly denying our sauiour to be the very messias Matth. 26. or redeamer of the world In what blyndnes were ye then my lord to alleage this texte against the real presence Note this reader of christes natural dody in the blessed sacrament But that this ys the ryght sense of that letter yt is euideÌ„t both by the wordes whych go afore it making mention of Antichristes coÌ„myng and also of the ende of the world and lyke wyse by these wordes that folowe there Then yf any maÌ„ say vnto yow Loo here is christ or there beleue hym not for false christes and Matth. 24. false prophetes shal ryse vp and wourke gteat myracles and wounders in so much yea the elected yf it may be done shal be brought in to errour And anon after he maketh playne mention ef christes commyng agayne at domes day See ye not then nowe my lord your oune errour yn wresting this place against the sacrament which christ spake only of such false prophetes false christes that shold Note come yn the tyme of Antichrist and set vp an other sauiour of the world yn his sted Do we say here is vpon this anlter or there vpon that an other christ then our sauiour Who beleueth sayeth my lord here is christ or there because any false prophete or false christ affirmeth hym to be there Say we not that he is in the sacrament Ioan. 6. because he hymselfe promysed vnto his apostles to geue them his flesh which he wold geue for the lyfe of the world and performyng that his Mahtth 2â— promes sayed to them take and eate this is my body and finally because the holy conciles the ancient doctours and the catholike church hath so taught vs Moreouer haue ye not my lord alleaged here that texte for yow which is directely opeÌ„ly aginst your owne selfe For say ye not here Episcopus iste suo iugulatur gladio is Christ in this parte of England by his true fayth and religion and there he is Is it not then great merueile that any learned and wyse man doth folow your doctrine whych seeth this your wreasting of the scrioture for the furtherance of your wicked doctrine But of this place I have spoken sufficieÌ„tly Nowe ye alleage saint Paul or your purpose which thus writeth As often as ye shal eate of this bread 1. Cor. 11. The bysshop fo 16. pa. 2. and drinke of this cup shewe ye fourth the lordes death vntil he come Vnto these wordes ye adde and say Tyl he come saithe s paul signifiyng The Confutation that he is not there corporally No syr he ment only that Christ was not present then visibly in his owne forme but that he wold come agayne at domes daye after such sorte as it is already declared at large For as these christes wordes Lucae 22. these are the wordes which I spake vnto yow when I was wyth yow do not proue that he was not theÌ„ wyth them bodily but only that he was not then wyth them mortal and apte to suffre peynes as he was wyth them before his death resurrection and as this saying of Christ The spirite Ioan. 7. was not yet geuen because Iesus was not yet glorified doth not proue that the holy goost was not geuen before that tyme vnto his apostles and certen other meÌ„ but only that he was not then geuen visibly and yn à visibly signe as he was afterward geuen in fyrye tongues euen so when Paul act 2. sayeth vntil he come he ment not absolutely that christ was not then bodily present in the sacrament but that he was not there visibly and yn his propre forme of fleash and bloud for after such sorte he should come agayne at domes daye therfore scripture speaking Marei 13. Lucae 12. Ioan. 16. of this christes retourning in to this world at domes daye sayeth that he shal be seane commyng in his gloyrie and maieste Your similitude my lord serueth not your pourpose for it only taketh place emong men which come not ne can come any other wyse then visiblye and yn their owne forme of whom we can not say wel do ye this vntil they come yf they be present then which we may truely say of christ that is euer present with vs bodily and inuisiby in the sacrament and absent visibly Christ vsed à lyke maner of speaking when Lucae 24. ge sayed vnto his apostles tarrye ye in Hierusalem vntil ye be yndued with strength from aboue for he ment that they were not then indued with strength from heaueÌ„ in à visible signe for their confirmation althoughe inuisibly they had receaued the strength Marke of the holy goost by grace why may we not then say my lord that S. Paul sayng vntil he come ment of his visible comming agayne at domes daye and not that he ment that Christ was not then present inuisibly in the holy sacrament of the aulter Werfore this argument is fully anusweared Nowe ye write after this maner The papistes say that euel and vngodly The bysshop fo 17. lib. 2. pa. 1. The confutation men do receaue in this sacrament the very body and bloud of Christ c. Al catholike learned men say euen so in dede and that not wythout S. Pauls authoritate and of many of the most best and oldest doctours of the church as it shal anon by gods grace appeare plainly No we ye say thus against the sacrifice of the holy masse They say that they offre The 〈…〉 â–ª Christ euery day for remission of synne c. But the apostles and euangelistes do say that christ hymselfe in his oune parson made à sacrifice for our synnes vpon the crosse by whose woundes al our
of christes mystical body the church paul sayeth We be al one body that eate of one 1. cor 10. bread S. Cyprian whom ye alleage is fully against yow as it appeareth before in this booke althoughe he saye that christes bloud is shewed by the wyne meanynge that wyne must neaades be put yn to the chalice at masse to be consecrated and not water only as some priestes then vsed to do for Lib. 2. epi. 3 by the wyne put yn to the chalice christes bloud which ranne out of his side perced with à speare at the tyme of his Alexander primus epi. prima death is represented and shewed and therfore he sayeth euen yn that same epistle that oure sacrifice must aunsweare and be lyke to christes passion yn the tyme of the which both bloud and water ranne out of his side This is nothinge against the presence of christes bloud in the sacrament nor it proueth not that wyne remayneth stil after the consecration but only that wyne must be put yn to the chalice to be consecrated with water This only cyprian went about to proue at that tyme and there Wherfore this place of Cyprian maketh nothinge for your purpose as much doth that Which ye bringe for yo we out of the same doctour which sayeth that chryst gaue bread De vnctioÌ„e â—â—â—smatis The bysshop fo 63. wyne to his apostles because he gaue them his bodie and bloud vnder the formes of bread and wyne and not yn the formes of fleshe and bloud for after suche sorte and forme he gaue his body to be wounded with the handes of souldiours Also he calleth the formes of bread and wyne figures of christes bodie and bloud because they signified and represented them not absent but presently hidde vnder them ynuisiblye Agayne Cyprian sayeth yn that sermon Chryst gaue vnto priestes à cuppe of his bloud ful of abound ance of an infinite fulnes both to be reserued and also to be geueÌ„ which ye my lord wynke at Fynally he maketh there playne mention of the consecratynge of both oyle and creame vpon mandy thursday for the anoyntynge of kynges priestes when they Oyle and creame are made of children yn theyr coÌ„firmatioÌ„ and sayeth that thruoghe the benefite of that anoyntinge wisdome and vnderstandyng are geuen to vs of Esaiae 11. god lyke wyse the gyft of counsel of strength kunnyng pyte and fear are powred by goddes inspiration in to Marks reader vs. And also that we beinge anoynted with this oile do fyght with il spirites and can not be infected with vncleane sauours Why do ye not my lord obserue these lessons Wil ye take that only that à litle seameth to make for your purpose refuse al the rest which maketh playnly and fully against your domges and doctryne Why also do ye labour so much in allegynge the authours which sayed that bread and wyne remayned stil yn the sacrameÌ„t because there was bread wyne before the consecration and because they seame yet to be there stil when none of al those doctours saye as ye do that there is only bread and wyne and not christes bodye and bloud but the cleane contrarie to it S. Chrysostom who ye alleage vpon the psalme ment In Psal 22 that christ would shewe vnto vs bread and wyne that is to saye his bodie and bloud yn to which bread and wyne was turned and which appeared stil bread and wyne and that for à similitude of his bodie and bloud yn their owne propre formes offered vpon the crosse for by the celebration of the holy sacrament as Gelasius sayeth there is an image and à similitude made of christes bodie crucified of his bloud shead furth of that bodye for oure redemption S. Hieroms wordes do make Hierom iâ— Matth. 2â— nothinge for your doctryne when he sayeth that chryst toke bread that conforteth mans heart that he myght represent therby his very bodye and bloud For first he sayeth not as ye do that he gaue only bread nor yet bread vnto his apostles and that he gaue theÌ„ not his very bodie and bloud but that he toke bread to be coÌ„secrated turned it in to his bodie that by the distributinge and receauinge of it he might represent his body and bloud yn that they were putte to death and crucyfied for vs which thing he bade his apostles and by them al other priestes to do whem he sayed Do ye this Luc. 22. 1. Cor. 11. for remembrance of me Agayne saynt Hierom vsed this word Representare to represent for to geue preseÌ„tly and out of hand as dyuers authours Râ—presentare Hieroni Mattheâ— 26 do vse it For Cicero sayed But also I wold gladly offre my body to suffre death si representari morte mea libertas ciuitatis potest id est dari nuÌ„c statiÌ„ Philippica 2 yf by my death the liberte of the citee might be euen nowe by and by geuen Also columella sayeth Itaque non aegre Libr 11. consequetur si semper se representauerit id est se presentem ostenderit inquit Budeus neque discesserit Cyprianus Representare quid sit Cypriano in orationeÌ„ dominicam sayeth We do desire the kyndom of god to be represented vnto us that is to say to be geuen vnto vs presently Agayne there he hath thus Christ also hymselfe brethren may be vnderstanded the kyndom of god whom we dailie desire to come whose commynge we desire sone to be represented to vs that is to say openly and presently to be shewed vnto vs. By these authorites it is manifest good reader that hierom is against my lord very much yn this place S. Ambrose maketh not for your purpose Lib. de iâ—â— qui mysteri is initiaÌ„tur cap. vlt. when he sayeth that christes body and bloud are signified after the coÌ„secratioÌ„ for as he sayeth not that they are onlie signified and not present there fo 63. as ye defende euen so he mente that by the outward formes of bread and wyne chrystes bodie and bloud were signified to bo hidde secretly vnder them and that the death of hym in his bodie and bloud offeringe vpon August ser 28 in LucaÌ„ the crosse was signified by the administration of the sacrament Also yt is true that he sayeth that we do receaue Lib 4. ca. 4. De sacrameÌ„tis the sacrament for à similitude of christes flesh and bloud but he doth Lib 4. ca. 4 De sacrameÌ„tis declare his meanynge with these wordes Wyne and water are put in to the chalice but bloud is made by the consecration of the heauenly word But thow doest perauenture say I see not the kinde or forme of bloud but à similitude is there for as thowe hast receaued in baptisme à similitude of death euen so thowe drinkest also à similitude of precious bloud that there should be noo abhorringe or à lothinge of bloud appeariÌ„ge
mans witte and reason Canst thou by reason tel me hou Adam was made of the earthe Eue of his â—ybbe Hou the busse of thornes which flamed wyth fire burned Exod. 3. not Hou the rod was made à serpent Hou the ryuers of Egypte were Exod. 4. 7. turned yn to bloud Hou Moyses lyued xl daies and xl nightes without meate and drinke Hou the children Psal 77. of Israel were fed with Manna Hou their clotâ—es were not woreÌ„ away the space of xl yeres hou the iewes passed Exod. 16. thorou the red sea saflye Hou water tes beynge yet closed Are not these Note this thinges as impossible to mans reason and witte as that the same his bodie to be at one tyme both yn heauen and earth and yn euery place where the sacrament is Why then doest not thou beleue this as wel as the other two Doth not goddes word teach it the as plainlie as the other Also did Ioan. 20. Act. 1. 10. not Christ eate and drinke with his apostles after his resurrection and yet no part of that meate and drinke was turned in to his bodilie nouryshemeÌ„t for then he neaded no nouryshemeÌ„t Was not this as â—trange à matter and as farre abouâ—â—ans reason as christ to be bodilie â—n dyuers places at one tyme Wherfore then doest thou not ceasse disputinge vpon this deape and vnsearchable mysterie and geue firme credence vnto it althoughe thy reason can not perceaue it Why doest thou not remembre also that christ promysed his disciples to geue them suche bread as shoulde be his oune very natural fleash which he wold geue Ioan. 6. to death for the lyfe of the woorld Can this his promes be veryfied of coÌ„mon bread Was that geuen vpon the crosse for the life of the woorld Hath not Christ which is the trouth it selfe and can not lye perfourmed yet this his promes And when gaue he that Ioan. 14. Heb. 6. bread which was his very fleash that he gaue for vs to death yf he did it not at his last soupper when he sayed Take and eate this ys my bodie that Matth. 26. 1. Cor. 11. shal be geuen for you Hou manifest are these wordes of oure dear sâ—uiour Christ did he euer speake more playne wordes vpon any article of oure fayth then these are Were it not theÌ„ mere madnes and à strange folyshenes to beleue the bisshoppe of canterbury coxe hoper Ridley ponete and suche other that do teache contrarie to this S. Paul affirmeth that he 1. Cor. 12. which receaueth this holy sacrament vnworthily is gyltie of christes bodie Marke and bloud Hou caÌ„ this be true yf there be nothinge els yn the sacrament but bread and wyne Is à man gyltie of christes bodie and bloud which eateth and drinketh nothinge els but bare bread and wyne Who that wise is wil saye that I am gyltie yn eatinge to muche moutton and yn drinking of wyne when I eate nothinge but milk and drinke only water Agayne sayeth not S. Paule that he 1. Cor. 11. which receaueth this holy sacrament vnworthilie eateh and drinketh it to his oune daÌ„nation because he discerneth not our lordes bodie that is to say he doth noâ— beleue that that thin ge is his boâ—â—e or els he doth not receaue it 〈◊〉 greater deuotion and purenes of conscience than other commoÌ„ meates Hou should this be true yf we did eate and drinke but onlye bread made of corne and mere wyne of the grape yn the receauinge of the blessed sacrament Byddeth not us S. Paule to examyne and proue oure coÌ„sciences Marke before we receaue this sacrament And what neade we to do this when we shal eate but common bread and drinke wyne of the grape Doth he synne deadly that receaue the those thinges yn synne Doth not then this place of paule proue sufficiently that oure sauiour Christes bodie and bloud are present reallie in this sacrament This haue al doctours of Christeâ— church expounded the scriptures coÌ„cerniÌ„ge this matter as it shal appeare by goddes graâ—e hereafter thoughe the bisshoppe 〈◊〉 that they be altogether vpon 〈…〉 Therfore beleue maÌ„ this doctriâ—â— without al doubtyng therof Lette no maÌ„s persuasioÌ„ nor reasonynge turne thy mynde froÌ„ this belefe Beware that thou trust not thy senses iudgement yn this matter Remembre that Isaac was disceaued Gen. 27. because he trusted more to his feeliÌ„ge of his sonne Iacobs handes than he did his uoice Shalt not thou be after lyke sort disceaued in this matter yf thou do folou the iudgement of thy senses and not only the hearinge or readinge of these christes wordes This is my bodie It is sufficient for the to beleue that christes bodie is both at ones yn the holie sacrament and also in heauen because the scripture teacheth both indifferently and teacheth not hou these two may stande together but only by goddes almyghtie pouer to whom nothyng his impossible as scripture witnesseth plainly Marci 10. Luc. 1. Peter Martyr recanted at oxford his first doctrine of the sacrament and so did also the bysshop pe of Canturberie This taught peter Martyr at his first commyng to oxford when he was but á lutheran in this matter whose wordes I and may other mo wrate in the diuynite schole when he redde lecture there but when he came ones to the court and sawe that that doctrine myslyked them that myght do hym hurt yn his lyuiÌ„ge he anon after turned his tipped and sange an other songe The bysshop also of Canterbury in his catechysme did ones sette furth the real presence of christes bodie Note in the sacrament but he chaunged that doctrine when he saw that the world serued for hym O lord what man is so madde to beleue suche mutable teachers which chaunge their doctrine at meÌ„s pleasir as they see à vantage and profite They turne and wil turne as the winde turneth but to retourne to my matter Tel me why may not christes bodie as I sayed afore be as wel yn the sacrament and yn heauen both at ones as that his bodie was with the bodie of the stone that lay stil vpoÌ„ his graue when he rosevp agayne from death to lyf yn one propre place and as his bodie was in one propre place at ones with the bodie of Hierony in Epitaphio Paulae Ioan. 20. Ampros in lu 24. Aug. the dore or gate when he entred yn to the house to his apostles when the gates were yet shitte and closed Christ went vp out of this world yn to heaven and sitteth there at the right hande of his father yet paule saw hym bodily vpon earth after his ascension as he testifieth and by that sight he 1. cor 9. 15. proued that he was risen againe bodily from death to lyf which he could not haue done yf that seinge of hym Lib. de passione petri apostoli had bene but à spiritual visioÌ„ S. Linus which was in the
the crosse Shedde he there wyne of the grape for the remissioÌ„ of oure synnes Gaue he not his owne natural body shed his owne precious bloud then for vs Promysed he not afore to his apostles to gyue them bread that shold be his owne very natural body which he Ioan. 6. wold gyue by death for the lyfe of the world Who is then my lord so folysh to beleue this your doctrine But ye go forward sayng Althoughe none eateth the body and The bisshop fo 5. pa. 2. drinketh the bloud of christ but they haue eternal lyfe as appeareth by Ihons wordes afore rehersed yet the good c. My lord ye vnderstand not christes The confutation wordes writteÌ„ by S. Ihon for the right sense of them is that euery maÌ„ which eateth and drinketh christes body and bloud worthilie hath euer lastyng lyfe as saynt paul expoundeth that place 1. Cor. 11. wryting to the corinthians That this only was christes meanyng there yt shal be proued anon by gods grace Now ye recite S. pauls words which sayeth Who so euer shal eate of this 1. Cor. 11. bread and drinke of this cup vnworthilie he shal be gyltie of the body bloud of the lord and then ye saye thus Here S. paul sayeth not that he that The bysshop eateth the bread and drinketh the cup of the lord vnworthily eateth and drinketh the body and the bloud of the lord but is gyltie of the body bloud of the lord but what he eateth drinketh he declareth sayng He eateth and drinketh his oune damnation What yf S. paul say not my lord that The confuâ—â—tion the vnworthy receauer of the holy sacrament receaueth our lords body his bloud Is that enoughe to proue that he receaueth them not as ye defende Who that hath any learning in logicke wil so reason Doth not paul affirme that the vnworthy receauour of this blessed sacrament is gyltie of the body and bloud of christ May we iustely say that he which eateth only bakers bread drinketh wyne of the grape is gyltie of christes body and bloud May à man be gyltâ—e of the vnworthy eating of à thing which he eateth not at al Wyl any wyse man say that I am gyltie of eating á capoÌ„ wheÌ„ I eate but mylke Or may we say wel that he is gyltie of mysse intreating of à kynges oune person when he doth abuse only his image or picture Why theÌ„ haue ye my lord destroyed so many images of christ and his holy saintes images Were they not more lyuely and manifest pictures and representatioÌ„s of christes passion than bread and wyne are That they so were I wil shortly by gods grace proue to your reproche shame that haue so leudly destroyd them wythout al good ground and cause sufficient Moreouer ye are disceaued The bysshop when ye saye that S. paul declareth what the vnworthy receauer 1. Cor. 11. of the sacrament eateth and drinketh when he sayeth that he eateth drinketh his oune damnation For he declareth only by those wordes what ponyshement he shal haue that vnworthily receaueth christes body bloud Dyd ye not see that paul vsed there à figure and ment that he did eate and drinke that bread and bloud vnto his oune damnation that vnworthilie receaued them But of this sufficient ye say thus agayne But al these forsayed admonitions exhortations and confortes doth the The bysshop fo 12. ca. 15 papistes as much as lyeth in them take away from al christien people by their transubstantation The confutation How proue ye this my lord I besech yow Marry thus say ye For yf we receaue The bysshop no bread nor wyne in the communion then al the lessons and confortes be gone which we should learne and receaue by eating of bread The confutation drinking of wyne It is very false my lord that ye say here Why did ye not proue it to be true but because ye could not I am very certen Wherfore may we not learne al such lessons by that only that bread and wyne are taken of the priest to be consecrated and are so tourned yn to christes flesh and bloud that their formes and qualitees remayne stil For as the bread wyne which are consecrated be made of many graynes of corne and of dyuers grapes of the vyne lykewyse are Cyprianus al Christian people ioyned spiritually throughe fayth hope loue and grace Marke reader vnto Christ the head of the church which is his mystical body Seconly as the bread and wyne that we do eate drinke daily are so turned yn to oure fleash and bloud that they make but one whole body nor are distincted from the other our flesh and bloud euen so be al christen people spiritually ioyned both vnto christ and also one vnto an other throughe the worthy receauing of christes fleash and bloud yn the sacrament in to which bread and wyne of lyke nature and sorte were chanuged by the word and pouer of god that they do make altogether but one body of christ which is the church This thing is my lord sufficiently represented and signified by the bread and wyne layed vpon the aulter to be consecrated and by their shapes apparaunces qualitees remayninge there stil and their substaunces presence is not requyred therunto thoughe ye say that it is but prouing not your sayng But yf I should graunt as luther teacheth his scholers that the substance of bread and wyne remayneth in the sacrament what should that that ye here saye make for your opinion Doth not the lutherians hold and defende that the substaunce also of bread and wyne is yn the sacrameÌ„t with christes very natural body and bloud How can ye my lord then proue this argument vnto à lutherian The substance of bread wyne doth stil abyde yn the sacrament ergo theryn My lord laboureth al yn vayne is not christes body bloud but only bread and wyne as ye say See ye not then that al this your labour was cleane il speÌ„t lost for therby ye proued not your purpose Noue ye say that the doctrine of transubstantiatioÌ„ doth subuerte our fayth in christ and to proue that your sayng ye write after this maner For this sacrament is ordoÌ„ned in bread and wyne which The bysshop fo 1â— pa. 2. be foodes for the body to signifie and to declare vnto vs our spiritual foode by christ then yf our corporal feeding vpon the bread and wyne be but phantastical so that there be no bread nor wyne to feed vpon althoughe they appeare to be there than yt doth vs to vnderstand that our spiritual feadyng in christ is also phantastical and that The confutation in dede we feede not in christ As this your sayng my lord ys grounded vpon no reason nor authorite euen so it may be sufficient for me at this tyme to denye it and to
disceaue vs and so it appeareth that this your reason my lord is of none effecte nor force at al. We opeÌ„ no gate as ye say falsely that we do vnto valentinianus heresy nor to any such other For althoughe we do say that our senses are not to be trusted yn this matter of the holy sacrament yet we denye not but that some credence may be geuen wel vnto them in natural thinges hauyng their natural condition and state And as concernyng the heresy of them that sayed christ was not à very man or that he had not very flesh and bones the contrary was not proued sufficiently by their senses which sawe hym but by many textes both of the old and also the newe testament Moreouer the scriptures are manyfest enoughe in many places against Basilides and such other that sayed christ was not crucified for vs but Simon Cyrenaeus by which scriptures that article and the beliefe of it is approued and not by oure senses RomanoruÌ„ 10. for S Paul sayeth that fayth commeth of the hearyng of gods word and not of hearyng seyng feeling or of any of the other our senses for they may often tymes disceaue vs as Saint Homi. 93. in Matthaeum Ioan. 14. Chrysostom wytnesseth where gods word which is the trueth itself can neuer disceaue vs. Wherfore the senses are not to be trusted heryn and so is al that reasoniÌ„ge which ye make my lord here wythe so many wordes not worth à bleue point Ye say also thus And yf there be no trust to be geuen The bysshop fo 22 pa. 2. to oure senses in this matter of the sacrament why than do the papistes so stoutly affirme that the accidentes remayne after the consecration which can not be iudged but by the senses Syr we do affirme that there is no The confutation trust to be geuen to our senses in matters of our faith especially where they do iudge agenst goddes word as they do in this matter For the scripture sayth that christ promysed to geue his apostles bread which should be his owne very flesh that he wold geue for the lyfe of the world and that he gaue Ioan. 8. Matth. 28. 1. Cor. 11. to them his bodie which was crucified for them the senses did iudge that it was but bread of corne Agayne our senses do iudge only the accidentes properly as al learned men do wel know whiche every maÌ„ may affirme to be yn the sacrament but notthinke ther of that their substances do remayne althoughe the scripture expresselye sayeth not that there remayneth no bread but that it is christes bodie which he gaue for vs to death and so it can not be breade forthat was not geueÌ„ for vs vpon the crosse The sacrament is not an elusion of our senses as ye say althoughe in yt appeare bread Gen. 18 19. Mar vt Ioan. 20 Actorum 1. and yt is not there as god and the angelles seamed men to loth AbrahaÌ„ and other and were not very men in dede and yet they were no elusions of their senses werfore an aÌ„uwseare is now made to al this your reasoninge my lord vpon the iudgement of our senses and natural reason Now ye labour The bysshop lib. 2. fo 23. pag. 1. to proue that oure belefe in this matter is against the fayth of the old autours of christes church ye alleageiustine the Holie martyr affirminge The confutation Anno d. â—0 103 90. that he is the oldest author that is knowen this daie to writte any treatie vpoÌ„ the sacrameÌ„tes which is very false for Anacletus the martyr Clement dionise saynt Martial certen other moo wrate of that matter before hym à great while as it appareth plainlie by their lyues writinges and bookes The confutation I muche merueile my lord that ye are not à shamed falsely to alleage iustine Iustinus wordes for the furtheraÌ„ce of your wicked doctrine which neuer wrote as ye say butthus onlie ThaÌ„ afterward bread the chalice of wyne and water myxed together is broughe vnto the bisshop or priest This nourysshemeÌ„t is called of vs Eucharistia And we take not these thinges as euery meate and euery drinke but as throughe goddes word Christ oure sauiour was incarnate and toke fleashe and bloud for oure saluation euen so we haue learned by these wordes This is my bodie This is my bloud that this meate by the which oure flesh bloud are throughe alteration nouryshed when it is blessed by the prayers of the word goddes sonne he meaneth is the flesh and bloud of iesu hymselfe incarnate These are his wordes which are as plaiÌ„lie agaiÌ„st your doctrine as caÌ„ be in four pointes The Iustinus whoÌ„ my lord alleageth for hym is first is that he speaketh of meÌ„glinge of wyne water together in the chalice of which the scripture maketh no meÌ„tioÌ„ agaiÌ„st hym in four pointes therfore ye saye that it is not to be passed vpon Secondlye he is contrarie to your teachinge whan he affirmeth verites not Wrytten in scripture that christ prayed when he did consecrate and that by his prayers the bread and wyne were blessed which is not mentioned yn the scripture and for that cause ye despise it and say it is à thinge of no necessite at al. Thirdly he sayeth that these are the wordes of consecration This is my bodye This is mybloud which ye denie Four thely he sayeth that the bread wine by which our flesh bloud are nouryshed are after they be blessed throughe christes prayers the flesh and bloud Marke â–ª this reader of christ How blynd were ye theÌ„ my lord when ye alleaged this authour for oure purpose which is so euideÌ„tly against your doctrine But what yf Iustinus had thought as ye saye that he did yet did not so indede that bread wyne remayned stil yn the sacrameÌ„t Could that haue proued your doctrine that there is nothinge els in the sacrament but bread an wyne only No man is so blynd but he maye se that it doth not proue your purpose thoughe it seame to make with luther Also many of the Greakes affirmed that the holie goost proceded not froÌ„ the father and he sonne both they agreed not theryn with the latine church vntil the conseil holden at florentia wich was with yn these cxx yeres and yet that their opinion proued not that the latine church erred yn their belefe why then should either Iustinus saying Theodoretus or any other of the Greates which wrote that bread and wyne remayned stil yn the sacrament make against our faith touchyngetraÌ„substaÌ„tiatioÌ„ which Greakes generallie did not receaue manyyeres after the latine church had manifestly taught yt But Iustinus saye ye affirmeth that the bread and wyne are turned in to our flesh and bloud to nouryshe our bodies It is true but not as ye do take his sainge for he meÌ„t that coÌ„mon bread and wyne are turned by the alteration
senteÌ„ces I wil recite Homi 17. in epist ad Hebraeos but this onli now We do not offre nou an other laÌ„be two morowe an other but euer the same thiÌ„ge it selfe Therfore this sacrifice is one or els by this reasoÌ„ that he is offered iÌ„ many places there are many christes NothiÌ„ge lesse but there is one christ euery where both Hieroni. ad heliodoruÌ„ beinge here ful there ful one bodie HieroÌ„ hath á lyke seÌ„teÌ„ce wheÌ„ he saieth thus God forbid that I should speake any il of theÌ„ which succediÌ„ge the apostles degree do make christes bodie with à holie mouth throughe whoÌ„ we be christians Also he sayeth ad Euagrium Lege eum in epistolaÌ„ ad Titum What eylde the minystre of tables widowes à deacoÌ„ he meaneth proudly to extolle hymselfe aboue theÌ„ at whose prayers christes bodie and bloud is made Finallie damascene Damas lib. 4. cap. 14. sayeth can not christe which was borne of à virgen make the breade his owne bodie and the wyne his bloud Againe he writeth after this sorte doest Christs body is made at masse thow aske how bread is made christes bodie and wyne and water his bloud I saye to the that the holie goost worketh the thinges aboue maÌ„s speach and vnderstandinge but the bread and wyne are turned Agayne he sayeth God hath ioyned is godhead vnto bread wyne and water and made them his bodie and bloud not that his bodie cometh downe from heauen but because the bread and wyne are chaunged in to the bodie and Inuocation helpeth to the consecratioÌ„ bloud of god The bread wyne water by the inuocation and commynge of the holy goost are aboue nature chaunged in to christes bodie bloud they are not twoo bodies but one and the selfe same bodie I passe by good reader many such sainges both of these same writers and of other also Now lerte my lord rayle vpon these doctours and great clearkes whose bookes he is not worthy to beare after them yf they where now alyue Now he maketh certen sophistical and captious argumentes that are bilded vpo à false fundation which is as it appeareth afore that we do beleue The bisshop fo 31. pa. 2. A false an enuyous imagination of the bysshop against priestes and saye christes bodie is made so of bread à newe as it was ones made yn the wombe of his deare mother oure ladie of whose most cleane and pure bloud it was made by the operation of the holie goost This is à very pyuysh and an enuious imagination of this man which neuer learned christened man did teache but we say onlye that the bread and wyne are by goddes holy word and almightie pouer turned in to he same christes one bodie and bloudde which he toke of our lady was ones crucified to death and that there are not two bodies as he fayneth that we do teach nor twoo christes Homi. 2. in 2 timo 1 homi 17. in Hebr. but one and the same that is yn the sacrament and yn heauen also as S. Chrisostom wytnesseth opeÌ„ly Wherfore al this his sophistical reasonynge is not worth à good ryshe for he disputeth thus Yf christes bodie that The bysshop fo 3â— pa. 2 â—n autem vt video pro christo aduersus christum pugnas Nazian in apolgetico was crucyfied was not made of breade but the bodie that was eateÌ„ at the soupper was made of breade as the papystes say than christes bodie that was eaten was not the same that was crucyfied This reason is as I haue sayed afore grounded al together vpon à false principle which is that the catholike teachers do say that christes bodie which was eaten at his maÌ„dy was made of breade as of a matter or à substaÌ„ce of newe and not that the breade was and is onlie turned yn to that selfe same bodie of christ that was borne of the vyrgen that suffered vpoÌ„ the crosse which was neuer but ones onely made and yet S. Cyprian sayeth The bread which our lord gaue vnto his disciples not chauÌ„ged in forme Cyprianus de coenad but in nature by the almyhtie power of the worde is made flesh Which is as moch to saye as that the breade is chaunged in to christes very flesh which he toke of is mother and not that his bodie or els he hymselfe now Marke is made à newe of the breade as this bysshop falselye affirmeth that we do beleue and teach and therfore his reasons made here are of no strength at al thoughe he iudged then neuer so stronge and insoluble Agayne it is an impudent lye when he sayeth that priestes do affirme that they make God is not made yn the sacrament god of the breade for god ys not made at al nor yet christes bodie à newe but they say truely with al catholike doctours that they are mynisters of god and that when they do pronounce these wordes of christ This is my bodie yn the masse then christ hymselfe and the holy goost do turne the breade in to christes bodie that his mother coÌ„ceaued and bare with the which the fo 32. godhead that neuer was made is ioyned vnseparably This is the catholike Note reader fayth which we do beleue and defende and not that thinge which this bysshop falsely sayeth that we defende therfore he is sufficientlye aunsweared in this his raylinge vnreasonable reasoÌ„ynge And so is not oure strongest argument yet answeared vnto as the bysshop sayeth it is nor our chiefe fuÌ„datioÌ„ wherpoÌ„we do buyldeour doctryne subuerted nor neuer shal be by any Matth. 7. 18 heretique for it is buylded vpon à sure rocke gods word and the church of christ which erreth not Ye say also after this maner in your booke my lord The soupper of our lord can be no perfect The bisshop fo 53. pa. 1. sacrament of spiritual foode excepte there be as wel bread and wyne as the bodie and bloud of oure sauiour spirituallie feedinge vs which by the sayed bread and wyne is signified Why The confutation do ye then my lord denye that christes bodye and bloud be in this sacrament Agayne is it enoughe to proue that bread and wyne muste neades be there because ye do so say No your bare word is not of any such force I passe by the argument of impanation fo 33. pa. 1. for I do not muche esteame it althoughe your improbation of it my lord be very weake buylded vpon twoo similitudes which doe not serue for that purpose For who that is learned wil say that christ should be none other wise ioyned vnto the bread in the sacrament yf it were there than the holy gost is vnto the water in baptisme or than the holy goost was vnto Ioan. 3. Matth. 3. the dooue For was it euer sayed in scripture of the holy goost This water is the holy goost or
as bloud What can be more playnly spoken to declare that he ment that the very bloud of christ is made by the consecration of wyne ynto it and yet we receaue it not in forme of bloud but in a similitude shape of it the forme of wyne that is lyke to bloud in colour least we should abhorre to drinke it if it did appeare vnto oure eies very bloud Why redde ye not this my lord that ye had not erred in the alleaginge of this authorite of s. Ambrose yow folowed and trusted to much peter Martyrs allegation Peter Martyr falsely alledgeth thē doctour which reciteth almost al authours falsely and vntruely as I wil by goddes grace declare in my booke made against hym Saint Ambrose is against yow whom ye allege for yowe sayinge that the priest prayeth thus at masse lib. 4. cap. ◠de sacramētis Make vnto vs this oblation to be acceptable which is à figure of the bodie bloud of christ For he calleth here the masse à sacrifice and sayeth that the priest maketh therin sacrifice to god for hym self and other which ye denye vtterly Againe he saieth not that it is only à figure as ye defende it to be but that it is à figure of christes bodie bloud in that respecte that they were crucified for as much as christes death is in the sacrament represented and figured Ye do nowe corrupt falsely Ambrofius in 1. cor 11. alleage S. Ambrose and make of his true sainge à false sentence For this ye make hym say In eatinge and drinkynge the bread and wyne we do signifie the fleshe and bloud that were offered for vs where in dede these are his wordes vpon this texte of S. Paul ye shal shewe furth our lordes death vntil he come For because ye are sayeth he made free by oure lordes death we remembringe that thinge in eatinge and drinkinge fleash and bloud which were offered for vs do signifie c. Loo my lord S. Ambrose sayth we do eate and drinke fleash and bloud and ye make hym say that we do eate and drinke bread and wyne Are ye not ashamed so manifestly to lye vpon the authours Also saint Ambrose sayeth wel thoughe ye il vnderstand his wordes that we do receaue the mystical cup of bloud for tuition of our bodie and soul in à signification or à figure not of christes bodie as ye would make vs beleue but of that that the newe testament was confirmed by christes bloud and that bloud is à wytnes of christes benifite which came by his bloud sheadynge vnto vs. Therfore ye do il conclude of these authorites of the doctours that christes bodie and Fol. 64. bloud are not really in the holy sacrament but that bread and wyne are only signes figures similitudes and representations of them as ye do lyke wyse Augustinus Epist 23. il vnderstand saint Austen wrytinge to Bonifacius For he ment that christ was not dailye offered in the masse by death and sufferinge of his passion againe for so he was neuer but ones offered and yet he is daily offered in the sacrament for the people atmasse and his passion represented vnto vs theryn For we do vse to say that christ suffered his passion vpon this day good fryday and that day he arose agayne when the daies of his passion and resurrection are passed manye hundred yeres before and à memorie or à representation only of those two thinges is celebrated and made vpon such daies And so is the sacrament à signe and à similitude of christes body in sufferinge death and passion and is called in à maner his body as the outwarde formes and kindes of bread and wyne are sacramentes and signes of christes bodie and bloud beynge some tyme called christes bodie and bloud as they may ryght wel in à certen maner of speakinge as Saint Austen wytnesseth there because that some tyme thinges signified are called by the names of their signes and contrarily also This we see plainlye ynoughe that saint Austen is not vpon my lordes syde but against hym vtterly when he sayeth that christ is dailye offered in sacrifice at masse for the people which my lord denyeth vtterly and yet sayeth that saint Austen is of his The bysshop fo 62. pag 2. Contra adamantum cap. 12. mynde and beliefe therin To be short when Saint Austen or any other docter affirmeth that the sacrament is a figure or à signe they neuer saye that bakers bread or material bread and wyne of the grape are only in the sacrament as signes of christes body and The signe of christes body how hit is to be vnderstand bloud only absent but they meane as I sayed à fore that the outward formes and kyndes of bread and wyne are signes of them there presently couered vnder neath them And also that the sacrament is à signe of christes mystical bodie the church and of his passion à representation and figure As for Theodoretus whom he alleageth agayne is anusweared before sufficiently Your fyfte note my lord fo 66. pa. ◠which ye gather out of Theodoretus that nothinge ought to be affirmed for à certen trueth in religion which is not spoken of in holy scripture is à very damnable note and the mother of many abamynable heresies as I haue declared largely in my booke of traditions and also briefely before in this boke And to touche the same matter vnwrittē verytees à lytel agayne is the baptisme of children sette out in scripture Confessed not origen and saynt Austē the cleane contrarye Sayeth not Saint Austen that it is à tradition vnwritten Origenes lib. 6. in Romanos ca. 6 in scripture that baptisme ministred of an heretike or à schismatike is sufficient and good In the scripture is no mention made that the father of heauen is vngotten that there are three persons that christ is consuhstantialis patri that oure lady was à continual vyrgen that the souday ought to be kept holy and many such other certen truethes in christes religion are not written in scripture What then my lord Is he arrogant and presumptuous that affirmeth them for certen verites in religion Yow saye vntruely that papistes do make and vnmake articles of our faith at their pleasure for they neuer made article of the fayth nor vnmade but heretikes hath so done many tymes Vnto this lye ye adde twoo moo This lye is often repeted of hym one that we do saye that christes bodie is naturally and sensibly in the bread when we say bread is not there and that christes bodie is there vnnaturally against nature and vnsensiblye Fol. 71 The second lye is that priestes make of Christ à newe sacrifice for synne for it is no newe sacrifice but the selfe same yn the thinge offered Homi. 2. in 2 ad Timot. that as Saynt Chrysostom sayeth Christ ones offered hymselfe vpon the crosse and whyche he offered at his
last soupper and commaūded al priestes to offer lyke wyse as it shal be declared here after by goddes grace Nowe ye reherse many figuratiue speaches vsed in the scripture to proue that christ spake lyke these wordes This is my bodie by à Fo. 72. 73 figure which al proueth it not except ye wil saye that Christ spake nothinge wythout à figure which I am sure ye wil not say Moreouer ye gather Fo. 76. three thinges out of s. Clemētes epistle against the catholikes belefe The first Epist 2 is that bread is called our lordes bodie which is very false for there is no mention at al of any bread but of our lordes bodie and he sayeth that that holy portion of his bodye should not be myxed wyth the meate that is dygested by the bealy or stomake and auoyed out at the foundament declaringe plainly therby that it is not material bread for then it should be also digested yn the stomacke and cast out at the foundament as other meates be Wherfore my lord was heryn ouerseene The second thinge that ye note of S. Clementes wordes is that the bread as ye calle it falsely ought not to be reserued when he hath the clene contrary sayinge yn the same wordes that ye alleage here for this he writeth yn effect The priestes deacons and ministers ought with feare and tremblinge keepe the leauinges of the broken peaces of our lordes bodie that no corruption be founde in the holy place least by negligence great ynyurie be done to the portion ef the lordes bodie My lord wynked at these wordes toke those only that seamed to make with hym and yet did not for S. Clement willed only that none of the hoostes or portions of them whyche were cōsecrated for the laye people should be reserued but spent and receaued of the clearkes Nother the third note that ye gather of S. Clemētes wordes is true which is that priestes ought not to receaue the sacrament alone but the people must neades communicate with them For he sayeth only that the layte did then receaue the sacrament with the priestes as they euer myght do yf they would themselfes but that their fact maketh no necessarie lawe for vs as dyuers men lyued in common and had nothinge propre yn the apostles tyme and yet that maketh no lawe to enforce vs so to lyue Moreouer ye affirme that christes sacrifice made vpon the crosse was that oblation of which Cyprian speaketh vnto cecilius saynge that it was figured before it was done The bysshop fo 78 by the bread and wyne which Melchizedech gaue vnto Abraham in which sayng ye make twoo faultes the one is that Melchizedech gaue bread wyne Lib. 2. epi. 3 vnto Abrahā did not offer thē to god that the other the sacrifice of christ done at his last soupper and the sacrifice Gen. 14. of the masse was not signified and figured by Melchisedecs dede than ▪ which twoo errours saint Cyprian confuteth sufficiently sayinge thus yn that same epistle after he had alleaged the wordes of the Genesis wrytten of Melchizedech for euer Which ordre sayeth he certenly is this commynge of that sacrifice that Melchizedech was the priest of the highe god and that he offered bread and wyne For Lib. 2 epi. 3. Psal 109. who is rather à priest of the highe god than oure lord iesus christ which offered à sacrifice vnto god the father and he offered the selfe same sacrifice that Melchisedech had offered that is bread and wyne forsoth his bodie and bloud Here we may playnly see that ye my lord erred both yn saynge that Melchisedech gaue bread wyne vnto Abraham for Cyprian sayeth as the texte of the Genesis also hath that he offered them in sacrifice to god and also in saying that Melchisedechs doinge then figured not christes sacrifice made at his mandy but only that Gene. 14. which was done ones vpon the crosse for it signified and figured his sacrifice made at his mandye as saynt Cyprian affirmeth by and by in that same epistle thus writinge There went before by Melchizedech an ymage of à sacrifice ordeyned in bread and wyne Which thinge our lord perfectly doinge fulfillynge hath offered bread and à chalice mixed with wyne and he that is the fulnes hath fulfilled the trueth of the image fygured afore Hitherto Cyprian Where he sayeth also that christ commaunded priestes to offre sacrifice at masse in à remembrance of his death sayīge do ye this in my remembraunce If à man wil The sacrifice the holy masse but only loke vpon and consider what Cyprian went about to proue and perswade in that epistle he shal fynde anon that my lord erred manifestly when he sayed that Melchisedechs oblation Lucae 22. ◠Cor. 2. figured only christes sacrifice made vpon the crosse for Cyprians purpose and intent there was to proue by many figures of the old testament that wyne ought to be put yn to the Marke chalice at masse to be offered in sacrifice god as Melchisedech had done afore in à figure and as chtist fulfillinge accomplysshyng perfitely that figure had done also at his mandye Wherfore ye ought my lord to recante this playne errour and to vse that lawe vpon youre selfe iustely which ye haue vsed against many other mē vniustly Christ offered sacrifice at his last souppe◠Ye peruerte also these wordes of Chrysostom When yow come to these mysteries do not thinke that ye receyue De eucharistia io enceniis by a man the bodye of god Vpō these wordes my lord maketh this argument Than yf we receaue not the body of christ at the handes of man ergo the bodie of christ is not reallye corporalli and naturallie in the sacrament and so geuen to vs by the priest What blyndnes is this Chrysostom The bysshop fo 93. byddeth men not thinke that they receaue christes body of a man the prieest meanynge that they receyued yt not of hym prīcipally but so of christ The confutation hymself and that he sayed to stere thē vnto greater deuotion in receauing of christes blessed bodie and my lord gathereth therof a pure negation that we receaue not christes bodie at the handes of ma. Is this a worthy persō to be beleued in his doctrine that thus reasoneth without reason Fourthermore my lord doth make aunswere vnto Theophilus bysshop of Alexandria which writeth thus vpon Markes gospel Theophilus christ geuinge thankes did breake the bread which also we do addynge therunto prayer And gaue vnto thē sayinge Take this is my bodie This that I do nowe geue and that which ye do nowe take For the bread is not onely à figure of christes bodie but it is chaunged in to the very bodie of christe For christ sayeth The bread which I wil gyue yowe is my flesh Neuerthelesse Ioan. 8. the flesh of christ is not seene for oure weakenes but bread and wyne are
sayinge The spirite gyueth lyfe but the fleash profiteth nothinge c. Doest thow not see here reader that Saint Austen ment not to denye the corporal and real beynge and eatinge of christes bodie in the sacrament For he ment that fleash that is to say such à fleshely and folyshe vnderstaÌ„dynge of christes wordes werby they thought that christ wold that they shold eate his flesh cut out in peaces â—er 2. de verbis apost as common meates are eaten and not alyue and whole without al hurt done to it profiteth nothinge but the spirite that is to say à spiritual vnderstandinge of his wordes that they should eate his flesh alyue ioyned vnto his spirite and godhead whole and not harmed in any thiÌ„ge geueth lyfe And so he wold that they shold not thinke that they should eate that his bodie which they sawe after any such maner and as they sawe it in that same forme of fleash visibly but inuisiblye as he sayeth there nor drinke the bloud which the iewes should shed furth in that forme of bloud in which it should be shed out and visiblie This ment he as his oune wordes afore recited declare plainly and therfore those wordes which my lord alleageth for hym maketh nothinge for hym at al. The ende of the fourth booke The fyfth boke of the sacrifice of the holy masse Althoughe ye my lord do saye without any good grounde that it is à great blasphem ye against christ to saye that in the masse is made à sacrifice propitiatorie for synne yet al the eldest and best learned doctours that euer were are vtterly against your errour therin as I haue declared touching The bysshop fol. 104. many of theÌ„ in my booke of the sacrifice of the holy masse and as I wil anon by goddes grace proue by some of their saiÌ„ges briefely We make no sacrifice The confutation Luc. 22. at masse but only as ministers of christ which bade vs so to do offereth hymselfe daily for vs therin and therfore ye are disceaued at the begynninge of this your boke when ye say that priestes do make their masse à sacrifice propitiatorie for the synnes of the quycke and deade as neuer no creature made but christ alone and that ones onely for al vpon the crosse And to proue this ye alleage S. Paul which spake there to the hebrews of christes Hebr. 9. 10. blouddy sacrifice made by his death only which he offered neuer but ones as he sayeth or els he must neades haue dyed more theÌ„ ones for as much as that kynde of sacrifice is necessarilie ioyned wyth his passion but this maketh nothynge vtterly against the sacrifice of the masse in which christ hymselfe turneth the substaunce of bread and wyne in to his owne very natural fleash and bloud and offereth How and in What seÌ„ce the masse is à sacrifice them in à remembraunce of his death for the application of his passion and the merite of it for remission of the synnes both of the quycke and the deade as al holy doctours bothe Graekes and latines do wytnesse Fo. 105. plainly of whose sentences I wil alledge some anon But here I aske of yowe my lord why may not Christ euery daie be offered in sacrifice wythout dyinge agayne for vs as wel as he was slayne as Ihon sayeth euen from Apocal. 13. the begynnynge of the world and yet he suffred death not many thousand yeres after Were not the sacrifices of Abel Isaac of the paschal lambe and many other sacrifices of the old lawe certen figures of christes sacrifice theÌ„ Exodi 12. 1 Lâ—â—â—ti 24. Gene. 4. to come vpon the crosse and were offered to put meÌ„ in mynde of it What theÌ„ should lette my lord that the masse myght not be a sacrifice for a remeÌ„brance of christes passion and death now passed as wel as they were of it to come that this sacrifice shold not as wel be an application of christes merites vnto vs for remission of oure synnes as they were I am very sure Lib. 17 ca 20 De ciuitate Dei that ye are not able wyth the helpe of althem that made this youre booke to auoyde this Austen writeth after this sorte therin Salomon sayeth A maÌ„ hath nothinge that god is to hym Ecclesiastes 8. but that thinge whych he shal eate drinke What thinge more credible may here be vnderstanded to saye than that which doth pertayne to the partakinge of this table Which that priest the mediatour of the newe testament gyueth of his bodie and bloud after Marke this reader the ordre of Melchisedech For that sacrifice hath succeded al the sacrifices of the old testament which were offered in à shadowe of it to come Wherfore we do acknowledge that voice of the same mediatour written in the Psal 39. psalme by the prophete Thowe woldest not haue sayed christ the sonne to his father à sacrifice an oblatioÌ„ but thowe madest me à perfecte body for because in the stead of al those old sacrifices and oblations christes bodie is offered in sacrifice and mynystred Three errours confuted here vnto the partakers Here are three of your errours my lord confuted The first that Melchisedech offered not sacrifice in bread and wyne for à figure of christes sacrifice made at his last soupper The secoÌ„de that christes bodi and bloud are not in the holi sacrameÌ„t but only bread and wyne The thirde that christes bodie is not offered in sacrifice at masse We do confesse that christes sacrifice made vpon the crosse was ful perfecte sufficient and did doth stil put away the synnes of al them that beleue perfectly in hym trust in goddes mercy repent their illyues and receaue the holy saeramentes by which as meanes that christes sacrifice is and neades must be applied vnto them and therfore it cometh not of any imperfection of christes sacrifice ones made for euer vpon the crosse that his blessed bodie is offered daily in sacrifice for oure synnes but only to applie that perfecte sacrifice vnto vs for to take away actually oure imperfectenes of synne This a unsweare is sufficient for the soilynge of al that is brought out of S. paules epistle vnto the hebrews Nowe ye make à distinction of sacrifices saynge that there is one kinde of sacrifices à propitiatorie or à mercyful sacrifice that is to saye such as pacyfieth goddes wrath and indignatioÌ„ obteyneth mercye for oure synnes and forgeuenes of them which is onely christes death sacrifice made ones for al vpon the crosse Which no good christian man The confutation denyeth But what then Canye therby proue my lord that christe offereth not hymselfe yet daily at masse by the priest as his ministre for an applyiÌ„ge of that his propitiatorie and most mercyful sacrifice made neuer but ones Maye not the sacrifice of the masse made in à remembrance of christes death and blouddy sacrifice be as wel
which christe hymselfe offered ones by his death to clense vs from synne The syxt and last lesson is that the hoost or sacrifice which priestes do offre dailie can not be cōsumed and therfore it is not bread and wyne for they are sone consumed but christes body bloud which are not consumed in eatinge and drinkīge of them but they stil euer remayne whol and safe Nowe à mā may see euidently that my lordes doctrine is against saint Chrysostoms beliefe and teachinge and that he rayleth vpon hym and his doctrine in this his last booke For first my lord sayeth that priestes haue inuented of them selfes à newe sacrifice vnto the great blasphemie yniurye of christ But ancient docters saye that christ hymselfe offered the same sacrifice that priestes offre at masse both at his last soupper and vpon the crosse also and commaunded priestes to offre yt in remembraunce of his death as these autoritees do shewe manyfestly S. Ireneus aboue M. ccc lxxiiij wrote thus Christ toke bread and gaue thankes sayinge lib. 4. ca. 32. Christ did institute the sacrifice of the masse This is my body And toke the chalice of wyne and confessed it to be his bloud and he taught à newe sacrifice of the newe testament which the church receauinge of the apostles offereth vnto god in al the whole world This holy martyr which was verye nyght christes tyme sayeth that christ taughte his apostles at his mandy by say in he these wordes This is my bodie This is my bloud à newe sacrifice of the newe testamēt that the apostles taught it vnto the church which offereth the same yn the whole world and my lord sayeth that christ offered not his body and bloud in sacrifice at his last soupper nor taught his apostles to offre them in sacrifice nor finally that priestes offre any sactifice more then the laite doth but they haue iuuented à newe sacrifice distincted frō christes iuiurious and blasphemous vnto it What is this yf it be not playne blyndnes and ignoraunce Is this my lord your doctryne to be approued of the auncyent docters sainges S. Cyprian agreeth wyth this saynge Luc. 22. Epist lib. 2. epist 3. If our lord iusus christ and god hymselfe be the highe priest of god the father and he hymselfe did first offre à sacrifice vnto god the father and hath commaunded that same to be done in remembraunce of hym that priest is verily christes vicar which doth folowe that thynge that christ hath done And then he offereth in the church á true and à ful sacrifice vnto god yf he begynne to offre as he may perceaue that christ offered And in the begynnynge of that epistle he sayeth that christ is the authour and teacher of this sacrifice of the masse and bade priestes Homi. 24. in 1. Cor. 10. offre it vnto god as he hymselfe had done afore at his mandy Chrysostom Homi. 2. in 2. time 1. sayeth also thus But christ hath prepared à muche more wounderful and à magnificent sacrifice both whē he chaunged the sacrifice it selfe and also when he did commaunde hym selfe to be offered in the steade of brute beastes which were offered in the Homi. 2. in 2 Tim. 1. old lawe Agayne he writeth thus that holy oblation whether peter offer it or Note this wel paule or els à priest what soeuer his deseruinge be is the same sacrifice which christ hymselfe gaue vnto his disciples and which also priestes do nowe make This the priestes sacrifice hath in it nothinge lesse than that of christes makinge Why so because men do not make holy this the priestes sacrifice but christ that had made that his owne sacrifice holy afore For as the wordes which christ spake are the same that the priestes do nowe also pronounce euen so is the sacrifice also the same Then he concludeth sayinge Wherfore this sacrifice is christes body and that also He that thinketh that this bodye hath any thynge lesse than that knweth not that it is christ which is nowe also present and worketh Eusebius which was about M cc yeres passed Eusebius lib 1. ca. 10. Demonst euangelicae holdeth also against my lordes doctryne saiynge Wherfore after al thiges christ wrought à certen merueylous host and an excellent sacrifice he offered it vnto his father for al our saluation and did ordayne that we should offre à remembraunce of that same thinge to god hymselfe for à sacrifice Ambrose sayeth I o lord remēbringe thy passion do come vnto thy Primae precatione praeparāte ad missam aulter althoughe I be à synner that I may offre to the that sacrifice which thow diddest ordeyne and commaunde to be offered for our saluation in remembraunce De eccles hierarch of the. S. Dionyse paules disciple writeth thus Wherfore he both reuerently and also accordynge to the office of à bysshop after holy prayses of goddes workes excuseth hymselfe that he offereth à sacrifice of saluatiō which is excellēter than he is hymselfe criynge out vnto hym Thow diddest bydde o lord Do ye this for à remembraunce of me Ignatius Luc. 22. 1. Cor. 11. Epist 8. S. Ihons scholer sayeth It is not leful to offre nother make sacrifice nor to celebrate masses without the byshops autorite or consent Fynallie for I passe ouer many other doctours autorites li. 10. ed. 20 de ciuitate dei Austen hath thus speakinge of christes blouddy sacrifice made vpon the crosse A sacrament of the which thinge he wold that the dailie sacrifice of the church should be seiynge he is the head of his bodie the church and she also is the body of that head as wel she by hym as he by her vsed to be offered in sacrifice Nowe can my lord iustely saye that priestes haue inuented Christ is offered in sacrifice of them selfes à newe sacrifice against christes sacrifice and that his doctrine is approued of al the auncient The masse is á sacrifice propitiatorye for synne doctours Moreouer let vs see whether this sacrifice of the masse which we haue now proued to be īstituted of christ be à sacrifice for remission of synne or not Of which matter thus writeth Hom. 69. ad pop Antiochenum in cap. 1. ad phil Chrysostom These thinges were not vnaduysedly rasshely or without cause ynacted or decreed of the apostles that the dead should be remembred in the dreadful misteries For thei do knowe that much good profite cōmeth vnto thē therof For whem the people Hebr. 5. shal stād holdyngvp their handes with the priestes the dreadful sacrifice is set furth how shal we not obteine gods fauour prainge for thē Agayne he sayeth We must traueile as much as may Homi. 41. in 1. Cor. 15 be that the dead may be helped not with weapinge but with prayer supplicatiōs almesses sacrifices This thinge was not inuēted without à cause nor we do not in vaine remēbre the dead ī the