and offered at his last supper vnder the form's of bread and wine according to the Order of Melchisedech and that the Eucharist as it was instituted and celebrated was not only a Sacrament but also a sacrifice is plainly euidenced out of the words expressing the action that Christ vsed in the instituting and celebrating therof for example (c) The three Euangelists S. Mathew S. Mark and S. Luke express the words Christ vsed in the instituting and celebrating of the Eucharist in the present Tense for example IS GIVEN IS shed likewise S. Paul as to Christs body 1. Cor. 11. is broken Besides the French and Latin Bibles of Caluinists haue IS giuen for you IS shed for you But according to the Latin vulgar translation the particles giuen shed broken are expressed in the future Tence namely shall be giuen shall be shed shall be broken Howeuer Howeuer whether they be expounded in the present or future Tense it matters not since the sense is the same for although is giuen is shed carry the signification of the present Tense neuertheless the subsequent particles namely Do this in remembrance of me vntil our lord shall come to judge the quick and the dead 1. Cor. 11. imply the future Tense The Greek Church hath alwais vsed the future Tense in their Liturgies namely S. Iames. S. Clement S. Basil S. Chrysostome to proue that Christ offered the sacrifice of his body and blood when he was present with his Apostles at his last supper and indeed Christ himselfe paue euidence enough of this Catholick assertion by saying Hic Calix Sanguinis mei This Cup of my blood And the Latin Church vseth the future Tense shall be giuen shall be shed to shew plainly that Christ spoke not of his body and blood onely then at his last supper offered but of the same sacrifice that was to be offered for the future till he should come again to judge the quick and the dead This is my body which is giuen for you Luk 22. which S. Paul expresseth in other term's viz This is my body which is broken for you 1. Cor. 11. This is my blood of the new Testament which is shed for many Mar 14. This is my blood the new Testament that is shed for many vnto remission of Sins Math. 26. All which sentences import sacrificing since they containe the proper words of sacrifice as it is plainly deducible out of other euident Scripture-testimonies in consequence whereof the Eucharist instituted and celebrated by Christ in his last supper is not a Sacrament only but a sacrifice also Again the afore said Verbs namely to giue to break to shed are vttered in the present tense after the Greek Translation signifying that Christ did did not only offer sacrifice in a bloody manner on the Crosse but in an vnbloody also at his last supper (d) S. Luke cap. 22. expresseth the action that Christ vsed in the institution of the Eucharist as to his body vnder the elements of bread and wine in these words This is my body vvhich is giuen for you which S. Paul 1. Cor. 11. deliuers thus This is my body vvhich is broken for you and 1. Cor. 10. he saith The bread which we break is it not the participation of the body of our lord S. Chrysostome expounding this sacred Text demandes why S. Paul added to the words of the Euangelist vvhich vve break and answer's to his own question saying This is done in the Eucharist and not on the Cross vvhere no bone of him vvas broken Io. 19. According to S. Chrysostome as likewise Theodoret and Occumenius who were versed in the Greek tongue Christ suffered himselfe to be broken in the Eucharist vnder the form of bread vnto filling of all which he did not suffer to be done saith S. Chrysostome on the Cross vnto redeeming of all and indeed Calvin in his Commentary vpon the 11. Chapter set down noteth that the particles Is Broken signify is offered or is sacrificed whereby appear's that the Apostles intent and aime was to shew that Christs body was truly broken in the vnbloody oblation offered at his last supper for as much as the species of the consecrated bread were then truly broken Besides as the words of the action which Christ vsed in instituting and celebrating the Eucharist viz This is my body which is giuen for you This is my blood shed for many vnto remission of sins doe euidently import (e) The sacrifice of the Euchariste in as much as it appeaseth God rendereth him propitious and procureth diuine grace vnto remission of sin◠is truly a propitiotary sacrifice taken in the proper sense according to the ancient Fathers S. Gyprian S. Basil S. Chrysostome S. Ambrose S. Austin and the Council of Trent assertes this Catholick doctrine and addeth withall The sacrifice of the Eucharist according to Apostolicall tradition is not onely offeréd for sinnes pains satisfactions and other necessities but likevvisa for such as are dead in the state of grace and not sufficiently purged as yet a propitiatory sacrifice for blood to be shed is to be sacrificed for propitiation or pardon of sins so the words of precept which follow This is my body giuen for you namely doe this in remembrance of me That is in memory of my death and passion doe signify a commemoratiue sacrifice and consequently plainly demonstrate the Eucharist not to be a Sacrament only but (f) The ancient Fathers S. Cypr. Ep. 63. and Caeci Orig. in cap. 16. Mat. and others also compare the sacrifice Christ offered of his body and blood at his last supper vnto the sacrifice of the paschall Lambe and other sacrifices of the old law wherby appears that the sacrifice Christ offered at his last supper was a sacrifice taken in the proper sense wherfore S. Gregor Nyssen Ora. 1. de Resur saith expresly that Christ in celebrating the Euchariste at his last supper sacrificed himselfe before he was sacrificed vpon the Cross a sacrified also For otherwise it would not be a liuely and perfect commemoration or representation of the sacrifice offered on the Cross such as Christ requireth Luk. 22. for as a Sacrament cannot be perfectly represented but by an other Sacrament 〈◊〉 a sacrifice cannot be liuely represented but by another sacrifice there is necessarily required similitude and proportion between the thing that representeth and the thing represented for a man cannot represent an horse or an horse a man nor the saying of the Apostle 1. Cor. 11. as often as you shall eat of this bread and drink of this drink you shall shew the death of our Lord doth infirm the strength of this argument * Patres antiqui in tribus oecumenicis Concilijs puta Ephesino Calcedo Constantinop vt constat ex praefatione Ephesi sic interpretati sunt verbae Apostoli quotiescunque māducabitis mortem Domini annunciabitis For the true sense and meaning therof is that the sacrifice of the Eucharist which is
HOLY CHARACTERS CONTAINING A MISCELANY OF THEOLOCICALL DISCOVRSES THAT IS THEOLOGY Positiue Scholasticall Polemicall and Morall Built vpon the foundation of Scriptures Traditions Councils Fathers DEVIDED INTO TWO BOOKS Written by GEORGE LEYBVRN Doctor of Diuinity Bevvare lest there be any man that deceiue you through Philosophy and crafty handling according to the traditions of men according to the rudiments of the vvorld and not according to Christ Coloss 2. Of your selues shall men rise speaking peruerse thinges to dravv Disciples after them Act. 20. PRINTED AT DOWAY By BALTAZAR BELLIER An. 1662. With Priviledge TO THE RIGHT HONORABLE LORD PERCY HERBERT LORD POWYS OF POWYS c. MY LORD S. Clement in the eleuenth booke of Apostolicall constitutions writeth that Selene the great beauty of Rome in those dayes when she shewed her selfe from a high Tower vnto the people of that Citty Simon the Magician by sleight conueyances represented as many Selenes as were windowes in the same Tower Howeuer there was no more then one true Selene the rest being meer outward resemblances hauing nothing of inward substance contriu'd by naturall magicke vnto deluding the Eye-sight of the Beholders in like manner though true Theology is not diuided nor has many faces being the science of one God that shew's her selfe front the high Tower of one diuine faith which supports her neuertheless through the subtill dealings of Satan is represented with as many faces as there be new models of Christian doctrine that is as many or rather more then ages down from Christ till these dayes euery age respectiuely hauing coind new opinions in order to the mysteries of Christian Religion Heady and high-mynded schollars once they come to be blown vp with the actiuity of their own witt and thereby become inordinate a 2. Timoth. 3. erunt homines seipsos amantes louers of their own thoughts leaue the loue of truth As a troubled eye so the vnderstanding deluded with opinions which goe beyond the boundaries of nature cannot see the light of truth Mittit illis Deus operationem erroris quoniam charitatem veritatis recipere noluerunt 2. Thes 2. In regard heady schollars are carried on the wings of Pride and will not embrace the loue of truth the supream prouidence giues them vp to their heart's lust vnto vncleaness of errour that is God b Secundum S. Aug. l. 20. ciuit c. 19. Deus mittit quatenus diabolum facere ista permittit permitt's Satan to send them strong delusion vnto belieuing lies and taking pleasure therein which together with pertinacy so by degrees blind's them that they still encrease in madness till at lengh through faction sedition and schism they endeauour to ruine as it were all true Christian doctrine and Religion witness Nestorius Arius Pelagius Donatus and sundry other anciēt and modern schollars which vpon what designs of ambition c S. Austin l. de vtil cred c. 1. saith that he is an Heretick that for temporall interest either coineth or followeth new opinions and interest is needless to express through new coind Theologies haue laboured to turne the Church of God into vtter disorder and confusion As all rebellion is to ciuill so all schism is to ecclesiasticall gouernement dangerous and pernicious In the old law lest the people of God might be deceiu'd with false coyne and weights the originall Cycli and originall weights were conseru'd in the Sanctuary of the Temple and no money or weights allow'd which were not conform to the original's of the same Sanctuary Likewise that the same people might not be deluded with false coyns and weights of doctrine the chaire of Moyses by diuine dispensation was cloathed with infallibility The high Priest how wicked soeuer could not vtter wicked doctrine from Moyses chaire as appears euidently from Christs own words Mat. 23. The scribes and Pharises sit in Moyses Chaire c. From which sacred Text S. Austin l. 6. con Faus Manichae c. 29. infers thus In Cathedra Moysis mali sedentes bona dicere cogebantur Besides when God erected Moyses his Chaire Deutro 17. he promised that all definitions Decrees and decisions of matters in debate as comming from that seate should be of vndoubted truth Moreouer the children of Israël were bound to submit to the sentence of the high Priest the law condemning of pride and punishing with death those which disobeyed the commandement of the Priest that ministred to our lord and the Decree of the Judges In the new law lest Christians might be carried away with euery winde of doctrine S. Peter and his Chaire by diuine dispensation were invested into much better priuiledges then Moyses and his Chaire For our Sauiour tooke speciall care that S. Peter might not fall away from the true faith as does euidence his prayer Luc. 22. Oraui pro te Petre vt non deficiat fides tua I haue prayed for thee Peter that thy faith faile not and doubtless his prayer was effectuall according to the Apostle Hebrae 5. Exauditus est Christus pro sua reuerentia Our lord prouided for S. Peter that his faith might not faile to the end saith S. Leo ser 3. de Assumpt The head being made invincible the state of all the rest might be more sure that is the rest thereby might be strengthned and confirm'd in faith S. Peter according to S. Ambrose l. 9. Noui Testam 9.75 Tom 4. after his denying of Christ was constituted the supream Pastour of souls because it was said to him afore When thou art conuerted confirm thy Brethren neither was Christ's prayer offered in order to the person of S. Peter only but likewise in reference to his office according to the inter pretation of the best antiquity so that the effect of the same prayer will continue as long as the Church of Christ shall endure on Earth and indeed euen as Christ commaunds S. Peter to feed his sheepe Ioa. 21. soe he commaunds him to confirm his Brethren Luc. 22. but that saying of Christ Feed my sheep did not relate to the person of S. Peter onely according to all Orthodox Writers but also to the office of supream Pastour which was conferd vpon S. Peter with intent to continue it in his successours being of necessary vse in the Church wherfore Christ saying to S. Peter confirme thy Brethren ought to carrie the same interpretation and in earnest it were manifest weaknes to giue vnto the successors of Moyses greater prerogatiues as to power authority and infallibility in the gouernement of the Synagogue then to the Successors of S. Peter in the gouernement of the Church of Christ for this were to prefer the law of bondage before the law of grace In consequence of the premises the Roman faith of S. Peters successors cannot faile not to fall away from faith is a priuiledge proper to the Church of Rome that is to the Bishops of that seate as also plainly appears by the clear Testimonies of primitiue Fathers For example S. Cyprian
misericordia eius nos in omnibus praeuenit cōsentire verò vel dissentire propriè voluntatis est to consent or not consent vnto it for God forceth no man vnto his freindship As to the second kind or way of gouerment Christ the son of the Virgin Mary was * Aug. 95. haer filius hominis venit magnus medicus quia magnus iacebit aeger ipse medicus factus est medicamentum phraenetici a great mercifull phisician vndertaking the Cure of a great infirm patient which was all mankind afflicted with sundry mortall infirmityes in healing wherof he applied no other remedy then himselfe he was made both the phisician and the phisick to shew his mercifull greatnes (d) Christ In the pursuance of the generall redemption performed all the seuen works of mercy and in the Cure of each infirmity he perform'd a work of mercy Man was halfe dead with hunger himselfe gaue him Heauenly (e) Jo. 6. Christ is named bread of life bread his own body vnto euerlasting life Man was halfe dead with thirst himselfe ministred drink made of his own blood that he might be no more a thirst Man was a very Idiot as to the knowledg of his Creatours glory and his own happines himselfe taught him (f) t' was foretold Ierem. 31 that the law of grace should be giuen in the inward parts and writ in the hearts of the faithfull and writ his holy ordinances in his heart Man in a journy between Ierusalem and Ierico met with thieues that robbed him of his garments wounded and left him for halfe dead himselfe was the charitable Samaritan that took compassion of him (g) Lut. 10. he went to him and bound vp his wounds and powred oyle and wine bound vp his wounds powred in oile and wine of seuerall graces and made full prouision for him Man was detained in prison for a debt that was not in his reach to discharge himselfe visited him wiped out and cancelled (h) Coloss 2. Christ is said to haue cancelled the handwriting of the decree that was against us the handwriting of the decree that was against him and fastened it vpon his Crosse wherin he dying spoiled the principalities and powers of death and hell triumphing ouer them which had brought all the fore mentioned infirmities vpon mankind CHAR. VIIJ. OF THE CROSS OF CHRIST THE CONTENTS Of the Cross of Christ came all our happines honour and worship due to the Cross the custome of ancient and modern Christians to make the sign of the Cross in their foreheads the ground manner and meaning thereof THe Cross of Christ is the Altar of generall redemption that is the Tree that was erected in Mount Calvary wherin Christ the second Adam by a supream sacrifice of his pretious body and blood redeemed the generall loss that the first Adam made in the tree planted in the terrestiall Paradise diuine providence fore ordaining so that the deuil * Canit Ecclesia inpraefatione de Dominica passione vt qui in ligno vincebat in ligno quoque vinceretur S. Ignatius mar Epis ad philad Crucis signum inquit est trophaeū contra virtutem principis mundi quod videns expauoscit audiens timet who in wood ouercame should in wood be ouercome And as a stagg worsted in single fight by another of his fellows euer after stands in awe of the Conquerour waues his walk or if by accident or necessity he passeth by him bowes his lofty head in recognisance of his inferiority and the others superiority (a) S. Damascene calleth the Cross of Christ a sign or token of his victory ouer the deuil and erected to the intent the conquered enemy may not dare to come near the place wherin it is exposed and S. Chrisostome expresly affirmes that deuils cannot abide near such as make the sign of the Cross on their forcheads Again Origen Hom. 8. in locis diuerfis calleth the Cross of the son of God our victory at the sight wherof deuils tremble Nothing affraid saith he of golden Capitolls they stand in fear of the Cross so the deuill standes in fear of the Cross that subdued him runneth from it and though he make light of guilded pallaces and contemne the Scepters of kings neuertheless he is afraid of the weapon that wounded him and trembles as often as he sees the sword that depriued him (b) Io. 12. Christ said the Prince of this vvorld the deuil shall be cast out and vvhen I shall be exalted from the earth that is put vpon the Cross I vvill dravv all men vnto me Wherefore S. Ignatius the Martyr calleth the Cross a trophy or sign that is set vp against the power of the Prince of this world who while he see it is afraid and while he heares the naming of it trembles of his principallity and power This is one reason of the generall practice vsed by Catholick Christians in making the * S. Chryfost si vultui tuo signum sanctae Crucis affixeris nullum daemonium propè stare poterst sign of the Cross on their forheades on their meat and drink (c) S. Hieron Epis ad Eustoch exhorteth this holy virgin to make the sign of the Cross with her hand in the doing of euery worke and in all their conuersations and exercises at their going out and coming into their houses at their going to bed and rising and this pious and religious vse hath descended from Father to son euer from the beginning of Christianity Tradition left it saith Tertullian custome confirmed it and faith practized it Another reason is because the Cross is a liuely representation of the Generall redemption vnto conseruing the memory of Christs passion who did chuse saith S. Austin in exposit Euang. S. Ioan. trac 43. That kind of death to hang on the Crosse and to fasten the same Crosse in the foreheades of the faithfull that a Christian may say God forbid that I should glory saue in the Crosse of our lord IESUS Christ Besides Christians by imprinting the sign of the Cross in their foreheades and saying in the name of the Father and of the son and of the holy Ghost doe confess and profess together with the mystery of generall redemption the mystery of the holy Trinity for they mention expresly the three diuine persons and in as much as they say In the name of the Father c. and not in the names vsing the singular number only they signifie implicitly the individuall or singular vnity of the individuall or singular diuine nature equally participated by each person Also they plainly and orderly express the marueilous order that the diuine persons had from all eternity for example they name the Father in the first place the son in the second the holy ghost in the last And in regard the diuine Father is a beginning without a beginning and as it were the head of the other two diuine persons in making the sign of
will free himselfe of his bondage at his pleasure As a ship that hath lost her helme cannot sail whether and as her self would but is caryed whether and as the wind will euen so a sinner that is depriued of the helme of grace cannot doe the good things which he should but the euill which he should not and as ship of it self can descend but not ascend so a man by the power of his own free will can fali into But cannot rise from sin The works of nature (c) God said by the mouth of his Prophet Ose cap. 13. Perdition is thine O Israel onely in me is thine help whereby is clearly euidenced that the euils which happen come of our own procurement in regard of the sinnes we commit which do not proceed from God who cannot be the author of euil as it is an euil worke though according to the Prophet Amos cap. 3. he is cause of punishment due to sin which is called malum poena But God punisheth in order to amendement in this life and Iustice after death so that those which amend their life need not feare the diuine iustice after death can cast him down but the works of grace only can raise him vp again that he is a seruant of sin and freed of iustice is his own free act but that he is freed of sin and a seruant vnto iustice is the work of grace through IESUS-CHRIST and indeed if the works of nature were sufficient enough to raise vp a sinner vnto iustification of life Christ had dyed * Ga. 2. so per legem iustitia ergo Christus gratis mortuus vnde Aug. infert contra Pelagi Si per naturaÌ„ tustitia ergo Christus graits moriuus ergo scandalum crucis euacuatum est without cause Furthermore besides this bondage there be sundry other euil things which the deuil hath made of sin for he that sinneth speakes * Jsa 5. va vobis qui dicitis maluÌ„ bonum bonum malum ponentes tenebras lumeÌ„ lumen tenebras poneÌ„tes amarum in dulce dulce in amaruÌ„ good of euill and euil of good puts darknes for light and light for darknes puts bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter goes far from the springs of liue waters and dyes in the waters of vnclean delights that is to say a sinner preferreth wickednes to godlines ignorance to knowledg vice to vertue and death to life for as much as he forsaketh God his creator without whom nothing can be lightened sweetened sanctified quickened know therefore says the holy Prophet Ieremy cap. 2. and Behold ô sinner that it is an euil thing and bitter that thou hast for saken God thy lord which is an infinit treasure of good things The deuil makes a couenant with euery man that sinneth which is like the league * 1. Reg. 11 Naas interpretatur serpens significat diabolum of Naas the Amonite 1. Reg. 11. on condition that he may thrust out his right eye that is his obedience to God and his loue to spirituall things which is a very ill agreement in regard it spoileth him of knowledg grace and glory a chess player by one negligent remouall or touch of his men a miss often times loseth the whole game and the whol gaine too euen so one sin destroyeth much good Eccles 9. for euen When a iust man turneth away from his iustice and committeth iniquity all his iustice that be bath done shall not be remembered but in his transgression that he hath committed and in his sin that be bath sinned in them shall be dye Ezech. 8. That is when a sinner does not cast away from him his wickednes wherby he hath taken the couenant of the deuil and turne to God with a new heart and a new spirit but die in the bitternes of his soul he shall lose all the fruit of his good works together with the glory of Heauen Neither are these all the euill things that the deuill hath made of sin for the burdens which he layes on the shoulders of him that sinneth mortally are most beauy and grieuous and albeit that for the present they seem sweet and light yet afterwards they press him down as he that in water drawes a log of wood feels not the full waight therof till he come to land so the burden of a sinner is not felt in the waters of fleshly delights and the pleasures of this life but when he shall goe out of them that is when he shall depart out of the world he will find the (d) S Iohn Apoca. 8. faith that the waters destroy many that is worldly delights which after death are made bitter water in which he delighted as bitter as wormwood and the load that sin laid on his neck so heauy that it will suppress him suddenly for as lightening descends from Heauen in the turne of an eye so a sinner will fall down into hell in * Job 21. in puncto descendune ad inferos Ex Luc. 10. videbam Satanam sicut fulgur de calo cadentem a trice which is the place of diuine execution in punishment of transgressions As earthly kings haue faire lodgings for the entertaining of the good people and dark prisons for the punishing of malefactours so the king of glory that is exalted aboue all Princes of the earth hath goodly pallaces for delighting such as do well which is Heauen and dungeons of vtter darknes for tormenting of those that doe euill which is hell where the wicked experience in bitter suffering the power of him whose mercy in bountifull gifts they haue despiced as he that walketh in iustice and shutteth his eyes from seeing euill shall dwell on high with God in full enjoyment of all good things so he that deuiateth from the waies of godlines and delighteth in the pathe of iniquity when the number of his life is cut of (e) The Prophet Isaias cap. 33. expressing the punishments which the wicked endure after their death speaketh to sinners thus Who among yee can endure to dvvell vvith the deuouring fire vvho among yee vvith euerlasting burnings Wherfore S. Gregory saith that the death of the wicked is an euerlasting death shall dwell below with the deuil in deuouring fire and euerlasting burnings which is a death without dying and sorrow without ending for death there is alwayes * S. Gregorâ—â—it miseris â—â—ors sine â—â—â—rte begining and sorrow neuer ending in reguard the deuouring fire is for euer burning and no deliuerance from hell which is a laborynth in the mids of the earth though easely entred into yet affordes no guid or thread to direct out againe and the windings and turnings therof minister nothing of pleasure for brimstone is scattered in euery walke * Job 14. vndique terrebunt eum formidines and trouble anguish feares together with dispaire and horrible confusion be on euery side hope of blessednes being rooted out of this dwelling yet
a perfect representation of Christ's death and Passion suffered on his Cross must precede the eating of that bread and drinking of that drink for Christ's death and Passion was (g) S. Austin l. 13. de Trinit c. 17 Epis 49. quaes 3. attestes that it is foretold in the old Testament that there should be in the law of grace a true proper outward visible sacrifice again it is foretold that in the last age of the new Law that is when Antichrist shall come the vsuall sacrifice shall cease which giue euidence enough of the continuance of som one sacrifice in the law of grace till the time of Antichrist Which cannot be meant of a Metaphoricall and invisible sacrifice being that kind of vnproper sacrifice will not cease in the dayes of Antichrist according to the holy Prophets Dan. 12. and Isaias cap. 10. a proper special sacrifice that cannot be represented perfecttly by a Sacrament but by a sacrifice wherin destruction must interuene necessarily either by death if what is offered by a liuing thing or by fraction if what is offered be a hard and drie thing as breard or by effusion if what is offered be a liquid thing as wine which experience sheweth in all the sacrifices of the law of nature and Moyses And indeed the end and innate propriety of a proper sacrifice being an externall sensible act of supream adoration is to signify God's omnipotency as to his power ouer life and death wheras a Sacrament signifieth the sanctifying of such as belieue in and serue God which is but the product or effect of Christ his bloody sacrifice If perfect representation of the sacrifice of the Cross could be attributed to any Sacrament it were to be ascribed to the Sacrament of Baptism wherby as the Apostle saith Heb. 9. Weare buried with Christ into his death Neuertheless Baptism doth not represent the death of Christ but the death and resurrection of him that is baptised Baptism signifying that he that is baptised doth die as vnto sin and rise as vnto newnes of life neither is Christ said to die in Baptism as he is belieued to be immolated in the sacrifice of the Eucharist Furthermore as * Sanguine hostiae obsignabatur vetus testamētum vt post Moysen declarat Apostolus Hebrae 1. Moyses began and dedicated the old Testament law or Religion in the blood of calfes contained in his cup saying This is the blood of the Couenant c. So Christ began and dedicated the new Testament in his own blood contained in the Chalice of his last supper saying This is the Chalice the new Testament in my blood c. Luc. 22. which the other Euangelist's more plainly expresse introducing Christ to say This is my blood of the new Testament wherby is euidently certaine that Christ's blood in the Chalice shed in an vnbloody manner was the blood of sacrifice and consequently in that sacrifice which is the sacrifice of the Eucharist consisteth the externall Religion and proper seruice of the new Testament as the outward Religion and soueraigne worship of God in the old law did consist in the sacrifices therof vnder which it was established Heb. 7. And though Christ hanging on his cross did confirme and ratify the new Testament yet he made it only at his last supper when he said This is the Chalice the new Testamēt in my blood or this is my blood of the new Testament For then Christ was free and aliue wheras on his cross he was deuested of liberty and depriued of life and consequently not in a condition to make it the making of a Testament being an act of a person free and aliue Also though Christs death and passion was the perfect sacrifice that (h) The Apostle Hebrae 1. teacheth that Christ By one oblation consummated for euer them that are sanctifyed where by one oblation is meant the sacrifice of the Cross which the Apostle there calleth sacrifice of consummation that is of generall redemption and indeed that sacred Text speak's onely of the sacrifice of the Cross not mentioning the sacrifice of application that is the sacrifice of Mass called the sacrifice of the Altar or the sacrifice of the Eucharist wherby the sacrifice of generall Redemption called the sacrifice of the Cross is particularly applyed and offered daily in all places of the Church vnto sanctification of life And indeed to affert that Christ onely once offered himselfe to God the Father were a manifest blasphemy since Scripture Testimonies shew euidently sundry oblations Christ made of himselfe For example he offered himselfe in the tyme of his conception and during his aboad on earth he made seuerall offerings in order to his own person for he offered his body his soul his life his fasting his praying his watching his sighs and teares howeuer the offering of his body in a bloody sacrifice was made once onely consummated the generall redemption or remission of all sins whatsoeuer as to sufficiency neuertheless that bloody sacrifice enduring only for a day of time could not be the externall sacrifice which the people of the new Testament might haue recourse vnto euen to the end of the world and to auerre the taking away of such externall sacrifice is to acknowledge the taking away also of externall Priesthood sacrifice and Priesthood being correlatiues and consequently the * S. Cypria de coena Dom. asserit nullam posse esse Religionem si sacrificium corporis sanguinis Christi auferatur abolishing of the new Testament for if the Priesthood and sacrifice therof be disannulled then of necessity must there be an abrogation of the law that was established vnder them Furthermore it is conuincingly manifest that it was an externall proper sacrifice which Christ offered at his last supper for the one oblation according to the order of Melchisedech which succeeded (i) That one sole sacrifice of Christs body and blood succeded in the room of many sacrifices is a catholick assertion vnanimously taught by the ancient Fathers And S. Aus l. 8. c. 27 l. 17. c. 20. de ciuit l. 3. de bap c. 19. names the sacrifice of Mass the sacrifice that sufficeth for all sacrifices which were offered in the old law for as much as the body of Christ is offered in the room of all those sacrifices in the room of all the sacrifices of the old law was that one or none was that one but that one was an externall proper sacrifice and cannot be meant of the sacrifice of the Cross that being rather after the order of Aaron since it was celebrated in reall effusion of blood then after the similitude of Melchisedech who offered no bloody oblation Besides all the necessary requisits vnto proper sacrifice are plainly obseruable in that action that Christ vsed in instituting and celebrating the Eucharist at his last supper 10. is obseruable Christ himself that is a Priest instituted by legall authority and more solemnly made then all the Priests
whosoeuer eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath eternall life and except you shall eate the flesh of the son of man and drinke his blood you haue no life in you again the bread that I will giue is my flesh for the life of the world Thus saith S. Austin ser 2. de verbis Apos c. 1. life said of life and to him that thinketh life to be a lyer this meat shall be death and not life The bread that I will giue is my flesh for the life of the world c. Thereby signifying plainly his intent of leauing to his Church his substantiall reall body in meate and his substantiall reall blood in drinke as an effectuall expedient for the obtaining eternall life for alwaies the words of Christ or God which doe importe a thing promised tending to mans saluation ought to be vnderstood in the sense wherein they be outwardly expressed in scripture that is to say * Aug. l. de doc Chris cap. 10. 16. in sermone inquit diuino id omne pertinet ad sensum literalem id est debet accipi literaliter vt verba sonāt non figuratè quod potest referri ad morum honestatem vel fidei veritatem locutio quae iubet vel vtilitatē vel beneficentiā est propria non figuratiua secundum Iustinum codice de legibus litterally setting aside Tropes and mysticall significations Besides a law or precept that exact's obedience from subjects and such indeed is the legacy of the new Testament ought to be cleare and plain to the vnderstanding of euery man that each one may decline what is forbidden and obserue what is enjoyned For no law or precept can be vnderstood by all subjects if the words thereof be mysticall or figuratiue but Christ to shew that he spok according * Concil Nicae quod est 7. synodus generalis Act. 6. probat ex citato Textu Jo. 6. con Iconiclastas Sacramentum Eucharistiae non esse imaginem Christi sed verum reale corpus erus probat insuper ex eodem loco Trid. sess 21. can 1. laicos non adctrings iure diuine ad communionem sub vtraque specie to the plain litterall sense when he perceiued that the Capharnaits for in the synagogue at Capharnaum Christ taught these thinges began to reason among themselues concerning the possibility of giuing his flesh to eate and his blood to drinke he did not correct their conceptions as to orall manducation and orall drinking thereof yet his custome (c) In regard Nicodemus conceiu'd spirituall regeneration after the similitude of naturall generation Christ rectifyed his vnderstanding in regard the Pharisees Io. 16. Mat. 15. imagined that a meer omission of washing their hand 's before refection was a grieuous crime Christ instructed them in the knowledge of sin and in regard the Apostles made a wrong construction of his saying in order to eating his body anddrinking of his blood Christ forthwith expounded his meaning telling them that the words he had spoken were spirit and life that is according to S. Austin Epis 98. they were spiritually not carnally meant as if Christ had intended to giue vnto his Apostles particles of his body diuided from the whole so that Christ in order to the manner and that onely of eating his body and drinking of his blood corrected his Apostles was constant in conformity to his pastorall office to instruct his auditory conceiuing amiss of his sayings but repeated the same words confirmed with an oath saying to them Amen Amen except yee eat the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood yee haue no life in you which conuincingly shews that Christ spake not figuratiuely but litterally and indeed an oath is sworn to the end that such as doubt of the thinges promised or spoken may be assured of the true meaning of him that promiseth or speaketh any thing Hebrae 6. in consequence of which a thing confirmed with an oath ought to be interpreted in the * Innocentius 3. cap. veniens Extra de iuramento plain literall sense and according to the conceptions of those for whose sake an oath is sworn but the Capharnaits for whose sake Christ * Augus ait Christum iurasse dicēdo Amen Amen swore conceiued Christ to speake of orall manducation of his body and orall drinking of his blood wherefore it was that manner of eating and drinking that Christ confirmed with his oath but when he saw that his Disciples did misunderstand his meaning as to the eating his flesh and drinking his blood imagining him to mean that they were to eate his flesh and drink his blood with the mouth of their body after the manner of common meate and drink that is to teare Christs body and blood diuiding one part from an other in eating and drinking it he corrected (d) According to S. Cyprian ser de Coena Domini the intent and aime of Christs saying Ioan. 6. Vnlesse you eate c. was to instruct vs that our abiding in him is meate and drinke from whence Caluinists vnaduisedly infer that S. Cyprian interpreted Christs words Vnlesse you eate c. Of spiritualll manducation onely For in the place set down S. Cyprian expresly assertes that Christ cōmanded Christians in the new law to drink his blood the eating wherof in the old law Deut. 12. was prohibited which doubtless is meant of true reall drinking Wherefore S. Austin 9.57 in Leuit ingeniously confesseth that in the new law wee are as truly cōmanded to drinke the blood of Christ as were the Jews in the old law forbidden to drink the blood of sacrifices offered vnto expiating sins in consequence of which according to S. Cyprian and S. Austin reall drinking of Christs reall blood is commanded in the chapter alledged and instructed them as to the manner therof only saying The words that I spake vnto you are spirit and life that is sayes S. Aug. on the 98. Psal They ought not to be vnderstood carnally as if Christs intent had been to giue certaine particles or peices of his body diuided from the whole but they ought to be vnderstood spiritually which is to say that Christs body is in the Sacrament after the manner of a spirituall substance invisible indivisible whole and entire in the whole entire subject also whole and entire in each part thereof And here is observable that a reall substantiall and true body may be considered after two sundry fashions conformably to the Apostle that sayes 1. Cor. 15. A body is raised spirituall in incorruption that is sown naturall in corruption First as it is cloathed with terrene conditions and qualities which naturally accōpany a body in this mortall life For example visibility divisibility and mortality Secondly as it is deuested of such rayments of corporall accidents and inuested with the noble conditions and qualities of a spirit or spirituall substance namely invisibility indivisibility impassibility According to this latter consideration which is
speaketh of sauing after death it is clear that he meaneth eternall saluation therby Thirdly that by the words The day of the lord shall declare it is vnderstood the day of each souls particular judgment is manifest likewise according to that saying Math. 24. Watch therfore for ye know not what howre the son of man will come that is to say what hower ye shall die and be iudged Again the same Apostle 2. Timoth 4. sayth that there was laid vp for him a crown of Iustice which At that day our lord would giue him a iust Iudg. Yet doubtless he obtained that reward instantly after his death as to essentiall blessedness Lastly that by the word (f) According to S Austin l. de fide operibus the fire of hell is euerlasting against the errour of Origin and the Latin Father 's in the Council's of Florence assert true fire in Purgatory and speake after the same manner of it as of Hell fire and the Current of catholick Doctours teach that the fire of Hell is true corporall fire fire true and reall fire is meant appear's by the Apostles saying That if any mans work burneth for to burne is proper to true fire and as concerning the particles * Jo. 1. vidimus gloriam eius quast gloriam vnigeniti à Patre vbi quasi non est particula diminuens aut faciens comparationem inter veram metaphoricam gloriam sed potius explicat veritatem vt notant S. Patres sic loquendo de Rege dicimus incedit quasi Rex id est vt Regem decet de vâ—ro iusto venit vt vir iustus id est vt decet virum iustum as it were they doe rather affirme then infirme the reality of fire for when S. Iohn sayeth of Christ cap. 1. we saw the glory of him as it were of the only begotten of the Father the particles as it were doe not deny Christ to be the true and naturall son of God the Father but rather affirme that vndoubted truth as all catholick writers doe obserue in their Commentaries vpon that scripture Hereby it is cleare (g) S. Cyprian Epis 52. ad Antonia writes thus T' is not the same thing to be sent to prison and there to remain till the last farthing be pay'd t' is not the same thing to receiue suddenly the reward of faith and vertue and to be clens'd and purg'd by fire after long suffering of grieuous sorrovves for sinnes committed afore that the Apostle held purgation of some soules after they were deuested of their bodies and before their translation vnto eternall life and this the catholick Church calleth Purgatory which name though it be no vsed in holy scripture no more then the words Trinity person and sundry others which are receiued and allowed of by all writers in order to a clearer explicating some misteries of christian Religion howeuer the name Purgatory taken in the sense afore mentioned layeth claime to a large series of Antiquity But seeing that scriptures and * S. Cyprian Epis tota 52. ad Anton Orig. hom 6. in Exod. cum inquit venitur si quis multa opera bona parum aliquid iniquitatis attulerit illud parum tanquaÌ„ pluÌ„bum resoluitur purgatur totum remanet aurum purum .... Hilar. in illud Psal 118. concupiuit anima mea purgatorium vocat indefessum ignem in quo grania sustinentur supplicia per quae animae à peccatis expiantur Aug. l. 2. 1. de ciuit c. 24. ait constare quod spiritus aliquorum fidelium poenas aliquas temporales post mortem patiantur primitiue Fathers doe assert the thing signifyed by the name of Purgatory vêªt videlicet purgation of some souls by suffering of temporall paines in the next life * Aug. quando de re constat de nomine non est conteÌ„ndendum no man can contend about that name without incurring a censure of manifest weakness yet in regard of two states only to which God promiseth eternall life or eternall death that is beatitude or damnation for Purgatory shall cease after the day of generall Iudgment is past both the scripture and the Fathers sometimes doe mention only after death the Paradise of the blessed and the Hell of the damned * De locis seu statibus perpetuis intelliguntur hae scripturae Eccles 11. si ceciderit lignum ad Austrum aut Aquilonem in quocunque loco inciderit sbi erit Item Mat. 25 Jte maledicti in ignem aternuÌ„ venite benedicti possidere RegnuÌ„ which be the two euerlasting states of soules but hence no man can argue an absolute negation of a third place or state in reference to temporall afflictions after death without preiudicing both scriptur's and Fathers as is sufficiently enough proued and though S. Austin Ser. 14. de verbis Domini lib. 10. de peccatorum meritis remissione cap. 20. doth expresly affirme that the catholick faith acknowledgeth two places only vat an eternall kingdome of Heauen or Hell eternall neuertheless by his other writings appeareth plainly that he held the Purgatory of some faithfull soul 's after death and in the cited writing's he denyeth only that the Catholick Church does acknowledge such a third place as Pelagius contended for who taught that children dying without baptism should be saued though they were not admitted into the kingdome of Heauen which errour S. Austin confuteth By the premises is euident that such souls only goe to Purgatory as are liable either to veniall sins or temporall satisfactions corresponding to their sins pardoned in this life as to the guilt thereof both of them importing defects that are inconsistent with the perfection of heauenly blessdeness yet these suffering souls while they endure their painfull afflictions haue something of comfort and refreshment (b) Pope Leo the tenth in his condemnation of Luther's 26. article hath defined that soul 's in Purgatory are assured of their saluation for they know that there is fauour laid vp for them they are certaine of their saluation they loue God with all their power conforming themselues in the bitterness of their afflictions to his diuine will of Iustice they haue confidence in the suffrages and sacrifices of the faithfull vpon earth in order to their deliuerance and are visited by their good Angells that cheare them vp Neither doth it hence follow that their paines are less grieuous for the intensest sorrow is not incompatible with the said refreshments as appeareth by Christ whose grief abounded and exceeded others in intensness notwithstanding the assurance of glory the comfort flowing from his God-head the conformity to the will of his diuine Father and the extream willingness to suffer his death and passion for the Redemption of the world and indeed it is a certaine truth that the anguish and tribulation which a soul endureth in Purgatory * Docent S. Aug. l de euva pro mortuis agenda c. 16. S.
by Priests of the Church lay Elders because they are not Church-ministers taken in the proper sense neither is it their office to pray ouer the sick and to administer holy vnction vnto remission of sins and it matters not that the Apostle sayes let them bring in Priests wheras the practice of the catholick Church is to employ one sole Priest in the administration of Extrem-vnction for the true meaning therof is let him bring in some one of the Priests the Apostle vseth the signre which Gramarians call Enallogy putting the plurall for the singular number After the same manner Mat. 1. the Angell of our lord appearing to Ioseph says Take the Babe and his Mother and goe into the land of Israel for they are dead that sought the Babes life notwithstanding he mentioneth only Herod saying when Herod was dead c. Lastly in as much as the Apostle asserteth absolutly putting no limitation of time If any be sick among you he plainly sheweth Extrem-vnction (e) Since all the other precepts S. Iames inioyn's in his catholick Epistle concerne christians in all ages t' is not as to reason probable that the sole precept of anointing the sick should be giuen for a short tyme onely and according to Caluin scarcely for the space of one age but this his interpretation the Council of Trent has condemn'd sess 14. doct de Sacram. Extr. vnct and can 2. to be of perpetuall vse in the catholick Church to the worlds end which is essentiall to a Sacrament of the new law wherfore sundry ancient Fathers that liued in the subsequent ages when they speake of christian belieuers reduced through sicknesse to eminent danger of death recommend to them holy vnction as a Sacrament of the new law and alledge for it the authority of S. Iames set down * Hieron Epis 65. ad Pamach oceanum de erroribus Originis in simili re ad fidem spectūte de qua tamen prima concilia nihil definierant sic scribit Confessi sunt quod negabatur tacuerunt de quo nemo quarebat and though the first generall Councill's make no mention of Extrem-vnction neuertheless no man ought to infer from that negatiue authority an argument to the preiudice of so warrantable a doctrine for they declared and defined such point's of christian faith as were questioned and impugned by the Hereticks of those times respectiuely but then no controuersy arose concerning Extrem-vnction By the premises is plainly euidenced that the guift of healing through vnction or laying on of hands (f) S. Marke mentioneth sick persons whom the anoynting with oyle cured And in the last Chapter of S. Marke t' is promised that the imposition of hands shall heale the sick mentioned by S. Mark and practiced in the primitiue times was not this holy vnction that s. Iames prescribeth in the forenamed catholick Epistle for that was a miraculous end owment and no gifts of doing miracles did confer sanctifying grace vnto remission of sins which is proper to a Sacrament of the new law and truly that particular guift (g) Often tymes such as were not Priests heald the sick by anoynting them namely according to S. Hierom S. Hilarion that had not receiu'd the Sacrament of holy Order and according to Tertull. ad scap c. 4. A certain lay-christian named Proculus anoynted with oyle Seuerus the Emperour and recouered him thereby called the gift of healing was extended only to corporall infirmities it could cure the body but not the soul Besides one and the same spirit distributed that and all other guifts of doing miracles seuerally according to his own free will 1. Cor. 12 wherfore neither such only as by ordination were promoted to Priestly ordination nor all those had the guift of healing but to the administring of Extrem-vnction is necessary Priestly ordination for the Apostle sayth expresly If any be sick among you let him bring in Priests of the Church Also our Extrem-vnction requireth oyle of Oliues blessed (h) The Councils of Flor. in the Decree of Eugenius and of Trent sess 14. cap. 1. declare that the oyle that is applyed in and is proper to the Sacrament of Extream-vnction ought to be blessed and consecrated by a Bishop which vsage is conform to the generall practice of the catholick Church and consecrated by a Bishop neither is it applyed to euery sick person but to such only as be incorporated into Christ by faith hope and charity nor to euery part of the sick body but to the Organs of the fiue senses which be the windows that let in sin into the howse of the soul and although our Extrem-vnction be endowed with vertue euen as to the healing corporall infirmities when the supreme prouidence thinketh it expedient for the sick yet the cure of these is the secundary effect thereof only being instituted specially to heale the soul Furthermore to the forementioned healing vnction no determinat form of prayer was annexed as is to our Extrem-vnction for example the Roman Church vseth this form * Concil Trid. expressè docet ritum vsū Extremaevnctionis quem obseruat Romana Ecclesia esse optimum idque patet ex decreto Eugenij ad calcem Concilij Florentini which doubtlesse is the best our Lord in vertue of that holy vnction and his most benigne mercy grant vnto thee Indulgence of all thy offences committed by seeing hearing smelling tasting and touching and indeed the Priest that ministreth Extrem-vnction (i) The necessity of the precept requires that the form of sacramentall vnction which consistes of these word's Per istam sanctam vnctionem pijssimam suam misericordiam indulgeat tibi Dominus quicquid deliquisti per visum auditum c. ought to be repeated fiue seuerall tymes in fiue seuerall anoyntings of the fiue senses I say the precept of necessity requires this ceremony though perhaps neither a fiue fold repeating of the formall words nor a siue fold anoynting of the sick can lay claim to the essence of the Sacrament is bound to anointe the Organs of euery sense and express the name of each one particularly together with a repetition of the said form vnless he shall obserue that the sick person is seiz'd with pangs of present death for then one sole vnction and the naming of all the outward senses respectiuely is sufficient enough as to the essence of the Sacrament and vnto obtaining the fruites therof for example it sufficeth if anointing one Organ only the Priest say our Lord through that holy vnction and his most benigne mercy grant vnto thee Indulgence of all thy offences committed by seeing hearing smelling tasting and touching As to the anointing reins breasts and feet though these vnctions haue nothing of the essentiall matter yet as to them a Priest ought to obserue the custome of that particular Church wherunto he is subiect howeuer decency requireth that he omit to anointe the reins and breasts of sick women CHAR. XIX OF THE
that went afore to wit with an oath by him that said vnto him Our lord hath sworne and will not repent thou art a Priest for euer according to the Order of Melchisedech 2. Outward oblation is obseruable which is expressed in the words wherby Christ consecrated his body and blood saying This is my body which is giuen for you (k) The Apostle S. Paul vseth the verbe giue in that signification when he mentioneth our redemption procured by the sacrifice of the Cross for exaÌ„ple Gal. 3. ad Tit. 2. likewise holy scripture vseth frequently the verb to shed for to Sacrifice Exod. 29. Leuit. 1.2.3 This is my blood of the new Testament which is shed for you which are the terms of proper sacrifice and were outwardly vttered in the last supper For indeed all the actions performed by Christ in celebrating the Eucharist were outward actions namly blessing of the bread giuing thanks to his diuine Father before consecration and * Christus in vltima coena manducauit corpus suum bibit sanguineÌ„ suum vna cuÌ„ Apostolis vt post s. Hiero alios Patres docet S. Thomas 3. p. q. 81. eating his own hody and drinking his own blood together with his Apostles after consecration 3. Oblation of a sensible permanent thing is obseruable vêªt videlicet Christ's body and blood which are sensible things vnder the form's of bread and wine which are sensible also 4. There is obseruable destruction or reall change in the oblation to wit by substantiall conuersion of the bread into Christ's body and wine into his blood Besides by eating and drinking therof the body and blood of Christ lose that sacramentall being they had by reproduction vnder the elements of bread and wine which is a reall change also 5. It was an oblation exhibited to God alone for Christ in celebrating the Eucharist addressed all his speeches to his diuine Father lastly there is obseruable recognition of diuine omnipotency as is plainly euidenced by the oblation it self since it succeeded not only in the room of the Pascall lamb but of all the other sacrifices of the law of Moyses and consequently ought to containe in it self the perfect morall signification essentiall to those sacrifices which is recognition of diuine omnipotency and representation of the sacrifice of the cross Nor is it inconuenient for a sacrifice going afore to be a representation or commemoration of a sacrifice comming after for all the old sacrifices went before the sacrifice of the crosse which neuertheless they represented How euer the sacrifice of the cross is only distinct from the sacrifice of the Fucharist as to the manner of offering bloodily or vnbloodily for the head-offerer is the same Christ and the thing offered the same also body and blood of Christ And albeit that Christ by one sole bloody oblation that is by once offering himself in a bloody manner consummated the generall redemption neuertheless he did not think fit to make that one generall oblation an effectuall redemption or remission of sins without the application therof for so he had entailed the kingdom of Heauen vpon euery sinner and consequently deuested himself of all power to disinherit any for what fault soeuer But the applicatiue perfection as to a sacrifice he gaue to the vnbloody oblation only which by his own institution and appointment is and shall be the externall seruice of the new Testament and the continuall application of his passion vnto sanctification As corporall remedies how perfect and sufficient soeuer doe no cure vpon a sick body that is to say are not effectuall remedies vnless they be applyed so Christ his death and passion though a spirituall remedy superabundantly sufficient to take away all the sins of the world neuertheless is not an effectuall remission of any till it be applied aright neither is the preeminent perfection of Christs death and passion a iot lessened therby application being necessarily requisit to its effect by Christ his own appointmeÌ„t And praiers which the faithfull offer to God one for an other doe not prejudice or diminish any part of the intercession which Christ himself made for his people while he liued vpon earth Io. 17. nor of those which sitting at the right hand of his diuine Father he presenteth continually Rom. 8. Heb. 7. But rather do apply the fruit therof to the effecting of the said faithfull their holy desires especially when prayers are offered by the Bishopps and Priests of the catholick Church vnto whom God hath committed the (l) God saith the Apostle 2. Cor. 5. Hath giuen vnto us the vvord of reconciliation novv then are vve Ambassadours for Christ God as it vvere exhorting by us Wherby is meant that Christ as man is the principall Minister vnto reconciling of sinners to God and for and in the room of Christ in order to the office of reconcilement the Apostles and their successors were instituted as his Vicars namely the Bishops and Priests of the Catholick Church Wherfore their absolution from sinnes by offering sacrifice and their ministring the Sacraments ought to be counted as Christs own absolution remission or pardon being the absoluing from and remitting sinnes in the room of Christ in like manner their preaching and exhorting in stead of Christ is as if it were Christ's own preaching and exhorting the office of Bishops and Priests being the Vicarship of Christ So that when the same Apostle saith Hebrae 8. that Christ onely is the Priest of the new law or Testament his meaning is that Christ is the chief Priest that is the Prince of Priests to whom as to his Ambassadours he hath committed the ministery of reconciliation In the old law according to the Apostle Hebrae 7. there was a series of many chief Priests succeeding one an other in that function for none of all them was of perpetuall durance But in our new law there is but one chief Priest or Bishop that shall endure for euer and all other Priests are his Vicars onely who in his room exercise Priestly function visibly wherfore Christ is chief Priest for euer and exerciseth his Priesthood by his substitute Ministers or Vicars which execute the office of reconciliation for him and in his room ministery of reconciliation for and vnder Christ who is the high Priest and chief Minister according to his humanity of mans reconcilement to God the others exercise Christs vicarshipp only These pray and minister sacrifice and Sacraments in Christs stead both vnto remission of sins and the verifying his For euer Priesthood according to the order of Melchisedech so that Christ is a Priest for euer after the right order and similitude of Melchisedech for as much as he dayly doth and shall to the end of the world offer by the Priests of the new law as his Vicars the vnbloody sacrifice of his own body and blood vnder the form's of bread and wine called by vse which is the arbitratour of words and language sacrifice of the
Eucharist sacrifice of the Mass sacrifice of the Altar The name Eucharist comes of the Greek Eucharistia that signifies thanksgiuing for Christ in celebrating his vnbloody oblation the night before his death gaue thanks to his diuine Father both in generall for all the benefits conferred vpon all mankind as in particular also for that one singular grace wherby he was impowred as man to iustitute so diuine a mistery So that vndoubtedly by a speciall prouidence the name Eucharist is appropriated to the sacrifice of Christ his body and blood to the end that euen the name therof might excite Priests whos office and function it is to ofter that sacrifice to imitate the thanksgiuing that Christ exhibited in the enterprise of this mistery The name Mass comes of Missa which is latine doubtless for if it had been an Hebrew word the vse therof would haue remained and continued among the greek Fathers as well as of Alleluya Osanna Amen which be Hebrew words But none of the Greek Fathers vse this term Missa and consequently it is a denomination which the people of the latine Church haue imposed to express the sacrifice of Christ his body and blood and signifies the same thing that dimissio in latine that is to say dismissing or sending away for in the primitiue Church it was an ordinary ceremony practised by the Deacon to cry aloud twice in the Church during the time of celebrating diuine seruice Ite Missa est once in the begining of the mistery or sacrifice wherin the Catecumens were not suffered to be present being Belieuers vnbaptised signifying therby that all such should depart out of the Church and once again in the end of the said mistery or sacrifice intimating therby the dimissing or sending away of the faithfull baptised This signification of the name Missa in English Mass and this originall grownd therof is approued by the vniform judgment of the maior part of orthodox writers Howeuer the appropriation of the said name as to signifying the seruice of the mistery or sacrifice of Christs body and blood is deriuable euen from the primitiue successors of the Apostles who (m) S. Clement that succeeded S. Peter in the supream gouernment of the Church composed a Missale and in his writingmentioneth the word Missa Mass And S. Denys did not onely write of the Ecclesiasticall Hierarchy but of the Mass also And whereas sectaries do not ascribe that work vnto him it is without warrantable ground howeuer whosoeuer was the Author thereof t' is certain that the Church of God hath approu'd it for the first Council of Nice stileth the Author Magnum which Title he had giuen vnto him afore and S. John Damascene calleth him Magnum Theologum à great diuine but all antiquity make mention of the Mass For example Alexander that was the fourth Pope after S. Peter Epis 1. ad orthodox And Sixtus that succeeded him according to S. Damascene in the life of the same Alexander S. Telesphorus seth forth an ordinance that commanded Priests to say 3. Masses in the feast of Christs Natiuity S. Soter prohibited all Priests to eate or drinke before they said their Masses S. Steuen the Pope vnder the persecution of Valerian the Emperour was kill'd at Mass S. Felix Ep. 2. ad Episcopos Galliae mentioneth saying of Masses vpon the Tombs of Martyrs S. Hierom. in cap. 11. Prouerb affirmes that the soules of the faithfull departed receiue comfort and helpe by the celebration of Mass and S. Austin Epis 49. tom 2. ad Deo gratias c. 3. teacheth that the sacrifice which Christians now offer is euidenced both by Euangelicall and propheticall Scripture besides this Catholick assertion is taught in sundry Councils namely in the Nicen. cap. 14. Carth. 2. can 4. So that it is a manifest weakness in sectaries to deny a doctrine that all antiquity by vnanimous consent plainly assert vse the name Missa and the signification therof namely S. Dionys S. Clement S. Euarist S. Alexander S. Sixtus S. Telesphorus S. Higinus S. Soter S. Fabianus S. Stephanus S. Felix S. Syluester S. Damascenus With whom were contemporary the great lights of the Church S. Basil S. Gregory Nazianzenus S. Ambro. S. Chrysost S. Hieron S. Epiphan S. Cyrill S. August wher vnto may be added sundry generall Councills wherof the vnquestionable testimonies and records are enough to euidence the truth of this primatiue doctrine so that with great reason it may be much wondered at how the People of England came to looke with so envious an eye vpon the Mass as to count it Idolatry since the practice therof is agreeing with the full and euident Testimonies of all the primitiue Fathers And as to the Realm of England euen from the first plantation of Christianity setled therein Mass constantly continued the sole publick worship or seruice that was resorted vnto till the ciuill power of Parliament in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth put it down vpon what design of auarice liberty and ambition is needless to express But in the room of the Mass was substituted a new outward seruice named the book of Common prayer and sett forth in the vulgar tongue wheras since the first age for 1500. Years not one example can be produced of any Christian kingdom which had not for the common publick seruice of Religion the Mass and that celebrated in Hebrew Greek or Latin neither were the holy Euangels wrirten in other language then Hebrew Greek and Latine which are the three holy tongues The Hebrew was sanctified from the beginning of the world God euen then conferring with Adam in the Hebrew tongue and teaching him the names of each liuing creature Gen. 2. Besides all three were sanctified in the death and Passion of Christ the son of God the inscription ouer his Cross Iesus of Nazareth king of the Iews being written in Hebrew Greek and Latine letters and prophesied * Septuaginta super psal 56.57.58 ne disperdas Dauid in tituli inscriptionē of long afore This doctrine does not preiudice what S. Paul writeth 1. Cor. 14 saying That he that speaketh a strange language edifieth himselfe but he that prophesieth edifieth the Church of God I would that you all speake with tongues but rather that you prophesied For it is conuincingly euident that the Apostle neither by these or any other words of that chapter commandeth the vse of the vulgar tongue in the Church seruice For so there had been no need of prophesying that is of interpreting vnto edification exhortation or instruction which the Apostle expresly enjoyneth saying That if any man speak a strange tongue let it be by two or at the most by three and that by course and let one interpret Besid's it is plain that S. Paul there treateth of the miraculous guifts or strange tongues infused both into men and women in the first begining of the Church and not intelligible without the miraculous guift of interpretation also and consequently he cannot mean the