instituted that they may be hiding places of things signified but that they may bee effectual signes seales and memorials as the Scripture speaketh Aliud existentia aliud significantia saith Augustine that is being one thing and signifying another thing But meerely significatiue or relatiue that is wholy placed in this that according to Gods ordinance declared in the Sacramentall word these things in a mutuall respect reciprocall relation betweene themselues are one certaine thing for as Beda saith vppon Lu 22 Panis ad corpus Christi mysticè vinum ad sanguinem refertur that is Tho bread is referred to the body of Christ mystically the wine to the bloud and are offered to be considered and also to bee taken spiritually by faith the signes of them which doe lawfully administer the Supper but the things are giuen of the Father and Christ the son the holy Ghost working together with them Seing that Aristotle booke 5. chap. 6. of the Metaphysicks doth teach that there are fower kinds of them which are one In number figure generall Analogie which of these waies is the bread the bodie of Christ Neither in number nor figure nor generall kinde but in analogie or proportion and similitude for they are said to be one in proportion whatsoeuer are compared together betweene themselues as one thing to another according to proportion he saith What things soeuer are as one thing to another are said one in respect Therfore the bread and body of Christ or the bread of life are one thing in proportion because both of them doe giue sustenance that is nourishment and increase to a man but that to the bodie but this to the faithfull soule So the wine of the Lord and the bloud of the Lord are one in proportion because they quench thirst and doe refresh but that the bodie this the faithfull soule Whether can that supernaturall coniunction whereby the Deitie of Christ is personally conioyned with the humanity or that miraculous whereby God hauing taken some visible shapes disclosed himselfe to some men as when God is said to haue appeared to Moses in a flame of fire in a bush a Exod. 3 2 or when the holy Ghost descended vpon Christ in the shape of a Doue Mat. 3.16 or when it was giuen to the Disciples by the breathing of Christ and with firie tongues Iohn 20.22 Act. 2.3 take place here No because the the personall vnion and the Sacramentall vnion doe differ in the whole kinde and because the condition of that bread should be better then of all the faithfull men to whom the bodie of Christ is vnited not personally but only mystically Moreouer the body of Christ is one thing which cannot bee in many places God or the holy Spirit another thing which is euery where And besides we may not argue from that which is done against order by miracle to that which is ordinary in the Church of God of which sort is the Supper of the Lord according to his owne precept Doe this Finally neither that Doue which Iohn Baptist saw descending from heauen vpon Christ nor that breath wherewith he breathed vpon his Disciples nor the fierie tongues which sate vpon each of the Disciples were God or the holy Ghost essentially or had the holy Spirit in them but were signes of that spirit both in Christ and also in the Disciples Is it true in all things that those things which are ioyned by Gods ordinance in a peculiar manner are affirmed one of another as This man is God the Doue is the Holy Ghost No otherwise we might say truely in a man The soule is the bodie and in Christ The Humanitie is the Diuinitie and in a fired sword the sword is the fire or the fire is the sword which yet no man doth grant But it is true chiefly in the propositions concerning the person of Christ when as for the same substantial word they put in concrete words as wel this man as this God But the personall vnion is not placed in the Sacrament wherefore it cannot bee that that should be alike true This man is God that This bread is the body of Christ Moreouer in symbolicall and Sacramentall speaches as we read that the holy Ghost was seene of Iohn descending like a Doue because the Doue was the signe of the Holy Ghost and so we grant that the bread is the bodie of Christ But concerning a vessell of wine we say truely but yet figuratiuely This is wine seing that there are two substances their ioyned and as it were the thing contained in the thing containing as also of an Angell appearing in mans shape it might bee saide This is an Angell but as a thing in a place which that it cannot be said of the body of Christ in the bread hath beene alreadie proued at large Why therefore are the Sacramentall signes called Exhibitiue Because the Lord doth so truely exhibit and giue himselfe being the bread celestiall â—ucer comment vpon the Ephes and that of eternall life to those which are his like as he gaue truly to his Disciples the holy Ghost by the signe of the breath of his mouth or as by the touching of the hand hee gaue vnto many health of bodie and minde as sight by clay made of spittell as by circumcision of the flesh the circumcision of the heart and as by baptisme Regeneration For they which with a true faith doe communicate with the signes corporally doe receiue true confirmation and increase of the communion of the bodie and bloud of the Lord spiritually But Irenaeus saith that the Eucharist doth consist of two things of an Earthly and a Heauenly Rightly yet we must not thinke that it is compounded or whole altogether substantiall or some subsisting thing made of whole parts as a man of bodie and of soule and the bodie of an head and a trunke but it is a holy action or a diuine ordinance wherein at one time but not in one place diuers things are distinctly propounded and deliuered no otherwise then as a pledge being deliuered or the earnest of any thing the thing it selfe was wont to be deliuered also together To what purpose commaunded the Lord to make his Supper Not for an vnbloudy oblation of his body to God the Father for the sinnes of the quick and dead or for a Scenical representation of the death of Christ but for a commemoration of his death for he saith Doe this in remembrance of me that is to say to bee celebrated in the assembly of the faithfull to that end a Luke 22 19. to which purpose also serueth the words of Paule verse 26. declaring what that is In remembrance of me For as often as ye shall eate of this bread and drinke of this cup ye shew the Lords death vntill he come Verse 25. That is 1 Cor. 11.24 call to minde and speake of the whole obedience of Christ and all his benefits with a thankfull mind
which is life it selfe and the fountaine of life cannot bee the bread of life to vs c Ioh. 14 Neither can the humanitie be separated from the word neither can the humanitie subsist without the Diuinite and his benefits without the whole person and therefore the one without the other are neither giuen nor receiued VVhether in the Supper of the Lord for the thing it selfe of the Sacrament doe wee partake of his merits alone or the liuely operation gifts or benefits of Christ without Christ himself that is without participation of the body and bloud of Christ or doe we partake of Christ himselfe with his benefits Truely Christ himselfe with al his benefits both those which are giuen to vs by imputation alone and also those which are giuen by reall efficacie 1. Because Christ himselfe one and the same God and man is that liuing bread from whom life eternall doth flowe to vs d Ioh. 6.51 and is eaten of them which are endued with true faith 2. Because bread and wine are holy signes not onely of the death and benefits but of the bodie and bloud of Christ 3. Because Paule doth plainly affirme it e 1 Cor. 10.16 we ought to haue a coÌ„munion with the body it self bloud it selfe of Christ that we may be partakers of his benefits For those benefits that liuely vertue or operation which sustaineth our soules vnto life eternall cannot be seuered from the bodie and bloud of Christ and moreouer not from Christ himself to whom it cleaueth a Ioh. 5.11 no more then the effect from the cause conteining it or the qualitie from the subiect in which it is properly inherent and from which it issueth because as Cyrill saith The spirit in Christ is ioyned chiefly with the flesh of Christ and the flesh also with the spirit so that wee can neither take his flesh without the operation nor the operation without the flesh neither in the plaine worde or in the Sacraments 4. Because he which imbraceth the promises of the Gospell by faith is made partaker of Christ b Heb 3.14 5. Because the verie words of Christ doe most clearely witnesse it Take eate this is my bodie Therefore it is needfull that the bodie of Christ should bee receiued and eaten of the faithfull 6. Because the true communion with Christ himselfe God and man is established in baptisme Therefore wee must determine that the same thing is done in the Supper 7. Because the Analogie of receiuing eating of bread wine should be lost vnlesse we should spiritually receiue Christ himselfe but that we may receiue the strength of nourishing which is in the bread it is needfull that we should receiue the bread it selfe 8. Because like as we dye in Adam because we are ioyned together with him by a naturall participation so we do liue in a spirituall life in Christ and we drawe it from Christ by reason of the spirituall participation with Christ c 1 Cor. 15.22 9 Because the Scripture euery where teacheth that the Church is one bodie of one head but truely it cannot be imagined that life doth come from the head to the bodie without the ioyning together of them both 10. Because they which stick to the accidents alone and leaue the substance are in no Science to bee suffered But the death of Christ and his benefits are reckoned among the accidents Therfore it is an intollerable thing to propound the benefits of Christ alone and not Christ himselfe But this we adde like as in the plaine worde the word preached shewing Christ to vs by voice is perceiued by the sense of the eares but Christ himselfe signified by the word preached is not receiued but by the vnderstanding beleeuing and in baptisme the bodie is dipped in the water but the minde of the beleeuer is washed with the bloud signified by the water So in the Supper the bodie is fed with that bread and that wine but the soule of the beleeuer is made fat with the flesh and bloud of the Lord as Tertullian speaketh Manduâ—atio Corporissed non manducatio corporalis Therefore there is an eating of the bodie but not a bodily eating but of faith or spirituall like as the coniunction is spirituall mysticall and supernaturall for as much as it is made by the apprehension of faith by the efficacie of the holy Ghost and also in like manner the presence of the bodie of Christ is spirituall For if our sight in a moment of time be ioyned with the bodie of the sun much more is faith conioyned with Christ himselfe and moreouer with his bodie placed in heauen Can this proposition be endured The bodie of Christ is exhibited with the bread If you do referre the word with to the time wherein the faithfull doe vse the Supper that the sense may bee When a faithfull man vsing the Supper doth eate the bread of the Lord and drinketh the wine of the Lord he is made partaker not only of earthly gifts but also of heauenly that is to say of the bodie of Christ and of the bloud of the same then truely wee doe in no manner of wise mislike that proposition But if any doe referre it being taken together with the other two particles In and sub that is in and vnder to the place that is to ordaine a presence of the inuisible bodie of Christ In cum sub pane that is in with vnder the bread wee doe worthily reiect this consubstantiation inexistence and indistance seing that this is neither expressed in the words of Christ nor can rightly bee drawne out from them Of how many sorts is this vnion or coniunction in the vse of the Lords Supper Twofold one of the bodie and bloud of Christ with the bread and wine which is called Sacramentall and belongeth to the forme of the Sacrament Another is the coniunction of the same bodie and bloud of Christ with the beleeuers which although spirituall is called the mysticall reall and substantiall communion or communication and fruition of the bodie and bloud of Christ which is exhibited vnder the holy symboles of the Supper Calu. Inst b 4. c. 17 sect 19 33 and belongeth to the end of the Sacrament Notwithstanding a mixture or transfusion of the flesh of Christ is not to be imagined in our soule because it sufficeth that Christ doth breath life into our soules from the substance of his flesh yea rather doth powre into vs his owne life although the flesh it selfe of Christ doth not enter into vs. Of what qualitie is the coniunction of the signes and of the thing signified in the supper of the Lord Not consubstantiall or naturall which may make a presence of the thing signified at the place of the signe 1. Because the words of the institution do by no meanes beare it 2. It is manifest that Christ sate placed with the Disciples at the table really and corporally 3. Neither are Sacraments
at their pleasure and the Princes of darknesse because they are the authors of all ignorance of God of blindnesse mischiefes vnhappinesse malice of all disorder trecherie crueltie c Ephes 2.2 Ephes 6.12 Col. 2.15 As for the name Lucifer it came from a false and friuolous exposition of that place Isaiah 14.12 which as may well appeare was in derision ironically giuen to the King of Babylon Whence do euill Angels take their beginning In respect of their nature and substance they are of God who did create them good of nothing and who doth still vphold them But in regard of the qualities brought vpon them they are of themselues as Christ witnesseth Ioh. 8.44 The diuel when he speaketh a lie speaketh of his owne that is of himselfe and continued not in the truth wherin he was created at the beginning but fel by his owne free wil and was a murderer from the beginning not in respect of Satan himselfe but of man that was made that is to say then when he first set vpon man whereupon we may gather that the Angels sinned before that Adam and Eue sinned What was the first sinne of the Angels Some thinke that it was pride according to that Eccles 10.15 Pride is the beginning of all sinne Others thinke it was enuie whereby Satan enuied that man was made after the image of God according to that Wisdom 2.24 By the diuels enuie death entered into the world But Christ shewes Ioh. 8.44 it was lying or the hatred of the truth that is of the euerlasting Gospell touching Christ who should take our flesh vpon him and of his grace which is needfull for all men to life eternall and of the nature of man which should be exalted aboue all Angels And therefore indeede it was the hatred they bore of Christs glorie and mans felicitie Also it was their apostacie and rebellion whereby Satan fell from God his maker and that very sinne which Christ calleth The sinne against the holy Ghost a Math. 12.31 1. Iohn 5.16 because he fell wittingly and willingly and of purpose from the truth and that also with hatred of that euerlasting truth whereof Christ speaketh I am the truth Ioh. 14.6 And to Pilate I am come into this world that I might beare witnesse to the truth Ioh. 18.31 The same is proved by the continuall practise of Satan euen from the beginning of the world to the end sowing lies and heresies either against the Deitie of Christ or against his humanitie or against his office And raising vp most cruell persecution against that truth of Christ Is there a great number of those Angels which fell from the truth Yes sure a great number and almost innumerable yet vncertaine to vs and not know howne many For 2. Pet. 2.4 and Iude 6. we reade that very many Angels fell at one time from the truth and therefore are cast into hell or the bottomlesse pit And Luk. 8.30 mention is made of a legion of diuels which possessed one man And Mat. 12.45 the vncleane spirit returning taketh with him seuen other spirits that is many other spirits worse then himselfe and more vncleane And Reu. 12.7 we reade that the dragon with his Angels fought against the woman and therefore there is no cause why we should sleepe secure and carelesse What punishment is inflicted vpon euill Angels Manifold 1. In that they are cast out of the heauens wherein the blessed be and wherein they were created into hell that is not only into that place vnder the earth ordained for the euerlâ—â—ting torments of the reprobate which Luk. 16.23 calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hell and chap. 8.31 the bottomlesse pit that is a gulph of a wonderfull depth but also into this ayre which compasseth the earth and into the region vnder the Moone as testifieth the Apostle Eph. 2.2 6.12 to exercise the patience of the godly and also to punish and to vexe the wicked for their impietie where also they being tyed with the chaines of darknesse are kept to the generall iudgement a 2. Pet. 2.4 Jud. 6. 2. In that their whole nature how great soeuer is wholy corrupted and defiled so as there is in it nothing at all sound and pure 3. Their will is so obstinate in sinne as they are not able no not to desire to repent of euill nor to be saued Which is by the iust iudgement of God who hath decreed that they which sinne against the holy Ghost that is they which wittingly and willingly and of set purpose sinne and renounce the knowne truth should neuer repent b Heb. 6 4. 10.26 1. Ioh. 3.8 1. Ioh. 3.8 The diuell sinneth euen from the beginning namely continually and obstinately 4. Their mind was darkened to wit being depriued both of the knowledge of all that truth as well of themselues as of God and of Christ which might stand them in any stead to life eternall As also of that created knowledge of those things wherin at the beginning they were created for which cause they are tearmed the princes of darknesse c Eph. 6.12 And yet not wholly because they excell yet in great knowledge of things concerning both God and men namely such as was naturall vnto them or they haue by nature partly by that naturall light which is left in them partly by obseruation partly by the effects of Gods power which come to passe in time By which means they knew Christ both to be the Sonne of God and also should be the Iudge of the world a Mat. 8.21 Act. 16.17 19. but yet without any affection towards him without any loue or affiance in him and to their greater terror and condemnation b Jam. 2.19 For which cause they are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Skilfull but more truly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because they do alwaies abuse that their knowledge to euill and neuer to good Can euill Angels foresee things to come and certainely foretell them To foresee and to foretell things to come so farre foorth as they are things to come and to know them before hand of themselues and by themselues and of their owne proper spirit they cannot for it is the peculiar worke of God alone for so it is said Esa 41.23 Tell vs what things shall come to passe and then we shall know that ye are gods But by the instinct of another or by reuelation from another and by the present causes by the experience and obseruation of things and by probable coniectures to foresee things to come it is granted vnto creatures So then by these meanes the wicked spirits may foretel things to come as namely such things as they haue learned to haue bene foretold in some place by some holy Prophet or such things whose natural causes they see to be present before their eyes or such things which they see now are disposed and like to come to passe or such things as themselues are purposed
end which is common both to the Law and Gospell or in the manner of obtaining righteousnesse for the doctrine of the law is the law of works which preacheth of doing and giueth the reward to him that doeth the law but the Gospell is the law of faith which imputeth faith unto righteousnesse to him that doth not worke but beleeueth in him who iustifieth the vngodly Rom. 3.21 4.5 10.5 Moreouer the law requireth of man a mans owne proper righteousnes and perfect obedience to all the commandements of God which he is bound in his owne behalfe to performe Leuit. 18.5 Mat. 19.17 If thou vvilt enter into life keepe the commaundements but to him that hath not this obedience it threatneth a curse b Deut 7 2. Gal. 3 10 But seeing it is impossible for man to attaine this end by reason of the corruption of the flesh c Rom 8 3.7 the Gospell offereth vs the righteousnes of another namely of Christ to be receiued of vs by faith that they which beleeue the Gospell may haue by imputation that which the law requireth to be in a man by propertie Rom. 5.19 By one mans obedience shall many be made righteous And Christ is the fulfilling of the law vnto righteousnes to euery one that beleueth Rom. 10.4 or which commeth to the same effect we may thus say The law demādeth the sum of our debt the Gospell publisheth the remission of it 3 They differ in the forme or difference of the promises for the promises in the law of eternal life temporall benefits are conditional That is they require the condition of perfect fulfilling the law as a cause as for example If thou do these things thou shalt liue in thē where the particle If for because expresseth the cause for our obediēce is required in the law as a cause But the promises of the gospel are free are not giuē because of fulfilling the law but frely for Christs sake Therfore whē it is said If thou beleeue the particle If is not causal but syllogistical that is it sheweth a consequence neither is there signifyed by it a cause or desert but a mean instrumēt without which applicatiō of Christs benefits cānot be made Therfore the particle freely doth especially make a difference betwixt the gospel the law Rom 3.24 Being iustified freely by his grace through the redemption of Iësus Christ which grace is set forth by many parables in the gospell 4 They differ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say by the effects adiuncts efficacy office of either of them For first the law teacheth good works neither doth it minister strength to the auditors therof by which they may performe those works neyther changeth the minds of men for of the law Moses speaketh thus Deu. 29.4 Ye haue heard seen but God hath not giuen you an vnderstanding hart But the gospell endoweth the saints with the holy ghost which spirit doth also giue that which the gospell requireth to wit faith Ier. 31.33 I will write my law in their hearts not with inke but vvith my spirit And the Apostle Gal. 3.2 speaketh thus This one thing I vvould knovv of you haue you receiued the spirit by the vvorks of the lavv or by the hearing of faith Therfore Paul 2. Cor. 31.8 calleth the lavv the ministery of death vvritten in the tables of stone but the gospell the spirit planted in the heart and ver 9 he calleth the law the ministery of condemnation but the gospell the ministery of righteousnes 2. Againe the law sheweth the disease accuseth exasperateth and laieth open sins but doth not take them away Rom. 3.20 But the gospell couereth sin and healeth the disease by declaring and pronoūcing free pardon of sins by Christ alone for this cause no man could euer be iustified by the law but by faith of the gospell we are all iustified 3. In the law is reueiled the wrath of God vpon euery man in the gospell without the law is reueiled the righteousnes of God from faith vnto faith Rom. 1.17 3.21 5 Lastly the Law and the Gospell do differ in the application to the obiectes or degrees of men for as the Apostle commaundeth 2. Tim. 2.15 that Doctors should rightly cut the word of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the preaching of the law properly belongeth to the impenitent and they who are not yet conuerted and those who continue in their sinnes hypocrites and secure persons as Christ Mat. 22.37 vseth the threatning of the law against a proud Lawyer Therefore saith the Apostle 1. Tim. 1.9 The law was made for the vniust But the Gospell belongeth to the repentant Therefore Christ in Luke 4.18 out of Isay 61.1 teacheth that the Gospell is to bee preached to them that are poore in spirit and of a contrite heart Therefore also Luke 7.48.50 he preached grace and mercie to the penitent woman Is it necessarie and profitable to know the difference of the Law and Gospell It is for the name it selfe doth cleeeely proue that the law is one kinde of doctrine and the Gospell another 2 Because the not knowing of this difference is a fountaine of error obscuring the light of the doctrine of Christ of the righteousnes of faith of perturbations of conscience On the contrarie by the difference of them both the office and benefits of Christ are better vnderstood 3 The Church is discerned and acknowledged from other sects and true faith and conscience is kept in great and true horrors of conscience What things are repugnant heerto 1 The error of the Papists who make no difference betwixt the Law and the Gospell but transforme rhe Gospell into a law and call it a more perfect law saying also that the old law was a law of feare the new a law of loue and that Christ hath merited and doth giue to vs that grace whereby we may fulfill the commaundements and by them attaine righteousnesse and eternal life 2 Of the Monks who cal those things which Christ Mat. 5 38. 6.31 19.11.12.21 speaketh to expound the lawe to lance the conscience and to stirre them vp to a desire of himselfe counsels onely necessary for them who desire something more perfect then the law of Moses commaundeth of this nature they faine three things chiefly to be deliuered by him 1. of not reuēging 2 of pouerty 3. of virginity but the precepts they say are necessary to al men where as on the cōtrary there is not the least word which Christ spoke which wee must not obey 3 The error of Pelagius and the Schoolemen who haue taught that the Patriarches were iustified and saued by obseruation of the law of nature the Iewes by keeping the law of Moses but Christians by obseruation of the new law of the Gospell The two and twentieth common Place Of the difference of the old and new Testament What signifieth the word Testament PRoperly it signifieth the iust and true meaning of our
ignominiously punished that hence it may appeare he was despised of men and full of sorrowes according to Esais Prophecie cha 53.3 3. He is crucified Gal. 3.13 then which punishment there was at that time none more grieuous ignominious for as it is to be gatherd out of Ps 22.17 the words of Thomas Iohn 20.25 they being strongly stretched vpon the crosse were fastned vnto it with nailes driueÌ„ through their haÌ„ds feet afterwards being set vpright on high they ended their life in the horrible torments of all their nerues whole body also the death of the crosse was most abhominable pronounced accursed by gods own mouth b Deut 21 23. This curse would the son of god vndergo therby to free vs froÌ„ the curse we had deserued that it might appeaer that sin was most abhominable for which god would haue his son vndergo such punishment that euen as death by a tree entred into the world eueÌ„ so by a tree of the crosse it might be takeÌ„ out of the world To conclud that the truth might bee answerable to the figure for euen as the sacrifice was lifted vpon the Altar and offered c Lev. 1.9.13 Deut 2-27 so Christ was lifted vp from the earth into the ayre being hanged and killed vpon the Crosse because he must ouercome the powers of the aire Ephes 2.2 Also Iohn 3. 14. And as Moses lift vp the Serpent in the wildernesse so must the son of man be lift vp that whosoeuer beleeueth in him should not perish but liue for euer He suffereth betwixt two the eues as a captaine of theeues that the Scripture might bee fulfilled Esa 53.13 He was committed among the transgressors and praied for sinners that he might suffer the punishment which we had deserued and might the second time make vs equall with the Angels in the kingdome of his father by the merit of which punishment hee also sanctified the infamous places appointed for punishment of malefactors as also the punishmeÌ„ts themselues of malefactors least any man should think that the infamie of them should be any hindrance before God to them which beleeue in him or that they could bee any impediment to mans saluation He was crucified with his hands spread abroad that with the one he might call and inuite the Iewes with the other the Gentiles vnto him offering them his merit and likewise as one that should become iudged of all men should set some on his right hand some on the left 6. He hangeth aliue vpon the crosse three whole houres namely from the sixt houre to the ninth that is froÌ„ twelue of the clock after our count til three in the afternoone Which great ignominy of Christ is the reward of our arrogancie and also our greatest glory prize before God by which all our iniquitie is put away Therfore Paul Gal. 6.4 saith God forbid that I should glory in anie thing but in the crosse of our Lord Iesus Christ 7. He hangeth naked that he might make satisfaction for the sin of our first parents who were disrobed spoyled of the garment of innocency also that he might cloath vs with his innocency glory immortality that he might enrich vs by his pouerty to conclude that such as the first man was dwelling in Paradise such might be the second man at his entrance into Paradise Also lots were cast vpon his garments which thing was also foretold Psal 22.19 that we might beleeue the euents of things shewing vs that this was he which should come 8. He feeleth thirst corporally coÌ„ming through the anguish and bitternesse of his griefe through the sense of Gods wrath as also spiritually through a most ardent desire of our saluation 9 In steed of Hippocras or some pretious wine that was wont to be giuen to them who were condemned to die that thereby they might be comforted Prouerb 31 6.7 he is made to drinke a most bitter drinke of vineger and gall mixed together that in him might be fulfilled that which long before was foretold by Dauid Psal 69.22 And that the second Adam might suffer punishment for that sweete iuyce which the first Adam sucked out of the forbidden apple 10 Men of all conditions reuile him the common people the Priests and Scribes the theefe vpon the crosse the souldiers scoffe at his prayers and wrest them to a verie wicked sense as though forsaking God he asked helpe of the creatures 11. He dieth else would the crucifying haue done no good vnlesse the soule had beene pulled away from the bodie because God had said In dying thou shalt die the death Gen. 2.17 12. His side is thrust through with a speare out of which ranne bloud by which the Church springeth and is quickned euen as Eua was formed out of Adams side and water wherewith the Church being new born is washed And from this wound as from a fountaine of life springeth the saluation of the Church comfort and expiation of all sins satisfaction and that washing or purifying which behooued to be done with the bloud is vnderstood to be now accomplished for without the shedding of bloud there is no remission of sinnes Heb. 9.22 Also by this wound the death of Christ was made manifest and certaine for the water which issued out of that wound of his side shewed that the weapon entered euen into the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 namely that skinne which being full of water encloseth the hart which being wounded it is necessarie that euerie creature so wounded should forthwith die At what time was he crucified At the feast of the Passeouer that he might shew himselfe truly to be that Pascall Lambe which was slayne for the sinnes of the world As the soule of Christ was separated from his bodie for the space of three daies was the Godhead likewise separated from them both or was the Godhead ioyned with the soule and seuered fâ—om the bodie Neyther saith Damascenus For the Godhead remayned vnseparable from both de Orthod fide and that which the word once tooke vpon him neuer afterwards left But how could it be that the diuine nature should continue vnited to the soule which was in Paradise and the bodie which was in the earth The diuine nature of the Sonne because it is both infinite and present in all places remained whole and vndeuided vnited to both together that is as well to the soule of Christ which was in Paradise as to the bodie which lay liueles in the earth For seeing the nature of God is most simple and so not to be parted or diuided God is not to be said to haue one part in heauen and an other in earth but he is whole in heauen and whole in earth not at seuerall times and by succession but both together which thing no created nature can doe Hence commeth the saying of Augustine It is proper to the whole Trinitie to be whole euerie where in spaces of places not diuided
VVhether was Christ being now dead true man He was for although the soule and bodie were separated and so it was a true death yet by the coniunction of personal vnion they remained together in one third as it were so that our life was truly hid in Christ yea euen when he was dead Others answere that Christ in that three daies was man materially because he was truly soule and bodie but at his resurrection they say he was man formally after his soule rerurned into his bodie Who therefore died and what he the the adiuncts of his death The sonne of God at the mention of whom the whole frame and nature of things in this world trembled for when he hanged vpon the crosse three hours before his death there was an Eclipse of the Sunne against the order of nature which lasted from the sixt houre to the ninth whereupon followed darkenesse vpon all the earth Mat. 27.45 that is through the whole world as Tertullian vvill haue it or as others expound it through the countrie of Iudea vvhich Eclipse did betoken to the Ievves a most miserable blindnesse But when the Lord died the vaile of the Temple was rent that we may knowe how by his merit there is a way opened for vs into heauen a Heb. 9.5 and that the ceremonies of the law were abrogated the earth shooke the rockes were rent asunder the graues opened out of which certaine of the Saints arising went into the Citie By which signes is euicted and prooued the indignitie of the crime committed against the Sonne of GOD a Heb. 9.8 the hardnesse of the wicked and the power of Christs death is shewed Of which things this effect also ensued that many of Christs enemies were conuerted so as they say Of a trueth this was a iust man and the Sonne of God Math. 27.54 And all the companie that came together to that sight beholding the things that were done smote their breasts and returned Luke 33.48 What was the end of Christs death and passion The chiefe end is the glorification of God for his iustice and mercy But the next end is the redemption and eternall saluation of mankind Ioh. 3.14 As Moses lifted vp the serpent in the wildernes so must the sonne of man be lift vp on the Crosse that whosoeuer beleeueth in him should not perish but haue euerlasting life And Rom. 4.25 He died for our sins namely to make satisfaction for them Vnto whom is the death and passion of Christ profitable Although he might haue beene a sufficient price for the sins for all men yet actually and effectually he died for his elect onely who receiue him and beleeue in him Mat. 1.21 He will deliuer his people from their sins Ioh. 10.15 I lay downe my life for my sheep And Chap. 17.19 For those which beleeue and whome the father hath giuē me I sanctifie my self For otherwise it would follow that Christ dyed without profit and to no purpose in regard of many and that the efficacy of Christs death could be made void by men Whereupon dependeth the dignitie and efficacie of Christs death On the dignitie of his person for therefore the passion death of Christ was perfect and acceptable to God 1. Because the sonne performed voluntarie obedience to the commaundement of the father For hee humbled himselfe and became obedient vnto death euen the death of the Crosse Phil. 2.7 2. Because it is of infinite merit namely it is the death of that man who is God How can that praier of Christ which he thrise repeated Mat. 26.39 stand with this obedience O my father if it be possible let this cup passe from me yet not as I will but as thou wilt Verie well namely in diuers respects and according to diuers purposes for in so much as Christ would not it was by reason of the infirmitie of his flesh which naturally and without any sinne feareth death as an enemie vnto nature but that hee would it came from the readines of the spirit because it was necessarie to the saluation of mankind according to that which Christ afterward saith Verse 41. The spirit indeed is readie but the flesh is weake Yea in this the obedience of Christ appeareth more plainely seeing that although the flesh would haue had the matter gone otherwise yet notwithstanding he wholy submitteth himselfe to the will of his father What effects then or what fruits be there of the Lords passion Many I A most full satisfaction for sinnes for the hand writing which was against vs by the law is taken away from vs and nailed to the crosse Coloss 2.14 that the remembrance of our sinnes might be put out by the bloud of Christ that at no time they should come into Gods sight a 1 Iohn 2.7 2 God is pacified and reconciled to man b Rom 3.24 3 The diuell is ouercome c Gen. 3.15 1 Ioh. 3.81 4 Death is swallowed vp d Osea 13.14 and the feare thereof is taken away e Heb. 2.15 so as to the faithfull it is nothing but a passage to eternal life 5 Man is absolued from his sinnes and iustified f Rom. 4.25 5.19 6 The partition wall which was betwixt the Iewes and Gentiles is broken downe g Eph 2.14 7 All things in heauen and earth that is all the faithfull vnder both the Old and New testament are become subiect to one head are called again to that head from which they were fallen are gathered also into one bodie Ps 28. Eph. 1.10.22 Col. 1.20 8 The prophecies are accomplished the truth is become agreeable to the figure of Samson of the brasen serpent of the sacrifices and other types 9 The mortification of our flesh For he died once that we might die vnto sinne for euer 1. Pet. 2.24 And our old man is crucified with him that the bodie of sinne might be destroyed that henceforth we should not serue sinne Rom. 6 6. 10 And that in few words I may comprise the whole matter the free remission of sins the purging of the blots in our soules and euerlasting life is hereby purchased for vs. 〈…〉 2 The infinite mercy of God who would rather haue his sonne to die a most shamefull death then destroy mankind created by himselfe 3 The exceeding humility of the eternall son of God the Lord of all things who was debased and cast down lower then all creatures by which humiliation he testified his loue toward mankind in suffering so great things for the redemption thereof 4 The ouglines of sinne is to be remembred by that most vile kind of death 5 The estate of the godly in this world in which they are conformable in their miseries to Christ their head all which things let them worke in vs a hatred of sinne let them stirre vs vp to integrity of life raise vs vp to conceiue certain hope of our saluation and patience in aduersitie The saying of Augustine is verie worthy
remembrance Looke vpon his wounds when he hung on the tree his bloud vvhen he died the price vvherevvith he redeemed vs. Hee hath his bodie so placed on the crosse as he bovveth it to kisse thee his armes spread to embrace thee his vvhole bodie giuen vs to redeeme thee Consider hovv great things these are vveigh these things in the ballance of your heart that he may be vvholy fastened in your heart vvho for your sakes vvas vvholy fastened to the crosse Hovv is the passion of Christ applied vnto vs By the word by faith and the Sacraments for by the word he is offered as by the hand of God by faith he is receiued as by the hand of man by the Sacraments he is sealed vp vnto vs. What opinions are against the sacrifice and passion of Christ 1 The blasphemy of the Marcionites and Manichees who affirmed that Christ did not suffer truly but imaginarily and in appearance to men 2 The blasphemy of the Papists whereby they affirme that Christ is still offered daily vnto the father by priestes in the Masse and that really for the quicke and the dead contrarie to that which is said Heh 10.14 vvith one offering hath he consecrated for euer them vvhich are sanctified 3 The righteousnesse which is of works Pardons Inuocations of Saints that forged Purgatorie and whatsoever men deuise thereby to make satisfaction for sinne The foure and twentieth common Place Of the buriall of Christ VVhat is buriall or burying IT is a proceeding of death and so also a confirmation of death for not liuing but dead men vse to be buried The Latine word Sepultura Buriall is deriued a sepeliendo or a sepiendo because the corps is enclosed and fensed with earth stone or some other matter and is laid vp in the graue or tombe But Funerare or Pollincere is to make readie the bodie for buriall by washing anointing and the like complements a Gen. 50.26 Math. 26.20 Mat. 27.60 1 Cor. 15 4 Wherupon Pollinctores were a seuerall sort of men from Libintiarii But what was the buriall of Christ It is a part of Christs abasing whereby after death his bodie being seuered from the soule was laid in a Sepulchre according to the fashion of the Iewes b yet so as this was a preparatiue and enterance to the glorie of his resurrection VVhat is the chiefe cause thereof God who not onely hath engrauen in the minds of men the custome and manner of burying according to that Gen. 3.19 Earth thou art and to dust thou shalt returne as the auncient examples of the Saints who were buried doe testifie c Gen. 23.4 15. 49.29 50 13. 2 King 13 3 Tob. 4 3 and the depriuation of buriall which is reckoned amonst the signes of Gods wrath d Psal 79.3 2 King 6.35 Ierem 14.16 22 19. but did also specially ordaine all things which were done about Christs buriall VVho were the ministers and meanes of this burial Noble and rich men who were of the degree of Senators Ioseph of Arimathea which some thinke to be the same with Ramathaim e 1. Sam. 1.1 and Nicodemus who were the Disciples of the Lord but in srcret through the feare of the Iewes f Ioh 3 2 19 38 and who as gratefull Disciples performed to their well deseruing maister the honour of buriall when as there appeared no danger or but very little whom whilest he liued he durst not confesse For when the open and professed Disciples of Christ were dispersed and hid themselues for feare they then stirred vp confirmed by God tooke the bodie of Iesus being giuen them by Pilate that it should not fall into the hands of the rascall executioners who were wont to cast the bodies of theeues into stinking pits whereby it appeareth how great the power of Christs death was who made these men so coragious as they feared not to attempt an enterprise most base and daungerous namely to take downe from the crosse a man condemned by the authoritie of the whole councill and the President and by this their deed to accuse their iudgement of iniustice and impietie whereby also they incurred extreame danger for his sake and in the extremest ignominy which Christ suffered what time he was hanged betwixt two theeues they professed themselues his Disciples how much more doth it now become vs so to doe when he raigneth in glorie What was the manner of his buriall Ioseph as it is recorded Mat. 27.58 went with a bold courage to aske Pilate the bodie of Iesus of whom he obtained it after he had vnderstood certainly by the centurion that hee was dead Mark 15.44 so God vseth to blesse those who earnestly and vprightly go about his busines which pertainineth to the publike weale and benefit Nicodemus in the meane while prepared a mixture of myrrhe and aloes which things do preserue bodies from putrefaction to the weight of an hundred pounds Ioh. 19.39 And so they both come and openly with their owne handes take the naked bodie of Christ from the Crosse and wrapped it in cleane linnens with those pretious odours after the maner which the Iewes vsed with their Nobles in hope of the resurrection and also hereby to signifie that Christ would rest in a pure minde well seasoned and spiced with sweet smelling vertues Yet it was annointed because they could not do it by reason of the shortnes of time For the Sabath was at hand on which day it was not lawfull to do any worke and the women a Ioh 20.1 Mark 16 when the Sabbath was ended came to the Sepulchre to annoint Iesus but he was now risen againe Yet those spices were which thing belongeth to God types of that quickening odour which ariseth from Christs death And God would by this glorious buriall declare the innocencie of Christ and abolish for the most part the ignominie of the crosse according as Esaias had foretold and his sepulcher shall be glorious cap. 11.10 VVhat are the subiectes and adiuncts of Christes buriall The place the time the shutting vp and keeping of the Sepulchre Where vvas the Lord buried 1 In a garden planted with herbs and trees next vnto the place where he was crucified in which place Ioseph had his Sepulcher that in the verie place of his delights he might be admonished of death by the beholding of the monument 1 Because the first Adam died spiritually in a garden 2 Because as Cyril saith there is prepared for vs a returne into Paradise by the death of Christ 3 To shew the plentiful fruit which should grow to all that beleeue from his death and buriall 4 Because from the crosse there is a passage to Paradise Againe he is buried in a Sepulchre 1. Hevven out of a rocke least the aduersaries should cauill that the Lordes bodie was stolne by his Disciples through some vaults vnder the ground 2 In a new one that we might know how that the condition of death is chaunged
perfect obedience of Christ but our sanctification hath the Lawe for his obiect 4. In the nearest efficient cause Iustification hath not the cause in vs because it dwelleth not in vs Sanctification hath the will which is the beginning of all humane actions for the beginning of action is deliberation of deliberation will and reason And in respect of the persons efficient for Tit. 3.5 Regeneration and Renouation are attributed vnto the Holy Ghost as to the efficient But iustification is wholy ascribed vnto Christ In thy seede shall all nations be blessed Gen. 22.18 5. In effects Iustification absolueth and acquiteth vs beefore Gods Iudgement Seate Sanctification doth not so 6. Iustification is an act vnseparable but Regeneration is an act separable because it is not perfected in an instant but by a certaine order or successiuely and by degrees according to the good pleasure of God and it is here begunne and shall be perfectted in the life to come Moreouer Iustification is a matter of meere gift but regeneration is a matter of our obedience 7. Paule doth notably expresse the difference of him that is to bee iustified and him that is to bee regenerate for hee that is to be iustified lamentably crieth out of his inherent righteousnesse Rom. 7.24 O wretched man that I am who shall deliuer mee from the bodie of this death But flying to imputed righteousnesse which is grounded only vpon mercie hee doth exceedingly reioyce and with a ful confidence tryumpheth ouer life death and al aduersities whatsoeuer Rom. 8.33.34 c. What are the instruments or meanes of iustification The instrumentall cause outwardly shewing and offering the benefit of iustification is the voice of the Gospell Rom. 1.16 The Gospell is the power of God to saluation to all that beleeue that is to say it is the instrument of God truely powerfull and effectuall to saue For the righteousnesse of God is thereby reuealed from faith to faith Hereupon it is called the word of beleefe a Act. 5.20 the vvorde of saluation b Act. 13.26 the word and ministerie of reconciliation c 2. Cor. 5.19 The administring causes and witnesses of this blessing but not the sellers thereof are the ministers of the Gospell according to that Iohn 20.23 Whose sinnes yee remit they shall bee remitted and whose sinnes yee retaine they shall bee retained And 1. Tim. 4.16 Take heede vnto thy selfe and vnto Doctrine continue therein for in doing this thou shalt both saue thy selfe those that heare thee namely because faith is by hearing and hearing is by preaching The instrumentall cause inwardly is also twofold 1. The instrument giuen by God or the hand apprehending and receiuing the grace of Iustifycation offered is sauing faith infused into the beleeuers by the Holy Ghost Rom. 3.28 Therfore vvee conclude that a man is iustified by faith without the workes of the lawe So euery where By faith d Gal. 2,6 Through faith e Eph 2.8 of faith f Rom 3 28 for these are all of one signifycation but in no place are we said to be iustified or saued for faith Rom. 10.8 This is the vvord of faith which we preach And hereupon it is called righteousnesse of faith in regard it is apprehended by faith when the Gospell is beleeued 2. The inward sealing cause is the holy ghost who sealeth Iustification in our hearts so as wee cannot doubt therof Eph. 1.13 Wherein also after that ye beleeued ye were sealed with the Holie spirit of promise which is the earnest of our inheritāce And 1. Cor. 6.11 You are iustified by the spirit of God in the name of our Lord Iesus Christ 3. The outward sealing causes are the Sacraments the one of initiation or entrance the other of Redemption Rom. 4.11 He receiued the Circumcision as the seale of righteousnesse which is by Faith Also 1. Cor. 11.23 and Tit. 3.5 He hath saued vs by the washing of the new birth and renewing of the holy Ghost In what sence then are we said to be iustified by faith Not by any inward dignitie or merit of faith it selfe not as it is a worke or new quality in vs not by any force or efficacie of Iustifying taken from Charitie nor because it hath charitie adioyned to it or worketh by it not because faith doth participate of the spirit of Christ to the end the beleeuer may be made righteous for that wee are commaunded to seeke righteousnesse not in our selues but in Christ a 2. Cor 5 2◠But wee are iustified by faith in regard it doth receiue and embrace the righteousnes that is offered in the Gospell Rom. 1.16.17 The righteousnesse of Christ is reueiled from faith to faith For as to iustification faith is a thing meerely passiue bringing nothing of our owne to procure vs fauour with God but receiuing that from Christ which is wanting in and toe our selues How then is faith said to be imputed for Righteousnesse Not absolutely but by Relation namely when it is vnderstood not to be alone but with his obiect Christ crucified as Rom. 3.22 The righteousnesse of God by the faith of Iesus Christ vnto all and vpon all that beleeue And verse 25. through faith in Christes bloud In which places by the word faith by a metonymie of the thing cōtaining for the thing cōtained Christ crucifyed is vnderstood but as he is apprehēded by faith In this sence Faith was imputed to Abraham vnto righteousnes or for righteousnes Rom. 4.9 And faith is imputed for righteousnesse vnto euerie one that beleeueth that is to say Christ crucifyed apprehended by faith is accounted our righteousnesse It is accoūted I say of god pronouncing from his tribunal seat the sentence of righteousnesse Euen as therfore the hand that receiueth a treasure that is giuen doth not enrich vs but the treasure that is it that enricheth so neither doth the work or action of faith iustify vs but Christ himself whom we apprehend by faith And this is that that the sound Diuines say that we are iustifyed by faith Correlatiuely that faith is imputed for righteousnes by reason of the obiect which assertion is plainly proued by that of Paul Rom. 3.27.28 Gal. 2.16 Where this sentence We are made righteous by faith is opposed vnto this proposition Wee are iustified by vvorkes as beeing contradictories Wherefore it is manifest by the nature of contradiction that no man is iustified by faith as it is a worke either our worke or Gods worke in vs but as it includeth the merit of Christ To speake properly and simply incredulitie is repugnant vnto faith and to the workes of the Lawe not working or the intermission of good workes is opposite but in respect of Iustification faith which resteth vpon the merit of Christ and workes which rest vpon the merits of Christ are contraries Hereupon also it is that Paule doth oppose the righteousnesse of the lawe and the righteousnesse of faith as contraries betweene themselues when Phil. 3.9
it by the application of them made to euery one For the legall Sabbath which was so called because of the rest besides that it was ordayned that that day should be imployed in the worshippe God that is in holy prayers preaching Sacrifices charitable collections for the poore to nourish the peoples faith a Luk 4.16 12 and that the Israelites should not wearie theÌ„selues or those that belonged to them with continual labor b Exod. 22. and to the ende they might continually remember the workes of God in the Creation c Gen. 2.1.12 of their deliuerance out of the bondage of Aegypt and redemption by Christ It was further a signe and testimonie of sanctification which did signifie that the Lord aboue doth sanctifie his by his Spirit Exod. 31.13 27. The Sabbath shall be a signe betweene mee and you that ye may know that it is I the Lord that sanctifie you Which thing also Paule sheweth to be done by Christ hee that sanctifieth and they that are sanctified are all of one Hebr. 2.11 As also of the spirituall and euerlasting Sabbath wherein wee must rest from euerie seruile worke that is from sinnes and our owne will and suffer God to worke his owne workes in vs and to reioyce in God thorow Christ It was also a shadowe of the heauenly Sabbath that is of eternall rest in God which we shall obtaine thorow faith when being deliuered from the flesh and the trouble thereof we shall rest in God when there shall bee Sabbath after Sabbath and Sabbath without any night Esay 66.23 The Arke of the Couenant did teach 1. Christ the Authour of the Couenant betweene God and the Elect. 2 It was a visible testimonie of the presence of God Exo. 25.10 22. I wil saith the lord vnto Moses Declare my self vnto the there and will talke with thee from the couer of the mercie seate betweene the two Cherubins which is aboue the Arke of the testimonie what things soeuer I will commaund thee to shewe vnto the children of Israell Whereupon also by the Figure Metonymie vsuall to types and Sacraments it is called the King of glorie d psal 47.5.7 And Iehouah as when the Arke remooued Moses said e Psal 68.1 2 2.13.1 8 Arise O Lord and let thine enemies be scattered and let all that hate thee flie away from thy presence And when it stood still hee said Returne O Lord vnto the tenne thousand thousands of Israell Numb 10.35 3 It was a type of Christ in whom are conteined all the treasures of wisedome and knowledge Surely the wood Cettim or Cedar which is not subiect to rotting out of which flowed a cleare and most odoriferous liquour which because it preserueth dead bodies from putrifying is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quickening that which is dead it did represent the vertue and merit of the bloud of Christ Now these are the thinges that were ioyned to the Arke and partly put into it 1 The golden pot hauing Manna in it did shadow out Christ who is the bread of life f Exod. 16.33 Ioh. 6.35 Heb. 9.4 2 Aarons rod which had budded was a type of the Priesthood of Iesus Christ whose priestly scepter whereas it had beene as it were withered in the world after his death resurrection it began to flourish to fructifie and to bring foorth the sweete fruits of the holy Gospell among the Gentiles g Numb 17 8 3 The Tables of the Couenant wherein was ingrauen by the finger of God the tenne Commaundements c Deut. 10.5 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which did signifie Christ the fulfilling of the law 4 The Golden board or couer which was aboue which was called the propitiatory of the Graecians the couer of the mercie seat it did signifie Christ the mediatour who is the propitiation for our sinnes and that couer whereby wee are couered against the anger and horrible iudgement of God k Rom 3.24 Ioh. 2 2 Exod 25.32 5 The Promise annexed signified that God would thence as out of his throne speake his Oracles and that there Christ would heare vs who is indeed the throne seat of God and the word of the father by whom he speaketh to vs and for whose sake he heareth vs As it is written Whatsoeuer ye shall aske the father in my name he will giue it you Iohn 15.16 And the two Cherubins seatâ—d vpon the couer of the Arke ioyning their wings together and with face to face looking toward the Arke it selfe did declare the consent of the Prophets and Apostles in doctrine and the stouping downe that is the earnest desire of the blessed Angels to know the whole mysterie of saluation a 1 Pet. 1.12 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The exhibiting also whereof euen presently so soone as Christ was borne they declared to the Church 6 Also the Arke of the couenant was a type of the company of the Elect which is fed with the heauenly Manna is gouerned with the Scepter of that Priest according to the royall order of Melchisedech it hath the law of God ingrauen in the tables of their hearts and is the keeper of the bookes of the prophecies and of the Apostles And as the Gold mingled with Brasse did resemble the hypocrites so the pure and perfect tried Golde wherewith the Arke was covered on euerie side did represent the faithfull who are tried in the fyre of afflictions b 1 Pet. 1â—7 And those men which are indeed like vnto Gold are worthily preferred before such as be like vnto lead and are profane men 7. The barres and staues did signifie the Ministers Doctors and schoolemen which doe performe their message for Christes sake Moreouer the washings did signifie that the sins of them that beleeue should be washed away in the bloud of Christ and that they are daily washed and purified by the holy Ghost c Leu. 14.8 7 Now the third was Chanaan a certaine pawne and pledge of the promise of Christ and the heauenly inheritance So 1. The sacrificing of Isaac d Gen. 22.10 did signifie the offering vp of Christ 2. The blessing of Ephraim and Manasses made by laying Iacobs armes and hands crosse vpon them did signifie the vnlike condition of their posterity e Gen. 48.14 3. The brasen Serpent f Numb 2.8 Ioh. 3.14.15 the trueth as touching the lifting vp of the banner of Christ crucified 4. The wood cast into the bitter waters whereby they were made sweet g Exod. 18.25 signified the branch of the stock of Isaie comforting all those which bee wearie and heauie loaden 5. The going about or compassing of Iericho seauen daies by the Israelites h Ios 6.5 that the strongholds of this world shall bee cast downe by the sound of the trumpets of the Gospell whereof the Prophet speaketh Psal 19.5 their sound is gone forth into the whole world i 2 Cor. 10.4 6. The cleansing of Naaman by washing himselfe
b 1 Cor. 11 27.29 As for example Abraham and his household c Gen. 17 23 Absalon Achitophel the people d Sam. 15.12 Iudas e Luk. 22.21 Simon Magus f Act. 8.13 But they belong to theÌ„ only for whoÌ„ they are appointed and such as be conteined in the couenant of God according to his words But not to them that be without which doe not professe the name of Christ and to such too as bee liuing and present but not to the deade and such as bee absent Wherein doe the word and Sacraments agree In the Efficient cause for the same person is the Authour of the promise of grace and of the Sacraments to wit the sonne of God the head King Doctor and Priest of the Church and in the instrumentall causes for the selfe same ministers of the word be also the disposers of the Sacraments g Mat. 28.1 1 Cor. 4.19 2 In the matter intelligible or the principall subiect for the same thing is promised in the word and the lawfull vse of the Sacraments the same Christ with his benefits of saluation Therfore as the Gospell testifieth those which turne to God are washed and sanctified by the name of the Lord Iesus and by the spirit of our God 1. Cor. 6.11 And that they are begotten by the Gospell and borne anewe by the worde of the liuing God 1. Corinth 4.15 h 1 Pet 1.23 1 Rom. 6.3 Tit 3.5 And that Iesus Christ is that breade of life Iohn 6.35 So the sacramentes doe testifie that those which are baptised into Iesus Christ are baptised into his death k Ioh. 3.33 36 Râ—â— â—4 23 Heâ— 11 6 Habac 2 4 and are saued by the washing of the new birth 1. And the bread which wee breake is the communion of the body of Christ 1. Cor. 10.16 3 In the forme manner and Instrument wherby we receiue the thing to saluation for the word and sacraments profit none but those which haue or shall haue faith k Ioh. 3.33 36 4 In the end common to them both For both the word and the sacraments are meanes whereby the sonne of God dooth teach and gather the Church vnto himselfe and doth in this life communicate himselfe and all his benefits to them that shall be saued yet so as he is able without eyther of them to worke in the hearts of the godly so often and when it pleaseth him 5 In the effects For as the word of life is to the godly the sauour of life vnto life to the vngodly the sauour of death vnto death 2. Cor. 2.16 So the Sacraments in themselues are to saluation to them that beleeue but vnto the vnbeleeuers they turne into iudgment and condemnation a 1. Cor. 11.29 Euen as a sweet oyntment is healthfull to the doue but it is present death to the flye And as the seed of the word preached so the vse of the sacrament doth not presently bring forth his fruit but in that time which is appointed of God 6 Lastly as the holy Ghost doth begin and strengthen faith by the word so also by the sacraments he doth stirre vp and confirme the same Out of all which followeth that there is such a coniunction and agreement of the outward and inward word as there is of the earthly signes and heauenly things Wherein do the word and Sacraments differ 1 In nature Because the word of the Gospell doth in expresse words declare to wit that we by faith are made partakers of Christ Iesus and of all his merits the sacraments doe represent them by signes or that doctrine which the word doth deliuer cleare and more manifest the Sacraments doe propound the same in a mysterie and not so expresly 2 In the instruments The word is deliuered with the mouth receiued with the eares but the rites of the sacraments are administred with the hands and they are subiect to the eyes and the other senses and doe lead vs as it were vnto the thing present as though wee should nowe in some sort touch Christ himselfe with our handes see him with our eyes perceiue him with our taste and feele him with our whole heart 3 In the subiect to whom The promises of the word are generally and in common pronounced to all alike as well to the vnbeleeuers as to the beleeuers For the word must be preached euen to the vnbeleeuers But the sacrameÌ„ts are to be communicated seuerally to them which be probably known to be members of the Church and they doe apply and restraine the promises in a speciall manner to euerie one that doth rightly vse these rites that as certainely as thou doest vse the visible Ceremonie according to Christ his institution So certainely thou mayest and oughtest to conclude that Christ also and all his benefits do belong vnto thee 4 In the measure of signifying for the word doth especially teach but the speciall office of the Sacraments is to seale and further the word doth signifie and apply spirituall things but the Sacraments doe rather and more especially represent and applie 5 In order for whereas the Sacraments are the appendices of the word which doe confirme faith it is meet that in such as bee of yeares the preaching of the word should goe before to begin and to increase faith together with a manifest profession of faith before they be rightly administred to any 6 The word is auailable euen without the sacraments as may be seene in Cornelius a Act. 10.2 3.4.44.45 But sacraments without the word are of no force For a seale without a Charter is nothing worth 7 The preaching of the word and that effectuall is required in those that be of yeares that they may bee saued For Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word of God Rom. 10.17 Except it please GOD extraordinarily to worke in their hearts But the Sacraments are not altogether expresly nor absolutely so necessarie that without exception whosoeuer inioyes them not should therefore despaire of the certaine hope of saluation For that saying of Bernard is most true Not the want but the contempt of the Sacraments is damnable 8 Lastly the word considered by it selfe alone if it bee compared with the sacrament considered by it selfe alone is better and more excellent then it Although if the sacrament bee added to it it doth yet become more excellent and powerfull and more effectuall for the confirmation of faith Therefore we may not ascribe the greater honour to the sacraments then to the preaching of the gospell that is to say we may not attribute more to the seales then to the written Testament of Iesus Christ What ought they to doe who are depriued of libertie to come to the holy assemblies of the Church wherein the ordinarie dispensation of the word and sacraments is performed They ought to inquire for them but if they cannot find them they must then exercise themselues in daily meditation at home both because the kingdom
Church ordained of Christ being euen now about to die for them which are full growne being alreadie baptized and examining themselues wherein by outward breaking of bread and powring out of wine into the cup is represented and as it were is set before the eyes of the faithfull the crucifying of the bodie and shedding of the bloud of Christ for vs and by giuing taking and vsing of those Elements the forgiuenesse of our sins gotten by the death of Christ the inward raking and spirituall enioying of his bodie bloud moreouer communion with Christ ful nourishmeÌ„t in Christ viuification and fellowship together with the rest of his liuely members is signified confirmed sealed to the faithful the memorie of so great benefits giuing of thanks is celebrated for the commendable vse of the faithfull assembled together that they may increase in faith and loue For as by baptisme we are borne againe so being borne again wee are fed and nourished by the Supper of the Lord and in Christ wee are as it were nourished and brought vp to life eternall Therfore when as Baptisme may once onely be administred the Supper of the Lord is to be vsed often because in it Christ is giuen vnto vs after the manner of meate but because meat and drinke doe goe away into nourishment they are often in our life time to be taken of vs. Furthermore the first example or patterne of that definition is the historie of the first Supper of the Lord expounded by Paul and of the rest of the Euangelists 1. Cor. 11.23 Mat. 26.26 Mar. 14.22 Luk. 22.19 What is the efficient principall cause of the Lords Supper The Lord himselfe who is the onely testator of the new Testament and the Authour of the Couenant of Grace and GOD the Redeemer in whome alone it haht pleased the Father to gather together all things Ephe. 1.10 And who is the way the trueth and the life Ioh. 14.6 the high priest Heb. 3.1 and the eternall King of the Church Psal 2 6. concerning whom alone the father cryed from heauen heare him Mat. 17.5 from whom it is called the Lords Supper therfore faithfully to be deliuered of the ministers reuerently to be handled neither is it to be depraued by adding minishing changing For Paul saith 1. Cor. 11.23 I haue receiued of the Lord that which I also haue deliuered vnto you namely by the reuelation of Iesus Christ Gal. 1.12 When hee was taken vp into paradise or the third heauen although this letteth not but that hee knewe very many peculiar sayings doings of Christ both from Ananias and also from other disciples of Christ which were eye witnesses and from Luke himselfe At what time was it instituted 1 Cor 1.23 In the yeare of the world 3995. of the age of Christ 33. of March 24. day which was Thursday in the euening surely that night wherein he was betrayed by Iudas vnto the Iewes was the Supper of the Lord instituted 1. First of all because of the figure going before that is to say of the eating of the Pascall Lambe or the legall solemne and Sacramentall Supper in place wherof Christ substituted the Supper EuaÌ„gelical Lu. 22.14.19 where that being performed a new institution of this in expresse words is put in the stead therof so the Apostle teacheth 1. Cor. 5.7 Christ our passeouer is sacrificed for vs. From whence it followeth that the Supper of the Lord is our Passouer For the same thing in both is signified namely Christ the true and immaculate sacrifice for the sins of the world there promised here exhibited The remembrance of the like benefite there of the deliuerance out of the bondage of Aegypt and of induction into the promised land here of freedome from the cruell slauerie of Sathan and of introduction into eternall life 2. Secondly because of his passion and death neate approching Dan 9.24 27 the remembrance of which benefit therein performed vnto vs he would set forth in this Supper 3 Thirdly that he might plainely shew a consummation and taking away of al Sacraments and Sacrifices of the Old TestameÌ„t and manner of the Paschall lambe it selfe which he had eaten before with the Disciples 4. Forthly that he might signifie or giue to vnderstand that he came in the fulnesse of time Mat. 11.13 Gal. 3.24 Gal. 4.4 5. That hee might so much the more commend his Supper which being now about to dye he so earnestly commended vnto his Seeing that Christ hauing Supped distributed the Supper to the Disciples in the euening whether is it lawfull for vs to giue it in the morning and to them which are fasting It is lawfull because circumstances of time as both of sitting downe of apparrel and of a certaine number of Communicants doe not appertaine to any mysterie neither are they substantiall pâ—rtâ— of the Sacrament neither haue they expres commandement from God because Christ said not This doe yee hauing supped or sitting or standing or so many in number for Christ first did eate the Passeouer because he would after old things institute new But the Eucharist is more conueniently distributed in the morning 1. Because it is an easier thing at that time to haue a holy meeting together forasmuch as in the day time much businesse doth happen wherby men are lead away from holy things 2. Because at that time we are more sober and wee haue a more apt and attentiue minde to perceiue excellent thing Yet notwithstanding the ancient fathers in time of a fast beecause they did spend the whole day in prayers in Sermons and in holy hymnes did giue the Supper of the Lord a little before night And in the time of Augustine in many Churches of Africa as he reporteth the thursday before Easter that the action of Christ might bee the more resembled the Eucharist was giuen to the fathfull in the night and after Supper But this custome was taken away by the sixt Synod or generall Councill which was held at Constantinople Seing that Christ being about to celebrate the Supper abased himselfe to wash the Disciples feete and said vnto them I haue giuing you an example that ye should doe euen as I haue done to you Whether are we being about to communicate tyed to this precept concerning washing of feete Not a whit because Christ did not therfore washe the feet of the Disciples that they should alwaies imitate that fact in kind but that he might driue from them the dreame of a ciuill kingdome of the Messias whereabout they did striue and that hee might shewe in himselfe a perfect example of humilitie like as elswhere hee commaunded that they should shake off the Dust from their feete that they should not beare a staffe nor scrip with them by the way that they should salute no man by the way that they which fast should annoint their head Not that they should drawe these things to a strait obseruation of words but that by this
Christs bloud doth take away the thirst of the soule 3 As wine doth make glad the heart of man b Psal 10.15 so also the promises concerning Christ do make glad the soule 4 As wine doth heat the bodie and maketh vs more cheerefull and readie to doe our businesse so the bloud of Christ receiued by faith doth quicken the soule vnto all good motions and so the vertue of the spirit doth stirre vs vp and maketh vs more nimble vnto all good wokes 5 As wine driueth away coldnes so the bloud of Christ driueth away the coldnes of loue and charitie 6 As win◠maketh vs more secure and more bold so the bloud of Christ receiued by Faith doth make vs secure and quiet before God and more constant in confession that there may be nothing at all which we ought to feare 7 As wine maketh vs wise so the bloud of Christ receiued by faith maketh vs wise in the confession and commemoration of Christs benefits 8 As wine driueth away the palenesse of the face maketh the face of man to shine as with oyle c Psal 104 15 so the bloud of Christ doth turne the colour of the soule being pale with feare of death into the verie colour of the Rose that is to say it appeaseth our consciences it maketh vs faire in the presence of God that wee may appeare before him with a fayre and ruddie face that is to say iust and accepted What if bread such as wee haue and wine be wanting in some countries with what signes is the supper to be administred With those earthly nourishments and corporall meats which all doe vse in that countrey in stead of bread and wine meate and drinke for this doth agree with the minde of Christ From hence it was granted to the Nouergian Priests as Volaterranus witnesseth necessitie requiring it that they did conscrate the mysticall cup without wine with that which they had in common seeing that wine caried into the countrey is quickly corrupted by the great force of the cold VVhat need is there now of those two signes that is to say of bread and wine seeing that the whole humanitie of Christ consisting of his parts of bodie and bloud doth liue glorious in the heauens and by reason of concomitancie that is to say a naturall ioyning together of the liuing bodie and the bloud the whole may be signified and giuen in seuerall kindes and where the quicke bodie is present there also must the bloud and soule be present and by reason of the hypostaticall vnion the diuinitie also may be there and so there may be no controuersie moued concerning those things that be equiualent but one may suffice in steed of two From whence is that Rime of Thomas Caro cibus sanguis potus manet tamen Christus totus sub vtraque specie that is to say The flesh is meate the bloud is drinke yet Christ remayneth whole vnder both kindes 1 Because the same reason of concomitancie doth belong to the Priests which notwithstanding celebrating the Masse will alwaies vse the whole sacrament 2 Because Christ Iesus who is the wisedome of the Eternall Father commending to his Church nothing superfluous ordayned those two signes and of set purpose commended the vse of the cup to all saying Drinke ye all of it to signifie the drinking of one and the same bloud shed for many common to all the faithfull without difference of Nation of sexe of estate But for mens conceipts the commaundement of God is not to bee violated who called distinctly and exactly bread the bodie not the bloud and wine the bloud not the bodie Neyther can the Church change the matter or forme 3 Because neyther for the connexion of parts in the thing signifyed is a diuulsion or diuision of the parts to be made in outward rite or ceremonie 4 Because there is not made an inclusion of Christ into the Sacramentall signes For Christ is present in the Supper not for the bread but for the man 5 Because that bodie and that bloud of Christ is not in this action represented vnto vs sacramentally as now the whole indiuided humanitie of Christ doth liue glorious but so farre forth as they were offered vnto death for vs vpon the crosse the bloud being shed out of the bodie for the words added to the signes doe plainly crie that the bodie and bloud of Christ are offered and exhibited to vs in the Supper as things separated in the sacrifice of the Crosse From whence we must conclude seeing that the concomitancie of the bodie and bloud cannot agree to the death of Christ for to be in the bodie and to be shed out of the bodie are things contrarie that that concomitancie is directly contrarie to the institution of Christ Neyther is the hypostaticall vnion of God and man therefore broken which is not broken in death although the soule and bloud be separated from the bodie Rightly therefore Beda The bread is referred to the bodie of Christ mystically the wine to the bloud And the ancient fathers spake no otherwise of this mysterie then if daily in the administration of the Lords Supper he should be slaine die and be sacrificed for vs This is in the cup saith Chrysostome which flowed out of his side and we are partakers of it But what If a man at this day be conuersant in those places where one part of the Supper is taken from the laity shall he altogether abstaine from the vse of the communion It were farre better for him to abstaine especially if hee haue learned out of the former doctrine of the Gospell that that corruption doth fight with the word of God For it is a great sin to consent to the least pollution of Christs institution against conscience Rightly therefore Ambrose He is vnworthie of the Lord which doth celebrate a mysterie otherwise then it was deliuered of him for he cannot be deuout which doth presume otherwise then it was giuen from that author What did Christ when he had taken the bread Hee instituted signes of a second kind that is the outward actions of them which do administer the Supper or rites of dispensation of the Lords Supper wherein he went before all ministers by his example What rites are they Hee gaue thanks to the father to whom he gaue all the thanks of our redemption as it were the chiefe cause thereof and in the vse as well of the Supper as of daily meat and of other things he taught vs to doe the same a Iohn 6.11 1 Tim. 4.5 by his example Moreouer also with blessing and thāksgiuing for the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is blessed and gaue thanks are vsed one with another Mat. 26.26.27 concerning the Lords Supper Mark. 14.22.23 not with the signe of the Crosse as the popish Cleargie ignorantly doe thinke as though he vsed coniuring but with blessing that is with prayers vnto God he prepared he appointed and he sanctified the bread
as also the wine to an holy vse For although the word Benedicere that is to blesse be vsed 1. Concerning God blessing the creatures eyther by a generall action as Gen. 1.28 Or blessing the Church by a speciall action as Numb 6.24 For Benefacere that is to doe well vnto because God in saying doth bring to passe giueth good things eyther corporall or spirituall or moreouer concerning men eyther towards God as Blessed be the Lord God of Israell Luke 1.68 For to thanke and praise God or towards other men for to pray for Math. 5.44 as Blesse them that curse you and to gratulate b Luk. 1.42 yet notwithstanding oftentimes it signifieth the same which is to dedicate or consecrate that is to separate from profane vse to appoint an holy vse according to Gods ordinance as Gen. 2.3 God blessed the seuenth day and sanctified it From whence Ecumenius saith that the Cup of blessing which we blesse is all one thing as if it should be said which we reuerence with praiers giuing of thanks From hence commeth consecration or sanctification and blessing whereby not with a meere Historical reading of the text of the Epistle to the Corinthians or of the Gospell but with praiers with giuing of thanks with a plaine faithful repetition of the words of the Institution and of the promise of Christ alwaies effectual with a liuely significatiue exposition moreouer with all that Lyturgy or holy action which Christ commaÌ„ded vs to performe as he himself did wherin God is effectual those which were vulgar common helps of nourishing the body are made sacrameÌ„ts of the body bloud of Christ appointed set out for quickning meat drink so are translated from common natural meat to holy and spirituall meate forasmuch as they are appointed to this vse and office that it may be the bodie and bloud of Christ not of it owne nature but by diuine institution which ought to be rehearsed against Faustus booke 20 Ch. 13 and declared that faith may haue what to embrace both in the word and in the Elements Augustine saith Noster panis calix certa consecratione mysticus fit nobis non nascitur That is Our bread and cup by a certaine consecration is made but not borne mysticall vnto vs. Therefore they are deceiued which referre the consecration onely to those words This is my bodie and this is my bloud and they which doe interpret the consecration concerning the hid vertue of those words which they call operatorie whereby the substance of the bread is changed and an inclusion made of the bodie and bloud of Christ For the Lord did not speake to the bread but to the Apostles when he saith concerning the bread Take Booke 7 Epist 63 Apologie 2 book 1. Epist 1 booke 4. Ch. 57 Booke 4. of the Sacram. Chap. 4 and eate this is my bodie c. And Gregorie saith that The Apostles added the Lords prayer to consecration Iustinus saith that the Eucharist was performed with prayer Cyprian saith with inuocation of the highest God Irenaeus saith with giuing of thanks which is the thing which the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 10.16 The cup of blessing which we blesse Ambrose saith with the words and speech of the Lord Iesus And what those words are he declareth chap. 5. reciting the words of institution and Augustine saith The word commeth to the Element and so is made the Sacrament But for the Canon of the Masse without which the Popish Cleargie doe denie that eyther consecration or participation can be made no scripture doth teach that it was taught by Christ and his Apostles but it is a pontificiall ordinance sowen together like vnto pieces of many authors and diuers times and stuffed with many blasphemies against Christ What did Christ after the blessing The bread being taken he brake it and he brake it not only because hee would deuide it but because of representing his death Is the breaking or cutting of bread an indifferent ceremony It is not but essentiall and Sacramentall wholy belonging to the end or scope and moreouer to the forme of the holy Supper as also the powring in of wine into the cup forasmuch as by it the faithfull do behold with the eyes of their mind Christ not onely bestowing himselfe for vs but as it were torne in peeces beaten to peeces broken in peeces with vnspeakeable torments of minde and body and torne a sunder euen to the most violent separation of the soule from the bodie and according to his humane nature butchered as it were into two parts and trickling downe drops of bloud for our saluation Not that his bodie was broken in verie deed For not a bone in it ought to be brokeÌ„ as was shadowed out by tâ—e Paschal Lamb a Ioh. 19.33 36 Exod. 124. but we cal it broken because then it was pulled a sunder his side opened his hands and feete pierced at length also the bodie separated from the soule which also is the cause why the Apostle by a Sacramentall Metotonymie and chaunge of names doth attribute to the bodie it selfe of the Lord that which was done in that bread and ought also now to be done when as hee saith that the Lord spake this concerning the bread This is my bodie which is broken for you 1. Cor. 11 24. And from the same custome of breaking of bread the Eucharist is called breaking of bread a Acts. 2.42 20.7 And that the custome of breaking was vsuall in the Churches in Paules time it plainely appeareth by his owne words when he saith The bread which wee breake 1. Cor. 10. and this custome the Church long obserued But the manner of the Hoste 6. That is of giuing those round small little morsels the Church of Rome instituted VVhat did the Lord concerning the bread broken and the wine powred forth Hee gaue to the Disciples or hee deliuered and distributed them into the hands of the Disciples and by the selfe samse thing he taught that the faithful ought to consider with a faithfull mind the same Christ in the distribution of that bread and of that wine euen as if they did see him giuing himselfe with eternal life with his owne hand to bee vsed and enioyed which thing also he doth in verie deed by the inward vertue of his holy Spirit VVhat words did Christ ioyne to his action Three sorts some commaunding in which he commaunded what he would haue his disciples to do in celebrating of the Supper and wherein he expressed the outward forme of the Supper signified the inward some are Indicatiue Sacramentall or words of promise which for declaration sake Christ ioyned to the signs wherein he declared the inward matter or thing signified finallie some are exegeticall wherein he set forth the end of this holy action What doth he commaund his to do in the supper 1 What the ministers themselues or disposers of the supper ought to doe
the grounds of Doctrines or of the Articles of faith and of the commandements of God alwaies to be taken without figures altogether as the words doe sound No seeing that there is no lesse certaintie in a figuratiue speech which may bee applyed to the nature of the thing concerning which it is spoken then in a proper Like as the first promise of the Gospell was published by God in a figuratiue speach The seede of the woman shall breake the Serpents head Gen. 3.15 which Iohn declareth in a proper speach 1. Epistle chap. 3. verse 8. The sonne of God appeared that hee might dissolue the works of the Diuell And the first chapter of Iohn is the ground of Doctrine concerning the person of Christ and yet in it are figuratiue speeches Verse 4. 5. That light was the light of men And that light shineth in the darkensse and the darkenesse comprehended it not But is it not absurd that Christ spake tropically and therefore enigmatically that is obscurely or doubtfully in the institution of his supper with the Disciples which were rude and simple In no wise for the thing it selfe sheweth that that Metonymicall speech was not enigmaticall doubtfull or darke to the Disciples for vnlesse it had come into their minde that bread was called of the Lord his bodie because it was a signe thereof doubtlesse they had beene troubled at so prodigious a thing as followeth vpon the proper and literall sense of the words And that so much the more because almost at the same time they could not vnderstand farre more easie things a Iohn 14.8 16.17 a seeing therefore they are not trobled with these words it is plain that they vnderstood those things Metonymically after the mnaner of the Scripture Especially as a little before they had eaten the Lambe which in the same sense is called Pascha that is the Passeouer Exod. 12.27 Which is the other part of words of Christ concerning the bread Which is giuen for you In Luke 22.19 or VVhich is broken for you in Paule 1. Cor. 11.24 For in Mathew and Marke this part is wanting the subiect of which member is not bread but bodie expressed in the Pronoune Relatiue which And the Attribute VVhich is giuen or deliuered for you namely vnto death or is broken that is Esay being interpreter Chap. 53.10 He is broken with sorrowes or is crucified and killed VVhat is signified in this proposition 1 The mysticall bodie of Christ is not signified for the mysticall bodie of Christ which is the Church is not giuen or deliuered or broken for vs but the true bodie 2 It is signified that Christ gaue not a glorified and spirituall bodie and therefore that the flesh of Christ is not simple meate in respect that it is glorified but that it is liuing meat vnto vs in respect that it was in time past crucified Iohn 6.51 3 It is gathered by a proper and regular predication that the bread is not called the body of Christ but figuratiuely because it is vniuersally true of a proper and regular signification Whatsoeuer is the predicate of the predicate is also the predicate of the subiect But that which is said heere of the bodie of Christ cannot be spoken properly and regularly of bread For bread is said to be giuen to vs properly not giuen for vs Neyther is wine said properly to be shed for vs by powred in to vs. Againe that which is giuen is but an Enallage of the present time for the future spoken for that which shall be shortly giuen vpon the crosse but not in the Eucharist Because Christ therein offered not or gaue his bodie for a sacrifice but vpon the crosse For it is an vsuall Enallage of scripture to speake concerning a thing now instant to be forthwith as it were of a thing present And so to vse the present tense for the future So Mat. 26.24 Wo be to that man by whom the sonne of man is betrayed And Iohn 10.15 I lay downe my life for my sheepe And the common translation hath VVhich shall be giuen for you VVhich is broken cannot be affirmed of the signe which the Lord had broken alreadie neyther can it be spoken of the bodie of Christ vnlesse it be Metonymically seeing that it was said of the bodie of Christ Exod. 12.46 and Iohn 19.36 yea shall not breake a bone thereof 4 And also the loue of Christ towards vs is commended because when he owed nothing to Death because he was without sinne for he was holy and vndefiled a Heb 17.26 he would vndergo it for vs. 5 Last of all the fruit of his death because he is said to be deliuered vnto death not onely for the Apostles but for many What are the words of the Lord concerning the cup They also consist of two branches the former is in Mathew and Marke This is my bloud of the new Testament Or as Luke and Paule hath it This cup is the new Testament in my bloud The subiect of which speech is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This of the neuter gender but not hic this in the masculine gender as hath the old interpretation which pronounce hoc this is referred to the wine not to the bloud for so it should bee an Identicall proposition which is manifestly plaine out of Luke 22.20 who addeth vnto 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is this the Noune 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is cup or wine as as if he had said This which I hold in my hands and giue to you And the predicate is bloud or the new testament in my bloud The couple the verbe substantiue est is which in Luke is wanting In which proposition surely it cannot be said without a Metonymie that the word cup is taken for wine which is contained in the cup and that this cup is that New testament In the one is the continent put for the thing contained in the other of the thing signified is for the signe For properly according to the word the cup it selfe or wine is not the new Testament it selfe but a pledge and seale of the new Testament or rather that wherewith the Testament is established that is to say of the bloud of Christ like as Circumcision was called the old Couenant By all which it appeareth that the words of the Lords supper are ful of figures but yet most vsual easie to be vndestood Whether may this proposition of Christ This is my bloud be so compared with that of Moses saying Exod. 24.8 concerning the bloud of calues this is the bloud of the couenant that both here there bloud being in deed in it owne essence as that being holden in the hands of Moses and this in the hands of Christ be demonstrated properly and not figuratiuely In no wise For Moses truly sprinkled the people with the bloud of the offering taken out of a basen that bloud was a sacramental signe therfore that enuntiatiō of Moses
1. Cor. 10.3 VVhat is the same but that which also wee haue saith Augustine Therefore the same meat and the same drink but to the vnderstanding and beleeuing But to the not vnderstanding that Manna alone Book de Vti lit paenitent vpon Ioh. tract 21 that water alone but to the beleeuers the same which now for then Christ was to come now he is come was to come and is come are diuers words but the same Christ 5 Because it could not be that Christ locally sitting at the table and communicating with the disciples as it is Mat. 26.29 I will not drinke henceforth of this fruit of the vine should himselfe eate himselfe really and corporally Did Christ Iesus take part of the same signes Truly no lesse then of the Paschall Lambe Concerning which let him which doubteth thinke 1 That the Lord Iesus sanctified the ordinarie Sacraments of both the Testaments in the vse thereof 2 And in instituting of the supper by his example went before in sayings doings that the whole Church may know that the first paterne is to be respected of her in that regard that it was the greatest cause why he did not abstaine whereupon Hierome saith ipse conuiua conuiuium ipse comedens qui comeditur that is Epist ad Hed. biam he is the guest and the feast he is eating and that which is eaten Is there that vertue and that sense of the words of Christ wherewith he instituted this Sacrament that as often as vpon the bread and wine they are recited by the Priest who hath a purpose to consecrate then the substance of bread and wine eyther by Analysis is resolued into the first matter or euen into nothing so that in steed thereof doe succeed the bodie and bloud of Christ or by a simple mutation is turned into the substance of the true bodie and of the true bloud of Christ so that the substance of bread is formed into the flesh of of Christ the bare accidents of breas and wine remayning hanging without a subiect God forbid 1 Because it were magicall to attribute the power of changing the substance of the signes to certaine words mumbled ouer 2 Because in expresse words of the Apostles and Euangelists the true natural substance of bread and wine is affirmed before and after consecration as they call it 1. Cor. 10.16.17 and 11.26 27.28 The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the bodie of Christ And wee that are many are one bread and one bodie because we all are partakers of one bread and As often as yee shall eate this bread ye shew forth the Lords death till he come And Whosoeuer shall eate this bread and drinke this cup of the Lord vnworthily shall be guiltie of the bodie and bloud of the Lord. And Let a man examine himselfe and so let him eate of this bread and drinke of this cup. For whereas they say that it is called bread not which is now but which was before it is confirmed by no testimonie of Scripture or iudgement of sense and besides Math. 26.29 I will not drinke saith hee henceforth of this fruit of the Vine Thus spake Christ after consecration 3 Because the kingdome or God is not corporall meate and drinke Rom. 14.17 4 Because in the proposition the pronoune hoc this demonstratiue doth not demonstrate the bodie of Christ For the transubstantiation saith Thomas is not accomplished but in the last instāt of the pronouncing of the words neither doth it demonstrate the accidēts alone of the bread For the accidētes are not the body of Christ neither doth it demōstrate any wandring thing or singular thing vncertainly determined For there is no Indiuiduum or singular thing which is not something And therefore certaine not wandering vndetermined or indefinite and especially the Demonstratiue Hoc this doth signifie some certaine thing 5 Because it is a wicked thing to be thought and spoken that the bread it selfe is properly and substantially the bodie of Christ 6 Because of this conuersion neither doth the Scripture giue sentence nor sense or reason iudge as of the rod of Moses turned into a Serpent a Exod 4.3 and of the water turned into wine Iohn 2.9 Where the Euangelist said not simply Water but Made wine For the accidents of bread doe plainely shew that bread doth remaine and they which partake of those holy signes doe feele in themselues a taste of wine and the power of the bread and wine This is an vnanswerable reason Framed thus euerie miracle is sensible transubstantiation is not sensible therefore it is no miracle 7 Because the substance the accidents thereof remayning cannot perish neyther can the accidents subsist without a subiect nor be the accidents of bread which are not the accidents of bread 8 Because the substance being remooued and the nature of the signes the similitude affinitie habit relation and Analogie of the signes to the thing signified come to nothing For the bread signifieth the bodie of Christ because it nourisheth strengtheneth and sustaineth which accidents cannot doe 9 Because heere is no word of Christ which may signifie a conuersion or transubstantiation For the verb Est doth not signifie to be made to be changed to be turned And note that which is said to be made cannot properly be said to be for Esse to be and Fieri to be made are said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say contradictorily 10 Because a carnall eating of the bodie of Christ is no where prooued in the Scriptures 11 Because it should follow that both the faithfull and vnbeleuers doe receiue the bodie of the Lord and his quickening spirit which neuer can be feuered from his bodie And Augustine saith that They doe not eate the bodie of Christ but which are in the bodie of Christ Because that bodie cannot be spoyled of quantitie nor in an instant and without locall motion be together in heauen in earth vnlesse vpon necessitie we should make an vbiquitie of Christs bodie which the verie transubstantiators do refuse to doe and the Fathers denie and they doe determine contrarie things which say that a bodie and the quantitie are truely present and yet not by meanes of the quantitie 13 Because now the bodie of Christ cannot be separated from the bloud nor the soule from his bodie and concerning Concomitancie there is nothing extant is the word of God 14 Because they write that Victor the third Bishop of Rome died hauing drunk poyson out of a chalice giuē him by his Subdeacon and that Henrie the seuenth Emperour of Lucelburge tooke poyson from the bread taken in the Eucharist by a Monke of Senens one of the preachers order 15 Because infinite discommodities doe follow this Transubstantiation as that the accidents must remaine without a subiect that if it happen that Mice do gnaw the bread they shal be said to gnaw accidēces or that if worms do breed of the bread it
the wicked eate the flesh and drinke the bloud of Christ vnto the iudgement of their owne condemnation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 truely and not refusing but receiuing it are made guiltie of Christs bodie No for 1. To eate vnto themselues Iudgement or to bring Iudgement vpon themselues is not to eate Christ who is made vnto vs righteousnesse and life 2. Because the promise of grace doth promise onely to the faithfull the participation of Christ himselfe and they are Sacramentall Seales to none but to the faithfull onely For what part hath the beleeuer with the Infidell light with darknesse Nor must wee say saith Augustine that hee eateth Christs bodie that is not in Christs bodie and therefore their vnbeleefe cannot make void the faith of God and the institution of the supper 3. Because no man saith the Apostle can bee partaker of the Lords Table that is of the meate set vpon the Lords table and of the table of Diuels that is haue any thing common with Diuels and vncleane spirits 4. Because the thing signified is receiued with the heart and not with the mouth for indeede Christ is not receiued by the instruments of the body but by faith alone a Ephe. 3.17 which the wicked do want 5 Because God giueth not holy things to dogs seeing the Lord forbiddeth the same to be done Math. 7.6 6 Because there are not contrarie effects of the participating and communciating of the bodie and bloud of Christ And the power of quickening or giuing life cannot be separated from the communion of the bodie of Christ and the wicked haue not life eternall but are condemned alreadie but he that eateth my flesh and drinketh my bloud hath eternall life saith our Sauiour Christ Iohn 6.51 7 Because Christs bodie eaten worketh life but being despised refused and reiected it worketh death and condemnation but this accidentally not in respect of participation but of priuation 8 Because Christ can discharge the office of a Iudge although the vnbeleeuers eat not his bodie with their mouth they eat then the Lords bread but not the bread which is the Lord hereunto tendeth that excellent saying of Augustine If thou receiue it carnally it ceaseth not to be spirituall but it is not so vnto thee Againe A good man receiueth the Sacrament and the matter of it an euill man the Sacrament onely and not the thing it selfe And againe He that disagreeth from Christ eateth not Christs bodie nor drinketh his bloud though he daily receiue the Sacrament of so great a thing vnto his owne iudgement Whereas therefore the Fathers Tract 25. vppon Iohn but especially Augustine say that the Lords bodie is sometimes receiued euen of the wicked by the word Bodie they meane the signifying signe and not the thing signifyed or matter of the Sacrament And the bodie of the Lord that is to say his symbolicall bodie is distinguished from the bodie of the Lord that is to say from the verie matter of the Sacrament 9 And lastly this consequence of our aduersaries is ridiculous Christs bodie is giuen or offered therefore it is receiued It is not receiued therefore it is not giuen Can a man be guiltie of the bodie and bloud of Christ which eateth not his bodie nor drinketh his bloud Essentially Hee may by reason of the abuse of the holy signes which is contumelious to the thing signified euen as they which dispise Christs seruants are guiltie of contemning our Lord Iesus Christ yea and of the father also Luke 10.16 And a contumely done to an Embassador redoundeth to the Prince that sent him and whosoeuer spitteth vpon teareth or trampleth vpon the kings Image or letters is guiltie of offence to the maiestie of the king himselfe to conclude the vnworthie receiuer is guiltie in that he doth not spiritually receiue and eate Christs bodie offered vnto him Whether may the minister without perill of conscience admit all to the Lords Supper seeing he cannot know who are worthie and who are vnworthie As the Church iudgeth not of hidden things that is to say doth not prye into the secret corners of our hearts but iudgeth the outward actions hauing the Decalogue rightly vnderstood for a rule therein so the ministers dutie is to leaue to God the iudgement of euerie mans heart admitting all that are not tainted with open crimes but he must restraine those that are bewitched with errors repugners of the foundation of doctrine blasphemers heretickes worshippers of Idols drunkards cozeners theeues tyrants adulterers euill and filthie speakers and those that any other way liue vngodly and walke not worthie of the Gospell which giue no signes of repentance the Ecclesiasticall Consistorie hauing first taken knowledge of them for to them belongeth that of the Poet. Procul hinc procul este profani People profane and wanting grace Packe hence and come not neare this place For Christ giueth a weightie and serious prohibition Giue not holy things vnto dogs Mat. 7.6 Neither must we communicate with other mens sinnes 1. Tim. 5.22 therefore Chrysostome saith He would rather giue his bodie to be shamefully torne in peeces then wittingly willingly reach out the bodie and bloud of our Lord to a wicked man that liueth without repentance And for this abuse Paule witnesseth that among the Corinthians many were weake and sicke and many slept Is it a thing arbitrarie or indifferent to vse the Supper of the Lord or to abstaine from it No but the contemners of the Lords table sinne grieuously for they contemne 1 That edict not humane but diuine Doe this 2 The memorie of Christs death whereby we are redeemed 3 They neglect the communicating of the bodie and bloud of Christ 4 And lastly they shew themselues vnworthie to be accounted Christs disciples Shall wee need any sacramentall signes of Christs bodie and bloud in that life that shall be euerlasting No for we shall be with our Lord Iesus Christ euen in bodily presence for there will be no place for any sacrament when Christs corporall presence shall be restored to the Church and the Church by the way of faith shall be restored to the heholding of Christ euen face to face a Rom. 8.24 1 Cor. 13.12 5.7 1 Ioh. 3.2 What is contrarie to this doctrine First the error of the Aquarians who vnder pretence of sobrietie vsed not wine but water in the Lords Supper Secondly the errors of the Papists who doe horribly profane the Supper of the Lord and disdaining the name thereof 1 Borrow the name of the Masse from the rites of Isis 2 They faine that the Masse as it is now retained among them was celebrated by Iames the brother of the Lord or by the other Apostles 3 They adorne it with Gold Siluer and pretious stones as if it were a whorish Thais to allure the more to loue and affect it 4 They doe superstitiously vse bread that is meerely without leauen 5 They doe necessarily mingle water with wine 6 They transforme the
or Bacchanalls without a Sermon or declaring of the Lords death which Paule would haue to be vsed in the Lords supper 23 By hearing or rather by looking vpon the Masse they thinke themselues armed against God and as it were with an Ammulet or preseruatiue against poyson safe from all daunger 24 That the Sacrament is once a yeare to bee deliuered or communicated to the people 25 They teach that auricular confession is necessarie for those that will be communicants 26 They celebrate the Masse in a strange and vnknowne language 27 In the Canon of the Masse besides the offering of their sacrifice they vse inuocation of Saints departed and they mixe withall imaginarie merits 28 They celebrate Masses for the honour of Saints and for the obtayning of their intercession with God whereby the remembrance and intercession of Christ is obscured and ouerthrowen 29 They thinke that the vse of the Supper is of absolute necessitie to those that are readye to depart this life 30 They vse consecrated bread for the quenching of fire and for the calming of tempests 31 They doe superstiously include it in their Armories and Cupbords 32 They burne candles before it 33 VVhen they please euen as in the olde time the Persians did the fire they carrie it about to bee worshipped Thirdly the errors of the consubstantiators who doe not admit the true doctrine of the letter and the spirit but thinke that the sacramentall speeches are to be interpreted literally according to the letter and rationallie as they meane 2 That it is offered bodily or essentially or ioyntly or after an admirable and vnspeakable manner and yet by the hand of the minister 3 They say that the bodie of Christ is cast into the mouthes euen of the wicked 4 They commend the recantation of Berengarius which was set downe to him by Pope Nicholas wherein he professeth that not onely the Sacrament but euen the verie true bodie and bloud of our Lord Iesus Christ is sensually and in truth handled and broken by the hands of the minister and torne in peeces by the teeth of the faithfull 5 They teach the reall omnipresence of the verie bodie of Christ vpon earth in many places nay in euery place 6 They attribute to the flesh of Christ many sortes of beings 7 They holde that there is a communion made by a mutuall reall and actuall conioyning of the substances 8 The doe not acknowledge the spirituall presence onely of the bodie and bloud of Christ 9 They reckon the papisticall eleuation and lifting vp of the hoast among things indifferent 10 They doe wickedly confound the twofold eating namely the one outward of the bread the other inwarde of the bodie of Christ to be but one and the same Fourthly the errour of them who haue taken away the breaking of bread in the supper of the Lord and in stead of bread broken or cut doe distribute vnto euery one that commeth to the Lords table so many in nomber of whole and severall breads or round and thin cakes 2 They haue abolished the deliuerie of the signes into the hands of the receiuers and the taking of them by their hands Fiftly the error of those who doe very seldome make mention of the sacramentall changing of the bread and wine 2 They teach that the onely merit of Christes obedience is to be accounted for the thing signified in the holy Supper of the Lord and thinke that onely the commemoration and remembrance of the death of Christ and of his benefits is taught therein and doe not vrge vs to bee by communion incorporated into Christ Sixtly the errors of them who first denie the presence of Christ in the Supper 2 They hold them to be but common signes which doe not effectually and powerfully moue 3 They account the sacramentall signes but as bare pictures and things to looke vpon whereby they may onely be stirred vp to renue the memory of Christs death 4 They take these holy mysteries but as outward notes or badges whereby they that professe themselues to be Christians may be distinguished from other profane people Seuenthly the error of them who doe vnreuerently vse these holy actions and in no other manner but as common and daily matters 2 They that thinke it is free for them eyther to come to the Lords Supper or to abstaine from it at their pleasure and therefore vse it verie seldome whereas indeed it is no small part of Gods worship and by God commaunded Eightly the error of some who alleadge that the Supper of the Lord succeedeth not the Paschall Lambe but Manna which was not an ordinarie and perpetuall sacrament nor ioyned in time with the Supper neyther had it any signe of the merite of Christ which is the chiefe thing in the Lords Suppe contrarie to the manifest institution of the Lord a Luk. 12.19 Ninthly the error or rather the dreame of a certaine libertine Iodochus Harchius a Montensian Belgan who holdeth that wee doe not eyther corporally or spiritually take and eate the verie bodie of Christ crucified but making a twofold flesh of Christ one naturall and taken of the virgin Marie now glorious in heauen the other spirituall intelligible and made by the diuine power of God of bread and wine to bee tasted and conceiued chiefely in the minde this hee imagineth to goe into the nourishment of the mysticall bodie that is to say of all the faithfull being daily taken with the mouth and by faith or otherwise he dreameth that there is a certaine power proceeding from the flesh of Christ and after a wonderfull and vnspeakeable sort infusing it selfe into the bread doth nourish the flesh of a Christian man which is cōtrarie to the expresse words of our Sauiour Christ which is giuen which is powred out which words doe euidently shew that the true bodie of Christ and the true bloud of Christ are signified and spiritually exhibited vnto the beleeuers The nine and fortieth common place Concerning Magistrates or Politicke gouernment Is the doctrine of policie or ciuill gouernment and Magistracie to be deliuered in the Church IT is Because Commonweales are the Nourceries of the Church and the consciences of both godly Magistrates and faithfull subiects are by this doctrine to bee enformed against such Fanaticall Spirits as oppugne that doctrine Whence is the Commonwealth called Politeia Policie Of the Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Citie comming of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 many But Ciuitas a Citie as it were Coiuitas or Ciuium vnitas the vnitie of Citizens is not onely such buildings as are comprehended in one ditch trench or wall but that multitude of people which doth inhabite those buildings And the regiment and order of that companie or people is called in Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 policie in Latine Respublica the Common-wealth From whence is deriued politice the Art of policie which teacheth how the Commonwealth must be ordered and preserued as also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
and professe openly that you doe beleeue and imbrace them For 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to shew is not to expresse any thing by similitude of fact or to represent by stage playing gestures but to declare and shew Neyther ought it to bee restrained to the Priests alone for seeing that whiles we are strangers in the bodie we are absent from the Lord a 2 Cor 5.6.7 we doe by this remember the Lord Iesus which is in the heauens which thing hee himselfe commaundeth vs doe till he commeth to iudgement signifying that the Church shall continue vntill that iudgement he would not haue commaunded it if he had determined to remaine with his corporally For memorie is opposite to bodily presence because remembrance is not of things to come nor of things present but of things past Of what qualitie ought that remembrance to bee Not any bare or idle remembrance of a thing past which nothing appertaineth vnto vs but operatiue and such whereby the faithfull minde in the vse of this Sacrament doth by faith lay hold vpon Christ with all his benefits doth apply to himselfe particularly and so cals to minde the sacrifice past and once performed in the flesh that thereby it feeleth present comfort gladnesse of minde peace of conscience increase of faith and of loue and moreouer doth conceiue most certaine hope of the life and happinesse to come by reason of that sacrifice Finally it is stirred vp to consider of so great loue of Christ and to offer vnto him by faith the sacrifice of prayse and to giue him thanks b Psal 50 23 From which end we doe againe vnderstand that the supper is not ordayned that it may be a reall and expiatorie or appeasing sacrifice for the quicke and the dead but a solemne and publicke thankesgiuing for the incarnation death redemption and all the benefits of Christ Which are the causes for which Christ ordained the memorie of himselfe to be celebrated amongst vs 1 His great loue the propertie whereof is that they which doe loue sincerely and from the heart do desire to liue in their minds and memorie Whereupon wee gather that Christ is neuer vnmindfull of vs. 2 The faithfull prouidence of Christ whereby hee prouided for his beloued that the benefits bestowed might truly profit and enioy their end For as by the forgetfulnesse of the benefactors a benefit receiued is lost so by memorie it is especially kept What is it to shew the death of the Lord Not onely to meditate vpon the historie but also to thinke earnestly 1 Of the iustice and wrath of God against sinne which are seene in this sacrifice 2 Of the great mercie of God towards vs. 3 Of the loue of the sonne towards mankind For so great is the seueritie of Gods iustice and the weight of sinne that there may be no reconciliation made vnlesse the penaltie due to sinne should be paid so great is the greatnesse of his anger that the eternall Father may not be pacified but by the intreatie and death of the sonne His mercie so great that the sonne is giuen for vs. So great is the loue of the sonne towards vs that he deriued this true and great anger vnto himselfe being made a sacrifice for vs doth make vs partakers of his flesh and bloud all which in the vse of the supper we must speak of meditate vpon that we may be truly feared by the acknowledgement of Gods anger we may be truly grieued for our sinnes and againe may be lifted vp with true comfort And finally that wee may celebrate our Lord Iesus Christ with true thankefulnesse heart mouth and life Is Christ to be adored in the bread of the Supper No. 1 Because he is not there present with his bodie 2 Neyther hath hee in his word tyed himselfe to the bread Therefore he is to be adored in the mysteries as saith Ambrose that is in the celebration of the supper in that he is God and in respect that he is God and man together yet so as that we rest not in the supper but that we may lift vp the eyes of faith and our hearts not to a peece of bread but into heauen where he is sitting at the right hand of God a Coll 3.1 whether also in time past the people in the administration of the supper were inuited while they were admonished Habere sursum corda that is to lift vp their hearts Not that they should bee yet taught to seeke downeward for the bodie and bloud of our Lord present in Essence either in the accidents without the subiect or in vnder or with the bread but rather to seek for him in heauen that selfesame flesh long agoe deliuered for vs and that bloud shed for vs to be touched and laid hold vpon with the hand of faith Wherefore euerie one of the Disciples did not rise that falling downe vpon their knees they might take bread and that wine out of his hand And in the little booke of Constitutions ascribed to Clement the people are commaunded to come with a certaine shame fast reuerence without tumult But concerning the shewing or lifting vp of the Sacrament we confesse that it was the custome in the ancient Church that the whole Sacrament couered with a cleane linnen cloath should be set vpon the holy table vntil it should be distributed to the people For then the minister of the Church the linnē being taken away 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as saith Dionysius that is opening the mysteries did set them before the eyes of those which were present In the Lyturgy also of Chrysostome he saith that the Priest was woont to lift the holy bread a little while from the table not aboue his head to say with a loud voyce Sancta sanctis that is holy things for holy men surely in imitation of the Iewish custome among whom the Priest being about the sacrifices did shew before hand the oblation before his breast and did lift it vp a Exod. 29 24.27 Leuit. 10.15 But not in any other respect then that the people should prepare themselues to the communion But now seeing that the eleuation of the bread aboue the Priests head is the sinew of Bread-worship and prescribed neyther by Christ nor of the Apostles nor obserued in the most ancient and purest Church it is rightly taken away in Euangelicall Churches Is that which is left of the Supper to be laid vp to be caried about to be seene or to be adored as though some holines did remaine inherent in it Much lesse for the Sacraments out of the holy and lawfull vse or out of the taking of them prescribed in these words Take eate take drinke are not Sacraments like as neyther water is the water of baptisme vnlesse some body be dipped in it as is meet but when any bodie hath beene dipped or sprinckled with water the name of the Father of the Sonne and of the holy Ghost being called