Crosse and of all his benefites Because Christ hath commaunded me and all the faithfull to eate of this breade broken and to to drinke of the cup distributed in remembrance of him with this promise g Mat. 26.27.28 Mar. 14.22.23.24 Luc. 22.16.20 1. Cor. 10.16.17 11.23.24.25 12.13 adioined First that his bodie was as certainly broken and offred for me on the Crosse and his bloud shed for me as I behold with my eies the bread of the Lord broken vnto me and the cup communicated to me and further that my soul is no lesse assuredly fed to euerlasting life with his bodie which was crucified for vs and his bloud which was shedde for vs than I receiue and tast by the mouth of my bodie the bread and wine the signes of the bodie and bloud of our Lord receiued at the hand of the Minister 76 What is it to eate the bodie of Christ crucified and to drinke his bloud that was shed It is not onely to imbrace by an assured confidence of minde the whole passion and death of Christ and thereby to h Ioh. 6.35.40.47.48.50.51.53.54 obtain forgiuenes of sins and euerlasting life but also by the holy Ghost who dwelleth both in Christ and vs so more and more to bee a Ioh. 6.56 vnited to his sacred bodie that though he be in b Act. 3.21 Act. 1.9 c. 1. Cor. 11.26 heauen and we in earth yet neuerthelesse are wee flesh of his flesh and bone of his c Eph. 5.29.30.32 1. Cor. 6.15.17.19 1. Ioh. 3.24 4.13 Ioh. 14 23. bones and as all the members of the bodie are by one soule so are wee also quickened and d Io. 6.56.57.58 Io. 15.1.2.3.4.5.6 Eph. 4.15.16 guided by one and the same spirite 77 Where hath Christ promised that he will as certainely giue his bodie and bloude so to bee eaten and dronken as they eate this breade broken and drinke this cup In the institution of his supper the wordes whereof are these e 1. Cor. 11.23 c. Mat. 26.26 c. Mar. 14.22 c. Luc. 22.19 c. Our Lord Iesus Christ in the night that he was betraied tooke bread And when he had giuen thankes he brake it and said Take eate this is my bodie which is broken for you this doe you in remembrance of me Likewise also he tooke the cup when he had supped and saide f Exod. 24.8 Heb. 9.20 This cup is the Newe Testament in my bloud g Exod. 13.9 this doe as often as yee shall drinke it in remembrance of me For as often as ye shal eat this bread and drinke this cup ye shewe the Lordes death till he come This promise is repeated by Saint Paul when he saith The cup of thankesgiuing wherewith we giue thankes is it not the Communion of the bloud of Christ The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the bodie of Christ h 1. Cor. 10.16.17 For wee that are manie are one bread and one bodie because wee all are partakers of one bread 78 Are then the bread and wine made the verie bodie and bloud of Christ No verily But as the water of baptisme is i Math. 26.29 Mar. 14.24 not turned into the bloud of Christ but is only a sign and pledge of those thinges that are sealed to vs in Baptisme So neither is the bread of the Lords Supper the verie bodie of k 1. Cor. 10.16 c. 11.26 c Christ Although according to the manner of Sacramentes and that i Gen. 17.10 c. Exod. 26.27.43.48 13 9. Act. 7.8 Exo. 24.8 Le. 16.10 17.11 Isa 6.6.7 Tit. 3.5 Act. 22.16 1. Pet. 3.21 1. Cor. 10.1 forme of speaking of them which is vsuall vnto the holy Ghost the bread is called the body of Christ 79 Why then doth Christ call breade his bodie and the cup his bloud or the new Testament in his bloud and Paul also calleth bread and wine the Communion of the bodie and bloude of Christ Christ not without great consideration speaketh so to wit not onely for to teach vs that as the bread and wine sustaine the life of the body so also his crucified body and bloudshed are indeed the meat drinke of our soul whereby it is a Iohn 6.51.55.56 nourished to eternall life but much more that by this visible signe and pledge he may assure vs that wee are as verily partakers of his bodie and bloud through the working of the holy ghost as wee doe b 1. Cor. 10.16.17 perceiue by the mouth of our bodie these holie signes in remembraunce of him and further also that his suffering and obedience is so certainely ours as though we our selues had suffered punishments for our sinnes and had satisfied God 80 What difference is there betweene the Supper of the Lord and the Popish Masse The Supper of the Lord testifieth to vs that we haue perfect forgiuenesse of all our sinnes for that only Sacrifice of Christ which himself once fully c Heb. 7.27 9 12.26.28 10.10.12.14 Iohn 19.30 Mat. 26.28 Luc. 22.19.20 wrought on the Crosse Then also that we by the holie Ghost are graffed into d 1. Cor. 6.17 10.16 12.13 Christ who now according to his humane nature is onely in heauen at the right hand of his e Heb. 1.3 8.1 c. Father and there will be f Ioan. 4.21.22.23 20.17 Luc. 24.52 Act. 7.55.56 Col. 3.1 Phil. 3.10 1. Thes 1.9.10 worshipped of vs. But in the Masse it is denied that the quicke and the dead haue remission of sins for the onely passion of Christ except also Christ bee daily offered for them by their Sacrificers Further also it is taught that Christ is bodilie vnder the formes of breade and wine and therefore is to bee a In canone Missae item de consecrat distin 2. worshipped in them And so the verie foundation of the Masse is nothing else than an vtter denyall of that onelie Sacrifice and passion of Christ Iesus and an accursed Idolatrie 81 Who are to come vnto the Table of the Lord They onely who are trulie sorrowfull that they haue offended GOD by their sinnes and yet trust that those sinnes are pardoned them for Christes sake and what other infirmities they haue that those are couered by his passion and death who also desire more and more to go forward in faith and integritie of life But hypocrites and they who doe not truely repent do eate and b 1. Cor. 10.21 11.28 c. drinke damnation to themselues 82 Are they also to be admitted to this supper who in confession and life declare them-selues to bee Infidels and vngodlie No. For by that meanes the couenaunt of GOD is profaned and the wrath of GOD is c 1. Cor. 11.20.34 Is 1.11 c. 66.3 Ier. 7.21 c. Ps 50.16 c. stirred vp against the whole assemblie Wherefore the Church by the
the signe of his renewing or regeneration is baptisme Afterwards when he is once renewed and borne again he must be fostered and nourished by the bodie and bloude of Christ the signe of which nourishing is the supper Now it is one and the same Christ who both regenerateth and nourisheth vs to eternal life And albeit it is the same participation of christ namely both the Washing away of sins by the bloud of christ The same thing is sealed in Baptisme and the Supper but the manner of â—eâ—ling is diuers which is represented in Baptisme and the Eating and drinking of the body and bloud of Christ which is confirmed vnto vs in the Supper yet notwithstanding that signification of our new birth is sealed by the dipping of our bodie into the water of Baptisme and this of our maintenance and preseruation is dâ—painted and sealed by the eating and drinking of bread and wine in the Supper And therefore the thing signified of the sacramentes is not diuerse because it is the same to bee washed with the bloud of christ and to drinke the bloud of Christ But the manner of sealing one and the sâ—me thing is diuerse 3 In baptisme is required confession of faith and repentance in the Elder sort in Jnfants it is sufficient if they be borne in the church seing they that are born in the Church are therefore reputed for regenerate or members of the church because they haue an inclination to faith repentance But in the supper is added a further cond tiâ—n of examining himselfe and of remembring the Lords death Doe this in remembraunce of mee Let a man examine himselfe Baptisme therefore is due vnto the whole Church vnto infants who are the children of faithfull Parents no lesse than the elder sort enrolling themselues and giuing their names to Christ The supper is graunted to such onely as are beleeuers and repentaunt 4. Baptisme must goe before and the supper follow Whereupon in the auncient church after the Sermno wâ—re dimissed such as were excommunicated likewise those that were possessed or troubled with an euill spirite and the Catechumens that is such as old not as yet vnderstand the gâ—ounds and principles of râ—ligion or were not as yet baptised So of old they who were not yet circumcised did not obserue the sacrifices or ceremonies Nowe if they who were baptised before they haue made confâ—ssion of their faith and repentaunce are not as yet to bee admitted vnto the supper much lesse are they who being baptised liue after the manner of swine and dogges 5. Baptisme is not to bee reiâ—erated but once onely to bee receiued in our life time The supper is often to be receiued of vs Because baptisme is a signe of our receiuing into the church and couenaunt and the couenaunt once made is not againe vndoone or made voide to those that repent but remaineth ratified and firme for euer The supper is a confirmation of our faith concerning the eternall continuance of the couenant which confirmation is necessary and therefore the supper is often to be iterated Hereof it is that the Apostle saith of the supper As often as ye shall eat this bread and drinke this cup yee shew the Lords death til he come But of baptisme he saith That al wee which haue beene baptized into christ haue beene baptized into his death And Christ Hee that shal beleeue and shal be baptised shal be saued And seeing also the supper was therefore to be instituted that in it shoulde be made a publique remembrance recounting shewing of Christs death it is often to be celebrated 6 What is the sense or meaning of the words of the institution of our Lordes supper HEre are both those very odious questions conteined concerning the sense of Christes woords in his supper The Transubstaâ—â—â—â— and Consubstantiaries relie not on the simple meaning of Christes words The Transubstantiaries together with the Consubstantiaries doe bost and glorie that they vnderstand the woords of Christ simply and aright But neither perfourme that which they brag and boast of For that is the true simplicity and propriety of the woord whereunto for the iust vnderstanding and interpretations thereof nothing is to bee added neither ought to be taken from it neither any thing altered For as many as hold that the body of Christ is With Jn or Vnder the breade they adde vnto the woordes of Christ and depart from true simplicity For if that which Christ said is simply to be reteined that is not to be admitted which he said not as is The bread is both bread and the body of Christ but simply this only The bread is the body of christ He said not My body is with or in or vnder the bread or the bread is both bread and my body together neither added he as these ad of their owne really substantially corporally but he vttered these bare words of the bread This is my body Neither haue the Traunsubstantiaries their opinion drawen from the woordes of Christ simply vnderstoode namely that of the bread is made the body of Christ or the bread is chaunged into the bodie of Christ For this is their owne forgery and inuention For Christ said not That the bread was now made or was a making or should be made but simply said The bread is his body where no chaunge coulde come betweene so that the words of christ be simply vnderstood Therefore falsely doe they persuade the people that they simply rest on the propriety of christes woords when as manifoldly and most farre they swarue and depart from it Wherefore the true sense and meaning of the woordes is diligently to be considered The holy Euangelistes Matthew Marke and Luke doe most specially of al others describe the institution of the Lords supper and besides them the Apostle also declareth it no lesse plainly and luculenâ—ly who thus speaketh 1. Corint 11. vers 23.24.25.26 I haue receiued of the Lord that which J also haue deliuered vnto you that the Lord Iesus in the night that he was betraied tooke bread And when he had giuen thanks he brake it and said Take eate this is my body which is broken for you this doe yee in remembraunce of me After the same maner also he took the cup when he had supped saying This cup is the new testament in my bloud this doe as oft as yee drinke it in râ—membrance of me For as often as ye shal eate this bread drink this cup ye shew the Lords death til he come These words of the Apostle we wil briefly expound and then we will demonstrate them by true and firme arguments In the night that he was betraied This circumstance is specified by the Apostle to giue vs to vnderstande that Christ would at the last supper of the Passeouer institute this his supper to shew 1. That now an end was made of al the old sacrifices he did substitute a new sacrament which should sâ—cceed should be
13.14 When thy sonne shal aske thee to morrow saying what is this Thou shalt then saie vnto him With a mightie hand the Lord brought vs out of Aegypt out of the house of bondage 6 To bee the bondes of mutuall Charitie The sixt and last end is that they may be the bonds of mutual dilection and loue because they who are entred into an association or confederacie with Christ the head of the Church ought not to bee at difference among themselues 1. Cor. 12.13 By one spirite are we all baptized into one bodie In like manner the Sacramentes are the bonds of publique meetinges and congregations in the Church 1. Cor. 11.33 When ye come together to eate tarrie one for another 1. Cor. 10.17 For wee that are manie are one bread and one bodie because we are all partakers of one bread Eph. 4.5 One God one Faith c. But we can not settle among vs this communion neither maintaine and continue it being once setled neither profitablie annunciate and shewe forth the death of the Lord as long as we dissent iarre among our selues contentiously about the institution of the Sacramentes The Sacraments are pledges of that communion which Christians haue first with christ and then between themselues 3 Jn what Sacraments differ from sacrifices WE must hold and obserue a difference betweene Sacrifices and Sacraments Sacraments sacrifices differ in their chiefe end that we may knowe what to do when we come vnto them Now they differ in the principal chiefe end For sacraments are only ceremonies Sacrifices may be ceremonies moral works also as the sacrifices of thanksgiuing are our works towards God whereby wee yeeld due obedience and honour vnto God such are the sacrifices of praise and thankfulnesse A sacrament is gods work toward vs wherein he giueth some thing to wit the signes and the things signed wherein he testifieth of his offering bestowing his benefits vpon vs. Or the distinction betweene them may be giuen thus A sacrifice is a woork in which we yeeld some obedience and worship vnto God But a sacrament is a work in which GOD giueth somewhat vnto vs First outward signes Secondly Thinges signified by them The same thinges may bee sacrifices and sacramentes A sacrament and a sacrifice may be sometimes together in one and the selfe-same thing but they are sacramentes in respect of God in respect of vs sacrifices and those onely eucharistical and of thanks-giuing For there is but one only sacrifice propitiatorie by the raunsome of Christ offered for vs on the crosse Obiection The Passouer and other ceremonies of the oulde testament were both sacrifices and sacramentes Therefore sacramentes doe nothing differ from sacrifices Aunswere More is in the conclusion than in the premisses Because this onely followeth That the same thing may be a sacrament a sacrifice So Baptism the Lords Supper are sacraments sacrifices They are sacraments and that principally because they are the worke of god who giueth vs some thing in them and dooth therein testifie his gift vnto vs. For in them he reacheth vnto vs certaine Symbols and tokens by his ministers as also by his ministers hee speaketh by his mouth vnto vs according as it is said Luk. 10.16 He that heareth you heareth mee So therefore euerie minister reacheth with his hand the sacramentes vnto vs and wee receiue them at their handes as at the handes of God if so wee take them with reuerence but much more God giueth and as it were reacheth with his hande vnto vs in the lawful and right vse of the sacramentes the things themselues which are signified by the sacramentes Furthermore Baptisme and the Lordes Supper are sacrifices not indeede principally but as they are our woork which we perform to God that is as we receiue these signes as it were from the hand of God and so declare our obedience towards God 4 Jn what sacramentes agree with the Word and in what they differ from it The sacraments aâ—d the word agâ—â—e In exhibiting the same things vnto vs. THE SacrameÌ„ts agree with the Word in these things 1. Both exhibite the same things vnto vs. For by both god doth testifie vnto vs his will and by both he proposeth the same benefites the same grace and the same Christ vnto vs neither doth God confirme or represent by his SacrameÌ„ts any other thing than he hath promised in his word and they who seek for any other thing in the Sacraments than is prescribed in the word of god frame make Idols 2. Both are from the holie Ghost and so both also confirme and establish faith 2 In proceeding 〈◊〉 the Holy Gâ—ost 3 In being instituâ—â—â— offered by God 4 In being accoÌ„pâ—â—â—hed by God 3. God instituteth both God offereth both 4. God accomplisheth both by the Ministers of his Church For hee speaketh with vs in his Woorde by the ministers and by the Ministers hee offereth and giueth vs these signes in his Sacramentes But the thinges them-selues which are signified by these signes the sonne of God immediately offereth vnto vs. Hee saith Joh. 20.22 Receiue the Holie Ghost And Iohn saith of him Matth. 3.11 Indeede J baptize you with water to amendment of life but hee that commeth after mee will baptize you with the holie Ghost and with fire The Sacraments differ froÌ„ the word in these things 1. In substance nature They disagree 1 In substance and nature For first Words signifie according to the appointment of men whoÌ„ it pleased that things should so be expressed signified Signes signifie according to a similitude which they haue with the thinges by them signified Secondly Words wee heare and reade Signes wee perceiue also by feeling seeing and tasting Thirdly Words signifie onelie Symboles and signes confirme also 2. The Woorde of the promise and commaundement is proposed without anie difference 2 In the persons 〈◊〉 they are offered to al. To the vnregenerate that they may either begin to beleeue and be regenerated or may bee left without excuse to the regenerate that they may the more beleeue and bee confirmed The Sacraments are giuen onelie to the members of the Church whose faith is by them confirmed and preserued The Word is preached to all at once The Sacraments are giuen to euerie member of the Church seuerallie one is baptized after another and the supper is ministred to one after another 3. The Woorde is the instrument of the holie Ghost by which he beginneth and confirmeth our faith 3 in their vse and therefore the Sacraments must follow the Word The Sacraments are the instruments of the holie Ghost by which he beginneth not but onelie confirmeth our faith and therefore the Word is to goe before them The reason of this difference is because the Sacraments without they be vnderstoode neuer mooue There is no desire after a thing which is not knowen But yet in Infants the case is diuers For in them faith
is confirmed not onely by Christ in the Euangelistes but also by Paul who expresly saith The cup of blessing which we blesse is it not the communion of the bloud of Christ The Signes and thinges signified in the Lordes Supper Moreouer the signes in this sacrament are bread and wine bread broke and eat wine distributed and taken The things signified are 1. The breaking of the body and the shedding of the bloud of Christ 2. Our vnion and coniunction with christ by faith so that wee drawe life euerlasting from him and are made partakers as of Christ himselfe so also of all his benefites as the branches are made partakers of the life of the vine Wee are aduertised of this our communion with christ First by the proportion which the signes haue with the thinges and Secondly by the promise which is adioyned And the proportion dooth chiefâ—â— propose and shewe two things vnto vs 1. The sacrifice of Christ. 2. Our communion with christ because the bread is not only broken but is also giuen vs to eate Now the breaking of the bread is a part of the ceremony whereunto a part of the thing signified dooth aunswere This difference doth Paul testifie when he saith This my body which is broken for you Heere recâ—iuing and eating is a part of the ceremony whereunto dooâ—h aunswere the thing signified â—o wit the eating of christes body Now this diuine and spirituall thing namely the breaking and communicating of christes body is signed and confirmed by this ceremony which is the breaking and receiuing of bread for two causes 1. Because Christ commandeth these rites vnto which we ought to giue no lesse credite than if Christ himselfe did speake with vs. 2. Because hee annexeth a promise that they who obserue these rites with a true faith must be assured and certaine that they haue communion with Christ Wine is added that wee should know the perfection and accomplishment of our saluation to be in his sacrifice that there was nothing which could be further desired The wine is seuered from the breade to signifie the violence of his death because his bloud was sundered from his body 2 What are the ends of the Lords supper THE ends for which the Lords supper was instituted are 1. That it might bee a câ—nfirmation of our faith that is a most certaine testification of our communion and vnion with christ because Christ testifieth vnto vs by these signs that hee doth as verily feede vs with his bodie and bloud vnto euerlasting life 〈◊〉 wee receiue at the hand of the minister these the Lords signes And this testification is directed to euerie one who receiueth the signes with a true faith and furder also wee so receiue the signes at the ministers hand as that rather the Lord himselfe giueth them vs by his m nisters Wherefore christ is saide to haue baptised moe disciples than Iohn when yet hee did it by his Apostles and other disciples 2. That it might bee a publique distinction or marke discerning the church from all other nations and secteâ— For the Lord instituted and appointed his supper for his disciples and not for others 3. That it might be our testification to christ and the whole church Which is a publique confession of our faith and a solemne binding of our selues to thankefulnes and the celebration of this benefite Both which are prooued by these wordes of christ Doe this in remembrance of me This remembrance is taken first for faith in the heart then for thankesgiuing and our publique confession 4. That it might be a bond of the churches assemblies and meetings because the Supper was instituted that it should be done and celebrated in a congregation and that either great or small Therefore the Supper as was said before is called a * Synaxis conuent and Christ expresly commaundeth Drinke yee all of this Likewise Paul When yee come together to eate staie one for another 5. That it might bee a bond of mutual loue and dilection because the Supper testifieth that all are made the members of christ vnder one heade as also Paul saith For we that are manie are one bread and one bodie because we are all partakers of one bread The Lordes supper may not bee celebrated by one alone Of this which hath beene spoken wee gather that the Lordes Supper ought not to bee celebrated by one onely 1. Because it is a communion and the signe of our communion 2. Because it is a thankesgiuing and all ought to giue thankes vnto God and by consequent hee that thinketh himselfe vnworthy to communicate with others in the Lordes Supper doth withall confesse himselfe not to bee fitte to giue thankes vnto God 3. Because christ together with his benefits is not proper to anie but common to all 4. Christ called all his housholde vnto it euen Iudas himselfe 5 That some abstaine from comming to the supper it commeth of a certaine euil and corrupt motion because they thinke them selues not woorthie inough to approche vnto this table All are worthy who beleeue themselues to bee deliuered by Christ from eternall damnation and desire to profite and goe forward in godlinesse In summe if the Supper bee receiued by one onely th t is done against the vse appellation institution and nature of the sacrament Obiection Christ in the word of the Institution of his supper putteth as the principal end of his supper his remembrance therefore the confirmation of faith must not be made the principal end of his supper Aunswere The reason foloweth not to the denial of a part by putting the whole For the remembrance of Christ is the whole wherein is comprised both our confession and our solemne bond to thankefulnesse and also the confirmation of our faith Wherefore rather by inuerting the reason I thus inferre and conclude because the remembrance is the supper therefore it is the confirmation of our faith and because also Christ proposeth vnto vs that ceremonie or rite which must bee vnto vs a remembrance of him he doth verily propose also a confirmation of our faith which is nothing else but a remembraunce of Christ and his benefites Obiection The holie ghost confirmeth our faith Therefore the supper doth not Aunswere The reason foloweth not to the remouing of an instrumental cause by the putting of a principal cause 3 What the supper differeth from Baptisme THE supper differeth from baptisme 1. Jn ceremonies or rites 2. In the circumstances of the institution and vse or in the significations of the ceremonies Baptisme is a signe of the couenant entered and made betweene God the faithfull The supper is a signe of the continuing of that couenant Or baptisme is a signe of regeneration and of our entrance into the church The supper is a signe of their fostering abiding and preseruation who are once entered into the church The new man must first be borne by the spirite of Christ as is a natural man by natural conception and
obserued that Paschal sacrameÌ„t being abolished 2. That the same thing might be signified difference only of time excepted For the Paschal Lamb signified Christ which should come and should be sacrificed The supper Christ already sacrificed Obiection But when the supper was instituted Christ was yet to be sacrificed Aunswere But then was at hand the offering vp and sacrificing of Christ For a few houres after he was sacrificed and the supper was from that time forward to signifie christ sacrificed 3. That he might stir vp in his Disciples and in vs greater attention and marking of the cause for which he did institute it and that we might vnderstand how earnestly Christ would haue this supper to bee recommended vnto vs seeing he did nothing before his death but that which was of most weight and moment Therefore did he in the very point or instaunt before his death institute it For it is as it were the testament and last wil of our testatour For which cause it is added In the same night that he was betraied Hee tooke bread That is vnleauened bread nor leauened which then they did eat of at the table The institution of the Supper and Vnleauened bread did concur then together and fall out by an accident and therefore he prescribed not any certaine manner of baking bread for the lords supper Yet notwithstanding the bread of the Lords supper differeth from common bread because this is taken for the nourishment of the bodie but that for the foode and nourishment of the soul that is for the confirmation of our faith And here wee are to note that he is saide to haue taken bread from the table Hee tooke not his bodie therefore neither tooke hee his bodie in the bread with the bread or vnder the bread When hee had giuen thankes He gaue thanks for his office now performed and finished on earth his last act yet remaining to bee done that thus it had pleased the Father to redeeme mankind or that the typicall passouer was abolished and the signified passouer was now exhibited or lastly hee gaue thankes for the admirable and wonderfull gathering and preseruing of the church Hee brake it That is he brake the bread which hee tooke from the table distributed the same being one amongst many not any other inuisible thing hidden in the bread He brake not his bodie but the bread as S. Paul saieth The bread which we breake c. Now he distributed the bread being one among many because wee that are many are one bodie But the cause for which hee brake this bread was to signifie his passion and the separation of his bodie from his soul Wherefore the breaking of bread is a necessarie ceremonie both in respect of the signification in respect of our confirmation and therefore is this ceremonie also to bee reteined 1. Because Christ hath commaunded it 2. For our owne comfort that we may knowe the bodie of Christ to haue beene as certainly crucified for vs as we see the bread to bee broken 3. That the opinion of transubstantiation and consubstantiation may be pulled out of mens mindes Take This commandement belongeth to the disciples and to the whole Church of the new Testament Whence it is cleare and manifest 1. That the masse is not the Supper of the Lord but a priuate supper of him that sacrificeth 2. That we must not be idle beholders of the supper but religious receiuers of it 3. That the lords supper is not to be celebrated but in an assembly or congregation 4. That the supper is a signe in respect of God This is my body This that is this bread Obiection Then should it haue been said * These Greeke pronouns caÌ„not bee expressed with the like English particleâ— Because the woordes BREAD and BODY being of diuerse genders in Greeke the Greek pronouns also are diuerâ—e when aâ— in English our particle THIS serueth for woordes of all genders 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Aunswere 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as much as if he had said this thing which I haue in my hand And that it is so to bee vnderstoode is prooued by these reasons 1. Christ tooke nothing but bread hee brake bread and gaue bread to his disciples to eate 2. Saint Paul saith expresly The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the bodie of â—hrist 3. Of the Wine it is said This cup is the new testament Wherefore after the same manner is it saide This that is this bread is my bodie that is a signe of my bodie which is broken and deliuered vnto death Wherefore farre be it from vs that we should say that Christ took bread visiblie and his bodie inuisiblie It is to be obserued that hee saith not Jn this is my bodie or this bread is my bodie inuisible but This bread is my bodie Which for you My Disciples that is for your saluation Is broken Obiection But Christes bodie neither was nor is broken Aunswere Hee hath a respect to the signification which the breaking of the breade did import Nowe this breaking signifieth the paines and renting of Christes bodie and the violent sundering of his soule and bodie one from the other For as the bread is broken and parted into diuers partes so the soule and bodie of Christ were separated and parted from each other Do this That is Being gathered assembled together take bread giue thankes distribute it Hee vnderstandeth the whole action which hee commaundeth and that to vs which beleeue and not the Iewes who were ready to crucifie him In remembraunce of me That is Thinking and meditating of my benefites which I haue done for you and which are by these rites recalled into your memory and further verily feeling and finding in heart that I giue you these my benâ—fites and therefore celebrating them by publique confession before God and Angels yea before men also and so giuing me thankes for them This remembraunce is the whole whose partes are the memory of christes benefites faith whereby we apply christ his merit vnto vs thankfulnesse or publique confession of his benefits Wherefore it followeth not Christ did institute his supper for a remembraunce of him therefore he did not institute it for confirmation of our faith For this obiection is no lesse friuolous than if I should say The holy Ghost confirmeth our faith Therefore the supper doth not For as it hath beene said before the reason followeth not to the remoouing of the instrumentall cause by the putting of the principall cause as neither dooth it follow to the deniâ—l of a paâ—â— by the putting of the whole For Remembrance compriseth the remembring of christes benefites faith and thanksgiuing For by his sacramentes christ remembreth vs of himselfe and his benefites and by his sacraments he raiseth and establisheth in vs our trust and confidence in him And further of that remembraunce of christes benefites it must follow that wee also yeelde thankes vnto him therefore publiquely This
cup is the new testament Or the couenant as both the * Berith greeke and * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hebrue word admitteth Now it is called the new couenant that is renewed or to speake it in a woord fulfilled And this new couenant is our reconciliation with God the communion and participation of Christ and all his benefites by faith in the sacrifice of Christ now fulfilled finished without any obseruation of the ceremonies of the old Passeouer The supper is called the new couenaÌ„t because it is a signe and a seale of this couenant signing and sealing vnto vs our reconciliation with God and our coniunction with Christ which is wrought by faith Now in calling the supper the new couenant first he comprehendeth both the promise and the condition which is expressed in the promise namelie faith and repentance Whereof also it foloweth that the supper was for this cause also instituted that it might bee a bond to bind vs to lead a christian life Secondly hee maketh an opposition betweene the new couenant and that couenant which was the Passeouer together with the rites thereof For the supper signified Christ offered The Passeouer signified Christ who should bee offered There is notwithstanding no small similitude and agreeing of both For both signifie our reconciliation with God and coniunction with Christ Jâ— my bloud which is shed for you for remission of sinnes The shedding of Christs bloud is the merite for which beeing apprehended of vs by faith we receiue remission of sinnes For as often as yee shall eate The supper therefore is often to be iterated and celebrated 1. Because of the woordes of the institution 2. In respect of the ende and purpose of the institution because it must bee done in remembranuce of Christ Shewe the Lordes death That is beleeue that Christ died and that for you and then professe it also publiquely before all Till hee come Therefore it must bee obserued vnto the worlds end neither is any other externall forme to be looked for vntill the day of iudgement The words of the institution which haue beene hitherto expounded may be made more plaine and cleare by these wordes of the Apostle The cup of blessing which we blesse is it not the communion of the bloude of Christ The bread which wee breake is it not the communion of the bodie of Christ The cup of blessing that is the cup of thankesgiuing which is receiued namely to this end that wee may yeeld thankes to Christ for his death and passion The communion of the bodie likewise the communion of the bloud is to be made through faith partaker of Christ and all his benefites the same spirit being in vs which is in Christ and woorking the same in vs which he worketh in Christ Bread and wine is the communion that is it is the signe of our communion with Christ Now our communion as the Apostle briefly declareth consisteth in this that wee who are manie are one bodie Whence it is most easie to collect that this communion is not a corporall eating For it is wrought onely by faith and the holy Ghost Christ is the heade and wee the members and all wee who are members haue also a communion of all Christs benefites Therefore the heade is common the benefites common and so the members also common among themselues wherefore their loue and dilection is common and mutual We vnderstand nowe what is the true meaning of the words of the institution especiallie of those about which is greatest coÌ„trouersy which are these This is my body that is to repeat in few wordes the true sense of them This bread broken of me and giuen to you is a signe of my bodie for your sakes rent and deliuered vnto death and a certaine seale of your coniunction with me so that he who beleeueth and eateth this bread doth truelie and reallie after a sort eat my bodie This our iudgement and interpretation or Christs rather is most true and vnto the truth of the Gospell most agreeable Here especially resistâ—unce is made and the greatest controuersie is about the word or vnderstanding of the word For our aduersaries vnderstand those wordes so as tâ—ey maintaine thereof to folow that Christes bodie is present and eaten corporallie But in the meane season they consider not that those wordes are sacramentallie to bee taken or that the speech is sacramental and therefore is not to be taken as proper and simple as it shoulde bee if thence were gathered that the bread is changed into Christs bodie Now to the signe here is attributed the name of the thing signified both for the coniunction which the thing signified hath in the right vse of the supper with the signe and also for the proportion which the signe hath with the thing signified Come wee now to those arguments whereby wee may confirme our interpretation and opinion to bee true The arguments which wee will vse are of three sorts such as are wont to bee also in like controuersies 1. Some are taken from the nature of the thing or subiect that is by vnderstanding the speech as the thing it selfe doth beare and suffer 2. Some are drawen from an analogie of the articles of our faith or from a conference of places or parts of christian doctrine for the holy spirite is the spirite of truth 3. Some are taken from other like places of scripture where the same thing is deliuered in such words as are manifest and whereof there is no controuersie The first sort of Arguments which are taken from the nature of the sacraments THE verie manner and forme of speaking yeeldeth vs a firme and strong argument Breade is the bodie of Christ but bread is not in it owne proper substance his bodie for by reason hereof haue they inuented consubstantiation therefore it is a figuratiue speeche euen such a one as is vsual vnto sacraments and is declared in the institution 2 Sacraments confirme exhibit promise seale no other thing than the woorde doth In the woorde is promised no corporal eating Therefore neither is anie such thing confirmed by the sacrament 3 In all sacraments when the names or properties of the things are attributed vnto the signes there is not signified the corporal presence of the thing but first a similitude of the things with their signes then a coniunction and vnion of the things with their signes in the right vse but in this sacrament Christ attributeth the name of the thing which is his bodie to the signe therefore there is not thereby signified a corporal presence of his bodie 4 The communion of Christ which is promised in his woorde and sacraments is not corporal but the communion of Christ which is giuen in the supper is the same with that which is giuen in the word and in all sacraments therefore the communion of Christ in the supper is spiritual 5 There is one and the same signification of all the Sacraments of the old and new testament
one sacrifice for sinnes sitteth for euer at the right hand of God Now the Papists contrarie to these manifest places of scripture will haue Christ to be often offered in the Masse 6 The Masse is repugnant to the doctrine of grace and iustification which teacheth that in this life onelie is the time of obteining fauour by faith alone for the onelie merite of christ The papists neglecting faith which they haue no knowledge of reiecting Christs merit substitute in place thereof this idolatrous inuention For through and for this sacrifice of the Masse and so for this worke as they speake wrought they maintaine that the dead also obtaine remission of sinnes 7 The Masse is repugnant vnto the articles of our faith concerning the true humanitie of christ concerning his true ascension into heauen and his returning from thence at the day of iudgement For they make a corporal presence of christ in the Masse saying that christ is inuisible present vnder the forme of breade and wine the substance of the bread and wine beeing abolished as often as the Masse is celebrated and this presence of Christ is corporal when the accidents onely of the signe remaine Jt is contrarie also to the nature of sacraments which permitteth not the substance of the signs to be abolished neither requireth any naturall connexion of the signes and things and therefore neither is it required in the Supper which leadeth vs to christ crucified and raigning in heauen and from thence communicating himselfe vnto vs. 8 The Masse is contrarie to the communion of Saintes with Christ. For it imagineth an execrable inuention which is that Christes bodie doth descend into our bodies and remaineth as long within our bodies as the formes remaine of bread and wine But the supper reacheth that wee are made members of Christ by the holy gh st and ingraffed into him 9 The Masse is repugnaunt to the true worship of God because it maketh Christ to be there corporally present so by consequent there to bee worshipped Euen as of ould before his ascension it was not onely lawful but in duty required that Christ should be worshipped in whatsoeuer place hee was and so also did his Disciples alwaies worship him when he was present as also when he ascended from them but after his ascension they did not from that time adore worship him turning vnto any one particular place more than other Wherfore seing the Papists in their Masse tie the worship and adoration of christ vnto a thing whereunto christ himselfe by expresse word hath not tied it they professe them selues to be idolaters and doe no lesse absurdly and impiously in this than if they should worship Christ at a wal or if they should worship a piller falling downe before it Which we prooue 1. Because no creature hath power to ty the woorshippe of God to anie thing or place wherein God hath not commaunded by expresse word himselfe to be worshipped and wherein God hath not promised to hear vs. And hereby is the cause of that difference plainly scene why the Iewes directing their praier to the propitiatorie or mercy seat did notwithstanding withall in spirite worship the true God and were by promise from him assured to bee head but worshipping in Dan and in Bethel and in the high places and in the temple of Samaria were idolaters not knowing what they worshipped Ioh. 4 22. Yee worship that which yee knowe not we worship that which we know for saluation is of the Iewes and the cause of this thing is more at large declared in the second of Kinges cap. 17. 2. Because in the newe testament all worshippe which is tied to anie certaine place on earth is vtterlie taken awaie and spiritual worship onlie required stirred and kindled by the holy ghost and doone with a true faith and knowledge of God Ioh. 4.21 The houre commeth when ye shal neither in this mountaine nor at Jerusalem worship the Father In these words Christ doth plainely take away worship tied and restrained to any certaine place on earth Wherefore wee must also take away and haue in detestation this impious inuention of christs corporal presence in the Masse or in the breade and wine For this being but that christ is in bodie present in the bread whether it be said to be done by transubstantiation or by consubstantiation the popish adoration standeth fast and of the contrarie side the presence of Christs body in the breade is taken away if wee take away this foule and shamefull Popish adoration of Christs bodie lying couertly by their iudgement vnder the formes of bread and wine Now withall wee are here to obserue What it is to worship christ in the bread namelie to direct our worshippe in soule minde cogitation and as much as may be in the motion of our bodies to the place in which the bread is and turning thereto to yeelde reuerence vnto christ as if hee were present there m re than else-where So of olde they worshipped God at the Arke turning thereto with their mindes and as much as might be with their external grace and inclination of bodie 1 OBiection The Masse is an application of Christes sacrifice Therefore it is not to be taken away Aunsw I denie the Antecedent because wee applie Christs merit by faith onely Obiect 2. There must bee a perpetuall sacrifice in the Church because Jsai foretoldâ— that it should bee from sabbath to sabbath Aunswere There must indeed be a perpetuall sacrifice in the church which is the sacrifice of thankes-giuing 1. Because it is a remembraunce of Christes sacrifice 2. Because almes were giuen in the primitiue church after the supper was ended which were a sacrifice 3. The supper also is an Eucharistical or thankesgiuing sacrifice For a propitiatory sacrifice the Fathers neuer dreamt of 6 What is the right and lawful vse of the supper THE right and lawfull vse of the supper consisteth in three thinges 1. When the rites and ceremonies instituted of CHRIST are reteined and obserued yet so that they bee not obserued of one or two priuatelie but that in a conuenient and lawfull assemblie of the church the breade be broken distributed and receiued and the wine giuen to all that communicate in remembrance of Christes death that is for confirmation of their faith and to shew their thankefulnesse 2. When the rites are obserued of those persons for whome Christ did institute them that is when the bread and wine is distributed and receiued of others of whom the Lorde woulde haue it receiued namely not of his enemies but of his Disciples which are the faithful For the obseruing of the rite without faith and repentance is not the vse but the abuse of it 3. When the supper is receiued for the right end which is in commemoration and remembraunce of the Lordes death 7 What the wicked receiue in the Lords supper THE wicked receiue 1. The bare signes onely namely bread and wine 2. They receiue those signes
yet wil I not faint in hope for Israel but wil looke when yet once againe God himselfe shal smite on rockes and water shal flowe out of them that his people in this time of drought maie drinke Euen so O God for thy promise sake and for thy troth of ould plighted in thy beloued Sonne vnto thy chosen open the rock of stone againe let againe the waters the liuing waters of thy word flow out and let the sauing riuers of thy Gospell runne and stop not through al drie places of our Land that men and Angels may see the felicity of thy Chosen and reioice in the gladnes of thy people and giue thanks and praise and glory and honour with thine inheritance vnto thy blessed name for euer A CATECHISM OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION 1 What is thy onely comfort in life and death THat both in soule body a 1. Cor 6.19 1. Thes 5.10 whether I liue or die b Rom. 14 8. I am not mine own but belong c 1. Cor. 3.23 wholy vnto my most faithful Lord Sauiour Iesus Christ who by his precious blood most fullie satisfying d 1. Pet. 1.18 1 Iohn 1.7 2.2 for all my sinnes hath deliueâ—ed e 1. Iohn 38. Heb. 2.14.15 mee from all the power of the diuell and so reserueth f Iohn 6.39 me that without the will of my heaâ—enly Father not so much as a haire may fal g Mat. 10.30 Luke 21.18 from â—y head yea all thinges must h Rom. 8.28 serue for my safeâ—y Wherefore by his Spirit also he assureth i 2 Cor. 1.22 5.5 Eph. 1.14 mee â—f euerlasting life and maketh k Rom. 8.24 me ready and preâ—ared that henceforth I may liue to him 2 How many thinges are necessarie for thee to know that thou enioying this comfort maist liue die happilie Three l Luk. 24.47 1. Cor. 6.11 Rom. 8.16 Tit. 33.4.5.6.7 8. The first what is the greatnes m Iohn 9.41 Rom. 3. of my sin misery The second how I am deliuered n Iohn 17.3 from all sinne and miserie The third what thankes I owe o Ephes 5.10 1. Pet. 2.9 3.10.11.12 Rom. 6.11.12.13 Mat. 5.16 2. Tim. 2.15 vnto God for this deliuerie There is a three-fold order or there are three partes of the studie of diuinitie THE first is a Catecheticall institution or briefe summe of Christian doctrine which is called a Catechisme and is a briefe explication of the generall pointes of the same doctrine This part is necessarie For both the learned and vnlearned ought to know the foundation of religion The second a handling of common places or coÌ„mon places which contein a larger explication of euery point and of hard quaestions together with their subdiuisions reasons and argumentes The third a diligent meditation of the scripture or holy writte This is the highest degree for which we learne all the rest to wit that we may come furnished to the reading vnderstanding and propounding of the holy Scripture Those former partes are taken out of the Scripture and againe common places do lead vs vnto the Scripture which is as it were a rule by which they are directed What a Catechisme is A CATECHISME is a briefe doctrine framed for youth the ruder sort conteining in it the summe of the doctrine of the Law Gospel or of Christian religion which being deliuered is required againe at the handes of the auditors It is so called of a Greek woord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to resound or to returne a voice back again Eccho-like because that children did by mouth make rehearsall of those thinges which were asked them and which they had hard Catechumeni in the primitiue church were those who learned the Catechisme that is to say such as were now of the Church and were instructed in christian Doctrine Neophyti or Nouices were those who were but new come vnto the Church so called from twoo Greeke woords 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signify a new plant Of the Catechumenes there were twoo sortes 1 Those who first being of some yeares whether of the Iewes or of the Gentils afterward came vnto Christ but were not as yet baptised These were first instructed in the Catechisme and afterwards baptised and admitted to the Lords supper 2. Those who were borne in the Church That is the Children of Christians These eftsoones after their birth as being members of the Church were baptised and after they were growen a little elder they were instructed and confirmed by laying on of handes and so dimissed out of the companie of the Catechumenes so that it was lawfull for them thence-forward to draw neer vnto the Lordes Supper This Catechising doctrine hath euer been in the Church For in the olde Testament God himselfe in briefe-wise deliuered the doctrine of the Lawe Gospell the Decalog the promises as when hee saith Walke before me Gen. 17.1 Gen. 22.18 and be thou perfect Likewise In thy seed shal al nations of the earth be blessed Now these things God would that Abraham and his posteritie should teach their Children and their whole familie and therefore this doctrine was framed fit for the capacity of Children and the ruder sort In the old Testament furthermore there were also sacrifices praiers other things in which the youth were instructed In the new Testament in the Apostles time there was likewise a Catechising doctrine as the author of the Epistle to the Hebrewes reporteth Therefore leauing the doctrine of the beginning of Christ Heb. 6.1 let vs be led forward vnto perfection not laying againe the foundation of repentance that is the beginning of Christian doctrine which comprehendeth repentance and faith These first beginnings or principles of Christian doctrine are called in the same place the doctrine of baptismes because they that were of some yeares before they came to christ were first instructed before they were baptised It is called also the doctrin of laying on of hands because the Catechisme was required at their handes that they should be able to answere in it on whom hands were laid that is to say of the children of Christians who were baptised in their infancy The parts of these rudimentes of Christian doctrine which they cal Catechisme are the Lawe and the Gospel or as it is said in the place afore named vnto the Hebrews repentance and faith in Christ Semblably the fathers also write Briefe summes of doctrine certain remnants of which we see as yet in Popery Now it behoueth that the youth be by and by instructed in this doctrine and doe knowe the foundation 1. Because of the commandement of God â—eut 6.7 Thou shalt tell them vnto thy children 2. Because we are so corrupted that except we be timely informed of the wil of God hardly or neuer we learne to do things acceptable vnto God and scarsely suffer ourselues with much adoe to be
exercise in sauing of vs not impeaching his iustice he hath vttered in his word Iohn 5.21 The father quickeneth whom he will The second is his infinite wisedome whereby hee knoweth how to turne the purposes of the Diuel imagined and deuised to the reproche of GOD himselfe by corrupting mankinde and to the ouerthrowing of the saluation of Gods chosen euen to the manifesting of his owne glorie and to the saluation of his chosen God therefore by this his wisedome hath found out an admirable temperament and such as no creature coulde haue found of his iustice and mercie in deliuering man that is such a way whereby hee might shewe his exceeding both mercie and iustice The third is Gods omnipotencie wherefore hee is able to performe that deliuerie of man from sinne and death which hee through his immeasurable mercie and wise counsaile decreed Luc. 1.37 With God nothing shal bee impossible To denie then mans deliuerie is to spoile God of infinite wisedome goodnes and power against that which is said 1. Sam. 2.6 The Lorde bringeth downe to the graue and raiseth vp Psal 68.20 To the Lord God belong the issues of death Isai 59.1 The Lords hand is not shortened Obiection What the vnchangeable iustice and truth of god requireth that is vnchangeable But the iustice and truth of god requireth the casting away and damnation of man for god had expresselie threatned euerlasting death to the transgressours of his lawe and the iustice of god will destroie euerie thing that is not conformable thereunto Therefore the casting awaie of man from the face of god is vnchangeable neither is it possible that without the impeaching of gods iustice and truth man should escape euerlasting damnation Aunswere The Maior is to bee distinguished What the iustice of God requireth to wit simplie without al condition that is simply vnchangeable It requireth the casting away of man with this condition except there bee interposed a full and perfect satisfaction Wherefore the iustice of GOD requireth that a sinner either satisfie or bee cast away Mathew 5.36 Thou shalt not come out thence vntill thou hast paide the vtmost farthing Replie But impossible is it for vs to satisfie for our sinnes or to beare sufficient punishment so that wee may come from thence Aunswere It is impossible in respect of our selues but not in respect of God He knoweth the meanes how by an other full satisfaction may be made for vs. Adam after his fall before by special reuelation hee was assured of the promise could not hope for deliuerance But that our deliuerie by another is possible is knowen onely by the promises of the Gospel and the reuealing of the holy Ghost forcibly mouing our hearts to beleeue the Gospel Here ariseth a question Whether Adam after his fall might haue certainly promised himselfe deliuerie Wee aunswere that hee coulde not without especiall promise and reuelation And before he had this nothing could present it selfe vnto his mind but the great iustice truth of God exacting of him euerlasting punishment for not yeelding obediēce For flesh bloud reueal not those things which are the peculiar and proper benefites of the Mediatour But some man may except that the selfe same causes notwithstanding doe remaine euen nowe after the publishing of the Gospell to wit the iustice and truth of GOD who is neuer chaunged If then Adam coulde not hope for deliuerie before the promise was published neither could he after the publishing thereof For so hee might haue reasoned It is impossible that the iustice and truth of GOD shoulde bee impeached But mans recouering and escaping out of punishment would impeache the iustice and truth of GOD because euerlasting punishment shoulde not bee inflicted on man which yet the iustice and truth of GOD require For the punishment to bee euerlasting and yet man to wade and escape out of it are thinges contradictorie and of flatte repugnauncie Therefore mans escape and deliuerie out of punishment is impossible This Obiection or temptation Adam might by the promise nowe made haue repelled on this wise The Minor is true if the escaping bee such that sufficient punishment and equall to the sinne bee laide neither vpon the sinner himselfe nor on another who offereth himselfe in the sinners place But the iustice of GOD hath inflicted punishment sufficient for our sinnes on his owne Sonne who offered himselfe of his owne accorde to sustaine it for vs. Wherefore mans escaping out of miserie by the full satisfaction performed by the Sonne of GOD doth not impeache but rather establish Gods iustice But againe it is replied That which necessarilie doth not conclude punishment to insue doth leaue some hope neither willeth vs to dispaire of deliuerie from punishment But the euent hath taught that the casting away of man is not necessarilie concluded or inferred vpon the first fall of Adam Therefore Adam beeing fallen no not before the promise published concerning the seede of the Woman ought altogether to haue dispaired of his deliuerie Aunswere Hee ought not verily to haue dispaired neither coulde hee haue inferred vpon his fall necessarily that his deliuerie out of miserie was simplie impossible but neither coulde hee of the otherside haue certainely promised vnto himselfe or hoped for it before the publishing of the Gospell Because neither hee nor any creature was able Humane reason might probablie coniecture but not necessarily conclude mans deliuerie or shoulde for euer haue beene able of himselfe to perceiue or so much as imagine vnto himselfe a maner of escaping punishment not repugnant to the iustice of God except GOD had declared and reuealed the same by his Sonne Hee might truelie as others likewise who liue out of the Church destitute of the worde of promise haue probablie reasoned that one day there shoulde bee a deliuerie First because it is not meete that man the most excellent creature shoulde bee made of GOD to sustaine the greatest punishment and that for euer Againe For that it seemeth not likely that GOD woulde haue deliuered a lawe to man to no effect that is which shoulde neuer bee perfectly performed by him But except the voice of the gospel had come mā would neuer haue beene able by these reasons long to haue withstood the tentation of the Diuel who woulde easily haue refuted them by his owne example Wherefore albeit these two reasons are of themselues most true for GOD did not make mankinde vnto perpetuall miserie neither made hee a lawe to no effect yet man beeing fallen is not able by reason of his blindnesse and corruption without the promise and grace of the holy Ghost to assent vnto them that is is not able of them certainely and necessarily to infer that he knoweth and hopeth for his deliuerance out of paine and miserie 3 Whether Deliuerie be necessarie and certaine THat some should be deliuered and saued from destruction is necessarie Obiection But it is free vnto God The deliuerie of some necessarie euen to saue
and will haue compassion on whome I will haue compassion Isay 43.25 I euen I am hee that putteth awaie thine iniquities for mine owne sake and will not remember thy sinnes Seuenthly That hee dooth these thinges towardes sinners who not onelie were vnwoorthie of them but also who were his deadlie enimies Romanes 5.10 When wee were enimies wee were reconciled to GOD by the death of his sonne They also of the wiser sort which are out of the Church are all compelled to attribute mercie vnto God beecause they see him so mercifullie to spare sinners whereupon Ieremie Lamentations chap. 3.22 saith It is the Lordes mercies that wee are not consumed because his compassions faile not But beecause the perfectnesse of Gods iustice and the priuitie of their owne sinnes doth not permit them to conceiue any firme persuasion of Gods mercie towardes them neither knowe they ought concerning the saluation of men by the death of his sonne therefore are they not able either constantly or wholy to agnise Gods mercie 1 Obiection Mercie is a kinde of griefe or sorrow therefore there is sorrow and griefe in God Aunswere The names of affections when they are attributed vnto God by an Anthropopathie they doe not signifie anie passion or change in God but an inspeakeable either dislike or liking of the obiects God therefore is said to be mercifull 1. Because he is against the destruction of his creature 2. Because hee doth those thinges which mercifull men are wont to doe 2 Obiection God seemeth sometimes to reioice in reuengement Isai 1. Prouerb 1. Aunswere He reioiceth not in reuengement or punishment but in the executing of his owne iustice 3 Obiection It seemeth in some places of scripture that Gods mercie doth not extend it selfe vnto the wicked Isai 27. Aunswere This is to be vnderstood of that degree of mercie wherewith he imbraceth his chosen And yet hee spareth also the wicked neither reioiceth at their destruction 4 Obiection But yet he saueth not all whereas he is able to do it Therefore hee is not exceeding mercifull neither mercifull towardes all Aunswere He doth not saue all for most iust cause For his mercie is so to bee exercised that it hinder not the execution of his iustice 5 Obiection He doth not take mercie on anie or receiue anie into fauour without the satisfaction of his sonne Therefore he doth it not freelie Aunswere That which is concluded doth not followe because God of his free grace giueth this satisfaction it selfe and applieth it vnto vs. Nowe hee giueth a thing freely who giueth the price of a thing for which the thing it selfe is giuen God is also called Bountifull 1. In what the bountifulnes of God is seene Because hee createth and gouerneth all things 2. He is the onely fountain of al good things 3. Which befall to all creatures 4. Yea to the wicked 5. Of his goodnes loue and free mercie towardes all creatures 6. But especiallie towardes mankinde which he hath made according to his image and for whose sake hee hath created all other things 7. But in them also chieflie toward his Church to whom hee hath opened himselfe and his will 8. And in this his Church toward his chosen Angels and men to whom by his sonne he giueth life and glorie euerlasting And further whom he is angry with and on whom he inflicteth punishment hee is not angrie with their substaunce or nature which himselfe created but with that corruption which came by other meanes to his diuine worke Rom. 1.18 The wrath of god is reueiled from heauen against all vngodlines Obiection No creature visible is subiect to so manie euils as man Therefore he is not bountifull towards men Aunswere Hee is subiect to these euils by an accident that is because of sinne but withall he is enriced abooue other creatures with great blessings euen when hee is out of the Church but is most happie and blessed if he repent God also alone is most free For what causes God is saied to bee most free because hee alone by nature is such that no fault or miserie can fall vpon him 2. Neither can hee bee constrained of anie 3. Neither is hee bounde to anie 4. Neither is hee subiect or tied to the rule or lore of an other Wherefore whatsoeuer he will and doth that hee will and doth of himselfe most freely when as much and in what maner he wil what he will that is most good iust But here chieflie is considered the freedome of will or libertie frō constraint which is the power abilitie whereby god without any necessitie hath from euerlasting decreed the whole order of the creatiō preseruatiō rule of al things and doth accomplish the same not beeing constrained or tied to other causes yet so that hee neuer swarueth from his rightnes To this beare witnes his miracles and many examples of deliueries and punishments and many places of scripture as Psalm 135.6 Whatsoeuer pleased the Lord that did hee in heauen and in earth in the sea and in all the depths 1. Sam. 14.6 It is not hard to the Lord to saue with manie or with fewe 1 Obiection That without which second causes which worke necessarilie can not worke doth it selfe also worke necessarilie Without the first cause which is God Second causes which necessarilie worke cannot worke therefore the first cause also which is God worketh together with them necessarilie Aunswere The Maior is true of such causes as woorke with absolute necessitie but it is false of such as worke onely of a conditionall necessitie that is because it so pleaseth God who notwithstanding could moue them otherwise or else at all not moue them or not so much as make them that they should worke and shoulde worke after that maner which they doe woorke Therefore all second causes depend on the first but not the first any way on the second 2 Obiection God is vnchangeablie good therefore not freelie good Aunswere This vnchangeablenes dooth not diminish but establish the libertie of Gods will For it is not the vnchangeablenes of a nature but constraint and coaction which is contrarie to libertie and so much the more freely the will chooseth with howe much the greater and surer force and motion it is carried vnto her obiect 3 Obiection It is said also of particular euents that God can onelie wil those thinges which are best but onelie those things which hee hath decreed are best therefore hee cannot will other things But aunswere is made to the Minor What things God hath decreed those are best not before but after his decree For Gods will being the rule and squire of rightnes therefore are thinges good because hee will them wherefore if hee woulde haue from euerlasting had anie other thing that then shoulde haue beene best As that Ioseph should be solde and made Lord of Aegypt and giue sustenance to his fathers familie was best because God would so Now if God would haue any other way
nothing For creation properly so called is a production of a thing out of nothing 2 Obiection Of nothing is made nothing Aunswere This principle and rule is true as concerning that order which was appointed by God in nature now created Further by such an agent as is created it selfe nothing is made of nothing but that which is impossible to a creature is possible to God the creator And it appertaineth to our comfort that God hath created all things of nothing For if he hath created all thinges of nothing he is able also to preserue vs and to hinder the attempts of the wicked yea to bring them to nothing 5 God created the world at a certaine and definite time 5 The world created at a certaine time and euen in the beginning of times not from euerlasting For first all thinges were created of nothing and therefore haue a beginning Secondly it is to bee knowen out of the sacred storie how long the world hath lasted For according to the veritie of the scripture by Luthers account they are from the creation of the world to the Natiuitie of Christ yeares 3960. and so to our time namely to the yeare of Christ 1579. there shall be yeares 5539. According to Melancthons supputation the yeares from the beginning of the world are 5541. For from the beginning of the world vnto Christ he numbreth 3962. yeares According to their supputation of Geneua from the creation of the world vnto Christ are 3942. yeares and sixe moneths There shall bee then to the yeare of Christ 1579. from the Creation of the world 5521. years and sixe moneths According to the supputation of Beroaldus from the creation of the worlde vnto Christ are 3928. yeares and so then shall bee to the yeare of Christ 1579. from the creation of the world 5507. yeares These supputations accorde verie well one with another as concerning the graunde number though in the lesser number some yeares are either wanting or abounding By these foure supputations then of the most learned of our time compared together this at the least shal be apparent that God created not the world before these 5541. yeares past and therefore it was not from euerlasting 6 The world created in a certain time 6 God created not the world in one moment but in the space of sixe daies In the seuenth day god ended all his works Obiect He that liueth for euer saith the sonne of Sirach Eccle. 18.1 made all thinges together Therefore hee made all in one moment Ans He speaketh not of a momēt of time but of the whole number of things as if he should say whatsoeuer are they are all from god by creation But the causes why god created not al in one moment are these 1. Because he would haue the creation of the matter it selfe distinct and manifest from the forming and fashioning of the bodies of the woorlde which consist of it 2. Because hee woulde shewe his power and libertie in producing and bringing forth whatsoeuer effects he could that without naturall causes while hee yeeldeth light to the woorld maketh the earth fruiteful bringeth plants out of it euen before the Sun Moon were made 3. He would this way shew his goodnes and prouidence whereby hee cherisheth his creatures and prouideth for them not yet borne bringing beasts into the earth full of plants and food and men into the world most stored and fraught with al thinges apperteining to the necessitie and delight of life 4. He would by that order and course of creation hold vs not in an idle but diligent consideration of his works which also by the consecration of a sabbaoth he hath consecrated to all mankinde 7 All things of the world created good 7 God created all thinges most wisely verie good that is euerie thing in their kind and degree perfect Gen 1.31 All thinges were verie good Wherefore god was not the cause of sin or deformity but sin came into the world by man Obiect Death is euil Likewise it is said There is no euil which the Lord hath not done Amos. 3.6 Ans 1. God at the first creation made all thinges good the euil both of crime or essence of pain or punishment ensued vpon mans disobedience 2. Death calamities are euil in respect of the creature which suffereth them and in the iudgement of flesh but they are good in respect of god who iustly inflicteth them for sin doth purge out that sin in the godly by chastisements Wherefore after the fall of man god was the author of pains punishments because they are in a respect consideration good but sin he doth not cause but onely permit 3 For what cause god created the world THe endes of the creation of al thinges are some general The ends of the creation of the world 1 The glorie of God some speciall and subordinate 1. The first and chiefe end is the glorie of god For he would haue his goodnes wisedome omnipotencie iustice which his properties he sheweth in the creation of al things be knowen magnified of vs. Prou. 16.4 The Lord made al thinges for himselfe Psal 103.22 Praise the Lord al ye his works Rom. 11.36 Of him through him and for him are al things 2. The manifesting knowledge 2 The knowledge of God contemplation of his diuine wisedome goodnes shining in the very creation of things For that he might bee celebrated magnified for his works he was to create those thinges which should know him should praise magnifie him being knowen and manifested vnto them in his woorkes And to this purpose created he natures both endewed with reason without reason that there might bee both those which shoulde praise him the matter of his praise Psalm 19.1 The heauens declare the glorie of god the firmament sheweth the worke of his hands 3. The administration gouerning of the world 3 His prouidence For therefore he created the world that hee might by his prouidence euer gouerne rule preserue it so might perpetually shew forth his maruelous works which he hath done from the beginning of the world now doth wil do but chiefly that he might administer the Church congregation of elect Angels men Isai 40.26 Lift vp your eies on high behold who hath created these things This third end is subordinat serueth for the secōd end 4. 4 That he might gather a church 5 That all things might serue for man To gather a church of Angels men who shuld agnise magnifie this creator 5. That al other things might serue for the safetie both of the soul bodie of man as also for the life necessity delight of men but especially that they might profit the elect eache thing in their due place might be to them as ministers instruments whereby god blessing increasing them might be lauded praised of them Gen. 1.28 Subdue the
or second causes produceth those effectes to which those creatures or causes are by the accustomed and common order of nature fit and so made of God as when he susteineth vs by nourishments Deutr. 8 3. and driueth away diseases by medicines Isay 38.21 Take a lump of drie figges and lay it vpon the boile and he shall recouer So likewise God by his worde written read heard sheweth vnto vs both his will himselfe Luk. 16.29 They haue Moses and the Prophets let them heare them His mediate working sometimes by good means sometimes by bad Moreouer the mediate woorking or action of God is doone sometimes by good sometimes by vitious and sinfull instruments as wel naturall as voluntary Yet in such wise that the work of God in them and by them is alwaies most good most iust and most holy For the goodnesse of gods works depend not vpon the goodnesse wisedome and rightnesse of the instrument but of god As touching good instruments that by thē God worketh verie wel there is no controuersie among the Godly but of euill instruments all thinke not the same Neuerthelesse yet except we wil deny 1 the trials and chastisementes of the Godlie or 2 the punishmentes of the wicked which are doone by the wicked both to bee iust and to proceede from the will power and efficacie of God as also 3 the vertues and such actions and deedes of the wicked as haue beene for the safetie of mankinde to be the giftes and blessings of God that is except we will deny that God is a iust iudge of the world and power-full in operation and the efficient of all good thinges wee must needes doubtlesse confesse that God doth also execute and accomplish his iust and holy works and iudgementes by euill and sinfull instruments So God Numb 23.8 blesseth Israell by Balaam Deutr 13.3 tempteth the people by false Prophetes 1. Sam. 16.14 vexeth Saul by Satan 2. Sam. 15 12. punisheth Dauid by Absalon 8 He worketh al good things Euen in all creatures 8 All good thinges done by the will of God both great and small hee woorketh good things so that not onely hee doth engender and preserue in them a generall power and force of woorking but doth also effectuallie moue them so that without his will being effectuall and woorking that power and force neuer in any thing sheweth forth it selfe or is brought into act that is not onlie all force of working but also the act and operation it selfe is in al creatures from GOD as the efficient thereof and directer For by the name of good are vnderstood What thinges are saide to bee good 1 The substances and natures of thinges 2 Their quantities and qualities forces or powers or inclinations 3 Habits and faculties of the minde conformed to the will of God 4 Motions actions and euents as they are motions and agree with the Law of God 5 Punishments as they are the execution of gods iustice and are inflicted by god the most iust and righteous iudge of the world All these since they are either things created of God or some thing ordained by him and agreeing with his diuine Lawe and iustice they must needes both partake of the nature of good and proceed from god their efficient and by his prouidence continue and be directed Furder 5 All thinges present past and to come done by God whereas al thinges are saide to be done by the prouidence of God we vnderstand both things past euen from the beginning of the woorlde thinges present and thinges to come euen to all eternitie Isay 46.9 Remember the former thinges of olde for I am god and there is no other god and there is nothing like me c. 9 He permitteth also euill things to be doone 9 God permitteth euill thinges Euill is twofolde the one of crime or offence which is sinne the other of pain or punishment which is euerie destruction or affliction or forsaking of the reasonable creature inflicted by God for sinne Example of each signification meaning is Ier. 18. The euill of punishment is a Moral good and is done by God If this nation against whom I haue pronounced turne from their wickednesse I will repent of the plague that I thought to bring vpon them But now because the euill of paine or punishment being the exequution of the Law and declaration of Gods iustice is indeed a natural euil as it is a destruction of the creature but is in a consideration a moral good as it is agreeing with the order of gods iustice this sort of euils also not onely as it is an action or motion but also as it is a destruction or affliction of sinners is to bee ascribed to God as autor efficient thereof 1 Because hee is the first cause efficient of al good things now all euill of punishment or pain as it is a punishment dooth partake of the nature of morall good because the law and order of Gods iustice requireth the punishment of sinne 2 Because it is the part of a iust iudge to punish sinne But God is iudge of the world wil be acknowledged the maintainer of his iustice and glorie 2. Chron. 19.6 Ye execute not the iudgements of man but of the Lorde 3 Because the whole Scripture with great consent referreth both the punishments of the wicked and the chastisements and exercises Martyrdomes of the godly as also the passion and death of the Sonne of God himselfe which is a sacrifice for the sinnes of men to the effectuall and forcible working of the will of God As Amos. 3. There is no euill in the Cittie which the Lorde hath not doone Isay 47.5 I the Lord make peace and create euill Wherefore wee account in the number of good things the punishments of the wicked and gods iudgements which God not onely by his vnchangeable decree wil haue doone but also doth them by his effectuall power and will For although destruction be euill in respect of the creature who suffereth it yet is it good in respect of the Law and order of diuine iustice exacting it and in respect of God most iustly inflicting it executing as it were the proper and peculiar woorke of the iudge of the worlde 1 Obiection Wised 1.13 God made not death Answere True not before sin when he created all things 2 Obiect Hose 13.9 Thy destruction is of thy selfe Israel Answere True as concerning the desert but as concerning the effecting or inflicting of their punishments it is from God 3 Obiect He will not death Ezech. 18.23 33.11 Answere He wil not death with a desire of destroying God wil and wil not death or that he delighteth in the destruction vexation or perdition of his creature neither would he it or woulde effect or cause it if it were nothing else but a destruction and perdition But he will it woorketh it and delighteth in it as it is the punishment of sinne and the
is the withdrawing of Gods grace Further that God doth in such sort permit sinne as that he doth not illighten their minds with the knowledge of his will or doth not bend their harts and wils which by his arcane and secrete efficacie he inclineth whither himself listeth vnto this as for the obeying of God to pursue or flie these or those obiectes that is doth not conforme the wils of sinning creatures to his will these sayinges of scripture witnes Rom. 14. Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne Deut. 13. If there arise among you a Prophet or a dreamer of dreames saying let vs go after other gods thou shalt not hearken vnto the words of the Prophet for the Lord your god prooueth you Deut. 29.2 Yee haue seene all that the Lord did before your eies in the land of Aegypt c. Yet the Lorde hath not giuen you an heart to perceiue and eies to see and eares to heare vnto this daie 1. Sam. 24.14 Wickednes proceedeth from the wicked but mine hand be not vpon thee Lastly in the description of prouidence it was said God directeth all both good and euil vnto his glorie and his chosens saluation that it directeth all things both good and euil to gods glorie that is to the manifesting and magnifiyng of his diuine iustice power wisedome truth mercie and goodnes And to the safetie of his chosen that is to the life ioy wisedome righteousnes glorie and felicitie euerlasting of his Church And that to these ends euen to the glorie of god safetie of his chosē al the counsels works of God in them also the punishments of sinne are referred of God ought to be out of controuersie seeing in al of them is beheld the glorie of god his fatherly care towards his Church Psalm 19.1 The heauens declare the glorie of god and the firmament sheweth the work of his hands Isai 48.9 For my names sake wil I differre my wrath Rom 8.28 We know that all things worke together for the best vnto them that loue god Iohn 9 3. Neither hath this man sinned nor his parents but that the works of god should be shewed on him God vseth also sinne or corruption it selfe which yet himselfe worketh not but suffereth to concurre with his owne action in the wicked 1. To shew forth both his iustice in punishing it and his mercie in remitting it 2. To woorke in vs a hatred of sinne true humilitie and an imploring of gods grace and thankefulnes of our deliuerie from sinne and death Prou. 16.4 The Lorde hath made all things for his owne sake yea euen the wicked but not wickednes for the daie of euill Exod. 9.16 Rom. 9.17.22.23 Ezech. 16.61.62.63 Gal. 3. We are further to consider the degrees of gods prouidence The degrees of Gods prouidence whereby hee tendereth the whole world mankind his chosen For he respecteth indeede and gouerneth all his creatures but especiallie mankinde as being the chiefe and principall amongst his woorkes and which beeing created according to his image he hath adorned with verie manie benefites aboue all other creatures And in mankinde especiallie those whom he hath elected and chosen to eternal life whom with the blessed Angels he maketh one euerlasting Church that in them he may dwell as in his Temple and habitation and therefore doth so guide and rule them in the whole race of their life as that all things must serue for their safetie Now haue we explicated and made plaine the definition of gods prouidence The prouidence of God is the gouerning and guiding of euery particular thing whereout ariseth a Question greatly to be considered which is whether gods prouidence extendeth it selfe to all things Aunswere Yea to euery little thing dooth the prouidence of GOD extende it selfe And that all thinges both the greatest and the smallest of them are ruled by the prouidence of GOD and that his prouidence is extended to all actions and motions of all creatures euen of those that sinne so that all thinges whatsoeuer are done come not to passe but by the eternall counsell and purpose of GOD either woorking them as they haue a respect and qualitie of good in them or permitting them as they are sinnes but moderating and gouerning all thinges euen sinne it selfe and directing them to his glorie and the safetie of his chosen is confirmed both by verie manie testimonies of Scripture and also by reasons drawen from the nature of God Testimonies Of the testimonies which may be alleadged for confirmation hereof there are certaine orders and rankes For some are vniuersall and generall which teach that all euents vniuersally are subiect to Gods prouidence Some are particular which speake both of some particular and certaine euents as also of the whole specials and generals thereof For the Scripture doth often transferre that to the whole specials generals which it speaketh of particular singular examples Wherefore it will haue all the indiuiduals singulars of the whole specials generals to be subiect to the diuine prouidence of God Of particular testimonies some belong to reasonable creatures or such as haue a wil in working be they good or bee they bad some to those which are without reason whether they be thinges liuing or not liuing Some likewise intreat of thinges contingent fortuning and casuall which soothly are such in respect of vs Some speake of necessarie thinges Nowe to all these heades as it were and principals adde we some such testimonies as are most cleare and famous for there are infinite Gods general prouidence confirmed The vniuersal and generall prouidence of God is witnessed by these Eph. 1.11 Hee woorketh all thinges after the counsell of his owne will Actes 17.25 Hee giueth to all life and breath and all thinges Num. 23.19 Hath hee saide and shall hee not doe it And hath hee spoken And shall be not accomplish it Nehem. 9.6 Thou hast made heauen and earth and all things that are therein the seas and all that are in them And thou preseruest them all Esai 45.7 I forme the light and create darkenes I make peace and create euill I the Lord doe all these things Of the prouidence of God ouer reasonable creatures the historie of Ioseph yeeldeth vs notable testimonies Gene. 45.18 Gods particular prouidence ouer creatures indued with reason You sent not me hither but God Gene. 50.20 When ye thought euill against me God disposed it to good Likewise the indurating and hardening of Pharao Exodus 3.4.7.8.9.10.14 Exodus 4.11 Who hath giuen the mouth to man or who hath made the dumme or the deafe or him that seeth Haue not I the Lord Therefore goe now and I will bee with thy mouth Iohn 9.3 it is saide that GOD woulde that hee shoulde bee borne blinde to whom CHRIST restored his sight Ios 11.6 The LORD saide vnto Iosua bee not afraide for them for to morrowe about this time will I deliuer them all slaine before Israel Iosua 21.45
dead corps A dead body is indeed void of sense and feeling but yet notwithstanding ignominious is it for the bodie to be committed vnto the earth as it is said To dust shalt thou returne And as Christes resurrection from the dead and death is a part of his glore so his burial that is the debasing of his bodie to bee in the same state with other dead carcases is a part of his humiliation 3 A certaine type was to be fulfilled It was foretolde by the type of Ionas remaining 3. daies in the Whale That the Messias should be buried Therefore for the fulfilling of this type he ought also to be buried and to remaine vntill the third day in the graue 4 He would be buried that he might not be afraid of the graue but might knowe that our head Christ Iesus had laid open the waie vnto vs by the graue and death to celestiall glorie and therefore shall wee bee raised out of the graue albeit we die giue vp the Ghost 5 That we might knowe how we are indeed deliuered from death For in his death a testimonie and record whereof is his buriall consisteth our saluation 6 That it might be apparent and manifest as concerning his resurrection euen that hee was able indeede to rise againe and to shew that hee hath ouercome death and that his resurrection was not imaginarie but the resurrectiō of a reuiuing corps 7 That we beeing spirituallie dead that is to sin might rest from sinne Rom. 6.4 Wee are buried with Christ by Baptisme into his death that like as Christ was raised vp from the dead by the glory of the father so we also should walke in newnesse of life HE DESCENDED INTO HEL I Beleeue in Christ who descended into Hel that is I beleeue that Christ for me sustained in his soule infernall hellish pains tormentes that exceeding ignominie which is due vnto the wicked in Hell that thereby I might not descend into hell and that I might neuer bee forced to suffer them all which otherwise I should suffer in hell eternallie but that of the contrarie rather I might ascend with Christ into heauen and there enioie with him exceeding happinesse and glory for euer and euer This is the vse and profite of this Article of Christes descension into hel Now wee are a little more at large to declare what is the meaning of that Article or what is properlie that Descension of Christ into hell Hell in Scripture is taken three waies For it signifieth 1. The graue Genesis 42.38 Then yee shall bring my graie heade with sorrowe vnto hell Psalm 16.10 Thou wilt not leaue my soule in Hell neither wilt thou suffer thy holy one to see corruption 2. The place of the damned As in the storie of the rich man and Lazarus 3. The paines of hell that is the terrours and tormentes of the soule and conscience Psal 116.3 The griefes of hel caught me 1. Sam. 2.6 The Lord bringeth downe to hel and raiseth vp that is into exceeding pains and torments out of which afterwards he again deliuereth In this third sense is it taken in this Article for it cannot be vnderstoode of the graue because there goeth before He was buried If anie say that this latter Article is an exposition of the former hee saith nothing For as often as two speeches expressing the same thing are ioyned together so that the one is an exposition of the other it is meete that the latter bee more cleare and open than the former againe it is not likely in this so briefe succinct a confession that the same thing should be twise spokē in other words Neither cā this place be vnderstood of the place of the damned For Christ said Into thy hands I commend my spirit to the Theef This day shalt thou be with me in Paradise as if he should saie This day shalt thou be with me as touching my soule in Paradise that is in the place of euerlasting saluation or happinesse where thou shalt being deliuered from al tormentes enioie most pleasaunt quiet and repose This is not to bee vnderstoode of the Godheade of Christ as if that shoulde bee the same daie together with the soule of the Theefe in Paradise For the God-head is and shall bee euery where But thou shalt be in Paradise with me euen whom thou seest hanging on the crosse The descension of Christ therefore into Hell signifieth 1 those extreme torments and griefes which christ suffered in his soule namely the wrath of God against sinnes and that such as the damned feele partly in this life partlie in the life to come 2. The Exceeding and extreme ignomine and reproche which christ suffered That Christ suffered these thinges is prooued by the Testimonie of Dauid before alleaged The griefes of Hell caught mee which is sayde of Christ in the person of Dauid There are other the like sayings whereby the same is prooued Isa 53.10 The Lord would breake him and make him subiect to infirmities Mat. 26.38 My soule is verie heauie euen vnto the death The same doo those his vexations also shewe in the garden when he swet blood Isai 53.6 The Lord hath laid vpon him the iniquitie of vs all Therefore hee crieth out Mat. 27.49 My God my god why hast thou forsaken mee The same is proued also by this reason euen because hee ought to suffer not onlie in body but in soule to for vs that hee might also redeeme our soules Obiection 1. The articles of faith ought to be vnderstood properlie Aunswere True except an article beeing taken according to the proper signification be disagreeing from other places of scripture But this Article of Christs descension into Hell beeing taken properlie is much repugnant to that saying of Christ Iohn 19.30 It is finished For if Christ fulfilled and finished all the parts of our redemption on the Crosse there was no cause why hee should descend into Hell that is vnto the place of the damned Obiection 2. Hee descended into Hell and that by a locall descension as the papists affirm to deliuer the Fathers thence Answere 1. Wee denie that christ descended locallie into Hell and that for this reason Jf christ did locallie descend into Hell hee descended either as touching his Godhead or as touching his soule or as touching his body Not as touching his Godhead For that is euerie where Not as touching his soule because he saith Father into thy handes I commend my spirite Replie But hee might also bee in the hand of his Father that is in his Fathers protection euen in Hell According to that Psalm 139.8 If I lie downe in Hell thou art there that is there also will god haue care ouer mee and there also will hee keepe me that I perish not Answere One place enterpreteth another for he had said before vnto the Theefe This daie shalt thou be with mee in Paradise that is in the place and state of the blessed where both
shall deliuer me from the bodie of this death Reu. 22.17 The spirit the Bride say Come Lord Jesu which they say not who are not ready to receiue the Lorde For the wicked tremble and shake at the mention of that iudgement THE THIRD PART OF THE CREED Of the holy Ghost the sanctifier IN this last part of the Apostolike confession are cōteined six articles whereof the first speaketh of the person of the holie Ghost the next of the Church which is gathered confirmed and preserued by the holy Ghost the foure articles following are of the benefites bestowed by the Holy Ghost on the Church and first of the communion of Saints Secondly of remission of sinnes Thirdly of the resurrection of the flesh Lastly of euerlasting life The chiefe Questions of the holy Ghost or holy spirite 1 What the name spirit signifieth 2 Who and what the Holie Ghost or spirite is 3 What is the holy Ghosts office 4 Of whom the holy Ghost is giuen and wherefore 5 To whom he is giuen 6 How he is giuen and receiued 7 How he is reteined and kept 8 Whether he maie be lost and how 9 Wherefore he is necessarie 10 How we may know that he dwelleth in vs. 1 * It is here to be noted that this Questiō serueth more properlie for the latine which vseth this name Spiritus only when as we in English vse as much or more rather the word Ghost than Spirit when wee speake of the third Person WHAT THE NAME SPIRIT SIGNIFIETH THE name spirite is taken sometimes for the cause sometimes for the effect When it is taken for the cause it signifieth a nature incorporeall and liuing of a spirituall essence wielding moouing and stirring some thing So first God essentiallie and personallie is a spirit that is incorporeal without any bodilie dimensions or quantitie inuisible Secondly The Angels also whether good or bad are in this sense spirites Thirdly after the same manner the soules of men are called spirits Gen. 2.7 Hee breathed in his face breath of life that is he sent in a spirit or soule into him When the woorde spirit is taken for an effect it signifieth 1. The aire moued 2. The mouing it selfe and motion of the aire 3. The wind and moouing vapours 4. Spirituall effects or motions good or bad So is it said The spirit of fear And contrary The spirit of Princes that is courage likewise The spirit of fornication 5. New spirit signifieth the giftes of the holy spirit In this doctrine which we haue in hand Spirit signifieth the cause stirring and moouing namely the third person of the God-head which is forcible in the mindes and wils of men And this third person of the God-heade is called a spirit 1. Because he is a spiritual essence or substaunce incorporeall and inuisible 2. Because he is inspired of the Father and the son that is because is the immediate stirrer and moouer of diuine works The Father and the Sonne mooue but by this spirit 3. Because himselfe inspireth and immediatly worketh motions in the harts of the Elect whence he is called Luk. 1.35 The power of the most high 4. Because hee is God equall and the same with the Father and the Son And god is a spirite This third person of the God-head is called Holie 1. Because he in himselfe by himselfe and of his owne nature is Holie 1. Because he is the hallower or sanctifier that is he immediatly halloweth or sanctifieth and maketh holie others The father and the sonne sanctifie by him and therefore mediatelie 2 Who and what the holy ghost is THE holie ghost is the third person of the true and onelie god-head proceeding from the Father and the Sonne and coeternall coequal and consubstantial with the Father and the Son and is sent from both into the harts of the Elect to sanctifie them vnto eternal life Here are we to say the same thinges of the Godhead of the holy Ghost which haue bin spoken before of the Godhead of the son For this definition is also to be prooued and confirmed by the proofes of the same foure partes 1 That the holy Ghost is a person 2 That he is the third person or that he is other distinct from the father and the Sonne 3 That he is true God with the Father and the Sonne or that he is equall to the Father and the Sonne 4 That he is of the same God-head with the Father the Sonne or that he is consubstantiall vnto both FIrst therefore that the holy ghost is a person is prooued 1 By his apparitions Because he hath appeared visible Luk. 3.22 The holy ghost came downe in a bodilie shape like a Doue Act. 2.3 And there appeared vnto them clouen toungs like fire and it that is the fire or the holie ghost sate vpon each of them Seeing then the holy Ghost descended in bodilie shape vpon Christ and sate vpon the Apostles it followeth that he is subsisting For no qualitie or created motion of minds or hearts is able to doe in like manner For an accident doth not only not take vpō it any shape but standeth in neede of some thing else in which it selfe should consist and bee Neither is the aire the place or subiect of holinesse godlinesse loue of God and other spiritual motions but the mindes of men 2. He is proued to be a person because he is called god 1. Cor. 3.16 Know yee not that yee are the temple of god and that the spirite of god dwelleth in you Acts 5.3 Why hath satan filled thine hart that thou shouldest lie vnto the holie Ghost And in the next verse he saith Thou hast not lied vnto men but vnto god See also Isai 40.7.13 Actes 28.25 Ephes 4.4.30 Howesoeuer then the aduersaries of this doctrine gtaunt the holy Ghost to be God yet this cannot bee but he must be a subsistent or person seing God is a being but our godlinesse goodnesse Godly motions and other diuine affections cannot be called God 3. He is a person because he is the author of our Baptisme and we are baptized in his name that is by his commaundement and wil. But wee are not baptized by the commaundement and wil of a deade thing or of a thing not existing neither are wee baptized in the name of the graces or giftes of God 4. Because the properties of a person are attributed vnto him as that hee teacheth that he distributeth giftes euen as he wil that he comforteth confirmeth ruleth raigneth likewise that hee sendeth Apostles that hee speaketh in the Apostles Luke 12.12 The holie Ghost shall teach you in the same houre what yee ought to saie So also he declareth the thinges to come Ioh. 16.13 The spirite of truth wil shewe you the thinges to come Hee giueth prophecies he commaundeth and willeth that the Apostles be separated and lastlie he appointeth teachers in the church All these are thinges proper vnto a person existing intelligent endued with a wil working
vnworthinesse dooth not hurt or impaire their saluation 13 Some sacramentes are to bee receiued but once in our life others more often Some are to be giuen to those of vnderstanding onely others to infants also Euen as they were instituted by God either in once making his couenaunt with all the Elect and those which were to be receiued into his church as circumcision and baptisme or after sundry falles and combates of temptations for the renuing of his couenant and for the fostering and preseruing of the vnity and assemblies of his Church as the Arke the Passouer and other sacrifices and so likewise the Lords Supper 14 Those thinges agree in common to the sacramentes of both the old and new couenaunt which haue been spoken of in the definition But their differences are these that the oulde shewe Christ who was after to be exhibited the newe Christ already exhibited with his benefites The rites of the old were diuerse from ours and moe in number as circumcâ—sion sacrifices oblations the Passeouer the Sabboth woorshipping at the Arke Christians haue others and those only two Baptisme and the Supper The oulde were darker the newe are clearer and more manifest The olde were proper and peculiar to Abrahams posterity and their seruauntes the new are commanded to the whole church which is to bee gathered both of Iewes and Gentiles 15 The sacramentes and the preaching of the gospell agree in this that they are the work of God which hee exerciseth towardes his church by his ministers who teach promise and offer vnto vs the same communion of Christ and all his benefites and also they agree in this that they are the externall instrumentes of the holy ghost by which he mooueth our harts to beleeue and so by the comming and meanes of faith maketh vs partakers of Christ and his benefits Neither yet is the working and operation of the holy ghost to be tied here neither doe these profite but rather hurt them who applie not vnto themselues by faith that which the woordes and rites signifie 16 The sacramentes differ from the word because the woorde doth by speech and they by gestures and motions signifie the will of god towardes vs. By the word faith is both begunne confirmed By these it is confirmed only in the lords supper The word also teacheth and confirmeth without the sacraments But the sacraments doe not without the word Without the knowledge of the word they who are growen to vnderstanding are not saued But men may both be regenerated and saued without the vse of the sacraments if it be not omitted through contempt The word is preached also to the vnbeleeuers and wicked men Vnto the sacraments the church must only admit them whom God willeth vs to account for members of the church 17 Sacraments and sacrifices agree in this that they are works commanded of God to be done in faith A sacrament differeth from a sacrifice in that God by sacraments signifieth and testifieth vnto vs his benefits which he performeth for vs. By sacrifices we yeeld and offer our obedience vnto God 18 Wherefore also one the same ceremony may be coÌ„sidered both as a sacrament and as a sacrifice as whereby God in giuing vs visible signes testifieth his benefits towards vs and we in receiuing them testifie againe our duty towards him And this testification of our faith thankefulnesse dependeth of that testifâ—cation of gods benefites towardes vs as of the chiefe and proper ende and vse of the sacramentes and is thereby raised in the mindes of the faithfull The confirmation of such of the former conclusions as most require it THE confirmation of the second conclusion The definition therein deliuered of sacraments is expressed Gen. 17.11 Exod. 20.10 Exod. 31.14 Thou shalt keep my sabbothes Now that sacraments are rites commanded and prescribed to the church by God is apparent by the instittuion of theÌ„ as also that they are rites adioined vnto the promise as visible signes and tokens thereof Because al sacraments are necessary duties towards GOD. But chiefly and principallie they are gods benefites towardes vs as circumcision did portende and shew remission of sinnes and mortification Deut. 30.6 Heb. 8 9.10 Neither onely doe we signifie them in confessing and celebrating them but chiefely God himselfe dooth signifie them vnto vs testâ—fieng and confirming them vnto vs by the ceremonies of sacrameÌ„ts For the Ministers as well in the administration of the sacraments as in the preaching of the woord â—eaâ—e the person possesse the place of God to the Church Mat 28.19 Teach and baptise all nations Iohn 4.2 Iesus did baptise when yet not hee himselfe but his disciples did baptise So of the signe and ceremonie of inauguratioÌ„ or anointing one to be King it is saide 1. Sam. 10.1 The Lord hath anointed thee When yet Samuel was sent to anoint Saul They furder are therefore saide to confirme our faith because the scripture witnesseth them to be the signes and tokens of the mutuall euerlasting couenant between God and the faithfull which God signifieth vnto vs in the bestowing of his benefits promised vs in the Gospell But God is alike to be beleeued whether by signes or by words which signifie his will because not onely our sacrifices and obedience but also the signes of grace deliuered vnto vs by God haue in their right vse the promise of grace adioyned vnto them As He that shall beleeue and shall bee baptised shall bee saued And lastly because the scripture to signifie the receiuing or want of the things signified alleageth the receiuing or want of the signs As Ps 51.7 Purge me with hysop I shal be clean Deut. 30.6 The Lord will circumcise thy heart Rom. 6.3 All wee which haue bin bapitised 1. Cor. 10.16 The bread which we break is it not the coÌ„munion of the bodie of Christ And hereof also follow the other ends specified in the definition in this second conclusion As That the sacraments discerne seuer the church from other sects This is manifest both by effects and by Testimonies Exod. 12.45 A strainger shall not eate thereof Rom. 3.1 What is the profit of circumcision Much euery maner of way because vnto them were committed the Oracles of God Eph. 2.11 Ye being in times past Gentiles called Vncircumcision of them who were at that time without Christ and were aliants from the common-wealth of Jsraell and were straingers from the couenants of promise and had no hope and were without God in the Worlde Gen. 17.11 Is shall bee a signe of the couenant betweene mee and you and it shall bee my couenant in your flesh Another ende is that they preserue the memorie of Gods benefits 1. Cor. 11.26 As often as yee shall eate this bread yee shew the Lords death vntill hee come Exod. 12.14 This day shall bee vnto you a remembrance Deut. 6.8 Thou shalt binde them for a signe vpon thine hand and they shall bee as signes of remembrance betweene thine eyes
required 1. That they who vse the sign shew forth the death of the lord 2. That they trie thēselues whether they haue faith repentance or no. And seeing the age of Infants can not doe these things Infants are for good cause excluded frō the Supper 6 What is the right and lawfull vse of Baptisme The drosse which the Papistes blend with the simplicity of Christes institution in baptisme is to be reiected THE right and lawfull vse of baptisme is when the ceremonies or rites instituted by Christ in baptisme are not changed Whence it is manifest that the drosse and filth of Papists as oile spettle and exorcisme or coniuration is to bee throwen away Obiection But these appertaine and belong to order and comlinesse Aunswere The Holy Ghost knew well enough what did appertain thereunto Reply But they appertaine to the signifieng of some thing Ans It belongeth not to men to Institute any sign of Gods wil. This also we are to thinke iudge of others of the same hatching 2. The vse of baptisme is right when baptism is giuen to them for whom it was instituted which are al the cōuerted or mēbers of the church 3. When baptisme is vsed to that ende whereunto it was instituted not for the healing of cattle but when the true endes thereof are respected Briefly the lawful and right vse of Baptisme is when hee that is conuerted is baptized according to the lawfull rite and end Now Baptisme may not be reiterated 1 Because it dependeth not on the person of him that baptizeth And further he that is once engraffed into Christ shal neuer bee cast out or reiected and therefore it sufficeth to be once receiued 2 Saluation doth not depend on baptisme 7 In place whereof baptisme succeeded Baptisme succeeded in the roome of circumcision BAptisme succeeded in the place of circumcision which is prooued first by the woord of the Apostle before alleadged For he saith That we are circumcised in Christ with circumcision made without handes by putting off the sinful body of the flesh through the circumcision of Christ The Apostles purpose is by this speech to shew that there is no fruit or vse now Of the circūcision which was made with hands because that was accomplished fulfilled in christ which was by it prefigured and shadowed Now to declare expound these words he presently addeth that they are buried together with christ by baptisme by which words he sheweth that the complement truth of baptism is the cōplement truth of circumcision seeing baptism signifieth one the selfe same thing to vs which circumcision signified of old time vnto the Fathers which is that spiritual circumcisiō which christ accomplisheth performeth in vs. This only is the difference that baptisme is the signe of the thing exhibibited which circūcision prefigured when it was yet absent not exhibited Wherefore wee are taught by this place of Paul that baptism is the same to Christians which circumcision was before to the Iewes 2. That baptism was substituted in the place of circumcision this also conuinceth for that as circumcision so also baptisme is a signe of admission and receiuing into the Church For as the infantes of Iewes and Proselytes beeing borne citizens of the church were thorough grace circumcised but those who were of elder yeares were then first admitted vnto circumcision when they professed Iudaisme so also the infantes of christians are presently baptized but the elder sort are not vntill they haue made profession of true christian doctrine insteede of which profession it serueth the infantes that they were born in the church There are other reasons also besides the testimonies of holy scriptures drawen especially from the vse of Baptisme whereby it may be confirmed that Baptisme succeeded circumcision Now to succeed any sacrament is the former being abolished to be substituted in place thereof and that so as to haue the same vse and end which the former sacrament had and to haue also the same thing signified So is there the same thing signified by baptisme which was before by circūcision Moreouer the citizens of the church are no lesse receiued by baptisme and are discerned from al other men than in times past by circumcision Obiect If baptisme succeeded circumcision then now also only the males are to be baptized if the circumstances of circumcision be kept Answere The circumstances are not now determined as then because also these were peculiar special which maie be omitted without breach of the commandement But this is general agreeing to both that the children of the godly ought by this sign to be engraffed into the church whether that be doone on the eight day or presentlie after their birth 8 How baptisme agreeth with circumcision and wherein it differeth from it CIrcumcision and baptisme agree Baptisme circumcisiō agree 1 In the end which they respect 2 In the thing which they woorke 3 In the thing which they signifie The differences of Circumcision and baptisme 1. In the chiefe and principal end whereas in both is sealed the promise of grace by christ which is alwaies one and the same 2. By both of them is wrought our receiuing into the Church 3 By both is signified regeneration Ye are circumcised in christ with circumcision made without hands Circumcision and baptisme differ 1. In rites For the same are not the rites of circumcision and of baptisme 2. Circumcision on gods behalfe promised grace for the Messias to come baptism for the Messias exhibited The circumcised were receiued into fauour for christ which was to be exhibited the baptised are receiued for christ exhibited 3. Circumcisiō had a promise also of a corporal benefite that is it was a testimonie also that god would giue a certain place for the church in the land of Canaan vntill the comming of the Messias Baptisme hath no promise in particular of any temporall benefite 4. Circumcision on our behalfe did binde to the obseruing of the whole Law ceremonial iudicial and moral Baptisme bindeth vs onely to faith and amendment of life that is to obserue only the morall law 5. Circumcision was instituted for the Jsraelites Baptisme was instituted for all nations that are desirous and willing to come vnto the society of the church 6. Circumcision was to last vntil the comming of the Messias baptisme shal continue vntil the end of the world CERTAINE CONCLVSIONS OF BAPTISME 1 BAptisme is a sacrament of the newe testament whereby christ testifieth vnto the faithful which are baptised in the name of the Father and the Sonne and the holie Ghost remission of all their sinnes the giuing of the holy Ghost and their engraffing into the church and his bodie and they of the other side professe that they receiue these benefites from God and therefore wil and ought hereafter to liue vnto him and to serue him And further the same baptisme was begun by Iohn Baptist and continued by the Apostles because he
posteritie Vnto other Nations but not vnto the Iewes it was free to be circumcised or not to be circumcised Wee must here obserue that they of the olde testament were of three sorts 1. Jsraelites which were of Abrahams posteritie and were necessarily bound by the Lawe to obserue circumcision the ceremonies 2. Proselytes who of the Gentiles were conuerted vnto the Iewes did more more for cōfirming of their faith submit thē selues vnto circumcision and the whole ceremonial lawe 3. Those of the gentiles who were conuerted vnto the Iewes but did not obserue the ceremonies For vnto the gentiles and Prosylites it was free to keepe or not to keepe circumcision and the ceremonies These latter were called also Religious men who embraced onely the doctrine and promises of god Obiect The males onelie were circumcised therefore the women were shut out from the couenant of grace Aunswere The women were comprehended in the circumcision of the males And God spared the weaker sex And it sufficed for them to come of godly progenitors 2 What are the ends of circumcision CIrcumcision was instituted 1. That it might bee a signe of the grace of God towardes Abrahams posteritie and that doubly First that God woulde receiue the beleeuers by the Messias who was to come Secondly that he would giue them the land of Canaan and graunt his church a certaine place there vntill the comming of the Messias 2. That it might be a bond to bind Abraham and his seede vnto thankefulnes or to faith and repentance and so to keepe the whole law 3. That it might bee a marke to distinguish the Iewes from other Nations and Sects 4. That it might bee a sacrament of initiating and receiuing them into the church 5. That it might bee an accusation and a signification of vncleannes For that rite did shewe that all men were subiect to sinnes and vnclean 6. That it might bee a signe which shoulde shewe and signifie that the meanes of their deliuerance through Christ which was to come shoulde not come elsewhence than from the bloud of Abraham 3 Why circumcision is abolished CIrcumcision is abolished 1. Because the thing signified is exhibited For among other things it signified that the Messias promised vnto the Fathers should come at length in his appointed time and should in our behalfe take our nature 2. Because circumcision was instituted for the seuering of the Iewes from all other Nations but now the church that difference being abolished is collected and gathered out of al Nations And now the sacrament of baptisme performerth the same vnto vs which circumcision did vnto them Moreouer as circumcision was a signe vnto them of their receiuing into the people of God So is baptisme vnto vs the first mark which seuereth the church from the wicked 4 Why Christ was circumcised CHrist was circumcised 1. That hee might signifie that hee was also a member of that circumcised people 2. That hee might shew that he receiued and tooke our sinnes on himselfe that he might satisfie for them 3. That he might testifie that he did entirelie and fullie fulfill the law in our behalfe 4. The circumcision of Christ was a part also of his humiliation and Ransome OF THE LORDS SVPPER THE chiefe questions 1 What the Supper of the Lord is 2 What are the ends thereof or wherefore it was instituted 3 What is differeth from Baptisme 4 What is the sense and meaning of the words of the institution 5 What is the difference betweene the Lords Supper and the Papists Masse 6 What is the right vse of the Supper 7 What the wicked receiue in the Supper 8 Who are to come and to be admitted vnto the Supper 1 WHAT THE SVPPER OF THE LORD IS FIrst we wil see by what names the Supper of the Lorde is called then wee wil in few woordes define what it is This action or ceremony or rite instituted by a Christ a little before his death is called A supper Why it is called a Supper from the first institution of it that is in respect of the originall or first beginning of this rite or in respect of the time wherein this ceremony was instituted which circumstance of time the church hath chaunged Jt is likewise called Synaxis that is Why a conuent a conuent in respect of the assembly and conuent of the church because some either few or many assemble and meete together in celebrating of the supper For in the first celebration the Disciples were present Take this and diuide it among you Wherefore it must needs be that there was some number there which also appeareth by the Apostle repeating the first institution 1. Cor. 11. where in the end he addeth When ye come together to eat tarry one for another And further that moe ought to come together to celebrate the supper this end of the supper doth euidently enough shew in that it was instituted to be a token and euen a bond of loue For we that are many are one bread and one bodie It is called also the Eucharist Why the Eucharist Why a sacrifice Why Missa because it is a rite and ceremony of thankesgiuing Last of all it is called also a sacrifice because it is the commemoration of christs propitiatory benefit And at length it was also called Missa frō the offering or from the dimissing of the rest who might not communicate after the sermō which went before the celebration was finished Now let vs come to define the Lords Supper The definition of the Lordes Supper THE Lords supper is a ceremonie or sacrament instituted and appointed of christ vnto the faithfull for a memorial of him whereby christ dooth certainly promise and seale vnto mee and all the faithfull first that his body was offered and broken on the crosse for mee and his bloode shed for me as truely as I see with my eies the bread of the Lord to be broken vnto me and his cup distributed and moreouer that hee doth as certainlie with his body crucified and his blood shed feed and nourish my soul vnto euerlasting life as my body is fed with the bread the cup of the lord receiued from the hand of the minister which are offered to me as certaine seales of the body blood of Christ It may be also more briefly defined on this wise The lords supper is a distributing receiuing of bread and wine commaunded of Christ vnto the faithfull that by these signes he might testifie that hee hath deliuered and yeelded his body vnto death and hath shedde his bloode for them and dooth giue them those thinges to eate and drinke that they might be vnto them the meate and drink of eternall life and that thereby also he might testifie that he would dwel in them for euer And againe that of the otherside hee might by the same signe bind them to mutuall dilection and loue seeing Christ spareth not to giue his body and bloode for vs. This
to their condemnation or they eate their owne dannation Nowe to eate damnation is through incredulitie abusing of the sacrament to be abalienated and repelled from christ and al his blessinges or through abusing of the sacrament being receiued without faith repentance grieuously to offend God and so to draw vpon themselues temporal and euerlasting punishmentes except they repent Contrariwise to eate christ is through faith to bee made partaker of his merite efficacie and benefites For no man can eate christ and not withall be made by faith partaker of his merite efficacie and giftes No man therefore can both eate Christ and withall eate his owne damnation and therefore false is their obiection who say thus The wicked eate damnation vnto themselues Therefore they eate Christ Reply But why eat the wicked damnation vnto themselues seeing it is a good worke to receiue the sacramentes Aunswere It is a good work by it selfe but not vnto the wicked The receiuing of the sacramentes is a good worke when the true and right vse is adioined otherwise it is made not a commaunded but a forbidden work as also God saith He that killeth a bullocke is as if he slue a man So Paul If thou be a transgressour of the Law thy circumcision is made vncircumcision Now for these causes the wicked eate vnto themselues The causes for which the wicked are saide to eate vnto themselues damnation and drawe on themselues damnation 1. Because they profane the signes and by consequent the thing signified by laieng holde on those thinges which were not instituted for them but for the Disâ—iples of Christ 2. Because they profane the couenaunt and testament of God by taking vnto themselues the signes and tokens of the couenaunt They wil seeme to be in league with GOD when as they are in league with the Diuell and not with God whom by this meanes they would make the Father of the wicked 3. Because they tread vnder foote the bloude of Christ His benefits indeed are offered vnto them but they receiue them not with faith and so mock God while they professe that they receiue the benefites of Christ when as they doe or mind nothing lesse and adde this new offence to their other sinnes 4. Because they condemne themselues by their owne iudgement For approching vnto the Lords table they professe that they accept of this doctrine and doe beleeue no saluation to be without Christ yet in the mean season are conscious vnto themselues that they are hypocrites and so condemne themselues 8 Who ought to approch and be admitted vnto the supper THIS question also conteineth two seuerall partes in it vnto which wee are seuerally to aunswere In the former part is demanded who ought to approch vnto the supper In the latter who ought to bee admitted And this latter part is larger and more generall because not the godly onely but hypocrites also who are not yet knowen to bee such are to be admitted vnto the supper The godly onely ought to approch vnto the supper First then is to bee considered who ought to approch thither They onely ought to approche vnto the supper who liue in true faith and repentance and so who haue faith and repentance not in possibilitie onelie but also actuallie whereby this obiection is refuted that Jnfants haue faith and therefore ought to approche vnto the Lords Supper For they ought not to come in respect of this circumstance which is adioined in the institution of the Supper Not Infants Shewe the death of the Lord Likewise Let a man examine himselfe and so let him eate of this bread and drinke of this cup. Wherefore we vnderstand in this place an actual faith which is a knowledge confidence beginning of obedience and a serious and earnest purpose to liue well But Infants haue faith onely potentiallie and in possibility not actually they haue an inclination onelie to faith or they haue faith onely by inclination but they haue not an actuall faith Not the wicked and hypocrites Fâ—â—thermore that it is not lawfull for the wicked to approch vnto the Supper it is manifest For the sacraments are instituted only for the faithful those which are coÌ„uerted to seal to theÌ„ the promise to confirm their faith The Word notwithstanding is common to the conuerted and vnconuerted that the conuerted may heare it and bee confirmed by it and that the vnconuerted also may heare it and thereby bee conuerted Wherefore from the nature and subiect of sacramentes is drawen this demonstratiue proofe What God hath instituted for his houshold and children that hypocrites and aliants from the Church ought not to receiue Moreouer Paul also interdicteth all the wicked without any exception from comming vnto this holy supper by woordes authentique in which namely hee commaundeth that euerie man trie and examine himselfe and so eate of that bread drinke of that cup. But to examine himself is to trie whether he hath faith and repentance Wherefore he will haue him to come who hath these things in him But how shall a man know that he hath these things 1. By a purpose and desire to obey god according to al the commandements of God 2. By a confidence tranquillity of conscience Hope maketh not ashamed because the loue of God is shed abroad in our harts by the holie ghost which is giuen to vs. 3. By effects as by the beginning of inward outward obedience Vnto these may be adioined also generall testimonies whereby vnbeleeuers are forbidden to come to the Supper As Mat. 5.24 Leaue there thine offring before the altar first be reconciled to thy brother then come offer thy gift Likewise 66.3 He that killeth a Bullocke is as if he slew a man The second part of the former question is Who ought to bee admitted vnto the Lords Supper THey are to be admitted of the Church who in woords deedes professe true repentance they also who expresse shew a profession of faith repentance in the actions of their life are to be admitted but not they whosoeuer simplie doe auouch that they beleeue all things For he that saith he beleeueth and hath not woorkes is a lier and denieth indeede that which he affirmeth in words according to that of the Apostle They professe that they knowe God but by woorkes they denie him and are abhominable and disobedient and to euerie good work reprobate So saint Iames also sheweth That faith which is without workes is dead The reasons why they are to be admitted onely who both by their confession and life professe faith and repentance are these 1. Because the church shoulde prophane Gods couenant if it shoulde admit vnbeleeuers and men impenitent For he that dooth a thing and he that consenteth vnto it are both obnoxious to the same lawe To prophane the couenaunt of God is to commend and acknowledge them for the confederates or friends and fellowes of God who are Gods enimies and
so to make God such a one as hath entered a couenaunt and is in league with hypocrites and wicked men Now the couenaunt of God is two waies prophaned namelie as well by communicating and imparting the signes of the couenaunt to them vnto whom God promiseth nothing as by receiuing and vsing the signes without faith and repentance For not onely they prophane the couenant who being as yet impenitent take the signes of the couenant vnto them but they also who wittingly and willingly giue the signs vnto those whom god hath shut from his couenant They make therefore God a felowe friend of the wicked the son of the diuell the son of God whosoeuer reach the signes vnto the wicked Obiect Hee that giueth to him that abuseth it sinneth The church giueth the supper vnto hypocrits which abuse it Therefore the church sinneth Ans He that giueth the supper to one which abuseth it sinneth if he wittingly willingly doth it otherwise he sinneth not but they who abuse the supper purchase damnation to theÌ„selues But the godly are not made partakers of that prophanation of the couenant prophaned by the wicked if they knowe not the wicked approching vnto the supper neither doe willingly admit the wicked Reply If they sinne who giue the supper wittinglie to him that abuseth it then dooth the Minister also sinne if he distribute it vnto such a one where yet there is no sentence passed of excommunication Aunswere True if hee doe it willingly but if the church proceed not against such a man and the minister notwithstanding be instant vpon the Church and doe his duetie he is blamelesse and the sinne shall lie on others euen on the Church 2. They are not to bee admitted to the supper who professe not faith and repentaunce both in life and confession because if such should be admitted the church should stir vp the anger of God against her selfe as of whom wittinglie and willinglie this shoulde bee committed Nowe that by this meanes the wrath of God is stirrâ—d vp against the church the Apostle sufficiently witnesseth saying For this cause manie are weake and sicke among you and manie sleepe For if wee woulde iudge our selues we should not bee iudged God therefore is angrie with the consenters so punisheth them because he punisheth the wicked whom they coÌ„senting thereto admitted for by both the supper of the Lorde is alike prophaned 3. Christ hath coÌ„manded that the wicked be not admitted And if any denie that any such coÌ„mandment is extant yet the substance tenor of the commandement shal be easily prooued For christ instituted his supper for his disciples to theÌ„ alone he said I haue earnestlie desired to eate this Passeouer with you Take this and part it among you This is my bodie which is giuen for you This cup is the new testament in my bloud which is shed for you Wherefore the supper was instituted for Christes disciples onely all others for whom Christ died not are excluded But yet for all this those hypocrites are to bee admitted together with the godly vnto the supper who are not as yet manifested because they professe in confession and outward actions faith and repentance But none ought to approch thither but true beleeuers For these onely excepted all others yea euen those hypocrites which are not as yet manifested eate and drinke vnto themselues damnation and prophane the Lords sacred Supper Obiection They then who auoide the prophaning of the Lords Supper doe well but they who refraine from the Lordes supper in respect of some hatred they beare to others or for some other sinnes auoide the prophaning of the supper Therefore they doe well Answere They who auoid the prophaning of the supper doe well if they auoid it in such sort as they ought namely by repenting themselues of those sinnes which haue been the causes of their refraining CERTAINE CONCLVSIONS OF THE SVPPER 1 THE other sacrament of the new testament is called the supper of the Lord not as if it were necessarie that the church should celebrate it in the Euening or vsuall time of supper but because it was instituted of Christ in that supper which he last had with his Disciples before his death It is called the table of the Lord because Christ dooth feede vs in it It is called the sacrament of the bodie and bloud of christ because these are communicated and imparted vnto vs in it It is called the Eucharist because in it are giuen solemne thankes vnto Christ for his death and benefites It is called Synaxis or the conuent because it ought to be celebrated in the conuents and assemblies of the church It is called also of the auncient a sacrifice because it is a representation of the propitiatory sacrifice accomplished by Christ on the crosse and a thankes-giuing or Eucharistical sacrifice for the same There is a third reason also why they called it a sacrifice because the ancient were wont themselues to confer bread vnto it therefore were they said to offer that is to conferre and giue in seuerall bread to that vse 2 The supper of the lord is a sacrament of the new testament wherein according to the commandement of Christ bread and wine is distributed and receiued in the assemblie of the faithfull in remembraunce of christ which is that christ might testifie vnto vs that hee feedeth vs with his body and bloud deliuered and shed for vs vnto eternal life and that we also might for these his benefites giue solemne thankes vnto him 3 The first and principal end and vse of the Lords supper is that Christ might therein testifie vnto vs that hee died for vs and dooth feede vs with his bloude and body vnto euerlasting life that so by this testification hee might cherish and encrease in vs our faith and so consequently this spirituall foode and nourishment The second end is thankes-giuing for these benefites of Christ and our publique and solemne profession of them and our duty towards christ The third is the distinguishing of the church from other sectes The fourth That it might be a bond of mutual loue and dilection The fift That it might be a bond of our assemblies and meetinges 4 That first ende and vse which is the confirmation of our faith in Christ the supper of the Lord hereof hath because Christ himselfe giueth this bread and drink by the hands of his ministers to be a memorial of him that is to admonish and put vs in remembraunce by this signe as by his visible word that he died for vs and is the foode of eternall life vnto vs while hee maketh vs his members both because he hath annexed a promise to this rite that hee wil feede those who eate this bread in remembraunce of him with his owne bodie and bloud when he saith This my body and also because the holy ghost doth by this visible testimony moue our minds and harts more firmely to beleeue the promise of the
gospel 5 There is then in the Lords supper a double meat and drink one externall visible terrene namely bread and wine and another internall There is also a double eating and receiuing an external and signifieng which is the corporall receiuing of the bread and wine that is which is perfourmed by the handes mouth and senses of the bodie and an internal inuisible and signified which is the fruition of Christes death and a spirituall engraffing into Christes bodie that is which is not perfourmed by the handes and mouth of the bodie but by the spirite and faith Lastly there is a double administer and dispenser of this meat and drinke an externall of the externall which is the minister of the church deliuering vs by his hand bread and wine and an internal of the internal meate which is Christ himselfe feeding vs by his body and bloud 6 Not the body and bloud of Christ but the bread and wine are the signes which serue for confirmation of our faith for the bodie and bloud of Christ are receiued that we may liue for euer But the bread and wine are receiued that wee maie bee confirmed and assured of that heauenlie foode and dailie more and more enioie it 7 Neither is the bread changed into the bodie of Christ nor the wine into the bloud of Christ neither doth the bodie and bloud of Christ succeed in their place they beeing abolished neither is Christs body substantially present in the bread or vnder the bread or where the bread is but in the right vse of the Lords supper the holy Ghost vseth this Symbole as an instrument to stirre vp faith in vs by which he more and more dwelleth in vs engraffeth vs into Christ and maketh vs thorough him to bee iust and righteous and to draw eternal life from him 8 Now when Christ saith This that is this bread is my body and This cup is my bloud the speech is sacramental or metonymical because the name of the thing signified is attributed to the sign it selfe that is it is meant that the bread is the sacrament or signe of his bodie and doth represent him and dooth testifie that Christes bodie is offered for vs on the crosse and is giuen vnto vs to be the foode of eternal life and therefore is the instrument of the holie Ghost to maintaine and encrease this food in vs as Saint Paul saith 1. Corinth 10. The bread is the communion of the bodie of Christ that is it is that thing by which wee are made partakers of christs bodie And elsewhere hee saith We haue been al made to drink into one spirit The same is the meaning also when it is said that the bread is called christes bodie for a similitude which the thing signified hath with the signe namely in that christes body nourisheth the spirituall life as breade dooth the corporall life and for that assured and certaine ioint receiuing of the thing and the signe in the right vse of the sacrament And this is the sacramental vnion of the bread which is shewed by a sacramental kinde of speaking but no such locall coniunction which is by some imagined 9 As therefore the body of christ signifieth both his proper and natural bodie and his sacramental bodie which is the bread of the Eucharist so the eating of Christes body is of two sorts one sacramental of the signe to wit the externall and corporall receiuing of the bread and wine the other reall or spirituall which is the receiuing of christs very body it selfe And to belâ—eue in christ dwelling in vs by faith is by the vertue operatioÌ„ of the holy ghost to be engraffed into his bodie as members to the head branches into the vine and so to bee made partakers of the frutie of the deâ—th and life of christ Whence it is apparant that they are falsly accused who thus teach as if they made either the bare signes onely to be in the Lords Supper or a partâ—cipation of christes death onelie or of his benefits or of the holy Ghost excluding the true reall spirituall communion of the very body of Christ it selfe 10 Now the right vse of the Supper is when the faithfull obserue this rite instituted by Christ in remembraunce of Christ that is to the stirring and raising vp of their faith and thankefulnesse 11 As in this right vse the bodie of Christ is sacramentallie eaten so also without this vse as by vnbeleeuers and hypocrites it is eaten sacramentally indeede but not reallie that is the sacramental Symboles or signes bread and wine are receiued but not the thinges themselues of the sacrament to wit the bodie and bloud of Christ 12 This doctrine of the supper of the Lord is grounded vpon verie manie and those most sound and firme reasons All those places of Scripture confirme it which speake of the Lords supper and Christ calling not anie inuisible thing in the bread but the verie visible and broken bread it selfe his bodie deliuered or broken for vs which whereas it cannot bee meant properlie himselfe addeth an exposition that that bread is truely receiued in remembraunce of him which is as if he had said That the bread is a sacrament of his bodie So likewise he saith the supper is the new testament which is spirituall one and euerlasting And Paul saith it is the communion of the bodie and bloud of Christ because al the faithful are one bodie in christ who cannot stand together with the communion of Diuels Likewise he maketh one and the same engraffing into christes bodie by one spirit to bee both in Baptisme and in the Lords Supper Moreouer the whole doctrine and nature of sacramentes confirme the same all which represent vnto the eies the same spirituall communion of christ to bee receiued by faith which the word or promise of the Gospel declareth vnto the eares Therefore they are called by the names of the thinges signified and in their right vse haue the receiuing of the thinges adioined vnto them The Articles also of our faith confirme it which teach that christs bodie is a true humane bodie not present at once in manie places as being now receiued into heauen and there to remain vntil the Lorde returne to iudgement and further that the communion of Saintes with christ is wrought by the holie Ghost not by anie entraunce of christs bodie into the bodies of men Wherefore this sentence and doctrine is of all the purer antiquitie of the church with most great and manifest consent held and professed 13 The Supper of the Lord differeth from Baptisme 1. Jn the Rite and manner of signifieng because the dipping into the water or washing signifieth a remission and purging out of sinne by the bloud and spirit of Christ and our societie fellowship with christ in his afflictions and glorification But the distributing of the bread and wine signifieth the death of Christ to bee imputed to vs vnto remission of sinnes and our selues engraffed into Christ
are receiued of vs namelie earthly externall and visible signs as are bread and wine and besides these also heauenlie internall and inuisible gifts as are the true bodie of Iesus Christ together with al his gifts and benefits and heauenlie treasures Thirdly that in the supper we are made partakers not onlie of the spirit of Christ and his satisfaction iustice vertue and operation but also of the verie substaunce and essence of his true-bodie and bloud which was giuen for vs to death on the crosse and which was shed for vs and are trulie fed with the selfe-same vnto eternal life and that this verie thing christ should teach vs and make knowen vnto vs by this visible receiuing of this bread and wine in his supper Fourthly That the bread and wine are not changed into the flesh and bloud of Christ but remaine true and natural bread and wine that also the bodie and bloud of christ are not shut vp into the bread and wine and therefore the bread and wine are called of christ his bodie and bloud in this sense for that his bodie and bloud are not onlie signified by these and set before our eies but also because as often as we eat and drink this bread and wine in the true and right vse Christ himselfe giueth vs his body and bloud indeed to be the meat and drink of eternal life Fiftly That without the right vse this receiuing of bread and wine is no sacrament neither anie thing but an emptie and vaine ceremonie and spectacle and such as men abuse to their own damnation Sixtly That there is no other true and lawful vse of the supper besides that which Christ himselfe hath instituted and commaunded to be kept namelie this that this bread and this wine be eaten and drunken in remembrance of him and to shew forth his death Seuenthly that Christ in his supper dooth not commaund and require a dissembled and hypocritical remembraunce of him and publishing of his death but such as embraceth his passion and death and all his benefites obtained by these for vs by a true and liuelie faith and with earnest and ardent thankefulnesse and applieth them vnto those which eate and drink as proper vnto them Eightly that Christ will dwell in beleeuers onelie and in them who not through contempt but through necessitie cannot come to the Lords supper yea in al beleeuers eueÌ„ from the beginning of the woorld to all eternitie euen as well and after the same manner as hee will dwell in them who came vnto the Lords Supper They disagree in these pointes FIRST that one part contendeth that these woordes of Christ This is my bodie must be vnderstood as the words sound which yet that part it selfe doth not but the other part that those words must be vnderstoode sacramentallie according to the declaration of Christ and Paul according to the most certaine and vnfallible rule and leuil of the articles of our christian faith SecoÌ„dly that one part wil haue the bodie bloud of christ to be essentiallie Jn or With the bread wine so to be eaten as that together with the bread the wine out of the haÌ„d of the minister it entereth by the mouth of the receiuers into their bodies but the other part wil haue the body of christ which in the first supper sate at the table by the disciples now to be coÌ„tinue not here on earth but aboue in the heauens aboue and without this visible world and heauen vntill hee descend thence againe to iudgement and yet that we notwithstanding here on earth as oft as wee eate this bread with a true faith are so fed with his bodie and made to drink of his bloud that not onlie through his Passion and bloudshed we are cleansed from our sinnes but are also in such sort coupled knit and incorporated into his true essential humane bodie by his spirit dwelling both in him and vs as that we are flesh of his flesh and bone of his bones and are more neerly and firmlie knit and vnited with him than the members of our bodie are vnited with our head and so wee drawe and haue in him and from him euerlasting life Thirdly That one part will haue all whosoeuer come to the Lordes supper and eate and drinke that breade and wine whether they bee beleeuers or vnbeleeuers to eate and drinke corporallie and with their bodilie mouth the flesh and bloud of Christ beleeuers to life and saluation vnbeleeuers to damnation and death the other holdeth that vnbeleeuers abuse indeede the outwarde signs bread and wine to their own damnation but that the faithful onelie can eate and drinke by a true faith and the fore alleaged working of â—he holie Ghost the bodie and bloud of Christ vnto eternal life OF THE KEIES OF THE KINGDOME OF HEAVEN AND OF EXCOMMVNICATION SEEING it hath beene shewed in the treatise next going before who are to bee admitted by the church vnto the Lords Supper very commodiously and fitly shall this doctrine follow concerning the power of the keies wherein besides other things this chiefly is taught How they who are not to be admitted must bee restrained and excluded from the Sacraments least approching vnto them they prophane them The chiefe questions 1 What the power is of the keies giuen vnto the church 2 Vnto whom that power is committed 3 Why the power of the keies is necessarie 4 What that power of the keies committed vnto the church differeth from the ciuil power 5 What order ought to be obserued in exercising the power of the keies 1 WHAT THE POWER OF THE KEIES GIVEN VNTO THE CHVRCH IS THE power of the keies of the kingdome of heauen which CHRIST gaue vnto his church is the office or charge imposed on the church by Christ of denouncing by the preaching of the gospel and church-discipline Gods will and euen of declaring the grace of God and remission of sinnes vnto the penitent that is to them who liue in true faith and repentance but of denouncing vnto the wicked the wrath of God and exclusion or banishment from the kingdome of christ and of casting such out of the church as long as they shall shew themselues in doctrine and life estranged from christ and of receiuing them againe into the church when afterwardes they shall repent Hereby it appeareth that the chiefe and principall parts of this power of the keies giuen vnto the Saints are the preaching of the gospel or ministerie of the word and church-iudgement which is called also spirituall Discipline or iurisdiction And verily necessarilie is Ecclesiasticall Discipline ioined and linked with the ministerie of Gods word Of the ministerie of the word there is no doubt but all the Prophets Christ and the Apostles haue preached Of the iurisdiction of the church likewise it is not to be doubted in as much as Christ himselfe and the Apostle haue both by precepts and practise confirmed and established it Now in both is conteined that power
Law indeed that is not by our owne obedience but yet not against the Lawe that is not without anothers perfect satisfaction for vs we are iustified before God but the Lawe is also established by faith through the beginning of newe obedience in this life and the acomplishing of the same in the life to come Acts. 15. Purifieng their hearts by faith Gal. 5.5 We through the spirite waite for the hope of righteousnesse through faith These and the like asseuerations that the Decalogue is to be taught in the new Testament and the commaundementes of christ and the Apostles agreeing with the Decalogue doe most euidently refute the impiety of Antinomies Libertines and such like who contend that the law is not to be taught in the church of christ The same also may be gathered out of the vse of Gods Law which vse thereof seeing it must be continuall in the church it followeth that the Law it selfe also must be perpetual Which that it may be the more manifest let the chiefe obiections opposed against it be considered 1 Obiection Christ is not the Law-giuer as it is said The Lawe was giuen by Moses but grace and trueth came by Christ Therefore neither he nor the ministers of the Gospell should teach the Law Aunswere Christ is not the Law-giuer as concerning the chiefe and principall function and office of the Mediatour For that is to bring foorth the gospell out of the bosome of his father to make request and intercession to be made a sacrifice for vs and by the gift of the Holy Ghost to reconcile vs vnto God But a part notwithstanding of this office is to shew and take away those errours wherewith the Lawe is corrupted and to propound the pure Doctrine thereof to this end that the mindes of men may thereby bee prepared to heare the preaching of the gospel which is proper vnto the Messias and that they being conuerted may be instructed what thankefulnes God requireth of thē for the benefit of their redemption Christ then is the Law-giuer as he is God and author of the law together with the father but as hee is Mediatour hee is not indeed the law-giuer because he publisheth not the Law as it is saide 1. John 2. but yet notwithstanding hee is the purger repairer and restorer of the law from corruptions and this not principally but that hee might performe the principall function of his Mediatourship to wit our reconcilement saluation The same answere we make also concerning the ministers of the gospell in asmuch as they are to propound no other Doctrine vnto the Church than Christ hath deliuered 2 Obiect Hee that hath satisfied the Lawe by punishment is not bound to obedience because the Lawe bindeth either to punishment or to obedience but not vnto both together But wee haue satisfied the Lawe by Christs punishment Therefore we stand not bound to perfourm obedience Aunswere We distinguish the Maior First he that hath suffered a sufficient punishment is not bound to obedience to witte not to the same obedience for the omitting whereof he suffered punishment but after that satisfaction hath been made by punishment for sinne committed he is bound notwithstanding hence forwarde to obey the lawe or to suffer newe punishment if through new disobedience he breake the lawe Secondly hee that hath satisfied not by his owne punishment but by anothers and is receiued into fauour without his owne satisfaction ought to obey the lawe though not as thereby to satisfie for sinnes yet to shewe his thankefulnes that is hee ought to order and direct his life according to his will by whom he is redeemed and of whom he is receiued into fauour For no man is therefore punished for sinne committed or deliuered from the crime therof that he should persist in it but that he should leaue off hence forwarde to commit sin any more and to offend him vnto whom hee is reconciled Wherefore in like manner wee also because Christ hath satisfied for our sins stand bound to performe the obediēce not of the time past but of the time to come and this also are we bound to perfourme not for any expiation or recompence of those sins which either wee haue committed or doe commit or hereafter shall commit but for the shewing of our thankefulnesse for the benefite of Christ whereby wee are deliuered from sinne and death This doth S. Paul teach Rom. 6. Hee that is dead is free from sinne Againe Likewise thinke ye also that yee are dead to sinne but are aliue to god in Jesus Christ our Lord. 3 Obiection Christians are not ruled by the Lawe but by the spirite of regeneration according as it is said ye are not vnder the lawe but vnder grace Againe The lawe is not giuen vnto the righteous man Therefore it is not to be taught in the Church of Christ Aunswere Christians are not ruled that is are not compelled and constrained by the law and feare of punishment vnto whatsoeuer discipline or order like as are the wicked but yet they are taught and instructed by the law of God what worship is pleasing vnto god and the holy Ghost vseth the voice of the Lawe to teach and incline them to an obedience not constrained or hypocritical but true and voluntary so that not only the Law commandeth them what to doe but the spirite also of grace dooth giue them ability to obay For this is not to be vnder the Law and the Law not to be giuen vnto the righteous So then the bond and Doctrine remaineth albeit the condemnation and constraint is taken away For vnto this are wee bound that our obedience be most free and voluntary Rom. 8.12 We are debters not to the flesh to liue after the flesh 4 Obiection The Lawe is not necessarie vnto saluation Therefore it is not to be taught in the Church Aunswere This reason is a fallacie reasoning that not to bee simplie so which is not in some respect so For albeit the Lawe is not necessarie to this that wee shoulde through our obedience vnto it be saued yet is it necessarie vnto other thinges as hath beene taught already in the doctrine concerning the vse of the Law 5 Obiection Coloss 2.3 Jn Christ are hid all the treasures of wisdome and knowledge Againe Yee are complete in him Therefore there is no neede of the Lawe in the Church of Christ Aunswere This reason deceiueth by inferring a false consequent because it proceedeth from the putting of the whole to the denial of a part The whole wisedome and knowledge that is the Doctrine of Christ deliuered by him vnto vs is sufficient necessary for the Church But a part of that Doctrine is the Morall Lawe also because Christ commanded not faith only but repentance also amendment of life to be preached in his name he himselfe deliuered and declared the Lawe The compleatnesse therefore and perfection of our wisedome and saluation which we haue in Christ doth not exclude but include
affect an excellencie aboue others but to bee well contented with those gifts which God hath giuen vs and to employ all our gifts studies to the glorie of God the safetie of our neighbours euen those which are of the baser and vnwoorthier sort neither at anie time to murmour against GOD if wee faile of our hope or if wee bee despised but in all things to ascribe the praise of wisdome iustice vnto God 1. Cor 4.6 These thinges I haue figuratiuelie applied vnto mine owne selfe and Apollos for your sakes that yee might learne by vs that no man presume aboue that which is written that one swell not against another for anie mans cause For who separateth thee And what hast thou that thou hast not receiued 1. Pet. 5.5 God resisteth the proud and giueth grace to the humble Humble your selues therefore vnder the mightie hand of god that he may exalt you in due time Matth. 18.4 Whosoeuer shal humble himselfe as this title child the same is the greatest in the kingdome of heauen Phil. 2.3 Doe nothing through contention or vaine glorie but in meekenesse of minde euerie man esteeme other better than himselfe 4 Patience is the knowledge agnising of Gods Maiestie wisedome iustice goodnesse resoluing through a confidence in gods promises and so in hope of gods assistance deliuering to obey god in suffering those euils aduersities which he sendeth on vs willeth vs to suffer neither in respect of the griefe which they bring to murmur against God or to doe any thing against his commandements but in our dolor griefe to retaine still the confidence and hope of gods assistaunce and to aske deliueraunce of him and by this knowledge and ful persuasion of Gods will to mitigate and assuage our griefe and paines Humilitie and Patience belong vnto the first commaundement not onely because they are partes of that internall obedience which god requireth immediately to be performed vnto him but also because they follow and accompany the true knowledge confidence loue and fear of god as necessarie effects of the same 5 Hope is a sure and certaine expectation of euerlasting life freelie to be giuen for Christes sake and of a mitigation or assuagement of present euils and of a deliueraunce from the same euils of this life and lastly an expecting and looking for al blessinges necessarie vnto saluation according to the counsell and will of God Now hope springeth from faith Because he that is certain of the present wil of God towardes him hath also certaine and assured promises of the time to come For God is not changed and the giftes and calling of God are without repentance Moreouer Faith and Hope differ in these considerations Faith embraceth the present benefites of god and his wil towardes vs. Hope embraceth the effectes and fruites which are to come of this present and perpetual wil of god Heb. 11.1 Faith is that which maketh those things to be which are hoped for and which sheweth those thinges which are not seen Hope that is seene is not hope for how can a man hope for that which he seeth 6 The loue of god is to acknowledge God to bee exceeding good and exceeding bountifull and mercifull not only in himselfe but also in vs and towards vs and that therefore he dooth employ his power wisedome iustice mercy goodnes to our saluation so through the acknowledging of this his infinit goodnes towards vs to loue God as that we more couet and desire our conioyning and conformity with him and the execution of his will than all other things whatsoeuer and further had rather leaue and relinquish all thinges than be bereaued of his communion and fellowship or offend him in any thing and are ready to part with all other thinges which wee loue for his sake nothing is more cared for of vs than how we maie doe thinges acceptable and gratefull vnto him 7 The feare of God is to acknowledge the infinit anger of God towards sinne his great power to punish sinne his wisedome and iustice and that right and dominion which he hath ouer al creatures and of the contrary to acknowledge our owne corruption and infirmity and therefore to submit our selues to god according to all his commaundementes and to account for the greatest euil our offending of God and estranging from him and in respect thereof highly to hate and detest al sinne and to bee ready rather to suffer al other euils whatsoeuer than that we will offend god in any thing Leuit. 14 19. Thou shalt fear the Lord thy god because J am the Lord. Ier. 10.7 Who would not fear thee O King of natiōs For to thee appertaineth the dominion for among al the wise men of the Gentiles and in all their kingdomes there is none like thee The feare and loue of god differ For the loue of god ariseth from a knowledge of gods goodnesse The fear of god ariseth from a knowledge of gods iustice and of his power to punish sinnes and of that right which he hath ouer al creatures Againe Loue pursueth good to wit god and our coniunction with him wherefore the loue of god is not to abide to be bereaued of god who is the chiefe good But fear flieth euill to wit the displeasure and wrath of god and our separation from him Wherefore also the fear of god is to beware that we offend not god Moreouer the fear of god which was in the nature of man vncorrupt differeth from that which is now in the regenerate in this life and which is in the blessed Angels and Saintes in the celestial life The feare of god which is in the blessed in euerlasting life is a high detestation of sinne and punishmentes without griefe because neither anie sinne is in them or any punishment of sin and they are assured that they shall neuer sinne or be punished Jsa 25.8 Hee wil destroie death for euer and the Lord God wil wipe awaie the tears from al faces The feare of god which is in the regenerate in this life is an acknowledging of sinne and the wrath of god an earnest griefe for the sinnes committed for the offending of god and for those calamities which by reason of sinnes both we and others susteine and a feare of future sins and punishments and an earnest desire of flying and shunning these euils by reason of the knowledge of that mercy which is shewed vnto vs through Christ Matth. 10.28 Feare yee not them which kil the bodie but are not able to kil the soule but rather feare him which is able to destroie both soule and bodie in hell Luk. 23.40 Fearest thou not god seeing that thou art in the same condemnation This feare is commonly called Sonne-like feare because it is such as Sonnes beare towardes their parents who are sorrie for the anger and displeasure of their father and yet notwithstanding are alwaies persuaded of the loue and mind of their father
desire of him in the Elect. For hee is giuen to them that desire him Luk. 11.13 Hence is drawen a forcible argument to prooue the God-head of the holy ghost For to worke effectuallie by the ministerie is proper to God onely 1. Cor. 3.7 Neither is he that planteth anie thing neither he that watereth but God that giueth the encrease Matth. 3.11 J baptize you with water to amendment of life but hee that commeth after mee will baptize you with the holie ghost and with fire Rom. 1.16 The gospel is the power of god because the holie ghost is forcible in working by it whereupon also the gospell is called the ministration of the spirite 2. Corint 3.8 Now the holy ghost is receiued by faith Eph. 1.13 Wherin also after that yee beleeued yee were sealed with the holy spirit of promise The world cannot receiue the spirit of truth because it neither seeth him nor knoweth him Obiection But faith is the gift and fruite of the holie ghost Ephes 2.8 By grace are yee saued through faith and that not of your selues it is the gift of god 1. Corinth 12.3 No man can saie that Jesus is the Lorde but by the holie ghost Aunswere 1. The woorking of the spirite is in order of nature before faith but in time both are together because the first beginning of faith is the receiuing of the holy ghost 2. Faith beeing once begun the holy ghost is more and more receiued who woorketh afterwardes other thinges in vs by faith As it is saide Galat. 5.6 Faith worketh by loue Actes 15.9 By faith mens heartes are purified 7 How the holy ghost is reteined THE holie ghost is receiued and kept 1. By meditation in the doctrine of the gospell and by studying to profit therein Psalm 1.2 He that doth meditate in the Law of the lord daâ—â— and night shall bee like a tree planted by the riuers of waters that wil bring foorth her fâ—uite in one season Coloss 3.16 Let the woorde of Christ dwel in you plenteouslie in all wisedome teaching and admonishing your selues 2. Hee is kept by encrease and continuaunce of repentaunce and amendment of life that is by a desire of bewaring to offend against our conscience Matth. 13.12 Vnto him that hath shal be giuen Reuelat. 22.11 He that is righteous let him be righteous still Ephes 4.30 Grieue not the holie spirit of god by whom yee are sealed vnto the daie of redemption Hither maie bee referred a desire of auoiding euill companie and sinne For hee that wil auoide sinne must auoide al occasion of sinning 3. Hee is reteined by dailie and earnest praieâ— and inuocation Luk 11.13 Howe much more shall your heauenlie Father giue the holy ghost to them that desire him The same wee maie see in that panoplie or complet harnesse which the Apostle describeth Ephes 6.14 Likewise it is confirmed by the example of Dauid who praieth Psalm 51.11 That god wil not take his holy spirit from him 4. He is reteined by applieng gods giftes to their right vse that is to his glorie and to the safetie of our neighbour Luke 22 32. And when thou art conuerted confirme thy Bretheren Matth. 25.29 Vnto euerie man that hath it shall bee giuen and from him that hath not euen that he hath shal be taken away 8 Whether and how the holy Ghost may be lost HEE may be lost of Hypocrits and reprobates Of the Elect he is neuer wholy lost but onely as touching manie giftes because they alwaies reteine some giftes Neither is hee finally lost of the Elect because at length they returne to repentance But of the reprobate he is altogether or wholy lost and finally so that they neuer receiue him Obiection But the holy ghost departed from Saul Therefore he may also depart from the Elect. Aunswere Hee departed from Saul but not the spirit of regeneration for he neuer had him Reply Yea but the regenerating spirite also departeth because Dauid praieth Psal 51.12 Restore to me the ioy of thy saluation Answ He is lost oftentimes as concerning some giftes of regeneration but not wholy For it cannot possibly bee that the Godly should reteine no remnants seeing they doe not sin to death A man saith Bernard neuer abideth in the same state either he goeth backward or forward For this difference is to be obserued held for the assoiling of that question How namely the perseuerance of the Elect may be notwithstanding certaine albeit they leese the holy Ghost which is because they are neuer wholly and finally destitute of the holy Ghost Now the holy Ghost may be lost fower waies and those contrarie to those other meanes whereby he is reteined 1 By neglecting the Woord and Doctrine For Paul willeth Timothie to stirre vp the gift of God which was in him also teacheth him how that may be doone 1. Tim. 4.15 By giuing attendance to his reading to exhortation and doctrine 2 He is lost by carnall securitie and by giuing ouer our selues to commit wickednesse against our conscience 3 By neglect of praier 4 By abusing the giftes of the holie Ghost as when they are not imploied to his glorie to the safety of our neighbor Luk. 8.18 Vnto him that hath shal be giuen from him that hath not euen that he hath shall be taken awaie 9 Wherefore the holy Ghost is necessarie HOW necessarie and needefull the Holy Ghost is and for what causes doth clearely appeare by these places of Scripture Ioh. 3.5 Except that a man be borne of water and of the spirit he cannot enter into the kingdome of Heauen 1. Cor. 15.50 Flesh bloud cannot inherit the kingdome of God 2. Cor. 3.5 Wee are not sufficient of our selues to thinke anie thing as of our selues but our sufficiencie is of God Hence we may thus conclude without whom we cannot thinke much lesse doe ought that is good and without whom we can neither be regenerated nor know God neither attain vnto the inhetaunce of the celestiall kingdome without him we cannot be saued But without the holy Ghost these things cannot be done by reason of the corruption blindnes of our nature Therefore without the holy Ghost it cannot be that we should be saued so it followeth that he is altogether necessarie for vs vnto saluation 10 How we may know that the holy Ghost dwelleth in vs. WEE know that wee haue him by the effectes or by his benefits and blessings in vs as by the true knowledge of God by regeneration faith and the inchoation or beginning of new obedience or by a readinesse and willingnesse to obay God Rom. 5.1 Beeing iustified by faith wee haue peace towards God The loue of god is shed in our harts Againe we know it by the testimony and witnesse which hee beareth vnto our spirit that we are the Sonnes of god Moreouer most certaine testimonies and tokens of the holy Ghost dwelling in vs are Comfort in the midst of death ioy in afflictions a purpose to perseuere in
faith sighes and ardent praiers a sincere professing of Christianitie 1. Corint 12.3 No man can saie that Iesus is the Lord but by the holy ghost In a woorde by faith and repentaunce we know that the holie Ghost dwelleth in vs. OF THE CHVRCH THE questions to be obserued 1 What the Church is 2 How many waies it is taken 3 What are the markes thereof 4 Wherefore it is called holy and Catholique 5 What is the difference betweene the Church the common-weale or ciuil state 6 Whence it is that the Church differeth from the rest of mankinde 7 Whether any may be saued out of the church 1 WHAT THE CHVRCH IS VVHen the question is what the Church is it is presupposed that there is a Church so that it is not necessarie to make a question Whether there be a church Now as concerning the name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ecclesia which we cal the church it is natiuely a Greeke woord and commeth from a word which signifieth to cal forth For the custome was in Athens that a companie of the citizens were called foorth by the voice of the crier from the rest of the multitude as it were namelie and by their Hundreds to an assembly wherein some publique speech was had or to heare relation made of some sentence or iudgement of the Senate And thus differeth the word Ecclesia from Synagoga or Synagog For Synagoga signifieth any manner of congregation be it neuer so common and inordinate But Ecclesia betokeneth an ordained congregation and such as is called together for some cause From hence the Apostles translated the name Ecclesia to their purpose terming the Church by it for resemblaunce and likenesse sake For the church is gods congregation neither comming together by chance without cause nor beeing inordinate but called foorth by the voice of the Lorde and the crie of the word that is by the ministers of the gospel from the kingdome of Satan to hear or embrace Gods word This congregation or companie of those which are called of God to the knowledge of the gospell the Latines keeping still the Greeke woorde call Ecclesia But it shall bee requisite that we a little more fully define what the Church is The church of God is a congregation or companie of men The definition of the Church chosen from euerlasting of god to eternal life which from the beginning of the woorld vnto the ende thereof is gathered of the sonne of god out of all mankinde by the holie ghost and the Woorde consenting in true faith and which the Sonne of God defendeth preserueth and at length glorifieth with glorie and life euerlasting Thus is the true Church of God defined whereof the Creede dooth properly speake Obiection 1. They which are in the church perish not as the definition affirmeth Manie hypocrites are in the Church Therefore either hypocrites shall not perish or it is false that they which are in the Church perish not Aunswere They which are in the inuisible Church perish not and of this was our definition But the Minor proposâ—â—ion speaketh of the visible Church in which are manie hypocrires Obiection 2. Where the inuisible church is not neither is the visible Jn the time of popery was not the inuisible church therefore there was not the visible Aunswere I denie the Minor For there also were remnantes that is there were alwaies some mingled with those dregs who held the foundation some more purely some lesse In summe the Church was oppressed but not extinguished 2 How manie waies the church is taken THE church is taken either for the true church The false Church or for the false The false church is vnproperly called the church and is a companie arrogating vnto themselues the title of Christes church but which do not folow the same but rather persequute it The true church is either visible The true church 〈◊〉 either vâ—â—ible or inuisible or inuisible The visible church is a companie among men embracing and professing the true and vncorrupt doctrine of the Lawe and the Gospel and vsing the Sacramentes aright according to Christes institution and professing obedience vnto the doctrine in which company are many vnregenerated or hypocrites In the 〈…〉 perish consenting notwithstanding agreeing to the doctrine in which also the Son of God is forcible to regenerate some by the vertue of his spirite vnto euerlasting life Hither appertaine the parables of the seede and the tares The inuisible church is a companie of those which are elected to eternall life in whom a newe life is begun here by the holie Ghost is perfected in the woorlde to come They which are in this inuisible church They which are in the inuisible Church neuer perish neuer perish neither are any hypocrites therein but the Elect only of whom it is said Ioh. 10.28 No man shal plucke my sheep out of mine hands Moreouer both these partes of the true Church both visible and inuisible are either vniuersall or particular The Vniuersall visible Church The Vniuersall visible Church is the companie of all those which professe the doctrine wheresoeuer in the worlde they be The particular Visible Church The particular visible is also a companie of those which professe the doctrine but in some certaine place The Visible Church is Vniuersall in respect of the profession of one Faith in Christ and of one Doctrine and worshippe But it is particular in respect of place and habitation The Vniuersall Inuisible and of diuersitie of rites and customes So also the Inuisible Church is Vniuersall as all the Elect in whatsoeuer place they bee and at whatsoeuer time they liued haue one faith The particular Inuisible againe it is particular as either in this or that place they haue the same faith Now all particular Churches are partes of the Vniuersall and the Visible are partes of the Vniuersall church Inuisible And of this Vniuersall Jnuisible Church doth the Article of our Creed speake properlie I beleeue the Holie Catholique Church For besides that the vniuersall inuisible church is catholique it is also nobilitated with this title that it is Holie Furder in this is the true communion of Saints between Christ and al his members It is called inuisible not that the men are inuisible but because their faith and godlinesse is inuisible neither is knowen of anie but of themseleus in whom it is neither can wee indeede discerne certainly the godly from the hypocrites in the church The TriumphaÌ„t and Militant parts of the Vniuersall Inuisible The partes of this vniuersal inuisible church may these two not vnfitly be accounted The church Militant and Triumphant The Militant is in this world fighting warring vnder the banner of Christ against the Diuel the woorlde and our flesh The Triumphant which both now triumpheth with the blessed Angels in heauen and shall after the resurrection enioie a full triumph Nowe although the Militant church is
by necessity excluded from it But such a communion of saints with Christ is spirituall as the Apostle doth shew 1. Cor. 6.17 Hee that is ioined vnto the Lorde is one spirit 1. Ioh. 4.13 Hereby know we that we dwel in him and he in vs because he hath giuen vs of his spirit Iohn 15.5 He is the vine we are the branches Ephes 1.22 4.15 5.30.31 He is the Bridegroome and we with the whole Church are his spouse 2 Such is our eating of Christ as is his abiding in vs but this is spirituall For that Christs abiding in vs is spirituall is sufficientlie perceiued by this in that such is his abiding in vs as is his Fathers Jf anie man loue me he will keepe my woord and my Father will loue him and we will come vnto him and will dwell with him But how doth the Father dwell in vs or abide with vs Truely by his spirite Therefore Christ also so abideth with vs or dwelleth in vs. 3 Christ abideth in vs perpetually Therefore that abiding or presence is not corporall because as touching his humane nature he saith Me yee shall not haue alwaies Therefore hee is not eaten of vs corporallie nay hee cannot be eaten of vs corporallie except he be in vs corporally and that also perpetuallie 3 Vnto the former mâ—y be adioined also argumentes taken from the sacrifice and adoration Wheresoeuer Christ is present corporallie whether it be after a visible or inuisible manner there he is to be adored to wit by our mindes and the motions of our bodies coÌ„uerted turned thither But he is not to be adored in the supper Therefore he is not present in the supper corporally That he is not to be adored in the supper is easilie proued For it is neuer granted in the new testament to tie bind inuocation to anie certain place Ioh. 4.21 The houre commeth when yee shal neither in this mountain nor at Ierusalem worship the father Againe Jf christ be so be adored worshipped in the supper by our mindes and motions of bodie conuerted vnto the bread that whole oblation sacrifice should consist in the hands of sacrificing masse-Priests because they offer the Son vnto the Father to obtain remission of sins and so were his crucifieng to be reiterated The third sort of argumentes which are drawen from like places of scripture where namelie the same thing is deliuered in words whereof there is no controuersie 1 COrporall eating is in expresse termes condemned by the holie Ghost Jt is the spirite saith Christ that quickeneth the flesh profiteth nothing By these woordes Christ expressely condemneth the corporal eating of his flesh whether visible or inuisible 2 The bread which we break saith the Apostle is the coÌ„munion of the body of christ But this coÌ„munioÌ„ is spiritual because when the same Apostle opposeth it to the communion of diuels ye caÌ„not saith he drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of diuels yee cannot be partakers of the lords table and of the table of Diuels by these words the Apostle denieth that the wicked can be partakers of the bodie and blood of christ in the supper And therefore there is no corporall eating of the body and bloude of christ in his supper 3 Christ saith that the bread is his bodie Therefore they tie not themselues to the verie woorde who say that christs body is in the bread vnder the bread with the bread 4 The cup is the new testament that is the cup is a signe of the new testament for it cannot bee otherwise meant or taken For the new testament is the seale of the promise or the promise it self but not the thing promised Likewise The cup is the communion of the bloud of christ The bread is the communion of the body of christ But this communion is a spirituall eating and drinking of the body and bloud of christ as is apparaunt by the wordes of the Apostle and the signes of that spiritual eating and drinking are bread and wine 5 In the Euangelist To eat christ which is the liuing bread which descended from heauen Likewise To eat Christs flesh and to drinke his bloud signifieth to beleeue in Christ Therefore in the words of the institutioÌ„ it signifieth the same also because christ doth not here otherwise expound them 6 There are also the like places of scripture vttered sacramentally of other sacramentes which confirme also the truth and meaning of this as Circumcision is the couenant The lamb is the Passeouer The leuitical sacrifices are said to be an expiation or doing away of sinne The bloud of sacrifices is called the bloud of the couenant Baptisme is the washing of the new birth Therefore these woords also This is my bodie are in like sort sacramentally spoken 7 Christ commaundeth his supper to bee celebrated and the bread wine to be eaten drunken in remembrance of him but this remeÌ„brance is chiefly performed by faith not corporally Moreouer that in memorial wherof we doe any thing is not it selfe present because we are not said to remember things that are present 8 By one spirite are we al baptized into one bodie whether we be Iewes or Grecians whether we be bond or free and haue been al made to drinke into one spirite Wherefore after the same maner doe we al eate the same bread Which Paul also manifestly sheweth affirming That al the Fathers did eate the same spirituall foode That eating therefore is not corporall whereby we are made partakers of the body and bloud of christ otherwise before the comming of christ the fathers should not haue beene at al made partakers of christ as hauing not as yet taken flesh Vnto these argumentes drawen out of the sacred Scripture and the ground of our faith may be added testimonies of the fathers and the purer church of al which we will at this present bring only that one notable saying of Macharius the Monke Bread and wine are a correspondent type of his flesh and they who receiue the bread which is shewed eate the flesh of Christ spirituallie AGAINST THE TRANSVBSTANTIATION OF THE PAPISTES NOW it is easy to see what we are to thinke of Transubstantiation euen that it is an impious inuention deuise of the Papists which also we wil shew and proue briefly by diuers reasons 1 Paul calleth expressely that which is taken bread both before after the eating Therefore that which is taken in the supper is not really the body 2 Christ brake bread but hee did not then breake his body Therefore the bread is not really his body 3 The Bread was not giuen for vs But the body of christ was giuen for vs Therefore the bread is not really Christs body 4 Christ willeth vs to take this sacrament and to take bread and wine in remembraunce of him Therefore the bread is called the body of Christ not reallie but in that it is a memorial of his body that is the bread is a remembrauncer
vnto vs of christs body euen as also it is coÌ„manded in the words of the institution Shew the Lords death til he come 5 The Analogie proportion of the sign the thing doth manifestly enough refel transubstantiatioÌ„ For in euery sacrament ar these two the sign the thing signified but the sign should perish if the bread should be transubstantiated that is if there shold be a change of the bread into christs body for so should remaine the thing signified onlie and not the signe therefore no sacrament Oâ—iection But the Accidents of bread and wine doe still remaine as whitenesse softnesse and such like Aunswere But so wil there not bee a proportion betweene the signe and the thing signified because accidents doe not nourish You can not say as the accidents of bread and wine nourish the body so the body of Christ nourisheth my soule vnto euerlasting life And further also the promise of God would by this meanes be made voide and frustrate For God promised that hee would giue the Messias not of the substaunce of wheat and wine but of the seede of Dauid Reply But we saie not that the bread and wine are conuerted into the substaunce of Christs bodie but that the substaunce of the bread and wine vanisheth quite awaie in place thereof succeedeth the substance of the bodie and bloud of Christ Aunswere Of this bread christ speaketh That it is his body and the same bread both before and in and after the administration of it is called bread Christ saith not this which is vnder the forme of bread is my body but he saith this that is this bread is my bodie And Paul saith The bread whith we breake is the communion of the bodie of Christ And againe For we that are many are one breade and one body Againe As often as yee shall eate this bread c. And a little after Whosoeuer shal eate this bread vnworthilie c. Moreouer Let a man examine himselfe and so let him eate of this bread Wherefore it is plaine and euident that the substaunce of bread and wine neither is changed neither perisheth neither lieth hid vnder a forme but remaineth stil the same bread and the same wine Nowe that there is no transubstantiation or conuersion of the substaunce of the breade and wine into the bodie of Christ is thus prooued If there bee anie transubstantiation christes institution is peruerted for it abolisheth and bringeth to nothing the substaunce of the bread which is the verie thing that in this ceremony is the body of christ For seing the bread is the body of Christ then doubtlesse if the bread remaine not neither doth the bodie of christ remaine in the supper and so christs woordes are no longer true when hee saide that that bread is his bodie and that wine his â—loud The Transubstantiaries if they be demaunded what thing it iâ— that they call the bodie of christ in the supper certainely they will not aunswere it is bread for they haue no bread left in the supper because it is transubstantiated but they will send vs to the very substance of christs body absolutely coÌ„sidered couered on the altar with the accidentes of bread Wherefore all they er who obiect and present the bodie of christ beeing considered by it selfe in it own proper matter and subiect to the external actions of the supper These and the former reasons refell consubstantiation also wherefore neither wil we bring any moe reasons seuerally against it Onely some certaine obiections of the Consubstantiaries themselues we will refute A refutation of obiections framed to confirme consubstantiation 1 OBiection Christ said This is my bodie But Christ is true Therefore we must beleeue him setting apart all Philosophicall subtiltie and sharpenes and so by consequent bread is not a signe of his bodie Aunswere Wee graunt their argument if they prooue that Christ putteth this to bee his meaning namely that Jn Vnder and With the bread is his bodie Replie But it is said here This is my bodie Aunswere In other sacramentes also are the like speeches as The Paschal Lambe is called the Passâ—ouer Bapâ—isme the washing of the newe-birth Circumcision the couenant Replie But we say not that the bread is the bodie of Christ reallie as the Papists say but that the bodie is in the bread Aunswere But in this respect the Papists seeme more to keep the word whom yet the Apostle expressely refuteth calling it bread both before the eating and in the eating and after the eating 2. It is no where saide either by Christ or by Saint Paul That the bodie of Christ is in the bread vnder the bread with the bread neither any where in scripture is this expressed But the true sense and meaning of those wordes is expressed in the text it self namely that the bread is the bodie of Christ symbolically that is as a symbole or tokeÌ„ of it For in the text it is plainly said Do this in remembrance of me So Paul also calleth the bread the communion of the bodie of christ Wherefore the bread is the representing or symbolical signifieng body of christ The bread is a sign of christs bodie but not a couert wherein his bodie it self remaineth 2 Obiection Christ is omnipotent Therefore his bodie may be there and so because he said it it is there Answere The reason is of no force which will conclude a thing to bee done because it may bee done Replie Whatsoeuer is at the right hand of God is euerie where Aunswere It is false For the sitting at the right hand of God signifieth the vnion of both natures in Christ his power and rule and excellencie of gifts Now although he rule all thinges yet is it not necessarie that hee shoulde bee present in bodie It is sufficient that his person is euery where and is present in dignitie As also hee sustained all thinges euen then when hee hung on the Crosse neither yet was his bodie euery where Therefore to say that christ sitteth at the right hand of the Father signifieth that christ is the person by whom the Father mediately gouerneth ruleth al things especiallie the church But no part of this Sitting is the vbiquitie of christs bodie it sufficeth that christs person is euery where 3 Obiection That which quickeneth and nourisheth vs is receiued into vs the bodie and bloud of christ doe quicken vs therefore they are receiued into vs. Aunswere The Maior is but meere particular and therefore false in general for not whatsoeuer quickeneth and nourisheth vs must necessarily be receiued into vs. That only must be receiued into vs necessarily which quickneth nourisheth naturally that is by a ioint-touching of our bodie This meate which so nourisheth vs after a naturall manner dooth not nourishe vs except thereby the substaunce of our bodie bee increased But wee speake farre otherwise of the nourishing of the soule which is spirituall Christes bodie doth not at all nourish vs naturally