Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
death_n	bread_n	cup_n	eat_v	7,692	5	7.7115	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A07949	The tryall of the nevv religion Contayning a plaine demonstration, that the late faith and doctrine of the Church of Rome, is indeede the new religion. By Thomas Bell.	Bell, Thomas, fl. 1593-1610.	1608 (1608)	STC 1832; ESTC S101552	27,259	56

Bread was assumpted but in a different manner from the opinion of Rupertus Another opinion a firmeth the annihilation of the Bread Durandus for all that telleth vs that onely the forme of Bread is changed and ohat the matter of Bread remaineth still in the Eucharist But Bellarmine the Pope and all his lesuites hold with the Councell of Trents definition that the Bread is transubstantiated into the bodie of Christ Behold this sive● harmonic and good agreement in this important poynt of popish fayth Of this subiect I haue written elswhere 〈◊〉 I will here onely touch the birth age thereof Transubstantion is not onely repugnant to all Phylosophy but also so absurd in all Christian speculation that it was vnknowne to the Church of God and to all approoued Councells Fathers and Histories for the space of one thousand and two 〈◊〉 yeeres It was first hatched by Pope Innocentiue the 〈◊〉 of that Name in the late Councell of Lateran which was holden 1215. yeeres after Christ. Yea this councell and the determination thereof was of so small reputation at that time that Durandus they ovvne famous popish Doctor who liued abode threescore yeres after it boldy published the contrary doctrine Which thing doth ●ogall the Papists that they cannot tell what to say to it But seeing this monster of popish sayth was hid and vnknowne for 1206. yeres together I must needs conclude with this ineuitable illation Ergo it is but a rottērag of the new religion CHAP. 11. Of Popish invocation of Saints OF this subiect I haue disputed at large in my Suruey The Papists in their fond popish invocation ascribe that to Saints which is onely and soly proper to Christ himselfe I prooue it because they make the Saints departed I will not say Traytors buried in hell not onely Mediators of intercession which is their vsuall refuge and fond so imagined euasion but also of redemption and saluation This one example may suffice for many Thomas 〈◊〉 sometimes Bishop of Canterbury what a subiect let others Iudge is invocated of the Pope and all his popish crew not barely and absolutely as an holy man if perhaps he so were which is more then I know but as the Sonne of the liuing GOD and the onely Sauiour of the World This Affection to the godly may seeme wonderfull but it is such a knowne truth as no Papist whatsoeuer he be 〈◊〉 without blushing denie the same These are the expresse words of their Hymne which they both say and sing vppon that day which they keep holie for his praise and honour Tuper Thomae 〈◊〉 quē pro te 〈…〉 Christe scandere qua Thomas ascendit By the blood of Thomas which he for thee did spend bring vs shether O Christ whether Thomas did ascend Loe Thomas 〈◊〉 died for vs and shed his blood to bring vs to heauen as the Pope telleth vs and would enforce vs to believe If this Poperly be not flat blasphemy my wits are not at home Let the indifferent Reader iudge and bee carefull of his soule This blasphemy is confirmed by the vsuall practise of the Papists especially of the Iesuits For their brother Iesuite Polanthus in his Treatise of Consesson testifieth as a truth vnto the world that they euer adde in the end of their Absolutions these expresse words The Passion of our Lord lesus Christ the merrits of the blessed Virgm Mary and of all Saints and all the good thou shalt doe and the punishment thou shalt suffer be to thee for the remission of thy sinnes for increase of grace and for the reward of eternall life Loe the merits of Saints are ioynt purchasers of our saluation vvith Christes blood and our owne workes God haue metcy vpon vs miserable sinners procure vs remission of our sinnes increase of Grace and etternall glorie O intollerable Popery who can indure to heare thy blasphemie No Scripture no Councell no Father no approued historie was euer acquainted with this newlie inuented heresie neuer knowne to the church of Christ for the space of one thousand yeres and odde I must therefore perforce conclude vvith this ineuitable illation Ergo popish invocation of Saints is but a rotten ragge of the New Religion CHAP. 12. Of the Communion vnder 〈◊〉 kind CHrist onely by the vniforme cōsent of all learned Papists hath lawfull power to institute a Sacrament Yet notwithstanding our Papists haue presumed to alter this holy Order For Christ commaunded the holy Eucharist or Communion to be celebrated in two distinct kindes viz. in Bread and wine He commaunded all to drinke and they all dranke of it saith the holy Euangelist And the Apostle Paule vrging Christes institution to the Corinthians telleth them plainly and religiously That they must receiue the holy Eucharist vnder both kindes This was the practise of the auncient Church for the space of 1230. yeeres after Christ. About which time they began in some odde Churches to leane off the Cuppe and to minister the Sacrament in Bread onely But that was done as Aquinas confesseth in some few places onely Afterward the Councell of Constance about the yeere of our Lord 1414. decreed it as an Article of Popish fayth that the Eucharist might be lawfully receiued vnder one kinde I therefore must perforce conclude with this ineuitable illation Ergo to receiue the holy Eucharist vnder one kind onely is but a rotten ragge of the New Religion CHAP. 13. Of priuate Masse THe priuate communicating in the Popish Masse where the Priest deuoureth vp all alone is wicked prophane excerable because it is repugnant to Christes institution who cōmaunded all to drinke thereof and to the Euangelist who affirmeth all to haue drunke thereof as also to the Apostle who chargeth the vnpriested Corinthians and laicall people to make a remembrance of the Lords death vntill his second comming so often as they receiue the holy Eucharist and this to do as well by drinking the Cuppe as by eating the Bread This was the vse and practise of the Church euerie where for more then a thousand yeres together But afterward when the peoples deuotion began to be remisse the priestes then deuoured vp all alone I therefore cannot but conclude with this ineuitable illation Ergo late popish priuate Masse is but a rotten ragge of the New Religion CHAP. 14. Of Pope Martins dispensation for the Brother to marry his naturall Sister POpe Martin saith Antiminus the popish Archbishop canonized saint tooke vpon him to dispense with one that he might mary his owne naturall sister Siluester Prierus a famous religious Fryer sometime Maister of the Popes sacred pallace hath these wordes Howbeit pope Martin the fift dispensed with him who had contracted and consumated matrimony with his owne naturall sister hauing first cōsulted with his skilfull Diuines so to auoyde scandale which otherwise was likely to ensue therevpon Bartholmaeus Fumus a religious Dominican fryer hath these