the party baptized and in the Lords supper bread wine with the rites and orders that christ himselfe ordained And this againe by a double manner of speech for sometimes vnder this worde there are meant onely the outward signes as when Augustine affirmeth August that the wicked do eate Christ as in respect of the sacrament And somtimes it is vsed for the signes ioyned with the very thing it selfe signified as when Irenaeus saith Irenaeus that the sacrament consisteth of two things one heauenlie and the other earthlie for hee calleth the heauenlie thing the body and bloud of christ and the earthlie the bread and the wine and all that together hee nameth the sacrament And this much concerning the word it selfe or the name sacrament Let vs now at the length come to the matter Sith nowe therefore that euerie sacrament is a signe wee must needes put the word Sacrament in the predicament of relation or relatiues as the logicians call them that is amongst such things as haue mutuall respectes one of them to an other And sith relation must needes be amongest sundrie thinges which haue mutuall respect one of them to an other wee must therefore of necessitie confesse that in the sacraments there is a signe and the thing signified Neyther when I deliuer these 2 parts which indeed do meete or wherof in truth al sacraments do consist do I shut out the word August Let the worde saith Augustine come vnto the element and it shal become a sacrament I do not therefore exclude or shut out the worde which is as it were the life soule of either of the parts and to which the sacraments themselues as wee haue saide before are adioyned as seales And thus farre foorth euen they agree with vs which otherwise doo most of all dissent from vs. Wherefore lette vs nowe see which bee those signes and which bee those thinges signified for in this point we doo not all agree Wee call water the signe in Baptisme and the thing signified we call Christs bloud by the washing whereof we hauing obtained forgiuenes of sinnes and being mortified in our flesh we are saued But concerning baptisme I will not nowe say anie more In the supper certainelie there are two signes or rather signes of two sortes For some of them are certaine materiall and substantiall signes as for example the bread and wine other-some are actions and sacramentall rites which are not for all that vaine or superfluous acts but haue there certaine sacramentall consideratton and respect from the Lordes institution of whiche point wee will speake heereafter I say then that in the Lordes supper these are outward materiall visible and as you would say palpable signes that God hath annected vnto his word euen the bread and wine This the Papistes denie as who after that they haue confessed that the sacraments doo consist of a signe and a thing signified doo yet notwithstanding afterwardes take the bare accidents of bread and wine as coulour forme and such like for the signes themselues for they maintaine that in the Lords supper there remaineth not the substāce of bread and wine but that that vanisheth away that there cōmeth in the place thereof the substance of the Lords bodie and bloud Therefore in their iudgement the signes shall be the accidents And which I beseech you Forsooth whitenesse roundnes and rednesse if they consecrate red wine which accidents they doo by a new name call kind shew or forme Augustine But as Augustine rightlie teacheth Vnlesse there were a certeine analogie proportion and agreement betweene the things signified the signes themselues they could not be counted sacraments Now betweene accidents substances there is no agreement therefore the sacraments as they call them shal not be sacraments for it behooueth the signes so to agree with the things signified that they may represent to mēs minds that which they signifie I will speake somewhat more plainelie A similitude If admonishing some one I would haue him with his eies to behold and with his mind to cōceiue a man I will not set before him the image of a horsse or of an oxe to looke vpon because that outward shape or forme of an horsse or of an oxe cannot beget in his mind the conceit portrature or image of a man although all these things that is to say man horsse oxe c. are referred to one generall word or terme to wit liuing creature much lesse then shall the shape of an herbe or forme of an horsse bring to my minde and memorie the forme or shape of a man and least of all others shall those accidents which are void of all substance as whitenesse rednesse roundnesse c. call to my remembrance things that in deed are to wit the bodie bloud of Christ In that papists make the accidents of the elements the signes of the sacraments there followeth three absurdities therevpon But it was the Lords purpose in his supper to offer vnto our mindes and thoughts the verie food of our soules that is to say Christes bodie deliuered to death for vs and his bloud shed for the forgiuenes of our sinnes betweene which and those accidents there is no proportion and agreement whereas yet notwithstanding bread and wine the verie food of our bodies in deed doo most fitlie euen set before our verie eies almost that same spirituall nourishment that we must haue from him And sith no man can be fed by accidents how can such accidents then represent that same eternall food Furthermore though by the meanes of some accidents materiall things may be set before our eies yet all accidents doo not belong to or agree with euerie matter for manie both white and round things may be beheld which shall not for all that represent a bodie and who hath told them that the bread which Christ brake and gaue vnto his disciples was white or round in such sort as they bake it and make it Therefore the true signes of Christes bodie and bloud are the verie bread and the verie wine which thing the apostle declareth 1. Corinth 10.16 saieng The bread which we breake is the communion or partaking of the bodie of Christ and the cup that we blesse is the partaking of the bloud of Christ And that same consubstantiation or transubstantiation is a filthie forgerie and deuise of satan Now let vs come to the thing signified and first wee will declare Enemies to truth are of two sorts that is ignorant and malicious what manner and kinde of signification this is that wee speake of For this is obiected against vs partlie by some that know not what is deliuered and taught in our churches and partlie by other some that doo maliciouslie slander vs that wee saie wee set out to be beheld in the sacraments as it were a vaine picture or a certeine dead image that maie stir vp in vs the remembraunce of Christ when yet notwithstanding
it it was not bread onlie but his bodie also Wherefore they must of necessity confes that these words This is my bodie these againe This bread is my bodie meane and signifie all one thing which not onlie all the ancient fathers do affirme in innumerable places Luther Brentius but Luther in manie places and Brentius also both in his booke called Syntagma and in his catechisme likewise Seluerieus Eberus yea Seluericus Eberus doo as it were in so many words testifie also this truth If yet notwithstanding they will haue euen the bodie vnited to the bread to be shewed out thereby I answer they must of necessitie then admit the trope or figure Synecdoche and that therefore the institution of Christ or the words of the institution can not be vnderstood without a trope or figure He proueth the aduersaries to fall into that which they dislike in others And what man that is in his right wits shall they persuade that the word bodie can at one the selfe same time be spoken of the bread of the bodie without an other Synedoche also And this you see what they haue gained who thinke it and publish it in others to be a horrible heresie by a trope or figure to vnderstand the words of the supper wheras they themselues are inforced and found out to make a double trope or figure Now let vs come to the word Est The word Est is expounded that is to say Is. Seeing that whatsoeuer is is not after one sort for to be hath place in all the predicaments when these men from hense gather thus or doo after this sort expound these words This bread is Christs bodie therfore it is essentiallie Christes bodie doo they not I beseech you speake as if they should say This is a liuing creature therfore it is a man And againe doo they reason lesse fondlie when they gather thus This bread is Christs bodie therfore this bread is Christs bodie not absent but present Now whereas they say that the word bodie because it is a substance cannot be otherwise spoken or vttered than substantiallie I say they should haue left this to the papists who are therefore inforced to bring in their transubstantiation of the bread because they say that things sundered or separated one of them from another could not be spoken one of another that therfore also this propositioÌ„ was false the bread is the bodie except they granted either that the bread it selfe became nothing or by changing were tourned into a substance of another sort to wit Vbiquitaries in vrging the baâ—e letter as absurd as Papists at the least the substance of his body Therfore these men alone do keep or vrge that most fondlie the bare worde or letter But these men of whom I now speake though in outward shewe and speech they refuse all tropes and figures in the exposition of these words of the institution doo yet notwithstanding ouer and besides the two tropes aboue mentioned that is to say The aduersaries by power of trueth constrained to fall into three tropes in the exposition of a fewe words though otherwise the name be odious to them the figure Synecdoche diuersly vsed in deede bring in an other and that same very strange and woonderfull when they will haue this speech this bread is my bodie to signifie and meane as much as if Christ shoulde haue saide my bodie is verily present wyth or in or vnder this bread Concerning which this is my minde that whosoeuer hee is that vseth this last forme or manner of speaking dooth not shew what the bodie it selfe is but rather declareth where the body is and therefore vseth the worde is not in the predicament of substance but in the predicament of Site as they call it Nowe I come to speake of that worde Body The word Body handled The thing that about this matter is laide vnto our charge The aduersaries charge is this that instead of the true bodie of Christ deliuered to death for vs wee substitute and place I can not tell what typicall or figuratiue or as it pleaseth them to call it fantasticall bodie when wee affirme that the bodie is spoken of the bread not that the bread is the very bodie it selfe but because it is as a signe and pledge of that true body of his which was giuen for vs. The answere thereto But is this to ascribe vnto Christ a fained body as these men slaunder vs Or is it not rather rightly to declare and shew in what sense that true and onelie bodie may bee saide or spoken of the bread to wit not as it is bread but in as much as it is a sacrament of that his bodie Therfore all these interpretations following which that stincking slanderer Illyricus tosseth too and fro Illyricus and his slaunders as if they were contrary one of them to an other that is to saye This bread sacramentally signifieth or sacramentallye is Christes bodie or againe This bread is the sacrament of Christes bodie doo in deede and trueth and altogether expresse but one and the selfe-same iudgement and matter Now that the worde bodie is in many places vsed by all the old right beleeuing writers for the verie signe of the bodie All the auntient Fathers vse the worde bodie for the signe of the bodie our aduersaries must of necessitie whether they will or no confesse sith that they feare not to affirme that Christes bodye is made broken consumed and why shoulde it not bee so likewise when it is saide to enter into the mouth To be short what strife and stubbornenesse is this of theirs They dare not denie the bread to be the sacrament of Christes body and why then will they not allowe of this interpretation Heere is the reason forsooth because they woulde haue it called the Sacrament of the bodie present Then the controuersie shal not be The state of the controuersie or question is not about the interpretation of the wordes of institution but about the presence of Christs bodie yet touching the interpretation and meaning of these wordes of the institution in which there is no mention at all neither of presence nor absence but herein onelie shall they consist whether that bodie of which that bread is saide to be the Sacrament be absent or present which controuersie I can not so much as suppose howe these men should determine out of these wordes This is my bodie The second part of the Lords supper to wit the institution of the cup and what is meant thereby Hitherto wee haue spoken of the first part of the Lords supper to wit the bread but now let vs come to the other part to wit the cuppe But tell vs I pray you what wee must vnderstande by the woord cup Verily by their confession euen that which is contained in the cuppe that is to say the wine and yet ouer and besides that the bloud
wee yet still dayly seeke and the more in number or strength that the obiectes of our faith so muche the more meete is that that meane measure of faith that wee haue beeing stirred vppe in vs it shoulde become so muche the more effectuall and powerfull For else what doo these men gather which wee may not euen from the very first institution and celebration of the Lords supper as safly collect against the repetition or often administration of the same A reason of the assertion For certainely if we conclude that the Lords supper is therfore superfluous because we receiue nothing therein but that which wee receiued before in the worde and baptisme then this also will followe therevppon that it is altogether vnprofitable to repaire the second or third time to the Lords supper seeing that hee that commeth thither the seconde or sundry times receiueth nothing more than that very selfe-same thing which before hee had laide holde of and receiued than when he came first thereto The second obiection with the answere therto But they say there is giuen to all that come thither not bread alone but that bread which is the sacrament otherwise Christs words shold be frustrate saying This is my bodie I grant all this and yet I deny the consequēce Both things that is the signe and the thing signified As man standeth of two parts so accordingly two things are offered in the supper is giuen or offered to all therefore all receiue both This hangeth not together for two things are offered one to the body the other to the minde the one is to bee taken holde of by the meane of the body either to life or to death the other is to bee apprehended by faith and yet but to life onelie Is it any maruell then that two thinges beeing to bee receiued by seuerall instrumentes and meanes though perhappes they bee both offered in one action as they saye the one of them should be receiued by euery one that bringeth the common instrument of the body and the other apprehended but of them alone that bring wyth them that same spirituall and onelie fit instrument to apprehend Christ by No verilye And yet heere againe I pray you marke howe great the strength of trueth is Those that contend so stiffely and that also wythout any profit to the church about vnwoorthie communicants for to what ende shoulde wee trauaile so muche about them A distinction voide of reason and religion Doo notwithstanding distinguish betweene such vnworthie persons as liue not christianlie enough or otherwise are not sufficiently prepared for receiuing of the supper yet so as they feare not to affirme that euen they also eate Christes fleshe though it be to their destruction vnlesse they repent and such as are altogether the wicked and vnbeleeuers who receiue nothing but the bare signes But if that same reall Consubstantiation which they fantasie bee true then this will ensue therevpon that not onelie all reasonable creatures without exception receuing the signs but the very beasts let there bee reuerence in hearing this that I nowe say A warie but yet withall a most necessarie caution and let not any manne take it as though I spake blasphemously eating that bread and drinking that wine shall haue receiued also the flesh and the bloud of Christ An obiection answered But they except further against this truth that the vnworthy are saide to be guiltie of the Lordes body and bloud Wee graunt that too Is it because they did vnwoorthily receiue the body and bloud 1. Corinth 11.27 No in deede But because they did eate vnwoorthily of that bread and drincke vnwoorthilye of that cuppe 1. Cor. 11.28 29. or because they discerned not the Lordes body for that same vnwoorthie vsing and receiuing of the holy signes or pledges redoundeth vnto the contempt of the thing signified and offered A fit similitude euen as he may iustly be accounted guiltie of some crime yea of treason if you will against the Emperoures Maiestie that in contempt or reprochfullye dooth violate the Emperours picture or image Wee see then that the wicked are become guiltye of the body and bloud of Christe not that they haue receiued them vnlesse a man will take the body for the signe of the bodye which is oftentimes vsed in the antient Fathers but because they haue thorowe their vnbeleefe reiected or refused them For Christ him selfe can neuer be sundered from that his quickening power Christ and his graces are neuer sundered wherefore looke of whom soeuer hee is receiued nowe indeede hee is receiued onely of the beleeuers they must of necessitye bee deliuered from eternall death Iohn 5.24 as he himself plainelie beareth witnesse Nowe whereas these men except against this trueth An obiection shortlie answered that christ is deliuered to some for iudgement and that thorowe the very fault of the hearers We grant that also but yet so in respect as Christ is thorowe their vnbeleefe refused and cast from them and not receiued of them by faith Lastly whereas these men suppose The last obiection with the answere therto that Christ him selfe can not bee truely partaken vnlesse hee be indeede apprehended both by the handes and mouth also The last obiection with the aunsweare thereto and that therefore we holde a communicating not of Christ himselfe but of his efficacie and power let vs a little consider this falshoode and weigh this slaunder First therefore we must knowe that when we remoue a bodily eating that so wee may establishe a spirituall and mysticall eating that both these must bee vnderstoode not of the thing it selfe which is communicated or partaken but of the maner of communicating or partaking For neither did Christ himselfe say Luke 22.19 This is the merite or benefite of my death but this is that my body which is giuen for you neyther doo wee suppose that Christ himselfe can be lesse vnskilfully separated from his efficacie A similitude when the question is of Spirituall nourishement than if a manne woulde denie that we had neede to eate bread it selfe and drincke wine it selfe that so afterwardes wee might drawe or fetch bodily nourishment from the same But wee saye and affirme that this manner of communicating or partaking is not bodilie neither yet that it can be perfourmed by bodilie instruments or meanes but altogether spirituall and mysticall as which is performed by faith alone which faith imbraceth that matter Faith alone imbraceth the words and sacraments all the graces offered vs therein that is offered vnto vs in the word and sacraments But if they will denie that this can be performed because of such a great distance of places let them then cease at the last to accuse vs of vngodlinesse as though we would either denie Gods almightie power or giue sentence touching this mysterie by the rules of worldlie philosophie And yet we will not denie but that
so it pleaseth God to vse his word written and preached that so hee might teach vs the knowledge of saluation yet the way and order in both of these is maruellously diuers if not altogether contrary For whereas our minde by a certaine ingendred and natural power is apt to conceiue vnderstand worldlie things yea and though it be true that some men are more apte to learne than othersome yet all men generallie are indued with facultie and power to vnderstand those points either by bookes or the mouth of their teacher when wee come to the true knowledge of God and that his heuenlie secret touching our saluatiō God must of necessitie vse a far other power in framing and disposing our minds that so our eares beeing purged and our harts also we may in our vnderstanding comprehend these matters and hauing comprehended them approoue of them yea consent vnto them and stay our selues vpon them or else we shall neuer attaine thereto And this is that same inuisible working power of the holie-ghost which graueth into our heartes that which the minde perceiueth or vnderstandeth otherwise the pastors and techers might speak to deafe people as it doth by too too common examples appeare at this day Therfore the Apostle saieth 1. Corinth 1.23 that the gospell is an offense or stumbling blocke to the Iewes and that it seemeth foolishnesse vnto the Gentiles And in another place that it is to some 2. Corinth 2.16 the sauor of life vnto life and to other-some the sauor of death vnto death But to whome is it the sauor of life vnto life Euen vnto suche as so perceiue and receiue it that they admit and submit themselues thereto And yet it can not be vnderstood and receiued vnlesse the holie-ghost doo by his powerfull grace alter and change vs. Wherfore to them then it must bee the sauor of death vnto death that doo refuse it and cast it farre from them Neither is God or the gospell it selfe cause of this neglect or contempt but the verye corrupt nature of man 1. Corinth 2.14 for the naturall manne perceiueth not the thinges of the spirite of God But to come to the matter that word of GOD that soundeth into our eares is an instrument ordained and directed by the Holie-ghost to teach vs that so wee maye vnderstande suche thinges as are needefull to bee vnderstoode for saluation and may by true faith applie vnto our selues suche thinges as wee vnderstoode and haue yeelded vnto The word by it selfe And this speeche of GOD talking so with vs is sometimes naked as it were and simple and sometimes againe is so decked and trimmed as it were with other things that euen the matter it selfe by reason of the rites and orders The worde with the sacraments annexed therto annected to the speech seemeth after a sort not to be spoken but to be doone Examples of the naked or bare speech are these infinite promises of the gospell as when wee heare this GOD so loued the worlde that hee gaue his onelie begotten Sonne Iohn 3.16 that whosoeuer beleeueth in him shoulde not perishe but haue eternall life So we reade and daily heare in the church the writings of the Prophets Apostles hauing exhortations reprehensions and comforts adioyned to the same according as good sheepheards do their duetie publikely and priuately And yet there are sometimes ioyned to this word of GOD some signes with certaine rites and orders that so the speeche may not onelie beate orders but also the thinges that are looked vppon may come to our sight And these are those thinges that the Latine writers call sacraments August cont Faust Memictiae lib. 19 cap. 16. habit tom 6. col 349. and therefore Augustine also called them visible words This verilye is certaine that euen the most auntient Latine diuines did interprete that Greeke worde Mysterie by the Latine word Sacrament and that not onelie in places where mention is made of the rites and orders of the Sacraments of the church as of Baptisme and the Lords supper but generally wher the question is of suche thinges as are of themselues close secret and far remoued from common vse Ephes 1. ◠So the calling of the Gentiles which the Apostle nameth a mysterie is of the olde Latine interpreter turned 1. Timoth. 3.16 sacrament And our whole saluation is the sacrament of godlinesse with him and the coniunction of Christ his church not the marriage of man wife as commonlie thorough ignorance menne haue supposed is with him a sacrament likewise Ephes 5.32 Apocal. 17.7 yea in the reuelation he mentioneth the sacrament of that vncleane harlot and the beast that carried hir To be short nothing is more common amongest the Latine diuines or commeth more often in their writings than this worde sacrament And yet the Latine church hath in a more secret and narrowe signification taken and vnderstoode this terme Sacrament how it is vsed amongest vs. sacrament namelie for the signes and rites which God hath adioyned to his promises that so hee might the more fully seale vp in our hearts the saluation that he hath reuealed vnto vs. And yet no other certainetie so farre as I knowe or can remember is this worde mysterie in the Apostles writings vsed in that sense or signification Verilie the name or word sacrament it selfe is amongest the Latinists of many significations for which doubtfulnesse of the worde we that nowe come in the last age of the worlde doo sustaine manye and great smartes The Apostle calleth circumcision a signe and a state Roman 4 11. and to speake plainely as the matter it selfe requireth though I doo not willinglie depart from wordes in vse least one inconuenience and mischiefe might be heaped vppon an other yet I hadde leiffer that the Latin authours and writers had still kept Paules worde But that we may at the length come to the purpose What the lords supper is let that rite or order of the Lordes supper bee a signe giuen vs from GOD whereby hee will haue testified and sealed vp vnto vs the communication or partaking of the bodie and bloud of Christ But because euery thing that is vsed in and about this holie banquet is not of one sort maner order and respect we are therefore to marke that euen this worde sacrament The word Sacrament in the narrow signification taken three waies and that in this more narrowe signification is of the olde Latine diuines taken three manner of ways For sometimes they vnderstand by sacraments the verie whole action in which respect both baptisme and the Lords supper it selfe also are called sacraments that is to say mystical actions or outward rites which doo represent to our vnderstanding some other certaine thing Somtimes againe not the whole action it selfe but that which is vsed in that action is so termed as in baptisme the water it selfe the sprinckling or laying it on
much lesse was it confirmed as an article of faith before the Councell of Laterane which was kept and holden in his dayes And though wee might by authoritie of good historiographers make it yet somewhat more new namely that it was not ratified as an article of religion till the Councell kept at Constance a citie so named in Germanie in the dayes of Pope Iohn the 23 which was about the yere of our Lord Garan in sinu Concilio Harding in confut Apolog. 1415. Yet to gratifie them wee wil grant it to be as old as the councel of Lateran in Rome held in the yere 1215 thaÌ„ the which also their own writers will not prescribe further But alas what get they hereby namely that this their dotage and dreame of transubstantiation at the least in the name of it hath not so manie gray haires on the head or yeares on the backe of it as they would beare the world in hand it hath for as by computation it may appeare it is but 300 do yeres old Neither wil that shift serue that they flee to here to wit that though the terme were not till then yet the matter was before A verie likelie thing forsooth as though the fathers of the Greeke and Latin churches so well skilled in those seuerall languages had not bin able aswel to haue deliuered the word as the matter In points of greater consequence than this by farre they hadde their peculiar and significant words as trinitie harmonously hypostasis and such like and yet in this they must faile forsooth to the end that the glorie of new inuention or forgerie rather may bee ascribed to some other But to conclude â—his point If papists vnder a false cloke of â—oueltie will not spare to reiect not onely olde but good and true things also then much more may we and that vppon good ground refuse this fantasie not onelie because it is new but also bicause it is false as shal god willing hereafter more fullie appeare 2 Howbeit that there is a chaunge no man of sound iudgement I thinke dooth or will denie but that is not in respect of the nature of the thinges themselues for the elements of bread and wine remaine in their owne proper peculiar substance wherof not only al men may be sufficient witnesses but almost all the senses of euery man as sight taste feeling c but this mutation is made in regarde of the vse and ende wherevnto they are applied because that they are by the Lordes owne institution and appointment separated from the common vse yea as it were froÌ„ common bread and wine and applied not onlie to a holy vse whilest they are vsed in holie assemblies wyth sanctified and religious mindes but dedicated also to holie endes that is to saye to ratifie and confirme our Faith in the trueth of Gods promises and to be sure seales and pledges to our consciences of holy things to wit of christs body and bloud and of the effects and fruits that by his death passion wee receiue But that this chaunge shoulde be wrought by any words as they say of consecration I am so farre off from allowing it as true that I am verily persuaded that they speake they knowe not what because it is not yet resolued not onely amongst the doctors of their side as Bessarian Biel Bonauenture Catharin Durand Scotus and others which be the words of coÌ„secratioÌ„ or with which words Christ and the priest by his example maketh the bread Christs body but because a pope himselfe who hath the fulnes of all knowledge in his breast and cannot erre if all bee true that they affirme I meane Pope Innocent the third Innocent de saâ—r altar myster lib. 4. cap. 6. a great fauourer and furtherer of such fantasies coulde not well tell how to resolue it as appeareth by his writings Yea in ascribing mutation and change of things to a forme of wordes vttered by the mouth of a mortall man they blasphemoussy robbe God of that glorie which is due vnto him alone Psalm 148.5 For to him onelie it belongeth to speake the woorde and to haue thinges made and giue it to an other to whom it at no hand appertaineth And if words be so strong in the one Sacrament as to turne bread into Christes body and wine into his bloud what reason is there that the wordes of institution vttered by the same person I meane the priest with intent also to consecrat it shold not alter the element of water in the other sacrament to wit of Baptisme and be so strong and powerfull as to make the same the very true and naturall bloud of our Sauiour Christ But let them say what they will For mine owne parte I rest resolute in this that this assertion and their whole action in consecration sauoureth verye stronglie of a magicall incantation and I am so muche the more confirmed in this because the Papistes reioycing as inchaunters and sorcerers doo in theyr odde numbers haue added one woorde that is to saye enim which is not in the Greeke or Latine textes Missali Roman ex decreto concil Trident. restitutum Pij quinti iussu editum pa. 23. col â— to the wordes of institution sayeng Hoc est enim corpus meum as may appeare in their misfall or masse booke and that not their old ones onelie but in one newlie furbished by the decree of the councel of Trent and published abroad to beholde the light like an vntimelie birth by the authoritie and commandement of Pope Pius the fift 3 And as the noueltie of this fained fantasie of transubstantiation is a brand good enough to worke the discredit thereof euen as though it had beene bored thorow the eare or worne a paper for forgerie and deceit so the grosse and palpable absurdities which follow the same opinion are sufficient and strong enough of themselues to make it out of credit with all persons indued with holie wisedome and right vnderstanding and to cause theÌ„ to esteeme of it not onely as a thing false and eronious but very vngodlie and blasphemous also To reckon vp all or largelie to discourse vppon the particulars neither is it my purpose neither is it almost possible so fertile a soile is this point in falshoode and yet I minde to touch some and that in suche sorte also as the vanitie and falshoode of this greate corruption may thereby easilie appeare to all suche as will not be wilfully blinded or stoppe their eies and eares at the brightnes and sound of truth At the least my hope and persuasion is that though I preuaile not either with the malicious blinde or simple ignorant yet I shall confirme and strengthen my brethren who together with me as in many other pointes of our christian religion so in this haue embraced the truth of God to our coÌ„forts 1 First I saye that this assertion of Transubstantiation or reall presence of Christes naturall bodie dooth
aunsweared as which indeede if it bee well weighed is not onelie vntrue as in respect of it selfe because though glorification implie a most excellent and heauenlie estate dooth not yet for all that destroye the essentiall properties of bodies glorified but most absurde and false also as in regard of vs. For if the glorification of Christs bodie haue remooued or taken awaye that essentiall propertie to witte that it shoulde truelie and indeede bee tied vnto a place then the like shall bee perfourmed and the same effect followe in all the glorified bodies of the faithfull after the resurrection because our Sauiour hath not onelie glorified his owne bodie for himselfe hee rising therein a mightie conquerour ouer death and hell and nowe triumphantlie ruling and raigning in the heauens in all maiestie but for our sakes also hath atchieued that greate honour wee hauing from him this assured promise in his worde Philip. 3.21 that God shal chaunge our base and vile bodies that they may bee fashioned like vnto his glorious bodie according vnto the mightie working whereby hee is able to subdue all things vnto himselfe But to saye that our bodies glorified after the rising againe of the same in the generall day of iudgement shall be euery where a rashe and vncertaine yea a beastlie and blasphemous assertion because it ascribeth that vnto vs which is proper and peculiar onelie to GOD for vnto hym alone it perteineth to fill heauen earth and all places alwayes and at one tyme as infinite places of Scripture doo plainelie prooue therefore this opinion also concerning Christes glorified bodie beeing euerie where or in infinite places at one time must of necessitie be suche likewise 4 Fourthlie it dooth directlye destroy and as it were at one blowe blotte out and deface all those Articles of our moste pretious Faith and Christian religion whych doo concerne Christes assured ascension into Heauen hys maiesticall sitting at the right hande of the Father and his glorious comming agayne from thence together wyth that infinite number of moste playne places of GODS holie woorde that out of the writinges of the Prophetes and Apostles may bee drawen for the proofe of those moste comfortable and necessarie pointes To deale wyth euerye one of these by themselues shortely and in fewe woordes I woulde faine knowe if our Sauiour Christ be here vpon earth in respect of his bodilye power and presence howe hee can iustlie as in regarde of the same hys bodye bee sayde to haue ascended into Heauen Or let them tel vs if hee remaine wyth vs in hys flesh how hee can bee truelye saide in hys manhoode to sitte at the right hande of hys Father in Heauen Or howe it can bee in religion or reason affirmed that our Sauiour shall come from Heauen with great power and glorie to iudge the quick and the dead seeing he is here on earth already The Scripture telleth vs for his ascension Actes 1.9 that in the sight and beholding of the blessed Apostles yea whiles they looked stedfastly towards heauen he was taken vp Let them shew so much for his bodilie abode vpon earth and proue it by such substantiall witnesse and wee are readie to yeelde Besides we knowe by the worde and therefore beleeue it that as he was seene go into heauen Actes 1.10 so shall he come againe but hee was seene to ascend thither bodilie and therefore so shall hee returne from thence againe I suppose they will not saye that our Sauiour had two bodies one that hee tooke wyth him an other that hee left heere for that were to make him altogether monstrous and men scrupulous none knowing in whether of them hee perfourmed the work of their redemption And to saye that that one blessed bodie of his was diuided is as absurde and erronious because it can not be so but that the whole bodie it selfe must be impaired and mangled at the least if not destroyed and so the woorke of saluation ouerthrowne To stand vpon anie naked interpretation touching the right hand of God will not serue their turne for there being nothing meant thereby in this article of our beleefe but the great glorie that is in heauen prepared for the saints and that most excellent blessednesse that belongeth to them whereof our sauior Christ was in a most full measure made by his ascention into heauen as in respect of his humanity absolute partaker what could they gaine Doo they imagine that it would heervpon insue that Christ should be euerie where and by consequent on earth but they are deceiued for why doo they not as well consider the word sitting which implieth locall residence in a place or doo they not know and beleeue that heauen it selfe is not euerie where but locall rather or will they not see that without warrant of the word yea contrarie to the same which in sundrie places opposeth heauen and earth one of them against another or sence of humane iudgement they iumble and confound them togither Reason will lead vs to this that none can be said to goe vp into the place where he is or to come downe from it when he remaineth there And though wee minde not to subiect our sauior speciallie as in respect of his eternall Godhead to humane sence yet by the same we may and ought to be ledde not to destroy the essentiall properties of his manhood Now then whether shall wee beleeue this trueth of the Lord or mens fantasies that go about to peruert our persuasions and deceiue our vnderstandings Let men of the worlde deeme what they lust this is the truth that God hath sanctified vnto vs in his word and I doo stedfastlie beleeue it in my heart and will throgh Gods goodnesse and strength alwaies confesse the same with my mouth that from the very time of Christes ascension into Heauen Acts. 3 2â— The Heauens must conteine his naturall bodie vntill the time that all things be restored that is euen to the worlds end 5 Fiftlie I say that this opinion dooth vniustlie depriue vs of all such spirituall graces and comforts for our consciences as God the father in his sonne Christ by sending the Holie ghost the third person in the deitie hath not onelie promised but in good time wil performe and bestow vpon the whole church generallie and euerie sound particular member of the same yea if we wey it well we shall finde that it is the ruine and bane of the church it selfe both in the whole bodie of it and in the seuerall parts Our sauior himselfe in most plaine and expresse terms faith Iohn 16.7 I tel you the truth it is expedient for you that I go away for if I go not away the comforter will not come vnto you but if I depart I will send him vnto you Hee that knoweth anie thing of truth is well acquainted with this that generallie all the word but most especiallie the comfortable promises conteined in the same be as it were the life