the power of death but wilt raise me againe from the dead And so consequently the Article of Christs descending into hell whereof these words are the foundation imports no more but that Christ went into the other world was in the state of the dead and under deaths dominion to wit untill his Resurrection This Exposition keeps the propriety of the words and the order of the Creed neither is there any thing that I know of weight against it The Hebrew word Sheol and the Greek Hades which are rendred sometimes hell do signifie the estate of the dead or the power of death Hell and destruction are before the Lord Prov. 15. 11. Jansenius a learned Writer of the Church of Rome upon the place notes that by hell and destruction Per infernum perditionem significatur status mortuorum non solum damnatorum ut nos ferè ex his vocibus auditis concipimus sed in genere status defunctorum Jansen ad loc is signified the state of the dead and not onely of the damned as we usually when we hear these words do conceive but the state of those in generall that are departed out of this life Thus also Genebrard another Romish Author and a skilfull Hebritian on Psal 30. 3. as we reckon Ab inferno id est è statu mortuorum liberasti Geneb ad loc where David sayes O Lord thou hast brought up my soul from Sheol hell our Translators have the grave Genebrard I say interprets it thus From hell that is out of the state of the dead hast thou delivered me And so that Psal 89. 48. What man is he that liveth and shall not see death and shall he deliver his soul from the hand of Sheol of hell So * Viz. That in the Booke of Common-Prayer Infernus significat totum mortuorum statum Gen. ad loc one of our Translations hath it the last Translation hath of the grave that likewise doth Genebrard expound in like manner though first he would draw it to their fained Limbus before-mentioned yet upon second thoughts which use to be wiser he addes Hell doth signifie the whole state of the dead And it is evident that by hell there cannot be meant the hell of the damned for David would not make it a thing impossible for any to escape that hell as he doth make it for any to escape the hell that he speaketh of Therefore by hell he must needs mean either the grave and then the word soul is not taken properly or the state of the state of the dead from which without extraordinary dispensation none is exempted Thus also is the Greek word Hades used 1 Cor. 15. 55. O Hades O hell so our Translators in the Margent render it though the Textuall reading be O grave where is thy victory There is no other hell but the state of the dead and the power of death which is vanquished and destroyed at and by the Resurrection of which the Apostle there speaketh So Rev. 20. 16. Death and hell were cast into the lake of fire that is death and the power of death For the hell of the damned the place of torment cannot there be meant by hell that hell being the lake of fire into which hell there spoken of is cast The meaning of the words is that at the Resurrection there shall be no more death nor any power of death any where but only in that lake of fire the place where the damned are in torment whose condition because of the wretchednesse of it is called death the second death Rev. 20. 6. And thus both Ecclesiasticall and Heathen Authors do use the word Hades making all that are dead and so under the power of death to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in inferno See B. Usher in hell as we English it And thus have some of the ancients expounded Christs descending into hell This is the Law of humane necessity saith Hilary Humanae ista Lex necessitatis ut consepultis corporibus ad inferos animae descendant Quam descensionem Dominus ad consummationem veri hominis non recusavit Hil. in Psal 138. that when the bodies are buried the souls descend into hell he means by hell the state of the dead in generall and the power of death keeping the soul separated from the body which descent the Lord Christ to prove himself true man did not refuse in like manner other of the Ancients S. Peters words also do confirm this Exposition Acts 2. 24. where speaking of Christ he saith Whom God hath raised up having loosed the pains of death because it was not possible that he should be holden by it The word in the Originall signifies to be holden 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by force and strong hand to be holden under ones power and dominion And to prove that Christ could not possibly be thus held by death he alledgeth the testimony of the Prophet David who speaking in the Person of Christ said Thou wilt not leave my soul in hell So that by Peters Commentary upon these words of David it appears that Christs not being left in hell signifies nothing els but his not being left under the power of death from which he was freed by his Resurrection of which Peter saith that David did speak in those words Acts 2. 31. And consequently Christs being in hell which is implied in these words of David Thou wilt not leave my soul in hell and expressed in the Creed imports nothing els but his being under the power of death under which he was kept for a while though not long So that of S. Paul Rom. 6. 9. Christ being risen from the dead dieth no more death hath no more dominion over him that also intimates that Christ being dead untill he rose from the dead death had dominion over him not whether he would or no but through his own permission Joh. 10. 18. Ob. But may some say according to this Exposition there is nothing more signified in the Article of Christs descending into hell then in the other that he died Answ I answer Yes there is more signified in the one then in the other For that Christ died imports only that his soul was separated from his bodie but that he descended into hell imports that his soule and bodie continued for a while in the state of separation to wit untill his Resurrection when they were again united one to the other Such difference as there is betwixt B. Usher birth and life here such also is there betwixt death and descending into hell Death performs its work in a moment but hell continues this work to wit the separation of the soule from the body untill the body rising again the soule and it are reunited together Therefore it may seem to be said Rev. 6. 8. that hell followed after death and thus both soul and body are said to be in Sheol or Hades or hell whilest they remaine separated one from
are delivered from Satan Now shall the Prince of this world be cast out said Christ when the time of his death was at hand Joh. 12. 31. For asmuch as the children are partakers of flesh and blood he also himselfe took part of the same that thorough death he might destroy him that had the power of death that is the devill Heb. 2. 14. The devill is there said to have the power of death though that properly belong unto God for it is he that killeth and he that maketh alive 1 Sam. 26. Deut. 32. 39. because by the malice of the devill man became guilty of sin and so liable unto death Christ by his death hath vanquished Satan and freed those that belong unto him from Satans power Therefore they that believe in Christ are said to be brought from the power of Satan unto God Act. 26. 18. and to be delivered from the power of darknesse Col. 1. 13. 3. We have right unto eternall life Had not Christ died we had been uncapable of life that life which is to come This was signified by that Gen. 3. 24. where it is said that Adam having sinned God drove him out viz. of Paradise and he placed at the East of the garden of Eden Cherubins and a flaming sword which turned every way to keep the way of the tree of life By reason of sin the life to come eternall life which was shadowed by that tree of life was inaccessible unto us we could have no accesse unto it but Christ by his blood hath made a new and living way for us Heb. 10. 20. And for this cause he is the mediator of the new Testament that by means of death for the redemption of the transgressions that were the first Testament they which are called might receive the promise of eternall inheritance Heb. 9. 15. And in the two verses following is shewed why the new Covenant that God hath made with his people is called a Testament because it is of force by Christs death For where a Testament is there must also of necessity be the death of the testator For a Testament is of force after men are dead otherwise it is of no strength at all whiles the testator liveth Neither doth this make for the Popish opinion of Limbus Patrum as if before Christs death none did go to heaven and enjoy the happinesse of the life to come For Jesus Christ yesterday and to day and the same for ever Heb. 13. 8. The death of Christ was of force as well before as since Christs coming they that did believe in Christ to come did enjoy the benefit of his death as well as they that now since his coming do believe in him Ob. But may some say notwithstanding Christs death yet still all die Answ True but not so as otherwise had it not been for Christs death they should have died For 1. By the death of Christ all that believe are altogether freed from the second death over such the second death hath no power Revel 20. 6. 2. The first death to believers is as no death but an entrance into life even life eternall Blessed are the dead which die in our Lord from henceforth yea saith the Spirit that they may rest from their labours c. Revel 14. 13. The souls of the faithfull being separated from their bodies do immediately enter into happinesse which made the Apostle say that to die was gain unto him Phil. 1. 21. And v. 23. that he desired to be dissolved and to be with Christ which was far better And the bodies of believers shall also in due time be raised up and together with their souls be made partakers of eternall blisse Christ by his death hath overcome death so that they that believe in him shall not be overcome by it not so as for ever to remain under the power and dominion of it I will ransome them from the power of the grave saith Christ I wil redeem them from death O death I will by thy plagues O grave I will be thy destruction Hos 13. 14. To which place the Apostle alludeth saying O death where is thy sting O grave where is thy victory And he addes the sting of death is sin and the strength of sin is the Law But 〈…〉 ks be unto God who giveth us victory thorough Jesus Christ our Lord 1 Cor. 15. 55 56 57. Vse 1. Here then is consolation for us in respect of the guilt of sin and the fear of wrath as due for sin Do our consciences accuse us doth Satan throw his fiery darts at us The meditation and application of Christs death is sufficient to quiet our consciences and to repell Satan and all his assaults Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods Elect it is God that justifieth Who is he that Turbatur conscientia sed non perturbabitur qui◠vulnerum Domini recordabor condemneth it is Christ that died Rom. 8. 33 34. My conscience saies one is troubled but it shall not be orewhelmed for I will remember the wounds of the Lord Jesus Vse 3. But as Christ died for sin so must we die unto sin thus must we be conformed to his death or els we can expect no benefit by it We thus judge saith the Apostle that if one died for all then were all dead And that he died for all that they that live should not henceforth live unto themselves but unto him that died for them and rose again 2 Cor. 5. 15. They are therefore most foolish and absurd who think that because Christ died for them therefore they may live as they list As if Christ by his death had purchased not freedome from sin but freedom to sin this is to turn the grace of God into lasciviousnesse and to deny the only Lord God and our Lord Jesus Christ Jude v. 4. But we have not so learned Christ Ephes 4. 20. our very Baptism doth teach us another lesson The Apostle having said Where sin abounded there grace hath abounded much more Rom. 5. 20. To prevent the abuse of this doctrine he addes presently after What shall we say then shall we continue in sin that grace may abound God forbid How shall we that are dead unto sin live any longer therein Know ye not that so many of us as were baptized into Christ were baptized into his death Therefore we are buried with him by baptisme into death c. Rom. 6. 1. 2 3 4. So Col. 3. 2 3. Set your affections on things above not on things on the earth for ye are dead viz. unto sin and v. 5. Mortifie therefore your members that are upon the earth fornication uncleannesse inordinate affection evill concupiscence and covetousnesse which is idolatry This mortifying of sin and dying unto sin imports 1. A serious and setled purpose to eschew sin I said that is I purposed I resolved I will take heed unto my waies that I offend not with my tongue Psal 39. 1. I am purposed
The Apostle saith that Christ humbled himself and became obedient unto death even the death of the Crosse Phil. 2. 8. And it is unquestionable that Christs death was a part and a chief part of his humiliation Therefore so long as he remained dead that is untill his Resurrection he was in the estate of humiliation 6. It appears by Scripture that when Christ died his soul went to heaven and therefore not to hell as taken for the place of torment which is most opposite and contrary unto heaven This day shalt thou be with me in Paradise said Christ to the penitent malefactour Therefore Christs soul being separated from his body went to Paradise which is all one with the third that is the highest heaven as was before shewed Some answer that Christ meant of himself in respect of his divine nature which is in all places and in Paradise or heaven in a more especiall manner in that respect they say Christ did promise the repentant thief that he should be with him that day in Paradise But first Bellarmine doth well refell this Bellar. de Beatitud Sanct. l. 1. c. 3. answer for that Christ promised that the thiefe should be where he was but in respect of his divine nature Christ was with the thief here in this world even then when he played the thief so that in this sense Christ in those words with me had promised no new thing unto him 2. The word of Christ cannot without doing violence unto them be otherwise taken then to import this that as the thief was then in respect of the body partner with Christ in pain and torment so that same day both their souls should be together where they should injoy blisse and happinesse Some therefore yeelding that those words with me have reference to Christ in respect of his soul say that Christs soul betwixt his death and his Resurrection might be both in heaven and in hell the place of torment one while in the one another while in the other But this is a groundlesse conjecture the Scripture Act. 2. clearly Videtur quòd usque ad horam resurrectionis manserit in inferno Aquinas part 3. qu. 5. art 4. enough sheweth that Christs soul from the time of his death was in the hell that it speaks of untill the time of his Resurrection Again some of the ancients do not without cause infer from those words of Christ which he spake when he gave up the Ghost Father into thy hands I commend my spirit For though Christs soul even in the hell of the damned might yet be said to be in the hands of the Father yet much Eusebius Emisenus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Juenricus Tunc clamor Domini magno conamine missus Aetheriis animam comitem commiscuit auris rather might it be said to be in his hands being in heaven Some arguments used in defence of this opinion are to be answered Ob. As first that drawn from Mat. 12. 40. As Jonas was three daies and three nights in the belly of the whale so shall the son of man be three daies and three nights in the heart of the earth Here by the heart of the earth they understand hell the hell of the damned which they suppose to be in the heart or midst of the earth The Papists also make use of this place for their Limbus before spoken of but it makes for neither opinion For 1. The Scripture doth not declare where hell the place Qui ignis gehennae cujusmodi in quâ mundi vel regionum parte futurus sit hominem arbitror scire neminem nisi fortè cui Spiritus divinus ostendit Aug. de Civ Dei lib. 20. cap. 16. of torment to which the Papists make their Limbus to be contiguous is seated Austin speaking of the fire of hell saith that he supposed no man could tell of what kind it is or in what part of the world except perhaps Gods spirit did reveal it 2. In those words of Christ which are objected by the heart of the earth is meant the grave For Christs abiding so long in the heart of the earth was to be a sign to the Jews as the context sheweth therefore it was to be a thing apparent unto them which his abiding so long in the grave was but not his abiding so long either in Limb or in the hell of the damned For if ever Christ were there yet it was more then the Jews could see but they might see that at such a time he was laid in the grave and that he continued there untill such a time after Ob. Against this it is objected That the heart is put for the midst of a thing and therefore the grave being not the midst of the earth cannot be the heart of it Answ But in the Scripture that part of a thing which is betwixt the extremes though it be not equally distant from the extremes is called the midst or the heart Ezek. 14. 14. 16. 18. 20. where its said if Noah Daniel and Job were in it c. in the originall it is word for word in the midst of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it where by the midst of the Land is not meant precisely the middle part of the Land but any place within it S◠Ezek. 27. 4. Tyrus is said to be in the midst of the sea in the originall as the margent notes it is in the heart of the sea Yet this heart or midst of the sea was not exactly the middle of it for Tyrus as it is said there v. 3. was situate at the entry of the sea Ob. But Bellarmine yet further objects that Christs sepulcher seems to have been above the earth and not at all within it because it was hewn out of a rock as the Scripture telleth us Answ But this hindreth not why it might not be within the earth and that it was so the Scripture sheweth relating how a great stone was rolled to the mouth of the sepulcher Mat. 27. 60. and that John stooped down to look into the sepulcher Ioh. 20. 5. These circumstances argue that the sepulcher was beneath in the earth and therefore might well be called the heart of the earth Ob. Again they argue from Ephes 4. 9. where it is said That Christ descended into the lower parts of the earth which some will have to signifie hell the place of torment and the Papists will have Limbus Patrum to be meant Answ But 1. why the lower parts of the earth should denote the hell of the damned or Limbus Patrum if there had been any such place at all I do not see it being unknown to us as I said before where that hell is seated 2. Therefore Cajetans exposition is much better that by the lower parts of the earth Ad inferiores partes terrae i. e. ad inferiorem partem mundi terram Cajet ad loc Comparatur non una pars terrae cum altera sed tota terra cum caelo
the other Object But again it may be objected that if the soul whilest it is in a state of separation from the body be said to be in hell then it is in hell even when it is in heaven Answ It is granted nor is this uncouth or inconvenient as some may think it to be because of the usuall sense and signification wherein the word hell is taken For as the word flesh is in B. Usher our ordinary speech taken strictly in opposition to fish yet sometimes and in propriety of speech it is of a more large extent For there is a flesh of fish 1 Cor 15. 39. So though we usually take the word hell in opposition to heaven taking hell for the place of torment as heaven for the place of happinesse yet the word hell as answering the Hebrew Sheol and the Greek Hades is so large as to comprehend even heaven it self in the notion of it Not indeed as heaven is the place of blisse and happinesse nor as it shall be after the Resurrection when the soul and body shall be in heaven but as heaven is the receptacle of souls separated from their bodies which state of separation though it reaâ—h to heaven as it doth in respect of the souls of the godly yet appertains to the dominion of death and the imperfection of the Saints who are not set free from that dominion of death and that imperfection untill the Resurrection Object Some may yet again object That the word descended which is used in the Creed argues that hell is below whereas heaven is above and how then can it be said that Christ in respect of his soul descended into hell whenas his soul went to heaven Answ To this it is answered divers wayes 1. That although when the godly die in respect of Licet ex mortuis aliqui ascendunt in coelum omnes tamen qui sepeliuntur descendunt in terram unde à conditione prima descensus cadaverum totus reliquus mortuorum status appellatur descensus Alsted in Theol. Catechit in Exposit Symb. their souls they ascend up to heaven yet because generally all in respect of their bodies when they are buried descend down into the earth therefore from that first condition of the descending of dead bodies the whole estate of the dead is called a descent 2. That the word which signifieth to descend is often used for to remove from one place to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 another though it be not from a higher place to a lower which is properly to descend As B Usher Acts 13. 4. So they being sent forth by the Holy Ghost departed unto Seleucia The word in the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Originall rendred departed is that which properly signifieth descended So Acts 18. 5. When Silas and Timotâ—â—us were come from Macedonia in the Originall the same word rendred were come is used And so in other places so that whereas it is said in the Creed he descended into hell the word descended is not to be pressed but to be taken as if it were said he went to hâ—ll And this may suffice for the explicating of the Article of Christs descending into hell which was the thing I aimed in the handling of these words Thou wilt not leave my soul in hell THE NINETEENTH SERMON ACTS 10. 40. Him God raised up the third day THese words were spoken by Peter and I need not tell of whom he spake them for they that know any thing in this kind know that it is Christ whom God raised up the third day Him God raised up viz from the dead as it is expressed Rom. 8. 11. The third day viz. after that he died as appeares by the context Whom they slew and hanged on a tree Him God raised up the third day Here then we have 1. The Resurrection of Christ Him God raised up 2. The time of his Resurrection the third day First then let us observe this That Christ did Doct. rise again from the dead The Resurrection of Christ is an Article of main concernment Peter told the Disciples that one was to be chosen in the place of Judas the traitour and why to be a witnesse with us said he of his that is of Christs resurrection Act. 1. 22. The Apostles were to testifie other things besides the resurrection of Christ but this is mentioned as a principall point to which they were to give testimony So Act. 4. 33. And with great power gave the Apostles witnesse of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus The Jews the professed enemies of Christ believe that he died even died the death of the Crosse but they will not believe that he rose again therefore Christ Resurrectio Christi est fides Christianorum crucified is a stumbling block unto them as the Apostle saith 1 Cor. 1. 23. But Christs resurrection is the faith of a Christian He that doth not believe this doth believe nothing to any purpose If Christ be not risen saith S. Paul and he is as not risen to those that do not believe him to be risen then is our preaching vain and your faith also is vain 1 Cor. 15. 14. And again v. 17. If Christ be not raised your faith is vain It behoves every one therefore not only to say that he believeth the article of Christs resurrection but to believe it indeed and to know upon what grounds he doth believe it Let us therefore see what grounds we have for this in and from the Scripture 1. Christs resurrection was tipified and prefigured Some conceive Isaac to have been a type and figure of Christ in this respect Isaac I say who as the story shews Gen. 22. was bound and laid upon the Altar and as good as dead yet was raised up and delivered whence it is said that Abraham received him from the dead in a figure Heb. 11. 19. Some understand it thus in a figure of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Eras resurrectionis typo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Occumen Christs resurrection But I insist not on that place which others more probably interpret otherwise That Ionas his deliverance out of the whales belly wherein he was as it were buried was a type of Christs resurrection from the dead we have Christs own testimony As Jonas was three daies and three nights in the whales belly and then was delivered out of it so shall the son of man be three daies and three nights in the heart of the earth that is in the grave and then be raised up out of it Mat. 12. 40. 2. Christs resurrection was prophecied and foretold Christ himself the great Prophet did foretel it in those words even now cited And so in other places Mat. 17 22 23. The son of man shall be betrayed into the hands of men and they shall kil him and the third day he shall be raised again And Joh. 2. 19. Jesus answered and said unto them destroy this Temple and in three daies I will raise
coming shall so remain and they vvho vvere before dead shall be raised up and together vvith the other shall be judged and in this sense is it said that Christ shall judge both quick and dead not that any shall be dead when they are judged but where as they were dead they shall be raised up and so be judged Thus is that to be understood Revel 20. 12. I saw the dead small and great stand before God viz. to be judged as it there followeth the dead that is those who had been dead And in opposition to these are the quick that is they who are found living when Christ cometh and so remaining alive come to judgement For the Lord himself saith S. Paul shal descend from heaven with a shout with the voice of the Archangel and with the trump of God and the dead in Christ shall rise first Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the ayre c. 1 Thes 4. 16. 17. Here the Apostle sheweth that the Elect Electi qui relinquimur non moriemur sed de vitâ corporali transferemur in vitam immortalem Hoc n. clarè significat repetendo qui vivimus simul rapiemur cum illis Hoc consonat verbis Petri Act. 10. Ipse est qui constitutus est à Deo judex vivorum mortuorum Et ideò in symbol cantamus c. Cajetan ad 1 Thes 4. vide etiam Cajetan ad 2 Tim. 4. 1. ad Act. 10. 42. for of them only he here speaketh that remain and are alive at Christs coming shall not die but shall together with those that were dead but then are raised up be conveyed unto Christ and be with him for ever viz. after the judgement which shall passe upon them Austin indeed having alledged these words of the Apostle makes a question whether Aug. de Civ Dei l. 20. c. 20. they whom Christ at his coming shall find alive in that very space whilest they are caught up as the Apostle speaks shall not have their souls separated from their bodies and presently re-united unto them But there is no ground at all for any such conceit and that other parallel place of the Apostle is against it viz. that 1 Cor 15. 51 52. Behold I shew you a mystery we shall not all sleep but we shall all be changed in a moment in a twinkling of an eye at the last trump for the trumpet shall sound and the dead shall be raised incorruptible aâ—d we shal be changed Here the Apostle plainly shewketh that the Elect of which likewise he here speaeth that are alive at Christs coming shall not sleep that is not die but only shall be changed that is as he after explaineth it of mortall shall be made immortall and of corruptible incorruptible Indeed this place to the Corinthians is diversly read and that was it that did mislead Austin he followed another and a contrary reading viz. We shall all rise again or We shall all sleep but we shall not all be changed But these readings are false and the other which we have in our Translations and is found in the Greek is the true reading See Cajetan on 1 Cor. 15. 51. 522. as may appear by divers reasons 1. Otherwise this place to the Corinthians and that other to the Thessalonians should but ill agree and therefore for the reconciling of them Austin was fain to make that strange quaere before mentioned and to imagine that which neither by Scripture nor by reason hath any probability for it 2. If we should read it thus we shall not all be changed then the Apostle should comprehend himself in the number of those that perish for the change there spoken of is a change unto glory and happinesse as appears by the words following and therefore all the Elect have that change only the reprobrate have it not though a change also they shall have but a wofull and miserable change and not that which the Apostle there intendeth 3. That which seemeth to me most convincing is this that except we should read it as we do We shal not all sleep but we shal al be changed that preface which the Apostle useth were impertinent improper Behold I shew you a mystery For what mystery is there in this that all shall sleep and die but not all be changed that is inherit glory eternall life If this had been that which the Apostle was to say he would never have brought it in Verè hoc est magnum mysterium quòd aliqui electorumabsque morte intercedente assequentur omnes immutationes supra scriptur c. Cajetan iâ— 1 Cor. 15. with such a preamble he would never have spoken of it as a mystery for surely nothing is more obvious to every understanding then that though all shall die yet all shall not enjoy the life to come But this is a mystery indeed except the Apostle had by the spirit of God revealed it we should have been ignorant of it that all shall not die but that some shall be exempted from death and without the intervention of death shal passe from this life to another incomparably better Ob. Some may object that Heb. 9. 27. It is appointed unto men to die once And how then should the Apostle say We shall not all sleep that is die Answ But this objection is easily answered Cajetane speaks briefly but pithily Statutum regulare Cajetane ad Thes 4. 17. est illos autem non mori singulare est That is the Statute or appointment for men to die is regular and ordinary but for those who remain at Christs coming not to die is singular and extraordinary And so necessarily those words It is appointed unto men to die once must be understood of Gods usuall and ordinary dispensation for by once there is meant onely once as appears by the context yet we know that Lazarus and some others who were raised from the dead to this mortall life did die more then once and besides the Scripture shews that Enoch and Eliah were so translated See Calvin on 1 Cor. 15. and taken from the earth as not to die once Some further answer that the change which the Apostle speaks of shall be as a kind of death but being no separation of soul and body it is not properly death I therefore rather acquiesce in the former answer And so also is that to be understood which Austin objecteth That which thou sowest it is not Quomodo quos viventes hic Christus inveniet per immortalitatem in illo vivificabuntur etsi non moriuntur cum videamus propter hoc esse dictum Tu quod seminas c. Aug. de Civ Dei l. 20. c. 20. quickned except it die 1 Cor. 15. 36. The Apostle there also speaks of that which is regular and ordinary and so it is true regularly and ordinarily none are quickned that is inherit eternall
nature is not of God 1 Thes 4. 3. This particle as is not alwaies a meer note of similitude but sometimes is used to set forth the truth of a thing as Joh. 1. 14. The Word was made flesh and dwelt among us and we beheld his glory as the glory of the only begotten Son of God c. That as the glory c. imports that the glory of Christ which S. John speaks of was indeed the very glory of the only begotten Son of God So Philem. v. 9. being such a one as Paul the aged saies Paul of himself it is therefore as much as if he had said being Paul the aged So likewise Mat. 14. 5. They counted him as a Prophet it is spoken concerning John Baptist and the meaning is they counted him indeed a Prophet as his Father Zacharias prophecied of him when he was newly born saying And thou child shalt be called the Prophet of the highest c. Luk. 1. 76. So here it being said that Christ was found in fashion as a man the meaning is that he was very man indeed like other men sin only excepted Heb. 4. 15. The scope of the Apostle is to shew how low Christ did humble himselfe 1. Unto death 2. Such a kind of death even the death of the Crosse First therefore observe from hence That Christ Doct. was obedient unto death where three things are to be shewed viz. 1. That Christ did suffer death And 2. That it was the will of God that Christ should suffer death And 3. That Christ in obedience to the will of God did suffer death 1. Christ did suffer death So all the Evangelists record and so S. Paul preached 1 Cor. 15. 3. So the Prophets fore-shewed Saying none other things then those which the Prophers and Moses did say should come that Christ should suffer viz. death as appears by the words following and that he should be the first that should rise from the dead Acts 26. 22 23. Daniel fore-told Christs death saying After threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off Dan. 9. 26. So Isaiah prophecied of him saying He was cut off out of the Land of the living Esa 53. 8. And v. 12. He hath powred out his soul unto death Christs death also was prefigured in the Law which was given by the Ministery of Moses all the sacrifices were figures of Christs death therefore he is called the Lamb of God that taketh away the sin of the world Joh. 1. 29. All the Lambs and so other beasts that were sacrificed in the time of the Law did typifie and prefigure Christ who as a Lamb was to be slaine and sacrificed for us The Author of the Epistle to the Hebrewes shews Christ in this among other things to have differed from the Priests that vvere in the Law that whereas they offered often Christ offered but once and that because he offered himself his offering was his suffering so that if he should have offered often he must also have died often whereas men use to die but once and so was Christ to die but not oft'ner See Heb. 9. 25 26 27 28. Ob. But it may be objected that some places of the Old Testament speaking of Christ seem to import that he should not die Thou art a Priest for ever c. Psal 110. 4. His dominion is an everlasting dominion c. Dan. 7. 14. Ans Indeed some from those and the like places did inferre that Christ should not die For when they heard Christ speak of his death they objected against it saying We have heard out of the Law that Christ abideth for ever Joh. 12. 34. As if because he should abide for ever as was signified in the * The Law is sometimes put for any part of the Old Testament as Joh. 15. 25. and 1 Cor. 14. 21. Law that is in the writings of the Old Testament therfore he should not die but they erred not rightly understanding the Scriptures which speak of Christs abiding for ever For the meaning of them is not that Christ should not die but that although he did die yet he should soon rise again and so abide for ever Christ being risen from the dead dieth no more death hath no more dominion over him Rom. 6. 9. 2. It was the will of God that Christ should suffer death There is nothing whatsoever comes to passe but by the will of God Who hath said Nihil fit nisi omnipotens fieri velit vel ipse faciendo vel permittendo ut fiat ab aliis Aug. and it cometh to passe and the Lord commandeth it not Lam. 3. 37. otherwise then by the will and pleasure of God not so much as a sparrow doth fall to the ground Mat. 10. 29. much lesse could so great a thing as Christs death have been had it not been the will and pleasure of God that it should be Pilate condemned Christ to die and others did execute the sentence which Pilate had pronounced but neither Pilate nor others did any thing to Christ but as God had before determined to be done Acts 4. 27 28. 3. It being the will of God that Christ should suffer death Christ in obedience to the will of God did suffer it This Commandement have I received of my Father said Christ Joh. 10. 18. viz. that he should lay down his life and therefore he would and did lay it down And Joh. 18. 11. The cup which my Father hath given me to drinke shall I not drink it As if he should say Shall I not suffer death seeing he will have me suffer it True it is Christ considering death in it self would have avoided it but considering it as that which his Father would have him to suffer so he was willing to suffer it Mat. 26. 39 42. Q. But why would God have Christ to suffer death A. 1. For the satisfying of his Justice God had determined declared death to be the punishment that should be inflicted for sin Gen. 2. 17. 3. 19. Rō 6. 33. Christ was to satisfie for sin and therefore he was to suffer death His soul was made an offering for sin Esa 53. 10. Without shedding of blood is no remission Heb. 9. 22. And v. 26. He appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself Thus Christ died for our sins 1 Cor. 15. 3. 2. God would have Christ to suffer death for the magnifying of his mercy God commendeth his love towards us sets it out in this that whiles we were yet sinners Christ died for us Ro. 5. 8. By Christs death first we are reconciled unto God When we were enemies we were reconciled unto God by the death of his Son Rom. 5. 10. In whom we have redemption thorough his blood even the forgiveness of our sins Col. 1. 14. And v. 21 22. And you that were sometimes alienated and enemies in your mind thorough wicked works yet now hath he reconciled in the body of his flesh through death 2. VVe
it up This he spake of the Temple of his body as it follows there v. 22. And when he was risen from the dead his Disciples remembred that he had said this unto them v. 22. Although Christs owne Disciples it seems did not understand the meaning of those words untill they were fulfilled that is untill Christ was risen from the dead yet Christ had so plainly at other times foretold his resurrection that the chief Priests and Pharisees could say unto Pilate when Christ was crucified dead and buried Sir we remember that that deceiver said while he was yet alive after three daies I will rise again And so the Prophets that were before Christs coming in the flesh did foreshew as other things concerning him that he should rise from the dead David in those words Thou wilt not leave my soul in hell nor suffer thine holy one to see corruption Psal 16. 10. did speak of Christs resurrection as is testified by S. Peter Act. 2. 31. He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ that his soul was not left in hell nor his flesh did see corruption And so by S. Paul Act. 13. 35 36 37. Wherefore he saith also in another Psalm Thou shalt not suffer thine holy one to see corruption For David after he had served his own generation by the will of God fell asleep and was laid unto his fathers and saw corruption But he whom God raised again saw no corruption So all the Prophets speaking of Christ his Priesthood and Kingdome induring for ever did consequently speak of Christs resurrection As * Or Solomon who by the title seems to have been the composer of that 72. Psalme David Psal 72. 17. 110. 4. And Daniel chapt 7. v. 14. Some from those and the like places of the Prophets falsly undâ—â—stood did infer that Christ should not die Joh. â—â— 34. But the Prophets had no such meaning but that though Christ did die yet he should rise againe and so abide for ever And therefore Christ called them fools and slow of heart to believe all that the Prophets had written who would not believe his resurrection when they were told of it Luk. 24. 25. And Paul professed that he did say no other things then those which the Prophets and Moses did say should come That Christ should suffer and that he should be the first that should rise from the dead Act. 26. 22 23. 3. All the foure Evangelists as we call them Matthew Mark Luke and John have carefully recorded Christs rising from the dead Though as in other of their relations so in this they differ in circumstances some relating one cireumstance some another yet they agree in the substance all relating this that he rose again They shew us also that Christ after his resurrection by many infallible proofs did shew himself alive as S. Luke speaks Act. 1. 3. That when his Disciples thought him to have been a spirit he said unto them Behold my hands and my feet that it is I my self handle me and see for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me have And when he had thus spoken he shewed them his hands and his feet Luk. 24. 39 40. And presently after it follows that he called for meat and did eat before them S. Iohn also relates how when Christ had appeared after his resurrection to the Apostles Thomas not being among them when he heard of it he would not believe it professing that except he should see in his hands the print of the nails and put his finger into the print of his nails and thrust his hand into his side he would not believe And that afterward Christ appeared unto them again Thomas being with them and that he spake unto Thomas saying Reach hither thy finger and behold my hands and reach hither thy hand and thrust it into my side and be not faithlesse but believe And that then Thomas cried out My Lord and my God Joh. 20. 24 25 26 27 28. The Evangelists also record that Christs resurrection was witnessed by an Angel from heaven Mat. 28. 5 6. Mar. 16. 5 6. Yea by more Angels then one Luk. 24. 4 5 6. 4. The Apostles did no lesse diligently preach and publish Christs resurrection Paul preached it as he testifieth 1 Cor. 15. 4. Where also in the verses following he doth largely insist upon the proof and demonstration of it So Act 13. 30. c. We find that in one of his Sermons he was much upon this point And so also was Peter Act. 2. 24. c. And it is said of all the Apostles in generall except Paul who was called to the Apostleship afterward that with great power they gave witnesse of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus Act. 4. 33. And Paul urgeth the force of this argument drawn from the preaching of the Apostles Yea and we are found false witnesses of God because we have testified of God that he raised up Christ whom he raised not up if so be that the dead rise not 1 Cor. 15. 15. 5. Divers reasons and arguments grounded upon Scripture prove that Christ did rise from the dead For 1. It was meet that as Christ did freely and voluntarily humble himself so again he should be exalted Those that honour me I will honour saith God 1 Sam. 2. 30. Therefore as Christ did honour God by submitting himself unto death so God would honour him by raising him from the dead He humbled himself became obedient unto death even the death of the Crosse Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him Phil. 2. 8. 9. Mansit in separatione inseparabilis unitas Bern. de Consid l. 5. c. 10. 2. Although when Christ died his soul and body were separated one from the other yet the divine nature was separated from neither the one nor the other Come see the place where the Lord lay said the Angel speaking of the grave where the dead body of Christ was laid Mat. 28. 6. which shews that the divine nature was still united to the body though the soul were separated from it And otherwise we could not rightly confesse as we do in the Creed that Christ the only son of God was buried Now there being this union betwixt the divine nature and Christs body it was not only meet but necessary that his body should be raised up and not be held under deaths dominion Though being man he died yet being God he rose again being put to death in the flesh his humane nature but quickned by the spirit his divine nature 1 Pet. 3. 18. 3. For the working out of our redemption it was requisite that Christ should not only die but also rise again Some when Christ did hang upon the Crosse blasphemed saying He saved others himselfe he cannot save Mar. 15. 31. Whereas that he might save others himself he would not save viz. not so as not to die But had he so died as not to rise again his death
Christ and the Father are one Joh. 10. 30. That which the Father doth he doth also Joh. 5. 17. 14. 10 11. Therefore Cum eadem fit divina virtus operatio Patris Filii haec duo se mutuò consequuntur quòd Christus fit suscitatus divinâ virtute Patris sui ipsius Aquin part 3. quest 53. art 4. ad 1. these two are so farre from crossing one the other Christ was raised up by the power of his Father and Christ arose by his own power that they confirme one the other they follow one upon the other Vse 3. Thirdly by Christs Resurrection our faith is confirmed in him as a most perfect Redeemer For seeing that Christ died for our sins he as our Surety was arrested by death as Gods Serjeant and cast into the prison of the grave in that he was not still detained there but released and set free it clearly shewes that the debt is discharged Gods justice satisfied and we through faith in Christ reconciled unto God and at peace with him The two Disciples that knew Christ to be dead but knew not that he was risen again seemed to have but small hope of redemption by him We trusted said they that it had been he that should have redeemed â—srael Luk. 24. 21. They did trust so before but now it seems they did in a manner despair of it And indeed had Christ so died as not to rise againe we could have had but a dead hope as I shewed before But now our hope is a lively hope as S. Peter calls it Blessed be God and the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ who according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope how by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead 1 Pet. 1. 3. So S. Paul having said that Christ was delivered for our offences and rose again for our justification he addes immediately Therefore being justified by faith we have peace with God through Jesus Christ our Lord Rom. 4. 25. 5. 1. And Acts 13. 38 39. having immediately before confirmed Christs Resurrection he thereupon inferres Be it known unto you therefore men and brethren that thorough this man is preached unto you forgivenesse of sins And by him all that believe are justified c. And Rom. 8. 34. he cryeth out Who is he that condemneth it is Christ that died yea rather that is risen again And Heb. 7. 25. Wherefore he is able to save to the uttermost all that come unto God by him seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them Vse 4. Fourthly by the Resurrection of Christ we may be assured of our owne Resurrection The Apostle 1 Cor. 15. to convince some among the Corinthians who denied the Resurrection of the dead first proves at large Christs Resurrection and from thence inferreth the resurrection of Christians Now if Christ be preached saith he that he rose from the dead how say some among you that there is no resurrection of the dead But if there be no resurrection of the dead then is Christ not risen 1 Cor. 15. 12 13. And v. 16. For if the dead rise not then is not Christ raised And v. 20. c. But now is Christ risen from the dead and become the first fruits of them that slept For since by man came death by man also came the Resurrection from the dead For as in Adam all die so in Christ shall all be made alive But every man in his own order Christ the first fruits afterward they that are Christs at his coming So 2 Cor. 4. 14. Knowing that he which raised up the Lord Jesus shall raise up us also by Jesus c. And 1 Thes 4. 14. For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him The force of this inference viz. of the resurrection of Christians from Christs resurrection consists in that near relation and union that is betwixt Christ and Christians he being their head Quod praecessit in caepite impletum erit in corpore Bern. and they his members As in the naturall body though all the members be under water yet the head being above they are safe and there 's no fear of drowning so is it in the mysticall body Christ our head being risen though we his members lie in the dust yet there is a sure and certain hope of our resurrection For the members must be with the head and conformed to it Father I will that they whom thou hast given me be with me where I am said Christ Joh. 17. 24. We know that when he shall appear we shall be like unto him 1 Joh. 3. 2. Christ shall change our vile bodies and shall make them like unto his own most glorious body Phil. 3. 21. THE TWENTIETH SERMON Vse 5. FIftly and lastly as Christ rose corporally so ought we to rise spiritually viz. from the death of sin to the life of grace There is a death of the soul by sin and a resurrection of the soul by grace Awake thou that sleepest and arise from the dead and Christ shall give thee light Ephes 5. 14. And that we must be conformed unto Christ by a spirituall resurrection the Apostle sheweth Rom. 6. 4. Therefore we are buried with him by baptisme into death that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father even so we also should walk in newnesse of life And v. 11. Likewise reckon ye also your selves dead indeed unto sin but alive unto God thorough Jesus Christ our Lord. We must thus be conformed unto Christ by the resurrection of our souls here or els we shall not be conformed unto Christ by the resurrection of our bodies hereafter For though all shall corporally rise again yet not so as to be conformed unto Christ in glory and happinesse No thus shall none rise corporally but only such as now rise spiritually so as to be conformed unto Christ in grace and holinesse Only they that whiles they are upon earth have their conversation in heaven can expect that the Lord Jesus will change their vile bodies and make them like unto his own most glorious body Phil. 3. 20 21. Now if we would know whether we be partakers of this spirituall resurrection we may try and discern it by these marks 1. Heavenly mindednesse If ye be risen with Christ seek those things that are above where Christ sitteth at the right hand of God Set your affections on things above and not on things on the earth Col. 3. 1. 2. 2. Love of Gods children We know that we are passed from death to life because we love the brethren 1 Joh. 3. 14. This is meant of loving the godly eo nomine in that very respect as they are godly not for by ends or carnall respects which they may do who are not godly 3. A sense and feeling of spirituall wants and infirmities VVhere there is such a
feeling there is life as there was in Paul who complained of the corruptions that were in him as grievous and burthensome unto him For I know said he that in me that is in my flesh no good dwelleth For to will is present with me but how to perform that which is good I find not For the good that I would do I do not but the evill that I would not that I do I find then a law that when I would do good evil is present with me For I delight in the law of God after the inward man But I see another law in my members warring against the law of my mind and leading me captive to the law of sin which is in my members O wretched man that I am who shall deliver me from the body of this death Rom. 7. 18 19 21 22 23 24. On the other side such appears to be alienated from the life of God as are without feeling Eph. 4. 18 19. such as are full of sin and of corruption and yet are nothing sensible of it but like the Angell of the Church of Laodicea think that they are rich and increased with goods and have need of nothing when as indeed they are wretched and miserable and poor and blind and naked Rev. 3. 17. 4. A love of Gods Ordinances As they that have corporall life so also they that have spirituall life will desire food convenient for them whereby their life may be preserved and whereby they may grow As new born babes desire the sincere milk of the word that you may grow thereby If so be that you have tasted that the Lord is gracious Pet. 2. 2 3. 5. Communion with God by prayer The Spirit which is the worker of this spirituall resurrection is the Spirit of grace and supplications Zach. 12. 10. The Spirit of Adoption whereby we cry Abba Father Rom. 8. 15. Behold he prayeth said Christ to Ananias speaking of Saul after called Paul when a spirituall life was newly put into him Acts 9. 11. The ordinary means whereby this spirituall resurrection is wrought is the Word preached As at the last day the Trumpet shall sound and the dead corporally shall be raised 1 Cor. 15. 52. So they that are spiritually dead are raised by the Trumpet of Gods Word sounding in their ears Verily verily I say unto you saith Christ that the houre is coming and nâ—w is that the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God and they that hear shall live Joh. 5. 25. That is spoken of the spirituall Resurrection as appears by these words and now is even as that which presently after followes v. 28. 29. is spoken of the corporall Resurrection The hour is coming in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice and shall come forth But the corporall Resurrection and the spirituall in this do differ that the corporall Resurrection is compleat and perfect at once In a moment in the twinkling of an eye 1 Cor. 15. 52. But the spirituall resurrection is carried on by degrees by little and little the inward man is renewed day by day 2 Cor. 4. 16. Therefore they that are already in some measure made partakers of spirituall resurrection must still labour that they may be made more and more partakers of it Grow in grace and in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ 2 Pet. 3. 18. So much for this point concerning Christs Resurrection That Christ did rise again from the dead I come now to speak a little of the time of his Resurrection the third day and here this point is to be considered Doct. That Christ did rise again the third day So we confesse in the Creed the Scripture is clear express for it Christ fore-telling his resurrection did likewise fore-tell this circumstance of time when it should be Destroy this Temple and after three dayes I will raise it up Joh. 2. 19. From that time farth began Jesus to shew unto his Disciples how that he must go unto Jerusalem and suffer many things of the Elders and chief Priests and Scribes and be killed and be raised again the third day Mat. 16. 21. So Mat. 20. 18 19. Behold we go up to Jerusalem and the Son of Man shall be betrayed unto the chief Priests and unto the Scribes and they shall condemn him to death And shall deliver him to the Gentiles to mock and to scourge and crucifie him and the third day he shall rise again And so much the chief Priests and Pharisees had understood as appears by their words to Pilate Sir we remember that that deceiver said while he was yet alive after three dayes I will rise again And therefore they desired to have Christs Sepulchre watched but till the third day Mat. 27. 63 64. All the four Evangelists also do record as that Christ rose again so that he rose again the third day So also Paul preached how that Christ did for our sins according to the Scriptures and that he was buried and that he rose again the third day 1 Cor. 15. 3. 4. It was congruous and meet that Christ should rise again the third day not sooner nor later Not sooner to shew that he was truly dead and for a while under the power of death and the dominion of it which is meant by his being in hell as was shevved before Not later that so he might comfort and revive the drooping and dying spirits of his Disciples who after his death untill they heard of his resurrection mourned and wept Mar. 16. 10. And that he might strengthen their faith which was ready to fail as appears by that Luk. 24. 21. We trusted that it had been he that should have redeemed Israel Again it was not only congruous and meet but also requisite and necessary that Christ should rise the third day because so it was 1. prefigured viz. by that which happened unto Ionas his being three daies and three nights in the fishes belly neither more nor lesse signified that Christ should be so long neither more nor lesse in the grave Mat. 12. 40. Ob. If Christ were three daies and three nights in the grave how then did he rise again the third day Answ Those three daies and three nights are taken synecdochically that is not for three whole daies and three whole nights but for part of three daies and part of three nights Christ died and was buried as the Evangelists shew the day before the Jewish Sabbath that is on Friday as we call it towards evening that part of the day is by a synedoche reckoned for a day and to it belongs the night going before the Jews beginning the naturall day which consists of 24. hours at evening Levit. 23. 32. Then Christ lay in the grave the night following and the day after which we call Saturday here are two daies and two nights and so likewise he remained in the grave the night after and rose early in the morning