Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
death_n body_n soul_n spirit_n 17,497 5 5.6554 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A47142 George Keith's explications of divers passages contained in his former books as also his free and open retractations of sundry other passages contained in the same, which may at present suffice for a reply to the late, as well as former books of Tho. Elwood, and John Penington, published against me, in respect of the most material things. Keith, George, 1639?-1716. 1697 (1697) Wing K163; ESTC R18950 49,736 50

There are 7 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

called Mary really and truly according to the flesh And his Birth thus after the flesh as he was born of the Virgin at Bethlem in Judea I did always believe as I do at present so believe was really intended and foretold in these words Gen. 3. 15. And as Mary was the immediate Mother of Christ according to the flesh so Evah who was the Mother of all Men was his Mother remotely But the Allegorical sense of Christ's Birth or Formation in the Saints is warranted both by Scripture and Antiquity By Scripture as Mat 12. 50. Rev. 12. 2. 5. And by Antiquity for Augustin first and long after him Erasmus said If Mary had not born Christ in her heart or soul he could not have been her Saviour tho she had born him in her flesh But this Allegorical Allusion of Christ's Birth in the Saints I did not ground on Gen. 3. 15. but on Mat. 12. 50. and Rev. 12. 1 5. And how and in what sense I understand the Birth of Christ in the Saints I refer to the 4th Paragraph of this Section XX. Page 254. And this is as proper a Death as when a man dieth for when a man dieth his soul dieth not in it self but it dieth unto that Fellowship it had with the body by reason of the Vital Union betwixt it and the body being broken Here Note I acknowledge this passage is not safely worded therefore I retract it For tho I had very safely asserted That the Life af Christ viz. The Principle of the Divine Life in men never dieth in it self but only as to men when they commit great and heinous sins whereby they are said to quench the spirit and crucifie the Son of God afresh to themselves after they had known a divine quickening yet the Union betwixt the soul and body of a man being broken is more properly a Death the other I take to be understood rather figuratively than proper For when the Vital Union betwixt Soul and Body is broken the Soul doth wholly cease to act in that body while it is dead But Christ ceaseth not oft times to act in a dead soul but doth oft act in it by sharp Reproof and Conviction for its sin and also by new and fresh Visitations of his Life and Love in order to quicken and renew it again Moreover the Soul and Body of a Man are so united that they make up one Person but so are not Christ and the Soul united as to be one Person for that would make every Saint to be Christ The Union betwixt the Soul and Body of a Man is a Personal Union whereby every Action of the body is chargable upon the Person according to that true Maxim Actiones sunt suppositorum i. e. Actions are of Persons as what the hand doth the Man whose hand it is is justly said to do it whether Good or Evil. But the Actions of Mens Souls in whom Christ is are not chargeable upon Christ for as Christ is no wise chargeable with the least Sin that the Soul Acteth so when the Soul repenteth and believeth c. That is not Christ that repenteth and believeth in that Soul Christ indeed is the Author and chief efficient cause of true Repentance and Faith in believers but he is not the subject of reception This excellent Union betwixt Christ and true Believers is compared in Scripture to that Union betwixt the Head and the Body the Vine and the Branches the Foundation and the Building but it is better felt by the Faithful than it can be defined by the best of words for it is unspeakable and yet is incomparably short of that Union that is betwixt the Godhead and Manhood of Christ which is a Personal Union So that the Man Christ is God yet so that the Manhood is not the Godhead And the Union betwixt Christ and Believers is by their Faith in him and Love to him by which Faith and Love as they are United to his Spirit and Measure of his Life and Grace in them so thereby they are United to the Man Christ in Heaven and to that fullness of Grace that dwells in him as every Member of the Body as it is United to the Life in that Member so it is to the Head and to the Life that is in the Head and as all the Members in the Natural Body are United both to the head and to each other so all the faithful are United to Christ and to one another The Reader that is willing to know my sense further as to these weighty matters above-mentioned relating to Christs Birth or Formation in the Saints and their Union with him may read if they please my Appendix to the General History of the Quakers by G. Croese Printed at London this present Year 1696. SECT II. Containg diverse Explanations and Emendations of Passages in my Book called The Universal free Grace of the Gospel Asserted Printed 1671. TItle Pag. Proved by many infallible Arguments in the evidence and demonstration of the Spirit of Truth Here Note That I had the Evidence and Demonstration of the Spirit of Truth on my side in diverse of the Arguments I have used in that Book I still believe but whereas on a further consideration and more mature Judgment I find diverse Passages in that Book that need correction therefore I Acknowledge my Weakness and Rashness in ascribing all the Arguments in that Book and my whole way of Arguing on that subject to the Evidence and Demonstration of the Spirit of Truth and I freely and most willingly retract that clause both here or any where else in any of my Books where I have used it so far 〈…〉 have ascribed any saying or Passage to the Spirit of 〈…〉 that is not according to the Testimony of the Holy 〈…〉 the Spirit of Truth leads into all Truth and into 〈◊〉 but Truth therefore whoever ascribes whether I or any Man else any untruth or Inpertinency or undue Application of Scripture to the Spirit of Truth however unwittingly they so do as what I did was unwittingly they do greatly Err and Sin in so doing And my sin and error herein I freely confess trusting in the Mercy of God for Christs sake for the pardon of that and all my other Sins I. Pag. 4. That God by an Eternal decree hath wholly passed by the most part of Men and left them in Darkness without any Light to shine in their Darkness that can possibly at any time Lead them out of it Doth not this discourage People Here Note That it is this which I mainly opposed in my Book Viz. The decree of absolute reprobation making salvation impossible to the greatest part of Mankind And on the other hand I earnestly plead for the Universality of the Light Word Grace and Spirit of God towards and upon all In a day of Visitation for making salvation possible unto them compared with p. 110. And in this Testimony I remain against that absurd Doctrine of absolute
Reprobation rendring salvation impossible either to the greatest part or indeed to any part of Mankind and for the possibility of salvation to all Mankind So that who shall not be saved are left without excuse But this possibility of salvation cannot be understood without it be acknowledged that God has made some Provision of means whereby Men Universally are put under a possibility of salvation the means of salvation are both without Men and within Men the means without are chiefly Christs coming in the Flesh and his suffering Death for all Men and offering up himself a Sacrifice for all c. The means within are the inward Visitations and Illuminations of God by his Spirit inwardly convincing Men of Sin and moving them to Repentance and Conversion unto God and Christ And tho I have plainly enough in this my Book opposed that absurd Doctrine of absolute Reprobation yet An Election even of Persons as well as of the Divine Seed I have owned and that God doth visit such elect Persons with his Mercy that he never leaveth them till he hath gained them to himself which is a wonderful Discrimination of the free Love of God Viz. To them above and beyond others who are not saved See pag. 107 and in p. 108. allowing the common Translation of these words Acts 13. 48. And as many as were ordained to eternal Life believed I say we grant that as whoever believes are ordained to Eternal Life so whoever are ordained to Eternal Life do believe And pag. 109. I denied that Faith foreseen or something in the Creature was the moving Cause of God's Decree of Election And that I said Election was not without respect to Faith my sense is obvious viz. That Election respects Faith not as its Cause but as its Effect and as the means unto salvation so that whoever shall be eternally saved God hath chosen them to eternal salvation And in the same page 109. I own a more special giving according to John 6. 37. by Virtue whereof all that are thus given by the Father unto Christ shall come unto him and cannot but come to him II. Pag. 5. The spirit of Life from God is entred into the two slain Witnesses and yet shall more abuudantly enter Here Note this is said only by an Allegorical and Metaphorical Allusion What my sense of Scripture Allusions is see a little after § 4. III. Pag. 6. Forasmuch as they both deny That the Universal Light that is given unto all is the Light Evangelical or a Light for the Faith of the Gospel to rest in Therefore they viz. Papists and Arminians do not hold it forth as the Immediate Object of the Christian Faith 2dly They deny the way and manner of its Operation to be by Immediate Revelation 3dly They say This Light comes from Christ but Christ himself is not in man Here Note That divers of my late Adversaries among that Sect of Quakers with whom I have had a great Contest of late concerning some of the great Fundamentals of Christian Doctrine have from this passage sought to infer my Agreement with them so as to hold That the Light within was sufficient to salvation without any thing else and thereby not only excluding all outward helps and means of salvation but even the Man Christ Jesus and his Death and Sufferings and Sacrifice of himself from being necessarily concerned in our salvation as because I had said that this Light is Evangelical that is in every man and is the Immediate Object of the Christian Faith and so that Christ is in every man But all this doth not prove that I ever did hold that the Light within is sufficient to salvation without any thing else for I did always believe that Christ is our intire and compleat Saviour in both respects viz. both as he came outwardly in the Flesh and died for our sins and became a Sacrifice of a sweet savour unto God to make a Reconciliation betwixt God and us and also as he cometh into us and is in us as the Eternal Word but I never held that the Word alone was our entire and Compleat Saviour without his taking the true Nature of Man upon him And that I never did exclude him but that still both in this book and all my other books first and last I did respect him both ways viz. both within us and without us as our compleat and entire Saviour and the compleat and entire Saviour of all that shall be saved by him I can sufficiently prove and that I have so considered him in this very book I shall bring sufficient Evidence for thus I write p. 120. of this book That the sufficiency of the Light and Grace of Christ within doth not make void the use and benefit of his Outward Coming Obedience Death and Sufferings For they are not to be set in Opposition to each other as if the one did hinder the sufficiency or usefulness of the other both being sufficient and useful and necessary in their own kind and way consummating and being consummated in one another And p. 10. I say And as concerning the sufficiency of this Light unto salvation we do not understand it in Opposition to either the Necessity or Usefulness of the Outward Coming of Christ and his Sufferings and Death for our sins nor in Opposition to the service and use of any Teachings in the Outward that come from the spirit of God or any Outward things to be done or practised which his spirit leadeth unto And p 11. I say Neither do we assert That men that have received this Light and spirit of God and have given themselves up unto it to obey it and so are become servants of Righteousness do receive at once a full and sufficient measure for the whole course of their lives but only sufficient for the present state condition opportunity and case to preserve protect and defend them from all Evil so that the Creature must be continually exercised in a perpetual dependance and waiting upon the Lord to receive the renewed and fresh Influences of his Divine Life and Light according as its present state condition and necessity may require there being no security of the soul out of this dependent waiting receiving frame And whereas my late Adversaries have much blamed my distinguishing betwixt a first and second Ministration of the Spirit and Light within given to both Jews and Gentiles calling the first Legal and that of the first Covenant the second Evangelical being that of the second Covenant and for my saying That none were justified by the Law or first ministration of the spirit or Light within and their Obedience thereunto but thro' Faith in Christ And they call this distinction New Doctrine and say therein I do contradict what I have formerly delivered in this book But for the Reader 's satisfaction I recommend to him if he please to read what I have writ in that very book from p. 8. to p. 10. where he will
find that I have used that very distinction and largely insisted on it in several pages of that book And in p. 29. I say giving the sense of Paul 's words By the works of the Law shall no flesh be justified Rom. 3. 20 By Law there is understood the Law of the first Covenant which came by Moses and it 's true no justification is by that Law whether it be understood of Moses his outward ministration Or of the same Ministration of Moses in the Spirit where the Law is Writ but in Tables of Stone till the Seed be raised by which the Law is fulfilled But in diverse of the Gentiles the Seed was raised which is that divine nature or birth by which they did the things contained in the Law and so were Justified by him who gave them power to fulfil it And whereas they strongly alledge out of this Book and some other of my former Books That I had formerly Asserted Men might be Justified and Saved without all knowledge and faith of Christ without us as he was Crucified c. But upon a diligent search into my Books and an Impartial Examination of all the places cited by them to prove it I can find no such thing and my so frequently cautioning the Matter all along wherever I had occasion That the express knowledge and faith of Christ's death is not universally necessary to Mens Salvation so that as I have noted in my Book called The Antichrists and Sadducees detected some of my Adversaries ten several times at least in the Words and Passages they have quoted out of my Books bring me in using the word Express still saying the express knowledge and faith of Christ's death is not universally necessary c. is sufficient to clear me with all intelligent and impartial Men that I still held some knowledge and faith of Christ though not express yet implicit was universally necessary to Mens Salvation IV. Pag. 9. And as he viz. Christ had his Flesh in the outward which was a Vail so he hath his Flesh in the inward which is a Vail also the Word became Flesh and dwelt in us said John Here Note Though I deny not the Flesh of Christ in the inward in an Allegorical and Metaphorical Sense as above Explained § 4. Sect. 10. yet I freely acknowledge I have unduly and improperly applied that place Joh. 1. 14. 1 Tim. 3. 16. to the Flesh of Christ in the inward as likewise I have made the same undue Application of that place in my Book called The Way cast up as in Page 133 134. and possibly in divers other Places and Books which undue Application wherever it is in any of my Books I do Retract judging it to be improper And though I might possibly excuse it to be only said by way of Allusion yet even in that respect I Retract it having found by too great Experience that too frequently Allusions do great hurt and are an occasion to ignorant People to draw them from the true Sense of that place of Scripture really intended by the Spirit of God to which the Allusion is made And though I am not against Allegorical Expositions of some places of Scripture warranted by Scripture or such as cannot be truly understood without an Allegory nor do I condemn universally Allusions to some places of Scripture yet for the sake of the Ignorant that may be hurt thereby I judge they had better be not used in many cases and when used in any case it should be told that it is but an Allusion V. Pag. 9. Thus it is sown natural viz. the Divine Seed but is raised Spiritual Here Note This is but an Allusion and was no wise intended in prejudice of the Resurrection of the Body for in this san Book Pag. 70. I plainly Assert the Resurrection of the Body as thing not yet attained by the deceased Saints But because as is a ready said Allusions in many cases are not safe I wish I had in used it in this case and therefore let it be as unsaid and the rathe because to my certain knowledge some great Preachers among that sort of Quakers that are turned my Adversaries do wholly apply all that is said in 1 Cor. 15. of the Resurrection to the inward rising of the Soul or the Seed within And I have more than once heard some Preachers among the Quakers wholly Expound that place 1 Cor. 15. 14. If Christ be not risen then is our preaching vain and your faith is also vain of the inward rising of the Life in the Hearers when the Ministers speak And one of their Ministers did so strongly Assert it that in a private Conference with him I could not by the best Reasons I could bring persuade him that it was meant of a Resurrection of the Body after death VI. Pag. 20. So that it is manifest by this Expression That which may be known of God Rom. 1. 19. And as it is in the Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is understood the Gospel And a little after I say aggreeable unto this is that the same Apostle writeth unto the Colossians 1. 23. That the Gospel has been preached to every Creature which is under Heaven but according to the Greek it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in every creature i. e. in every man as when Christ said to his Disciples Preach the Gospel to every creature Here Note that by the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Paul meant an inward divine supernatural Principle in the Gentiles who had not the Gospel outwardly preached unto them which he saith was manifest in them and which God had shewed unto them and which he calls the Truth that many held in unrighteousness v. 18. I still hold and that in a figurative way of Synecdoche it may be called Gospel or as the word Gospel may be extended to a more general signification than is commonly used in Scripture I will not deny for taken at large it may signifie any Intimation of God's Love Goodness and Mercy to sinful men and in this sense it may be said that the Gospel hath been preached in every Creature i. e. in every Man And as the Divine Principle Word and Light within preacheth in some sort the Love Goodness and Mercy of God to sinful men in order to their salvation so every creature without or so to speak the whole Creation both without Man and in Man himself doth preach it as it is said Ps 19. 1. The Heavens declare the glory of God c. Not only the glory of his Power Justice and Wisdom but also the glory of his Mercy Love and Goodness towards men Yet I must needs acknowledg that I am fully convinced that it is not a due application to apply this to the word Gospel as it is generally used in Scripture and particularly by Paul in these places quoted by me Ro. 1. 16. and Col. 1. 23. and 1 T. 3. 16. therefore I do freely retract and correct my undue
that would take up too much time and be improper in this place it sufficeth at present that I retract that sense formerly given and that I declare my sense of that place of Scripture to be conconcerning his coming without us to Judgment which is I think the more general sense of Christian Expositors But let none from hence infer that I deny the inward coming of Christ in mens hearts to destroy Sin for that I own but I say it is not the true sense of that place of Scripture and whereas it is said in that place He will appear the Second time without Sin unto Salvation doth not infer being understood of his coming without us to Judgment that Sin remains in the deceased Saints until his coming But that at his coming he will not charge Sin upon them but will solemnly acquit and discharge them of all their Sins however great they have been who have sincerely repented of them and believed in him whereas upon all others he will charge their Sins upon them as is clear from Matth. 25. And though the deceased Saints need no Salvation from Sin yet from some of the effects and consequences of it they do until the Resurrection with respect to which Paul said We are saved by Hope and Hope that is seen is not Hope c. For seeing Death is the last enemy that is to be destroyed which is not destroyed but by the Resurrection from the Dead therefore the Resurrection from the Dead is that Salvation which all the Saints both living and deceased wait for which will be at Christ's coming without us And that this was my Belief when I did write that Book as well as formerly I shall for proof recite two plain passages out of that Book the first is pag. 42. where I say We believe with all our Hearts and in believing the same we rejoice with Joy unspeakable and full of Glory in all our Sufferings Tryals and Temptations even that He whom we look for will come again at the Last Day and raise us up to live with him for ever in an immortal and incorruptible Body and then shall we be saved as well from all the consequences of Sin of all kinds as now from Sin it self in the being and nature of it For then and not till then fully and in all respects shall Death be swallowed up in Victory and that full Salvation and enjoyment be attained which all true Christians do yet wait for The second passage is pag. 45. And I hope it will satisfie any sober Reader that we acknowledge the Coming of Christ in the Clouds or in the Air in a Literal Sense Pag. 65. That Christ will come in the End of the World we do faithfully believe according to that 1 Cor. 15. and other Scriptures But that his coming mentioned 1 Cor. 11. is that last coming of his is not yet proved but is a meer begging of the Question Here Note That this passage contains another plain proof that I believed that Christ would come in the End of the World in his Glorified Person without us to judge the World and I judged that the People called Quakers generally so believed until my late experience hath given me sufficient ground to think otherwise and that from the Words of divers among them plainly denying and ridiculing any such thing telling me the End of the World is already come and there is no other coming of Christ to be expected but his inward coming in the Hearts of People and into this foul Error the Printed Books of G. W. and other Leading Men among their Teachers had led them although now he and some others seem to own it that Christ will outwardly come again But if a Scrutiny were made among them one by one few among them in comparison would be found to own it in respect of many that would deny it But whereas in that passage above-quoted I had affirmed That our Lord's coming mentioned 1 Cor. 11. 26. is that last coming of his is not yet proved but is a meer begging of the Question This whole Passage I fully and freely retract with all the other passages either in this Book or in my Book called Truth Defended where I have denyed his coming mentioned 1 Cor. 11. 26. to be his outward coming or in any other of my Books where any such like passage is to be found I fully and freely Retract them all And on the Contrary I do freely and with great Satisfaction declare That I am sufficiently convinced and perswaded in my Conscience that the Coming of the Lord mentioned 1 Cor. 11 is His Last Coming which is to be without us which will be accompanyed with his more abundant inward coming and Revelation in us As also whatever is said in this Book called the Rector Corrected concerning the Command that our Lord gave to his Apostles Matth. 28. 19. That it was not Water-Baptism there commanded I fully and freely Retract that also and all the like passages either in Truth Defended or in any of my other Books whatsoever conconcerning the sense of that place of Scripture Matth. 28. 19. And on the contrary I do declare that I am fully and clearly perswaded in my Conscience that Water-Baptism was there commanded by Christ And here I think fit to Transcribe what I have already said in my late Book called The Antichrists and Sadduces detected c. to this effect pag. 34 35. I am not ashamed to own my general Mistakes I have been under concerning divers places of Scripture particularly relative to Water-Baptism and the Supper as Matth. 28. 19. and 1 Cor. 11. 26. And I am so far from being ashamed to publish this Confession that I have great Peace and Joy in it Amd I also declare that I am justly ashamed that I have been so long deceived and byassed with such weak Arguments as both they called Friends and I have used being too much influenced and byassed by their pretended Authority to perswade and draw away the Minds of People from the true sense of these places of Scripture and the Arguments that we have used against these two things are so weak that they have the some force against the Bible it self and all Books and outward Testimonies and outward Acts of Worship and therefore are void in themselves for seeing they have no force against the latter they have as little against the former However I continue in my faithful Testimony against the abuse of these things and the dead empty and formal may that too many practise them and except the Lord be found to bless and accompany them who use them with his Power and Spirit they are but as empty Shadows and Shells but who find the Lord to bless them with his Presence I judge them not It is not proper for me in this place to give any large account of the Reasons why I am otherwise minded as to the Sense of those two places of Scripture Matth. 28. 19.
and 1 Cor. 11. 26. than I was sometime formerly only I think fit to give one Reason at present in particular as to each and another in general as to both My reason why Water-Baptism is to be understood Matth. 28. 19. as a thing commanded of the Lord to be done by the Apostles and not the Baptism with the Holy Ghost because we no where find in all the Scripture such a phrase or manner of Speech that ever any Man but Christ alone who is both God and Man did Baptize with the Holy Ghost or had power so to do it is peculiarly attributed to Christ whose Work it was and still is and to no other Man or Men as John declared He that cometh after me shall Baptize you he did not say They that come after me but he with Fire and with the Holy Ghost And as to that distinction formerly given by me and others that though the Apostles neither could nor did baptize with the Holy Ghost principally yet instrumentally or ministerially they might and did But in answer to this I say where the Scripture doth not distinguish nor give any ground of such a distinction we ought not to give it But the Scripture giveth no such ground and the Scripture phrase and manner of Speech is strictly to be observed in all such cases so that we ought not to put our private glosses on Christ's Commandments as it were a most absurd Distinction to say though God created the World principally yet Angels did create it instrumentally or to say Christ redeemed the World principally by his Death and Sufferings but the Martyrs redeemed the World by their Deaths instrumentally surely as these Distinctions are false and unwarrantable so is that other about Baptizing with the Spirit instrumentally and ministerially My reason why the comeing of the Lord mentioned 1 Cor. 11. 26. is his outward Comeing because the outward practise of Breaking Bread in the Supper was appointed as a commemoration in a solemn way of his Body that was broken for us on the Cross and of his Bodily Sufferings and Humiliation for he did not say Take eat this is my Spirit but This is my Body and it was the Man Christ Jesus that said this therefore as the practise of Breaking the Bread with Prayer and Thanksgiving and Eating it and Pouring out Wine into the Cup and Drinking it was a solemn Commemoration of his Body that was broken for us and his Blood that was shed for us so the believers being enjoyned to do it untill his comeing again that Comeing again must needs signifie his Bodily Comeing for he was Spiritually come both then and in all Ages to the Faithful that the living and faithful Remembrance of his last coming might be preserved by that solemn Practise and also the unspeakable benefit that the Faithful haveby his Sufferings for as Preaching by Words doth hold forth Christ Crucified by audible Signs to the Ears of the Faithful so do these outward things duly practised by visible and otherwise sensible Signs hold him forth to their Eyes Smelling Tast and Feeling that so the Remembrance of him by these so many doors as it were may the more effectually enter into their Hearts and make the deeper Impression upon them and it stands well with good reason that what is represented to Mens Hearts of our Lord's Sufferings by their Hearing Sight Smell Tasting and Feeling in the use of these signs instituted by himself will more effectually affect their Hearts and Souls than what is done alone by the Hearing or Reading as in other cases for Men to see a Tragedy of the real Sufferings of some noble Person acted before their Sight is more than to read it or hear a Report of it and on this account it was that some ancient Writers called these outward Institutions verbum visibile i. e the visible Word My reason in general for both is that it hath pleased God of late since I have found the great opposition to this great fundamental Truth of the Gospel that many among the People called Quakers have made viz. the Faith in Christ crucified and raised again c. as a necessary thing to our Christianity and Salvation let them pretend and profess what they will to the contrary to give me a further and clearer sight and a more deep inward sense and consideration of the great benefit and advantage the practise of these outward things when duly practised is to the preserving the Christian Doctrine and Faith in the World as well as to divers other great uses and ends they being as proper and effectual means in their kind and manner in conjunction with Preaching to preserve the Doctrine and Faith of Christ in the World as Preaching it self and where these outward things are practised the true Doctrine of them ought to be Preached but the Doctrine of them is like to be laid aside when the Practise of them is not only discontinued but opposed and reviled under the Names of beggarly Elements worldly Rudiments and carnal Ordinances And I do boldly and freely in the sincerity of my Heart further declare that it hath pleased God to give me to see that the spring and rise of thatgreat Opposition that hath been and is in many against these outward Practices has been and is a secret Prejudice against the Doctrine of Christ crucified and the mysterious working of an Antichristian and Diabolical spirit designing to draw men from Name and Thing of Christianity to Paganism and Deism and at the next step to Idolatry and Atheism Howbeit in many there is not this knowledge and sight of this Mystery of Iniquity But many simple-hearted and truly pious and well-meaning Souls have been led aside to disown and speak against the use of these outward Practices being stumbled and greatly offended with the beholding the great abuse of them and the undue and irregular way and manner of many their practising them as it was said that the Sons of Ely caused the Sacrifices of the Lord to be abhorred But as the abuse of things ought not to take away the due use of them so where they are not duly practised the simple want of them as neither the simple want of preaching where the Gospel is not outwardly preached I judge will not be imputed to them to be their Sin it being generally acknowledged among sober judicious Christians that it 's not the want of them but the wilful neglect of them where they can be duly had that is a man's Sin and hindrance to his Salvation I adhere to the general rule of Christian Communion in this case generally received and owned by all true Christians that we ought to join in all external acts of Christian Religion and Worship with all professed Christians holding the Fundamentals of the Christian Religion and maintaining nothing contrary thereunto against whose sincerity we have nothing justly to object If so in our joyning with them in these external acts of Worship nothing
be required of us to be done that is sin in the sight of God to wit that is any breach of any positive express command of God Pag. 71. citing my Book called Help in time of Need concerning the Antichrist mentioned 1 John 2. 18. this is Antichrist who denys Christ the Son come in the Revelation of himself in the Heart for that coming of Christ in his Bodily Appearance at Jerusalem Antichrist will not does not deny seeing to confess him so come will never harm his Kingdom provided Christ's Kingdom be not set up in the Heart Here Note These foregoing Words For that coming of Christ in his Bodily Appearance at Jerusalem Antichrist will not does not deny I Retract as unsafely worded for though a sort of Antichrists may not deny but confess in Hypocrisie to Christs outward coming as also they may confess in Hypocrisie to his coming in Mens Hearts yet I am satisfied the true meaning of these words 1 John 2. 18. compared with 1 John 4. 3. respects principally the coming of Christ in the Flesh as he outwardly suffered in that Body of Flesh and consequentially the spiritual Blessings and Benefits we have by that same among which is his Spiritual coming into our Hearts and though a sort of Antichrists and men of an Antichristian Spirit may confess in hypocrisie to Christ's outward coming yet they neither do nor can confess to him as he did outwardly come in sincerity of Heart And it is the sincere Confession from the Heart to Christ as he outwardly came in the Flesh and to all the spiritual Blessings that men receive by him as of his Light Spirit and Grace in them that is the Confession there meant for every one that truly viz. with sincerity of heart so confesseth him come in the Flesh whose Confession floweth from a Living Faith in him is of God and whosoever doth not so confess him but deny him so come is of Antichrist and this denyal of Christ come in the Flesh may be several ways as 1st to deny that he who did so come is the Christ and thus the unbelieving Jews did and do deny him 2dly To deny that he who did so come was and is both God and Man and that as such he is the Salvation of men in whom they are to believe and whom they are to call upon and worship with divine adoration and thus the Mahumetans do deny him and many who go under the Name of Christians who deny that the man Christ is their Salvation and the Object of Faith and adoration 3dly To deny the virtue and efficacy of his being a Sacrifice by his Death for the Remission of the sins of all Men who ever shall be saved from the begining of the World to the end of it 4thly To deny that all the Light and Grace and divine Influence of the Spirit that any Man have or ever had is by Jesus Christ who hath purchased and procured it unto them by his most holy and perfect Obedience unto Death and in these three respects my late Opposers among the People called Quakers are guilty of denying Christ come in the Flesh as I have sufficiently proved against them in divers printed Books particularly in my Narrative of the Proceedings at Turners-Hall the 11th of the 4th Month 1696. and in that called The Antichrists and Saddnces detected For whatever seeming Confessions they give to the Man Christ without them while they place Mens whole Salvation upon an inward Principle and plead that Men may be saved eternally without all Knowledge and Faith of Christ without them either express or implicite As they do particularly in that Antichristian and Abusive Book containing many Antichristian Principles and false Accusations against me called Keith against Keith for which I purpose God willing ere long to call them to an Account All their seeming Confessions is but a Judas Kiss and a plain betraying the Christian Cause into the hands of Infidels Jews and Pagans Pag. 195. Nor doth it follow that because Confession in the adult is necessary to Salvation that therefore Baptism with Water is seeing confession of the Truth may well consist without Water-Baptism namely in a Holy Conversation and profession of Christianity with the Mouth as the Apostle said With the Mouth Confession is made to Salvation Here Note 1. I still adhere to it with all charitable Christians that Baptism with Water is not of equal necessity with Faith and Confession unto Savation for many of the Martyrs did nobly confess to Christ who were put to cruel Deaths before they could be Baptized and in that and in all other cases where Baptism cannot be duly had the votum Baptismi i. e. the desire of Baptism is judged equivalent to Baptism by all charitable Christians 2. That I said Confession in the adult is necessary to Salvation by this it doth appear that it is no new Doctrine in me so to affirm this Book of mine having been in Print for sixteen Years past and which was approved by the Second Days Meeting though in contradiction to what they then approved they have of late greatly blamed me as guilty of broaching a new Doctrine among the People called Quakers for my saying It is a necessary Duty that every one among the Quakers should give a Confession of their Faith to Christ and his doctrine in the fundamental and essential parts thereof before they can be owned to be Members of a Christian communion This they extreamly cry out against knowing that such a thing would discover the vile Errors that are lodged among them But until they do this whatever great and high pretences they make to be the Church of Christ and the only gathered Church they can never be justly esteemed a Church of Christ In my Book called Truth 's Defence c. pag. 104 105. and as for the Word Immediate Revelation seeing it is not any Scripture-phrase no not in the case of the Prophets and Apostles so far as I can remember if the thing it self were granted to wit That God doth inwardly reveal and speak his Mind or shew his Glory and glorious Presence in his Children as he did in and to his Saints of Old so that the Saints do hear see and perceive also tast and savour and feel after God himself as he reveals himself in his Son by the Holy Spirit the Controversie about the Name or Phrase should soon be at an end Here Note That sixteen Years ago I was for holding up no Controversies about the name or term Immediate Revelation though many among the People called Quakers have earnestly and fiercely contended for that term and some of them no doubt will much blame me that I do not now contend for it But why did they not blame me then for my not contending about it are they become of late more Eagle-sighted to see this and other things they judge to be errors in my Books which they formerly did not see or at least gave me
Lord's love and goodness at that time when I wrote that Book which was a time of great Suffering unto me being straitly confined in Prison where I met with divers Hardships and Severities from Men all which the Lord turned to my spiritual Advantage and the spiritual Comforts and Refreshments where withal the Lord was pleased to visit my Soul were exceeding precious unto me as they are at this day feeling at this present time these of the same kind and nature by the good Spirit of the Lord continued and renewed unto me notwithstanding of the unjust and uncharitable Judgment of my late Adversaries against me as if I were become a dry Tree yet my Soul is alive to praise God who hath preserved me to this instant in the midst of many great and deep Exercises and Tryals both inward and outward one of the greatest of which hath been and is the envy and rage of such who have risen up in great enmity against me for my telling them the Truth and my faithful opposing the Errors and Evils that I have found among them and my trust and Faith is in God through Christ Jesus that he will preserve me to the end and disappoint and frustrate all their False Prophecies bitter Curses and lying Divinations they have poured out against me and continue to utter both in print and private Letters they send to me for which I desire and pray sincerely unto God that he may give them Repentance and Forgiveness And being sensible and truly convinced that I had too far exceeded in the thoughts of my spiritual Attainments not only then but since therefore whatever passages are to be found either in this first Book or any other of my later Books that are justy offensive on the account of my going beyond the due Bounds of my real growth and spiritual and inward state in the Truth or of thinking of my inward Attainments and Calls Services Labours and Testimonies beyond what I ought to have thought or wherein either in this or any other of my Books I have seemed to my self or professed to others to have been acted by a purely divine impulse and motion to speak and write I do freely and most willingly retract and revoke it so far as any thing of the least mixture of mistake or untruth is to be found therein as I confess I have found some mixture in this Book and in other my Books And as in other things I acknowledge my Mistakes as to the People called Quakers in general so in this that was the general mistake among us that their chief Leaders led us generally into that the People called Quakers was the Church come out of the Wilderness But for divers Years past I have seen my Mistakes as to this and the great Defects Disorders Confusions and Imperfections I have found among them and especially the ignorance and great want of dne Qualifications in the generality of their Ministry have given just ground to judge far otherwise concerning them But yet I do affirm that I have found divers that go under that Name that have to my understanding and apprehension made a good progress in spiritual Experiences and other spiritual Attainments of Knowledge and Virtue And I do still continue in my real perswasion and belief that there was a good Work of God upon the Hearts of many of that People and his mighty Power did stir and operate in them as I hope it doth in some continue to do unto this day But greatly has the Power of Darkness and Error prevailed with many especially their Leaders in great part to mislead them and Presumption and Pride earthly Lusts and uncharitableness in so highly condemning others are Sins that did and do greatly prevail among them and hath brought a great Cloud of Darkness over many of them which I pray God to remove and cause his blessed Light to shine forth more among them and all others and that he would be pleased to knit and unite the Hearts of all that sincerely love the Lord to love one another and make them of one Heart and Soul that they may worship the Lord together in Spirit and in Truth that as the Lord is one all his People may be one which cannot otherwise be effected but by the more powerful Coming and Appearance of the Lord Jesus Christ into their Hearts and inward parts to prepare them for his last coming in Glory without them to receive them to his Heavenly Kingdom Even so come Lord Jesus come quickly Amen But notwithstanding of the particular passages in that Book which I have retracted I adhere to my Testimony I have given in the same as in all my other Books as to Matter and Substance of many weighty things there delivered and the good Advice I gave to my Country-men in that Book I wish heartily they would duly regard Pag. 63. And this Prophet Jesus Christ is nigh unto us yea more nigh than all the Men or Books upon the face of the Earth And a little after And the Bride rejoyceth greatly because of the Voice of the Bridegroom himself And now we need not-say who will go down into the Grave and bring up Christ to us or who will ascend to Heaven to bring him down to us or who will go over the Seas and bring us tydings of him from Jerusalem when he suffered in the Flesh him whose Name is the Word of God we of a truth witness near us even in our Hearts so that we need not either ascend or descend or go fouth c. Here Note That this above-mentioned passage was brought by T. Ellwood in one of his late printed Books against me to parallel that Antichristian Doctrine of G. Whitehead who said in his Truth Defended Answer to W. Burnet The Quakers see no need of directing to pag. 110 111. the Type for the Antitype viz. neither to the outward Temple nor yet to Jerusalem either to Jesus Christ or his Blood knowing that neither the Righteousness of Faith nor the Word of it doth so direct Rom. 10. And a little after he saith And where do the Scriptures say the Blood was there shed for Justification and that Men must be directed to Jerusalem to it Light and Life pag. 59 60. But who seeth not that my Words have no such tendency as his but are of quite another importance as intimating that after we are brought to know God and Christ by the inward Teaching of God and Christ in our Hearts that perswadeth us that Christ suffered in the Flesh at Jerusalem and moveth us to believe the outward Testimony of the Holy Scriptures concerning Christ's Death and Sufferings we need not say who will go over the Seas and bring us Tydings of him from Jerusalem where he suffered in the Flesh for all sincere Christians are well satisfied with the Faith they have already of Christ by the inward Testimony of his Spirit in their Hearts that the Scripture-record of him is ture So