are free from these paines that is hee speaketh of felicity and liberty which is not in Hell Whereupon also it is clear that Christ spake this to the Theefe not of his God-head but of that which suffered which was his soul For the godhead was with the Theefe neither did Christ suffer or was deliuered as touching his God-heade but as touching his soule Lastly Christ descended not into Hell locally as touching his bodie because his body was in the graue neither rose from any other place but from the graue It followeth therefore that this article cannot bee vnderstood of a locall descension into Hell Aunswere 2 Albeit it were true that Christ descended locally into Hell yet hee shoulde not haue descended for this cause which they imagine as namely to deliuer the Fathers Which also is prooued by this reason If Christ descended locally into Hel he descended either to suffer or to deliuer Not to suffer because now all thinges were finished on the Crosse as christ himselfe also hanging on the Crosse said Jt is finished He descended not to deliuer the Fathers 1 Because he did this before in suffering for them on earth 2 Hee did the same by the power and efficacie of his God-heade from the verie beginning of the worlde not by the descension of his soule or bodie into Hel. 3 The Fathers were not in Limbo Therefore they could not be deliuered thence As it is saide Luk. 16.46 Betweene you and vs there is a great gulfe set so that they which would go from hence to you cannot neither can they come from thence to vs. And in the same place Lazarus is said to bee in Abrahams bosome not in Limbo The soules of the iust are in the hand of God 3 Objection Christ indeede did not descend into Hell either to suffer or to deliuer but as some wil to shewe the Diuell and Death his victorie and so to strike a terrour into them Which they say is confirmed by that place of Peter 1. Pet. 3.19 By the which he also went preached vnto the spirits that are in prison which were in time passed disobedient Answere That for this cause Christ descended into Hell is not found in scripture that place of Peter is thus to be vnderstood Christ went that is beeing sent from the beginning of the Father vnto the Church by his spirite that is by his God-head and vnto the spirites that are now in prison that is in Hell hee preached in time passed when as yet they liued were disobedient namely before the flud and in the time of Noah inuiting them to repentance So is also another saieng of Peter to be vnderstood 1. Pet. 4.6 The Gospel was also preached vnto the dead That is vnto those which are now dead or were then dead when Peter wrote this and who then liued when the Gospel was preached vnto them Reply Christ descended into the lowest partes of the earth Ephes 4.9 Therefore to Hell Aunswere Into the lowest partes of the earth that is into the earth which is the lowest part of the world This interpretation is prooued by the scope and drift of the Apostle who maketh in that place an opposition of christs great glory his great humiliation But were it so that these places which some alleage for to establish this opinion were to be vnderstood of a locall descension of Christ into Hell yet would they not make for them but rather for the papists who teach That christ preached vnto the Fathers in Hell and thence deliuered them Now if these testimonies help not the Papists muchlesse wil they helpe them For it is certaine that it cannot be thence prooued that Christ descended into Hell to strike a terrour into Death and the Diuell This opinion indeed is not impious or vngodly is approoued by manie of the Fathers but yet I leaue it because it is not grounded on anie firme reasons and contrarie reasons are at hand easie to be had For 1. Christ himselfe said which testimonies haue now often beene recited This daie shalt thou bee with mee in Paradise Father into thy hands I commend my spirite Againe It is finished 2. Jf hee descended to triumph this Article should bee the beginning of his glorification But it is not likelie that Christ tooke the beginning of his glorification in hell For it is apparent by the opposition of the Article following That christes Descension was the lowest degree of his humiliation And yet I confesse withall that christ stroke a great terrour into the Diuels but that was by his death whereby hee disarmed and vanquished the Diuel sin and death THE THIRD DAY HE ROSE AGAINE FROM THE DEAD I Beleeue that Christ shooke off death from himselfe quickened his deade body reunited his bodie vnto his soule restored vnto himselfe a blessed celestial and glorious life and that by his owne proper power The chiefe Questions of christs resurrection are 1 Whether Christ rose againe 2 How he rose 3 For what cause he rose 4 The fruit of his resurrection 1 WHETHER CHRIST ROSE AGAINE THat Christ rose againe is prooued by the testimonies of Angels weomen Euangelistes Apostles and other Saintes who after his resurrection sawe him felt him and talked with him And wee were to beleeue the Apostles in respect of the authority which they had from heauen although they had not seene him 2 HOW CHRIST ROSE CHRIST rose first by his owne power euen by his Godheade Iohn 2.19 Destroie this temple and in three daies I will raise it vp againe Ioh. 10.18 I haue power to laie downe my soule and haue power to take it vp againe Ioh. 5.21 As the Father raiseth vp the dead and quickeneth them so the Sonne quickeneth whom he will Obiection But the Father raised him Rom. 4.24 Therefore hee raised not himselfe Aunswere The Father raised the Sonne by the Son himselfe not as by an instrument but as by another person of the same essence and power with the Father The Sonne is raised of the Father by himselfe Himselfe hath raised vp himselfe by his spirite Secondlie Iesus Christ true God and man rose according to that nature according to which he suffered namelie according to his humane nature euen the true humane nature and the same in essence and properties and that not deified but glorified al infirmities thereof beeing done away Luk. 24.39 Behold my handes and my feete for it is I my selfe handle me and see me for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as yee see mee haue And truely nothing else coulde rise againe but that which had fallen The same bodie therefore which fell did rise againe which is the greatest comfort vnto vs. For hee must haue been one and the same Mediatour who should merit for vs a communicating and participation of those benefits which we had lost by sin who should restore the same vnto vs and applie them to euerie one Againe except Christes fleshe hadde risen neither shoulde ours rise
remission of sinnes is giuen REmission of sins is giuen by faith Remission of sinnes giuen by faith through the working of the Holy Ghost by which being wrought and kindled in vs by the holy Ghost wee receiue the same Therefore the purpose and decree of God of remitting sinnes is euerlasting but the executing and performance thereof is when by faith we applie remission of sins vnto vs. So also God doth alwaies loue his elect but that loue is not poured out in their hearts before their repentance For they haue that certain testimonie of conscieÌ„ce by the gift of the holy Ghost that they are loued of god so haue their sins remitted who truly conuert and repent Oâ— THE RESVRRECTION OF THE FLESH THE chiefe quâ—stions 1 What the Resurrection is 2 The Errours concerning the Resurrection 3 Whence it may appeare that the Resurrection shall certainelie be 4 For what end the Resurrection shal be 5 By whom 6 How 7 When. 8 What bodies shall rise 9 Whether the soule be immortall 1 WHAT THE RESVRRECTION IS THE Word Resurrection signifieth sometime preseruation The resurrection of the flesh is a restoring of the substance of our bodies after death euen of the same matter whereof they now consist and a reuiuing and quickening of the same bodies with life immortall and incorruptible by the same immortall soule whereby they now liue which God will woorke by Christ in the ende of the woorlde by his diuine vertue and power which restoring also shal be of the elect vnto the eternall glorie of God but of the reprobate vnto eternall paines That is 1. There shal be a restoring of the same bodie which is a recollecting gathering together of the same matter which was scattered and seuered into al the Elementes 2. An vniting of it with the same soule and a reuiuing of it 〈◊〉 the same soule which also it had before 3. A putting off of al infirmities a putting on of immortality 2 The Errours concerning the Resurrection THE Errours helde of the resurrection are of three sortes Some haue vtterlie denied it and haue auouched the souls to die together with the bodies 2. Some haue granted the immortalitie of the soule but haue constred the resurrection to bee a resurrection in this life but the bodies they denied to rise at all although the soules of the godlie haue fruition after death of euerlasting happinesse 3. Some as Anabaptistes deny that the verie selfe same bodies which we now haue shal rise again but they saie that Christ at his second comming will make new bodies 3 Whence it maie appeare that the Resurrection shall certainlie beâ— IT maie be verily collected probably out of philosophie that there shal be sometime a resurrection Probable proofes of the Resurrection yeelded by philosophie but no necessarie demonstrance but no necessarie demonstration can bee yeelded thence that the Resurrection shall certainly bee For in philosophy are manie principles which accord not with the sacred writinges of Gods spirite Againe in philosophy the knowleege which it hath of Gods iustice and trueth is but a maimed reason But in the holie writ of God the reasons are firme true Hence alone therefore is demonstration giuen for the most certaine accomplishment of the Resurrection And this first by testimonies of scripture then by reasons drawn out of scripture The testimonies of Scripture The Testimonies of scripture for demoÌ„strance of the Resurrection which confirme the certaintie of the resurrection hereafter to come are most euident and those taken both out of the olde and new Testament Iob 19.25 I am sure that my redeemer liueth and hee shall stand the last on the earth and though after my skin worms destroy this bodie yet shal I see God in my flesh Iohn 5.28 The hour shal come in the which all that are in the graues shall heare his voice And they shal come forth that haue doone good vnto the resurrection of life but they that haue doone euil vnto the resurrection of condemnation Iohn 6 40. I wil raise him vp at the last day 1. Corint 15.13 If there bee no resurrection of the deade then is Christ not risen And if Christ be not risen then is our preaching vaine and your faith is also vaine Reasons drawen out of the scripture for proofe thereof The reasons which are drawen also out of Scripture are diuerse 1. God promiseth eternall life not to the soule onelie but also to the bodie of the godly and contrarie to the vngodly hee threatneth eternall punishment and paines both of bodie and soule and these promises and threatninges of God must bee fulfilled For the certainty of them is vnchaungeable But they shal not bee fulfilled if the deade shal not rise Seeing therefore God dooth most certainelie in his good time accomplish that which hee promiseth to the godly and menaceth to the wicked it followeth of necessitie that the dead must rise againe 2. The mercie of God is perfect as which extendeth it selfe to the whole man and which will haue vs wholy saued Therefore our bodies also shal rise again 3. The mercie and loue of God towardes the godly is perpetuall and vnchaungeable so that what hee once will of his fatherly loue towardes them perfourme vnto them the same he euer will But he wil haue the godly saued both in soule and bodie therefore they must be both in soule and bodie euen whole saued and therefore that they maie bee whole saued they must needes rise againe 4. The perfect iustice of God requireth that the same wholie whereby they sinne should be punished with eternall paines But they sinne both in their whole bodie and in their soule Therefore their bodies also must be raised againe because they ought no lesse in body than in soule to suffer eternal pains 5. Christ is risen therefore wee also shall rise This sequele is most sure For first Christ therefore rose againe that hee might raise vs. Secondly Christ is our head and we his members Seeing then Christ our head is risen we also his members doubtles shal rise For the glorie of the head requireth this that he haue his members sutable in like condition with him Wherefore if the members should continue rotten the head should not be glorious Thirdly The same spirite is in vs which is in Christ raised he ioineth and vniteth vs with Christ and worketh the same in vs which he doth in Christ neither is at anie time not like himselfe But he hath raised Christ Therefore also hee will raise vs. 6. It is saide that Christ shall haue an euerlasting kingdome but this he should not haue if our bodies should alwaies continue in death for neither would it suffice that our soules are immortall or eternal without our bodies For that Christs kingdome may be eternall he must haue eternall subiects and those wholy eternall Therefore our bodies also shall rise that so wee whole may bee subiect eternally vnto Christ our king
his law therfore euen the least sin meriteth eternal abiection and casting away Most certainelie both in respect of his iustice which abhorreth and punisheth whatsoeuer is not agreeable vnto it and in respect of his truth because hee had denounced before that he woulde punish men if they obeied not his commaundement God therefore seeing he is true doth neuer change this his sentence 1 Obiection But the wicked florish here Aunswere The wicked florish but for a short time to bee cast at length into eternal tormentes except they repent Yea in this life also they are punished First they are miserablie vexed with the torments and terrors of conscience which in the reprobate are the beginning and sense of eternall paines 2. Euen those good things which they vse with greatest pleasure serue for their punishment and destruction and verilie so much the more how much the lesse they know and acknowledge them for a punishment For it is a most grieuous punishment not to receiue gods gifts in respect of gods promise nor to know the right vse of them neither with his giftes to receiue a will and abilitie also to vse them well For if these thinges concurre not in the fruition of good things mens sinnes and punishment must needs be the more encreased and exasperated and thereby except there come conuersion eternal destruction or death is certainely purchased 3. They are afflicted with other punishmentes also most grieuous oftentimes yet with more grieuous in the life to come where it shal bee a continuall death not to bee dead 2 Obiection But God made not euil and death Aunswere The euils of sin and punishment had not come if man would He made them not in the beginning and further also after the beginning neither euill nor death shoulde haue beene except our selues had woulde For they ensued on the voluntarie sinne of man God forcibly inflicting them as a most iust punishment 3 Obiection If God punish sinnes with present and euerlasting punishments he punisheth the same twise is vniust but God punisheth sinnes with present and euerlasting punishmentes therefore he punisheth the same sinne twise and is vniust Answ The Minor is to be distinguished for it is but one punishment but hath seueral parts For present punishments are the beginning of euerlasting because they are not sufficient to satisfie Gods iustice 4 Obiection If God punish sinnes with eternall punishments Then either all of vs perish or Gods iustice is not satisfied Aunswere If God should punish our sinnes in vs with eternal punishments we should all perish neither should we euer recouer vs thence but hee doth not so punish them in vs neither yet is Gods iustice impeached or violated because hee punisheth our sinnes in Christ with a punishment temporall but yet equiualent to euerlasting This equability doth the Gospel adde vnto the rigour and seueritie of the law 5 Obiection The iustice of God permitteth not that the same sinne be twise punished but our sinnes are most fullie punished in his sonne and this punishment is imputed vnto the godlie or beleeuers Therefore the same ought no more to bee punished in the godlie and so they are vniustlie afflicted Aunswere The afflictions of the godly are not punishments and satisfaction for their sinnes but onely fatherly chastisementes and the Crosse whereby they are brought to humility Which that it may bee better vnderstoode wee are necessarily here to speake of afflictions or calamities OF AFFLICTIONS The chiefe questions are 1 How manie kindes of afflictions there be 2 What be the causes of them 3 What comforts are to be opposed against them 1 How manie kindes there be of afflictions SOme afflictions are temporal and some eternall Eternal are the tormentes of the soule and bodie proper vnto the wicked into which all the Diuels are to bee throwen and all wicked men who are not conuerted in this life The qualitie of these tormentes is expressed when they are called in scripture a worme fire horror euerlasting torment likewise euerlasting death which is not a destruction of the bodie and soule or a perpetuall senselesnes but an infinite and endlesse continuaunce of those tormentes which the wicked in this life dispairing begin to feele or it is neuer to be dead yet to die continually that is to liue forsaken and abiected of God subiect to all tormentes both of bodie and soule But wee are here to collect testimonies of scripture against Epicures of which heard not a fewe are found euen in the Popes court thereby to demonstrate that the pains torments of the wicked both in bodie and soule Why the punishment of sinne ought to bee eternall shal be eternal 1. Isai 66.24 Their worme shal not die their feare shal not be put out Mar. 9.43 Into hell into the fire that neuer shal bee quenched where their worme dieth not the fire neuer goeth out Mat. 25.41 Go into euerlasting fire which is prepared for the Diuel his Angels 1. Pet. 4.18 If the righteous scarcelie be saued where shall the vngodlie sinner appear Mat. 10.28 Feare him who can cast both bodie soul into helfire The soul is the cause fountain of sins the body as a thing without reason and brutish doth execute that which the soul sheweth commandeth wherefore both the author instrument of sins shal be punished 2. The reason also why the paines and punishments of sins should be eternal infinit is euident because for sin committed against the infinit good an infinit punishment is iustlie exacted neither coulde there be made by anie temporall punishment of a meere creature sufficient satisfaction vnto gods infinit eternal iustice therefore the temporal punishment of Christ that it might be sufficient to deliuer the elect was to be equiualent to eternall pains Here the Epicures obiect He that is exceeding mercifull How Gods mercie and his iustice stand together in inflicting eternall punishment cannot behold the eternal torments of his creatures much lesse inflict such on them God is exceeding merciful because his mercie doth far exceed our sins Therefore he doth not suffer his creatures to remain in eternal torments Answ The Maior is true when exceeding most exact iustice such as is in god doth not exact require that exceeding sinne haue exceeding punishment Replie Exceeding strict iustice doth not stand with exceeding mercie because that admitteth no mitigating equabilitie In God is exceeding iustice therefore not exceeding mercie Answ Both the Maior and the proofe thereof is false Because God punishing of his exceeding iustice our sin with exceeding punishment doth notwithstanding shewe exceeding equability and fauorablenes whiles he translateth the punishment thereof from vs laieth it vpon his sonne They frame also the same reply on this wise With him that followeth extreme or strict iustice mercie and equabilitie hath no place But god in punishing sinnes foloweth strict iustice Therfore he is not merciful To which we answer 1.
Heb. 2.16 made of the seede of Dauid Rom. 1.3 Borne of the Iewes concerning the flesh Rom. 9.5 euery where the son of Abraham of Dauid and the son of man And also Luk. 3. his petigree stock concerning the fleshe is deduced vnto Adam Therefore hee was begotten of the substance of his mother Mary and issued from the same seede of Adam from which we did Luk. 24.39 Christ prooueth himselfe to be a true man and not a spirite by this that a spirite hath not fleshe and bones as hee hath and reteineth euen after his resurrection Apollinaris the hereticke saide that Christes bodie indeede was a true bodie but insteede of a soule he had the Woorde onlie But this man is easilie refuted because Christ should not then haue bin like vnto his brethren in al thinges except sinne And Christ himselfe doth plainly confesse My soule is verie heauy euen vnto the death Mat. 26.38 And Luk 2.52 he is said to haue encreased in wisedome and stature and in fauour with God and men And Iohn 10.18 To laie downe his soule and to take it againe But to encrease in wisedome and to bee heauy and sad doe neither agree vnto a bodie which is reasonlesse neither vnto the god-head which is not obnoxious to changes and passions Hither belongeth also that Luk. 23.46 Father into thine handes I commend my spirit And when hee thus had said He gaue vp the Ghost This cannot bee saide of christs godhead For that being immense infinit is euery where nether doth a remouing from one place to another agree vnto it it is not laid downe and taken vp again that is it neuer departed or was seuered from the body but remaineth alwaies vnited vnto it Wherefore there must needs be in Christ besides his body his Godhead a true humane soule which did truely suffer and abide in Christ these chaunges and the like Secondly it is confirmed by diuine promises and prophecies For the Messias in the old Testament was promised to be such a one as should be the seede of the woman of Abraham Isaac Iacob c. But this Iesus the Sonne of the Virgine Mary is that promised Messias Therefore he must needs bee true man issuing of the bloode and posterity of the woman and the Fathers and therefore to haue been indeede begotten of the substance of Marie and to haue taken true flesh Thirdly The office of the Mediatour confirmeth the same The sinne of men in respect of gods truth and iustice could not bee punished in any other nature than in a humane nature which shoulde bee of the same kind with ours But in the Mediatour which is Jesus Christ alone our sinnes were to bee punished Therefore he must needes bee true man who hath humane flesh not created of nothing or borne else-whence but sprong from the bloud of Adam as well as ours Moreouer Jt was necessarie for Christ not onelie to take but also to retaine our nature for euer Because GOD hath decreed to bestowe and dooth bestowe the benefites which Christ by his death hath purchased for vs by this man CHRIST vpon them onely who are and remain engraffed into his masse and flesh as members into their head or braunches into their vine 1. Cor. 15.21 For since by man came death by man came also the resurrection of the dead Iohn 15.6 Jf a man abide not in me he is cast forth as a braunch and withereth Lastly Jt behoued Christ to be made and to continue our brother for euer that as he is flesh of our flesh so we also of the otherside might be flesh bones of his flesh and bones by the same spirite dwelling in vs. Eph. 5.30 We are members of his bodie of his flesh and of his bones Iohn 5.56 Eph. 4.12.16 Rom. 8.11 c. Wherefore except Christ had indeede taken our nature without which hee cannot be our brother we shoulde loose that comfort euer needefull and necessarie for vs which consisteth in the Brotherhood onely of Christ with vs I am of his flesh and of his bones 1 Obiection The flesh of Adam that is humane flesh issuing from Adam by generation vnto his posteritie is sinnefull The flesh of Christ is not sinnefull therefore the flesh of Christ is not the flesh of Adam Aunswere The Maior proposition hath a fallacie of the accident For it is not necessarie that of whatsoeuer the accident of a thing is denied of the same the thing also or subiect of the accident shoulde bee denied because an accident dooth so cleaue to the thing wherein it is as it may bee separated from it Sinne is not of the essence and nature of humane flesh for that was created pure of God but sinne came otherwise by the defection falling of our first parents from god Seeing then the flesh of Adam is sinfull only by an accident it foloweth that the flesh of Christ is onely in respect of that accident not the flesh of Adam but is as touching the substaunce the same flesh with the flesh of Adam Wherefore they deale like Sophisters who denie the flesh of CHRIST for that it is voide of sinne to bee the same in substaunce or Essence or kinde with the flesh of Adam For hee that coulde in the beginning create humane flesh pure of nothing is able also by his omnipotent power and speciall working so to forme it of the substaunce of the Virgin being a sinner as withall to let and stop any issuing of sinne thereunto that is to make it pure and holy There is no new or strange thing therefore if the omnipotent Lord hath tooke humane substance without the accident sinne into the vnity of his person Wherefore this their Argument shal be rather thus inuerted The flesh of Adam is true flesh Christs flesh is the flesh of Adam therefore Christs flesh is true flesh and by a consequent Christ is true man as also the office of the Mediatour did require that he should both bee and continue true man For seeing true men had sinned he was to be true man that shoulde make satisfaction Because it must bee one and the same Mediatour who must alwaies make intercession vnto the father for vs and hee must euer continue such that is true and very man 2 Obiection That which is conceiued and begotten of another is of the same substance with him The flesh of Christ was conceiued of the holie Ghost Therefore the flesh of Christ is no creature but came downe from heauen issuing from the substaunce of God Aunswere There is a fallacie in the diuers vnderstanding of the particle OF For that in the Maior signifieth the matter or material cause in the Minor the efficient cause onely that is That which is conceiued or begotten of another transfusing or passing his substance or part of his substaunce into the thing begotten this is of the same essence with him who begot it CHRISTS fleshe was conceiued by the Holy GHOST not that hee transfused or
tormentes ignominies paines and grifes vnto all which Christ was subiect and obnoxious as wel in soule as in body from the point of his natiuity vntill the howre of his death resurrection Mat. 26.38 My soul is very heauy euen vnto the death Mat. 27.46 My God my God why hast thou forsaken me Isa 53.4 Surelie he hath carried our sorrowes But principally by the name of Passion is signified the last act of the humiliation and pains of Christ the chiefe part of which his pains and dolours was in his soule wherein hee felt the ire and wrath of God against sinne which also was the cause why he so trembled and shooke at death was so faint-harted in his death whereas other Martyrs of Christ haue susteined stoutlie and couragiouslie extreme torments For the torments punishments of others haue no proportion with the torments and punishments of Christ For others as Stephen Laurence and the like susteined only corporall paines and torments but were vpheld within by the holy ghost But Christ suffered the paines both of body soule For he suffered first our infirmity that is the infirmities of humane nature he hungered thirsted was wearie was stroken with sadnesse and griefe 2 Hee suffered pouertie Luk 9.58 The sonne of man hath not whereon to lay his head 3 He suffered infinite iniuries contumelies slaunders layings in wait for him backbitings reproches blasphemies annihilating and contempt Psalm 22.7 I am a worme and not a man Isay 53.2 He hath neither forme nor beutie when wee shall see him there shall bee no forme that we should desire him 4 Hee suffered the Tentations of the diuel Mat. 4.1 He. 4.15 He was in all thinges tempted in like sort 5 Hee suffered the death of the bodie and that reprochefull and contumelious euen the death of the Crosse 6 He suffered the most grieuous torments of soule that is he found the sense and feeling of the wrath of God against sinne to be laide on him Hereof it was that he cried with a loude voice My God why hast thou forsaken me as if he should saie why doost thou not driue and put away from me so great torments For he signifieth by those words not a diuulsion or separation of his Godhead from his manhood but the differring and delaying of help and succour We see then what and howe great thinges Christ hath suffered for vs which are therefore proposed vnto vs and sette before our eyes to giue vs to consider 1. The history it selfe of Christs passion agreeing with Gods sacred oracles and prophecies 2. The cause or fruites of Christes Passion 3. His example that wee are also to enter into eternal life and heauenlie glorie by death as did Christ and these three thinges are especially to be considered in Christs Passion Obiection There is no proportion betweene temporal punishment and eternal Christ suffered only temporal paines and punishmentes Therefore he could not satisfie gods iustice Aunswere There is no proportion betweene temporall and eternall punishment if they bee considered as beeing both in the same degree and in the same subiect Question But how may the raunsome of one person answere for the sins of an infinit number of men Aunswere It may and that for these two causes 1. Because he is true God which suffered Obiection But god cannot die and suffer Aunswere God cannot suffer in that he is God Or further we graunt that Christ was not God in that he suffered died Obiect Christ is not God in that he suffered Therefore it is false which is saide Acts 20.28 That God hath purchased the Church with his owne bloode Ans This was spoken by a communicating of the properties but this was in the person not in the nature that is That person which is God and man purchased the Church The communicating of properties is to attribute that to the whole person which is proper vnto one nature and this is attributed in a concrete voice not in an abstract because the concrete voice signifieth the person in which are both natures and the property of that nature whereof some thing is affirmed But the abstract name signifieth the nature which is in the person but not the person And therefore it is that nothing hindereth why that which is proper to one nature may not bee affirmed of the whole person so that propertie it selfe be in the person But contrarie of the abstract name onely the properties of that nature are affirmed vnto which they properly belong As of the God-heade which is the abstract name no propertie of the man-hoode maie be affirmed but onelie the properties of the God-heade because the God-heade signifieth not the person which hath both natures but onelie the diuine nature it selfe But of God which is the concrete name the properties not of the God-head only but of the manhood also may be affirmed because God signifieth not the diuine nature but the person which hath both the diuine nature and humane The second cause why the raunsome of one person may aunswere for the sinnes of an infinite number is the grieuousnesse of his punishment because hee suffered that which wee should haue suffered for euer His Passion therefore is equiualent to euerlasting punishment yea it surpasseth it For that God should suffer is more than that all the creatures shoulde perish euerlastinglie 2 According to which nature Christ suffered CHRIST suffered not according to both natures neither according to his God-head but according to his humane nature onely both in body and soule For his diuine nature is immortal Now he so suffered according to his humanity that by his death and Passion he made satisfaction for infinite sinnes of men Question But why could not his God-head suffer Answere Because it is not changeable neither can that which is life it selfe dy This susteined vpheld the humane nature in paines after death restored it to life Obiection God purchased the Church with his owne bloode Actes 20.28 Therefore the god-head suffered Aunswere It doth not follow because an argument from the concrete which is God to the abstract which is the God-heade is if no consequence Againe the kind of affirmation is altered God is said to haue died by a figure of speech which is Synecdoche vsed whē we signifie the whole by a part as whole Christ by God and by a communicating of the properties But when it is said The god-head died that admitteth no figure as beeing a meere abstract The concrete signifieth the subiect or person hauing the nature or forme But the abstract signifieth the bare nature and forme onelie Wherefore the argument doth not follow A man is compounded of the elementes and is corporeal Therefore his soul also is corporeal This cannot follow Because al things agree not to the forme which agree to the subiect the soule is the forme of man man is the essentiall subiect of the soule Wherefore neither doth it follow Christ God died Therefore Christs God-heade died For
dead corps A dead body is indeed void of sense and feeling but yet notwithstanding ignominious is it for the bodie to be committed vnto the earth as it is said To dust shalt thou returne And as Christes resurrection from the dead and death is a part of his glore so his burial that is the debasing of his bodie to bee in the same state with other dead carcases is a part of his humiliation 3 A certaine type was to be fulfilled It was foretolde by the type of Ionas remaining 3. daies in the Whale That the Messias should be buried Therefore for the fulfilling of this type he ought also to be buried and to remaine vntill the third day in the graue 4 He would be buried that he might not be afraid of the graue but might knowe that our head Christ Iesus had laid open the waie vnto vs by the graue and death to celestiall glorie and therefore shall wee bee raised out of the graue albeit we die giue vp the Ghost 5 That we might knowe how we are indeed deliuered from death For in his death a testimonie and record whereof is his buriall consisteth our saluation 6 That it might be apparent and manifest as concerning his resurrection euen that hee was able indeede to rise againe and to shew that hee hath ouercome death and that his resurrection was not imaginarie but the resurrectiō of a reuiuing corps 7 That we beeing spirituallie dead that is to sin might rest from sinne Rom. 6.4 Wee are buried with Christ by Baptisme into his death that like as Christ was raised vp from the dead by the glory of the father so we also should walke in newnesse of life HE DESCENDED INTO HEL I Beleeue in Christ who descended into Hel that is I beleeue that Christ for me sustained in his soule infernall hellish pains tormentes that exceeding ignominie which is due vnto the wicked in Hell that thereby I might not descend into hell and that I might neuer bee forced to suffer them all which otherwise I should suffer in hell eternallie but that of the contrarie rather I might ascend with Christ into heauen and there enioie with him exceeding happinesse and glory for euer and euer This is the vse and profite of this Article of Christes descension into hel Now wee are a little more at large to declare what is the meaning of that Article or what is properlie that Descension of Christ into hell Hell in Scripture is taken three waies For it signifieth 1. The graue Genesis 42.38 Then yee shall bring my graie heade with sorrowe vnto hell Psalm 16.10 Thou wilt not leaue my soule in Hell neither wilt thou suffer thy holy one to see corruption 2. The place of the damned As in the storie of the rich man and Lazarus 3. The paines of hell that is the terrours and tormentes of the soule and conscience Psal 116.3 The griefes of hel caught me 1. Sam. 2.6 The Lord bringeth downe to hel and raiseth vp that is into exceeding pains and torments out of which afterwards he again deliuereth In this third sense is it taken in this Article for it cannot be vnderstoode of the graue because there goeth before He was buried If anie say that this latter Article is an exposition of the former hee saith nothing For as often as two speeches expressing the same thing are ioyned together so that the one is an exposition of the other it is meete that the latter bee more cleare and open than the former againe it is not likely in this so briefe succinct a confession that the same thing should be twise spokē in other words Neither cā this place be vnderstood of the place of the damned For Christ said Into thy hands I commend my spirit to the Theef This day shalt thou be with me in Paradise as if he should saie This day shalt thou be with me as touching my soule in Paradise that is in the place of euerlasting saluation or happinesse where thou shalt being deliuered from al tormentes enioie most pleasaunt quiet and repose This is not to bee vnderstoode of the Godheade of Christ as if that shoulde bee the same daie together with the soule of the Theefe in Paradise For the God-head is and shall bee euery where But thou shalt be in Paradise with me euen whom thou seest hanging on the crosse The descension of Christ therefore into Hell signifieth 1 those extreme torments and griefes which christ suffered in his soule namely the wrath of God against sinnes and that such as the damned feele partly in this life partlie in the life to come 2. The Exceeding and extreme ignomine and reproche which christ suffered That Christ suffered these thinges is prooued by the Testimonie of Dauid before alleaged The griefes of Hell caught mee which is sayde of Christ in the person of Dauid There are other the like sayings whereby the same is prooued Isa 53.10 The Lord would breake him and make him subiect to infirmities Mat. 26.38 My soule is verie heauie euen vnto the death The same doo those his vexations also shewe in the garden when he swet blood Isai 53.6 The Lord hath laid vpon him the iniquitie of vs all Therefore hee crieth out Mat. 27.49 My God my god why hast thou forsaken mee The same is proued also by this reason euen because hee ought to suffer not onlie in body but in soule to for vs that hee might also redeeme our soules Obiection 1. The articles of faith ought to be vnderstood properlie Aunswere True except an article beeing taken according to the proper signification be disagreeing from other places of scripture But this Article of Christs descension into Hell beeing taken properlie is much repugnant to that saying of Christ Iohn 19.30 It is finished For if Christ fulfilled and finished all the parts of our redemption on the Crosse there was no cause why hee should descend into Hell that is vnto the place of the damned Obiection 2. Hee descended into Hell and that by a locall descension as the papists affirm to deliuer the Fathers thence Answere 1. Wee denie that christ descended locallie into Hell and that for this reason Jf christ did locallie descend into Hell hee descended either as touching his Godhead or as touching his soule or as touching his body Not as touching his Godhead For that is euerie where Not as touching his soule because he saith Father into thy handes I commend my spirite Replie But hee might also bee in the hand of his Father that is in his Fathers protection euen in Hell According to that Psalm 139.8 If I lie downe in Hell thou art there that is there also will god haue care ouer mee and there also will hee keepe me that I perish not Answere One place enterpreteth another for he had said before vnto the Theefe This daie shalt thou be with mee in Paradise that is in the place and state of the blessed where both
crie with a loude voice vnder the aultar saying How long Lord holy and true doost not thou iudge and auenge our bloode on them that dwell on the earth Wherefore the soules liue 8. Luk. 16.22 Lazarus is said to bee carried into Abrahams bosome and out of the same place also it is apparent concerning the souls of the wicked For the rich glutton is also saide of the contrarie to bee caried downe to hell These testimonies therefore of Scripture teach and confirme most euidently that not onely in the bodie before death and after the resurrection of the bodie but also in the whole space and time comming betweene the soules are liue feele vnderstand out of the bodie though the manner of their operations bee to vs vnknowen Wherefore also this gift of immortalitie hath some similitude with God who alone as the onely fountaine and author of life hath immortalitie 1. Timot. 6. Man should haue liued immortallie if hee had not sinned But furdermore that man should haue lead a blessed life immortallie and for euer not in soule onely but also in bodie if hee had not purchased death and mortalitie vnto himselfe by sinne is first hereby proued because by sin death entered into the worlde as the wages of sinne Rom. 5. 6. Next because wee being freeed from sinne by christ are also freed from death And lastly because God him-selfe did withdraw from man being made by sinne subiect vnto death the signe or sacrament of immortalitie which was the fruite of the tree of life Gen. 3. Wherefore their obiections are nought worth who imagine the soules after death to sleepe or vanish away For Gen. 1. and 1. Cor. 15. Adam is saide to haue beene made a liuing soule not simplie as these will haue it like as other liuing creatures are termed in the same place liuing soules but as being made to the image and similitude of God which hee hath not in common with other creatures Gen. 2. When God saieth Jn the day that thou eatest of the tree of knowledge of good and euill thou shalt die the death hee doth not threaten vnto man the destruction or extinguishing of his soule but eternal death that is Sundrie places of scripture alleaged against the immortality of the soule interpreted according to their right sense and meaning the horrible feeling and terrour of Gods wrath and iudgement and to liue forsaken and cast from God subiect to all miseries and tormentes an adioint of which death is the separation of the soule and body which at that time through the mercy of God that mankind might be saued was differred For so was Adam dead while yet hee liued in Paradise according to Gods denouncement euen assoone as he had eaten of the forbidden fruite So in eternal death liue all the damned and reprobate Whose fire shall not bee put out and their worme not dy So Ephes 2. they are said to be dead through sinne who liue in sinne without repentaunce And Ephes 5. Hee is willed to rise from the dead who is reclaimed from sinne to God And Rom. 7 5. Paul saith that he was dead through the knowledge of his sinne and the wrath of God Iob. 11. Act. 7. 1. Cor. 11. 1. Thess 4. The deade are saide to sleepe but this is by a * Synecdochâ— figure of speech translating that which is proper vnto the bodie to the whole man For that this belongeth to the bodie which is to bee recalled from death to life as it were from sleepe to wake againe manie places declare as Iob 7. Beholde now I sleepe in the dust For not the soule but the bodie onely sleepeth in the dust and graue The Preacher saith The condition of the children of men Eccle. 3 1â— and the condition of beastes are euen as one condition vnto them Therefore there is no immortality of the soul Ans It is a fallacie concluding that which is in some respect so to bee simplie so 1. Men die as beastes in that men must needes once die and depart out of this life because men are not here to continue for euer nor haue heere a setled place 2. Men die as beastes that is in the sense and iudgement of the wicked Blessednesse and the kingdome promised to the Godly is saide then first to fall vnto them at the last daie Mat. 24.25 Mar. 13. Dan. 12. But these places shewe not that the soules of the godly doe not presentlie when they depart from their bodies enioie celestial blessednesse and ioy but that at the last daie when their bodies are raised againe their felicitie and glorie shall bee consummated and made absolute For so we praie thy kingdome come when yet God now also raigneth in vs. Of that which is saide 1. Corint 15. If in this life onelie wee haue hope we are of all men most miserable they thus reason He that is blessed and happie before the resurrection is not without the resurrection most miserable But we without the resurrection should be of al men most miserable Therefore we are not before the resurrection blessed and happie But the Maior wee aunswere Hee is not miserable without the resurrection who cannot onely before it but without it also bee blessed But wee are in such wise blessed before it that notwithstanding without it following and ensuing wee cannot enioie that former blessednesse because God hath ioyned with so vnseparable a knot the beginning and proceeding and finishing or perfection of the Electes blessednesse that none can haue the beginning who must not come to the ende consummation thereof Wherefore either we must rise again or wee must want also that celestiall blessednesse before the resurrection Rom. 8.11 Jf the spirit of him that raised vp Jesus from the dead dwell in you he that raised vp Christ from the dead shal also quicken your mortal bodies Heb. 11.39 These all through faith are deade and receiued not the promise Therefore they receiued not their countrie We aunswere first Although they dying had not found their countrie yet would it not follow of these woordes that they are not at al or haue no sense after death For he that is not or hath no sense seeketh not his countrie Secondly The author of that Epistle doth not speak of the life after death which is lead in the celestial countrie 2. Cor. 5. but of this life in which the faithful walking their pilgrimage sought for the celestiall countrie not finding their countrie on earth Psalm 78.39 They are flesh a winde that passeth awaie and commeth not againe By these and the like speeches the breuitie of mans life and the frailtie and perishing of all humane affaires without God is described and bewailed For as here they are compared to a wind eftsoones vanishing awaie so Psalm 103. they are compared to dust grasse and flowers of the field Likewise Job 14. Hee shooteth forth as a flower and is cut downe and vanisheth as a shadowe Isaie 40.6 All flesh
or more acceptable vnto the godly than to serue for the manifesting of gods glory either by life or by death As Phil. 1. it is said As alwaies so now Christ shall be magnified in my body whether it bee by life or by death c. Last of all if they say that the soule hath neither sense nor action but by bodilie instruments and therefore being naked and destitute of these is destitute also of sense motion and operation To graunt vnto them this Antecedent of the soule being in the bodie yet notwithstanding of the soule freed from the bodie both learned Philosophers confesse the contrarie the word of god testifieth the contrarie as 1. Cor. 13.9 We know in part we prophecie in part but when that which is perfect is come then that which is in part shal be abolished OF EVERLASTING LIFE THIS Article is placed in the end 1. Because it is perfectlie fulfilled after the rest 2. Because it is an effect of all the other articles that is we beleeue all the other articles for this and all things that we beleeue were done that we might beleeue this article and so at length inioy euerlasting life This article is the end and roofe of our whole saluation and life The chiefe questions of euerlasting life 1 What euerlasting life is 2 Of whom it is giuen 3 To whom it is giuen 4 Wherefore it is giuen 5 When it is giuen 6 How it is giuen 7 Whether in this life wee may bee assured of euerlasting life 1 WHAT EVERLASTING LIFE IS What life is in generall LIFE is defined among Philosophers diuersly and it is indeede a word of diuers significations signifiyng diuers things In generall it is either the verie existence and being of the soul with the bodie or the operation of a liung thing that is it signifieth to be or to doe those things which are proper vnto a liuing nature for it is taken both for the first act and for the second Therefore death is the destruction of a liuing thing and of the power or facultie of woorking Or Life is an aptitude of a liuing thing to worke the operations proper vnto it and is also the operations themselues by reason of the Vnion of the bodie with the soule Generally both as touching god and Angels and men it is the existence or being of a liuing thing and the facultie or power wherewith euerie liuing thing beeing endewed dooth exercise the operations and actions of life Spirits also liue but they haue not that from life but from their very nature essence Now when we mention euerlasting life we restraine the word for then it speaketh of the euerlasting life of men Angels That is called Euerlasting 1. Which hath neither beginning nor ending Life euerlasting hath a beginning but no end 2 Which hath no beginning and hath an ending as the decrees of god 3. Which hath a beginning but shal haue no end as euerlasting life But this question seemeth vnexplicable because it is said thereof Jsai 64.4 and 1. Cor. 2.9 Neither eie hath seene neither eare hath heard neither came into mans heart the things which god hath prepared for them that loue him Yet we will see what may be knowen concerning this question of the holy Scripture 1. Life in generall signifieth to liue or to be as wee restraine beeing to a thing liuing that is to bee endued with a soule which soule is that whereby we liue and the naturall life is the remaining or dwelling of the soule in a liuing bodie and the operation of the soule or the facultie of the soule working those actions which are proper to a liuing thing For the soule is the essential forme of life which who haue liue 2. Euerlasting life is nothing else but to be as we restrain being to a regenerate man which To be The full definition of euerlasting life is to haue the Jmage of god restored according to which we were at the first created But to explane expouÌ„d this we haue need of a more ful definitioÌ„ Wherefore euerlasting life is the habitation or dwelling of god in Angels and men by the holie ghost and the true knowledge of god his will and all his woorkes kindled by the same spirite in their hearts and true and perfect righteousnes and wisedome that is a perfect conformitie and correspondence of their will and powers and operations with the minde and will of god as also a ioy resting on god and a sufficiencie of all good thinges in god as touching both soule and bodie which shall neuer be interrupted hindered or haue an end Life euerlasting is 1 The knowâ—ege of God and wisedome The proofe and confirmation of the partes of this definition is easie 1. It is the knowlege of God and wisedome Iohn 17.3 This is life eternall that they know thee to bee the onelie verie God and whom thou hast sent Iesus Christ 2. 2 Righteousnes It is righteousnesse Luk. 20.36 They are equall vnto the Angels 3 Ioy. 4 Sufficiencie in God and are the sonnes of God since they are the children of the resurrection 3. It is ioy Ioh. 16.22 Your ioy shall no man take from you 4. It is sufficiencie in god Reuel 21.22 The Lord god almightie and the Lambe are the Temple of it And the Citie hath no neede of the Sunne neither of the Moone to shine in it for the glorie of god did light it and the Lambe is the light of it All those good things which we possesse here shall then be perfect 1. Cor. 13.10 When that which is perfect is come then that which is in part shall be abolished 5 Without interruption 5. It shall not be interrupted Reuel 21.4 God shall wipe away all teares from their eies Luk. 1.33 Of his kingdome shall bee no end Dan. 7.27 And the kingdome and dominion and the greatnes of the kingdome vnder the whole heauen shall bee giuen to the holy people of the most high whose kingdome is an euerlasting kingdome that is which hath neither beginning nor ending 3 Euerlasting life is that which hath a beginning but is without end In this third sense also shall wee enioy euerlasting life Obiection Euerlasting life is to liue euerlastinglie But the wicked also shall be raised and be immortall because they shall liue eternally Therefore the wicked shall haue euerlasting life Answere By the name of euerlasting life is not meant the presence of the soule in the bodie that is the naturall life but this being presupposed there is furder meant a spirituall life which the holy Ghost woorketh by his proper function and office Now with the naturall life in the wicked shall bee ioyned 1. A reiection from God 2. A priuation and want of the knowledge and grace of God 3. A perpetuall and vnutterable torment and vexation Their worme shal neuer die There shall bee weeping and gnashing of teeth Here-by is vnderstoode that euerlasting
death is The euerlasting death of the wicked and is so called not because the reprobate by once dyeng shall fulfill it but because they shall die perpetuallie and shall feele perpetuall tormentes 2 Who giueth euerlasting life Euerlasting life the worke of all three Persons GOD alone giueth eternall life the Father giueth it by the son the holy ghost Of the Father it is said Ioh. 5.21 As the Father raiseth vp the dead and quickneth them so the son quickneth whom he will In which place the same is affirmed of the son also as in like maner in these folowing Ioh. 14. In him was life Isai 9.6 The Father of eternitie Iohn 10.28 I giue vnto them eternall life that is not by merit onely but also by power and working Of the Holy Ghost likewise it is saide Iohn 3.5 Except a man bee borne of water and the spirit hee can not enter into the kingdome of God Rom. 8.11 Hee that raised vp Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortall bodies by his spirit dwelling in you And this testimonie is to bee obserued for the confirmation of the Godhead of both Obiection But the ministers also giue life according to that of Paul 1. Cor. 4.15 In Christ Iesus J haue begotten you through the Gospel Aunswere Christ and the holy Ghost giue life by their owne power the ministers are onely instruments by whom Christ worketh through thâ— vertue of his spirite Replie But Christ giueth life by a communicated power Therefore not by his proper power Answere He giueth it by a power communicated but communicated from euerlasting as he was begotten from euerlasting Ioh. 5.26 As the Father hath life in himselfe so likewise hath he giuen to the Sonne to haue life in himselfe 3 To whom euerlasting life is giuen EVerlasting life is giuen to all the Elect All the Elect they alone are partakers of euerlasting life and to them onely Joh. 10.28 I giue vnto them eternal life that is to my sheepe who are his elect and chosen Iohn 17.9 I pray for them I pray not for the world but for them which thou hast giuen me for they are thine and verse 12. Those that thou gauest me haue I kept and none of them is lost but the childe of perdition Againe faith and repentaunce are proper vnto the Elect only but these are part of eternal life Therefore eternal life belongeth to the Elect onely Rom. 11.7 The Elect haue obtained it and the rest haue beene hardened Wee must obserue in this place whereas the question is To whom euerlasting life is giuen that it is better to answere That eternal life is giuen to the Elect than to say it is giuen vnto the conuerted * As they are elected so theâ— are but chosen to eternall life as they are conuerted so they are in part admitted vnto it and begin to bâ— put in possession of it For conuersion and faith are the beginning of eternal life And to say Eternal life is giuen to the conuerted were all one as if you woulde say life is giuen to the liuing 4 For what cause euerlasting life is giuen THE impellent or motiue cause of euerlasting life giuen vnto vs is the alone free mercy of God For a good thing doth communicate it selfe and make others partakers of it and his loue towardes mankinde God of his â—ree mercy giueth vs for Christs sake euerlasting life that wee might praise and magnifie the same his mercy for euer And he will that euerlasting life bee giuen vs and himselfe giueth the same vnto vs for the alone intercession and merit of Christ imputed vnto vs by the comming and interposing whereof gods mercy is more illustrated and manifested than without it But no work of man either foreseene in vs or present is the cause of this eternall life whereunto notwithstanding wee are brought by many meanes Before the beginning of eternal life our woorkes merit eternall death after the beginning thereof all our woorkes are effectes thereof and nothing is cause of it selfe The final cause or end for which eternal life is giuen vs is that the mercy of God might be acknowledged and magnified of vs. Eph. 1.6 To the praise of the glorie of his grace wherewith hee hath made vs accepted in his beloued For the same cause God giueth vs eternall life for which hee chose vs. 5 When euerlasting life is giuen Euerlasting life is beguâ— here by conuersion IN this life is giuen the beginning of eternal life and that necessarily For vnto whom life euerlasting is not begunne to be giuen here that is who beginneth not here to feele a part of eternal life to wit faith and conuersion vnto him life euerlasting shal neuer be giuen after this life 2. Corinth 5.2 Therefore we sigh desiring to be clothed with our house which is from heauen Because that if we be clothed we shal not bee found naked It is consuÌ„mated in the worlde to come by glorification The consummation of euerlasting life is after this life for vnto whom euerlasting life is begunne to bee giuen here to them shal it be giuen finished compleate and consummated And of this consuÌ„mation ther are two degrees one when the soule is presently carried into heauen because by the death of the bodie we are freed from all infirmitie the other degree is greater higher and more glorious when in the resurrection of the bodies the soules shall againe be vnited to their bodies because after the resurrection we shal be made glorious and shall see God euen as hee is Iohn 5.24 He that heareth my word and beleeueth in him that sent mee hath euerlasting life and shall not come into condemnation but hath passed from death to life 1. Iohn 3.2 Nowe are wee the Sonnes of GOD but yet it dooth not appeare what wee shall bee and wee knowe that when hee shal appeare we shal bee like him for we shal see him as he is 6 How euerlasting life is giuen vnto vs. EVerlasting life is giuen vnto vs by the holy Ghost God giueth vâ— euerlasting â—iâ—â— by the outwâ— ministerie 〈◊〉 thâ—â—warde miâ— of the spirit and the holy Ghost giueth it vs in this life by the ministerie of the word by the worde he worketh in vs the knowledge of God and his wil This knowledge hath following it a study and desire more and more to know God and to liue according to the prescript of his will It is giuen heere vnto infants so that they haue an inclination to repentaunce and faith But the consummation and accomplishment of euerlasting life shal be giuen vs after this life immediately Now that it is heere giuen vs mediately by the woorde is prooued by plaine testimonies of Scripture John 6.68 Whither shall wee goe say the Disciples Thou hast the words of life 1. Corint 4.15 Jn Christ Jesus J haue begotten you through the gospel Rom. 116. The gospell is the power of
yet wil I not faint in hope for Israel but wil looke when yet once againe God himselfe shal smite on rockes and water shal flowe out of them that his people in this time of drought maie drinke Euen so O God for thy promise sake and for thy troth of ould plighted in thy beloued Sonne vnto thy chosen open the rock of stone againe let againe the waters the liuing waters of thy word flow out and let the sauing riuers of thy Gospell runne and stop not through al drie places of our Land that men and Angels may see the felicity of thy Chosen and reioice in the gladnes of thy people and giue thanks and praise and glory and honour with thine inheritance vnto thy blessed name for euer A CATECHISM OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION 1 What is thy onely comfort in life and death THat both in soule body a 1. Cor 6.19 1. Thes 5.10 whether I liue or die b Rom. 14 8. I am not mine own but belong c 1. Cor. 3.23 wholy vnto my most faithful Lord Sauiour Iesus Christ who by his precious blood most fullie satisfying d 1. Pet. 1.18 1 Iohn 1.7 2.2 for all my sinnes hath deliueâ—ed e 1. Iohn 38. Heb. 2.14.15 mee from all the power of the diuell and so reserueth f Iohn 6.39 me that without the will of my heaâ—enly Father not so much as a haire may fal g Mat. 10.30 Luke 21.18 from â—y head yea all thinges must h Rom. 8.28 serue for my safeâ—y Wherefore by his Spirit also he assureth i 2 Cor. 1.22 5.5 Eph. 1.14 mee â—f euerlasting life and maketh k Rom. 8.24 me ready and preâ—ared that henceforth I may liue to him 2 How many thinges are necessarie for thee to know that thou enioying this comfort maist liue die happilie Three l Luk. 24.47 1. Cor. 6.11 Rom. 8.16 Tit. 33.4.5.6.7 8. The first what is the greatnes m Iohn 9.41 Rom. 3. of my sin misery The second how I am deliuered n Iohn 17.3 from all sinne and miserie The third what thankes I owe o Ephes 5.10 1. Pet. 2.9 3.10.11.12 Rom. 6.11.12.13 Mat. 5.16 2. Tim. 2.15 vnto God for this deliuerie There is a three-fold order or there are three partes of the studie of diuinitie THE first is a Catecheticall institution or briefe summe of Christian doctrine which is called a Catechisme and is a briefe explication of the generall pointes of the same doctrine This part is necessarie For both the learned and vnlearned ought to know the foundation of religion The second a handling of common places or coÌ„mon places which contein a larger explication of euery point and of hard quaestions together with their subdiuisions reasons and argumentes The third a diligent meditation of the scripture or holy writte This is the highest degree for which we learne all the rest to wit that we may come furnished to the reading vnderstanding and propounding of the holy Scripture Those former partes are taken out of the Scripture and againe common places do lead vs vnto the Scripture which is as it were a rule by which they are directed What a Catechisme is A CATECHISME is a briefe doctrine framed for youth the ruder sort conteining in it the summe of the doctrine of the Law Gospel or of Christian religion which being deliuered is required againe at the handes of the auditors It is so called of a Greek woord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to resound or to returne a voice back again Eccho-like because that children did by mouth make rehearsall of those thinges which were asked them and which they had hard Catechumeni in the primitiue church were those who learned the Catechisme that is to say such as were now of the Church and were instructed in christian Doctrine Neophyti or Nouices were those who were but new come vnto the Church so called from twoo Greeke woords 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signify a new plant Of the Catechumenes there were twoo sortes 1 Those who first being of some yeares whether of the Iewes or of the Gentils afterward came vnto Christ but were not as yet baptised These were first instructed in the Catechisme and afterwards baptised and admitted to the Lords supper 2. Those who were borne in the Church That is the Children of Christians These eftsoones after their birth as being members of the Church were baptised and after they were growen a little elder they were instructed and confirmed by laying on of handes and so dimissed out of the companie of the Catechumenes so that it was lawfull for them thence-forward to draw neer vnto the Lordes Supper This Catechising doctrine hath euer been in the Church For in the olde Testament God himselfe in briefe-wise deliuered the doctrine of the Lawe Gospell the Decalog the promises as when hee saith Walke before me Gen. 17.1 Gen. 22.18 and be thou perfect Likewise In thy seed shal al nations of the earth be blessed Now these things God would that Abraham and his posteritie should teach their Children and their whole familie and therefore this doctrine was framed fit for the capacity of Children and the ruder sort In the old Testament furthermore there were also sacrifices praiers other things in which the youth were instructed In the new Testament in the Apostles time there was likewise a Catechising doctrine as the author of the Epistle to the Hebrewes reporteth Therefore leauing the doctrine of the beginning of Christ Heb. 6.1 let vs be led forward vnto perfection not laying againe the foundation of repentance that is the beginning of Christian doctrine which comprehendeth repentance and faith These first beginnings or principles of Christian doctrine are called in the same place the doctrine of baptismes because they that were of some yeares before they came to christ were first instructed before they were baptised It is called also the doctrin of laying on of hands because the Catechisme was required at their handes that they should be able to answere in it on whom hands were laid that is to say of the children of Christians who were baptised in their infancy The parts of these rudimentes of Christian doctrine which they cal Catechisme are the Lawe and the Gospel or as it is said in the place afore named vnto the Hebrews repentance and faith in Christ Semblably the fathers also write Briefe summes of doctrine certain remnants of which we see as yet in Popery Now it behoueth that the youth be by and by instructed in this doctrine and doe knowe the foundation 1. Because of the commandement of God â—eut 6.7 Thou shalt tell them vnto thy children 2. Because we are so corrupted that except we be timely informed of the wil of God hardly or neuer we learne to do things acceptable vnto God and scarsely suffer ourselues with much adoe to be
as much as al mē haue sinned cap. 7. We know that the law is spiritual but I am carnal sold vnder sinne Eph. 2. We were by nature the children of wrath as wel as others Last of al seeing infantes also are subiect to sinne whereupon also they die and are to be baptised as before time they were circumcised and they cannot as yet sinne by imitation it must needs be that sinne is bred in them as it is said Genes 8. The cogitation of mans heart is euill euen from his youth And Isaie 48. I called thee transgressor euen from thy womb Against this doctrine it is obiected first Obiect Of the deriuation of the soule from the soul of the parents If sinne bee propagated from the Parents vnto their posterity either the soul stained with originall sinne is deriued by deduction out of the soule of the Parents or is created by God of nothing infected with sinne and is infused into the bodie or els being created pure by God it draweth corruption and naughtines of the body vnto which it is vnited But since that a spiritual substance may not be cut into parts soules are not propagated by deduction out of the soule of the Parentes neither are they created corrupt of God because God by this meanes should be made autor of sinne contrarie to that which hath beene said God saw al which he had made they were verie good neither are the soules depraued by the bodies partly for that it would be against both the end vnto which man was created euen to life euerlasting and also against the goodnes of god for a pure and innocent soul to be ioined with a bodie of which it should be depraued partlie for that sinne can not be propagated by the bodie which ◠senseles neither exerciseth any action on the soule but by the soul Wherefore the children are not borne corrupt of corrupt parentes 1 Answere The souls are corrupted by the bodies To this the answeare is double First they can not proue that which in the third place in their Minor they affirme That the soules can not draw naughtines corruptiō from the bodies For our first Parentes also were created to eternall life and yet were depraued falling from god Wherefore as the creation of our first parentes and their triall by temptation and in temptation their falling away which being put their corruption was certainly to followe so also the vniting of the soules with their bodies in which certainlie they shall be corrupted is not contrarie to the goodnes of God partly because God is so good as also he will shew foorth his anger against sinne and his iustice togither with his mercie in his woorkes partly because he hath appointed a remedie in his sonne vnto the which who flie are deliuered from this hereditarie and necessarie corruption and from the danger of damnation neither is it disagreeing from his goodnes rather to saue men freed from sinne and death by the death of his onele begotten Son then if they had neuer fallen into these miseries Neither is it absurd that the nature or temperature of the bodie though it bee senseles yet should be prone to euill and no fit instrument for the good actions of the soule and that the soule not being established in that puritie in which it was made should follow the inclinations and corrupt temperature of the bodie and should fal from that integritie in which it was as soone as it is vnited vnto the bodie and seeing that the bodie proceeding from sinful and guiltie parentes is one part of a man that God should be offended with the whole man for that part of his which is guiltie and should withdraw the grace of his spirite that the other part also that is the soule being depriued of spiritual giftes may fall into wickednes and malediction But be it that they were able to prooue that Minor proposition 2 Answere The souls are togither created and vnited to their bodies yet there is another sufficient answere to the Maior so that wee haue no neede to enter into any doubtfull dispute about the deducting of the soule from the soule of the parentes by generation neither of the maner how Originall sinne is propagated For although wee graunt that the soules of all men as soone as they begin to liue are created of god yet it is not to be imagined that the soules haue a beeing some time before they are vnited to the bodies For at one and the same time they are both created and vnited to their bodies as it is said The soule of man is at the same time both created and vnited to the bodie Hee breathed in his face breath of life But as the substance also of bodies though it be taken out of the substance of the parentes yet is rightly said to be created of God that is framed by him and the substances both of men and diuels who both are sinfull are preserued of God neither is yet God the autor or maintainer of their sinne or malice so also the substance of the soules and their naturall faculties God togither both createth and bereaueth of his giftes which giftes hee gaue of that condition to Adam that hee would also giue them to his posteritie if himselfe did keepe them but would not giue them if hee by his vnthankfulnes should cast them away Now the soule being destitute of the spirite and spirituall light although it bee inclined to desires and operations yet is it blinde not inclined to such desires and actions as the law of God requireth And by this meanes the inclinations being despoiled of their rightnes are become of their owne accord euill and are repugnant to the lawe of God And those defectes in the minde and will and heart of our first parentes are the iust punishmentes of sin committed by our first parentes and by their seed in them as they are inflicted by God but the inclinations corrupted by these defectes and the defectes themselues because they are a cause that man neither is nor can bee conformable to the law of God they are sinnes as they are drawen by men sinning vpon themselues and their seede and as they haue from them and their seede their being 2 Obiection That which the Parents themselues haue not they cannot deriue vnto their posteritie Original sin is taken awaie from the godly Therefore at the leastwise these doe not deriue it to their posteritie Aunswere Original sinne is taken away from the godlie and saints of god as concerning the guilt of it that is so as it is remitted them for Christs sake But as it is a sinne repugnant to the Lawe so it abideth in them For although they be withal regenerated by the holie ghost vnto whomsoeuer their sinne is forgiuen yet that renewing is not perfected in this life Wherefore the godlie also doe deriue such a nature to their posteritie as themselues haue that is a corrupt one
Li. 3. de libero arbitrio cap 4. And Augustine God is a iust reuenger of those thinges of which yet he is not an euill autor Wherefore those sinnes which ensue and followe are in respect of god considered as most iust punishments which as they are punishments haue their beeing from him as their author and causer but as they are sinnes in respect of men they come God neither willing nor causing them but permitting onely seeing he doth not cause men to do that which he would haue done for a punishment to this end as for to obay therein his will For one and the same work is good and holy in respect of God and sin in respect of men by reason of the diuersitie both of the efficiences of the ends For first man by reason of his great both ignorance and corruption will and worketh euill only But God because hee is exceeding good and the verie rule of goodnesse and righteousnesse doing in all things what he wil will and worketh alwaies only that which is good Secondly men haue such an end of their actions as is disagreeing frō the Law of God that is what they doe they do not to that end to obay God but to fulfill their bad and corrupt desires But God hath the end of all his woorkes agreeing with his nature and Law euen that he may declare and execute his iustice goodnesse and mercie By these two thinges it commeth to passe that the reasonable creature woorking together with God God woorking vprightly and holily doth neuerthelesse it selfe woorke vnholylie and corruptly 5 What are the effects of sinne NOw that it is defined what sinne is and from whence it came we are to consider also what be the euils which follow sinne For except this also be knowen we know not yet how great euil there is in sinne and with how great hatred God pursueth it It hath been said before that euil was of two sorts one of crime or offence which is sinne the other of paine or punishment The euil of punishment is the effect of the euil of offence That this maie be the better vnderstoode we must here againe remember that of punishments Some are onlie punishments as are the destruction of nature or tormentes others both punishments and sins as al sins which haue followed since the first fal 1 The sinnes which follow are effects of those which go before Sinnes ensuing effects of sinnes which go before So original sinne is the effect of the sinne or fal of our first parents By one mans disobedience manie were made sinners And secondly All actual sinnes are effects of original sinne Sinne took occasion by the commandement and deceiued me And thirdlie The effect of actual sins is the increase of them that is greater guiltines by reason of the most iust iudgement of God because God punisheth sins with sins Wherefore God also gaue them vp to their hearts lustes Rom. 1.24 2 Thes 2.11 Mat. 25.29 Other mens sins oftentimes effectes of actual sinne And therefore God shal send them strong delusiō that they should beleeue lies Frō him that hath not shal be takē away also that which he hath And fourthly The effects of actual sins are also oftentimes other mens sins by reason of scandale or example wherby some are made worse of others are entised or moued to sin So the persuasion of the diuel caused man to decline from God and now it worketh in stubburn-minded men The diuel put it into the heart of Iudas to betraie Christ Ioh. 13. Euil speeches corrupt good maners So euill teachers doe withdrawe men from god to errours idolatry and other sins So a vse of liberty out of season offendeth and draweth men to sinne An euil conscience an effect of sinne 2 There followeth sin in the immoueable and perpetual order of Gods iudgement an euil conscience which is the knowledge and dislike which we haue in our mind of our own sinne and the knowledge of the iudgement of God against sin and that proceeding out of the knowledge of Gods Law vpon which ensueth the fear of the wrath of God and punishment according to the order of gods iustice and a flieng and hatred of God who destroieth sinne which is the beginning of desperation and eternall torments except it bee cured by the comfort of the gospel Rom. 2. The gentiles shewe the effect of the Law written in their harts their conscience also bearing witnes and their thoughts accusing one another or excusing And Isaiah There is no peace to the wicked Temporall and spiritual euils effects of sin 3 Temporall and spirituall euils as temporall death and in a worde all the calamities of this life These euils are onely punishments that is torments and dissolution of nature If any man obiect that they also are subiect to temporall death and other calamities who haue all their sinnes remitted them and therefore al temporall euils are not the punishmentes or effects of sinne Temporal euils in the regenerate are effectes of sinne not as punishmentes but as chastisements but some haue other causes we answere that the consequence holdeth not from the denial of one particular to the denial of the general For albeit the calamities of the regenerate are not effectes of sin as a punishment which is inflicted on men sinning that so the iustice of God might be satisfied yet are they effects of sinne as chastisementes and exercises whereby sinne is repressed and more and more purged out vntill at length by corporall death the whole be abolished Now that of the blind man Ioh. 9. Neither this man hath sinned nor his parents Christ meaneth not simply that they had not sinned or that their sins were not a cause of this calamity but that their sinnes were not the principal cause why he was borne blind but that the woorkes of God should be shewed on him Christ by a miracle opening his eies 4 Eternall death which is the effect of al sinnes Eternall death the effect of sin as they are sinnes For al of what quality soeuer they bee are punished either with eternal paine as in the reprobate or with equiualent paine to eternal as in the sonne This death doth begin in the reprobate euen in this world that is anxiety and torment of conscience which we also should feele except we were deliuered by the grace of God Now by the name of eternal death is not vnderstoode the destruction of the soule or body or the separation of them but the abandoning and banishing of the soule and bodie liuing from the face of God a continuall horror and torment and a feeling and flying of Gods wrath and iudgement and a horrible murmuring against God taking vengeance of their sinnes If they obiect that the sinnes of those who beleeue in Christ The regenerate though they sin are not punished with this death because Christ hath suffered an equiualent punishment for them are not punished with eternall
that the Maior is false in respect of him who for his wisedome knoweth means to mitigate punishmēts or to exercise mercy as that notwithstanding his iustice may remaine inuiolated and himselfe bee satisfied So god doth execute extreame and exquisite iustice in punishing our sinnes shewing neuerthelesse exceeding and maruelous equabilitie and lenity while hee punisheth them in his Sonne and not in vs. And therefore one degree of mercie denied doth not straight enforce the deniall of others God punisheth sinne in the reprobate with eternal punishments yet is he merciful while he is not delighted with the death of him that dieth but doth by differring and mitigating the punishment and by bestowing benefites inuite all men to repentance When a Iudge putteth a robber to death he executeth extreame iustice yet may he be mercifull withall if hee reioice not at the destruction of the man but had rather hee were saued if so the lawe permitted Temporal afflictions belong both to the wicked and the godly Temporall afflictions belong to both both vnto the godly and to the reprobate These are either punishments or the Crosse The punishment is either destruction or torment inflicted by order of iustice on the person giltie of sinne And this is proper vnto the reprobate because it is inflicted on them to this ende that Gods iustice may bee satisfied For the law bindeth all men either to obedience or to punishment In the wicked they are punishmentes in the godly the crosse Obiection But the euils which the wicked suffer in this life are lighter than that they shoulde satisfie Gods iustice Answere They are a part of their punishment though not their whole punishment Nowe as euerie part of the Aire is called Aire so euerie part of punishment is punishment The degrees therefore of the punishment and paines which the wicked suffer are to bee obserued The first degree is in this life For when the conscience of their misdeedes and wickednesse doth gnawe vexe and terrifie them then beginneth their hellish and infernall worme The second degree is in temporall death When they departing out of this life without comfort come into the place of torment and vexations Luke 16. The third degree is at the day of iudgement when againe to euerie of their bodies raised from the dead their soules shal bee reunited For then at length shall the paines of hell bee consummated and shall fall in troupes together on both bodie and soule The Crosse is the affliction of the godly The Crosse of the godly is of foure sortes For this is not properly a punishment because it is not inflicted that thereby Gods iustice shoulde bee satisfied for their sinnes Nowe the Crosse is of foure sortes which are drawen from the endes for which it is laid on the godly First the Chastisementes 1. Chastisements which GOD layeth on the godly for the remnaunts of sinne in them and oftentimes also for some peculiar sinnes committed by them that they may bee admonished of their vncleannesse and stirred to repentaunce and the studie of godlinesse and good workes least persisting in their sinnes they bee condemned For they are not according to iustice inflicted to bee any satisfaction or recompence for their sinnes but according to mercie for their amendment and saluation For by these chastisementes they are admonished of the anger of GOD against sinnes and of eternall punishment which GOD will inflict on them if they repent not Secondly 2. Tryals The proofes and tryals of their faith hope inuocation feare of GOD and patience that the elect may goe forwarde in these vertues and the same also bee made knowen to others Such was the affliction of Iob. Thirdly Martyrdomes 3. Martyrdomes which are testifications concerning their doctrine For when the godly are for the confession of true doctrine pressed with calamities or slaine these afflictions are no punishmentes of certaine transgressions but martyrdomes whereby they testifie and witnesse the doctrine of the gospell which they professe to bee true and doubt not to seale this with their bloud and whereby also they witnesse that they in exceeding tormentes and death feele and haue experience of that comfort which they did promise out of that doctrine in their teaching vnto others They witnesse also and testifie that there remaineth another life and an other iudgement after this life Fourthly lastly the Crosse is their Raunsome euen the obedience of Christ alone 4. Raunsome which is a satisfaction for our sinnes consisting of his whole humiliation from the very first point of his Conception in the wombe to his last agonie on the Crosse A briefe type or table of mans afflictions Afflictions are some Temporal In the wicked as punishmentes properly in speciall so called In the godly as the Crosse and that is 1 Chastisements 2 Trials 3 Martyrdome 4 Raunsome Eternal as the hellish torments of the damned 2 What are the causes of afflictions The impellent cause sinne SInne is the impellent cause because it is an euill merite and deserueth euill of punishmentes in the wicked and also of the Crosse in the godlie yet after a diuers maner and in diuers respects It is a cause of punishment in the wicked that sinne may bee recompensed with iust punishment In the godly the cause of the Crosse is not to satisfie Gods iustice but that sinne may be knowen and so relinquished and put off The impellent cause then of punishmentes in the wicked is their sin to be punished or recompensed The chiefe efficient Gods iustice The principall efficient cause is the iustice of god inflicting punishmēt for sin Instrumentall causes thereof are diuers Instrumental causes all creatures Angels and men both good and bad and all other creatures which are all armed against sinners and fight vnder GODS banner The finall cause is that the iustice of GOD may bee satisfied The causes of the crosse of the godly The causes of the crosse of the godlie are 1 The acknowledgeing and purging out of sin God doth not giue the bridle vnto the godly but by fatherly chastisementes restraineth recalleth and amendeth them 1. The acknowledging and relinquishing of sinne 1. Corin. 11.32 When wee are iudged wee are iudged of the Lord. Psalm 119.71 It is good for mee O Lord that thou hast humbled mee But hee giueth the raines to the wicked that they may gallop to destruction he endoweth them with the commodities of this life and suffereth them to enioy a short ioy thereby to shewe his loue towardes his creatures and to conuince them of vnthankfulnes and to take away al excuse from them 2. The hatred of the Diuell and the wicked 2. The hatred of the Diuel and wicked men Iohn 15.19 If ye were of the world the world would loue you The Diuel especially lieth in wait ambush against the church and assaulteth it both by tyrants and by heretiques to pul many from God 1. Pet. 5 8.
doth not good fortune followe a good conscience And therefore hee murmureth against God and fretteth as did Cato and others 5. The finall causes in their chastisementes trials 5. The final causes of their afflictions and Martyrdomes Those causes are first Gods glorie The torment is lesse to the godly when they know that GOD is honoured by their sufferings and that thereby they shewe their thankefulnesse vnto him Psalm 119.75 Thou art iust O Lorde and thy iudgements are right Secondly Our saluation which is accomplished by afflictions Psalm 119.71 It is good for mee that I haue beene afflicted 1. Cor. 11.32 When wee are iudged we are chastened of the Lorde because wee shoulde not bee condemned with the woorlde Thirdly the saluation of others that is their conuersion and confirming For Actes 5. The Apostles reioyced euen because they sawe many by their ministerie to bee conuerted vnto GOD and faith to bee confirmed in others by the example of their afflictions and constancy in the truth and doctrine that they were counted woorthy to suffer rebuke for Christs name The Philosophers say It is a good end for which thou sufferest that thou maiest saue thy country and attaine vnto euerlasting renowme and glory But yet in the meane season wretched man hee thinketh what will these thinges profite me when my selfe perish But we are chastised that wee may not perish with the world 6. The comparing of ends euentes 6. The conference and comparing together of euentes It is better for a short time to be chastised of the Lord with certaine and assured hope of a glorious deliuery than to liue in plenty and aboundaunce of thinges and to be pulled from God and to run into euerlasting perdition The Philosophers conferring and comparing euils together finde but little good arising out of so manie euils 7. The hope of recompence Because the true good for the obtaining whereof they suffer euils they are wholy ignoraunt of 7. The hope of recompence Matth. 5.12 Your rewarde is great in heauen Wee knowe that there remaine other blessinges for vs after this life nothing to be compared with these momentary afflictions Euen in this life also the Godlie receiue grater blessinges than other man For they haue GOD pacified and pleased with them and other spirituall giftes and the beginning of eternall life Therefore also corporall blessinges are profitable for their saluation Marc. 10.29 There is no man that hath forsaken house or bretheren or children or landes for my sake and the Ghospels but hee shall receiue a hundred-fould nowe at this present and in the woorlde to come eternall life Psalm 37.16 A small thing to the iust man is better than great riches to the wicked Roman 5.3 Wee reioyce in tribulations A recompence in small euils doth in some sort comfort the Philosophers but in great euils not at all because they thinke that they hadde rather want that recompence than buie it so deare the reason whereof is because the recompence is but vncertaine small and transitorie 8. The example of the Sonne of GOD. For the seruaunt is not aboue his Maister Iohn 15.20 8. The Examples of Christ and his Saintes who haue suffered before vs. And God will haue vs to bee made like to the image of his Sonne Roman 8.29 And Philip. 2.5 Let the same minde bee in you that was euen in Christ Iesus 2. Cor. 8.9 IESVS CHRIST beeing rich for your sakes became poore Let vs accompany therefore Christ in ignominy and in glory For both the thankfulnesse which we owe requireth this and seeing Christ hath died not for his owne profite but for ours why shoulde wee refuse to suffer any thing for our owne profite and commodity Likewise the examples of other holy and godly men who haue suffered with the sauing both of themselues others haue not perished in afflictions but haue beene maruailouslie saued preserued Mat. 5. So did they persecute the Prophets which haue beene before you The examples therefore of holy Martyrs doe comfort and hearten vs while we thinke that we are not better than they but rather woorse And therefore ought wee much more patiently to beare our crosse Againe seeing they haue beene preserued by GOD amiddest their afflictions and haue escaped out of them wee haue confidence also that wee shall bee preserued and deliuered because the Loue of GOD towardes his is immutable and knoweth no chaunge 9. 9. The certaine presence and assistance of goâ—â— The presence and assistaunce of GOD in all cases and chances of our life Wee know that God hath a care of vs euen in our crosse that he will defend comfort strengthen and establish vs by his spirite that wee may not through griefe and paine forsake him 1. Cor. 10.13 God doth not suffer vs to be tempted aboue our power Psal 19.15 I am with him in his tribulation Iohn 14.16 I will send you another comforter Iohn 14.23 I my father will come vnto him Ioh. 14.18 I will not leaue you comfortles Esay 49.15 Can a woman forget her child and not haue compassion on the Son of her wombe Though shee should forget 10. The final and ful deliuerie yet will I not forget thee 10 The finall and full deliuerie For as of punishment so also of deliuerie there are three degrees The first is in this life where we haue the beginning of eternall life The second is in our bodily death when the soul is caried into Abrahams bosome The third is after the resurrection of our bodies when wee shall bee both in body and soule perfectly blessed that is fully deliuered from all both sinne and punishment Ioh. 10.28 No man shall plucke them out of mine hande Rom. 8.30 Whom he iustified them also he glorified Reu. 21.4 God shall wipe away all teares from their eies Wherefore as the first consolation is the foundation and beginning so this last is the finishing and accomplishment of all the rest THE SECOND PART OF MANS DELIVERIE 12 Seeing then by the iust iudgement of God we are subiect both to temporall and eternall punishments is there yet any meanes or way remaining whereby we may be deliuered from these punishments be reconciled to God GOD will haue his iustice a Exod. 20.5 23.7 satisfied wherefore it is necessary that b Rom. 8.3 wee satisfy either by our selues or by another 13 Are we able to satisfie by our selues Not a whit Naie rather we doe euerie day c Iob. 9.2.3 15.15 Mat. 6.12 increase our debt 14 Is there any creature able in heauen or in earth which is only a creature to satisfie for vs None For first God will not d Heb. 2.14 punish that sin in any other creature which man hath committed And further neither can that which is nothing but a creature sustaine the wrath of god against sinne and e Psal 130.3 Iob. 4.18 25.5 deliuer others from it 15 What manner of Mediatour
Crosse and of all his benefites Because Christ hath commaunded me and all the faithfull to eate of this breade broken and to to drinke of the cup distributed in remembrance of him with this promise g Mat. 26.27.28 Mar. 14.22.23.24 Luc. 22.16.20 1. Cor. 10.16.17 11.23.24.25 12.13 adioined First that his bodie was as certainly broken and offred for me on the Crosse and his bloud shed for me as I behold with my eies the bread of the Lord broken vnto me and the cup communicated to me and further that my soul is no lesse assuredly fed to euerlasting life with his bodie which was crucified for vs and his bloud which was shedde for vs than I receiue and tast by the mouth of my bodie the bread and wine the signes of the bodie and bloud of our Lord receiued at the hand of the Minister 76 What is it to eate the bodie of Christ crucified and to drinke his bloud that was shed It is not onely to imbrace by an assured confidence of minde the whole passion and death of Christ and thereby to h Ioh. 6.35.40.47.48.50.51.53.54 obtain forgiuenes of sins and euerlasting life but also by the holy Ghost who dwelleth both in Christ and vs so more and more to bee a Ioh. 6.56 vnited to his sacred bodie that though he be in b Act. 3.21 Act. 1.9 c. 1. Cor. 11.26 heauen and we in earth yet neuerthelesse are wee flesh of his flesh and bone of his c Eph. 5.29.30.32 1. Cor. 6.15.17.19 1. Ioh. 3.24 4.13 Ioh. 14 23. bones and as all the members of the bodie are by one soule so are wee also quickened and d Io. 6.56.57.58 Io. 15.1.2.3.4.5.6 Eph. 4.15.16 guided by one and the same spirite 77 Where hath Christ promised that he will as certainely giue his bodie and bloude so to bee eaten and dronken as they eate this breade broken and drinke this cup In the institution of his supper the wordes whereof are these e 1. Cor. 11.23 c. Mat. 26.26 c. Mar. 14.22 c. Luc. 22.19 c. Our Lord Iesus Christ in the night that he was betraied tooke bread And when he had giuen thankes he brake it and said Take eate this is my bodie which is broken for you this doe you in remembrance of me Likewise also he tooke the cup when he had supped and saide f Exod. 24.8 Heb. 9.20 This cup is the Newe Testament in my bloud g Exod. 13.9 this doe as often as yee shall drinke it in remembrance of me For as often as ye shal eat this bread and drinke this cup ye shewe the Lordes death till he come This promise is repeated by Saint Paul when he saith The cup of thankesgiuing wherewith we giue thankes is it not the Communion of the bloud of Christ The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the bodie of Christ h 1. Cor. 10.16.17 For wee that are manie are one bread and one bodie because wee all are partakers of one bread 78 Are then the bread and wine made the verie bodie and bloud of Christ No verily But as the water of baptisme is i Math. 26.29 Mar. 14.24 not turned into the bloud of Christ but is only a sign and pledge of those thinges that are sealed to vs in Baptisme So neither is the bread of the Lords Supper the verie bodie of k 1. Cor. 10.16 c. 11.26 c Christ Although according to the manner of Sacramentes and that i Gen. 17.10 c. Exod. 26.27.43.48 13 9. Act. 7.8 Exo. 24.8 Le. 16.10 17.11 Isa 6.6.7 Tit. 3.5 Act. 22.16 1. Pet. 3.21 1. Cor. 10.1 forme of speaking of them which is vsuall vnto the holy Ghost the bread is called the body of Christ 79 Why then doth Christ call breade his bodie and the cup his bloud or the new Testament in his bloud and Paul also calleth bread and wine the Communion of the bodie and bloude of Christ Christ not without great consideration speaketh so to wit not onely for to teach vs that as the bread and wine sustaine the life of the body so also his crucified body and bloudshed are indeed the meat drinke of our soul whereby it is a Iohn 6.51.55.56 nourished to eternall life but much more that by this visible signe and pledge he may assure vs that wee are as verily partakers of his bodie and bloud through the working of the holy ghost as wee doe b 1. Cor. 10.16.17 perceiue by the mouth of our bodie these holie signes in remembraunce of him and further also that his suffering and obedience is so certainely ours as though we our selues had suffered punishments for our sinnes and had satisfied God 80 What difference is there betweene the Supper of the Lord and the Popish Masse The Supper of the Lord testifieth to vs that we haue perfect forgiuenesse of all our sinnes for that only Sacrifice of Christ which himself once fully c Heb. 7.27 9 12.26.28 10.10.12.14 Iohn 19.30 Mat. 26.28 Luc. 22.19.20 wrought on the Crosse Then also that we by the holie Ghost are graffed into d 1. Cor. 6.17 10.16 12.13 Christ who now according to his humane nature is onely in heauen at the right hand of his e Heb. 1.3 8.1 c. Father and there will be f Ioan. 4.21.22.23 20.17 Luc. 24.52 Act. 7.55.56 Col. 3.1 Phil. 3.10 1. Thes 1.9.10 worshipped of vs. But in the Masse it is denied that the quicke and the dead haue remission of sins for the onely passion of Christ except also Christ bee daily offered for them by their Sacrificers Further also it is taught that Christ is bodilie vnder the formes of breade and wine and therefore is to bee a In canone Missae item de consecrat distin 2. worshipped in them And so the verie foundation of the Masse is nothing else than an vtter denyall of that onelie Sacrifice and passion of Christ Iesus and an accursed Idolatrie 81 Who are to come vnto the Table of the Lord They onely who are trulie sorrowfull that they haue offended GOD by their sinnes and yet trust that those sinnes are pardoned them for Christes sake and what other infirmities they haue that those are couered by his passion and death who also desire more and more to go forward in faith and integritie of life But hypocrites and they who doe not truely repent do eate and b 1. Cor. 10.21 11.28 c. drinke damnation to themselues 82 Are they also to be admitted to this supper who in confession and life declare them-selues to bee Infidels and vngodlie No. For by that meanes the couenaunt of GOD is profaned and the wrath of GOD is c 1. Cor. 11.20.34 Is 1.11 c. 66.3 Ier. 7.21 c. Ps 50.16 c. stirred vp against the whole assemblie Wherefore the Church by the
our wisedome 2 Hee is called our Righteousnesse that is our Iustifier 2. Righteousnes For in him our righteousnesse is as in the subiect and is made ours by his merite and forcible operation For 1. hee suffered the punishment of our sinnes which is iustice and righteousnesse and the merit for-which we are reputed iust and righteous Furthermore he by his power maketh vs righteous in the sight of god by imputing vnto vs that his righteousnesse and by giuing vs faith whereby our selues also receiuing it may apply it vnto vs. 3 He is called our Sanctification 3 Sanctification 4. Redemption because he doth regenerate vs by his holy spirit 4 Redemption because hee finally deliuereth vs. For the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we interpret Redemption dooth not onely signifie the price but also the effect thereof For abstractes are put for their concretes according to the vsuall maner of the Hebrewes 4 What manner of Mediator ours ought to bee IT is manifest by those thinges which are gone before that there is giuen vs a recouerie out of eternal paines wherunto we were adiudged by reason of our sin by a sufficient satisfaction perfourmed by some Mediator in our behalfe Now therefore it may bee well demaunded what manner of Mediatour is required to performe pay a recompence and ransome equiualent to our sins and of sufficient worthinesse to redeeme vs To this answere is made in the 15. question of the Catechisme That such a one is required who must bee True man that is Our Mediatour must bee true man and true God who must haue mans nature comming of mankind and sprung from Adam and stil retaining it not as that it should be created of nothing or made anie way than of our bloode 2. A man perfectlie iust 3. True God Nowe the Demonstrations and proofes concerning the person of the Mediatour are drawne from his office For because such is his office him-selfe also ought to bee such a one Hee must bee true man subiect vnto all our infirmities except sinne 1 He ought to be true man and that a seruaunt that is subiect to al infirmities Phil. 2.7 Isa 53.3 First because it was man that sinned As by one man sinne entered into the woorlde Secondly That he might suffer death For he ought to make satisfaction for vs by shedding his blood Hee coulde not haue suffered death except he had bin true man Thirdly That he might help and relieue our infirmities Fourthly That hee might bee our brother and our head and wee his members Heb. 2.14 For as much as the children were partakers of the flesh and bloode hee also himselfe likewise tooke part with them It was requisite therefore that our Mediatour shoulde bee true man and that borne of the same mankind which sinned not created of nothing 1. Because of Gods iustice which required that the selfesame nature which hadde sinned should pay for those sinnes because the same was to bee deliuered But our nature which sprang from Adam sinned Wherefore true man of the same nature with vs ought to pay for men that which was required at their handes Gen. 2.17 In the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt die the death Ezech. 18.20 The same soul that sinneth shall die 1. Cor. 15.21 By man came death by man came also the resurrection of the dead Hereof the Apostle also saith Coloss 2.12 That wee are buried with him thorough Baptisme in whom wee are also raised vp together Augu. Lib. de vera relig And Augustine in his booke Of true Religion saith The same nature was to bee taken which was to bee deliuered 2. For our comfort which consisteth in this that wee may know our Mediatour to bee very man sprung of the same bloode of which our selues were and to be our brother For except hee were such a one wee should neuer bee able to resolue that he is the Messias and promised Sauiour vnto vs and that the benefite of redemption dooth certainely belong to our flesh and to vs men neither shoulde wee freely fly and betake vs vnto him in our temptations For of the seede of the woman it is saide Gen. 3.15 Gen. 12. 22.26 that hee shall break the head of the Serpent the Diuel and In Abrahams seede are all nations to bee blessed It was requisite therefore that our Mediatour shoulde bee borne of mankinde very man And furthermore I adde that it was requisite that he should be subiect to al our infirmities sinne onely excepted And that 1. For the truth of God who often by the Prophetes describeth our Mediatour to bee such a man as is poore weake contemptible And of Esaias especially is hee described to bee such a one 2. Isai 53.3 Heb. 2.11 For our comfort Hee that sanctifieth and they which are sanctified are al of one that is of the same humane nature Wherefore he is not ashamed to cal them brethren 2 It is requisite that hee bee a man perfectly iust Why our mediatour was to bee voide of sinne that hee might worthily bee our Sauiour that is that his passion might bee a ransome for the sinnes of others For had he bin a sinner or vniust he should not haue beene able to haue satisfied so much as for his owne sinnes and to haue auoided the wrath of God much lesse to merit gods fauour for others 2. Corinth 5.21 God hath made him to bee sinne for vs which knewe no sinne that we should be the righteousnesse of God in him Hebru 7.26 Such an High-Priest it became vs to haue which is holy harmelesse vndefiled separate from sinners 1. Pet. 2.22 Who did no sinne neither was there guile found in his mouth 1. Pet. 3.18 Christ hath once suffered for sinnes the iust for the vniust that hee might bring vs to god Nowe foure manner of waies is Christ perfectly iust Christ said to be perfectly iust foure waies or hath perfectly fulfilled the Lawe 1. By his owne righteousnesse For Christ alone perfourmed perfect obedience such as the Lawe required For hee was conceiued by the holie ghost neither was there guile in him 2. By paying sufficient punishment for our sinnes It was necessary that this double fulfilling of the Law should be in Christ For except hee were iust for himselfe that is hadde perfect conformitie with the Lawe he could not haue fulfilled the Lawe for vs by making satisfaction for our sinnes or by suffering the punishment which the Law exacted of vs not of him And except his suffering of punishment had beene sufficient wee shoulde as yet remaine in our sinnes and death Furthermore that righteousnesse of Christ whereby himselfe did perfectlie keepe the Lawe is called the fulfilling of the Lawe by obedience and his suffering of punishment due for our sinnes is termed the fulfilling of the Lawe by punishment likewise obedience perfected and absolued in suffering punishment And the punishment verily vnto which we were bound he of his owne accord
There failed nothing of all the good thinges which the LORD saide vnto the house of Israell but all came to passe 2. Samuel 16.10 The LORD hath bidden him curse Dauid 1. Kinges 22.20 Who shall intise Ahab that hee may goe and fall at Ramoth Gilead and so foorth Thou shalt entise and shalt also preuaile Prouerbes 21.1 The Kinges heart is in the hand of the LORD hee turneth it whither soeuer it pleaseth him Prou. 19.14 A prudent wife commeth of the LORD Prou. 22.14 The mouth of straunge women is as a deepe pit Hee with whom the LORD is angrie shall fall therein Esd 10.5 The LORD calleth the king of Assyrians the rodde of his fury Lament 3.37 Who is hee then that saith and it commeth to passe and the LORD commaundeth it not Daniel 4.32 According to his will hee woorketh in the armie of heauen and in the inhabitauntes of the earth and none can staie his hand nor saie vnto him what doest thou Actes 4.27 Herode and Pontius Pilate with the gentiles and the people of Israell gathered themselues together to do whatsoeuer thine hand and thy counsel had determined before to be done Of his prouidence in creatures which are without reason whether they bee liuing or not liuing His prouidence ouer creatures voide of reason testimonies are extaunt euerie where in the sacred Scriptures Iob. 37. Psalme 34.20 The Lord keepeth all the iust mans bones Psalm 104. throughout the whole Psalme Likewise Psalme 134.7 Hee bringeth vp the clouds from the ends of the earth and makeeth the lightnings with the rain he draweth forth the wind out of his treasures Gen. 8.1 God remembred Noah and made a wind to passe vpon the earth Psal 147.8.9 Which giueth to beasts their food and to the young Rauens that crie Mat. 6 26.30 Your heauenlie father feedeth the foules of the Aire And a little after If god so clothe the grasse of the field shall he not doe much more vnto you His prouidence ouer thinges casual and fortuning Of the prouidence of god gouerning things contingent fortuning and casual these places of scriptures speak Exod. 21.13 Jf a man hath not laide wait but God hath offered him into his hand then I will appoint thee a place whither he shall flee Math. 10.29.30 Are not two sparrowes solde for a farthing and one of them shall not fall on the grounde without your father Yea and all the haires of your head are numbered Iob. 1.21 The Lord hath giuen and the Lord hath taken it blessed bee the name of the Lord. Prou. 16.33 The lot is cast into the lap but the whole disposition thereof is of the Lord. Ios 7. God openeth the theft of Achan by lot His prouidence in necessarie euentes Lastly that necessarie euents whether such come by a naturall necessitie or by the order so setled of God in nature or whether they be by a conditional necessitie as in respect of Gods decree or other causes comming betweene are wrought and ruled by the prouidence of God these sayinges doe prooue Iob. 37.5 God thundereth maruelouslie with his voice he saith to the snow bee thou vpon the earth likewise the small raine and to the great rain of his power The whirle wind commeth out of the south and the cold from the Northwind At the breath of God the frost is giuen Iob. 38.27 He causeth the bud of the hearb to spring forth by raine he begetteth the dewe the frost the ice he bringeth forth mazzareth in their time hee guideth Arcturus hee guideth the motions of heauen effectuallie woorketh by them in these lower regions Psal 104.14 He causeth the grasse to growe for the cattell and hearbe for the vse of man that he may bring forth breade out of the earth c. Prou. 20.12 The Lord hath made both these euen the eare to heare and the eie to see that is God made not onely the power but the very act also of hearing and seeing So not one bone of Christ was broken Iohn 19.36 Because that was decreed and foretolde by God Exod. 12.46 So Christ according to the determinate counsell of God was deliuered vp to be slaine of the Iewes Act. 3.23 Isai 46.10 My counsaile shall stand and I will doe whatsoeuer I will I call a byrd from the East and the man of my counsel from far As I haue spoken it so will I bring it to passe J haue purposed it and I will doe it To these and the like testimonies of scriptures those places also may be added which confirme the resurrection raising again frō the dead of those bodies which we carry about with vs in this life as Philip. 3.21 Who shall change our vile bodie that it may be fashioned like vnto his glorious bodie according to the woorking whereby he is able euen to subdue all things vnto himselfe 1. Cor. 15.53 This corruptible must put on incorruption this mortal must put on immortalitie For seeing we see the substāce of our bodies to be so many waies chāged scattered after death when as they ar mouldred into dust Gen. 3. Iob. 10. it foloweth thereof necessarily that there is a prouidence of god which taketh a most strait and exact care euen of the smallest dust whereby the substance of our bodies so often altered dissipated into infinite forms parts is again in such wise to be recollected gathered together reduced to their first masse forme as that not other but the selfe same bodies which wee haue in this life shall rise again Against these places of scripture alleadged some make exception that the examples whereof these places speake are particular prophetical euents administred by the speciall counsell of god and that therefore there may not bee framed a general rule vniuersallie extēding to al euents But against these we returne a threefold answere For first The like causes are found in al euents for which the scripture affirmeth those euents afore recited to haue beene done or to be done by the counsel decree of god namely the glorie of god and the safetie of his chosen The causes therfore of al euents being like we are to iudge alike of all For all wise men confesse that a generall is well gathered out of the enumeration or numbering of many singulars or particulars then when as there cannot be alleaged any different or vnlike example Neither doth any of the godly such as conceiue aright of the immeasurable wisdome of god deny that god hath most good reasons for al things which are done albeit they are not known to vs whereby al thinges are referred to those two last endes Wherefore those things which god hath not foretolde or hath not by the speciall testimonie of his word shewed to be done by his wil are no lesse to be thought to depende of his secrete gouernement than those things which he hath by plaine wordes expressed that himselfe either would doe hereafter or before had done Secondly we
common to all three persons yet the order and manner of woorking is different and appropriate to eache But the Ransome the Sonne onely hath paied Secondly The Sonne is called the onelie Sauiour in respect of the creature to whom hee is opposed and from whom hee is discerned that is from the woorke of saluation not the Father and the holy Ghost but the creatures onely are excluded For no creature deliuereth from sinne and death So 1. Corinth 2.16 it is saide The thinges of god knoweth no man but the Spirite of god But it followeth not hereof that the Father and the Sonne knowe not themselues For the Spirite in that place is compared with the creature not with the Father and the Sonne Replie But there haue beene manie Sauiours of the people and some of them also called by the same name as Iosua Therefore not CHRIST onelie is Sauiour Aunswere Other were termed Sauiours but in a most diuers respect First Because they carried a type of this IESVS as our true onelie and designed Sauiour by GOD. Nowe albeit the Patents of Iosua when they gaue him this name coulde not so much as suspect that by him shoulde come the deliuerie of the people of Israell yet was it decreed with GOD from euerlasting that hee as also others shoulde bee a type of the onelie Mediatour and Sauiour Wherefore by his secrete and vnknowen prouidence hee so mooued and ruled his Parentes willes that they shoulde call him Iosua Secondlie GOD by them bestowed onelie corporall and temporall benefites vpon the Israelites But by this Iesus he saueth all the chosen dispersed through the whole world from all euils both of bodie and soule from sinne and death euerlasting Thirdly Christ is the author of all good things both temporal and eternall and these he by his owne efficacie bestoweth on whom he will They were onelie instruments and ministers by whom Christ gaue safety and benefites temporal to the people 2 Iesus is the perfect sauiour 2 Moreouer that this Iesus is the perfect Sauiour and doth most perfectlie deliuer vs from all euils these places testifie Col. 2.9 In him dwelleth all the fulnes of the godhead bodilie And verse 10. Yee are compleat in him that is Christ is that one and perfect God the fountaine of all knowledge and good therefore he is sufficient for your saluation he who hath Christ cannot bee ignoraunt or want any of those thinges which are necessarie to eternal blessednes neither hath any need to aske them elsewhere 1. Iohn 1.7 The bloud of Iesus Christ clenseth vs from all sin Hebr. 7.25 Christ is able perfectlie to saue them that come vnto God by him seeing he euer liueth to make intercession for them Against the Papists merits and intercessions of saintes Hereof in the 3â— question of the Catechisme is inferred a notable consequence against the Papists who couple their owne woorkes and the intercessions of Saintes with Christes merite and intercession namely that they indeede spoile and robbe Iesus of this glorie whereby hee is the perfect and onelie Sauiour Which is also true of them who seeke for but the least iot of saluation or felicitie in themselues or other thinges without Christ The collection is this He is the perfect and onelie Sauiour who bestoweth saluation neither iointlie with others nor in part onelie but full intire and whole But this Iesus the sonne of Marie is that Sauiour which is the onelie and perfect Sauiour whereof demonstration hath beene made a little before Wherefore hee bestoweth saluation neither iointlie with others neither part thereof onlie but he alone performes the whole and by a consequent they who ioine moe intercessours with Iesus or craue and expect anie part of saluation elsewhere doe indeede denie the onelie Sauiour Iesus Obiection To pray for others is to make intercession God will that one should pray for another as the Saintes for Saintes Therefore he will that one make intercession for another And by a consequent the glorie of Christ is not impeached if the intercessions of Saints be adioined vnto his intercession Answere There is an ambiguitie both in the woorde Praier and in the word Intercession God wil that one pray and make intercession for an other But this they must doe not standing on the worthines of their owne intercession and merites but on the worthines of the intercession and merites of the onely Mediatour Christ Christ maketh intercession for vs because he prayeth will and obtaineth and effectuateth it himselfe that for his owne sacrifice and prayers wee may bee receiued of God the father into fauour and bee reformed according to his image Christ therefore maketh intercession for vs by the vigour and vertue of his owne proper worthines and merite for his own worthines be is heard and obtaineth what be desireth After this sort doe not the Saints make intercession one for another Wherefore seeing the Papists faigne that the Saintes doe by their owne merites and praiers obtaine for others grace and certain good thinges at Gods handes they manifestly derogate from the glorie of Christ and denie him to bee the onelie Sauiour 2 From what euils he saueth vs. HE deliuereth vs from all euils of all both crime Christ saueth vs from all euils both of crime and paine and paine most fullie and perfectly Math 1.21 He shal saue his people from their sinnes 1. Iohn 1.7 The bloud of Iesus Christ clenseth vs from all sinne that is that it may not bee imputed vnto vs and that it may not raigne in vs but bee abolished and so wee at length leaue off to sinne Wherefore also hee deliuereth vs from all paine and punishment For the cause being taken away which is sinne the effect is taken away which is punishment Rom. 8.1 Now then there is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Iesus Iohn 10.28 I giue vnto them eternall life The saluation then which this our Sauiour Iesus Christ bringeth vs is righteousnes and life euerlasting Dan 9 24. Seuentie weeks are determined to finish the wickednes and to seale vp the sinnes and to reconcile the iniquitie and to bring in euerlasting righteousnes 1. Cor. 1.30 He is made vnto vs wisedome righteousnes sanctification and redemption 3 How he saueth HE saueth vs after two sorts First by his merite that is yeelding a sufficient punishment or satisfaction for our sinnes Christ saueth vs â— By his merit whereby hee hath merited for vs remission of sinnes reconciliation with God the holy Ghost saluation and life euerlasting Vnto this beare many places of holy Scripture witnesse in plentifull sort 1. Iohn 2.2 If anie man sinne wee haue an Aduocate with the Father Iesus Christ the iust And hee is the reconciliation for our sinnes and not for ours onelie but also for the sinnes of the whole woorld Rom. 3.25 Whom God hath set forth to be a reconciliation through faith in his bloud to declare his righteousnesse by the forgiuenesse of sinnes Rom 5
from the concrete to the abstract the reason doth not follow Christ therefore suffered according to his humane nature onelie making a sufficicnt and most perfect satisfaction thereby for our sins Which his satisfaction is made ours by applicatioÌ„ which is double The one from god who iustifieth vs for christs merit maketh vs to cease from sin The other from our selues who by faith apprehend applie vnto vs Christs merit by being fully persuaded that God for the ransome of his Son doth pardon vs our sinne Nowe that there was another nature in christ which nether suffered nor died is proued by these testimonies Ioh. 2.19 Destroie this Temple in three daies I wil raise it vp again 1. Pe. 3.18 was put to death concerning the flesh but was quickned in the spirit Reu. 1.18 I was dead and behold J am aliue Ioh. 18. I haue power to laie downe my soule and power to take it vp againe 3 The causes impellent or motiues of Christs Passion 1 THE loue of God towardes mankind Ioh. 3.16 So God loued the world that he gaue his onlie begotten Sonne 2. The mercy of God towards men fallen into sin 3. The wil of God to reuenge the iniurie of the Diuel who in reproch and despite of God auerted vs from him and maimed the image of God in vs in despite of the creator But here it maie be demaunded whether Christ fulfilled the Lawe or no and secondly if he did why then hee shoulde suffer so bitter a Passion Whereunto we aunswere first that he fulfilled the Law 1. By his righteousnes in obseruing it 2. By satisfaction in suffering punishment for our sinnes who had transgressed it Both which are most perfect Nowe to the second demand then why if Christ fulfilled the law was he so grieuously punished of God seeing punishment is the wages of sinne and sinne was not in him who neuer committed anie We answere that it was not for himselfe but for vs that hee was punished Reply A righteous man ought not to be punished for the vnrighteous Aunswere True except first he voluntarilie offer himselfe for them Secondly except he willinglie do suffer in such sort for them as that he yeelde a sufficient ransome and payment Thirdly except he haue the power of recouering himselfe out of the punishment once suffered Fourthly except he be able to bring to passe that they also for whom he offereth himselfe to satisfie leaue off to transgresse and sinne hereafter Fifthly except he bee of the same nature with them for whom he satisfieth If such a satisfier bee substituted there is nothing committed against the iustice of God for in so suffering both are saued both he that suffereth and they for whome hee suffereth Now such a suretie and satisfier was Christ who is not onelie man or of the same nature with vs but wee are also his members when the whole suffereth punishment the members also and partes are punished And for this coniunction of ours with Christ our head the Apostles commonly say that he suffered in Christ 4 The final causes or ends of his Passion THE first final cause or end of his passion is That his passion might bee a sufficient ransome for our sins or the redeeming of vs. 2. The mâ—nifesting of the loue goodnes mercie righteousnes of God while he punnisheth his sonne for vs. The chiefe finall causes then are Our saluation and the glorie of God To the former belongeth the knowledge of the greatnesse of sinne that we may knowe how great an euil sinne is and what it deserueth and further to knowe that death is not now pernicious and hurtfull to the Godly and therfore not to bee feared To the latter belongeth our Iustification wherein all the benefites are comprehended which Christ merited by dying euen our deliuery from death which hee bestoweth vpon vs. Obiection If hee haue satisfied for all then al should be saued Answere He satisfied for al as touching his satisfaction but not as touching the application thereof al not applying it vnto them Wherefore hee hath satisfied for al but doth not deliuer all but only those who by faith applie it And those he deliuereth 1. Because the Father ordeined him to this or because the Father will 2. Because the Son willingly offereth himselfe 3 Because this ransome is sufficient SVFFERED VNDER PONTIVS PILATE MEntion is made of Pilate in Christs passion 1. Because Christ would receiue from him a testimony of his innocencie that thereby we might knowe that he was pronounced innocent by the voice of the iudge himselfe 2. Beecause it was requisite that he should be solemnly coÌ„demned that we might know that hee though innocent was notwithstanding condemned that we might not be coÌ„demned as also he sustained death that we might be freed from it 3. That wee might be aduertised of the fulfilling of the Prophecy Gen. 49.10 The scepter shall not depart from Iudah nor a Law-giuer from betweene his feete vntill Shilo come For then was the Scepter taken from Iudah when Christ was a little after condemned of Pilate a Romane gouernour of whom before he was absolued This circumstance therefore is diligently to be coÌ„sidered in Christs passion that we may know him to be the Messias because al conditions are fulfilled in him which are required in the Messias Whereof this Prophecie of the taking away of the Scepter from Iudah was one 4. That we might know that Christ was condemned of God himselfe also and therefore that hee satisfied God for vs. For the head and gouernour of ordinarie iudgement is God himselfe Wherefore Christ was not to haue beene priuily taken away by the Iewes neither to be drawen to death by tumult and disorderlie but by lawefull order and iudgement and by inquisition made concerning all the accusations of Christ God would haue him first to be examined that his innocencie might appeare Secondly to be condemned that it might appeare that hee beeing before pronounced innocent was now condemned not for his owne fault but for ours and that so his vniust condemnation might be insteed of our most iust condemnatioÌ„ Thirdly to be put to death both that the prophecies might bee fulfilled and also that it might appear that both Iewes Gentils did put Christ to death CRVCIFIED I Beleeue in Christ Crucified that is I beleeue Christ did vndergo this punishment and this curse of the Crosse for my sake and that he was made obnoxious for my sake to Gods curse which I and we all deserued a type also of which curse was the death of the Crosse cursed by God himselfe Now for three causes would God haue his Sonne suffer the punishment of so ignominious a death 1 That we might knowe The curse due for our sinnes to haue laine vpon him so should be stirred vp to greater thankefulnesse considering how detestable a thing sinne is so that it could not be expiated or satisfied for but with the most bitter and most opprobrious and shamefull
death of the onely begotten Sonne of God 2 That it might be an exasperating of the punishment and so wee so much the more confirmed in a true faith when wee consider Christ by this kinde of punishment to haue taken vpon him our gilt euen our punishment also and curse according to that Cursed is euerie one that hangeth on tree Deut. 21.23 Gal. 3.13 3 That the trueth might answere according to the types and figures so we might know the types to be fulfilled in Christ For 1 The sacrifices which shadowed the sacrifice of Christ were hung vpon trees thereby to signifie that Christ should be fastned on a tree and accomplishing his sacrifice offer a holy sacrifice vnto his Father 2 The sacrifices being lifted vp on high before they were burned did signifie the exalting and listing vp of Christ on the Altar of the Crosse 3 The same was shadowed in Isaack who being laid on wood was to haue beene sacrificed of his Father 4 The brasen Serpent which Moses set vp vpon a pole in the wildernesse depainteth this kind of punishment Christ himselfe interpreted of himselfe this type of the brasen Serpent Joh. 3.14 DEAD I Beleeue in Christ dead that is I beleeue Christ not onely to haue suffered extreame torments for my sake but also death it selfe hath by his death obtained for me remission of sinnes and reconciliation with God consequently also the holy Ghost who beginneth in me a new life that I may againe bee made the Temple of God and at length attaine vnto euerlasting life wherein I shall woorship and magnifie God for euer OF CHRISTS DEATH THE chiefe Questions hereof are 1 How Christ is said to haue bin dead 2 Whether it was requisite and necessarie that Christ should die 3 What are the fruits of Christs death 1 HOW CHRIST IS SAID TO HAVE BEENE DEAD IT is needful to moue this question because of the heretikes who haue depraued the sense of this article Marcion denied that hee died indeed as also hee affirmed the whole ordinarie dispensation and ministerie of the humane nature in Christ and all those thinges which hee did vndergoe for vs to haue bin but imaginarie and that hee onely seemed to bee as a man Nestorius separated the two natures in Christ neither would haue the sonne of God but man onely to haue died Doe not boast thou Jewe saieth Nestorius thou hast not crucified God The Vbiquitaries beleeue that the humanitie of Christ from the moment of his incarnation was so indowed with all the properties of the Godhead as that only in this the humanitie differeth from the Godhead that the humanitie hath by an accident whatsoeuer the Godhead hath by and of it selfe Hereof it commeth that they imagin that Christ was in the time of his death yea when hee was inclosed in the Virgins wombe in heauen and eueriewhere not onely as touching his Godhead but with his bodie too This is it which they call the forme of God Wherefore against all these wee affirme that Christ died truely and corporallie euen by a true diuulsion separation of his soule from his bodie so that not onely his soule and body were not together euerie where but were not together in one place Mat. 27.50 Thē Iesus cried again with a loud voice yeelded vp the Ghost Mar. 15.37 Iesus cried with a loude voice and gaue vp the Ghost Luk 23.46 Father into thy hands I commend my spirit And when hee had saide these words hee gaue vp the Ghost Iohn 19.30 Hee bowed his head and gaue vp the Ghost But yet this is further to be added that although his soule was separated from his bodie yet the Word notwithstanding did not forsake neither bodie nor soule but remained neuerthelesse ioyned both to bodie and soule and therefore the two natures in Christ were not diuelled or sundered by that diuulsion of the soule and bodie Obiection Why then cried hee Mat. 27.46 My God my God why hast thou forsaken mee Aunswere Because of his delay and differring of help and succour For the two natures in Christ ought not to haue beene diuelled or sundered because it is written God hath purchased the Church with his owne bloude And hee was to be the sonne of God who shoulde die for our sinnes that hee might bee a sufficient price for them Hereby also it doth clearely appeare that The vnion of both natures in Christ is no Vbiquitie For the soul being separated from the bodie was not in the graue with the bodie and by a consequent not eueriewhere because that which is euerie where can neuer bee separated Obiection But as vertue that is his diuinitie is saide to haue gone out of him so also hee gaue vp the Ghost Aunswere There is a dissimilitude in these Because the diuinity remaining vnited with the humane nature yet did worke abroade without it The soule did depart from the bodie The reason of this dissimilitude is because the act of his diuinitie is increate and infinite but the act and power of his soul finite and created 2 Whether it was requisite and necessary that Christ should die IT was requisite and necessarie that Christ should die 1. In respect of the iustice of God that so his iustice might be satisfied which required the death of men by whom it was violated For the hurting offending of the greatest good is to bee expiated with the greatest punishment or with the vtmost destruction of nature that is with the death of the giltie condemned for sinne according to that Rom. 6.23 The wages of sinne is death Now it was requisite that the sonne of God should die that hee might bee a sufficient ransome for our sinnes For no creature coulde haue sustained such a punishment as should haue beene equiualent to eternall punishment and yet withall should haue beene temporal Obiection They haue deserued eternall punishment whosoeuer are not reconciled to God by Christ. Therefore the soules ought not to be separated from their bodies that they might suffer eternal damnation Aunswere It dooth not followe but this rather That therefore both bodie and soule must bee together that they maie suffer it which at length shall so come to passe 2 Jn respect of gods truth that the truth of GOD maie bee satisfied For GOD threatned and denounced death when euer wee sinned which denouncing was to bee fulfilled after sin was once committed And this is that commination or threatning pronounced by God himselfe Gen. 2.17 In the daie that thou eatest thereof thou shalt die the death Obiection But Adam did not presently die Aunswere Truely he died spirituallie eternal death and now was dead I hard saith he Gen. 3.10 thy voice There was a terrour in him and a feeling of Gods wrath a strife with death the losse of al the giftes both of body and mind But there followed the equity moderation and lenitie of the Gospell For God had not expressely saide that hee shoulde certainelie die wholy and that
resurrection of our Mediatour was requisite for our iustification first because except his punishment had beene finite wee coulde not haue recouered out of euerlasting death from which the Mediatour was so to deliuer vs as that hee shoulde vtterly ouercome it in vs. If then our Mediatour was vtterlie to vanquish and ouercome death in vs hee ought then so to die as to ouercome death first in himselfe and so to fulfill indeede that which was foretolde Ose 13.14 1. Cor. 15.54 Death is swallowed vp into victorie O Death where is thy sting O graue where is thy victorie Againe Except Christ had ouercome death he could not haue bestowed his benefites on vs which by his death hee had merited for vs neither should we knowe that hee had satisfied for vs because if hee had continued in death it had beene a certaine argument that he had not satisfied but was ouercome of death of the burdē of sin For where death is there is sinne or if he had satisfied yet had remained in death this had been contrarie to the iustice of God Wherefore Christ was to rise both that wee might knowe that hee had promerited benefites for vs and also that himselfe might applie the same vnto vs that is that by his merit and efficacy we might be perfectlie saued and iustified 2. Christ rose for our regeneration For iustification or remission of sinnes sufficeth not without the inchoation and beginning of a new life 3. For our saluation and glorification God wil by this meanes euerlastinglie quicken and glorifie vs that beeing inserted and engraffed into the masse of his Son that is his humane nature wee maie for euer bee carried of it and out of it drawe life For these causes it was necessarie that Christ shoulde rise againe that is that his soul which was laide downe from the body should be againe ioined with the same body For resurrection is nothing else than a coniunction or reuniting of the same body with the same soule 4 What are the fruites of Christes Resurrection ALL the causes of Christs Resurrection are not fruites of his Resurrection And after a diuerse maner are the causes and the fruites of his resurrection considered and moreouer the benefites of Christ bestowed by his resurrection are one way considered as causes of Christs resurrection and otherwise as fruites of the same For the Questions are diuerse Wherefore christ rose And What fruits Christs resurrection bringeth vnto vs. Furdermore the fruite of Christs resurrectiō of two sorts the one respecting christ the other vs. For first as the Apostle sayth Rom. 1.4 Hee is declared by the resurrection to bee the Sonne of God euen the onely begotten and beloued Sonne of God who is also God himselfe Againe Christs humane nature also was by his resurrection adorned with that glorie which becommeth the nature of the Son of God The fruit of Christs resurrection which respecteth vs is of many sorts But to speake in general all the benefites of christes death are the fruites which we receiue by his resurrection For Christes resurrection maketh that his death hath his effect Christ by his resurrection dooth applie vnto vs those benefites which he merited for vs by his death by this means the same are the benefits both of his death resurrection which are otherwise merited for vs thā they ar bestowed on vs. For it was not necessarie that the verie act of meriting deseruing should dure all the time both of the old and the new Church but onely the act of bestowing or applieng the same and therefore it was necessarie also that the Mediatour should be continually that hee might bestow those benefites on the Church which hee was once to merite for this can not bee doone without a Mediatour and therefore neither can the Church be for one moment without a Mediator In the old church Christ the Mediator did bestow on the Fathers the benefits of his death to come by the force and efficacy of his resurrection to come nowe he bestoweth them on vs by the efficacie of his resurrection alreadie past It remaineth now that wee in speciall reckon the chiefe fruites which the resurrection of Christ bringeth vnto vs. First then by the resurrection of Christ wee know him to be the Messias as in whom the prophecies were fulfilled Secondly We are confirmed and warranted by Christes resurrection 1. Of his merit That hee hath fullie and perfectlie satisfied for our sinnes For one onelie sinne not being satisfied for had withheld christ still in death He was cast into such a prison as that except he had paied the vtmost farthing he had not beene let goe But he was let goe and dimissed Therefore he paied the vtmost farthing 2. We are confirmed of the application of Christes benefites which could not haue been bestowed if he had not risen For as was said before it was necessarie that the selfesame Mediatour beeing man should rise againe Ioh 7.39 The holy Ghost was not yet giuen Iesus was not yet glorified Wherefore wel saith Saint Paul Rom. 4.25 That Christ is risen again for our righteousnes that is to confer and apply righteousnesse vnto vs. Thirdly A fruit of christes resurrection is the gift of the holie Ghost by whom christ regenerateth vs and giueth vs eternal life Before time the Godlie were also endued with the holie Ghost and regenerated but more sparingly than nowe in the newe Testament and yet both by the force and vertue of his resurrection For the holy Ghost by whose vertue and operation onely wee are regenerated cannot be giuen but by the resurrection and ascension of christ Fourthly We must also ascribe and attribute it vnto christes resurrection that hee preserueth vs by his perpetuall and applied righteousnesse that hee beginneth in vs eternal life and so dooth also ascertaine and assure vs of the consummation and accomplishment of eternall life whereof wee cannot bee certaine except wee haue the beginning thereof and the beginning we should not haue except we had the holy Ghost Fiftlie The resurrection of our bodies is the fruite of christes resurrection 1. Because christ is our Heade and wee his members Now it is expedient for the Heades glorifie that the members bee glorious Christ indeede shoulde bee by himselfe though hee had no members or if his members continued in death but hee should not be Head because he is not heade but in respect of his members Neither shoulde hee bee a king without a kingdome according to the nature of correlatiues whose verie beeing dependeth vppon necessarie relation which one hath to the other and according to the nature of correlatiues a glorious head doth require glorious members and such as are correspondent vnto it 2. Because if Christ be risen he hath also abolished sinne If he hath abolished sinne either hee hath abolished his own sin or ours but not his owne therefore ours If he hath abolished our sin he hath abolished death also For if the cause
shall deliuer me from the bodie of this death Reu. 22.17 The spirit the Bride say Come Lord Jesu which they say not who are not ready to receiue the Lorde For the wicked tremble and shake at the mention of that iudgement THE THIRD PART OF THE CREED Of the holy Ghost the sanctifier IN this last part of the Apostolike confession are cōteined six articles whereof the first speaketh of the person of the holie Ghost the next of the Church which is gathered confirmed and preserued by the holy Ghost the foure articles following are of the benefites bestowed by the Holy Ghost on the Church and first of the communion of Saints Secondly of remission of sinnes Thirdly of the resurrection of the flesh Lastly of euerlasting life The chiefe Questions of the holy Ghost or holy spirite 1 What the name spirit signifieth 2 Who and what the Holie Ghost or spirite is 3 What is the holy Ghosts office 4 Of whom the holy Ghost is giuen and wherefore 5 To whom he is giuen 6 How he is giuen and receiued 7 How he is reteined and kept 8 Whether he maie be lost and how 9 Wherefore he is necessarie 10 How we may know that he dwelleth in vs. 1 * It is here to be noted that this Questiō serueth more properlie for the latine which vseth this name Spiritus only when as we in English vse as much or more rather the word Ghost than Spirit when wee speake of the third Person WHAT THE NAME SPIRIT SIGNIFIETH THE name spirite is taken sometimes for the cause sometimes for the effect When it is taken for the cause it signifieth a nature incorporeall and liuing of a spirituall essence wielding moouing and stirring some thing So first God essentiallie and personallie is a spirit that is incorporeal without any bodilie dimensions or quantitie inuisible Secondly The Angels also whether good or bad are in this sense spirites Thirdly after the same manner the soules of men are called spirits Gen. 2.7 Hee breathed in his face breath of life that is he sent in a spirit or soule into him When the woorde spirit is taken for an effect it signifieth 1. The aire moued 2. The mouing it selfe and motion of the aire 3. The wind and moouing vapours 4. Spirituall effects or motions good or bad So is it said The spirit of fear And contrary The spirit of Princes that is courage likewise The spirit of fornication 5. New spirit signifieth the giftes of the holy spirit In this doctrine which we haue in hand Spirit signifieth the cause stirring and moouing namely the third person of the God-head which is forcible in the mindes and wils of men And this third person of the God-heade is called a spirit 1. Because he is a spiritual essence or substaunce incorporeall and inuisible 2. Because he is inspired of the Father and the son that is because is the immediate stirrer and moouer of diuine works The Father and the Sonne mooue but by this spirit 3. Because himselfe inspireth and immediatly worketh motions in the harts of the Elect whence he is called Luk. 1.35 The power of the most high 4. Because hee is God equall and the same with the Father and the Son And god is a spirite This third person of the God-head is called Holie 1. Because he in himselfe by himselfe and of his owne nature is Holie 1. Because he is the hallower or sanctifier that is he immediatly halloweth or sanctifieth and maketh holie others The father and the sonne sanctifie by him and therefore mediatelie 2 Who and what the holy ghost is THE holie ghost is the third person of the true and onelie god-head proceeding from the Father and the Sonne and coeternall coequal and consubstantial with the Father and the Son and is sent from both into the harts of the Elect to sanctifie them vnto eternal life Here are we to say the same thinges of the Godhead of the holy Ghost which haue bin spoken before of the Godhead of the son For this definition is also to be prooued and confirmed by the proofes of the same foure partes 1 That the holy Ghost is a person 2 That he is the third person or that he is other distinct from the father and the Sonne 3 That he is true God with the Father and the Sonne or that he is equall to the Father and the Sonne 4 That he is of the same God-head with the Father the Sonne or that he is consubstantiall vnto both FIrst therefore that the holy ghost is a person is prooued 1 By his apparitions Because he hath appeared visible Luk. 3.22 The holy ghost came downe in a bodilie shape like a Doue Act. 2.3 And there appeared vnto them clouen toungs like fire and it that is the fire or the holie ghost sate vpon each of them Seeing then the holy Ghost descended in bodilie shape vpon Christ and sate vpon the Apostles it followeth that he is subsisting For no qualitie or created motion of minds or hearts is able to doe in like manner For an accident doth not only not take vpō it any shape but standeth in neede of some thing else in which it selfe should consist and bee Neither is the aire the place or subiect of holinesse godlinesse loue of God and other spiritual motions but the mindes of men 2. He is proued to be a person because he is called god 1. Cor. 3.16 Know yee not that yee are the temple of god and that the spirite of god dwelleth in you Acts 5.3 Why hath satan filled thine hart that thou shouldest lie vnto the holie Ghost And in the next verse he saith Thou hast not lied vnto men but vnto god See also Isai 40.7.13 Actes 28.25 Ephes 4.4.30 Howesoeuer then the aduersaries of this doctrine gtaunt the holy Ghost to be God yet this cannot bee but he must be a subsistent or person seing God is a being but our godlinesse goodnesse Godly motions and other diuine affections cannot be called God 3. He is a person because he is the author of our Baptisme and we are baptized in his name that is by his commaundement and wil. But wee are not baptized by the commaundement and wil of a deade thing or of a thing not existing neither are wee baptized in the name of the graces or giftes of God 4. Because the properties of a person are attributed vnto him as that hee teacheth that he distributeth giftes euen as he wil that he comforteth confirmeth ruleth raigneth likewise that hee sendeth Apostles that hee speaketh in the Apostles Luke 12.12 The holie Ghost shall teach you in the same houre what yee ought to saie So also he declareth the thinges to come Ioh. 16.13 The spirite of truth wil shewe you the thinges to come Hee giueth prophecies he commaundeth and willeth that the Apostles be separated and lastlie he appointeth teachers in the church All these are thinges proper vnto a person existing intelligent endued with a wil working
is grasse But if they vrge the verie woorde in these speeches it will followe that not onely after death there is nothing remaining but that there is not any resurrection when hee saith a wind that passeth and commeth not againe as also flowers and shadowes whereunto man is compared doe so perish that they are not recouered Psalm 88.5 I am counted as the slain lying in the graue whom thou remembrest no more In these wordes the Prophet doth not signifie either himselfe or the dead to bee exempted from Gods prouidence but he complaineth that he is forsaken of God euen as the deade seeme to men not to bee cared for of him and therefore he speaketh not according to the sense of faith but of his owne opinion and weaknes miserie who iudgeth those to be forsaken and neglected of God whose deliuerie for a while he dooth differre But what faith in the meane season suggesteth and telleth the godly euen when they wrestle with temptation he sheweth Psalm 11.2 when hee saith The iust shall bee in euerlasting memorie Psal 146.4 His spirit departeth and he returneth to his earth thē his thoughts perish Here he saith not the spirit or soul of men perisheth or vanisheth or dieth or is bereaued of sense but that it departeth to wit from the bodie wherein it dwelleth and that not the spirit but the man returneth to his earth that is as concerning his bodie which was made of earth as is written Gen. 3 and Eccles 12. And lastly he saith that his thoughtes perish which is not that the soule is after this life bereaued of reason iudgement and sense of the mercy or wrath of God but that his purposes and counsels are made frustrate which man in this life had setled with him-selfe to bring to passe in which sense it is said Psalm 112.10 The desire of the wicked shal perish They gather also other sayings which take away all praising and worshipping of God from the dead As Psal 88.10 Wilt thou shew a miracle vnto the dead Or shall the dead rise and praise thee But in such speeches death and hell or the graue haue two significations They who are spiritually dead whether before or after the death of the bodie that is they who are depriued of gods grace forsaken and reiected of god and are in hell that is in the place torments of the damned or else in this life despairing and destitute of comfort shall not praise god at all neither in this life nor in the life to come But they who are dead not spiritually but corporally onely albeit they shall not praise god in this life while their bodies are in hell that is in the graue yet in soul they shal not cease to acknowledge and praise god in the other life vntill when receiuing their bodies againe they shall magnifie him in both in the celestial eternity But in the meane season because god will also be agnised and magnified of men in this life therefore both the whole Church and euerie one of the faithfull not only pray that they may not fall into that forsaking into that sense of gods wrath wherewith the wicked are oppressed but also desire that they may bee in this mortall life preserued and defended vntill the end thereof by god appointed be expired For the Saints doe not simply stand in feare of the bodily death and graue but that they may not be forsaken of god neither fall into desperation and destruction or their enimies insult against god when they are ouerthrowen this with daily and ardent praiers and petitions they beg and craue continually Nowe that which the aduersaries ad farther out of the Psal 146.2 I will praise the Lord during my life as long as J haue anie beeing I will sing vnto my God this maketh nothing with thē For he restraineth not the praising of God to the time of his mortal life but only he saith that he wil spēd all that time in Gods praises which notwithstanding in manie other places he extendeth to continue al eternity as Psal 34. I wil praise the Lord continually But oftentimes this particle vntill or as long as signifieth a continuance of the time going before some euent without any excluding of the time following as 1. Cor. 15.25 He must raign vntil he hath put al his enemies vnder his feete Iob. 10.20 Let him cease and leaue off from mee that I maie take a little comfort before I goe and shal not returne Hee denieth in these wordes that he shall returne into this mortall life and to conuerse among men in this woorlde but hee denieth not that hee in the meane season hath his beeing and doth liue vntil againe he see God in his flesh euen the same Iob who thē was afflicted As himself saith ca. 19.26 Iob 3.11 Why died I not when I came out of the womb Here also Iob dooth not denie the soules after death to bee liue feele and vnderstand but only he saith the miseries of this present life are not felt If they vrge that neither the euils of the life to come are felt because then Job shoulde wish for a bad chaunge we aunswere that Iob wisheth not for the death of the wicked but of the godly But if they ad furder That Job dooth make Kings and Princes also which gather gold vnto them smal and great that is al men good and bad partakers of this rest our aunswere is out of the processe and course of his whole speech that Iob dooth not teach here what is the state of men after this life but onely desireth to bee rid of his present miserie and therefore through humane infirmity and impatiency doth compare the sense and feeling of his present miseries with the death and state of the dead whatsoeuer it be as they who are grieuously tormented with present distresses and calamities prefer any thing whatsoeuer before that which they suffer So also chapter 7. hee speaketh as one despairing of deliuerie in this life Remember that my life is but a wind and that mine eie shal not returne to see pleasure For so hee expoundeth himselfe when he addeth He shal returne no more to his house neither shall his place knowe him anie more So likewise cap. 17. My breath is corrupt and the graue is readie for me They are woords of one despairing of life and saluation god being wrath and angry But chapter 34.14 when it is said If he set his hart vpon man and gather vnto him selfe his spirit and his breath Al flesh shal perish together it is not saide that the soule dooth sleepe or perish but that by the departure thereof the body dieth and is dissolued Further they adde Jf presently after death the godlie were blessed then iniurie was doone vnto them who were called againe into this mortall life But to this we aunswere That neither god can be iniurious to any man whereas he is in no mans debt neither can any thing happen better
13.14 When thy sonne shal aske thee to morrow saying what is this Thou shalt then saie vnto him With a mightie hand the Lord brought vs out of Aegypt out of the house of bondage 6 To bee the bondes of mutuall Charitie The sixt and last end is that they may be the bonds of mutual dilection and loue because they who are entred into an association or confederacie with Christ the head of the Church ought not to bee at difference among themselues 1. Cor. 12.13 By one spirite are we all baptized into one bodie In like manner the Sacramentes are the bonds of publique meetinges and congregations in the Church 1. Cor. 11.33 When ye come together to eate tarrie one for another 1. Cor. 10.17 For wee that are manie are one bread and one bodie because we are all partakers of one bread Eph. 4.5 One God one Faith c. But we can not settle among vs this communion neither maintaine and continue it being once setled neither profitablie annunciate and shewe forth the death of the Lord as long as we dissent iarre among our selues contentiously about the institution of the Sacramentes The Sacraments are pledges of that communion which Christians haue first with christ and then between themselues 3 Jn what Sacraments differ from sacrifices WE must hold and obserue a difference betweene Sacrifices and Sacraments Sacraments sacrifices differ in their chiefe end that we may knowe what to do when we come vnto them Now they differ in the principal chiefe end For sacraments are only ceremonies Sacrifices may be ceremonies moral works also as the sacrifices of thanksgiuing are our works towards God whereby wee yeeld due obedience and honour vnto God such are the sacrifices of praise and thankfulnesse A sacrament is gods work toward vs wherein he giueth some thing to wit the signes and the things signed wherein he testifieth of his offering bestowing his benefits vpon vs. Or the distinction betweene them may be giuen thus A sacrifice is a woork in which we yeeld some obedience and worship vnto God But a sacrament is a work in which GOD giueth somewhat vnto vs First outward signes Secondly Thinges signified by them The same thinges may bee sacrifices and sacramentes A sacrament and a sacrifice may be sometimes together in one and the selfe-same thing but they are sacramentes in respect of God in respect of vs sacrifices and those onely eucharistical and of thanks-giuing For there is but one only sacrifice propitiatorie by the raunsome of Christ offered for vs on the crosse Obiection The Passouer and other ceremonies of the oulde testament were both sacrifices and sacramentes Therefore sacramentes doe nothing differ from sacrifices Aunswere More is in the conclusion than in the premisses Because this onely followeth That the same thing may be a sacrament a sacrifice So Baptism the Lords Supper are sacraments sacrifices They are sacraments and that principally because they are the worke of god who giueth vs some thing in them and dooth therein testifie his gift vnto vs. For in them he reacheth vnto vs certaine Symbols and tokens by his ministers as also by his ministers hee speaketh by his mouth vnto vs according as it is said Luk. 10.16 He that heareth you heareth mee So therefore euerie minister reacheth with his hand the sacramentes vnto vs and wee receiue them at their handes as at the handes of God if so wee take them with reuerence but much more God giueth and as it were reacheth with his hande vnto vs in the lawful and right vse of the sacramentes the things themselues which are signified by the sacramentes Furthermore Baptisme and the Lordes Supper are sacrifices not indeede principally but as they are our woork which we perform to God that is as we receiue these signes as it were from the hand of God and so declare our obedience towards God 4 Jn what sacramentes agree with the Word and in what they differ from it The sacraments aâ—d the word agâ—â—e In exhibiting the same things vnto vs. THE SacrameÌ„ts agree with the Word in these things 1. Both exhibite the same things vnto vs. For by both god doth testifie vnto vs his will and by both he proposeth the same benefites the same grace and the same Christ vnto vs neither doth God confirme or represent by his SacrameÌ„ts any other thing than he hath promised in his word and they who seek for any other thing in the Sacraments than is prescribed in the word of god frame make Idols 2. Both are from the holie Ghost and so both also confirme and establish faith 2 In proceeding 〈◊〉 the Holy Gâ—ost 3 In being instituâ—â—â— offered by God 4 In being accoÌ„pâ—â—â—hed by God 3. God instituteth both God offereth both 4. God accomplisheth both by the Ministers of his Church For hee speaketh with vs in his Woorde by the ministers and by the Ministers hee offereth and giueth vs these signes in his Sacramentes But the thinges them-selues which are signified by these signes the sonne of God immediately offereth vnto vs. Hee saith Joh. 20.22 Receiue the Holie Ghost And Iohn saith of him Matth. 3.11 Indeede J baptize you with water to amendment of life but hee that commeth after mee will baptize you with the holie Ghost and with fire The Sacraments differ froÌ„ the word in these things 1. In substance nature They disagree 1 In substance and nature For first Words signifie according to the appointment of men whoÌ„ it pleased that things should so be expressed signified Signes signifie according to a similitude which they haue with the thinges by them signified Secondly Words wee heare and reade Signes wee perceiue also by feeling seeing and tasting Thirdly Words signifie onelie Symboles and signes confirme also 2. The Woorde of the promise and commaundement is proposed without anie difference 2 In the persons 〈◊〉 they are offered to al. To the vnregenerate that they may either begin to beleeue and be regenerated or may bee left without excuse to the regenerate that they may the more beleeue and bee confirmed The Sacraments are giuen onelie to the members of the Church whose faith is by them confirmed and preserued The Word is preached to all at once The Sacraments are giuen to euerie member of the Church seuerallie one is baptized after another and the supper is ministred to one after another 3. The Woorde is the instrument of the holie Ghost by which he beginneth and confirmeth our faith 3 in their vse and therefore the Sacraments must follow the Word The Sacraments are the instruments of the holie Ghost by which he beginneth not but onelie confirmeth our faith and therefore the Word is to goe before them The reason of this difference is because the Sacraments without they be vnderstoode neuer mooue There is no desire after a thing which is not knowen But yet in Infants the case is diuers For in them faith
posteritie Vnto other Nations but not vnto the Iewes it was free to be circumcised or not to be circumcised Wee must here obserue that they of the olde testament were of three sorts 1. Jsraelites which were of Abrahams posteritie and were necessarily bound by the Lawe to obserue circumcision the ceremonies 2. Proselytes who of the Gentiles were conuerted vnto the Iewes did more more for cōfirming of their faith submit thē selues vnto circumcision and the whole ceremonial lawe 3. Those of the gentiles who were conuerted vnto the Iewes but did not obserue the ceremonies For vnto the gentiles and Prosylites it was free to keepe or not to keepe circumcision and the ceremonies These latter were called also Religious men who embraced onely the doctrine and promises of god Obiect The males onelie were circumcised therefore the women were shut out from the couenant of grace Aunswere The women were comprehended in the circumcision of the males And God spared the weaker sex And it sufficed for them to come of godly progenitors 2 What are the ends of circumcision CIrcumcision was instituted 1. That it might bee a signe of the grace of God towardes Abrahams posteritie and that doubly First that God woulde receiue the beleeuers by the Messias who was to come Secondly that he would giue them the land of Canaan and graunt his church a certaine place there vntill the comming of the Messias 2. That it might be a bond to bind Abraham and his seede vnto thankefulnes or to faith and repentance and so to keepe the whole law 3. That it might bee a marke to distinguish the Iewes from other Nations and Sects 4. That it might bee a sacrament of initiating and receiuing them into the church 5. That it might bee an accusation and a signification of vncleannes For that rite did shewe that all men were subiect to sinnes and vnclean 6. That it might bee a signe which shoulde shewe and signifie that the meanes of their deliuerance through Christ which was to come shoulde not come elsewhence than from the bloud of Abraham 3 Why circumcision is abolished CIrcumcision is abolished 1. Because the thing signified is exhibited For among other things it signified that the Messias promised vnto the Fathers should come at length in his appointed time and should in our behalfe take our nature 2. Because circumcision was instituted for the seuering of the Iewes from all other Nations but now the church that difference being abolished is collected and gathered out of al Nations And now the sacrament of baptisme performerth the same vnto vs which circumcision did vnto them Moreouer as circumcision was a signe vnto them of their receiuing into the people of God So is baptisme vnto vs the first mark which seuereth the church from the wicked 4 Why Christ was circumcised CHrist was circumcised 1. That hee might signifie that hee was also a member of that circumcised people 2. That hee might shew that he receiued and tooke our sinnes on himselfe that he might satisfie for them 3. That he might testifie that he did entirelie and fullie fulfill the law in our behalfe 4. The circumcision of Christ was a part also of his humiliation and Ransome OF THE LORDS SVPPER THE chiefe questions 1 What the Supper of the Lord is 2 What are the ends thereof or wherefore it was instituted 3 What is differeth from Baptisme 4 What is the sense and meaning of the words of the institution 5 What is the difference betweene the Lords Supper and the Papists Masse 6 What is the right vse of the Supper 7 What the wicked receiue in the Supper 8 Who are to come and to be admitted vnto the Supper 1 WHAT THE SVPPER OF THE LORD IS FIrst we wil see by what names the Supper of the Lorde is called then wee wil in few woordes define what it is This action or ceremony or rite instituted by a Christ a little before his death is called A supper Why it is called a Supper from the first institution of it that is in respect of the originall or first beginning of this rite or in respect of the time wherein this ceremony was instituted which circumstance of time the church hath chaunged Jt is likewise called Synaxis that is Why a conuent a conuent in respect of the assembly and conuent of the church because some either few or many assemble and meete together in celebrating of the supper For in the first celebration the Disciples were present Take this and diuide it among you Wherefore it must needs be that there was some number there which also appeareth by the Apostle repeating the first institution 1. Cor. 11. where in the end he addeth When ye come together to eat tarry one for another And further that moe ought to come together to celebrate the supper this end of the supper doth euidently enough shew in that it was instituted to be a token and euen a bond of loue For we that are many are one bread and one bodie It is called also the Eucharist Why the Eucharist Why a sacrifice Why Missa because it is a rite and ceremony of thankesgiuing Last of all it is called also a sacrifice because it is the commemoration of christs propitiatory benefit And at length it was also called Missa frō the offering or from the dimissing of the rest who might not communicate after the sermō which went before the celebration was finished Now let vs come to define the Lords Supper The definition of the Lordes Supper THE Lords supper is a ceremonie or sacrament instituted and appointed of christ vnto the faithfull for a memorial of him whereby christ dooth certainly promise and seale vnto mee and all the faithfull first that his body was offered and broken on the crosse for mee and his bloode shed for me as truely as I see with my eies the bread of the Lord to be broken vnto me and his cup distributed and moreouer that hee doth as certainlie with his body crucified and his blood shed feed and nourish my soul vnto euerlasting life as my body is fed with the bread the cup of the lord receiued from the hand of the minister which are offered to me as certaine seales of the body blood of Christ It may be also more briefly defined on this wise The lords supper is a distributing receiuing of bread and wine commaunded of Christ vnto the faithfull that by these signes he might testifie that hee hath deliuered and yeelded his body vnto death and hath shedde his bloode for them and dooth giue them those thinges to eate and drinke that they might be vnto them the meate and drink of eternall life and that thereby also he might testifie that he would dwel in them for euer And againe that of the otherside hee might by the same signe bind them to mutuall dilection and loue seeing Christ spareth not to giue his body and bloode for vs. This
obserued that Paschal sacrameÌ„t being abolished 2. That the same thing might be signified difference only of time excepted For the Paschal Lamb signified Christ which should come and should be sacrificed The supper Christ already sacrificed Obiection But when the supper was instituted Christ was yet to be sacrificed Aunswere But then was at hand the offering vp and sacrificing of Christ For a few houres after he was sacrificed and the supper was from that time forward to signifie christ sacrificed 3. That he might stir vp in his Disciples and in vs greater attention and marking of the cause for which he did institute it and that we might vnderstand how earnestly Christ would haue this supper to bee recommended vnto vs seeing he did nothing before his death but that which was of most weight and moment Therefore did he in the very point or instaunt before his death institute it For it is as it were the testament and last wil of our testatour For which cause it is added In the same night that he was betraied Hee tooke bread That is vnleauened bread nor leauened which then they did eat of at the table The institution of the Supper and Vnleauened bread did concur then together and fall out by an accident and therefore he prescribed not any certaine manner of baking bread for the lords supper Yet notwithstanding the bread of the Lords supper differeth from common bread because this is taken for the nourishment of the bodie but that for the foode and nourishment of the soul that is for the confirmation of our faith And here wee are to note that he is saide to haue taken bread from the table Hee tooke not his bodie therefore neither tooke hee his bodie in the bread with the bread or vnder the bread When hee had giuen thankes He gaue thanks for his office now performed and finished on earth his last act yet remaining to bee done that thus it had pleased the Father to redeeme mankind or that the typicall passouer was abolished and the signified passouer was now exhibited or lastly hee gaue thankes for the admirable and wonderfull gathering and preseruing of the church Hee brake it That is he brake the bread which hee tooke from the table distributed the same being one amongst many not any other inuisible thing hidden in the bread He brake not his bodie but the bread as S. Paul saieth The bread which we breake c. Now he distributed the bread being one among many because wee that are many are one bodie But the cause for which hee brake this bread was to signifie his passion and the separation of his bodie from his soul Wherefore the breaking of bread is a necessarie ceremonie both in respect of the signification in respect of our confirmation and therefore is this ceremonie also to bee reteined 1. Because Christ hath commaunded it 2. For our owne comfort that we may knowe the bodie of Christ to haue beene as certainly crucified for vs as we see the bread to bee broken 3. That the opinion of transubstantiation and consubstantiation may be pulled out of mens mindes Take This commandement belongeth to the disciples and to the whole Church of the new Testament Whence it is cleare and manifest 1. That the masse is not the Supper of the Lord but a priuate supper of him that sacrificeth 2. That we must not be idle beholders of the supper but religious receiuers of it 3. That the lords supper is not to be celebrated but in an assembly or congregation 4. That the supper is a signe in respect of God This is my body This that is this bread Obiection Then should it haue been said * These Greeke pronouns caÌ„not bee expressed with the like English particleâ— Because the woordes BREAD and BODY being of diuerse genders in Greeke the Greek pronouns also are diuerâ—e when aâ— in English our particle THIS serueth for woordes of all genders 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Aunswere 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as much as if he had said this thing which I haue in my hand And that it is so to bee vnderstoode is prooued by these reasons 1. Christ tooke nothing but bread hee brake bread and gaue bread to his disciples to eate 2. Saint Paul saith expresly The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the bodie of â—hrist 3. Of the Wine it is said This cup is the new testament Wherefore after the same manner is it saide This that is this bread is my bodie that is a signe of my bodie which is broken and deliuered vnto death Wherefore farre be it from vs that we should say that Christ took bread visiblie and his bodie inuisiblie It is to be obserued that hee saith not Jn this is my bodie or this bread is my bodie inuisible but This bread is my bodie Which for you My Disciples that is for your saluation Is broken Obiection But Christes bodie neither was nor is broken Aunswere Hee hath a respect to the signification which the breaking of the breade did import Nowe this breaking signifieth the paines and renting of Christes bodie and the violent sundering of his soule and bodie one from the other For as the bread is broken and parted into diuers partes so the soule and bodie of Christ were separated and parted from each other Do this That is Being gathered assembled together take bread giue thankes distribute it Hee vnderstandeth the whole action which hee commaundeth and that to vs which beleeue and not the Iewes who were ready to crucifie him In remembraunce of me That is Thinking and meditating of my benefites which I haue done for you and which are by these rites recalled into your memory and further verily feeling and finding in heart that I giue you these my benâ—fites and therefore celebrating them by publique confession before God and Angels yea before men also and so giuing me thankes for them This remembraunce is the whole whose partes are the memory of christes benefites faith whereby we apply christ his merit vnto vs thankfulnesse or publique confession of his benefits Wherefore it followeth not Christ did institute his supper for a remembraunce of him therefore he did not institute it for confirmation of our faith For this obiection is no lesse friuolous than if I should say The holy Ghost confirmeth our faith Therefore the supper doth not For as it hath beene said before the reason followeth not to the remoouing of the instrumentall cause by the putting of the principall cause as neither dooth it follow to the deniâ—l of a paâ—â— by the putting of the whole For Remembrance compriseth the remembring of christes benefites faith and thanksgiuing For by his sacramentes christ remembreth vs of himselfe and his benefites and by his sacraments he raiseth and establisheth in vs our trust and confidence in him And further of that remembraunce of christes benefites it must follow that wee also yeelde thankes vnto him therefore publiquely This
cup is the new testament Or the couenant as both the * Berith greeke and * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hebrue word admitteth Now it is called the new couenant that is renewed or to speake it in a woord fulfilled And this new couenant is our reconciliation with God the communion and participation of Christ and all his benefites by faith in the sacrifice of Christ now fulfilled finished without any obseruation of the ceremonies of the old Passeouer The supper is called the new couenaÌ„t because it is a signe and a seale of this couenant signing and sealing vnto vs our reconciliation with God and our coniunction with Christ which is wrought by faith Now in calling the supper the new couenant first he comprehendeth both the promise and the condition which is expressed in the promise namelie faith and repentance Whereof also it foloweth that the supper was for this cause also instituted that it might bee a bond to bind vs to lead a christian life Secondly hee maketh an opposition betweene the new couenant and that couenant which was the Passeouer together with the rites thereof For the supper signified Christ offered The Passeouer signified Christ who should bee offered There is notwithstanding no small similitude and agreeing of both For both signifie our reconciliation with God and coniunction with Christ Jâ— my bloud which is shed for you for remission of sinnes The shedding of Christs bloud is the merite for which beeing apprehended of vs by faith we receiue remission of sinnes For as often as yee shall eate The supper therefore is often to be iterated and celebrated 1. Because of the woordes of the institution 2. In respect of the ende and purpose of the institution because it must bee done in remembranuce of Christ Shewe the Lordes death That is beleeue that Christ died and that for you and then professe it also publiquely before all Till hee come Therefore it must bee obserued vnto the worlds end neither is any other externall forme to be looked for vntill the day of iudgement The words of the institution which haue beene hitherto expounded may be made more plaine and cleare by these wordes of the Apostle The cup of blessing which we blesse is it not the communion of the bloude of Christ The bread which wee breake is it not the communion of the bodie of Christ The cup of blessing that is the cup of thankesgiuing which is receiued namely to this end that wee may yeeld thankes to Christ for his death and passion The communion of the bodie likewise the communion of the bloud is to be made through faith partaker of Christ and all his benefites the same spirit being in vs which is in Christ and woorking the same in vs which he worketh in Christ Bread and wine is the communion that is it is the signe of our communion with Christ Now our communion as the Apostle briefly declareth consisteth in this that wee who are manie are one bodie Whence it is most easie to collect that this communion is not a corporall eating For it is wrought onely by faith and the holy Ghost Christ is the heade and wee the members and all wee who are members haue also a communion of all Christs benefites Therefore the heade is common the benefites common and so the members also common among themselues wherefore their loue and dilection is common and mutual We vnderstand nowe what is the true meaning of the words of the institution especiallie of those about which is greatest coÌ„trouersy which are these This is my body that is to repeat in few wordes the true sense of them This bread broken of me and giuen to you is a signe of my bodie for your sakes rent and deliuered vnto death and a certaine seale of your coniunction with me so that he who beleeueth and eateth this bread doth truelie and reallie after a sort eat my bodie This our iudgement and interpretation or Christs rather is most true and vnto the truth of the Gospell most agreeable Here especially resistâ—unce is made and the greatest controuersie is about the word or vnderstanding of the word For our aduersaries vnderstand those wordes so as tâ—ey maintaine thereof to folow that Christes bodie is present and eaten corporallie But in the meane season they consider not that those wordes are sacramentallie to bee taken or that the speech is sacramental and therefore is not to be taken as proper and simple as it shoulde bee if thence were gathered that the bread is changed into Christs bodie Now to the signe here is attributed the name of the thing signified both for the coniunction which the thing signified hath in the right vse of the supper with the signe and also for the proportion which the signe hath with the thing signified Come wee now to those arguments whereby wee may confirme our interpretation and opinion to bee true The arguments which wee will vse are of three sorts such as are wont to bee also in like controuersies 1. Some are taken from the nature of the thing or subiect that is by vnderstanding the speech as the thing it selfe doth beare and suffer 2. Some are drawen from an analogie of the articles of our faith or from a conference of places or parts of christian doctrine for the holy spirite is the spirite of truth 3. Some are taken from other like places of scripture where the same thing is deliuered in such words as are manifest and whereof there is no controuersie The first sort of Arguments which are taken from the nature of the sacraments THE verie manner and forme of speaking yeeldeth vs a firme and strong argument Breade is the bodie of Christ but bread is not in it owne proper substance his bodie for by reason hereof haue they inuented consubstantiation therefore it is a figuratiue speeche euen such a one as is vsual vnto sacraments and is declared in the institution 2 Sacraments confirme exhibit promise seale no other thing than the woorde doth In the woorde is promised no corporal eating Therefore neither is anie such thing confirmed by the sacrament 3 In all sacraments when the names or properties of the things are attributed vnto the signes there is not signified the corporal presence of the thing but first a similitude of the things with their signes then a coniunction and vnion of the things with their signes in the right vse but in this sacrament Christ attributeth the name of the thing which is his bodie to the signe therefore there is not thereby signified a corporal presence of his bodie 4 The communion of Christ which is promised in his woorde and sacraments is not corporal but the communion of Christ which is giuen in the supper is the same with that which is giuen in the word and in all sacraments therefore the communion of Christ in the supper is spiritual 5 There is one and the same signification of all the Sacraments of the old and new testament
vnto vs of christs body euen as also it is coÌ„manded in the words of the institution Shew the Lords death til he come 5 The Analogie proportion of the sign the thing doth manifestly enough refel transubstantiatioÌ„ For in euery sacrament ar these two the sign the thing signified but the sign should perish if the bread should be transubstantiated that is if there shold be a change of the bread into christs body for so should remaine the thing signified onlie and not the signe therefore no sacrament Oâ—iection But the Accidents of bread and wine doe still remaine as whitenesse softnesse and such like Aunswere But so wil there not bee a proportion betweene the signe and the thing signified because accidents doe not nourish You can not say as the accidents of bread and wine nourish the body so the body of Christ nourisheth my soule vnto euerlasting life And further also the promise of God would by this meanes be made voide and frustrate For God promised that hee would giue the Messias not of the substaunce of wheat and wine but of the seede of Dauid Reply But we saie not that the bread and wine are conuerted into the substaunce of Christs bodie but that the substaunce of the bread and wine vanisheth quite awaie in place thereof succeedeth the substance of the bodie and bloud of Christ Aunswere Of this bread christ speaketh That it is his body and the same bread both before and in and after the administration of it is called bread Christ saith not this which is vnder the forme of bread is my body but he saith this that is this bread is my bodie And Paul saith The bread whith we breake is the communion of the bodie of Christ And againe For we that are many are one breade and one body Againe As often as yee shall eate this bread c. And a little after Whosoeuer shal eate this bread vnworthilie c. Moreouer Let a man examine himselfe and so let him eate of this bread Wherefore it is plaine and euident that the substaunce of bread and wine neither is changed neither perisheth neither lieth hid vnder a forme but remaineth stil the same bread and the same wine Nowe that there is no transubstantiation or conuersion of the substaunce of the breade and wine into the bodie of Christ is thus prooued If there bee anie transubstantiation christes institution is peruerted for it abolisheth and bringeth to nothing the substaunce of the bread which is the verie thing that in this ceremony is the body of christ For seing the bread is the body of Christ then doubtlesse if the bread remaine not neither doth the bodie of christ remaine in the supper and so christs woordes are no longer true when hee saide that that bread is his bodie and that wine his â—loud The Transubstantiaries if they be demaunded what thing it iâ— that they call the bodie of christ in the supper certainely they will not aunswere it is bread for they haue no bread left in the supper because it is transubstantiated but they will send vs to the very substance of christs body absolutely coÌ„sidered couered on the altar with the accidentes of bread Wherefore all they er who obiect and present the bodie of christ beeing considered by it selfe in it own proper matter and subiect to the external actions of the supper These and the former reasons refell consubstantiation also wherefore neither wil we bring any moe reasons seuerally against it Onely some certaine obiections of the Consubstantiaries themselues we will refute A refutation of obiections framed to confirme consubstantiation 1 OBiection Christ said This is my bodie But Christ is true Therefore we must beleeue him setting apart all Philosophicall subtiltie and sharpenes and so by consequent bread is not a signe of his bodie Aunswere Wee graunt their argument if they prooue that Christ putteth this to bee his meaning namely that Jn Vnder and With the bread is his bodie Replie But it is said here This is my bodie Aunswere In other sacramentes also are the like speeches as The Paschal Lambe is called the Passâ—ouer Bapâ—isme the washing of the newe-birth Circumcision the couenant Replie But we say not that the bread is the bodie of Christ reallie as the Papists say but that the bodie is in the bread Aunswere But in this respect the Papists seeme more to keep the word whom yet the Apostle expressely refuteth calling it bread both before the eating and in the eating and after the eating 2. It is no where saide either by Christ or by Saint Paul That the bodie of Christ is in the bread vnder the bread with the bread neither any where in scripture is this expressed But the true sense and meaning of those wordes is expressed in the text it self namely that the bread is the bodie of Christ symbolically that is as a symbole or tokeÌ„ of it For in the text it is plainly said Do this in remembrance of me So Paul also calleth the bread the communion of the bodie of christ Wherefore the bread is the representing or symbolical signifieng body of christ The bread is a sign of christs bodie but not a couert wherein his bodie it self remaineth 2 Obiection Christ is omnipotent Therefore his bodie may be there and so because he said it it is there Answere The reason is of no force which will conclude a thing to bee done because it may bee done Replie Whatsoeuer is at the right hand of God is euerie where Aunswere It is false For the sitting at the right hand of God signifieth the vnion of both natures in Christ his power and rule and excellencie of gifts Now although he rule all thinges yet is it not necessarie that hee shoulde bee present in bodie It is sufficient that his person is euery where and is present in dignitie As also hee sustained all thinges euen then when hee hung on the Crosse neither yet was his bodie euery where Therefore to say that christ sitteth at the right hand of the Father signifieth that christ is the person by whom the Father mediately gouerneth ruleth al things especiallie the church But no part of this Sitting is the vbiquitie of christs bodie it sufficeth that christs person is euery where 3 Obiection That which quickeneth and nourisheth vs is receiued into vs the bodie and bloud of christ doe quicken vs therefore they are receiued into vs. Aunswere The Maior is but meere particular and therefore false in general for not whatsoeuer quickeneth and nourisheth vs must necessarily be receiued into vs. That only must be receiued into vs necessarily which quickneth nourisheth naturally that is by a ioint-touching of our bodie This meate which so nourisheth vs after a naturall manner dooth not nourishe vs except thereby the substaunce of our bodie bee increased But wee speake farre otherwise of the nourishing of the soule which is spirituall Christes bodie doth not at all nourish vs naturally
so to make God such a one as hath entered a couenaunt and is in league with hypocrites and wicked men Now the couenaunt of God is two waies prophaned namelie as well by communicating and imparting the signes of the couenaunt to them vnto whom God promiseth nothing as by receiuing and vsing the signes without faith and repentance For not onely they prophane the couenant who being as yet impenitent take the signes of the couenant vnto them but they also who wittingly and willingly giue the signs vnto those whom god hath shut from his couenant They make therefore God a felowe friend of the wicked the son of the diuell the son of God whosoeuer reach the signes vnto the wicked Obiect Hee that giueth to him that abuseth it sinneth The church giueth the supper vnto hypocrits which abuse it Therefore the church sinneth Ans He that giueth the supper to one which abuseth it sinneth if he wittingly willingly doth it otherwise he sinneth not but they who abuse the supper purchase damnation to theÌ„selues But the godly are not made partakers of that prophanation of the couenant prophaned by the wicked if they knowe not the wicked approching vnto the supper neither doe willingly admit the wicked Reply If they sinne who giue the supper wittinglie to him that abuseth it then dooth the Minister also sinne if he distribute it vnto such a one where yet there is no sentence passed of excommunication Aunswere True if hee doe it willingly but if the church proceed not against such a man and the minister notwithstanding be instant vpon the Church and doe his duetie he is blamelesse and the sinne shall lie on others euen on the Church 2. They are not to bee admitted to the supper who professe not faith and repentaunce both in life and confession because if such should be admitted the church should stir vp the anger of God against her selfe as of whom wittinglie and willinglie this shoulde bee committed Nowe that by this meanes the wrath of God is stirrâ—d vp against the church the Apostle sufficiently witnesseth saying For this cause manie are weake and sicke among you and manie sleepe For if wee woulde iudge our selues we should not bee iudged God therefore is angrie with the consenters so punisheth them because he punisheth the wicked whom they coÌ„senting thereto admitted for by both the supper of the Lorde is alike prophaned 3. Christ hath coÌ„manded that the wicked be not admitted And if any denie that any such coÌ„mandment is extant yet the substance tenor of the commandement shal be easily prooued For christ instituted his supper for his disciples to theÌ„ alone he said I haue earnestlie desired to eate this Passeouer with you Take this and part it among you This is my bodie which is giuen for you This cup is the new testament in my bloud which is shed for you Wherefore the supper was instituted for Christes disciples onely all others for whom Christ died not are excluded But yet for all this those hypocrites are to bee admitted together with the godly vnto the supper who are not as yet manifested because they professe in confession and outward actions faith and repentance But none ought to approch thither but true beleeuers For these onely excepted all others yea euen those hypocrites which are not as yet manifested eate and drinke vnto themselues damnation and prophane the Lords sacred Supper Obiection They then who auoide the prophaning of the Lords Supper doe well but they who refraine from the Lordes supper in respect of some hatred they beare to others or for some other sinnes auoide the prophaning of the supper Therefore they doe well Answere They who auoid the prophaning of the supper doe well if they auoid it in such sort as they ought namely by repenting themselues of those sinnes which haue been the causes of their refraining CERTAINE CONCLVSIONS OF THE SVPPER 1 THE other sacrament of the new testament is called the supper of the Lord not as if it were necessarie that the church should celebrate it in the Euening or vsuall time of supper but because it was instituted of Christ in that supper which he last had with his Disciples before his death It is called the table of the Lord because Christ dooth feede vs in it It is called the sacrament of the bodie and bloud of christ because these are communicated and imparted vnto vs in it It is called the Eucharist because in it are giuen solemne thankes vnto Christ for his death and benefites It is called Synaxis or the conuent because it ought to be celebrated in the conuents and assemblies of the church It is called also of the auncient a sacrifice because it is a representation of the propitiatory sacrifice accomplished by Christ on the crosse and a thankes-giuing or Eucharistical sacrifice for the same There is a third reason also why they called it a sacrifice because the ancient were wont themselues to confer bread vnto it therefore were they said to offer that is to conferre and giue in seuerall bread to that vse 2 The supper of the lord is a sacrament of the new testament wherein according to the commandement of Christ bread and wine is distributed and receiued in the assemblie of the faithfull in remembraunce of christ which is that christ might testifie vnto vs that hee feedeth vs with his body and bloud deliuered and shed for vs vnto eternal life and that we also might for these his benefites giue solemne thankes vnto him 3 The first and principal end and vse of the Lords supper is that Christ might therein testifie vnto vs that hee died for vs and dooth feede vs with his bloude and body vnto euerlasting life that so by this testification hee might cherish and encrease in vs our faith and so consequently this spirituall foode and nourishment The second end is thankes-giuing for these benefites of Christ and our publique and solemne profession of them and our duty towards christ The third is the distinguishing of the church from other sectes The fourth That it might be a bond of mutual loue and dilection The fift That it might be a bond of our assemblies and meetinges 4 That first ende and vse which is the confirmation of our faith in Christ the supper of the Lord hereof hath because Christ himselfe giueth this bread and drink by the hands of his ministers to be a memorial of him that is to admonish and put vs in remembraunce by this signe as by his visible word that he died for vs and is the foode of eternall life vnto vs while hee maketh vs his members both because he hath annexed a promise to this rite that hee wil feede those who eate this bread in remembraunce of him with his owne bodie and bloud when he saith This my body and also because the holy ghost doth by this visible testimony moue our minds and harts more firmely to beleeue the promise of the
gospel 5 There is then in the Lords supper a double meat and drink one externall visible terrene namely bread and wine and another internall There is also a double eating and receiuing an external and signifieng which is the corporall receiuing of the bread and wine that is which is perfourmed by the handes mouth and senses of the bodie and an internal inuisible and signified which is the fruition of Christes death and a spirituall engraffing into Christes bodie that is which is not perfourmed by the handes and mouth of the bodie but by the spirite and faith Lastly there is a double administer and dispenser of this meat and drinke an externall of the externall which is the minister of the church deliuering vs by his hand bread and wine and an internal of the internal meate which is Christ himselfe feeding vs by his body and bloud 6 Not the body and bloud of Christ but the bread and wine are the signes which serue for confirmation of our faith for the bodie and bloud of Christ are receiued that we may liue for euer But the bread and wine are receiued that wee maie bee confirmed and assured of that heauenlie foode and dailie more and more enioie it 7 Neither is the bread changed into the bodie of Christ nor the wine into the bloud of Christ neither doth the bodie and bloud of Christ succeed in their place they beeing abolished neither is Christs body substantially present in the bread or vnder the bread or where the bread is but in the right vse of the Lords supper the holy Ghost vseth this Symbole as an instrument to stirre vp faith in vs by which he more and more dwelleth in vs engraffeth vs into Christ and maketh vs thorough him to bee iust and righteous and to draw eternal life from him 8 Now when Christ saith This that is this bread is my body and This cup is my bloud the speech is sacramental or metonymical because the name of the thing signified is attributed to the sign it selfe that is it is meant that the bread is the sacrament or signe of his bodie and doth represent him and dooth testifie that Christes bodie is offered for vs on the crosse and is giuen vnto vs to be the foode of eternal life and therefore is the instrument of the holie Ghost to maintaine and encrease this food in vs as Saint Paul saith 1. Corinth 10. The bread is the communion of the bodie of Christ that is it is that thing by which wee are made partakers of christs bodie And elsewhere hee saith We haue been al made to drink into one spirit The same is the meaning also when it is said that the bread is called christes bodie for a similitude which the thing signified hath with the signe namely in that christes body nourisheth the spirituall life as breade dooth the corporall life and for that assured and certaine ioint receiuing of the thing and the signe in the right vse of the sacrament And this is the sacramental vnion of the bread which is shewed by a sacramental kinde of speaking but no such locall coniunction which is by some imagined 9 As therefore the body of christ signifieth both his proper and natural bodie and his sacramental bodie which is the bread of the Eucharist so the eating of Christes body is of two sorts one sacramental of the signe to wit the externall and corporall receiuing of the bread and wine the other reall or spirituall which is the receiuing of christs very body it selfe And to belâ—eue in christ dwelling in vs by faith is by the vertue operatioÌ„ of the holy ghost to be engraffed into his bodie as members to the head branches into the vine and so to bee made partakers of the frutie of the deâ—th and life of christ Whence it is apparant that they are falsly accused who thus teach as if they made either the bare signes onely to be in the Lords Supper or a partâ—cipation of christes death onelie or of his benefits or of the holy Ghost excluding the true reall spirituall communion of the very body of Christ it selfe 10 Now the right vse of the Supper is when the faithfull obserue this rite instituted by Christ in remembraunce of Christ that is to the stirring and raising vp of their faith and thankefulnesse 11 As in this right vse the bodie of Christ is sacramentallie eaten so also without this vse as by vnbeleeuers and hypocrites it is eaten sacramentally indeede but not reallie that is the sacramental Symboles or signes bread and wine are receiued but not the thinges themselues of the sacrament to wit the bodie and bloud of Christ 12 This doctrine of the supper of the Lord is grounded vpon verie manie and those most sound and firme reasons All those places of Scripture confirme it which speake of the Lords supper and Christ calling not anie inuisible thing in the bread but the verie visible and broken bread it selfe his bodie deliuered or broken for vs which whereas it cannot bee meant properlie himselfe addeth an exposition that that bread is truely receiued in remembraunce of him which is as if he had said That the bread is a sacrament of his bodie So likewise he saith the supper is the new testament which is spirituall one and euerlasting And Paul saith it is the communion of the bodie and bloud of Christ because al the faithful are one bodie in christ who cannot stand together with the communion of Diuels Likewise he maketh one and the same engraffing into christes bodie by one spirit to bee both in Baptisme and in the Lords Supper Moreouer the whole doctrine and nature of sacramentes confirme the same all which represent vnto the eies the same spirituall communion of christ to bee receiued by faith which the word or promise of the Gospel declareth vnto the eares Therefore they are called by the names of the thinges signified and in their right vse haue the receiuing of the thinges adioined vnto them The Articles also of our faith confirme it which teach that christs bodie is a true humane bodie not present at once in manie places as being now receiued into heauen and there to remain vntil the Lorde returne to iudgement and further that the communion of Saintes with christ is wrought by the holie Ghost not by anie entraunce of christs bodie into the bodies of men Wherefore this sentence and doctrine is of all the purer antiquitie of the church with most great and manifest consent held and professed 13 The Supper of the Lord differeth from Baptisme 1. Jn the Rite and manner of signifieng because the dipping into the water or washing signifieth a remission and purging out of sinne by the bloud and spirit of Christ and our societie fellowship with christ in his afflictions and glorification But the distributing of the bread and wine signifieth the death of Christ to bee imputed to vs vnto remission of sinnes and our selues engraffed into Christ
to haue ascended from a lower place into an higher and to remaine in heauen vntill hee come to iudgement Nowe that some except That Christ dooth descend from heauen as oft as the supper is administred it is already refuted 4 We take not awaie the doctrine of the properties of christs humanitie Answere They altogether take it away For they wil haue his humane nature to be such as is not seene nor felt nor limited in place Reply But christ did put off these infirmities reteined the essential properties Answere But these are verie essential properties which being taken away the verity also and truth of his humane nature is taken awaie Austine saith Take awaie from bodies their spaces and they shall be no where 5 We abolish not the Doctrine concerning the communicating of properties of both natures Aunswere Yea but they endeuour it For they apply those properties of his diuine nature which are affirmed of the whole person in the concrete to both natures J wil be with you to the ende of the world This they vnderstand of both natures which is all one as if when it is said Christ God and man was circumcised one should thus conclude Therefore the godhead of Christ was circumcised as wel as his flesh Replie This onelie wee adde That those Articles belong to them Aunswere After this sort all sectes may shift off all testimonies of Scriptures But they belong hither and that by a double right 1. Because they are written of the bodie of Christ But the body of Christ belongeth to the supper Therefoâ—e these Articles also belong hither For they shew how Christs bodie is to be eaâ—en 2 They belong hither because no Article of faith is at variaunce with another So belongeth hither also the Doctrine of iustification because in the â—upper no other iustice or righteousnes must bee sought for but by the bloud of Christ 6 The manner how we eate it is not to bee defined Answere They commit a double fault in so saying 1. When they denie that the maner is to be defined and so contradict and gain saie the Scripture which defineth it and sheweth that it is spiritual that there is wrought an vnion with Christ by faith through the holy Ghost 2. They themselues define the manner as it clearly appeareth by their writings 7 The saieng of Durandus is true We heare the woords we perceiue the motions we know not the manner we beleeue the presence Aunswere Durandus maketh nought either for you or against vs or for himselfe because he was a Papist And againe if his saying be rightly vnderstoode we may admit it We heare the words This is my bodie not that we eate with our mouth the bodie of Christ in the breade Wee perceiue the motions that is we perceiue the bread to enter into our mouth not the bodie of Christ We know not the maner that is not perfectly to wit after what maner the holy Ghost is eueriewhere whole in Christ and in al the Saints and how he vniteth vs in Christ We beleeue the presence namely such as is the eating and as is the vnion of the members and the head 8 We teach this onelie That the bodie and bloud of christ is trulie substantiallie and naturallie exhibited Aunswere Wee grant that we eat the true bodie of Christ So then is their disputation vaine and friuolous First Because they confesse that wee are made partakers of the true bodie of christ and that wee must not question of the manner For this wee graunt Secondly Because the reasons and refutations which they bring are of no weight or moment Certaine reasons whereby is proued That the bodie of Christ is not present either in or vnder or at the bread of the Lords Supper neither is corporallie eaten Vnder With Jn or At the Bread 1 BEcause hee tooke a true humane nature Whereunto wee ad also that wee cannot eate him otherwise than his disciples did in the first Supper 2. He truely ascended out of earth into heauen 3. Such is our eating of him as his abiding is in vs. 4. All the Saints of the old and new Testament haue the same vnion with Christ 5 Christ onely is able to offer himselfe vnto his Father Now it is necessarie in the vse of the Supper to craue of God remission of sinnes Wherefore if he bee present at the bread we must craue of him and so wee offer the bread But in the New testament it is not lawfull to direct our prayer to any certaine place 6. The blessings which are promised vnto the godly onely are spirituall Vnto these and other fore alleaged reasons commeth the consent of the auncient Fathers Ambrose Athanasius Austine Basil Bede Bertram Chrysostome ClemeÌ„s Alexandrinus the councell of Nice Ciprian Cyrill Denis Gelasius Gregorie the Great Gregorie Nazianzene Hezichius Hierom Hilarie Irenaeus Justine Leo Macharius Origen Procopius Gaza Tertullian and so forth THE SECOND APPENDIX OR ADDITION Arguments whereby the opinion of Vbiquitaries is refelled and the truth of sound doctrine confirmed THE FIRST ARGVMENT THE Marcionites and Manichees imagined that Christ had not a true and solid bodie but onely made shew of the shape of a bodie so that hee seemed onely to haue flesh and bones whereas indeed hee had them not And further that the verie incarnation and al the motions and operations of christ did but only seeme so in outward appearaÌ„ce whereas in the truth of the thing there was no such thing done Now the opinion of Vbiquitie and of the reall communicating of the properties of both natures doth raise againe from Hel that phantasticall dotarie and frensie of those heretiques Therefore it is no lesse to bee abandoned and banished out of the church to Hell than that heresie of the Manichees That this opinion of Vbiquitie doth giue life againe to the former wee proue The Vbiquitaries are of opinion and so teach That all the properties of the Godhead were presently from the verie point of Christs conception reallie effused from the Godhead of the woorde into the humane nature which christ tooke Hence these absurdities will folow 1. Christ shall not be truely borne of the Virgine if as touching the nature of his humanitie he was truely and essentiallie without the wombe of his mother before hee was borne and after hee was borne hee remained no lesse truely and substantiallie as touching his humanitie in that selfe-same wombe than before 2. Christ was not truely weake in his humane nature and subiect to passions if hee were then also as touching the same nature partaker of the Diuine maiestie and omnipotencie 3. Hee was not truely dead if also in the time of his death as touching his soule and bodie hee were essentiallie present euerie where together with his Godhead For the soul being euerie where present could not be really separated in distance of places from the bodie which also should be euerie where present and so neither could the body die but onely
therefore neither doe we so cheerfullie and perfectlie as we ought perfourme these workes vnto God and our neighbour J see another Law in my members rebelling against the Lawe of my minde And this is the cause why the works of the godly cannot stand in iudgement 4 How our workes though not perfectlie good please God ALbeit our works be not done according vnto the Law but are contrariwise manie waies defiled they please God notwithstanding through faith and for the merit and intercession of Christ our Mediatour remaining now also intercessour for vs with his Father Whence Christ is called our High-Priest by whom our woorks are offered hee is called also the Altar wheron our works being put are pleasing to God whereas otherwise they would stincke in the sight of God The works of the person which pleaseth god so please God as the person himselfe doth Nowe the person pleaseth God by the imputation of the righteousnesse and sanctification or satisfaction of Christ beeing clad namelie with the righteousnes puritie and sanctification of Christ that is the person pleaseth God for the Mediatours sake and therefore the woorks also of the person are for the Mediatours sake pleasing and acceptable vnto god God doth not examine our vnperfect iustice our works as they are in themselues according to the rigour of the Law according to which he should rather condemn them but he regardeth and considereth them in his son Whereof it foloweth that we do as it were supplie and repaire our want defect with the perfection of Christs satisfaction 5 Why we are to doe good works OVT of the doctrine of free satisfaction humane reason reasoneth on this wise He is not bound himselfe to satisfie for whom another hath alreadie satisfied Christ hath satisfied for vs. Therefore there is no neede for vs to doe good woorks Aunswere There is more in the conclusion of this reason than in the premisses For this onely should follow be concluded Therefore we our selues are not bound to satisfie and this wee grant 1 In respect of Gods iustice which doth not exact a double paiment 2 In respect of our own saluation which otherwise should be none at all Reply Satisfaction is perfect obedience we are not bound to satisfaction Therefore neither are we bound to perfect obedience no not in the life to come For whō another hath satisfied for he himselfe is not enforced to satisfie But the obedience of Christ is not a ful satisfaction for our sinnes Therefore the fomer consequence is true Aunswere There is yet more concluded than the premisses would afford For this should followe that obedience is neuer at any time to bee performed of vs as thereby to satisfie for our sins already cōmitted or which shall be committed vntill the end of our life But it followeth not hereof that wee must not bee perfect in the life to come For then also wee shall bee bound to perfect obedience we shall be like vnto the Angels and our worke shall be perfectly good although that perfect obedience then due neither shall nor can be a satisfaction or ransome for our sinnes to wit for that obedience which we omitted in this life and yet was due to be performed of vs. For he that oweth twenty florens doth not pay his debt if he repay ten florens Wherefore the Maior proposition hath a double meaning and is true if it be taken in this sense whom an other hath satisfied for hee himselfe is not bound to satisfie to wit for those thinges for which satisfaction was made before So we are not bound to satisfie for our sinnes which we now commit For Christ hath fully perfectly satisfied his Father for all our sinnes and hath performed perfect obedience vnto the Lawe in our behalfe which otherwise wee shoulde haue performed in this life vnto the lawe and which we in this life omit and are no way able to perfourme Now for this end hath Christ satisfied for vs and redeemed vs by his bloud that at length we might in the life to come cease from sinne and performe that obedience vnto him which then we are to performe Neither dooth it for all this hereof followe that God requireth a double obedience or satisfaction of vs. For God excteth obedience hence-forward of vs as thereby to shewe our thankefulnesse and not to satisfie for those sins which we commit in this life For wee are neuer able to satisfie by that obedience which we owe for that obedience which we doe not performe neither is there any other besides Christs satisfaction required for that obedience which is not performed by vs in this life this satisfaction of christ is sufficient to expiate and doe away all our sinnes God notwithstanding doth in this life also require of vs this our obedience though yet it be but begun and vnperfect For seeing God so greatly hated sinne that satisfaction could not be made vnto him for sinne but by the death of his only begotten Sonne wee verily must also hate it euen as himselfe also cōmandeth vs to fly abhor it from our hart and soule And Christ hath not therefore freely redeemed vs that it might hence forwarde be lawful for vs to giue our selues ouer vnto sinne but that being freed from sinne wee should hereafter begin to liue to him onely This end of our redemption which Christ himselfe respected is cause sufficient for which al of vs should necessarily doe good workes because namelie they are testimonies and effectes of that new life which is at length after this life to be accōplished Besides this cause there are manie others also in like sort most weightie which we wil in few words declare We are to doe good woorkes in respect of God our selues and our neighbour In respect of God 1. Because of the commandement of God Let your light so shine before men that they maie see your good workes and glorifie your Father which is in heauen God requireth the beginning of obedience in this life and the perfection thereof in the life to come Wherefore we are necessarilie to giue our selues to good workes that wee maie perfourme due obedience vnto God who requireth it of vs. Joh. 15·12 This is my commaundement that yee loue one another Rom. 6.18 Beeing made free from sinne yee are made the seruantes of righteousnes 1. Thess 4.3 This is the wil of God euen your sanctification 2. For the glorie of God The setting foorth of Gods glorie is the chiefe end why God commaundeth and wil haue good works to be don of vs that both by them we maie worship and magnifie god and others seeing the same maie glorifie our heauenly father like as that saying of christ before alleadged out of S. Matthew doth teach vs. 3 Because of that thankefulnes which the regenerat ow. It is right and iust that by whom we are redeemed and from whom we receiue exceeding great benefites and those of al sorts we should also loue magnifie worship
is vrged when obedience cannot possibly bee performed But here it is necessarie that we distinguish and discerne the nature of men corrupted from it selfe being vncorrupted For in nature beeing not as yet depraued or corrupted through sinne there were and shal be againe also in nature perfectly restored these two vses of gods lawe especially The first is the whole and entire conformity of man with god For there did shine and againe shall shine in the minde of man the perfect knowledge of god and his will and the same did woorke againe shal worke the correspondence and congruity of all our inclinations and motions with this diuine order that is perfect iustice and righteousnesse before god For the mind iudging aright doth rightlie also gouern guide the hart wil not being through stubburnesse peruerted depraued Nowe that both there was perfect knowledge of the law in mans nature not yet fallē and did woorke also in it perfect conformity with god the doctrine concerning the image of god doth testify whereunto man was created which is by Christ in vs restored The other vse of the Law in nature vncorrupted is a good conscience or a certaine perswasion of gods fauour and a certaine hope of eternall life For when as the Lawe both commandeth perfect obedience and promiseth eternall life to those that perfourme it Therfore it worketh in nature vncorrupted as perfect obedience so also certaine expectation of the reward according as it is saide Leuit. 18. Rom. 10. Gal. 3. He that doth them shall liue in them Mat. 19. If thou wilt enter into life keepe the commaundements But in nature now corrupted there are other effects or vses of the Law those partly accidental partly the remaines of those proper effectes which it hath in nature vncorrupted partly in the regenerate partly in the vnregenerate As therefore the whole Law is a Schoolemaster to Christ so likewise is the Morall whereof the first vse is both in the regenerate and vnregenerate the preseruing and mantaining of discipline both in the church and without also For the Lawe both being by god himselfe engrauen in the mindes of all men and speaking by the voice of teachers magistrats doth by binding of the conscience and by denouncing ordaining of punishments by shame bridle restraine the vnregenerate also so that they shunne open and manifest wickednesse and some order is thereby kept in the world amiddest the furies of Diuels and wicked men that mankinde may be preserued and the church thence collected and gathered 1. Tim. 1.9 The Law is giuen to the lawlesse and disobedient But albeit this vse of the law doth chiefely belong vnto the vnregenerate who are not bridled by the loue of god and righteousnesse but by the feare of punishment onely shame not to make open profession of wickednesse yet hath it place also in the godly For they indeede haue another bridle whereby they are guided euen the holy ghost illightening and inclining their harts vnto obedience but yet by reason of the weakenes and corruption of the flesh prone to sinne experience teacheth that this chaine and bonde also is profitable and necessary for them for the shunning and auoiding of transgressions Many places also of Scripture witnesse this which threaten euen vnto the saintes if they run into grieuous offences grieuous punishments As Ezech. 18. If the righteous turne away from his righteousnesse and commit iniquity hee shall die for it And the examples of punishmentes as of Eli of Dauid and many others For therefore both threatnings and examples are set before the godly to keepe them in good order The second vse is the acknowledgement and accusing of sinne in the regenerate and vnregenerate Rom. 3.20 By the Law commeth the knowledge of sinne Rom. 7.7 J knew nothing but by the Lawe for neither had I knowen lust except the Law had said Thou shalt not lust This vse of the Law belongeth vnto all men because all haue so much knowledge of the Lawe as is sufficient to breede in them a pricke and remorse of conscience But there is a double effect hereof For in the vnregenerate the knowledge of sin of the iudgement of God against sin engendereth an hatred of god an increase of sinne For so much the more doth nature not yet regenerated desire to commit and excuse sinne and murmureth against gods iudgemēt how much the more the law vrgeth and presseth the prohibition and condemnation of sinne Rom. 4.15 The Law causeth wrath Rom. 7. Sinne took an occasion by the commandement and wrought in mee al manner of concupiscence Moreouer if those vnregenerate be also reprobate then woorketh it at length in them despaire and blasphemy Therefore 2. Cor. 3. it is called the ministery of death But in the elect the knowledge of sinne is a preparing of them vnto conuersion For it woorketh in them a desire of Gods fauour and of deliuerance from sinne enforceth them despairing of their own righteousnesse to seeke for righteousnesse and life in Christ their Mediatour And after they are once conuerted it continually instructeth them with due contrition truely to humble themselues in the sight of God and maketh them to profit and goe forwarde daily in true conuersion vnto God and in the dread fear of God Now although many wicked men beeing blinded with security doe not acknowledge their sinne for a time yet the Law accuseth all and the terrours and torments of conscience doe at length oppresse them Vnto the regenerate also although they neither are subiect to damnation neither liue without the acknowledgement and bewailing of their sinne yet necessary is the preaching meditation of the Law that thereby they more and more knowing the remnants of sinne which are in them may continue and go foreward in true repentance and amendment of life Moreouer concerning both these vses namely the maintenance of Discipline and acknowledgement of sinne it is said that the Lawe is a Schoolemaster vnto Christ For neither can men be instructed concerning god neither doth the holy ghost woorke faith and conuersion in their heartes except open and manifest transgressions be eschewed and they persist not in sinnes against their conscience Jsai 66. J will regard the poore and contrite in spirite Rom. 8.13 If yee mortifie the deedes of the bodie by the spirite ye shall liue but if yee liue after the fleshe ye shall die Neither do they indeede seeke for desire earnestly deliueraunce from sinne and death who doe not truely knowe and agnise the greatnesse of sinne Joh. 9.41 If yee were blind yee should not haue sinne but now yee say Wee see Therefore your sinne remaineth The third vse of the moral Law is proper vnto the regenerate to witte an instructing and informing of them concerning the true seruice and woorship of God This is done by the doctrine of the Lawe in teaching and exhorting For seeing there are yet remaining manifold ignorāces
by necessity excluded from it But such a communion of saints with Christ is spirituall as the Apostle doth shew 1. Cor. 6.17 Hee that is ioined vnto the Lorde is one spirit 1. Ioh. 4.13 Hereby know we that we dwel in him and he in vs because he hath giuen vs of his spirit Iohn 15.5 He is the vine we are the branches Ephes 1.22 4.15 5.30.31 He is the Bridegroome and we with the whole Church are his spouse 2 Such is our eating of Christ as is his abiding in vs but this is spirituall For that Christs abiding in vs is spirituall is sufficientlie perceiued by this in that such is his abiding in vs as is his Fathers Jf anie man loue me he will keepe my woord and my Father will loue him and we will come vnto him and will dwell with him But how doth the Father dwell in vs or abide with vs Truely by his spirite Therefore Christ also so abideth with vs or dwelleth in vs. 3 Christ abideth in vs perpetually Therefore that abiding or presence is not corporall because as touching his humane nature he saith Me yee shall not haue alwaies Therefore hee is not eaten of vs corporallie nay hee cannot be eaten of vs corporallie except he be in vs corporally and that also perpetuallie 3 Vnto the former mâ—y be adioined also argumentes taken from the sacrifice and adoration Wheresoeuer Christ is present corporallie whether it be after a visible or inuisible manner there he is to be adored to wit by our mindes and the motions of our bodies coÌ„uerted turned thither But he is not to be adored in the supper Therefore he is not present in the supper corporally That he is not to be adored in the supper is easilie proued For it is neuer granted in the new testament to tie bind inuocation to anie certain place Ioh. 4.21 The houre commeth when yee shal neither in this mountain nor at Ierusalem worship the father Againe Jf christ be so be adored worshipped in the supper by our mindes and motions of bodie conuerted vnto the bread that whole oblation sacrifice should consist in the hands of sacrificing masse-Priests because they offer the Son vnto the Father to obtain remission of sins and so were his crucifieng to be reiterated The third sort of argumentes which are drawen from like places of scripture where namelie the same thing is deliuered in words whereof there is no controuersie 1 COrporall eating is in expresse termes condemned by the holie Ghost Jt is the spirite saith Christ that quickeneth the flesh profiteth nothing By these woordes Christ expressely condemneth the corporal eating of his flesh whether visible or inuisible 2 The bread which we break saith the Apostle is the coÌ„munion of the body of christ But this coÌ„munioÌ„ is spiritual because when the same Apostle opposeth it to the communion of diuels ye caÌ„not saith he drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of diuels yee cannot be partakers of the lords table and of the table of Diuels by these words the Apostle denieth that the wicked can be partakers of the bodie and blood of christ in the supper And therefore there is no corporall eating of the body and bloude of christ in his supper 3 Christ saith that the bread is his bodie Therefore they tie not themselues to the verie woorde who say that christs body is in the bread vnder the bread with the bread 4 The cup is the new testament that is the cup is a signe of the new testament for it cannot bee otherwise meant or taken For the new testament is the seale of the promise or the promise it self but not the thing promised Likewise The cup is the communion of the bloud of christ The bread is the communion of the body of christ But this communion is a spirituall eating and drinking of the body and bloud of christ as is apparaunt by the wordes of the Apostle and the signes of that spiritual eating and drinking are bread and wine 5 In the Euangelist To eat christ which is the liuing bread which descended from heauen Likewise To eat Christs flesh and to drinke his bloud signifieth to beleeue in Christ Therefore in the words of the institutioÌ„ it signifieth the same also because christ doth not here otherwise expound them 6 There are also the like places of scripture vttered sacramentally of other sacramentes which confirme also the truth and meaning of this as Circumcision is the couenant The lamb is the Passeouer The leuitical sacrifices are said to be an expiation or doing away of sinne The bloud of sacrifices is called the bloud of the couenant Baptisme is the washing of the new birth Therefore these woords also This is my bodie are in like sort sacramentally spoken 7 Christ commaundeth his supper to bee celebrated and the bread wine to be eaten drunken in remembrance of him but this remeÌ„brance is chiefly performed by faith not corporally Moreouer that in memorial wherof we doe any thing is not it selfe present because we are not said to remember things that are present 8 By one spirite are we al baptized into one bodie whether we be Iewes or Grecians whether we be bond or free and haue been al made to drinke into one spirite Wherefore after the same maner doe we al eate the same bread Which Paul also manifestly sheweth affirming That al the Fathers did eate the same spirituall foode That eating therefore is not corporall whereby we are made partakers of the body and bloud of christ otherwise before the comming of christ the fathers should not haue beene at al made partakers of christ as hauing not as yet taken flesh Vnto these argumentes drawen out of the sacred Scripture and the ground of our faith may be added testimonies of the fathers and the purer church of al which we will at this present bring only that one notable saying of Macharius the Monke Bread and wine are a correspondent type of his flesh and they who receiue the bread which is shewed eate the flesh of Christ spirituallie AGAINST THE TRANSVBSTANTIATION OF THE PAPISTES NOW it is easy to see what we are to thinke of Transubstantiation euen that it is an impious inuention deuise of the Papists which also we wil shew and proue briefly by diuers reasons 1 Paul calleth expressely that which is taken bread both before after the eating Therefore that which is taken in the supper is not really the body 2 Christ brake bread but hee did not then breake his body Therefore the bread is not really his body 3 The Bread was not giuen for vs But the body of christ was giuen for vs Therefore the bread is not really Christs body 4 Christ willeth vs to take this sacrament and to take bread and wine in remembraunce of him Therefore the bread is called the body of Christ not reallie but in that it is a memorial of his body that is the bread is a remembrauncer