whole space and time coming between the soules are live feele understand out of the body though the manner of their operations without the body be to us unknown Wherefore also this gift of immortality hath some similitude with God who alone 1 Tim. 6.16 as the onely fountaine and author of life hath immortality Lastly the resurrection of the flesh presupposeth the immortality of the soule so that we beleeve the one with the other For that the same body should rise againe necessary it is that it be quickned with the same substantiall forme it once injoyed which is the soule For not every change of an accidentary forme maketh another individuall but one and the same individuall still remaineth as long as one and the same matter is quickned with the same essentiall forme Now if the soule die and God create another soule and seat it in the body then not the same but a diverse forme quickneth the body and so it shall not be the same Individuall But it shall be the same Individuall as in the fifth of these questions it is proved Therefore it must needs be quickned with the selfe-same soule But furthermore Man should have lived immortally if he had not sinned Rom. 5.12 Rom. 6.23 Gen. 3.24 That man should have led a blessed life immortally and for ever not in soule onely but also in body if he had not purchased death and mortality unto himselfe by sinne is proved 1. Because by sinne death entered into the world as the wages of sinne 2. Because we being freed from sinne by Christ are also freed from death 3. Because God himselfe did withdraw from man being made by sinne subject unto death the signe or sacrament of immortality which was the fruit of the tree of life Wherefore their objections are nought worth who imagine the soule after death to sleep or vanish away Gen. 2.7 1 Cor. 15.45 For Adam is said to have been made a living soule not simply as these will have it like as other living creatures are termed in the same place living soules but as being made to the image and similitude of God which he hath not in common with other creatures Sundry places of Scripture alledged against the immortality of the soule interpreted according to their right sâ—nse and meaning Object 1. God saith In the day that thou eatest of the tree of knowledge of good and evill thou shalt die the death Answ He doth not threaten unto man the destruction or extinguishing of his soule but eternall death that is the horrible feeling and terrours of Gods wrath and judgement and to live forsaken and cast from God subject to all miseries and torments an adjoynt of which death is the separation of the soule and body which at that time through the mercy of God that mankind might be saved was deferred For so was Adam dead while yet he lived in Paradise according to Gods denouncement Genes 2.17 Ephes 2.5 Ephes 5.14 even as soone as he had eaten of the forbidden fruit So in eternall death live all the damned and reprobate Whose fire shall not be put out and their worme not die So they are said to be dead through sinne who live in sinne without repentance And he is willed to rise from the dead who is reclaimed from sin to God Rom. 7.10 11. and S. Paul saith he was dead through the knowledge of his sin and the wrath of God Object 2. The dead are said to sleep Acts 7.60 Ans But this is by a * Synecdoche figure of speech translating that which is proper unto the body to the whole man For that this belongeth to the body which is to be re-called from death to life as it were from sleep to wake again many places declare as Behold now I sleep in the dust For not the soul 1 Cor. 1â— 30 but the body only sleepeth in the dust and grave Object 3. The Preacher saith The condition of the children of men and the condition of beasts are even as one condition unto them Therefore there is no immortality of soule Ans 1. It is a fallacy concluding that which is in some respect so to be simply so Indeed the condition of both man and beast is equall as touching the necessity of dying imposed on both for men as well as beasts must needs once die and depart out of this life because men are not to continue here for ever but it is decreed that all must die and so they have here no setled place But the Preachers meaning is not that the condition of man and beast is all one concerning the event ensuing after death for the soules of beasts are extinguished and vanish away then when their bodies die but the souls of men as hath been proved by the fore-rehearsed testimonies remain alive after the death of their bodies Ans 2. We deny the Antecedent for the Preacher speaketh of mans death not as he himselfe thought of it in his own heart but as it seemeth in the sense and judgement of the wicked and profane vulgar sort of men built and grounded on the outward apparent likelihood of events betiding both the good and evill For to the doctrine of Gods providence and just judgement whereby one day the good shall be crowned with good things and the evill recompenced with evill to this I say he adjoineth by way of objection a lamentable complaint of mans erroneous judgement Object 4. Blessednesse and the kingdome promised to the godly is said then first to fall unto them at the last day Ans These places shew not Mat. 24.25 Mark 13. Dan. 12. that the souls of the godly do not presently when they depart from their bodies enjoy celestiall blessednesse and joy but that at the last day when their bodies are raised again their felicity and glory shall be consummated and made absolute for so we pray Thy kingdome come when yet God now also reigneth in us Object 5. He that is blessed and happy befâ—re the resurrection is not without the resurrection most miserable But wee without the resurrection should be of all men most miserable If in this life only we have hope we are of all men most miserable 1 Cor. 15.9 Therefore we are not before the resurrection blessed and happy Ans to the Major Hee is not miserable without the resurrection who can not only before it but without it also be blessed But we are in such wise blessed before it that notwithstanding without it following and insuing we cannot enjoy that former blessednesse because God hath joyned with so inseparable a knot the beginning and proceeding and finishing or perfection of the elects blessednesse that none can have the beginning who must not come to the end and consummation thereof Wherefore either we must rise again or we must want also that celestiall blessednesse before the resurrection If the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you
they are sins For all sinnes of what quality soever they be are punished either with eternall pain as in the Reprobate or with equivalent paine to eternall as in the Son of God This death doth begin in the Reprobate even in this world that is anxiety and torment of conscience which we also should feele except we were delivered by the grace of God Now by the name of eternall death is not understood the destruction of the soule or body or the separation of them but the abandoning and banishing of the soule and body living from the face of God a continuall horrour and torment and a feeling and flying of Gods wrath and judgement a horrible murmuring against God taking vengeance of their sins If they object That the sinnes of those who beleeve in Christ are not punished with eternall death We answer that those were punished in Christ with a punishment which both for the grievousnesse of the punishment and for the dignity of the person who suffered it is equivalent to those eternall punishments which were to be inflicted upon us for our sins As it is said Isa 53.6 He hath laid upon him the iniquity of us all Against that which we affirm That eternall death is the effect of all sins yea even of the least some thus dispute Ob. Like is not to be given to things unlike but sins are not like Therefore all ought not to be punished with eternall death Answ There is more in the conclusion of this reason The regenerate though they sin are not punished with this death because Christ hath suffered an equivalent punishment for them Why the during of punishment ought to be alike to all sins but not the degree of punishment Luke 12.47 Mat. 11.24 All sins are not equall then was in the premisses for only this followeth to be concluded Therefore all sins ought not to be punished with like punishment For all sinnes even the least deserve eternall punishment because all sins offend against the eternall and infinite good Wherefore as concerning the durance and lasting of the punishment all sins are punished with like punishment but not as concerning the degrees of punishment All sins are punished with eternall torments yet so as not with equall torments The servant who knoweth the will of his Master and doth it not shall be beaten with many stripes It shall be easier for them of the land of Sodome in the day of judgement then for thee Greater sins shall be punished with more grievous torments and lesser sins with lighter but both for ever Here the Stoicks object That all sins or vices are joyned with any one vice and therefore all are like and equall But neither is this consequence of force whereas also things unlike unequall may be joyned together neither is the Antecedent granted that seemeth to be proved by the saying of James He that faileth in one Jam. 2.10 is guilty of all But James saith not that all sins or vices concurre and are joyned with one but first that in the breach of one point the whole Law is violated as the whole body is said to be hurt when one part is harmed Then that there concurreth with every sin the fountain or cause of all other sins that is the contempt of God And this evill being seated in the heart doth violate the love of God and so all other parts of our obedience towards God For no worke which proceedeth not from the perfect love dread reverence of God can agree with the Law of God or please God And yet have we experience that this hindreth not but that which is infected with one vice may be propense and prone to some sins more and to some lesse especially since vices themselves also are one opposite to another by the one of which contraries and not by both at one time every man violateth vertue Neither are those principles also of the Stoicall Philosophers to be granted That how farre soever thou goe in sinning after thou hast once past the line or middle which is vertue it is not materiall for the increasing or augmenting the fault of passing beyond the line and that all vertues are alike and equall one to another so that no man is stronger then a strong man For whereas sin is a swerving from the middle it is manifest that how much greater the swerving is so much is the sin more grievous And that vertues are both in the same and in divers men other-whiles greater other-whiles lesser even as much as the qualities of the body are different in degrees experience doth witnesse Wherefore in the judgement of God also there are degrees put as well of punishments as of sins The use of this doctrine of sin in the Church It is requisite that this doctrine be knowne in the Church 1. That knowing how great an evill sin is we may yeeld the praise of justice unto God who doth most severely punish it 2. That we may abhorre all sins with our whole heart and desire the more earnestly to be fenced and defended of God against all sin 3. That by extenuating or lessning any wee flatter not our selves in a conceit of our owne righteousnesse or in hope of escaping 4. That measuring our sin by the Law of God neither esteeming evill for good or good evill we loose not our consciences when God bindeth them nor bind them when God looseth them and acknowledging the remnant of sin in us and our manifold fallings wee should not despaire of pardon flying to God the Mediatour with boldnesse 5. That also wee may be able to discerne our selves from the wicked and profane men in whom sin reigneth and from all those that sin against the holy Ghost and that wee may conceive in our mind hope and confidence of Gods mercy 6. That wee lay not the cause or fault of our sins and destruction on God but remember that it is to be sought in our selves 7. That knowing there are degrees of punishments and sins we adde not sins to sins but consider that lesser sins shall be punished with lesser punishments and greater with greater 8. That remembring the sins of Parents are punished also in their posterity we spare not only our selves but our posterity also in avoiding sins 9. That we may give and render thankes unto God for this benefit that he for his owne glory and the gathering and salvation of his Church doth maintain and continue also amongst the wicked some order of vertue and discipline 10. That true and perpetuall thankfulnesse may be kindled in us towards God and his Son our Lord Jesus Christ in that he hath delivered us from these great evils sin and the paines and punishment of sin Quest 8. Are wee so corrupt that wee are not all apt to doe well and are prone to all vice Answ Indeed we are a Gen. 8.19 and 6.5 Job 14.4 and 15.14 16 35. John 3.6 Isa 53.6 except we be regenerated by the
punishment severally because they are not sufficient to satisfie Gods justice Object 4. If God punish sins with eternall punishments then either all of us perish or Gods justice is not satisfied Ans If God should punish our sins in us with eternall punishments wee should all perish indeed but he doth not punish them in us with eternall paines neither yet is his justice impeached or violated because hee punisheth our sins in Christ with a punishment temporall but yet equivalent to everlasting This equability doth the Gospel adde unto the Law Repl. If he punish them in Christ and be just he ought no further to punish them in us Therefore the godly are unjustly afflicted in this life Ans The afflictions of the godly are not punishments and satisfactions for their sinnes but only fatherly chastisements and the Crosse whereby they are brought to humility Which that it may be the better understood we are here necessarily to speak of afflictions or calamities but first the next question is to be expounded Quest 11. Is not God therefore mercifull Ans Yea verily he is mercifull a Exo. 34.6 7. and 20.6 but so that he is also just b Psal 10.7 Exod. 20.5 23 7 34.6 Psal 5.56 Nah. 1.2 â— Wherefore his justice requireth that the same which is committed against the divine Majesty of God should also be recompenced with extreme that is everlasting punishments both of body and soule The Explication THis question of the Catechisme is an objection against that doctrine That God punisheth all and every sin with everlasting paines and thus it is framed Object It is the property of him that is exceeding mercifull to remit somewhat of extreme justice but God is exceeding mercifull Therefore he will remit somewhat of extreme justice and will not punish sin with eternall paines Answ We answer to the Major on this wise It is the point of him that is mercifull to remit something but without breach of justice if he be exactly just Now God is so exceeding mercifull that he is also exactly just Therefore he will so exercise mercy that not withstanding he will not impaire his justice And the justice of God exacteth that all sins committed against his soveraigne majesty should be punished with most exquisite that is everlasting paines both of body and soule that there may be some proportion between the crime and the penalty Repl. 1. Exceeding strict justice doth not stand with exceeding mercy in God there is exceeding mercy Therefore in God exceeding strict justice standeth not with it Answ The Major is denied Repl. Thus it is proved Exceeding mercy admitteth mitigating equity but strict and exact justice such as is in God admitteth not this Ergo c. Ans Yes the justice of God admitteth mitigating equity and favourablenesse not by omitting but by transferring the punishment on some other Repl. 2. With him that followeth extreme or strict justice mercy and equity hath no place but God doth strictly execute his Law Therefore with him mercy hath no place Or thus He who remitteth nought of extreme right he is not mercifull but only just but God remitteth nought of his right because he punisheth all sin with sufficient punishment Ans 1. We deny the Minor For God remitteth a great deale of his strict right though he punish sins with eternall paines For as touching the reprobate he useth much favourable dealing towards them whiles he both now deferreth their punishments inviteth them by many benefits unto repentance and in the eternity it self of their punishment wil punish them more mildly then they deserved And as touching the elect he useth much toleration againe towards them because he giveth us his Son and subjecteth him unto punishment on our behalf of his meer mercy obliged bound thereto by no right or merit of ours 2. The Major is denied as false in respect of him who for his wisdome knoweth means of exercising mercy without breach of his justice also in respect of him who whilest he executeth his justice yet rejoyceth not in the destruction of man but had rather he were saved As when a Judge condemneth a robber to the wheele and yet rejoyceth not in his punishment hee though hee seem to execute the extremity of Law yet useth lenity Much more God mingleth marvellous equity with his justice For he is not delighted with the destruction of the ungodly because hee will not the death of a sinner and though hee punish all sins with everlasting paines Ezek. 33.11 yet he also taketh pity on us in deriving the punishment from us and laying it on his Son Repl. 3. The Prophet Jeremy saith Forgive not their iniquity neither put out their sinne from thy sight The mercy therefore of God is not extended to the Reprobate Answ 1. It is true when God denieth his mercy unto them repenting What mercy God extendeth to the wicked and except hee have just cause why hee doth not save all But God hath most just cause why he suffereth them to perish even the manifestation of his justice and power in punishing the wicked 2. It is to be understood of that degree of his mercy which hee sheweth towards his chosen even of his mercy whereby he giveth them remission of sinnes his holy Spirit and life everlasting but it is not to be granted concerning that generall mercy whereby he guideth and governeth all creatures Repl. 4. The Lord saith in Isaiah Ah I will ease mee of mine adversaries Therefore God is delighted with the destruction of his enemies Answ These and the like speeches are spoken after the order of men by an Anthropopathy or humane affection and by them is signified that God will the execution of his justice but is not delighted with the death or destruction of men as being his creatures Repl. 5. Nay neither on the penitent doth God exercise mercy For if God punish all sins with sufficient punishment in Christ hee is not mercifull Answ I deny the consequence of this Proposition because he gave us his Son freely who should satisfie for us This satisfaction did the Gospel adde OF AFFLICTIONS Three principall questions there are touching afflictions 1. How many kinds of afflictions there be 2. What be the causes of them 3. What comforts are to be opposed against them 1. How many kinds of afflictions there be Two sorts of afflictions 1. Temporall 2. Eternall SOme afflictions are temporall and some eternall Eternall are the torments of the soule and body ever to endure and never to have end into which all the Divels are to be thrown and all wicked men who are not converted in this life They are called in Scripture hell-fire a worme torment everlasting death because the tortures shall be perpetuall and such as men endure at the point of death who by dying daily can never dye For this shall be everlasting death alwaies to die and never be dead or a continuance of death with infinite excesse
Rom. 8.3 John 3.16 Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things c. this is legall The other means of satisfying is by another which the Gospel revealeth and Gods mercy admitteth That that was impossible to the law God sending his own Son c. So God loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son c. this is evangelicall satisfaction Indeed in the law it is not taught but it is no where therein disallowed or excluded neither is it repugnant to the justice of God For so there be satisfaction performed by man through a sufficient punishment for the disobedience of man the law resteth contented and the justice of God permitteth that the party offendant be absolved and received into favour This is the summe of all Furthermore by this question of the Catechism here propounded two things are taught concerning mans delivery 1. That delivery is possible 2. By what means it may be atchieved That these may be more fully understood we are to consider 1. What mans delivery is and in what things it consisteth 2. Whether any such delivery be possible or might be wrought after the fall 3. Whether it be necessary and certain 4. Whether wee may expect that it be perfect 5. By what means it may be wrought 1. What mans delivery is and wherein it consisteth THis word Delivery is respective For all delivery and liberty hath a respect of the thing from which it exempteth and of the thing into which it freeth or delivereth as delivery from captivity and bondage into liberty and freedome respecteth captivity whence it absolveth and liberty whereof it gives us possession Now men are by nature the slaves of sin Sathan and death We can therefore no way better conceive and understand what mans delivery is Heb 2.14 2 Tim. 2.26 then by a serious meditation and examination what his misery is Mans misery consisteth 1. In his losse of righteousnesse and his inbred corruption to wit sin 2. In the punishments of sin His delivery therefore from this misery requireth 1. A perfect pardoning and abolishment of sin with a renuing in us the righteousnesse we have lost 2. An immunity from all penalties and miseries which are the wages of sin As then there are two parts of mans misery I mean Sin and Death So there are on the other side two parts of his delivery to wit from sin and from death His delivery from sin is both a pardoning of the sin that it may not for ever be imputed and an abolishing of it in us by the renewing of our nature that it reigne not in our mortall body His delivery from death is first a delivery from desperation or the feeling of Gods wrath which being in the wicked here begun shall continue everlastingly and is called everlasting death and secondly from all calamities and miseries of this life and lastly from temporall and eternall death Hence it appeareth what and of what quality mans delivery is What mans delivery is to wit A perfect acquitall of man being fallen from all the misery of sin and death and a full restoring by Christ of righteousnesse holinesse life and everlasting felicity or perfect blessednesse which in all true beleevers is begun here in this life and shall be perfected in the life to come 2. Whether any such delivery be possible that is might be wrought after the fall THis question is necessary for if there be no delivery of us out of misery in vain make we question of the rest Again there is some cause to doubt thereof to them especially unto whom the doctrine of the Gospel is unknown The delivery therefore of man Three causes of the possiblenesse of mans delivery being fallen is possible and the causes of the possiblenesse thereof are in God alone declared in the Scripture which are these Gods goodness Gods immeasurable goodnesse and mercy which would not suffer all mankind to perish for ever Gods wisdome Gods infinite wisdom whereby he was able to find out such a way of delivery whereby he might shew his exceeding mercy towards mankinde and yet no whit impeach his justice Gods omnipotency Gods omnipotency whereby as he had power to create man of nothing after his owne image so he had equall ability to restore him after his fal and free him from sin and death To deny then the possibility of mans delivery is to spoile God of infinite wisdome goodnesse and omnipotency whereas verily in him there is no defect at al of wise counsell immeasurable goodnesse and infinite power as it is said The Lord bringeth downe to the grave and raiseth up 1. Sam. 2.6 Psal 68.20 Esay 59.1 To the Lord God belong the issues of death The Lords hand is not shortned But the question is moved especially concerning us Whence we know this delivery to be possible and whether mans reason without the word of God may attaine unto the knowledge thereof and whether Adam after his fall could have a perfect knowledge and assured hope of the same Answ That our delivery was possible Humane reason how it might know or not know ought touching our deliverie is now evident by the event and accomplishment thereof and we know it by the Gospel or divine revelation But humane reason knoweth no one tittle or jot of this delivery or the manner whereby it was effected although probably it may be conjectured that in humane reason it was not simply impossible whereas there is no likelihood at all 1. That so glorious and excellent a creature should be framed to eternall misery or 2. That God should authorise such a law as could never be fulfilled Which two arguments of mans brain are in themselves powerful and invincible but mans reason through her corrupt and weak judgment giveth no credit to so apparent a truth neither assenteth unto it without the promise and grace of the holy Ghost that is is not able out of these two axiomes and principles certainly and necessarily to infer that he knoweth and hopeth for his deliverance out of paine and misery As then they who are sequestred from the Church and are ignorant of the Gospel can have no knowledge or hope of delivery so Adam after his fall by the meere instinct and conduct of naturall reason without Gods especiall revelation and peculiar promise could not possibly have intelligence or confidence thereof For sin being once committed nothing could be conversant in his mind and understanding nothing obvious to his eyes but the severe and exact justice of God which suffereth not sin to escape unpunished and Gods unchangeable truth which had pronounced Genes 2.19 In what day soever thou eatest thereof thou shalt die the death Adam well perceived that this Gods justice and truth must needs be satisfied with the perpetuall ruine and destruction of the transgressor and therefore out of this contemplation and consideration could collect no hold or hope of liberty He might
that as touching it we look for Christ to come from heaven whom as touching the Word we beleeve to be in the earth with us Wherefore according to your opinion either the Word is contained in place with the flesh or the flesh is every-where with the Word whereas one nature receiveth not any contrary or divers thing in it selfe and it is a thing diverse and far unlike to be circumscribed in place and to be every-where and seeing the Word is every-where and the flesh is not every-where it is apparent that one and the same Christ is of both natures and is every-where as touching the nature of his God-head but is not every-where as touching the nature of his man-hood is created and hath no beginning is subject to death and cannot die the one he hath by the nature of the Word whereby he is God the other by the nature of his flesh whereby the same God is man Wherefore that one Son of God and the same made the Sonne of man hath a beginning by the nature of flesh and hath no beginning by the nature of his God-head was created by the nature of his flesh and was not created by the nature of his God-head circumscribed in place by the nature of his flesh and not contained in any place by the nature of his God-head is lower also then the Angels by the nature of his flesh and is equall with the Father according to the nature of his God-head died by the nature of his flesh and never died by the nature of his God-head This is the Catholike faith and confession which the Apostles delivered the Martyrs established and the faithfull hitherto hold and maintaine ON THE 15. SABBATH Quest 37. What beleevest thou when thou saiest He suffered Answ That he all the time of his life which he led in the earth but especially at the end thereof sustained the wrath of God both in body and soule against the sin of all mankind a Esay 53.4 1 Pet. 2.24 3.18 1 Tim. 2.6 that he might by his passion as the only propitiatory sacrifice b Esay 53.10 Ephes 5.2 1 Cor. 5.5 1 John 2.2 Rom. 3.15 Heb. 9.28 10 14. deliver our body and soule from everlasting damnation c Gal. 3.13 Colos 1.13 Heb. 9.12 1 Pet. 1.18 19. and purchase unto us the favour of God righteousnesse and everlasting life d Rom. 3.25 2 Cor. 5.21 John 3.16 9.51 Heb. 9.15 10.19 The Explication NOw have we in few words expounded those Articles of the Apostolike Creed which intreate of the person of Christ and have withall declared in the exposition thereof those things which are necessary for us to know both of the Divinity of Christ and of his humane nature which was taken by the Word of the seed of David united personally with the Word by the vertue of the holy Ghost and begotten in marvellous manner of the Virgins substance The course of order requireth that now consequently we expound and declare those Articles which treat of the office of Christ and first of all of his Humiliation or humbling which is the former part of Christs office whereunto belong these Articles He suffered under Pontius Pilate was crucified dead and buried He descended into hell After we have expounded these we will come unto the rest of the Articles which speak of his Glorification which is the other part of Christs office The Passion of Christ doth follow next his Conception and Nativity Two causes why Christs passion followeth his nativity immediatly in the Creed The fruits to be gathered out of the story of Christs life 1. Because in his Passion and Death consisteth our salvation 2. Because his whole life was a continuall passion suffering and calamity Yet notwithstanding many things may and ought to be profitably observed out of the story of the whole race of his life on earth set downe by the Evangelists For that doth shew 1. This person to be the promised Messias seeing in him concurre and are fulfilled all the prophecies 2. That story is a consideration or meditation of that humility or obedience which he performed unto his Father Hither belong those things which are especially to be considered in Christs Passion 1. The history it selfe of Christs Passion agreeing with Gods sacred Oracles and Prophecies 2. The causes or fruits of Christs Passion 3. His example that we are also to enter into eternall life heavenly glory by suffering death as did Christ But for fuller explication these foure Questions touching Christs Passion are to be considered 1. What is understood by the name of Passion or what Christ suffered 2. Whether he suffered according to both natures 3. What was the impellent cause of Christs Passion 4. What the finall causes or ends and fruits thereof 1. What is meant by the name of Passion or what Christ suffered BY the name of Passion is understood the whole humiliation or the obedience of Christs whole humiliation all the miseries infirmities torments ignominies paines and griefs unto all which Christ for our sakes was subject and obnoxious as well in soule as in body from the point of his nativity untill the houre of his death and resurrection For the chiefe part of his paines and dolours were the torments in his soule wherein he felt the ire and wrath of God against the sin of mankind But principally by the name Passion is signified the last part of his humiliation even the last act of his life Mat. 26.38 27 46. Esay 53.4 6 10. Christs sufferings wherein he suffered extreme torments of soule and body for our finnes My soule is very heavie even unto the death My God my God why hast thou forsaken me Surely he hath carried our sorrowes The Lord hath laid upon him the iniquities of us all The Lord would break him and make him subject to infirmities What then did Christ suffer He suffered 1. A privation and want of incomparable happinesse joy and all other heavenly blessings which he should have injoyed 2. All the infirmities of mans nature sinne onely excepted he hungred thirsted Mat. 8.17 John 4.7 19.28 Hebr. 4.15 was weary was stricken with sadnesse and griete c. 3. Extreme need and poverty The sonne of man hath not whereon to lay his head 4. For infinite injuries contumelies slanders layings in wait for him back-bitings reproaches blasphemies annihilating Luke 9 58. Mat. 12.24 and contempt I am a worme and not a man He hath neither forme nor beauty when we shall see him there shall be no forme that we should desire him Psal 22 7. Esay 53.4 5. The temptations of the Devill He was in all things tempted in like sort yet without sinne 6. The death of the body and that reproachfull and contumelious even the death of the Crosse 7. The most grievous torments of soule that is Hebr. 4.15 he found the sense and feeling of the wrath of God against the sins
the God-head signifieth not the person which hath both names but only the divine nature it selfe But of God which is the concrete name the properties not of the God-head only but of the man-hood also may be affirmed because God signifieth not the divine nature but the person which hath both the divine nature and the humane Object 3. There is no proportion between temporall punishment and eternall Christ suffered onely temporall paines and punishments therefore he could not satisfie for eternall punishment Answ There is no proportion between temporall and eternall punishment if they be considered as being both in the same subject but in diverse subjects there may be The temporall punishment of the Son of God is of more value and worth than the eternall punishment of the whole world for divers causes heretofore alledged Object 4. If Christ satisfied perfectly for all then all must be saved But all are not saved Therefore he satisfied not perfectly for all Answ Christ satisfied for all men as concerning the application of his merit and satisfaction True it is that Christ fulfilled the Law two wayes 1. By his owne righteousnesse 2. By satisfying for our unrighteousnesse and both these he performed most perfectly But the satisfaction is made outs by our private application which is two-fold the former is wrought by God when he justifieth us for his Sons merit and causeth us to cease from sin the latter is effected by us through faith For we then apply unto our selves the merit of Christ when by a true faith we are perswaded that God remitteth our sins for his Sons sacrifice and satisfaction and without this application Christs satisfaction availeth us nothing Object 5. There were also propitiatory sacrifices in Moses Law Answ There were no sacrifices which might properly be termed expiatory but those that were were shadowes onely of Christs sacrifice which onely is propitiatory Hebr 10.4 1 John 1.7 1 John 2.2 For it is impossible that the bloud of Buls and Goates should take away sinnes The bloud of Jesus Christ cleanseth us from all sinne He is the propitiation for the sinnes of the whole world 2. Whether Christ suffered according to both natures CHrist suffered not according to both natures neither according to his God-head but according to his humane nature onely both in body and soule For his divine nature is immutable impassible immortall and very life it selfe which cannot die Now he so suffered according to his humanity that by his death and passion he made satisfaction for infinite sinnes of men And the divinity sustained and upheld the humanity in the griefes and paines thereof and raised it againe to life when it had been dead Christ was put to death concerning the flesh but was quickned in the spirit 1 Pet. 3.18 4.2 John 2.19 Rev. 1.18 John 10.18 For Christ also hath once suffered for sinnes the just for the unjust that he might bring us unto God Destroy this Temple and I will raise it up againe in three dayes I was dead and loe I am alive I have power to lay downe my life and to take it up againe These testimonies prove that there was another nature in Christ besides his flesh which other nature neither suffered nor died Irenaeus saith As Christ was man that so he might be tempted Lib. 3. cont hares so he was the Word that so he might be glorified The Word indeed and Deity so resting in him that he might be tempted crucified and suffer death and yet united to his humanity that so he might overcome temptation death c. Object God purchased the Church with his owne bloud therefore the God-head suffered Ans It doth not follow Acts 20.28 because an argument from the concrete which is God to the abstract which is the God head is of no consequence Againe the kind of affirmation is altered God is said to have dyed by a figurative speech which is Synecdoche use when we signifie the whole by a part as whole Christ by God and by a communicating of the properties But when it is said The God head died this affirmation admitteth no figure seeing the subject in it is a meer abstract The concrete signifieth the subject or person having the nature or forme but the abstract signifieth the bare nature and forme onely Wherefore as the argument doth not follow A man is compounded of the clements and is corporeall Therefore his soule also is corporeall this cannot follow because all things agree not to the forme which agree to the subject the soule is the forme of man man is the essentiall subject of the soule So neither doth it follow Christ-God died therefore Christs God-head died For from the concrete to the abstract the reason doth not follow 3. The causes impellent or motives of Christs Passion John 3.16 1. THE love of God towards mankind So God loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son 2. The mercy of God towards man fallen into sin Of his mercy he saved us Titus 3.5 3. The will of God to revenge the injury of the Devill who in reproach and despight of God averted us from him and maimed the image of God in us in despight of the Creatour 4. The finall causes or ends of the Passion THE finall causes and fruits of Christs Passion are all one save that they differ in divers respects For in respect of Christ who suffered they are termed finall causes in respect of us they are called fruits The finall causes or ends of his Passion are 1. The manifesting of the love goodnesse mercy righteousnesse of God while he punisheth his Sonne for us 2. That his Passion might be a sufficient ransome of our sins or the redeeming of us The chiefe finall causes then are The glory of God and our salvation To the former finall cause belongeth the knowledge of the greatnesse of sinne that we may know how great an evill sinne is and what it deserveth To the latter belongeth our justification wherein all the benefits are comprehended which Christ merited by dying and by his freeing himselfe from death Hence know we that death is not now pernicious and hurtfull to the godly and therefore not to be feared Quest 38. For what cause should he suffer under Pilate as being his Judge Answ That he being innocent and condemned before a civill Judge a John 18.38 Mat. 27.24 Luk. 23.14 15. John 19.4 might deliver us from the severe judgement of God which remained for all men b Psal 69 5. Esay 53.45 2 Cor. 5.21 Gal. 3.13 The Explication MEntion is made of Pilate in Christs Passion 1. Because Christ did receive from him a testimony of his innocency that thereby we might know that he was pronounced innocent by the voyce of the Judge himself 2. That we might know that he though innocent was notwithstanding solemnely condemned 3. That we might be advertised of the fulfilling of the prophecy Eâ—ck â—1 27 I will over-turne
felt and buried that men might know it to be a dead crops Hither belong some parts of the story penned by the Evangelists as that Christ was pierced with a lance that he was taken down from the Crosse that he was annointed and wrapt in linnen cloathes c. For these are good evidences of the truth of his death We therefore by his buriall are ascertained of his true death and by his death assured of our redemption For our salvation consisteth in his death the testimony whereof is his buriall 2. That the last part of his humiliation whereby hee did debase himselfe for our sakes might be accomplished For buriall was a part of the punishment curse â—â—n 3.19 and ignominy which we had deserved as it is said To dust shalt thou returne A dead body is indeed void of sense and feeling but yet notwithstanding ignominious it was for the body to be committed to the earth as any other dead corps As then Christs resurrection from the dead and death is a part of his glory so his buriall that is the debasing of his body to be in the same state with other dead carkases is a part of that humiliation which he sustained for our sakes 3. Hee would be buried that we might not be affraid of the grave but might know that our head Christ had sanctified our graves by his buriall that now they are no longer graves unto us but chambers of quiet repose untill we be raised againe unto life 4. That it might be apparent or manifest as concerning his resurrection that hee had truely overcome death in his body that by his own power and vigour he had shaken off death from himselfe and that his resurrection was not imaginary but a resurrection of a reviving corps 5. That he might confirme in us an hope of the resurrection to wit that the time shall once come when we after his example shall be buried and by his power shall rise again knowing that Christ our head hath laid open the way unto us by the grave and death to celestiall glory and therefore shall wee be raised out of the grave though we die and give up the Ghost 6. That we being spiritually dead that is to sin might rest from sin We are buried with Christ by baptisme into his death Rom. 6.4 that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father so we also should walke in newnesse of life 7. That the truth might be answerable to the type of Jonas and the prophecies might be fulfilled concerning the buriall of the Messias Thou Psal 16.10 Esay 53.9 shalt not leave my soule in hell He made his grave with the wicked Quest 42. But since that Christ died for us why must we also die Answ Our death is not a satisfaction for our sins a Mar. 8.37 but the abolishing of sin and our passage into life everlasting b Phil. 1.32 John 8.24 Rom. 7.14 The Explication HEre is answer made unto that objection If Christ died for us why then die wee too For hee should not die for whom another hath already died otherwise the satisfaction would seem double Answ Hee for whom another died should not die as thereby to satisfie that is so that his death should be any merit or satisfaction but there are other causes why we must die For wee die not to satisfie the justice of God but by death as a meane to receive those gifts which Christ by his death hath merited for us For this our temporall death What our temporall death is is 1. An admonition of the remnants of sin in us 2. An admonition of the greatnesse of sin 3. A purging and cleansing of us For by death are purged out the reliques and remaines of sin in us 4 A translating into eternall life For by corporall death is the passage of the faithfull made into eternall life Repl. If the cause be taken away the effect is taken away but the cause of death in us which is sin is taken away by Christ therefore the effect also which is death it selfe ought to be taken away Ans Where all cause is taken away the effect also is taken away but in us all cause of death is not taken away As concerning the purging out of sin albeit it be taken away as touching the remission of sin Or we may answer unto the Minor proposition that sin is indeed taken away as touching the guilt but it is not taken away as touching the matter of sin which as yet remaineth to be purged by little and little that we might be exercised in prayer and repentance in this life untill in another life we be perfectly discharged from the reliques of sin Quest 43. What other commodities receive we by the sacrifice and death of Christ Answ That by the vertue of his death our old man is crucified slain and buried together with him a Rom. 6.6 that henceforth evill lusts and desires may not reigne in us b Rom. 6.6 12. but we may offer our selves unto him a sacrifice of thanksgiving c Rom. 12.1 The Explication THis Question concerneth the fruits and commodities of Christs death Here also the end of Christs death and the fruits of the same are all one thing as we have before shewed in his Passion considered with diverse respects For those ends which Christ proposed unto himselfe in dying they become fruits unto us in receiving and apprehending them The fruit therefore and commodity of Christs death is the whole work of our Redemption Justification or remission of sins Justification or remission of sins because the justice of God requireth that God should not punish a sinner twice but he hath punished our sins in Christ Therefore he will not punish again the same in us The bloud of Jesus Christ purgeth us from all sin 1 John 1.7 as well originall as actuall as well of fact or doing what we should not as of omission or not doing what we should So then we are justified that is we are freed from the guilt as well of punishment as of crime by the death of Christ The cause of this effect is the death of Christ The gift of the holy Ghost and regeneration The gift of the holy Ghost and through his working regeneration and a new life because Christ by his death hath not onely obtained for us pardon of our sin and reconciliation with God but also the gift of the holy Ghost that by his working and vertue the old man might be crucified with Christ that is that by the holy Ghost through the efficacy of Christs merit and our engraffing into him our corrupt and as yet not regenerated nature might be abolished in us and that of the contrary righteousnesse might be begun in us the image of God destroyed by the Divell in us might be restored and we by the same spirit moved to shew and yeeld all thankfulnesse for so great
Rom. 8.11 hee that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortall bodies Object 6. These all through faith are dead and received not the promise Heb. 11.39 Therefore they received not their Countrey Answ 1. Although they dying had not found their countrey yet would it not follow of these words that they are not at all or have no sense after death for he that is not or hath no sense seeketh not his countrey 2. The author of that Epistle doth not speak of the life after death which is led in the celestiall countrey 2 Cor. 5. but of this life in which the faithfull walking their pilgrimage sought for the celestiall countrey not finding their countrey on earth Object 7. They are flesh a wind that passeth away and cometh not again Answ By these and the like speeches the brevity of mans life and the frailty and perishing of all humane affaires without God is described and bewailed For as here they are compared to a wind eft-soons vanishing away so Psal 103. they are compared to dust grasse and flowers of the field Likewise Hee shooteth forth as a flower Job 14.2 and is cut downe and vanisheth as a shadow All flesh is grasse Isa 40.6 But if they urge the very word in these speeches it will follow that not only after death there is nothing remaining but that there is not any resurrection when hee saith a wind that passeth and cometh not again as flowers and shadowes whereunto man is compared doe so perish that they are not recovered Object 8. I am counted as the slain lying in the grave whom thou remembrest no more Ans In these words the Prophet doth not signifie either himselfe Psal 88.5 or the dead to be exempted from Gods providence but he complaineth that hee is forsaken of God even as the dead seem to men not to be cared for of him and therefore he speaketh not according to the sense of faith but of his own opinion and weaknesse and misery who judgeth those to be forsaken and neglected of God whose delivery for a while he doth deferre But what faith in the mean season suggesteth and telleth the godly even when they wrestle with temptation he sheweth when he saith The just shall be in everlasting memory Object 9. His spirit departeth Psal 112.6 and hee returneth to the earth then his thoughts perish Ans Here hee saith not Psal 146.4 the spirit or soul of man perisheth or vanisheth or dieth or it is bereaved of sense but that it departeth to wit from the body wherein it dwelleth and that not the spirit but the man returneth to his earth that is as concerning his body which was made of earth as it is written Genes 3. and Eccl. 12. And lastly hee saith that his thoughts perish which is not that the soul is after this life bereaved of reason judgement and sense of the mercy or wrath of God but that his purposes and counsels are made frustrate which man in this life had setled with himselfe to bring to passe Psal 112.10 in which sense it is said The desire of the wicked shall perish Object 10. They gather also other sayings which take away all praising and worshipping of God from the dead As Wilt thou shew a miracle unto the dead Or shall the dead rise and praise thee Psal 88.10 But in such speeches death and hell or the grave have two significations They who are spiritually dead whether afore or after the death of the body that is they who are deprived of Gods grace and forsaken and rejected of God and are in hell that is in the place and torments of the damned or else in this life despairing and destitute of comfort shall not praise God at all neither in this life nor in the life to come But they who are dead not spiritually but corporally only albeit they shall not praise God in this life while their bodies are in hell that is in the grave yet in the soul they shall not cease to acknowledge and praise God in the other life untill when receiving their bodies again they shall magnifie him in both in the celestiall eternity But in the mean season because God will also be agnised and magnified of men in this life therefore both the whole Church and every one of the faithfull not only pray that they may not fall into that forsaking and into that sense of Gods wrath wherewith the wicked are oppressed but also desire that they may be in this mortall life preserved and defended untill the end thereof by God appointed be expired For the Saints doe not simply stand in fear of the bodily death and grave but that they may not be forsaken of God neither fall into desperation and destruction or their enemies insult against God when they are overthrown this with daily and ardent prayers and petitions they beg and crave continually Now that which the adversaries adde further Psal 146.2 I will praise the Lord during my life as long as I have any being I will sing unto my God Answ This maketh nothing with them for hee restraineth not the praising of God to the time of his mortall life but only he saith that he will spend all that time in Gods praises which notwithstanding in many other places he extendeth to continue through all eternity as Psal 34. I will praise the Lord continually But oftentimes this particle untill or as long as signifieth a continuance of the time going before some event without any excluding of the time following as Hee must raign untill hee put all his enemies under his feet 1 Cor. 15.25 Object 11. Let him cease and leave off from mee that I may take a little comfort before I goe Job 10.20 and shall not return Answ Hee denyeth in these words that hee shall return into this mortall life and to converse among men in this world but he denyeth not that he in the mean season hath his being and doth live untill again hee see God in his flesh Chap. 17.26 even the same Job who then was afflicted Object Why dyed I not when I came out of the womb So should I have slept then and beene at rest Job 3.11 13. c. Answ Here also Job doth not deny the soules after death to be live feele and understand but onely he saith the miseries of this present life are not felt If they urge that neither the evils of the life to come are felt because then Job should wish for a bad change we answer that Job wisheth not for the death of the wicked but of the godly But if they adde further That Job doth make Kings and Princes also which gather gold unto them small and great that is all men good and bad partakers of this rest our answer is out of the processe and course of his whole speech that Job doth not teach here what is the state of men
after this life but onely desireth to be rid of his present misery and therefore through humane infirmity and impatiencie doth compare the sense and feeling of his present miseries with the death and state of the dead whatsoever it be as they who are grievously tormented with present distresses and calamities preferre any thing whatsoever before that which they suffer So also Chap. 7. he speaketh as one despairing of delivery in this life Chap. 7 7.10 Remember that my life is but a wind and that my eye shall not returne to see pleasure For so he expoundeth himselfe when he addeth He shall returne no more to his house neither shall his place know him any more So likewise Chap. 17. My breath is corrupt Verse 1. and the grave is ready for me They are words of one despairing of life and salvation God being wroth and angry But when it is said If he set his heart upon man and gather unto himselfe his spirit and his breath All flesh shall perish together Chap. 34.14 15. it is not said that the soule doth sleep or perish but that by the departure thereof the body dieth and is dissolved Further they adde If presently after death the godly were blessed then injury was done unto them who were called againe into this mortall life But to this we answer That neither God can be injurious to any man whereas he is in no mans debt neither can any thing happen better or more acceptable unto the godly then to serve for the manifesting of Gods glory either by life or by death as it is said As alwayes Phil. 1.20 so now Christ shall be magnified in my body whether it be by life or by death c. Last of all if they say That the soule hath neither sense nor action but by bodily instruments and therefore being naked and destitute of these is destitute also of sense motion and operation To grant unto them this Antecedent of the soule being in the body yet notwithstanding of the soule freed from the body both learned Philosophers confesse the contrary and the Word of God testifieth the contrary as We know in part 1 Cor. 13.9 and we prophecie in part but when that which is perfect is come then that which is in part shall be abolished 2. Where and in what estate it abideth being separate from the body THe Papists dreame that the soules of men passe out of their bodies into the fire of Purgatory there to be purged from their sinnes some sooner some later Not in Purgatory as the Papists teach Li. 4. di 21. cap. â— according as they in their life time more or lesse loved the transitory pelfe of this world as Lombard speaketh Contrariwise the Scripture teacheth us that not any fire after death but onely the bloud of Christ in this life cleanseth our soules from all sinne It farther instructeth us how that the soules of the faithfull deceased are not plunged into the place of torment there to be refined from the drosse of their sins but are gathered unto Christ and into Abrahams bosome and on the other side that the soules of the wicked are forth-with cast into hell whence there is no retire and are now tormented with infernall flames but yet reserved to more grievous tortures of that everlasting fire which at the time of Christs coming to judgement The estate of the soules of the godly Luke 23.46 Acts 7.59 Luke 16.22 Phil. 1.3 2 Cor. 5.8 The estate of the soules of the wicked Mat. 10.28 the wrath of Jehovah shall kindle Of the estate of the soules of the godly these places yeeld testimony Into thy hands I commend my spirit Lord Jesus receive my soule And so it was that the beggar died and was carried by the Angels into Abrahams bosome Therefore he feared not Purgatory The faithfull covet to remove out of the body and to dwell with the Lord therefore they passe not through Purgatory first before they approach unto the sight of the Lord. Of the state of the soules of the ungodly these places make sufficient evidence Feare him who is able to cast both body and soule into hell fire The glutton straight after his buriall was in hell torments and cried I am tormented in this flame Luke 16.23 whence he shall never escape Wherefore the soules of the wicked leaving their bodies are not forth-with transported into Purgatory whence there may be a gappe or way to escape but are violently thrust down into the unspeakable fire of hell 3. What the Resurrection is and the errours concerning it THe word Resurrection signifieth sometimes mans spirituall conversion unto God The signification of the word Rev. 20.5 As This is the first Resurrection But in this Article the resurrection of the flesh is A restoring of the substance of our bodies after death even of the same matter whereof they now consist and a reviving and quickning of the same bodies with life immortall and incorruptible by the same immortall soul whereby they now live which God will work by Christ in the end of the world by his divine vertue and power which restoring also shall be of the Elect unto eternall glory The parts of it but of the reprobate unto eternall paines That is there shall be 1. A restoring of the same body which is a re-collecting and gathering together of the same matter whereof our body was first composed and which after our death was scattered and severed into all the elements 2. An uniting of it with the same soule and a reviving of it by the same soule which it had before with a putting off of all infirmities and a putting on of immortality 3. A glorifying of the Elect and an eternall rejection of the Reprobare Three errours concerning the Resurrection The errours held of the Resurrection are of three sorts 1. Some have utterly denied it and have avouched the soules to die together with the bodies as the Sadducees of whom mention is made in the Acts The Sadducees say that there is no Resurrection Acts 23.8 neither Angel nor Spirit 2. Some have granted the immortality of the soule but have construed the resurrection to be a resurrection in this life meaning by this resurrection nothing else but regeneration but the bodies they denied to rise at all although the soules of the godly have fruition after death of everlasting happines Hymeneus and Philetus seeme to have been authors of this heresie of whom the Apostle saith 2 Tim. 2.18 Which as concerning the truth have erred saying that the resurrection is past already and doe destroy the faith of some 3. Some as Anabaptists deny that the very selfe-same bodies which we now have shall rise againe but they say that God at Christs second coming will make new bodies Against all these errours we are to beleeve the Scripture affirming that the dead shall certainly rise againe 4. Whence it may appeare that the Resurrection shall
certainly be Probable proofes of the Resurrection yeelded by Philosophy but no necessary demonstrance IT may be verily collected probably out of Philosophy that there shall be sometime a Resurrection but no necessary demonstration can be yeelded thence that the Resurrection shall certainly be For in Philosophy are many principles which accord not with the sacred writings of Gods Spirit Againe in Philosophy the knowledge which it hath of Gods justice and truth is but a maimed reason But in the holy writ of God Proofes hereof out of Scripure the reasons are firme and true Hence alone therefore is demonstration given for the most certaine accomplishment of the Resurrection And this Testimony By testimony of Scripture Reason By reason drawn out of the Scripture The testimonies of Scripture which confirme the certainty of the Resurrection hereafter to come Testimonies of Scripture for demonstrance of the Resurrection Job 19.25 26. Esay 26.19 Ezek. 37.12 are most evident and those taken both out of the old and new Testament I am sure that my Redeemer liveth and he shall stand the last on the earth and though after my skin wormes destroy this body yet shall I see God in my flesh The dead men shall live even with my body they shall rise I will open your graves and cause you to come out of your sepulchers And many of them that sleep in the dust shall awake some to everlasting life Dan. 12.2 Job 5.28 29. and some to shame and perpetuall contempt The houre shall come in the which all that are in the graves shall heare his voyce And they shall come forth that have done good unto the resurrection of life but they that have done evill unto the resurrection of condemnation John 6.40 1 Cor. 15.13 1 Thess 4.14 Rev. 20.12.13 I will raise him up at the last day If there be no resurrection of the dead then is Christ not risen And if Christ be not risen then is our preaching vaine and your faith is also vaine If we beleeve that Jesus is dead and is risen even so them which sleep in Jesus God will bring with him And I saw the dead both great and small stand before God and the sea gave up her dead which were in her and death and hell delivered up the dead The reasons which are drawne also out of Scripture are diverse 1. God is the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob and God is not the God of the dead but of the living But he should not be the God of whole Abraham nor the God of the living except the body of Abraham should one day be raised God is the God of the whole man not of a part onely but he should not be the God of the whole man but of a part of man only if the body did never rise againe Mat. 22.32 This reason Christ useth against the Sadducees 2. God promiseth eternall life not to the soule onely but also to the body of the godly and contrary to the ungodly he threatneth eternall punishment and paines both of body and soule and these promises and threatnings of God must be fulfilled For the certainty of them is unchangeable But they shall not be fulfilled if the dead shall not rise Seeing therefor God doth most certainly in his good time accomplish that which he promiseth to the godly and menaceth to the wicked it followeth of necessity that the dead must rise againe 3. The mercy of God is perfect as which extendeth it selfe to the whole man and which will have us wholly saved therefore our bodies also shall rise againe 4. The mercy and love of God towards the godly is perpetuall and unchangeable so that what he once will of his fatherly love towards them performe unto them the same he ever will But he will have the godly saved both in soule and body therefore they must be both in soule and body even whole saved and therefore that they be whole saved they must needs rise againe 5. The perfect justice of God requireth that the same wholly whereby the wicked sin should be punisht with eternall paines But they sin both in their whole body and in their soule Therefore their bodies must be raised againe because they ought no lesse in body then in soule to suffer eternall paines 6. Christ is risen therefore we all shall rise This sequell is most sure For 1. Christ therefore rose againe that he might raise us 2. Christ is our head and we be his members Seeing then Christ our head is risen we also his members doubtlesse shall rise for the glory of the head requites this that he have his members sutable and in like condition with him Wherefore if the members should continue rotten the head should not be glorious 3. The same spirit is in us which is in Christ raised he joyneth and uniteth us with Christ and worketh the same in us which he doth in Christ nor is at any time not like himselfe But he hath raised Christ therefore also he will raise us 7. It is said that Christ shall have an everlasting kingdome but this he shall not have Psal 45. if our bodies should alwayes continue in death for neither would it suffice that our soules are immortall or eternall without our bodies For that Christs kingdome may be eternall he must have eternall subjects and those wholly eternall Therefore our bodies also shall rise that so we whole may be subject eternally unto Christ our King 8. Christ is a perfect Saviour because he hath saved and reconciled to God whole man Therefore our corrupt bodies also shall be raised by Christ and rise againe 9. Christ is not of lesse force to save then Adam to lose nay Christ restored to us all that which Adam lost and destroyed by sinning yea farre more and greater things by his merit Adam lost from us among other gifts the eternall life also of our bodies therefore Christ hath restored it unto us and consequently our bodies shall certainly rise againe 10. He published his law unto man after the fall therefore he will have man once keep it But that is not done in this life therefore it shall be done in the life to come and therefore men shall rise againe 11. The wages of sinne is death Therefore sin being abolished Rom. 3.23 death shall be abolished and death being abolished we shall rise againe to everlasting life 12. To this end also our bodies were made that in them as temples the holy Ghost might dwell for ever therefore our bodies shall rise and live for ever 4. What bodies shall rise The same bodies shalâ— rise THe bodies which shall rise shall be not onely humane bodies but even the selfe-same also which we now in our life time carry about with us and not others created of Christ as the Anabaptists will have it For Job saith In this flesh shall I see my Lord Job 19.26 Ephel 6.8 1 Cor. 15.53 I
holy Ghost For the holy Ghost by the Word worketh in us the knowledge of God and his will that knowledge hath following it a study and desire more and more to know God and live according to the prescript of his will John 6.68 1 Cor. 4.15 Rom. 1.16 Rom. 10.17 Whither shall we go say the Disciples Thou hast the words of life In Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the Gospel The Gospel is the power of God unto salvation to every one that beleeveth Faith is by hearing and hearing by the Word of God And this is the ordinary manner of giving us this beginning of everlasting life namely by the Word mediately But there is another manner of giving the same unto infants and by miracles such as was the conversion of the Theefe on the Crosse of Paul and of Cornelius Here the ordinary way onely is respected which is proper unto men of yeeres 6. When everlasting life is given Everlasting life is begun here by conversion IN this life is given the beginning of eternall life but the consummation and accomplishment thereof shall be given us after this life howbeit to none but such as have received the beginning thereof in this life For unto whom life everlasting is not begun to be given here that is who beginneth not here to feele a part of eternall life to wit faith and conversion unto him life everlasting shall never be given after this life 2 Cor. 5.2 Mat. 13.12 Therefore we sigh desiring to be cloathed with our house which is from heaven because that if we be cloathed we shall not be found naked To him that hath it shall be given and from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath The consummation of everlasting life is after this life It is consummated in the world to come by glorification for unto whom everlasting life is begun to be given here to them it shall be given finished complete and consummated And of this consummation there are two degrees one when the soule loosed from the body is presently carried into heaven because by the death of the body we are freed from all infirmity the other degree is greater higher and more glorious when in the resurrection of the bodies the soules shall againe be united to their bodies because after the resurrection we shall be made glorious and shall see God even as he is He that heareth my word and beleeveth in him that sent me hath everlasting life John 5.24 and shall not come into condemnation but hath passed from death to life Now are we the sons of God 1 John 3.2 but yet it doth not appeare what we shall be and we know that when he shall appeare we shall be like him for we shall see him as he is 7. Whether we can in this life be assured of everlasting life IN this life not onely we may but we ought also to be assured and certaine of everlasting life otherwise we shall never have it For it is given to all the faithfull and to them onely Farther to beleeve eternall life is to be assuredly perswaded that not onely some shall be partakers thereof but that I also am one of that number which is to be observed against Papisticall diffidence and uncertainty For we must be certaine of our finall perseverance Being justified by faith we have peace towards God Rom. 5.1 John 10.28 I give unto them eternall life Now he should not give eternall life if he gave a doubtfull and uncertaine life which might be interrupted The gifts and calling of God are without repentance Rom. 11.19 John 10.28 Phil. 1.6 2 Tim. 1.12 No man shall take my sheep out of my hand He which hath begun a good work in you he shall perfect it I know whom I have beleeved and I am perswaded that he is able to keep that which I have committed to him against that day He that beleeveth knoweth that he doth beleeve This assurance and certainty is grounded on sure and strong reasons The reasons whereon out assurance of everlasting life is grounded 1. The author of everlasting life is unchangeable even God himselfe 2. Gods election is eternall and also unchangeable 3. Christ is heard in all things which he desireth of his Father But he prayed that his Father would save all those whom he had given him 4. God will not have us to pray for good things necessary to salvation with a condition but simply because he hath promised it John 17.11 24. 1 Tim. 2.19 The foundation of God remaineth sure with his seale The Lord knoweth who are his Wherefore to doubt of the perseverance and consummation of eternall life were to overthrow the faith and truth of God and to make void Christs intercession But whence may we be assured hereof Of the consummation of everlasting life we must be assured by the beginning thereof To every one that hath it shall be given The gifts of God are without repentance God is faithfull Therefore as he hath begun so will he perfect his work How we are assured of the beginning and consummation of eternal life in us Mar. 9.24 Of the beginning of eternall life we are assured chiefly by a true faith which withstandeth doubts that is which hath a purpose to resist the Divell and crieth I beleeve Lord help my unbeliefe Moreover by a full perswasion of the good will of God towards us and our consent herein which is two wayes 1. By the peace of conscience towards God which we have being justified by faith 2. By true repentance and a full purpose and intent to live according to Gods commandements For faith cannot be without repentance Whose house we are Rom. 5.1 Heb. 3.6 if we hold fast the confidence and the rejoycing of the hope unto the end That which now hath been spoken of this Article doth sufficiently declare what it is To beleeve everlasting life namely assuredly and certainly to be perswaded What it is to beleeve everlasting life 1. That after this life there shall be also a life wherein the Church shall be glorified and God magnified of her everlastingly 2. That I also am a member of this Church and therefore partaker of everlasting life 3. That I also in this life have and injoy the beginning of everlasting life Quest 59. But when thou beleevest all these things what profit redoundeth thence unto thee Answ That I am righteous in Christ before God and an heire of eternall life a Heb. 2.4 Rom. 2.17 John 3.36 Quest 60. How art thou righteous before God Ans Onely by faith in Christ Jesus b Rom. 3.21.22 24. 5.1 Gal. 2.16 Ephes 2.8 9. Phil. 3.9 so that although my conscience accuse me that I have grievously trespassed against all the commandements of God and have not kept one of them c Rom. 3.9 c. and further am as yet prone to all evill d
union as it was assumed Nor can there be any true reason of that union which destroyeth the reason of the substance of flesh but that reason of the union which he feignes by a certaine contradiction destroyeth the reason of the substance because it makes that which is locall to be illocall that which hath dimensions to have no dimensions that which hath quantity to have no quantity a body to be no body and a substance no substance VII But he also assumed a soule for he said My soule is heavie unto the death Mat. 26. which also he breathed out on the Crosse Mat. 27. to wit an intelligent soule which after death should remaine and which might grow in wisdome in the time of his humiliation Luke 2. The Animadversion This Thesis is right opposed 1. To the errour of Apollinaris feigning that the Word assumed flesh without a soule and that hee himselfe was in stead of a soule See Ambrose de Incay l. 1. c. 7. 2. To that Papisticall fiction of such a perfection in Christs soule as from its creation was so replenished with knowledge and grace that it could not learne any knowledge or grow therein which it knew not before See Bellarm de Christo l. 4. c. 1 2 3 4. 3. To the folly of Ubiquitaries and of this teacher concerning the ubiquitie and omniscience of Christs humanity even from the moment of his conception and union for if Christ did truly breathe out his soule upon the Crosse there must needs be a truly locall separation of the soule and body in death therefore by no meanes could the soule or body then be every-where Or if then the soule or the body was in any wise every-where and if in any sort there was not made a true separation of both neither did Christ in some sort truly breathe out his soul that i◠he did not truly dye which is false notwithstanding then that is in that separation of the body and soule the humanity was not separated from the Word but inseparably the union of the natures remained in death For Christ then was not truly man although hee died according to his body but living according to his soule therefore it followes irrefragably 1. That by affirming the ubiquity of Christs body or soule or of both we must deny that Christ truly died 2. That ubiquity neither is the forme of the hypostaticall union nor the specificall difference of it which Smidlinus in the conference at Maulbrun Pag. 14. Lat. p. 9. Germ. affirmed and laboured for Nor is it the effect or consequence thereof which afterward Chemnitius devised to correct Smidlinus his opinion For the union remained not onely in death but also in the whole state of his humilitie without any reall transfusion of the ubiquity or any other of the divine properties into the flesh without which the Ubiquitaries cry out that Christ is no more God then Peter was Out of all which it is plaine that ubiquity by this Thesis cuts its owne throat For how can a dead body hanging on the Crosse and lying in the grave and yet not separated from the Word have an illocall-manner of subsisting Likewise if the soule which the Word assumed could in the time of humiliation encrease in wisdome as Luke 2. then doubtlesse from the womb it could not be omniscient although it subsisted in the Word VIII This humane nature of Christ is not required to the dignity of the person of the Word as it is simply the Word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For the Word is a person of it selfe perfect and every way complete even from his eternall generation of the Father IX It belongs notwithstanding to the integrity of the Word incarnate or of Christ as be is Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whose person after the Incarnation is compounded as the Ecclesiastick Writers doe witnesse The Animadversion If the flesh belong to the integrity of the person of the Word incarnate In the ninth Position there lies some deceit for he saith that the flesh belongs to the integrity of the Word incarnate that afterward hee may conclude the ubiquitie of the flesh when as the entire Word being incarnate is every-where But he cunningly saith that it belongs to the integrity of the Word incarnate but not to the integritie of the person of the Word incarnate lest hee should seem to conclude a quaternitie or make the Word one person and the Word incarnate another To the same purpose is it when he calls the person of the Word incarnate or of Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 compounded Now the orthodox Writers though they reject not simply these speeches for they themselves speak so without any feare of cavilling yet they warne us to understand them aright to wit in that sense as they were used by Ecclesiastick Writers to whose testimony our adversaries appeale lest wee should conclude that the hypostasis of the Word before its Incarnation was imperfect or that it is from some other hypostasis of the Word incarnate For so of necessity a quaternity must follow We must then stick to that which our adversary confesseth rightly Thes 8. that the Word is in it selfe altogether perfect and entire We must also hold what he acknowledgeth Thes 12. that there is not one Son begot of the Father from eternity and another conceived and begot of Mary in time but that there is one and the same For these being granted it is plaine that the Word and the Word incarnate are not two different persons but one and the same numericall hypostasis and that they differ not essentially but onely in some respect as Peter when he is clothed and when he is naked is one and the same person differing from it selfe not subjectively but accidentally Hence further it followes manifestly that nothing can be properly said to belong to the integrity of the Word incarnate which doth not also belong to the integrity of the person of the Word but to say this were to deny the perfection of the Word and to make a composition in God The Word incarnate is improperly a person created That the flesh then doth belong to the integrity of the person of the Word is to be so understood as the person is called compounded by Writers to wit not properly but improperly For on the first Thesis we shewed That the person of the Word incarnate is compounded made up constituted consisteth of two natures not as an heap of corne is made up of many graines a mixed body of elements Or as a living creature is compounded of a body and soule which are peculiar waies of composition Neither can they be attributed to the person of Christ unlesse many absurdities doe follow hence as Thomas shewes at length But the terme Composition is here taken in a large signification How the hypostaticall union is a composition for the position of divers things together in one which way soever it be for so the
And thou preservest them all I forme the light and create darknes I make peace and create evill I the Lord doe all these things Wisedome reacheth from one end to another mightily and comely doth shee order all things Gods particular providence over creatures renewed with reason Ge. 45.8 50.20 Exod. 4.11 Jos 11.6 21.45 2 Sam. 16.10 1 Kings 22.20 Pro. 21.1 19.14 22.14 Esay 10.5 Lament 2.37 Dan. 4.32 Of the speciall providence of God over reasonable creatures the history of Joseph yeeldeth us notable testimonies Ye sent mee not hither but God When ye thought evill against mee God disposed it to good Likewise the indurating and hardening of Pharaoh Exod. 3.4 7 8 9 10 14. Who hath given the mouth to man or who hath made the dumbe or the deafe or him that seeth Have not I the Lord Therefore goe now and I will be with thy mouth The Lord said unto Josuah Be not affraid for them for to morrow about this time I will deliver them all slaine before Israel There failed nothing of all the good things which the Lord had said unto the house of Israel but all came to passe The Lord hath bidden him curse David Who shall entise Ahab that he may goe and fall at Ramoth Gilead and so forth Thou shalt entise and shalt also prevaile The Kings heart is in the hand of the Lord he turneth it whither-soever it pleaseth him A prudent wife cometh of the Lord. The mouth of strange women is as a deep pit He with whom the Lord is angry shall fall therein Likewise the Lord calleth the King of the Assyrians the rod of his fury Who is he then that saith and it commeth to passe and the Lord commandeth it not According to his will he worketh in the army of heaven and in the inhabitants of the earth and none can stay his hand nor say unto him What doest thou Herod and Pontius Pilate Acts 4.27 with the Gentiles and the people of Israel gathered themselves together to doe whatsoever thine hand and thy counsell had determined before to be done His providence over creatures voide of reason Psal 34.20 Job 37. Psa 104. 134.7 Gen. 8.1 Psal 147.8 9. Mat. 6.20 30. Of his providence in creatures which are without reason whether they bee living or not living testimonies are extant every where in the Sacred Scriptures The Lord keepeth all the just mans bones Likewise Hee bringeth up the clouds from the ends of the earth and maketh the lightnings with the raine hee draweth forth the winde out of his treasures God remembred Noah and made a winde to passe upon the earth Which giveth to beasts their food and to the young Ravens that cry Your heavenly Father feedeth the fowles of the aire If God so clothe the grasse of the field shall hee not doe much more unto you 4. Of the providence of God governing things contingent fortuâ—ing and casuall these places of Scripture speake If a man hath not laid wait 2. His providence over things casuall fortuning Exod. 21.11 Mat. 10.21 30 Joâ— 1.21 Prov. 16.33 Josua 7. but God hath offered him into his hand then I will appoint thee a place whither he shall flee Are not two Sparrowes sold for a farthing and one of them shall not fall to the ground without your Father Yea and all the haires of your head are numbred The Lord hath given and the Lord hath taken it blessed be the Lords Name The lot is cast into the lap but the whole disposition thereof is of the Lord. Thus God openeth the theft of Achan by lot Gods providence in necessary events John 19.36 Exod 12.46 Luke 24.46 Marke 18.7 Mat. 24 2â— John 10 2â— Two necessities depending on Gods decree Job 37.5 6 9 10. Job 38.27 28 32. Psal 104.13 14 15. Of Gods providence in necessary events if their necessity depend on the decree of God revealed in his word we have these evidences These things were done that the Scripture should be fulfilled Not a bone of him shall be broken Thus it is written and thus it behoved Christ to suffer and to rise again from the dead the third day It must needs be that offences shall come If it were possible they should deceive the very Elect. My sheep shal never perish neither shall any pluck them out of mine hand If their necessity depend on the order settled by God in nature that iâ— on naturall causes working by a naturall necessity we have also these proofes thereof God thundreth marvellously with his voice he saith to the snow Be thou upon the earth likewise to the small raine and to the raine of his power The whirle wind cometh out of the South and the cold from the North-wind At the breath of God the frost is given He causeth the bud of the herbe to spring forth by raine he begetteth the deaw the frost the ice he bringeth forth Mazzaroth in their time he guideth Arcturus he guideth the motions of heaven and effectually worketh by them in these lower regions Hee watereth the mountaines from his chambers and the earth is filled with the fruit of thy workes He causeth the grasse to grow for the cattell and herbe for the use of man that he maâ— bring forth bread out of the earth and wine that maketh glad the heart of man and oyle to make the face to shine and bread that strengtheneth mans heart He appointed the Moone for certaine seasons the Sun knoweth his going downe Thou makest darknesse and it is night To those testimonies of Scripture which ratifie Gods providence in such necessary events as depend on his decree revealed in his word those places also may be added which confirme the resurrection and raising again from the dead of those bodies which we carry about with us in this life as Who shall change our vile body that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body Genes 3. Job 10. according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto himselfe This corruptible must put on incorruption and this morâ—all must put on immortality For seeing we see the substance of our bodies to be so many waies changed and scattered after death when as they are moldred into dust it followeth therefore necessarily that there is a providence of God which taketh a most strait and exact care even of the smallest dust whereby the substance of out bodies so often altered and dissipated into infinite formes and parts is againe in such wise to be recollected gathered together and reduced to their first masse and forme as that not other but the selfe same bodies which wee have in this life shall rise againe Against these places of Scripture alledged some make exception That the examples whereof these places speake are particular and propheticall events administred by the speciall counsell of God and that therefore there may not be framed a generall rule universally extending to all events But against
hath sent He that beleeveth in the Son hath everlasting life That all men should honour the Son as they honour the Father This is a certain and invincible argument of the Deity of the Son for faith is a worship due only to God OF THE NAME JESVS But that it may be the better understood that by the name Jesus the office of the Sonne of God the Mediatour is designed these foure questions are to be considered 1. What is signified by the word Jesus 2. From what evils he saveth or delivereth 3. How hee saveth 4. Whom hee saveth 1. What the name Jesus signifieth THe question touching the name Jesus concerneth not so much the Etimologie and peculiar sense which this name importeth but especially respecteth the office of the Son of God therin implyed The word Jesus in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mat. 1.21 and in Hebrew Jehoscuah or Jescuah signifieth a Saviour and Authour of safety which Name God himself gave unto the Mediatour 0166 0 in the new testament This true Etymon or original signification of this word is assigned by the Angel saying For he shall save his people from their sinnes Luke 1.31 The Son of God therefore is called Jesus in respect of his office by an excellencie 1. In that he is our Mediatour who saveth and delivereth from the evils both of crime and punishment 2. And that alone 3. Yea and most perfectly whether we respect the number of these evils hee delivereth us from them all or the degrees of them hee hath utterly annihilated the greatest yea and smallest portion of them And the salvation which he tendereth unto us is righteousnes and life everlasting Jesus is our Saviour This is gathered out of his very name because he hath not a bare title without the thing it selfe but farther therewith performeth and executeth the office of a Mediatour Object Many others were called by the Name Jesus and were Saviours of their People as for example Josuah the Captaine of Israel and divers other Therefore from this name it is not necessarily argued and inforced that Christ onely is our Saviour Answ Others had this name because they were typicall Saviours prefiguring and resembling this true Saviour Repl. Yea but the Parents of Josuah when they gave their young Infant this name could not so much as suspect that by him should come the delivery of the people of Israel Answ What then yet GOD knew and thereupon so directed their wils that they should call him Josuah Now there is a great difference between those other and this our Jesus Differences between the true Jesus our Saviuor and others of the same name 1. Others had this name imposed on them by the will of men this our Jesus had his name given him by an Angel 2. Others were but types and shaddowes this was the true prefigured Jesus 3. God by them bestowed onely corporall and temporall benefits upon his people the Israelites but by this Jesus he saveth all the chosen dispersed through the whole world from all evils both of body and soule from sin and death everlasting 4. they were only instruments and ministers by whom Christ gave safety and benefits temporall to the people Christ is the authour of all good things both temporall and eternall and these he by his own efficacy bestoweth on whom he will Thus the Son of God is called Jesus by an excellency above others being the true Saviour 1. Because he exempteth and freeth us from all evils of crime and paine 2. Because he alone worketh this freedome and delivery That the Sonne of God onely is that Saviour is shewed by the places of Scripture following There is no salvation in any other 2. Jesus alone is our Saviour Acts 4.12 John 3.18 1 John 5.11 1 Tim. 2.5 Esa 43.11 25. Rom. 5.19 How the whole three persons are said to be Saviours For among men there is given no other name under heaven whereby wee must be saved Hee that beleeveth not in the Sonne is condemned already because hee beleeveth not in the name of the onely begotten Son of God God hath given unto us eternall life and this life is in his Son There is one God and one Mediatour between God and man which is the man Christ Jesus I am the Lord and besides me there is no Saviour I am hee that putteth away thine iniquities for mine owne sake By the obedience of one shall many be made righteous Object The Father and the holy Ghost also are our Saviours Therefore not the Sonne alone Ans 1. It is a fallacy affirming that to be simply and wholly so which is but in some respect only so True it is they all save mankinde but the difference is in the manner of their saving For The Father by sending the Son The Father saveth as the fountaine of our delivery because he sendeth his Sonne into flesh by him to deliver us but the Father himselfe is not sent The holy Ghost by being sent of the Sonne The holy Ghost saveth as an immediate effector or worker of regeneration sent from the Father by the Sonne into the hearts of the chosen The Son only by ment and efficacy The Sonne saveth b◠his merit and efficacy and thus becometh sole Mediatour paying the ransome giving the holy Ghost regenerating and raising us up unto life eternall Wherefore this efficacy and effectuall working it self is common to all three persons yet the order and manner of working is different and appropriate to each But the ransome the Sonne onley hath paid The particle alone executes all creatures from being Saviours 1. Cor. 2.11 Ans 2. The Sonne is called the onely Saviour in respect of the creature to whom he is opposed and from whom he is descerned that is from the word of salvation not the Father and the holy Ghost but the creatures onely are excluded For no creature delivereth from sin and death So it is said The things of God knoweth no man but the Spirit of God but it followeth not hereof that the Father and the Son know not themselves For the Spirit in that place is compared with the creature not with the Father and the Son 2. From what evils he saveth or delivereth HE delivereth us from all evils both of crime and paine most fully and perfectly From the evill of crime for so the Angel testifieth Hee shall save his people from their sinnes The bloud of Jesus Christ cleanseth us from all sinne that is that it may not be imputed unto us Mat. 1.21 1 John 1.7 and that it may not raigne in us but be abolished and so we at length leave off to sin Wherefore also he delivereth us from all paine and punishment For the cause being taken away which is sinne the effect is taken away which is punishment Rom 8.1 Now then there is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus I give unto them eternall life This salvation
man Nestorius separated the two natures in Christ Nestorius heresie neither would have the Sonne of God but man onely to have died Doe not boast thou Jew saith Nestorius thou hast not crucified God but man The Ubiquitaries beleeve that the humanity of Christ The Ubiquitaries heresie from the moment of his incarnation was so endowed with all the properties of the God-head as that onely in this the humanity differeth from the God-head that the humanity hath by an accident whatsoever the God-head hath by and of it selfe Hereof it cometh that they imagine that Christ was in the time of his death yea when he was inclosed in the Virgins womb in heaven and every where not only as touching his God-head but with his body too This is it which they call the forme of God Phil. 2.6 Wherefore against all these we affirme and in the Creed beleeve that Christ died truly and corporally even by a true divulsion and separation of his soule from his body 1. Christ died truly and that a locall separation so that not onely his soule and body were not together every where but were not together in one place the soule was not where the body was Matth. 27.50 Marke 15.37 Luke 23.46 John 19.30 nor the body where the soule was Then Jesus cried againe with a loud voyce and yeelded up the Ghost Jesus cried with a lowd voyce and gave up the Ghost Father into thy hands I commend my spirit And when he had said these words he gave up the Ghost He bowed his head and gave up the Ghost Object But as vertue that is his divinity is said to have gone out of him so also he gave up the Ghost Answ There is a dissimilitude in these Because the divinity remaining united with the humane nature yet did work abroad without it The soule did depart from the body The reason of this dissimilitude is because the act of his divinity is increate and infinite but the act and power of his soule finite and created But yet this is further to be added 2. Christ died without breach of the union of his two natures that although his soule was truly separated from his body yet the Word notwithstanding did not forsake neither body nor soule but remained neverthelesse joyned both to body and soule and therefore the two natures in Christ were not divelled or sundered by that divulsion of the soule and body Object Why then cryed he Matth. 27.46 My God my God why hast thou forsaken me Answ Because of his delay and deferring of help and succour For the two natures in Christ ought not to have been divelled or sundred because it is written God hath purchased the Church with his own bloud And he was to be the Son of God who should die for our sins Acts 20.28 that he might be a sufficient price for them Hereby also it doth cleerly appeare That The union of both natures in Christ is no Vbiquity For the soule being separated from the body was not in the grave with the body and by a consequent not every where because that which is every where can never be separated and yet in death and in the grave the union of both natures remained and continued 2. Whether it was requisite and necessary that Christ should die IT was requisite and necessary that Christ to make full satisfaction not only should suffer but also should die 1. In respect of the justice of God that so his justice might be satisfied which required the death of men by whom it was violated For the hurting and offending of the greatest good is to be expiated with the greatest punishment or with the utmost destruction of nature that is with the death of the guilty condemned for sinne according to that The wages of sinne is death Rom. 6.23 But Christ succeeded in our stead and took on him our person who had sinned and had deserved death not only eternall but temporall also For wee deserved destruction which is the dissolution of the soule from the body whereon ensueth the dissolution of the body as a house is said to be subverted and destroyed when one part is separated from another Now it was requisite that the Sonne of God should die that he might be a sufficient ransome for our sins For no creature could have sustained such a punishment as should have been equivalent to eternall punishment and yet withall should have been temporall Object They have deserved eternall punishment whosoever are not reconciled to God by Christ therefore the soules ought not to be separated from their bodies that they might suffer eternall damnation Ans It doth not follow but this rather That therefore both body and soule must be together that they may suffer it which at length shall so come to passe Therefore it was necessary that Christ should die for us and his soule be separated from his body 2. In respect of Gods truth that the truth of God may be satisfied For God threatned and denounced death when ever we sinned which denouncing was to be fulfilled after sin was once committed And this is that commination or threatning pronounced by God himself In the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt die the death Obj. But Adam did not presently die Ans Truely he forth-with died not a bodily death Gen. 2.17 howbeit he became mortall straight upon it and by little and little he dayly died and even now already had he died spiritually eternall death and now was dead I heard saith he thy voice and I was affraid because I was naked Gen. 3.20 There was a terrour in him and a feeling of Gods wrath a strife with death the losse of all the gifts both of body and mind But there followed the equity moderation and lenity of the Gospel For God had not expresly said that he should certainly die wholly and presently For so had he perished for ever Wherefore the Son offered a mitigation and lenifying raised him up to a new life that notwithstanding he should remain subject to the corporall death which yet should not be deadly and pernicious unto him 3. In respect of the promise made to the Fathers both by words He is brought as a sheep to the slaughter and as a sheep before be shearer is dumb Esay 53.7 so openeth he not his mouth and by sacrifices whereby God promiseth that Christ should die such a death as should be an equivalent price for the sins of the whole world This could not be the work of a meere creature but of the Son of God only and therefore it was requisite and necessary that the Son of God should suffer so grievous a death for us Ob. Then they do not satisfie Gods justice who are punished because their punishment is endlesse and eternall Ans They satisfie by eternall punishment Rep. So then might we also be delivered from the curse by our selves Ans So then shall we never be
reason of the latter is because all the elect and faithfull and they alone doe by faith apply unto themselves the merit of Christs death and by his application obtaine the efficacy thereof even their justification and salvation according to that saying of Scripture He which beleeveth in the Son hath life everlasting The rest are excluded from this efficacy of Christs death by their own infidelity according as it followeth in the same place He which beleeveth not shall not see life but the wrath of God abideth on him Wherefore John 3.36 whom the Scripture cancelleth from the participation of the efficacy of Christs death for them Christ cannot be said to have died with respect of the efficacy of his death but in respect only of the sufficiency of his sacrifice because the death of Christ is sufficient to save them if they beleeved but it saveth them not because they beleeve not If any demand what the will of Christ herein was whether he had a will to die for all hee is answered by the same distinction For as hee died so would hee die Whether Christ would die for all men As therefore he died for all in respect of the sufficiency of his ransome but for the faithfull alone in regard of the efficacy of the same so would hee also die for all in generall as concerning the sufficiency of his merit that is hee would in most sufficient maner demerit for all by his death grace righteousnesse and life everlasting seeing he would that nothing should be wanting on his part that there should be no defect in his merit that so all the wicked and reprobate might perish without excuse But for the elect alone hee would die as touching the efficacy of his merit that is hee would not only sufficiently merit grace and salvation but also effectually impart them on the elect alone namely hee would give unto them faith and the holy Ghost and accomplish or effect in them that they should apply unto themselves by faith the benefits of his death and so obtain the fruits thereof In this sense Christ is well said to have died in a different maner for the faithfull and unfaithfull Neither hath this interpretation any inconvenience consequent thereon but accordeth not only with Scripture but even with very experience also both which testifie unto us that the salve of sin and death is most sufficiently and plentifully offered in the Gospel unto all but it is applyed and it cureth the faithfull alone The whole current of Scripture restraineth the efficacy of redemption to some particulars only as to Christs sheep to the elect and to the beleeving whereas on the other side it apparently abandoneth and sequestreth from the grace of Christ the reprobate and unfaithfull as long as they remain such What concord hath Christ with Belial or what part hath the beleever with the infidell Again 2 Cor. 6.15 Christ prayed for the Elect only and beleeving and such as hereafter should beleeve on him I pray not for the world but for those whom thou hast given mee If Christ would not pray for the world to wit for the unfaithfull much lesse would he so die for them John 27.9 as by his death to effect their salvation For it is a lesse thing to pray for a man than to die for him and intercession and suffering of death are the two individuall or inseparable parts of Christs sacrifice of which if Christ deny the ungodly the one who is he that dareth reach out unto them the other Lastly the sounder Fathers and Schoole-men doe thus restraine these texts of Scriptures The opinion of Fathers herein Aug ad cap. ob cap. 1 in Ioh. tract 52. serm 137. de temp Cyr. in Ioh. lib. 11 cap. 19. Prospâ—r ad cap. Gallorum Lumb lib. 3. dist 22 Sum. de veâ—it Mat. 26. Quaft 7. and distinguish on them as we doe especially Augustine Cyril and Prosper Lombard thus writeth Christ offered up himself to God the Trinity for all men as touching the sufficiency of the price pay'd but for the elect alone as touching the efficacy because he wrought salvation only for the Predestinate Thomas saith The merit of Christ as concerning the sufficiency thereof equally belongeth unto all but not concerning the efficacy which hapneth partly by reason of free-will and partly by reason of Gods election whereby the effects and fruits of Christs merits are mercifully bestowed on some and by the just judgement of God are with-held from others This is the language of other School-men also Whence it is evident that Christ so died for all that notwithstanding the benefits of his death properly concern the faithfull alone to whom only they are availeable Object 1. The promise of the Gospel is universall as appeareth in that Christ saith Come unto mee all And againe That every man might be saved Also That hee might have mercy on all Therefore it concerneth not the faithfull alone Ans The promise indeed is universall but in regard of the faithfull and penitent For to extend it unto filthy dogs and hogs that is to the reprobate were open blasphemy There is saith Ambrose a certain speciall university of the elect and fore-knowne of God severed and discerned from the generality of all This manner of restraint is deduced out of the very letter of the promise John 3.16 Rom. 322. That every one which beleeveth should not perish but have everlasting life The righteousnesse of God by the faith of Christ Jesus unto all and upon all that beleeve Come unto mee all yee which labour and travell and I will refresh you Hee is rich unto all that call upon him Whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved Mat. 11.28 Acts 2.21 Heb. 5.9 Mat. 7.6 Hee is made the authour of salvation unto all that obey him And out of the words of Christ Give not that which is holy unto dogs and cast not pearles before swine Obj. 2. Christ died for all Therefore his death appertaineth not to the faithfull only Answ Christ died for all as touching the merit and sufficiency of his ransom for the faithfull only as touching the application and efficacy thereof For inasmuch as the death of Christ is imparted unto them and profiteth them only it is rightly said to appertain properly unto them alone as before hath bin proved at large Quest 41. To what end was he buried also Ans That thereby he might make manifest that he was dead indeed a Act. 13.29 Mat. 27.59 60 Luk. 23.52 The Explication THE causes of Christs buriall are many For 1. He would be buried in testimony of his true death that we might know that hee was dead indeed For the living are not buried but the dead only As then after his resurrection hee offered himselfe to be seen handled c. for evident proof of the truth of his body raised from death so after his death he offered his body to be
but also our soules Therefore he ought to suffer not only in body but in soule also 2. Christ was to deliver us from the paines and torments of hell Therefore hee of force must suffer them which being so he either suffered them before his death or after death The Papists themselves confesse that hee suffered not after death Therefore it must needs be that he suffered them before death But these paines he suffered not in the body for the sufferings of the body were only externall Therefore he suffered those griefs in his soule 3. It is very convenient that the extremest and most grievous part of Christs Passion which was these dolours of minde should not be passed over without mention in the Creed But if the Article of Descension into hell concerne them not they should be left unmentioned sith that the former Articles treat only of the externall sufferings of the body which Christ suffered without him There is no doubt therefore but that by this Article the ghostly passions or sufferings of his soule are signified This is the true meaning of the Descension into hell and wee are to maintaine and defend against the Papists that which is certain namely that Christ so descended as hath been proved in this discourse Howbeit if any man be able to maintain with sure grounds and proofs that Christ descended in any other sense it is well I cannot Object 1. See D. Tho. Bils Bish of Winchin his Tract touching the redemption of mankind Pag. 154. c. John 19.30 The Articles of faith are to be understood properly and without any trope or figure Answ True except an Article being taken according to the proper signification be disagreeing from other places of Scripture But this Article of Christs descension into hell being taken properly is much repugnant to that saying of Christ It is finished For if Christ fulfilled and finished all the parts of our Redemption on the Crosse there was no cause why he should descend into hell that is into the place of the damned Object 2. The terrours and torments of the soule in Christ went before his buriall But the descension into hell followeth his buriall Therefore the descension into hell concerneth not those torments Ans The Minor of this Syllogisme is faulty in alledging that for a cause which is no cause For in the Creed the descension into hell followeth the buriall not that it was performed after the buriall but because it is an illustration of that which went before touching the Passion Death and Buriall lest any thing should be detracted from them as if it were said He suffered not only in body hee died not onely a bodily death hee was not onely buried but also suffered in soule the extreamest vexations and hellish dolours such as all the reprobate shall suffer for ever The chiefest therefore and weightiest part of Christs passion followeth in good order For the Creed proceedeth from the griefs of the body to the vexation and anguish of the minde and from the visible Passion to the invisible as it were from a lesse to a greater matter and circumstance 2. The fruits and use of Christs descension into hell CHrist descended into hell 1. That we might not descend thither but rather that hee might free us from the eternall paines and torments thereof 2. That he might transport and carry us triumphantly with him into heaven What it is to beleeve in Christ who descended into hell Wherefore to beleeve in Christ which descended into hell is to beleeve that Christ sustained for mee in his soule infernall and hellish paines and torments and that exceeding ignominy which is due unto the wicked in hell that thereby I might not descend into hell and that I might never be forced to suffer them all which otherwise I should suffer in hell eternally but that of the contrary rather I might ascend with Christ into heaven and there injoy with him exceeding happinesse and glory for ever and ever This is the use and profit of this Article of Christs descension into hell ON THE 17. SABBATH Quest 45. What doth the Resurrection of Christ profit us Answ First by his Resurrection he vanquished death that he might make us partakers of that righteousnesse which hee had gotten us by his death a Rom. 4.25 1 Pet. 1.3 1 Cor. 15.16 Again wee are now also stirred up by his power to a new life b Rom. 6.4 Col. 3.1 c. Eph. 1.3 2.5 Lastly the Resurrection of our head Christ is a pledge unto us of our glorious resurrection c 1 Cor. 15.20 21. The Explication THus farre have we continued the Treatise of Christs humiliation It remaineth that wee proceed unto his glorification for which hee rose the third day from the dead For the humiliation of the Mediatour was not to endure for ever but it was enough that he suffered once and died notwithstanding the efficacy and power thereof in preserving and maintaining the blessings issuing and flowing thence with full stream endureth for ever Now in Christs Resurrection two things are especially to be considered the history Two things to be considered in Christs resurrection and the fruit thereof In the history wee are to observe Who rose Who it was that rose from the dead 1. The history and therein to wit Christ both God and man in that body in which he died For this the Word never put off How he rose The manner of his rising which was that he who was verily dead revived from death recalling his soule to his body and gloriously came forth of his Sepulchre on the third day according to the Scriptures and that both by his Fathers and his own force and power I say not the power of his flesh but of his God-head For he was raised of the Father by himself because the Father worketh by the Son The testimonies of his rising The testimonies of his true resurrection Hee shewed himself openly to many women and Disciples the Angels bare witnesse thereunto 4. The fruits of Christs resurrection c. The fruits of Christs resurrection are expressed in these questions following The chief questions of Christs Resurrection are 1. Whether Christ rose againe 2. How he rose 3. For what cause he rose 4. What are the fruits of his resurrection 1. Whether Christ rose again INsidels beleeve that Christ died but beleeve not that he rose from death Neverthelesse that Christ rose again is proved by the restimonies of Angels Women Evangelists Apostles and other Saints who after his resurrection saw him felt him and talked with him And we were to beleeve the Apostles in respect of the authority which they had from heaven although they had not seen him 2. How Christ rose THe maner of Christs Resurrection is declared by these circumstances following 1. Christ did rise truely and indeed so that his soule did truely and indeed returne unto his body from which it was
severed by death Truely and hee did truely come forth even out of the grave also in despite of the Watch-men they being withall amazed and stricken therewith 2. He rose the same person which he died the same Jesus Christ God and Man according to the nature wherein he suffered namely In his true body according to his humane nature even the true humane nature and the same in essence and properties and that not deified but glorified all infirmities thereof being done away Behold my hands and my feet for it is I my selfe handle mee and see mee for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as yee see mee have And truely nothing else could rise againe Luke 24.39 but that which had fallen The same body therefore which fell did rise again which is the greatest comfort unto us For hee must have been one and the same Mediatour who should merit for us a communicating and participation of those benefits which we had lost by sin and who should restore the same unto us and apply them to every one Again except Christ flesh had risen neither should ours rise 3. He rose by his owne power that is he put death to flight and shook it from himselfe quickened his dead body re-united it to his soule By his own power John 2.29 John 10.18 John 5.21 Rom. 4.24 8.11 and restored un to himself a blessed heavenly and glorious life and that by the might and power of his God-head Destroy this Temple and in three dayes I will raise it up again I have power to lay downe my soule and have power to take it up againe As the Father raiseth up the dead and quickneth them so the Son quâ—ckneth whom he will Obj. But the Father raised him For it is said If the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you c. Therefore he raised not himself Ans The Father raised the Son by the Son himself not as by an instrument but as by another person of the same essence and power with the Father by which the person doth ordinarily work The Son is raised of the Father by himselfe himselfe hath raised up himselfe by his Spirit For John 5.19 Whatsoever things the Father doth the same things doth the Son also 4 Hee rose the third day by his Fathers and his owne power The third day 1. Because the Scriptures in which are understood all the prophecies and types under the Law doe shew that Christ ought to rise the third day as for example wee may instance in Jonas who fore-shewed Christ 2. Because his body was to rise not being tainted with any corruption and yet not forth-with the first day that his death might undoubtedly be knowne but the third day after his Passion on the Crosse The circumstance therefore of the third day is inserted in the Creed that the truth might be correspondent to the type and we ascertained that this Jesus is the Messias promised to the Fathers because he alone rose the third day 3. For what cause Christ rose CHrist rose The glory of the Father and the Son Rom. 1.4 John 17.1 For his Fathers and his owne glory Declared to be the Son of God by the resurrection from the dead Father glorifie thy Son that thy Son may also glorifie thee For the glory of the Son is the glory of the Father Because of the prophecies Psal 16.10 Acts 2.27 In respect of the prophecies which were uttered of his death and of his resurrection Thou shalt not leave my soule in the grave neither shalt thou suffer thine boly One to see corruption When hee shall make his soule an offering for sinne hee shall see his seed Esay 53.10 Mat. 12 39. and shall prolong his dayes Hee shall see of the travell of his soule and shall be satisfied No signe shall be given unto it save the signe of the Prophet Jonas For as Jonas was three dayes and three nights in the Whales belly so shall the Sonne of Man be three dayes and three nights in the heart of the earth As yet they knew not the Scripture Mat. 25.54 that hee must rise againe from the dead In regard of these and other such prophecies it was necessary that Christ should die and rise againe that the Scriptures might be fulfilled How then should the Scriptures be fulfilled which say that it must be so to wit because of Gods unchangeable decree revealed in the Scriptures of which decree the Apostles in the Acts speak Acts 4.27 28. saying Doubtlesse against thine only Son Jesus whom thou hast anointed both Herod and Pontius Pilate with the Gentiles and the people of Israel gathered themselves together to doe whatsoever thine hand and thy counsell had determined before to be done Hither also belong Christs own predictions hereof Mat. 17 23. John 2.19 They shall kill the Son of Man but the third day hee shall rise again I will raise up this Temple again The worthinesse of the person rising Acts 2.14 John 3.35 For the worthinesse and power of the person that rose For for this cause it was impossible that Christ should be held of death as Peter testifieth and that 1. Because Christ is the beloved and only begotten Son of God The Father loveth the Son and hath given all things into his hands So God loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son c. 2. Christ is true God and authout of life I am the resurrection and life John 5.26 â—1 10.28 As the Father hath life in himselfe so likewise hath he given to the Son to have life in himselfe As the Father raiseth up the dead and quickneth them so the Son quickneth whom he will I give unto them eternall life It had been absurd then that he should not be raised but sleep in death who giveth life to others 3. Christ is righteous in himself and by dying satisfyed for our sins which were imputed to him Now where sin is not there doth not death reigne any more With one offering hath he consecrated for ever them that are sanctified Heb. 10.14 Rom. 5.10 In that he died he died once to sin but in that he liveth he liveth to God The office of the person In respect of the office of the person who rose which had he remained in death he could not have discharged For 1. The Mediatour who was true God and Man should reigne for ever Thy throne O God is for ever and ever the Scepter of thy Kingdome is a Scepter of righteousnesse Psal 45.7 2 Sam. 7.13 14. I will stablish the throne of his Kingdome for ever I will be his Father and he shall be my Son I have sworne once by my holinesse that I will not faile David Psal 83.34 35 36. Ez. 37.23 24. His seed shall endure for ever and his seate is like as the Sun before mee Hee shall stand fast for evermore as the
effect likewise is taken away The wages of sinne is death Further Rom. 6.23 if he hath abolished death and that by a sufficient satisfaction for our sins which satisfaction he hath shewed and declared by his resurrection to be sufficient it is certain that his resurrection is a most certain testimony of our resurrection for he having performed a sufficient satisfaction for the sins of his members the members cannot remain in death But the resurrection of Christ the head is an argument of the perfect satisfaction for the sinnes of his members Therefore Christs resurrection is also an argument of the perfect resurrection of his members 3. As the first Adam received the blessings for himselfe and all his posterity and lost the same from all So Christ the second Adam received life and all other gifts for himselfe and others and therefore also will communicate eternall life with us 4. Seeing the same spirit dwelleth in us which did in Christ he shall work also the same in us which in our head he did For the spirit is alwayes alike neither could he work in the head and sleep in the members Therefore seeing Christ hath raised himselfe up by his spirit from the dead he will verily also raise us up If the spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you Rom. 8.11 he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortall bodies because that his Spirit dwelleth in you 5. Because Christ is man and our brother for except he were man we should have no hope of the resurrection of our flesh For 1 Cor 1â— 11 by man came the resurrection Therefore for his tender love and affection he will not leave us in death and so much the rather in regard of his power and glory For if he being dead raised himselfe much more being alive shall he be able to raise us up and if in the time of his humiliation he had power to raise himselfe much more may he raise us out of the grave now he reigneth in glory aâ— the right hand of his Father Object 1. Then the wicked shall not rise againe because Christs resurrection is neither an argument nor the cause of the resurrection of the wicked but of the godly onely Answ There be other causes for which the wicked shall rise againe even for the just judgement of God whereby he hath appointed them to eternall paines For the same thing may have moe effects and diverse causes Object 2. These are the benefits of his death therefore not of his resurrection Ans They are of his death as by it he deserved them of his resurrection 1. In respect of the manifestation of them for by his resurrection he declared that those benefis were purchased for us For by escaping from this punishment he made plaine proofe of his full and perfect satisfaction for sinne 2. In respect of the application of them Because by his resurrection he applieth his benefits unto us 2 Cor. â— 9 He being rich was made poore and being poore was made rich againe that he might enrich us Object 3. The effect is not before the cause The cause of these benefis which is his resurrection was not before the first resurrection therefore neither the effect that is the benefits themselves Answ The resurrection was not as touching the accomplishment thereof but in the counsell of God and in efficacy and vertue it was in the Old Testament For then also were men received into favour they were indued with the holy Ghost and received the other benefits but for and by the Mediatour which was in time appointed to be humbled and glorified Knowledge that Christ is the prophecied Melâ—ias By Christs resurrection we know him to be the Messias as in whom the prophecies were fulfilled Assurance that he is the Mediatour By it we are assured that he now executeth the office of the Mediatour that he applyeth unto us the benefit of redemption that he preserveth us perpetually in that righteousnesse which he hath applied unto us that he beginneth in us a new life and so doth also assure and ascertain us of the consummation and accomplishment of eternall life all which he could not doe except he had risen againe Affurance that he will alwaies defend his Church Seeing he now liveth and reigneth for ever we are certaine that he will preserve and defend his Church The consummation of all his benefits The last though not the least fruit of Christs resurrection is The consummation and perfecting of all his benefits and the glorifying of his Church For Christ did therefore die and is therefore risen and hath therefore perfectly delivered us from sin that we may be joynt heires with him of his kingdome and glory Col. 1.18 Rom. 8.17 He is the first-borne of the dead We are the heires of God and heires annexed with Christ He shall conforme and make us like unto himself because we live by the same spirit whereby he doth And this spirit is not unlike himselfe Rom. 8.11 If the spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortall bodies because that his spirit dwelleth in you John 14.3 I will come againe and receive you unto my selfe that where I am there may ye be also The summe of the fruits of Christs resurrection is that seeing Christ is risen it is manifest that he is declared to be the Son of God and as touching his humanity is endowed with that glory which becometh the nature of the Sonne of God and further that he endueth us also with his spirit regenerateth us by the vertue of his spirit and will at length consummate and perfect the new life begun in us and make us co-partners of the same his glory felicity and everlasting life The meaning of the Article He rose againe from the dead Now what is the meaning of this Article I beleeve in Christ which rose againe the third day from the dead Answ The meaning hereof is that I beleeve 1. That Christ did truly recall his soule into his dead body and quickned it 2. That he retained a true soul and true body but both now glorified and free from all our infirmities 3. That he rose by his owne vertue and power 4. That he rose to this end to make me a partaker of his righteousnesse sanctification and glorification which he had purchased for us by his death Quest 46. How understand you that He ascended into heaven Answ That Christ his Disciples looking on was taken up from the earth into heaven a Acts 1.9 Marke 16.19 Luke 24. â—1 and yet still is there for our sakes b Hebr. 9.24 4.14 Rom. 8.34 Col. 3.1 and will be untill he come againe to judge the quick and the dead c Acts 1.11 Mat. 24.30 The Explication CHrists ascension into heaven is a
in the world inferre that the world is not governed by God or if so then hee is unjust for It should goe well say they with the righteous But it doth not so Therefore God either cannot performe it or standeth not to his promises or there is no providence Unto which their cavill we answer That because in this life it goeth not well with the godly it shall goe well with them at length after this life 2. God will have us know it for our comfort that we may comfort our selves amidst our evils and miseries with this that at length shall come a time when wee shall be delivered out of this corruption and rottennesse 3. That wee may retain and keep our selves in the feare of God and our duty and that others also may be reclaimed from evill This judgement shall be let us endeavour therefore that we may be able to stand in this judgement The Scripture useth this argument both wayes both to comfort us and to hold and keep us in our duty Christ shall at length judge the wicked and our enemies suffer wee therefore patiently persecutions Rom. 14.10 We shall all appear before the judgement seate of Christ therefore live wee godly Luke 21.36 Watch therefore and pray continually that yee may bee counted worthy to escape all those things which shall come to passe and that yee may stand before the Son of man 2 Pet. 3.11 Seeing therefore that all these things must be dissolved what manner persons ought yee to be in holy conversation and godlinesse 4. That the wicked may be left excuselesse for they are warned sufficiently that they should be ready at every season lest they should say they were oppressed unawares 11. For what cause God would not have us certain of the time of judgement ALbeit it be most certain that the last judgement shall at length be yet the day of that judgement is altogether uncertain Mark 13.32 Of that day and hour no man knoweth no not the Angels which are in heaven nor the Son himself save the Father Now the causes why God would have it hid from us are these 1. That he might exercise our faith and patience and so wee should shew that wee would beleeve God and persevere in the expectation of his promise albeit we know not the time of our delivery 2. That he might bridle our curiosity 3. That hee might keep us in his fear in godlinesse and in executing of our duty and so we should be no way secure but ready every moment because were are uncertain when the Lord will come 4. That the very wicked might not deferre and prolong repentance seeing they know not the houre Mat. 24.43 25. â—3 lest perhaps the day overtake them unawares If the good man of the house knew at what watch the theefe would come he would surely watch Watch therefore for ye know neither the day nor the hour when the Son of man will come Luke 19.13 Occupy till I come 12. For what cause God deferreth that judgement HEe deferreth it 1. To exercise faith patience hope and prayer in the godly 2. That all the elect may be gathered to the Church For in respect of them and not in respect of the wicked doth the world continue for the creatures were made for the children of the house the wicked use them as theeves and robbers But when the whole number of the Church is fulfilled and gathered together then shall be the end Now God will have the elect gathered by ordinary means he will have them in this life to hear the word and by it be renewed and converted to which is required some tract of time 3. Hee deferreth it that hee might grant unto all a time and space of repentance as in Noahs time and that his deferring might leave the wicked and obstinate without excuse Rom. 2.4 9.22 Despisest thou the riches of his bountifulnesse and patience and long sufferance not knowing that the bountifulnesse of God leadeth thee to repentance God suffereth with patience the vessels of wrath prepared to destruction 13. Whether the last judgement be to be wished for WE are doubt lesse to wish for the day of judgment because it is an undoubted signe and token of that difference whereby the elect are discerned from the reprobate which declaration the godly do earnestly desire Moreover it shall be a delivery out of those miseries in which wee are Rom. 7.24 O wretched man that I am who shall deliver me from the body of this death Revel 22.17 The Spirit and the Bride say Come Lord Jesu which they say not who are not ready to receive the Lord for the wicked tremble and shake at the mention of that judgment The meaning of the Article I beleeve in Jesus Christ which shall come to judge the quick the dead What is the meaning then of this Article I beleeve in Christ which shall come to judge the quick and the dead Ans I beleeve 1. That Christ shal certainly come and that at his second coming there shall follow a renewing of heaven and earth 2. That the self-same Christ shall come who for us was born suffered and rose againe 3. That he shall come visibly and gloriously to deliver his Church whereof I am a member 4. That he shall come to abject and cast away the wicked into everlasting pains Our comfort by Christs coming By these we receive great and sound comfort also and consolation For seeing there shall be a renovation or renewing of heaven and earth we have a confidence and trust that our state also shall be at length other and better then now it is seeing Christ shall come we shall have a favourable Judge for he shall come to judge who hath merited righteousnesse for us who is our Brother Redeemer Patron and Defender seeing he shall come gloriously he shall also give a just sentence and judgement and shall be mighty enough to deliver us seeing hee shall come to deliver his Church great cause why wee should cheerfully expect him seeing he shall abject and cast away the wicked into everlasting torments let us suffer patiently their tyranny To conclude seeing he shall deliver the godly and cast away the wicked he will also deliver not cast away us and therefore it is necessary that we repent and be thankfull in this life and flie fleshly security that we may be in the number of them whom he shall deliver ON THE 20. SABBATH Quest 53. What beleevest thou concerning the holy Ghost Ans First that he is true and co-eternall God with the eternall Father and the Son a 1 John 5.7 Gen. 1.2 Isa 48.16 1 Cor. 3.16 6.19 Act. 5.3 4. Secondly that he is also given to mee b Gal. 4.6 Mat. 28.29 30. 2 Cor. 1.22 Ephes 1.13 to make mee through a true faith partaker of Christ and all his benefits c Gal. 3.14 1 Pet. 1.2 1 Cor.
worketh by his holy Spirit in their hearts a sense and feeling of that pardon whereon they may for ever rest setled and confirmed Therefore the purpose and decree of God of remitting sins is everlasting but the executing and performance thereof is when by faith wee apply remission of sins offered unto us in the Gospel So also God doth alwayes love his elect but that love is not powred out in their hearts before their repentance For they have that certain testimony of conscience by the gift of the holy Ghost that they are loved of God and so have their sins remitted who truly convert and repent ON THE 22. SABBATH Ques 57. What comfort hast thou by the resurrection of the flesh Answ That not only my soule after it shall depart our of my body shall presently be taken up to Christ her head a Luke 6.22 23.43 Phil. 1.21 23. but that this my flesh also being raised up by the power of Christ shall be again united to my soul and shall be made like to the glorious body of Christ b Job 19.25 26. 1 John 3.2 Phil. 3.21 The Explication The chief Questions hereto belonging are 1. Whether the soule be immortall 2. Where it abideth being separated from the body 3 What the Resurrection is and the errours concerning the Resurrection 4. Whence it may appeare that the Resurrection shall certainly be 5. What bodies shall rise 6. How 7. When. 8. By whom and by whose power 9. For what end the Resurrection shall be 1. Whether the soule be immontall BEsides that this Question belongeth to the Article of the resurrection The causes for which this question is to be moved the â—xplication also theâ—eof in it self shall not be altogether unprofitable or fruitleâ—â— For not now onlâ— do they begin to dispute against the immortality of the soul but the Sadduces also denyed it as they likewise that said Matth. 22.23 2 Tim. 2.17 the resurrection was past already unto him that beleeved neither made any other resurrection besides that spirituall resurrection of the regenerate Likewise also some Anabaptists deny the immortality of the soul Moreover Paul the â—hird Pope of Rome when he was breathing out his soule and ready to die said That now at length hee should try and know three things whereof in his whole time hee had much doubted 1. Whether there were a God 2. Whether soules were immortall 3. Whether there were any hell Oftentimes also in the Psalmer and in Solomon we meet with these and such like Aphorismes Eccles 3.19 Psal 115.17 Man dieth like a brute beast The dead shall not praise thee O Lord. Wherefore it ought not to seem strange if this question be moved neither shall it be altogether vain and needlesse both because it serveth for the controuling and refuting especially of Epicures as also because it maketh for the better understanding of some places of holy Scripture But because there have been and even now are who have taught That the soule of man like as of brute beasts is nothing else but life or the vitall power arising of the temperature and perfection of the body and therefore dieth and is extinguished together with the body and as some of them speak who will seem to beleeve the resurrection of the dead doth sleep when the body dieth that is is without motion or sense untill the raising of the body which indeed is nothing else then that the soul is mortall that is a meer quality only in the body and when the body is dissolved becometh nothing because if it were an incorporeall substance it could not be without sense and motion Against these we are to hold the records of Gods word and writ concerning the spirituall and immortall substance of mans soule The soul an incorporeall substance That the soul of man is not onely a form or perfection or temperament or force and power or an agitation arising out of the temperature of the body but a substance incorporeall living understanding dwelling in the body and sustaining and moving it these places following of holy Scripture doe shew Psal 48. His soule shall be blessed in life Heb. 12. God is called the Father of spirits And it is said of the faithfull Heb. 12.9 22. Ye are come to the celestiall Jerusalem and to the company of innumerable Angels and to the spirits of just and perfect men No man knoweth the things of a man save the spirit of a man which is in him 1 Cor. 2.11 In these and the like places of Scripture both the soule of a man is called a spirit and the properties of a living and understanding substance are attributed unto it Wherefore to no purpose do the adversaries of this doctrine oppose those places in which the name of the soule is taken for the life and will of man as Mat. 5.25 The soul is more worth then meat I put my soul in my hand For by the fore-alledged places it is manifest Job 13 14. that this is not generall but is used by a figure of speech whereby wee call the effect by the name of his cause Now the immortality of the soule is proved by many places of holy Scripture The soul immortall Luke 23.43 Christ hanging on the crosse said to the thiefe This day shalt thou be with me in paradise But he could not be there in body because that was dead and buried Therefore his soule was gathered with Christs in Paradise and so consequently the soule liveth Phil. 1.23 Paul saith I desire to be loosed and to be with Christ he speaketh of the rest and joy which he should injoy with Christ But they who feele nothing what can their joy or happinesse be Wherefore they also are refuted in this place who say mens soules sleep Wisd 3.1 Mat. 22. â—2 Luke 23.46 1 Cor. 5.8 and so withall deny the immortality of the soule The soules of the just are in the hands of God God is not the God of the dead but of the living Therfore the souls live Into thy hands I commend my spirit When we remove out of the body we go unto the Lord. Wherefore the soules sleep not as some Anabaptists will have them but injoy immortall life and celestiall glory with the Lord. The soules of the godly that were killed Revel 6.10 are said to cry with a loud voice under the Altar saying How long Lord holy and true doest thou not judge and avenge our bloud on them that dwell on the earth Luke 16.21 Wherefore the soules live Lazarus is said to be carried into Abrahams bosome and out of the same place also it is apparent concerning the soules of the wicked For the rich Glutton is also of the contrary said to be carried downe to hell These testimonies therefore of Scripture teach and confirme most evidently that not only in the body before death and after the resurrection of the body but also in the
shall be covered with this my skin And the Apostle saith Every man shall receive in his body according to that he hath done This mortality must put on immortality If then the bodies which have finned shall receive accordingly not other bodies but the same shall rise Therefore in the African Churches it was said I beleeve the resurrection of this flesh Cyprian in expos Symb. And the very word it selfe of rising enforceth as much for nothing can rise but that which is fallen This is the resurrection saith Ambrose as is intimated by the sounding of the very word that that which fell may rise that which was dead may revive Wherefore seeing our bodies shall rise no other bodies shall rise or be quickned then those which have fallen and are dead or no other then those which doe fall and die The justice also of God enforceth as much De side resurrect cap. 19. For this saith Ambrose is the order and course of justice that because the actions of the body and soule are common to both the body executing that which the soule decreed both of them should likewise come unto judgement both of them be either delivered up to perpetuall punishment 2. Thes 1.6 Cyprian in expos Symb. or reserved to eternall glory For the justice of God requireth that the flesh of the Saints which have fought in the field should also be crowned and the flesh of the wicked which have blasphemed against God should be tormented Wherefore to every soule shall be rendered not any other body what soever but the body wherewith it was once knit and coupled that forth-with the flesh with her owne soule may according to the actions of this present life either be gloriously crowned as chaste or as unchaste be extreamly afflicted Lastly as Christ rose againe in the same flesh wherein he died so shall we rise with that very flesh we now are clothed withall 1 Cor. 15.50 Object Flesh and bloud cannot inherit the kingdome of God These our bodies are flesh and bloud Therefore they cannot possesse the kingdome of God and by consequent not these but other bodies shall rise in the last day Answ 1. Flesh and bloud in this saying of the Apostle which maketh the Major proposition signifie some evill adherent quality of the substance or the substance in respect of that quality But in the Minor they signifie the very substance of our bodies How flesh and bloud 〈◊〉 denied the heavenly inheritance whereof the Anabaptists falsely understand their conclusion 2. Here is a fallacy of Accident For the reason proceedeth from corrupted substance to meere substance thus Flesh and bloud being mortall and corruptible as now it is shall not possesse the kingdome of God they fore simply no flesh or bloud shall enjoy the kingdome of God Which kind of reasoning is altogether inconsequent So then flesh that is sinfull and corruptible shall not possesse the kingdome of God but our flesh shall enter in being glorious and immortall and being then no more able to sinne neither shall it be corruptible The Apostle of purpose layeth this downe in the same chapter It is sowed a naturall body and is raised a spirituall body Repl. 1 Cor. 15.44 Our bodies shall rise spirituall bodies Therefore then our bodies shall not have the properties of our flesh Answ The Apostle calleth that a spirituall body not which is changed into a spirit in all properties In what sense our boâ—â—es shall be spirituall but which is guided by the spirit of God which is immortall and free from all miseries adorned with heavenly lightnesse glory might and holinesse As likewise on the other side he termeth that a naturall body not which is turned into the soule or is like unto the soule in all properties but which in this mortality is swayed quickned and governed by the soule That this is the meaning of the Apostles words is apparent by these reasons Verse 53. 1. Because he saith It shall rise a spirituall body but a spirit is no body 2. Himself addeth This corruptible body must put on incorruption 3. If any body after the resurrection should be so spiritual as not retaining at all any bodily properties then surely Christs body should have been so but now he saith to the Apostles Handle me and see Luke 24.39 for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as yee see me have Therefore much more shall our spirituall bodies have flesh and bones Thus Augustine interpreteth Apostles meaning Cons. Adimanw cap. 12. Whereas the Apostle saith that in the resurrection the body shall be spirituall we may not therefore thinke that it shall be a spirit and no body but he calleth that a spirituall body which without any corruption or death is altogether subject to the spirit For when he calleth the body which we now have a naturall body we may not imagine hereon that it is a soule and no body Therefore as the body is now called naturall because it is subject to the soule and cannot be called spirituall because it is not yet fully subject to the soule as long as it may be corrupted so then it shall be called spirituall when by no corruption it can resist the spirit and eternity 6. How the Resurrection shall be The dead shall be raised THe dead shall be raised with a shout and with the voice of the Archangel At the resurrection and with the trumpet of God and shall be presented before the high and most just Judge Jesus Christ The resurrection shall be in glorious manner and openly not fearfully not in secret and shall be far other then that which was wrought in some men at the resurrection of Christ For it shall be done all Angels men and divels beholding it yea with the exceeding joy of all the godly and with the exceeding feare and trembling of the wicked The living shall be changed They who then shall remaine alive shall be in a moment of time changed and be made of mortall immortall Read cap. 15. of the former to the Corinthians and cap. 4. of the former to the Thessalonians 7. When the Resurrection shall be THe resurrection shall be in the end of the world in the last day John 6.40 John 11.24 Mat. 24.35 I will raise him up at the last day This Martha confessed I know that Lazarus my brother shall rise againe in the resurrection of the last day But of that day knoweth no man no not the Angels of heaven but God only This question is to be held and proposed of us that our faith be not troubled while we are forced to expect and tarry or that we may not imagine to our selves any certain time when we think those things will happen and so begin to doubt and think our selves to be deluded when those things fall not so out nor come to passe at the time appointed by us This question maketh for the increase of hope
we may in some sort conceive what life eternall is Life is defined among the Philosophers diversly What life is and it is indeed a word of divers significations and signifying divers things Generally both as touching God and Angels living soules and plants it is the existence or being of a living thing For even Spirits live but they have not that from any quickning soule but from their very nature and essence But in wights or creatures possessed of living soules life is properly the being of living creatures which is nothing else but To be indued with a living soule or To have in him a living soule For What a soule is the soule is that whereby such a wight liveth or the essentiall forme of life which who have live It is taken both for the first act that is for the very living and being and for the second act that is for the operation of a living thing Thus therefore it is more fully defined Naturall life is the existence or abiding of the soule in a quickned body and the operation of a living thing Or it is the act and perfection of the soule executing operations proper to a living thing Or finally it is an aptitude of a living thing to work the operations proper unto it and is also the operations themselves by reason of the union of the body with the soule Now when we mention everlasting life we restraine the word life for then we speak of the everlasting life of men and Angels That is called everlasting 1. Which hath neither beginning nor ending so God is everlasting 2. Which hath no beginning and yet hath an ending as the decree of God What everlasting meaneth 3. Which hath a beginning but shall have no end as Angels and the soules of men c. And in this third sense our heavenly life is called everlasting life that is a life having beginning but without end So then the everlasting life of man is nothing else but the eternall being of a regenerate and glorified man which being What everlasting life is is to have the image of God restored according to which man was at the first created to wit to be endued with perfect wisdome righteousnesse and felicity or with a true knowledge and love of God joyned with eternall joy And here in these acts of acknowledging and loving God we for plainenesse sake include the faculties and powers of acknowledging and loving God For to be able to acknowledge God aright and love him no lesse belong to the spirituall life then to acknowledge and love him 1 Cor. 2.14 seeing The naturall man perceiveth not the things of the Spirit of God neither can know them Againe we thus describe it Everlasting life is a perfect restauration of Gods image in us and eternall joy resting on God celestiall glory and abundant fruition of all good things which are required to the state of perfect happinesse More briefly it is a perfect conformity of man with God consisting in the true and perfect knowledge and love of God and in the glory of both soule and body So that to the full understanding of the essence of everlasting life Two parts of this life we are to consider these two things Uunion An union both of our body and soule with God Conformity with God A conformity with God which issueth out of this union as an effect proceedeth from his cause Now this conformity is a perspicuous and evident knowledge of God and his will and his works perfect righteousnesse joy fixed in God incomparable glory wherewith our bodies and soules shall flourish and shine as the Sunne and a sufficiency of all good things in God pertaining to true and perfect blisse All these things doe somewhat expresse the maner and forme of everlasting life Now if we adde hereunto the efficient and finall causes thereof An ample definition of everlasting life an absolute full definition may be thus framed Everlasting life is the eternall habitation or dwelling of God in the Elect by the holy Ghost and the true knowledge of God his will and all his works kindled by the same spirit immediatly in their hearts and true and perfect righteousnesse and wisdome that is a perfect conformity and correspondence of their will and powers and operations with the mind and will of God as also a joy resting on God and a sufficiency of all good things in God as touching both soule and body freely bestowed by God through Christ on the Elect begun in this life and to be perfected in the life to come to this end to glorifie and magnifie God through all eternity The particular proofe of each part of this definition All the parts of this definition are taken out of the Scripture Gods eternall habitation in us John 14.23 John 14.16 It is the eternall habitation of God in us by the holy Ghost I and my Father will come unto him and will dwell with him He shall give you another Comforter that he may abide with you for ever Knowledge of God and perfect wisdome John 17.36 It is the knowledge of God and perfect wisdome This is life eternall that they know thee to be the onely very true God and whom thou hast sent Jesus Christ Righteousnesse Luke 20.36 It is righteousnesse They are equall unto the Angels and are the sonnes of God sith they are the children of the resurrection Joy John 16.22 It is joy in God Your joy shall no man take from you Sufficiency in God Revel 21.22 23. 1 Cor. 15.28 1 Cor. 13.33 It is sufficiency in God The Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the Temple of it And the City hath no need of the Sunne neither of the Moone to shine in it for the glory of God did light it and the Lamb is the light of it God shall be all in all All those good things which we possesse here shall then be perfect When that which is perfect is come then that which is in part shall be abolished Without interruption Revel 21.4 Luke 1.33 Dan. 7.27 It shall not be interrupted God shall wipe away all teares Of his Kingdome shall be no end And the Kingdome and Dominion and the greatnesse of the Kingdome under the whole heaven shall be given to the holy people of the most High whose Kingdome is an everlasting Kingdome that is which hath neither beginning nor ending Object Everlasting life is to live everlastingly But the wicked also shall be raised and be immortall because they shall live eternally Therefore the wicked shall have everlasting life Answ No consequence is currant or of force when it is deduced but from one part onely of a definition For by the name of everlasting life is not meant the presence of the soule in the body that is the naturall life but this being presupposed there is further meant a spirituall life which the holy Ghost worketh in the Elect by
his proper function and office Now though the wicked after the Resurrection shall be immortall yet their soul-soul-life shall be no life but everlasting death For with the eternall life in the wicked shall be joyned 1. An eternall rejection from God 2. A privation and want of the knowledge and grace of God 3. A perpetuall and unutterable torment and vexation Their worme shall never dye There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth The everlasting death of the wicked Hereby is understood what everlasting death is and that it is so called not because the Reprobate by once dying shall fulfill it but because they shall dye perpetually and shall feele perpetuall torment without end 2. Who giveth everlasting life GOD alone giveth eternall life Rom. 6.23 Everlasting life the work of all three persons For Eternall life is the gift of God and the Father as the author and fountaine of all life giveth it by the Sonne and the holy Ghost the Sonne by the holy Ghost the holy Ghost by himselfe which order of working is naturall in the persons of the Divinity Of the Father it is said As the Father raiseth up the dead John 5.21 26. and quickneth them so the Sonne quickneth whom he will In which place the same is affirmed of the Sonne also as in like manner in these following John 1.4 Esay 9.6 John 10.28 John 3.5 Rom. 8.12 In him was life The Father of eternity I give unto them eternall life that is not by merit onely but also by power and working Of the holy Ghost likewise it is said Except a man be borne of water and of the Spirit he cannot enter into the Kingdome of God He that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortall bodies by his Spirit dwelling in you And this testimony is to be observed for the confirmation of the God-head of both Object But the Ministers also give life according to that 1 Cor. 4.15 1 Tim. 4.16 In Christ Jesus I have begot you through the Gospel In doing this thou shalt both save thy selfe and them that heare thee Therefore God onely giveth not life Answ There may be many subordinate causes of one effect Christ and the holy Ghost give life by their own power the Ministers are only instruments by whom Christ worketh through the vertue of his Spirit Let a man so think of us 1 Cor. 4.1 3.5 6. as of the Ministers of Christ and disposers of the secrets of God Who is Paul then And who is Apollos but the Ministers by whom ye beleeved and as the Lord gave to every man I have planted Apollos watered but God gave the increase Repl. But Christ giveth life by a communicated power Therefore not by his proper power Ans He giveth it by a power communicated but communicated from everlasting as he was begotten from everlasting By retortion therefore it followeth thus He giveth life by a power communicated to him of his Father from everlasting John 5.26 Therefore he giveth it by his owne power As the Father hath life in himselfe so likewise hath he given to the Sonne to have life in himselfe 3. To whom everlasting life is given EVerlasting life is given to all and only such as are elect from everlasting or All the Elect and they alone are partakers of everlasting life John 10 28. John 17.9 12. Rom. 11.7 to them that are converted in this life I give unto them eternall life that is to my sheep who are his elect and chosen I pray for them I pray not for the world but for them which thou hast given me for they are thine Those that thou gavest me have I kept and none of them is lost but the child of perdition Againe faith and repentance are proper to the Elect only The Elect have obtained it and the rest have been hardned We must observe in this place whereas the question is To whom everlasting life is given that it is better to answer That eternall life is given to the Elect * As they are elected so they are but chosen to eternall life as they are converted so they are in part admitted unto it and begin to be put in dossession of it then to say It is given unto the converted For Conversion and Faith are the beginning of eternal life And to say eternall life is given to the converted were all one as if you would say life is given to the living Also when the question is To whom the beginning of everlasting life is given we answer rightly Unto the Elect. For if you say It is given to the converted you answer no more then that which is in question and doubt seeing it is demanded who they are whom God converteth 4. For what cause everlasting life is given EVerlasting life is given unto us not for our works either present or fore-seen God of his free mercy giveth us for Christs sake everlasting â—â—sief that we might praise and magnifie the same his mercy for ever Rom. 6.23 Ephes 2.8 9 10. but for the alone free mercy of God and his love towards mankind and his will of shewing his mercy in saving the Elect for the alone satisfaction and merit of Christ imputed unto us by faith to this end that God may be magnified of us for ever The gift of God is eternall life through Jesus Christ our Lord. By grace we are saved through faith and that not of our selves it is the gift of God Not of works lest any man should boast For we are his workmanship created in Christ Jesus unto good works which God hath ordained that we should walke in them So God loved the world John 3.16 that he gave his only begotten Sonne that whosoever beleeveth in him should not perish but have everlasting life c. Wherefore the impellent or motive cause of everlasting life given unto us is not any work of us men either present or fore seen in us For before the beginning of eternall life that is before conversion all our works merit eternall death after the beginning thereof that is after conversion they are effects thereof and nothing is cause of it selfe We are indeed brought unto it by many meanes but the meanes by which we are led of God unto eternall life are one thing and the cause for which we are led unto it another The finall cause or end for which eternall life is given us is that the mercy of God might be acknowledged and magnified of us To the praise of the glory of his grace Ephes 1.6 wherewith he hath made us accepted in his beloved For the same cause God giveth us eternall life for which he chose us 5. How everlasting life is given unto us God giveth us everlasting life by ths outward ministery of the Word and the inward ministery of the Spirit EVerlasting life is given us by faith faith by the preaching of the Word and inward efficacy of the
testifie that he doth in a lawfull and right use of them bestow the thing promised and so may confirme our faith or that he may instruct us of his will by his Sacraments and by them exhort us to receive and imbrace the blessings purchased by Christ and further seale by those Sacraments these benefits and blessings of Christ unto us Now the Sacraments seale these benefits and blessings unto us 1. Because Sacraments are signes 2. Because they are pledges having a promise Therefore by these signes and pledges of Gods favour towards us the holy Ghost effectually moveth our hearts no lesse then by the Word The second end is the distinguishing of the Church from Painims 2. To distinguish the Church from others and all other Sects whatsoever For God will have his Church to be beheld in the world and to be knowne by these sacred signes as souldiers are knowne by their military tokens and sheep by those marks which their shepheard seareth seareth in them He willeth the Jewes to be circumcised and Christians to be baptized he interdicteth aliens and strangers and excludeth them from eating of the Paschall Lamb. God will have his Kingdome discerned from the Synagogue of Sathan for these two causes 1. For his owne glories sake 2. For our comfort and salvation For as he will not have himselfe shuffled and mingled with Idols so neither will he have his people shuffled and mighled with the Kingdome of the Devill The third end is the profession and testification of our thank fulnesse and duty towards God 3. To prosesse and testifie our thankfulnesse which is the bond whereby we are obliged unto Christ to be his people as he is our God to shew true repentance to beleeve in him and to receive of him his benefits offered unto us The fourth is the propagation and maintenance of the doctrine 4. To propagate and maintain the doctrine because God will not have the use of his Sacraments to be without the Word and application thereof The fifth is an occasion thereby given to the yonger sort to inquire what these things meane 5. To give an occasion to the younger to inquire and learne the things by them signified Exod. 13.14 and so an occasion also of explicating and preaching the benefits of Christ unto them As also the Lord saith unto his people When thy son shall aske thee to morrow saying What is this Thou shalt then say unto him With a mighty hand the Lord brought us out of Egypt out of the house of bondage The sixth and last end is that they may be bonds of mutuall dilection and love because they 6. To unite us in mutuall love and affection who are entred into an association or confederacy with Christ the head of the Church ought not to be at difference among themselves By one spirit are we all baptized into one body In like manner the Sacraments are the bonds of publike meetings and congregations in the Church When ye come together to eate tarry one for another For we that are many are one bread 1 Cor. 12.13 11.33 10.17 Ephes 4.5 and one body because we are all partakers of one bread One God one Faith c. But we cannot settle among us this communion neither maintaine and continue it being once settled neither profitably annunciate and shew sorth the death of the Lord as long as we dissent and jarre among our selves contentiously about the institution of the Sacraments For the Sacraments are pledges of that communion which Christians have first with Christ and then between themselves In what Sacraments differ from Sacrifices WE must hold and observe a difference betweene Sacrifices and Sacraments that we may know what to doe when we come unto the Sacraments and not make Sacrifices of Sacraments that is present our owne workes imagining that they please God for the very work done and deserve remission of sinnes as Papists doe Now the difference betweene these consisteth especially in two things In their kind and nature In their kinde and nature For Sacraments are onely ceremonies witnessing unto us Gods will Sacrifices may be ceremoniall and morall works also as our Sacrifices of thanksgiving of praise and thankfulnesse the calves of our lips our almes c. are morall works whereby we yeeld unto God due obedience and honour without any ceremony In their principall end In their principall and chiefe end In the Sacraments God offereth unto us his benefits but Sacrifices are testimonies of our obedience towards God This appeareth out the definition of both A Sacrament it a work wherein God giveth us something to wit the signes and the things signified A Sacrament A Sacrifice and wherein he testifieth of his offering and bestowing his benefits upon us A Sacrifice is a work wherein we yeeld unto God obedience or the worship which he hath commanded us Or it is our work done in faith and to this end principally That God may have his due honour and obedience They differ then as these two To give and To take differ For God giveth Sacraments unto us and he receiveth Sacrifices of us Howbeit the same rite or ceremony may be in diverse respects both a Sacrament and a Sacrifice A Sacrament as it is given of God A Sacrifice as it is used by the godly performing to God their obedience and yeelding him tanks Therefore a Sacrament and Sacrifice are often one and the selfe-same thing The same thing or work may be a Sacrifice and a Sacrament in a diverse respect but still they differ in respect All Sacraments then in respect of us are Sacrifices also but those onely Eucharisticall and of thanksgiving not propitiatory For there is but one onely Sacrifice propitiatory to wit the ransome of Christ offered for us on the Crosse Hence we easily may answer unto that objection Object The Passeover and other ceremonies of the Old Testament were both Sacrifices and Sacraments Therefore the Sacraments doe nothing differ from Sacrifices Ans More is in the conclusion then in the premisses because this only followeth That the same thing may be a Sacrament and a Sacrifice So Baptisme and the Lords supper are Sacraments and Sacrifices in a diverse manner and respect They are Sacraments and that principally because they are the work of God who giveth us something in them and doth therein testifie his gift unto us For in them he reacheth unto us certaine symbols and tokens by his Ministers as also by his Ministers he speaketh as by his mouth unto us according as it is said Luke 10.16 He that heareth you heareth me So therefore every Minister reacheth with his hand the Sacraments unto us and we receive them at their hands as at the hands of God if so we take them with reverence but much more God giveth and as it were reacheth with his hand unto us in the lawfull and right use of the Sacraments the things themselves which are
in the Supper 8. Who are to come to the Supper 9. Who are to be admitted to the Supper The three former of these belong to the 75. and 76. Questions of the Catechism the fourth to the 77 78 79. the fifth to the 80. the sixth seventh eighth and ninth to the 81. and under them they shall be placed and handled 1. What the Supper of the Lord is The names given to this Sacrament and the reason of the names FIrst we will see by what names the Supper of the Lord is called then we will in few words define what it is This action or ceremony or rite instituted by Christ a little before his death is called The Lords Supper It is called 1. The Lords Supper from the first institution of it that is in respect of the originall or first beginning of this rite or in respect of the time wherein this ceremony was instituted which circumstance of time the Church for her liberty in case of this quality hath changed For it was a matter of casualty that this ceremony was instituted of Christ rather in the evening at supper time then in the morning or at noon day to wit because of the eating of the Paschal Lamb which by the law was to be celebrated in the evening and was afterwards to be abolished by this new Sacrament It is called of S. Paul 2. The Lords Table The Table of the Lord. It is likewise called Synaxis that is a covenant 3. A covenant of assembly in respect of the assembly and convent of the Church because some either few or many must assemble and meet together in celebrating of the Supper for in the first celebration the disciples were present to them it was said Take this and divide it among you Wherefore it must needs be that there was some number there which also appeareth by the Apostle repeating the first institution where in the end he addeth 1 Cor. 11.20 35. When ye come together to eat tarry one for another And further that moe ought to come together to celebrate the Supper this end of the Supper doth evidently enough shew in that it was instituted to be a token and even a bond of love For wee that are many 1 Cor. 10.17 are one bread and one body It is called also the Eucharist 4. The Eucharist because it is a rite and ceremony of thanksgiving Last of all 5. A Sacrifice it is called also a Sacrifice not propitiatory or meritorious as the Papists dream but gratulatory because it is the commemoration of Christs propitiatory sacrifice And at length it was also called Missa from the offering or from the dismissing of the rest who might not communicate after the Sermon which went before the celebration was finished We retain the name left in Scripture and call it The Lords Supper Now let us come to define the Lords Supper The definition of the Lords Supper The Lords Supper is a ceremony or Sacrament instituted and appointed of Christ unto the faithfull for a memoriall of him whereby Christ doth certainly promise and seal unto me and all the faithfull first That his body was offered and broken on the crosse for mee and his bloud shed for me as truly as I see with mine eyes the bread of the Lord to be broken unto me and his cup distributed And moreover That hee doth as certainly with his body crucified and his bloud shed feed and nourish my soul unto everlasting life as my body is fed with the bread and the cup the Lord received from the hand of the minister which are offered to me as certain seals of the body and bloud of Christ It may be also more briefly defined on this wise The Lords Supper is a distributing and receiving of bread and wine commanded of Christ unto the faithfull that by these signes he might testifie that hee hath delivered and yeelded his body unto death and hath shed his bloud for them and doth give them those things to eate and drink that they might be unto them the meat and dâ—ink of eternall life and that thereby also hee might testifie that hee would dwell in them nourish and quicken them for ever And again That of the other side he might by the same signes binde them to mutuall dilection and love seeing Christ spareth not to give his body and bloud for us This is confirmed not only by Christ in the Evangelists but also by Paul who expresly saith The cup of the blessing which wee blesse is it not the communion of the bloud of Christ Moreover The signe and things signified in the Lords Supper the signes in the Sacrament are bread and wine bread broken and eaten wine distributed and taken The things signified are 1. The breaking of the bodâ— and the shedaing of the bloud of Christ 2. Our union and conjunction with Christ by faith so that wee draw life everlasting from him and are made partakers as of Christ himselfe so also of all his benefits as the branches are made partakers of the life of the vine Wee are advertised of this our union and communion with Christ 1. By the proportion which the signes have with the things 2. By the promise which is adjoyned And the proportion doth chiefly propose and shew two things unto us 1. The sacrifice of Christ 2. Our communion with Christ because the bread is not only broken but is also given us to eat Breaking of the bread a part of the ceremony Now the breaking of the bread is a part of the ceremony because unto it a part of the thing signified doth answer namely the breaking of Christs body of which signification of this signe Paul doth testifie when he saith 1 Cor. 11.24 This is my body which is broken for you Here receiving and eating is part of the ceremony whereunto doth answer the thing signified to wit the eating of Christs body Now this divine and spirituall thing namely the breaking and communicating of Christs body is signified and confirmed by this ceremony which is the breaking and receiving of bread for two causes 1. Because Christ commandeth these rites unto which we ought to give no lesse credit then if Christ himself did speak with us 2. Because he annexeth a promise that they who observe these rites with a true faith must be assured and certain that they have communion with Christ. Wine is added that wee should know the perfection and accomplishment of our salvation to be in his sacrifice and that there was nothing which could be further desired The wine is severed from the bread to signifie the violence of his death because the bloud was sundered from his body 2. What are the ends of the Lords Supper THe ends for which the Lords Supper was instituted are Confirmation of our faith That it might be a confirmation of our faith that is a most certain testification of our communion and union with Christ
Church in the Supper of his continuing and increasing his benefits unto us In the mean time it is one and the same Christ who both regenerateth and nourisheth us to eternall life In manner of using In the manner of using them To the lawfull use of baptisme regeneration sufficeth therefore it agreeth to all whom the Church reputeth regenerate as all elder persons professing faith and repentance and infants born in the Church But the Supper requireth farther the triall of the faith of the receivers the remembrance of the Lords death and thanksgiving Luke 22.19 1 Cor. 11.18 Doe this in remembrance of me Shew forth the Lords death till he come Let a man examine himself Baptism therefore is due to the whole Church that is as well to infants as elder persons the Supper onely to elder persons who can prove themselves and shew forth the Lords death In order of receiving In the order of receiving them For baptism must goe before and the Supper follow that is the sacrament of the Supper must not be given but to them who are baptised and not to them neither presently after baptisme but after they have made confession of their faith and repentance Whereupon in the ancient Church after the sermon were dismissed such as were excommunicated likewise those that were possessed or troubled with an evill spirit and the Catechumens that is such as did not yet understand the grounds and principles of religion or were not as yet baptised So of old they who were not yet circumcised were not admitted to the sacrifices or ceremonies Now if they who were baptised before they have made confession of their faith and repentance are not as yet to be admitted unto the Supper much lesse are they who being baptised live after the manner of swine and dogs In order of receiving it selfe which of baptism is but once of the Supper often In the receiving it selfe Wee must often celebrate the Supper because we must often shew forth the Lords death for it was therefore instituted that in it should be made publick remembrance recounting and shewing of Christs death also the confirmation of our faith concerning the eternall continuance of the covenant which confirmation is by the Supper is often necessary and therefore the Supper is often to be reiterated as also the eating of the Paschal lamb prefiguring this Supper was for this cause yeerly reiterated But baptism is not to be reiterated but once only to be received in our life time even as circumcision of old was but once received and baptism is therefore not to be reiterated both because wee have no commandement to this purpose and also because it is a signe of our receiving into the Church and covenant of God for the covenant once made is not againe undone or made void to those that repent but remaineth ratified and firme for ever For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance and wee by repentance after our falls enter not a new league with God but renew and restore an old Hereof it is that Christ himselfe saith of the Supper Luke 22.19 1 Cor. 11.26 Doe this as often as yee shall drink it in remembrance of me And the Apostle As often as ye shall eat this bread and drink this cup ye shew the Lords death till hee come Rom. 9.3 But of baptism the same Apostle teacheth As many as have been baptised into Christ Jesus have been baptised into his death And Christ pronounceth Mark 16.16 He that shall beleeve and be baptised shall be saved Quest 76. What is it to eat the body of Christ crucified and to drink his bloud that was shed Ans It is not only to imbrace by an assured confidence of mind the whole passion and death of Christ and thereby to obtain forgivenesse or sins and everlasting life a Joh. 6.35 40 47 48 50 51 53 54. but also by the holy Ghost who dwelleth both in Christ and us so more and more to be united to his sacred body b Joh. 6.55 56. that though he be in heaven c Col. 3.1 Acts 3.21 1 Cor. 11.26 and we in earth yet neverthelesse are we flesh of his flesh and bone of his bones d Ephes 5.30 3.16 1 Cor. 6.15 1 John 3.24 and 4.13 and as all the members of the body are by one soule so are we also quickned and guided by one and the same Spirit e Joh. 6.57 15.1 2 3 4 5 6. Eph. 4.15 16. The Explication THis question expoundeth and declareth the thing signified in the Sacrament The eating of Christs flesh and drinking of his bloud is not corporall What it is to eat the flesh of Christ but spirituall and compriseth 1. Faith of Christs passion and death 2. An apprehension of remission of sinnes and eternall life through faith 3. Our union with Christ by the holy Ghost dwelling in Christ and in us 4. The benefit of his quickning by the same spirit Wherefore to eate the flesh of Christ and drink his bloud is to be received into favour with God for Christs merit to receive remission of sinnes and be reconciled to God by the same faith to have the Sonne of God who assumed mans nature and united it personally unto him dwelling in us and coupling us unto himselfe and his assumed nature by pouring into us his Spirit through whom he regenerateth us and restoreth light in us righteousnesse and life eternall such as is eminent in his assumed manhood More briefly to eate is 1. To beleeve 2. To receive remission of sins by faith 3. To be united to Christ 4. To be made partakers of the life of Christ or to be made like and conformed unto Christ by the holy Ghost who worketh the same things in us and in Christ This eating is our communion with Christ which the Scripture teacheth and which we professe in the Creed namely a spirituall union with Christ as members with the head and branches with the vine Christ teacheth us this eating of his flesh John 6. and confirmeth it in the Supper by externall signes Thus did the ancient Fathers Augustine Eusebius Nazianzen Hilary and others expound the eating of Christs body as hereafter shall appeare Wherefore the opinions of Papisticall Transubstantiation of a corporall presence and of eating Christs body in the bread with the mouth which many defend are not grounded on the words of the Supper which promise the eating of Christs body Quest 77. Where hath Christ promised that hee will as certainly give his body and bloud so to be eaten and drunken as they eat this bread broken and drink this cup Ans In the institution of his Supper the words whereof are these a 1 Cor. 11.23 24 25. Matth. 26.26 27 28. Mark 14.22 23 24. Luk. 22.19 20 Our Lord Jesus Christ in the night that hee was betrayed took bread and when he had given thanks hee brake it and said Take eat this
abolished and the signified Pasteover was now exhibited and a memoriall of him was to be signed to the Church or lastly hee gave thanks for the admirable and wonderfull gathering and preserving of the Church Hee brake it That is hee brake the bread which hee took from the table and distributed the same being one among many not any other invisible thing hidden in the bread He brake not his body but the bread as Saint Paul saith The bread which hee brake c. Now he distributed the bread being one among many because wee that are many are one body But the cause for which he brake this bread was to signifie 1. His passion and the separation of his body from his soule Two things signified by the breaking of the bread 1 Cor. 10.16 2. The communion of many with his own body and their bond of union and mutuall love The bread which we breake is it not the communion of Christ For wee that are many are one bread and one body Wherefore the breaking of bread is a necessary ceremonie both in respect of the signification Poure causes why this ceremony is to be retained and in respect of the confirmation of our faith and therefore is this ceremony also to be retained 1. Because Christ hath commanded it Doe this 2. Because of the authority and example of the Church planted in the Apostles time which from the rite of breaking termed the whole action Breaking of bread 3. For our own comfort that we may know the body of Christ to have been as certainly crucified for us as we see the bread to be broken unto us 4. That the opinions of Transubstantiation and Consubstantiation may be pulled out of mens minds Take eat This commandement belongeth to the disciples and to the whole Church of the new Testament Whence it is cleer and manifest 1. That the Popish Masse wherein the priest giveth nothing to the Church to be taken and eaten is not the Supper of the Lord but a private supper of him that sacrificeth and a meer stage-play 2. That wee must not be idle beholders of the Supper but religious receivers of it 3. That the Lords Supper is not to be celebrated but in an assembly or congregation where there are such as receive and eat 4. That the Supper is a signe of grace in respect of God reaching out unto us his benefits to be apprehended with a strong faith even as we receive the signe with our hand and mouth This is my body This that is this bread Object Then should it have been said * These Greek pronouns cannot be expressed with the like English particles because the words BREAD and BODY being of divers genders in Greek the Greek pronouns also are divers when as in English our particle THIS serveth for words of all genders 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ans 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as much as if he had said This thing which I have in my hand now that was bread And that it is so to be understood is proved by these reasons 1. Christ took nothing but bread he brake bread and gave bread to his disciples to eare 2. S. Paul saith expresly The bread which he brake is it not the communion of the body of Christ 3. Of the wine it is said This cup is the new Testament in my bloud Wherefore after the same manner it is said This that is this bread is my body which is broken and delivered unto death for you The literall sense if it be properly taken can be no otherwise understood then thus The substance of this bread is the substance of my body But so to understand it is an undoubted absurdity for bread is a masse without life baked of corn and not united personally to the Word but the body of Christ is a living substance born of the Virgin and united personally to the Word Christ therefore calleth the bread his body meaning Cont. Adim c. 12. the signe of his body by a sacramentall Metonymie attributing the name of the thing signified to the signe because he appointeth this bread to be signe and sacrament of his body as Augustine himself interpreteth The Lord doubted not to say This is my body when he gave the signe of his body Wherefore far be it from us that we should say that Christ took bread visibly and his body invisibly in the bread For it is to be observed that he saith not In this is my body Or This bread is my body invisible But This bread is my body true and visible which is given for you Moreover these are the words of the promise added to this sacrament to teach us what the bread is in this use to wit the body of Christ that is what Christ exhibiteth and imparteth to the receivers of this bread and beleevers of this promise even his body or that flesh which in the Gospel hee promised to give for the salvation of the world For this is no diverse promise from that hee delivered in the sixth of John John 6.51 but every way the same concerning his flesh quickning us and the eating thereof profitable to salvation Only here the sacramentall rite is adjoined wherewith the promise is adorned and sealed as if he should say In the Gospel I promised life eternall to all that eat my flesh and drink my bloud now I confirme and ratifie this my promise with an outward ceremony that henceforth they which beleeve this promise and feed on this bread may undoubtedly be perswaded and assured that they verily eat my flesh which was given for the salvation of the world and have life eternall By this promise therefore this bread is made the sacrament and signe of Christs body and Christs body is made the thing signified by this sacrament The union of the signe the thing signified in the Sacrament and these two I mean the signe and the thing signified are united in this sacrament not by any naturall copulation or corporall and locall existence one in the other much lesse by transubstantiation or changing one into the other but by signifying sealing and exhibiting the one by the other that is by a sacramentall union whose bond is the promise added to the bread requiring the faith of the receivers Whence it is cleer that these things in their lawfull use are alwayes jointly exhibited and received but not without faith of the promise viewing and apprehending the thing promised now present in the Sacrament yet not present or included in the signe as in a vessell containing it but present in the promise which is the better part life and soul of the sacrament For they want judgement who affirme that Christs body cannot be present in the sacrament except it be in or under the bread as if forsooth the bread alone without the promise were either a sacrament or the principall part of a sacrament Which for you my disciples that is for
Supper therefore is often to be iterated and celebrated 1. Because of the words of the institution 2. In respect of the end and purpose of the institution because it must be done in remembrance of Christ Shew the Lords death That is beleeve that Christ dyed and that for you and then professe it also publickly before all Till he come Therefore it must be observed unto the worlds end neither is any other externall form to be looked for untill the day of judgement The words of the institution which have been hitherto expounded 1 Cor. 10.16 may be made more plain and cleer by these words of the Apostle The cup of blessing which wee blesse is it not the communion of the bloud of Christ The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the body of Christ The cup of blessing That is the cup of thanksgiving which is received namely to this end that we may yeeld thanks to Christ for his death and passion The communion of the body likewise the communion of the bloud is to be made through faith partakers of Christ and all his benefits the same spirit being in us which is in Christ John 15.2 â—phes 5. 1 John 1.6 and working the same in us which he worketh in Christ Or it is a spirituall fellowship of the faithfull with Christ as of members with the head and branches with the vine Bread and wine is the communion that is it is the signe and testimony of our communion with Christ But this our communion as the Apostle briefly declareth consisteth in this that wee who are many are but one body Whence it is most easie to collect That this communion of Christ is not a corporalleating For it is wrought only by faith and the holy Ghost Christ is the head and we the members and all wee who are members have also a communion of all Christs benefits Therefore the head is common the benefits common and so the members also common among themselves wherefore their love and dilection is common and mutuall Quest 78. Are then the bread and wine made the very body and bloud of Christ ON THE 19. SABBATH Ans No verily a Matt. 26.29 Mark 14.24 But as the water of baptism is not turned into the bloud of Christ but is only a signe and pledge of those things that are sealed unto us in baptism b Ephes 5.26 so neither is the bread of the Lords Supper the very body of Christ c 1 Cor. 10.16 11.26 although according to the manner of Sacraments and that forme of speaking of them which is usuall to the holy Ghost d Gen. 17.10 11. Exod. 12.11 13. 13.9 Titus 3.5 1 Pet. 3.21 1 Corinth 10.4 the bread is called the body of Christ The Explication THe Papists Transubstantiation under which also Consubstantiation maintained by the Ubiquitaries and others is comprehended is in this Question of the Catechisme consuted and rejected and the sacramentall kind of speech which we use with the true sense of those words of Christ This is my body examined and unfolded We will first intreat of that forme of speech which we use and of the true meaning of Christs words then will wee handle the controversie of Transubstantiation and Consubstantiation That therefore which hath been heretofore spoken in generall of sacramentall phrases and termes must be restrained to this Sacrament For thus Austine himself descendeth from the generall rule of sacramentall termes unto a particular instance of eating Christs flesh Eâ—ist 23. ad Bonifâ—â— This saith he is the only way to find whether a phrase be proper or figurative That whatsoever in Gods word cannot properly be referred to some point of morall duty or to the truth of faith you may be assured that it is figuratively spoken And a little after hee produceth this example Except yee eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drink his bloud yee have no life in you Hee seemeth saith Augustine by these words to injoyne us some hainous crime It is therefore a figurative speech instructing us that wee are to partake of Christs passion and joyfully and fruitfully to recall to mind how his flesh was crucified and wounded for us Wherefore as of Baptisme as hath been already declared so of the Lords Supper also the Scripture speaketh sometimes properly and sometimes figuratively The speech is figurative when Christ saith of the bread This is my body and of the cup This is my bloud Likewise when Paul saith This cup is the new Testament in my bloud For in these the name of the thing signified is attributed to the signe Paul also then speaketh figuratively when he saith This is my body which is broken for you because he attributeth the property of the signe which is to be broken to the thing signified Thus Cyprian must be understood When we drink of the cup we cleave to the crosse Serm. de Coena Hom 24. in 1 Cor. 10. Hom. 27. wee suck Christs bloud and lay our tongues in our Redeemers wounds Thus Chrysostome is to be interpreted when he saith Christs bloud is in the chalice Christs body which is in heaven is presented on earth to our view and is not only seen but touched of us nor touched only but eaten also he is held bitten and eaten of us in token of love as sometimes wee bite at him whom we love and touch his flesh with our tongue These sentences are not truly spoken or understood of the body of Christ but by a trope and figure usuall in sacraments Now the speech is proper when Christ saith Doe this in remembrance of me and when the Fathers every where say The breaking of bread is a memoriall a lively shadow of Christs sacrifice The bread signifieth the body of Christ It is a figure a signe a sacrament of the body of Christ Of the controversie concerning the words used in the Supper NOw whereas our adversaries the Papists and others deny that Christs words are sacramentally spoken and say we are to keep the letter wee must here adde something touching the controversie of the letter and meaning of the letter The Papists bear us in hand that by the vertue and force of consecration there is made a transubstantiation or changing of the bread into the body of Christ the accidents only remaining Others tell us of a consubstantiation or co-existence of Christs body in or with the bread The Transubstantiaries The Transubstantiaries and Consubstantiaries relie not on the simple meaning of Christs words together with the Consubstantiaries doe boast and glory that they understand the words of Christ simply and aright But neither perform that which they brag and boast of for that is the true simplicity and property of the word whereunto for the just understanding and interpretation thereof nothing is to be added neither ought to be taken from it neither any thing altered But as many as hold that the body of Christ
is with in or under the bread they adde unto the words of Christ and depart from true simplicity For if that which Christ said is simply to be retained and that not to be admitted which he said not then may we not say The bread is both bread and the body of Christ but simply this only The bread is the body of Christ For he said not My body is with or in or under the bread or The bread is both bread and my body together neither addeth he as these adde of their own really substantially corporally but he uttereth these bare words of the bread This is my body Neither have the Transubstantiaries their opinion drawn from the words of Christ simply understood namely that of the bread is made the body of Christ or the bread is changed into the body of Christ for this is their own forgery and invention For Christ said not that the bread was now made or was a making or should be made but simply said The bread is my body where no change could come between so that the words of Christ be simply understood Therefore falsly do they perswade the people that they simply rest on the propriety of Gods word when as manifoldly and most farre they swerve and depart from it The true interpretation of Christ words We Protestants retain the words of Christ without adding or altering to wit that the bread is the body of Christ and indeed the true and visible body which was given for us But because these words literally taken would admit a sense repugnant to the truth of Christian faith for if bread were properly Christs body it would follow that bread was crucified for us therefore we affirm that in Christs words a convenient meaning must be inquired after that is Christs words must be understood sacramentally namely that the bread is called Christs body because it is a signe of Christs body the cup or wine in the cup is called Christs bloud because it is a sign of Christs bloud the cup is also called the new Testament because it is a signe of the new Testament even as baptism is termed a washing away of sins and a laver of new birth because it is a signe of both these which are wrought properly by the bloud and spirit of Christ The true sense therefore and naturall interpretation of Christs words is This is my body which is given for you that is This bread broken by me and given to you is a signe of my body delivered to death for you and an authentick seal of your conjunction with me so that he which shall beleeve and eat this bread he truly and really after a sort eateth my body Here therefore to the signe is attributed the name of the thing signified both for the conjunction which the thing signified hath in the right use of the Supper with the signe and also for the proportion which the signe hath with the thing signified In this exposition we are not led and over-ruled by Philosophy and humane reason as our adversaries traduce us and bear the world in hand we are but we observe those rules by which in the joint consent of all sound wise men wee are to censure the interpretation of any Scripture whatsoever namely by the analogie and rule of faith by the nature of the thing or subject by the testimonies of Scripture which teach the same thing Three rules wâ—ereby we may judge of the interpretation of Scripture For by help of these three rules the naturall sense of Scripture is wont to be examined as often as necessity driveth us from the letter to the sense and meaning 1. That no interpretation be received dissonant from the rule of faith or repugnant to any article thereof or any commandement of the Decalogue or any expresse testimony of Scripture for the spirit of truth is not contrary to it self 2. That the sense derived out of words signifying any thing have a congruity with the nature of the thing signified by the words as in this present subject of the Supper whereon wee insist when any question or doubt is moved therein we are to enquire seeing it is a Sacrament how the Scripture else-where speaketh of Sacraments and of the Supper it selfe 3. That other like places be weighed and considered by which it is either manifest and granted or may be demonstrated by some circumstance that they contain the same doctrine concerning the same thing which is contained in the place in controversie For if we be fully resolved of the meaning of any cleerer and uncontroversed place we shall also be resolved of the sense of the place in controversie if the same thing be delivered in both So then it is out of doubt that that meaning of the words of the Supper which is agreeable with these rules is true and those untrue which disagree from them But this our construing and interpretation which indeed is not ours but the doctrine of Christ himself his Apostles and all orthodox or right-beleeving antiquity doth every way sute with these rules wherefore undoubtedly it is most true and best beseeming the truth of the Gospel Now let us come to the arguments by which wee prove our interpretation to be true they are of four sorts 1. Some are taken out of the text it self and circumstances of the institution of the Lords Supper 2. Some are taken from the nature of the thing or subject that is by understanding the speech as the thing it self doth bear and suffer namely according to the nature of all Sacraments 3. Some are drawn from an analogie of the articles of our faith or from a conference of places or parts of Christian doctrine 4. Some are taken from other like places of Scripture where the same thing is delivered in such words as are manifest and whereof there is no controversie 1. The first sort of arguments taken out of the text and circumstances of the institution of the Lords Supper He sate down 1. CHrists humane nature at the first celebrating of the Supper by a corporall kind of placing sate in his proper place at the table and now is in heaven wherefore then it was not neither is it now corporally in the bread or in the place of the bread He took bread 2. Christ at the first Supper took not into his hands nor brake his body but bread wherefore bread is not properly and really the very body of Christ This is my body 3. Christs body was born of a virgin But bread is made of meal therefore it is not really Christs body 4. Christ said of the visible bread being broken This is my body and of the visible cup being distributed unto his disciples This cup is the new Testament in my bloud Therefore the Papists retain not the letter when they say My body is contained under the forms of bread and wine nor the Ubiquitaries when they thus speak My body is in with under this
bread and much lesse when both of them say My invisible body contained under this form or under this bread is my body For both of them do not only manifestly decline from the letter to a glosse of their own but shamefully pervert Christs words in the former glosse as if it were written My body is under this and in the later they father on Christ a childish tautologie or repetition of the same thing as if he had said My body is my body Which was given for you 5. Christs body which we eat in the Supper was delivered to death and crucified for us But bread was not given and crucified for us Therefore bread is not properly and really the body of Christ This cup is the new Testament 6. As the cup is the new Testament so the bread is the body of Christ The cup is the new Testament sacramentally as before hath been shewed and now may be farther proved by this reason The new Testament properly is not drunk with the mouth but beleeved with the heart but the cup is drunk with the mouth therefore the cup cannot properly be the new Testament Therefore the bread is Christs body in the same sense to wit sacramentally 7. If the bread be properly Christs body and the cup his bloud it must needs be that in the first Supper the bloud was separated from Christs body and that now both of them be given us apart as they are signes apart But neither in the first Supper was the bloud then without the body neither is the body now given without bloud for then Christ was not yet dead and now he dieth no more Therefore the bread is the body and the cup the bloud of Christ not properly but sacramentally 8. That which Christ himself did eat and drink was not properly his body and bloud else should hee have eaten and drunken himselfe But hee did eat of that bread and drink of that cup for he saith I will drink no more of the fruit of the vine Mark 14.25 and Chrysostome commenting hereon saith Hee also drank of the cup Hom. 83. in Mark. lest hearing those words they should say What Doe wee then drink bloud and eat flesh and so be troubled For when hee first made mention of this kind of eating and drinking many took offence for the words sake onely Therefore lest this should then also happen hee himselfe first did eat and drinke that so hee might lead them with a quiet reposed mind to the communion of the mysteries The bread therefore and the cup are not properly Christs body and bloud but sacramentally Doe this in remembrance of mee 9. Remembrance is not of things corporally present but of things absent Christ instituted this sacrament to be celebrated in remembrance of him Therefore Christ is not corporally present in the bread or sacrament Doe this 10. Either Christ with his body is not substantially in the bread or forme of bread or the Supper is not to be any more celebrated For the Apostle biddeth us eat of this bread and drink of this cup and shew forth the Lords death till he come But questionlesse the celebration of the Supper is not yet to be intermitted but ought to be continued unto the end of the world Christ therefore is not yet come neither is he corporally in the bread or form of bread 11. As the bread was the body of Christ in the first Supper and the disciples did eat Christs body so and no otherwise the bread is now Christs body and wee eat Christs body for our Supper is no other then the Supper of the disciples was But in the first Supper the bread was not essentially Christs body neither did the disciples eat Christs body with their mouthes in the bread or in the form of bread for Christ corporally and visibly sate at the table with his disciples and suffered no change the whole action throughout Therefore now also the bread is not essentially Christs body neither do we eat Christs body with our mouthes in the bread or in the form of bread 2. The second sort of arguments which are taken from the nature of the Sacraments 1. THe very manner and form of speaking yeeldeth us a firm and strong argument Bread is the body of Christ But bread is not in his own proper substance his body for by reason hereof have they invented Transubstantiation and Consubstantiation Therefore it is a figurative speech even such a one as is usuall unto sacraments and is afore declared in the institution of the Supper 2. In all sacraments when the name or properties of the things signified are attributed unto the signes there is not signified the corporall presence of the thing in the signes but first a similitude of the things with their signes and a sealing of them by their signes then a conjunction and union of the things with their signes in the right use But in this Sacrament Christ attributeth the names of the things signified his body and bloud to the signes the bread and wine saying This is my body This is my bloud Therefore there is not thereby signified a corporall presence of his body 3. The nature of all sacraments is that the signs be understood and taken corporally that the things signified must be understood and taken spiritually and that the visible things be not the things signified but only signes and pledges of them 4. Sacramentall phrases and termes are sacramentally to be understood These words of the Supper This is my body This is my bloud are sacramentall phrases for they signifie the Sacrament and attribute the names of the things signified to the signes Therefore they are to be understood sacramentally Object There is no figurative speech expressed in the words of the Supper Therefore wee may not so interpret them Answ The Antecedent is false for Christ himselfe adjoined a sacramentall declaration immediately on them saying Doe this that is eat this bread and drink this cup in remembrance of me that is that therby ye may be certified and assured that my body was given and my bloud was shed for you and given to you to be meat and drink unto life eternall Again This cup is the new Testament in my bloud that is the seale of the new Testament and promise of grace now fulfilled in my bloud 5. Whatsoever is not promised in the Gospel that cannot be sealed unto us by the Supper for sacraments confirm exhibite promise seal no other thing then the word doth whence they are termed visible promises and visible words In the Gospel is promised no corporall eating Joh. 6.62 63. nay it is peremptorily reproved and condemned by Christ in the Gospel by two arguments 1. Because not long after hee would exalt his body into heaven and remove it far from the Jews mouthes 2. Because the corporall eating of his flesh profiteth nothing Neither doth he there distinguish the eating of him into a grosse and a
faith whilst we distinguish and separate that which is divine from that which is humane and joyning them againe after their separation confesse one God and man yea we our selves are made his body by this Sacrament and knit and united to our head by the thing signified by the Sacrament De divina mensa Et quod The Canon of the Nicene Councell Againe here also is the Lords Table Let us not childishly cleave to the bread and wine set before us but lifting up our minds on high by faith let us consider that on that Table is set the Lamb of God taking away the sinnes of the world which is offered of the Priests without killing and let us truely receiving his precious body and bloud beleeve that they are SIGNES of our resurrection For therefore we receive not much but little thereby to acknowledge that it is not received to satisfie In Litur de Trin. l. 8. Orat. de pas but to sanctifie us Basil We have set on the Table the figures of the sacred body and blood Hillarie The bread and wine received and drunke effect and worke that both we are in Christ In 1 Cor. 11. and Christ in us Gregory Nazianzene The figures of the precious body and bloud of Christ Ambrose Because we are delivered by our LORDS death being mindfull thereof in eating and drinking wee Signifie or Represent the flesh and bloud that were offered up for us De Sacr. l. 4. c. 5. Cont. Adim cap. 12. In Psa 3 Epist 23. ad Bonisac Againe This oblation is the FIGVRE OF THE BODY AND BLOVD of our LORD Jesus CHRIST Augustine Our Lord doubted not to say This is my body when he gave a TOKEN of his body Againe The Lord admitted Judas to that banquet wherein he ministred and gave to his disciples the FIGVRE of his body and bloud The same Father saith Vnlesse Sacraments had a certaine likenesse of the things whereof they bee Sacraments without question they were no Sacraments And in consideration of this likenesse oftentimes they beare the names of the things themselves As therefore the Sacrament of the body of CHRIST is AFTER A CERTAINE MANER the body of Christ and the Sacrament of Christs bloud is his bloud so the Sacrament of faith is faith In senten Prosper de ause dist 2. c. Hoc est Againe As then the celestiall bread Christs flesh is IN SOME SORT called Christs body whereas indeed it is a Sacrament of Christs body namely that visible palpable and mortall body which was nailed on the Crosse and the sacrificing of his flesh done by the hands of the Minister is called Christs Passion death and crucifying NOT IN THE TRVTH OF THE THING but in a mysterie SIGNIFYING it So the Sacrament of faith by which is meant Baptisme is faith Serm. ad infant Also These my brethren are therefore called Sacraments because in them one thing is seene another understood That which is seene hath a bodily forme that which is understood hath a spirituall fruit or benefit In Mat. Hom. 83. Chrysostome This is my bloud which is shed for the remission of sinnes which Christ said to shew that his Passion and Crosse was a mysterie and to comfort his disciples Dialog 1. Theodoret Our Saviour verily changed the names of the signes and the things signified and gave the same name to the body which is proper to the signe and that to the signe which is proper to the body The cause of this change is manifest to them that are entred into the first principles of divine mysteries For he would that they who use the Sacraments should not bend and set their minds on the nature of the things which are seene but for the alteration of the names should beleeve that alteration which is made through grace For he who tearmed that by name of corne and bread which is by nature a body and called himselfe a vine he honoured the signes which are seene with the title and name of his body and bloud not by changing the nature but by adding grace to the nature Macarius the Monke hath a famous saying to this purpose Hom. 27. Bread and wine are a correspondent type of his flesh and they who receive the bread which is shewed eate the flesh of Christ spiritually Other testimonies for briefenesse sake we omit Of Transubstantiation NOw it is easie to see what we are to think of Transubstantiation even that it is an impious invention and device of the Papists which also we will shew and prove briefly by divers reasons But first we must declare in a word what the Papists properly meane by their Transubstantiation They suppose that by force of Consecration that is of uttering these words upon the creatures of bread and wine This is my body This is the cup of the new Testament in my bloud the bread and wine is substantially converted or turned into the body and bloud of Christ the formes onely or accidents of bread and wine remaining namely the shape or figure the heat the taste the weight c. They therefore call these words of Consecration operatorie and effective able to work and effect the conversion and change and they say that the change is fully accomplished in the very last instant of uttering the syllable * The Latine particle was UM hoc est corpua me VM which I chose rather to resemble by the English forme of Consecration DY This is my boDY and then there is no longer bread and wine but the body and bloud of Christ is present and is contained under the forms of bread and wine and is eaten and drunk in the Eucharist or Supper by the mouth of the Communicants Concerning the manner of the change it is not agreed on by all Some say that the substance of bread and wine is by Transsubstantiation changed into the substance of Christs body and bloud so that the bread and wine is essentially made the very body and bloud of Christ the externall formes only remaining and this they terme a substantiall change or change of the substance What the Papists call a substantiall change Others are of opinion that the substance of bread and wine is not changed but vanisheth by annihilation or by being brought to nothing and that then the substance of Christs body and bloud succeedeth in place thereof so that the substance of Christs body and bloud after the consecration cometh under these formes and accidents under which before was the substance of the bread and wine And this they call a formal change or a change of formes Lombard in his Sentences expoundeth both these opinions What they call a formall change Li. 4. di 11. Tho. Aqui. p. 3. q. 78. a. 5. and seemeth to approve the former alone Howbeit they call both these changes by the name of Transsubstantiation They affirm also that the particle This in the words of consecration doth note some indeterminate
not to the Latine Church but by the Greeke Church and those words are found in the Greeke Testament when first it was written in Greeke And therefore wee have no Hebrew words derived unto our Church which the Greeke Church had not before us If also wee seek the Greeke Fathers the word Missa will never be found to have been used by them Therefore I think not that the word Missa was taken from the Hebrewes but Missa which doubtlesse is a Latine word by originall seemeth to have taken from the Fathers who used Remissa for Remissio as Tertullian Tertul. lib. 4. cont Marc. Cypr. debono patient Epist 4. lib. 3. Wee have spoken saith hee of a De remissa peccatorum remissio of sinnes And Cyprian Hee that was to give b Daturus remissam peccatorum remission of sins did not disdaine to be baptised And again he useth the same word Hee that blasphemeth against the holy Ghost hath not c Remissam peccatorum non habet remission of sins Wherefore as they say Remissa for Remissio so they seem also to have said Missa for Missio But herein againe they much vary For some will have the word Missa to be used as it were Missio from an ancient custome of Ecclesiasticall rites and actions which came from the Greeke Churches to the Latine because Sermons and Lectures being ended before the Communion a Deacon did send forth that is did command the Catechumenes the possested with spirits and the excommunicated persons to depart crying with a loud voice If any Catechumene be yet abiding within the Church let him depart and so the word Missa seemeth to be used as it were a Mission or sending away because it was the last part of divine Service Others will have it to be so called from a Dimission or from the manner of dimissing the congregation because Service being ended a Deacon dimissed them with these words Ite missa est that is Goe you may depart Or as others interprete it Go now is the collection of almes which they will have to be called Missa of the sending it in as we may so speake or throwing or casting it in for the poore Lombard hath a new conceit hereof Lib. 4. dist 15. It is called the Masse saith hee because an heavenly Messenger cometh to consecrate Christs quickning body according to that prayer of the Priest Almighty God command that this be carried by the hands of thine Angell into thine high Altar c. Therefore unlesse an Angell come it cannot rightly be called a Masse Loe the folly of the man Againe The Masse is so called either because the host is sent whereof mention is made in that Service whence it is said Ite missa est that is Follow the host Lib. 4. dist 24. which is sent up to heaven trace yee after it Or because an Angel cometh from heaven to consecrate the Lords body by whom the host is carried and conveyed to the heavenly Altar Whence it is also said Ite missa est Goe it is sent Wee reject both the name and the thing For this word the Masse doth not agree to the Lords Supper because the Lords Supper hath nothing common and agreeing with the name of Missa albeit it was used of the ancient Writers Moreover we have no need of this name for wee have other words for this purpose extant in Scripture where it is called The Lords Supper The Lords Table Breaking of bread c. Now let us see the differences of the Supper and the Masse and those most contrary one to another and such as in respect whereof the Masse ought to be abolished They are especially three and are desciphered in the Catechisme 1. The Lords Supper testifieth unto us That wee have full remission of sinnes and justification freely by faith for Christs one and onely sacrifice finished on the Crosse according to these sayings of Scripture The bread is the body of Christ given for us Heb. 7.27 Heb. 9.12 26. The cup is the bloud of Christ shed for us for remission of sinnes Doe this in remembrance of mee Shew forth the Lords death till hee come That did hee once when hee offered up himselfe By his owne bloud entred hee in once into the holy place and obtained eternall redemption for us For then must hee have often suffered since the foundation of the world but now in the end of the world hath hee appeared once to put away sinne by the sacrifice of himselfe Heb. 10.10 12 14. By the which will wee are sanctified even by the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once made This man after hee had offered one sacrifice for sinnes sitteth for ever at the right hand of God With one offering hath hee consecrated for ever them that are sanctified Contrariwise the Masse denieth that both quicke and dead have remission of sins by and for Christs oblation except also he be daily offered by the Massing-Priests to God his Father For thus hath that their Canon which they call the lesse Holy Father Almighty and Eternall God receive this immaculate host or sacrifice which I thy unworthy servant offer to thee my living and true God for my innumerable sinnes offences and negligences and for all that stand about me here present yea and for all faithfull Christians quick and dead that it may be profitable to me and them to everlasting salvation And their greater Canon hath Remember Lord thy servants and handmaids N. and all here present whose faith and devotion is well knowne unto thee for whom we offer or who offer unto thee this sacrifice of praise for themselves and all that are theirs for the redemption of their soules for the hope of their safety and salvation What need was there that Christ should offer himselfe at all if the oblation of a petty Masse-Priest may serve for the redemption of soules 2. The Lords Supper witnesseth unto us That Christ according to the Articles of faith as concerning his humanity is in heaven at the right hand of his Father and is not shrouded under the bare accidents of the elements or signes in the Supper and that he exhibiteth unto us in the Supper his body and bloud to be eaten and drunken by faith and that he ingraffeth us into himselfe by his holy Spirit that we may abide in him and have him abiding in us as it is said He that is joyned unto the Lord 2 Cor. 6.17 10.16 Heb. 1.3 8.1 4. is one spirit The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the body of Christ We have such an high-Priest that sitteth at the right hand of the Throne of the Majesty in the heavens For he were not a Priest if he were on earth Contrariwise the Masse teacheth us That bread and wine by force of consecration is changed into Christs body and blood and that this his body and bloud in the act of consecration
his body to dogs to wit to the wicked contrary to his own doctrine Give not holy things to dogs nor cast pearles to swine August lib. 21. c. 25. de Civit. Dei in lo. tract 26. 59. in senten Prosp c. 3.39 Ambros Serm. de coena 8. From the authority of Fathers who have preached the same doctrine Austine and Prosper Ambrose saith Although the Sacraments or signes suffer themselves to be taken and touched by the unworthie yet these men cannot be partakers of the spirit whose infidelity or unworthinesse contradicteth so great holinesse And a little after But as for those who in word only with dry hearts and minds that is without affection and without understanding are present at these sacred mysteries or further be partakers of the gifts therein they indeed lick the rocke but they neither suck honey thence nor oyle because they are not quickned with any sweetnesse of charity or fatnesse of sanctity of the holy Ghost they neither judge themselves nor discerne the Sacraments but unreverently frequent and use these his holy gifts and blessings as common meats and impudently intrude themselves into the Lords Table in a filthy garment for whom it had been better with a milstone about their neck to have been drowned in the sea then with an uncleane conscience to have taken one morsell at the Lords hands who to this very day createth sanctifieth blesseth and divideth to godly receivers his true and sacred body The causes for which the wicked are said to cate unto themselves damnation Now for these causes the wicked eat unto themselves and draw on themselves damnation 1. Because they profane the signes and by consequent the things signified by laying hold on those things which are not instituted for them but for the Disciples of Christ 2. Because they profane the Covenant and Testament of God by taking unto themselves the signes and tokens of the Covenant They will seeme to be in league with God whereas they are in league with the Devill and not with God whom by this meanes they would as much as in them lieth make the Father of the wicked 3. Because they discerne not the Lords body and tread under foot the bloud of Christ His benefits indeed are offered unto them but they receive them not with faith and so mock God while they professe that they receive the benefits of Christ when as they doe or minde nothing lesse and adde this new offence to their other sinnes 4. Because they condemne themselves by their owne judgement For approaching unto the Lords Table they professe that they accept of this doctrine and doe beleeve no salvation to be without Christ and yet in the meane season are conscious unto themselves that they are hypocrites and so condemn themselves Therefore false is their objection who say thus The wicked eat damnation unto themselves Therefore they eat Christs body Ans Nay rather the contrary followeth They eat damnation Therefore not Christs body For To eat Christ and To eat damnation are contraries which cannot stand together Repl. 1. They eat unworthily Therefore they eat Answ I grant they eat but they eat not Christ For the text saith expresly Whosoever shall eat this bread unworthily 1 Cor. 11.7 Repl. Christ is not a Saviour only but a Judge also Answ Hee is a Judge not of them by whom he is eaten but of them of whom hee is despised and rejected For of them which eat he saith He which eateth mee shall live by mee John 6.57 But of them which despise him he proclaimeth Depart from me all ye that work iniquity Matt. 7.23 As therefore the Gospel being beleeved is the savour of life unto life and being despised is the savour of death unto death So Christ being eaten quickeneth but being contemned judgeth the eater But he is then despised when in the word and sacraments he is offered to the unfaithfull but is refused or rejected through infidelity Repl. 3. They are guilty of Christs body Therefore they eat it Ans The cause of their guilt is not the eating of Christ but the eating of the bread without Christ because it is said Hee that eateth of this bread unworthily The abuse then of the signe is the contempt of Christ as the defacing of the Kings Charter or Seal is an injury to the Prince himself and a matter of treason Repl. 4. But how eat the wicked damnation unto themselves seeing it is a good work to receive the Sacrament Ans It is a good work by it self but not unto the wicked The receiving of the Sacrament is a good work when the true and right use is adjoyned otherwise it is made not a commanded but a forbidden work as also God saith He that killeth a bullocke Isa 66.3 is as if he slew a man So likewise Paul This is not to eat the Lords body And again 1 Cor. 11.20 Rom. 2.26 If thou be a transgresser of the law thy circumcision is made uncircumcision Else might wee thus conclude The receiving of Christs body is a good work Therefore the wicked by that receit cannot be made guilty of Christs body 3. What the right and lawfull use of the Supper is THe right and lawfull use of the Supper is When the faithfull receive in the Church the Lords bread and his cup and shew forth his death to this end that this receiving may be a pledge of their union with Christ and an application of the whole benefit of our redemption and salvation It consisteth in three things 1. When the rites and ceremonies instituted of Christ are retained and observed yet so that they be not observed of one or two privately buâ— in a convenient and lawfull assembly of the Church whether great or small and the rites instituted are That the Lords bread be broken distributed and received and the Lords cup given to all that communicate in remembrance of Christs death 2. When the rights are observed of those persons for whom Christ did institute them that is when the bread and wine is not distributed and received of others then of whom the Lord would have it received namely not of his enemies but of his â—isciples which are the faithfull For the observing of the rite without faith and repentance is not the use but the abuse of it 3. When the Supper is received and the whole action directed to the right end appointed by Christ which is in commemoration and remembrance of the Lords death and for confirmation of our faith and to shew our thankefulnesse Quest 82. Are they also to be admitted to the Supper who in confession and life declare themselves to be unbeleevers and ungodly Ans No. For by that means the Covenant of God is profaned and the wrath of God is stirred up against the whole assembly a 1 Cor. 11.20 34. Isa 1.1 c. 66.3 Jerem. 21. Psa 50.16 c. wherefore the Church by the commandement of Christ
him come and observe it and he shall be as one that is born in the land For no uncircumcised person shall eat thereof 3. The allegories or resemblances between Christ and the Paschal lamb FOr confirmation and illustration of the principall end of the passeover the consideration of the resemblances of such rites as God prescribed to be observed in the killing and eating the Paschall lamb may much availe A Collation of the type and the thing signified by the type THE TYPE WAS THE THING SIGNIFIED IS 1. A Lamb out of the flock 1. Christ very or true man Isa 53. John 1. 2. Without blemish set apart 2 Without sin Isa 53. Heb. 7. 3. To be slain and rosted 3. Who suffered and died 1 Cor. 5. 4. Without breaking any bone 4. Without having his bones broken John 19. 5. About evening 5. In the end of the world Heb. 1. 9. 6. The posts were to be sprinkled witâ— his bloud 6. His satisfaction was imputed unto us Isa 53. Rom. 3. 7. That the Destroyer might passe over the Israelites housâ—s 7. That we might be delivered from everlasting death Heb 2. 8. He was to be eaten and that in every family 8. There must be in man an applying of this death of Christ to himselfe by faith Rom. 1. John 6. 9. He was to be eaten all 9. This application must be according to all the Articles of faith 2 Tim. 3. 10. Without leavened bread 10. Without hypocrisie 1 Cor. 5. 11. With sowre herbs 11. With patience of the crosse Matt. 10. 12. Hastily and in the habit of travellers 12. With a desire of profiting and expectation of an heavenly life Matth. 13. Heb. 13. 13. Of the Circumcised alone 13. The regenerate onely eat him and hee is profitable to them alone and they onely take not the Sacraments to their condemnation Joh. 6. Heb. 13. 1 Cor. 11. 4. Whether the ancient passeover be now abrogated THat the ancient passeover is now by Christs coming abrogated with all other types whatsoever prefiguring the Messias to come is cleer 1. Out of the whole disputation of the Apostle to the Hebrews touching the abolishment of the legall shadowes Heb. 7.12 which abolishment is now performed in the New Testament If the priesthood be changed then of necessity must there be a change of the law In that he saith a New Testament hee hath abrogated the Old 2. From the fulfilling and performance of those legall shadows These things were done that the Scripture should be fulfilled Not a bone of him shall be broken John 19.36 Christ our passeover is sacrificed for us 1 Cor. 5.7 3. From the substituting of the New Testament in place thereof For Christ when he was ready to die and to sacrifice himselfe as the true Passeover ended the ceremony of the Paschall lamb with a solemn banquet and thenceforth instituted and ordained a Supper to be observed by his Church in place thereof I have desired to eat this passeover with you before I suffer Luke 22.15 19. Doe this in remembrance of mee Where hee commandeth that we celebrate and solemnize the supper in memory of him not the ancient passeover As then Baptism succeeded Circumcision so the Lords Supper succeeded the Passeover in the new Testament Certain conclusions of the Supper 1. THe Supper of the Lord is a sacrament of the new Testament wherein according to the commandement of Christ Bread and Wine is distributed and received in the assembly of the faithfull in remembrance of Christ which is that Christ might testifie unto us that he feedeth us with his body and bloud delivered and shed for us to eternall life and that we also might for these his benefits give solemn thanks unto him 2. The first and principall end and use of the Lords Supper is That Christ might therein testifie unto us that he died for us and doth feed us with his bloud and body unto everlasting life that so by this restification he might cherish and increase in us our faith and so consequently this spirituall food and nourishment The second end is thanksgiving for these benefits of Christ and our publick and solemn profession of them and our duty towards Christ The third is the distinguishing of the Church from other sects The fourth that it might be a bond of mutuall love and dilection The fifth that it might be a bond of our assemblies and meetings 3. That first end and use which is the confirmation of our faith in Christ the Supper of the Lord hath because Christ himself giveth this bread and drink by the hands of his Ministers to be a memoriall of him that is to admonish and put us in remembrance by this signe as by his visible word that he died for us and is the food of eternall life unto us while he maketh us his members both because he hath annexed a promise to this rite that he will feed those who eat this bread in remembrance of him with his own body and bloud when he saith This is my body and also because the holy Ghost doth by this visible testimony move our minds and hearts more firmly to beleeve the promise of the Gospel 4. There is then in the Lords Supper a double meat and drinke one externall visible terrene namely bread and wine and another internall There is also a double eating and receiving an externall and signifying which is the corporall receiving of the bread and wine that is which is performed by the hands mouth and senses of the body and an internall invisible and signified which is the fruition of Christs death and a spirituall ingraffing into Christs body that is which is not performed by the hands and mouth of the body but by the spirit and faith Lastly there is a double administer and dispenser of this meat and drink an externall of the externall which is the Minister of the Church delivering by his hand bread and wine and an internall of the internall meat which is Christ himself feeding us by his body and bloud 5. Not the body and bloud of Christ but the bread and wine are the signs which serve for confirmation of our faith for the body and bloud of Christ are received that we may live for ever But the bread and wine are received that we may be confirmed and assured of that heavenly food and daily more and more injoy it 6. Neither is the bread changed into the body of Christ nor the wine into the bloud of Christ neither doth the body and bloud of Christ succeed in their place they being abolished neither is Christs body substantially present in the bread or under the bread or where the bread is but in the right use of the Lords Supper the holy Ghost useth this symbole as an instrument to stir up faith in us by which he more and more dwelleth in us ingraffeth us into Christ and maketh us through him to be just and righteous and to draw eternall life from
him 8. Now when Christ saith This that is This bread is my body and This cup is my bloud the speech is sacramentall or metonymicall because the name of the thing signified is attributed to the signe it self that is it is meant that the bread it the sacrament or signe of his body and doth represent him and doth testifie that Christs body is offered for us on the crosse and is given to us to be food of eternall life and therefore is the instrument of the holy Ghost to maintain and increase this food in us 1 Cor. 10. as S. Paul saith The bread is the communion of the body of Christ that is it is that thing by which we are made partakers of Christs body And else-where he saith We have been all made to drink into one Spirit The same is the meaning also when it is said that the bread is called Christs body for a similitude which the thing signified hath with the signe namely that Christs body nourisheth the spirituall life as bread doth the corporall life and for that assured and certain joint-receiving of the thing and the signe in the right use of the sacrament And this is the sacramentall union of the bread which is shewed by a sacramentall kind of speaking but no such locall conjunction as is by some imagined 9. As therefore the body of Christ signifieth both his proper and naturall body and his sacramentall body which is the bread of the Eucharist so the eating of Christs body is of two sorts one sacramentall of the signe to wit the externall and corporall receiving of the bread and wine the other reall or spirituall which is the receiving of Christs very body it self And to beleeve in Christ dwelling in us by faith is by the vertue and operation of the holy Ghost to be ingraffed into his body as members to the head and branches into the vine and so to be made partakers of the fruit of the death and life of Christ Whence it is apparent that they are falsly accused who thus teach as if they made either the bare signes only to be in the Lords Supper or a participation of Christs death only or of his benefâ—â—s or of the holy Ghost excluding the true reall and spirituall communion of the very body of Christ it self 10. Now the right use of the Supper is when the faithfull observe this rite instituted by Christ in remembrance of Christ that is to the stirring and raising up of their faith and thankfulnesse 11. As in this right use the body of Christ is sacramentally taken so also without this use as by unbeleevers and hypocrites it is eaten sacramentally indeed but not really that is the sacramentall symboles or signes bread and wine are received but not the things themselves of the sacrament to wit the body and bloud of Christ 12. This doctrine of the Supper of the Lord is grounded upon very many and those most sound and firm reasons All those places of Scripture confirm it which speak of the Lords Supper and Christ calling not any invisible thing in the bread but the very visible and broken bread it selfe his body delivered or broken for us which whereas it cannot be meant properly himselfe addeth an exposition that that bread is truly received in remembrance of him which is as if he had said That the bread is a sacrament of his body So likewise he saith The Supper is the new testament which is spirituall one and everlasting And Paul saith It is the communion of the body and bloud of Christ because all the faithfull are one body in Christ who cannot stand together with the communion of the divels Likewise he maketh one and the same ingraffing into Christs body by one spirit to be both in baptism and in the Lords supper Moreover the whole doctrine and nature of Sacraments confirm the same all which represent to the eyes the same spirituall communion of Christ to be received by faith which the word or promise of the Gospel declareth unto the ears Therefore they are called by the names of the things signified and in their right use have the receiving of the things adjoined unto them The articles also of our faith confirm it which teach that Christs body is a true humane body not present at once in many places as being now received into heaven and there to remain untill the Lord return to Judgement and further that the communion of saints with Christ is wrought by the holy Ghost not by any entrance of Christs body into the bodies of men Wherefore this sentence and doctrine is of all the purer antiquity of the Church with most great and manifest consent held and professed 13. The Supper of the Lord differeth from Baptism 1. In the rite and manner of signifying because the dipping into the water or washing signifyeth a remission and purging out of sin by the bloud and spirit of Christ and our society and fellowship with Christ in his afflictions and glorification But the distributing of the bread and wine signifieth the death of Christ to be imputed unto us unto remission of sins and our selves ingraffed into Christ to become his members 2. They differ in their speciall use because Baptism is the testimony of our regeneration and of the covenant made between us and God and of our receiving into the Church But the Lords Supper testifieth that we are ever to be nourished by Christ remaining in us and that the covenant made between God and us shall ever be established and ratified unto us and that we for ever shall abide in the Church and body of Christ 3. They differ in the persons to whom they are to be given Baptism is given to all those who are to be accounted for members of the Church whether they be of yeers and understanding or infants The Lords Supper is to be given to them only who are able to understand and celebrate the benefits of Christ and to examine themselves 4. They differ in the often celebrating of them Baptism is to be received but once only because the covenant of God being once made is alwayes firm and of force to the penitent But the Supper is often to be received because an often renewing and recalling of that covenant to our remembrance is necessary for our faith 5. They differ in the order which is to be observed in the use of them Because Baptism is to be given before the Supper and the Supper may not be given unto any except he be first baptised 14. They come worthily to the Lords Supper who examine themselves that is are endued with true faith and repentance They who find not this in themselves ought neither to come without it lest they eat and drink their own judgement not to defer repentance wherewith they should come lest they draw upon themselves hardnesse of heart and eternall pains 15. The Church ought to admit all those unto it who professe themselves to imbrace the
hell or in the greatest matter of all others impiously to blaspheme if this be not The second Argument THe blasphemie of Samosatenus Arrius and the late Anti-trinitaries is this That Christ-man is not properly and by nature God but onely by an accidentall participation of Divine properties majesty honour power and vertue The Ubiquitaries also maintaine the same consideration of the God-head of Christ-man while they define the personall union by his communicating alone of properties whereby the flesh of Christ is made omnipotent and every where So that now that man is and is called God not that hee is properly and by nature God but because in finite power majesty and glory is given him from God and all the gifts of the holy Ghost are bestowed on him without measure Now this accidentall bestowing of the God head and all the properties doth not make Christ to be properly and by nature God but only by divine grace or God unproperly so called because it is not the very essentiall God-head of the Word but a certain participation thereof in vertue and efficacy And therefore the sounder Fathers objected unto the Arrians that they took away the true and eternall God-head of Christ when they made him a God not by nature but by grace b participation onely of dignity and majesty Therefore seeing the Vbiquitaries also equalling our Immanuel with God by participation of properties onely take away his true and eternall God-head wee doe disclaime and accurse this their doctrine as blasphemous and hereticall And that they doe this their own words and opinions witnesse Brentius in recog p. 20 Anar Thes 10. â—â— p. Tubin Thes 25 26. and Apol. â—agr 29. as Brentius and Jacobus Andraeas and others of them in their writings Whence we conclude that the Ubiquitaries hold the same opinion with the Artians and the Anti-trinitaries of the God-head of Christ-man that is that all esteeme him for God not by nature but onely by grace of participation new temporary created adopted If these things be true Christ shall not be God and man Lib. 1. de Trinita but a divine man such as the Ubiquitaries repute him who as Servetus hold this opinion That God can communicate the fulnesse of his God-head give his divinity majesty power and glory unto man But wee execrate and detest the same blasphemy of both The third Argument NEstorius taught That the union of God the Word with man was wrought by the participation only of equality as touching majesty honour power vertue and operation Neither doth hee make the difference of the dwelling of the Word in mans nature which himselfe tooke and in other Saints to consist in any other thing than in those gifts and graces bestowed by God on man The selfe same also doe the Vbiquitaries teach because they cry that there is no difference between the inhabiting and dwelling of the God head in Peter and in Christ except it be taken from the communication of the gifts or properties of the God-head and they contend that by this meanes this man which was taken by the Word is God because the Word doth nothing without him but all things by him This is nothing else than to make Christ man onely God by an accident Wherefore the doctrine of Vbiquity is altogether the same with Nestorius his heresie Tert. lib. de Trin pag. 6. 10. Tertullian saith If Christ be man onely how then is he present every-where being called upon and invocated seeing this is not the nature of man but of God to be able to be present in all places By this testimony is refuted the Ubiquity of the humane nature in Christ Object But the union of the divine and humane nature in Christ is unseparable Therefore wheresoever the divine nature is there is also the humane nature Ans It is true which is said that the union is unseparable The Word never forsaketh the nature once assumed and taken But the Word is not in the humane nature as the soul is included in my body Wheresoever my body is there must my soule needs be neither is my soule at the same time without my body But the Word is not so in Christ-man But hee is so unseparably and personally in the humane nature as that he is together also without the humane nature in all the parts of the world as he filleth all and in holy men and Angels by his speciall presence The personall union of both natures doth not evert the generall action and working of his presence and majestie neither doth it let or hinder the speciall working of his presence because the Word is effectuall and worketh forcibly in the regenerate The generall points wherein the Churches which professe the Gospel agree or disagree in the controversie concerning the Lords Supper THey agree in these points 1. That as well the Supper of the Lord as Baptisme is a visible pledge and testimony annexed by Christ himselfe to the promise of grace to this end chiefly that our faith in this promise might be confirmed and strengthened 2. That in the true use of the Supper as well as in all other Sacraments two things are given by God unto us and are received of us namely earthly externall and visible signes are bread and wine and besides these also heavenly internall and invisible gifts as are the true body of Jesus Christ together with all his gifts and benefits and heavenly treasures 3. That in the Supper we are made partakers not only of the Spirit of Christ and his satisfaction justice vertue and operation but also of the very substance and essence of his true body and bloud which was given for us to death on the Crosse and which was shed for us and are truly fed with the self same unto eternall life and that this very thing Christ should teach and make known unto us by this visible receiving of this bread and wine in this Supper 4. That the bread and wine are not changed into the flesh and bloud of Christ but remain true and naturall bread and wine that also the body and bloud of Christ are not shut up in the bread and wine and therefore the bread and wine are called the body of Christ his body and bloud in this sense for that his body and bloud are not only signified by these and set before our eies but also because as often as we eat or drink this bread and wine in the true and right use Christ himself giveth us his body and bloud indeed to be the meat and drink of eternall life 5. That without the right use this receiving of bread and wine is no Sacrament neither any thing but an emptie and vaine ceremony and spectacle and such as men abuse to their owne damnation 6. That there is no other true and lawfull use of the Supper besides that which Christ himself hath instituted and commanded to be ketp namely this that this bread and this wine be eaten and drunken
7.7 What this knowledge of sin worketh by it selfe in the unregenerate and reprobate Thou shalt not lust This use of the law to wit the knowledge of sin and of the judgement of God against sin of it selfe ingendereth in the unregenerate an hatred of God and an increase of sin For so much the more doth nature not yet regenerated desire to commit and excuse sin how much the more the law urgeth and presseth the prohibition and condemnation of sin The law causeth wrath Sin took an occasion by the commandement Rom. 4.15 7.8 and wrought in mee all maner of concupiscence Moreover if those unregenerate be also reprobate then worketh it at length in them a despaire and blasphemy Therefore it is called the ministery of death But by accident the knowledge of sin is in the Elect a preparing of them to conversion 2 Cor. 3.7 What it worketh by accident in the elect and regenerate to wit God by this means constraining and compelling them to acknowledge their owne unrighteousnesse despaire of any help from themselves and by faith to seek for righteousnesse Gaâ—at 3.21 22. and life in Christ their Mediatour If there had been a law given which could have given life surely righteousnesse should have been by the law But the Scripture hath concluded all under sin that the promise by the faith of Jesus Christ should be given to them which beleeve III. In nature restored by Christ or in the regenerate the uses of the Morall law are many Seven uses of the Morall law in nature restored Maintenance of discipline Maintenance of discipline For although this use of the law doth chiefly belong unto the regenerate who are not bridled by the Law of God and righteousnesse as hath been already shewed but by the feare of punishment only and shame not to make open profession of wickednesse abstaine from sin according to that of the Poet The wicked refuse to sin for feare of punishment yet hath it place also in the godly because for the weaknesse and corruption of the flesh prone to sin it is profitable and necessary that both the threatnings of the law and examples of punishment should be set before them also to keep them in good order For God threatneth even to the Saints if they run into grievous offences grievous punishments If the righteous turne away from his righteousnesse and commit iniquity hee shall die for it Acknowledgement of sin Acknowledgement of sin Ezek. 18.24 For this use though it principally belong to the unregenerate yet it concerneth the regenerate also For even to the regenerate the law is a glasse wherein they may see the defects and imperfection of their nature and it instructeth them continually with due contrition to humble themselves in the sight of God and maketh them to profit and goe forward daily in true conversion unto God and faith in God and that as their renewing increaseth so their prayer should increase wherein they beg and crave to be daily more and more conformable to God and his Law Rom. 7.22 23.24 I delight in the Law of God concerning the inner man but I see another law in my members rebelling against the law of my minde c. O wretched man that I am who shall deliver mee from this body of death Concerning both these uses of the law namely the maintenance of discipline and acknowledgement of sin is that saying of Paul to be understood Gal. 3.24 The law is our School-master unto Christ and that as well in the unregenerate elect as in the regenerate For to the former of these it is a preparation to conversion to the latter an increase of conversion seeing faith cannot be kindled in the heart nor consist therein at all except open and manifest transgressions be eschewed and sins against the conscience avoided 1 John 3.7 8. Let no man deceive you Hee that committeth sin is of the Divell Direction in Gods worship Christian conversion Psal 119. sect 14. vers 1. Jerem. 31.33 Ezek. 11.19 36.26 27. The third use of the Morall law is to be a rale of Gods worship and of Christian conversion Thy word O Lord is a lanthorne unto my feet and alight unto my paths I will put my laws in their inward parts and write them in their hearts This use is proper unto the regenerate For although the law also be unto the unregenerate a rule of their actions before conversion yet to them it is not a rule of worship and thankfulnesse towards God as it is to the regenerate Testimony of God who and what hee is The Morall law delivered and expounded in the Church is a testimony of God that there is a God and likewise who and what hee is Testimony of the true Church and true Religion The voice of the law sounding in the Church is an evident testimony shewing which is the true Church and which is true Religion in the world For seeing in the Church alone the doctrine of the law hath been and now is preserved pure and uncorrupt which all other sects have by assenting to manifest errours and impieties diversly corrupted the voice then of the law which soundeth in the Church is an evident disciphering and declaring which is the people of God and which is true Religion in the world Testimony of the excellency of mans nature before the fail It is a testimony of the excellency of mans nature which was before the fall and originall righteousnesse lost in Adam that is it remembreth us of the Image of God in man which was created in him and which is restored in him by Christ Testimony of eternall life It is a testimony of eternall life to come wherein we shall againe perfectly fulfill the law For the law was given to be observed by men But in this life it is not fulfilled of us Therefore there must needs be yet another life remaining wherein we shall live according to the prescript of the law that so at length the law may be fulfilled of us IV. In nature perfectly restored and glorified after this life although the preaching of the law and the whole Ministery shall cease and have an end yet there shall remain in the Elect a knowledge of the law and there shall shine in them perfect obedience thereunto and full conformity with God Therefore then shall be the same uses of the law which were in nature uncorrupt before the fall The Arguments of Antinomists Libertines and other such like profane Heretikes who maintaine that the law is not to be taught in the Church of Christ OBject 1. That which cannot be kept ought not to be taught because it profiteth nothing The law cannot be kept Therefore it ought not to be taught in Christian Churches Answ 1. This is a fallacy alledging a false cause For the impossibility of perfect obedience of the law in this infirmity of our nature is no sufficient cause why
de veritate mat Art 26. q. 7. An. Christi 1270. The sufficiency of Christs merit is equally extended to all but not the efficacy thereof which comes to passe partly by free-will partly by Divine election by which the effect of Christs merits is conferred in mercy on some and in Gods just judgement it is with-drawn from some Idem in cap. 5. Apocal. We may speake two wayes of that Redemption which was performed by the suffering of God Either according to sufficiency and so his suffering redeemed all because he delivered all so far as concerned him for he is sufficient to save and redeeme all although there were infinite worlds as Anselme saith lib. 2. Cur Deus homo c. c. 14. or according to efficacy and so he redeemed not all by his suffering because all do not adhere to the Redeemer and therefore all have not the efficacy of redemption Peter Lombard l. 3. dist 22. Christ offered himselfe for all to God the Trinity in respect of the sufficency of the price but only for the Elect in respect of efficacy because he effected salvation only for the predestinated Peter Galatinus de arcanis Cathol veritatis l. 8. c. 14. on that place of Esay cap. 53. My just Servant shall justifie many Though the suffering of Christ is sufficient to blot away the sins of all men yet it was not to blot them all away but of those only who were to beleeve in him and were to repent for that cause he saith And he tooke away or â—are the sins of many IX Thus besides the Schoole-men the Orthodox Fathers also teach So Prosper Aquitanicus in the yeare of Christ 460. Resp ad object Vincent object 1. Whereas it is rightly said that our Saviour was crucified for the redemption of all the world for undertaking the affaires of humane nature and for the common losse in Adam yet it may be said that he died only for these to whom his death was profitable And Cyril on John l. 11. c. 19. saith That Christ is an Advocate for the sins of all the world that is not only for the Jews but also for other Nations or for all who being called by faith attaine to righteousnesse and sanctification so that the benefit of a Mediatour not without cause belongs only to them whose Mediatour and High-Priest he is X. But of all men Austin speakes most clearely whose opinion because it is altogether ours I thought to set in opposition to some Sycophants Thus he speaks If we consider * Tom. 1. ad Art falsò imp Art 1. the greatnesse and power of the price and that it belongs to the only cause of mankinde the bloud of Christ is the redemption of the whole world but they that passe out of this life without faith and the Sacrament of regeneration they are not partakers of redemption Whereas then by reason of that one nature of all and the one cause of all undertaken by our Lord truly all are said to be redeemed and yet not all are delivered from captivity doubtlesse the propertie of redemption is in them out of whom the Prince of this world is ejected and now they are no more the vessels of Satan but the members of Christ Whose death is not so spent upon mankinde that they also who are not regenerated should appertaine to his redemption but so that what by one example is done for all by a particular Sacrament should be celebrated in each one for that cup of immortality which was composed of our infirmity and of our verity and of divine verity it hath in it selfe that which may benefit all but if it be not drunke it doth not cure A monition of PHILIP PARRY to the Reader THis doctrine of the efficacy of Christs death D. Parry handled more at large in the first part of the golden Ladder of salvation where he wrote a particular Exercise of it As also in the Epitome of Arminianisme or The examination of the five Articles of the Remonstrants in the Netherlands As also in the Body of Christian doctrine to the 40. Question Edit posthumae Also Collegio 18. disp 23. of Christs death for all And lastly in that peculiar Speech which we placed among the Orations declaimed in the University Tom. 2. oper Theol. D. Parry In which Writings he defends and retaines that distinction of the Schoole-men and Ancient Fathers of sufficiency and efficacy with other Orthodox Divines But the good old man a little before his death when he understood that in the Provinciall Synod of Dort this was called into question unwisely by some brethren under Parries name and authority he began to think more seriously of it supposing that it was not altogether so necessary whereas without it these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or seeming contradictions of Scripture may seeme to be fitly reconciled XI We therefore with all our heart reject the Epicurean blasphemies of the late Pelagians namely Huberus Puccius and such like by which the foundation of Christian faith is utterly overthrowne as 1. That Christ so died for all men that by his death truly and undoubtedly all men are freed from all sin and condemnation whether they beleeve or not 2. That by Christs death God was reconciled to all mankind and that he hath truly received into his favour the whole race of mankinde whether they be Turks Jews or Epicures 3. And that he hath also received them to mercy who before his death were in hell For Huberus in his 66. These saith That Christ died effectually for them 4. That remission of sins is given equally to all Idem Thes 270. Puccius de â—ffiâ— pag. 7. Idem lâ—b MS. cap. 24. 5. That the pardon of sin is generall 6. That the Reprobates were as well saved by Christ as others 7. That all and every one by the bounty and universall grace of God the Father in Christ are saved 8. That as Christ was the Creator so he is the Redeemer of all and every one One Egge is not liker to another then Huberus is to Puccius they both build upon one foundation to wit upon the generall redemption pardon and salvation by Christs death without any particular faith from which notwithstanding Infidels fall away here is only the difference that what is covertly and sophistically spoken by Huberus is roundly professed by Puccius to wit Pelagianisme necessarily resulting thence as is shewed in Margarita Aurea that there is no originall sin seeing that by the power of Christs death all men and every one are borne as they are men according to Huberus as they are redeemed men according to Puccius in the state of grace and salvation saith he in the bosome and grace of God saith this and therefore in the state of blessednesse so they procure not their owne destruction by infidelity Let the Church yea let God judge betweene these two and betweene Osiander with what conscience he can deny that there is any controversie about this to wit
is performed by God washing the soule inwardly for I saith the Baptist baptise you with water Christ baptiseth you with the holy Ghost And Ambrose With water the body is washed by the Spirit the soul is cleansed from sin Testimonies of Scripture and of others a Augustine in Joh. Tract 8. de Catechis c. 3. b 1 Pet. 3.21 Baptisme also saveth us not as if by it the filth of the flesh were done away but the answer of a good conscience toward God c John 1.33 He it is who baptiseth you with the holy Ghost Ephes 5.26 Christ sanctifieth his Church having purged her through the washing of water in the Word d Ambrose in Luc. lib. 2. cap. 3. III. Yet we do not for this make a double Sacrament of Baptisme when we name the washing of water and of the Spirit or externall and internall but we say there are two parts of one Baptisme that we may distinctly teach what is done by man the Minister and what by God the Authour Neither did Paul divide the Sacrament of Circumcision into two when he distinguished the circumcision of the flesh and of the a heart which distinction whosoever takes away either they leave nothing or surely lesse to God in the Sacrament then to the Ministers allowing to God onely the internall parts but to the Ministers both externall and internall Testimonies of Scripture a Rom. 2.28 29. For he is not a Jew which is one outwardly neither is that circumcision which is outward in the flesh But he is a Jew which is one inwardly and circumcision is that of the heart in the spirit and not in the letter IV. In the lawfull use of Baptisme the internall is signified by the externall and is truly exhibited and sealed according to the promise He that beleeveth and is baptised shall be saved As for hypocrites and Infidels when they are dipt in water they are not baptised by the Spirit because the holy Ghost flies from a counterfeit man and he dwels not in a body subject to sins Hom. 5. in Mat. operis impers and therefore he cannot be the child of God as Chrysostome most truly saith V. Baptisme then washeth away sins it regenerates it saves c. not by any secret force annexed or imprinted in the water nor by the work wrought but by a Sacramentall phrase because there is a neere conjunction of both the washings in the lawfull use that is attributed to the externall which is proper to the internall or by a Synecdoche that is given to the whole which belongs to the part VI. Whereas Baptisme hath succeeded Circumcision that it might be the Sacrament of initiation in the new Covenant it ought not to be iterated although it hath beene unworthily received or before conversion because it remaines alwaies ratified to those that are converted as the promise of the Gospell is and the Covenant but to those that repent it is both ratified and it is saving and the use thereof before unlawfull is now made lawfull to them to which purpose Austine saith If he that receiveth the Sacrament Contra Crescent l. 2. c. 28. had never received it is not so cut off but is acknowledged which of it selfe was hurtfull to him that is amended will be profitable Testimonies of Scripture Jerem. 3.1 Thou hast gone a whoring after many lovers but returne to me saith the Lord. Ezek. 16.59 60. I will even deale with thee as thou hast done which hast despised the oath in breaking the covenant Neverthelesse I will remember my covenant with thee in the dayes of thy youth and I will establish unto thee an everlasting covenant VII The Church should conferre Baptisme as Christ hath commanded upon all that are in yeares professing the faith of Christ and a repentance and upon Infants also borne in the Church or who with their parents are come into the Church because to these also the promise and covenant b appertaine and these are to be brought to c Christ which should be done by the ordinary Ministers not by women or other persons having no calling to the Ministeriall d function the administration of which is a part of the e Sacrament Testimonies of Scripture and of others a Mat. 28.19 Teach all Nations baptising them b Mark. 16.16 He that beleeveth and is baptised c. Gen. 17.7 I will be thy God and the God of thy seed Acts 2.38 39. Repent and be baptised every one of you in the Name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins and ye shall receive the gift of the holy Ghost For the promise is unto you and to your children and to all that are a far off even as many as the Lord our God shall call c Mat. 19.14 Suffer these little ones and forbid them not to come to me for to such belongs the kingdome of heaven d Mat. 28.19 Mark 16.16 e Concil Carthag 4. Canon 100. Let not a woman presume to baptise for that addition Except necessity urge is not in the Canon of the Councell but is foisted in by the Pope Decret dist 4. de consecr C. Mulier against the meaning both of the Councell and the command of Christ which cannot without sin be violated except some other speciall command from God should be given VIII These contrary doctrines we impugne 1. That Baptisme is no signe of grace but onely a badge or marke by which Christians are discerned tying them to faith and to the Crosse 2. That water and the Word are not the essentiall parts of Baptisme but water and the person of the holy Ghost included in the Word 3. That there is annexed and affixed a secret vertue which confers upon the baptised the grace of the holy Ghost 4. That the holy Spirit with his effects are tied to Baptisme 5. That the effects of the holy Spirit and of Baptisme are alike or equall 6. That baptised Hypocrites and Infidels as Judas and Simon Magus c. are regenerated in Baptisme by the holy Ghost no lesse then the faithfull 7. That Ministers baptise not onely with water but also with the holy Ghost and so they do more in baptisme then Christ himselfe did 8. That the Infants of the Church are not to be baptised that the baptised are to be re-baptised 9. That the Infants of the Church before Baptisme are spiritually possessed by Satan and therefore are to be exorcised with certaine words and crossings 10. That the children of the Church before Baptisme do no more belong to the Covenant of God then the children of Turks and that there is no difference at all betweene Turkish and Christian children 11. That in case of necessity Mid-wives or any other that have no calling do duely baptise ARTICLE X. Of the Lords Supper I. WE beleeve the holy Supper to be the communion of the bodie and bloud of Christ which is by taking the bread broken and the cup being a blessed in memorie of Christs death till he b come that is to say that it
is the other Sacrament of the New Testament instituted by Christ by which he testifieth to us who receive the consecrated bread and wine with a faithfull remembrance of his death that he feeds us with his bodie which was given for us and with his bloud which was powred out for us and that hee quickneth d us that with him and amongst our selves we may grow up into one e bodie and that the covenant begun with God in Baptisme may remaine f ratified to us for ever Testimonies of Scripture a 1 Cor. 10.16 The cup of blessing which we blesse is it not the communion of the bloud of Christ the bread which we breake is it not the communion of the body of Christ b 1 Cor. 11.26 As often as you shall eat of this bread and drink of this cup you shall declare the Lords death untill he come c Matth. 26.26 Mark 14.22 Luke 22.17 1 Cor. 11.21 While they were eating he took bread and blessed and brake it then gave it to his disciples and said Take eat this is my body d John 6.54 He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my bloud hath life eternall and I will raise him up at the last day e John 6.56 Who eateth my flesh and drinketh my bloud he abideth in me and I in him 1 Cor. 10.17 Because there is one bread we being many are one bread and one body for we all partake of that one bread 1 Cor. 12.13 We have all drunk into one spirit f 1 Cor. 11.25 This cup is the New Testament in my bloud II. We say also that this Sacrament consisteth of externall signes and of the promises of grace in the word annexed to the a signes and consequently of a twofold food and a twofold eating or taking to wit an externall of bread and wine which is done by the mouth of the bodie out of the hand of the Minister as our sense witnesseth and an internall spirituall of Christs bodie and bloud which is by faith out of the hands of God himselfe and by the externall it is both signified exhibited and sealed in the lawfull use of the Sacrament as the promise annexed to the Symboles b witnesseth Testimonies of Scripture and of others a Apolog. August Confes tit De use Sacram. c. And because in the Sacraments there are two things to wit the signe and the word the word in the New Testament is the promise of grace added to the signe The promise of the New Testament is the promise of the remission of sins as this Text saith This is my body which is given for you This is the cup of the New Testament with my bloud which is shed for many to the remission of sins The word then offers remission of sins and the ceremony is as it were the pledge of the word or feale as Paul calls it shewing the promise b Matth. 26. c. III. For whereas all Sacraments are seales of grace promised in the a Gospel it is not to be doubted but these words of promise in the Supper This is my body which is given for you This is my bloud which is powred out for you c. are the very same Evangelicall promise in b John The bread which I will give you is my flesh which I will give you for the life of the world for my flesh is meat indeed and my bloud is drinke indeed being covered with the sacramentall ceremonie and confirmed with a symbolicall eating for the greater safetie or assurance but that it speaketh of the spirituall food of Christs bodie and bloud which is by faith is c manifest Testimonies of Scripture and of others a Rom. 4.11 And he received the signe of circumcision the seale of the justice of faith received in the fore-skin Apolog. August Confes tit De usu Sacram. c. The word in the New Testament is the promise of grace as above b John 6.5 I am that living bread that came downe from heaven if any man eat of this bread he shall live for ever But the bread which I will give is my flesh which I will give for the life of the world c John 6.35 I am that bread of life he that cometh to me shall not hunger and he that beleeveth in me shall never thirst IV. Christ never promised in the Gospel any orall manducation of his flesh but by expresse arguments rejected a it and therefore never established it by the Sacrament of his Supper And doubtlesse they sin grievously who at this day disturb the Church with their orall manducation which to acknowledge is no waies necessary to salvation to any but rather pernicious to many Testimonies of Scripture a John 6.61 62 63. When Jesus knew in himselfe that his disciples murmured at it he said unto them Doth this offend you What and if you shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before It is the Spirit that quickneth the flesh profiteth nothing the words that I speak unto you they are spirit and they are life V. The particle This as we teach and beleeve doth demonstrate the bread which Christ brake and that it is the true bodie of Christ not by conversion into the bodie nor by any reall co-existence with the bodie but by a sacramentall way because it is the Sacrament of Christs bodie or a sacred signe of it So the Apostle interprets Christs a meaning when he calls the cup The New Testament that is the Sacrament of the New Testament the bread The communion of Christs b body that is the Sacrament of that communion So c Austine The Lord saith he doubted not to say This is my bodie when he gave the signe of his bodie So d Prosper saith The bread is after a manner called the bodie of Christ and the sacramentall action is called the passion death and crucifying of Christ not in a reall veritie but in a signifying mysterie Testimonies of Scripture and of others a 1 Cor. 11.25 This cup is the New Testament in my bloud b 1 Cor. 10.16 The bread which we break c. c August cont Adimant cap. 12. d Prosper in Decret de Consecrat dist 2. cap. Hoc est VI. And whereas Christs bodie neither in the bread nor under the species of bread but rather in the word of promise is exhibited to us to be eaten by faith the wicked indeed eat the signes to their owne condemnation by abusing of which they sin against Christ himselfe but being destitute of faith they receive not his bodie Of which notwithstanding by the Apostles testimony they are guilty not that they receive it which by their infidelitie they tread upon but because they unworthily eat that bread which is the symbole or a signe of it Testimonies of Scripture a 1 Corinth 11.27 29. Whosoever shall eat this bread and drink this cup of the Lord unworthily shall be guilty of the body and bloud of the Lord. Also Who eateth and drinketh unworthily eateth and drinketh damnation to himselfe
made a curse for us upon the tree hath redeemed us from the curse of the Law e Ephes 1.7 Col. 1.14 We have redemption by his bloud f Col. 1.20 Having made peace by the bloud of his Crosse by him he hath reconciled all things to himselfe hath reconciled them in the body of his flesh by death g 1 Pet. 1.18 We are redeemed by the precious bloud of the immaculate Lamb. h Isa 53.5 By whose stripes we are healed i 1 John 1.7 The bloud of Christ purgeth us from all our sins k Rev. 19. 7.14 Thou hast redeemed us by thy bloud They have washed their robes and made them white in the bloud of the Lambe The latter is this The Scripture defines our whole justification by remission of sins through the bloud of Christ therefore onely the effusion of bloud is that by imputation of which we are justified and the remission of sins is our whole righteousnesse They confirme the Antecedent by testimonies of Scripture l Luke 18.13 God be mercifull to me a sinner I tell you that he went downe unto his house justified rather then the other m Acts 13.38 Be it knowne to you that to you is preached remission of sins through him and from all things from which by the Law you could not be absolved by him all that beleeve are justified Here to be absolved to be justified to have remission of sins are the same things David pronounceth that man blessed to whom God imputeth righteousnesse without works n Rom. 4.7 Psal 32.1 Blessed are they whose sins are forgiven and whose iniquities are hid Blessed is the man to whom God imputeth no sin o Rom. 8.33 Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods Elect It is God that justifieth who shall condemne It is Christ who is dead c. p 2 Cor. 5.19 God was in Christ reconciling to himselfe the world by not imputing to them their sins q Ephes 1.7 In whom we have redemption by his bloud that is remission of sins c. They have also other arguments which for brevities sake I omit they alledge also for themselves the Catechisme of the Palatinate qq 37.45.66.55.57.72.76.80.84 c. In which it is taught that we obtaine remission of sins justice and life eternall for the alone sacrifice of Christ on the Crosse and that onely the bloud of Christ purgeth us from all sin which very thing is every-where found in the Directory of the Palatinate Hitherto the different opinions concerning justice I now passe to the second head where I will briefly shew without prejudice to others what I can approve or disapprove in those who follow the first opinion I cannot see how they can prove out of Scripture the imputation of Gods essential justice or why that should be said to be imputed seeing man was never obliged either to the possession or performance of it for God never conferred upon man his essentiall justice and man never lost it They make God then unjust as if he did require of man divine justice which he never gave him nor ever will give him The reason is a Paralogisme non causae for although whole Christ is a King Priest and Saviour and whole Christ justifieth yet it is knowne that he performes the effects of his office among which is justification by the distinct operations of his natures therefore whole Christ justifieth but one way according to his divinity to wit as the efficient cause another way according to his humanity to wit as a meritorious cause and the dignity of the merit flowes from the dignity of the person that is from the deity of the Mediatour But from hence it doth not follow that the deity can challenge any part of the merit being the fountaine of merit It behooved then the Mediatour to be God not that the deity or justice of the deity might be imputed to us or according to Osianders madnesse essentially dwelling in us might become our justice but for the cause explained in the Catechisme q. 17. Therefore the justice of the divinity differs from merit as the cause from the effect Other inconveniences also of this opinion belong to the two ensuing therefore I joyne the second and third opinion together for they differ not save onely that the one makes two parts the other three parts of imputative justice All which opinions are subject to the same inconveniences 1. All confound the justice of the person and of the merit of Christ which the Scripture oftentimes conjoynes but doth also manifestly distinguish as the efficient cause or sine qua non and the materiall cause of our justice as My righteous servant by his knowledge shall justifie many For such an High-Priest became us who might be holy separated from sinners that he might offer not for his owne but for the sins of the people Him who knew not sin he hath made sin for us that we c. 1 Pet. 3. Christ suffered once the just for the unjust And so our Catechisme quest 15.16 2. These distinctions which they make betweene not unjust and just betweene not transgressing of the Law and fulfilling of the Law betweene not dead and alive they have more subtlety then verity being indeed equivalent termes as I will afterward shew for of necessity he that before God is not unjust must be just who transgresseth not the Law fulfils it who is not dead is alive Seeing all these are immediate contraries one of which being affirmed or denied the other must necessarily be affirmed or denied 3. If by the imputation of the passive obedience we are not as yet just but onely not unjust how is this true We are justified by the bloud of his Son We are reconciled by his death c 4. If remission of sins be not whole justification how can that be true Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven Rom. 4. c. how doth the Apostle in the same place take for the same thing To impute righteousnesse and Not to impute sin 5. If the omission of obedience to the Law and the imperfection of our holinesse are not expiated by Christs passive obedience but necessarily that must be covered with Christs actuall obedience this with his naturall holinesse how againe can this be true The bloud of Jesus Christ purgeth us from all sin unlesse perhaps omission and imperfection be not sins 6. If we are not justified by the passive but by the active obedience of Christ how is it that Christ died not in vaine For what need was there that Christ should die and by his death procure to us pardon for our sins if by his just and holy life he had already merited righteousnesse for us for righteousnesse necessarily presupposeth remission of sins 7. It is manifest that all these partitions of Christs merits into two or three members do exceedingly derogate either from the death of Christ or from the justice of God For these
for all beleevers I beleeve Ergo he dyed and prayed for mee But they are too cold comforters who teach afflicted consciences thus to reason Christ dyed for all men I am a man Ergo he dyed for mee Why may not a Turk a dog or a hog wallowing in the mire conclude so O brave comforters and Preachers of Gods word for the maineâ—inew of Christian comfort is not to be a man but to be ingraffed into Christ Againe they object out of the Apostle That all are made alive in Christ 1 Cor. 15.22 as all dyed in Adam But if they will absolutely say that all are made alive in Christ Scripture and experience will refell them This is it then the Apostle saith that Christ gives life to all his owne as Adam brought death upon all his owne And he indeed by grace which is more but this by naturall propagation which is easier This sense of the Apostle is proved by the subsequent words for when he had said that all were made alive in Christ hee presently subjoynes Every one in his owne order Christ as the first-fruits afterward they that are Christs that is beleevers who are given to him by the Father and for whom he earnestly prayed to the Father Neither is Austins interpretation different from this De civit Dei l. 13. c. 33. therefore it is said that all are alive in Christ not as if all that die in Adam were members of Christ but because as no man except in his naturall bodie dyeth in Adam so no man in the spirituall bodie is quickned but in Christ Neither have they cause to object that by these meanes Adam is made stronger then Christ if he destroy more by death then Christ preserveth by his death and life They know not what they bark against Be it so that all who are lost in Adam are saved by Christ But this way grace shall not abound but will be onely equall to sin The power of both is not to be measured by the number of those who die or live but by the manner by which perdition and vivification are obtained or else by the greatnesle of the benefits received or lost It s an easie matter to wound but hard to cure according to the Proverb You shall sooner and with more ease destroy 600 men then save one You shall sooner tumble downe many men from off the bridge into the water then you can preserve one from drowning So it was more easie to undoe all mankind then to restore one man from destruction That Satan could doe Adam could doe but this none can effect except Christ Beasts or afflictions can hurt offend and kill men but it is in no mans power save onely in his who is the Creatour of all things â—o restore salvation and life eternall Therefore Christs death had been stronger then Adams though he had restored but one man to life Besides it is certaine and out of question that the good things we have by Christ doe as far excell those things which we lost by Adam as heaven and eternitie exceed terrene and transient blessings For Adam was earthly saith the Apostle Christ heavenly he was naturall this spirituall he ejected us out of an earthly Paradise this hath introduced us into an heavenly Mansion and hath crowned us with eternitie of happinesse Thus I suppose we have sufficiently demonstrated and defended that the fruit of Christs death and resurrection doth appertaine to all and onely to them who repent and by faith adhere to Christ A briefe Introduction to the Controversie of the Eucharist explaining the chiefe Questions that are controverted or not controverted among the Protestants By D. DAVID PARIE Foure generall Remembrances 1. LEt the younger sort remember to discriminate between the questions that concerne the ceremonies and rites of the Supper and questions of doctrine which is the Evangelicall promise annexed to the ceremonie 2. Let them learne also to put difference between questions controverted and not controverted whether of doctrine or of ceremony 3. Let them know that the controversies about the ceremony are of lesse consequence and may for the most part yea should with moderation be decided or agreed upon according to the circumstances of time place and people but alwaies to edification 4. Let them know that there are three chiefe questions of the doctrine of the Supper not controverted and so many controverted to which all others may be easily reduced Of both I will briefly give some hints to young Divines Three uncontroverted Questions concerning the doctrine of the Supper 1. What the Supper of the Lord is All Protestants agree in this that the Lords Supper is a Sacrament of the New Testament instituted by Christ in which bread and wine being taken the true bodie and bloud of Christ is also received so that there is sealed to the faithfull the communion of Christ and of his benefits 2. What be the ends and uses of the Supper instituted by Christ All Protestants consent in this that this receiving confirmes the faith of the promises of grace both because this is the common use of Sacraments as also because Christ said of this Sacrament 1 Cor. 11.26 Doe this in remembrance of mee And This cup is the new covenant in my bloud Therefore they consent in this that the holy Supper is the commemoration of our Lords death untill he come according to the Apostles admonition 3. What is exhibited and received in the Lords Supper In this also the Protestants agree that bread and wine is received by the mouth and bodie the bodie and bloud of our Lord with all his benefits are taken by a faithfull heart I say the Protestant Divines agree in these but as for contentious pratlers they neither agree in these nor in any thing else whose brawlings should not measure mens judgements concerning the consent or controversies of the Protestant Churches The three controverted Questions be these Quest 1. What the union of the signe and thing signified is in the Lords Supper Whether transubstantiation or consubstantiation or else a mysticall relation To these the answer shall be in three Propositions two whereof shall be negative and one affirmative Proposition 1. The signe and the thing are not united by transubstantiation that is by such a mutation which turnes the substance of the signes into the substance of the things the bare accidents remaining Reason 1. From Christs words This is my body He said not Be this or Let this be made my bodie Reas 2. Bread in the Scripture is called bread in the action before and after the action Reas 3. The orthodox Fathers retaine bread in the Supper and when they speak hyperbolically of changing of the bread they will be understood sacramentally as Theodoret Dial. 1. Christ would have those 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 causa est sacramentis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who receive the Sacraments not to be intent upon the nature of the things which are seen but
by the changing of names to beleeve that change which is made of grace Here Theodoret himselfe in the same Dialogue teacheth that a sacramentall change is to be understood thus speaking He honoured the visible signes by the name of Christs body and bloud not changing nature but adding grace to nature Propos 2. The signes and things signified are not united by consubstantiation that is in the reall existence of two bodies in the same place under the same accidents or under the lurking of the one within the other such as is that of oates in the sacke of mony in the purse of the infant in the cradle or of wine in the pot which are like to things consubstantiated Reason 1. Because the words of Christ This is my body shew to us not where the bodie of Christ is nor what it is in with or under the bread but what the bread it selfe is and should be to godly men in this Sacrament to wit his bodie Reas 2. The bodie of Christ is a true organicall finite and visible bodie not present or every-where upon earth since the Ascension but existing and remaining in heaven even till his last returne As the Apostle tells us Declare the Lords death untill his coming againe Reas 3. The orthodox Fathers teach that the bodie and bloud of Christ are in the bread and wine not as in lurking places but as in a mysticall or in a mysterie Chrysostome in that imperfect work Matth. Hom. 11. In the consecrated vessels not the true body of Christ but the mysterie of Christs body is contained Propos 3. In the sacramentall Supper the signes and things are united by a sacramentall union This is it which is common to the whole kind of Sacraments otherwise this union were not sacramentall or of a Sacrament but of a Supper Now in all other Sacraments there is a relative union that is a mysticall signification obsignation exhibition and reception of the thing signified by externall symbols in the right use which is not without faith and repentance in the receivers Reason 1. From the genus in all Sacraments there is such an union therefore in this Supper also The Antecedent is manifest out of the definition and chiefe end of Sacraments Reas 2. The bread is the bodie of Christ either in the truth of the thing as Austin speaks in the sentence of Prosper or in a signifying mysterie not in the truth of the thing or essentially because there is no transubstantiation therefore in a signifying mysterie Reas 3. Hither belong all the Arguments by which a sacramentall phrase is proved to be in the words of the Supper for a sacramentall union begets sacramentall phrases Reas 4. The testimonies of Fathers that the bread is a signe a figure a sacrament of Christs bodie August contra Adim c. 12. The Lord doubted not to say This is my bodie when he gave the signe of his bodie The Objection of Papists for Transubstantiation out of the words of the Supper That which Christ gave and the Priest consecrates is Christs bodie Ergo it is not bread It followes because these are disparata As this thing is a man Ergo it is not an oxe I answer by denying that this argument is grounded upon the position of one species to the removing of the disparate species of the same genus because it is vicious proceeding from the position of a sacramentall relation to the negation of the subject or fundamentall Such as if I would say This man is a father Ergo he is not a man This man is Cesar Ergo he is not a man So they This bread is Christs bodie Ergo it is not bread It is therefore fallacia accidentis no lesse absurd then if you should reason from the position of the forme to the negation of the matter This thing is a table Ergo it is not wood For though Christs bodie is not the forme or accident of bread yet the relation which the bread by vertue of the promise hath to Christs bodie is the forme of the Sacrament So it doth not follow The Dove is the holy Ghost Ergo this is not a Dove Circumcision is the covenant Ergo it is not circumcision The cup is the New Testament Ergo it is not the cup. As for the testimonies of the Fathers which the Papists object concerning the changing of the symboles the common answer is That they are to be understood of a sacramentall not of an essentiall change which is manifest out of the orthodoxall consent of the Fathers on this Sacrament Quest 2. How as well the symboles as the celestiall things signified in the Supper are exhibited and received About this question we are at controversie both with the Pontificians and Ubiquitarians because both of them will have the things signified to be secretly and miraculously present in the signes or species of the signes and to be carried in and handled by the Ministers hands and to be received into the mouths of the communicants Wee teach on the contrary that the things are exhibited with the signes and are received together with them in the lawfull use of the Supper but in a different manner The symboles are touched by the hands of the Minister and received by the mouths of the communicants but the things themselves are exhibited by Christ himselfe our high-Priest and by faith are received of us Which also may be explained in three Propositions two negative and one affirmative Propos 1. The body and bloud of Christ which are the things signified are neither handled nor exhibited by the hand of the Ministers to the end that they should in these symboles be corporally received Reas 1. Is negative from the whole kind of Sacraments In no Sacrament doth the Minister handle or give spirituall things signified therefore neither in the Supper The antecedent is proved both by induction which is also plaine by the Adversaries confession as also by the analogie of Sacraments and of the Word Mark 1. I am the voice of a crier John 1. I baptise with water Hee that cometh after mee shall baptise you with the holy Ghost and with fire 1 Corinth 3.7 Neither is he that watereth nor he that planteth any thing but God who giveth the encrease Therefore it is so in the Sacraments which are the visible word Reas 2. The things signified are not in with or under the symboles being there corporally present as was shewed Quest. 1. Propos 2. therefore they are not handled by the Ministers fingers nor distributed Reas 3. The things signified in the Supper are spirituall which are offered to the faithfull in the promise of grace annexed to the symboles but the promise of grace is not touched by the hand c. Reas 4. The testimonies of Fathers as Chrysoft serm de Euch. in encaen Doe not thinke you that come to these mysteries that you receive from man the divine body that is from the Minister and many such like Propos 2. The
the place and state of the blessed where both of us shall be free from these paines that is he speaketh of felicity and liberty which is not in hell for his meaning is both of us who now suffer shall this day be in Paradise a place of everlasting salvation or happinesse where being delivered from all torments we shall injoy most pleasant quiet and repose But Paradise is neither hell nor in hell which is the place of torment Whereupon also it is cleere that Christ spake this to the Thiefe not of his God-head but of that which suffered which was his soule For the God-head was not with the Thiefe neither did Christ suffer or was elivered as touching his God-head but as touching his soule 2. If Christ did locally descend into hell Because there was no cause why Christ should descend Joâ—â— 39.30 he descended either to suffer or to deliver the Fathers thence as the Papists affirme But he descended not to suffer because now all things were finished on the Crosse as Christ himselfe also hanging on the Crosse said It is finished Hee descended not to deliver the Fathers 1 1. Not to suffer 1. Because hee did this before in suffering for them on the earth 2 2 Not to tree the Fathers out of the Limbo Wisd 3.1 Luke 16.26 2. He did the same by his power and efficacy of his God-head from the very beginning of the world not by the descension of his soule or body into hell The Fathers were not in Limbo Therefore they could not be delivered thence as it is said The soules of the just are in the hand of God Between you and us there is a great gulfe set so that they which would goe from hence to you cannot neither can they come from thence to us And in the same place Lazarus dying is said to be carried by the Angels into Abrahams bosome not into Limbus Patrum Some thinke that Christ indeed descended not into hell either to suffer 3 3. Not to triumph over Death and the Divell and affright them 1 Pet. 3.19 or to deliver the Fathers thence but to shew there the Divell and death his victory and to strike a terrour into them But that Christ descended for this cause is no where found extant in Scripture They object unto us first that place of Peter By the which he also went and preached unto the Spirits that are in prison which were in time passed disobedient Answ Peters meaning in this place is not as these men conjecture but is on this wise Hee saith Christ went that is being sent from the beginning of the Father unto the Church By his Spirit that is by his God-head To the Spirits that are now in prison that is in hell He preached in time passed When as yet they lived and were disobedient namely before the Floud For then hee preached to the disobedient when they were disobedient But they were disobedient in the time of Noah Therefore Christ preached by Noah and by the Fathers inviting the disobedient to repentance Farther if Peter here spake of the descension into hell yet this was not their opinion who pretend the broaching of it but the Papists who affirme and teach that Christ preached in hell unto the Fathers and delivered them 1 Pet. 4.6 They bring another place of Peter The Gospell was also preached unto the dead Answ That is unto those which are now dead or were then dead when Peter wrote this and who then lived when the Gospell was preached unto them They wrest and misconstrue also a place of Paul Ephes 4.9 Christ descended into the lowest parts of the earth Answ Into the lowest parts of the earth that is into the earth which is the lowest part of the world For one part of the earth is not opposed unto another but the earth is opposed unto heaven and the humiliation of Christ is thereby signified This interpretation is proved by the scope and drift of the Apostle who maketh in that place an opposition of Christs great glory and his great humiliation So on the other side Christ ascended into the highest paris of heaven that is into heaven into the highest part of the world These places therefore make nothing for the descension of Christ into hell and were it so that these places alledged to establish this opinion were to be understood of a locall descension of Christ into hell yet would they not make for them but rather for the Papists who teach that Christ preached unto the Fathers in hell and thence delivered them Now if these testimonies help not the Papists much lesse will they help them For it is certaine that it cannot be thence proved that Christ descended into hell to strike a terrour into death and the Divell This opinion indeed is not impious or ungodly and is approved by many of the Fathers so that we are not to contend maliciously with any therein yet I leave it because it is not grounded on any firme reasons neither can be gained by witnesse of Scripture and contrary reasons are at hand easie to be had For 1. After his death when he had said It is finished the soule of Christ rested in the hands of his Father into which he had commended it And 2. If hee descended to triumph this Article should be the beginning of his glorification but it is not likely that Christ took the beginning of his glorification in hell For it is apparent by the opposition of the Article following that Christs descension was the lowest degree of his humiliation And yet I confesse withall that Christ strook a greater terrour into the Divels but that was by his death whereby hee disarmed and vanquished the Divell Sin and death and without doubt the Divell perceived himselfe conquered by the death of Christ Hell signifieth in this place the terrours and torments of the soule What meaneth then this Christs descension into hell It signifieth 1. Those extreme torments straights and griefes which Christ suffered in his soule namely the wrath of God against sinners and that such as the damned feele partly in this life and partly in the life to come 2. The exceeding and extreme ignominy and reproach which Christ suffered That Christ suffered these things is proved by the testimony of David before alledged The griefes of hell caught mee Psal 116.3 which is said of Christ in the person of David There are other the like sayings whereby the same is proved The Lord would breake him and make him subject to infirmities Esay 53.10 Mat 26.31 My soule is very heavie even unto the death The same doe those his vexations also shew in the Garden when he sweat bloud because The Lord hath laid upon him the iniquities of us all Luke 22.44 Esay 53.6 Therefore he crieth out My God my God why hast thou forsaken mee The same is also proved by these reasons 1. Christ was to redeeme not only our bodies