Lord of Plessis in his bookes of the truth of Christian Religion Zegedine in his Common places and to Reckerman in his Systema Theologicum But if any one on the contrary side iudge that these few are too many I would request him to pardon me herein seeing if I had produced no reasons for the 〈◊〉 of this truth I had failed in the chiefe point of this 〈◊〉 wherein is auouched that all quaestions 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 may be cleared iustified with arguments and 〈◊〉 And that the truth of this assertion may ye◠〈◊〉 appearâ—… let vs proceed to the quaestion concerning the resurrection of the dead which is also supernaturall and take a view how by great variety of arguments and reasons the Spirit of God doth open the same in the Diuine Scriptures The Doctrine of the Resurrection is strange absurde and almost yea altogether incredible in the iudgement of the naturall man but most wise and reasonable vnto the Christian Act. 17. 18. The Apostle Saint Paul in the fifteenth Chapter of the first Epistle to the Corinthians proueth the same by many arguments Fides Christianorum resurrectio mortuorum and reasons As first Christ is rison from the dead therefore there is a Resurrection Now that Christ is risen he prooueth it first for that his Psal 16. 10. Rom. 9. 6. resurrection was fore-tolde in the word of God the which that it should not take effect it was impossible Secondly he proveth it by the testimony of those that saw and handled his wounds that were made in his body both before and after his death Thirdly he proueth it by the effect of Christs sufferings and death which was a full satisfaction for sinne and an abolishing of death and therefore an introduction of a Resurrection For where there is no sinne there is no death at least as it is a paine and punishment for sin but onely as it is an entrance vnto life euerlasting which cannot be enioyed by our whole maÌ„ vnlesse theâ—e be a Resurrection Now the Apostle hauing thus proued the Resurrection of the dead by our Sauiours owne Resurrection hee proceedeth to proue the same by diuers other arguments and reasons If saith hee there be no resurrection to a better estate asâ— this life then this world doth afford then are the godly of all men most miserable for that in this life they are subiect to so many outward and inward crosses Yea then let vs eate and drinke for to morrow we shall die and let vs labour to enioy the pleasures of this life if there be no resurrection nor hope to inioy better things in the world to come But it is absurd to imagine that the godly are in the worst case and that godlesse Epicures and Atheists are in the best therefore it cannot be but there shall be a Resurrection Moreouer whereas God doth raise vp his faithfull seruants here in this life in their soules from the death of sinne to the life of righteousnesse whereof Baptisme is not onely aâ—liuely representation but also an assured pledge why should they doubt but that he can and will deliuer their bodies out of the bonds of bodilie death seeing the one is a farre greater and harder worke then the other and specially seeing he hath giuen his word also that all such that haue their part in the first Resurrection shall not be hurt by the second death much Apoc. 20. 6. lesse be kept for euer vnder the power of the same Furthermore if these intelligible motiues will not prevaile with vs the Apostle sendeth vs to sensible things that we may be convinced by the censure of our sense For saith he if hearbes and graine after a sort die in the Winter and receiue life againe in the Spring why may not the bodies of men doe so likewise Surely Saint Austin auoucheth that he that quickneth putrified and dead graine by the which mans life is maintained in this world wil much more quicken man himself that he may liue with him for euer The which truth is most solemnly auouched by the Prophet Esay Thy dead shall arise with Isa 26. 19. my bodie shall they arise awake and sing yee that dwell in the â—ust for thy dew is as the dew of the hearbes and the earth shall cast out the dead The earth saith the Prophet doth bring out her hearbes in the Spring which were dead in the Winter and why may she not doe so with our bodies at the generall iudgement Wherefore as our blessed Sauiour Mar. 22. 29. testifieth all such as are contrarie minded erre not knowing the Scriptures nor the power of God nor yet his constant and vnchangeable goodnesse For first the Scriptures doe plainelie testifie that there shall be a Resurrection of some of them that sleepe in the dust to Dan. 12. 2. glorie and of some to perpetuall shame and contempt Secondlie the power of God doth teach that as he made all things out of a confused Chaos at the first and gaue to each thing their distinct and seuerall beings so he can doe the like againe if al lthings should returne to their former confusion Thirdlie the constant and vnchangeable goodnesse of God doth likewise assure vs of the truth hereof For God is the God of Abraham and of all the spirituall children of Abraham Exod. 3. 15. Prou. 17. 17. Isa 49. 15. 2 Tim. 2. 13. for euer For a true friend loueth alwaies much more God the faithfullest friend of all friends For if we be vnfaithfull yet he will not be vnfaithfull he cannot denie himselfe 1 Thess 4. 17 And therefore albeit that sin may suffer a full death hee causeth the faithfull to sustaine the anguish of a bodily death yet he will raise them vp again to life that they may euer liue with him and inioy the fruit of his most constant and immutable goodnesse and loue For the bodies of the faithfull as they haue beene co-workers with their soules in the Lords seruice so they shall be ioynt possessors with them in that happinesse and blisse wherewith he will reward all his faithfull seruants Yea whereas our blessed Sauiour Christ tooke vnto him an humane body as well as a humane soule and suffered in the one as well as in the other vndoubtedly the faithfull shall be partakers of their saluation and redemption as well in the one as in the other Now by these things that haue beene deliuered it is euident that holy Scripture giuen by diuine inspiration is able by such sufficient arguments and reasons in all the mysteries of piety and godlinesse to teach truth and to convince errour 2 Tim. 3. 15. that the man of God may be made thereby wise to saluation by faith in Christ that is that the sincere and sound Christian the true seruant of God may obtaine a wise faith and so may be saued Yea that a professor of any Religion should voluntarily confesse that the points of his profession cannot
that his body was not left in the graue being the place appointed for bodies subiect to corruption And doth not the Apostle Saint Peter teaching the same truth alleadge the same place of the Psalmist for the confirmation thereof Psal 16. 10. Act. 2. 27. For albeit it belongeth to the body properly to arise yet that there may be a resurrection of any dead person from death to life the soule departed must also be brought from the place whither it was before conueyed and placed againe in the body or else there can be no resurrection thereof to life Wherefore the Apostle to proue the truth of our Sauiours resurrection sheweth out of the Prophet that as his body was raised out of the place of corruption so his soule was not left in hell but brought backe againe from thence that his resurrection might be wrought thereby For Nephesh properly and principally signifying the soule why should it not be so taken in this place where there Analogum per se positum â—…at pro famosiori significatione is nothing to restraine it to a signification that is lesse proper And specially seeing the Apostle Saint Peter who well knew the meaning of the Prophet and was to expound him in a plaine manner for all the New Testament is but a plainâ—… explication of the doctrines that were before deliuered more darkly in the Old interpreteth Nephesh not by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is not by person body or dead body but by soule Act. 2. 27. Obiect 2. But it is auouched that Christs soule was presently vpon his death carried vp into heauen and therefore could not descend into hell because Christ saith to the penitent theife To day shalt thou be with me in Paradise Luc. 23. 43. Solut. I answere that our Creed teacheth vs that Christ dyed and then when he was dead and his soule was departed out of his Body what became of them both viz. that his Body was buried and that his soule descended into hell And now must this plaine Article be inuerted both in words and in sense and we willed to belieue that at that very time he ascended into heauen when our Creed saith that he descended into hell But some will say doth not our Sauiour say to the thiefe To day shalt thou be with me in Paradise With me therefore with my soule How followeth that The inference rather should be this With me therefore with my Diuine Nature Seeing the principall Denominatio sequitur principalem partem part giueth the name and not the lesse principall And especially whereas concerning the humane nature of Christ he himselfe after this time wherein these words were spoken testifyeth saying I haue not as yet ascended to my Father Ioh. 20. 17. Moreouer how should our blessed Sauiour haue so fitly parallel'd his type Ionah who was both in body and soule in the belly of the Whale if he had not beene after the same manner as well in soule as in body in the belly of hell and in the bowels of the earth Matth. 12. 40. Obiect 3. Now if it be further obiected that our Sauiour needed not in soule to descend into hell seeing all things belonging to mans saluation were finished by him when he hanged on the Crosse Solut. the answere is that when our blessed Sauiour spake these words all things are finished all his very sufferings were not then ended For he was not then dead nor buried nor had continued three dayes and three nights in the bowels of the earth in the state of a dead man Besides the circumstance of the place doth plainly conuince that our blessed Sauiours meaning in these words was that all things were foretold by the Prophets that should be done vnto the Messiah before his death were done vnto him and so finished excepting this one They gaue me gall to eate and when I was thirsty they gaue me vineger to drinke and therefore that this Prophesie might also be fulfilled he said I thirst Whereupon when they had giuen him vineger mingled with gall and hee had tasted thereof he said All things are finished that is all things that were to be done to the Messiah before his death euen all these things saith our blessed Sauiour are done now to me And verily it is most euident and plaine that the principall drift and scope of the Euangelists is to demonstrate and to make euident that all things that were foretold by all the Prophets concerning the true Messiah were fulfilled in our most blessed Sauiour Jesus Christ Ioh. 20. 31. and therefore that he was the true Messiah QVEST. XXI Fasting or any outward thing doth not sanctifie any but onely the inward graces of the Spirit and all such things as do enter into the heart of man Arguments drawne from the subiect Matth. 15. 11. That which goeth into the mouth defileth not the man but that which commeth out of the mouth defileth the man For whatsoeuer goeth into the mouth goeth into the belly and is cast out into the draught but those things that come out of the mouth proceed from the heart and they defile a man For out of the heart proceed euill thoughts murders adulteries fornications thefts false witnessing slanders and the like and these are the things that defile a man Hence we thus reason that as meates doe not defile a man because they enter not into the soule but sinnes that enter in and dwell there and there contriue all their euill designes so meates nor any other such outward thing doth sanctifie the heart because they enter not in there but onely the diuine graces of Gods Spirit and the spirituall meanes appointed by God for the effecting of these holy and heauenly graces QVEST. XXII There is no such place appointed to the faithfull after this life as Purgatory is saiâ— to be The faithfull are pilgrimes here in this world and haue 2 Cor 5. 6. heauen for their home and countrey whether they come when their pilgrimage here in this world with their liues commeth to an end they passe not then from hence to Purgatory but to Heauen as it may appeare by the history of Lazarus and Luke 16. 22 23 43. of the penitent thiefe And of the comfortable assurance hereof are all the faithfull partakers as the Apostle testifieth speaking in the name of them all and saying Wee know that if our 2 Cor. 5 1. earthly house of this Tabernacle be destroyed we haue a building Heb. 11. 10. giuen of God that is not an house made with hands but eternall in heauen And verily our most blessed Sauiour at his departure out of this world ascended vp into heauen there to prepare a place for all the faithfull For he did not this for the Apostles Ioh. 14. 2. onely as he prayed not for them alone but also for all
such as should beleeue in him through their word Where he further Ioh. 17. 20. testifieth that his will was that they all should be with him euen where he himselfe is and that they might see his glory which cannot be meant but of the place of glory QVEST. XXIII Our blessed Sauiour is not corporally present in the Eucharist but in Heauen When some of our Sauiours owne Disciples were offended at those words of his Except ye eat the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his bloud yee haue no life in you thinking that he had spoken of a grosse and carnall eating of his flesh with their bodily mouthes Iesus said vnto them Doth this offend you what then if yee should see the Sonne of man ascend vp where Ioh. 6. 62. he was before By which words he gaue them to vnderstand that his carrying of his body at his Ascension into Heauen would teach them if they were Eagles with the mouthes of faith to mount vp thither and there to feed vpon him with the Luke 17. 37. mouthes of their mindes and not to dreame of a grosse and carnall feeding vpon his flesh with their bodily mouthes So reasoneth Saint Austin when ye shall see the Sonne of man Aug. in Ioh. tract 27. ascending were he was before then verily ye shall perceiue that he giueth not his body to be eaten after that manner as yee conceiue Then verily ye shall vnderstand that the grace of Christ is not consumed by chewing it in the mouth So likewise Athan. in illud quicuâ—quâ—… dixerit vâ—rbum c. Athanasius saith that Christ for this end warned them of his ascension into Heauen that he might draw them from thinking vpon his Body and that they might thereby learne that the flesh which he spake of was a coelestiall meat from aboue and a spirituall nourishment to be giuen by him The words which I speake vnto you are spirit and life the which saith he is as much as if he had said This Body which is in your sight and is to be deliuered to death for the world shall be giuen you for meat that it may be spiritually distributed to euery one of you and be an assurance and a preseruatiue to raise you vp to eternall life QVEST. XXIIII The Citie of Rome is the mysticall Babylon and the pretended titulary Romane Church is the most certaine seate of the great Antichrist of these last times The Apostle Saint Iohn describing in her colours that Babylon Apoc. 17. 18. which was to be the certaine seat of the great Antichrist of these last times auoucheth in plaine words that it is the very Citie that in his time raigned ouer the Kings of the earth the which was the Citie of Rome The truth whereof is so euident that our Rhemists themselues in their notes vpon that Chapter doe subscribe thereunto but they thinke to helpe the matter by excepting that Rome was Babylon vnder the gouernment of the persecuting Emperours but that exception will not serue their turne for by the plaine censure of Saint Iohn Rome must be the Royall Seat of the great Antichrist of these last times Wherefore they except in the second place that albeit the great Antichrist of these last times shall sit at Rome yet he may sit there in the Princes throne and not in the Priests chaire But Chrysostome precisely affirmeth that Antichrist shall Chrysost in 2. Ep ad Thess cap. 2. take vpon him the Empire both of God and men and therefore shall sit in the Priests chaire as well as in the Princes throne And so it was signified by his two bornes like to the Lambes Apoc. 13. 11. and so it is claimed by themselues by their double keyes and swords giuen in their Armes and carried before them and so it was really acted by Boniface the eight who one day shewed himselfe vnto the people in his Papall attire and the next day in the robes of an Emperour And it hath a long time bâ—en practised by them all and is still defended by most of their followers as a soueraignty that iustly belongeth vnto them And was not this most plainly fore-told by the Apostle that Antichrist should sit in the Temple of God not in the Temple of God at Ierusalem seeing that was vtterly to be destroyed and neuer to be built againe but in the Temple of God seated in the greatest City of his Antichristian Dominion that is in Babylonish Rome and that he should exalt himselfe aboue all that is called God and worshipped that is aboue all ciuill and Ecclesiasticall Gouernours of whom it is written I haue said yee are Gods Yea and that he should sit in the Temple Ioh. 8. 34. of God as God that is as Gods Lieutenant Generall and Christ Vicar vniuersall not onely in earth but also in Purgatory and in heauen also as it is signified by his triple Crowne And doth he not by his Indulgences take vpon him to open the doores of Purgatory at his pleasure And by Canonizing of Saints doth hee not take vpon him to giue greater or lesser dignities in the Kingdome of Heauen No maruell then that he taketh vpon him to dispose of temporall Kingdomes and earthly crownes and to possesse and dispossesse Kings of their Regalities at his owne will For this great Antichrist in his transcendent pride will not content himselfe with the honour and dignity of a great starre as all the ancient Bishops of Rome were wâ—nt to doe but he will aduance himselfe into the throne of Christ the Sunne of Righteousnesse that all the greatest starres both in the ciuill and also in the Ecclesiasticall Gouernment may take their light and authority from him For if wee will beleeue his Parasires his supremacy is so much greater then the Emperours as the Sunne is greater then the Moone QVEST. XXV The word of God rightly vnderstood doth giue credite to it selfe and doth cause it selfe to be beleeued and imbraced as the word of God for the excellency of the diuine doctrines contained therein and not onely for the bare testimony of the Church Arguments drawne from the attributes or adiuncts Behold saith Moses Deut. 4. 5. I haue taught you ordinances and lawes as the Lord my God commanded mee that yee should doe euen so in the land whether ye goe to possesse it Keepe them therfore and doe them for it is your wisedome and vnderstanding in the sight of the people that shall heare all these ordinances and say onely this people is wise and vnderstanding and a great Nation For what Nation is so great that hath Ordinances and Lawes so righteous as all this Law is that I haue set before thee this day In which words Moses prooueth that his doctrine which hee deliuered vnto the children of Israell was of GOD because it was a wise and a righteous doctrine able to iustifie it selfe to be so euen in the iudgement of the Heathen themselues which
such things most powerfull to enable them to produce such and such effects for the producing whereof they were ordained by God The which causes and effects powers and faculties qualities and properties when they are found out then there is a right knowledge of the things themselues Now what are causes and effects powers qualities and the like but reasons and arguments whereby all things are made open and manifest and so are rightly apprehended and knowne Looke we into the sacred Scriptures and we may see therein how the Lord doth lay open vnto his people the mysteries of godlinesse yea euen that great mystery of godlinesse God manifested in the flesh being the principall subiect of those divine bookes by assigning his efficient cause God the Father Matth. 3. 17. and his Mother the Blessed Virgin Mary the daughter of David the King Luk. 1. 31. His materiall causes his Divine and humane Natures Matth. 1. 23. His formall cause the vniting of his humane nature by personall vnion vnto his divine Ioh. 1. 14. his finall cause the working out of mans redemption Gal. 4. 4. His effects our reconciliation to God Ephe. 2. 18. with our deliuerance out of the bondage of sinne and Satan and our translation into the glorious liberty of the sonnes of God Ioh. 8. 36. His attributes according to his Divine nature infinite wisedome holinesse righteousnesse and the like Col. 2. 3. and according to his humane nature such a measure of all divine and heauenly graces as â—re farre aboue the perfections of any other creatures Ioh 1. 19. The time when he was borne euen when the Scepter was taken away from Iudah and all regall authority was in the hands of strangers Luc. 2. 1. The place where he was borne Bethlehem Matth. 2. 5. The place whither he â—led into banishment Aegypt Matth. 2. 13. The place where he was brought vp Nazareth Matth. 2. 23. The places where he liued preached wrought his miracles and dyed Galile Samaria Iury and Ierusalem Luc. 13. 24. The place where his body was laid after his death a Sepulcher that was in a Garden wherein neuer any body was laid before Ioh. 14. 42. The place whither he ascended after his resurrection and where he sitteth at the right hand of God and from whence he shall come to iudge both quicke and dead the highest Heauens Act. 2. 32. Diuers things from him all creatures in their defects and imperfections Ioh. 1. 23. Things like vnto him all creatures in their good properties and gifts Gen. 1. 26. especially typicall persons as Melchisedecke Heb. 6. 2. Isaack Gen. 17. 16. Sampson Iud. 16. 30. Ionah Matth. 12. 40. and all the high Priests Heb. 9 9. Typicall things the brasen Serpent Ioh. 3. 14. The mercy seat Hebr. 4. 16. Especially the Sacraments both of the Old and New Testaments 1 Cor 10. 4. His description Heb. 1. 2. His distribution by his Propheticall Priestly and Kingly offices set down in the greatâ—r part of that Epistle the interpretation of hiâ— Name Iesus a Sauiour Matth. 1. 21. Of his Name Christ annointed Cant 1. 2. Of his Name Emmanuel God with vs Matth. 1. 23. His Conjugates a Sauiour bringing saluation to all that are saued Act. 4. 14. His testimonies of God the Father the Sonne and the Holy Ghost 1 Ioh. 5. 7. Of the Angels Luk 2. 11. Of all the Prophets Act. 10. 4â— And of his greatest enemies euen the Diuels themselues Matth. 8. 23. The principall parts of the Word of God are the Law and 2 Cor. 4. 2. Gospel both of which are grounded vpon the evidence of reason and truth Law saith Ciâ—ero is the higest reason The Cic. l. 1. de leg which if it be true of the wise Lawes made by wise men much more is it true of the most wise and righteous Lawes made by Deut. 4. 8. the most wise and righteous God And verily it is the reason of the Law that is the life of the Law and bindeth the conscience to yeeld obedience For if the Law be contrary to reason it bindeth such as are subiect thereunto onely to endure the penalty thereof and â—ot to performe the thing therein commanded For as Tertullâ—an saith if a Law will not be tryed Tert. in Apol. Quod ad omnes attinet ab oinnibus debet approbaâ—i it is iustly suspected and if it being not tryed and approued yet is forced vpon any it is wicked seeing no Law doth owe to it selfe the iustifying of the equity thereof but to them of whom it doth require obedience And therefore wise and moderate Princes doe vse to call together a generall assembly of all the States and Commons of their Kingdomes that vpon iust causes and reasons duely weighed and examined both hurtfull Lawes may he taken away and holsome Statutes enacted for the generall good of their Kingdomes and Countries The which Statutes when they are published are many times set forth barely without their reasons least happily they might grow into too great a Volume But it is not so with the Lawes of God especially with those of the first Table for they haue sundry reasons adioyned to them as lights to make manifest the aequity of them and as Orators to perswade obedience thereunto And verily there was great reason why it should be so seeing by the fall of Adam the true knowledge of them is greatly defaced in all his posterity Whereas the Lawes of the second Table which concerne our duty towards our neighbour are for the most part barely deliuered because they are knowne by their owne light and that to the most barbarous people that liue on the face of the whole earth As it may appeare by the History of the West-Indinas who are reported presently to haue approued and embraced the aequity of those Lawes when they were at the first proposed vnto them And yet behold how behooueâ—… it is euen for the faithfull themselues to haue many reasons set downe before their eyes for the procuring of ready obedience to be yeelded euen vnto these commandements in that the Spirit of God hath caused the Prophets and Apostles being the expounders thereof to set downe in their Canonicall writings many most forcible and effectuall argument for the procuring of a more ready obedience to the same And verily experience it selfe doth shew Veritas docendo suadet that truth doth teach by perswasion that is by arguments and reasons as being such motiues and inducements as best befit the reasonable and generous nature of man Whereas brute Generosus animus poti us ducitur quam trahitur beasts that want reason are to be compelled by force and violence And therefore the Law of God in the originall is called Thorah that is a Doctrine or Teaching for that it doth teach and instruct the people of God by the Divine aequity and reason that is contained therein Now if the Law of God which is in part naturally knowne had need to be further
presence Aug. cont Faustum l. 20. c. 11. Cyrill in Ioh. l. 11 c. 3. Vigil cont Eutychem at one time in the Sunne and in the Moone and on the Crosse So Cyrill Christ could not be conuersant with his Apostles after that he had once ascended So Vigilius writing against Eutyches The flesh of Christ when it was on earth was not in heauen and now because it is in heauen certainely it is not on earth Yea so farre it is from being on earth that we looke for Christ after the flesh to come from heauen whom as he is God the Word we beleeue to be with vs on earth but by your opinion saith he to Eutyches either the word is comprehended in a place as well as the flesh or the flesh is euery where together with the word seeing that one nature doth not receiue any contrary or different estate Now to be contained in a place and to be present in euery place be things diuers and very dislike And therefore for so much as the word is euery where the flesh of Christ is not euery where it is cleare that one and the selfe-same Christ is of both natures that is euery where according to the nature of his Diuinity and contayned in a place according to the nature of his humanity This is the Catholike faith and confession which the Apostles deliuered the Martyres confirmed and the faithfull persist in to this day Wherefore the Church of Rome hath made an Apostacy from the Catholicke faith in that shee teacheth that the flesh of Christ is both together in heauen and on earth and not contayned in one certaine place but is in all places wheresoeuer the Eucharist is administred albeit it be administred in innumerable places at one time QVEST. XXIX Christs Body and Bloud ought not and in truth cannot be often offered vp to God by the Masse-Priests as a propitiatory sacrifice for the quicke and the dead The often offering of the same sacrifice doth argue the imperfection thereof as the Apostle saith As the doing againe again of one the selfesame worke doth shew that it was vnsufficiently done at the beginning For no wise man will goe about to do the same work the second time which was sufficiently yea perfectly done at the first lest it be said vnto him Act not that which is acted already No wise stage-player will attēpt Noli actum agere to come vpō the stage where Roscius is to act the same Enterlude that he acteth As no Historiographer of any iudgement will take vpon him to write that selfe-same History that Livy Caesar or Salust haue already written And shall then euery Masse-Priest be so presumptuous as to take vpon him to offer vp Christ as a propitiatory sacrifice for the sinnes of quicke and dead where as that one oblation of Christ made once by himselfe was so sufficient and perfect that thereby he brought in eternall redemption and made perfect for euer them Heb. 7. 25. 10. 14. that are sanctified What will they put our deare Sauiour to death againe and shed his bloud surely this they must doe if in their Masse they will offer him vp a propitiatory sacrifice for sinne seeing that cannot be performed without a bloudy death For iustice cannot be satisfied for sinne vnlesse that which is due be rendred thereto But the wages and hire due to sinne is death The Rom. 6. 19. which is so euident and vndoubted a truth that the Apostle is bold to auouch that if our Sauiour himselfe should haue often offered himselfe to God as an expiatory sacrifice for sinne hee Heb. 9. 26. should haue often suffered and dyed But our blessed Sauiour dyed but once neither needeth he nay neither can he dye any Rom. 6. 9. more therefore he cannot be offered any more as an expiatory sacrifice for sinne Wherefore in that the Masse-Priests doe still presumptuously vndertake to offer vp Christ as an expiatory sacrifice for sinne what doe they therein but as much as in them lyeth murder and slay Christ againe and shed his pretious bloud and greatly derogate from the dignity of that sacrifice that he himselfe did offer at his death QVEST. XXX Christs flesh is not eaten with our bodily mouthes The pretended eating of Christs flesh with our bodily mouthes by the members of the Romish Synagogue is impious and wicked against Piety Religion and nature it selfe causing our Christian faith to be scorned and abhorred of the Heathen and therefore it was neuer intended much lesse commanded and commended by our Lord himselfe Our Sacrament saith Cyrill doth not command the eating of a man Cyr. ad obiect Theodor. drawing the minds of the faithfull to grosse conceits after an irreligious manner for as concerning these words of our Sauiour Christ Except ye eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his bloud yee haue no life in you Saint Austin affirmeth Aug de doct Christ l. 3. c. 16. that seeing there seemeth therein an impiety to be commanded therefore they are not to be vnderstood literally but mystically and spiritually And verily the grosse mistaking of these words by the Church of Rome hath caused some of the heathen to condemne Christians of more barbarous impiety and inhumanity then was vsed in the impious and inhumane Anthropophagi for that they did eate but the flesh of ordinary men whereas the other pretend that they eat the very flesh of their God QVEST. XXXI Enoch and Elias cannot come in their owne persons to resist Antichrist and to be slaine of him Enoch and Elias cannot be slaine of Antichrist seeing their bodies be glorified and therefore immortall and not subiect vnto death And if they should assume other bodies then were they not the same persons because they had not the same essentiall parts Moreouer if a soule may assume diuers bodies with which of them shall she be vnited at the day of the generall resurrection QVEST. XXXII It is a property onely belonging to God to forgiue sinne When Iesus said to the sicke of the palsie Sonne thy sinnes Mar. 2. 5. are forgiuen thee and some of the Scribes sitting there did thus reason in their hearts Why doth this man speake blasphemies who can forgiue sinne but God alone He perceiuing that they thus reasoned in themselues said vnto them Whether is it easier to say to the sicke of the Palsey Thy sinnes are forgiuen thee or to say Arise take vp thy bed and walke Whereby he gaue them to vnderstand that by a word to cure both the sicknesses of the soule and the body was a property belonging to one and the selfe-same power euen to God And therefore that seeing he did make it appeare euen to their outward senses that by his word he did cure the diseases of the body they should haue acknowledged his diuine power whereby he was also able to cure the sinnes of the soule For as Chrysostome and Hillary teach our