Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
death_n	body_n	heart_n	sin_n	4,063	5	4.5548	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A91267	A seasonable vindication of free-admission, and frequent administration of the Holy Communion to all visible church-members, regenerate or unregenerate. From the institution, precept, president of Christ himself; the doctrine, practice of the primitive Church, fathers, councils, Christians: the confessions, articles, records, chief writers of our own and other reformed churches: the dangerous consequents, effects, schisms arising from the disusage, infrequency, monopoly of this sacrament, to visible or real saints alone; and suspension of all others from it, till approved worthy upon trial. And that upon meer Anabaptistical, and papistical false principles, practices, (here discovered) unadvisedly embraced, imitated, asserted, exceeded by sundry over-rigid, reforming ministers; to our Saviours dishonour, our Churches great disturbance, their own, their peoples prejudice; and the common enemies, and seducers grand advantage. / By Will: Prynne of Swainswick Esq; a bencher of Lincolns Inne·	Prynne, William, 1600-1669.	1656 (1656)	Wing P4070; Thomason E495_3; ESTC R203285	81,072	108

all the world preach the Gospel to every Creature He that believeth the Gospel preached and is baptized shall be saved he that believeth not shall be damned To which he superaddes Mat. 20. 14 15. c. 11. 20. to 25. Mar. 6. 11. And whosoever will not receive you nor hear your words when ye depart out of that house or City shake off the dust of your feet Verily I say unto you it shall be more tolerable for the Land of Sodom and Gomorrah in the day of judgement than for that City 2 Cor. 2. 15 16. For we are unto God a sweet savour of Christ in preaching the Word as well as administring the Sacraments in them that are saved as in them that perish To the one we are the savour of death unto death and to the other we are the savour of life unto life By which it is apparent that there is as much danger judgement damnation incurred by every man by his unworthy receiving of Baptism and unprofitable hearing and contemning the Word preached as by his unworthy receiving the Lords Supper as also by his unworthy praying which is an abomination unto the Lord and turned into sinne Psal. 109. 7. Prov. 28. 9. Isa. 66. 3. Upon which account all unregenerate ignorant impenitent scandalous persons should be totally secluded from Baptism preaching hearing of the Word and Prayer as well as the Lords Supper by our Ministers So this Erroneous Popish opinion refuted at large by Dr. Ames in his Bellarminus Enervatus Tom. 3. l. 1. c. 4. De Saramentorum Comparatione hath severed the ordinary daily use of the Lords Supper used in the Primitive times from the ordinary publike Prayers and preaching the Word which it alwaies accompanied in the best and purest times and ingendred a world of unnecessary unchristian Controversies Schisms Sect in the Church of God especially in our own of later times And therefore ought now to be duely considered reformed exploded as well as that Monster of Transubstantiation which originally introduced these fond superstitious Popish Errors that now so much intoxicate the brains perplex the consciences both of Protestant Ministers and People and are like to prove our Churches ruine The Church of England in her 13 Article with our Protestant Writers Divines doe all Generally condemn the Popish doctrine of Merit of Congruity Yet most of them now really embrace justify preach teach print it in their extraordinary Preparations for the Lords Supper They all generally now teach and exact a visible or real worthinesse as absolutely necessary for every Communicant without which he must in no wise approach to the Lords Supper for then it will certainly prove meer poyson to him and he shall only eat and drink thereat his own damnation But if he be so really so visibly worthy and prepared as they prescribe and require hi● to be then he may certainly assure himself that God will accompany this ordinance with his special presence Grace blessing so as he shall assuredly reap much Grace encrease confirmation of his Faith Ioy Peace Assurance and all other Graces by it Whether this be not the Popish Schoolmens meriting Grace of Congruity and tying of Gods Grace Spirit to our Worthinesse Merits Preparations for our own inherent Worthinesse and Preparation sake let all judicious Protestants resolve Verily when I seriously ponder that Memorable Passage of Martin Luther in his Greater Catechism i That this Sacrament was not institnted for those that are worthy and purely clensed from their sins but clean contrary even for miserable and wretched sinners sensible of nothing but their own unworthinesse Therefore let such a one say Lord I would very willingly be worthy of this Supper but yet I come unto it induced by no worthines of mine own but trusting on thy Word alone because thou hast commanded me to come c. For the Sacrament is not to be looked on as an hurtfull thing from which we should run with both our feet but as a saving and wholesome Medicin which may heal thy diseases and give life both to thy Soul and Body Why then do we so shun it as if it were a Poison which being received would bring present death unto us Yea but some may say I am not so sensible of my sins and unworthinesse as I should be To such as are in this condition I can give no better advice than to look into their own hearts and to see whether they be not flesh and blood and may not say with Paul Rom. 7. I know that in me that is in my flesh dwelleth no thing that is good In summe by how much lesse sensible thou art of thy sins and defects the more reasons thou hast of comming and frequent seeking Help and Physick And when I consider these Passages in the Practice of Piety so much approved by all our Divines and pious Christians concerning the due manner of Practicing Piety in receiving the Holy Supper of the Lord k That no man living is of himself worthy to be a Guest at so holy a Banquet The Rules there prescribed How to consider and perceive our own unworthinesse by examining our lives according to Gods Commandement With these ensuing Meditations prescribed to every Communicant to ponder both before and at this Sacrament l Ponder then with what face darest thou offer to touch so holy a body with such defiled hands Or to drink such precious blood with so lewd and lying mouths Or to lodge so blessed a Guest in so unclean a Stable For if the m Bethshemites were slain for but looking irreverently to the Ark of the Old Testament what judgement maist thou justly expect who with such impure eyes and heart art come to see and receive the Ark of the New Testament in which n dwelleth all the fullnesse of the Godhead bodily c. If John Baptist the holiest man that was boru of a woman thought himself o unworthy to bear his shooes O Lord how unworthy is such a prophane wretch as thou art to eat his flesh and to drink his precious bloud If the blessed Apostle St. Peter seeing but a glympse of Christs almighty power thought himself p unworthy to stand in the same boat with him How unworthy art thou to sit with Christ at the same Table where thou maist behold the infinitenesse of his Grace and Mercy displayed If the q Centurion thought that the roof of his House was not worthy to harbour so divine a Guest What room can there be fit under thy Ribbs for Christs Holinesse to dwell in If the r bloud-issued sick woman feared to touch the hem of his garment How shouldest thou tremble to eat his flesh and to drink his All-healing bloud Yet if thou comest humbly in Faith Repentance and Charity abhorring thy sins past and purposing unfeignedly to amend thy life henceforth let not thy former sins affright thee for they shall never be laid to thy charge and

Others of them guilty of Adulterie lasciviousnesse fornication ch. 6. 18 19. c. 10. 8. 2 Cor. 12. 21. Others of them spiritually proud and puffed up with their knowledge who did eat things sacrificed to Idols in Idols Temples and scandalized their weak brethren ch. 8. 1. 2 7 8 c. c. 10. 22 23 28 29 30 32 33. Others of them withheld due maintenance from Pa●l himself those other Ministers who instructed them ch. 9. 6. to 20. Besides their men and women were very disorderly in their publike assemblies and came together not for the better but for the worse for which he reprehends them ch. 11. 3. to 34. and ch. 14. throughout More particularly when they came to receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper they were very disorderly in not receiving it all together and tarrying not one for the other in despising and not relieving their poor Brethren and not eating with them yea some of them were drunken when they came to receive and they were also full of schisms contentions factions some being for Paul others for Apollos others for Cephas c. 1 Cor. 11. 16. to 34. 1 Cor. 3. 1 2 3. Yea the Apostle writes expresly that he could not speak unto the generality of them as unto spiritual but unto carnul even as unto babes in Christ being carnal and walking as men chap. 3. 1 2 3 4. Yet notwithstanding all these disabilities si●s scandals they were then freely admitted to the Lords Table and not secluded from it And though the Apostle reprehends them in this Epistle for their ignorance these other vices sins and disorders in their meetings yet he gives no order to their Ministers or Presbyteries to seclude them from the Sacrament till better instructed prepared and reformed in their lives but only admonisheth them to reform those their abuses themselves to judge and examine themselves before they eat and drink of the Lords bread and cup because otherwise they shall eat and drink Judgement to themselves and bring Gods temporal Iudgements of sicknesse and death upon them yet no way dehorts them from constant and frequent reception of this Sacrament by reason of this danger of unworthy receiving which they must take care to reform 1 Cor. 11. 33 34. but in no case omit the duty being Christs prescribed Ordinance to shew forth his death till ●e come Verse 25 26. From which only Texts and Presidents in Scripture relating to this Sacraments institution and reception it is most clear to my judgement and conscience 1. That Ignorance in Church-members and baptized Christians of years of discretion is no sufficient ●ause to debarre them from the Lords Supper no more than from the preaching of the word The reason is most clear because Christs Supper as d Augustine e Bishop Iewel f Thomas Beacon and others resolve is both a visible and audible Sermon Word and the Priest therein preacheth and declareth the death of the Lord with the fruits and benefits of his passion to the Communicants to instruct teach edifie them thereby as he doth by his other Sermons reading and preaching of the word at other seasons Therefore the best and readiest way to instruct and reform the peoples ignorance is frequently to call presse and admit them to this holy Sacrament that they * may be thereby edified instruct●d comforted inlightned by it and not to seclude them from it year after year which doth but continue and increase their former ignorance and harden them therein 2ly That no scandalous sins crimes unregeneracy or want of spiritual saving graces ought to seclude any external Christians or Church-members from the Lords Supper no more than from hearing of the word prayer thanksgiving fasting reading the Scriptures or any other publick or private duties of Gods worship Because they are peremptorily g commanded to perform this duty in remembrance of Christs death and thereby to shew forth his death till he come as well as to hear read pray fast praise God and the like from which no sin nor unpreparednesse may exempt or excuse any man yea it is a far greater and more dangerous sinne wilfully to neglect omit contemn the performance of this or any other holy duty than sinfully to perform and set about it there being a total disobedience in the one but a partial obedience at least through a failing in the due manner of peformance in the other Which I wish all Ministers and Christians would now sadly consider And so much the rather because the Apostle and Spirit of God in this Epistle pointblank against Dr. Drakes Mr. Collins and others conclusions thence make the Corinthians scandalous sins forementioned their resort to and eating meats offered to Idols and Devils in their Temples a more scandalous crime than any English Christians are now guilty of not a ground to seclude them from the Lords Table Supper Temple as unfit to communicate with other Christians but presseth their frequent participation of the Lords Table and resort to his Temple his Ordinances as the strongest argument to disswade reclame them from these scandalous sinnes Witnesse these expresse words 1 Cor. 10. 14. to 24. Wherefore my dearly beloved flee from Idolatry I speak as to wise men judge ye what I say The Cup of blessing which we blesse is it not the communion of the bloud of Christ The bread which we break is it not the communion of the body of Christ For we being many are one hread For we are all partakers of that one bread Behold Israel after the flesh are not they which eat of the Sacrifices partakers of the Altar What say I then that the Idol is any thing or that which is offered in sacrifice to Idols is any thing But I say that the things that the Gentiles sacrifice they sacrifice to devil● and not to God and I would not that ye should have fellowship with Devils Mark this inference and that which follows Ye cannot drink the Cup of the Lord and the Cup of Devils Ye cannot be partakers of the Lords Table and of the Table of Devils c. In which clause the word cannot is not taken physically or naturally for they did actually eat drink of the Table Cup of the Lord and Devils for which he reprehends them nor of a moral or spiritual cannot as some interpret it that is You cannot lawfully or spiritually of right drink of the Lords Cup or be partakers of the Lords Table but ought to abstain or be secluded from them so long as ye partake of the Cup and Table of Devils which is clearly contradicted as false by the 16 17 and 20 verses but of a rational and logical * cannot That is You cannot in reason duty justice convenience experience drink of the Cup and partake of the Table of Devils or go to Idols Temples but flee from Idolatry and not have fellowship with Devils because you all drink the Cup of the Lord and are all partakers of the

joyned together in unseparable Charity the Lords Sacraments do declare But Christian people being assembled in one Church do communicate in faith all together Ergo being so assembled they ought to communicate in Sacraments all together But Mr. Harding of the nature of this word Communio seemeth to fashion out * far other arguments It is called Communio saith he Ergo it may be private It is called Communio Ergo it may be received of one alone It is called Communio Ergo the Priest may receive it without Communicants Mr. Harding weigh your Argnments better before you send them thus abroad You shall lesse offend God and your own Conscience you shall lesse deceive your Brethren and children shall take lesse occasion to wonder at you y Now to adde a little more hereunto touching the nature of this word Communio wherein you so uncourteously charge all others with ignorance and lack of learning as it pleaseth you to do throughout your whole Book I think it not amisse to shew you what certain Writers both old and new have thought and written in that behalf I need not here to allege the words that St. Paul useth touching the holy Communion z We are all one Bread all one body as many as do communicate of one Bread Neither that a Saint Hierom saith The Lords Supper must be Common Neither that b St. Chrysostom The thing that is the Lords they make Private But the Lords things are not this Servants or that Servants but common to all Neither that c St. Augustine saith He would have us to understand that this Meat and Drink is the Fellowship of his Body and of his Members Neither that d Chrysostom saith What shall I call the Communication or Communion we are all one self-same body What signifyeth the Bread The Body of Christ And what are they made that receive it The Body of Christ Although these Fathers by these words do manifestly declare That the holy Mysteries in their time were divided commonly to the whole people yet will I take no advantage thereof for that Mr. Harding will reply They come not precisely to the nature of this word Communio Therefore I shall note one or two others and such as Mr. Harding cannot deny for that they speak directly to the matter e Pachymeres a Greek Writer the Paraphrast upon Dionysius hath these words Therefore saith he hath this Father Dionysius called it The Communion for that there all they that were worthy did communicate of the Holy Mysteries And all then were reputed worthy and received daily in the Primitive Church but persons excommunicate and injoyned to Penance who upon great and notorious crimes could not be suffered to communicate with the rest of the faithfull sometimes during their whole life but only when they should depart the world This extremity was used for terror of others and such reconciliation was thought necessary at the end for solace of the party that he should not utterly be swallowed up in despair but might perceive he was received again amongst the faithfull by sending the Communion to him at his death and so depart comfortably as the Member of Christ as * Bishop Jewel writes and proves in the next page f Haymo writing upon Saint Pauls Epistles saith thus The Cup is called Communication which is as much as participation because all do communicate of it g Hugo Cardinalis saith thus Afterwards let the Communion be said which is so called that we should all communicate h Gerardus Lorichius Dicitur Communio quia concorditer de uno Pane et uno Calice multi participamus c. Is is called Communio because we being many do communicate together agreeably of one Bread one Cup And this word Communio is as much as participation or receiving of parts i Micrologus Non potest proprie dici Communio nisi plures de eodem sacrificio participent It cannot justly be called a Communion unlesse many do receive of one Sacrifice If Mr. Harding will not believe us yet I hope he will believe some of these They be all his own It were much for him to say they be all ignorant and unlearned and not one of them understood what he wrote Certainly their age will give it them they are no Lutherans 3ly k Whereas Mr. Harding in defence of Private Masse puts this case What if 4. or 5. of sundry houses in a sickness time being at the point of death require to have their rites cre they depart the Priest after that he hath received the Sacrament in the Church dineth and then being called upon carrieth the rest a mile or two unto the sick He doth what he is required Doth he not in this case communicate with them c. Else if this might not be counted a lawful and good communion and therefore not be used one of these great Inconveniences should willingly be committed That either they should be denied that necessary victual of life at their departure hence which were a cruel Injury and a thing contrary to the examples and godly ordinances of the Primitive Church Or the Priest rather for companies sake than of devotion should receive that holy meat after he had served his stomack with common meats c. Bishop Jewel amongst other solid Answers hereunto returns this But if the people would now communicate every day as they did then in the Primitive Church or at least oftner than they do now then should not this matter seem so necessary at the end as is here pretended And so had Mr. Harding lost another Argument To these 3. passages of Bishop Iewel I shall annex that of his learned coetanean and fellow Exile for Religion Thomas Beacon a burning and a shining light in his Catechism Vol. 1. of his Works f. 462 463. where after he hath proved by sundry Scriptures and Authorities That the Lords Supper in the Apostles times Primitive Church was commonly received every day or Lords day at the least Adding That among the Greeks even at this day if any man absent himself from the Lords Table by the space of 14. dayes except he can render a reasonable cause of his absence he is excommunicate and put from the Company of the faithfull and that in all those mighty large populous Kingdoms under that most puissant King Precious John the holy Communion of the Body and Bloud of the Lord hath from the beginning been daily administred unto the people and yet is at this present day as Histories make mention He then censures this as a grosse Popish innovation and abuse contrary both to Scripture and Antiquity That whereas the Lord Christ Iesus would have the holy Communion of his blessed Body and precious Blood to be oft times received of the faithfull for a remembrance of his death and passion and for the worthy earnest diligent consideration of that inestimable Benefit which we have obtained of God

this Sacrament shall seal unto thy Soul that all thy sins and the judgements due unto them are fully pardoned and clean washed away by the bloud of Christ For this Sacrament was not ordained for them who were perfect or worthy but to help penitent sinners unto perfection Christ ſ came not to call the righteous but sinners to repentance And he saith The whole need not a Physician but they that are sick These hath Christ called and when they came them he ever helped witness the whole Gospel which testifieth that not one sinner who came to Christ for Mercy went ever away without his errand Bath thou likewise thy sick soul in this Fountain of Christs bloud and doubtlesse according to his promise Zech. 13. 1. thou shalt be healed of all thy sinnes and uncleannesse Not Sinners therefore but those who are unwilling to repent of their sinnes are debarred from this Sacrament c. t I am in a word a u carnal creature whose very soul is seal'd under sin a wretched man compassed about with a body of death Yet Lord seeing thou x callest here I come and seeing thou callest sinners I have thrust my self in among the rest and seeing thou callest All with their heaviest loades I see no reason why I should stay behind O Lord I am sick and whether should I go but unto thee the Physician of my Soul Thou hast cured many but never didst thou meet with a more miserable Patient c. And why should I doubt of thy Good will c With this further passage y But then thou wilt say It were safer to abstain from comming to the holy Communion than to resort unto it Not so For God hath * threatned to punish the wilfull neglect of his Sacraments with eternal damnation And it is the commandement of Christ z Take eat doe this in remembrance of me and he will have his Commandement under the penalty of his Curse obeyed And seeing this Sacrament was the a greatest token of Christs love which he left at his end to his Friends whom he loveth to the end therefore the neglect and contempt of this Sacrament must argue the b contempt and neglect of his Love Bloudshedding than which no sin in Gods account can seem more haynous Nathing hinders why thou maist not come freely to the Lords Table but because thou wouldest rather want the love of God then leave thy filthy sins O come then but come a Guest prepared for the Lords Table Seeing they are c blessed who are called to the Lambs Supper And when I further observe the several passages of like nature in others of our Writers touching this Sacrament with this Confession of our sinnes in our English Liturgy And this acknowledgement We do not presume to come unto this thy Table O Lord trusting in our own worthinesse but in thy great and manifold Mercies we are unworthy O Lord to gather up the crumbs under thy Table c even then when we approach unto this Supper With those passages prescribed in the Exhortation before this Sacrament to be used by all our Ministers to their People when they see them negligent to come to the Holy Communion When God calleth you be not you ashamed to say I will not come c I for my part am here present and according to mine Office I bid you in the Name of God I call you in Christs behalf I exhort you as you love your own salvation that ye will be partakers of this Holy Communion c. I can no wayes approve the forementioned Doctrin and Opinion of visible or real worthinesse pre-required by our c New Doctors as the only rule of their admitting men to this Sacrament as Orthodox or solid but reject it as erronious Popish and meer merit of Congruity Disclaim that General received opinion That there is another sublimer Fitnesse Holinesse Examination Preparation required of all men in their addresses to this Sacrament than to any other of Gods Ordinances And cannot but conclude it a most damnable impious dangerous unchristian practice for any Ministers to dehort debar prohibit any of their unexcommunicated Parishioners from it who desire to receive it whiles they freely admit them to all other Ordinances since God himself both thus calls and commands them under pain of the highest sinne contempt and damnation to repair constantly to this Sacrament as the chiefest medicine to cure comfort refresh their sin sick drooping despairing Souls And up●n unpassionate serious second thoughts of what is here premised I doubt not they will all subscribe to my Opinion herin though they may deem it a strange Novelty at first reading and admit all freely to this Sacrament as well as to other Ordinances 12ly Our Reverend f Bishop Jewil the Harmony of Confessions sect. 14. with all Protestant Churches and Divines justly chargeth the Church of Rome and Romish Priests with Grand Sacrilege Church-robbery wickedness injury impiety in the highest degree for denying prohibiting the Cup of the Lord to the Lay people in the administration of this Sacrament contrary to Christs own institution and practice the practice of the Primitive Church Fathers Christians in former ages all other Christian Churches in the world for certain reasons best known to themselves and more especially for this very reason as g Iohn Gerson a principle member of the Council of Constance privy to its secrets records That if Lay-men should communicate under both kinds as Priests Dignitas Sacerdotis non esset super dignitatem Laicorum The Dignity of Priests should not be above the dignity of Lay-men Whence Gabriel Biel extolleth the dignity of the Priest above our Lady and all other Saints because he may communicate under both kinds and they cannot And so have they altered the Sacrament of aequality and unity and made it a Sacrament of difference and dissention as h Bishop Iewel truely observeth Now I appeal to the Judgements Consciences of all judicious Protestants and i Pope Gelasius himself who justly condemned this practice as most wicked injurious impious Sacrilege in the Popes and Priests of Rome whether it be not a farre greater worser execrabler Sacrilege for any of our Protestaut English Ministers contrary to our Saviours precept president the custom doctrine practice of the Apostles Primitive Churches Fathers Christians and all other Churches in the world yea to the Councils Canons Injunctions Articles Liturgies Homilies Writers of our English Church and k Statutes of our Realm obstinately wilfully to detain not only the Sacred Cup but Bread and whole Lords Supper from all their Parishioners for sundry Moneths Years together as no wayes due or belonging to them And that onely upon no other real Ground but this alone l to erect a new Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction in themselves and their intended Presbyteries over the Lords Sacrament it self and all their people and to advance their own Sacerdotal or Presbyterial

5ly I desire such Ministers who have preached printed cryed up this false rule of admission to and administration of this Sacrament sadly to consider the retaliating justice of God upon them arising from this their error and neglect of administring it That whiles they have peremptorily debarred their Parishioners and people from the Lords Supper and laid it quite aside as denying or doubting their real Sain●ship many of their people have upon their own principles turned Anabaptists Independents Quakers Seekers yea publikely in their Churches Pulpits c Writings proclaimed them to be no real Saints or Ministers of Christ at all but Baals Priests Seducers of the people false Prophets Hirelings Hypocrites Deceivers Impostors Antichrists fit only to be cast forth unto the Dunghil trodden under foot of men deserted both their Church assemblies Ministry and withheld their Tithes I beseech them sadly to ponder how God hath thus repaid them in their own false coin and to acknowledge his justice on them in it 5ly Let them consider this notable passage of d Abbot Theon about 530 years after Christ That mens sins ought not to deterre them from but excite them to the frequent participation of the Lords Supper and that those who deem themselves worthy receivers as these supercilious secluders of their Parishioners from the Sacrament doe are most unworthy Nec tamen ex eo debemus nos a Dominica Communione suspendere quia nos agnoscimus peccatores sed ad eam magis ac magis est et propter animae medicinam et purificationem Spiritus avidè festinandum veruntamen ea humilitate mentis ac fide ut indignos nos perceptione tantae gratiae judicantes remedia potius nostris vulneribus expetamus Ali●quin nec anniversaria quidem dignè est praesumenda Communio ut quidam facunt qui in Monasteriis consistentes ita Sacramentorum coelestium dignitatem sanctificationem ac meritum metiuntur ut aestiment ea non nisi sanctos immaculatos debere praesumere et non Potius ut sanctos mundosque nos sua participatione perficiant Qui profectò majorem arrogantiae praesumptionem quam declinare sibi videntur incurrunt quia vel tunc cum ea percipiunt dignos se ejus perceptione dijudicant Multo enim justius est ut cum hac cordis humilitate qua credimus et fatemur illa sacrosancta mysteria nunquam pro merito nos posse contingere singulis ea Dominicis diebus ob remedium nostrorum aegcitudinem praesumamus quam ut vana persuasione cordis elati vel post annum dignos eorum participio nos esse credamus Wherefore as the blessed antient Martyr e Ignatius in his Epistle to the Ephesians thus exhorts them to the frequent reception of the Eucharist Date itaque operam ut crebrius congregemini ad Eucharistiam et gloriam Dei Quando enim saepius in idem loci convenitis labefactantur vires Satanae et ignita illius ad peccat●m jacula irrita resiliunt which f Joannes C●●machus likewise seconds pressing the frequent reception of the Eucharist upon these and other Grounds which the primitive Christians daily and frequently received in common as the marginal g Authors besides those forecited and Eusebius De Demonstratione vangelica lib. 1. c. 10. p. 300. inform us So let our rigid Innovators now imitate this their practice for the future lest they increase the power kingdom of Satan their own and their Parishioners sins and damnation by debarring them from this spiritual balm and soveraign means of their Salvation instead of making them more worthy and prepared to receive it or lesse sinfull by their Suspension from it 6ly Let them ponder that the Primitive Fathers and Christians though they were over-rigid to such as fell away to Idolatry through fear in times of persecution yet upon their repentance they admitted them to receive the Lords Supper at home in private when they lay sick upon their death-beds though they stood actually excommunicated from the Church and all publike Ordinances to the end they should not be swallowed up utterly in despair but die comfortably as the Members of Christ as h Bishop Iewel proves at large by the story of Serapion and Concil. Carthaginense 6. Can. 13. With what hearts faces consciences then can these Cathari and Novations deny this Sacrament now to their Parishioners who earnestly desire and long after it both in their healths sicknesses and at their very deaths though never actually excommunicated nor guilty of such Grosse Apostacy to Idolatry when as they freely admit them to their Church-assemblies and all other publick Ordinances contrary to the practice of the Primitive Churches Fathers who cast all such as were excommunicated for any scandalous sins crime or heresie ont of their Churches debarred them from their Congregations and all Christian Communion with them in prayer or any other publike Ordinances as well as in the Lords Supper which is most apparent by the Excommunications and presidents of i Serapion k Numerianus l Philip and m Theodosius the Emperors n Apoiinarius and o Arius the Hereticks with others recorded in Ecclesiastical Histories By this pregnant Testimony of Tertullian in his Apology Summumque futuri judicii praejudicium est si quis ita deliquerit ut a Communione orationis et Conventus et omnis sancti commercii relegetur By these phrases of p St. Cyprian whereby he expresseth the nature and use of Excommunication in his age Arcere cohibere ejicere excludere pellere rejicere ab Ecclesia Seperare a Christi corpore c. By these expressions of q Origen Ab Ecclesiae corpore desecari per Ecclesiae Praesides Auferatur è populo Dei eradicetur et tradatur Satana Is qui praesidet populo regit Ecclesiasticam disciplinam ejicit eum de Congregatione fidelium In Ecclesiis Christi consuetudo tenuit talis ut qui manifesti sunt in magnis delictis ejiciantur ab oratione Communi c. By this phrase of r Gregorius Thaumaturgus Bishop of Neo-Caesaria against covetors plunderers of Captives and other mens goods for filthy gain whom he resolves to be a Dei Ecclesia abdicati which Theodorus Balsamon Patriarch of Antioch thus expounds Ecclesia abdicatus id est ejectus et al●onus dicuntur enim abdicati filii quando propter aliqua crimina ab haereditate paterna alienantur In tempore autem talis calamitatis existimare aliorum calamitatem esse sui lucri occasionem est impiorum hominum et Dei invisorum et qui omnem improbitatem superant Unde visum est eos abdicare pro eo quod est aperte Ecclesia expellere et a sidelium multitudine separare ne propter ipsos Dei ira ad omnes veniat c. Which I wish the plundering Covetous Saints of our age would consider being all ipso jure excommunicated persons Qui ea rapiunt

are administred whence it is stiled and defined A casting or putting a scandalous Sinner out of the Church A cutting him off from the Congregation and a delivering him over unto r Satan but never a Suspension from the Lords Supper or other publike Ordinances being only the consequence nor form or essence of Excommunication so much of late contested for and so little understood by those who are most eager to introduce it 6ly I humbly conceive that no greater measure or degree of knowledge faith profession of Christ Confession of sinne and repentance is necessarily required by God or to be exacted by Ministers to enable men now to receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper than in the Primitive Church was exacted by Christs own Apostles and Ministers in persons of ripe years newly converted to Christianity upon their admission to Baptism they being both Sacraments and Seals of the Covenant of Grace alike and requiring the self-same qualifications Hence our learned ſ Bishop Iewel writes It appeareth by St. Cyprian St. Hierom t St. Augustine and other old Writers That they that were baptized as well Children as others immediately received the holy Mysteries in both kinds St. u Hierom speaking of one Hilarion saith thus He cannot administer Baptism without the Sacrament of Thanksgiving x St. Cyprians words touching this matter be these Ubi solennibus adimpletis c. After the solemnity of the Consecration was done and the Deacon began to administer the Cup unto them that were present and among others there received the childs turn being come by the power of the divine Majesty she turned away her face c. Here by the way we may well gather That like as the Priest the Deacons and the people received even so the child received too without any manner of innovation or difference This Custome of administring the Lords Supper as well to infants as others immediately after their Baptism in the Primitive times proceeded as I conceive from the very practice of the Apostles Acts 2. 38. to 42. where the 3000. Converts so soon as they believed and were baptized were immediately admitted into the Apostles fellowship and to the breaking of bread which most interpret of the Sacrament of the Lords Supper comparing it with Acts 20. 7. 1 Cor. 10. 2 3. 16 17. Now a very * small measure of instruction knowledge faith repentaece confession of sin and acknowledgement of Christ was reputed sufficient in the Primitive Church by the Apostles and Ministers of Christ to qualifie and admit converts of ripe years to the Sacrament of Baptism as is clear by Mat. 3. 5 6. Acts 2. 38 41 42 46 47. c. 8. 12 13 16. 36 37 38. c. 9. 17 18. c. 10. 47 48. c. 11. 16 17. c. 16. 15. 30. to 35. c. 18. 8. c. 22. 16. where all were instructed converted believed baptized in one and the very self-same day and made profession of the faith of Christ upon the first Sermon they heard without any further delay or Suspension of them from Baptism Therefore they and all other baptized Christians of ripe years immediately upon their baptism and conversion ought now to be admitted to the Sacrament of the Lords Supper upon the self-same terms and qualifications and not secluded from it under a pretence of ignorance or unfitnesse to receive it 7ly Whereas some Ministers most insist upon the 1 Cor. 11. 27 29. Whosoever shall eat this bread and drink this cup of the Lord unworthily shall ●e guilty of the body and bloud of the Lord For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily eateth and drinketh damnation to himself not to the Minister or other Communicants not discerning the Lords body as the prime ground and reason to suspend ignorant and scandalous persons in their judgement from this Sacrament I beseech them to observe 1. What the Antient Fathers and y Bishop Iewel out of them concludes against the Papists who object it to prove a Transubstantiation in this Sacrament Even so z St. Augustine writeth of the water of Baptism Baptismus valet al●is ad Regnum aliis ad judicium Again he saith a Baptismum multi habent non ad vitam aeternam sed ad poenam aternam non bene utentes tanto b●ne Verily b Saint Augustine saith Reus erit non parvi pretii sed sanguinis Christi qui fornicatione et adulterio violat et commaculat animam Christi sanguine et Passione mundatam Againe he saith c Adultter reus erit aeternae mortis quia vilem in se habuit sanguinem Redemptoris d Athanasius saith Adorantes dominum neque ita ut dignum est ei viventes non sentiunt se reos fieri Dominicae mortis e And St. Cyprian saith Impiis in morte Christi nullus superest quaestus sed justissime eos beneficia neglecta condem●ant If then * Baptism be received by some unto judgement and everlasting pain as well as the Lords Supper If Fornicators and Adulterers by defiling their souls made clean by the Passion and bloud of Christ be guilty of the bloud of Christ though they receive not this Sacrament If those who worship the Lord in prayer or any other sacred Ordinance as well as this and yet live not so as is meet for the Lord are thereby made guilty of our Lords death If wicked mens despising of the benefits of Christ doth justly condemn and make Christ death ungainfull to them as well as unworthy receiving this Sacrament Then this Text can afford no Jurisdiction or ground at all to our Ministers or others to seclude any from the Lords Supper no more than from Baptism or any other sacred Ordinance upon this Account ● 2ly Observe what Exposition f Bishop Iewel in the same place gives of this Text This therefore is St. Pauls meaning that the wicked resorting unworthily to the Holy Mysteries and having no regard what is meant thereby DESPISE THE DEATH AND CROSSE OF CHRIST and therefore are guilty of the Lords Body and Bloud that are represented in the Sacrament To come nearer to the purpose St. Augustine saith Habeant foris Sacramentum corporis Christi sed rem ipsam amittunt intus cujus est illud Sacramentum ET IDEO SIBI JUDICIUM MANDUCANT ET BIBUNT Here Saint Augustine saith they are guilty NOT BECAUSE THEY RECEIVE BUT BECAVSE THEY RECEIVE NOT THE BODY OF CHRIST Mark well these words Mr. Harding and let others mark them now they are effectual The wicked by St. Augustines judgement are guilty NOT BECAVSE THEY RECEIVE but BECAVSE THEY RECEIVE NOT THE BODY OF CHRIST And if so then I hence inferre That those who willfully neglect to receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper or keep off others from it who desire and presse to receive it are more guilty of the body and bloud of Christ than those who unworthily receive it because they h more neglect contemn despise

and undervalue Christs death and passion represented therein than those who in obedience to his Institution make conscience externally to receive it when administred and do neither externally nor internally Sacramentally nor spiritually receive the body of Christ when as the others who receive unworthily receive it externally and Sacramentally at least in the Elements Which Judas likewise did as Bishop Iewel there asserts out of two Quotations in i St. Augustines writings 3ly Consider that when our Saviour sent forth his Apostles and Ministers who succeed them to preach he gave them this Commission Mark 16. 15 16. Go ye into all the World and preach the Gospel to every creature He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved BVT HE THAT BELIEVETH NOT SHALL BE DAMNED Which is likewise seconded John 3. 18 36. 2 Cor. 2. 15 16. If then the damnation of those who believe not the Gospel preached authorizeth not Ministers or Presbyteries to seclude any unbelieving Christians or other unprofitable hearers from hearing the Word and Gospel read or preached in the Church or elsewhere then by the self-same reason this danger of eating and drinking damnation and being guilty of the Lords body and bloud can be no sufficient Authority Ground or Commission for any Classi● Presbytery or Minister whatsoever to seclude any visible unexcommunicated Church-member from the Lords Supper no more than from the Word preached read prayer or any other sacred Ordinance which * God commands them to frequent which no mortals●may or can without the highest presumption usurpation juridically enjoyn them to abstain from or neglect Seeing we ought herein to obey God rather than men as the Apostle themselves have twice resolved Acts 4. 17 18 19 20 29 30 32. c. 5. 20 21 28 29. c. 42. and Daniel long before them Dan. 6. 5. to 18. All which particulars with what else I shall subjoyn in this Vindication duely considered together with that Commission which every Minister publikely received heretofore at his Ordination when he had this power conferred on him Be thou a faithfull Dispenser of the Word of God and OF HIS HOLY SACRAMENTS Take thou Authority to preach the Word of God AND TO MINISTER THE HOLY SACRAMENTS IN THIS CONGREGATION where thou shalt be so appointed And that solemn promise he then openly made k I will by the help of the Lord GIVE MY FAITHFVL DILIGENCE ALWAYS SO TO ADMINISTER THE DOCTRINE AND SACRAMENTS OF CHRIST AS THE LORD HATH COMMANDED AND THIS REALM HATH RECEIVED THE SAME according to the commandements of God will I hope through Gods blessing on them resolve and determine all those distracting needlesse Controversies touching Suspension of particular Persons or whole Parishes from the Lords Supper and remove all New-erected Bars and Rayles to keep the people from Free-admission and accesse to the Lords Table in all plaees where of late years they have been injuriously sequestred from it and restore the frequent Celebration thereof in remembrance of our Saviours Passion And so much the rather because the very Directory it self as well as our old Common Prayer Book in the Section Of the Celebration of the Communion or Sacrament of the Lords Supper resolves thus in the very first lines The Communion or Supper of the Lord is † frequently to be celebrated But how often may be considered and determined by the Ministers and other Church-Governours of each Congregation as they shall find most convenient for the comfort and edification of the people committed to their charge After which it directs When the day is come for administration the Minister shall make a short Exhortation expressing the inestimable benefits we have by the Sacrament together with the ends and use thereof setting forth the great necessity of having our Comfort and Strength renewed thereby in this our Pilgrimage and Warfare which being the things I plead for I cannot but hope all Ministers of the Church of England will henceforth cordially pursue notwithstanding all former Books Cavils Scruples to disswade them from their duties herein * If there be therefore any consolation in Christ if any comfort of love if any fellowship of the Spirit if any bowels and mercies fulfil ye my joy that ye be like minded having the same love being of one accord of one mind herein * Finally brethren whatsoever things are true whatsoever things are honest whatsoever things are just whatsoever things are pure whatsoever things are lovely whatsoever things are of good report if there be any virtue if there be any praise think on these things Those things which ye have both learned received and heard seen in me do the God of Peace shall be with you The Grace of our Lord Iesus Christ be with you all Amen So prayes your unfe●gned Christian Friend and Brother in the Lord WILLIAM PRYNNE Swainswick Sept. 1. 1656. A Seasonable Vindication of the frequent Administration of the Holy Communion to all Visible Church-members Regenerate or Vnregenerate HAving heretofore in a several Publications from Divine and Humane Authorities of all sorts largely evinced That the holy Communion of the Lords-Supper belongs equally to all and every visible Member of every particular Church capable of self-examination not actually cut off from it by a legal Excommunication be he regenerate or unregenerate That it ought to be now frequently administred in publick to all congregations as it was in the Primitive Church That it is a powerfully Converting as well as a Confirming Ordinance That Christ himself admitted b Judas to it though a Devil Theef Traytor Covetous wretch selling Christ for money to his Crucifiers at its original institution as well as the holiest Apostles That all Ministers are bound by their Office Duty Christs command to administer and all their people of age of discretion often to receive it That none may or ought to be secluded from it but such as are for their Notorious sins actually excommunicated from Church-Communion and all other Ordinances That sole Suspension from this Sacrament by way of Church-censure with free admission to all other publick Ordinances and Examination by Ministers or Presbyters of other mens fitness by way of Jurisdiction before their admission to the Lords Supper are not warranted by any precept or president in Gods word That neither the Ministers who deliver this Sacrament to unworthy Receivers presenting themselves humbly and earnestly to receive it nor such who receive together with them are guilty of their unworthy receiving but themselves alone nor any wayes partakers with them in their sins Answering likewise all Objections to the contrary Which Mr. John Humfrey in his Sermons Vindications of Free-admission to the Lords Supper and Rejoynder to Dr. Drake hath acutely judiciously solidly backed vindicated since with John Timson in The Barre removed and Answer to Mr. Collings and Mr. Saunders And having newly in my Legal resolution of two Important Quaeres of General pres●nt concernment clearly demonstrated