Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
death_n	body_n	flesh_n	soul_n	9,302	5	5.4130	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A06606	A treatise of the iudge of controuersies. Written in Latin, by the R. Father Martinus Becanus of the Society of Iesus, Professour in Diuinity. And Englished by W.W. Gent; De judice controversiarum. English	Becanus, Martinus, 1563-1624.; Wright, William, 1563-1639.	1619 (1619)	STC 1707; ESTC S101284	69,267	198

a Sacrament Luther indeed doth thus define it A Sacrament is a promise annexed to an externall signe Melancthon thus A Sacrament is a rite which hath the commandment of God to which is adioyned a promise of grace that is to say of free reconciliation or remission of sinnes as he explicateth himselfe Caluin in this manner A Sacrament is an outward signe by the which Calu. l. 4. Instit cap. 14. §. ● our Lord doth seale to our consciences the promise of his good will to vnderprop the weaknes of our fayth But verily none of all these definitions are in the Scripture Nay one of them doth not agree with another For Luther in his definition sayth that the promise is of the essence of a Sacrament Melancthon houldeth that it is annexed to the Sacrament But Caluin insinuateth in his that the promise is not annexed to the Sacrament but rather that the Sacrament is annexed and added to the promise and not that the promise is of the effect of Gods good will towards vs. Therefore according to Melancthon thus the promise were to be expressed if any shall receaue the sacramēt of Baptisme or of the Eucharist Him I promise the remission of his sinnes But according to Caluin in this māner God hath promised to you remission of sins and life euerlasting and this promise he declares and seales by the Sacraments Thirdly whatsoeuer is to be thought of these definitions which our Aduersaryes haue newly inuented how will they shew out of the Scripture that they agree to Baptisme and the Eucharist I for my part see not But let vs try One definition is this A Sacrament is a rite which hath a Commandment of God to which is annexed a promise of remission of sins Let our aduersaryes proue out of scripture that this definition is agreeable to the Eucharist Let them proue I say this out of Scripture that the Eucharist hath a promise of remission of sinns annexed vnto it Or that which is all one That God in the Scripture doth promise vs remission of our sinns if we receaue this Sacrament They can neuer proue it For this Sacrament is not ordayned of God to remit a man his sinnes or to make of a wicked man or a sinner a iust holy man but rather it is instituted to the end that it may nourish confirme and increase that iustice grace and sanctity which was in him before he receaued this Sacrament Nay rather it is so farre off from remitting of sinnes as it is pernicious to a sinner if he come to it knowing himselfe guilty of deadly sinne Hence it is of the Apostle to the Corinthians But let a man proue himselfe and so let him eat of that bread and drinke of that chalice for he that eateth and drinketh vnworthily eateth drinketh iudgment to himselfe And Christ in his last supper would not giue the Eucharist to his Apostles before he had washed their feet to the end that he might giue vs to vnderstand that none vnles they be washed pure and free from all mortall sinne are to be admitted to the holy table of our Lord. And the reason is plaine out of the nature of this Sacrament For what is the Eucharist but a kind of spirituall meate and drinke by the which our soule is refreshed and made strong For my flesh sayth Christ is truly meate and my bloud is truly drinke And therefore as corporall meate and drinke doth not profit the body vnles it be aliue euen so neither the Eucharist doth helpe the soule vnles it be voyd of sin which is the death of the soule The third Controuersy is whether exorcismes and other ceremonyes vsed in the Catholike Church may be admitted in Baptisme That Lutherans admit them the Caluinists reiect thē Yet neither of them both can confirme their opinion out Scripture Not the Lutherans because the Scripture in no place maketh mention that such ceremonyes ought to be vsed but only we receaue them from the tradition of the Church Of the which thus S. Augustine writeth By the most ancient tradition of the Church sayth he children are exercised Aug l. 2. de nupt concup cap. 29. and breathed vpon that they may be translated to the kingdome of Christ from the power of darknes Not the Caluinists without it be in this manner No ceremonyes are to be vsed in the Church but those of the which there is expresse command in the Scripture But there is no command of the ceremonyes which the Catholikes vse in Baptisme Therfore such Ceremonyes are not to be vsed But the M●ior is both false and contrary to the Caluinists themselues For the Caluinists do vse many ceremonies in Baptisme of the which there is no command in the whole Suripture such are these 1. That the infant must be baptized before al the people and that it should be on a Sunday or some other day when the people is wont to come togeather 2. That they who bring the infant to be baptized should be asked whether they will promise to instruct the child in fayth and manners after he shall grow to perfect age 3. That a name should be imposed vpon the infant who is baptized 4. That the forme of Baptisme should be pronounced in their country language 5. That the Creed our Lords prayer others also should be recyted Which ceremonyes Caluin prescribeth in a litle booke treating of the forme of ministring the Sacraments But where I pray you is commanded in Scripture Baptisme ought to be ministred Certainly in no place Hence therfore followeth that either they must reiect all those their ceremonyes or els graunt that all those which we vse are not therefore to be condemned because they are not expresly commanded in Scripture The fourth Controuersy Whether those who are baptized of heretikes are to be baptized againe S. Crprian in tymes past who was Bishop of Carthage did affirme it with some others But S. Augustine did deny it and followed that doctrine which was more true the which he did defend by no other meanes then by the Apostolicall tradition practise of the Church For so he writes against the Donatists VVhich custome sayth he to wit that baptisme may not be iterated I beleeue to haue proceeded Aug. l. 2. cont Donat c. 7. out of the Apostolicall tradition And againe That custome which was opposed against Cyprian is to be beleeued to haue receiued it beginning from the Apostolicall tradition to the which Cyprian did not yeald because it seemed to him vtterly destitute of any authority from the Scripture There are many other such like controuersies which cannot be decided out of Scripture alone but they must of necessity haue some other Iudge which heer I will briefly poynt to 1. Whether Baptisme may be giuen by one dipping 2. Whether Christians may worship Sunday in place of the Sabboath 3. Whether our Lady remained a Virgin after her Childbirth 4. Whether S. Peter the Apostle was Bishop

the hairy crowne of them that walke in their sinnes Likewise when the Apostle sayth Epist 4. 11. Ibid. He gaue some Apostles and some Prophets and some Euangelists and some Pastours Doctours His Question was how these names might be distinguished and also what office and function was due to each one What office for the Apostles what for the Prophets what for the Euangelists and what for Pastours and Doctours Moreouer he asked him this that Ibidem 1. Tim. 2. 1. seing the Apostle writeth I desire therefore first of all that obsecrations prayers postulations thanksgiuings be made for all men what difference could be made in these wordes Also what that signified that the Ibid. Rom. 11. 28. Apostle sayth of the Iewes According to the Ghospell indeed enemies for you but according to the election most deare for the Fathers Againe What that other place of S. Paul Ibid. Colo. 2. 18. meant Let no man seduce you willing in the humility and religion of Angells walking in the things which he hath not seene in vaine puffed vp by the sense of his flesh and not holding the head Euodius the Bishop asked of him Epist 98. 99. 1. Pet. 3. 19. what spirit it was of whom S. Peter spake in his first Canonicall Epist In the which spirit comming he preached to them also that were in prison Epist 120. Psal 120. Honoratus also what that speach of our Lord signified Deus Deus meus quare me dereliquisti Moreouer how that other place of Ibid. Eph. 3. 17. S. Paul was interpreted Rooted and founded in Charity that you may be able to comprehend withall the Saints what is the breadth and length and height and depth Who were also the fiue foolish Virgins and who were the wise Mat. 25. 2. Againe what was the outward Ibid. darknesse Matth. 22. 13. And how that place of S. Iohn was vnderstood the word was made flesh Ioan. 1. 14. Simplicianus asked him what that lib 1. ad Simpli quaest ● Rom. 7. 7. place of the Apostle meant where he sayth VVhat shall we say then is the law sinne God forbid and to that vnhappy man that I am who shall deliuer me from the body of this death Ibid. quaest ●● Rom. 9. 10● lib. 2. quaest ● 1. Reg. 10. 10. 1. Reg. 16. 24. What was the meaning of that in S. Paul But Rebecca conceiuing of one copulation of Isaac our Father and all the rest forward to that Vnlesse the Lord of Saboath had left vs seed And how it is sayd in one place that the spirit of our Lord seized vpon Saul seing in another place it is written that a wicked spirit vexed him Ibid. quest 2. 1 Reg. 15. 21. Ibid. quaest 3. And in what sense it is sayd by God in the booke of Kings it repenteth me that I haue made Saul King And againe Whether that vncleane spirit which was in Pythonissa could make Samuel who was dead before come to see Saul and speake with him Also he asked him as concerning Ibid. quaest 5. 3. Reg. 17. 20. that speach of Elias O my Lord what euen the VVidow also by whom I am after a sort susteyned hast thou afflicted that thou would st kill her sonne Now by these questions it appeareth manifestly that the Scripture in many places is obscure and hard to be vnderstood And that many most learned men of whom we haue here made mention confessed themselues not to vnderstand many things without being instructed by more learned then themselues Now therefore let vs go forward in explicating what may be the causes of so great obscurity What are the causes why the Scripture is obscure I find two causes especially The one is drawne from the things themselues which are treated of in the Scripture The other from the manner of treating of them The things of the which the Scripture treateth are of foure kindes 1. Histories as in the booke of Genesis Exodus Numeri Deuteronomi Iosue the bookes of Iudges of Kings Paralipomenon Esdras Iudith Tobias Hester the Machabees also the Ghospel and the Acts of the Apostles Secondly Prophesies such as for the most part are contained in the psalmes in the greater and lesser Prophets and in the Apocalips of S. Iohn Thirdly misteries of our faith especially about the blessed Trinity the Incarnation of Christ about predestination and reprobation about the force and efficacy of the holy Sacraments about the presence of Christ in the Eucharist about iustifying fayth about the Resurection of the dead such like other poynts Fourthly Precepts and morall documents as concerning vertues and vices For albeit that neyther in these nor in histories there is perchance any great obscurity in regard of the things treated of yet notwithstanding there is great obscurity in the prophesies and misteries of fayth For these are aboue mans capacity and vnderstanding so that we 1. Cor. 13. 12. cannot perceiue them but after a darke manner as the Apostle sayth Now the manner of treating of these things oftentymes is obscure for these causes First because there be many improper speaches in the Scripture as figures allegories and parables vnder the whichly hidden many truthes the which are not presently vnderstood of the reader Also the obscurity thereof is increased by some word which is taken sometymes in the same sentence one while properly and another while figuratiuely as in this place for example Euery one that drinketh of this water shall Ioan. 4. 13. thirst againe but he that shall drinke of the water that I will giue him shall not thirst for euer Where to drinke of water and to thirst in the former part of the sentence is taken corporally and in the latter part spiritually And againe in the very same Chapter Do not you say that yet there are Ibid. v. 35. foure monthes and haruest cometh Behould I say to you lift vp your eyes and see the countries that they are white already to haruest For heare in the first place the word haruest is taken in it proper signification but in the latter figuratiuely And againe in the same Apostle Ioan. 9. 39● For iudgment came I into this word that they that see not may see and they that see may become blind where the former part is taken for corporall sight and the latter for spirituall And in S. Paul Him who knew no sinne 2. Cor. 5. 21. for vs he hath made sinne Where sinne in one place is taken properly for sinne but in the other place figuratiuely for a sacrifice offered for sinne for the sense Vide. Orig 3. com in Epist ad Rom. Augu. lib. 2. de consen Euangelist cap. 30. of that place is that it was Gods will that Christ who neuer had sinned should be a sacrifice for the sinne of mankind Secondly not only figures are found in the words as I haue already shewed but also in the very things themselues For one