Selected quad for the lemma: death_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
death_n	body_n	fire_n	soul_n	4,333	5	5.0921	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A10958	The faith, doctrine, and religion, professed, & protected in the realme of England, and dominions of the same expressed in 39 articles, concordablie agreed vpon by the reuerend bishops, and clergie of this kingdome, at two seuerall meetings, or conuocations of theirs, in the yeares of our Lord, 1562, and 1604: the said articles analised into propositions, and the propositions prooued to be agreeable both to the written word of God, and to the extant confessions of all the neighbour churches, Christianlie reformed: the aduersaries also of note, and name, which from the apostles daies, and primitiue Church hetherto, haue crossed, or contradicted the said articles in generall, or any particle, or proposition arising from anie of them in particular, heereby are discouered, laid open, and so confuted. Perused, and by the lawfull authoritie of the Church of England, allowed to be publique.	Rogers, Thomas, d. 1616.; Rogers, Thomas, d. 1616. English creede.	1607 (1607)	STC 21228; ESTC S116041	208,079	284

God I cried vnto thee and thou hast healed mee Thou Lord hast brought my soule out of Hell I will thanke thee ô Lord my God with all my heart will praise thy name for euermore For great is thy mercie towards mee thou hast deliuered my soule frō the nethermost hell In that he ascended what is it but that he had also descended first into the lowest parts of the earth He that descended is euen the same that ascended farre aboue all heauens that he might fill all things O death where is thy sting O hell where is this victorie Also that Christ went downe into Hell all sound Christians both in former daies and now liuing doe acknowledge howbeit in the interpretation of the article there is not that consent as were to be wished some holding that Christ descended into Hel. 1. As God onely and not man as they doe which say how Christ descended powerfully and effectually but not personally into hell and that the deitie exhibited it selfe as it were present in the infernall parts to the terror of the deuill and other damned spirits 2. As the man onely and that as some thinke in body onely as when death as it were preuailed ouer him lying in the graue as others deeme in Soule onely when he went vnto the place of the reprobate to the increasing of their torments 3. As God and man in one person as they do which affirme that Christ in bodie and soule went some thinke as it were into Hell when vpon the Crosse and els where he suffered the terrors and torments prophecied of Esay 53. v. 6.10 Psal. 116. v. 2. and mentioned Matth. 26. v. 38. or 27. v. 46. Luk. 22. v. 42. some say euen into Hell the verie place destinied for the Reprobate which he entred into the very moment of his Resurrection at which time hee shewed and declared himselfe a most glorious conqueror both of death and Hell the most powerfull enemies Errors adversaries vnto this truth But till wee know the natiue and vndoubted sense of this article and mysterie of religion persist wee adversaries vnto thē which say That Christ descended not into hell at all calling this article an error and a fable as Carlile doth That Christ beeing dead descended into the place of euerlasting torments where in soule he indured for a time the very paines which the damned spirits without intermission doe abide Bannisters error That Christ aliue vpon the crosse humbled himselfe Vsque ad inferni tremenda tormenta euen vnto the dreadfull torments of hell endured for a time those torments quales reprobi in aeternū sensuri sunt which the reprobates shall euerlastingly suffer in hell euen despaired of Gods mercie finding God at this time Non Patrem sed Tyrennum no a Father but a Tyran and ouercame Despaire by despaire death by death hell by hell and Satan by Satan suffered actually All the torments of hell for our redemption and descended into the heauiest torments that Hell could yeeld suffered the torments of hell The second death Abiection from God and was made a cursse that is had the bitter anguish of Gods wrath in his soule and body which is the fire that shall neuer be quenched That Christ personally in Soule went downe into Lake Lymbo to fetch from thence as Canisius to loose from thēce as Vaux he saith the soules of our forefathers which afore his death as the Papists dreame were shut vp in the close prison of Hell That Christ by his descension hath quite turned Hell into Paradise Costerus the Iesuits error 4. Article Of the Resurrection of Christ. Christ did truly 1 arise againe from death and tooke againe his bodie with flesh bones and all things appertaining to the perfection of mans nature 2 wherewith he ascended into heauen and there sitteth 3 vntill he returne to iudge all men at the last day The propositions 1. Christ is risen from the dead 2. Christ is ascended into heauen 3. Christ shall come again at the last day to iudge all men euen the quick and the dead 1. Proposition Christ is risen from the dead The profe from Gods word THe resurrection of Christ may easily be prooued from the holy Scriptures in which it is euident first that Christ should and next that hee did rise from death vnto life both by his appearing to Marie Magdalene to diuers women to two to tenne to all the disciples f to moe then 500. brethren at once to sundry persons by the space of 40 daies together and by the testimonie also of the Apostles Peter Paul A truth both beleeued and acknowledged by Gods people from age to age Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Vtterly false then and vnchristian is the opinion of those men Which vtterly denie the resurrection of any flesh as did the Sadduces the false Apostles Simon Magus and the Manichies Which would acknowledge no resurrection of Christ as would not nor will the Iewes nor heretike Hamant nor Dauid Georg one of whose errors was that the flesh of Christ was dissolued into ashes and so rose no more which affirme as did Cerinthus that Christ shall rise againe but yet is not risen Which say how our Sauiour after his resurrection was so deified as he reteined no more the parts and properties of his bodie and soule nor the vnion of both natures but is meerely God So thought the Schwenkfeldians Which take the Resurrection of Christ to be but an allegorie and no true and certaine historie as doe the Familie of Loue 2. Proposition Christ is ascended into heauen The proofe from Gods word In saying how Christ with his bodie is ascended into heauen and there sitteth and abideth we doe agree with the Prophets Euangelists and Apostles with the ancien fathers and Gods people our brethren throughout all Christendome Errors and adversaries vnto this truth But we altogether dissent From Hamant the English heretike which denied the ascension of Christ Also from Ket the heretike and Apostata which likewise denied our Sauiours asscension affirming that his humane nature is not in heauen but in Iudaea gathering a Church and people Also from the Germane Vbiquitaries and Papists they saying that Christ as man is not onely in heauen but in earth too at this instant wheresoeuer the deitie is these affirming the humane nature of Christ is wheresoeuer the Sacrament of the Altar is administred Also from the Montanists Cataphrygians and Carpocratians who held how Christ not in body but in soule ascended into heauen From the papists who say that Christ ascending into heauen carried with him the soules which he loosed from captiuitie and bondage of the deuill euen the soules of the righteous afore that time were not in heauen

Manichians which baptize not any Not false christians or Marcionites which did baptise the liuing for the dead Which Marcionites also denied Baptisme vnto all married persons baptized none but persons single virgins widdowes and women diuorced from their husbands Not Originists who maintaine a Baptisme by fire as also that after the resurrectiō of our bodies wee shall haue neede of Baptisme Not of Matthewe Hamants opinion that Norfolke Heretike which stood in it to the death that Baptisme is not necessarie in the Church Not Anabaptists which number Baptisme among things indifferent and so to be vsed or refused at our discretion Not Familists which say there is no true Baptisme but onely among themselues Nor Papists who both baptise Bels Babels as afore hath bin showen art 25. prop. 10 and also make the vowe and profession of the monachall or life of a Monch as good a token of Christians as Baptisme 2. Proposition Baptisme is a signe or seale of the regeneration or newe birth of Christians The proofe from Gods word Baptisme of S. Paul is called the washing of the newe Birth of others the Sacrament of the newe birth to signifie how they which rightly as all doe not receiue they the same are ingrafted into the body of Christ as by a seale be assured frō God that their sinnes be pardoned and forgiuen and themselues adopted for the children of God confirmed in the faith and doe increase in grace by virtue of praier vnto God And this is the constant doctrine of all Churches protestant and reformed The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth But no part of the true Church thinketh as did manie old haeretickes viz. that The baptized of the orthodoxall ministers are to be rebaptized as said the Nouatians Originall sinne is not pardoned in Infants as said the Pelagians because they haue no such sinne in them at all Onely sinnes past and not sinnes future or not yet committed are by Baptisme clensed as the Messalians held Being once Baptized we can no more be tēpted as thought the Iouians which was the error also of the Pelagians The Baptsme of water is now ceased and the Baptisme of voluntary blood by whipping is come in place thereof without which none can be saued as the Flagelliferians published Wee also condemne the opinion Of the Russeis that there is such a necessitie of Baptisme as that all that die without the same are damned Also of the Bannisterians which say that the water at Baptisme is not holy in respect that it is applied to an holy vse that the ordinarie and common washings among the Turkes and Iewes is the same to them that Baptisme is to vs Likewise of the Familie of Loue which conceiue basely of this Sacrament calling it in derision Elementish water and of no better validitie or virtue then common water Also of the Anabaptists who ascribe no more vnto Baptisme then vnto any other thing ciuilly discerning one man from another and say that the Sacraments of the newe Testament are no instruments to raise or confirme faith And lastly of the Papists who maintaine that Baptisme serueth to the putting away of originall sinne onely Baptisme bringeth grace euen ex opere operato 3. Proposition Infants and young children by the word of God are to be baptized The proofe from Gods word Although by expresse tearms wee be not cōmanded to baptize young children yet wee beleeue they are to be baptised and that for these among other reasons 1. The grace of God is vniuersall and pertaineth vnto all Therefore the signe or Seale of grace is vniuersall and belongeth vnto all so well young as old 2. Baptisme is vnto vs as Circumcision was vnto the Iewes But the Infants of the Iewes were circumcised Therefore the children of Christians are to be baptized 3. Children belong vnto the kingdome of heauen and are in the couenant therefore the signe of the couenant is not to be denied them 4. Christ gaue in commandement that all should be baptized Therefore young children are not to be exempted 5. Christ hath shed his blood aswell for the washing away the sinnes of children as of the elder sort Therefore it is very necessarie that they should be partakers of the Sacrament thereof All Christian churches allowe of the Baptisme of infants Adversaries vnto this truth The premises declare that They slander vs which say That all Protestants denie the Baptisme of children to be necessarie and this is Runnagate Hills report They erre which oppugne this truth as doe many persons but not after one and the same sort For. Some vtterly denie that Infants or young children are to be baptized so did the Pelagians the Heracleons and the Henricians and so doe the Anabaptists whereof said some how baptisme is the inuention of Pope Nicholas and therefore naught others that Baptisme is of the deuill So thought Melchior Hoffeman so also doe the Swermerians a set among the said Anabaptists the Seruetians and the Familie of Loue which doth hold that none should be baptized vntill hee be thirtie yeares old Others refuse to baptise not all but some Infants So denied is Baptisme by the Barrowists vnto the seede of whores and witches by the Brownists vnto the children of open sinners by the the Disciplinarians vnto their children which subiect not themselues as Dud. Fenner saith vnto the discipline of the Church or obey not the Presbyteriall decrees Others allow the Baptisme of Infants yet thinke those Infants not lawfully baptized which are baptized either by the newe ministers of the Church of England as the Brownists doe thinke or by Protestant ministers as the Papists are of minde witnesse their rebaptizing of Infants in France and in Netherland or by vnpreaching ministers as the disciplinarian Puritanes doe hold And others are of opinion that none are to be baptized which beleeue not first Hence the Anabaptists Infants beleeue not therefore be not to be baptized Hence the Lutherans Infants doe beleeue Therefore to be baptized 28. Article Of the Supper of the Lord. The Supper of the Lord is not only 1 a signe of the loue that Christians ought to haue among themselues one to another but rather 2 it is a Sacrament of our redemption by Christs death Insomuch that to such as worthily with Faith receiue the same the Bread which we breake is a partaking of the Body of Christ and likewise the Cuppe of blessing is a partaking of the Blood of Christ. 3 transubstantion or the change of the substance of Bread and wine in the Supper of the Lord canot be proued by holy writ but is repugnant to the plaine words of Scripture ouerthroweth the nature of a Sacrament and hath giuen occasion to many superstitions 4 The Body of Christ

Mosaicall decalogue is naturall morall and perpetuall is their doctrine 4. Proposition The Iudiciall lawes of the Iewes are not necessarily to be receiued or established in any Common wealth The profe from Gods word The truth hereof appeareth by the Apostles decree which sheweth wherevnto onely the primitiue church necessarily was tied By the Apostles doctrine which enioyneth Christians to yeeld obediēce vnto the ordināces of their lawfull gouerners and commanders whosoeuer By the Apostles example and namely of the blessed S. Paul who tooke benefit and made good vse of the Romane and Emperiall lawes Adversaries vnto this truth This truth neither is nor euer was oppugned by any Church Only among our selues some thinke vs necessarily tied vnto all the Iudicials of Moses as the Brownists For they say The lawes Iudiciall of Moses belong as well vnto Christians as they did vnto the Iewes Others that wee are bound though not vnto all yet vnto some of the Iudicialls as holdeth T.C. and Philip Stubs 5. Proposition No Christian man whosoeuer is freed from the obedience of the law Morall The proofe from Gods word Thinke not that I am come to destroy the Lawe or the Prophets I am not come to destroy them but to fulfill them For truly I say vnto you saith our Sauiour Christ till heauen and earth perish one iot or one title of the law shall not scape till all things be fulfilled whosoeuer therefore shall breake one of these least commandements and teach men so shall be called the least in the kingdome of heauen c If thou wilt enter into life keepe the commandements c. Thou shalt nor kill thou shalt not commit adulterie thou shalt not steale thou shalt not beare false witnesse Honour thy father and thy mother Doe wee make the lawe of none effect through faith God forbid yea we establish the Lawe Circumcision is nothing and vncircumcision is nothing but the keeping of the Commandements of God The publike confessions of the Churches of God in France and Belgia agree with this Doctrine The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Whereby are condemned as most wicked and vnsond the opinions Of the Manichies who found fault with the whole Lawe of God as wicked and prooceeding not from the true God but from the Prince of darkenes Of Brownist Glouer whose opinion was that Loue now is come in the place of the tenne commandements Of Iohannes Islebius and his followers the Antinonies who will not haue Gods lawe to be preached nor the consciences of sinners to be terrified and troubled with the iudgements of God Of Banister among our selues who held how it is vtterly euill for the Elect so much as to thinke much lesse to speake or heare of the feare of God which the Law preacheth 8. Article Of the three Creedes 1 The three Creedes Nicene creede Athanasius creede and that which is commonly called the Apostles creede ought thoroughly to be receiued and beleeued For 2 they may be prooued by most certaine warrants of holy Scripture The propositions 1. The Nicen Athanasian and Apostolicall Creedes ought to be receiued and beleeued 2. The three creedes viz. the Ni. Athan. and of the Apostles may be prooved by the holy Scripture 1. Proposition The Nicen Athanasian and Apostolicall Creedes ought to be receiued and beleeued THis Proposition the Churches of God both aunciently and in these daies doe acknowledge for true The adversaries vnto this truth Therefore much out of the way of Godlinesse are they which tearme the Apostles Creede A forged patcherie as Barrowe doth and Athanasius Sathanasius creede so did Gregorius Paulus in Polouia and in the newe Arrians and Nestorians in Lituania My selfe some ●8 yeares agoe heard a great learned man whose name vpon an other occasion afore is expressed to whose acquaintance I was artificially brought which in private conference betweene him and my selfe tearmed worthy Zanchius a Foole an Asse from his booke de tribus Elohim which refuteth the newe Arrians against whose sounders the Creedes of Athanasius and Nicene were deuised Him attentiuely I heard but could neuer since abide for those wordes in deede I neuer sawe him since 2. Proposition The three Creedes viz. the Ni. Athan. and of the Apostles may be prooued by the holy Scripture The proofe from Gods word Than this assertion nothing is more true For the Creedes I meane these three Creedes speake first Of one and the same God whom wee are to beleeue is for essence but one in persons three viz. the Father the Creator the Sonne the Redeemer the holy Ghost the sanctifier Next of the people of God which we must thinke and beleeue is The holy and Catholike Church The communion of Saints Pardoned of all their sinnes And appointed to arise from death and to enioy eternall life both in body and soule Aduersaries vnto this truth Therefore wee are enemies to all adversaries of this doctrine or any whit of the same in them comprised whether they be Atheists Iewes Sadduces Ebionites Tretheites Antitrinitarains Apollinarians Arrians Manichies Nestorians Origenians Turkes Papists Familists Anabaptists or whosoeuer 9. Article Of Originall or Birth sinne 1 Originall sinne standeth not in the follwing of Adam as the Pelagians doe vainely talke but 2 it is the fault corruption of the nature of euery man that naturally is engendred of the offspring of Adam whereby man is very far gone from originall righteousnesse and is inclined to evill so that the flesh lusteth against the spirit and therefore in euery person borne into the world it deserueth Gods wrath and damnation 3 And this infection of nature doth remaine yea in them that are regenerated whereby the lust of the flesh called in Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 VVhich some doe expound the wisedome some the Sensuallitie some the affection some the desire of the flesh is not subiect to the law of God And although there is no condemnation for them that beleeue and are baptised yet the apostle doth confesse that 4 Concupiscence and Lust hath of it selfe the nature of sinne The propositions 1. There is Originall sinne 2. Originall sinne is the fault and corruption of the nature of euery man c. 3. Originall sinne remaineth in God his deere children 4. Concupiscence euen in the regenerate is sinne 1. Proposition There is Originall sinne The proofe from Gods word In the holy Scripture we finde of Originall sinne the cause the subiect and the effects the cause thereof is Adams fall partly by the subtill suggestions of the deuill partly through his owne freewill and the propagation of Adam his corrupted nature vnto his seede and posteritie Except a man be borne againe he cannot see the kingdom of God saith our Sauiour Christ As by one man sinne entred into the world and death by sinne and so death

are to be admitted into the ministery They are causes which indeede are none to debarre men from the ecclesiasticall function as if men haue bin twice married an error of the Russeis be married haue had certaine wiues haue not receiued the Sacrament of Confirmation haue bin baptized of Heretikes these may not be Priests say the Papists or if either they haue not bin trained vp in the Familie or be not Elders in the said Familie of Loue 24. Article Of speaking in the Congregation in such a tongue as the people vnderstand not It is a thing plainely repugnant to the word of God and the custome of the primitiue Church to haue publike prayer in the Church or to minister the Sacraments in a tongue not vnderstood of the people The proposition Publike praier and the Sacraments must be ministred in a tongue vnderstood of the common people The proofe from Gods word THis assertion needeth small proofe For who so is perswaded as all true Christians of vnderstanding are that what is done publikely in the Church by a strange language not vnderstood of the people profiteth not the Congregation edifieth not the weake instructeth not the ignorant inflameth not the zeale offendeth the hearers abuseth the people dipleaseth God bringeth religion into contempt easily will thinke that where the praiers be said or the Sacraments administred in a tongue not vnderstood of the vulgar sort neither is the word of God regarded nor the custome of the purer primitiue Church obserued This article no church doth doubt of and very many by their extant Confessions doe allow Aduersaries vnto this truth But their is nothing either so true or apparent which hath by all men at any time bin acknowledged So contrary to this truth In old time the Ossens made their praiers vnto God alwaies in a strange language which they learned of Elxeus their founder and the Marcosians at the ministration of Baptisme vsed certaine Hebrew words not to edifie but to terrifie and astonish the mindes of the weake and ignorant people In these daies the Turkes performe all their superstitions in the Arabian language thinking it not onely vnmeete but also an vnlawfull thing for the common sort of persons to vnderstand their Mahometane mysteries The Iacobite preists doe vse a tongue at their church ministrations and meetings which the vulgar people cannot comprehend The diuine Lyturgie among the Russians is compounded partly of the Greeke and partly of the Sclavonian language The Papists will haue all diuine Seruice Praiers and Sacraments and that throughout the world ministred onely in the Latine tongue which but fewe men of the common people doe vnderstand some of them holding that It is not necessary that wee vnderstand our praiers and that praiers not vnderstood of the people are acceptable to God and all of them maintaining that hee is accursed whosoeuer doth affirme how the Masse ought to be celebrate onely in a vulgar tongue 25. Article Of the Sacraments Sacraments ordained of Christ 1 be not onely badges or tokens of Christian mens profession but rather they be 2 certaine sure witnesses and effectuall signes of grace and Gods good will toward vs by which he doth worke inuisibly in vs 3 and not onely quicken but also strengthen and confirme our faith in him 4 There be two Sacraments ordained of Christ our Lord in the Gospell that is to say Baptisme and the Supper of the Lord. Those fiue commonly called Sacraments that is to say 5 Confirmation 6 Penance 7 Orders 8 Matrimony and 9 extreame vnction are not to be compted for Sacraments of the Gospell beeing such as haue growen partly of the corrupt following of the Apostles partly are states of life allowed in the Scriptures but yet haue not like nature of Sacraments with Baptisme and the Lords Supper for that they haue not any visible signe or ceremonie ordained of God 10 The Sacraments were not ordained of Christ to be gazed vpon or to be carried about but that wee should duely vse them 11 And in such onely as worthily receiue the same they haue a wholesome effect or operation but they that receiue them vnworthyly purchase to themselues damnation as Saint Paul saith The propositions 1. The Sacraments ordained of Christ be badges or tokens of our profession which be Christians 2. The Sacraments be certaine sure witnesses and effectuall signes of grace and God his good will toward vs. 3. By the Sacraments God doth quicken strengthen and confirme our faith in him 4. Christ hath ordained but two Sacraments in his holy Gospell 5. Confirmation is no Sacrament 6. Penance is no Sacrament 7. Orders is no Sacrament 8. Matrimonie is no Sacrament 9. Extreame vnction is no Sacrament 10. The Sacraments are not to be abused but rightly to be vsed of vs all 11. All which receiue the Sacrament receiue not therewithall the things signified by the Sacraments 1. Proposition The Sacraments ordained of Christ be badges or tokens of our profession which be Christians The proofe from Gods word THe Sacraments are badges or tokens both of Christians and of Christianitie Of Christians For by them are visibly discerned the faithfull from Pagans and Christians Iewes Turkes and all prophane Atheists Of Christianitie For as Circumcision in the old Lawe was a token how the corrupt and carnall affections of the minde should be subdued and that the Lord required not so much an outward of the Body as an inward circumcision of the heart so Baptisme telleth vs that being once dead vnto sinne wee are to liue vnto righteousnes that all wee which haue bin baptized vnto Iesus Christ haue bin baptized into his death c. and must walke in newnesse of life c. for wee haue put on Christ by Baptisme And as the Paschall Lambe was to the Iewes a token that the flight of sinne should alwaies be fresh in memorie and that it should be celebrated not with old Leauen neither in the Leauen of maliciousnes but with the vnleauened bread of synceritie and truth so the participation of one Loafe and of one Cuppe in the Lord his Supper doth commend vnto our consideration a sweete concord a brotherly vnanimitie and a constant continuance in the true worship of God without fauouring of Idolatrie in ay respect This doe the godly in al their Churches and throughout the word both teach and testifie The Adversaries vnto this truth Vngodly therefore and in a cursed state are they which equall other things with the Sacraments to discerne Christians from Pagans So the Iacobites imprint the signe of the Crosse on their Armes Foreheades c. to be knowen for Christians which contemne the Sacraments as of none account Soe doe the Anabaptists Ther be saith D. Sarania which hold how the Sacraments were to be administred onely at the first plāting of the Church by the

and by thy feete all the Angels Archangells Patriarches Prophets Apostles Euāgelists Martyrs Confessours Virgins Widdowes Infants heale thee The Minister therof vsually is a priest but may be any other Christian. The effect of annoiling is to purge and put away veniall sinnes committed by mispending of our senses as also sinnes forgotten In this antichristian doctrine many errors be contained For In respect of the matter the Papists make of greasie matter a spiritual ointment whereas there is none ointment spirituall but the holy Ghost In respect of the forme the onely propitiator and mediatour betweene God and man Christ Iesus is blasphemed and the merit and power of his death ascribed vnto greasie oile Besides Christ is not acknowledged for the onely Sauiour of mankinde and Physitian of our soules but other Physitians be called vpon besides him In respect of the minister they hold how any mā hath power to forgiue sinns which belongeth vnto God alone also that other men yea women and not the minsters of the word onely may be minsters of the Sacraments In respect of the effect they teach vs which is vtterly vntrue that neither all sinnes be mortall nor that Christ hath cleansed such as be his from all their sinnes by his pretious blood 10. Proposition The Sacraments are not to be abused but rightly to be vsed of vs all The proofe from Gods word In the word of God the right vse of the Sacraments and the ends of their institution are euidently set downe For Concerning Baptisme Christ hee saith Teach all nations baptizing them c Hee that shall beleeue and be baptized shall be saued Touching the Lord his Supper saith our Sauiour of the Bread take eate c. and of the Cup Drinke yee all of it and S. Paul The cup of blessing which wee blesse is not the communion of the blood of Christ The bread which wee breake is not the communion of the body of Christ This truth doe the Chruches reformed by their Confessions subscribe vnto The errors adversaries vnto this truth Then greatly doe they sinne who either doe not vse the Sacraments either at all as doe the Schwenfeldias or minister them but vnto whome they list so is Baptisme of the Seruetians and Anabaptists ministred onely vnto elder persons denied vnto Infants and so is the same Sacrament of the Marcionites ministred vnto single persons but denied vnto married folkes or doe abuse them So abused is baptisme by them who baptise things without reason yea some times without life or sense so haue the Papists baptized both Bells and Babels as the greater Bell of S. Iohn de Lateran at Rome by Pope Iohn the 14. who named it Iohn after his owne name and the great Bell of Christ church in Oxford which D. Tr●sham the Vice chancellor named Mary Babells as the Duke of Aluar cheife Standare which hee vsed in the Lowe countries was baptized by Pius Quintus An. 156● and called Margaret by the said Pope and so the Cataphrygians baptized the dead bodies of men Againe Baptisme was Baptized by the Marcionites when they baptized the liuing for the dead also by the No●uatian and Papists when they rebaptized infants afore baptized as they tearmed them by Heretikes And so abused was the Lords Supper by certaine Heretikes condemned in a Councell at Carthage whose manner was to thurst the Sacrament into the mouthes of dead men and is by the Papists whose gift is to vse it magically as a salue against bodily si●knes and aduersitie also to carrie the same about pompously and superstitiously in the open streetes to be adored of the beholders 11. Proposition All which receiue the Sacraments receiue not therewithall the things signified by the Sacraments The proofe from Gods word Wee read in the holy Scripture that Some persons doe receiue the Sacraments and the things signified by the Sacraments which are the remission of sinnes and other spirituall graces from God and so receiued was the Sacrament of Baptisme of Cornelius and the Lords Supper of the good disciples and the godly Corinthians Some againe receiue the sacraments but not the things by them signified so receiued was Baptisme of Sunon Magus and the Lords Supper of Iudas and so receiue the Atheists Libertines and impenitent persons And some receiue not the Sacraments at all and yet are partakers of the things by the Sacraments signified such a communicant was the Theife vpon the Crosse This maketh vs to conceiue well both of those men and womē which would and yet cannot communicate in the publike and Christian assemblies and of the children of Christian parents which depart this world vnbaptized Furthermore it is apparent how Saluation is promised to such as are baptized yet not simply in respect of their baptisme but if they doe beleeue Againe S. Paul faith whosoeuer shall eate the bread or drinke the cuppe of the Lord Vnworthily shall be guiltie of the body and blood of Christ And this the purer Churches euery where doe acknowledge The adversaries vnto this truth The Papists therefore be in a wrong opinion which deliuer that The Sacraments are not only Seales but also causes of grace and The Sacraments doe giue grace euen because they be deliuered and receaued ex opere operato 26. Article Of the vnworthinesse of the Ministers which hinder not the effect of the Sacraments Although in the visible Church the euill be euer mingled with the good and sometime the euill haue chiefe authoritie in the ministration of the word and Sacraments yet forasmuch as they doe not the same in their owne name but in Christs and doe minister by his commission and authoritie 1 wee may vse their ministerie both in hearing the of God and in the receiuing the Sacraments Neither is the effect of Christs ordinance taken away by their wickednes nor the grace of Gods gifts diminished from such as by faith and rightly doe receiue the Sacraments m●nistred vnto them which are effectuall because of Christs institution and promise although they be ministred by euill men Neuerthelesse it appertaineth to the discipline of the Church that 2 enquirie be made of euill ministers and that they be accused by those that haue knowledge of their offenses and finally being found guiltie by iust iudgement be deposed The propositions 1. The effect of the word and Sacraments is not hindred by the badnes of ministers 2. Euill Ministers are to be searched out convicted and deposed but orderly and by the discipline of the Church 1. Proposition The effect of the word and Sacraments is not hindered by the badnes of Ministers The proofe from Gods word OF the ministers ecclesiasticall the Church is to conceiue neither to sinisterly as though their vnworthines could make the word and Sacraments the lesse effectuall to such as worthily doe heare and receiue them nor on the

is giuen taken and eaten in the Supper onely after an heauenly and spirituall manner and the meane wherby the Body of Christ is receiued and eaten in the Supper is Faith 5 The Sacrament of the Lords Supper was not by Christs ordinance reserued carried about lifted vp or worshipped The Propositions 1. The supper of the Lord is a signe of the loue that Christians ought to haue among themselues 2. The Lords Supper is a Sacrament of our redemption by Christs death and to them which receiue the same worthily by Faith a partaking of the Body and Blood of Christ. 3. The Bread and Wine in the Lords Supper be not changed into another substance 4. The Body of Christ is giuen taken and eaten after an heauenly and spirituall not after a carnall sort 5. To reserue carrie about lift vp or worship the Sacrament of the Lords Supper is contrary to the ordinance of Christ. The Propositions 1. Proposition The Supper of the Lord is a signe of the loue that Christians ought to haue among themselues The proofe from Gods word THe Supper of the Lord is a token of the loue that Christians ought to haue among themselues For which cause it is called the Lords table the Lords Supper a communion of the body of Christ and they that partake thereof though they be manie yet are but one bread and one body This is the doctrine of all Christian Churches The errors adversaries vnto this truth So thinke not those men who either with heretike Hamant denie the vse of the Lords Supper to be necessarie or with the Rhemists raile on it and the Protestants that vse the same calling it a prophane and detestable Table the Cuppe of deuills 2. Proposition The Sacrament of the Lords Supper is Sacrament of our redemption by Christs death and to them which receiue the same worthily by Faith a partaking of the Body and blood of Christ. The proofe from Gods word The Sacrament of the Lords Supper is to all Christians a Sacrament of our redemption by Iesus Christ. For. This is my blood of the newe Testament which is shedde for many for the remission of sinnes this is my body which is giuen for you c. This cuppe is the newe Testament in my blood which is shedde for you saith our Sauiour And to such as receiue the same worthily and by Faith it is the partaking of the Body and Blood of Christ This is a truth openly both maintained testified by the neighbour Churches Errors Adversaries to this truth Diuersly hath this proposition bin oppugned For Some either denying or not acknowledging the benefite of so heauenly a Sacrament doe say how It is to be receiued onely for obedience sake to the princes commandement but is of none effect to the perfect ones An opinion of the Families It doth neither good nor hurt to the receiuers The Messalians error It doth much hurt and no good to participate the Lords Supper among Protestants say the Papists It is no signe assuring vs that all our sinnes through Christ are pardoned For onlie veniall and mortall sinnes are thereby remitted and we must alwaies doubt of the forgiuenesse of our sinnes say the same Papistes Others doe teach that It can profit such as haue no faith as Babes and Infants in which error be the Russians yea the dead bodies of men It can benefit such as receiue it not at all if on there behalfe it be administred as persons absent vpon the Seas in the warres yea and dead and present too when yet they participate not but the Priest for them These errors the Papistes defend 3. Proposition The bread and VVine in the Lords Supper be not changed into another substance The proofe of Gods word Transsubstantiation or the change of the substance of Bread and Wine in the Supper of the Lord we do vtterly deny and the reasons moouing vs thereunto are for that it is repugnant to the plaine words of the Scripture For I will not drinke hencefoorth of this fruite of the Vine saith our Sauiour Christ Which fruite had it really bin either the Blood or by way of concomitance the very Body and blood of Iesus Christ then our Lord had eaten himselfe which is not only blasphemous to be spoken but also impossible to be done and directly against the word of God where commandement is often giuen that the blood with flesh not of Beast much lesse of man must not be eaten The heauen must containe Iesus Christ vntill the time that all things be restored saith S. Peter If Christ therefore corporally according to his humanitie be in heauen then is he not in the Sacrament As often as ye shall eate this Bread not Christ his reall Body and drinke this Cuppe not the reall Blood of Christ you shewe the Lords death till he come saith S. Paul Therfore hee is not come which hee must be being vnder the formes of Bread and Wine Transubstātiatiō besides ouerthroweth the nature of the Sacrament For where there is no Element there can be no Sacrament Because Gods word comming vnto the element maketh a Sacrament Finally it hath bin the occasion of much superstition and Idolatrie For from hence proceeded the Reseruation of the Transubstantiated bread for sundrie superstitious purposes hence the adoration of the Bread euen as God himselfe and that both of Priest and people hence the carrying about in pompous procession of the wafer-God and hence the Popish feast called Corpus Christi-day The right consideration hereof hath mooued all the Churches reformed to shewe their detestation hereof both by their Sermons and wrightings The adversaries vnto this truth Abhominable therefore be the Popish errors viz. that In the Eucharist there is n●t the substance of Bread and wine but onely the meere accidents and qualities Substantially and really the Body and Blood together with the soule and diuinitie of our Lord Iesus Christ and therefore Christ is contained in the Sacrament Eucharisticall Vnder each kind and vnder euery part of each kinde seuerally whole Christ is comprised After the consecration in the wonderfull Sacrament of the Eucharist the Body and blood of our Lord Iesus Christ is and that not onely in the vse while it is taken but afore also and after in the Hosts or consecrated peices reserued or remaining after the Communion In the holy Sacrament Christ the onely begotten Sonne of God is to be adored with the very worship of Latria Marcus also that detestable heretike held that the wine of the Lords Supper was conuerted into blood 4. Proposition The Body of Christ is giuen taken and eaten after an heauenly and spirituall not after a carnall sort The proofe from Gods word The regenerate haue in them a double life one carnall the other spirituall The life carnall and temporarie they brought with them into this