to all men according to his dâ—iâ—t eternall life where as the Scripture speaking of all comming before him gives us to understand it in a larger sense namely that as in his call many are by discoveries of his grace drawn in to beleeve on him and so given up to him and receive eternall life in and with him so they that refuse and rebell shall yet one day by his power given him by vertue of his ransome come before him bow to him and acknowledge him Lord before he passe the sentence on them Isay 45.22 23. Rom 14.9 10 11 12. Phil. 2.7 to 10.11 So that the same abuses as before may here be noted ☞ 1. 3. The word For 2 Cor. 5.14 15. Rom. 4.25 and 5.8 page 28 29. 2 Tim. 2.6 Mat. 20.28 and 26.28 Luke 22.20 page 49 50. This word For where it is Hee dyed for all or many for thee for us and the like The nature and force of the word For saith he is very significant It signifies interest propriety and carrieth the force of promise performance in it unto the persons concerned therein and this sense he explicateth thus They have an interest or propriety in the glory vertue power life and riches of his death yea he after puts in specialty right enjoyment In which expressed sense of his as set down page 28 29. and 49 50 There is much darknesse and un Scripture like language in it for the dying of Christ was but once in his own person as the publike man to fulfill truth and satisfie justice and it is over and past and he is not now so dying nor can dye any more Rom. 6.9 10. Rev. 1.18 Besides had he not risen and overcome death Wee had yet been in our sinner and our faith vain and perished when our bodyes dye 1 Cor. 15.17 18. Yea and however his death is exceeding precious and fruitfull yet the vertue of it for eternall life glory riches c. is in Scripture language ratherest put upon his resurrection ascension and glory with which the Father hath glorified him and his everliving to intersede Asts 13.33 34.38 39. â— Rom. 5.10 and 6.10 and 8.2 34. Heb. 7. and 8 and 9. and 10.1 Peter 10 â— Col. 1.19 and 2.3 9. But his death in the vertue of it as he is risen and is with the vertue of it gone into the holy of holyest and hath there presented before God the Father and offered himselfe by the eternall Spirit to God a ransome and spotlesse sacrifice and so fat down by vertue thereof a Mediatour so his death in the vertue of it is remaining and perpetuall Heb. 9.12 14.15 and thus it appears by his after writing page 189. he is to be understood and so if wee mind that which is generall and common to the nature of man his sense as first set down without his explication hath a truth in it that as he tooke that very nature that all mankind hath and dyed in that nature for sinnes and rose for just fication and ascended and gave himselfe a ransome to God for all and by vertue thereof is the man the Mediator between God and men so all in that nature have a speciality of interest a bove the fallen Angels and so have their lives by him Acts 17.27 28. John 6.33 And have mercy and life prepared in him and so a right to looke and come to him in the meanes that he useth John 1.4 5. And a promise that in so turning and comming in to him he will save them c. Porv. 1 22 23 24. Isay 45.22 whence they that deny him in his call and follow still on for lying vanities are said to deny him that bought them 2 Peter 2.1 To forsake their own mercies Jona 2.8 To loosse their own soules Mate 16 26. to bring upon themselves swift destruction 2 Peter 2.1 and so even such to perish for whom Christ dyed 1 Cor. 8.11 But when they are so given up and perish they have lost their interest that once was theirs and are blotted out of the Book of life and so though in agravation of their sinne it may be said stall Christ dyed that is did once dye for them but then For implyes not the remaining vertue of his death in blessed operations nor their present interest therein which they have now deprived themselves of Prov. 1.24 25. But now for his sonse as explicated by him it is very false for it is not in every place so significative for such an interest as he hath explicated that is manifest abundantly in the Scripture 1. Christ dyed for the Ephesians before Paul preached to them and yet before their receit of the Gospell they were without Christ being alians from the common wealth of Israel and strangers from the Covenants of promise having no hope and without God in the world Ephes 2.12 which had not been true if Christ his dying for them had in and by that act of dying only or in that saying For given them such an interest as Mr. Garner affirmeth from the word For. 2. But to proceed he speakes in a plain contradicting language to the Holy Ghost who saith expresly That Christ dyed for the ungodly Rom. 5.6 For the unjust 1 Peter 3.18 And yet saith again as expresly that none such hath any inheritance in the Kingdome of Christ and of God Ephes 5.5 and that such that is while such or as such shall not inherit c. 1 Cor. 6.9 10 Gal. 5.22 And that those who now doe inherit were some times such but then they did not inherit but now they are washed c. and so made meet to inherit 1 Cor. 6.11 Col. 1.12.13 The holy Ghost never fastening the inheritance and such interest on this word or bare act Christ dyed for them But on his gracious application of the vertue of his death and resurrection inabling them to beleeve and making on in Christ Iohn 1.12 so that heerin his sense appeares unsavory in such an affirmation of Christ dying for all But to come closer to him in that wherein hee would strive to wind himselfe out by saying though the word For implyes not such an interest That all have at present yet it implies that at one time or other they shall that are concerned in that word For shall have such an interest I shall therefore let the Scripture appeare 3. That not only the dying but the death of Christ in the vertue of it in his Resurrection Ascension Sacrifice offering with its prevailency with God and spirit and grace received as it is in him the publicke man a purgation fit to purge a Reconciliation to reconcile a medicine to heale a life to enlive food of life to afford eternall life to the eaters and all ready and prepared in him and set forth in the Gospell and men by Christ and his servants called thereto Prov. 9.1 2 3 4 5. Mat. 22.17 So it is affirmed ready yea and many called and invited on this
whether only the materiall blood which in shedding issued out of the body of Christ as the blood he did bleed and that came forth of him when he was circumcised Luke 1.21 and when he was in his agony Luke 22.24 and as some suppose when he was Scurged and when he had a crown of Thornes platted on his head Mark 15.15 17. and when they nayled him on the Crosse and crucified him Mat. 27.35 and when after his death his fide was peirced with a speare Luke 19.34 35. whether this be his meaning by all the blood as the words with that he writ before and after it would so seem and whether this shedding be all the sprinckling he beleeveth or not it remaines doubtfull but as I understand as he tooke flesh and blood when he was made in our nature Heb. 2.14 even so all the abasements sorrowes anguishes and torments he suffered in that nature with all the forementioned being compleated or consummated in his death or dying the whole being his laying down his life for us this all this nothing lesse then this I understand by all the blood that Christ did shed 1 John 3.16 Isay 5.3.1 8. and with all his sufferings the compleating of them in dying I count the shedding of his blood though in this businesse bloodsheeding doth imply the Sacrifice offered whose blood was shed Heb. 9.12.22.26 and yet take in all his sufferings with the vertue thereof in his Sacrifice offered still shedding is not sprinckling but shedding and sprinckling are two distinct things tnd so with out shedding of blood and so offering the sacrifice whose blood was shed there is no remission of sinnes because otherwise there can be no blood to be sprinckled Heb. 9.22 23 26. yet even so also without sprinckling of blood and therein applying the vertue of the sacrifice there is no remission of sinnes purgation of conscience and nature and happy safety received and enjoyed Heb. 9.12 13 14 23. and 12.24 And this is clearly shaddowed and typed out it was not enough for the Passeover that the Lamb was of the first yeare and without blemmish and slain and so the blood shed c. unlesse the blood was offered with a branch of Hysop taken and sprnickled on the two side posts and the upper post of the dore and without which no assurance of a sacrifice Exod. 12.6 7 22 23. nor for cleansing and sanctifying Blood-shedding was not enough if it were not also sprinckled Lev. 8.11 30. and 14 7. nor for taking away any uncleannesse it was not enough that the water of purification was made for all Israel unlesse the particulars defiled were sprinckled with it Num. 19.13 18 19. yea this distinction between blood-shedding and blood-sprinckling is in the Law clearly held forth Exod. 29.16 21 Lev. 1.5 and 4.6 7. Num. 8.7 And come to the Gospell â— may be said of all to that what ever right or part Christ hath in them by vertue of his bloodshed and Sacrifice offered to God yet as Christ saith to Peter John 13.8 If he wash them not they have no part with him 3. Thirdly â—as he hath set down his proposition darkly and unprofitably so he hath set it down subtilly and craftily as a man guilty of some known errour in what he would seeme to maintain in that going about to disprove the distinction between blood-shedding and blood-sprinckling he saith all the blood which Christ did shed is the blood of sprinckling which is fit togull the un-wary leaves roome when the distinction proves sound for him notwithstanding his position to say he ment not to fault the distnction though that be his main drift that he might thirdly disprove another distinction if he could As here is a suspition ofcarnality and ignorance in his understanding of the blood of Christ as it is sprinckled may not some Reader conceive that he would have men to thinke that in the Mosayecall Sacrifices the materiall blood even so such and as it was when shed was sprinckled even so the materiall blood of Christ his body such as it was when shed even such and so materially sprinckled a brave motive for the Romish reservation of rellects and because this can no way be demonstrated and evidenced how it should be so and that it so is therefore all the blood-shedding must needs be sprinckling But to come a little neerer him If blood-shedding had been the sprinckling or if it had or could so have been sprinckled upon any what would it have profited them seeing if Christ be not risen wee are yet in our sinnes our faith vaine and preaching vain 1 Cor. 15.14 17 and the Lord Jesus Christ of whom and whose redemption wee treat hath a spirituall body and is a spirituall man the Lord from Heaven heavenly A quickning spirit 1 Cor. 15.40 49. So now as he hath dyed for our sinnes and rose for our justification and offered himselfe with the vertue of his blood and death a sacrifice to God the Father appearing now in Heaven for us Rom. 4.25 1 Cor. 15.3 4. Heb. 9.12 14.24 when we speake of his blood and death as presented before God in the heaven or applyed to or sprinckled on the hearts and consciencs of men on earth wee understand it spiritually his words even when he speakes of these things are spirit and life and so spiritually to bee understood John 6 63. and so though when we speak of his suffering blood shedding and dying we understand it materially as in a mortall body hee suffered in the flesh and shed materiall blood indeed and dyed for our sinnes and was put to death in the flesh yet as he is risen for our justification and hath overcome death and is gon up to Heaven and hath presented the vertue of his blood which is reall and spirituall before his Father in the Heavens and by the spirit by which he rose from the dead offered himselfe a spotlesse sacrifice to God and obtained eternall redemption Heb. 9.12.14 So when wee speake of the sufferings blood and death of Christ as presented in Heaven to God or applyed on earth to men wee understand it spiritually of the worth vertue and prevailing effecacy thereof with God or men and as the High-priest did once a yeare go into the holy of holiest sprinckled blood on the mercy seat c. and so sanctified the tabernacle and made an atonement for all Israel and this that they might be cleansed legally from all their sinnes Levi. 16.14.15 36.34 and yet they had their sacrifices to come to and sprincklings of blood and of the waters of purification for application which if neglected the neglectors were not personally clean but to be cut off or dye in that their legall uncleannesse Num. 19. to 8. And the fault found in those sacrifices as appertaining to conscience is that they did not make the commers thereunto perfect even so we being fallen and God yet mercifull and willing to shew us favour even at his
nature though clearly delivered as is clear 1 Joh. 3.1.2 3. with Col. 3.3 4. the sayings themselves are a light so called 2 Pet. 1.19 4 Hee saith not that the sayings or the hardnesse of the things in the sayings did lead any to erre no sure if they had become fooles in themselves and beleeved the sayings and attended on God therein they should have had as much knowledge of the things as was meet for them in due season John 8.31 32. Prov. 8 9. But they not beleeving the truth of the sayings because of some things in them beyond their conception they did wrest them to bring them to their own conception and so hurt themselves 5. Hee faith not that all men or gracious men but only such 1. As were unlearned not spiritually inlightened and taught of God and so had not the faith and feare of God ruling in their hearts John 6 44 45. 2 Cor. 2.9 15. 2. Unstable such as did not abide in that which was plainly testified in the Gospell and which also they are at some time perswaded to beleeve John 2.24 3. And did wrest all the other Scriptures to their own destruction they did not so magnifie the love of God in speaking in the Gospell with words of plainnesse and truth for them to understand but tooke his sayings as the speeches of a Barbarian and so they beleeved not the sayings in their own plain repoit for in so beleeving or speaking they had not erred Mat. 2.5 6. But they did wrest mangle adde too or take from frame absurdities raise their own consequences and then make glosses and so wrested the Scripture to their own destruction so that all this rather holdeth forth the plainnesse of the beginning of the Gospell And if it be replyed that Christ spake many things in partables Mat. 13.3 Answer is it is true he did so and yet he spake the beginning of the Gospell clearly John 3.15 19. and the partables expounded to his Disciples are now left upon record for us and so that to us can be no sufficient plea Mat. 13. and Luke 8. But though he did speak many things in parrables before his death and resurrection yet he left in charge with his Disciples to whom he promised and after his ascension did send forth his spirit to teach them all he had said to them Iohn 14.26 that what he told them in darknesse they should speak in the light and what they heard in the eare that to preach on the house tops Mat. 10.17 and is not this given as a reason that the knowledge given them is a light set on a candle-stick that they that enter in may see the light Luke 8.10 16. And have not the Apostles professed to have kept this charge to have used great plainnes of speech not to put a vail over their face 2 Cor. 3.12 13. and to have renounced the hidden things of dishonesty not walking in craftinesse nor handling the word of God deceitfully but by manifestation of the truth commending themselves to every mans conscience in the sight of God 2 Cor. 4.2 and to write none other thing then those to whom they writ did read 2 Cor. 1.13 and so as when they read they might understand their knowledge c. Ephes 3.4 protested before God the things they writ they did not lye Gal. 1.11 20. And shall wee be such fools then to be cheated and drawn from the beleefe of the plain sayings of the spirit in the Gospell by unbeleeving intimations of difficulty to preferre mens painted fancies farre be it VIII He runs most upon reasoning and frameth reasons to find and conclude impossibilities of truth absurdities untruths and contradictions of truth even in the plain sayings of the Holy Ghost page 25 47 111 159 and 172. And so hovers about a text to fashion it for himselfe before he dare meddle with it the particular reasons I shall deale with in answer of his senses forced on many words and his latter conclusions only note this here this is not the way of faith or of a beleever nor yet the way to faith it beseemes Hethens and Pagons for their religion and not Christians It beseems us what ever our Lord hath said to beleeve it true right and good though it be a bove the reach of our reason and not to goe reasoning and inferring and so seek to have reason first satisfied and then beleeve But to beleeve first that reason may be subdued in beleeving till when it cannot be rightly satisfied about the truth and goodnesse of divine things seeing it is naturally an enemy to God Rom. 8.6.7 and must be subdued 1 Cor. 1.18.19.20 and such as have striven to have reason first satisfied have turned from the truth John 6.29 to 66. and this is the way by which the writers of Divinity and Phylosophy dissected have denied the creation and beginning of the world the drowning of the world severall actions of Christ and the resurrection of the body after death they conceit they see so many impossibilities of truth in the sayings so many absurdities and contradictions and they pretend discoveries of mysteries in which they affirm all true so denying the whole foundation of Religion Oh reason unsubdued Oh wisdome of the flesh what an enemy art thou to God I am sorry to see a man of such eminencie so swayed by thee IX He compareth the sayings of God concerning Christ and his workes by him with the sayings of his servants touching men yea and of others also as page 63. not to equalize only the world and all men in their sayings in the largenesse of the extent which yet were too much to equall man with God but to limmit the extent of those words in the sayings of God to the extent in the sayings of men which is very evill and dishonourable to God Isay 40.12 18. and contrary to our expresse rule Heb. 2.8 1 Cor 15.27 from Psalme 8.6 with Iohn 1.2 3 12. Though Mr. Garner hath done this hiddenly X. He limmiteth generall sayings of the spirit for propositions for faith to applicatory sayings of Beleevers by the spirit in profession of faith yea and maketh those applicatory sayings in confession of faith to be the true interpretors and oppeners of the largenesse of the extent of the generall sayings for propositions for faith pages 60 61 68. And by the same way of interpretation there is as much force every way to deny that God created every man because it is said of Israel one God hath created us Mal. 2.20 that all men have sinned because it is said of Israel we have sinned and committed iniquity Dan. 9.5 and of beleevers in many things wee offend all Iames 3.2 That all must dye because it is said of Israel wee must needs dye 2 Sam. 14.14 that all shall be raised because speaking of the Jewes it is said many c. Dan. 12.2 and that all shall come to judgement because it is said in speaking to
mystery he hath unvailed are not all degrees of men and all Nations and all Kindreds of people all persons had he not as good have writ plainly and said All signifies but some of all sorts of men and so have saved himselfe out of that snare of denying persons to be men But if he had so said yet the Scripture would reprove his saying where Paul was preaching Gospell and Christ risen from the dead and that God will judge the world by him and that he hath given assurance thereof to all men or offered them faith a ground to beleeve it in that he hath raised him from the dead how doth he teach us there to understand All men and All Nations see Acts 17.24 God that made the world and all things therein mind how well this suits with Psalme 8.6.10 Heb. 2.6.9 John 1.3.11 Seeing he is the Lord of Heaven and Earth c. compare this with Col. 2.3.9 He giveth to all life and breath and all things and was not all this by Christ who by vertue of his death and ransome is the Lord of all Acts 10.36 Rom. 14.9 now mind verse 26. And hath made of one blood all Nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth so here in respect of the nature the flesh and blood Christ took is no difference so in respect of his death as death was the wages of finne and of his resurrection and offering through which he is become Lord of all so as there is in him a door of hope and he shall be the judge so farre no difference the difference and so the mystery unvailed by the Spirit through the Apostles and not Mr. Knowles and Mr. Garner is in some further thing And all Nations of men is here all men that are in all Nations of all sorts and degrees which also is from his providence according to his purpose as saith the text mind it And hath determined the times before appointed and the bounds of their habitation and now marke the end verse 27. that they should seeke after the Lord if happily they might feel after him and find him note here his gracious end but is there any hope or possibility mind the text though he be not farre from every one of us see here how the word Vs may be stretched to the largest when All is spoken of all while used in the works of God leaves none out and that is a good ground in speaking to and of persons surviving and hearing to leave none out and so the Apostle here doth not after such a large proposition single out himselfe and those of his mind from the residue But in respect of that he had spoken in this equalizeth himselfe to them according to that Phil. 2.6 7. and so Vs is as large as all spoken to yea all at that time living as the text doth manifest verse 18. for in him wee live and move and have our being and that wee may be assured the Apostle puts in himselfe with them in the word Vs see how he applyes the saying of some of their own Poets for wee are also his ofspring c. and on this ground exhorteth to repentance by preaching Gospell and that this shall not be in vain wee have a sure word Psalme 86.9 speaking of God and his workes he saith All Nations whom thou hast made shall come and worship before thee Oh Lord c. which is true and will appear true as a Prophesie at the returne of the Jewes and Christ sitting on his Throne and as a proposition at the great and generall Judgement Isay 45.22 23. Phil. 2.10 11. So that he that will exclude the persons of men or any of them from the death of Christ and his resurrection and this fruit of the same mentioned Acts 17 24-31 and Psalme 86.9 Doth likewise as much exclude their persons or for many persons from being created and preserved by God But had Mr. Garner observed or would any man observe how the Holy Ghost gives us to understand the word All when spoken by God of his workes in and by Christ when of creation when of a restoration by and in a publike man when of Son like priviledges when the word All is in such speeches used as a proposition and when as a prophesie hee should see it in the largest extent the word in such a sentence can beare and that as a ground when his servants speake of the same it is in the largest sense that can be sutable to his servants therefore concerning me and those of my mind Mr. Garner with the approbation of Mr Knowles hath written a notorious and plain un-truth and slander page 57. In saying that by All in Isay 53.6 wee understand all persons from first to last wee have no cause so to do for in that when God speakes of his giving his Sonne to dye for All men he meanes all from first to last is a good ground for men to speak of all men in their time and to whom they speak and so for the Prophet to speak of all Israel But with this slander he hath written as false doctrine in his interpretation that All is only wee who doe enjoy peace with God whereas he meant all Israel as is evident John 8.39 as the Apostle includes unbeleeving Gentils with himselfe and stretcheth All to the utmost a servant may without limmitation Acts 17 24-31 But enough is shown before about the word All which in so many Scriptures is abused by M. Garners Reason and a forced stinted sense put in it ☞ 1. 5. The word Tast in Heb. 2.9 should tast death the naturall meaning of these words he conceives and layeth his conceit for a ground of Doctrine and truth is not his suffering of death but an effect and fruit of his suffering of Death and being crowned with glory and saith he we are to understand the words Tasting death to be a sweetning or rellishing of death a making of death tastfull savory sweet usefull and gainfull page 44. now for answer That Jesus Christ by his death and resurrection hath taken out the sting and curse of the first death so as in it selfe it is to no man a curse nor is able for ever to detain those that dye But they shall be raised and made a live again and so it is made lesse dreadfull more easie and but as passage to immortality to every man is a truth affirmed in Scripture though by Mr. Garner denyed 1 Cor. 15.21 22-54 55 56. 2 Tim. 1.10 though the choyce benefit be to Beleevers Eccles 7 1-8 1 Cor. 15.57 58. so that through the mediation of Christ and only his own personal death is made savory gainfull to them Rom. 5 8-10 Rev. 1.5 1 John 1.7 but their-through even their own dyings also 2 Cor. 4.11 to 18. Phil. 1.21 2 Cor. 1 5-9 And had the word Tast such a meaning in this Heb. 2.9 it would still confirme the truth Mr.
saith It is for men John 1.4 5.9 The world 1 John 2.2 All Nations to the ends of the Earth Act. 13.47 But speaking of the same received and enjoyed he saith it is in beleevers that are borne of God John 1.12 13. and 3 3.5-16 a people chosen out of the world and not of it John 15.19 17.14 redeemed unto God out of every kindered tongue and people and Nation Rev. 5.9 yea he contradicteth the very testimony of the Holy Ghost that saith of the life of Christ Iohn 1.4 5. It is the light of men and the light shineth in the darknesse and the darknesse comprehendeth it not But this man saith he is a light of or to none but those in whom he revealeth himselfe and draweth their hearts to beleeve on him and so also denyeth the doctrine of Jesus Christ Iohn 3.19 that saith This is the condemnation that light is come into the world and men love darknesse c. and hate the light which this man denyes saying that Christ is no such light to any that they may take offence at it or so as they may for that be condemned for if he extend any light they beleeve c. surely our Saviour said well Mat 6.23 If the light that is in a man be darknesse how great is that darknesse And so if Mr. Garners grand opinion and most esteemed truth and Mystery that must season all the rest be filled with so much darknesse no marvell his whole Treatise be full of darknesse To conclude his mysteries with his affirmation concerning Jesus Christ being a light to the Gentils c. That mystery was not in being till Christs manifestation and suffering in the flesh page 115. and 123. and 131. I confesse this is my sterially exprest and had need to have been better explicated that it might be acknowledged true for certain the word the Sonne of God that is the Christ in whom is all the mystery of God and the life in him that is the light of men was verily in being before he tooke flesh John 1.2 3 4.14 1 Iohn 1.1 2. yea and the calling of the Gentils was fully in the Scriptures of the Prophets though the flesh of Christ and his actuall and personall death resurrection and Sacrifice was not so in being till acted and then the mystery concerning Gentils cōversion not made known in his dying but by his Spirit after his resurrection and ascension Acts 2. and 9. and 10. and 11 Col. 3.5 So that in all this view of his expressed Mysteries one may clearly see that 1. he hath only pretended to and boasted of but not unvailed any mystery 2. He was out of his place and out of the way of Christ and those taught of him to pretend and assay to talke of the high and deep mysteries when he is discoursing of the beginning of the Gospell of Christ the foundation of repentance to draw in unbeleevers to beleeve and help forward the weakest Christ and his did not so Iohn 16.12 1 Cor. 3.1 2. 2 Cor. 3.12 and 4.2 Heb. 5 12. 3. He tooke a wrong course to discover mysteries in that he strove to find them in and fetch them out of such words as All men All nations the world the whole world It had been more seemly to have done it in and out of the names and titles of Christ and his members as Jesus Christ our Lord the Sonne of God the Saviour of the world Emanuel the seed c. though indeed the mysteries are unvailed in full sayings of the Gospell 4. He wrongs the sayings of the Gospell in pretending as if the sayings therein about the foundation and things absolutely needfull to salvation were darke and full of mysterious equivocation as his own sayings are that so he might have his fancies admired and received for truth as is shewn in this reply 5. In all his acknowledgements of truth he hath come short of those that have gon before him if not of those he opposeth let their writings testifie 6. In all his pretence of unvailing Mysteries he hath missed the very mentioning of them as Scripture doth which are plainly unvailed set forth therein yet in such words of wisdome and truth without any equivocation as by reason of the vaile over the heart till it turne to the Lord none clearly see prize or understand without some spirituall illumination and opperation of the Holy Ghost that turneth the heart to the Lord and giveth both the eye to see and some experimentall tast thereof 2 Cor. 3 17 18. As 1. The freenesse riches and glorious love of God in the gift of his Sonne and the reconciliation wrought and hope laid up in him this shining through the death of Christ upon the heart of a man so as when a man is found in his filth and enmity and sees nothing in himselfe to difference him from others or encourage him to looke to God yet such the power of his death when this love is commended through it and the power of the love through it commended as it puls a man from out of himselfe dependances and delights and from the worlds state way and fellowship and reconcileth him to God enabling him to beleeve on Christ renewing the heart c. Rom. 5.5 8.10.11 Tit. 3.4 5 6 7. 2. The speciall interests priviledges and gifts confirmed on these that are so brought in to beleeve even all the priviledges of the new Testament even the holy Spirit to mind them of Christ and teach them the things of him and write his mind in their heart to lead them indue them with gifts make them usefull c. Iohn 1.12 13. and 14.16 17 26. and 16.13 14 15. 1 Cor. 2.9 10.11 Heb. 9.14 15. 3. The intercourses of love the streams and springs the secret hints of light whispers the cōmunications receits between Jesus Christ the heart of the Church or souls of unfained Beleevers Cant. 1. and 2. and 3. and 4. c. In all which is some experimentall knowledge of that great mystery God manifested in the flesh c. These are mysteries plainly declared and evidenced in words of truth and wisdome that are a light yet rightly known discerned and prized of none without the spirituall teaching of the Holy Ghost 1 Cor. 2.8.15 7. He hath come short of expressing those mysteries or that mystery he hath most busied himselfe to unvail which also though with brevity is more plainly and fully exprest in the Treatise that is by him opposed as may be there seene in chap 14. page 78.81 82 83 84. And Oh that he rightly knew this mystery as it is unvailed That the Gentils should be fellow-heires and of the same body and partakers of his promise in Christ by the Gospell Ephes 3.6 By circumcission and being endeered too and made one with the Jewes by Mosaicall observances It was not doubted by any of the Beleeving Jewes in the primitive times But without this and only by the
through whence that 1 Cor. 13.12 1 John 3.2 and more then our faith can fully apprehend and for more then at that time had or yet have that faith and for that he saith of 1 Tim. 4.10 It is still life divinely spoken and I am sorry it hath been declared by his pen viz. that these words are not spoken of the second person of Christ as Mediator but of God by whose providence all men are preserved especially Beleevers Oh that those called Anti-trinitarians might not read this saying of Mr. T. W. for they deny not Christ as Mediator to be a distinct person but only that in this one Almighty living God there should be three distinct unseparable undevided as I beleeve there are in this one God though they say but one person and that the Father and what lesse saith hee that saith plainly These words are not spoken of the second person surely he meant not so he beleeveth the second person to be the same one living God that the Father is nor is his after sentence of Christ as Mediator any helpe or lesse free from error for whatsoever things the Father doth these also doth the Sonne likewise John 5.19 to 27. And the Father hath given him Authority to execute judgement also because he is the Sonne of man he it is by whom the Earth and the Inhabitants there of are upheld and by whom all things consist Psalme 75.3 Col. 1.17 18 nor is there any preservation of mankind fallen into sinne nor of creatures for his use but through a Mediator for God whose mercies are over all his workes is holy and righteous in all his wayes Psalme 85.10 145.8.17 So as all providence is by God in Christ and all dispensation of mercies and meanes through him surely he might have learned a more divine exposition of the words God who is the Saviour from Paul if he dispised him not because sometimes he was a Tent-maker who opens and gives the sense of that Isay 45.21 22 23. no God else besids me A just God a Saviour I am God and none else unto me every knee shall bow as meant of Jesus Phil. 2.10 But Mr. W. faies here the word signifies no more but a preservation I pray doth not that word reach far enough surely such as know the originall as well as he say it s the same word Luk. 2.10 unto you is borne this day a Saviour which is Christ the Lord to which Mr. T. W. glosse might reply that can be no such good tidings of great joy unto all people that are fallen into sinne or that is no more but a preserver which God was from the beginning and is of all men without Christ as Mediator these are dangerous glosses yea the same word say some is frequently used for Saviour in the Apostles writings The rest that followes is fore-answered here pag. 4. But when the wisdome of man will presume to teach what must be wisdome in Christ wee are not like to judge a right of any thing nor will his death or ransome be found to be in vain of such as are by him judged to be a second death which I have writ at large in the discourse of the precious blood of Christ chap. 11. 2. As for his objection set down as mine Christ death is not in vain for those who are damned for hereby they are freed from origin all sinne this is neither my opinion nor faith nor any such thing in my Booke surely if I should say he was non-plust to give a faire answer in reproving what was there said and so devised this objection that he might hint to such as never read my Booke as if I held it and so might seeme to them to have confuted me when he hath done nothing lesse though all his answers to it if they were bent against Christ his dying for all men they are as much against his dying for any as for all 3. As for that he puts as my objection quoting page 39. Christs death is not in vain though all be not savad for he dyed to make them savable and to open a door that they may be saved in this also he wrongs me both in word and sense could not such a one as Mr. Whitfield have answered my sayings without framing them into a mould fit for his own turne the one halfe of his saying none of mine and the rest altered which also was not brought in to such an end as he that reads chapter 7. may see and my words are in page 39. That Jesus Christ hath so dyed for every man that he hath redeemed all mankind satisfied Gods justice is become the propitiation for the sinnes of all men and hath made them savable and opened the door that they might be saved and is so faithfull and able and useth such meanes that whosoever perisheth it will be through their own fault and to the same purpose more largly before page 36. and before that after an explication of the businesse page 11. that as he hath in himselfe so saved all men so being assended he doth by vertue of his death and the redemption wrought in himselfe uâ—e such meanes and in some seasons so put forth spirit therein that he makes all savable so as there is a possiblenesse in and through him and possibility with him for all men to come in to him to beleeve on him and in beleeving to be eternally saved Joh. 3.16 17 18 19. with farther explication for that an examiner of lesse conscience and skill then Mr. T. W. professeth to have might have seene to have reported righter and understood better then to say hee knoweth not well what can be understood by making saveable unlesse a purchasing a possibility of salvation for all and for all surely a wise man would not use so many reasons to fault hee knew not what but the Treatise declared my meaning fully How I understand That Jesus Christ hath and doth make men saveable where as in the other Treatise is shewne the double enmity mankind fell into by sin And so first how mans fall necessitated him in the day of his sinning in Dying to Dye because of the truth and justice of God so as without death no remission of sin and without resurrection no justification for God cannot lye or be untrue or unjust so as here was a barre removed by Jesus Christ who Dying for all all dyed 2 Cor. 5.14 Though to the dishonour of the Death of Christ Mr. W. say God was able to save men even before Christ was given to dye by what way and meanes hee should think best Though I beleeve Christ was given to Dye though not sent forth to act it in the first moment of Adams fall But Secondly the fall and sin of man did so corrupt the nature and disposition of man that though the death bee suffered by Christ for him he will not come in to God if something be not done to change his
Scripture where it is said of any part of the world or any sort of men in the world Christ did not dye for them or that he dyed not for All that he is not the Saviour of the world not the propitiation for the sins of the whole world then he may to some other sayings put in his but or only Besides it s shewn in the Treatise as much restraint in some applicatory saying about Creation Fall Death Resurrection Judgement and that some for whom Christ dyed perish And this for answer to page 14. 5. I have his puting that for Scripture which is none as that God hated Esaue before he was borne and such stuffe as answered enough as also his intimate farthering a falsehood upon the Apostle who never said all Christ dyed for are justified by his blood or have their sinne forgiven and shall be eternally saved I well perceive where the Scripture untranslated how some would misreport them to serve their owne turnes with but read the Treatise and there is answer unâ—â—moved by Mr W. 6. He wrongs me in saying that I grant that the word world may some times be taken for the better part of them namely the Elect. But my Treatise saith otherwise That by the world in Joh. 17. is meant all the uncalled whatsoever they are in Gods decree of which they called are not and for which world clearly distinct from all the called that believe Christ prayed for a blessing on the ministration of the called that the uncalled the world distinct might beleeve vers 21.23 from which Mr. W. flyes when he comes at it as fearing it would confute his confutation As for all that followes it is so far from answering any thing that the Treatise remains still answer enough Besides I go by plain sayings of Scripture and not by Sillogismes in my Answer to the Objections and his sillogisme is slenderly proved All those and only those who are elected are likewise redeemed called justified glorified This his proposition Now I may make the Assumption not in two divers termes and so forcelesse as he did But in one viz. But Mr. T. W. is not glorified let himselfe make the conclusion and prove it But his main strength for confutation is in his Title and Epistle wherein he sides with and humours the prophane and scoffing company in using the language many do when they are powring in strong drinke and powring out oathes with Jeering and reproches But what he means by lay-preachers I am left to guesse I know the Scriptures distinguish between Governours and people as I hope he will not call the Governours our King Parliament and Magistrates Lay or of the people but Magistrates so I hope he will acknowledge himselfe a subject one of the people True before Christ came in the flesh there was a distinction betweene Priests and Levites and the rest of the people of Israel but now since Christ hath carried our nature to the right hand of God he is the high Priest and all that unfainedly believe are the spirituall Priests 1 Pet. 2 5-9 and the distinction is between the Church that is Gods inheritance and the world out of which they are called and chosen And this Church is the pillar of truth the light of the world and hath its authority for preaching each according to the faith and gifts given from Christ and not from men Rom. 12.3 1 Cor. 12.3 11. Eph. 4 7 12. 1 Pet. 4.11 Though liberty of doing this in publique places is from the Governours And that in the Church it selfe is a Distinction between Officers called Bishops or Elders and Deacons and the rest of the brethren And he that usurpe an Office without a Church call let him bear his reproof True when the Bishop of Rome began to usurp authority over Princes Then hee and his Ministers were called spirituall and the Clergie as if they were the Church and the Magistrates and people together as their inferiours called the Lavty But I find not that language in the Apostles writing And I hope because of the Covenant it is not the meaning of Mr. T. W. But only hee meanes men that are not in his order and so called as himselfe and then he begins wrong for without disparagement to him or them be it said the opinion he maintaines is that which such teach And the objections I answered I had them all in writing froÌ„ a Gentleman that very like sometimes hath been a Black-smith the calling the Distinctions proves and faulting them I had first from an Officer sometime a Shoo-maker and the opposition from some other Gentlemen of other callings And I hope Mr. Garner will not be ashamed to say he was an Apothecary nor I am perswaded will be glory in having Mr. T. W. of his side As for his charging them with wandering I have known some of his Order for calling have so done from place to place to get their living which I thinke he approves not but going where ones calling and Gods providence leads is not wandring though it were from Northamptonshire to great Yarmouth and from thence thither againe I wish he may requite none evill for good As for Tho. Moore He beleeves the Doctrine of the Gospel in the plain sayings thereof true and good and will acknowledge any swarving of his there from to be his errour when by those sayings it is shewne him But carnall reasonings or Philosophy he will not yeeld to to wave those sayings by As for his being a Weaver some twenty yeares since he hath no cause to be ashamed of it unlesse for his entering it contrary to the counsell of his deceased father and without consent of his then living friends and some correction from God on his body till by providence he was drawne from it nor hath he any cause to glory for having the same authority for school-teaching at that time that Mr W. had for preaching As for Wells it is a Coast Towne nighet Yarmouth and further from Northâ—hampton Shire then Vpwell o◠〈◊〉 in which he lived But this but a little mistake for 〈◊〉 that takes greater things on trust and will undertake to describâ— and censure those whom hee never knew nor correct his mistakes when by reading he might have had some knowledge to have set downe opinions righter As for that he saith T. M. hath of late taken on him the office of Teaching if hee had said neere twenty yeares ago hee received authority for Schoole-teaching hee had kept within some bounds of truth but for teaching or preaching Gospell I know not what hee meanes by Office for Apostles Prophets Evangelists Pastors Teachers were all Teachers and Preachers of the Gospell the words of prophecie exhortation wisdome knowledge faith c. are all for teaching Gospell the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every beleever to profit withall And teaching and preaching of Gospell and that to conversion or edifying soules hath been by reasoning or conference Joh. 4. Act.
have abode in that glory Ioh. 12.24 But in this his glory and glorious perfection abiding and not laying it aside and becomming lower he could not be for mankind that was fallen into sinne and under death a perfect JESUS a perfect Propitiation peace righteousnesse and perfect Lord Saviour and helper of mankinde which he must certainly bee or else he cannot be the author of eternall salvation That he might be perfect then in regard of us it was necessary that he be made flesh in our very nature that so the nature that sinneth might suffer John 1.14 Rom. 8.3 yea in our nature as fallen and so submitted to infirmities and mortallity even to the flesh and blood that he might dye Heb. 2.14 And that hee be in this our nature subjected to infirmities as a publike maâ— and surely in the same obligation with us and so under the Law under which wee were fallen That so our debt may be his and he be found under the guilt of our sinnes Gal. 4.4.5 And being thus found as a surety a servant and under the Law for us that God the Father passe by us and call him to an account for our debt and charge him with our sinnes Isay 53.6.2 Cor. 5.19 And he must own this charge and imputation and confesse also Heb 10.5 9. Psal 40 7.12 And that our sinnes being charged on him and he accepting the charge he also undergoe the sentence and so dyed for our sinnes for without shedding of blood there is no remission of sinnes 1 Pet 2.24 and 3 18. Heb 9 22. And yet that he may be perfect for us it is necessary that he rise from the dead acquit of all our sinne and a victory over our death that as mercy and truth are met and righteousnesse and peace doe kisse in his Death So truth may spring out of the earth in his resurrection for our justification Psal 85.10 11. Rom 4 25. For if Christ be not raised our faith is vain we are yet in our sinnes 1 Cor. 15.17 And now he is so risen yet there is still more to be done by him necessary that he might be a perfect Saviour namely That by the eternall spirit he ascend into the highest Heaven even the holy of holiest and there appeare before God for us and present at the propitiatory or mercy seat and bosome of the Father the vertue of his blood shed He being now risen and so offer to him his own risen and holy body a spotlesse sacrifice a price a ransome for those for whom he dyed that so thereby he may obtain and procure of his Father 1. A right of Lordship over us all 1. That wee may be his by purchase and he have the power and authority over us to dispose of us and judge us 1 Tim. 2.6 Rom. 14.9 2. Eternall redemption of our nature in himself as the publick man and for men and receive eternall life in our nature in the man and for men that he may have it to bestow Heb. 9.12 14. 1 John 5.11 3. The use of meanes and sending forth of his Spirit in that meanes whereby men might be enlightned in some knowledge of his goodnesse and have some participation of his mercyes that they might thereby be admonished and reproved and instructed to repentance and seeking of him and so come in to him for life Psal 68.18 John 1.4 5 9 Act. 14.17 and 17 26 27 30 31. Rom. 2.4 Iohn 1.7 and 20.31 for as wee in our particular persons as individualls could not have partaked of the misery we fell in too in the fall of the first publick man had their been no medium by propogation for encrease to come forth of him so neither could any of mankinde in any of their particular persons partake of that blessed restoration and eternall life obtained and received in the nature of and for mankind in and by the second publick man if there be no Spirituall medium to call and regenerate men that they may come into him But he having gon through and done all first mentioned and now obtained all this latter mentioned he is made perfect and become perfect and so as it is said of him Luke 24.26 46. ought not Christ to have suffered these things and to enter into his glory thus it is writen and thus it behooved Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead the third day and that repentance and remission of sinns should be preached in his name among all nations so it is said even of God the Father Heb. 2.10 It became him for whom are all things and by whom are all things in bringing many sonns unto glory to make the Captaine of their salvation perfect through sufferings suitable to which it is said of Christ himself Heb 5.8 Though he was a sonne yet learned he Obedience by the things which he suffered as I understand he tooke occasion to shew forth obedience by the things which he suffered and so was made perfect yea perfect in the highest degree of perfection though not while he was suffering yet by and through sufferings not in one thing only suffered but the things which hee suffered his sufferings for had he not had our nature subjected to humane infirmities and that made under the law for us he could not have dyed for us and then truth and mercy could not have mett righteousnesse and peace could not have kissed on our behalfe Heb. 2.14 Psal 85.10 And had he not dyed for our sinns he could not have risen Just on our behalfe and for our Justification and so truth could not have sprung out of the earth that we might participate Rom. 4 25. Psal 85.11 and had he nor so risen for our Iustification he could not have ascended into the Heavens to present the vertue of his blood and offer himself a sacrifice a price and ransom to God for us he had not then had wherewith to prevaile with God to take sinne out of the way with all that was contrary to us that mercy might be shewne and righteousnesse looke downe from Heaven on us Heb. 1.3 Col. 2.14 15. to purchase us into his dispose Rom. 149. To obtain eternall redemption and receive eternall life in our nature for men that he might have it to bestow Heb. 9.12 to procure meanes and spirit to be sent to call and draw us Iohn 16.7 Psal 68.18 nor had he had wherewith by spirit to take sinne out of our conscience and to purge our nature Heb. 9.14 for which cause he had his body given him and hath done the will of the Father Heb. 10.5 10 and so through suffering in our nature for us and in the same nature raised presenting the nature of his sufferings and offering himselfe a sacrifice unto God he is made perfect or become perfect A perfect Saviour Propitiation righteousnesse A Lord able to save and able to destroy and here is our businesse sure distinct and here is a reconciliation and salvation in our nature dispensable
and and the other only to those that obey him But it would fill many leaves to explain and set forth that which the Scripture setteth forth evidencing this distinction as in Ezek. 24.3 13 setting forth a purgation by ofire prepared and the Pot with liquour and choise peeces of flesh put in which is a good preparation for purging and bringing forth the Scum and then of the efficafie of the fire bringing the scum a loft in which respect the liquor is said to be purged and then of the obstenacy of the people in not suffering the scum when raised to be taken off and thrown out and so it boyled in again and the liquor was not purged and therefore the following purgation was to be consumption and burning of pot and liquor and flesh and bones and scum and all together Doth not this shadow out to us apurgation and atonment or propitiation wrought by Christ in himselfe that is full of force and vertue as fire for opperation like that is said of him Heb. 1.3 And the declaration of this grace or purging and peace to reprove for folly and to call into Christ and so in convincement to make the scum to arise like that Eph. 2.16 Prov 1.22 23 and then the rebellion of many for whom this purgation was prepared and to whom being tendered it begun to worke and raise the scum in which respect they are said to be purged like that Esay 5.1 8. But they loving darknesse rather then light offering despite to the spirit of grace and in that respect not purged and for that cause to be destroyed like that Iohn 3.19 2 Thes 2.10 Though such as receive the purgation and yeild to the opperation of it are purged indeed like that Heb. 9.14 Rev. 1.5 and is not here a distinction between a purgation prepared and tendered and opperating and the same purgation received submitted too and so enjoyed in the choise effecasie and fruit thereof and the former larger then the latter how saith the text verse 13. in thy filthynesse is lewdnesse Because I have purged thee and thou wast not purged thou shalt not be purged from thy filthynesse any more till I have caused my fury to rest upon thee now as they were tipes and figures to us doth it not shew all aforesaid Besides to what purpose is the Councell to such as are poore blind naked c. to come to Christ to buy and receive of him Gold tryed white raiment and eye-salve to anoint c. if the provision of these prepared in Christ and the tender of them be no larger then the receipt and enjoyment by men sure those that have received and doe enjoy these are not poore blind naked and miserable and they that are Destitute of these and so poore blind naked and miserable are in vain counselled to goe to get these things of Christ if there be not provision and fulnesse in him for any but those that have it in them all ready but see Christ gave no vain councell and yet he gave this councell Rev. 17 18. yet if we should take notice of some parables uttered and opened by our Saviour will it not hold forth the same distinction to us evidently consider Mat 13.39 18.23 24 28.37.43 Is not the field there the world of mankind such men as are neither borne of God nor given up to the Devill before either good seed or tares be sowen Is it not Christ his own field and that also as he is the Sonne of man and is not that by vertue of his death resurrection and ransome wherewith he purchased them Rom. 14 9. Psalme 2.6 9. and 24.1 2. Is not Christ and the word discovering him the seed and good seed before it be sown And are not those that have received that good seed and are borne thereof as 1 Pet. 1.21.23 and so the blade spring up of the same seed as Gal. 3.19 19. The children of the Kingdome and the tares sprung up from the evill seed the children of the Devill And are not all still in one field which is the world of mankind which in respect of this mingle-mangle of one and another not the Church and Kingdome sure but the world of mankind as now ends at the comming of Christ Now is not the field of mankind that is not the Devils who soweth in another mans field but Christs the Sonne of mans field larger then the Children of the Kingdome yea is there not more seed sown then is rightly received and brings forth fruit to the harvest I say no more but read the parrables with there interpretations Mat. 13. and Luke 8.5 13. Thus far the distinction appeares approved in Scripture by sayings that are more remote in regard of expressions But if wee come to view those that are neerer and plainer it will more brighter and fully appeare as if I should instance the language of the Scripture and spirit of wisdome therein speaking That when it speaketh of the death of Christ for propitiation and so of his ransome and that redemption and peace compleated in his owne body for men And the common salvation extended there-through to men as apropitiation and ground of calling men It speaks of it in generall words as for all for the world for sinners But if in the same place it speakes of the peculiar priviledges enjoyed it changeth the person and speakes more limmittedly and applicatively which would not alwaies be if both were of like large extent as is shewne in the treatise chap. 10 page 53.54 and may be more fully when need is But that which is all ready shewn in the Treatise is enough where the distinction is shown and proved to be in the Scripture where first the severall parts of the distinction are proved The first part proved in divers plain sentences of Scripture chap. 1. page 2. which Mr. Garner mis-reporteth in his Treatise page 6. as alledged for the proofe of the whole distinction and in the same chap. 1. page 3.4 The first part is explecated the second part of the distinction is proved also by divers sentences of Scripture chap. 1. p. 5.6 and explicated also pag. 6 7. Again secondly the distinctionit selfe is proved in expresse words in plain sentences of Scripture chap. 3. page 24. which Scriptures Mr. Garner receiting in his Treatise page 12.11 leaves out some verses that the distinction might be hid from his owne and other mens eyes 3. The distinction is explicated and proved by Scripture in eight particulars chap. 1. page 14 and 15. And lastly the whole five first chapters in that Treatise do evidence the same to be in Scripture plentifully shewne all which it became Mr. Gerner to have refused by plain sentences of Scriptue before he had so boldly against such a appearing truth affirmed That the Scripture warrenteth no such distinction But I will now veiw his reasons or proofes which he opposeth with all 1. He charheth me to propound these things rather in way of
mercy Seat in his own bosome as I may say there was Truth requiring our death and Justice our suffering the curse But Jesus Christ that dyed for our sinnes being risen for our justification and gone with the vertue of his blood to the Father mercy truth are met righteousnesse peace have kissed and Christ hath made the atonement with God and is become the propitiation for the sinnes of the whole world and now righteousness looks down from Heaven and God shewes mercy to men Psal 85.10 11 1 John 2.2 Psal 36.7 8. so that here is a reconciliation made with God for men 2 Cor. 5.19 Ephes 2.16 Col. 1.20 a purgation Heb. 3. a laver of regeneration Tit. 3.5 to reconcile and purge with all and this for men But yet if this be not applied if men receive it not and be not sprinckled washed and purged and renewed therewith they cannot be reconciled in themselves to good and so not eternally saved 1 John 3 3 5. and this spinckling is a spirituall businesse namely When through the Gospell in which Christ is set forth for a propitiation Rom. 3.25 the spirit beares witnesse of Christ John 15.26 1 John 5.6 and therein instructeth in the knowledge of his death and resurrection for us and so gives in to beleeve the testimony 1 Cor. 15.1 4. Gal. 3.1 5. 2 Thes 1.10 then shines in commends the love of God to the heart in this that while we were siners Christ dyed for us and his love thus commended through his death made known then the vertue of his death becomes prevalent and effecatious in the beleevers heart reconciles him to God in this his receit of the atonement Rom. 5.8.10 11. Tit. 3.4 5. and redeems him from his vain conversation 1 Pet. 1.18 19. from among men to God Rev. 5.9 and so purgeth both conscience and nature Heb. 9.14 and so doth he purchase to God and wash from sinne with his blood Acts 20.28 Rev. 1.5 and yet in himselfe in the propitiation he hath made with God for men there is the same fulnesse still for those that have not yet received and to dispence more still of the vertue of his blood to those that have received Rom. 25.26 1 Cor. 15.2 3 4. 1 John 1.7 8 9. Iohn 1.16 So that both the distinctions remain sound as they are explicated in the faulted but not confuted Treatise chap. 1. and 2. and I am sorry that Mr. Knowles and Mr. Gerner are adversaries hereto 5. He secretly and covertly faults the distinction about the severall endes of the death of Christ one for propitiation and one for witnesse bearing to the truth and so giving us example of obedience to God and love to one another and one for confirming the new Testament all which are proved and explicated in the second chapter page 16 21. and not at all by him refused and if he desire any further explanation or proofe he might have it I trow he will not say that as Christ dyed for our sinnes the Scribes and Pharises did make him flesh or under the Law for us or that they did charge our sinnes upon him or put him to death for them but that God the Father did all this to Christ for us and so delivered him for our offences and raised him for our justification Isay 53.6 Rom 4 24 25. I hope also he will not say that as Christ did willingly lay down his life in suffering all that befell him or witnesse-bearing to the truth for calling sheep and feeding the called and to give us an example to follow his steps therein that God did persecute and crucifie him for speaking the words he gave him to speake and doing of that he gave him to doe for the good of men and the speciall good of his sheep But that the Scribes and Pharises the Elders chiefe Priests c. did through envy persecute crucifie and put him to death for that Psal 2.1 4. Mat. 27.18 I hope he that can see the difference between Gods sending Joseph into Aegypt for good and his Brethens sending him for evill can see the difference in this also and so distinguish of the ends of the same death of Christ in these respects And for the third end is that a confirmation of a Testament when the Testator is put to death as an evill doer surely it s not proper to say God the Father put him to death to confirme Christ his owne Testament nor did the Pharisees so put him to death but as he was one with the Father in will and so willingly yeelded himselfe to dye for our sinnes and willingly laid down his life in witnesse-bearing too and defence of the truth he had preached so he most willingly and freely as his owne more peculiar acting did give up the ghost and die to ratifie the new Testament Heb. 9.16 17. Galath 3.14 15. which appeares also in the timelinsse of his death before those that were crucified with him Mark 15 44. though that also was for another speciall end Joh. 19.36 But yet most clearely in this that whereas others when they were spent and gave up the ghost their heads fell downe he cried with a loud voice Mark 15.37 and first bowed his head and then gave up the ghost Joh. 19.30 And so freely dyed and confirmed his Testament But Master Garner would be faulting knew he how saying that I speaking of the severall ends of his death in my Treatise pag. 22. But hee was mistaken for that was in the former chap. but in the third chapter I was speaking of the divers maner of mentioning those ends in Scripture but something hee would say to bring that distinction within compasse to be faulted in faulting the distinction pag 7. lin 3.19 though to no advantage to him 6. He saith also pag. 7. That I say That when the death of Christ in respect of that end which was for propitiation and ransome is only mentioned as it is for all so it is exprest in such generall words only as the world all men c. But here he hath clipt my words and left out that I say in Propositions for faith it is here exprest and for this I quote hee saith 2 Cor. 5.14 15 19 c. And hee should have done well to have put in many other places and expressions quoted Chap. 20. pag. 133. Proof 6. But this conclusion is unsound saith he which will appeare from what is written Heb. 9.28 where mention is made saith he of the death of Christ in respect of ransome and propitiation only c. And yet it is not exprest in such generall words as the world or all men to which I answer hee hath corruptly left out c. which was explained in my Treatise chap. 20. pag. 33. But to passe that I question his first affirmation and deny his second though he calls to mind it and double the same But now let us mind it well Heb. 9.28 So Christ was once
against which the opposer fighteth and for that cause faulteth the distinction But if he be sure of truth on his side then 6. Why doth he not set down his saying plainly why shunnes he the light and seeks to carry away his oppinion in the darke Why saith he not plainly the death resurrection and sacrifice of Christ the preparation of redemption propitiation Justification and life in him and the mentioning and setting it forth in the Gospell and calling men thereto is for no more then those that are partakers thereof both by faith in Christ and really and gloriously in themselves before God and that the declaration of all this holds forth no want in them to whom it is spoken but a reall enjoyment of all for whom it is prepared and that for those that refuse there was never any thing in truth prepared for them this had been plain dealing and as he knowes who once said thus so all his writing testifies this to be his meaning in his own often expression of his businesse pages 3.4 5 6 and 10 11 12 and 13 14 15 and 17 19 20 21 and 23 24. all which is fully and in every of his expressions answered in which both the truth of the proposition and the distinction opposed is cleared and proved and that in consideration of Redemption as in Christ for men and as received by men in reciving Christ the former is larger then the latter and so his Babell of confusion on which he hath walked through his Treatise is confounded in that is shewne Prov. 9.1 to 5. Mat. 22.1 7. Heb. 9 5. John 6 37 40. Ezek 24.13 Mat. 13. And all the answer to him hitherto though there was enough said in the opposed Treatise that remaineth unanswered and more and further explication in another Treatise entituled A discourse a bout the precious blood and Sacrifice of Jesus Christ in the first twelve chapters of that Treatise which may serve for answer in that businesse and so I might have the farther view of this opposers Tract because he hath here left my Treatise and answereth not thereto but because he pretends an including of mine as he goeth along I will take a briefe view and answer accordingly THE SECOND PART AND so as he includeth me in answering Mr. Lamb. This I find all the way that hee chargeth mee with putting on many Scriptures a corrupt sense which if I had done and hee had made it manifest I would have acknowledged it and have thanked him but I find no such matter at all discovered though often boastingly affirmed by him but I will plainly set it down without mending as it is in the opposed Treatise and then note what wayes hee hath taken to prove that sense corrupt and so whether it stand good or not The whole drift of the Treatise was to testifie the truth of these two places of Scripture according to the sense the words import and that was in my Title though another that is true also was put on it and the places were 1 Tim. 2.6 who gave himselfe a ransome for all And Heb. 2.9 That he by the grace of God should taste death for every man and the sense said by me to be imported Is this That Jesus Christ by the grace good-will and favour of God did taste death for every man and so gave himselfe a ransome to God for all men and so is become the Saviour of the world and the propitiation for the sinnes of the whole world This is the sense as the Holy Ghost hath left it for me in expresse words If Joh. 3.16 17. be compared with Heb. 2.9 1 Tim. 2.6 and Joh. 4.42 and 1 Joh. 4 14. and 22. And so is the sense exprest in that opposed Treatise Chap. 1. pag. 1. And all the five first Chapters with the Distinctions in them then used to cleare the stateing of the question shall now remaine as this Opposer calls them so many proofes to which he hath said nothing to shew the abuse of any Scripture or weaknesse of any proofe as he that reades that Treatise and seeth what is said may know and then the sense is opened and affirmed by plain Sayings of Scripture without any exposition chap. 7 which neither he nor Mr. Knoles is able to doe for the corrupt sense and contradictions of Scripture which he in many places setteth downe After that the sense is proved six severall wayes by the Scripture manifestly which hee hath not shewed the least weaknesse in and this from chap. 8. to chap. 19. And then againe by six severall arguments chap. 20. which he hath not so much as medled with And then againe by his severall proofes which also unlesse three or foure expressions in answer of Mr. Lambs Reasons mentioned by him he hath not at all answered besides following reasons that are all let alone Where were Mr. Knoles his eyes or his care of speaking truth when hee writ to the Churches that the most waighty reasons c. were fully and clearely answered which is true of never a one and but very few of the weakest also medled with But now as the sense is not only in but the very sayings of the Holy Ghost So let us see how the holy Ghost teacheth us to take it and when in the largest extent of the sense Psa 8.6 The Prophet by the Spirit speaking of God the Father concerning Christ that dyed and rose and revived to that end that he might be Lord of all Rom. 14.9 Thou hast put all things under his feet Now how doth the Holy Spirit teach us to understand the word All when it is used in mentioning the works of God in and concerning his Sonne Christ when it is God that saith or doth it And when it is his Sonne of or to whom he speaketh or doth how must wee understand All then mind what the Holy Ghost saith in Heb. 2.8 1 Cor. 15.27 Heb. 2.8 he rehearseth the words Thou hast put all things in subjection under his feet now marke the Inference or Interpretation for in that he put All in subjection under him he left nothing that is not put under him What is the extent of the word All here Is any exception here of any but only of God that did put all things under him So 1 Cor. 15.27 For he hath put All things under his feet But when he saith All things are put under him It is manifest that hee is excepted that did put all things under him that is as is said God only is excepted from being put Under and marke that he saith when he saith that is when the Lord God saith and when he saith it of his works concerning his Sonne he saith not when men speak of Christ no nor when his servants speake to all men or of them nor saith he when God saith of earthly Kings He will put All under them that it is so large no not when Jew and Gentiles are opposed but when God saith and when
lesse then salvation through faith in Christ page 119. and mind his after explication saith he No taking away of sinne no Redemption Reconciliation or Atonement wrought for any but by the sprinckling or application of the blood of Christ upon them neither is it any other way of use to us neither doth it any other way speak good for us before God but as it 's sprinckled on our consciences by the power of the Spirit page 194. Neither are any persons redeemed or purchased with the blood of Christ not have they any part in his death and blood shed who have not their consciences sprinckled with the blood of Christ neither doth his blood any other way redeem purchase reconcile or make Atonement c. Surely were it not for the sake of some others I should no otherwise answer these greiveous blasphemies of the death Resurrection and presenting of the vertue of the precious blood of Iesus Christ and his invaluable Sacrifice offered to God his Father then they did Rabshâ—kah with silence Isay 36.21 For he knoweth that in the opposed Treatise it is shown by and according to Scripture that there is none reconciled in heart to God none Redeemed from among men to God no purgation in Conscience but by the spirituall sprinckling and application of the precious blood of Christ and so in the application and receit of that reconciliation propitiation Atonement Redemption purgation and righteousnesse which Iesus Christ hath by and in himselfe wrought with God for men and in whom it is perfect and compleat before any receive the same and though here through many mercies by him be reached unto men to draw to him yet this Atonement c. is received no other way but in receiving him in whom it is and from whom it is never devided as is also shown in that other Treatise of the discourse about the precious blood of Christ And in this Reply also which distinction he hath striven to confound and yet now in his fashion he would seem to acknowledge it but to the greatest dishonour to Christ and in fury to men and to Saints also that ever I saw in any writer that confesseth Jesus that was borne in Bethlehem and of the Virgin Mary to be the Christ which yet I hope in part he doth but here in these affirmations it is evident without any wresting or glosse 1. He hath denyed That Christ by the vertue of his blood and Sacrifice offered to God hath purchased All men of God and received the right of Lord-ship over them thereby and so a power and right of judgeing them by his Gospell and aggravation of their sinnes by his blood shed for them and mercies extended there through to them For he hath peremtorily affirmed that there are no persons purchased with the blood of Christ who have not their coÌ„sciences sprinkled with his blood and that his blood doth not any otherwise purchase then by sprinckling upon the Conscience And so hath plainly denyed the truth of those sayings of the Holy Ghost Ro. 149 12. Phil. 2.9 10 11. Acts 10.36 42. Psalme 2.6.10 2. He hath fully denyed all that preparation and provision of Redemption Reconciliation Atonement righteousnesse life and Spirit which God by vertue of the precious blood and Sacrifice of Christ presented to him hath made in Christ to be preached to men to invite them to come in to him and receive it yea for any but those that are come in and have it already for hee affirmed that there is no taking away of sinne no reconciliation Redemption or Atonement wrought for any but by the sprinckling or application of the blood of Christ upon them which is sure in their in-comming and within them and so hath denyed the truth of these Scriptures Joh. 14 5 9 10 11. 2 Cor. 5.10.14.19 Prov. 9.2.6 Mat. 22.1.14 3. Hee hath also denyed the will of the Father that all should honour the Sonne as they honour the Father John 5.23 for he denyeth the Lord Jesus Christ the glory of all the mercies light meanes and spirituall motions he by the vertue of his blood and Sacrifice offered to God hath procured for and extendeth to the Sonnes of men to call invite and move them to repentance and turning in to God for he saith plainly neither is his blood any other way of use to us neither doth it any other way speak good for us before God but as it 's sprinckled upon our consciences by the power of the Spirit And so he hath denyed the truth of that affirmed in John 1.4 11. Psalme 75 3. Col. 1.17 Rom. 2.4 Acts 14.17 and 17 26.31 4. Hee hath also denyed the mediation of Christ between God and men by vertue of his blood and Sacrifice offered to God 1 Tim. 2.5 Isay 53.12 yea and also his speciall Advocation and intercession by vertue of his precious blood and Sacrifice with God for Beleevers 1 John 2.1 Heb. 7 25. In that he saith his blood is no other way to us neither doth it any other way speak good for us before God but as it is sprinckled upon our consciences now in sprinckling on the conscience it speaketh peace and good to us and purgeth within And if it had not spoke good for us and Christ by it had done nothing with God for us what is that which brought it to us or is he of their mind that thinkes their was no dying of Christ for us but his dying in us I hope he is farre from that but I fort eare though here is just cause to say further only he hath denyed one part of that mediation mentioned Heb. 9 15. Thus hath he altogether denyed and raced the Gospell as it is set forth to be preached to unbeleevers as a truth that they might beleeve and in beleeving might receive and for not believing be under sinne for he hath affirmed their is no Redemption no Reconciliation no Atonemen and so no sinne taken out of the way no pardon no life obtained wrought or made with God by Christ or received into the hands of Christ for men to dispence to such as beleeve that it might be preached to them in his name that they might beleeve as Paul did to such as yet beleeved not Acts 13.36 37 38. but this mans sayings give out that of all this there is nothing done with God for any by Christ his Dying Resurrection Ascension offering Sacrifice and mediation by vertue of all with God nothing hath his blood done for any till by spirit it be sprinckled on their conscience nor doth it any thing with God for any by his presentment of it to God nor any other way but by sprinckling upon the conscience and sure that is not till they be made Beleevers so as they come to the blood of sprinckling so that till men be Beleevers and first washed by his blood there is by Mr. Garners doctrine nothing done for them by Christ of any worth to be told them to bring them
to beleeve But there was nothing 2. Cor. 5.19 to occasion such grosse conceits for it is not said of the world God hath reconciled the world to himselfe by Jesus Christ as it is said of Beleevers verse 18. nor is it said God will not impute sinne to the World as it 's said of Beleevers Rom. 4.5.8 nor is it said God is in Christ reconciling a part of the World and so is now and will be hereafter neither is it said verse 21. God made him to be sinne for us and wee were then and therein made the righteousnesse of God in him but it is said That God was in Christ reconciling c. and this set forth as the word of reconciliation put into their hearts to minister to the world But so much is said of this in the opposed Treatise and this reply that more need not be said to shew the errour of his grosse conception neither was there any thing in the Sacrifices and purifications under the Law to occasion in him this grosse conception for he that reads Moses and the after histories may see that there were many for whom sacrifices were dayly offered and the water of purification made that yet for not approaching and for not being sprinckled were unclean and to be cut off else Israel had not been so often punished Besides the Gospell being before even the first Testament and the sprincklings of the first Testament shadowes of the sprinckling of the New Testament which is the choyce of the Gospell and not to be preached to all men as the beginning of the Gospell about which wee treat is and so this abuse of so many Scriptures to such an end hath more evill in it then he was aware of nor doe I suppose here to discover it such as experimentally know what the new Testament is will discerne his imiscarrages in this so that in this all his senses forced on words he hath hitherto plainly tought men to deny Christs Lord-ship over them and him to be the author of mrecies extended to them or that there is any hope c. yea even the Saints to deny the prevailency of his intercession before or to procure spirituall application but I am weary with beholding such unsavoury shifts only it is meet to take notice of the truth and fulfilling of those words 2 Peter 2 12 13. For the word Advocation he takes away the peculiarity of it being the speciall and peculiar part of the intercession of Christ And to help it that his sayings might seem right he slanders others saying they do separate between the Propitiation and the Advocation and gives out as if they held that Christ dyed for many for whom he did not Rise Ascend and intercede pagâ— 94 95 189. And as if some might receive the propitiation and not receive the benefit of his Advocation to which I might answer with Psal 52.3.4 fit weapons for his drift But all that have read the opposed Treatise may know the falsnesse of his charges and such as read and beleeve the Scriptures may see the weaknesse of his arguings to make in our speakings the Death of Christ and the Resurrection of Christ and his offering himselfe a Sacrifice to God distinct workes and to say the one was before the other and the one is not the other and yet that in altogether he hath made the Propitiation and is become The Propitiation for the sinnes of the whole world is no deviding of these Again to say he is the Propitiation before set forth so to men and to call his making peace with God for men and his preaching peace in being set forth as a propitiation through faith in his blood c. and the worke of the Spirit inabling by faith to receive him to call these I say distinct workes is not deviding for whatsoever is in him for any that they might beleeve yet he is no Propitiation to or in any till they beleeve so the mediation of Christ with God for men by vertue of his propitiation considered as a distinct worke is no separating between them Again in this mediation to consider the difference between that which is generall for the World John 17 21 23. Isay 53.12 and that which is peculiar for Beleevers that come to God by him which is his speciall intercession Heb. 7.25 and 9.14 15. Iohn 17.9.20 and called Advocation 1 John 2.1 is no separating between Propitiation and Advocation yet is Christ no where called the Advocate of the World no the Apostle doth not say so much as if any man sinne he hath but wee Beleevers have an Advocate c. and this generall intercession of Christ for all men and his speciall intercession for Beleevers by vertue of one and the same Propitiation is a ground for such as yet beleeve not to beleeve and the medium that produceth it likewise and a ground of speciall consolation to Beleevers to whom it was a motive instruction and patterne how to pray for all men how to pray for believers But M. Garners sense and interpretation shuts the door of hope against all that already beleeve not and so takes away the ground of lawfulnesse for praying for all men for Kings Magistrates or Subjects yea for any of them till we know them first to beleeve but enough was said for this in the opposed Treatise that he hath not answered as may there be seen c 5. p. 32. c. 11. p. 58 59. c. 17 p. 1 9 112. 192. XV. To come towards an end the last of his wayes to prove his businesse that I will mention is a pretence of unvailing Mysteries the truth is I should have conceived the florrishing Title to have been put on by the Printer and not himselfe as it befell me in the Title of the Treatise he opposeth but that I find this in Master Knowles Epistle to the Churches There are divers mysteries concerning our Redemption by Jesus Christ unvailed in this small Treatise yea such by his affirmation as will make known the knowledge God hath given Mr. Garner And Mr. Garner in his Preface cals it this ensuing and unvailing Treatise and so confirmes the Title Mysterie unvailed and the truth unvailed by Robert Garner A faire pretence and confidently affirmed to make his opinion to be received but yet he must give us leave to try all things and so this pretence that wee may imbrace and hold fast that which is good and refuse the rest 1. It might be queried what he meanes by Mysteries whether that which is hidden and now by him first revealed and then he should shew himselfe rashly puft up with his fleshly mind intruding into things he hath not seen as will appear 1 Iohn 3.2 Col. 3.3 4. and 2.18 or whether he mean that which was hidden kept secret with God but now hath bin manifested in the person by the Spirit of Christ and by the Apostles made known and left upon Record and then his pretence hath a secret
denyall of Christ come in the flesh and of the truth of the Apostles record and testimony Rom. 16.25 26. or whether he meanes that which was hid and is made known but hath a depth of excellency in it beyond conception and then he usurpes the office of the Holy Ghost 1 Cor. 2.9 10-15 or whether he mean it of that which is manifested and made Known but vailed so with superstitions false glosses and interpretations that till confuted men cannot rightly see that which is This is the fairest and best sense to take him in and thus I conceive his meaning to be though herein he wrong and rob others of their due and arrogate to himselfe boasting of other mens line 2. It might be demanded which of or how many of the Mysteries he meaneth seeing he pretends unvailing mysteries for the Scripture and Spirit therein speaking of this glorious life and blessednesse in and by Christ cals it the mystery Rom. 16.25 Ephes 3.3 4 9. Col. 1 26 27. The mystery of God Col. 2 2. the mystery of Christ Col. 4.3 the mystery of the faith 1 Tim. 3.9 the mystery of godlinesse verse 16 the mystery of his will Ephes 1.9 the mystery of the Kingdome Marke 4.11 yea the wisdome of God in a mystery 1 Cor. 2.7 So that as God and Christ is on so the mystery is one which I say not to fault his saying mysteries for which some destinctions he may so say rightly Mat. 13.11 but then he should not have cryed down distinctions as divisions and separation when he must be driven to use them and shall not be so charged for the same that he cals unvailing mysteries he cals the truth unvailed and I will take him every way in the best and most favourable sense for the truth or this life and blessednesse in Christ the wisdome of God and the power of God may be considered as it was ordained and prepared of God in Christ and so was in him perfect even Propitiation wisdome righteousnesse sanctification redemption everlasting Covenant inheritance Kingdome glory union and fellowship with God and eternall life all was prepared by God in Christ 1 Peter 1.20 and in Christ Iohn 1.4 and was with the Father 1 Iohn 1.1 2. though hid with God in Christ Col. 3.3 And also it may be considered according to the severall degrees of Gods revealing and giving and so Jesus Christ the Propitiation in the very nature of man to take away sinne abollish death and overthrow the works of the Devill that so such as beleeve in him might have life and the reside reserved to judgement this was made known in some measure and beleeved also before any difference was between Jew and Gentile 1 Iohn 3.5 6. Gal 3.15 Jude 14 15. Heb. 11 2 7. So that I conceive he means not this discovery Again God made known to Abraham the Gospell more fully and so made known to him that Christ should come of him That in him all Nations should be blessed revealed to him the everlasting Covenant for the spirituall seed the multiplicity union and stability of the same seed and their certainty of enjoying the inheritance and made that Covenant fore confirmed in Christ with Abraham for all the spirituall seed which yet made no difference between Jewes and Gentils according to the flâ—sh Gen. 12.3 and 15.5.6 and 17 1-8 and 22.17 Gal. 3.8 9.16.29 but I will not charge it on him to mean it of this discovery Again that Christ should suffer and overcome and see his seed and of the travell of his soule and that he should be Gods salvation and shew forth judgement to the Gentils and that God would make a new Testamentall Covenant with his People and power out his Spirit on all flesh was still further revealed to and by the Prophet Isay 53. and 42.19 6. and 49 6 Jer. 31. Joel 2. Neither did this put the difference between Jewes and Gentils Yet I cannot though faine I would cleare him from intending it of this discovery but I passe it yet as also the shewing what made the difference and wherein it was of that in fit place But all this while the manner of his comming his Birth exile returne manner of life his preaching with the manner of all his sufferings death buriall and resurrection ascension offering Sacrifice exaltation and filling in our nature with the powring out of the Spirit and giving the precious promises of the new Testament though fore mentioned by the Prophets yet not clearly but as a thing still hid with God till it come to be fulfilled and acted by Iesus Christ our Lord the Holy Ghost also bearing witnesse of him and then and so was this mystery unvailed Luke 24 44-48 Rom. 1.15 and 16.25 26. 2 Tim 1.10 And the Apostles were the first makers known and revealers of this Mystery so as Mr. Garner cannot be the unvailer in this sense nor I suppose doth he so mean though of these things I suppose he meanes for to them one head of his mysteries are belonging And yet further the Gentils free participation of the benefit of al these things by the Gospel and so to be fellow heirs and of the same body and to have fellowship in all the priviledges of Israel without Circumcision or any outward observance to under them to the Iewes and to make them of the Iewish Nation this also was not clear but a hidden thing till performed by Christ and testified by his Spirit and so it was manifest to the Apostles who were the first declarers and makers of it known Acts 10. and 11. Col. 1.23.26 27. Ephes 3 4 5 6 7. And in this sense Master Garner cannot be the unvailer nor I beleeve will say he is though of this and the former he must needs be understood to mean by Mysteries For the glory of Beleevers estate at the appearing of Christ though revealed that it shall be and they shall be like Christ yet how glorious and what that same is is a thing that is still hid in God with Christ and will not be manifested till he doe come again in glory and appear visibly Col. 3 3 4. 1 Iohn 3.2 and I hope M. Garner would have none to count him the unvailer of this 3. It might be questioned what he means by Vnvailing whether the manifestation and evidencing that it might appreare but that is the worke of God in and by Christ effecting and the Spirits testifying as is shown or the first making known publishing and witnessing but this was the businesse of the Apostles and first witnesses who had the whole Gospell immediatly from Christ his own person as is shown or whether he mean only the blowing away of some mists and removing some darknesse cast on by mens deceits interpretations and glosses this is the most charitable sense to understand him in though in this sense he is not an unvailer but a gleaner out of those that have done it yet in this sense I understand him
before Mr. Garners time or mine so that he in this hath unvailed no mystery but strove to cast a vail on Iohn 6.33 51. to obscure the plainly appearing sense and to make men beleeve that the life of the world and the life of Christ that eternall life he gives to them that in beleeving he draws out of the world is all one and the same life a grosse and absurd conceit V. Mystery That the reall manifestation and suffering of Christ in the flesh his personall Death upon the Tree was more wonderfull glorious and mysticall in respect of the declaration of the wisdome power and grace of God which did more wonderfully shine forth in it then either the promises or shadowes of his Death so it was more wonderfull and glorious then those in respect of the power fruit of it also which was the breaking down the partition wall which was between Jewes and Gentils it was the beginning of life and salvation unto all Nations of the world p 111 112 113 114 126. He cals ' it the glorious saving power of the Death of Christ and surely I am ready to acknowledge the dying of Christ precious powerfull glorious c. and the Death of Christ exceeding in power glory and fruitfulnesse and that to Gentils also But this hath been unvailed by the Apostles and is clearly held forth in preaching and writing generally and so not unvailed by Mr. Garner who hath rather vailed the plainly appearing truth then unvailed the mystery in his expressions for the Death of Christ was gloriously and savingly powerfull even before his actuall dying and that to mankind and in Beleevers from Adam to Noah and from Noah to Abraham before there was any Nation of Israel distinct from Gentils Heb. 11.1.8 and when that distinction was it did not limmit the power of his Death to Israel muchlesse did it limmit it to the lewes it only limmitted the enjoyment of the priviledges of the first Testament to them and yet not so but that the door was open for any Gentile of any Nation in submitting and comming in by Circumcision to be one people with them they might enjoy Exod. 12. and 13. though through the pride of the Gentils this became a partition-wall And yet farther through Christ was much glorified in being inabled to dye such a death and mercy and truth met therein yet the Holy Ghost speaketh of the personall sufferings and dying of Christ as of an abasement Isay 53. 2 Cor. 5.21 Phil. 2.7 8. and of his resurrection as that wherein he was mightily declared to be the Sonne of God Rom. 1.4 and sayeth expresly notwithstanding his denying that if he had not risen wee had been yet in our sinnes and faith and preaching vain 1 Cor. 15.17 And that he is exalted to be a Prince and a Saviour c. Acts 5.31 and received spirit gifts in the man for men even for the rebellious also That the Lord God might dwell among them Psalme 68 18 and by this spirit making known and applying the death of him that is risen that was once dead and is alive for evermore it is that his death is so glorious powerfull and saving in men as is foreshown But Mr. Garner saith expresly that to dye for men and to gather them together in one is one and the same thing pag. 126. so that he doth but talke confusedly when he talkes of sprinckling for blood-sheding and blood sprinckling are by this saying one and the same thing so that here he vailes the mystery in Scripture unvailed VI. Mystery That Christ was fore promised to be a light in the Gentils revealing in them and giving to them remission of sins salvation life everlasting through saith in Christ page 128 And that unto all those to whom he is a light which himselfe expounded in many places to be all the Nations of the earth All men the World the whole World the Gentils c he revealeth himselfe in them drawing their hearts to beleeve in him unto life everlasting page 129. This is the main and bottome matter the grand mystery and swaying and interpreting truth which though in many places he puts down in his own name yet he takes it for granted none will deny it this streams through his Book from the beginning to the end and is the ground of his forcing his private sense on so many places of Scripture this is it led him to such expressions in his unvailing Mysteries This is it with which he answers Mr. Lambs reasons this is the maine matter and bottome proofe for his confounding the destinctions at first and for raising his conclusions at last and to speak as the truth is if he have unvailed any one Mystery this is it but whether it be a mystery of truth or no that remaines to be tryed for he hath brought no proofe nor testimony for the truth of it but his own affirmation and Mr. Knowles aprobation and that is to light for proofe for we have no Rabby to take any point of faith from for his own authority or testimony but only Christ Mat. 23.8 nor are we to esteem any light in his sayings that addes to or takes from or speakes besides and otherwise then the sayings of Christ in the Gospell Isay 8 20. Gal. 1.6 7 8 9. Rev. 22.18 19. Besides Mr. Garners expressions are some-what harsh and dangerous giving to much aprobation to the opinion of those that will speak as gloriously of the death of Christ as he and yet concerning Jesus that was borne in Bethlehem â—e out of us dying and rising and offerering Sacrifice for us and so a propitiation with God for us and this made known to us concerning that in his person without us by word and Spirit and all effecacies thereof are nothing but Christ after the flesh and knowing him after the flesh And they exalted a Christ that is the Son of God the Saviour the propitiation they say and in every man Dying in a man and rising in a man and this their happinesse when this in them is revealed to them quite besides the Scripture the next step to Athisme And Mr. Garners expressions are come very neer to it but to say the least in this expression of his mystery that with faithfulnesse can be said he wrongs the Scripture Isay 52.15 and 9.1 2. Mat. 4 14 15. That speakes of Christ personall comming to the Jewes preaching the Gospell to them and that Gentils also might enjoy the same As if Zabulun and Napthaly because bordering upon and in the way of the Gentils were Gentils and as if the Gospell preaching by Christ come in the flesh were not a great light among them yea no light but only to those in whom Christ was revealed giving them remission of sinnes and everlasting life yea he alters the language of the Holy Ghost who speaking of the life and propitiation in Christ and the Salvation in him as set forth shining and tendered in the Gospell
belonged to Paul not as a man but as an elect vessell A secret indeed no where as redemption was effected by Christ in his owne body set forth in the Scripture which tels us That all are by nature dead in trespasses and sins under sin c. without difference Rom. 3. Eph. 2. And that Christ dyed for the ungodly and unjust and for our sinnes and surely men are ungodly and unjust and sinners as they are men and not as they are elect vessels Rom. 3 10-20 But that it was for men is evident 2 Cor. 5.11.14 15. 1 Tim. 2.5 6. Thirdly for what Christ thus gave himselfe to God whether for this that for and upon this very gift men should be at peace with God one with him and God now without any more done take all sinne out of them or from off them and so all punishments and deaths and fill them with eternall life embracing them as sons in his delightfull love or whether it was for this that for and upon that very gift Jesus Christ might have the dispose and be the Lord of all Rom. 14.9 Psal 2.7.9 And be the Saviour of the world 1 John 4.14 Isa 49.6 And the propitiation for the sinnes of the whole world Ioh. 2 2. And be filled with authority power and spirit to preserve men and creatures for their use and to use means and send forth spirit in the means to move men to repent and seek the Lord Matth. 28.18 Phil. 2.8 9 10. Psal 75.3 68.18 Rom. 2.4 And to be the Judge of all to absolve all that by his grace in the meanes are prevailed with to beleeve on him Mat. 9.6 Act. 10.43 And to condemne such as hold the truth in unrighteousnesse and so persist in their impenitencie unbeliefe and rebellion Ioh. 1.18 19. Psal 68 18-21 And that being thus made perfect he should be the Author of eternall salvation to all that obey him Hebr. 5 8 9. And throw into a second death all that rebelled against him their right and lawfull Lord that bought them and abolished the first death for them 2 Pet. 2.1 2 Tim. 1.10 With the Devils also for that they usurped to deceive and draw men to rebell against his government Now whether of these wayes Mr. T. W. will answer this question Charity bids me make no resolution because if he should answer the former way as his writing gives occasion to suspect then I know no full or plaine sentence of Scripture to expresse or countenance his Answer with nor can Iunderstand how he can free his saying from charging God with injustice for receiving a sufficient price and detaining that for which it was given in suffering such as by such saying ought to be freed still to be born under guilt and defilement of sinne and to remaine many dayes under the power the darknesse and sinne and Satan and afflicted with punishments and death nor can I see how he will avoyd derogating from the great mediation and exercise of the High priest hood of Jesus Christ which Scripture shews to be at the Right hand of God and by vertue of his Death and Sacrifice offered to God wherefore I will not so conceive of his meaning but if he Answer in the latter though it be with more apt and fit expressions then hee granteth all that T. M. hath laboured to maintaine for how else will he understand the sufficiency of the death of Christ wee are not questioning what is the sufficiency of God the Creator as Creator The Death Resurrection and Sacrifice of Christ is certainly a creature though such as in which the Creator is yet as Christ is the first borne of every creature The first borne from the dead the second man made a quickning Spirit so all this in him a new creation now how there should be a sufficiency in any created being though possessed with God for redeeming any for which there neither is nor ever was any intention or will of the Creator I cannot understand indeed if he had said it might have been sufficient if God had so willed I might and would have spared this given another Answer But he plainly confesseth There was value and worth in Christs Death in regard of the sufficiency and excellency of it for the redeeming al the men in the world And if there was such value and worth for sufficiency in it It is so in it still compare John 1.4.5 with 1 Ioh. 1.1 2 3. The Word of the Lord endureth for ever I say 40 8. 1 Pet. 1.24 25. And we are to follow those the end of whose doctrine and conversation is to set forth Iesus Christ The same yesterday and to day and for ever Heb. 13 8. And so whosoever misse it is for not receiving the tenders of it in the meanes Prov. 1.23 24 c. So that Mr. T. W. in this saying hath secretly granted that which he openly opposeth but yet he saith whether Christ in Gods intention and his owne performance so payed a ransome for all and every particular man as thereby to make satisfaction and procure reconciliation with God for them is the thing in question This T. M. undertakes to prove saith Mr. T. W. He meanes not that T. M. goeth about to prove that this is the thing in question that rests for himself to prove But that T. M. undertakes to prove this thing that is in question but he should either have put downe T. M. his owne expressions or else not after have slandered him p. 3. l. 5 6 7. saying That Christ entended to reconcile all men to God by the reconciliation wrought in his body with God for men which saith he are Tho. Moore his owne words but as hee hath annexed them they are Mr. Tho. Whitfeild his owne surmises And therefore seeing he hath not set downe the question either as Doctor Davenant did To which I yeelded in my Booke nor as I there expressed it nor kept close in his Treatise in answering to that hee expresseth as mine I must a little open the businesse before I yeeld him this to be mine And so I confesse my selfe to conceive that I understand and beleeve that in the beginning God made one man a living soule and that he made him righteous and a publike man Gen. 1.26.27 1 Cor. 15.45 That he made them superiour and inferiour male and female fit for encrease by generation and called their name Adam 1 Tim. 2.13 Gen. 1.27 5.2 And that God at the first created all men in his creation of this man and made all men righteous in making this man righteous Eccles 7 29. So as what this Adam was in his publique place in which he then stood all men were in him for he was all men and what God adorned and furnished him withall he did it in him to all men And the oportunity of eating of the Tree of Life with the charge not to eat of the tree of Knowledge of good and evill and affirmation of
Death in dying to Dye in the very day he should eat thereof given to this man was given to all men in this man And this publique man eating of the fruit of the forbidden tree he sinned and so lost the Image of God out of his heart and fell under the guilt and power of sin and so under the power of the Law and of death c. And what he did all men did in him so as in him all men sinned and fell Rom. 5.12 And the Almighty convicting him of sin convicted all men of sin so that by this one offence or the offence of this one unto all men to condemnation that is on all men in a publique man yet not at the first on them as individuals and particulars yet so as all the individuals when ever they come forth by propogation from him as they are of him in that Nature they partake of and are under the guilt and partake of the same misery in bondage to law sin and death Rom. 5.19 Ephes 2.1 2 3. So that by reason of the sentence gone forth from the Almighty Genes 2.17 more unalterable then that of the Medes and Persians Hest 3 8 Truth and Justice required a present imposing of the execution of that Death and curse which is the first Death according to the just judgement of God without a mediator and that all men must have perished in if God had not found out a remedie for without sheading blood no Remission Heb. 9.22 But now this I beleeve that as God in his purpose of making man did see that man would fall So in his purpose and Councell he provided the remedy in his Son before the world was 1 Pet. 1.20 And presently upon the fall in the very same moment this businesse was done and acted in respect of agreement conceipt Tender and acceptation betweene God and Christ the Sonne of God to take into union of Person the nature of man to be made flesh under the Law and beare the imputation of sin and so to dye and rise and offer sacrifice for man which God accepted and so filled him in the nature of man with all fulnesse of grace and truth so that here is a propitiation life from the dead and a new creation in And a new heaven and earth for this second Man And spirit to quicken c. Psal 40. Heb. 10.5.10 So that here are two men two Adams the first the last 1 Cor. 15.45 c. So that the vertue of the Death Resurrection and Sacrifice of Christ was from the beginning so as thereby men were either saved or left to the judgement of Christ Though the fruitfulnesse thereof was neither so apparant nor abundant till it was really acted in our nature by Christ John 1 1-17 John 1.1 2. so that there is no Divinity in this Argument of Mr. W. That because many were damned before Christ actually Dyed therefore Christ dyed not for them page 4.36 37. page 11. l. 4. hee might as well have said mâ—ny were saved before Christ actually dyed therefore he dyed not for them But passing such Arguments as of no force to enlightened beleevers Scripture sheweth us two things wrought by God in the gift of his Son and obtained of God and effected by Christ by vertue of his Death Resurrection and offering himselfe a Sacrifice to God and receit of Spirit in the man viz. 1. A supportation of the old or first creation for a time Psal 75.3 Col. 1.17 Heb. 1.3 In which there is both time and space given that men might repent and come in to their Lord 2 Pet. 3 9. Rev. 3.21 And also meanes and some motion of Spirit to sead and move to repentance and seeking the Lord Rom 2 4. Act. 14 17. 17 26 27. Gen. 6.3 Psal 68.18 And 2. A new creation in which is pardon Peace justification life from the dead or eternall life and inheritance Revel 21.5 which all that by grace are brought into union with Christ partaking of 2 Cor 5 17. Here in this life in spirit in a first fruits Rom. 8 10.23 In the Resurrection in fulnesse both in soule and body Phil. 3.21 1 John 3.2 Now in these two men the first and the last man all men are considerable The first a naturall man The second a spirituall In the first difference of sexe and degree In the second not so The first fallen The second having undertaken hath restored that fallen nature And thereby preserveth the first with that creation for a time so as generations come forth from him the distinctions of sexe and degrees remaining preserved and ordered by him for the time and hath also a new creation for all that come forth of the first Adam and by the means he useth come in to him But as none come in to the second Adam that came not forth of the first so none come forth of the first Adam whose nature the second hath not taken for whom he hath done nothing by which they might partake of him and for refusall thereof be justly judged by him but these two Adams are not both naturall to have their severall posterities by generation The second is a spirituall man and his seed is of such as come in to him by regeneration It was therefore something unsavoury and of no force to prove any thing so to exptesse his comparison and the opposition of the two Adams with their severall posterities and then mention the supposition of a third page 68. line 17 18. unlesse Mr. W. could shew a posterity comming forth of the loynes of the Man Christ or a Generation comming in to him who never came forth of the first Adam and so were first of his posterity But to the businesse as I am helped to understand but by Scripture and also by reason subdued to beleeve God in his owne sayings If Jesus Christ in the beginning did by his consent and agreement with God his Father become the second Man the last publique Man and so under-tooke for the first man the first publique man who was all men Then he under-tooke for all men Rom. 5.12.14 1 Cor. 15.22.45 46 47. If he tooke the nature of the first Adam that was all men and not only a part of that nature or some part of the nature of Adam but the whole nature of whole Adam then he took the nature of all men Luke 3.23.38 Act. 17.26 If Jesus Christ became under the Law and stood in the stead and bare the sins of the first Adam and dyed for his sins in whom all sinned and fell under Law and whose sin was the sin of all men Then surely hee was made under the Law for and stood in the stead and bare the sins and dyed for the sins of all men Though the gift in and by Christ exceed the offence Rom. 8.3 Gal. 3.3.4 Rom. 5. And if Jesus Christ took not on him the difference of sexes and degrees or any of the excellencies or furniture
of the first Adam but only the nature which was one in both sexes and each degree Then he came and dyed for all men in both sexes and every degree not so much respecting sexes or degrees as the nature of men for whom and for whose sins he came and dyed and so for them as men ungodly and sinners and not as elect vessels and a holy generation though to make such and even from the roofe and beginning of all it is evident That Jesus Christ the second publique man undertook as the second man A publique person for the first man a publique person and so for all that were in him and by propogation to come of him that they might not perish in this first judgement and death but to be given him into his dispose to preserve alive a time that they might live to him in this life and after death to raise them and bring them alive before him to be judged by him in another judgement to another life or to another death according to the Gospell Rom. 14 9-12 2 Cor. 5.10 11 14 15. Phil. 2 7-11 Rom. 2.16 and so the holy Ghost teacheth us to understand the businesse saying As by the offence of one unto all men to condemnation even so by the righteousneosse of one unto all men to justification of life Rom. 5.18 that is as is aforesaid in the other in the publicke man that undertooke for all men and that so as their lives are preserved a time and the old creation for them that such as come into him by the meanes he useth while he preserveth them in this old creation may partake of the new creation in him and such as perish in rebellion against him may be brought to another judgement and sentenced to a second Death And so in this sense Jesus Christ hath dyed and given himselfe a ransome for All men so as he hath made an atonement with God and is himselfe become the propitiation for their sinnes that it may be declared or testified in some fruites of his goodnesse to lead to repentance and seeking the Lord that so such as are by grace brought in to beleeve may be reconciled unto God and receive remission of sinnes and eternall life and those that perish in refusall and rebellion be justly sent down to a second Death which is a foundation and ground of and motive to repentance faith and obedience for all men set forth in the Gospell shewing in all this their obligation to Christ with incouragement to come in to Christ and terrour to all that rebell If Mr. T. W. his expressions may be taken in this sense it is yeelded as a true report or else not for this is that which Mr. T. W. opposeth and which T. M. endevoureth to shew proved in the sayings of holy Scripture for otherwise to prove he is still lesse being no Linguist for knowledge of divers tongues no Arthist in Logick either according to Aristotle or Ramus nor learned in Philosophy either morrall politicall or naturall either Epicurian Pithagorean Stoicke or Platonist or were he yet he could not thinke meet by these to square mould and prove Divinity but only what God saith in his word as he is helped to understand he desireth to beleeve and takes his sayings to be proofe enough and of more worth then all the reasons and arguments of men against them But Mr. T. W. saith that for proofe T. M. makes use of three things which he makes the principall ground of his Doctrine That which he cals the first ground for T. M. his proofe is The distinction between the Redemption reconciliation and salvation which Jesus Christ effected in his own body with God for men and that he effected by his Spirit in men God this saith Mr. T. W. is not agreeable to Scripture To which I answer I have been so told by such whom he reproacheth as lay preachers but not by any profest Divines before I read it in Mr. T. W. 2. This distinction and foure more one about the distinct ends of his death another the distinct manner of mentioning those ends another about the divers waies of propounding his death and another about the difference of the extent and force of the same word in Scripture I used for clearing the businesse in stating the question But seeing so many of those he reproacheth as lay preachers affirme them my proofes and now it is so affirmed by two Clerks professed Divines though of contrary judgement and practice let them so stand each of the five distinctions being of the like force to prove and foure of them not faulted by Mr. T. W. 3. This distinction he faulteth is in the Treatise shewn expresly in the Scripture there quoted page 2. to 14 15. and nothing there disproved in any quotation but remaineth full enough to answer all he hath said to fault it besides the distinction and that which it now acknowledged a proofe for are both shewn in that Treatise and in the first part of my answer to Mr. Garner to be plainly set forth and proved in the Scripture 4. His way of faulting the distinction is by framing reasons and calling Scripture to make a consequent with though I hope he will not justifie the Saduces so reasoning from Scripture Mat. 22. as divers in our-dayes also have done to deny the reurrection of the body But this with all that followes in his leasons is answered and the abuse of Scripture therein shewn before in that Treatise in divers places to which he hath said nothing and again in the first and third part of the Reply to M. Garner so as for answer no more need but only to desire the Reader to peruse the same though the Reader of his may see 1. In his first reason much weaknesse for whatever reconciliation be wrough with God in Christ by his Death yet no men are reconciled to God but by the spirituall application thereof when the love of God is there through commended to the heart which slayes the enmity there and reconciles to God in receit of the atonement whence the words while wee were c. and being now justified and wee have now received Atonement Rom. 5.8 9.10 11. The Colotians were enemies in their minds by wicked workes in which they walked after Christ had dyed yea and made peace in presenting the vertue of his death before God also and by application of this were after reconciled to God Col. 1.20 21 22 23. Besides he is not able to prove that the Death of Christ is agreater worke then the resurrection of Christ nor that the reconciling to God by love commended through the death of Christ a greater worke then the further saving by the power of the Spirit of life by which he rose from the dead which sounds harsh to Ephes 1.17.19 20. though his so saying acknowledgeth the distinction As for his altering the Text Rom. 8.32 it may be said God doth not give an unâ—glorified Sonne to
his but having delivered him up for us all it is not said how shall he not deliver up all things for us but as he said if he give him to us who was delivered for us and is wisdome righteousnesse c. how saith the text shall he not with him in giving him freely give us all things which makes nothing for Mr. W. his Reason 2. His next reason is answered in the Treatise opposed and in reply to Mr. G. It s no where said that the world hath Redemption through his blood nor that God will not impute sin to the world though Mr. T. W. take liberty to confound and limit generall propositions with speciall applications and to blot out difference between present preterperfect and future tense here and else where 3. His third Reason is dubious and forceleffe and answered in the Treatise opposed and in reply to Mr. Garner about the word Advocate 4. His fourth Reason is grounded upon an oversight of the change of person in the Apostles speeches from verse 14 to 21 in 2 Cor. 5. and mis conception of the word might as is shewn in reply to Mr. Garner about that word 5. His fifth Reason hath an equivocation in the words hath reconciled which should be hath wrought reconciliation in his own body or reconciled the nature of mankind in himselfe for all mon and then his consequence is not true of all men nor doth a Peter 1.3 speake of any more then the then Beleevers yea in those words not of all them as the next verses the change of persons shew and so prove not Mr. Garners sayings at all 6. For his sixt reason I forbeare to note what appeares in it I desire to deale reverently with him and not to provoke him for Christ by his death resurrection and Sacrifice hath purchaced all men of God and wrought reconciliation in their nature in himselfe for them and doth use meanes that it might be applied to them which if they persit in rebellious resusing and when he opens their eyes will not see their saying if he give them up and doe no more he is but a halfe Saviour will neither helpe themselves nor hurt him 7. His seventh reason is grounded on a slander as is fore shown and built up with queries to which answer enough is both in the Treatise and in the reply to Mr. Garner and all the world being Christs out of which those that are chosen in the heavenly call to him are his peculiar and have his Spirit I marvell at his passages in this businesse as if some were his peculiar before they have his Spirit and after shall have or as if the greatest number of men were their own as evill men say Psal 12. for if they be Gods and not their own then they are Christs also and that by vertue of his ransome Psal 26.9 That which he saith is the second ground of T. M. proof is A distinction between a common salvation which Christ hath purchased for all and a speciall salvation which he hath purchased for Beleevers this T. M. disclaimes and marvels thaâ— so learned a man and profest Divine professing the examination of my Book should under his hand affirme such a thing For 1. I was about the first distinction still and comming to treat of the second branch the redemption reconciliation and salvation which by his Spirit discovering and applying the former he worketh in men I mentioned how he was fitted for it and how he proceedeth to effect it in which I shewed how the Scripture sheweth a common salvation in which also there is a witnesse and tender to draw men toward the speciall and so that their is a speciall falvation in all which I spake not of purchase but dispensation which Mr. T. W. could not but see and why he hath altered the businesse and misreported my sayings let the reader judge 2. I doe not conceive so grosly carnally and scantily of Christ as if he were not the Saviour and author of salvation but only a purchaser of it only a bargain maker with God a purchaser of some things for the Father to give to another I beleeve him so to have purchased as to have all into his dispose so as he hath power to forgive sinnes and to give eternall life and is able to save and able to destroy yea the Father doth nothing without him but whatsoever the Father doth the Son doth the same and God would have all men honour the Son as they honour the Father Mat. 9. John 5. 3. This second of his reported my grounds being his own framed position to answer it is meet himselfe deale with it and not I whom it concernes not and what concerneth this businesse of mine is already fully and largly answered in the Treatise which became him to have answered and not to flye that and frame prositions and objections as him best liketh and as he conceives his reasons might best answer and yet there is still farther answer to all he saith in this Reply to Mr. Garner in the first part on Hebrewes 5.9 1. As for the common salvation mentioned Jud. 3. though I but quoted the place after this saying The faith of this common salvation is as the oppening the doore to the speciall Text p. 11. And so gave no occasion of his if salvation be taken in a speciall sense for I desire not to take any part of the salvation wrought by Christ in his own body or extended by vertue thereof to men in a carnall sense but spiritually in regard of the salvation because it comes from the Lord the quickning Spirit and hath evidence and motives in it to spirituall good even that part of it which is in preservation of the old creation how much more that which exceeds and hath its ends and tendancy towards eternall life though it be not eternall life which is the speciall but what salvation is meant Jud. 3. whether the common in beleefe whereof the speciall is received or the speciall only I have the Reader for answer to consider what is said Jud. 4 5. of the types some destroyed after saved and for the sanctification c. mentioned consider Heb. 10.19 for whom surely he prayed and was as dilligent as for these other Reply I make not least I should occasion his zeale to become fury As for his affirming the salvation no larger then the faith and because the faith of the salvation is not given to all therefore the salvation was no farther common then to them that had it His undertaking to be a Minister of the Gospell to many nigh Rutland Lincolne shire and Yermouth who at that time had not that faith given them doth confute his saying though one might also say there is more in the salvation wrought by Christ both common and speciall then any words in doctrine can fully set forth without divine Spirit to discover or will be fully manifested till no more need of such mediums to see
hath run himselfe into such snares as he snares himselfe worse to get out againe saying every one is enjoyned to beleeve on Christ page 7. And yet that it may be denyed that all men are bound to beleeve on Christ page 68. Put a duty to beleeve instead of Christ for the foundation of faith page 7. Proclaiming such commands as God gives for men to walke in to be some of them contrary to the inward mind of God some contrary one to another surely if Enthusiastes may be granted this denies them nothing but how may this appeare he saith God gave Abraham a command to kill his Sonne and then another not to kill which latter being his purpose was crosse to the former command page 49. 84. But where will he prove this not in the revealed word of God for that tels us God bad Abraham offer his Sonne for a burnt offering and so much was revealed Gen. 22.2 And Abraham not knowing that this contained any lesse then to offer him up a burnt offering he did offer and intended to slay there was his tryall but the latter command though crossing Abrahams intentions did enlighten his understanding and so he saw not one command crosing another but obeyed both in offering his Sonne Heb. 11.17 and not slaying him but offering the Ram a burnt offering And as for Pharaoh he had hardened his own heart long before nor was Gods hardening any other but the withstanding that opperation by which he had before been moving his heart and so justly for his rebellion and cruelty leaving him to Satan yet did he command nothing in charging him to let his people goe but what he would have done there being a people to be let goe and he had done well if he had willingly yeelded it but he brought him to it at last as he will one day all those that in the day of grace refuse to acknowledge Jesus Christ the Lord bring them to it Phil. 2.10 11. Oh what spirit is that which so sets out the command of God that he is faine to plead the equity of them with that Rom. 9.20 did the Apostle so in that place or hath God done so Ezek. 18. surely his commands are righteous altogether Psal 19. I set passe that might be said in that which followes page 7. to avoid provocation But as he deales with the command so he is as crosse to the Apostles in setting forth the Gospell to be beleeved consider page 169. First saith Mr. T. W. no man is bound to beleeve Christ dyed for him till he seele his need of him and be humbled but first to beleeve that God hath given his Sonne to purchase redemption for all repenting sinners Now what Gospell is this what humiliation and repentance is that and whence comes it that must be before a man beleeve so much as that Christ dyed for him Christ dyed for the ungodly his enemies c. But such as have repented are not so called yea the Apostles have preached the death and resurrection of Christ for men to call and move them to repentance Acts 13.37 39. 1 Cor. 15.14 Secondly he saith it is their duty to see and feele their sinnes and be so humbled for them as thereby they may be brought to repentance See here they must not see their sinnes by this doctrine as Christ was made finne and a curse for them nor look upon them as they have pirced him and so come in to him for they may not yet beleeve that he dyed for them how crosse is this to the Scripture Zach. 12.10 and the Apostles preaching of repentance who set it forth as the gift of Christ that is risen from the dead and exalted and urged it one that ground that in beleeving it might be effected Acts 2. 3. 13. 17.31 Thirdly hee saith that when they are truly humbled and brought to repentance it is their duty to renounce their own righteousnesse and rest on Christ alone for salvation strange doctrin that a man should rely on Christ before he can beleeve that Christ dyed for him surely Paul was otherwise led the knowledge of Christ produced his repentance faith confidence and not these that Phil. 3 7 8 9. Fourthly he saith that doing this they ought to perswade themselves that Christ dyed for them c. here is right the cart to lead the horse and the building made the foundation surely the Apostle receiving the atonement throug divine love manifested in his death did let goe his own righteousnesse and depend on him to besaved by his life Rom. 5.8.10 11. Thus have I noted the Gospell and saith Mr. T. W. sets forth Oh you that through grace beleeve is not this a humane faith did such a faith ever support you in a day of tryall and when God by Spirit in the word of grace testified of his Sonne and in discovery of his rich grace to your heart brought you in to believe did not that melt humble and worke repentance in you or were you left to view reason from such things in you selves to parswade your own hearts to believe I must a peale to beleevers in this and so to M. T. W. his own heart because of that 1 John 4 5 6. That which he saith is the third ground Tho. Mocre brings to prove that Christ dyed for all is those generall expressions which the Scripture useth in speaking of Christs Death Surely if I can find him right in none of his heads of proceeding it is time to let answering of him alone 1 Tim. 2.6 Heb. 2.9 not an expression only but the whole sentences I writ to testifie the truth of them in the sense the words import whatsoever Title was put on my Book of which I need not be a shamed but before I began to prove I endevoured to cleare the businesse by severall distinctions in five severall chapters containing 32 pages and now I have by reason oâ— his and another not the worse because a Shoo-maker and another not the worse because an Apothecary seeing they are Christians calling them proofes yeelded them so to be and out of the first distinction Mr. T. W. hath affirmed two grounds though he hath disproved nothing by it then in the first chapter I shewed how the question is stated by divers the first as I had it from such as Mr. W. cals lay-preachers and that I opposed and that is it Mr. T. W. labours to maintain the second as it is stated by those called Arminians which I also have confuted in the Treatise the third as some Ministers have stated it the fourth and fifth as some learned sober and judicious Ministers in great place whom I love and reverence as godly howsoever they be affected towards me have stated it the sixt as some learned writers are reported to have stated it the seventh as it was stated in the Synod of Dort which I approve as good and true the last as Doctor Davenant stated it to
which I stood page 33.36 Then I began to prove by opening the question and answering it in twelve answers by plain sayings of Scripture without interpretation or glosses chapter 7. page 37.38 39. which when Mr. T. W. can doe to prove Christ dyed not for all or only for an elect company or that all he dyed for shall have eternall life or that there is a world yet in Scripture called a beleeving world that are the sinners and unjust for whom Christ dyed he may be credited else he doth nothing to purpose then I proceeded to more enlarged proofe 1. By considering Christ as the common person in the room of all mankind of whom the first was a figure chapter 8. page 40 49. 2. By considering the joynt mentioning of creation and redemption by Christ chapter 9 page 49 52. 3. By considering the constancy of the Scripture in changing the person when having mentioned the generall it mentions any speciall chap. 10. p. 53.54 4 By considering 1 Tim. 3.6 and Heb. 2.9 in the force of the words the scope and circumstances of the places chap. 11.12 p. 55 56. 5. By considering like places of Scripture speaking in like manner chap. 13. p. 66. 70. To all which M. W. hath said nothing to confute any one argument 6. By adding six arguments to satisfie such as must have reason satisfied with addition of 18. severall proofes chap. 20. page 129. to 137. with addition of more proofes chap. 21. p. 138. 143. with removeall of doubts chap. 22. now Mr. W. only pitches upon the generall expressions the sixth of the 18. proofs p. 233. Did this learned man examine my Booke well or goe about to answer me to call this my third ground and to say nothing but that which is already answered in the Booke and the least refuted by him that for answer to all I need but say read the Treatise againe and for such generall words as All men Every man the World he taketh paines to no purpose The Treatise sheweth as many significations as he but how it is taken when it is spoken by God of his great workes by and concerning his Sonne in this he hath done nothing and all he hath said is fully answered in the Treatise chap. 5 11. 12. 13. And at large in answer to Mr. Garner as for the objections I answered I never medled with them so long as I looked on them as Schoole disputes framed against Arminius by learned men who in their grounds of Religion have confessed as much as I say but when they were sent me by a Gentleman sometime as report is a Black smith no dishonour to him in the eyes of the wise in opposition to the truth I have so answered them and Mr. W. hath strengthened my answers by faulting and not confuring any one of them as he that reads may there see In which all his here now moulded objections queries and reasons are answered and again in answering the same things to Mr. R. G. on the same words in the second and third part of that Reply only I shall here hint some things as answers to some new expressions of his 1. I beleeve according to Scripture two Adams or men the first naturall the second spirituall and the sayings of Scripture as they are of things belonging to the first I understand in a naturall sense and as they are of things belonging to the second I understand in a spirituall sense and yet both in that sense the words in such sayings imports which is rightly called the litterall sense 1 Cor 15.45.48 And this in answer to Mr. W. p. 8.9 whose crosse and carnall expressions I forbeare to put to tryall 2. I never said nor writ that every child can understand such a figure as this the Pot seethes over where the subject is put for the adjunct alas many Children may take the fastened grumble on the outside as well as the pottage within for an adjunct But I said such a saying may be understood by meane Country people that know not what to call such figures yea and profitably so as the end of such a voice being to hasten the Mother to save the pottage from being lost which if shee stay to here a Clearke open the figure and being delighted in hearing how figurative the childs speech was all may be lost I apply it not But in the other figure though a part be sometimes put for the whole that excludes not the whole or else that he cals a part is the whole But that God made all Nations should be a figure put for part and that God made Israell should be the proper speech to limit and explicate I hope Mr. T. W. will not say and this for answer to his p. 13. 3. I am not willing to urge his taking men off from beleeving the resurrection of all men from the testimony of Scripture to take it on his word 1 Cor. 15. For since by man death is not that the death of all by man also the resurrection of the dead is not that as large as the former did death befall any more by the first man then were made righteous in him and he stood for and they sinned in him and shall any more be raised by the second then those whose natures he hath taken and for whom dyed and rose let Mr. W. prove that till when I prefer the text v. 22. For as in Adam all dye evenso in Christ shall all be made alive though I beleeve a more aboundant and excellent life for such as by grace are one in him 4. I am sorry for his rashnesse and bold adventure to give occasion of strength to those that would hold many Gods and have many wives and be justified by their own workes as if the word But or only or that which is as much or more were not in the Scripture for these what are not mens words and humane righteousnesse plainly excluded in our justification before God Rom. 3.20.21 27 28 9.32 10.3 Is it not plainly said there is but one God 1 Cor. 8.6 and saith he not expresly Isay 45.21 22. No God else besides me none besides me I God and none else and surely though men should love their enemies and their Brethren and their Children And I am perswaded Mr. W. would those at least where he is Minister should love him and that with true and faithfull love also and yet this is more then to love their wives only But if Mr. W. meane it of that peculiar love and fellowship that ought to be between man and wife I suppose he better knowes the law of nature the law mortall and Leviticall then so to object did not God make twaine one Hath he not forbidden to take another to vex her life Hath he not forbidden fornication Adultry c. Is there another Minister besides M. W. or any judicious among the people that will thus reason when he can shew the place in holy