without an originall is voide Kel f. 19. b. A remainder is limited to the King and before the inrolement of the deed the King granteth it over and then the deed is inrolled this will not make the grant good Coke l. 3. f. 29. An executor assigneth auditors to one who was accountant to the testator and his auditors find him in arrearages the Action of debt shall be brought in the Detinet onely and hath respect to the beginning 11. H. 6. If I have a villaine for yeares as executor and the villaine purchaseth land the executor entreth the land shall be to the use of the testator and assets in his hands because the villaine which was the cause of it was to such use Ployd f. 292. a. Chap-mans case Causa origo est materia negotii Cok l. 1. Shellies case f. 99. b. vide As if a servant hath an intent to kill his Master before the execution of his intent departeth out of his service being out of his service executeth his intent and killeth him which was his Master it is petit treason for the execution respects the originall cause which was the malice conceived when he was his servant vide ibidem plura I. S. buildeth a shop on the wast of a Mannor of which the Queene was seis'd the Queen granteth the Mannor to the Earle of Leicester and he never entreth nor taketh rent I. S. dieth and his sonne entreth there is no descent against the patentee because there was no disseisin against the Queene Dyer 266. b. Yet when the law giveth power and authority to doe any thing Exception the law adjudgeth of the thing by the act subsequent not precedent Coke l. 8. f. 146. b. As the law giveth me power or license to enter into a common Hostlery or Taverne or to the Lord to distraine or to the owner of the soile to distrain for damage feasant or to him in the reversion to view if wast be made and to the commoner to enter into the land to see his beasts but if he that entreth into the Hostlery or Tavern maketh trespass or if the Lord that distraineth for rent or damage fesant beat or slay the distress or if he that entreth to see wast breaketh the house or remaineth there an whole night or the commoner cut downe trees in these cases the Law shall judge by act subsequent that they entred to that purpose and shall be trespassors from the beginning for acta exteriora indicant intoriora secreta the outward acts shew the inward secrets and with what minde and with what intent he did enter So if a purveyor take my beasts for the hostle of the King by force of his commission it is legall but if he sell them in Market then the first taking is injurious Coke l. 9. f. 11. a. Tenant in taile hath issue two daughters and dieth and the elder entreth into the whole and after entry maketh a feoffment with warranty which is a lineall warranty for the one and collaterall for the other the law judgeth by the act subsequent that the entry was not generall for them both but that it was onely for her selfe and that it shall be a warranty to commence by disseisin for the one moiety Quod initio vitiosum est tractu temporis non convalescet Reg. I. Civ Quod initio non valet tractu temporis non convalescet Coke com f. 35. a. That which in the beginning is vicious or invalid cannot by tract of time bee made good or valid as tenant for life of a carve of land the reversion to the father in fee the son and heire apparent endoweth his wife of this carve by the assent of the father tenant for life dieth the husband dieth this is no good endowment ex assensu patris because the father at the time of the assent had but a reversion expectant upon a free-hold whereof hee could not have endowed his own wife Ployd f. 432. b. A. possessed of an horse selleth the horse upon condition that hee shall pay him at Christmas forty shillings for it and before the said feast he selleth the horse to another and at the feast the first buyer faileth of payment whereupon A. reseiseth the horse yet the second buyer shall not have him because at the time of the second contract A. had no interest nor property nor possession of the horse but onely a condition which was not sufficient to make the contract good A. seised of Lands in see maketh a lease for twenty yeares rendring rent to begin presently and the same day he maketh a Lease to another for the same terme the second lease is utterly void so as if the first Lessee surrendreth his terme to the Lessor or loseth the same by breach of condition or forfeiteth it by making a feoffment upon entry of the Lessor the second Lessee shall not have his terme because the Lessor at the making of the second lease had nothing in him but the reversion ibidem A feoffement to the use of the husband for life the remainder to I. S. the remainder to the wife for her joynture this is not a joynture to bar dower because it did not take effect immediately after the death of her husband Hut Rep. f. 50. An infant or a married woman makes a will and publisheth the same and afterwards dieth being of full age or sole notwithstanding this both Wills are void 10. Eliz. 344. Noy Max. f. 4. A lease for life the remainder to the Major and commonalty of B. whereas there is no such it is void though the King doth create such a corporation during the particular estate so a remainder limited to John the son of I. S. having no such son and afterwards a son is borne to him whose name is John during the particular estate it is void Doder Que malo inchoata sunt principio vix bono peraguntur fine Those things which have a bad beginning can hardly have a good end Coke l. 11. f. 78. As a man seised of Lands in fee by deed upon good consideration granteth the Land after his death to the Queene her heires and successors such grant is not made good by the generall words of the act of 18. Eliz. because it was void in the beginning and with it accordeth 38. H. 6. f. 33. The Abbeffe of Sions case and the Earle of Leicesters case Ployd f. 4000. a stronger case then it vide ibidem plura Magdalen Colledges case Coke l. 4. f. 90. a. If a son and heir apparent of a Baron reteyne a Chaplaine and giveth to him his letters under signe and seale and after his father dieth and this Chaplaine purchaseth a dispensation this retainer and those letters will not serve him in that they were not availeable at the beginning vide ibid. Dâ—uries case Coke câ—m f. 352 b. If a fine be levied without any originall it is voidable but not void but if an originall be brought and a retraxii
husbands because it is possible for the husband to have got it and whose soever the Cow is his is the Calfe also Swinwood f. 18. And if the issue be borne within a month or day after marriage between parties of a full lawfull age the child is legitimate Coke Com. f. 244. a. And in the legall understanding of the common Law he is said to be haeres who is ex justis nuptijs procreatus borne of lawful matrimony haeres legitimus est quem nuptiae demonstrant and he is a lawfull heire whom marriage demonstrated so to be Coke ibidem f. 7. b. Coke l. 7. f. 44. a. One who is engendred in avowtry during the coverture is a mulier by the temporall and common Law though a bastard by the spirituall Law Jus sanguinis quod in legitimis successionibus spectatur ipso nativitatis tempore quaesitum est Reg. I. C. The right of blood which is regarded in lawfull successions or inheritances is found in the very time of the nativity and therefore jus primogeniturae the tight of the elder Brother-ship in the cause of inheritance is principally to be respected because it is in the eldest Son and his issue per modum substantiae and that which is in any person per modum substantiae is inseperable from him and cannot be extended to any other besides it is against the Laws of proximity of degrees that those which are in a remote degree should be preferred before those of the next degree and therefore in all common weales for the most part proximity of blood hath been preferred of which we have a notable example confirmed by the act of Lycurgus the judicious Law-giver as when Eunonus King of the Lacedaenonians had two Sons Polydectes the elder and Lycurgus the younger and Polydectes deceased leaving no Son living at the time of his death the Scepter of the Kingdome was seated in the hands of Lycurgus afterwards when Polydectes Widdow had brought forth a Son Lycurgus did willingly and peaceably yeeld to him the Scepter which act of Lycurgus agreeth fully with our Laws whereby it is ruled that if a man have a Son and Daughter and the Son purchaseth Land and dyeth the Daughter entreth and after the Father begetteth another Son of the same Wife this Son shall have the Land 19. H. 6. b and is also ratified by diverse examples in the successions of our Kings I will instance onely in one and the most illustrious one King Edward the third being deceased Richard the second the Son of his eldest Son obtained the Kingdome and was preferred before John Edmund and Thomas the sons of the same King wheras any of them was more worthy and fit for the Scepter yet is it granted that in succession of regall dignity jus primogeniturae is not constantly observed because in that case the good of the common-weale and commodity of the people is politically to be respected and as the Civilians the good estate of the Kingdome and Subjects is more to be heeded quam sangninis series then the pedigree of blood and so Solomon the younger Brother was advanced before the elder by the hand of David his Father and Roboam preferred Abias his younger Son yet this must be done cautiously and with a good conscience and intention and probably for the utility of the State otherwise it will neither please God nor man yet in the disposing of private estates the Law of Primogeniture is more strictly to be observed because by it confusion and dissention is avoyded which from the contrary doth proceed as is intimated by Coke l. 3. f. 40. b. Wherein our Law excelleth which preferreth the elder Brother and his issue before the younger Brother and his issue in case of descent and that jure sanguinis by his birth right as he is most worthy of blood and therefore as Coke in his com f. 14. a. The male and all descendant from him shall inherit before the female and among the males the eldest Brother and his posterity shall inherit Lands in Fee-simple as heire before any younger Brother or any descending from him whereas by the Civill Law the inheritance is divided among the males Lutleton l. 1. c. 1. There be three Brothers and the middle Brother purchaseth Lands in Fee simple and dyeth without issue the elder Brother shall have the Land by descent so also it is if the youngest purchaseth Lands in Fee and dyeth without issue the eldest shall have it jure sanguinis because he is the worthiest of blood Little So if a man enfeoffe another upon condition and the condition is broken and then the Feoffor dyeth without issue his wife privement ensaint and the Brother of the Feoffor enter for the condition broken and after a Son is borne he shall avoid the possession of the Uncle and may lawfully claime the inheritance 9. H. 7. 25. And 9. H. 8. 23. It is said that after two or more descents the heire afterwards born claiming by descent may enter into Land but he shall not have a Writ of account for the meane profits And though Littleton in defence of the custome of Gavelkind by which the issues may equally inherit alledgeth the reason that every Son is as great a Gentleman as the eldest Son is yet as Sr. Edward Coke com a. f. 14. saith Gentry and arms doth not descend to all the brethren alike for the eldest jure primogeniturae shall beare as a badg of his birth-right his Fathers armes without any difference because he is more worthy of blood but all the younger brethren shall give severall differences additio probat minoritatem and the addition demonstrateth and proveth the minority of the issue but by the Statute of 31. H. 8. A great part of Rent is made descendible to the eldest Son according to the course of the common Law for that by the meanes of that custome diverse antient and great families after a few descents came to very little or nothing according to the simile of the Poet In plures quoties rivos deducitur amnis Fit minor ac unda deficiente perit A Flood deduced into little streames Coke ibid. Soone groweth lesse and falleth by that meanes But in cases of purchase it is otherwise a. 15. E. 4. If a man devise land to a man and his heire and the devisee dieth having issue a daughter his wife privement enseint with a son who is afterwards borne the daughter shall enjoy the Land in perpetuum And 9. H. 6. 23. It is said that if the remainder cannot vest at any time when it falleth it shall not vest in him is borne afterwards where another hath entred before 2. Eliz. 190. Pl. 18. If a lease for life be made the remainder to the right heires of I. S. and I. S. is then alive the inheritance passeth presently out of the Lessor but cannot vest in the heire of I. S. for then living his father he is not in rerum natura for non
est haeres viventis and the remainder is onely good upon this contingent if I. S. dieth during the life of the lessor Coke com f. 378. a. But if lands be given to A. and B. so long as they joyntly together live the remainder to the right heires of him which dieth first and warranteth the land in forma praedicta A. dieth his heire shall have the warranty and yet the remainder vested not during the life of A. for the death of A. must precede the remainder and yet shall the heire of A. have the land by descent vide ibidem 378. b. Justum non est aliquem ante natum mortuum facere Bastardum qui toto tempore suo pro legitimo habebatur Coke l. 8. f. 101. a. b. It is not just to make any one a Bastard borne before marriage being dead who all his life time was accounted legitimate For by the law of England if such a Bastard which the law termeth Bastard eigne doth continue possession in peace that is if the mulier make no entry for the Bastard eigne or continuall claime and so dieth in peace his issue is become right heire and will bar the mulier because he was legitimate by the lawes of the holy Church For though the subsequent marriage doth not make a Bastard legitimate quoad consuetudinem regni as â—ract phraseth it in regard of the custome of the Realme yet quoad sacerdotium in respect of the Canon law it doth and in this case of legitimation which in law is so precious and of so great estimation the law respecteth neither infancy or other defects in the mulier but preferreth legitimation of blood before any benefit of temporall inheritance and therfore the law saith that by the death of Bastard eigne in peace his issue is become right heire and by consequence the mulier is barred and the descent doth not onely take away the entry but the right also and therefore descent in this case shall be a bar to right as descent of services rents reversions expectant upon an estate taile shall bar the right of the mulier 14. E. 2. Bastardy 26. but not the entry or claime of the disseisee But if a Bastard eigne dieth without issue so as the land doth descend the mulier shall have it ibidem and if the Lord by escheat entreth this shall not bar the mulier because no descent Coke com 244. If there be Bastard eigne and mulier puisne and the father maketh lease for life reserving rent and the bastard eigne receiveth the rent and dieth having issue this shall barr the mulier Coke com f. 15. a. If a man hath issue a son being a Bastard eigne and a daughter and the daughter is married the father dieth and the son entreth and dieth seised this shall barre the feme covert and the descent in this case of services rents reversions expectant upon estate or for life whereupon rents are reserved c. shall bind the right of the mulier but the descent of these shall not bind them that right have to an Action Coke com f. 244. a. So if the Bastard dieth seised and his issue endoweth the wife of the Bastard the mulier cannot enter upon tenant in dower for his right was barred by the descent ibidem If the Bastard eigne entreth into land and hath issue and entreth into religion this descent shall bar the right of the mulier ibidem If a man hath issue two daughters the eldest being Bastard eigne and they enter and occupy peaceably as heires the law shall not adjudge the whole possession in the mulier so as if the Bastard had issue and died her issue shall inherit and if they make partition that partition shall binde the issue for ever Coke com 244. a. b. And such a Bastard being impleaded or vouched shall have his age If a man hath issue a Bastard eigne or mulier puisne and the Bastard in the life of the father hath issue and dieth and then the father dieth seised and the son of the Bastard entreth as heire to his Grand-father and dieth seised this descent shall bind the mulier ibidem b. If the Bastard enter and the mulier dyeth his wife being privement with a Son and the Bastard hath issue and dyeth seised the Son is borne his right is bound for ever but if the Bastard dyeth seised his wife enseint with a Son the mulier entreth and the Son is borne the issue of the Bastard is barred ibidem 244. a. If the bastard eigne entreth and the King seiseth the Land for some contempt committed by the Bastard for which the King receiveth the profits of the Land and the Bastard dyeth and his issue upon petition is restored to the possession the mulier barred for ever But when the King seiseth for a contempt of the Father c. if the issue of the Bastard eigne upon petition be restored for that the seisure was without cause the mulier is not barred for the Bastard could never enter but the possession of the King in that case shall be adjudged in the right of the mulier Coke ibidem f. 245. b. Bastardus nullius est filius Littleton Coke com f. 203. a. aut filius populi Coke l. 6. f. 6. A bastard is the Son of none or the Son of the people according to the common report Cui pater est populus pater est fibi nullus omnis Cui pater est populus non habet ille patrem To whom the people Father is to him is Father none and all To whom the people Father is well Fatherlesse we may him call For as the civilians pater est quem nuptiae demonstrant he is a Father whom the espousalls and nuptialls shew so to be And therefore if a wife have a bastard it shall not be a villaine or if a villaine have a bastard by a woman and marrieth her the bastard is no villaine because he is nullius filius though some hold the contrary as Bracton and Britton for in both cases the issue at the common Law is a bastard quasi nullius filius Coke com f. 123. a. And though a bastard be a reputed Son yet is he not such a Son in consideration whereof an use may be raised because in judgement of Law he is nullius filius Dyer 374. And for the same reason where the Statute of 32. H. 8. of wills speaketh of children bastard children are not within that statute and a bastard of a woman is no child within that Statute where the mother conveyeth Lands unto him Dyer 313. Qui ex damnato coitu oriuntur inter filios non computantur Coke com f. 3. b. Who are borne of condemned or unlawfull copulation are not to be reckoned among children as a man maketh a lease to B. for life the remainder to the issue male of B. and the heires males of his body B. hath issue a bastard Son he shall not take the remainder because
if an Action of wast be brought by two joynt-tenants the release of one shall bar the other as it is holden 9. H. 5. f. 15. by the Court for in wast the personalty is the principall and though one joynt-tenant cannot prejudice the other in regard of the matter of inheritance or franke tenement yet in regard of the profits of the frank-tenement they may vide ib. plura If husband and wife purchase socage lands to them and their heires of their bodies and they having issue within fourteen yeares of age doe dy in this case if the grandmother of the part of the mother of the issue first seise the Ward she shall have the Wardship and not the grandfather of the part of the father of the issue 8. Eliz. 296. b. because they are in aequali jure and where the right is equall the condition of the possessor is the better To which obiter may be annexed the sage judgement of Augustus who after the civill wars being molested with the complaints of diverse who demanded many places of ambiguous right from the possessors because they severally were given by the Senate Pompey Caesar Lepidus or Augustus to the Souldiers gave sentence for the possessors Duo non possunt unam rem in solido possidere R g. I. C. Vlpiamus Coke com f. 368. a. Two cannot possess one and the same thing fully and wholy for dominion had its beginning from possession and as there cannot be two Lords and Masters of one and the same thing fully and wholly so cannot two fully and wholly possess one and the same thing As if A. of B. be seised of a Mese F. of G. that hath no right to enter into the same Mese claiming the said Mese to hold to him and his heires entreth into the said Mese but A. of B. is continually abiding in the same Mese In this case the possession of the frank-tenement shall alwaies be adjudged in A. of B. and not in F. of G. because where two be in one house or other tenements and the one claimeth by one title and the other by another title the law shall judge him in possession that right hath for two cannot possess one and the same thing fully and wholly But if a man hath issue two daughters Bastard eigne and mulier puisne and dieth seised and they both enter generally the sole possession shall not be adjudged onely in the puisne because they claime by one and the same title Coke ibidem Yet though the possession of one thing cannot be fully and wholly but in one yet the property may be in two as Ployd f. 5. 24. Manwood said it is not strange in our law that two should have a severall interest in one and the same terme and two properties in it for if lessee for yeares grant over his terme to another by deed indented rendting rent and that for default of payment that he shall enter and retaine till the grantee hath paid to him the rent if he doe enter for default of payment and retaine he hath one property and the grantee also hath another property for his interest is not gone but hath a property tel quel such as it is and may have all the property upon payment of the arreares So if one hath a terme for yeares and is bound in a recognisance or statute staple and execution for non pay-ment is sued against him and the terme is extended and a certaine annuall value delivered to the Connusee as it well may be for it may bee sold out-right or extended to an annuall value there the connusee hath one property for the payment of his debt and the lessee another property and upon the payment of the debt shall have the terme again A woman made a lease for yeares of mills in Kent with exception that she should have the profits and there was a great debate whether the exception were good or no because the profits of the mills was all the benefit and in effect the mills themselves but at the last the exception was judged good in law and that the woman should have the profits There if shee enter to have the profits she hath one property and the lessee another property and it is incertaine how many yeares the property of the woman will continue So if one Lease sheep for a time to manure his land or pawn his dog as the case was in 5. H. 7. The owner hath some property and he to whom the Sheep is leased or the dog pawned another Ployd ibid. Possessio fratris de feodo simplici facit sororem esse haeredem The possession of the brother of a fee simple maketh the sister to be heire Littleton Coke com f. 14. b. As if one hath issue a son and a daughter by one venter and a son by another venter and dieth seised of Lands in fee-simple and the eldest son entreth into the land and dieth without issue the Sister shall have the land and not the younger son though the younger son be heire to the father for the possession of the brother of the fee-simple maketh the sister to be heire but the brother must be in Actuall possession and there must be pedis positio a corporall fixing of his foot and entry upon the land and there must be some Act done to make her heire for she is but haeres factus by the actuall possession of her brother for the younger son is haeres natus to the father and if the eldest son had died before he had taken actuall possession the younger son might have entred and had the land as heire to the father but by the possession of the brother she being of the whole blood is made heire But in dignities where no possession can be had but such as descendeth to a man and his heires as in Dukes Earles Barons c. there can be no possession of the brother to make the sister inherit but the younger brother being heire to the father shall inherit the dignity inherent to the blood as heire to him was first created noble Coke ibid. And as Ploydon saith there is a great difference betweene lands in fee-simple and lands tailed in regard of possession for the possession of a brother of an estate taile as heire to his father shall not make the sister to be heire but it shall descend to the younger son of the halfe venter for he ought to have it per formam doni Ployd f. 57. a. And if a Bastard eigne abare in fee-simple land after the death of the father and dieth seised without interruption and his issue enter he shall hold it and the right of the mulier puisne and his heires are bound for ever Ployd ibidem So if a woman seised in fee consent to a ravishor and the daughter which is proxima de sanguine next of blood doth enter there the son after borne shall not take away the title and possession of the daughter So where a
remainder is appointed in fee to the right heires of I. S. who dieth having a daughter which entreth after the death of tenant for life there the son after borne shall not recover the lands before vested in the daughter as purchased for thereit is a fee simple to which the son after born hath no right for the lands were in none of his Ancestors before But where the estate is an estate taile the son ought to have it per formam doni As if a feme which suffereth a recovery by covin contrary to the Statute of 11. H. 7. is defeated by entry of the daughter tenant in taile the son borne may enter and oust the daughter for that the title in taile is in him because the statute saith he shall enjoy it according to the title which is in taile and therein the common proverb is verified One shall beat the bush and the other have the bird As if a man hath land by descent of the part of the mother and maketh a feoffment on condition and dieth without issue and the heire of the part of the father entreth the heire of the part of the mother may oust him Ployd 56. b. and 57. a. In Wimbish case quod vide Infinitum injure reprebatur Coke l. 6. f. 45. What is infinite is reproved and rejected in law As if a man have a debt by simple contract and taketh an obligation for the same debt or any part of it the contract is determined 3. H. 4. 17. 11. H. 4. 9. and 9. E. 4. 50. 51. So if a man have a debt upon an obligation and by course of law hath a judgement upon it the contract by specialty is changed into a thing of record for if he that recovereth should have a new Action or a new judgement he may have infinite Actions and infinite judgements to the perpetuall charge and vexation of the defendant and he shall not have a new Action or a new judgement for what is infinite is rejected in law So upon every judgement the defendant shall be amerced and if he bee a Duke Marquess Earle Viscount or Baron he shall be amerced 100 l. and so the defendant should be infinitely amerced upon an obligation which shall be mischievous Ibid. And lib. 7. f. 45. b. It was resolved in the Court of Wards by the greater part that a Bill of reviver upon a bill of reviver shall not be admitted by reason of the infiniteness which is rejected in law And lib. 8. f. 16. b. When the first office is found against the King and the melius inquirendum also the King is bound nor to have any melius inquirendum for the same matter because there should be no end of it and that such writs might issue infinitely and infinity is condemned in law Nihil tam conveniens naturali aequitati quam voluntatem domini volentis suam rem in aliam transferre ratam haberi Bracton f. 18. God hath given to man all the land terram dedit filiis bominum So men by Gods endowment are made Lords of the land and what property a man hath in lands by law by the law of God also he hath dominion of it and therefore every man who is the lawfull owner of land may grant to what person in what manner and for what time it pleaseth him for if the land be subject to man then is it subject to his will for the will cometh from the mind which is the principall part of man because it directeth the body and all things he hath and if his land be subject to his will this his will is a sufficient consideration by which his land may pass as his will is and there is no greater consideration then the will Ployd f. 308. b. And nothing is more agreeable to naturall equity then to ratify the will of the Lord willing to transferr his substance and estate over to another And therefore at the common law the intention and will of the parties was the direction of uses for they were onely determinable and to be adjudged by the Chancellor which is the Court of conscience and equity and there is nothing more agreeable to equity then that the will of the Lord or owner and the meaning of the parties should direct the uses 31. H. 16. Tit. subpaena Fitz. 23. A man being ceste que use and having one sole daughter declared his intent and meaning to the Feoffees that after his decease his daughter should have his land and for it question was made in the Chancery whether the limitation of that use made to the daughter might be revoked and in reasoning of that case Fortescue held opinion that if ceste que use had issue a daughter and being sick declared his intention to his feoffee that his daughter shall have his land after his decease and after hee recovered his health he had issue a sonne now saith hee it is good conscience the sonne should have the Subpaena because hee is heire for conscientia dicitur a conset scio quasi simul scire cum Deo that is to know the will of God so neere as reason will and the intention of the parties is to direct the uses according to a conscionable and benigne construction Coke l. 1. f. 100. a. b. vide ibidem plura As a gift in taile may bee made upon condition that tenant in taile may alien for the profits of his issue and good and hee may alien notwithstanding the Statute of W. 2. because in that case voluntas donatoris observatur The will of the Donor is observed Coke com 224. b. If Lands be given to B. and his heires Habendum to him and the heires of his body or if given to him and the heires of his body Habendum to him and his heires he hath estate taile and a fee expectant but if Lands bee given to B. and his heires if B. have heires of his body and if he die without heires of his body that it shall revert to the Donor it is an estate taile and the reversion in the Donor for voluntas donatoris in charta doni sui manifeste expressa est observanda The will of the Donor manifestly expressed in the Charter of the gift is to be observed Coke com f. 21. a. If a common person doth without consideration give to I. S. his goods indefinitely all his goods doe pass 21. E. 4. 25. Alba of Waltams case by Brown and Genny If the King doe grant to one lands ex mero motu and though his Highnesse doth rehearse some consideration in the patent of his grant which is not true as if the consideration bee that whereas the Grantee hath done his Majesty good service on the Sea or beyond the Sea or in his Wars though the consideration bee meerely supposed and therefore no good consideration in Law yet the words ex mero motu doe make the Grant good 26 H. 8. 1. by Fitz. And if a common person doe by deed