whosoeuer eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath eternall life and except you shall eate the flesh of the son of man and drinke his blood you haue no life in you again the bread that I will giue is my flesh for the life of the world Thus saith S. Austin ser 2. de verbis Apos c. 1. life said of life and to him that thinketh life to be a lyer this meat shall be death and not life The bread that I will giue is my flesh for the life of the world c. Thereby signifying plainly his intent of leauing to his Church his substantiall reall body in meate and his substantiall reall blood in drinke as an effectuall expedient for the obtaining eternall life for alwaies the words of Christ or God which doe importe a thing promised tending to mans saluation ought to be vnderstood in the sense wherein they be outwardly expressed in scripture that is to say * Aug. l. de doc Chris cap. 10. 16. in sermone inquit diuino id omne pertinet ad sensum literalem id est debet accipi literaliter vt verba sonāt non figuratè quod potest referri ad morum honestatem vel fidei veritatem locutio quae iubet vel vtilitatē vel beneficentiā est propria non figuratiua secundum Iustinum codice de legibus litterally setting aside Tropes and mysticall significations Besides a law or precept that exact's obedience from subjects and such indeed is the legacy of the new Testament ought to be cleare and plain to the vnderstanding of euery man that each one may decline what is forbidden and obserue what is enjoyned For no law or precept can be vnderstood by all subjects if the words thereof be mysticall or figuratiue but Christ to shew that he spok according * Concil Nicae quod est 7. synodus generalis Act. 6. probat ex citato Textu Jo. 6. con Iconiclastas Sacramentum Eucharistiae non esse imaginem Christi sed verum reale corpus erus probat insuper ex eodem loco Trid. sess 21. can 1. laicos non adctrings iure diuine ad communionem sub vtraque specie to the plain litterall sense when he perceiued that the Capharnaits for in the synagogue at Capharnaum Christ taught these thinges began to reason among themselues concerning the possibility of giuing his flesh to eate and his blood to drinke he did not correct their conceptions as to orall manducation and orall drinking thereof yet his custome (c) In regard Nicodemus conceiu'd spirituall regeneration after the similitude of naturall generation Christ rectifyed his vnderstanding in regard the Pharisees Io. 16. Mat. 15. imagined that a meer omission of washing their hand 's before refection was a grieuous crime Christ instructed them in the knowledge of sin and in regard the Apostles made a wrong construction of his saying in order to eating his body anddrinking of his blood Christ forthwith expounded his meaning telling them that the words he had spoken were spirit and life that is according to S. Austin Epis 98. they were spiritually not carnally meant as if Christ had intended to giue vnto his Apostles particles of his body diuided from the whole so that Christ in order to the manner and that onely of eating his body and drinking of his blood corrected his Apostles was constant in conformity to his pastorall office to instruct his auditory conceiuing amiss of his sayings but repeated the same words confirmed with an oath saying to them Amen Amen except yee eat the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood yee haue no life in you which conuincingly shews that Christ spake not figuratiuely but litterally and indeed an oath is sworn to the end that such as doubt of the thinges promised or spoken may be assured of the true meaning of him that promiseth or speaketh any thing Hebrae 6. in consequence of which a thing confirmed with an oath ought to be interpreted in the * Innocentius 3. cap. veniens Extra de iuramento plain literall sense and according to the conceptions of those for whose sake an oath is sworn but the Capharnaits for whose sake Christ * Augus ait Christum iurasse dicēdo Amen Amen swore conceiued Christ to speake of orall manducation of his body and orall drinking of his blood wherefore it was that manner of eating and drinking that Christ confirmed with his oath but when he saw that his Disciples did misunderstand his meaning as to the eating his flesh and drinking his blood imagining him to mean that they were to eate his flesh and drink his blood with the mouth of their body after the manner of common meate and drink that is to teare Christs body and blood diuiding one part from an other in eating and drinking it he corrected (d) According to S. Cyprian ser de Coena Domini the intent and aime of Christs saying Ioan. 6. Vnlesse you eate c. was to instruct vs that our abiding in him is meate and drinke from whence Caluinists vnaduisedly infer that S. Cyprian interpreted Christs words Vnlesse you eate c. Of spiritualll manducation onely For in the place set down S. Cyprian expresly assertes that Christ cōmanded Christians in the new law to drink his blood the eating wherof in the old law Deut. 12. was prohibited which doubtless is meant of true reall drinking Wherefore S. Austin 9.57 in Leuit ingeniously confesseth that in the new law wee are as truly cōmanded to drinke the blood of Christ as were the Jews in the old law forbidden to drink the blood of sacrifices offered vnto expiating sins in consequence of which according to S. Cyprian and S. Austin reall drinking of Christs reall blood is commanded in the chapter alledged and instructed them as to the manner therof only saying The words that I spake vnto you are spirit and life that is sayes S. Aug. on the 98. Psal They ought not to be vnderstood carnally as if Christs intent had been to giue certaine particles or peices of his body diuided from the whole but they ought to be vnderstood spiritually which is to say that Christs body is in the Sacrament after the manner of a spirituall substance invisible indivisible whole and entire in the whole entire subject also whole and entire in each part thereof And here is observable that a reall substantiall and true body may be considered after two sundry fashions conformably to the Apostle that sayes 1. Cor. 15. A body is raised spirituall in incorruption that is sown naturall in corruption First as it is cloathed with terrene conditions and qualities which naturally accōpany a body in this mortall life For example visibility divisibility and mortality Secondly as it is deuested of such rayments of corporall accidents and inuested with the noble conditions and qualities of a spirit or spirituall substance namely invisibility indivisibility impassibility According to this latter consideration which is
prouidence permitteth them is good for God suffereth them to be that the approu'd as gold in the fire tryed may be manifested and discouered from the holow hearted members of the Church The supream prouidence suffereth them to be that the carnall thereby may be stird vp to seek and the spirituall to clear the truth the supream prouidence tolerateth them to the end that many may be raised out of their sleep to see the day of God and be glad therof S. Aug. c. 8. de verae religione the supream prouidence suffereth them to be choosing rather to draw good out of euill then to permit no euill at all But woe to such as through their fault commit the euill that God suffereth to be CHAR. XV. OF CHRISTIAN HOPE THE CONTENTS Good works supported by diuine promises haue a good claim to the glory of Heauen which is the consistency of Christian hope God by promising maketh himselfe mans debter the assurance that man hath that God cannot faile of his promise doth not render him sure of the thing promised till he shall performe the condition of the promise made which is full perseuerance in the exercise of good works whereof no man can be certain the death of Christ brought forth Hope of life CHristian Hope is a certaine * S. August vocat Christianā spem certam exspectationem gloriae futurae expectation of future glory supported by diuine promises and perseuerance in good works the condition of the promises proceeding from diuine grace through the merits of Christ And as God cannot faile of his promise who is * 2. Thessal 3. fidelis autem Deus est faithfull in all he promiseth or falsify his word who is the eternall truth so works done a right cannot be frustrated of the reward promised being * Bona opera quae procedunt ex gratia sunt quasi pignora arahae regni caelestis pledges of full assurance which render God their (a) According to Tertull. l. depenit a good worke makes God mans debter likewise S. Austin ser 31. de verbis Domini Saith that God vnder his hand-writing hath giuen us an engagement of his promises debter not because God owes any thing that is not his own who is lord of all things and good works themselues are his (b) According to S. Austin in Enchir. c. 107. good works are the gifts of God and God by crowning our works crownes but his own gifts and indeed euery good worke conducing to heauenly blessednes proceedes from druine grace which is Gods free liberall gift gifts deriued from his grace that make them good but because the reward that his goodnes gratis and frankly promises justice performes * Hebrae 6. non enim iniustus Deus vt obliuiscatur operis vestri dilectionis quā ostendistis in nomine ipsius qui ministrastis sāctis ministratis for God is not vnjust to forget the worke and labour of loue shewn towards his name Holy Ioh hauing this full assurance of diuine promises shut vp in the cabinet of his heart was not a more illustrious king sitting in his Regall Throne then he was glorious lying on his dunghill where he rejoyced and gloried in the assurance of promised glory through Christ his Redeemer though he (c) Though I vvere saith holy Iob c. 9. perfect neuerthess my soul is ignorant therof and Salomon Prouerb 20. Who can say my heart is clean I am clean from sin and the Apostle 1. Cor. 4. durst nost pronounce him selfe iustifyed albeit his conscience was not guilty of euill Again S. Austin l. 1. de ciuit c. 12. teacheth that though we can be certain of the reward of perseuerance neuertheless we cannot besure of perseuerance it selfe since no man can know certainly without a speciall reuclatiō that he shall cōtinue in the exercise of good works till the end of his life was not sure of saluation nor yet or his own iustification Hence euidently appeares the eminency of diuine Hope aboue any human expectation for this is like dust that is blown away with the wind or like the smoake that is dispersed here and there with a tempest to the confusion of him that placeth his trust in the arme of flesh but diuine Hope doth not make ashamed it is the ancre of the soul and holds it firme and stedfast in the greatest storme of tribulation and affliction And as the ancre of a ship doth not fix in water but in the firm earth below (d) The Apostle Hebr. 6. assures us that Christian Hope entereth into those parts which are within the vail that is Sanctum Sanctorum which is an allegory taken from the ancient Tabernacle or Temple of the Iews the inward part whereof was called Sanctum Sanctorum which the interposition of a vail seperated from that part where the people assembled together This inward part was a type of the diuine Tabernacle and represented euerlasting blessednes wherasthe other part was a figure only of enjoyments proper to the present life so Christian Hope doth not stay at the porch or entry of the vaile of the Tabernacle which misteriously represents the floating waters of transitory and visible enjoyments but passeth into the inward parts therof which is Sanctum Sanctorum the holiest place mysteriously shewing the throne of the inuisible God whether is entred the fore-runner for all true beleiues IESUS-CHRIST the author of diuine Hope Christ came into the world as a great Phisician to heal the infirmities of man and he made of his own blood * Aug. sanguis medici factus est medicamentum phraenetici the phisick that healed him wherby he begot him vnto a full assurance of Hope so that it would be impossibile that he should hate him as to perdition for whom he hath shed his blood as to saluation Thus Christs death was made the Hope of life which his resurrection confirm'd Christ rising did perfect what dying he had merited and gloriously risen he entred into the inward parts of the vaile that is of his heauenly kingdom making way for all such (e) The Apostle Rom. 2. ascribes iustification to the doers not to the hearers of the law whereby is euident that not faith alone but the keeping of Gods commandements is of necessity required vnto obtaining heauenly blessednes as shall obserue his commandements to follow and to receiue the reward of eternall life that his death hath merited CHAR. XVJ. OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY TOWARD GOD THE CONTENTS God will not be lou'd for a reward that is not himselfe in the exhibition of loue God exacteth all the loue of God and the loue of the world are iuconsistent together whosoeuer loueth God a right keepeth his commandements where there is deadly transgression there is nothing of iustification as water extinguisbeth fire so each mortall sin driueth away charity out of the soul CHarity towards God is a supernaturall loue wherewith the soul being inuested loues God
not desert before himselfe be deserted and that is to say God doth not refuse his (c) Mat. 7. If ye that aere euil can giue to your children good gifts hovv much more shall your Father that is in Heauen giue good things to them vvhich aske him This sacred text evidently shew's Gods willingnes to furnish all expedients necessary for the sauing of euery soul if asked aright and indeed by good things are meant all spirituall meet helps of diuine grace plenteous measure of grace that brings effectually vnto iustification of life if man doth not refuse Gods call vnto it neither doth God cease * Apoco 3. ecce sto ad ostium pulso Et Luc. 11. pulsate aperietur vobis to call though man neuer comply with or consent to Gods calling and as the whole aire is said to be darkened in the absence of the sun notwithstanding that stars remaine in the firmament which furnish an inferior light so man is said to be hardened through obstinate * Aug. l. 1. ad Simplicianum Noluit Esau non cucurrit sed si voluisset cucurrisset Dei adiutorio peruenisset qui velle currere vocando prâ—staret nisi vocatione contempta reprebus fieret resisting of the diuine mercy although he doth not want sufficient grace to call him to Gods plenteous grace who obstructs the way of correction to none and giues power of doing well euen to euery one though hardened against him (d) According to S. Austin l. 3. de lib. arb c. 19. euery man hath power to know to seek profitably what vnprofitably he know's not l. de cor gra c. 17. teacheth expresly that in the day of generall judgment it may be answered to a damned soul that shall plead want of perseuerance in grace that he might haue perseuered if he would himselfe and therefore in an other place ascribes the hardnes of Pharaohs heart to his own fault being he resisted Gods mercifull grace whereby he might haue cast from him his transgressions Likewise S. Austins Disciple S. Prosper in his answere to Vincentius questions auerres that God depriu's no man of power to do well nor obstructs his way vnto correction Pharao as well as Nabuchodonosor might haue obtained plenteous grace of true repentance vnto iustification of life if he had not contemned gods call vnto it it was in his mercifully called as well as in the others power to embrace the diuine call vnto amendement Gods plenteous grace (e) In order to the royall dinner mentioned Mat. 22. S. Austin l. 38. quaes 68. expresseth his sentiment thus To that supper vvhich our lord saith vvas prepared neither all those vvhich vvere inuited vvould goe neither those vvhich vvent could haue gone vnless they had been called in consequence of which saith this greatest Doctor of grace neither these that vvent ought to ascribe their going to themselues nor those vvhich refused to goe ought to impute their not going to any other then themselues since it vvas in their ovvn povver to goe being they vvere inuited is like the plentifull nuptiall dinner prepared by the king mentioned in the Gospell at the mariage of his son of which many of his subjects made themselues vnworthy because being bidden they did not only refuse to goe but also sharply treated those that bid them Pharao was like these vnworthy bidden guests for he did not only contemn Gods call to plenteous grace of repentance but also made light of the callers and therefore God made him an example of his iust wrath multiplving his miracles and wonders in the land of Egypt euen to the desolation of him and his kingdom Hereby may be illustrated what is inserted in the said Gospell to witt Many called few chosen God calleth as he is a mercifull bountifull benefactor and is said to call many because he calleth all for his calling is an act of his first will which is (f) According to S. Chrysostome hom in ep ad Eph. Gods first will is that euen those which haue sinned against him may not perish but his second will is to let the wicked perish For this subsequent or secundary will of God is called the will of his iustice because as to this will rewardsare decreed sutable to the merits of each one God rendereth the enjoyments of Heauen for good and inflicteth the punishments of hell for euil works his will of mercy to saue all hauing made none vnto damnation but God chooseth to his glory as he is a iust rewarder And this his choosing is an act of his second will which is the will of his iustice to reward euery one according to his works and he is said to choose few because in respect of the many ill works which God finds deseruing damnation (g) S. Chrysostome hom 30. in act Apos teacheth that Gods preordination to glory supposeth his fore knowledge of good works in regard whereof he preordaineth and predâ—stinateth to glory effectually in consequence whereof the sole way to obtaine eternall blessednes is to abstaine from sin and perseuer in good works he finds few good works to choose worthy glorification CHAR. XXIJ. OF CHRISTS CHARITY TO MAN THE CONTENTS Christ came into the world to destroy sin and death and accordingly offered the Cup of his passion for as many as were liable thereto that is for the deliuerance of all men the elect and reprobat the whole world joynt and seperat except the Virgin Mary had sinned and perished in Adam Christs murderers had no reason to dispaire being Christ euen for them offered his prayer CHrists charity to man is the Cup of his passion made (a) According to the Apostle 2. Cor. 13. Christ was crucifyed as infirm that is according to the infirmity of human nature which he had assum'd in regard where of S. Prosper nameth Christs charity towards mankind the Cup of his passion made of human infirmity which is conform to Christs own words set down in S. Matthews Gospel Can ye drink the Cup that I shall drink of And the 26. Chap. of the same Gospel If it be possible let this Cup pass avvay from me Where is meant by the Cup Christs passion of human infirmity and diuine vertue vnto saluation to euery one that shall drink of it As Christ purposely came into the world * Timoth. 2. Christus Dei hominum mediator mediator of God and men excepting none from his mediation so he purposely offered the Cup of his passion for all excluding none from drinking thereof which is to say that * S. Leo. ser de natiuit Domini Dominus inquit noster peccati mortisque destructor sicut nulluÌ„ a reatu liberum reperijt ita liberandis omnibus venit being come to destroy sin and death and finding none free from the guilt of either he made himselfe the Generall Redeemer of all for their deliuerance out of both himselfe became the full propitiation for
the sinns of the whole world joynt and seperat comprehending euen children of one daies old and such as are hardened against him * Concil Valent 3. cap. 5. Christus Iesus Daeminus noster sicut nullus homo est fuit vel erit cuius naturae in illo assumpta nō fuerit Ita nullus est c. as there is none or hath been or euer shall be any whose human nature is not assumed in Christ so there is none or hath been or shall euer be any for whome Christ hath not suffered his passion in regard whereof he is called Sauiour of all though specially of those which by baptisme are buried with him into death that is which drink of the Cup of his passion for baptism was instituted by him as an essentiall requisite for the drinking thereof vnto iustification of life and the offering the Cup of his passion had been litle conducible to the end it was offered for if necessary meanes had not been prouided to profer it an end cannot be obtained without the application of helps conuenient and conform there to and as to this point of generall prouision Christ was wanting to none for such as are baptised in him and consequently buried with him by baptism into death of sin receiue the benefit of his passions Cup which if they shall constantly keep they cannot be depriued of eternall blessednes due to their holy perseuerance in sanctity through the merits of Christs death and all those * Secundum S. Aug. qui nunquam audiuit Euangelium Chricti habet gratiam qua possit vel praeceptū naturae implere vel qua possit implorare auxilium ad praeceptū naturae implendum vnde illud psal 83. benedictionē dabit Dominus qui lege dedit who are not baptised if they are come to the yeares of discretion do infallibly participate of Gods generall grace on the same scoare of Christs death sufficiently as to the obseruation of the commandements which if they shall faithfully keep and these are written in their hearts they must certainly enioye the benefit of baptism or some other aduantage equalling that as to iustification Touching (b) According to S. Prosper l. de voca Gent. c. 23. Young children born of vnbelieuing parents might receiue meet helpe in order to their saluation if the same parents should vse well the grace that Christ through his bitter passion hath procured for euery kind of people and nation being Christ offered the Cup of his passion for all men joint and seperat excluding none on his part from the possibility of drinking of it children who die before the vse of reason without baptism though they want thereby the benefit of generall redemption and consequently are depriued of full felicity neuertheless their misfortune must not be ascribed to the wanting of a generall Redeemer (c) The Apostle 2. Cor. 5. inferreth from Christs dying for all men that all were dead in Adam saying if one Christ be dead for all from whence t is euident that Christ dyed for all which were dead in Adam and indeed otherwise the Apostle had made a very weak inference and to noe purpose wherfore since according to the Apostle all men were dead in Adam without doubt Christ dyed for all men joynt and seperat and S. Austin after the same manner inferreth from the text set down that all men were dead in Adam because Christ dyed for all and l. 6. con Iulia c. 1. makes vse of the same argument to proue against Iulian and the Pelagians that all children were dead in Adam because one Christ dyed for all and this Catholick doctrine S. Austin inculcateth vrgeth and presseth against all opposers Hanc inquit doctrinam inculco impingo refercio recusanti so that our modern Teachers say vnaduisedly that S. Austin nouer taught that Christ gaue himselfe a propitiation was crucifyed or dyed for all men joynt and seperat besides S. Austin trac 31. in Joan. saith expresly that the Iewes which murthered Christ ought not to dispaire being Christ euen for them offered his prayer and a litle after Christ saith he considered his death as offered for and not as procured by them which doctrine S. Prosper confirms l. 2. de vocat gent. Christ hauing dyed for and to redeem all excluding none on his part it is to be imputed either to the negligence of their parents who if Christians let them die without baptism if infidels help them not as they might doe by embracing * Graetia implorandi diuinum uuxilium implēdi omnia praecepta naturae omnibus hominibus adultis gratis cōcessa est proinde nemo est cui ad fidem Christi aliquis non patent accessus vnde Io. 1. erat lux veraquae illuminat omnem bominem venientem in hunc mundum Gods generall grace that leads them to the marueilous light of Christian faith Again many times it is to be ascribed to naturall secundary causes which take Children out of this life before baptism can be administred to them howeuer God is not wanting in necessary requisits or meanes as to the full happines of those Infants which by naturall causes are preuented of the application of baptism because they do not suffer preiudice for want of sufficient expedients since Christ hath instituted baptism as a most sufficient remedy vnto blessednes in order to all men and infants are depriued of the fruit for as much only as the application of it is obstructed by certaine naturall causes which God did not dispose and ordaine to that end or purpose but for a generall good of the whole vniuers which God is not bound to hinder for he doth not inuert or obstruct the order of things settled from the creation of the world he is not only generall benefactour according to mercy but also a generall prouider according to prouidence he taketh not care of one creature so as to neglect his care of another or so to benefit one as to preiudice another for example if a man should cast himselfe willfully into a hot fiery furnace God to preserue him from burning should be obliged to hinder the innate actiuity of fire which is to burne and so to work miraculously aboue nature as he did in the hot furnace of Babilon which God is not bound to doe howeuer the premises giue euidence enough to beleiue that Christ is rightly named the Redeemer and Sauiour of all Besides as a king is truly a king soueraign lord and supream Gouernor of his people though they rebell against him and will not be gouerned so Christ is truly (d) The Apostle 1. Timoth. 4. calleth Christ the Sauiour of all men but specially of the faithfull where the particle specially giues euidence enough against our modern Teachers that Christ dyed for the Redemption of all men joynt and seperat which Catholick doctrine S. Iohn the Apostle cap. 2. clearly demonstrates saying that Christ Is the propitiation for our sins and not for ours
* S. Basilius in ora de trac is good when he barketh against enimyes and naught when he hurteth friends that is if it so fall out that a man is angry and notwithstanding bridles his wrath according to reason and iustice without putting in wicked execution what he hath wickedly conceiued is not guilty of sin for moderate anger aduisedly managed is without reproofe as plainly euidenceth the Apostle Eph. 4. saying Be angry but sin not let not the sun goe down vpon your wrath which is to say He that is stirred vp vnto anger ought not to let himselfe be carried away vnto wicked enterprises or giue his passion one nights lodging in his bosome lest it be conuerted into hatred and reuenge irrationall and immoderate not rationall aÌ„d moderat anger beareth the guilt of transgression for example anger accoÌ„paned with inordinate desires is a grieuous sin and anger that seeketh iustice vniustly is damnable for as much as it either exceedeth in the pursuance or vseth crafty dealings for the execution therof But anger that artempteth wicked enterprifes kindleth strife breatheth forth injuries raiserh slanders and vttereth blasphemyes is an abomination to God The soueraigne cure of inordinate anger is integrity and innocence of life as storkes deuour venemous serpents and receiue noe hurt but nourishment thereby so the vertuous digest poisonous words calumnies detractions without suffering harme therby The sin of anger cannot enter into the heart of the spirituall man he that delighteth in godlines will not swear curse and blaspheme as doth the carnall man when he encountereth with any coÌ„tradiction or hard difficulty A stone cast into a fountaine that has a botome filled with dirty mudd easily trubleâ—h the water therof so euery small stone of offence trubleth such as haue fulness of wickednes in their hearts It is the spirituall man that gouerneth his assections vnto bridling of anger because he is meek lowly in mynd and liuely touched with the feeling of his Redeemers meeknes that did not once open his mouth while he was reproached and slandered or shewed trouble or vnquietnes while he was buffered whipped crowned with thornes and as a lambe carried to the slaughterhouse an innocent and godly life in imitation of Christ our Sauiour is a sure remedy against the sin of anger CHAR. XXXV OF GLVTTONY THE CONTENTS Excess in aboundance of meate or drink hath nothing of reason and preiudiceth nature a glutton pleaseth his gust vnto satisfying his belly and displeaseth his Creatour to the destroying of his soul drunkennes is a voluntary madnes GLuttony is an vnuaturall greedines of meat and drink a glutton passeth the bounds of nature that is content with moderat nourrishment and likewise of reason that detesteth transgression for example he requireth either meat for his Iust as did the Israëlits in the wildernes Psal 78. or lusteth after exquisit feeding as did the sons of Hely 1 Reg. 2. or exceedeth in aboundance of cheare as did the Sodomites Ezech. 16. or is hastily greedy euen after gross meates as was Esau that chose rather to sell away his birth right for bread and potage Gen. 25. then to refraine his greedy appetite one sole moment A glutton prefereth the present pleasure of eating and drinking before worldly riches or heauenly treasures his heart lodgeth in his belly * Philip. 3. quoruÌ„ Deus venter est gloria â—n confusione ipsorum queÌ„ locum explanans Tertulliamus Deus inquit venter puâ—mo templum a qualiculus altare quibus tota charitas in cacabis feruet fides in culina spes tota in ferculis which is the God he serueth and adoreth litle considering that such seruice will bring to him sham and destruction for whosoeuer soweth in the flesh of the flesh reapeth corruption Eph. 6. it were extream madnes to put good wine into a vessell which is sure to corrupt it such a vessell is the belly that corrupteth whatsoeuer it receiueth meat eaten in desight and * loel vlulate qui bibitis vinum in dulcedine quoniam perijt ab ore vestro Nomine vini intelligitur omne genus potus quod obrietateâ—n procurare potest wine drunken in sweetnes perish from us besides in the end therof they bite like a serpent and hurt deadly like a cockatrice To whom is woe to whom is sorrow to whom is strife and to whom be wounds without cause euen to them that tary long at the wine Prouerb 23. * Clemens Alex. Esca inquit ventriest venter Escae Deus autem hunc haÌ„c destruet to them that exceed in aboundance of chcare by surfeiting and drunkennes haue many thousands perished wherefore Christ IESUS Luc. 21. warneth us to take heed to our selues lest at any time our hearts be oppressed with surfeiting and drunkennes lest that day surprise us at vnawarres that is lest while we spend the tyme of this life in excess of meat and drinke death come * Iob. 21. ducunt in bonis dies suos in puncto descendunt ad inferos and carrie us down suddenly to hell The rich glutton Luc. 16. cloathed in purple and silke fared euery day delicately and splendidly but as soon as death seized on him he was buryed in hell where in lieu of delicat morsells his feeding was of Adders * Psal 6. ignis sulphur spiritus procellaruÌ„ pars calicis corum and fire and brimstone was the portion of his cup wherby clearly appeareth the extream madnes of such as to please their gust vnto satisfying their belly displease their Creatour vnto destroying their souls But if there were no place of torments appointed by the supream prouidence for the punishment of sinfull disorders after death Neuertheless inordinate eating drinking taking pastime liuing at ease and making full chear dayly is a detestable practice as to naturall reason because such as liue so murder themselues thereby the law of nature commandes conseruation of life which they shorten through voluntary excess * Luc. 21. attendite vobis ne fortè grauentur corda vestra crapula ebrietate again gluttony oppresseth nature and obstructeth all the faculties thereof the belly of a glutton is full while his soul is empty and he that delighteth in wine is destitute * Chrysologus ebrietatem qui habet homo noÌ„ est Aug. eam qui habet seipsum non habet Cicero recta inquit mente vti non potest qui multo cibo vinoque repletur Et Seneca vocat ebrietatem voliitariam insaniam of wisdom Prouerb 20. The excess of it is a voluntary madnes whosoeuer is drunk neither knoweth where he is nor what he doeth nor sensible of the euill whereto drunkennes bringeth him thinketh that he doeth well when he is faln into a deadly precipice Furthermore a glutton is a sham to mankind insomuch as he turneth the glory of an incorruptible soul into the similitude of a corruptible body and of beasts for inordinat eating and drinking
and offered at his last supper vnder the form's of bread and wine according to the Order of Melchisedech and that the Eucharist as it was instituted and celebrated was not only a Sacrament but also a sacrifice is plainly euidenced out of the words expressing the action that Christ vsed in the instituting and celebrating therof for example (c) The three Euangelists S. Mathew S. Mark and S. Luke express the words Christ vsed in the instituting and celebrating of the Eucharist in the present Tense for example IS GIVEN IS shed likewise S. Paul as to Christs body 1. Cor. 11. is broken Besides the French and Latin Bibles of Caluinists haue IS giuen for you IS shed for you But according to the Latin vulgar translation the particles giuen shed broken are expressed in the future Tence namely shall be giuen shall be shed shall be broken Howeuer Howeuer whether they be expounded in the present or future Tense it matters not since the sense is the same for although is giuen is shed carry the signification of the present Tense neuertheless the subsequent particles namely Do this in remembrance of me vntil our lord shall come to judge the quick and the dead 1. Cor. 11. imply the future Tense The Greek Church hath alwais vsed the future Tense in their Liturgies namely S. Iames. S. Clement S. Basil S. Chrysostome to proue that Christ offered the sacrifice of his body and blood when he was present with his Apostles at his last supper and indeed Christ himselfe paue euidence enough of this Catholick assertion by saying Hic Calix Sanguinis mei This Cup of my blood And the Latin Church vseth the future Tense shall be giuen shall be shed to shew plainly that Christ spoke not of his body and blood onely then at his last supper offered but of the same sacrifice that was to be offered for the future till he should come again to judge the quick and the dead This is my body which is giuen for you Luk 22. which S. Paul expresseth in other term's viz This is my body which is broken for you 1. Cor. 11. This is my blood of the new Testament which is shed for many Mar 14. This is my blood the new Testament that is shed for many vnto remission of Sins Math. 26. All which sentences import sacrificing since they containe the proper words of sacrifice as it is plainly deducible out of other euident Scripture-testimonies in consequence whereof the Eucharist instituted and celebrated by Christ in his last supper is not a Sacrament only but a sacrifice also Again the afore said Verbs namely to giue to break to shed are vttered in the present tense after the Greek Translation signifying that Christ did did not only offer sacrifice in a bloody manner on the Crosse but in an vnbloody also at his last supper (d) S. Luke cap. 22. expresseth the action that Christ vsed in the institution of the Eucharist as to his body vnder the elements of bread and wine in these words This is my body vvhich is giuen for you which S. Paul 1. Cor. 11. deliuers thus This is my body vvhich is broken for you and 1. Cor. 10. he saith The bread which we break is it not the participation of the body of our lord S. Chrysostome expounding this sacred Text demandes why S. Paul added to the words of the Euangelist vvhich vve break and answer's to his own question saying This is done in the Eucharist and not on the Cross vvhere no bone of him vvas broken Io. 19. According to S. Chrysostome as likewise Theodoret and Occumenius who were versed in the Greek tongue Christ suffered himselfe to be broken in the Eucharist vnder the form of bread vnto filling of all which he did not suffer to be done saith S. Chrysostome on the Cross vnto redeeming of all and indeed Calvin in his Commentary vpon the 11. Chapter set down noteth that the particles Is Broken signify is offered or is sacrificed whereby appear's that the Apostles intent and aime was to shew that Christs body was truly broken in the vnbloody oblation offered at his last supper for as much as the species of the consecrated bread were then truly broken Besides as the words of the action which Christ vsed in instituting and celebrating the Eucharist viz This is my body which is giuen for you This is my blood shed for many vnto remission of sins doe euidently import (e) The sacrifice of the Euchariste in as much as it appeaseth God rendereth him propitious and procureth diuine grace vnto remission of sin◠is truly a propitiotary sacrifice taken in the proper sense according to the ancient Fathers S. Gyprian S. Basil S. Chrysostome S. Ambrose S. Austin and the Council of Trent assertes this Catholick doctrine and addeth withall The sacrifice of the Eucharist according to Apostolicall tradition is not onely offeréd for sinnes pains satisfactions and other necessities but likevvisa for such as are dead in the state of grace and not sufficiently purged as yet a propitiatory sacrifice for blood to be shed is to be sacrificed for propitiation or pardon of sins so the words of precept which follow This is my body giuen for you namely doe this in remembrance of me That is in memory of my death and passion doe signify a commemoratiue sacrifice and consequently plainly demonstrate the Eucharist not to be a Sacrament only but (f) The ancient Fathers S. Cypr. Ep. 63. and Caeci Orig. in cap. 16. Mat. and others also compare the sacrifice Christ offered of his body and blood at his last supper vnto the sacrifice of the paschall Lambe and other sacrifices of the old law wherby appears that the sacrifice Christ offered at his last supper was a sacrifice taken in the proper sense wherfore S. Gregor Nyssen Ora. 1. de Resur saith expresly that Christ in celebrating the Euchariste at his last supper sacrificed himselfe before he was sacrificed vpon the Cross a sacrified also For otherwise it would not be a liuely and perfect commemoration or representation of the sacrifice offered on the Cross such as Christ requireth Luk. 22. for as a Sacrament cannot be perfectly represented but by an other Sacrament 〈◊〉 a sacrifice cannot be liuely represented but by another sacrifice there is necessarily required similitude and proportion between the thing that representeth and the thing represented for a man cannot represent an horse or an horse a man nor the saying of the Apostle 1. Cor. 11. as often as you shall eat of this bread and drink of this drink you shall shew the death of our Lord doth infirm the strength of this argument * Patres antiqui in tribus oecumenicis Concilijs puta Ephesino Calcedo Constantinop vt constat ex praefatione Ephesi sic interpretati sunt verbae Apostoli quotiescunque māducabitis mortem Domini annunciabitis For the true sense and meaning therof is that the sacrifice of the Eucharist which is
a perfect representation of Christ's death and Passion suffered on his Cross must precede the eating of that bread and drinking of that drink for Christ's death and Passion was (g) S. Austin l. 13. de Trinit c. 17 Epis 49. quaes 3. attestes that it is foretold in the old Testament that there should be in the law of grace a true proper outward visible sacrifice again it is foretold that in the last age of the new Law that is when Antichrist shall come the vsuall sacrifice shall cease which giue euidence enough of the continuance of som one sacrifice in the law of grace till the time of Antichrist Which cannot be meant of a Metaphoricall and invisible sacrifice being that kind of vnproper sacrifice will not cease in the dayes of Antichrist according to the holy Prophets Dan. 12. and Isaias cap. 10. a proper special sacrifice that cannot be represented perfecttly by a Sacrament but by a sacrifice wherin destruction must interuene necessarily either by death if what is offered by a liuing thing or by fraction if what is offered be a hard and drie thing as breard or by effusion if what is offered be a liquid thing as wine which experience sheweth in all the sacrifices of the law of nature and Moyses And indeed the end and innate propriety of a proper sacrifice being an externall sensible act of supream adoration is to signify God's omnipotency as to his power ouer life and death wheras a Sacrament signifieth the sanctifying of such as belieue in and serue God which is but the product or effect of Christ his bloody sacrifice If perfect representation of the sacrifice of the Cross could be attributed to any Sacrament it were to be ascribed to the Sacrament of Baptism wherby as the Apostle saith Heb. 9. Weare buried with Christ into his death Neuertheless Baptism doth not represent the death of Christ but the death and resurrection of him that is baptised Baptism signifying that he that is baptised doth die as vnto sin and rise as vnto newnes of life neither is Christ said to die in Baptism as he is belieued to be immolated in the sacrifice of the Eucharist Furthermore as * Sanguine hostiae obsignabatur vetus testamētum vt post Moysen declarat Apostolus Hebrae 1. Moyses began and dedicated the old Testament law or Religion in the blood of calfes contained in his cup saying This is the blood of the Couenant c. So Christ began and dedicated the new Testament in his own blood contained in the Chalice of his last supper saying This is the Chalice the new Testament in my blood c. Luc. 22. which the other Euangelist's more plainly expresse introducing Christ to say This is my blood of the new Testament wherby is euidently certaine that Christ's blood in the Chalice shed in an vnbloody manner was the blood of sacrifice and consequently in that sacrifice which is the sacrifice of the Eucharist consisteth the externall Religion and proper seruice of the new Testament as the outward Religion and soueraigne worship of God in the old law did consist in the sacrifices therof vnder which it was established Heb. 7. And though Christ hanging on his cross did confirme and ratify the new Testament yet he made it only at his last supper when he said This is the Chalice the new Testamēt in my blood or this is my blood of the new Testament For then Christ was free and aliue wheras on his cross he was deuested of liberty and depriued of life and consequently not in a condition to make it the making of a Testament being an act of a person free and aliue Also though Christs death and passion was the perfect sacrifice that (h) The Apostle Hebrae 1. teacheth that Christ By one oblation consummated for euer them that are sanctifyed where by one oblation is meant the sacrifice of the Cross which the Apostle there calleth sacrifice of consummation that is of generall redemption and indeed that sacred Text speak's onely of the sacrifice of the Cross not mentioning the sacrifice of application that is the sacrifice of Mass called the sacrifice of the Altar or the sacrifice of the Eucharist wherby the sacrifice of generall Redemption called the sacrifice of the Cross is particularly applyed and offered daily in all places of the Church vnto sanctification of life And indeed to affert that Christ onely once offered himselfe to God the Father were a manifest blasphemy since Scripture Testimonies shew euidently sundry oblations Christ made of himselfe For example he offered himselfe in the tyme of his conception and during his aboad on earth he made seuerall offerings in order to his own person for he offered his body his soul his life his fasting his praying his watching his sighs and teares howeuer the offering of his body in a bloody sacrifice was made once onely consummated the generall redemption or remission of all sins whatsoeuer as to sufficiency neuertheless that bloody sacrifice enduring only for a day of time could not be the externall sacrifice which the people of the new Testament might haue recourse vnto euen to the end of the world and to auerre the taking away of such externall sacrifice is to acknowledge the taking away also of externall Priesthood sacrifice and Priesthood being correlatiues and consequently the * S. Cypria de coena Dom. asserit nullam posse esse Religionem si sacrificium corporis sanguinis Christi auferatur abolishing of the new Testament for if the Priesthood and sacrifice therof be disannulled then of necessity must there be an abrogation of the law that was established vnder them Furthermore it is conuincingly manifest that it was an externall proper sacrifice which Christ offered at his last supper for the one oblation according to the order of Melchisedech which succeeded (i) That one sole sacrifice of Christs body and blood succeded in the room of many sacrifices is a catholick assertion vnanimously taught by the ancient Fathers And S. Aus l. 8. c. 27 l. 17. c. 20. de ciuit l. 3. de bap c. 19. names the sacrifice of Mass the sacrifice that sufficeth for all sacrifices which were offered in the old law for as much as the body of Christ is offered in the room of all those sacrifices in the room of all the sacrifices of the old law was that one or none was that one but that one was an externall proper sacrifice and cannot be meant of the sacrifice of the Cross that being rather after the order of Aaron since it was celebrated in reall effusion of blood then after the similitude of Melchisedech who offered no bloody oblation Besides all the necessary requisits vnto proper sacrifice are plainly obseruable in that action that Christ vsed in instituting and celebrating the Eucharist at his last supper 10. is obseruable Christ himself that is a Priest instituted by legall authority and more solemnly made then all the Priests
that went afore to wit with an oath by him that said vnto him Our lord hath sworne and will not repent thou art a Priest for euer according to the Order of Melchisedech 2. Outward oblation is obseruable which is expressed in the words wherby Christ consecrated his body and blood saying This is my body which is giuen for you (k) The Apostle S. Paul vseth the verbe giue in that signification when he mentioneth our redemption procured by the sacrifice of the Cross for exaÌ„ple Gal. 3. ad Tit. 2. likewise holy scripture vseth frequently the verb to shed for to Sacrifice Exod. 29. Leuit. 1.2.3 This is my blood of the new Testament which is shed for you which are the terms of proper sacrifice and were outwardly vttered in the last supper For indeed all the actions performed by Christ in celebrating the Eucharist were outward actions namly blessing of the bread giuing thanks to his diuine Father before consecration and * Christus in vltima coena manducauit corpus suum bibit sanguineÌ„ suum vna cuÌ„ Apostolis vt post s. Hiero alios Patres docet S. Thomas 3. p. q. 81. eating his own hody and drinking his own blood together with his Apostles after consecration 3. Oblation of a sensible permanent thing is obseruable vêªt videlicet Christ's body and blood which are sensible things vnder the form's of bread and wine which are sensible also 4. There is obseruable destruction or reall change in the oblation to wit by substantiall conuersion of the bread into Christ's body and wine into his blood Besides by eating and drinking therof the body and blood of Christ lose that sacramentall being they had by reproduction vnder the elements of bread and wine which is a reall change also 5. It was an oblation exhibited to God alone for Christ in celebrating the Eucharist addressed all his speeches to his diuine Father lastly there is obseruable recognition of diuine omnipotency as is plainly euidenced by the oblation it self since it succeeded not only in the room of the Pascall lamb but of all the other sacrifices of the law of Moyses and consequently ought to containe in it self the perfect morall signification essentiall to those sacrifices which is recognition of diuine omnipotency and representation of the sacrifice of the cross Nor is it inconuenient for a sacrifice going afore to be a representation or commemoration of a sacrifice comming after for all the old sacrifices went before the sacrifice of the crosse which neuertheless they represented How euer the sacrifice of the cross is only distinct from the sacrifice of the Fucharist as to the manner of offering bloodily or vnbloodily for the head-offerer is the same Christ and the thing offered the same also body and blood of Christ And albeit that Christ by one sole bloody oblation that is by once offering himself in a bloody manner consummated the generall redemption neuertheless he did not think fit to make that one generall oblation an effectuall redemption or remission of sins without the application therof for so he had entailed the kingdom of Heauen vpon euery sinner and consequently deuested himself of all power to disinherit any for what fault soeuer But the applicatiue perfection as to a sacrifice he gaue to the vnbloody oblation only which by his own institution and appointment is and shall be the externall seruice of the new Testament and the continuall application of his passion vnto sanctification As corporall remedies how perfect and sufficient soeuer doe no cure vpon a sick body that is to say are not effectuall remedies vnless they be applyed so Christ his death and passion though a spirituall remedy superabundantly sufficient to take away all the sins of the world neuertheless is not an effectuall remission of any till it be applied aright neither is the preeminent perfection of Christs death and passion a iot lessened therby application being necessarily requisit to its effect by Christ his own appointmeÌ„t And praiers which the faithfull offer to God one for an other doe not prejudice or diminish any part of the intercession which Christ himself made for his people while he liued vpon earth Io. 17. nor of those which sitting at the right hand of his diuine Father he presenteth continually Rom. 8. Heb. 7. But rather do apply the fruit therof to the effecting of the said faithfull their holy desires especially when prayers are offered by the Bishopps and Priests of the catholick Church vnto whom God hath committed the (l) God saith the Apostle 2. Cor. 5. Hath giuen vnto us the vvord of reconciliation novv then are vve Ambassadours for Christ God as it vvere exhorting by us Wherby is meant that Christ as man is the principall Minister vnto reconciling of sinners to God and for and in the room of Christ in order to the office of reconcilement the Apostles and their successors were instituted as his Vicars namely the Bishops and Priests of the Catholick Church Wherfore their absolution from sinnes by offering sacrifice and their ministring the Sacraments ought to be counted as Christs own absolution remission or pardon being the absoluing from and remitting sinnes in the room of Christ in like manner their preaching and exhorting in stead of Christ is as if it were Christ's own preaching and exhorting the office of Bishops and Priests being the Vicarship of Christ So that when the same Apostle saith Hebrae 8. that Christ onely is the Priest of the new law or Testament his meaning is that Christ is the chief Priest that is the Prince of Priests to whom as to his Ambassadours he hath committed the ministery of reconciliation In the old law according to the Apostle Hebrae 7. there was a series of many chief Priests succeeding one an other in that function for none of all them was of perpetuall durance But in our new law there is but one chief Priest or Bishop that shall endure for euer and all other Priests are his Vicars onely who in his room exercise Priestly function visibly wherfore Christ is chief Priest for euer and exerciseth his Priesthood by his substitute Ministers or Vicars which execute the office of reconciliation for him and in his room ministery of reconciliation for and vnder Christ who is the high Priest and chief Minister according to his humanity of mans reconcilement to God the others exercise Christs vicarshipp only These pray and minister sacrifice and Sacraments in Christs stead both vnto remission of sins and the verifying his For euer Priesthood according to the order of Melchisedech so that Christ is a Priest for euer after the right order and similitude of Melchisedech for as much as he dayly doth and shall to the end of the world offer by the Priests of the new law as his Vicars the vnbloody sacrifice of his own body and blood vnder the form's of bread and wine called by vse which is the arbitratour of words and language sacrifice of the
proper to things spirituall Christ meant the orall eating of his flesh and orall drinking of his blood saying The words that I speak vnto you that is those things my flesh and blood are * Trid. sess 13. ait Christum instituisse SacrameÌ„tum Eucharistiae taÌ„quam spiritualem animaruÌ„ cibum spirit and life and that is to say are spiritually cloathed after the imitation of spirituall substances exempted from the carnall proprieties which naturally adhere to flesh and blood in this mortall life but are no essentiall requisits there vnto whereby it is plain that the eating of Christs body and drinking of his blood in the Sacrament of the Eucharist may be said spirituall in reference to the spirituall being they haue therein Besides Christs body and blood be indeed spirituall supersubstantiall meate and drink wherby the substance of humane souls is supported and nourished spiritually As corporall meate doth repaire materiall breaches which naturall heate mak's in a materiall body so this spirituall meate doth repaire the spirituall ruines that the fire of concupiscence doth cause in a spirituall soul Also the eating of Christs body and drinking of his blood may bee termed spirituall through faith for as much as a Christian that eateth and drinketh worthily is vnited to Christ by faith which is aspirituall quality Again the eating of Christs body and the drinking of his blood may be styled spirituall because of Christs death and passion figured therein and this Sacrament imports * QuotiescuÌ„quo ait Apostolus manducabitis panem hunc calicem bibetis mortem Domini annunciahitis donec veniat a commemoration thereof so that a Christian receiuing worthily doth communicate with Christs passion suffered on the cross and this manner of spirituall locution is vsed sometimes by ancient Fathers who neuertheless expresly affirm Christ to bee truly (e) The second Council of Nice Act. 6. declares euidently that the Sacrament of the Eucharist ought not to be called the Image of Christs body because he did not say take eate the Image of my body also declares that in the Sacrament is the true body of Christ because he said This is my body really and substantially in the Sacrament of the Eucharist neither is the literall sense of words inconsistent with the spirituall signification of thinges which they express taken in the literall sense For example though Isaac and Ismael doe literally signify the two sons of Abraham as the history of Genesis plainly sheweth neuertheless the Apostle Gal. 4. by Ismael that was born of Agar a seruant spiritually and figuratiuely vnderstands the old Testament that was a law of bondage and likewise by Isaac that was born of Sara a free woman spiritually and figuratiuely vnderstandeth the new Testament which is a law of liberty and grace and indeed all Sacraments whatsoeuer besides * Aug. l. 2. con aduers legis c. 9. ait Christi locutionem nisâ— manducaueritis c. codem modo esse figuratam ac duo filij Abraha fuâ—â—unt duo Test amenta Jsaac Ismael secuÌ„dum literam vere de facto fuerunt filij Abraha figurabant tamen duo Testamenta Idem Aug. l. 3. de doct Christ c. 16. ait illam Christi locutionem nisi manducaueritis c. figuratam esse quatenus praecipit communicandum passioni Christi vtiâ—â—ter recondendum in memoria quod pro nobis caro Christi crucifixa sit Non negat tamen dictam locutionem in sensu literali etïam intelligi de reali oralâ— manducatione corporit Christi bibition◠〈◊〉 sanguinis sub spocicbus consecratis panis vins their literall doe admit a spirituall or figuratiue construction being defined visible figures or signes of spirituall invisible grace The Sacrament of Circumcision according to the literall meaning thereof did signify corporall circumcision as to the foreskin of the flesh called prepuce and according to it 's spirituall and figuratiue signification did import spirituall circumcision as to the foreskin of the heart which is of spirituall vices as also did shadow grace giuen in the new law In like manner the words vttered in baptism I baptise thee taken in the literall sense which is expressed immediatly by the said words doe signify reall washing of naturall water as to the body and taken in the spirituall sense they signify spirituall washing of grace * Aug. vnde tanta vis aquae vt corpus tangat cor vero abluat as to the soul Furthermore the words whereby Christ instituted the Sacrament of the Eucharist in full performance of the promise afore mentioned Io. 6. giue cleare euidence of Christs meaning in recognition of a reall eating of his body and reall drinking of his blood The words of institution according to the consenting Testimonies of all ancient and modern writers are these This is my body which is giuen for you Luc. 22. This is my body which shall be deliuered for you This Chalice is the new Testament in my blood 1. Cor. 11. This is the blood of the new Testament which shall be shed for you Mar. 14. This is my blood of thenew Testament that shall be shed for many vnto remission of sins Mat. 26. Which words of Christ being as plainly and clearly vttered as to the litterall sense as those of God the Father in the Transfiguration of Christ to wit This is my son Mat. 30. and consequently there beeing no more reason to wrest the former then the latter words to a figuratiue signification it is a manifest blindnes in the Caluinists and other ancienter sectaries to wrest the proper cleare words and to substitute in their room improper obscure tropes and figures without any ground of reason for what can be more vnreasonable then to think that Christ saying This is my body which shall bee deliuered for you 1. Cor. 11. This is my blood which shall bee shed for many vnto remission of sins Mat. 26. meant a figure (f) Both canon and ciuil lawers treating of Testaments legasies and contracts teach that we must not recede from the words of the Testament nor from the rigour thereof and that we ought to presume of the Testatours intent and meaning according to the signification of the words taken in their proper sense of his body only and a figure of his blood only since a figure was not deliuered in a Sacrifice but Christ's true reall substantiall body nor a figure was shed vnto remission of sins but Christs true reall and substantiall blood Besides a thing that is mysterious vnheard of afore and instituted for an article of faith as is the Sacrament of the Eucharist of necessity ought to bee propounded (g) According to S. Chrysostome Hom. 83. in Mat. because Christ said This is my body we must not doubt of but belieue it to be so And S. Austin Tom. 8. in psal 33. saith expresly that when Christ gaue the Sacrament of the Eucharist he did that which no other could do for Christ saith
him that is ordained a Bishop which is the Tenet of all catholick writers that assert Episcopacy to deriue it's institution from Christ and to be an ecclesiasticall order taken in the proper sense for the Council of Tent sess 23. c. 4. can 4. doth define the Sacrament of Order to imprint a character which definition being absolute without restriction or distinction between one order and an other it doth euidently follow that all orders doe imprint a character which is a spirituall signe deriued into the soul wherby a man is muested with power to exercise certain ecclesiasticall functions in order to the ministery of the Eucharist and it matters not that the priestly is more worthy and excellent then the Episcopall character as distinct from it for the impression of a new and distinct character is not grounded in the more or less perfection and excellency of a precedent character but in the distinction of powers and abilities in reference to exercising the ministery of the Euchariste neither Matters it that Fathers and Councils when they number the Sacraments of the new law do acknowledg seuen only comprehending holy order for one for in so numbring of them they consider holy Order in (l) According to the Ancient Fathers ordination of a Bishop and a Priest is said to be one and the same that is taken in the generall sense and holy order so taken is but one Sacrament onely but a Bishop taken in the proper sense euen according to S. Hierom. Dial. con Lucif hath in the Church the preeminence which Aaron had in law of Moses and to meer Priests he giues that Degree of preeminence onely into which the sons of Aaron were inuested Besides s. Epiphan l. de Sacerdot dignit c. 6. calleth Episcopacy a Deified Order and cap. 7. assert's difference between a Bishop and a meer Priest being God exact's not the same thing 's from a Priest as from a Bishop that has preeminence aboue him a genericall signification as it containeth all it's sundry species or kinds Wherfore in as much as according to the rules of Logick what can be rightly affirmed of a thing taken in the generall sense may be also affirmed of all the sundry species contained therin it doth plainly follow that since ecclesiasticall order taken in its genericall signification is a Sacrament and doth imprint a Character euery true species therof is a Sacrament and imprinteth a Character In like manner Fathers and Councils reckoning seuen Orders they do coÌ„prehend Episcopacy vnder Priesthood And for as much as Christ had but one spouse which is the Church a Bishop and a Priest that supplieth his room and representeth his Person in the ministery ought to be married to the Church only * S. Hieron in sua Apolog con Jouin Apostoli inquit vel virgines vel post nuptias contineÌ„tes fuerunt id est absquo vxorum consortio wherfore the Apostles after they were ordained Bishops and Priests led their life 's in all godliness purity and chastity and this apostolicall practice Bishops and Priests down from them to these times haue religiously obserued S. Hierom L. in vigilantium exclaimeth against some Modern Hereticks of those times for taking such of the people only to be Priest's as had (m) According to the second Council of Carthage continency was enioyned to Bishops and Priests the ancient Fathers there assembled declaring with one accord that they ought to obserue it being the Apostles taught it and antiquity kept it Besides the first Council of Nice put forth an ordinance that Bishops Priest's and Deacons should entertaine no woman in their families except Mothers Grand-mothers sisters and Aunts making no mention of wifes From whence S. Basil Epis 17 infer's that to take wifes after the receiuing of holy Order was not permitted And indeed Clergy-men of those dayes had so great a reuerence to chastity that euen the Arian Bishop's ordain'd no man that was marryed as witnesseth S. Epiphan her 37. moreouer it was neuer permitted in the Church of Christ that a Bishop or Priest might marry as appear's by the Testimonies of ancient Fathers of the Greek Church though now this Church faln into schism differs from the Latins in opinion and practice as to such as had wifes before their ordination wiues contrary to the custome of both the Eastern and western Churches that allwaies promoted to the Maior-orders Virginia or such as were esteemed chast and pure from all carnall vncleaness and though in the primitiue times when there was great scarcity of single persons as proper and fit to be ordained Bishops Priest's Deacons and Sub-Deacons the Church-gouernours tooke of married men for the exercising those functions neuertheless these did not accompany with their wiues after their ordination but led their liues in all purity and chastity as did their wiues also according to a mutuall promise of continency and since the Priests of the old law to whom marriage was permitted as it were of necessity to multiply the people of God and who did sâ—adow only in their ministery what the Priests of the new law do really offer in their sacrifices viz. the true and reall body and blood of Christ in memory of his death and passion did abstain not only from the carnall embracement's of their wiues but also from the houses wherin they resided before they were to enter into the Temple for the performance of their spirituall functions respectruely it is most consonant as to reason that Priest's of the new law doe obserue continency together with purity and holyness Besides the vnmarried careth for the things of our lord how he may please him but he that is married careth for the things of the world how he may please his wife 1. Cor. 7. Wherfore such as leaue the world to be ordained Bishops Priest's Deacons and Sub Deacons ought to leade a single life without wifes and truly in regard therof there is less danger of dissipating ecclesiasticall goods and conuerting them to the making vp of inheritance for Clergy-mens children Furthermore Priests vnmarried are in a better condition to reproue the vices of lay-people then if they were married and for as much as they are single men they be less vnquiet contentious and troublesome to their flock not seeking to enrich children which they haue not Iouinianus and VigilaÌ„tius were the first sectaries that stood vp in defence of Priests marriages and Luther and Caluin raysed vp againe that heresy after that it had been dead and buried for many ages teaching that it is not only lawfull for Peiests to marry before but euen after their ordination These are followd by all the sectaries of the present times And knowing well that the opinion contradicteth all antiquity they labour to make it agree with the holy scriptures whence they cut out weak interpretations and form coniecturall deductions only abusing sundry text's for Example God says Gen. 1. bring forth fruit and multiply whence they very weakly
Eucharist sacrifice of the Mass sacrifice of the Altar The name Eucharist comes of the Greek Eucharistia that signifies thanksgiuing for Christ in celebrating his vnbloody oblation the night before his death gaue thanks to his diuine Father both in generall for all the benefits conferred vpon all mankind as in particular also for that one singular grace wherby he was impowred as man to iustitute so diuine a mistery So that vndoubtedly by a speciall prouidence the name Eucharist is appropriated to the sacrifice of Christ his body and blood to the end that euen the name therof might excite Priests whos office and function it is to ofter that sacrifice to imitate the thanksgiuing that Christ exhibited in the enterprise of this mistery The name Mass comes of Missa which is latine doubtless for if it had been an Hebrew word the vse therof would haue remained and continued among the greek Fathers as well as of Alleluya Osanna Amen which be Hebrew words But none of the Greek Fathers vse this term Missa and consequently it is a denomination which the people of the latine Church haue imposed to express the sacrifice of Christ his body and blood and signifies the same thing that dimissio in latine that is to say dismissing or sending away for in the primitiue Church it was an ordinary ceremony practised by the Deacon to cry aloud twice in the Church during the time of celebrating diuine seruice Ite Missa est once in the begining of the mistery or sacrifice wherin the Catecumens were not suffered to be present being Belieuers vnbaptised signifying therby that all such should depart out of the Church and once again in the end of the said mistery or sacrifice intimating therby the dimissing or sending away of the faithfull baptised This signification of the name Missa in English Mass and this originall grownd therof is approued by the vniform judgment of the maior part of orthodox writers Howeuer the appropriation of the said name as to signifying the seruice of the mistery or sacrifice of Christs body and blood is deriuable euen from the primitiue successors of the Apostles who (m) S. Clement that succeeded S. Peter in the supream gouernment of the Church composed a Missale and in his writingmentioneth the word Missa Mass And S. Denys did not onely write of the Ecclesiasticall Hierarchy but of the Mass also And whereas sectaries do not ascribe that work vnto him it is without warrantable ground howeuer whosoeuer was the Author thereof t' is certain that the Church of God hath approu'd it for the first Council of Nice stileth the Author Magnum which Title he had giuen vnto him afore and S. John Damascene calleth him Magnum Theologum à great diuine but all antiquity make mention of the Mass For example Alexander that was the fourth Pope after S. Peter Epis 1. ad orthodox And Sixtus that succeeded him according to S. Damascene in the life of the same Alexander S. Telesphorus seth forth an ordinance that commanded Priests to say 3. Masses in the feast of Christs Natiuity S. Soter prohibited all Priests to eate or drinke before they said their Masses S. Steuen the Pope vnder the persecution of Valerian the Emperour was kill'd at Mass S. Felix Ep. 2. ad Episcopos Galliae mentioneth saying of Masses vpon the Tombs of Martyrs S. Hierom. in cap. 11. Prouerb affirmes that the soules of the faithfull departed receiue comfort and helpe by the celebration of Mass and S. Austin Epis 49. tom 2. ad Deo gratias c. 3. teacheth that the sacrifice which Christians now offer is euidenced both by Euangelicall and propheticall Scripture besides this Catholick assertion is taught in sundry Councils namely in the Nicen. cap. 14. Carth. 2. can 4. So that it is a manifest weakness in sectaries to deny a doctrine that all antiquity by vnanimous consent plainly assert vse the name Missa and the signification therof namely S. Dionys S. Clement S. Euarist S. Alexander S. Sixtus S. Telesphorus S. Higinus S. Soter S. Fabianus S. Stephanus S. Felix S. Syluester S. Damascenus With whom were contemporary the great lights of the Church S. Basil S. Gregory Nazianzenus S. Ambro. S. Chrysost S. Hieron S. Epiphan S. Cyrill S. August wher vnto may be added sundry generall Councills wherof the vnquestionable testimonies and records are enough to euidence the truth of this primatiue doctrine so that with great reason it may be much wondered at how the People of England came to looke with so envious an eye vpon the Mass as to count it Idolatry since the practice therof is agreeing with the full and euident Testimonies of all the primitiue Fathers And as to the Realm of England euen from the first plantation of Christianity setled therein Mass constantly continued the sole publick worship or seruice that was resorted vnto till the ciuill power of Parliament in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth put it down vpon what design of auarice liberty and ambition is needless to express But in the room of the Mass was substituted a new outward seruice named the book of Common prayer and sett forth in the vulgar tongue wheras since the first age for 1500. Years not one example can be produced of any Christian kingdom which had not for the common publick seruice of Religion the Mass and that celebrated in Hebrew Greek or Latin neither were the holy Euangels wrirten in other language then Hebrew Greek and Latine which are the three holy tongues The Hebrew was sanctified from the beginning of the world God euen then conferring with Adam in the Hebrew tongue and teaching him the names of each liuing creature Gen. 2. Besides all three were sanctified in the death and Passion of Christ the son of God the inscription ouer his Cross Iesus of Nazareth king of the Iews being written in Hebrew Greek and Latine letters and prophesied * Septuaginta super psal 56.57.58 ne disperdas Dauid in tituli inscriptionē of long afore This doctrine does not preiudice what S. Paul writeth 1. Cor. 14 saying That he that speaketh a strange language edifieth himselfe but he that prophesieth edifieth the Church of God I would that you all speake with tongues but rather that you prophesied For it is conuincingly euident that the Apostle neither by these or any other words of that chapter commandeth the vse of the vulgar tongue in the Church seruice For so there had been no need of prophesying that is of interpreting vnto edification exhortation or instruction which the Apostle expresly enjoyneth saying That if any man speak a strange tongue let it be by two or at the most by three and that by course and let one interpret Besid's it is plain that S. Paul there treateth of the miraculous guifts or strange tongues infused both into men and women in the first begining of the Church and not intelligible without the miraculous guift of interpretation also and consequently he cannot mean the
A man must be made a christian through baptism before he can make a progress in christianity through confirmation A man must be made a member of Christ through baptism before he can be a soldier of Christ through confirmation A man must be endued with faith through baptism before he can be deputed to a speciall office in the exercise thereof which is to defend it against the assaults of Tyrants through confirmation A man must be invested with * Hieron diolog con Lucifer cap. 4. quemodo inquit ab Ecclesia recipiet confirmationeÌ„ qui nec dum remissionem peccatorum coÌ„secutus est Docet Arianos qui errabant contra formam baptismi non accepisse spiritum sanctuÌ„ per Sacramentum CoÌ„firmationis grace vnto remission of sins through baptism before he can receiue the holy Ghost vnto perfection through confirmation which does not confer sanctity after the manner of other Sacraments only but also doth * Omnes S. Patres qui agunt de Sacramento confirmationis doceÌ„t baptismi gratiam perfici consummari per gratiam coÌ„firmationis increase and perfect the sanctity receiued afore by baptism it being the complement or consummation thereof Whereby it is plainly euident that albeit this Sacrament is not as baptism a requisite absolutely necessary vnto obtaining eternall blessedness neuertheless it is conditionally necessary to wit as to the armour of grace and (h) According to Pope Vrban dist 5. de consecratione there is no perfect christian that hath not receiu'd the holy Ghost through the imposition of Episcopall hands and Hugo de S. Vict. l. 2. de Sacram. par 7. cap. 3. countes it dangerous to dye without being confirm'd afore which is conform to the doctrine of ancient Fathers S. Dionys Lâ—de Eccles Hierar c. 4. S. Cypr. Epis 72. ad Iubaian which assert that then a man has fulnes of sanctity and is made an adopted son of God when he receiues both the Sacraments baptism and confirmation perfection therof as also to a more ample measure of blessedness then baptisme alone doth effect so that christian catholicks especially such as liue vnder persecution ought to vse extraordinary endeauours for their admittance to this Sacrament the proper office there of being to strenghten them by grace that they may not fall from the Church of Christ * In Epis ad Fabium vti refert Eusebius l. 1. cap. 35. S. Cornelius affirmeth that Nouatus fell into Heresie for the want therof If they haue no conueniency in their own country to repaire vnto a catholick Bishop the spirituall aduantages which they may reape from the Sacrament of confirmation will compence the charges of a journey into forrain parts where catholick Bishops are to be found but this is to be vnderstood in reference to such catholicks as haue ability of body and a competency of temporall fortunes As touching the sensible rites or ceremonies employed in or about the Sacrament of confirmation the most remarkable are two only For example a Bishop in making of chrism breatheth three times in form of a cross on the mouth of the pot or flagon that containeth the said Chrism signifying thereby that euen at that time through episcopall consecration Chrism receiueth virtue from God wherby it is impowered as his instrument to confer strengthning grace to such as doe receaue the Sacrament aright and ceremonies signifying the thing that is done for the time they are employed are profitable by the confession of such * Caluinus in sua harmonia ad cap. 7. S. Marci fatetur caeremonias illas quae habent significationem eius quod tunc fit duÌ„ exercentur esse vtiles as impugne catholick ceremonies The other ceremonie is the reuerence a Bishop exhibiteth to the consecrated Chrism bowing down his head he saluteth saying Haile holy Chrism This ceremony hath nothing of Idolatry for an vnliu'd thing may challenge religious adoration in reference to an other distinct wherin excellency is contained to which religious adoration is due The ancient Iewes adored the Ark of the Testament because of the relation it had to God that is an increated excellency and all Christians doe religiously worship and adore the sacred books of the new Testament in reguard of the word of God therin comprehended And subjects of a temporall Prince do render ciuil reuerence to his chaire of state in relation to his sacred Person if a king or Emperour to which is due ciuill adoration by the law of God and nature in like manner religious worship is exhibited to holy Chrism in as much as it is the effectuall instrument of God to giue armour of grace to such as are baptised and is by speciall benediction deputed to the effecting therof CHAR. VIIJ. OF THE EVCHARISTE THE CONTENTS Christ the night before his passion made his last Testament gaue vnto his Church a legasy of his body and blood in the Sacrament of the Euchariste vnder the form's of bread and wine for to continue the spirituall food of souls till he come to Iudgment The express words of the Testament This is my body This Chalice is the nevv Testament in my blood exclude each figure that is inconsistent with the litterall sense intended by the Testatour that vseth not to say one thing literally and mean an other mystically because Christ Said this is my body this Chalice is the nevv Testament in my blood no man in reason ought to doubt of it Authorities of Councils testimonies of ancient Fathers and the warrantable practice of both primitiue and modern Churches euince the reall presence of Christ in the Sacrament of the Euchariste in vertue of the same word that was made flesh and made all things of nothing bread is transubstantiated in to the body and wine in to the bloud of Christ who is in Heauen and in the Sacrament at once One body can agree with many places by diuine dispensation Requisit's necessary to a worthy receiuing of Christs body and bloud in the Sacrament THe Euchariste is the (a) The blood of Christ shed vnto remission of sinnes is the proper legacy of the new Testament according to Christs owne words set down 1. Cor. 11. This Chalice is the nevv Testament in my blood legacy of the new Testament vnto eternall life that Christ bequeathed to his Church in a Sacrament of his body and blood the night before he suffered his passion in the presence of witnesses without exception which were his Apostles The same body and blood that Christ offered in a sacrifice on the cross visibly to the redeeming of man kind vnto liberty he left in a Sacrament vnder the elements of bread and wine invisibly to the feeding of man vnto eternall life In the bestowing of this legacy Christ who is faithfull in all he promiseth fulfilled the promise he had made long afore and which is set down Io. 6. (b) Christ Ioan. 6. promising and recommending the Sacrament of his body and blood said